10700F vs 5600x: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-10700F

Ryzen 5 5600X vs Core i7-10700F

Availability

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler

Buy on Amazon

$194

In Stock

Updated 68 minutes ago

Availability

Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy on Amazon

$245.96

In Stock

Updated 67 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 189 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

  • Performs up to 10% better in Fortnite than Core i7-10700F — 328 vs 297 FPS

  • Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-10700F — $194. 0 vs $245.96

  • Up to 29% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i7-10700F — $0.59 vs $0.83 per FPS

Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F

Fortnite

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Ryzen 5 5600X

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020


FPS

328

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.59/FPS

100%

Price, $

$194

100%

FPS and Value Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler

Buy for $194 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 68 minutes ago

Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

297

90%

Value, $/FPS

$0.83/FPS

71%

Price, $

$245.96

78%

Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for $245.96 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 67 minutes ago

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

Ryzen 5 5600X

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020

Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

1606

FPS

1464

FPS

Minecraft

305

FPS

276

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

531

FPS

480

FPS

VALORANT

1209

FPS

1100

FPS

League of Legends

746

FPS

677

FPS

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Ryzen 5 5600X

Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020


Single-Core

1616

100%

Multi-Core

8161

100%

Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1254

71%

Multi-Core

7794

95%

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

Intel Core i7-10700F

Nov 5th, 2020

Release Date Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 5 Collection Core i7
Vermeer Codename Comet Lake
AMD Socket AM4 Socket Intel Socket 1200

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

6 Cores

8

12 Threads

16

3. 7 GHz

Base Clock Speed 2.9 GHz
4.6 GHz Turbo Clock Speed

4.8 GHz

65 W TDP 65 W

7 nm

Process Size 14 nm

37.0x

Multiplier 29.0x
None Integrated Graphics None

Yes

Overclockable No

Builds Using Ryzen 5 5600X or Core i7-10700F

Fortnite, 1080p, High

Allied Gaming Patriot Desktop PC

247 FPS

$5.26/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 500 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,299

In Stock

Updated 53 minutes ago

CLX Set Gaming Desktop PC

247 FPS

$5.99/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$1,479.49

In Stock

Updated 51 minutes ago

Skytech Chronos Gaming PC

247 FPS

$6. 07/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,499.99

In Stock

Updated 57 minutes ago

Skytech Blaze 3.0 Gaming PC

247 FPS

$6.07/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,499.99

In Stock

Updated 59 minutes ago

Skytech Chronos Gaming PC

247 FPS

$6.07/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$1,499.99

In Stock

Updated 61 minutes ago

Skytech Shiva Gaming PC

247 FPS

$6.07/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,499.99

In Stock

Updated 61 minutes ago

YEYIAN Katana R02 Gaming PC

247 FPS

$6.07/FPS

GeForce RTX 3070

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,499

In Stock

Updated 56 minutes ago

Skytech Azure Gaming PC

227 FPS

$6. 09/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,382.2

In Stock

Updated 60 minutes ago

SkytechBlaze 3.0 Gaming PC

227 FPS

$6.17/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,399.99

In Stock

Updated 61 minutes ago

Skytech Shiva Gaming PC

227 FPS

$6.17/FPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Ryzen 5 5600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$1,399.98

In Stock

Updated 62 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Ryzen 5 5600X

Ryzen 7 5800X

Ryzen 5 5600X

Ryzen 9 5900X

$387.99

Core i7-12700K

$399.99

Ryzen 5 5600X

Ryzen 5 5600X

Ryzen 5 5600G

Ryzen 5 5600X

Ryzen 5 2600

Core i5-11400F

$158. 99

Ryzen 5 5600X

Core i5-12600K

$277.99

Ryzen 5 5600X

Ryzen 5 5600X

Ryzen 5 3600

$138.95

Ryzen 5 2600X

Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i7 10700F vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i7 10700F

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2.9 GHz Intel Core i7 10700F with 8-cores against the 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 5600X with 6-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i7 10700F

67

Ryzen 5 5600X

83

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i7 10700F

53

Ryzen 5 5600X

58

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i7 10700F

56

Ryzen 5 5600X

67

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i7 10700F

60

Ryzen 5 5600X

71

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 5600X and 10700F

Advantages of Intel Core i7 10700F

  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz)

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

  • More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 14 nanometers
  • Has 16 MB larger L3 cache size
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • 36% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1654 vs 1217 points
  • Newer PCI Express version – 4.0
  • Newer — released 5-months later
  • Around 1.88 GB/s (4%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i7 10700F

1256

Ryzen 5 5600X
+24%

1555

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i7 10700F
+4%

12306

Ryzen 5 5600X

11849

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i7 10700F

2924

Ryzen 5 5600X
+16%

3384

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i7 10700F

17098

Ryzen 5 5600X
+30%

22257

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i7 10700F

1223

Ryzen 5 5600X
+36%

1668

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i7 10700F

8102

Ryzen 5 5600X
+10%

8925

▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 10700F and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

General

Vendor Intel AMD
Released May 1, 2020 October 8, 2020
Type Desktop Desktop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Comet Lake Vermeer
Model number i7-10700F
Socket LGA-1200 AM4
Integrated GPU No No

Performance

Cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Base Frequency 2. 9 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency 4.8 GHz 4.6 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 29x 37x
Bus Bandwidth 8 GT/s
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) 512K (per core)
L3 Cache 16MB (shared) 32MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No Yes
Fabrication process 14 nm 7 nm
TDP 65 W 65 W
Max. temperature 100°C 95°C

Memory support

Memory types DDR4-2933 DDR4-3200
Memory Size 128 GB 128 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s 47.68 GB/s
ECC Support No Yes
Official site Intel Core i7 10700F official page AMD Ryzen 5 5600X official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i7 10700F

57 (20.2%)

Ryzen 5 5600X

225 (79.8%)

Total votes: 282

Сompetitors

1.
Core i5 12400 and Core i7 10700F

2.
Core i7 10700 and Core i7 10700F

3.
Ryzen 5 5500U and Ryzen 5 5600X

4.
Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 5600X

5.
Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 5 5600X

6.
Apple M1 and Ryzen 5 5600X

7.
Core i5 12400F and Ryzen 5 5600X

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-10700: What is the difference?

58points

72points

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

56points

64points

Intel Core i7-10700

Comparison winner

Cost-effectiveness winner

i7-10700F

vs

64 facts in comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i7-10700

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 5600X better than Intel Core i7-10700?

  • 267MHz higher ram speed?
    3200MHzvs2933MHz
  • 7nm smaller semiconductor size?
    7nmvs14nm
  • 1MB bigger L2 cache?
    3MBvs2MB
  • 27. 29% higher PassMark result?
    22256vs17485
  • 16MB bigger L3 cache?
    32MBvs16MB
  • 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
    4vs3
  • Has an unlocked multiplier?
  • 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
    0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core

Why is Intel Core i7-10700 better than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X?

  • 4 more CPU threads?
    16vs12
  • 5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
    100°Cvs95°C
  • 128KB bigger L1 cache?
    512KBvs384KB
  • Has integrated graphics?
  • 5.96% higher Cinebench R20 (multi) result?
    4834vs4562

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Intel Core i7-10700

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 4700U

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Intel Core i7-10700

vs

Intel Core i5-12500

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

Intel Core i7-10700

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Intel Core i7-10700

vs

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Intel Core i7-10700

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

Intel Core i7-10700

vs

Intel Core i5-11400

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i7-10700

vs

Intel Core i7-11700

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

Intel Core i5-12600K

Intel Core i7-10700

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600X

Intel Core i7-10700

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

vs

Intel Core i9-10900K

Price comparison

Cheap alternatives

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

8 User reviews

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

9. 9/10

8 User reviews

Intel Core i7-10700

0 User reviews

Intel Core i7-10700

0.0/10

0 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.4/10

7 votes

No reviews yet

 

Gaming

9.5/10

8 votes

No reviews yet

 

Performance

9.4/10

8 votes

No reviews yet

 

Reliability

9.6/10

8 votes

No reviews yet

 

Energy efficiency

9.7/10

7 votes

No reviews yet

 

Performance

1.CPU speed

6 x 3.7GHz

8 x 2.9GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2. CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

4.6GHz

4.8GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

✖Intel Core i7-10700

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

0.5MB/core

0. 25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

5.33MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

3200MHz

2933MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

47.68GB/s

45.8GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

✖Intel Core i7-10700

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9. bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

✔Intel Core i7-10700

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

✔Intel Core i7-10700

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

✔Intel Core i7-10700

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

✔Intel Core i7-10700

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

✔Intel Core i7-10700

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

✖Intel Core i7-10700

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9. front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-10700F


Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel Core i7-10700F processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Buy on Amazon


vs

Intel Core i7-10700F

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

  • CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 3355 vs 2920
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 21975 vs 17027








Launch date 5 Nov 2020 vs 30 Apr 2020
Unlocked Unlocked vs Locked
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 14 nm
L2 cache 3 MB vs 2 MB
L3 cache 32 MB vs 16 MB
PassMark — Single thread mark 3355 vs 2920
PassMark — CPU mark 21975 vs 17027

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-10700F

  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
  • 4 more threads: 16 vs 12
  • Around 4% higher clock speed: 4. 80 GHz vs 4.6 GHz
  • Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 95 °C
  • Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score: 10019 vs 8111







Number of cores 8 vs 6
Number of threads 16 vs 12
Maximum frequency 4.80 GHz vs 4.6 GHz
Maximum core temperature 100°C vs 95 °C
L1 cache 512 KB vs 384 KB
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 10019 vs 8111

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-10700F




PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score

CPU 1
CPU 2






Name AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel Core i7-10700F
PassMark — Single thread mark 3355 2920
PassMark — CPU mark 21975 17027
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 8111 10019

Compare specifications (specs)























































AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel Core i7-10700F
Architecture codename Zen 3 Comet Lake
Launch date 5 Nov 2020 30 Apr 2020
Launch price (MSRP) $299 $298 — $310
OPN PIB 100-100000065BOX
OPN Tray 100-000000065
Place in performance rating 139 163
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Processor Number

i7-10700F
Series

10th Generation Intel Core i7 Processors
Status

Launched
Base frequency 3. 7 GHz 2.90 GHz
L1 cache 384 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 32 MB 16 MB
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 14 nm
Maximum core temperature 95 °C 100°C
Maximum frequency 4.6 GHz 4.80 GHz
Number of cores 6 8
Number of threads 12 16
Unlocked
64 bit support

Bus Speed

8 GT/s
ECC memory support
Max memory channels 2 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 47. 68 GB/s 45.8 GB/s
Maximum memory size 128 GB 128 GB
Supported memory types DDR4-3200 DDR4-2933
Sockets supported AM4 FCLGA1200
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 65 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration

1
Package Size

37.5mm x 37.5mm
Thermal Solution

PCG 2015C
Max number of PCIe lanes 20 16
PCI Express revision 4. 0 3.0
PCIe configurations 1×16+x4, 2×8+x4, 1×8+2×4+x4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
Scalability

1S Only
AMD SenseMI
AMD StoreMI technology
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology

Idle States

Instruction set extensions

Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2
Intel 64

Intel® Hyper-Threading technology

Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported

Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)

Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost

Intel® Turbo Boost technology

Thermal Monitoring

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)

Intel® Identity Protection technology

Intel® OS Guard

Intel® Secure Key technology

Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)

Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Secure Boot

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare AMD Ryzen 5 5600X with others




AMD
Ryzen 5 5600X



vs



AMD
Ryzen 3 2200G




AMD
Ryzen 5 5600X



vs



AMD
Ryzen 7 3800XT




AMD
Ryzen 5 5600X



vs



Intel
Core i7-10700F




AMD
Ryzen 5 5600X



vs



Intel
Core i9-10910




AMD
Ryzen 5 5600X



vs



AMD
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G




AMD
Ryzen 5 5600X



vs



Intel
Core i5-11600

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs.

Intel Core i7-10700F

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X operates with 6 cores and 12 CPU threads. It run at 4.60 GHz base 4.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 CPU socket. This version includes 32.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 4.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Vermeer (Zen 3) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q4/2020

Intel Core i7-10700F

The Intel Core i7-10700F operates with 8 cores and 12 CPU threads. It run at 4.80 GHz base 4.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1200 CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Comet Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2020

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i7-10700F

Compare Detail

3.70 GHz Frequency 2.90 GHz
6 Cores 8
4.60 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 4.80 GHz
4.20 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 4.60 GHz
Yes Hyperthreading Yes
Yes Overclocking No
normal Core Architecture normal
no iGPU GPU no iGPU
No turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
7 nm Technology 14 nm
No turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
DirectX Version
Max. displays
DDR4-3200 Memory DDR4-2933
2 Memory channels 2
Max memory
Yes ECC No
3. 00 MB L2 Cache
32.00 MB L3 Cache 16.00 MB
4.0 PCIe version 3.0
20 PCIe lanes 16
7 nm Technology 14 nm
AM4 Socket LGA 1200
65 W TDP 65 W
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q4/2020 Release date Q2/2020

Show more data

Show more data

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel Core i7-10700F
65 W Max TDP 65 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-10700F

Summary

Relative performance

Relative performance

Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Much higher single threaded performance (around 27% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
60 watts lower power draw.
Around 27% higher average synthetic performance.
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-10700F
None

Gaming

HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.


Productivity

No clear winner declared

Features
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel Core i7-10700F
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
XFR 2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
ABM
ADX
RdRand
TBT 2. 0
TBT 3.0

Architecture
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel Core i7-10700F
Architecture AMD Zen 3 vs Intel_Cometlake
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR4-3200 MHz
Dual-channel
vs DDR4-2933 MHz
Dual-channel
Codename Vermeer vs Comet Lake
Release Date Nov 2020 vs Apr 2020

Cores
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel Core i7-10700F
Cores 6 vs 8
Threads 12 vs 16
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics No vs No

Cache
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel Core i7-10700F
L1 Cache 64K (per core) vs 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 512K (per core) vs 256K (per core)
L3 Cache 32MB vs 16MB (shared)

Physical
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel Core i7-10700F
Socket AMD Socket AM4 vs Intel Socket 1200
Max Case Temp 95°C vs 72°C
Package vs FC-LGA1200
Die Size unknown vs unknown
Process 7 nm vs 14 nm

Performance
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel Core i7-10700F
Cpu Frequency 3700 MHz vs 2900 MHz
Turbo Clock 4600 MHz vs 4800 MHz
Base Clock 100 MHz vs 100 MHz
Voltage N/A vs N/A
TDP 65 W vs 125 W

Points — higher is better

Points — higher is better

  • AMD Ryzen 5 5600X (simulated)

    260. 67

  • Intel Core i7-10700F (simulated)

    205.18

points — higher is better

Intel Core i7 10700F vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X:

performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i7 10700F

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Which is better: 8-core Intel Core i7 10700F at 2.9 GHz or AMD Ryzen 5 5600X with 6 cores at 3.7 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

  1. Overview
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Features
  5. Comments (1)

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single -flow performance

Rating in tests using one nucleus

Core i7 10700f

67 67

Ryzen 5 5600x

83

Multi -flow performance

Tests in benchmarks, where all nucleus 9000 are involved0003

Core i7 10700f

53

Ryzen 5 5600x

58

Energy Equality

Energy Effect CHIP

Core I7 10700F

56

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 RIC

Core i7 10700F

60

Ryzen 5 5600X

71

Key differences

What are the main differences between 5600X and 10700F

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 10700F

  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4. 8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz)

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

  • More modern process — 7 vs. 14 nanometers
  • Has 16MB more L3 cache
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • 36% faster in single-core test 1ech4 and veek25 — 16% faster in single-core test
  • New PCI Express Standard — 4.0
  • 5 months later than rival
  • 1.88 GB/s (4%) higher maximum memory bandwidth

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Core i7 10700F

1256

Ryzen 5 5600X
+24%

1555

Cinebench R23 (multi-core)

Core i7 10700F
+4%

12306

Ryzen 5 5600X

11849

Passmark CPU (Single Core)
+16%

3384

Passmark CPU (multi-core)

Core i7 10700F

17098

Ryzen 5 5600X
+30%

22257

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Core i7 10700F

1223

Ryzen 5 5600X
+36%

1668

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Core i7 10700F

8102

Ryzen 5 5600X
+10%

8925

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

List of full specifications for Intel Core i7 10700F and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

General information

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Release date May 1, 2020 October 8, 2020
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Comet Lake Vermeer
Model number i7-10700F
Socket LGA-1200 AM4
Integrated graphics No No

Performance

Cores 8 6
Number of threads 16 12
Frequency 2. 9 GHz 3.7 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 4.8 GHz 4.6 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 29x 37x
Tire speed 8 GT/s
Level 1 cache 64KB (per core) 64KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 256KB (per core) 512KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 16MB (shared) 32MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier No Yes

Power consumption

Process technology 14 nanometers 7 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP) 65 W 65 W
Critical temperature 100°C 95°C

Memory support

Memory type DDR4-2933 DDR4-3200
Max. size 128 GB 128 GB
Number of channels 2 2
Max. bandwidth 45.8 GB/s 47.68 GB/s
ECC 9 support0190

No Yes

Other

website

Official site Site Intel Core i7 10700F AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
PCI Express version 3.0 4.0
Max. PCI Express lanes 16 20

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Core i7 10700F

57 (20.2%)

Ryzen 5 5600X

225 (79.8%)

Total votes: 282

3

Competitors

1.
Core i5 12400 and Core i7 10700F

2.
Core i7 10700 and Core i7 10700F

3.
Ryzen 5 5500U and Ryzen 5 5600X

4.
Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 5600X

5.
Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 5 5600X

6.
Apple M1 and Ryzen 5 5600X

7.
Core i5 12400F and Ryzen 5 5600X

What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X or Intel Core i7 10700F?

Name

Message

Intel Core i7-10700F or AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

  • Home
  • >
  • The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.

    Speed ​​in office use

    Core i7-10700F

    81.9

    Ryzen 5 5600x

    84.5 (+3.1%)

    Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.

    The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.

    Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.

    Speed ​​in heavy applications

    Core i7-10700F

    58.6 (+0.3%)

    Ryzen 5 5600x

    58.4

    maximum

    The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.

    At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.

    Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values ​​corresponding to the processor.

    Speed ​​of numerical operations

    Simple household tasks

    Core i7-10700F

    79

    Ryzen 5 5600x

    82.1 (+3.8%)

    Demanding games and tasks

    Core i7-10700F

    64. 2

    Ryzen 5 5600x

    65.6 (+2.1%)

    Extreme

    Core i7-10700F

    21.5

    Ryzen 5 5600x

    22.1 (+2.7%)

    Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.

    We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.

    Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.

    When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.

    Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.

    Benchmarks

    Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.

    Cinebench R23 Single Core

    Intel Core i7-10700F

    1255

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    1593 (+21.2%)

    Cinebench R23 Multi Core

    Intel Core i7-10700F

    12250 (+10.3% )

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    10988

    Cinebench R20 Single Core

    Intel Core i7-10700F

    499

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    604 (+17.4%)

    Cinebench R20 Multi Core

    Intel Core i7-10700F

    4834 (+5.6%)

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    4562

    Cinebench R15 Single Core

    Intel Core i7-10700f

    214

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    (+17000) R15 Multi Core

    Intel Core i7-10700F

    2291 (+14%)

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    1970

    Geekbench 5 Single Core

    Intel Core i7-10700F

    1267

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    1572 (+19.4%)

    Geekbench 5 Multi Core

    Intel Core i7-10700F

    8945 (+5.9%)

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    8420

    Passmark

    Intel Core i7-10700F

    16980

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    22194 (+23. 5%)

    Specifications

    Data is not yet complete, so tables may be missing information or existing features.

    Basic

    Manufacturer Intel AMD
    DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Processor
    ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation.
    Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 14 No data
    Date of release The month and year the processor was released. 08-2022 09-2022
    Model Official name. i7-10700F
    Cores The number of physical cores. 8 6
    ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 16 12
    Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard).
    Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 2.9 GHz 3.7 GHz
    Turbo FrequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. 4.8 No data
    L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 16 No data
    Instructions 64-bit
    Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
    Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. No No
    Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 8 GT/s
    Number of QPI links
    TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 65 No data
    Cooling system specifications PCG 2015C

    Video core

    Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings.
    GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. No data No data
    Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. No data No data
    Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect.
    Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time.

    RAM

    Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 128 No data
    Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR4-2933
    RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2
    RAM bandwidth 45.8 GB/s
    ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data

    PCI

    configuration options

    PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 3 No data
    PCI Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
    Number of PCI lanes 16 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4

    Data Security

    AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. No data No data
    Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data

    Decoration

    Dimensions No data No data
    Supported sockets No data No data
    Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data

    Which is better

    Intel Core i7-10700F

    • On average, gaming performance is 1% better.
    • The number of physical cores is 2 more.
    • The number of threads is 4 more.
    • In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and 1% better.
    • Price lower by $50
    • Base frequency higher by 0.8 GHz.

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-10700: What is the difference?

    58 ballla

    72 Ballla

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    56 Ballla

    64 Ballla

    Intel Core i7-10700 9000 in comparison

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

    Intel Core i7-10700

    Why is AMD Ryzen 5 5600X better than Intel Core i7-10700?

    • 267MHz higher RAM speed?
      3200MHz vs 2933MHz
    • Semiconductor size 7nm smaller?
      7nm vs 14nm
    • 1MB more L2 cache?
      3MB vs 2MB
    • 27.29% higher PassMark score?
      22256 vs 17485
    • 16MB more L3 cache?
      32MB vs 16MB
    • 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
      4 vs 3
    • Has an unlocked multiplier?
    • 0. 25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
      0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core

    • 4 more CPU threads?
      16 vs 12
    • 5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
      100°C vs 95°C
    • 128KB more L1 cache?
      512KB vs 384KB
    • Does it have integrated graphics?
    • 5.96% higher Cinebench R20 score (multi-core)?
      4834 vs 4562

    Which comparisons are the most popular?

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

    vs

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

    Intel Core i7-10700

    vs

    AMD Ryzen 7 4700U

    AMD Ryzen 7 4700U

    0003

    VS

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600

    Intel Core i7-10700

    VS

    Intel Core i5-12500

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    VS

    AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

    Intel Core I7-100002 Intel Core I7-10000 INTEL CORE vs

    AMD RYZEN 5 5600G

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    VS

    AMD Ryzen 7 5800x

    Intel Core i7-10700

    VS

    Intel Core I5-10400

    AMD Ryzen 5 562 AMD Ryzen 5 562 AMD Ryzen 5 562 AMD Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

    Intel Core i7-10700

    VS

    AMD RYZEN 7 5700G

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    VS

    AMD Ryzen 7 5700g

    Intel Core I7-10700

    VS

    Intel Core2 Intel Core2 Intel Core2 Intel Core2 Intel Core AMD RYZEN 5 5600X

    VS

    Intel Core i5-10400

    Intel Core i7-10700

    VS

    Intel Core i7-11700

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    9000 VS

    Intel Core INTEL Core 2600C Core i7-10700

    VS

    AMD Ryzen 7 5800x

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    VS

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600x

    Intel Core i7-10700

    VS

    AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600u

    AMD Ry

    Intel Core i9-10900K

    Price Match

    Cheaper

    User Reviews

    Overall Rating

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

    8 User Reviews

    AMD

    0002 9. 9 /10

    8 reviews of users

    Intel Core i7-10700

    0 Reviews of users

    Intel Core i7-10700

    0.0 /10

    0 Reviews of Users

    Functions Qualities

    9.4 /10

    7 Votes

    Reviews are not yet

    Games

    9.5 /10

    8 Votes

    002

    performance

    9.4 /10

    8 Votes

    Reviews still not

    Reliability

    /10

    Votes

    Reviews yet there are no

    9000 9000

    /10

    7 votes

    No reviews yet

    Performance

    1.cpu speed

    6 x 3.7GHz

    8 x 2.9GHz

    CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

    2nd processor thread

    More threads result in better performance and better multi-tasking.

    3.speed turbo clock

    4.6GHz

    4.8GHz

    When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    4. Unlocked

    ✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

    ✖Intel Core i7-10700

    Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.

    5.L2 cache

    More L2 scratchpad results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

    6.L3 cache

    More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

    7.L1 cache

    More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

    8.core L2

    0.5MB/core

    0.25MB/core

    More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

    9.core L3

    5.33MB/core

    2MB/core

    More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

    Memory

    1.RAM speed

    3200MHz

    2933MHz

    Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    47.68GB/s

    45.8GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.DDR version

    DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

    4 memory channels

    More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

    5.Maximum memory

    Maximum memory (RAM).

    6.bus baud rate

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

    The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.

    7.Supports memory troubleshooting code

    ✖AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

    ✖Intel Core i7-10700

    Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    8.eMMC version

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)

    A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

    9.bus frequency

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)

    The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

    Geotagging

    1. PassMark result

    This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

    2. PassMark result (single)

    This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

    3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

    Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

    4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

    Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

    5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

    Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

    6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

    Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

    7. Blender test result (bmw27)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)

    The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

    8.Blender result (classroom)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)

    The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

    9.performance per watt

    This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

    Functions

    1.uses multithreading

    ✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

    ✔Intel Core i7-10700

    processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

    2. Has AES

    ✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

    ✔Intel Core i7-10700

    AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

    3. Has AVX

    ✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

    ✔Intel Core i7-10700

    AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

    4.Version SSE

    SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

    5.Has F16C

    ✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

    ✔Intel Core i7-10700

    F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

    6 bits transmitted at the same time

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)

    NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

    7. Has MMX

    ✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

    ✔Intel Core i7-10700

    MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

    8.Has TrustZone

    ✖AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

    ✖Intel Core i7-10700

    Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through Digital Rights Management (DRM) ).

    9.interface width

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)

    The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better

    Price comparison

    Cancel

    Which CPUs are better?

    Comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel Core i7-10700F

    Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel Core i7-10700F processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technology, Virtualization, Security and reliability.
    Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

    versus

    Intel Core i7-10700F

    Advantages

    reasons to select AMD Ryzen 5 5600x

    • The processor is more, the difference in production dates 6 months
    • more, the processor is unlocked. the new technological process of manufacturing the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 7 nm vs 14 nm
    • L2 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
    • L3 cache is 2 times (s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
    • Performance in the PassMark — Single benchmark about 15% more thread mark: 3355 vs 2920
    • Performance in PassMark — CPU mark about 29% more: 21975 vs 17027
    Release date 5 Nov 2020 vs 30 Apr 2020
    Unlocked Unlocked / Locked
    Process 7 nm vs 14 nm
    Level 2 cache 3MB vs 2MB
    Level 3 cache 32MB vs 16MB
    PassMark — Single thread mark 3355 vs 2920
    PassMark — CPU mark 21975 vs 17027

    Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-10700F

    • 2 more cores, run more applications simultaneously: 8 vs 6
    • 4 more threads: 16 vs 12
    • About 4% more clock speed: 4. 80 GHz vs 4.6 GHz
    • About 5% more max core temperature: 100°C vs 95°C % more means more data can be stored in it for quick access
    • Performance in the 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark is about 24% higher: 10019 vs 8111
    Number of cores 8 vs 6
    Number of threads 16 vs 12
    Maximum frequency 4.80 GHz vs 4.6 GHz
    Maximum core temperature 100°C vs 95°C
    Level 1 cache 512 KB vs 384 KB
    3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 10019 vs 8111

    Benchmark comparison

    CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
    CPU 2: Intel Core i7-10700F

    PassMark — Single thread mark
    CPU 1
    CPU 2
    PassMark — CPU mark
    CPU 1
    CPU 2
    3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score
    CPU 1
    CPU 2
    Name AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel Core i7-10700F
    PassMark — Single thread mark 3355 2920
    PassMark — CPU mark 21975 17027
    3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 8111 10019

    Performance comparison

    configuration

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Intel Core i7-10700F
    Architecture name Zen 3 Comet Lake
    Production date Nov 5, 2020 30 Apr 2020
    Price at first issue date $299 $298 — $310
    OPN PIB 100-100000065BOX
    OPN Tray 100-000000065
    Place in the ranking 139 163
    Applicability Desktop Desktop
    Processor Number i7-10700F
    Series 10th Generation Intel Core i7 Processors
    Status Launched
    Base frequency 3. 7 GHz 2.90 GHz
    Level 1 cache 384KB 512KB
    Level 2 cache 3MB 2MB
    Level 3 cache 32MB 16MB
    Process 7nm 14nm
    Maximum core temperature 95 °C 100°C
    Maximum frequency 4.6 GHz 4.80 GHz
    Number of cores 6 8
    Number of threads 12 16
    Unlocked
    Support 64 bit
    Bus Speed ​​ 8 GT/s
    ECC support
    Maximum number of memory channels 2 2
    Maximum memory bandwidth 47. 68 GB/s 45.8 GB/s
    Maximum memory size 128GB 128GB
    Supported memory types DDR4-3200 DDR4-2933
    Supported sockets AM4 FCLGA1200
    Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 65 Watt
    Maximum number of processors in 1
    Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm
    Thermal Solution PCG 2015C
    Number of PCI Express lanes 20 16
    PCI Express revision 4. 0 3.0
    PCIe configurations 1×16+x4, 2×8+x4, 1×8+2×4+x4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4
    Scalability 1S Only
    AMD SenseMI
    AMD StoreMI technology
    Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3)
    Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
    Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2)
    Intel® AES New Instructions
    Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
    Idle States
    Extended instructions Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2
    Intel 64
    Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
    Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported
    Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
    Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost
    Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
    Thermal Monitoring
    AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
    Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
    Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
    Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
    Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
    Intel® Identity Protection Technology
    Intel® OS Guard
    Intel® Secure Key Technology
    Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX)
    Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
    Secure Boot

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs Intel Core i7-10700F — Comparative specifications and benchmarks of processors

    VS

    Which one to choose?

    It’s time to choose the winner. What is the difference and which is better in AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs Intel Core i7-10700F comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!

    Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor

    Who will win in the comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Intel Core i7-10700F. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.

    3.70 GHz

    Clock frequency

    2.90 GHZ

    6

    Nuclei

    8

    4.40 GHZ

    turbo (1 core)

    4.80 GHZ

    12

    Number YES

    Acceleration

    No.

    Turbo (8 Cores)

    4.60 GHZ

    4.20 GHZ

    turbo (6 nuclei)

    Normal

    Architecture

    0x

    A Core 9000 A Core 9000 A Core 9000 A0003

    0x

    B core

    Processor family and generation

    Internal graphics

    It’s hard to compare AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs Intel Core i7-10700F when graphics card function and specs matter only in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.

    AMD Radeon 7 Graphics (Renoir)

    GPU name

    1.90 GHz

    GPU frequency

    No Turbo

    GPU (TURBO)

    No Turbo

    Generation

    12

    version DirectX

    7

    Executive blocks

    448

    The number of shadeers

    -Maximum memory

    3

    Number of monitors

    7 nm

    Technology

    Q1/2020

    Release date

    2 GB

    Max. GPU Memory

    Hardware codec support

    Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.

    Decode / Encode

    H364

    NO

    Decode / Encode

    JPEG

    H365 8BIT

    H365 10BIT

    DecoDE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE (0003

    NO

    Decode / Encode

    VP9

    NO

    Decode

    VC-1

    NO

    Decode / Encode

    AVC

    9000 / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE

    Decode / Encode

    h365 / HEVC (10 bit)

    RAM and PCIe

    These are memory standards supported by processors. The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.

    DDR4-3200

    Memorial type

    DDR4-2933

    64 GB

    Maximum memory

    128 GB

    2

    2

    2

    NO

    ECC

    9000 3. 0 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

    version of PCIE

    3.0

    12

    PCIE Lines

    16

    Crystation

    Support for data encryption

    YES

    AES-Ni

    YES

    Memory & PCIe

    Thermal management and TDP

    Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and workloads that, as a result, unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Intel Core i7-10700F, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).

    TDP

    65 W

    95 °C

    Maximum temperature

    100 °C

    Maximum TDP

    TDP Download

    65 W

    TDP (PL1)

    TDP (PL2)

    Technical details

    9000

    16. 00 MB

    L3-CACHE

    16.00 MB

    7 NM

    Technology

    14 NM

    CEZANNE (Zen 3)

    Architecture

    Comet

    AMD-V, SEV

    Virtualization

    VT-X, VT, VT, VT, VT -x EPT, VT-d

    AM4

    SOCKET (connector)

    LGA 1200

    q1/2021

    Date of exit

    q2/2020

    x86-64 (64 bit)

    set of instructions (ISA)

    EM64T

    3.00 MB

    L2-Cache

    2.00 MB

    Part Number

    BX8070110700F

    Devices compatible with this processor

    It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.

    Unknown

    Used in

    Unknown

    Popular CPU comparisons

    one. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs.
    AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
    2. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs.
    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
    3. AMD Ryzen 7 5700G vs.
    AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
    four. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs.
    AMD Ryzen 5 3600
    5. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs.
    Intel Core i5-11400
    6. AMD Ryzen 7 4700S vs.
    AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
    7. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs.
    AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
    eight. AMD Ryzen 3 3200G vs.
    AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
    9. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs.
    AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
    ten. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs.
    Intel Core i5-11600K
    eleven. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs.
    Intel Core i7-10700F
    12. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G vs.
    AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
    13. AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs.
    AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
    fourteen. Intel Core i5-12600K vs.
    AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
    fifteen. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs.
    Intel Core i7-1160G7

    Test AMD Ryzen 5 5600G processor on a system with discrete graphics and compare it to other AMD and Intel

    hexa-core models
    Testing the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Similar AMD and Intel Models Without the

    Discrete Graphics Card Recently testing the new AMD Ryzen 5 5600G APU and some other AMD and Intel hexa-core processors, we limited ourselves to using the integrated GPU in all participants. The reason is clear — it is this mode of operation that is the main and most important for APUs: they are purchased first of all when they plan to do without a discrete video card. But some moments with this approach remain behind the scenes. In particular, we can’t compare performance with «pure» AMD processors on Zen2 and Zen3 — precisely because of their purity . And it needs to be done. In addition, a discrete graphics card may eventually appear in an APU-based system — if, for example, the power of the integrated video core is insufficient. This is especially true at a time like now — when the prices of video cards are pushing for the use of integrated graphics, at least as a temporary solution: just trample on until normalization. Moreover, solutions based on Zen3 have their own specifics. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is a great processor — but its MSRP is $299: it has not decreased since the release (especially since the first months, due to the shortage, real prices were much higher). And until recently, this was the cheapest offer on the new AMD microarchitecture. And the Ryzen 5 5600G received a recommended price of $ 259 — much cheaper. Yes, of course, in this case we lose support for PCIe 4. 0, and performance will have to “move” — but it’s just important to understand: by how much. Moreover, we repeat, the situation on the video card market generally pushes the buyer towards this decision when assembling a new system from scratch. When upgrading, some video card may already be available — and, quite possibly, much more powerful than the built-in one, but this difference in recommended prices still remains. It is the 5600G that is the cheapest six-core Zen3, and the cheapest Zen3, in principle, risks becoming the Ryzen 3 5300G for a long time. Yes — four cores are no longer fashionable, but often quite enough. Moreover, in the case of a modern architecture — that in «pure» AMD processors it starts exclusively with six cores, which by definition is more expensive.

    However, we don’t have a 5300G yet — and four cores are really not fashionable . There are different six-core models, so it’s time to test such models again. Only already a little differently than in the previous article — for better coverage of issues that were previously left behind the scenes.

    Test participants

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600G AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
    Core name Cezanne Vermeer
    Production technology 7 nm 7/12 nm
    Core frequency, GHz 3.9/4.4 3.7/4.6
    Number of cores/threads 6/12 6/12
    L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 192/192 192/192
    L2 cache, KB 6×512 6×512
    L3 cache, MiB 16 32
    RAM 2×DDR4-3200 2×DDR4-3200
    TDP, W 65 65
    Number of PCIe lanes 20 (3.0) 20 (4.0)
    Integrated GPU Radeon no

    The main pair of participants is like this, because when using a discrete graphics card, there is a choice between these models. In both cases, six Zen3 cores — but other parameters differ. First of all, the different capacity of the third level cache is striking — and different versions of PCIe: this is the fee for the built-in GPU. But you can use it right away, and buy a video card later — if when prices become more interesting.

    AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G
    Core name Pinnacle Ridge Matisse Renoir
    Production technology 12 nm 7/12 nm 7 nm
    Core frequency, GHz 3.4/3.9 3.6/4.2 3.7/4.2
    Number of cores/threads 6/12 6/12 6/12
    L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 384/192 192/192 192/192
    L2 cache, KB 6×512 6×512 6×512
    L3 cache, MiB 16 32 8
    RAM 2×DDR4-2933 2×DDR4-3200 2×DDR4-3200
    TDP, W 65 65 65
    Number of PCIe lanes 20 (3. 0) 20 (4.0) 20 (3.0)
    Integrated GPU no no Radeon

    But, since we are talking about prices, we need to see what else six-core is inexpensively offered on the market. First of all, previous AMD models are of interest — for example, the same Ryzen 5 4650G can be purchased cheaper, but it can also do without a discrete for some time. The Ryzen 5 3600 is even cheaper (we decided to use it over the 3600X because the performance is very close, but the prices are not; and today we are more interested in them) is one of the rightfully popular models. However, the old 2600 is still interesting to many for the same reason. Even as a new purchase — after all, there are also six cores, but it costs some pennies. And on a budget motherboard, none of the built-in capabilities are lost — unlike new models, where the built-in USB3 Gen2 and PCIe 4.0, together with many popular chipsets, will still turn into USB3 Gen1 and PCIe 3. 0. But is it worth saving so much? The question is open. And isn’t it time to think about upgrading for many owners of such processors — too. Especially if the motherboard supports the installation of Zen3, or at least Zen2 — after all, the Ryzen 5 2600 is still a liquid processor. However, you can sell it together with the board — especially if it’s something four years ago: its capabilities may no longer be enough (for example, even the top models on the X370 of the first wave support the installation of only one fast SSD without tricks and are officially incompatible with Zen3). In a word, such a base today will not hurt.

    Intel Core i5-9400F Intel Core i5-10400 Intel Core i5-11400F
    Core name Coffee Lake Comet Lake Rocket Lake
    Production technology 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm
    Core frequency, GHz 2. 9/4.1 2.9/4.3 2.6/4.4
    Number of cores/threads 6/6 6/12 6/12
    L1 cache (total), I/D, KB 192/192 192/192 192/288
    L2 cache, KB 6×256 6×256 6×512
    L3 cache, MiB 9 12 12
    RAM 2×DDR4-2666 2×DDR4-2666 2×DDR4-3200
    TDP, W 65 65 65
    Number of PCIe lanes 16 (3.0) 16 (3.0) 20 (4.0)
    Integrated GPU no UHD Graphics 630 no

    Same as Intel. Here we decided to take two younger Core i5s of the tenth and eleventh generations — adding to them a similar model of the ninth. Users of these may also already be thinking about upgrading. Which in their case is possible in two directions — either replacing the processor, if you can find a Core i7 or i9 inexpensivelyunder LGA1151 (but this is poorly formalized, since it fundamentally depends on how inexpensive is ), or a transition to a new AMD or Intel platform with a new processor. Moreover, when choosing a motherboard based on AMD B550 or Intel B560, it is much easier to convince yourself of the need for upgrading than with just replacing the processor. Only its performance will not be limited — there will be new interfaces. Which, perhaps, in practice are not so necessary — but as an additional argument for modernization they will fit.

    Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-9400F, recall, 2018 processors. If we rewind a year ago, there we will get (to a first approximation) the same thing — Ryzen 5 1600/1600X and Core i5 8000 series. Three or four years is quite a long time for the itch of the upgrade to appear. Five is even more sufficient, only in 2016 we will find at best quad-core Skylake. And it seems to us that everyone has either already changed them — or they have finally become convinced that this is not yet required. But for those in the second group, today’s testing may also be useful. Simply because the maximum for the first version of LGA1151 is the level of Ryzen 3 3100 and Core i3-10100. And, if a year ago it was decided that replacing the old quad-core with is almost the same as , a six-core architecture is not needed, then this year’s proposals may change the mind somewhat. Or they may not change — postponing the upgrade for another year.

    Other environments are traditional for the main line of tests — a discrete video card based on Radeon RX Vega 56, 16 GB of DDR4 memory (in all cases, the maximum official frequency for each processor), a mid-range SATA SSD.

    Test Method

    Methodology for testing computer systems of the sample of 2020

    The testing methodology is described in detail in a separate article, and the results of all tests are available in a separate table in Microsoft Excel format. Directly in the articles, we use the processed results: normalized with respect to the reference system (Intel Core i5-9600K with 16 GB of memory, AMD Radeon Vega 56 video card and SATA SSD) and grouped by computer application areas. Accordingly, all diagrams related to applications have dimensionless scores — so more is always better. And starting from this year, we are finally transferring game tests to an optional status (the reasons for which are discussed in detail in the description of the test methodology), so that only specialized materials will be available for them.

    iXBT Application Benchmark 2020

    Until 2019, Ryzen needed a head start in the number of cores, or at least computation threads — without which direct competition with Core did not work. We got access to a new process technology and modernized the microarchitecture — and the roles immediately changed. In fact, the Ryzen 5 3600 set the bar so high that at first it competed even with the Core i7 — not to mention the younger Core i5. Rocket Lake got every chance to get even with at least Zen2 — but the old technical process played against mass models: the typical for Core “non-K” TDP 65 W significantly limits the performance of these processors. AMD does not have such problems — so competition with Zen3 is definitely impossible for now. And even the cheapest (of the most modern six-core) Ryzen 5 5600G is already fast — which, as we have already seen, can compete with the Core i5-11600K without much effort. But with the Ryzen 5 5600X, it still can’t. Again, the miracle did not work out: just as Renoir lagged behind Matisse, so Cezanne is not quite a competitor to Vermeer. But it costs (officially) cheaper, can do without a discrete video card, and overtakes all the others (except for the half-brother in microarchitecture) without any problems. And one more interesting point — if in three years in the younger Core i5 performance has grown by 30%, then for Ryzen 5 this is almost one and a half times. But nothing surprising — one could actually expect more. After all, all that Intel managed to do was to change the microarchitecture once and stop blocking Hyper-Threading support (which turned out to be even more effective). AMD changed the microarchitecture twice — and one process technology. As you stomp, so you pop.

    The nature of the load is similar — the preferences of the programs are slightly different. In particular, there is less «cache-loving», so APUs do not suffer from L3 limitations. The 4650G turned out to be no worse than the 3600X, and, accordingly, faster than the 3600. The 5600G turned out to be incapable of such a feat, although it still turned out to be the second among all the participants. But the 11400F in this case, the limitations of the heat pack also interfere — but the redesigned FPU allows you to reach at least the level of Zen2. And the increase in productivity over three years is already closer to 40%. But AMD still has about one and a half.

    But not all applications scale «per processor» as well as the two groups above. However, the general trends are still visible to the naked eye. First, AMD has done more work over the past three to four years — and achieved better results. Secondly, Intel is hindered most of all by one thing — the technical process that has remained unchanged since 2014. Then — revolutionary and the best on the market. Three years later, still the best on the market. In general, it turned out to be so unique that it is still not outdated to a large extent — but has already ceased to be the best, and at times has begun to frankly interfere. The new 10 nm has finally been brought to mind — but in the desktop segment they are not yet used with all the consequences.

    The first Ryzen in these programs had a hard time — the tactic of «throwing cores» does not work here. We changed the microarchitecture — and everything worked out right away. At first sight. On the second, the technical process also helped here, which allowed unprecedented amounts of cache memory to be stuffed into “clean” processors. Where there was no place for them, everything is much worse, and the increase in L3 in Cezanne is still not enough. Although in practice everything is not so scary — it is already not far behind the 3000th family, and can compete with Rocket Lake. However, the latter can demonstrate a comparable level of performance at lower prices, but the latter is perhaps the main problem with Zen3 in all variants. Which is much less than we would like.

    One gets the feeling that the increase in L3 was purely a forced measure — without this, replacing the cores with more productive ones might not be very effective. As a result, just as Renoir lacked it, Cezanne is also lacking to the same extent (already more). But in practice, again, the measures taken are already enough to overtake «clean» processors. And with Intel, it’s a tragedy in general — improvements in the microarchitecture in a limited thermal package did not give any effect at all. Actually, there is nothing surprising in the fact that such an upgrade at Intel was delayed until the last moment — and they did not even try to use it in more mass-produced (and even more limited in consumption) laptop processors, no. Here’s a simple «turn on» HT and a small proportional increase in L3 at the time, the performance of the Core i5 increased one and a half times. But the need for this was ripe even before the advent of Zen2 — more threads in Ryzen put the Core in a very uncomfortable position initially.

    But they still feel dry and comfortable in archivers — and the worst thing in this group is the APU. In the new generation, however, they managed to win back part of the gap from models without graphics — the increase in L3 helped. But still: Ryzen CPUs are the best, Ryzen APUs are the worst. And Zen2 is inside or Zen3 is not important. The case when the environment is more important than the cores themselves.

    A more familiar picture. Just complementing other scenarios. So let’s go straight to the results — it is already very difficult to make a mistake with them, even if you do not look at specific numbers.

    Let’s start with AMD. And, according to tradition, from the bad — it’s easy to see that the performance of the APU in general-purpose applications is lower than that of the «clean» Ryzen CPUs on the same number of similar cores. The size of the backlog at the last stage did not change, despite the doubling of the capacity of L3 — since the new cores could use even more than L3. Add to this the «old» PCIe — and we understand that with the similarity of names and unification (finally!) of model numbers, these are significantly different devices. The strength of the APU is a good (by the standards of this segment) integrated graphics. But if it is not supposed to be used, then for equal money a “clean” processor is better. And now they are rather equal in retail — despite the official price list, since the opportunity to at least temporarily do without a discrete video card in our time is worth a lot in the literal sense. Therefore, in such a situation, updating the APU lineup cannot but be welcomed — we get the same + 20% performance with a generation change. Yes — from a lower base. But the ability to buy a processor with graphics faster than a «processor without graphics» in itself may be important to someone. Moreover, AMD is ready to sell such (unlike its predecessors) in large quantities. Yes, and with logical pricing — slower, but also cheaper (and it’s a pity that the invisible hand of the market corrects this).

    Intel does not have a problem of choosing between smart and beautiful — but there is a serious technological one. The notorious outdated technical process — which hits the younger processor models especially hard: the traditional 65 W in this segment is simply not enough this time. You can, of course, “unclench” (or completely cancel) manually — but the effect may also be unusual for buyers of younger Core i5s: since you have to take care of the cooler, and choose a board with a powerful power system to get the maximum effect. For buyers of the top series, this is not a novelty — but here the situation is different. But cheap six-core Rocket Lake generally exist in nature (especially cheap ones, if you focus on discrete) — but Zen3 still does not. On the other hand, the role of «cheap, but not so fast» is still well played by Zen2 — so the exchange is almost equivalent. If you do not affect other characteristics …

    Energy consumption and energy efficiency

    …because there are no economical Rocket Lakes either. At first glance, the Core i5-11400F seems to be so, but only because it was driven with an iron hand into the framework in which its predecessors were simply spacious. Driven — along the way, forcing the processor to work slower than it could. And all the same, extra 20-30 watts ran up. And if you try to remove the restrictions, then this baby flies under the same 200 watts as the older models of the line. AMD does not have such «features». And in general — Zen3 with the same technical process has become (in all forms) more economical than Zen2. And monolithic APUs consume less power than pure processors.

    And Intel’s former leadership in energy efficiency is gone. Although, in fairness, the company’s junior processors look better in this regard — they do not have to try to overtake direct (or even a priori stronger) competitors at any cost, and the TDP limit itself is useful for this purpose. But modern AMD processors are capable of more. Moreover, when switching to Zen3, energy efficiency increased — but Rocket Lake only reduces it. This microarchitecture is too «complex» for 14 nm — that’s why it was put off until the last minute in this form.

    Games

    As already mentioned in the description of the methodology, it makes no sense to keep the «classic approach» to testing gaming performance — since video cards have long been determining not only it, but also significantly affect the cost of the system, you need to «dance» exclusively from them. And from the games themselves — too: in modern conditions, fixing a game set for a long time does not make sense, since literally everything can change with the next update. But we will carry out a brief test in (albeit) relatively synthetic conditions — using a couple of games in the «processor-dependent» mode.

    AMD vs. Intel: big testing of processors in games

    However, this is quite indicative. Firstly, once again we admire the fairness of the claims against the first Ryzen by gamers. Secondly, once again we see the loss of APU to «clean» processors. But there are nuances — in the previous generation it was larger, which is why we did not even try to include Renoir in a large game test. It is clear that all the same, everything will be determined first of all by the video card, but if you are guided by its mandatory presence, there is nothing to buy an APU for. If only itself will come out — but it’s hard to plan something in advance. These processors are faster than the «old» Ryzen, but the latter are still popular due to the fact that they cost a penny (relatively). But they still couldn’t keep up with the “old” Core APUs of 2020.

    But the increase in L3 to 16 MB seems to be enough in some cases : in the 5000th line, the difference has been greatly reduced. Even more important is that the same 5600G can already outperform any older processors from AMD itself — and it looks advantageous against the background of Intel. It is clear that it is dangerous to make a final conclusion on just two games — but here, at least, there is something to study additionally. And considering the APU as a temporary solution has become easier — there will be no fear of losing too much in the future.

    On the other hand, the 5600G is still expensive. The younger models of Intel processors are slower than due to low clock frequencies (which is further aggravated by power consumption limits), but they are inexpensive. At the same time, it is clear that in quality settings closer to reality, the same 10400 (or better than 11400) will still be able to work in a gaming PC for the entire video card. And if so, why pay more?

    Total

    We have already written and will repeat once again that the main problems of the Ryzen 5000 family are not at all in the technical part. Everything is just fine with it: in all its manifestations, these processors are not the best on the market at the moment in terms of the totality of characteristics. The problem is that there are few of them — and they are all (relatively) expensive. From this point of view, one cannot help but welcome the appearance of new APUs, this is an expansion of the range, moreover, with cheaper models. But the situation on the video card market played a bad joke on them: in fact, they are usually sold for more than the recommended prices. In fact, the retail price of the Ryzen 5 5600G is now the same as the Ryzen 5 5600X, which makes it an excellent choice in cases where the integrated GPU is planned to be used — but a bad choice when a discrete graphics card is already there (even if the old one is a new one and then you can buy it) . And cheaper there are only old Ryzen models — or Intel processors. Here the situation is reversed: technically, Core has been losing the last couple of years, but this can be compensated for by the price. It is clear that performance will also be lower, but it is not always fundamental, especially since the most demanding users have long been guided by 8+ cores, leaving 4-6 to the mass buyer, and the latter pays much less attention to numbers in benchmarks.

    In general, prices are the weapon of the laggard. The last time Intel resorted to it was in the middle of the 2000s, in a similar position. The older Pentiums were sold at the price of an Athlon of similar positioning (but higher performance), but, for example, only Intel had budget dual-core chips in its assortment. The release of the Core 2 Duo changed roles radically — and for a long time. But as soon as AMD began to produce good products again, the company immediately stopped playing as the defender of all the orphans and the poor . Especially since, generally speaking, such a role is difficult for a technology leader — retail always strives to correct a too “tasty” recommended price. Therefore, the state of affairs becomes so unstable: if Ryzen 9 unconditionally rules the ball in the segment of top desktop processors (and Ryzen Threadripper still has no one to compete with even on “old” cores), then you will have to choose a floor or two below. Paying attention not only to speed, but also to the functionality and cost of the platform (as well as its components). But in any case, Cezanne today is a very good offer.