Ryzen 5 5600X vs Core i7-10700F
Availability
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy on Amazon
$194
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Availability
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy on Amazon
$245.96
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 189 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Performs up to 10% better in Fortnite than Core i7-10700F — 328 vs 297 FPS
-
Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-10700F — $194.
0 vs $245.96
-
Up to 29% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i7-10700F — $0.59 vs $0.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
Fortnite
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 5 5600X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
328
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy for $194 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
297
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
71%
Price, $
$245.96
78%
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $245.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 5 5600X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
1606
FPS
1464
FPS
Minecraft
305
FPS
276
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
531
FPS
480
FPS
VALORANT
1209
FPS
1100
FPS
League of Legends
746
FPS
677
FPS
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 5600X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Single-Core
1616
100%
Multi-Core
8161
100%
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1254
71%
Multi-Core
7794
95%
|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
vs |
Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
|
Nov 5th, 2020 |
Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vermeer | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
| 6 | Cores |
8 |
| 12 | Threads |
16 |
|
3. |
Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed |
4.8 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
|
7 nm |
Process Size | 14 nm |
|
37.0x |
Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
|
Yes |
Overclockable | No |
7 GHzBuilds Using Ryzen 5 5600X or Core i7-10700F
Fortnite, 1080p, High
Allied Gaming Patriot Desktop PC
247 FPS
$5.26/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Ryzen 5 5600X
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,299
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
CLX Set Gaming Desktop PC
247 FPS
$5.99/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Ryzen 5 5600X
16 GB, 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,479.49
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Skytech Chronos Gaming PC
247 FPS
$6.
07/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Ryzen 5 5600X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,499.99
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Skytech Blaze 3.0 Gaming PC
247 FPS
$6.07/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Ryzen 5 5600X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,499.99
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Skytech Chronos Gaming PC
247 FPS
$6.07/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Ryzen 5 5600X
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,499.99
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Skytech Shiva Gaming PC
247 FPS
$6.07/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Ryzen 5 5600X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,499.99
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
YEYIAN Katana R02 Gaming PC
247 FPS
$6.07/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Ryzen 5 5600X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,499
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Skytech Azure Gaming PC
227 FPS
$6.
09/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Ryzen 5 5600X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,382.2
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
SkytechBlaze 3.0 Gaming PC
227 FPS
$6.17/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Ryzen 5 5600X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,399.99
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Skytech Shiva Gaming PC
227 FPS
$6.17/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Ryzen 5 5600X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,399.98
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 9 5900X
$387.99
Core i7-12700K
$399.99
Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600G
Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 2600
Core i5-11400F
$158.
99
Ryzen 5 5600X
Core i5-12600K
$277.99
Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 3600
$138.95
Ryzen 5 2600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7 10700F vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 10700F
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2.9 GHz Intel Core i7 10700F with 8-cores against the 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 5 5600X with 6-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i7 10700F
67
Ryzen 5 5600X
83
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i7 10700F
53
Ryzen 5 5600X
58
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i7 10700F
56
Ryzen 5 5600X
67
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i7 10700F
60
Ryzen 5 5600X
71
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 5600X and 10700F
Advantages of Intel Core i7 10700F
- Has 2 more physical cores
- 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.
8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 14 nanometers
- Has 16 MB larger L3 cache size
- Unlocked multiplier
- 36% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1654 vs 1217 points
- Newer PCI Express version – 4.0
- Newer — released 5-months later
- Around 1.88 GB/s (4%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i7 10700F
1256
Ryzen 5 5600X
+24%
1555
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 10700F
+4%
12306
Ryzen 5 5600X
11849
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i7 10700F
2924
Ryzen 5 5600X
+16%
3384
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i7 10700F
17098
Ryzen 5 5600X
+30%
22257
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i7 10700F
1223
Ryzen 5 5600X
+36%
1668
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 10700F
8102
Ryzen 5 5600X
+10%
8925
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 10700F and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
General
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | May 1, 2020 | October 8, 2020 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Comet Lake | Vermeer |
| Model number | i7-10700F | — |
| Socket | LGA-1200 | AM4 |
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
Performance
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base Frequency | 2. 9 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 37x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | — |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 16MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | Yes |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Max. temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
Max. Memory Channels |
2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i7 10700F official page | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 20 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i7 10700F
57 (20.2%)
Ryzen 5 5600X
225 (79.8%)
Total votes: 282
ompetitors
1.
Core i5 12400 and Core i7 10700F
2.
Core i7 10700 and Core i7 10700F
3.
Ryzen 5 5500U and Ryzen 5 5600X
4.
Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 5600X
5.
Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 5 5600X
6.
Apple M1 and Ryzen 5 5600X
7.
Core i5 12400F and Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-10700: What is the difference?
58points
72points
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
56points
64points
Intel Core i7-10700
Comparison winner
Cost-effectiveness winner
i7-10700F
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-10700
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 5600X better than Intel Core i7-10700?
- 267MHz higher ram speed?
3200MHzvs2933MHz - 7nm smaller semiconductor size?
7nmvs14nm - 1MB bigger L2 cache?
3MBvs2MB - 27.
29% higher PassMark result?
22256vs17485 - 16MB bigger L3 cache?
32MBvs16MB - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
4vs3 - Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 0.25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.5MB/corevs0.25MB/core
Why is Intel Core i7-10700 better than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X?
- 4 more CPU threads?
16vs12 - 5°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs95°C - 128KB bigger L1 cache?
512KBvs384KB - Has integrated graphics?
- 5.96% higher Cinebench R20 (multi) result?
4834vs4562
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
Intel Core i5-12500
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
Intel Core i5-11400
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
Intel Core i7-11700
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
Intel Core i5-12600K
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
Intel Core i9-10900K
Price comparison
Cheap alternatives
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
8 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
9.
9/10
8 User reviews
Intel Core i7-10700
0 User reviews
Intel Core i7-10700
0.0/10
0 User reviews
Features
Value for money
9.4/10
7 votes
No reviews yet
Gaming
9.5/10
8 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
9.4/10
8 votes
No reviews yet
Reliability
9.6/10
8 votes
No reviews yet
Energy efficiency
9.7/10
7 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.7GHz
8 x 2.9GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.6GHz
4.8GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✖Intel Core i7-10700
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.
25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
5.33MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
3200MHz
2933MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
47.68GB/s
45.8GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✖Intel Core i7-10700
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.
bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✔Intel Core i7-10700
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✔Intel Core i7-10700
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✔Intel Core i7-10700
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✔Intel Core i7-10700
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✔Intel Core i7-10700
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✖Intel Core i7-10700
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.
front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-10700F
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel Core i7-10700F processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i7-10700F
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 3355 vs 2920
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 21975 vs 17027
| Launch date | 5 Nov 2020 vs 30 Apr 2020 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| L2 cache | 3 MB vs 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB vs 16 MB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 3355 vs 2920 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 21975 vs 17027 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-10700F
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
- 4 more threads: 16 vs 12
- Around 4% higher clock speed: 4.
80 GHz vs 4.6 GHz - Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 95 °C
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score: 10019 vs 8111
| Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
| Number of threads | 16 vs 12 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.80 GHz vs 4.6 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 95 °C |
| L1 cache | 512 KB vs 384 KB |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 10019 vs 8111 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-10700F
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 3355 | 2920 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 21975 | 17027 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 8111 | 10019 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Intel Core i7-10700F | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Zen 3 | Comet Lake |
| Launch date | 5 Nov 2020 | 30 Apr 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $298 — $310 |
| OPN PIB | 100-100000065BOX | |
| OPN Tray | 100-000000065 | |
| Place in performance rating | 139 | 163 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | i7-10700F | |
| Series | 10th Generation Intel Core i7 Processors | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Base frequency | 3. 7 GHz |
2.90 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 16 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.6 GHz | 4.80 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 16 |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s | |
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 47. 68 GB/s |
45.8 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Sockets supported | AM4 | FCLGA1200 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C | |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 4. 0 |
3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1×16+x4, 2×8+x4, 1×8+2×4+x4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| AMD StoreMI technology | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 |
|
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Ryzen 5 5600X with others
AMD
Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD
Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD
Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD
Ryzen 7 3800XT
AMD
Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
Intel
Core i7-10700F
AMD
Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
Intel
Core i9-10910
AMD
Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
AMD
Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
Intel
Core i5-11600
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs.
Intel Core i7-10700F
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X operates with 6 cores and 12 CPU threads. It run at 4.60 GHz base 4.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 CPU socket. This version includes 32.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 4.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Vermeer (Zen 3) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q4/2020
Intel Core i7-10700F
The Intel Core i7-10700F operates with 8 cores and 12 CPU threads. It run at 4.80 GHz base 4.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1200 CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Comet Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d.
The product was launched on Q2/2020
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-10700F
Compare Detail
| 3.70 GHz | Frequency | 2.90 GHz |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 4.60 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.80 GHz |
| 4.20 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 4.60 GHz |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 7 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| DirectX Version | ||
| Max. displays | ||
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes | ECC | No |
3. 00 MB |
L2 Cache | — |
| 32.00 MB | L3 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 7 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA 1200 |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q4/2020 | Release date | Q2/2020 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula.
As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Monero Hashrate kH/s
The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Intel Core i7-10700F | |
| 65 W | Max TDP | 65 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-10700F
Summary
Relative performance
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
Much higher single threaded performance (around 27% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications. |
| 60 watts lower power draw. |
| Around 27% higher average synthetic performance. |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-10700F |
| None |
Gaming
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Features
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Intel Core i7-10700F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMX | ||||
| SSE | ||||
| SSE2 | ||||
| SSE3 | ||||
| SSSE3 | ||||
| SSE4A | ||||
| SSE4.1 | ||||
| SSE4.2 | ||||
| AES | ||||
| AVX | ||||
| AVX2 | ||||
| BMI1 | ||||
| BMI2 | ||||
| SHA | ||||
| F16C | ||||
| FMA3 | ||||
| AMD64 | ||||
| EVP | ||||
| AMD-V | ||||
| SMAP | ||||
| SMEP | ||||
| SMT | ||||
| Precision Boost 2 | ||||
| XFR 2 | ||||
| EIST | ||||
| Intel 64 | ||||
| XD bit | ||||
| VT-x | ||||
| VT-d | ||||
| AES-NI | ||||
| TSX | ||||
| TXT | ||||
| CLMUL | ||||
| ABM | ||||
| ADX | ||||
| RdRand | ||||
TBT 2. 0 |
||||
| TBT 3.0 | ||||
Architecture
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Intel Core i7-10700F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | AMD Zen 3 | vs | Intel_Cometlake | |
| Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
| Memory Support | DDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel |
vs | DDR4-2933 MHz Dual-channel |
|
| Codename | Vermeer | vs | Comet Lake | |
| Release Date | Nov 2020 | vs | Apr 2020 |
Cores
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Intel Core i7-10700F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | vs | 8 | |
| Threads | 12 | vs | 16 | |
| SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
| Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Intel Core i7-10700F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | vs | 64K (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | vs | 256K (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 32MB | vs | 16MB (shared) |
Physical
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Intel Core i7-10700F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | Intel Socket 1200 | |
| Max Case Temp | 95°C | vs | 72°C | |
| Package | vs | FC-LGA1200 | ||
| Die Size | unknown | vs | unknown | |
| Process | 7 nm | vs | 14 nm |
Performance
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Intel Core i7-10700F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3700 MHz | vs | 2900 MHz | |
| Turbo Clock | 4600 MHz | vs | 4800 MHz | |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
| Voltage | N/A | vs | N/A | |
| TDP | 65 W | vs | 125 W |
Points — higher is better
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X (simulated)
260.
67 -
Intel Core i7-10700F (simulated)
205.18
points — higher is better
Intel Core i7 10700F vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 10700F
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Which is better: 8-core Intel Core i7 10700F at 2.9 GHz or AMD Ryzen 5 5600X with 6 cores at 3.7 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments (1)
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i7 10700f
67 67
Ryzen 5 5600x
83
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nucleus 9000 are involved0003
Core i7 10700f
53
Ryzen 5 5600x
58
Energy Equality
Energy Effect CHIP
Core I7 10700F
56
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 RIC
Core i7 10700F
60
Ryzen 5 5600X
71
Key differences
What are the main differences between 5600X and 10700F
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 10700F
- Has 2 more physical cores
- 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.
8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- More modern process — 7 vs. 14 nanometers
- Has 16MB more L3 cache
- Unlocked multiplier
- 36% faster in single-core test 1ech4 and veek25 — 16% faster in single-core test
- New PCI Express Standard — 4.0
- 5 months later than rival
- 1.88 GB/s (4%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 10700F
1256
Ryzen 5 5600X
+24%
1555
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 10700F
+4%
12306
Ryzen 5 5600X
11849
Passmark CPU (Single Core)
+16%
3384
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 10700F
17098
Ryzen 5 5600X
+30%
22257
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 10700F
1223
Ryzen 5 5600X
+36%
1668
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 10700F
8102
Ryzen 5 5600X
+10%
8925
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full specifications for Intel Core i7 10700F and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Release date | May 1, 2020 | October 8, 2020 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Comet Lake | Vermeer |
| Model number | i7-10700F | — |
| Socket | LGA-1200 | AM4 |
| Integrated graphics | No | No |
Performance
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 16 | 12 |
| Frequency | 2. 9 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 29x | 37x |
| Tire speed | 8 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 16MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Power consumption
| Process technology | 14 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
Memory support
| Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-3200 |
Max. size |
128 GB | 128 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC 9 support0190 | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i7 10700F | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 10700F
57 (20.2%)
Ryzen 5 5600X
225 (79.8%)
Total votes: 282
3
Competitors
1.
Core i5 12400 and Core i7 10700F
2.
Core i7 10700 and Core i7 10700F
3.
Ryzen 5 5500U and Ryzen 5 5600X
4.
Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 5 5600X
5.
Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 5 5600X
6.
Apple M1 and Ryzen 5 5600X
7.
Core i5 12400F and Ryzen 5 5600X
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X or Intel Core i7 10700F?
Name
Message
Intel Core i7-10700F or AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
- Home
- >
- On average, gaming performance is 1% better.
- The number of physical cores is 2 more.
- The number of threads is 4 more.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and 1% better.
- Price lower by $50
- Base frequency higher by 0.8 GHz.
- 267MHz higher RAM speed?
3200MHz vs 2933MHz - Semiconductor size 7nm smaller?
7nm vs 14nm - 1MB more L2 cache?
3MB vs 2MB - 27.29% higher PassMark score?
22256 vs 17485 - 16MB more L3 cache?
32MB vs 16MB - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
4 vs 3 - Has an unlocked multiplier?
- 0.
25MB/core more L2 cache per core?
0.5MB/core vs 0.25MB/core - 4 more CPU threads?
16 vs 12 - 5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 95°C - 128KB more L1 cache?
512KB vs 384KB - Does it have integrated graphics?
- 5.96% higher Cinebench R20 score (multi-core)?
4834 vs 4562 - The processor is more, the difference in production dates 6 months
- more, the processor is unlocked. the new technological process of manufacturing the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- L2 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L3 cache is 2 times (s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in the PassMark — Single benchmark about 15% more thread mark: 3355 vs 2920
- Performance in PassMark — CPU mark about 29% more: 21975 vs 17027
- 2 more cores, run more applications simultaneously: 8 vs 6
- 4 more threads: 16 vs 12
- About 4% more clock speed: 4.
80 GHz vs 4.6 GHz - About 5% more max core temperature: 100°C vs 95°C % more means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in the 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark is about 24% higher: 10019 vs 8111
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i7-10700F
81.9
Ryzen 5 5600x
84.5 (+3.1%)
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i7-10700F
58.6 (+0.3%)
Ryzen 5 5600x
58.4
maximum
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
Core i7-10700F 79 Ryzen 5 5600x 82.1 (+3.8%) |
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Core i7-10700F 64. Ryzen 5 5600x 65.6 (+2.1%) |
2
Extreme |
|
Core i7-10700F 21.5 Ryzen 5 5600x 22.1 (+2.7%) |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16.
Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i7-10700F
1255
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
1593 (+21.2%)
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-10700F
12250 (+10.3% )
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
10988
Cinebench R20 Single Core
Intel Core i7-10700F
499
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
604 (+17.4%)
Cinebench R20 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-10700F
4834 (+5.6%)
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
4562
Cinebench R15 Single Core
Intel Core i7-10700f
214
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
(+17000) R15 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-10700F
2291 (+14%)
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
1970
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i7-10700F
1267
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
1572 (+19.4%)
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i7-10700F
8945 (+5.9%)
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
8420
Passmark
Intel Core i7-10700F
16980
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
22194 (+23.
5%)
Specifications
Data is not yet complete, so tables may be missing information or existing features.
Basic
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Processor | |
| ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | ||
| Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 | No data |
Date of release The month and year the processor was released. |
08-2022 | 09-2022 |
| Model Official name. | i7-10700F | |
| Cores The number of physical cores. | 8 | 6 |
| ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 16 | 12 |
| Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). |
SMT (note that some games may not work well with SMT, for maximum FPS, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). |
| Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Turbo FrequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. |
4.8 | No data |
| L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 16 | No data |
| Instructions | 64-bit | |
| Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. |
No | No |
| Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s | |
| Number of QPI links | ||
| TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 65 | No data |
| Cooling system specifications | PCG 2015C |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. |
||
| GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | No data | No data |
| Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. | No data | No data |
| Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. |
RAM
| Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 128 | No data |
| Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4-2933 | |
| RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | |
| RAM bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | |
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. |
No data | No data |
PCI
| PCI-E Computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | 3 | No data |
| PCI | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Number of PCI lanes | 16 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. |
No data | No data |
| Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
| Dimensions | No data | No data |
| Supported sockets | No data | No data |
| Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Core i7-10700F
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7-10700: What is the difference?
58 ballla
72 Ballla
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
56 Ballla
64 Ballla
Intel Core i7-10700 9000 in comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i7-10700
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 5600X better than Intel Core i7-10700?
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-10700
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
0003
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-10700
VS
Intel Core i5-12500
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Core I7-100002 Intel Core I7-10000 INTEL CORE vs
AMD RYZEN 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800x
Intel Core i7-10700
VS
Intel Core I5-10400
AMD Ryzen 5 562 AMD Ryzen 5 562 AMD Ryzen 5 562 AMD Ryzen 5 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Intel Core i7-10700
VS
AMD RYZEN 7 5700G
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5700g
Intel Core I7-10700
VS
Intel Core2 Intel Core2 Intel Core2 Intel Core2 Intel Core AMD RYZEN 5 5600X
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i7-10700
VS
Intel Core i7-11700
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
9000 VS
Intel Core INTEL Core 2600C Core i7-10700
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800x
AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600x
Intel Core i7-10700
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U
AMD Ryzen 5 5600u
AMD Ry
Intel Core i9-10900K
Price Match
Cheaper
User Reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
8 User Reviews
AMD
0002 9.
9 /10
8 reviews of users
Intel Core i7-10700
0 Reviews of users
Intel Core i7-10700
0.0 /10
0 Reviews of Users
Functions Qualities
9.4 /10
7 Votes
Reviews are not yet
Games
9.5 /10
8 Votes
002
performance
9.4 /10
8 Votes
Reviews still not
Reliability
/10
Votes
Reviews yet there are no
9000 9000
/10
7 votes
No reviews yet
Performance
1.cpu speed
6 x 3.7GHz
8 x 2.9GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multi-tasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.6GHz
4.8GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✖Intel Core i7-10700
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and can be easily overclocked for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
5.33MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
3200MHz
2933MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
47.68GB/s
45.8GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4 memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✖Intel Core i7-10700
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✔Intel Core i7-10700
processor cores into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✔Intel Core i7-10700
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✔Intel Core i7-10700
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✔Intel Core i7-10700
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✔Intel Core i7-10700
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
✖Intel Core i7-10700
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through Digital Rights Management (DRM) ).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 5600X)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-10700)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel Core i7-10700F
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel Core i7-10700F processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technology, Virtualization, Security and reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
versus
Intel Core i7-10700F
Advantages
reasons to select AMD Ryzen 5 5600x
| Release date | 5 Nov 2020 vs 30 Apr 2020 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
| Process | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Level 2 cache | 3MB vs 2MB |
| Level 3 cache | 32MB vs 16MB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 3355 vs 2920 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 21975 vs 17027 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-10700F
| Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
| Number of threads | 16 vs 12 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.80 GHz vs 4.6 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 95°C |
| Level 1 cache | 512 KB vs 384 KB |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 10019 vs 8111 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-10700F
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 3355 | 2920 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 21975 | 17027 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 8111 | 10019 |
Performance comparison
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Intel Core i7-10700F | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Zen 3 | Comet Lake |
| Production date | Nov 5, 2020 | 30 Apr 2020 |
| Price at first issue date | $299 | $298 — $310 |
| OPN PIB | 100-100000065BOX | |
| OPN Tray | 100-000000065 | |
| Place in the ranking | 139 | 163 |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | i7-10700F | |
| Series | 10th Generation Intel Core i7 Processors | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Base frequency | 3. 7 GHz |
2.90 GHz |
| Level 1 cache | 384KB | 512KB |
| Level 2 cache | 3MB | 2MB |
| Level 3 cache | 32MB | 16MB |
| Process | 7nm | 14nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.6 GHz | 4.80 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 16 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s | |
| ECC support | ||
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 47. 68 GB/s |
45.8 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 128GB | 128GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Supported sockets | AM4 | FCLGA1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Maximum number of processors in | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C | |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 4. 0 |
3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1×16+x4, 2×8+x4, 1×8+2×4+x4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| AMD StoreMI technology | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 |
|
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs Intel Core i7-10700F — Comparative specifications and benchmarks of processors
VS
Which one to choose?
It’s time to choose the winner.
What is the difference and which is better in AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs Intel Core i7-10700F comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!
Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor
Who will win in the comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Intel Core i7-10700F. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.
3.70 GHz
Clock frequency
2.90 GHZ
6
Nuclei
8
4.40 GHZ
turbo (1 core)
4.80 GHZ
12
Number YES
Acceleration
No.
Turbo (8 Cores)
4.60 GHZ
4.20 GHZ
turbo (6 nuclei)
Normal
Architecture
0x
A Core 9000 A Core 9000 A Core 9000 A0003
0x
B core
Processor family and generation
Internal graphics
It’s hard to compare AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs Intel Core i7-10700F when graphics card function and specs matter only in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.
AMD Radeon 7 Graphics (Renoir)
GPU name
1.90 GHz
GPU frequency
No Turbo
GPU (TURBO)
No Turbo
Generation
12
version DirectX
7
Executive blocks
448
The number of shadeers
-Maximum memory
3
Number of monitors
7 nm
Technology
Q1/2020
Release date
2 GB
Max. GPU Memory
Hardware codec support
Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers.
These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.
Decode / Encode
H364
NO
Decode / Encode
JPEG
H365 8BIT
H365 10BIT
DecoDE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE (0003
NO
Decode / Encode
VP9
NO
Decode
VC-1
NO
Decode / Encode
AVC
9000 / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE / ENCODE
Decode / Encode
h365 / HEVC (10 bit)
RAM and PCIe
These are memory standards supported by processors. The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.
DDR4-3200
Memorial type
DDR4-2933
64 GB
Maximum memory
128 GB
2
2
2
NO
ECC
9000 3.
0 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
version of PCIE
3.0
12
PCIE Lines
16
Crystation
Support for data encryption
YES
AES-Ni
YES
Memory & PCIe
Thermal management and TDP
Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and workloads that, as a result, unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Intel Core i7-10700F, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).
TDP
65 W
95 °C
Maximum temperature
100 °C
—
Maximum TDP
—
—
TDP Download
—
65 W
TDP (PL1)
TDP (PL2)
Technical details
9000
16.
00 MB
L3-CACHE
16.00 MB
7 NM
Technology
14 NM
CEZANNE (Zen 3)
Architecture
Comet
AMD-V, SEV
Virtualization
VT-X, VT, VT, VT, VT -x EPT, VT-d
AM4
SOCKET (connector)
LGA 1200
q1/2021
Date of exit
q2/2020
x86-64 (64 bit)
set of instructions (ISA)
EM64T
3.00 MB
L2-Cache
2.00 MB
—
Part Number
BX8070110700F
Devices compatible with this processor
It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.
Unknown
Used in
Unknown
Popular CPU comparisons
| one. |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs. AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
|
| 2. |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
|
| 3. |
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |
|
four.
|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs. AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
|
| 5. |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs. Intel Core i5-11400 |
|
| 6. |
AMD Ryzen 7 4700S vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |
|
| 7. |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs. AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
|
| eight. |
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |
|
9.
|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |
|
| ten. |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs. Intel Core i5-11600K |
|
eleven.
|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs. Intel Core i7-10700F |
|
| 12. |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |
|
13.
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |
|
| fourteen. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |
|
fifteen.
|
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7 |
Test AMD Ryzen 5 5600G processor on a system with discrete graphics and compare it to other AMD and Intel
hexa-core models
Testing the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Similar AMD and Intel Models Without the
Discrete Graphics Card Recently testing the new AMD Ryzen 5 5600G APU and some other AMD and Intel hexa-core processors, we limited ourselves to using the integrated GPU in all participants. The reason is clear — it is this mode of operation that is the main and most important for APUs: they are purchased first of all when they plan to do without a discrete video card.
But some moments with this approach remain behind the scenes. In particular, we can’t compare performance with «pure» AMD processors on Zen2 and Zen3 — precisely because of their purity . And it needs to be done. In addition, a discrete graphics card may eventually appear in an APU-based system — if, for example, the power of the integrated video core is insufficient. This is especially true at a time like now — when the prices of video cards are pushing for the use of integrated graphics, at least as a temporary solution: just trample on until normalization. Moreover, solutions based on Zen3 have their own specifics. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is a great processor — but its MSRP is $299: it has not decreased since the release (especially since the first months, due to the shortage, real prices were much higher). And until recently, this was the cheapest offer on the new AMD microarchitecture. And the Ryzen 5 5600G received a recommended price of $ 259 — much cheaper. Yes, of course, in this case we lose support for PCIe 4.
0, and performance will have to “move” — but it’s just important to understand: by how much. Moreover, we repeat, the situation on the video card market generally pushes the buyer towards this decision when assembling a new system from scratch. When upgrading, some video card may already be available — and, quite possibly, much more powerful than the built-in one, but this difference in recommended prices still remains. It is the 5600G that is the cheapest six-core Zen3, and the cheapest Zen3, in principle, risks becoming the Ryzen 3 5300G for a long time. Yes — four cores are no longer fashionable, but often quite enough. Moreover, in the case of a modern architecture — that in «pure» AMD processors it starts exclusively with six cores, which by definition is more expensive.
However, we don’t have a 5300G yet — and four cores are really not fashionable . There are different six-core models, so it’s time to test such models again. Only already a little differently than in the previous article — for better coverage of issues that were previously left behind the scenes.
Test participants
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | |
|---|---|---|
| Core name | Cezanne | Vermeer |
| Production technology | 7 nm | 7/12 nm |
| Core frequency, GHz | 3.9/4.4 | 3.7/4.6 |
| Number of cores/threads | 6/12 | 6/12 |
| L1 cache (total), I/D, KB | 192/192 | 192/192 |
| L2 cache, KB | 6×512 | 6×512 |
| L3 cache, MiB | 16 | 32 |
| RAM | 2×DDR4-3200 | 2×DDR4-3200 |
| TDP, W | 65 | 65 |
| Number of PCIe lanes | 20 (3.0) | 20 (4.0) |
| Integrated GPU | Radeon | no |
The main pair of participants is like this, because when using a discrete graphics card, there is a choice between these models.
In both cases, six Zen3 cores — but other parameters differ. First of all, the different capacity of the third level cache is striking — and different versions of PCIe: this is the fee for the built-in GPU. But you can use it right away, and buy a video card later — if when prices become more interesting.
| AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core name | Pinnacle Ridge | Matisse | Renoir |
| Production technology | 12 nm | 7/12 nm | 7 nm |
| Core frequency, GHz | 3.4/3.9 | 3.6/4.2 | 3.7/4.2 |
| Number of cores/threads | 6/12 | 6/12 | 6/12 |
| L1 cache (total), I/D, KB | 384/192 | 192/192 | 192/192 |
| L2 cache, KB | 6×512 | 6×512 | 6×512 |
| L3 cache, MiB | 16 | 32 | 8 |
| RAM | 2×DDR4-2933 | 2×DDR4-3200 | 2×DDR4-3200 |
| TDP, W | 65 | 65 | 65 |
| Number of PCIe lanes | 20 (3. 0) |
20 (4.0) | 20 (3.0) |
| Integrated GPU | no | no | Radeon |
But, since we are talking about prices, we need to see what else six-core is inexpensively offered on the market. First of all, previous AMD models are of interest — for example, the same Ryzen 5 4650G can be purchased cheaper, but it can also do without a discrete for some time. The Ryzen 5 3600 is even cheaper (we decided to use it over the 3600X because the performance is very close, but the prices are not; and today we are more interested in them) is one of the rightfully popular models. However, the old 2600 is still interesting to many for the same reason. Even as a new purchase — after all, there are also six cores, but it costs some pennies. And on a budget motherboard, none of the built-in capabilities are lost — unlike new models, where the built-in USB3 Gen2 and PCIe 4.0, together with many popular chipsets, will still turn into USB3 Gen1 and PCIe 3.
0. But is it worth saving so much? The question is open. And isn’t it time to think about upgrading for many owners of such processors — too. Especially if the motherboard supports the installation of Zen3, or at least Zen2 — after all, the Ryzen 5 2600 is still a liquid processor. However, you can sell it together with the board — especially if it’s something four years ago: its capabilities may no longer be enough (for example, even the top models on the X370 of the first wave support the installation of only one fast SSD without tricks and are officially incompatible with Zen3). In a word, such a base today will not hurt.
| Intel Core i5-9400F | Intel Core i5-10400 | Intel Core i5-11400F | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core name | Coffee Lake | Comet Lake | Rocket Lake |
| Production technology | 14 nm | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Core frequency, GHz | 2. 9/4.1 |
2.9/4.3 | 2.6/4.4 |
| Number of cores/threads | 6/6 | 6/12 | 6/12 |
| L1 cache (total), I/D, KB | 192/192 | 192/192 | 192/288 |
| L2 cache, KB | 6×256 | 6×256 | 6×512 |
| L3 cache, MiB | 9 | 12 | 12 |
| RAM | 2×DDR4-2666 | 2×DDR4-2666 | 2×DDR4-3200 |
| TDP, W | 65 | 65 | 65 |
| Number of PCIe lanes | 16 (3.0) | 16 (3.0) | 20 (4.0) |
| Integrated GPU | no | UHD Graphics 630 | no |
Same as Intel. Here we decided to take two younger Core i5s of the tenth and eleventh generations — adding to them a similar model of the ninth. Users of these may also already be thinking about upgrading.
Which in their case is possible in two directions — either replacing the processor, if you can find a Core i7 or i9 inexpensivelyunder LGA1151 (but this is poorly formalized, since it fundamentally depends on how inexpensive is ), or a transition to a new AMD or Intel platform with a new processor. Moreover, when choosing a motherboard based on AMD B550 or Intel B560, it is much easier to convince yourself of the need for upgrading than with just replacing the processor. Only its performance will not be limited — there will be new interfaces. Which, perhaps, in practice are not so necessary — but as an additional argument for modernization they will fit.
Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-9400F, recall, 2018 processors. If we rewind a year ago, there we will get (to a first approximation) the same thing — Ryzen 5 1600/1600X and Core i5 8000 series. Three or four years is quite a long time for the itch of the upgrade to appear. Five is even more sufficient, only in 2016 we will find at best quad-core Skylake.
And it seems to us that everyone has either already changed them — or they have finally become convinced that this is not yet required. But for those in the second group, today’s testing may also be useful. Simply because the maximum for the first version of LGA1151 is the level of Ryzen 3 3100 and Core i3-10100. And, if a year ago it was decided that replacing the old quad-core with is almost the same as , a six-core architecture is not needed, then this year’s proposals may change the mind somewhat. Or they may not change — postponing the upgrade for another year.
Other environments are traditional for the main line of tests — a discrete video card based on Radeon RX Vega 56, 16 GB of DDR4 memory (in all cases, the maximum official frequency for each processor), a mid-range SATA SSD.
Test Method
Methodology for testing computer systems of the sample of 2020
The testing methodology is described in detail in a separate article, and the results of all tests are available in a separate table in Microsoft Excel format.
Directly in the articles, we use the processed results: normalized with respect to the reference system (Intel Core i5-9600K with 16 GB of memory, AMD Radeon Vega 56 video card and SATA SSD) and grouped by computer application areas. Accordingly, all diagrams related to applications have dimensionless scores — so more is always better. And starting from this year, we are finally transferring game tests to an optional status (the reasons for which are discussed in detail in the description of the test methodology), so that only specialized materials will be available for them.
iXBT Application Benchmark 2020
Until 2019, Ryzen needed a head start in the number of cores, or at least computation threads — without which direct competition with Core did not work. We got access to a new process technology and modernized the microarchitecture — and the roles immediately changed. In fact, the Ryzen 5 3600 set the bar so high that at first it competed even with the Core i7 — not to mention the younger Core i5.
Rocket Lake got every chance to get even with at least Zen2 — but the old technical process played against mass models: the typical for Core “non-K” TDP 65 W significantly limits the performance of these processors. AMD does not have such problems — so competition with Zen3 is definitely impossible for now. And even the cheapest (of the most modern six-core) Ryzen 5 5600G is already fast — which, as we have already seen, can compete with the Core i5-11600K without much effort. But with the Ryzen 5 5600X, it still can’t. Again, the miracle did not work out: just as Renoir lagged behind Matisse, so Cezanne is not quite a competitor to Vermeer. But it costs (officially) cheaper, can do without a discrete video card, and overtakes all the others (except for the half-brother in microarchitecture) without any problems. And one more interesting point — if in three years in the younger Core i5 performance has grown by 30%, then for Ryzen 5 this is almost one and a half times. But nothing surprising — one could actually expect more.
After all, all that Intel managed to do was to change the microarchitecture once and stop blocking Hyper-Threading support (which turned out to be even more effective). AMD changed the microarchitecture twice — and one process technology. As you stomp, so you pop.
The nature of the load is similar — the preferences of the programs are slightly different. In particular, there is less «cache-loving», so APUs do not suffer from L3 limitations. The 4650G turned out to be no worse than the 3600X, and, accordingly, faster than the 3600. The 5600G turned out to be incapable of such a feat, although it still turned out to be the second among all the participants. But the 11400F in this case, the limitations of the heat pack also interfere — but the redesigned FPU allows you to reach at least the level of Zen2. And the increase in productivity over three years is already closer to 40%. But AMD still has about one and a half.
But not all applications scale «per processor» as well as the two groups above.
However, the general trends are still visible to the naked eye. First, AMD has done more work over the past three to four years — and achieved better results. Secondly, Intel is hindered most of all by one thing — the technical process that has remained unchanged since 2014. Then — revolutionary and the best on the market. Three years later, still the best on the market. In general, it turned out to be so unique that it is still not outdated to a large extent — but has already ceased to be the best, and at times has begun to frankly interfere. The new 10 nm has finally been brought to mind — but in the desktop segment they are not yet used with all the consequences.
The first Ryzen in these programs had a hard time — the tactic of «throwing cores» does not work here. We changed the microarchitecture — and everything worked out right away. At first sight. On the second, the technical process also helped here, which allowed unprecedented amounts of cache memory to be stuffed into “clean” processors.
Where there was no place for them, everything is much worse, and the increase in L3 in Cezanne is still not enough. Although in practice everything is not so scary — it is already not far behind the 3000th family, and can compete with Rocket Lake. However, the latter can demonstrate a comparable level of performance at lower prices, but the latter is perhaps the main problem with Zen3 in all variants. Which is much less than we would like.
One gets the feeling that the increase in L3 was purely a forced measure — without this, replacing the cores with more productive ones might not be very effective. As a result, just as Renoir lacked it, Cezanne is also lacking to the same extent (already more). But in practice, again, the measures taken are already enough to overtake «clean» processors. And with Intel, it’s a tragedy in general — improvements in the microarchitecture in a limited thermal package did not give any effect at all. Actually, there is nothing surprising in the fact that such an upgrade at Intel was delayed until the last moment — and they did not even try to use it in more mass-produced (and even more limited in consumption) laptop processors, no.
Here’s a simple «turn on» HT and a small proportional increase in L3 at the time, the performance of the Core i5 increased one and a half times. But the need for this was ripe even before the advent of Zen2 — more threads in Ryzen put the Core in a very uncomfortable position initially.
But they still feel dry and comfortable in archivers — and the worst thing in this group is the APU. In the new generation, however, they managed to win back part of the gap from models without graphics — the increase in L3 helped. But still: Ryzen CPUs are the best, Ryzen APUs are the worst. And Zen2 is inside or Zen3 is not important. The case when the environment is more important than the cores themselves.
A more familiar picture. Just complementing other scenarios. So let’s go straight to the results — it is already very difficult to make a mistake with them, even if you do not look at specific numbers.
Let’s start with AMD. And, according to tradition, from the bad — it’s easy to see that the performance of the APU in general-purpose applications is lower than that of the «clean» Ryzen CPUs on the same number of similar cores.
The size of the backlog at the last stage did not change, despite the doubling of the capacity of L3 — since the new cores could use even more than L3. Add to this the «old» PCIe — and we understand that with the similarity of names and unification (finally!) of model numbers, these are significantly different devices. The strength of the APU is a good (by the standards of this segment) integrated graphics. But if it is not supposed to be used, then for equal money a “clean” processor is better. And now they are rather equal in retail — despite the official price list, since the opportunity to at least temporarily do without a discrete video card in our time is worth a lot in the literal sense. Therefore, in such a situation, updating the APU lineup cannot but be welcomed — we get the same + 20% performance with a generation change. Yes — from a lower base. But the ability to buy a processor with graphics faster than a «processor without graphics» in itself may be important to someone.
Moreover, AMD is ready to sell such (unlike its predecessors) in large quantities. Yes, and with logical pricing — slower, but also cheaper (and it’s a pity that the invisible hand of the market corrects this).
Intel does not have a problem of choosing between smart and beautiful — but there is a serious technological one. The notorious outdated technical process — which hits the younger processor models especially hard: the traditional 65 W in this segment is simply not enough this time. You can, of course, “unclench” (or completely cancel) manually — but the effect may also be unusual for buyers of younger Core i5s: since you have to take care of the cooler, and choose a board with a powerful power system to get the maximum effect. For buyers of the top series, this is not a novelty — but here the situation is different. But cheap six-core Rocket Lake generally exist in nature (especially cheap ones, if you focus on discrete) — but Zen3 still does not. On the other hand, the role of «cheap, but not so fast» is still well played by Zen2 — so the exchange is almost equivalent.
If you do not affect other characteristics …
Energy consumption and energy efficiency
…because there are no economical Rocket Lakes either. At first glance, the Core i5-11400F seems to be so, but only because it was driven with an iron hand into the framework in which its predecessors were simply spacious. Driven — along the way, forcing the processor to work slower than it could. And all the same, extra 20-30 watts ran up. And if you try to remove the restrictions, then this baby flies under the same 200 watts as the older models of the line. AMD does not have such «features». And in general — Zen3 with the same technical process has become (in all forms) more economical than Zen2. And monolithic APUs consume less power than pure processors.
And Intel’s former leadership in energy efficiency is gone. Although, in fairness, the company’s junior processors look better in this regard — they do not have to try to overtake direct (or even a priori stronger) competitors at any cost, and the TDP limit itself is useful for this purpose.
But modern AMD processors are capable of more. Moreover, when switching to Zen3, energy efficiency increased — but Rocket Lake only reduces it. This microarchitecture is too «complex» for 14 nm — that’s why it was put off until the last minute in this form.
Games
As already mentioned in the description of the methodology, it makes no sense to keep the «classic approach» to testing gaming performance — since video cards have long been determining not only it, but also significantly affect the cost of the system, you need to «dance» exclusively from them. And from the games themselves — too: in modern conditions, fixing a game set for a long time does not make sense, since literally everything can change with the next update. But we will carry out a brief test in (albeit) relatively synthetic conditions — using a couple of games in the «processor-dependent» mode.
AMD vs. Intel: big testing of processors in games
However, this is quite indicative. Firstly, once again we admire the fairness of the claims against the first Ryzen by gamers.
Secondly, once again we see the loss of APU to «clean» processors. But there are nuances — in the previous generation it was larger, which is why we did not even try to include Renoir in a large game test. It is clear that all the same, everything will be determined first of all by the video card, but if you are guided by its mandatory presence, there is nothing to buy an APU for. If only itself will come out — but it’s hard to plan something in advance. These processors are faster than the «old» Ryzen, but the latter are still popular due to the fact that they cost a penny (relatively). But they still couldn’t keep up with the “old” Core APUs of 2020.
But the increase in L3 to 16 MB seems to be enough in some cases : in the 5000th line, the difference has been greatly reduced. Even more important is that the same 5600G can already outperform any older processors from AMD itself — and it looks advantageous against the background of Intel. It is clear that it is dangerous to make a final conclusion on just two games — but here, at least, there is something to study additionally.
And considering the APU as a temporary solution has become easier — there will be no fear of losing too much in the future.
On the other hand, the 5600G is still expensive. The younger models of Intel processors are slower than due to low clock frequencies (which is further aggravated by power consumption limits), but they are inexpensive. At the same time, it is clear that in quality settings closer to reality, the same 10400 (or better than 11400) will still be able to work in a gaming PC for the entire video card. And if so, why pay more?
Total
We have already written and will repeat once again that the main problems of the Ryzen 5000 family are not at all in the technical part. Everything is just fine with it: in all its manifestations, these processors are not the best on the market at the moment in terms of the totality of characteristics. The problem is that there are few of them — and they are all (relatively) expensive. From this point of view, one cannot help but welcome the appearance of new APUs, this is an expansion of the range, moreover, with cheaper models.
But the situation on the video card market played a bad joke on them: in fact, they are usually sold for more than the recommended prices. In fact, the retail price of the Ryzen 5 5600G is now the same as the Ryzen 5 5600X, which makes it an excellent choice in cases where the integrated GPU is planned to be used — but a bad choice when a discrete graphics card is already there (even if the old one is a new one and then you can buy it) . And cheaper there are only old Ryzen models — or Intel processors. Here the situation is reversed: technically, Core has been losing the last couple of years, but this can be compensated for by the price. It is clear that performance will also be lower, but it is not always fundamental, especially since the most demanding users have long been guided by 8+ cores, leaving 4-6 to the mass buyer, and the latter pays much less attention to numbers in benchmarks.
In general, prices are the weapon of the laggard. The last time Intel resorted to it was in the middle of the 2000s, in a similar position.
The older Pentiums were sold at the price of an Athlon of similar positioning (but higher performance), but, for example, only Intel had budget dual-core chips in its assortment. The release of the Core 2 Duo changed roles radically — and for a long time. But as soon as AMD began to produce good products again, the company immediately stopped playing as the defender of all the orphans and the poor . Especially since, generally speaking, such a role is difficult for a technology leader — retail always strives to correct a too “tasty” recommended price. Therefore, the state of affairs becomes so unstable: if Ryzen 9 unconditionally rules the ball in the segment of top desktop processors (and Ryzen Threadripper still has no one to compete with even on “old” cores), then you will have to choose a floor or two below. Paying attention not only to speed, but also to the functionality and cost of the platform (as well as its components). But in any case, Cezanne today is a very good offer.