Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4700U Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-1065G7 on one side and the AMD Ryzen 7 4700U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the ultrabook sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,9GHz. The second is used on the thin and light laptop segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Intel Core i7-1065G7 | AMD Ryzen 7 4700U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Ultrabook | Thin and light laptop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Sunny Cove | Zen 2 | ||||||
| Core name | Ice Lake-U | Renoir | ||||||
| Family | Core i7-1000 | Ryzen 7 4000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
FJ8068904310403, |
100-000000083 |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2019 | Q1 2020 | ||||||
| Lithography | 10 nm+ | 7 nm FinFET | ||||||
| Transistors | — | 4. 940.000.000 |
||||||
| Cores | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1,3 GHz | 2,0 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,9 GHz | 4,1 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 8 MB | 8 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 |
DDR4-3200 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 55,63 GB/s | 68,27 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 15 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 | AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP | ||||||
| GPU cores | — | 7 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 64 | — | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 512 | 448 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 300 MHz | 400 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1100 MHz | 1600 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1. 075 GFLOPS |
1.434 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA1526 | FP6 | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 105°C | ||||||
| AI accelerator |
Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, |
— |
||||||
| Crypto engine |
AES New Instructions, |
— |
||||||
| Security |
Software Guard Extensions, |
— |
||||||
| Max display resolution |
5120 x [email protected] |
— |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 463 | 485 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 2. 302 |
2.411 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 180 | 180 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 520 | 1.170 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 440 | 470 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 1.190 | 2.650 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.134 | 1.165 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 4.432 | 7.122 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.426 | 2.554 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 8. 809 |
13.726 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
5.335 | 4.571 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
16.790 | 21.326 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
1.129 | 1.091 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
3.973 | 5.220 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
283,92 GFLOPS | 339,7 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
1.119 pts / W | 1.422 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 7 4700U has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of AMD Ryzen 7 4700U is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 7 4700U was started more recently.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 4700U |
485 2.  411 |
| Intel Core i7-1065G7 |
463 2.302 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 5%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 4700U |
180 1.170 |
| Intel Core i7-1065G7 |
180 520 |
In a single core, there is no noticeable difference.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 125%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 4700U |
470 2.650 |
| Intel Core i7-1065G7 |
440 1.190 |
In single core, the difference is 7%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 123%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 4700U |
1.165 7.122 |
| Intel Core i7-1065G7 |
1.134 4.432 |
In single core, the difference is 3%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 61%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 4700U |
2.554 13.726 |
| Intel Core i7-1065G7 |
2.426 8.  809 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 56%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 4700U |
4.571 21.326 |
| Intel Core i7-1065G7 |
5.335 16.790 |
In single core, the difference is 17%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 27%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 4700U |
1.091 5.220 |
| Intel Core i7-1065G7 |
1.  1293.973 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 31%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 4700U |
1.213 5.820 |
| Intel Core i7-1065G7 |
1.348 4.203 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 38%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems.
Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i7-1065G7 AMD equivalentAMD Ryzen 7 4700U Intel equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 7 4700GAMD Ryzen 7 4700GE
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U vs. Intel Core i7-1065G7
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
The AMD Ryzen 7 4700U operates with 82 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.10 GHz base all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the FP6 CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 105 °C degrees C. In particular, Renoir (Zen 2) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q1/2020
Intel Core i7-1065G7
The Intel Core i7-1065G7 operates with 4 cores and 8 CPU threads.
It run at 3.90 GHz base 3.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1526 CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200LPDDR4-3733 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Ice Lake U Architecture is enhanced with 10 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2019
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
Intel Core i7-1065G7
Compare Detail
| 2.00 GHz | Frequency | 1.30 GHz |
| 82 | Cores | 4 |
| 4.10 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.90 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores) | 3.50 GHz | |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
AMD Radeon 7 Graphics (Renoir) |
GPU |
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940 |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 1. 10 GHz |
| 7 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 1.10 GHz |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR4-3200LPDDR4-3733 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 12 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| FP6 | Socket | BGA 1526 |
| 15 W | TDP | 15 W |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q1/2020 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot.
The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.
