1660 ti vs 1080 ti: Please click the green button to continue.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti



  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    100%

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    158%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
100 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti .
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
58% higher gaming performance.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (69 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GPU Name TU116 (TU116-400-A1) vs GP102 (GP102-350-K1-A1)
Fab Process 12 nm vs 16 nm
Die Size 284 mm² vs 471 mm²
Transistors 6,600 million vs 12,000 million
Shaders 1536 vs 3584
Compute Units 24 vs 28
Core clock 1500 MHz vs 1480 MHz
ROPs 48 vs 88
TMUs 96 vs 224

Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Memory Type GDDR6 vs GDDR5X
Bus Width 192 bit vs 352 bit
Memory Speed 1500 MHz

12000 MHz effective
vs 1376 MHz

11008 MHz effective
Memory Size 6144 Mb vs 11264 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
TDP 120 watts vs 220 watts
Release Date 22 Feb 2019 vs UNRELEASED
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    84. 96 GP/s

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    130.20 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    169.90 GT/s

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    332.00 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    288.00 GB/s

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    484.00 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    5437.00 GFLOPs

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    10609.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    44

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    66

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    91

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    123

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    90

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    134

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    103

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    160

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    93

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    163

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    40

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    55

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    104

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    156

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    108

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    145

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    85

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    119

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    71

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    89

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    97

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    116

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    68

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    116

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    124

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    170

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    105

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    148

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    47

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    71

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    36

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    46

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    80

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    119

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    46

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    64

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    98

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    148

FPS (higher is better)

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    81

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    115

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    102

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    168

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    91

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    140

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    36

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    69

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    34

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    53

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    69

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    98

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    69

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    109

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    74

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    120

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    71

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    121

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    26

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    36

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    71

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    109

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    78

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    119

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    56

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    89

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    52

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    66

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    70

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    104

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    48

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    82

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    94

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    144

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    68

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    101

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    35

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    57

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    26

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    37

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    56

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    89

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    35

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    50

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    65

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    104

FPS (higher is better)

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    52

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    78

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    73

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    121

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    64

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    108

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    26

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    51

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    12

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    33

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    37

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    60

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    40

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    68

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    41

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    70

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    40

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    72

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    10

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    18

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    38

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    61

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    43

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    71

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    28

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    46

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    25

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    42

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    37

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    58

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    26

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    46

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    47

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    78

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    35

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    55

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    22

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    36

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    13

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    22

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    33

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    53

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    24

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    31

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    32

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    52

FPS (higher is better)

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    26

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    42

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    41

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    71

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    34

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    66

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    16

  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    29

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Radeon RX 5500 XT
VS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
VS
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GeForce RTX 2070 Super
VS
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Radeon RX 5700 XT
VS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GeForce RTX 2080 Super
VS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super TITAN V

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences








Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 1536 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,8 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 3584 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,6 GHz, its lithography is 16 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
Release date

Q1 2019

Q1 2017
Model number

TU116-400-A1

GP102-350-K1-A1
GPU name

TU116

GP102
Architecture

Turing

Pascal
Generation

GeForce 16

GeForce 10
Lithography

12 nm

16 nm
Transistors

6. 600.000.000

11.800.000.000
Bus interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock

1.500 MHz

1.481 MHz
GPU boost clock

1.770 MHz

1.582 MHz
Memory frequency

1.500 MHz

1.376 MHz
Effective memory speed

12 Gbps

11 Gbps
Memory size

6 GB

11 GB
Memory type

GDDR6

GDDR5X
Memory bus

192 Bit

352 Bit
Memory bandwidth

288,0 GB/s

484,4 GB/s
TDP

120 W

250 W
Suggested PSU 450W ATX Power Supply 600W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology

4-way SLI, 2-way SLI HB
Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x DisplayPort

1x HDMI
3x DisplayPort


Max display resolution

7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),

7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP),

3840 x 2160@240Hz (DP)

7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),

4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI)


Maximum GPU Temperature

95°C

91°C
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

24

28
Shading units (cuda cores)

1. 536

3.584
TMUs

96

224
ROPs

48

88
Cache memory

1,5 MB

2,8 MB
Pixel fillrate

85,0 GP/s

139,2 GP/s
Texture fillrate

169,9 GT/s

354,4 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half)

10,9 TFLOPS

177,2 GFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float)

5,4 TFLOPS

11,3 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)

169,9 GFLOPS

354,4 GFLOPS
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

11.340
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

5.437

The difference is 109%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-QNvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website.