AMD Radeon RX 560 benchmarks: the Red Team’s budget GPU simply isn’t powerful enough
At this point, we have to wonder — just how many Radeon RX 560s are on the market? When the graphics card first launched, there were both 2GB and 4GB versions. Some models had additional PCI Express power, some didn’t. Some had factory overclocks, while others remained at stock speeds. That’s confusing enough, but then a new version of the RX 560 with only 14 of the 16 available compute units enabled appeared — effectively a rebrand of the last generation RX 460. And then, multiple versions of that lower end configuration were unleashed upon the market as well.
So let’s help explain the situation by offering some initial recommendations if you are considering an RX 560. First of all, only consider the 4GB models of this card — the 2GB variants simply don’t have enough VRAM to be used in modern games at 1080p, and this will continue to be an issue going forward. Secondly, while the boost clocks for the RX 560 are in the region of 1220MHz to 1275MHz depending on the model, only cards with a PCI Express power input will actually be able to reach these speeds on a consistent basis. We tested a Gigabyte board without PCIe power and found that clocks could drop to 1190MHz and then fluctuate — though increasing the power slider using overclocking tool MSI Afterburner did counteract this behaviour.
All of these variations make things unduly confusing for the uninitiated and even make it difficult for us to decide which cards we should actually test. In the end, we decided to test both the 14 and 16 compute unit models of the RX 560, going with 4GB of RAM and equalised clock speeds. This should give you an idea of performance from the very best RX 560 models on the market, with only the compute unit count differing them.
Which GPUs are worth buying? We’ve made our picks for the best graphics cards available, updated with the latest graphics cards as they’re released. As well as an overall performance champ, we name the best value graphics card and best cheap graphics card to guide your next upgrade.
The chief competitors to the RX 560 come from the other major player in the graphics card space, Nvidia, who have also saw fit to offer a range of cards with slightly different specifications and abilities. There are three cards to consider from Team Green: the GTX 1050 2GB, the GTX 1050 3GB and the GTX 1050 Ti. All of the models we tested don’t require a PCIe power input, making them a little easier to run with budget power supplies. The more expensive Ti card is the fastest budget GPU on the market, while the cut-down 1050 2GB holds its own remarkably well as the cheapest GPU in our line-up, but occasionally tanks hard with games that with heavier VRAM requirements (Battlefield 1, we’re looking at you). The recently released 1050 3GB seemingly offers the best of both worlds, with anywhere from slightly worse to far better performance than the 2GB model at the same RRP — although retail availability in some regions remains distinctly subpar.
Numerous models of RX 560 are available — we chose to test the best possible models that feature both 14 and 16 compute units, with equalised, locked clocks.
- Buy the AMD Radeon RX 560 from Amazon.
So here’s our data for the nine titles in our current test line-up. Our benchmark system is pretty advanced, but at the most basic level, the bar charts represent performance data expressed as an average and with bottom-end and top-end frame-rates too. Click on the bar chart to swap between frame-rate and percentage differentials with full mouse-over support. It’s pretty cool, but if you’re viewing this page on a desktop PC and you want to go even deeper, play the relevant video embed and watch frame-rate and frame-time telemetry play out for each card. You can even use the controls on the right side of the video to add or remove different cards from the real-time comparison.
Assassin’s Creed Unity
We begin with Assassin’s Creed Unity, the 2014 release of the near-annual series set in Revolution-era France. The game can be a stiff challenge for graphics cards with low amounts of VRAM, but the 4GB on both of our RX 560 cards should be enough to see off the challenge. However, the cards still fall down in comparison to their Nvidia rivals, coming in shy of the playable standard of 30 frames per second. The VRAM-starved GTX 1050 2GB sits just a couple of frames per second than the better RX 560, the GTX 1050 3GB is a few frames faster still, while the GTX 1050 Ti turns in the best result overall at a comfortable 37fps.
AC Unity: 1080p, Ultra High, FXAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Ashes of the Singularity
Next up we have our first DirectX 12 test, niche strategy game Ashes of the Singularity. This game was a popular benchmark as it offers a good stress test and includes a bevy of options and settings to tweak. AMD cards tend to handle DirectX 12 a little better than their Nvidia equivalents, and indeed we see that the RX 560 cards outclass the GTX 1050 2GB here. However, the newly released GTX 1050 3GB does much better, with a score seven per cent faster than the best RX 560. The GTX 1050 Ti remains the overall winner at 32fps, which is 15 per cent ahead of the best AMD card.
Ashes of the Singularity DX12: 1080p, Extreme, No AA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Battlefield 1
Our third test is Battlefield 1, the 2016 title that focused on the trials of World War 1. As well as its trademark large-scale multiplayer, the game also includes a brief single-player campaign which makes a much more repeatable benchmark. The AMD cards do well here, with the two flavours sitting around 50 frames per second with a slight three per cent difference between them. The GTX 1050 Ti scores about 60 frames per second, while the GTX 1050 2GB shows its VRAM limitations with a dreadful result — whether you’re gaming at high or ultra under DX12, it’s a slideshow. The GTX 1050 3GB leaves the 2GB model in the dust with a respectable 48fps, nearly equalling the AMD cards.
Battlefield 1: 1080p, Ultra, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Crysis 3
Crysis 3 is still a tough game to run smoothly, even five years after its release, especially on the very high preset that we’re using in our tests. The RX 560 models fall behind their Nvidia competition here with the stronger card of the pair achieving just 37fps on average. In contrast, the GTX 1050 cards manage around 43fps and the 1050 Ti hits 47fps. These cards should be able to target 60fps by dropping from very high to high settings, assuming your CPU is up to the task.
Crysis 3: 1080p, Very High, SMAA T2X
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
The Division
The Division is our next DirectX 12 benchmark. This 2016 game is set in post-pandemic NYC, with impressive graphics and a convincing combination of MMO mechanics and third-person shooter gameplay. Our AMD cards again do better here than in DirectX 11 titles, with a confident 20 per cent lead over the GTX 1050 2GB, which simply doesn’t have the VRAM to get the job done. However, the GTX 1050 Ti continues its uninterrupted reign with a solid 33fps with the GTX 1050 3GB following close behind at 31fps.
The Division DX12: 1080p, Ultra, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Far Cry Primal
Next up is Far Cry Primal, the tweener game that sits between the fourth and fifth numbered entries in the popular open-world series. The RX 560s return to their usual position at the bottom of the pile, with both cards recording results around 30fps. Meanwhile, the two Nvidia cards show their dominance with results closer to 40 frames per second. Interestingly, we do have the HD texture pack enabled here, but it doesn’t seem to bother the GTX 1050 2GB — in the benchmark, at least. In fact the 3GB version of the card actually shows worse performance at just 37fps, likely due to its limited memory bandwidth.
Far Cry Primal: 1080p, Ultra, SMAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Ghost Recon Wildlands
Ghost Recon Wildlands is the most recent — and most demanding — title in this version of our benchmark suite, thanks to a punishing ultra preset that outstrips anything we’ve seen before. Here the GTX 1050 is able to outperform the RX 560 cards despite its limited VRAM, with the 16 Compute Unit version of the card sitting 7 per cent behind the GTX 1050 2GB. The GTX 1050 Ti is once again even further ahead, recording a score of 40 frames per second which works out to a deficit of 20 per cent for the AMD card.
Ghost Recon Wildlands: 1080p, Very High, TAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider from 2016 is the eleventh game in the Lara-led series that started in 1996. The most recent title supports a ton of modern graphical technologies, ensuring a good workout for our GPUs using the very high preset (with high textures) and SMAA. The better RX 560 draws level with the GTX 1050 2GB here (though the experience is less stable there owing to a lack of RAM), while the GTX 1050 3GB has a small but comfortable lead. Meanwhile, the GTX 1050 Ti cruises ahead with a leader of more than 15 per cent over the RX 560.
Rise of the Tomb Raider: 1080p, Very High, SMAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3 remains an incredibly popular title that also provides a unique graphical challenge, making it a strong choice for our benchmark suite. Unfortunately, the AMD Radeon RX 560 cards don’t perform well in this game from 2015, with a five per cent gap to the GTX 1050 and 15 per cent to the GTX 1050 Ti. In addition to poor average frame-rates, the RX 560 cards also have terrible stutter, which simply doesn’t materialise at all on either of the Nvidia offerings.
The Witcher 3: 1080p, Ultra, POST-AA, No Hairworks
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
Generational comparison
We’ll conclude with a look at how the RX 560 compares to its AMD family members, including the higher-end RX and Vega graphics cards and the older R9 Fury X. It’s worth bearing in mind that these are all higher-end components than the RX 560, so don’t expect miracles even though some time has passed since they were released.
Assassin’s Creed Unity: Ultra High, FXAA
Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools.
We hope these words, live charts and illustrative photos have made this confusing collection of graphics card models a little easier to understand. For more information, you could have a look at our review of the RX 460, the RX 560’s immediate predecessor.
Now that you’ve seen the benchmarks for one card, why not check out see which PC hardware we recommend to our friends and family? Here are the DF picks for the overall best graphics cards and for the best gaming monitors on the market.
Radeon RX 560 [in 3 benchmarks]
Radeon RX 560
Buy
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
- Core clock speed 1175 MHz
- Max video memory 4 GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 7000 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started Radeon RX 560 sales 18 April 2017 at a recommended price of $99. This is GCN 4.0 architecture desktop card based on 14 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 7 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is dual-slot card attached via PCIe 3.0 x8 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 170 mm. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 75 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
9.24%
of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon RX
560
vs
GeForce RTX
4090
General info
Some basic facts about Radeon RX 560: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
Place in performance rating | 363 | |
Place by popularity | 46 | |
Value for money | 2.![]() |
|
Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | |
GPU code name | Polaris 21 | |
Market segment | Desktop | |
Release date | 18 April 2017 (5 years ago) | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Current price | $376 (3.8x MSRP) | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Value for money
To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
Radeon RX 560’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon RX 560’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | of 18432 (AD102) |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | of 2903 (Radeon Pro W6600) |
Number of transistors | 3,000 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 75 Watt | of 900 (Tesla S2050) |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 | of 959.6 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX) |
Floating-point performance | 2,611 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon RX 560’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Length | 170 mm | |
Width | 2-slot | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon RX 560: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
Memory bandwidth | 112.![]() |
of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon RX 560. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
HDMI | + |
API support
APIs supported by Radeon RX 560, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.![]() |
|
Vulkan | 1.2.131 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of Radeon RX 560. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
RX 560
9.24
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
- GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
RX 560
3615
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
RX 560
18780
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
RX 560
18272
Game benchmarks
Let’s see how good Radeon RX 560 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 35 |
Relative perfomance
Overall Radeon RX 560 performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
108.23
AMD Radeon HD 7850
106.06
NVIDIA T400
101.19
AMD Radeon RX 560
100
NVIDIA T400 4 GB
97.08
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
93.51
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
92. 75
NVIDIA equivalent
The nearest Radeon RX 560’s NVIDIA equivalent is T400, which is faster by 1% and higher by 3 positions in our performance rating.
T400
Compare
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 560:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
108.55
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
108.23
NVIDIA T400
101.19
AMD Radeon RX 560
100
NVIDIA T400 4 GB
97.08
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
93.51
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
92. 75
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Radeon RX
560X
Compare
Radeon R7
360
Compare
P104
100
Compare
Radeon RX
550
Compare
P106
090
Compare
Radeon R9
370
Compare
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Radeon RX 560 according to our statistics.
Ryzen 3
1200
4.8%
FX
6300
2.9%
Core i3
10100F
2.7%
Ryzen 5
2600
2.6%
Ryzen 5
1600
2.2%
Core i3
9100F
2.1%
Ryzen 5
3600
1.9%
Ryzen 5
3550H
1. 7%
Core i5
3470
1.6%
Ryzen 3
2200G
1.6%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Radeon RX 560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Radeon RX 560 [in 3 benchmarks]
Radeon RX 560
- PCIe 3.0 x8 interface
- Core frequency 1175 MHz
- Video memory size 4 GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory frequency 7000 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started Radeon RX 560 sales on April 18, 2017 at MSRP 99$. This is a desktop video card based on the GCN 4.0 architecture and 14 nm manufacturing process, primarily aimed at gamers. It has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory at 7 GHz, and coupled with a 128-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 112.0 Gb / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a dual-slot PCIe 3.0 x8 card. The length of the reference version is 170 mm. An additional power cable is not required for connection, and the power consumption is 75 W.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of
9.24%
from the leader, which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon RX
560
vs
GeForce RTX
4090
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Radeon RX 560, as well as when sales started and cost at the time.
To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of video cards and their cost, taking into account the cost of other cards.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Features
Radeon RX 560’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak of Radeon RX 560’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Compatibility and dimensions
1
Information on Radeon RX 560 compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon RX 560. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Video connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
HDMI |
API
1 9000
APIs supported by Radeon RX 560, including their revisions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Sheder Model | 6.4 | |
Full HD | 35 |
Relative Performance
Radeon RX 560 overall performance compared to its nearest desktop competitor.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
108.23
AMD Radeon HD 7850
106.06
NVIDIA T400
101. 19
AMD Radeon RX 560
100
NVIDIA T400 4GB
97.08
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
93.51
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
92.75
Competitor from NVIDIA
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon RX 560 from NVIDIA is T400, which is faster by 1% and lower by 3 positions in our rating on average.
T400
Compare
Here are some NVIDIA Radeon RX 560 closest competitors:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
108.55
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
108.23
NVIDIA T400
101.19
AMD Radeon RX 560
100
NVIDIA T400 4GB
97.08
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
93. 51
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
92.75
Other video cards
Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.
Radeon RX
560X
Compare
Radeon R7
360
Compare
P104
100
Compare
Radeon RX
550
Compare
P106
090
Compare
Radeon R9
370
Compare
Recommended Processors
According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the Radeon RX 560.
Ryzen 3
1200
4.8%
FX
6300
2.9%
Core i3
10100F
2.7%
Ryzen 5
2600
2.6%
Ryzen 5
1600
2.2%
Core i3
9100F
2.1%
Ryzen 5
3600
1.9%
Ryzen 5
3550H
1.7%
Core i5
3470
1.6%
Ryzen 3
2200G
1.