1660 ti vs 960: Please click the green button to continue.

MSI GeForce GTX 960 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: What is the difference?

46points

MSI GeForce GTX 960

55points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

54 facts in comparison

MSI GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Why is MSI GeForce GTX 960 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

  • 253MHz faster memory clock speed?
    1753MHzvs1500MHz
  • 2 more DisplayPort outputs?
    3vs1
  • 8.2dB lower load noise level?
    40dBvs48.2dB
  • 2.1dB lower idle noise level?
    36.4dBvs38.5dB

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than MSI GeForce GTX 960?

  • 373MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    1500MHzvs1127MHz
  • 3.13 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    5.44 TFLOPSvs2.31 TFLOPS
  • 48.86 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    84. 96 GPixel/svs36.1 GPixel/s
  • 4988MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    12000MHzvs7012MHz
  • 3x more VRAM?
    6GBvs2GB
  • 97.8 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    169.9 GTexels/svs72.1 GTexels/s
  • 175.8GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    288GB/svs112.2GB/s
  • 64bit wider memory bus width?
    192bitvs128bit

Which are the most popular comparisons?

MSI GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

MSI GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

MSI GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050

MSI GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX110

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

MSI GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

MSI GeForce GTX 960

vs

Asus Radeon RX 550 4GB

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

MSI GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX150

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

MSI GeForce GTX 960

vs

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Ventus XS OC

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSI GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5500M

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

MSI GeForce GTX 960

0 User reviews

MSI GeForce GTX 960

0. 0/10

0 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

3 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

10.0/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

No reviews yet

 

9.3/10

3 votes

Gaming

No reviews yet

 

8.7/10

3 votes

Performance

No reviews yet

 

9.7/10

3 votes

Fan noise

No reviews yet

 

8.3/10

3 votes

Reliability

No reviews yet

 

9.0/10

3 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1127MHz

1500MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1178MHz

1770MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

36. 1 GPixel/s

84.96 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

2.31 TFLOPS

5.44 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

72.1 GTexels/s

169.9 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1753MHz

1500MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

7012MHz

12000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

112.2GB/s

288GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

128bit

192bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖MSI GeForce GTX 960

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔MSI GeForce GTX 960

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖MSI GeForce GTX 960

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔MSI GeForce GTX 960

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖MSI GeForce GTX 960

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI GeForce GTX 960)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔MSI GeForce GTX 960

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI GeForce GTX 960)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (MSI GeForce GTX 960)

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 960: What is the difference?

55points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

46points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

54 facts in comparison

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 960?

  • 373MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    1500MHzvs1127MHz
  • 3. 13 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    5.44 TFLOPSvs2.31 TFLOPS
  • 48.86 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    84.96 GPixel/svs36.1 GPixel/s
  • 4988MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    12000MHzvs7012MHz
  • 3x more VRAM?
    6GBvs2GB
  • 97.8 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    169.9 GTexels/svs72.1 GTexels/s
  • 176GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    288GB/svs112GB/s
  • 64bit wider memory bus width?
    192bitvs128bit

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

  • 253MHz faster memory clock speed?
    1753MHzvs1500MHz
  • 2 more DisplayPort outputs?
    3vs1
  • 8.2dB lower load noise level?
    40dBvs48.2dB
  • 2.1dB lower idle noise level?
    36.4dBvs38.5dB

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX330

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

AMD Radeon RX 570

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5500M

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

AMD Radeon Vega 8

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX150

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

3 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

10. 0/10

3 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

3 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

9.3/10

3 User reviews

Features

Value for money

9.3/10

3 votes

8.3/10

3 votes

Gaming

8.7/10

3 votes

8.7/10

3 votes

Performance

9.7/10

3 votes

9.0/10

3 votes

Fan noise

8.3/10

3 votes

8.0/10

3 votes

Reliability

9.0/10

3 votes

10.0/10

3 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1500MHz

1127MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1770MHz

1178MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3. pixel rate

84.96 GPixel/s

36.1 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

5.44 TFLOPS

2.31 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

169.9 GTexels/s

72.1 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1500MHz

1753MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

12000MHz

7012MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

288GB/s

112GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

192bit

128bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 960)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

HDMI 2.0

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 960)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce GTX 960 Graphics cards Comparison

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile and GeForce GTX 960, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile stacks up against GeForce GTX 960, check out specs charts below.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile

Check Price

GeForce GTX 960

Check Price

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile here:

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile Laptops

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile GeForce GTX 960
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pins
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Recommended system power (PSU) 400 Watt
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3. 0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960.
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 960 — in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 960 — with Maxwell.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is 328 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960.
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 960 — by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile is 11993 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 50−55 35−40
ultra / 1080p 35−40 21−24
QHD / 1440p 27−30 16−18
4K / 2160p 16−18 10−11
low / 720p 80−85 60−65
medium / 1080p 60−65 40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
high / 1080p 80−85 55−60
ultra / 1080p 70−75 45−50
QHD / 1440p 55−60 35−40
4K / 2160p 30−33 18−20
low / 720p 130−140 100−110
medium / 1080p 90−95 60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
low / 768p 45−50 50−55
QHD / 1440p 0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile.
low / 768p 250−260 250−260
medium / 768p 230−240 220−230
ultra / 1080p 180−190
QHD / 1440p 150−160 110−120
4K / 2160p 100−110 70−75
high / 768p 220−230 210−220
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
low / 768p 70−75 60−65
medium / 1080p 50−55 55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 768p 110−120 110−120
ultra / 1080p 110−120 100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
high / 1080p 65−70 45−50
ultra / 1080p 60−65 40−45
QHD / 1440p 40−45 27−30
4K / 2160p 21−24 14−16
low / 720p 100−110 80−85
medium / 1080p 70−75 45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
high / 1080p 95−100 60−65
ultra / 1080p 75−80 45−50
QHD / 1440p 45−50 27−30
4K / 2160p 21−24 27−30
low / 720p 220−230 180−190
medium / 1080p 150−160 110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Fortnite is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
high / 1080p 85−90 60−65
ultra / 1080p 70−75 45−50
QHD / 1440p 50−55 30−35
4K / 2160p 35−40 24−27
low / 720p 140−150 100−110
medium / 1080p 95−100 65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
low / 768p 160−170 140−150
medium / 768p 150−160 120−130
high / 1080p 100−110 70−75
ultra / 1080p 50−55 30−35
QHD / 1440p 40−45 21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
high / 1080p 40−45 24−27
ultra / 1080p 30−35 20−22
QHD / 1440p 24−27 16−18
4K / 2160p 14−16 8−9
low / 720p 95−100 65−70
medium / 1080p 55−60 30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
low / 768p 120−130 130−140
medium / 1080p 120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile.
high / 1080p 80−85
ultra / 1080p 55−60 14−16
4K / 2160p 18−20
low / 720p 120−130 100−110
medium / 1080p 90−95 18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 97% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
high / 1080p 35−40 24−27
ultra / 1080p 24−27 16−18
QHD / 1440p 18−20 10−11
4K / 2160p 12−14 7−8
low / 720p 95−100 65−70
medium / 1080p 55−60 35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
low / 768p 190−200 130−140
medium / 768p 130−140 85−90
high / 1080p 75−80 45−50
ultra / 1080p 40−45 24−27
4K / 2160p 27−30 16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 960.
low / 768p 130−140 90−95
medium / 768p 60−65
ultra / 1080p 65−70 50−55
high / 768p 60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile in World of Tanks is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 960.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile GeForce GTX 960
Architecture Turing Maxwell
Code name N18E-G0 GM206
Type Laptop Desktop
Release date 23 April 2019 22 January 2015
Pipelines 1536 1024
Core clock speed 1455 MHz 1127 MHz
Boost Clock 1590 MHz 1178 MHz
Transistor count 6,600 million 2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 152. 6 72 billion/sec
Floating-point performance 2,413 gflops
Length 9.5″ (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width 192 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth 288.0 GB/s 112 GB/s
Shared memory
G-SYNC support +
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1. 2.131 1.1.126
CUDA 7.5 +
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.27 kh/s
CUDA cores 1024
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm)
SLI options +
Multi monitor support 4 displays
HDCP +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 318 Mh/s
Laptop size medium sized
Decred / DCR (Decred) 0. 92 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 8 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 141.47 Sol/s
GameStream +
GeForce ShadowPlay +
GPU Boost 2.0
GameWorks +
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti mobile vs Quadro K5200
  • GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 960 vs Quadro K5200

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960


GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960


  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    244%

  • GeForce GTX 960

    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
144% higher gaming performance.
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 960
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (5 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 960
GPU Name TU116 (TU116-400-A1) vs GM206 (GM206-300-A1)
Fab Process 12 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 284 mm² vs 228 mm²
Transistors 6,600 million vs 2,940 million
Shaders 1536 vs 1024
Compute Units 24 vs 8
Core clock 1500 MHz vs 1127 MHz
ROPs 48 vs 32
TMUs 96 vs 64

Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 960
Memory Type GDDR6 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 192 bit vs 128 bit
Memory Speed 1500 MHz

12000 MHz effective
vs 1753 MHz

7012 MHz effective
Memory Size 6144 Mb vs 2048 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 960
TDP 120 watts vs 120 watts
Release Date 22 Feb 2019 vs 22 Jan 2015
  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    84. 96 GP/s

  • GeForce GTX 960

    36.10 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    169.90 GT/s

  • GeForce GTX 960

    72.10 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    288.00 GB/s

  • GeForce GTX 960

    112.20 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    5437.00 GFLOPs

  • GeForce GTX 960

    2308.10 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    124

  • GeForce GTX 960

    53

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    91

  • GeForce GTX 960

    36

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    94

  • GeForce GTX 960

    37

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    64

  • GeForce GTX 960

    27

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

  • GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    34

  • GeForce GTX 960

    14

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Radeon RX 5500 XT
VS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
VS
GeForce GTX 960 GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
VS
GeForce GTX 960 GeForce GTX 1050
VS
Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 XT
VS
Radeon RX 6600 XT GeForce RTX 2060

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960

Availability

MSRP in USD: $279

PNY GeForce® GTX 1660 Ti 6GB Graphics Card

Buy on Amazon

$229.99

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 27 minutes agoASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti EVO TOP Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 6GB GDDR6, 14Gbps Memory Speed, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4, Space-Grade Lubricant, Compact Design, GPU Tweak II)

Buy on Amazon

$249

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 27 minutes agoASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti EVO OC Edition Graphics Card (PCIe 3.0, 6GB GDDR6, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4, Space-Grade Lubricant, Compact Design, GPU Tweak II)

Buy on Amazon

$250

In Stock


1770 1815 MHz

Boost Clock

Updated 27 minutes agoPNY GeForce® GTX 1660 Ti 6GB Graphics Card

Buy on Amazon

$279.95

In Stock


Same as Founder’s Edition

Updated 27 minutes ago

Availability

MSRP in USD: $199

No items available

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms GeForce GTX 960 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1492 days newer than GeForce GTX 960.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

League of Legends

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019


FPS

656

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.35/FPS

100%

Price, $

$229.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

PNY GeForce® GTX 1660 Ti 6GB Graphics Card

Buy for $229.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 27 minutes ago

GeForce GTX 960

Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015


FPS

468

60%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Resolution

1920×1080

Game Graphics

High

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019

GeForce GTX 960

Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015

293

FPS

210

FPS

VALORANT

656

FPS

468

FPS

League of Legends

158

FPS

111

FPS

Grand Theft Auto V

404

FPS

289

FPS

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

181

FPS

129

FPS

Apex Legends

Theoretical Performance

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

84. 96 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

169.9 GTexel/s

100%

GeForce GTX 960

Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015


Pixel Fillrate

37.7 GPixel/s

-25%

Texel Fillrate

75.39 GTexel/s

-25%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

Feb 22nd, 2019

Release Date Jan 22nd, 2015
GeForce 16 Generation GeForce 900
$279 MSRP

$199

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort Outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin Power Connectors 1x 6-pin

Desktop

Segment

Desktop

6 GB

Memory 2 GB
GDDR6 Type GDDR5
192-bit Bus 128-bit

288 GB/s

Bandwidth 112. 2 GB/s

1500 MHz

Base Clock Speed 1127 MHz

1770 MHz

Boost Clock Speed 1178 MHz
1500 MHz Memory Clock Speed

1753 MHz

Builds Using GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or GeForce GTX 960

League of Legends, 1080p, High

Gaming PC

551 FPS

$0.18/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$99.99

In Stock

Updated 60560 minutes ago

ASUS ROG Strix GL10 Gaming Desktop PC

565 FPS

$1.13/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600X

8 GB, 256 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$639

In Stock

Updated 11 minutes ago

ASUS ROG Gaming Desktop PC

565 FPS

$1.15/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600X

16 GB, N/A Storage

Buy on Amazon

$649

In Stock

Updated 11 minutes ago

ASUS ROG Strix GL10 Gaming Desktop PC

565 FPS

$1. 34/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600X

16 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$759

In Stock

Updated 11 minutes ago

2022 ASUS ROG Strix GL10 Gaming Desktop PC

565 FPS

$1.41/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600X

16 GB, 256 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$799

In Stock

Updated 10 minutes ago

ASUS ROG Gaming Desktop PC

565 FPS

$1.47/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600X

16 GB, 1 TB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$829

In Stock

Updated 11 minutes ago

ASUS ROG Strix GL10 Gaming Desktop PC

565 FPS

$1.49/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600X

32 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$840

In Stock

Updated 11 minutes ago

CUK Mantis Professional Student Desktop PC

629 FPS

$1.51/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Core i5-11400F

32 GB, 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD

Buy on Amazon

$949. 99

In Stock

Updated 16 minutes ago

ROG Strix GL10DH Gaming Desktop PC

586 FPS

$1.55/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 7 3700X

16 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$909.99

In Stock

Updated 20 minutes ago

ASUS ROG Strix GL10 Gaming Desktop PC

565 FPS

$1.56/FPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Ryzen 5 3600X

32 GB, 512 GB SSD

Buy on Amazon

$881.02

In Stock

Updated 14 minutes ago

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

$229.99

Radeon HD 7750M

N/A Stock

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

$229.99

Radeon R9 Nano

N/A Stock

GeForce GTX 960

N/A Stock

GeForce 930MX

N/A Stock

GeForce RTX 3050

$289.99

GeForce GTX 960

N/A Stock

Radeon RX 6600

$249. 99

GeForce GTX 960

N/A Stock

Radeon RX 6600

$249.99

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

$229.99

GeForce RTX 3070

$519.99

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

$229.99

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

$229.6

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

$229.99

GeForce RTX 3050

$289.99

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

$229.99

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs. GTX 1060 vs. GTX 960 — Graphics — Feature

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GPU rolled into town late last week. It’s an important launch in many ways because it represents the first card on the new Turing architecture to do without the ray tracing and image enhancement goodies found on the RTX line.

Nvidia wants to position it as a price-to-performance champ, citing the $279 (£259) price point as a key attribute. Trouble is, we reckon that pricing is too high given that GeForce RTX 2060 starts at £310 and offers a leading game in the package. Looking toward the red team, the Radeon RX Vega 56 can be had for similar money to the GTX 1660 Ti, plus beats it in sheer performance and offers three games to boot. Bottom line is that GTX 1660 Ti is a good card albeit at the wrong price point.

Whether you are a fan or not, GTX 16-series is here to stay, and we are likely to see GTX 1660 and GTX 1650 both make debut in the next two months, thus helping bring Turing to the real meat of the gaming market.

We always find it instructive to see how one generation of GPU performs against older iterations. Such analysis shows how successive architectures deal with the growing complexity of games engines. Rather more handily, this comparison enables users of older cards to understand and quantify how much extra performance they are likely to receive by upgrading one they installed three or four years ago.

In this article we examine the performance benefits of jumping up the Nvidia architecture pack whilst not dialling up the power. Keeping things simple, we have a GeForce GTX 960 2GB (Maxwell), GeForce GTX 1060 6GB (Pascal) and, of course, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Turing), all said to be consuming a maximum TDP of 120W, examined over a wider breadth of games than in the original review. The purpose is to educate the reader into making informed choices if going down the green route.

Is such a comparison even valid and useful, you might ask? Nvidia’s own data suggest that the desktop GeForce install base is still heavily skewed towards older cards. Almost 70 per cent of GeForces are from the GTX 960 series or older. It’s clear that gamers are upgrading far less frequently, but there comes a time when the existing card simply cannot cut the performance mustard in newer titles run at beautiful image-quality settings. GeForce GTX 960, as we will show, is such a card.

Let’s roll out each GPU’s vital specs and give them a quick once-over.











































GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs.

GTX 1060 vs. GTX 960

GPU name

GTX 1660 Ti

GTX 1060

GTX 960

Launch date

Feb 2019

July 2016

January 2015

Codename

TU116

GP106

GM206

Architecture

Turing

Pascal

Maxwell

Process (nm)

12

16

28

Transistors (bn)

6.6

4.4

2.9

Die Size (mm²)

284

200

227

Base Clock (MHz)

1,500

1,506

1,126

Boost Clock (MHz)

1,770

1,708

1,78

Shaders

1,536

1,280

1,024

GFLOPS

5,437

3,855

2,416

Memory Size

6GB

6GB

2GB

Memory Bus

192-bit

192-bit

128-bit

Memory Type

GDDR6

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Clock

12Gbps

8Gbps

7Gbps

Memory Bandwidth

288

192

112

ROPs

48

48

32

Texture Units

96



80

64

Power Connector

8-pin

6-pin

6-pin

TDP (watts)

120

120

120

Launch MSRP

$279

$249

$199

Analysis

Launch price, quoted in US dollars, does highlight the comparison is not perfectly valid. Even if we take inflation into account, having linear prices would mean the GTX 1060 have cost about the same as GTX 960 — it came soon after — and the GTX 1660 Ti about $220. That clearly is not the case here, yet the suggested MSRPs are not a million miles off.

It’s clear that Nvidia was really on its game in the interim time between GTX 960 and GTX 1060. Sure, the new GPU cost 25 per cent more, though in just 18 months the GFLOPS throughput went up by 60 per cent and memory bandwidth by 71 per cent, all without increasing the power budget. What’s more, the architecture refinements between Pascal and Maxwell lead to even more performance than the table suggests. GeForce GTX 1060 was a killer midrange gaming GPU for mid-2016: a real price-to-performance champ.

It has taken much longer to bring the GTX 1660 Ti to the table. A combination of the energy-efficient Turing architecture and 12nm process gives the new GPU an expected performance uplift whilst keeping to the same board power as the other two cards. This time around, from a pure numbers’ perspective, throughput and bandwidth go up by 41 per cent and 50 per cent, respectively.

Conveniently ignoring architecture, Nvidia has achieved less of an improvement in 31 months than it did in the previous 19. We believe this trend will continue in the future, where manifest changes in microarchitecture will outweigh speeds and feeds. GPUs will get better, albeit more slowly than we have been used to in the previous 10 years.

Knowing what we do about underlying Turing architecture, which is smart and efficient, we still feel as if GTX 1660 Ti offers too little of an upgrade over GTX 1060 once the 31-month introduction lag is factored into the equation. The legion of GTX 1060 owners may well look at GTX 1660 Ti and be unperturbed, especially as it doesn’t feature the RT and Tensor cores that could, potentially, be a deal-maker for the slightly dearer GeForce RTX 2060.

The real question, really, is whether GTX 1660 Ti offers the massive framerate and smoothness boost to users still hanging on to the GTX 960, or similar, GPUs, so let’s find out just how it shakes out across 10 applications.

0024

  • 3.13 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
    5.44 TFLOPS vs 2.31 TFLOPS
  • 48.86 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    84.96 GPixel/s vs 36.1 GPixel/s
  • 4988MHz higher effective clock speed?
    12000MHz vs 7012MHz
  • 3x more VRAM?
    6GB vs 2GB
  • 97.8 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
    169.9 GTexels/s vs 72.1 GTexels/s
  • 176GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    288GB/s vs 112GB/s
  • 64bit wider memory bus?
    192bit vs 128bit
    • 253MHz faster memory speed?
      1753MHz vs 1500MHz
    • 2 more DisplayPort outputs?
      3 vs 1
    • 8.2dB lower noise level at full load?
      40dB vs 48.2dB
    • 2.1dB lower idle noise?
      36.4dB vs 38. 5dB

    Which comparisons are the most popular?

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660 Ti

    VS

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660 Super

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 960

    VS

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTXE GTXE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTORCE GTXE0004 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX330

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    0003

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    vs.

    AMD Radeon Vega 8

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    vs.0111

    The price ratio

    9.3 /10

    3 Votes

    8.3 /10

    3 Votes

    8.7 /10

    9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

    000

    3 VOTES

    performance

    9.7 /10

    3 Votes

    /10

    3 Votes

    Little Right

    8.3 /10

    003

    8.0 /10

    3 Votes

    Reliability

    /10

    3 VOTES

    10.0 /10 9000

    3 VOTES

    Production

    1127MHz

    The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

    2.turbo GPU

    1770MHz

    1178MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel rate

    84.96 GPixel/s

    36.1 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    5.44 TFLOPS

    2.31 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    169.9 GTexels/s

    72.1 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    1500MHz

    1753MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    12000MHz

    7012MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    288GB/s

    112GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width

    192bit

    128bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5.GDDR memory versions

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5.GPU Temperature at Boot

    Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI-based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to an attached display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 960)

    More HDMI connections allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    HDMI 3.Version

    HDMI 2.0

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 960)

    New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    6. Mini DisplayPort 9 outputs0003

    Allows you to connect to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

    Price Match

    Cancel

    Which graphics cards are better?

    Driver nVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650/1660Ti and RTX 2060/2070 Max … — Orașul Löbau

    Driver nVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650/1660Ti and RTX 2060/2070 Max . .. — Orașul Löbau — document PDF

    liblib.ro

    This package contains the driver for nVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, 1660Ti and RTX 2060, 2070 Max-Q, 2080 Max-Q graphics cards. A graphics or video driver is …

    nVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650/1660Ti and RTX 2060/2070 Max Driver …

    This package contains the driver for nVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, 1660Ti and RTX 2060, 2070 Max-Q, 2080 Max-Q graphics cards. The graphics or video driver is …

    GeForce RTX 2060 with 12 GB of memory and RTX 3070 Ti with 16 GB. Nvidia…

    Oct 4 ’13 2021 … According to numerous rumors, Nvidia is preparing a line of GeForce RTX 30 Super graphics cards. However, the upcoming announcement of the company may even be …

    AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 — Versus

    What is the difference between Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon RX 5500M? Find out which one is better and their overall performance in the video card rating.

    Download driver NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | Overview and . ..

    Download NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 driver … Timely updating of the video card driver is the main guarantee of its high-quality and safe operation. On this …

    NVidia GeForce 8400 GS driver free download (ver. 340.52)

    On this page you can always free download NVidia GeForce 8400 GS video card driver.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Graphics Driver …

    Feb 21 ’11 2021 … Troubleshooting information for Dell PC GeForce video adapter driver not updated on Windows 10.

    Download NVidia GeForce 8400 GS driver for Windows

    Mar 1 2016 … Free download driver for video card NVidia GeForce 8400 GS for Windows 7/10/8/8.1/XP/Vista 32/64-bit (x86/x64). NVidia GeForce 8400 GS …

    Download driver for NVidia GeForce 8400 GS — GetDrivers.net 2021 … Download drivers for NVidia GeForce 8400 GS via direct link. Free and without registration. OS: Windows 10, Windows 8/Vista, Windows 7/XP …

    Download NVidia GeForce 930MX Driver v.376. 19 for Windows …

    Download NVidia GeForce 930MX Driver v.376.19 for Windows 10 64-bit for free.

    Select and download driver for video card NVIDIA GeForce

    Select and download NVIDIA driver. Driver for. Geforce. Quadro Riva TNT Riva TNT2 ION nForce. Video card. GeForce 945M GeForce GT 1030 GeForce GTX 950

    Download Driver for GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — NVIDIA Drivers …

    The latest NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti driver for free download can be found on this page.

    Download NVidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti driver for Windows

    Driver for NVidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti graphics card. 03 May. 2018. On this page below there are links to download the latest free drivers for …

    Download driver NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G (for laptop)

    Download driver NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G (for laptop). by admin • 12/05/2016. Download driver Operating systems Windows 11, Windows 10, Windows 8 / 8.1, …

    Download NVidia GeForce 3D Vision Driver v.185. 85 for Windows …

    Download NVidia GeForce 3D Vision Driver v.185.85 for Windows 7 (32 /64-bit), Vista (32/64-bit) free.

    NVIDIA GeForce/GTX/Quadro 9 Graphics Driver0003

    This package contains driver for NVIDIA 940MX/GTX 950M/GTX 1050/GTX 960M/GeForce 930M/Quadro M1000M/Quadro M1200/GeForce 820M/920M on …

    Free Download Driver for NVidia GeForce 8400 GS3 9000 GS3 Jan 9 2019 … NVidia GeForce 8400 GS is a powerful, modern and functional video card from a well-known manufacturer, which, like other cards …

    Driver for nVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 graphics adapters …

    This package contains a driver for nVIDIA video adapters GeForce GTX 1060/1070/1080. It is supported on Alienware 13 R3, Alienware 15 R3 and Alienware …

    GeForce Game Ready Driver | 466.11 | Windows 10 64-bit | NVIDIA

    Apr 14 ’11 2021 … Game Ready Drivers provide the best possible gaming experience for all major new releases. Prior to a new title launching, our driver team . ..

    Download NVidia GeForce 8400 GS driver for free — Windows …

    Feb 2 2011 2018 … The official driver for the NVidia GeForce 8400 GS video card allows the operating system to determine the card model and put it into operation.

    NVIDIA released the GeForce Game Ready 512.15 WHQL driver with… 2022 … NVIDIA has released a new GeForce Game Ready 512.15 WHQL graphics driver package. It includes support for Ghostwire: Tokyo and …

    Download driver for NVIDIA GeForce 610M graphics card for free 2021 … NVIDIA GeForce 610M is a popular series of graphics cards that are usually installed in mid-range laptops and netbooks.

    Driver for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050, 1050 Ti, 1060, 1070 and 1080

    This package contains the driver for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050, 1050 Ti, 1060, 1070, and 1080 graphics cards.

    nVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050, 745 Graphics | Dell United Kingdom — Dell

    This package provides the nVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050, GTX 745 Graphics driver and is supported on Inspiron 3668 and Vostro 3668 models with Operating Systems . ..

    Nvidia GeForce 940MX vs Nvidia GeForce MX150: What is the difference?

    … is the MX150 better than the Nvidia GeForce 940MX? GPU frequency 105MHz more? 1227MHzvs1122MHz; 0.17 TFLOPS over FLOPS ? 1.13TFLOPSvs0.9539 …

    NVIDIA GeForce 940MX vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150 — DeviceList

    We compared the specifications of NVIDIA GeForce 940MX and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you.

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — Versus

    What is the difference between Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti? … VEINEDA GTX 1060 3GB 5GB 6GB 192Bit GD…VEINEDA GTX 1060 3GB 5GB 6GB 192Bit …

    Nvidia GeForce 940MX vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050: What is the difference?

    What is the difference between Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 and Nvidia GeForce 940MX? Find out which one is better and their overall performance in the video card rating.

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — Versus

    What is the difference between Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti? Find out which one is better and their overall performance in the video card rating.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030… — Hitesti

    Compare graphics cards and find out which is better. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030. Specifications, gaming performance in …

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 — Versus

    What is the difference between Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060? Find out which one is better and their overall performance in the video card rating.

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 — Versus

    What is the difference between Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 960? Find out which one is better and their overall performance in the video card rating.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti …

    Compare graphics cards and find out which is better. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Specifications, gaming performance in …

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 — Versus

    What is the difference between Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 960? Find out which one is better and their overall performance in the video card rating.

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 — Versus

    What is the difference between Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 970? Find out which one is better and their common… HUANANZHI Video Card gtx 1060 6gb gtx 96.

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 — Versus

    What is the difference between Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 660? Find out which one is better and their overall performance in the video card rating.

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti — Versus

    What is the difference between Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070? Find out which one is better and their overall performance in the video card rating.

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 — Versus

    What is the difference between Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050? Find out which one is better and their overall performance in the video card rating.

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti — Versus

    What is the difference between Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050? Find out which one is better and their overall performance in the video card rating.

    Videocard Gigabyte GV-N2060OC-6GD GeForce RTX 2060/ 6 GB

    Placă video PC ⇥ Videocard Gigabyte GV-N2060OC-6GD GeForce RTX 2060/ 6 GB ⇤ în online magazinul ▷ Enter MD. ➢ Livrare de o zi prin Balti, …

    Evolution *50* ti of the Nvidia card series (750 ti vs 1050 ti vs 1650 super)

    Maxwell of the first version will be GTX 750 ti. And if anyone has already forgotten — the maxwell seems to have been the 900th series of the card, but this is formally the second maxwell …

    Prin utilizarea site-ului nostru, sunteți de acord cu utilizarea cookie-urilor pentru o experiență mai bună.

    Liblib.ro © 2022

    specs and benchmarks in 57 games and 19 benchmarks

    NVIDIA started shipping the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on April 23, 2019. This is a graphics card for laptops, based on the Turing architecture, with a 12 nm process technology. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory with a frequency of 1500 MHz, a 192-bit bus, which provides a bandwidth of 12 Gb / s.

    The card occupies 1 slot, connected via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. The card does not require additional power supply.

    Specifications

    GPU

    GPU name
    TU116
    Architecture
    Turing
    Manufacturer
    TSMC
    Process
    12 nm
    Number of transistors
    6600 million
    Crystal area
    284 mm²

    Graphic card

    Release date
    April 23, 2019
    Generation
    GeForce 16 Mobile
    Predecessor
    GeForce 10 Mobile
    Descendant
    GeForce 20 Mobile
    Market price
    $1185
    Data bus interface
    PCIe 3. 0 x16

    Frequencies

    Base frequency
    1140 MHz
    Boost frequency
    1335 MHz
    Memory frequency
    1500 MHz

    Memory

    Memory capacity
    6GB
    Memory type
    GDDR6
    Memory bus
    192 bit
    Memory speed
    12 Gb/s
    Memory bandwidth
    288 GB/s

    Render configuration

    Shader units
    1536
    Texture blocks
    96
    Raster blocks
    48
    Streaming Multiprocessors
    24
    L1 cache
    64 KB
    L2 cache
    1. 5 MB

    Rated output

    Pixel fill rate
    64.08 HP/s
    Texture Fill Rate
    128.2 GT/s
    Performance FP16
    8.202 Tflops
    Performance FP32
    4.101 Tflops
    Performance FP64
    128.2 GFlops

    Graphics

    DirectX
    12 (12_1)
    OpenGL
    4.6
    OpenCL
    1.2
    Vulcan
    1.2
    CUDA
    7.5
    Shader model
    6. 5

    Video card design

    Occupied slots
    1
    Outlets
    None
    Power supply
    Not required
    Board number
    E4914 SKU 50
    Maximum temperature
    61°C
    Maximum noise
    45.6 dB

    Game FPS

    Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

    (2020)

    Better than AMD Radeon R9 FURY, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 31.1

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 27. 0

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 18.3

    Valorant

    (2020)

    Better than AMD Radeon R9 FURY, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 136.5

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 111.6

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 97.1

    Death Stranding

    (2020)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

    1280×720 / Low / 136.1

    1920×1080 / Medium / 87.7

    1920×1080 / High / 81.3

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 78.4

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 48.0

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 29.1

    Cyberpunk 2077

    (2020)

    Better than AMD Radeon R9 FURY, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 31.1

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 29.1

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 19.1

    Apex Legends

    (2019)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 570, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 590.

    1280×720 / Low / 144

    1920×1080 / Medium / 119.6

    1920×1080 / Tall / 94. 85

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 94.3

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 51.9

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 31.0

    Metro Exodus

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 96.6

    1920×1080 / Medium / 60

    1920×1080 / Tall / 46. 6

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 36.8

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 27.9

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 17.6

    Red Dead Redemption 2

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

    1280×720 / Low / 115.1

    1920×1080 / Medium / 71.7

    1920×1080 / High / 47. 2

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 29.4

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 26.1

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 16.6

    PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

    (2017)

    Better than AMD Radeon R9 Nano, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 590.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 54.9

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 42.0

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 23. 9

    Overwatch

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 580.

    1280×720 / Low / 193.7

    1920×1080 / Tall / 140.7

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 116

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 72.8

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 37.5

    Grand Theft Auto V

    (2015)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030.

    1024×768 / Low / 161.3

    1366×768 / Medium / 151.5

    1920×1080 / Tall / 114.6

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 59.6

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 45.9

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 22.2

    Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

    (2012)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 580, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 191.5

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 159.6

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 143.6

    League of Legends

    (2019)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 580, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980.

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 359.0

    2560×1440 / Ultra / 199.5

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 79. 8

    The Witcher 3

    (2015)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA RTX A2000 (mobile).

    1024×768 / Low / 243

    1366×768 / Medium / 164.5

    1920×1080 / High / 92.1

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 51.3

    3840×2160 / Tall / 31

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 30. 9

    Horizon Zero Dawn

    (2020)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 590, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q.

    1280×720 / Low / 119

    1920×1080 / Medium / 78

    1920×1080 / Tall / 65

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 51

    F1 2020

    (2020)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 219

    1920×1080 / Medium / 130

    1920×1080 / Tall / 112

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 79

    Gears Tactics

    (2020)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 214.7

    1920×1080 / Medium / 130. 2

    1920×1080 / High / 79.9

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 56.1

    Doom Eternal

    (2020)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 168.9

    1920×1080 / Medium / 101.7

    1920×1080 / Tall / 95.4

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 93. 4

    Hunt Showdown

    (2020)

    Better than NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 176.8

    1920×1080 / Medium / 81.2

    1920×1080 / High / 63.3

    Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order

    (2019)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 590, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile.

    1920×1080 / Medium / 91. 5

    1920×1080 / High / 78.1

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 72.4

    Call of Duty: Modern Warfare

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 570.

    1280×720 / Low / 135.2

    1920×1080 / Medium / 88

    1920×1080 / Tall / 72.6

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 62. 6

    GRID 2019

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.

    1280×720 / Low / 112.9

    1920×1080 / Medium / 86.5

    1920×1080 / Tall / 72

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 58.7

    Borderlands 3

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

    1280×720 / Low / 101.75

    1920×1080 / Medium / 76.8

    1920×1080 / High / 53.9

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 41.9

    Control

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 590.

    1280×720 / Low / 158.3

    1920×1080 / Medium / 63. 7

    1920×1080 / High / 47.1

    Total War: Three Kingdoms

    (2019)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 590, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660.

    1280×720 / Low / 176.75

    1920×1080 / Medium / 84.8

    1920×1080 / High / 55.9

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 41.35

    Rage 2

    (2019)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 570, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 580.

    1280×720 / Low / 150.55

    1920×1080 / Medium / 73.55

    1920×1080 / Tall / 62.25

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 61.5

    Anno 1800

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, but worse than Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics.

    1280×720 / Low / 73.75

    1920×1080 / Medium / 70. 95

    1920×1080 / Tall / 54.7

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 29.6

    The Division 2

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q.

    1280×720 / Low / 126

    1920×1080 / Medium / 83.5

    1920×1080 / Tall / 67.5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 49. 5

    Dirt Rally 2.0

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5300M.

    1280×720 / Low / 187.7

    1920×1080 / Medium / 121.25

    1920×1080 / High / 95.95

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 58.25

    Far Cry New Dawn

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q.

    1280×720 / Low / 97

    1920×1080 / Medium / 81

    1920×1080 / Tall / 78

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 71

    Battlefield V

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL.

    1280×720 / Low / 117.4

    1920×1080 / Medium / 82. 9

    1920×1080 / Tall / 77.5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 73

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 38

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 37.9

    Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M.

    1280×720 / Low / 64

    1920×1080 / Medium / 56

    1920×1080 / Tall / 51

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 42

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider

    (2018)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 570, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M.

    1280×720 / Low / 97.5

    1920×1080 / Medium / 70

    1920×1080 / Tall / 63.5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 56.5

    Far Cry 5

    (2018)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 460, but worse than AMD Radeon Pro W6800.

    1280×720 / Low / 85.5

    1920×1080 / Medium / 69

    1920×1080 / Tall / 66

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 62

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 30

    3840×2160 / Ultra / 30

    X-Plane 11. 11

    (2018)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT.

    1280×720 / Low / 81.25

    1920×1080 / Medium / 71.65

    1920×1080 / Tall / 61.6

    Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA RTX A2000 (mobile).

    1280×720 / Low / 106.4

    1920×1080 / Medium / 70. 3

    1920×1080 / Tall / 50

    Rise of the Tomb Raider

    (2016)

    Better than AMD Radeon HD 8970M, but worse than AMD Radeon R7 370.

    1024×768 / Low / 93.7

    1920×1080 / Tall / 72.7

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 64.5

    Dota 2 Reborn

    (2015)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce MX250, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5300M.

    1280×720 / Low / 113

    1366×768 / Medium / 102.1

    1920×1080 / High / 93.8

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 86.3

    Flight Simulator 2020

    (2020)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

    1280×720 / Low / 55.1

    1920×1080 / Medium / 49. 4

    1920×1080 / High / 37.1

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 25.3

    Escape from Tarkov

    (2020)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro T1000.

    1280×720 / Low / 121.2

    1920×1080 / Medium / 98.3

    1920×1080 / Tall / 90.5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 87. 7

    Need for Speed ​​Heat

    (2019)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 5600M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 95.8

    1920×1080 / Medium / 83

    1920×1080 / High / 73.9

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 66.9

    Ghost Recon Breakpoint

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660.

    1280×720 / Low / 98.5

    1920×1080 / Medium / 70

    1920×1080 / Tall / 65.5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 49.5

    FIFA 20

    (2019)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 147.9

    1920×1080 / Medium / 145. 4

    1920×1080 / Tall / 141

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 139.3

    F1 2019

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q.

    1280×720 / Low / 169

    1920×1080 / Medium / 129.5

    1920×1080 / Tall / 111.5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 74

    Anthem

    (2019)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, but worse than AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL.

    1280×720 / Low / 53.6

    1920×1080 / Medium / 48.9

    1920×1080 / Tall / 48.8

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 46.4

    Darksiders III

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q.

    1280×720 / Low / 135.6

    1920×1080 / Medium / 85. 8

    1920×1080 / Tall / 77.4

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 72.8

    Call of Duty Black Ops 4

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q.

    1280×720 / Low / 115.2

    1920×1080 / Medium / 87.9

    1920×1080 / Tall / 84.6

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 83. 1

    Monster Hunter World

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 66.9

    1920×1080 / Medium / 59.3

    1920×1080 / High / 59.5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 50.8

    World of Tanks enCore

    (2018)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce MX350, but worse than Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics.

    1366×768 / Low / 376.8

    1920×1080 / Medium / 215.9

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 117.3

    Kingdom Come: Deliverance

    (2018)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 5700, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 125.6

    1920×1080 / Medium / 91.7

    1920×1080 / High / 77. 3

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 53.7

    Fortnite

    (2018)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 540, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce MX250.

    1280×720 / Low / 138

    1920×1080 / Medium / 92.2

    1920×1080 / High / 89.5

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 78.6

    Middle-earth: Shadow of War

    (2017)

    Better than AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile.

    1280×720 / Low / 91

    1920×1080 / Medium / 82

    1920×1080 / Tall / 72

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 61

    Rocket League

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA Quadro P600, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.

    1280×720 / Low / 227.05

    1920×1080 / Medium / 186. 45

    1920×1080 / Tall / 157.7

    Ghost Recon Wildlands

    (2017)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 590.

    1280×720 / Low / 130.4

    1920×1080 / Medium / 78.1

    1920×1080 / Tall / 72.4

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 41.5

    Ashes of the Singularity

    (2016)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.

    1920×1080 / Medium / 42.4

    1920×1080 / Tall / 40.7

    Rainbow Six Siege

    (2015)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 460.

    1024×768 / Low / 232.8

    1366×768 / Medium / 200.1

    1920×1080 / Tall / 163.6

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 148. 8

    BioShock Infinite

    (2013)

    Better than NVIDIA Quadro P3000, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970.

    1280×720 / Low / 263.2

    1366×768 / Medium / 260.7

    1366×768 / Tall / 236.85

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 119.2

    Tomb Raider

    (2013)

    Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile.

    1024×768 / Low / 343.8

    1366×768 / Medium / 322.9

    1366×768 / Tall / 296.9

    1920×1080 / Ultra / 166.1

    Benchmark tests

    3DMark Cloud Gate GPU: 63086 Better than AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 but worse than NVIDIA Quadro P3000.

    3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score: 33027 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile but worse than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q.

    3DMark Fire Strike Graphics: 13355 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 but worse than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q.

    3DMark Fire Strike Score: 11615 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile but worse than AMD Radeon RX 570.

    3DMark Ice Storm GPU: 306910 Better than AMD Radeon R9 380 but worse than AMD Radeon RX 460.

    3DMark Time Spy Graphics: 5084.5 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti but worse than NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile.

    3DMark Time Spy Score: 5072 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

    3DMark Vantage P: 31845 Better than AMD Radeon RX 6600 but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M.

    3DMark06: 25211 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce MX250.

    3DMark11 P: 15913 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro P5000.

    3DMark11 P GPU: 17439 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q.

    Cinebench R10 32Bit OpenGL: 8562.5 Better than AMD Radeon R5 M335 but worse than Intel UHD Graphics 630.

    Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit: 96.86 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 but worse than AMD Radeon R9 M470.

    ComputeMark v2.1 Normal, Score: 10027 Better than AMD Radeon R9 390X, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q.

    GFXBench: 943.13 Better than AMD Radeon R9 290X but worse than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000.

    GFXBench 3.0 1080p Manhattan Offscreen: 360.61 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI (mobile).

    GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen OGL: 360. 61 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile.

    GFXBench 3.1 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen: 345.78 Better than NVIDIA Quadro P4000, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro P5000.

    LuxMark v2.0 64Bit Sala GPUs-only: 4254 Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro P5000.

    Passmark: 8814 Better than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q.

    Comparison with other graphics cards

    Map 1:

    Map 2:

    Video reviews and tests (AMD Ryzen 7 4800H/16GB/NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti MAX-Q 6GB)

    NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR GAMING LAPTOP ! NVIDIA Max-Q

    RTX 3050 Ti vs GTX 1660 Ti — MUST See Before Buying 3050 Ti!

    🎮 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — CS:GO gameplay benchmarks (1080p)

    🎮 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — World of Tanks gameplay benchmarks (1080p) Q — For Honor gameplay benchmarks (1080p)

    🎮 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — Minecraft gameplay benchmarks (1080p)

    🎮 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — Metro Exodus gameplay benchmarks (1080p)

    🎮 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — Borderlands 3 gameplay benchmarks (1080p)

    🎮 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — GTA V gameplay benchmarks (1080p)

    🎮 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — Apex Legends gameplay benchmarks (1080p)

    If you find a mistake or have something to add, write in the comments. Have you had any experience with this video card? Is it worth buying such a card today?

    Comparative test of NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti video cards from ASUS, MSI, Gigabyte and Inno3D. Removed excess?

    03/29/19

    9000 Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition

    MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti WINDFORCE OC 6G video card

    Inno3D GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Twin X2 video card

    Test bench description and test methodology RTX 2080 Ti, RTX 2080, RTX 2070, RTX 2060) received a lot of criticism. The advantages of tensor and RT-core technologies turned out to be at least controversial, but led to a significant increase in the complexity and cost of video cards.

    You can read more about this in our material on video cards based on the RTX 2070.

    ” tensor cores and RT cores, but the architecture of the GPU is the same — Turing. This made the video card much more attractive in terms of cost.

    The GTX prefix, not RTX, in the name of the GTX 1660 Ti is another detail that indicates the absence of RT cores.

    Accordingly, models based on the GTX 1660 Ti do not have hardware support for ray tracing (Ray Tracing) and do not support the DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) anti-aliasing method.

    How critical is the lack of these technologies? At the moment it’s not that important. Even in top RTX graphics cards, activating Ray Tracing can cause performance to drop below a comfortable level. Therefore, the presence of RT cores in weaker video cards is rather nominal. And that’s not to mention the fact that the image with the use of Ray Tracing in most cases does not look radically better.

    The distribution of DLSS in games is still very modest.

    Features of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and positioning

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660 Ti are conventionally replaced by very successful models of the last generation on the basis ) claims a performance increase of up to 50% over the GTX 1060. The new GTX 1660 Ti should compete well with the GTX 1070, as we’ll see in the benchmark results.

    .

    Analyzing the characteristics of the RTX 2060, GTX 1660 Ti, GTX 1660 video cards, you can notice a significant decrease in the mercy of the GPU crystals of the GTX 1660 Ti, GTX 1660 models, which is mainly due to the absence of tensor and RT cores. And the smaller the area, the lower the cost of chip production, other things being equal.

    As in the older NVIDIA models of the new generation, it uses a new 12-nanometer process technology and GDDR6 memory.

    Please note that the amount of video memory is 6 GB. The same maximum volume was available in the previous generation GTX 1060 video cards. For additional power, an eight-pin connector is used.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti-based video cards from different manufacturers usually have three DisplayPort and one HDMI video outputs. If the absence of DVI in older video cards of the new generation is logical, then in this case such a connector would not hurt.

    The video outputs themselves have become more modern. DisplayPort is now DisplayPort 1.4a and HDMI is now HDMI 2.0b.

    Considering the new architecture, the GTX 1660 Ti automatically provides you with new features related to video codecs, decoding, etc. For example, support for H.265 (HEVC) data compression in [email protected], as well as improved quality of HEVC and H.264 encoding.

    Test participants

    Some may feel a sense of deja vu, because in our last comparison test of video cards (and then these were models based on the RTX 2070) there were video cards of absolutely the same vendors.

    So, for a comparative test of video cards based on NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti , we managed to assemble video cards ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition, Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660 1660 Ti Twin X2, MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G.

    ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition, Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti WINDFORCE OC 6G, Inno3D GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Twin X2, and MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G

    video cards are noticeably different in size. There are both very advanced devices with a powerful backlight system, as well as more modest models.

    Compare

    Comparison chart

     

    ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti WINDFORCE OC 6G Inno3D GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Twin X2 MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G
    Code identifier of the model ROG-STRIX-GTX1660TI-O6G-GAMING

    GV-N16666TWF2001

    N1666T2-06D6-1710AVA15

    ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition (ROG-STRIX-GTX1660TI-O6G-GAMING)

    The ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition tested is the most powerful in the manufacturer’s entire GTX 1660 Ti range.

    ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition is the only one in the test that received a video output configuration with two HDMI connectors. Perhaps this is due to the adaptation to use some VR helmets

    The model belongs to the ROG Strix series. ASUS left the design of video cards of this series practically unchanged. And the past generation ROG Strix GTX 10X0 adapters looked pretty much the same.

    Even for such a relatively economical model as the GTX 1660 Ti, the manufacturer installed a very advanced large heatsink, pierced by heat pipes, with three fans.

    Curious detail: the ends of the fan blades are connected by a ring. Previously, we have not seen such a solution for ASUS ROG Strix models

    The result was not long in coming. In terms of cooling efficiency, the ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition was ahead of all other participants in the test.

    ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition monitoring in MSI Afterburner

    Under load in our conditions, the temperature stabilized at around 60 ° C and for this the fans had enough speed of only 950 rpm.

    It turns out that the graphics card is both cool and very quiet.

    When the GPU temperature is low, the fans will stop automatically. Such a function today is no longer surprising.

    ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition specs (GPU-Z app data) The value of the frequency in Boost mode is 1860 MHz. But the memory frequency corresponds to the reference.

    By the way, although the MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G has a slightly higher Boost frequency, according to the test results, it was the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition that turned out to be the fastest video card in the test among other video cards based on the GTX 1660 Ti . Although the performance difference is just negligible. Almost within the margin of error.

    For enthusiasts and fans of overclocking, it will certainly be important that the model will allow a fairly significant (up to 120%) increase in the power consumption limit and 9The 2977 is the only board in the test where the GPU is powered by the 6-phase power supply.

    Traditionally, ASUS ROG Strix models are equipped with a number of interesting additional details.

    The board has two BIOS chips with slightly modified device operation modes. The Performance variant provides increased cooling efficiency, while the Quiet variant is designed for quieter operation. BIOS selection is carried out by a special switch.

    All tests were performed in Performance mode.

    The backlight, if desired, can be completely turned off even without installing the appropriate proprietary software. For this, a special button is placed on the board.

    But that’s not all. Additionally, there is a platform for manually measuring the voltage of RAM, GPU, PLL and a set of contacts for connecting an LED strip and case fans. The rotational speed of these fans can be related to GPU temperature.

    RBG lighting ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition

    Backlight control ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition

    Aura RGB lighting is quite advanced. Luminous RGB elements are located on the front and side (Republic of Gamers inscription). But there is no glowing logo on the rear panel, as, for example, in the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 OC edition.

    A special proprietary application is provided to control the backlight. Various dynamic effects are available.

    Note that all the highlighted elements change color and glow intensity at the same time. Accordingly, such effects as a “snake”, iridescent overflows, when different parts of the board have a different glow color, are not available here.

    Still, on the backlight solutions that were used in the previous generation of video cards, today it is already quite difficult to compete with advanced models of competitors and ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition, in this regard, is inferior to the MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING model X 6G.

    In terms of capabilities, proprietary software is roughly a combination of MSI Afterburner and GPU-Z

    Summing up, we can say that the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition is an interesting option based on the GTX 1660 Ti. It turned out to have the most advanced cooling system and board among all participants, the model provides excellent performance, has a number of additional «chips» that enthusiasts will like.

    But the cost of ASUS ROG Strix solutions is quite high. But in this case, ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition does not stand out at all from the background, for example, MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G.

    ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition rating (ROG-STRIX-GTX1660TI-O6G-GAMING)

    + excellent cooling system

    + fan shutdown at low load

    + GPU frequencies significantly increased

    + dual BIOS

    + Contacts for connecting RGB LED strips and housing fans

    — quite high cost

    — large dimensions

    MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X 6G

    MSI GTXEN TIM.

    As with the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition, this MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G graphics card is the most advanced graphics card in MSI’s entire line of GTX 1660 Ti based models.

    MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G specifications (GPU-Z application data)

    The GPU boost frequency is the highest in the test. And the memory runs at over 12,000 MHz.

    As a result, video card is among the leaders in performance . If we talk about models based on the GTX 1660 Ti, then the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition was still meagerly faster. However, you won’t notice such a difference without special tests.

    For the new generation of graphics cards, MSI has radically redesigned the MSI GAMING series. The emphasis on red is no longer being done, and this is probably due to the use of not a single color red, but RGB lighting RGB Mystic Light.

    And I must say that this backlight is very impressive. In terms of advanced lighting effects, this model exceeds ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti O.C. In operation, the card can shimmer with colors, lights can run along intricate trajectories, flicker in strobe mode, etc. The device will take up two expansion slots on the motherboard.

    Advanced cooling system. The heat pipes run through a heatsink which is blown by two large fans with specially designed blades.

    Monitoring MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G in MSI Afterburner

    The cooling performance of MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G is very good. We have no complaints about noise either. But, when compared with the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition, the GPU temperature is slightly higher (65 ° C), and the fan speed is slightly higher (1500 rpm).

    Fans alternate blades with different design (TORX FAN 3.0 technology)

    GPU power — 4-phase. There is an opportunity to increase the power consumption limit during overclocking, but it is not very large (107%). MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G and ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC graphics cards are the most advanced in the edition.

    At a similar cost (at the time of publication), they have about the same level of performance. On the side of the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition, there is a slightly more advanced board and slightly better cooling performance. And the backlight is more interesting at MSI.

    MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G rating:

    + good cooling system

    + low load fans off

    + significantly increased GPU frequencies

    + advanced lighting system

    quite high price

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti WINDFORCE OC 6G (GV-N166TWF2OC-6GD)0003

    The plastic back panel, the lack of backlight makes it immediately clear that the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti WINDFORCE OC 6G is not as cool as the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition or MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G .

    But with a closer acquaintance, you find that in important parameters is quite capable of competing with the most advanced test models .

    Specifications Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (GPU-Z application data)

    The video card has a fairly high factory overclock. The GPU boost frequency is 1845 MHz. The memory frequency, like all other test participants based on the GTX 1660 Ti, corresponds to the reference.

    If you don’t “look under a magnifying glass” fractions of a percent, then the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti WINDFORCE OC 6G (GV-N166TWF2OC-6GD) is on par with the leaders 9 in performance2978 .

    What about cooling?

    I was somewhat embarrassed that the plastic casing of the cooling system protrudes quite a lot along the length of the board. The device could well have been made a few centimeters shorter.

    CO heatpipes in direct contact with the GPU surface

    Note that the plastic casing of the CO that covers the board is significantly longer than the board itself. The use of special heat pipes with composite materials is claimed. The radiator is blown by large 100mm fans. Gigabyte continues to use a scheme in which the fans rotate in different directions. This is said to reduce turbulence in the area between the fans, resulting in better heat dissipation.

    Monitoring the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in MSI Afterburner

    In our test, the GPU temperature reached 63 °C. The fan speed was 1650 rpm. A very decent result. It turns out that in terms of cooling efficiency, the model is approximately at the same level as the MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G.

    Automatic fan stop at low GPU temperature is also present here.

    The functionality of the proprietary software resembles MSI Afterburner, but the possibilities, in general, are less

    powerful ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition.

    With a comparable performance level with the powerful ASUS and MSI, the effective cooling system of the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti WINDFORCE OC 6G video card turned out to be noticeably more affordable.

    This is a very interesting option for those who can sacrifice the lack of backlighting, but want to get high performance without much extra money.

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti WindForce OC 6G (GV-N1666TWF2OC-6GD):

    + good cooling system

    + Balanced

    + Significant GPU

    + Significant GPU 9000 + MPU and cost

    Inno3D GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Twin X2 (left) compared to other test participants)

    The design is without any frills, but the manufacturer still decided to refresh the exterior with a painted back plate, which, by the way, is made of metal.

    Modern video cards often have a «tinted» connector panel. In this case, the manufacturer left the usual silver color

    Inno3D GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Twin X2 specifications (GPU-Z application data)

    Inno3D GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Twin X2 (N166T2-06D6-1710VA15) operating frequencies are standard. This is reflected in the performance results. The Inno3D graphics card naturally lagged behind the ASUS, MSI, Gigabyte video cards, which have higher GPU frequencies.

    But such a lag is measured literally in units of percent.

    Compact dimensions make efficient cooling more difficult. The fans here are not so big, but the radiator turned out to be difficult. It is quite extensively intertwined with heat pipes.

    Monitoring Inno3D GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Twin X2 in MSI Afterburner

    The maximum GPU temperature recorded at 66°C is a good indicator. But to ensure it, the fans spun up to 1900 rpm, which is noticeably more than other participants. The video card is not noisy, but it works louder than other participants in this test of video cards based on the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti.

    It’s nice that the developers did not leave the model without an automatic fan shutdown system. It occurs when the GPU temperature drops below 41°C.

    Power limit increase is not available here. The initial value of Power Limit is 100% and is the maximum. VA15) is the most affordable GTX 1660 Ti based graphics card in the test.

    It’s not a bad device, but the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Ti WINDFORCE OC 6G costs a little more, but has higher GPU frequencies and more efficient CO.

    Here it should be additionally noted that the Inno3D GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Twin X2 is just entering stores. The indicated price is the level that is expected at the start of sales.

    A more significant difference in price compared to the specified Gigabyte can increase the attractiveness of the model for users.

    Estimation Inno3d GeForce GTX 1660 Twin X2 (N166T2-06D6-1710VA15):

    + Compact dimensions

    + The most affordable model in the test

    + Detachment of fans

    9000 + for 3DMark and VRMark test applications included

    — reference frequencies

    — the cooling system is somewhat inferior to other participants in the test in terms of efficiency

    Video cards were tested without overclocking and without using proprietary profiles (OC, Gaming, Silence, etc. ), which are sometimes available when installing proprietary software.

    We compared the tested video cards based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with the previous generation video adapter based on GTX 1070, which was MSI GeForce GTX 1070 GAMING X 8G. Please note that the GTX 1070 model used was running at its native clocks, which are higher than the reference clocks of the GTX 1070.

    We used modern games that support DirectX 11 and DirectX 12, which have built-in benchmarks, as test applications to determine the performance of video cards. The program also includes popular synthetic tests 3DMark.

    Each game was played on maximum or near maximum graphics settings. In games, we used 1920×1080 and 2560×1440 pixels. 3DMark 11 tested the cards with the Extreme preset, while 3DMark (2013) used the Fire Strike Extreme, Fire Strike Ultra, and DirectX 12 Time Spy benchmarks.

    Maximum GPU temperature and system power consumption (without monitor) were monitored in Metro: Last Light. It was in this game that the video cards, according to observations, heated up most intensively, and the maximum power consumption occurred.

    The system itself was operated outside the PC case (open bench) at a room temperature of about 21 °C. The noise level created by the operation of video card cooling systems was evaluated subjectively.

    The final score in the Performance category was determined on the basis of all tests with an equal contribution from each test. However, when talking about games, to reduce the influence of dependence on the processor when calculating the overall performance (category «Performance»), only results with a higher resolution of 2560 × 1440 pixels were taken into account.

    Results at 1920×1080 pixels. provided for information.

    Histograms are normalized as a percentage with models sorted by test results. Specific results in terms of scores and FPS are also listed.

    The price of video cards is based on the database of major online stores (at the time of publication).

    Test platform configuration:

    Processor: Intel Core i7-3770K overclocked to 4.4 MHz

    Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi Z77X

    RAM: 4×4 GB DDR3 1600

    Storage: SSD Adata S511 120 GB (system), HDD 1 TB

    Operating system: Windows 10 Pro 64 bit

    Monitor: Philips 272P7P7VPTKEB

    Used NVIDIA driver for all video cards: GeForce 419.35

    Test results

    9000

    9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

    000

    004

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    0003

    Judging by the test results, the performance of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti video cards is slightly lower than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 . And this is a very decent level!

    Video cards are able to provide a comfortable level of FPS in almost any of the most demanding games with a resolution of Full HD . Using a higher resolution of 2560×1440 pixels. somewhere, it may no longer be possible to set the maximum settings.

    Overall performance based on 2560×1440 pixel results for games. In lower resolution Full HD (1920×1080 pix.) GTX 1660 Ti models will pull up to the GTX 1070 even tighter.

    Unfortunately, we did not have a GTX 1060 6 GB on hand for comparison. Yes, a 50% percentage gain will be seen in few places. But 20-40% (depending on application) growth in the new GTX 1660 Ti is quite to be expected.

    At the start of sales of NVIDIA’s new generation video cards, and these were the high-performance RTX 2080 Ti, RTX 2080, RTX 2070, many criticized for a very high price level. It was difficult for these new products to compete with the solutions of the previous generation GTX 10XX.

    But the video cards of the more affordable GTX 1660 Ti series, which lost their “body kit” in the form of tensor and RT cores , turned out to be very attractive in terms of performance and cost . And in this regard, they look good against the background of the outgoing GTX 10XX models.

    With the new generation model, you also get better power efficiency, although you could expect more from the new 12nm process combined with the Turing architecture.

    Is the GTX 1660 Ti a good replacement for GTX 1060 owners? Perhaps the difference between them will not be so significant for many. But for those who spent too much time watching the ninth series of GTX 9XX, or for owners of weaker 1050 Ti, switching to the GTX 1660 Ti will bring a big jump in speed.

    As for the test participants, in general, ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1660 Ti OC edition and MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X 6G stand out as the most advanced models.

    2022 © All rights reserved