1650 super vs 980 ti: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs 980 Ti [in 10 benchmarks]

19 марта, 2023

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti


GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti


  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
150 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 980 Ti .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 980 Ti
15% higher gaming performance.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 980 Ti

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (18 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU Name TU116 () vs GM200 (GM200-310-A1)
Fab Process 12 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 284 mm² vs 601 mm²
Transistors 6,600 million vs 8,000 million
Shaders 1280 vs 2816
Compute Units 20 vs 22
Core clock 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz
ROPs 32 vs 96
TMUs 80 vs 176

Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Memory Type GDDR6 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 128 bit vs 384 bit
Memory Speed 1500 MHz

12000 MHz effective		 vs 1753 MHz

7012 MHz effective
Memory Size 4096 Mb vs 6144 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 980 Ti
TDP 100 watts vs 250 watts
Release Date 22 Nov 2019 vs 2 Jun 2015

GigaPixels — higher is better

GigaTexels — higher is better

GB/s — higher is better

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Radeon RX 580
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1060
VS
GeForce GTX 980 Ti Radeon RX 5500 XT
VS
GeForce GTX 980 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
VS
Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 XT
VS
Radeon RX 6600 XT GeForce RTX 2060

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

GTX 980 Ti vs 1650S

Muhammed Kıyakoğlu
Decapat