Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/phenom-ii-x6-1100t-be-vs-fx-6300%23general-info
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
3060
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Core i5
12400F
vs
Core i5
13400F
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/phenom-ii-x6-1100t-be-vs-fx-6300%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
Radeon RX
580
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1650
GeForce RTX
3060
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Core i5
12400F
vs
Core i5
13400F
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T or AMD FX-6300
- Main page
- >
- Processors
- >
- Comparison
- >
9 0003 AMD Phenom II X6 1100T vs AMD FX-6300
Family
- Phenom II X6 1045T
Compare - Phenom II X6 1055T
Compare - Phenom II X6 1075T
Compare - Phenom II X6 1090T
Compare 9 0004
Family
- FX-6100
Compare - FX-6120 Six-core
Compare - FX-6200 Six-Core Equal
Game Speed
Phenom II X6 1100T
47.6 (+7%)
FX-6300
44.4
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Phenom II X6 1100T
49.6 (+4%)
FX-6300
47.9
Performance in everyday work such as browsing and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Phenom II X6 1100T
27.6 (+10%)
FX-6300
25.1
loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Price
The data is obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
Phenom II X6 1100T 37.6 FX-6300 37.6 |
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Phenom II X6 1100T 20.6 (+19%) FX-6300 17.3 |
Extreme |
|
Phenom II X6 1100T 5.3 (+26%) FX-6300 4.2 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths.
A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests of users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R20 Single Core
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
209 (+7%)
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
1093 (+28% )
AMD FX-6300
854
Geekbench 3 Multi Core
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
9502 (+17%)
AMD FX-6 300
8142
Cinebench R11.5
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
1.12 (+5%)
AMD FX-6300
1.07
Cinebench R11.5
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
5.
81 (+18%)
AMD FX-63 00
4.92
Features
Main
| Socket Installable on motherboards with a suitable socket. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. | AM3 | AM3+ |
| Manufacturer Firm | AMD | AMD |
Performance
| Cores The total number of physical cores. | 6 | 6 |
| ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 6 | 6 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. |
Missing | Missing |
| Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in case of corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Cache and RAM
Video core
PCI
Details
Which is better
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
- On average, gaming performance is 7% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 19%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 26%.
AMD FX-6300
- The base frequency is 0.
2 GHz higher.
How are they similar
- The number of physical cores is the same.
- The number of threads is equal.
Your comment can be here
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-6300 and AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
AMD FX-6300
versus
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD FX-6300
- Newer processor, release date difference 1 year(s) 9 month(s) )
- Approximately 15% more clock speed frequency: 3.
8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz - Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
- L2 cache is 2x larger, meaning more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L3 cache is about 33% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Approximately 32% less power consumption : 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Approximately 10% improvement in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 4193 vs 3809
- Approximately 4% improvement in Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance: 527 vs 509
- Benchmark performance e CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 47% more: 6.905 vs 4.711
| Release date | October 2012 vs December 2010 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz |
| Process | 32nm SOI vs 45nm |
| Level 2 cache | 6 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 4193 vs 3809 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 527 vs 509 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
6.905 vs 4.711 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.195 vs 16.192 |
Reasons to choose AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
- Unlocked CPU, unlocked multiplier allows easy overclocking
- 2.7 times larger L1 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in about 1% more in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1500 vs 1488
- Performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core about 17% more: 2230 vs 1914
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 9% better: 5.182 vs 4.767
| Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
| Level 1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 288 KB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1500 vs 1488 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2230 vs 1914 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
5.182 vs 4.767 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD FX-6300
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
| Name | AMD FX-6300 | AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 1488 | 1500 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 4193 | 3809 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 527 | 509 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1914 | 2230 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 2087 | 0 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
6.905 | 4.711 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.195 | 16.192 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.339 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.85 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.767 | 5.182 |
Feature comparison
| AMD FX-6300 | AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Vishera | Thuban |
| Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
| Production date | October 2012 | December 2010 |
| OPN PIB | FD6300WMHKBOX | |
| OPN Tray | FD6300WMW6KHK | |
| Ranking | 2382 | 2472 |
| Price now | $58. 99 |
|
| Series | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors | |
| Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 31.81 | |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | |
| Crystal area | 315 mm | 346 mm |
| Level 1 cache | 288KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 6MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 8MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
| Technological process | 32nm SOI | 45nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 70. 50°C |
|
| Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 6 | |
| Voltage P0 Vcore | Min: 1.15 V — Max: 1.3875 V | |
| Number of transistors | 1200 million | 904 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Supported sockets | AM3+ | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
| PCI Express revision | 3.
|