GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Folding@Home PPD Averages, Power Consumption & Research Projects
- GPU PPD
- Brands
- Nvidia
- GPU Folding@Home Profile
GPU FOLDING OVERVIEW
Folding@Home PPD for the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti represents the averages of folding work unit
samples collected from a wide variety of users different computer hardware configurations.
Average values are used to
best represent folding PPD performance of a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti across different F@H projects and user
variables such as power settings, overclocks, operating system and specific work units which can yield
wildly different highs and lows for PPD scores on the same GPU platform.
GPU PPD AVERAGE: ALL OS
2,167,565
Average of 500 most recent PPD samples
Data Samples: ALL OS
165,464
All Time
Stats as of Tuesday, 27 June 2023 18:02:16
TRY OUR BETTER F@H WEB CLIENT
Get more details on your GPU and CPU PPD in real-time, save money with folding time of use scheduling. Available for chrome, edge, brave and other chromium browsers.
GET IT FOR FREE NOW
Folding STATISTICS GP102 [GeForce GTX 1080 Ti] 11380 — Nvidia
|
DATA SAMPLES INFO Filter applied, PPD samples all time |
AVERAGE FOLDING PERFORMANCE Based on ALL available PPD samples by filter |
WORK UNIT PPD RECORDS All Time |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS FILTER | SAMPLES | PPD | WU Per 24hrs | Time Per WU | Points Per WU | BEST PPD | WORST PPD |
| All OS AVG | 165412 | 2,218,181 | 7.94 | 3 hrs 1 mins | 279,462 | 8,544,828 | 12,474 |
| Linux | 70490 | 2,444,129 | 8.20 | 3 hrs 56 mins | 297,904 | 8,544,828 | 26,864 |
| Windows | 94417 | 2,054,223 | 7. 72 |
3 hrs 7 mins | 266,229 | 5,774,682 | 12,474 |
12 WEEK AVG PPD CHANGE VS. WORK UNITS AVAILABLE — GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GPU PPD average changes week to week for a number of reasons such as credit for type of projects/causes available, varience in work unit difficulty, OS/GPU drivers, folding cores, GPU models, clocks, power targets etc.
The chart below serves as a way to see historical week to week performance change as PPD for a GPU is never a constant, as the work units processed are always changing.
Recent Work Unit Research Type Allocations — GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Average PPD is impacted by the types of research work units being done as they return different amounts of points and take different amounts of time.
The following shows the work unit allocation of research causes to better understand changes in PPD over time for the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.
24 HOUR WU ALLOCATION
POLYMERASE — 40.
3%
ALZHEIMERS — 29.85%
INFLUENZA — 20.9%
CANCER — 5.97%
UNSPECIFIED — 2.99%
7 DAY WU ALLOCATION
INFLUENZA — 32.92%
POLYMERASE — 27.48%
ALZHEIMERS — 23.51%
UNSPECIFIED — 8.42%
CANCER — 6.93%
DIABETES — 0.74%
12 WEEK WU ALLOCATION
CANCER — 47.23%
LIQUID-PHASE-SEPARATION — 34.13%
INFLUENZA — 4.99%
POLYMERASE — 4.37%
BIOFILM — 3.02%
ALZHEIMERS — 2.24%
UNSPECIFIED — 1.81%
PARKINSONS — 1.04%
CANNABINOID — 0.52%
MEMBRANE TRANSPORT — 0.3%
DIABETES — 0.27%
MALARIA — 0.08%
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti kWh POWER CONSUMPTION & COST
Power consumption information for the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is based on an average wattage taken from
vendor information for the lowest and highest power draws for the GPU under folding@home compute loads.
Wattage information is only for the GPU and does not include the host computers power usage.
|
GPU Power Draw Watts — TDP |
Daily Power Usage kWh |
Points per kWh |
Daily Cost at $0. 10 per kWh |
Power Cost per 1m Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 250 W | 6.00 kWh | 361,261 | $0.60 | $0.277 |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti COMPUTE
VS kWH USAGE
DAY, MONTH, WEEK & YEAR
Folding@Home compute projections for the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti can be used to help inform long term point goals and related costs based on 24/7 usage.
| Duration | Nick Name |
Points Average |
Work Units Average |
Power Usage kWh |
Power Cost at $0.10 per kWh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day | PPD | 2,167,565 | 10.83 | 6.00 kWh | $0.60 |
| Week | PPW | 15,172,955 | 75.80 | 42.00 kWh | $4.20 |
| Month | PPM | 65,930,102 | 329.36 | 182.50 kWh | $18.25 |
| Year | PPY | 791,161,225 | 3952. 31 |
2190.00 kWh | $219.00 |
5 BEST PPD RESEARCH PROJECTS — GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
The following data is the average PPD values for GeForce GTX 1080 Ti project work units based on multiple samples collected via the use of our Folding@Home dark mode web client.
| PPD Rank |
Project ID |
Cause Research |
PPD Average |
Points WU Average |
WUs Day Average |
WU Time Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13448 | covid-19 | 3,314,907 | 243,362 | 13.62 | 2 hrs 46 mins |
| 2 | 14939 | parkinsons | 3,155,993 | 187,266 | 16.85 | 1 hrs 25 mins |
| 3 | 13454 | covid-19 | 3,114,212 | 238,160 | 13.08 | 2 hrs 50 mins |
| 4 | 13460 | covid-19 | 2,990,285 | 235,697 | 12. 69 |
2 hrs 54 mins |
| 5 | 13458 | covid-19 | 2,983,933 | 235,494 | 12.67 | 2 hrs 54 mins |
5 LOWEST PPD RESEARCH PROJECTS — GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
The following data is the average PPD values for GeForce GTX 1080 Ti project work units based on multiple samples collected via the use of our Folding@Home dark mode web client.
| PPD Rank |
Project ID |
Cause Research |
PPD Average |
Points WU Average |
WUs Day Average |
WU Time Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16920 | cancer | 947,042 | 41,673 | 22.73 | 1 hrs 3 mins |
| 2 | 14945 | diabetes | 1,141,412 | 74,006 | 15.42 | 2 hrs 33 mins |
| 3 | 18711 | cancer | 1,219,507 | 231,193 | 5. 27 |
5 hrs 33 mins |
| 4 | 16921 | cancer | 1,327,821 | 46,549 | 28.53 | 0 hrs 50 mins |
| 5 | 14948 | cancer | 1,359,026 | 76,674 | 17.72 | 1 hrs 21 mins |
GeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- GeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
-
GeForce RTX 3060
100%
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
103%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 40 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti . |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR) |
| Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS) |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
These graphics cards seems to have comparable performance based on the game benchmark suite used (47 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Name | GA106 (GA106-300-A1) | vs | GP102 (GP102-350-K1-A1) | |
| Fab Process | 8 nm | vs | 16 nm | |
| Die Size | 300 mm² | vs | 471 mm² | |
| Transistors | 13,250 million | vs | 12,000 million | |
| Shaders | 3840 | vs | 3584 | |
| Compute Units | 30 | vs | 28 | |
| Core clock | 1627 MHz | vs | 1480 MHz | |
| ROPs | 64 | vs | 88 | |
| TMUs | 120 | vs | 224 |
Memory Configuration
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | vs | GDDR5X | |
| Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 352 bit | |
| Memory Speed | 1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective |
vs | 1376 MHz 11008 MHz effective |
|
| Memory Size | 12288 Mb | vs | 11264 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180 watts | vs | 220 watts | |
| Release Date | UNRELEASED | vs | UNRELEASED |
-
GeForce RTX 3060
118.
50 GP/s -
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
130.20 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
GeForce RTX 3060
222.20 GT/s
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
332.00 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
GeForce RTX 3060
336.00 GB/s
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
484.00 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
GeForce RTX 3060
14220.00 GFLOPs
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
10609.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11
-
GeForce RTX 3060
68
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
66
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
128
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
123
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
142
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
160
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
131
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
163
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
-
GeForce RTX 3060
62
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
55
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11
-
GeForce RTX 3060
101
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
89
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
108
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
116
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11
-
GeForce RTX 3060
158
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
148
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
70
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
71
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
46
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
46
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
71
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
64
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
152
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
148
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
123
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
115
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
153
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
168
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce RTX 3060
128
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
140
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
64
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
69
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11
-
GeForce RTX 3060
54
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
53
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
97
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
98
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
107
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
120
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
101
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
121
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
-
GeForce RTX 3060
39
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
36
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11
-
GeForce RTX 3060
69
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
66
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
85
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
104
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11
-
GeForce RTX 3060
105
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
101
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
55
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
57
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
37
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
37
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
56
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
50
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
100
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
104
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
82
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
78
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
114
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
121
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce RTX 3060
90
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
108
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
48
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
51
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11
-
GeForce RTX 3060
34
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
33
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
57
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
60
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
61
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
70
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
61
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
72
FPS (higher is better)
Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12
-
GeForce RTX 3060
19
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
18
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11
-
GeForce RTX 3060
39
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
42
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
48
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
58
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11
-
GeForce RTX 3060
56
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
55
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
34
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
36
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
20
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
22
FPS (higher is better)
UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
35
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
31
FPS (higher is better)
Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
50
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
52
FPS (higher is better)
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
44
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
42
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
66
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
71
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64
-
GeForce RTX 3060
28
-
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
29
FPS (higher is better)
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
| VS | ||
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
| VS | ||
| GeForce RTX 2080 Super | TITAN V |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Measuring the power consumption of Nvidia graphics cards — GIGABYTE Aorus GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
This article was written by a website visitor and has been rewarded.
This article will measure the power consumption of a GIGABYTE Aorus GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (GV-N108TAORUS-11GD) graphics card, powered by a separate Corsair HX1000i power supply that supports Corsair Link Digital to monitor power settings.
You can see a more visual connection of a video card to a separate power supply in the previous article The whole truth about the power consumption of AMD video cards. ASUS Radeon RX 470 DirectCU II.
recommendations
Previous graphics card power consumption measurements:
The whole truth about AMD graphics card power consumption. ASUS Radeon RX 470 DirectCU II
We measure the power consumption of AMD video cards. PowerColor Radeon AXRX VEGA 56 8GBHBM2-3DH reference
We measure the power consumption of AMD video cards.
PowerColor Radeon VII AXVII 16GBHBM2-3DH
Measuring the power consumption of AMD graphics cards — PowerColor Radeon™ RX 480 8GB GDDR5
Measuring the power consumption of Nvidia graphics cards — Inno3D GeForce GTX 1080 Twin X2
Contents:
- 3Dmark Time Spy Extreme
- FurMark
- Company of Heroes 2
- Total
3Dmark Time Spy Extreme
GPU Temperature and Cooling Speed
2.87 W, average — 243.26 W , and for Videocard +12V Power the maximum is -277.8 W, the average is 248.21 W. In the second test segment of 3DMark Time Spy Extreme, the following results were obtained: GPU Power maximum — 284.93 W, average — 238.75 W, and for Videocard +12V Power maximum — 292.9 W, average — 244.27 W.
GPU Temperature and Cooling Speed
The following results were obtained with the increase in the power consumption limit: 1st test section GPU Power maximum 308.
97 W, average — 281.69 W, Videocard +12V Power maximum — 316.64 W, average — 288.93 W; 2nd test section GPU Power max 393.24W, avg 301.9W, Videocard +12V Power maximum — 403.05 W, average — 304.68 W.
FurMark
GPU Temp & Cooler RPM
GPU Temp & Cooler RPM
900 05
In Furmark AAx8, the data is almost the same: the maximum value of GPU Power is 258.04 W, average — 248.8 W, Videocard +12V Power maximum — 268.39 W, average — 256.61 W. With a 50% increase in the limit, the following power consumption values were obtained: maximum GPU Power 284.8 W, average — 274.6 W, Videocard + 12V Power maximum — 292.52 W, average — 282.61 W.
GPU temperature and cooling speed
GPU temperature and cooling speed
GPU temperature and cooling speed
In Company of Heroes 2 1920×1080 graphics card power consumption was: maximum GPU Power 266.11 W, average — 220.1 W, Videocard +12V Power maximum — 286.
11 W, average — 228.02 W. With a 50% increase in the limit, the following power consumption values were obtained: maximum GPU Power 368.76 W, average — 357.87 W, Videocard + 12V Power maximum — 382.49W, average — 367.77 W.
GPU temperature and cooling speed
GPU temperature and cooling speed
In Company of Heroes 2 3840×2160 graphics card power consumption was: maximum GPU Power 282.4 W, average — 220.2 W, Videocard + 12V Power maximum — 325.27 W, average — 242.30 W. With a 50% increase in the limit, the following power consumption values were obtained: the maximum value of GPU Power is 373.24 W, the average is 329.16 W, Videocard +12V Power maximum — 3397.03 W, average — 340.93 W.
Total
As a result, we see that the Nvidia driver measures the total power consumption of the video card, unlike AMD.
A power consumption review of an almost similar video card, you can read the Aorus GTX 1080 Ti Xtreme Edition 11G Review tomshardware review at the link.
This material was written by a site visitor and has been rewarded.
DS-N316/2(C) | Products | Hi Watch
Video and audio
| IP video input | 16 channels Resolution up to 8 MP |
| Inlet capacity | 160 Mbps |
| Output capacity | 80 Mbps |
| HDMI output | 1ch, 4K(4096×2160)/30Hz, 4K(3840×2160)/30Hz, 2K(2560×1440)/60Hz, 1920×1080/60Hz, 1600×1200/60Hz, 1280x 1024/60Hz, 1280×720/60Hz |
| VGA output | 1ch, 1920 x 1080/60 60Hz, 1280 x 1024/60Hz, 1280 x 720/60Hz |
| Video output | Simultaneous HDMI/VGA output |
| CVBS outlet | — |
| Audio output | 1 channel, RCA (linear, 1 kΩ) |
| Two-way audio | 1ch, RCA (2. 0 V p-p, 1 kΩ, when using audio input) |
Decoding
| Decoding format | H.265+/H.265/H.264+/H.264 |
| Recording resolution | 8MP/6MP/5MP/4MP/3MP/1080p/UXGA/720p/VGA/4CIF/DCIF/2CIF/CIF/QCIF |
| Synchronous playback | 16 channels |
| Playability | 1ch @ 8MP (30fps) / 5ch @ 1080p (30fps) |
| Flow type | Video, video and audio |
| Audio compression | G. 711ulaw/G.711alaw/G.722/G.726 |
Network
| Remote connection | 64 |
| Network protocols | TCP/IP, DHCP, IPv4, IPv6, DNS, DDNS, NTP, RTSP, SADP, SMTP, NFS, iSCSI, ISUP, UPnP™, HTTP, HTTPS |
| Network interface | 1 RJ45 auto 10/100/1000 M Ethernet |
Auxiliary interfaces
| SATA | 2 SATA |
| Tank | Up to 8 TB per drive |
| USB | Front panel: 1 × USB 2. 0; rear panel: 1 × USB 2.0 |
| Alarm input/output | 4/1 |
Basic
| Power supply | DC 12 V, 2.1 A |
| Power consumption (without HDD) | ≤ 15 W |
| Operating temperature | -10 to +55 °C |
| Operating humidity | 10 to 90% |
| Dimensions | 385 × 315 × 52 mm (15.
|