How Does Intel’s 12600K Compare With Their 12600KF?
Compare Intel’s Core i5-12600K with their Core i5-12600KF. Which CPU is better for gaming, general apps, and professional tools?
Core i5 12600K
Intel Core i5-12600K
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Core i5 12600KF
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
This article compares Intel’s Core i5-12600K with their Core i5-12600KF, exploring which CPU is better for:
- Gaming — the latest graphics-intense games
- General Apps — web browsing, streaming, and office applications
- Professional Tools — 2D and 3D graphics tools, video editors, compilers, and engineering tools
Gaming on the Core i5-12600K vs. Core i5-12600KF
Ella Don / Unsplash
Core i5-12600K
When using Intel’s Core i5 12600K CPU for gaming, you can expect good game performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Core i5-12600KF
When using Intel’s Core i5 12600KF CPU for gaming, you can expect good game performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Core i5 12600K
Intel Core i5-12600K
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Core i5 12600KF
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Gaming Considerations
While a good GPU is critical for gaming performance, your CPU will also have a significant impact. If the CPU is too slow, it can be a bottleneck for your GPU, which can reduce your framerate or cause stuttering. The most important CPU capabilities for gaming are single-core max turbo boost frequency and the number of cores. A high base frequency is also critical for inadequately cooled CPUs.
Depending on the game, the CPU will often handle tasks including scene management, gameplay logic, physics calculations, and asset loading.
Having multiple CPU cores can improve performance with games that utilize them. However, developers cannot split up every task to take advantage of a growing number of cores. Most modern games don’t benefit from having more than 6–8 cores. Game performance will experience diminishing returns as you add more CPU cores.
Cores
12600K:
The 12600K’s 6 Performance cores allow for good performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
12600KF:
The 12600KF’s 6 Performance cores allow for good performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
Learn more about Core Counts below.
Base Frequency
12600K:
The 12600K’s 3.70 GHz base frequency is good for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.
12600KF:
The 12600KF’s 3.70 GHz base frequency is good for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
Single-Core Turbo
12600K:
With a high-end cooler, the 12600K’s 4.90 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency is excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
12600KF:
With a high-end cooler, the 12600KF’s 4.90 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency is excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
P-Core Turbo
12600K:
With a high-end cooler, the 12600K’s 4.
90 GHz max turbo boost frequency of the Performance cores are excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games. P core turbo boost frequencies can be maintained with a high-end cooler.
12600KF:
With a high-end cooler, the 12600KF’s 4.90 GHz max turbo boost frequency of the Performance cores are excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games. P core turbo boost frequencies can be maintained with a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
Overclocking Support
12600K:
When using a high-end cooler, the 12600K CPU’s support for overclocking can be excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
12600KF:
When using a high-end cooler, the 12600KF CPU’s support for overclocking can be excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
Learn more about Overclocking below.
DDR Support
12600K:
The 12600K CPU’s support for DDR5 with a max stock speed of 4800 MHz can be excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
12600KF:
The 12600KF CPU’s support for DDR5 with a max stock speed of 4800 MHz can be excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
Learn more about DDR Support below.
PCIe
12600K:
The 12600K CPU’s support for PCIe 5.0 can be excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, when using the fastest SSDs and graphics cards.
12600KF:
The 12600KF CPU’s support for PCIe 5.0 can be excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, when using the fastest SSDs and graphics cards.
L3 Cache
12600K:
The 12600K’s 20 MB of L3 cache is good for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
12600KF:
The 12600KF’s 20 MB of L3 cache is good for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
Learn more about Cache Sizes below.
General Apps on the Core i5-12600K vs. Core i5-12600KF
Core i5-12600K
When using Intel’s Core i5 12600K CPU for general apps, you can expect excellent app performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Core i5-12600KF
When using Intel’s Core i5 12600KF CPU for general apps, you can expect excellent app performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Core i5 12600K
Intel Core i5-12600K
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Core i5 12600KF
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
General App Considerations
If you’re only planning to stream shows, use office apps, or browse the internet, you won’t need a top-end CPU to get good performance.
The most important CPU capability for general app usage is the single-core max turbo boost frequency. A high base frequency is also helpful for inadequately cooled CPUs.
Browsers depend on your CPU to quickly load pages and video content and manage multiple browser tabs. Higher single-core turbo boost frequencies can speed up page load times.
Office and web applications are typically single-threaded, so running a single application won’t take advantage of a many-core CPU.
The more cores a CPU has, the more applications you can run simultaneously without noticing a performance impact.
Office and web applications rarely max out the CPU for long periods. These applications can use turbo boost speeds when a burst of processing power is needed, returning to the more efficient base frequencies afterward.
Cores
12600K:
The 12600K’s 6 Performance cores allow for excellent performance with modern apps.
12600KF:
The 12600KF’s 6 Performance cores allow for excellent performance with modern apps.
Learn more about Core Counts below.
Single-Core Turbo
12600K:
With a high-end cooler, the 12600K’s 4.90 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency is excellent for performance with modern apps. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
12600KF:
With a high-end cooler, the 12600KF’s 4.90 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency is excellent for performance with modern apps. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
P-Core Turbo
12600K:
With a high-end cooler, the 12600K’s 4.90 GHz max turbo boost frequency of the Performance cores are excellent for performance with modern apps. P core turbo boost frequencies can be maintained with a high-end cooler.
12600KF:
With a high-end cooler, the 12600KF’s 4.90 GHz max turbo boost frequency of the Performance cores are excellent for performance with modern apps. P core turbo boost frequencies can be maintained with a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
DDR Support
12600K:
The 12600K CPU’s support for DDR5 with a max stock speed of 4800 MHz can be excellent for performance with modern apps.
12600KF:
The 12600KF CPU’s support for DDR5 with a max stock speed of 4800 MHz can be excellent for performance with modern apps.
Learn more about DDR Support below.
Professional Tools on the Core i5-12600K vs. Core i5-12600KF
Core i5-12600K
When using Intel’s Core i5 12600K CPU for professional tools, you can expect good tool performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Core i5-12600KF
When using Intel’s Core i5 12600KF CPU for professional tools, you can expect good tool performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Core i5 12600K
Intel Core i5-12600K
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Core i5 12600KF
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Professional Tool Considerations
Video editors, 2D and 3D graphics tools, software compilers, and engineering tools require high-performing CPUs.
Professional tools are often well optimized to use many cores. CPU cores allow tools to parallelize processing tasks. Increasing the number of cores can divide the time required to process a task if the tool has good multi-threading support.
To maximize performance with professional tools, you’ll want to use a CPU with a high turbo boost frequency and many CPU cores.
Good heat dissipation is needed to maintain turbo boost frequencies for extended periods.
While graphics applications use your GPU for some rendering tasks, most calculations and data operations are still dependent on your CPU.
Cores
12600K:
The 12600K’s 6 Performance cores allow for good performance with professional tools.
12600KF:
The 12600KF’s 6 Performance cores allow for good performance with professional tools.
Learn more about Core Counts below.
Base Frequency
12600K:
The 12600K’s 3.70 GHz base frequency is good for performance with professional tools, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.
12600KF:
The 12600KF’s 3.70 GHz base frequency is good for performance with professional tools, when not boosting.
You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
Single-Core Turbo
12600K:
With a high-end cooler, the 12600K’s 4.90 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency is excellent for performance with professional tools. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
12600KF:
With a high-end cooler, the 12600KF’s 4.90 GHz single-core max turbo boost frequency is excellent for performance with professional tools. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
P-Core Turbo
12600K:
With a high-end cooler, the 12600K’s 4.90 GHz max turbo boost frequency of the Performance cores are excellent for performance with professional tools. P core turbo boost frequencies can be maintained with a high-end cooler.
12600KF:
With a high-end cooler, the 12600KF’s 4.
90 GHz max turbo boost frequency of the Performance cores are excellent for performance with professional tools. P core turbo boost frequencies can be maintained with a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
Overclocking Support
12600K:
When using a high-end cooler, the 12600K CPU’s support for overclocking can be excellent for performance with professional tools.
12600KF:
When using a high-end cooler, the 12600KF CPU’s support for overclocking can be excellent for performance with professional tools.
Learn more about Overclocking below.
DDR Support
12600K:
The 12600K CPU’s support for DDR5 with a max stock speed of 4800 MHz can be excellent for performance with professional tools.
12600KF:
The 12600KF CPU’s support for DDR5 with a max stock speed of 4800 MHz can be excellent for performance with professional tools.
Learn more about DDR Support below.
PCIe
12600K:
The 12600K CPU’s support for PCIe 5.0 can be excellent for performance with professional tools, when using the fastest SSDs and graphics cards.
12600KF:
The 12600KF CPU’s support for PCIe 5.0 can be excellent for performance with professional tools, when using the fastest SSDs and graphics cards.
L3 Cache
12600K:
The 12600K’s 20 MB of L3 cache is good for performance with professional tools.
12600KF:
The 12600KF’s 20 MB of L3 cache is good for performance with professional tools.
Learn more about Cache Sizes below.
Considerations When Choosing a CPU
Core Count
Intel’s Core i5-12600K CPUs have 6 Performance (P) cores and 4 Efficiency (E) cores for a total of 10 cores.
Intel’s Core i5-12600KF CPUs have 6 Performance (P) cores and 4 Efficiency (E) cores for a total of 10 cores.
Increased core counts can improve the performance of games and professional tools that use them. Most modern games don’t benefit from having more than 6–8 cores. Even general apps can benefit from many cores when numerous applications are open simultaneously. Web browsers don’t significantly take advantage of multiple cores when loading a single page. However, more CPU cores can improve performance when running demanding web apps in multiple windows.
Intel’s 12th generation and newer CPUs have performance (P) cores and efficiency (E) cores. The P cores are comparable to previous generation cores. E cores are focused on adding additional threads in an energy-efficient manner. They take up much less room on the CPU and generate less heat. However, their smaller cache and minimal interconnect capabilities make them more appropriate for offloading background tasks.
CPU Clock Speeds
The Intel Core i5-12600K’s 6 Performance cores have a 3.70 GHz base frequency and support a 4.90 GHz max turbo boost frequency.
The Intel Core i5-12600KF’s 6 Performance cores have a 3.70 GHz base frequency and support a 4.90 GHz max turbo boost frequency.
Single-core performance is essential for some games, as many don’t take full advantage of multiple cores. Professional tools depend on high single and multi-core turbo frequencies to maximize their processing speed.
Turbo boost frequencies are only achieved under ideal circumstances. The safest strategy for consistent gaming performance with a basic cooler is to get a processor with a higher base clock speed. However, with adequate cooling, you may be able to maintain speeds near the max boost frequency.
Check out my article, Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for Intel’s Core i5-12600K, for recommended coolers that can maintain these boost frequencies on the 12600K.
Check out my article, Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for Intel’s Core i5-12600KF, for recommended coolers that can maintain these boost frequencies on the 12600KF.
DDR Support
The 12600K CPU’s fastest supported DDR memory type is DDR5, with a max stock speed of 4800 MHz.
The 12600KF CPU’s fastest supported DDR memory type is DDR5, with a max stock speed of 4800 MHz.
You can exceed these stock speeds officially supported by CPUs when overclocking memory, such as with an XMP profile. Motherboard specifications will indicate their supported overclocked-memory speeds. To be able to overclock DDR memory, your motherboard chipset needs to support memory overclocking.
Faster PC memory can improve game and professional tool performance by reducing the time it takes to perform calculations and data operations.
Using the quickest RAM may not have as much of an impact as upgrading your CPU and graphics card or adding more RAM.
Learn more about DDR in DDR4 vs. DDR5? Which You Should Buy.
Learn about our recommended RAM for the 12600K in Choosing the Best RAM for Intel’s Core i5-12600K CPU.
Learn about our recommended RAM for the 12600KF in Choosing the Best RAM for Intel’s Core i5-12600KF CPU.
Cache Size
The Intel Core i5-12600K has an L3 cache capacity of 20 MB.
The Intel Core i5-12600KF has an L3 cache capacity of 20 MB.
A CPU’s cache is a small amount of memory, close to the CPU cores, containing recently used data. An L3 cache capacity of at least 20 MB is ideal for games and professional tool performance.
Games and professional tool performance can improve as cache size increases, as it can reduce delays when retrieving commonly used assets from memory. While nearly any task will use a CPU’s cache, a large cache becomes less impactful for general PC usage, such as browsing webpages.
Remember that cache sizes often increase with core counts, so if you want to increase your L3 cache, you may need to get a CPU with more cores.
Overclocking
The 12600K supports overclocking.
The 12600KF supports overclocking.
Overclocking is mainly relevant for PC gamers who want to maximize their game framerates. CPU overclocking increases frequencies past their default limits. Excellent heat dissipation via fans or another solution is required to maintain system stability while overclocking.
Professional tools can benefit from overclocked frequencies. However, overclocking may introduce some possibility of system instability, which may be less acceptable in business scenarios.
Best Liquid Cooler
CORSAIR iCUE h250i ELITE LCD Liquid CPU Cooler
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Best Air Cooler
Noctua NH-D15, Premium CPU Cooler
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Learn More About the Intel Core i5-12600K
- Which Chipsets Work With Intel’s Core i5-12600K CPU?
- Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for Intel’s Core i5-12600K
- Choosing the Best Power Supply for Intel’s Core i5-12600K
- Is the Core i5-12600K CPU Good for Gaming?
- Choosing the Best RAM for Intel’s Core i5-12600K CPU
- Choosing the Best Motherboard for Intel’s Core i5-12600K
- How Many Cores Do Intel Core i5-12600K CPUs Have?
- What Is the TDP of the Core i5-12600K CPU?
You can find detailed 12600K specifications on Intel’s site.
Learn More About the Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Which Chipsets Work With Intel’s Core i5-12600KF CPU?
- Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for Intel’s Core i5-12600KF
- Choosing the Best Power Supply for Intel’s Core i5-12600KF
- Is the Core i5-12600KF CPU Good for Gaming?
- Choosing the Best RAM for Intel’s Core i5-12600KF CPU
- Choosing the Best Motherboard for Intel’s Core i5-12600KF
- How Many Cores Do Intel Core i5-12600KF CPUs Have?
- What Is the TDP of the Core i5-12600KF CPU?
You can find detailed 12600KF specifications on Intel’s site.
Have a suggestion or correction for this article? Send us an email at:
[email protected]
You can also contact the author at:
[email protected]
Intel Core i5 12600KF vs i5 12600K: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 12600KF
Intel Core i5 12600K
We compared two 10-core desktop CPUs: the 3.
7 GHz Intel Core i5 12600KF against the 3.7 GHz i5 12600K. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i5 12600KF
97
Core i5 12600K
98
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i5 12600KF
78
Core i5 12600K
77
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i5 12600KF
64
Core i5 12600K
64
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i5 12600KF
84
Core i5 12600K
82
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 12600K and 12600KF
Advantages of Intel Core i5 12600K
- Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 770
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i5 12600KF
+1%
1894
Core i5 12600K
1882
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 12600KF
+2%
17692
Core i5 12600K
17307
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i5 12600KF
3927
Core i5 12600K
+1%
3948
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i5 12600KF
27100
Core i5 12600K
+1%
27244
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i5 12600KF
1844
Core i5 12600K
+3%
1908
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 12600KF
+1%
11623
Core i5 12600K
11551
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 12600KF and i5 12600K
General
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | October 27, 2021 | October 27, 2021 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Alder Lake-S | Alder Lake-S |
| Model number | i5-12600KF | i5-12600K |
| Socket | LGA-1700 | LGA-1700 |
| Integrated GPU | No | UHD Graphics 770 |
Performance
| Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base Frequency | 3. 7 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 37x | 37x |
| L1 Cache | 80K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 9728K (shared) | 9728K (shared) |
| L3 Cache | 20MB (shared) | 20MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
| Fabrication process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| TDP | 125 W | 125 W |
| Max. temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| GPU Base Clock | — | 300 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | — | 1450 MHz |
| Shading Units | — | 256 |
| TMUs | — | 16 |
| ROPs | — | 8 |
| Execution Units | — | 32 |
| TGP | — | 15 W |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i5 12600KF
n/a
Core i5 12600K
0.
78 TFLOPS
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i5 12600KF official page | Intel Core i5 12600K official page |
| PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i5 12600KF
389 (66.
2%)
Core i5 12600K
199 (33.8%)
Total votes: 588
ompetitors
1.
Ryzen 7 5800X and Core i5 12600KF
2.
Core i5 12400F and Core i5 12600KF
3.
Core i7 12700 and Core i5 12600KF
4.
Ryzen 7 5800X and Core i5 12600K
5.
Core i7 11700K and Core i5 12600K
6.
Apple M1 and Core i5 12600K
7.
Core i7 12700K and Core i5 12600K
8.
Core i5 12400F and Core i5 12600K
So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i5 12600K or i5 12600KF?
Name
Message
Promotion
Intel Core i5-12600KF vs Intel Core i5-12600K
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-12600KF and Intel Core i5-12600K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i5-12600K
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-12600K
- Around 67% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 27% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 11% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 27677 vs 27233
| L1 cache | 640 KB vs 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 9. 5 MB vs 7.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 20 MB vs 18 MB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 3980 vs 3972 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 27677 vs 27233 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-12600KF
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-12600K
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-12600KF | Intel Core i5-12600K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 3972 | 3980 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 27233 | 27677 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 13170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-12600KF | Intel Core i5-12600K | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake | Alder Lake |
| Launch date | 4 Nov 2021 | 4 Nov 2021 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $264 — $274 | $289 — 299 |
| Place in performance rating | 46 | 25 |
| Processor Number | i5-12600KF | i5-12600K |
| Series | 12th Generation Intel Core i5 Processors | 12th Generation Intel Core i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| 64 bit support | ||
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 640 KB |
| L2 cache | 7. 5 MB |
9.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 18 MB | 20 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | Intel 7 | Intel 7 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.90 GHz | 4.90 GHz |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Supported memory types | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 45. 0 mm x 37.5 mm |
45.0 mm x 37.5 mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2020A | PCG 2020A |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 20 | 20 |
| PCI Express revision | 5.0 and 4.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16+4, 2×8+4 | Up to 1×16+4, 2×8+4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Mode-based Execute Control (MBE) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 |
Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® Volume Management Device (VMD) | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Device ID | 0x4680 | |
| Execution Units | 32 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 45 GHz |
|
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | |
| Number of displays supported | 4 | |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4. 5 |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i5-12600KF with others
Intel
Core i5-12600KF
vs
Intel
Core i9-10900K
Intel
Core i5-12600KF
vs
AMD
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
Intel
Core i5-12600KF
vs
AMD
Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel
Core i5-12600KF
vs
AMD
Ryzen 9 5900
Intel
Core i5-12600KF
vs
Intel
Core i9-11900K
Intel
Core i5-12600KF
vs
Intel
Core i9-11900KF
Intel Core i5-12600KF vs Intel Core i5-12600K
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i5-12600KF vs Intel Core i5-12600K
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-12600KF on one side and the Intel Core i5-12600K on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 10 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,9GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 10 cores, 16 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Core i5-12600KF | Intel Core i5-12600K | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Alder Lake | Alder Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Alder Lake-S | Alder Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | Core i5-12000 | Core i5-12000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | Core i5-12600KF | BX8071512600K | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2021 | Q4 2021 | ||||||
| Lithography | Intel 7 | Intel 7 | ||||||
| Cores | 10 | 10 | ||||||
| Threads | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,7 GHz | 3,7 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,9 GHz | 4,9 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 20 MB | 20 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 76,8 GB/s | 76,8 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 20 | ||||||
| TDP | 125 W | 125 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 650W ATX Power Supply | 650W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | — | 32 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 256 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1450 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 742,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1700 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1700 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 100°C | ||||||
| AI accelerator | Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, Deep Learning Boost |
Gaussian & Neural Accelerator, Deep Learning Boost |
||||||
| Crypto engine | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
||||||
| Security | OS Guard, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard, Mode-based Execute Control, Control-Flow Enforcement Technology |
OS Guard, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard, Mode-based Execute Control, Control-Flow Enforcement Technology |
||||||
| Max display resolution | — | 4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 816 | 751 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 7. 783 |
7.145 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 374 | 266 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 3.627 | 2.507 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 994 | 678 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 9.624 | 6.523 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 2.075 | 1.784 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 20.077 | 16.793 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 4.015 | 4.056 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 26. 412 |
24.171 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
10.445 | 8.644 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
51.387 | 43.147 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
1.825 | 1.860 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
11.589 | 12.005 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
755,3 GFLOPS | 729,3 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
411 pts / W | 345 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600KF |
816 7.783 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K |
751 7.145 |
In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 9%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600KF |
374 3.  627 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K |
266 2.507 |
In single core, the difference is 41%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 45%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600KF |
994 9.  624 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K |
678 6.523 |
In single core, the difference is 47%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 48%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600KF |
2.075 20.  077 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K |
1.784 16.793 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 20%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600KF |
4. 26.412 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K |
4.056 24.171 |
In single core, the difference is -1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 9%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600KF |
10.445 51. |
| Intel Core i5-12600K |
8.644 43.147 |
In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 19%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600K |
1. 12.005 |
| Intel Core i5-12600KF |
1.825 11.589 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 4%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600K |
2.076 11.464 |
| Intel Core i5-12600KF |
1.750 10.012 |
In single core, the difference is 19%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 15%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-12600KF |
1.927 11.126 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K |
1. 11.032 |
In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i5-12600KF AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-12600K AMD equivalent
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. Intel Core i5-12600KF
Intel Core i5-12600K
The Intel Core i5-12600K operates with 10 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 4.90 GHz base 4.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1700 CPU socket. This version includes 20.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 RAM and features 5.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Alder Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 10 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q4/2021
Intel Core i5-12600KF
The Intel Core i5-12600KF operates with 10 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 4.90 GHz base 4.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1700 CPU socket. This version includes 20.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 RAM and features 5.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Alder Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 10 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q4/2021
Intel Core i5-12600K
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Compare Detail
| 3.70 GHz | Frequency | 3.70 GHz |
| 10 | Cores | 10 |
| 4.90 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.90 GHz |
| 4.50 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 4.50 GHz |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking | Yes |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Intel UHD Graphics 770 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 1.45 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 10 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| 1.45 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | |
| 3 | Max. displays | |
| DDR4-3200 DDR5-4800 |
Memory | DDR4-3200 DDR5-4800 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No | ECC | No |
| 9. |
L2 Cache | 9.50 MB |
| 20.00 MB | L3 Cache | 20.00 MB |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| 10 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| LGA 1700 | Socket | LGA 1700 |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q4/2021 | Release date | Q4/2021 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| Intel Core i5-12600K | Intel Core i5-12600KF | |
| 125 W | Max TDP | 125 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
Intel Core i5-12600K review | 64 facts and highlights
74points
Intel Core i5-12600K
i5-12600KF
Intel Core i5-12600K
Why is Intel Core i5-12600K better than the average?
- CPU speed?
6 x 3.7GHz & 4 x 2.8GHzvs12.47GHz
- RAM speed?
4800MHzvs2487.36MHz - CPU threads?
16vs7.72 - Semiconductor size?
10nmvs17.01nm - L2 cache?
9.5MBvs2.23MB - PassMark result?
27564vs8616.84 - Turbo clock speed?
4.9GHzvs3.83GHz - L3 cache?
20MBvs9.52MB
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i5-12600K
vs
Intel Core i7-11700
Intel Core i5-12600K
vs
Intel Core i7-12700K
Intel Core i5-12600K
vs
Intel Core i5-12600
Intel Core i5-12600K
vs
Intel Core i7-11700K
Intel Core i5-12600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Core i5-12600K
vs
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Intel Core i5-12600K
vs
Intel Core i7-12700
Intel Core i5-12600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i5-12600K
3 User reviews
Intel Core i5-12600K
9. 3/10
3 User reviews
Features
Value for money
8.0/10
3 votes
Gaming
9.3/10
3 votes
Performance
9.3/10
3 votes
Reliability
8.3/10
3 votes
Energy efficiency
6.3/10
3 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
6 x 3.7GHz & 4 x 2.8GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
4.9GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔Intel Core i5-12600K
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
4800MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
76.8GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✖Intel Core i5-12600K
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i5-12600K
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔Intel Core i5-12600K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i5-12600K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i5-12600K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i5-12600K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i5-12600K
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
Intel Core i5 12600KF vs i5 12600K:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 12600KF
Intel Core i5 12600K
Which is better: Intel Core i5 12600KF at 3.7 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.9) or i5 12600K at 3.7 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 4.9)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 10-core desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i5 12600KF
97 97
Core i5 12600k
98 9000 9000
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus 9 are involved0003
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 12600K
- There is an integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 770
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i5 12600KF
+1%
1894
Core i5 12600K
1882
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i5 12600KF
+2%
17692
Core i5 12600K
17307
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i5 12600KF
3927
Core i5 12600K
+1%
3948
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i5 12600KF
27100
Core i5 12600K
+1%
27244
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i5 12600KF
1844
Core i5 12600K
+3%
1908
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i5 12600KF
+1%
11623
Core i5 12600K
11551
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full specifications of Intel Core i5 12600KF and i5 12600K
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | October 27, 2021 | October 27, 2021 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Alder Lake-S | Alder Lake-S |
| Model number | i5-12600KF | i5-12600K |
| Socket | LGA-1700 | LGA-1700 |
| Integrated graphics | No | UHD Graphics 770 |
Performance
| Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Number of threads | 16 | 16 |
| Frequency | 3. |
3.7 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 37x | 37x |
| Level 1 cache | 80KB (per core) | 80KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 9728KB (general) | 9728KB (general) |
| Level 3 cache | 20MB (shared) | 20MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Energy consumption
| Process technology | 10 nanometers | 10 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 125 W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Integrated graphics | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| GPU frequency | — | 300 MHz |
| Boost GPU frequency | — | 1450 MHz |
| Shader blocks | — | 256 |
| TMUs | — | 16 |
| ROPs | — | 8 |
| Computer units | — | 32 |
| TGP | — | 15W |
Igpu Flops
Core i5 12600kf
N/D
Core i5 12600k
0. 78 Teraflops
Memory Support
| DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | Yes |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i5 12600KF | Site Intel Core i5 12600K |
| PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i5 12600KF
389 (66.2%)
Core i5 12600K
199 (33.8%)
Total votes: 588
8
2
Competitors
1.
Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i5 12600KF
2.
Core i5 12400F vs. Core i5 12600KF
3.
Core i7 12700 vs Core i5 12600KF
4.
Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i5 12600K
5.
Core i7 11700K vs. Core i5 12600K
6.
Apple M1 vs Core i5 12600K
7.
Core i7 12700K vs Core i5 12600K
8.
Core i5 12400F vs. Core i5 12600K
What will you choose: Intel Core i5 12600K or i5 12600KF?
Name
Message
Intel Core i5-12600K | 64 factors
74 points
Intel Core i5-12600K
i5-12600KF
Intel Core i5-12600K
Why is Intel Core i5-12600K better than others?
- CPU speed?
6 x 3.7GHz & 4 x 2.8GHz vs 12.47GHz - RAM speed?
4800MHz vs 2487.36MHz
- CPU thread?
16 vs 7.72 - Semiconductors size?
10nm vs 17.01nm - L2 cache?
9.5MB vs 2.23MB - PassMark result?
27564 vs 8616.84 - Turbo clock speed?
4.9GHz vs 3.83GHz - L3 cache?
20MB vs 9.52MB
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Core i5-12600K
vs
Intel Core i7-11700
Intel Core i5-12600K
vs
Intel Core i7-12700k
Intel Core i5-12600k
VS
Intel Core i5-12600
Intel Core i5-12600k
VS
I7-11700K
INTEL CORE
ENT vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700x
Intel Core i5-12600k
VS
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Intel Core i5-12600k
VS
VS
Intel Core I7-12700
ENTEL CORE I7-1200KA I7-1200KE I7-1200K vs
AMD RYZEN 7 5700G
Comparison prices
Users reviews
General rating
Intel Core i5-12600K
3 Reviews of users
Intel Core I5-12600K 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9069 9069 9069 9069 9069 9069 9069 9069 9069 9069 9. 3 9069 90LAY 9069 9069 9.3 9069 9.3 9069 90LAY 9069 9089 9089 9089 90LAY 9069 9089 9089 9089 9089 9ARE 9089 9089 9.3 90LAY 9069 9.3 9089 9.3AR Features
Value for money
8.0 /10
3 votes
Games
9.3 /10
903 votes Performance
903 votes0003
9.3 /10
3 Votes
Reliability
8.3 /10
3 Votes
Energy Equality
6.3 /10 9000 9000 3 Votes
Production
Production production Production
Production Protection, Production Protection
6 x 3.7GHz & 4 x 2.8GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.9GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4.Unlocked multiplier
✔Intel Core i5-12600K
Some processors come with unlocked multiplier and can be overclocked more easily, allowing you to get better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
More L1 scratchpad results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9. L3 core
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
4800MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
76.8GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5. Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7. Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖Intel Core i5-12600K
Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4.Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i5-12600K
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides higher performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads . Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔Intel Core i5-12600K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i5-12600K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i5-12600K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i5-12600K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i5-12600K
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming.
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price.
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPU is better?
Testing the Intel Core i5-12600K (Alder Lake) processor for the new LGA1700 platform, including disabling «efficient» cores
Testing the Intel Core i9-12900K (Alder Lake) processor for the new LGA1700
platform Most recently, we studied the top processor of the Intel Alder Lake family — the Core i9-12900K. Such models are very interesting as a demonstration of the ultimate capabilities of manufacturers, which is why they attract considerable attention — but only theoretical. In practice 90% of buyers were oriented (explicitly or indirectly) 10-15 years ago to processors from the $80-$200 price range, and continue to do so. Unless the prices have grown a little due to natural inflation and (to an even greater extent) due to the resumption of full-fledged competition in the processor market, so the range can already be shifted by $120-$300, but that’s all. And no Intel Core i9 or AMD Ryzen 9 simply fit into this framework. The same is true for modern Core i7 or Ryzen 7: they are bought more than top models, but much less than younger ones. Therefore, there is nothing surprising in the fact that one Core i5 (12600K) immediately appeared in the updated Intel assortment, although the mass production of inexpensive models, along with budget chipsets, is scheduled for early next year. In general, Alder Lake and the new Intel platform come seriously and for a long time — and in all market segments.
What distinguishes Intel’s approach from AMD’s policy, which has two fundamentally different families: APU and CPU. The desktop models of the latter to a large extent have something in common with server processors, but the laptop direction (which has long been much more massive) is covered exclusively by the APU. In which, we recall, «only» eight cores maximum, and the overall performance is lower than that of «clean» processors (since there is noticeably less cache memory — and not only), and still only PCIe Gen3. So comparison of 16-core Core i9-12900K and Ryzen 9 5950X are one thing, but how the top-end Core i9-12900HK laptop will look against the background of competitors is a completely different question. After all, it has no direct competitors, although there are fewer cores than the desktop namesake — only 14, of which 6 are productive and 8 are efficient. But this configuration has much in common with the Core i5-12600K, which has exactly the same number of productive cores. In general, testing this model is doubly interesting: it will be bought more actively, and it will be possible to approximately evaluate the capabilities of laptop «tops» now — before the advent of laptops and mini-PCs based on them.
In addition, when testing the Core i9-12900K, we limited ourselves only to the «standard» configuration — when all the cores work. It is impossible to completely disable productive cores — at least one must be present among the workers. But all clusters of effective ones can be easily turned off. It is clear that it is not very interesting to perform such an operation with the i9-12900K, since it is the second cluster of E-cores that distinguishes it from the cheaper i7-12700K in the first place. But single-cluster models for such an application may be purchased.
Why might this be useful? First, as expected, not all applications are still able to «understand» a heterogeneous structure, and this often applies to games. They don’t need too many cores at all — so 6-8 P-cores will already do an excellent job with all the work. And there are a little more problems under Windows 10, the scheduler of which distributes tasks among the cores normally, but “statically”: when the load changes, the process that got on the E-core will no longer “move” to the P-core. What, it seems, is the reason for the performance problems we noted last time. Problems were observed in only three subtests out of two dozen — but still. Windows 11 should work better in this regard, i.e. there is still a difference between the systems. But not the fact that the difference is is enough to rush the migration.
In addition, the new processors have one more feature that can be seen by carefully looking at the screenshots. P-cores support AVX512, but E-cores do not, and in order for the operating system not to go crazy, instruction systems have to be “trimmed” in heterogeneous mode. And when you turn off the E-cores, you can return everything as it was. In some scenarios, this may also be more important than the total number of cores.
Well, from a research point of view, such testing should be carried out in general — after all, it allows you to compare Alder Lake P-cores with their predecessors (Rocket Lake and Comet Lake) or direct competitors from the AMD camp directly. And it doesn’t even matter how much this shutdown of effective cores is practically significant. In any case, there is a reason to satisfy your curiosity at someone else’s expense. We would drive new processors on E-cores alone, if it were possible 🙂 In addition, the configuration of the younger desktop Core i5 will also not have E-cores, and the cheapest i5-12400 is definitely expected to be like this — just doomed (as it was already i5-10400 and i5-11400) to mainstream popularity. Of course, it also has lower frequencies, but it is useful to understand what to expect from such processors right now. And it’s time to learn more about the P-cores themselves, because desktop Core i3 (and lower) do not provide other cores.
Test participants
| Intel Core i5-12600K (6+0) | Intel Core i9-12900K (8+0) | Intel Core i5-12600K | Intel Core i9-12900K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core name | Alder Lake | Alder Lake | Alder Lake | Alder Lake |
| Production technology | Intel 7 | Intel 7 | Intel 7 | Intel 7 |
| Core frequency, GHz | 3. |
3.2/5.2 | 2.8/3.6(E) — 3.7/4.9(P) | 2.4/3.9(E) — 3.2/5.2(P) |
| Number of cores/threads | 6/12 | 8/16 | 10/16 | 16/24 |
| L1 cache (total), I/D, KB | 192/288 | 256/384 | 256/128(E) — 192/288(P) | 512/256(E) — 256/384(P) |
| L2 cache, KB | 6×1280 | 8×1280 | 1×2048(E) — 6×1280(P) | 2×2048(E) — 8×1280(P) |
| L3 cache, MiB | 20 | 30 | 20 | 30 |
| RAM | 2×DDR4-3200 / 2×DDR5-4800 | 2×DDR4-3200 / 2×DDR5-4800 | 2×DDR4-3200 / 2×DDR5-4800 | 2×DDR4-3200 / 2×DDR5-4800 |
| TDP, W | 125 / 150 | 125 / 241 | 125 / 150 | 125 / 241 |
| Number of PCIe lanes | 16 (Gen5) + 4 (Gen4) | 16 (Gen5) + 4 (Gen4) | 16 (Gen5) + 4 (Gen4) | 16 (Gen5) + 4 (Gen4) |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 770 |
Today’s main hero will, of course, be the Core i5-12600K — but you need to compare it with the older model anyway. Moreover, in both positions: in the standard configuration, and as a six-core with an eight-core.
| Intel Core i7-10700K | Intel Core i9-10850K | Intel Core i5-11600K | Intel Core i7-11700K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core name | Comet Lake | Comet Lake | Rocket Lake | Rocket Lake |
| Production technology | 14 nm | 14 nm | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Core frequency, GHz | 3.8/5.1 | 3.6/5.2 | 3.9/4.9 | 3.6/5.0 |
| Number of cores/threads | 8/16 | 10/20 | 6/12 | 8/16 |
| L1 cache (total), I/D, KB | 256/256 | 320/320 | 192/288 | 256/384 |
| L2 cache, KB | 8×256 | 10×256 | 6×512 | 8×512 |
| L3 cache, MiB | 16 | 20 | 12 | 16 |
| RAM | 2×DDR4-2933 | 2×DDR4-2933 | 2×DDR4-3200 | 2×DDR4-3200 |
| TDP, W | 125 | 125 | 125 | 125 |
| Number of PCIe lanes | 16 (Gen3) | 16 (Gen3) | 20 (Gen4) | 20 (Gen4) |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 750 | UHD Graphics 750 |
Both modes are also interesting for comparison with Rocket Lake — and with an equal number of cores. But instead of the Core i9-11900K, let’s take the i7-11700K today for a change, since these processors also differ slightly from each other. But we decided to get creative with Comet Lake — without six-cores. Because … it’s not too interesting anymore, as it seems to us: in essence, the tenth generation Core i5 is the eighth Core i7, which appeared four years ago and has since been studied from all angles. Therefore, only the Core i7-10700K will provide a «end-to-end» comparison of architectures. To which we will add a ten-core Core i9-10850K — after all, the Core i5-12600K is also formally a ten-core in the full configuration (6 + 4), so such a comparison suggests itself.
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | |
|---|---|---|
| Core name | Vermeer | Vermeer |
| Production technology | 7/12 nm | 7/12 nm |
| Core frequency, GHz | 3.7/4.6 | 3.8/4. |
| Number of cores/threads | 6/12 | 8/16 |
| L1 cache (total), I/D, KB | 192/192 | 256/256 |
| L2 cache, KB | 6×512 | 8×512 |
| L3 cache, MiB | 32 | 32 |
| RAM | 2×DDR4-3200 | 2×DDR4-3200 |
| TDP, W | 65 | 105 |
| Number of PCIe lanes | 20 (Gen4) | 20 (Gen4) |
| Integrated GPU | no | no |
today — we need older modern Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 7. Firstly, because these are direct competitors to the Core i5-12600K even officially. Secondly, these are just six and eight cores — which also interests us.
We couldn’t completely equalize other test conditions: DDR5 was «gotten» only in the form of two modules of 16 GB each, and the rest of the processors were tested with 16 GB of memory in total. However, we specially optimized the tests for the latter value and with some reservations for 8 GB, so this cannot affect the results (but in the new method, of course, we will already switch to higher values). The AMD Radeon Vega 56 video card and SATA SSD are the same for everyone, they also do not affect. The memory clock speed is the maximum according to the processor specification. Intel Multi-Core Enhance and AMD Precision Boost Overdrive technologies are disabled — for the latter, this is typical by default, but many motherboards strive to turn on the former quietly. Here, along with the memory frequency, they can affect performance, and their use is made more specific by the requirements for the board and chipset, but in normal mode there are no problems. At the same time for Core i9-12900K the removal of limits does not make sense at all (as we have already seen), since 241 W, which it is “allowed” to consume in turbo mode for a long time, is always enough in practice. But for the Core i5-12600K, the results may change — this processor is limited to 150 W, which is not so far from the «regular» TDP.
However, this is a separate issue that requires separate consideration.
Test Method
Methodology for testing computer systems of the 2020 sample
The testing methodology is described in detail in a separate article, and the results of all tests are available in a separate table in Microsoft Excel format. Directly in the articles, we use the processed results: normalized with respect to the reference system (Intel Core i5-9600K with 16 GB of memory, AMD Radeon Vega 56 graphics card and SATA SSD) and grouped by computer application. Accordingly, on all diagrams related to applications, dimensionless points, so here “more is better” everywhere. And starting from this year, we are finally transferring game tests to an optional status (the reasons for which are discussed in detail in the description of the test methodology), so that only specialized materials will be available for them.
Today is not the case. Since, in the first approximation, all participants are more than enough in practice for any gaming system with any discrete video card. And if you go into the question in detail and up to FPS units, then there are already possible options, and different games behave differently. Intel puts a serious emphasis on increased gaming performance, which means it will definitely need to be studied in full, not in short format. This process is already underway and the results will be coming soon.
iXBT Application Benchmark 2020
| Points (100 = Core i5-9600K; more is better) | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 151.1 |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | 189.7 |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | 162.4 |
| Intel Core i9-10850K | 187.2 |
| Intel Core i5-11600K | 145.8 |
| Intel Core i7-11700K | 174.5 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K (6+0) | 171.3 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K (8+0) | 228. |
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 90.7 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 158.1 |
Two programs out of three in a heterogeneous configuration do not work correctly, sticking to E-cores. Hence the significant loss of the Core i5-12600K to all the subjects in general — it has only one cluster of E-cores, i.e. four things. Disabling E-cores magically fixes everything — and shows that, under equal conditions, Intel’s cores are the best at the moment. It would even be possible to do without a heterogeneous scheme — arrange a company with a performance of 10 P-cores (which would probably have been possible to shove into an older crystal). But Intel was important to compete not only on an equal footing — since there is Ryzen 9 on the marketwith not one, but two eight-core chiplets. And you can’t stand in one place for a long time — which the company learned very well. New powerful cores are good, but this is too traditional a way to increase performance. And different «quality» cores, with all the possible shortcomings at the first stage, are very promising — especially considering that such processors are moving forward in all market segments. By the way, it becomes clear that AMD’s laptop market will have a hard time in the near future — as we well know, the 5600X is noticeably faster than the 5600G, and laptop APUs are designed the same way as desktop ones. Therefore, AMD has virtually no odds in the number of cores on the mobile market, and in quality, too. And this is done even without the effect of E-nuclei.
A study of the detailed results shows that there are actually three “wrong” applications in the group, not two. HandBrake always hits the right cores — that’s just in the full configuration, it actually manages with them alone: turning on the E-cores for both «alders» gives literally 3-5 seconds of savings and does not depend on the number of cores. This means that improvements are possible due to software optimization.
| Points (100 = Core i5-9600K; more is better) | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 153.7 |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | 195.8 |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | 169.4 |
| Intel Core i9-10850K | 206.9 |
| Intel Core i5-11600K | 149.9 |
| Intel Core i7-11700K | 193.7 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K (6+0) | 179.6 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K (8+0) | 245.2 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 127.7 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 244.6 |
In this group, one test behaved “badly” on Core i9, and already two on Core i5. As a result, his average results are worse. Disabling the E-cores makes the situation simple and transparent. So it’s not for nothing that we mentioned the Core i5-12400 above — a cheap and simple processor with a performance higher than any old six-core processors from both Intel and AMD, as well as a capable wind the tail of and many eight-core models . .. Yes, it’s just some kind of holiday! But faster (nominally) models for a real holiday need the right support from the software. Without which, the E-cores only get in the way at times.
| Points (100 = Core i5-9600K; more is better) | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 137.5 |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | 161.3 |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | 143.4 |
| Intel Core i9-10850K | 160.4 |
| Intel Core i5-11600K | 142.5 |
| Intel Core i7-11700K | 161.9 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K (6+0) | 168.2 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K (8+0) | 212.1 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 187.2 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 224. |
And the right support is not only when performance does not drop, but also when it grows in the right quantities. What is also not observed in this group is that video editors do not have too great a need for a large number of cores (once this phrase would have sounded ridiculous). Therefore, by the way, only four E-cores give the Core i5-12600K more than eight of those Core i9-12900K: the last one has enough P-cores, and the last one has only six P-cores. But what! Even the Ryzen 7 5800X and Core i7-11700K are put to shame, something we never expected.
| Points (100 = Core i5-9600K; more is better) | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 140.3 |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | 146.1 |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | 116.9 |
| Intel Core i9-10850K | 119. |
| Intel Core i5-11600K | 131.5 |
| Intel Core i7-11700K | 136.7 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K (6+0) | 186.0 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K (8+0) | 220.0 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 188.9 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 211.6 |
As it turned out, the E-cores interfered with the Core i9-12900K not only when rendering in Photoshop, but also in the main test of this program. Moreover — in the other two, they also at least do not help. In practice, you can ignore it — the absolute level of performance is such that there is simply no one to compete with Intel’s new products. And the number of cores, as we remember, did not solve anything here before — single-threaded performance is important. And it is outstanding for P-cores in Alder Lake. The jokes are over.
| Points (100 = Core i5-9600K; more is better) | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 186. |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | 245.9 |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | 210.6 |
| Intel Core i9-10850K | 253.5 |
| Intel Core i5-11600K | 171.6 |
| Intel Core i7-11700K | 214.4 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K (6+0) | 195.2 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K (8+0) | 280.3 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 248.3 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 388.9 |
An example of a completely different kind — when the number of computation threads being executed is very important, even to the detriment of their quality. As a result, Core i9-10850K quietly overtook until recently even the Ryzen 7 5800X, not to mention the Core i7-11700K — at least the huge L3 cache helped the first one (which this application loves). And now the Core i5-12600K is almost at the same level. And the Core i9-12900K noticeably outperforms it on P-cores alone — accelerating by an additional third when they are turned on.
| Points (100 = Core i5-9600K; more is better) | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 158.6 |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | 182.2 |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | 172.8 |
| Intel Core i9-10850K | 191.3 |
| Intel Core i5-11600K | 162.8 |
| Intel Core i7-11700K | 186.5 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K (6+0) | 161.5 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K (8+0) | 221.8 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 174.7 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 228.8 |
Again, ambivalent feelings: on the one hand, the increase from E-cores is small, on the other hand, it was enough. Moreover, here the results of Intel processors were not bad before — and now even some negative influence of DDR5 is visible in the younger models. If you disable the E-core. And if you do not turn it off, then it is not visible. But the tail was pulled out — the nose got stuck : four E-cores «add» 8% of performance to six P-cores, but even eight E-cores can speed up eight P-cores by only 3%. Conclusion? If we start from peak performance in real tasks, then this heterogeneity is not so necessary. So it is not for nothing that it will not be in junior desktop processors, up to the Core i5 part — for them this is “extra” silicon costs.
| Points (100 = Core i5-9600K; more is better) | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 146.4 |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | 179.8 |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | 148.8 |
| Intel Core i9-10850K | 166.6 |
| Intel Core i5-11600K | 136.5 |
| Intel Core i7-11700K | 163. |
| Intel Core i5-12600K (6+0) | 176.7 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K (8+0) | 230.4 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 197.4 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 265.3 |
In the same tasks, E-cores are relatively efficient, and the performance gain they provide is proportional to their number — i.e. all is correct . But it is also clearly visible that in this class it is not so necessary. The Core i5-12600K, even on the same R-cores, consistently outperforms the Core i7-11700K and only formally lags behind the Ryzen 7 5800X — and these are eight-core processors. This means that there is a transition of quality into quantity at this stage of microarchitecture modernization. At the same time, the same Core i5-12600K in full configuration is noticeably behind the Core i9-12900K with disabled E-cores. And, if he had not one cluster of those, but two, he would still lag behind. That is, again, if you «dance» from performance, then E-cores are not really needed by older desktop processors, and in the younger ones they will not be at all. The main thing they are capable of is to unload the main R-cores from any background processes. Or save some energy — more on that below.
| Points (100 = Core i5-9600K; more is better) | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 152.7 |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | 183.7 |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | 158.4 |
| Intel Core i9-10850K | 179.5 |
| Intel Core i5-11600K | 148.1 |
| Intel Core i7-11700K | 174.3 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K (6+0) | 176.6 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K (8+0) | 233.2 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 166.2 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 238. |
In the meantime, let’s look at the integral result — taking into account all the advantages and disadvantages, as well as the identified errors in the programs. It clearly shows that if Intel just needed good six- to eight-core (maybe even ten-core) desktop processors, there was no need to rush to introduce a heterogeneous structure. The Golden Cove microarchitecture turned out to be so good that the processors using it, without straining, take out the market feet first both previous Intel designs and all existing AMD processors. On an equal footing, of course. Why was it necessary to come up with complex schemes and fill all the bumps that any revolutionaries had at the first stages? And at some point, it still needed to be done. Since, first of all, E-cores are a nod to mobile solutions, which are sold many times more. And their effectiveness (included right in the name) will grow as the software is refined. In many programs, it is noticeable even now. In some — now it only interferes. But buyers of mass Intel desktop processors will not notice the second at all — due to the lack of E-cores in them. And for those choosing seniors, the company also provided a certain field for experimentation — which users of such solutions, in general, love.
Energy consumption and energy efficiency
| Maximum power | Minimum power | Medium power | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 120.1 | 63.3 | 109.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | 182.1 | 65.6 | 149.9 |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | 186.8 | 61.1 | 144.8 |
| Intel Core i9-10850K | 231.5 | 54.4 | 173.4 |
| Intel Core i5-11600K | 208.3 | 67.5 | 161.8 |
| Intel Core i7-11700K | 217. |
61.1 | 169.9 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K (6+0) | 171.3 | 55.8 | 142.7 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K (8+0) | 300.9 | 67.0 | 234.9 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 170.0 | 55.7 | 122.6 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 310.9 | 62.9 | 186.7 |
Especially since there are other factors besides bare performance. It is clearly seen that turning off the E-cores increases power consumption — and quite noticeably. As it should be, the processor has to “twist” even “simple” pieces of code on powerful cores. It may turn out faster — but it will also consume more energy. Although in this regard the new technical process looks very good — in any mode, the new products are much more economical than their predecessors, and they already look good against the background of competitors. Only Core i9 scares-12900K (and it was they who scared everyone at the stage of preliminary announcements) — but precisely because it is “allowed” to consume a quarter of a kilowatt in long-term mode. Since this is a top solution — which is obliged to compete with Ryzen 9 in terms of performance, so we won’t stand for the price of for . Even the i7-12700K in default mode will be much more economical (already 190W in turbo mode, not 241W), and the Core i5-12600K (150W) is even more so. Even in the “6 + 0” mode, it consumes at the level of the Core i5-10600K, but not the i5-11600K — although it works much faster than both. So in fact, despite the outstanding behavior of the Core i9-12900K, the new platform itself as a whole is a step towards more economical systems.
| Performance per watt | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 1.39 |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | 1.21 |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | 1.09 |
| Intel Core i9-10850K | 1.04 |
| Intel Core i5-11600K | 0.92 |
| Intel Core i7-11700K | 1. |
| Intel Core i5-12600K (6+0) | 1.24 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K (8+0) | 0.99 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K | 1.36 |
| Intel Core i9-12900K | 1.27 |
Even clearer. In testing, we encountered errors more than once or twice due to the «excessive» use of E-cores — but they also reduced power consumption more than performance. If you turn them off, then everything becomes more predictable — but sometimes the energy efficiency turns out to be no higher than that of the company’s previous developments. Although to the fullest extent this is true only for the «overfed» i9-12900K — but true. But the younger models look good in any form. And it becomes completely clear why in the laptop segment the balance is shifted towards E-cores. Indeed, you can buy a desktop Core i7 with eight P-cores and only four E-cores, and in laptops even the older Core i9this is 6P + 8E. But it’s easier for him, of course — we recall that mobile Ryzen 9 currently has eight cores, not 12-16. In the desktop segment, older Intel processors have to compete in unequal conditions. The younger ones don’t have this problem.
Total
Today we tested the Core i5-12600K — conditionally the youngest of the older Alder Lake — and along the way touched on some other issues that in any case needed to be addressed. Based on the results, it can be seen that the strongest point of the new family of processors (at least, their desktop modifications) is not heterogeneity at all, but powerful P-cores with the Golden Cove architecture. AT equal conditions they alone are enough to defeat all opponents. The weak point of the top-end Core i9-12900K is that it must fight in unequal conditions : AMD can pack 16 of its “P-cores” into processors for AM4, while Intel cannot. On the other hand, there are no ideal solutions at all — we find something, we lose something . For example, Intel does not have a division into CPU and APU (in the F-series of its processors, the GPU is blocked, but there are no fundamental differences in the other blocks), forcing buyers to be torn between smart and beautiful.
Market positioning of Core i5 and Core i7 eliminates this problem. Moreover, given the performance of these Alder Lake generation processor families, Ryzen processors already look overpriced. It is clear that AMD has reserves to reduce prices, and the real retail prices of the same Ryzen 7 5800X have already dropped below the same Core i5-12600K in some places. But whether this is enough — time will tell. Especially after the appearance of inexpensive boards for LGA1700, because in this matter the advantage is still on the side of AM4. (Unless, of course, we close our eyes to the difference in the functionality of the chipsets, in which even the X570 is inferior to the Z690, not to mention the very primitive budget chips.) In general, markets will solve — and we will observe. The fundamental point can be considered that Intel now has very competitive processors. Without any reservations. Technically, even better than similar AMD offerings. And the LGA1700 platform is much more modern than the current AM4. And all this, in general, even without taking into account heterogeneity — in the mass desktop segments one could do without it. Actually, Intel has also known this for a long time, so in most new processors they plan to do without it.
It does not follow from this failure of the E-nucleus concept itself. It’s just that it’s too revolutionary a breakdown of all previous approaches — which needs to be digested. In the same way, Hyper-Threading did not immediately “go” (at first it was very often better to disable this technology) and multi-core as such (manufacturers had already stopped producing single-core processors, and many programmers continued to write strictly single-threaded code). The different «quality» of the cores is just a further development of multi-threaded computing technologies. A large number of identical cores is easier, but it is not free. The programmers will still have to work hard on the new concept. Sometimes everything is already fine, but in some places there is something to refine. And in order to have something to work on at all, someone had to take the first step. As usual, it was made by Intel.
core i5-12600k | Tags | Overclockers.ru
golds
September 14, 2022
The Intel Core i5-13500 and Core i5-13400 significantly outperform their predecessors, delivering performance on par with the more expensive processors of the current Intel
line
Zystax
June 24, 2022
A320, B350, and X370 chipset boards now support the new Ryzen 5000 processors. But should you upgrade from an old Ryzen 5 1600 or Ryzen 5 2600 to a Ryzen 5 5600X?
Zelot
June 10, 2022
Core i5-12600K lost up to 30% of the cost in a few weeks
hilnur20012
May 1, 2022
Decent processor for less than $300
Zelot
April 15, 2022
AMD processors are already cheaper than at the beginning of February 2022
Andrey Ponkratov
April 2, 2022
This is a mATX motherboard that is worth the money and deserves attention due to its very good price/functionality ratio.
Alexey Sychev
March 27, 2022 at 07:13
Not without RGB lighting.
Alexey Sychev
March 21, 2022 at 09:09
Among processors with six cores, it became the best.
Andrey Ponkratov
March 21, 2022
We have a good option for creating a relatively inexpensive gaming build on the new LGA 1700 platform with DDR4 RAM.
Alexey Sychev
March 16, 2022 at 01:13 pm
The processor frequency has approached 6.9 GHz.
Andrey Ponkratov
February 26, 2022
A MicroATX all-in-one home board for mid-range gaming assembly came to the lab for testing.
Andrey Ponkratov
February 17, 2022
The ASUS model is an ordinary corporate board without frills, but with good basic functionality and support for various interfaces.
Andrey Ponkratov
February 12, 2022
We’ll take a look at a typical entry-level flagship chipset model and see how it performs with an Intel Core i5-12600K processor.
Andrey Ponkratov
February 10, 2022
We will study the entry-level model, which offers an interesting combination of technical solutions from expensive segments with a simple layout and a modest set of interfaces.
Andrey Ponkratov
February 8, 2022
ASUS ROG Strix Z690-I Gaming WIFI is a new mini-ITX masterpiece from the company’s engineers.
Andrey Ponkratov
February 1, 2022
The MPG (MSI Performance Gaming) line includes motherboards that are close to flagship devices in terms of functionality and will suit not only gamers.
Zelot
December 30, 2021
How does the 2018 Core i7-9700K handle modern games? Maybe it’s time to run for the new Core i5-12600K? let’s figure it out
Andrey Ponkratov
December 30, 2021
We’ll look at a couple of XPG modules that are designed for gamers and users who want to improve the performance of a fresh system.
Zelot
December 21, 2021
The Ryzen 9 5950X hasn’t dropped in price at all, and the Core i5-12600KF is cheaper than the Ryzen 5 5600X
Zelot
December 13, 2021
How many fps in games gives a more expensive DDR5-5200 compared to DDR4-3600 on a Core i5-12600K
Andrey Ponkratov
November 30, 2021
What can you expect from the junior Alder Lake generation and how will it perform against the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and Intel Core i7-12700K?
golds
November 27, 2021
Also got some details about their
specifications
Zystax
November 12, 2021
Ryzen 5 5600X and Core i5-12600K start the fight for the title of people’s processor, but when choosing, you need to take into account not only their performance, but also many other nuances.
golds
November 8, 2021
However, there is a big BUT, as is the case with Ryzen processors — this is power consumption
golds
November 6, 2021
Processors expected to be released in the first half of 2023
golds
November 5, 2021
But after the release of Alder Lake processors, next time everything can change
golds
November 4, 2021
Results vary by processor model and test application
golds
November 4, 2021
Test results published by TweakPC
Anonymous
October 26, 2021
Alder Lake benchmarks hint at huge jump in multi-threaded performance
golds
October 26, 2021
If the results are real, then AMD’s competitor will have a hard time
golds
October 22, 2021
Information made available from Intel’s marketing slides
golds
October 21, 2021
In addition, confirmation of core i9-12900K clock speeds has appeared
NikolaiNikiforov
October 15, 2021
The new 12th generation of Alder Lake processors is positioned by Intel as a revolutionary technical achievement, but is it really so. In my opinion, there are reasons to believe that the hybrid architecture of these processors only covers up the technical imperfection of these processors.
golds
October 14, 2021
Intel’s new mid-ranger beats Ryzen 5 5600X by 33%
Anonymous
September 27, 2021
According to the MSI LGA1700 upgrade kit promotion, the release date of the 12th Gen Intel Core is November 4th.
id_1
September 2, 2021
Looks like AMD will have to make room.
golds
August 27, 2021
This information is revealed by a new leak from Moore’s Law Is Dead
id_1
August 26, 2021
The price of a novelty can be very tempting.
golds
July 15, 2021
These processors are: Core i9-12900K, Core i712700K and Core i5 12600K
id_1
July 14, 2021
At least in the Cinebench R20 benchmark.
Intel Core i5-12600K vs Intel Core i5-12600KF — comparative characteristics and benchmarks of processors
VS
Which one to choose?
It’s time to choose the winner. What is the difference and which is better in Intel Core i5-12600K vs Intel Core i5-12600KF comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!
Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor
Who will win in the comparison of Intel Core i5-12600K and Intel Core i5-12600KF. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.
3.40 GHz
Clock frequency
3.70 GHZ
10
Nuclei
10
4.90 GHZ
turbo (1 core)
4.90 GHZ
16
Number YES
Acceleration
YES
4. 50 GHZ
Turbo (10 Cores)
4.50 GHZ
HYBRID (Big.little)
Architecture
HYBRID (BIG.LITLE)0002 6x Golden Cove
A Core
6x Golden Cove
4x Gracemont
B Core
4x Graacemont
—
C Core
Family and Generation of the processor and generation of processor and generation -12600K
Name
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Desktop / Server
Segment
Desktop / Server
Intel Core i 12000
Intel Core i 12000
CPU group 90 020003
Intel Core i5
Family
Intel Core i5
12
Generation
12
Intel Core i5-11600K
Predecessor
Intel Core
9000-9000 SUUSK
Internal graphics
It’s hard to compare Intel Core i5-12600K vs. Intel Core i5-12600KF when graphics card function and specifications matter only in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.
Intel IRIS XE Graphics 32 (Alder Lake S)
Name GPU
No IGPU
0.40 GHZ
GPU
1.45 GHZ
9000 GPU (Turbo)
NO TURBO 9000 2 9000 2 NO000 NOT 12
DirectX Version
32
Execution Units
256
Number of Shaders
3
Number of Monitors
10 Technology
10 Technology
0002 Q4/2021
Release date
16 GB
Max. GPU Memory
—
Hardware codec support
Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.
Decode / Encode
h364
No
Decode / Encode
JPEG
No
Decode
VP8
No
Decode / Encode
VP9
No
Decode
VC-1
No
Decode / Encode
AVC
No
Decode / Encode
h365 / HEVC ( 8 Bit)
No.
Decode / Encode
H365 / HEVC (10 Bit)
No
Decode
AV1
No.
RAM
These are memory standards supported by processors. The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.
DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Memorial type
No DATA
256 GB
Maximum memory
No Data
2
2
Memory channels
No Data
No
ECC
NO DATA 9000 NO DATA
NO DATA
5.0
PCIe version
no data
20
PCIe lanes
no data
Encryption
Data encryption support 9000 AES
Yes
0003
Yes
Memory & AMP; PCIe
Memory type
DDR4-3200
DDR5-4800
Maximum memory
128 GB
Memory channels
2
version PCIE
5.03
PCIE Lines
20,0003
TDP
Modern systems are loaded with demanding games and working applications , which, as a result, reveal the full potential of the processor. When choosing between Intel Core i5-12600K and Intel Core i5-12600KF, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).
100 ° C
Maximum temperature
100 ° C
—
Maximum TDP
—
—
TDP Download
—
125 W
TDP (PL1)
125 W
228 W / 56 S
TDP (PL2)
150 W
Technical details
20
Alder Lake S
Architecture
Alder Lake S
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
LGA 19 (connector)
LGA 1700
Q4/2021
Release date
q4/2021
x86-64 (64 BIT)
Instructions set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 BIT)
—
L2-Cache
9.50 MB
—
Part Number
BX8071512600KF
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
ISA extensions
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
which devices are using processors.
It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.
Unknown
Used in
Unknown
Popular CPU comparisons
| one. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. Intel Core i9-11900K |
|
| 2. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |
|
| 3. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. Intel Core i5-11600K |
|
| four. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. Intel Core i5-9600K |
|
| 5. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. Intel Core i7-1160G7 |
|
| 6. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. Intel Celeron J4125 |
|
| 7. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. AMD A10-5800K |
|
| eight. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. AMD Ryzen 3 4300GE |
|
| 9. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. Intel Celeron J4115 |
|
| ten. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. Intel Core i5-8400 |
|
| eleven. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. Intel Celeron N4020 |
|
| 12. |
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. Intel Core i5-12600KF |
|
| 13. |
Intel Core i5-12600KF AMD Ryzen 3 3250U |
|
| fourteen. |
Apple M1 vs. Intel Core i5-12600K |
|
|
fifteen. |
Intel Core i5-12400F vs. Intel Core i5-12600KF |
Comparison of Intel Core i5-12600KF and Intel Core i5-12600K
Comparative analysis of the Intel Core i5-12600KF and Intel Core i5-12600K processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and reliability, Technology, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Image quality in graphics , Graphics API support.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score.
Intel Core i5-12600KF
versus
Intel Core i5-12600K
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-12600K
- About 67% larger L1 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L3 cache is about 11% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark about 2% better: 27677 vs 27233
% more, means more data can be stored in it for quick access
| L1 cache | 640 KB vs 384 KB |
| Level 2 cache | 9.5MB vs 7.5MB |
| Level 3 cache | 20MB vs 18MB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 3980 vs 3972 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 27677 vs 27233 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-12600KF
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-12600K
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-12600KF | Intel Core i5-12600K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 3972 | 3980 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 27233 | 27677 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 13170 |
Performance comparison
| Intel Core i5-12600KF | Intel Core i5-12600K | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture name | Alder Lake | Alder Lake |
| Production date | 4 Nov 2021 | 4 Nov 2021 |
| Price at the date of the first issue | $264 — $274 | $289 — 299 |
| Rank | 46 | 25 |
| Processor Number | i5-12600KF | i5-12600K |
| Series | 12th Generation Intel Core i5 Processors | 12th Generation Intel Core i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
| Support 64 bit | ||
| Level 1 cache | 384KB | 640KB |
| Level 2 cache | 7. |
9.5MB |
| Level 3 cache | 18MB | 20MB |
| Process | Intel 7 | Intel 7 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.90 GHz | 4.90 GHz |
| Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 128GB | 128GB |
| Supported memory types | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s |
| Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 45. |
45.0 mm x 37.5 mm |
| Supported sockets | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2020A | PCG 2020A |
| Number of PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
| PCI Express revision | 5.0 and 4.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16+4, 2×8+4 | Up to 1×16+4, 2×8+4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
| Mode-based Execute Control (MBE) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extended instructions | Intel SSE4. |
Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
| Intel® Volume Management Device (VMD) | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| Device ID | 0x4680 | |
| Number of execution units | 32 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. |