AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: What is the difference?
48points
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
50points
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
64 facts in comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2400G better than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X?
- 10°C higher maximum operating temperature?
95°Cvs85°C - 40W lower TDP?
65Wvs105W - Has integrated graphics?
Why is AMD Ryzen 7 2700X better than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G?
- 2.06x faster CPU speed?
8 x 3.7GHzvs4 x 3.6GHz - 8 more CPU threads?
16vs8 - 2nm smaller semiconductor size?
12nmvs14nm - 2MB bigger L2 cache?
4MBvs2MB - 1.88x higher PassMark result?
17623vs9377 - 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.3GHzvs3.9GHz
- 12MB bigger L3 cache?
16MBvs4MB - 384KB bigger L1 cache?
768KBvs384KB
Which are the most popular comparisons?
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
Intel Core i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
vs
Intel Core i5-7600
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
2 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
8.
5/10
2 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
2 User reviews
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
9.0/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
1 votes
8.5/10
2 votes
Gaming
7.5/10
2 votes
8.0/10
2 votes
Performance
7.0/10
2 votes
8.0/10
2 votes
Reliability
9.0/10
2 votes
9.5/10
2 votes
Energy efficiency
9.0/10
2 votes
7.5/10
2 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
4 x 3.6GHz
8 x 3.7GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
3.9GHz
4.3GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.L2 core
0.5MB/core
0.
5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
1MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2933MHz
2933MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
43.71GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene.
More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads.
This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 5 2400G: performance comparison
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.
7 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 2700X with 8-cores against the 3.6 GHz Ryzen 5 2400G with 4-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Ryzen 7 2700X
57
Ryzen 5 2400G
51
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Ryzen 7 2700X
48
Ryzen 5 2400G
23
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Ryzen 7 2700X
46
Ryzen 5 2400G
45
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Ryzen 7 2700X
53
Ryzen 5 2400G
43
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 2400G and 2700X
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Has 12 MB larger L3 cache size
- Has 4 more physical cores
- More modern manufacturing process – 12 versus 14 nanometers
- 18% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1074 vs 914 points
- 10% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.
3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than the Ryzen 7 2700X – 65 vs 105 Watt
- Includes an integrated GPU Radeon RX Vega 11
- More than 10° C higher critical temperature
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+7%
1092
Ryzen 5 2400G
1020
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+113%
10131
Ryzen 5 2400G
4761
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+13%
2423
Ryzen 5 2400G
2141
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+100%
17398
Ryzen 5 2400G
8705
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+18%
1070
Ryzen 5 2400G
909
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+107%
7328
Ryzen 5 2400G
3546
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2400G
General
| Vendor | AMD | AMD |
| Released | April 19, 2018 | February 12, 2018 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Zen+ | Raven Ridge |
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| Integrated GPU | No | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Performance
| Cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 3. 7 GHz |
3.6 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 37x | 36x |
| L1 Cache | 96K (per core) | 128K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 16MB (shared) | 4MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
| Transistors | 4.8 billions | 4.9 billions |
| Fabrication process | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 105 W | 65 W |
| Max. temperature | 85°C | 95°C |
| Integrated Graphics | — | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| GPU Base Clock | — | 300 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | — | 1250 MHz |
| Shading Units | — | 704 |
| TMUs | — | 44 |
| ROPs | — | 8 |
| Execution Units | — | 11 |
| TGP | — | 65 W |
Max. Resolution |
— | 3840×2160 — 60 Hz |
iGPU FLOPS
Ryzen 7 2700X
n/a
Ryzen 5 2400G
1.746 TFLOPS
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Memory Size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 43.71 GB/s | 43.71 GB/s |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| Official site | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X official page | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 20 | 12 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Ryzen 7 2700X
1 (100%)
Ryzen 5 2400G
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1
ompetitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 5600X
2.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 5800X
3.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 5700X
4.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 5 5600G
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G or Ryzen 7 2700X?
Name
Message
Promotion
How Does AMD’s 2700X Compare With Their 2400G?
Compare AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X with their Ryzen 5 2400G. Which CPU is better for gaming, general apps, and professional tools?
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
This article compares AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X with their Ryzen 5 2400G, exploring which CPU is better for:
- Gaming — the latest graphics-intense games
- General Apps — web browsing, streaming, and office applications
- Professional Tools — 2D and 3D graphics tools, video editors, compilers, and engineering tools
Gaming on the Ryzen 7 2700X vs.
Ryzen 5 2400G
Ella Don / Unsplash
Ryzen 7 2700X
When using AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU for gaming, you can expect good game performance with a high-performance CPU cooler or mediocre game performance with a basic or stock CPU cooler.
Ryzen 5 2400G
When using AMD’s Ryzen 5 2400G CPU for gaming, you can expect poor game performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Gaming Considerations
While a good GPU is critical for gaming performance, your CPU will also have a significant impact. If the CPU is too slow, it can be a bottleneck for your GPU, which can reduce your framerate or cause stuttering.
The most important CPU capabilities for gaming are single-core max boost frequency and the number of cores. A high base frequency is also critical for inadequately cooled CPUs.
Depending on the game, the CPU will often handle tasks including scene management, gameplay logic, physics calculations, and asset loading.
Having multiple CPU cores can improve performance with games that utilize them. However, developers cannot split up every task to take advantage of a growing number of cores. Most modern games don’t benefit from having more than 6–8 cores. Game performance will experience diminishing returns as you add more CPU cores.
Cores
2700X:
The 2700X’s 8 cores allow for excellent performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
2400G:
The 2400G’s 4 cores allow for mediocre performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
Learn more about Core Counts below.
Base Frequency
2700X:
The 2700X’s 3.7 GHz base frequency is good for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.
2400G:
The 2400G’s 3.6 GHz base frequency is good for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
Single-Core Boost
2700X:
With a high-end cooler, the 2700X’s 4.3 GHz single-core max boost frequency is excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
2400G:
With a high-end cooler, the 2400G’s 3.9 GHz single-core max boost frequency is good for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
Overclocking Support
2700X:
When using a high-end cooler, the 2700X CPU’s support for overclocking can be excellent for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
2400G:
The 2400G CPU’s lack of support for overclocking cannot benefit performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
Learn more about Overclocking below.
DDR Support
2700X:
The 2700X CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz can be mediocre for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
2400G:
The 2400G CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz can be mediocre for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
Learn more about DDR Support below.
PCIe
2700X:
The 2700X CPU’s support for PCIe 3.
0 can be poor for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, as it will limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.
2400G:
The 2400G CPU’s support for PCIe 3.0 can be poor for performance with the latest graphics-intense games, as it will limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.
L3 Cache
2700X:
The 2700X’s 16 MB of L3 cache is mediocre for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
2400G:
The 2400G’s lackluster 4 MB of L3 cache is poor for performance with the latest graphics-intense games.
Learn more about Cache Sizes below.
General Apps on the Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Ryzen 5 2400G
Ryzen 7 2700X
When using AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU for general apps, you can expect good app performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Ryzen 5 2400G
When using AMD’s Ryzen 5 2400G CPU for general apps, you can expect good app performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
General App Considerations
If you’re only planning to stream shows, use office apps, or browse the internet, you won’t need a top-end CPU to get good performance. The most important CPU capability for general app usage is the single-core max boost frequency. A high base frequency is also helpful for inadequately cooled CPUs.
Browsers depend on your CPU to quickly load pages and video content and manage multiple browser tabs. Higher single-core boost frequencies can speed up page load times.
Office and web applications are typically single-threaded, so running a single application won’t take advantage of a many-core CPU.
The more cores a CPU has, the more applications you can run simultaneously without noticing a performance impact.
Office and web applications rarely max out the CPU for long periods. These applications can use boost speeds when a burst of processing power is needed, returning to the more efficient base frequencies afterward.
Cores
2700X:
The 2700X’s 8 cores allow for excellent performance with modern apps.
2400G:
The 2400G’s 4 cores allow for excellent performance with modern apps.
Learn more about Core Counts below.
Single-Core Boost
2700X:
With a high-end cooler, the 2700X’s 4.3 GHz single-core max boost frequency is excellent for performance with modern apps.
You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
2400G:
With a high-end cooler, the 2400G’s 3.9 GHz single-core max boost frequency is excellent for performance with modern apps. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
DDR Support
2700X:
The 2700X CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz can be mediocre for performance with modern apps.
2400G:
The 2400G CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz can be mediocre for performance with modern apps.
Learn more about DDR Support below.
Professional Tools on the Ryzen 7 2700X vs. Ryzen 5 2400G
Ryzen 7 2700X
When using AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU for professional tools, you can expect good tool performance with a high-performance CPU cooler or mediocre tool performance with a basic or stock CPU cooler.
Ryzen 5 2400G
When using AMD’s Ryzen 5 2400G CPU for professional tools, you can expect poor tool performance with either a high-performance CPU cooler or a stock CPU cooler.
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Ryzen 5 2400G
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Professional Tool Considerations
Video editors, 2D and 3D graphics tools, software compilers, and engineering tools require high-performing CPUs.
Professional tools are often well optimized to use many cores. CPU cores allow tools to parallelize processing tasks. Increasing the number of cores can divide the time required to process a task if the tool has good multi-threading support.
To maximize performance with professional tools, you’ll want to use a CPU with a high boost frequency and many CPU cores.
Good heat dissipation is needed to maintain boost frequencies for extended periods.
While graphics applications use your GPU for some rendering tasks, most calculations and data operations are still dependent on your CPU.
Cores
2700X:
The 2700X’s 8 cores allow for excellent performance with professional tools.
2400G:
The 2400G’s 4 cores allow for mediocre performance with professional tools.
Learn more about Core Counts below.
Base Frequency
2700X:
The 2700X’s 3.7 GHz base frequency is good for performance with professional tools, when not boosting. You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.
2400G:
The 2400G’s 3.6 GHz base frequency is good for performance with professional tools, when not boosting.
You can reach these base frequencies even without a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
Single-Core Boost
2700X:
With a high-end cooler, the 2700X’s 4.3 GHz single-core max boost frequency is excellent for performance with professional tools. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
2400G:
With a high-end cooler, the 2400G’s 3.9 GHz single-core max boost frequency is good for performance with professional tools. You can maintain these frequencies with a high-end cooler.
Learn more about CPU Clock Speeds below.
Overclocking Support
2700X:
When using a high-end cooler, the 2700X CPU’s support for overclocking can be excellent for performance with professional tools.
2400G:
The 2400G CPU’s lack of support for overclocking cannot benefit performance with professional tools.
Learn more about Overclocking below.
DDR Support
2700X:
The 2700X CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz can be mediocre for performance with professional tools.
2400G:
The 2400G CPU’s support for DDR4 with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz can be mediocre for performance with professional tools.
Learn more about DDR Support below.
PCIe
2700X:
The 2700X CPU’s support for PCIe 3.0 can be poor for performance with professional tools, as it will limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.
2400G:
The 2400G CPU’s support for PCIe 3.0 can be poor for performance with professional tools, as it will limit the potential of the latest SSDs and graphics cards.
L3 Cache
2700X:
The 2700X’s 16 MB of L3 cache is mediocre for performance with professional tools.
2400G:
The 2400G’s lackluster 4 MB of L3 cache is poor for performance with professional tools.
Learn more about Cache Sizes below.
Considerations When Choosing a CPU
Core Count
AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPUs have 8 cores.
AMD’s Ryzen 5 2400G CPUs have 4 cores.
Increased core counts can improve the performance of games and professional tools that use them. Most modern games don’t benefit from having more than 6–8 cores. Even general apps can benefit from many cores when numerous applications are open simultaneously. Web browsers don’t significantly take advantage of multiple cores when loading a single page. However, more CPU cores can improve performance when running demanding web apps in multiple windows.
CPU Clock Speeds
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has a 3.7 GHz base frequency and supports a 4.3 GHz single-core max boost frequency.
The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a 3.6 GHz base frequency and supports a 3.9 GHz single-core max boost frequency.
Single-core performance is essential for some games, as many don’t take full advantage of multiple cores. Professional tools depend on high single and multi-core boost frequencies to maximize their processing speed.
Boost frequencies are only achieved under ideal circumstances. The safest strategy for consistent gaming performance with a basic cooler is to get a processor with a higher base clock speed. However, with adequate cooling, you may be able to maintain speeds near the max boost frequency.
Check out my article, Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X, for recommended coolers that can maintain these boost frequencies on the 2700X.
Check out my article, Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for AMD’s Ryzen 5 2400G, for recommended coolers that can maintain these boost frequencies on the 2400G.
DDR Support
The 2700X CPU’s fastest supported DDR memory type is DDR4, with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz.
The 2400G CPU’s fastest supported DDR memory type is DDR4, with a max stock speed of 2933 MHz.
You can exceed these stock speeds officially supported by CPUs when overclocking memory, such as with an XMP profile. Motherboard specifications will indicate their supported overclocked-memory speeds. To be able to overclock DDR memory, your motherboard chipset needs to support memory overclocking.
Faster PC memory can improve game and professional tool performance by reducing the time it takes to perform calculations and data operations.
Using the quickest RAM may not have as much of an impact as upgrading your CPU and graphics card or adding more RAM.
Learn about our recommended RAM for the 2700X in Choosing the Best RAM for AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU.
Learn about our recommended RAM for the 2400G in Choosing the Best RAM for AMD’s Ryzen 5 2400G CPU.
Cache Size
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has an L3 cache capacity of 16 MB.
The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has an L3 cache capacity of 4 MB.
A CPU’s cache is a small amount of memory, close to the CPU cores, containing recently used data. An L3 cache capacity of at least 20 MB is ideal for games and professional tool performance.
Games and professional tool performance can improve as cache size increases, as it can reduce delays when retrieving commonly used assets from memory. While nearly any task will use a CPU’s cache, a large cache becomes less impactful for general PC usage, such as browsing webpages.
Remember that cache sizes often increase with core counts, so if you want to increase your L3 cache, you may need to get a CPU with more cores.
Overclocking
The 2700X supports overclocking.
The 2400G does not support overclocking.
Overclocking is mainly relevant for PC gamers who want to maximize their game framerates. CPU overclocking increases frequencies past their default limits.
Excellent heat dissipation via fans or another solution is required to maintain system stability while overclocking.
Professional tools can benefit from overclocked frequencies. However, overclocking may introduce some possibility of system instability, which may be less acceptable in business scenarios.
Best Liquid Cooler
CORSAIR iCUE h250i ELITE LCD Liquid CPU Cooler
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Best Air Cooler
Noctua NH-D15, Premium CPU Cooler
Check Price on Amazon
Amazon Affiliate Link
Learn More About the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Which Chipsets Work With AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU?
- Choosing the Best Power Supply for AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU
- Choosing the Best Motherboard for AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X
- Is the Ryzen 7 2700X CPU Good for Gaming?
- Choosing the Best RAM for AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X CPU
- Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for AMD’s Ryzen 7 2700X
- What Is the TDP of the Ryzen 7 2700X CPU?
- How Many Cores Do AMD Ryzen 7 2700X CPUs Have?
Learn More About the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Which Chipsets Work With AMD’s Ryzen 5 2400G CPU?
- Choosing the Best Power Supply for AMD’s Ryzen 5 2400G CPU
- Choosing the Best Motherboard for AMD’s Ryzen 5 2400G
- Is the Ryzen 5 2400G CPU Good for Gaming?
- Choosing the Best RAM for AMD’s Ryzen 5 2400G CPU
- Choosing the Best CPU Cooler for AMD’s Ryzen 5 2400G
- What Is the TDP of the Ryzen 5 2400G CPU?
- How Many Cores Do AMD Ryzen 5 2400G CPUs Have?
Have a suggestion or correction for this article? Send us an email at:
corrections@techreviewer.
com
You can also contact the author at:
[email protected]
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X on one side and the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 8 cores, 16 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,3GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen+ | Zen | ||||||
| Core name | Pinnacle Ridge | Raven Ridge | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 7 2000 | Ryzen 5 2000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | YD270XBGM88AF | YD2400C5M4MFB, YD2400C5FBBOX |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2018 | Q1 2018 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 800.000.000 |
4.950.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 16 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,7 GHz | 3,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,3 GHz | 3,9 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 16 MB | 16 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 43,71 GB/s | 43,71 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 105 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | ||||||
| GPU cores | — | 11 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | — | 704 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | — | 1250 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | — | 1. 746 GFLOPS |
||||||
| Socket | AM4, PGA-1331 | AM4, PGA-1331 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 85°C | 95°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 476 | 423 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 5.031 | 2.272 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 180 | 154 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.828 | 820 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1. |
1.006 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 11.289 | 4.827 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.428 | 2.153 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 17.584 | 8.735 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.823 | 3.958 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
26.797 | 11.738 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
384,3 GFLOPS | 165,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
255 pts / W | 181 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is less. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
476 5.031 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
423 2.272 |
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 121%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
180 1. |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
154 820 |
In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 123%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
1.118 11. |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
1.006 4.827 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 134%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
2. 17.584 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
2.153 8.735 |
In single core, the difference is 13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 101%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.823 26. |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
3.958 11.738 |
In single core, the difference is 22%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 128%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
5.027 26.264 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
4.160 12.101 |
In single core, the difference is 21%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 117%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.044 13.431 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
4. 12.322 |
In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 9%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
4.820 26.430 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
4.342 14.684 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 80%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Intel equivalentAMD Ryzen 5 2400G Intel equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700AMD Ryzen 7 2700EAMD Ryzen 7 2700U
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| Model |
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
| MSRP |
$169. |
$329.00 |
| Amazon | Check Price | Check Price |
| Product Feature Score | 2,000 | 4,011 |
| Basic Details | ||
| Arcitecture | 64bit | 64bit |
| Base Speed |
3. |
3.7 |
| Turbo Speed | 3.9 | 4.3 |
| Total Cores | 4 | 8 |
| Socket Type | AM4 | AM4 |
| Processor Class | Mainstream | Performance |
| Unlocked | ||
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 24 |
| Cache Details | ||
| L1 Cache Size | 384 | 768 |
| L2 Cache Size | 2 | 4 |
| L3 Cache Size | 4 | 16 |
| Detailed Specifications | ||
| Manufacturing Process | 14 | 12 |
| AMD CPU Features | ||
| AMD StoreMI Technology | ||
| AMD Ryzen™ VR-Ready Premium | ||
| AMD SenseMI Technology | ||
| AMD Ryzen™ Master Utility | ||
| Intel CPU Features | ||
| Integrated GPU Details | ||
| Integrated GPU | ||
| GPU Model | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| FreeSync Technology | ||
| GPU Clock Speed | 1250 | |
| Shaders | 704 | |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 44 | |
| Compute Units | 11 | |
| Memory Specifications | ||
| System Memory Speed | 2933 | 2933 |
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Power Specifications | ||
| Default TDP | 65 | 105 |
| Cooler Included | ||
| Officially OS Support | ||
| Windows 10 — 64Bit Edition | ||
| RHEL x86 / 64-Bit | ||
| Ubuntu x86 / 64-Bit | ||
CPU-Z Benchmark for AMD Ryzen 5 2400G (1T)
Best CPU performance — 64-bit — October 2022
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G (1T)
Back to validation
Intel Core i9-12900KF
Intel Core i9-12900K
Intel Core i7-12700K
Intel Core i7-12700KF
Intel Core i5-12600K
Intel Core i5-12600KF
Intel Core i9-11900K
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Intel Core i7-11700K
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Intel Core i7-11700KF
Intel Core i5-11600K
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Intel Core i5-11600KF
Intel Core i7-11700
Intel Core i7-11700F
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
Intel Core i5-11500
Intel Core i9-10900KF
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10850K
Intel Core i7-10700KF
Intel Core i5-11400
Intel Core i5-11400F
Intel Core i9-10900
Intel Core i5-11400H
Intel Core i9-9900KF
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
Intel Core i7-9700KF
Intel Core i7-10700K
Intel Core i7-9700K
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Core i5-10600KF
Intel Core i5-9600KF
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i7-10700
Intel Core i7-10700F
Intel Core i7-1165G7
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
Intel Core i7-9700F
Intel Core i7-9700
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel Core i5-9600K
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Intel Core i7-8700K
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Intel Core i5-1135G7
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Intel Core i5-8600K
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Intel Core i7-7700K
Intel Core i7-10875H
Intel Core i5-7600K
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-8700
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Intel Core i7-10870H
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
Intel Core i7-10750H
Intel Core i3-10105F
Intel Core i3-9100F
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Core i5-8500
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
Intel Core i5-9400
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i3-10100F
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i5-6600K
Intel Core i5-10400F
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Core i7-9750H
Intel Core i5-8400
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
Intel Core i7-7700
Intel Core i7-8750H
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Intel Core i5-4690K
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core i5-9300H
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i3-8100
Intel Core i7-10510U
Intel Core i5-7500
Intel Core i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-4670K
Intel Core i7-8565U
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i5-4690
Intel Core i5-10210U
Intel Core i5-1035G1
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Core i7-4790
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel Core i7-6700
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Intel Core i7-4770
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Intel Core i5-8265U
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core i3-1005G1
Intel Core i5-4590
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with
Intel Core i7-3770K
Intel Core i5-7400
Intel Core i5-3570K
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
Intel Core i7-8550U
Intel Core i5-4570
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
Intel Core i3-7100
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel Core i5-2500K
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H with
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i7-2600K
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Intel Core i5-8250U
Intel Core i5-6400
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-4460
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U with
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
AMD Athlon 3000G
Intel Core i5-4440
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2
Intel Core i3-4170
Intel Core i5-2500
Intel Pentium G4560
Intel Core i7-2600
(YOU) AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Intel Core i3-4160
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with
Intel Xeon E5-2689
Intel Core i7-7500U
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel Core i5-7200U
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Core i7-6500U
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i5-6300U
Intel Xeon E5450
Intel Core i3-2120
Intel Core i5-3230M
Intel Core i3-2100
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Core i5 750
Intel Core i5-5200U
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
Intel Core i5-2520M
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
Intel Core i5 650
Intel Core i5-3210M
Intel Core i7 920
AMD FX -8350
Intel Core i5-2450M
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
AMD FX -4300
AMD FX -8320
AMD FX -6300
Intel Core i5-2410M
Intel Core i5-4210U
AMD FX -8300
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Core i3-7020U
Pentium E5200
Intel Core i5-4200U
Intel Core i3-3110M
Intel Core i3-5005U
Intel Core i3-6006U
AMD Phenom II X4 955
Intel Core i3-4005U
0025 85°C
65W vs 105W
Why is AMD Ryzen 7 2700X better than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G?
- 2.
06x higher CPU speed?
8 x 3.7GHz vs 4 x 3.6GHz - 8 more CPU threads?
16 vs 8 - Semiconductor size 2nm smaller?
12nm vs 14nm - 2MB more L2 cache?
4MB vs 2MB - 1.88x higher PassMark score?
17623 vs 9377 - 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.3GHz vs 3.9GHz - 12MB more L3 cache?
16MB vs 4MB - 384KB more L1 cache?
768KB vs 384KB
Which comparisons are the most popular?
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
VS
Intel Core i5-1135g7
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
VS
Intel Core i3-1115G4
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
Intel Core i3-1115g 9000 Amd Amd Amd Amd Amd Amd Amd Amd Amd Amd AMD AMD vs
Intel Core i5-10210u
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
VS
Intel Core i5-10210u
AMD Ryzen 7 5800h
VS
VS
3500h
AMD Ry
AMD RYUS0003
Intel Core i3-1115g4
AMD Ryzen 5 4600h
VS
Intel Core i5-10300h
Intel Core i3-1115g4
VS
I5-1135g7
AMD RY 55000 AMD RY 55000 AMD RYOT RY 55000 AMD Ry
Intel Core i3-1115g4
Completion of prices
Users reviews
General rating
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
2 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
8. 5 /10 9
2 reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
2 Reviews of users
AMD Ryzen 7 2700x
/10
2 Reviews of Users 9010 Functions
Reason and quality
/10
1 Votes
8.5 /10
2 Votes
Games
7.5 /10
2 VOTES
8.0 /10
2 VOTES 9Ol000
Energy efficiency
9.0 /10
2 Votes
7.5 /10
2 Votes
Custom
1. Sproops of the central processor
4 x 3.6GHz
8 x 3.7GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
3.9GHz
4.3GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Unlocked
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.5MB/core
0.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2933MHz
2933MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
43.71GB/s
43.71GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
7. Supports memory debug code
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9. bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures CPU performance using multithreading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Cinebench R20 is a test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The Blender (classroom) test measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.power per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
This means the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✔AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
✖AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming through Digital Rights Management (DRM) .
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 5 2400G)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
This page is currently only available in English.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 5 2400G: 9 performance comparison0001
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Which is better: 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 2700X at 3.7 GHz or Ryzen 5 2400G with 4 cores at 3.6 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one kernel
Ryzen 7 2700x
57 57 57
Ryzen 5 2400G
51
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus
Ryzen 7 2,0002 48
Ryzen 5 2400G
23
Energy efficiency
Efficiency of energy consumption chip
Ryzen 7 2700x
46
Ryzen 5 2400g
45
RATIVE NANOREVIEW
Final rating
Key differences
What are the main differences between 2400G and 2700X
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Has 12 MB more L3 cache
- Has 4 physical cores more
- More modern process technology — 12 vs.
14 nanometers
- 18% faster in Geekbench v5 single-core test — 1074 and 914 points
- 10% faster frequency in Turbo Boost (4.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- 38% lower than Ryzen 7 2700X peak power consumption — 65 vs 105 Watts
- Has an integrated graphics accelerator Radeon RX Vega 11
- More than 10°C higher than maximum operating temperature
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+7%
1092
Ryzen 5 2400G
1020
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+113%
10131
Ryzen 5 2400G
4761
Passmark CPU (single core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+13%
2423
Ryzen 5 2400G
2141
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+100%
17398
Ryzen 5 2400G
8705
Geekbench 5 (Single Core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+18%
1070
Ryzen 5 2400G
909
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Ryzen 7 2700X
+107%
7328
Ryzen 5 2400G
3546
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 2400G full technical specifications list
General information
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Release date | April 19, 2018 | February 12, 2018 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Zen+ | Raven Ridge |
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| Integrated graphics | No | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Performance
| Cores | 8 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 16 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3. |
3.6 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 37x | 36x |
| Level 1 cache | 96KB (per core) | 128KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 512KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 16MB (shared) | 4MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | 4.8 billion | 4.9 billion |
| Process | 12 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Power Demand (TDP) | 105 W | 65 W |
| Critical temperature | 85°C | 95°C |
| Integrated graphics | — | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| GPU frequency | — | 300 MHz |
| Boost GPU frequency | — | 1250 MHz |
| Shader blocks | — | 704 |
| TMUs | — | 44 |
| ROPs | — | 8 |
| Compute units | — | 11 |
| TGP | — | 65 W |
| Max. |
— | 3840×2160 — 60Hz |
Igpu Flops
Ryzen 7 2700x
N/D
Ryzen 5 2400G
1.746 Teraflops
Memory Support
| DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 | |
| Max. size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 43.71 GB/s | 43.71 GB/s |
| ECC support | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Official site | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 20 | 12 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Ryzen 7 2700X
1 (100%)
Ryzen 5 2400G
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1
Competitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 5 5600X
2.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 5800X
3.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 5700X
4.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 5 5600G
What will you choose: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G or Ryzen 7 2700X?
Name
Message
Home PC with AMD RYZEN7 2700X
ホーム
Record for the production of home-grown PC
Record for the production of home PC with AMD Ryzen 2700x
, which uses the «Zen+ architecture» improved from the 2nd generation Zen architecture’s 12nm process technology to 12nm.
Many of the current PC cases are not equipped with a 5-inch bay, and the left and right single-sided front covers are not easy to use with frequent use of the optical drive, so even if you meet two conditions, the following options are possible: Stryker SE from CoolerMaster, Graphite was chosen Corsair’s 780T, Cougar’s PANZER MAX, and finally Cougar’s «PANZER MAX» Military Corps.
Used parts
| CPU | AMD | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (3.7-4.3 GHz)
The Cougar PANZER MAX could have had a radiator at the front, but to install the radiator it was decided to remove the air duct to direct the wind towards the rear. The PANZER MAX has 2.5″ and 3.5″ drives mounted on the back, and while well made, motherboard installation and wiring is tricky and surprisingly narrow for a full tower. B450 Pro4 has SATA M.2 and PCIe Ultra M.2 slots. Lubricate and install in MB. A simple «MasterLiquid ML240L RGB» water cooler from Cooler Master is installed for AMD. Fasten the parts. It is surprisingly difficult to attach to the bracket, although it simply clings to nails. I noticed that the Cooler Master logo was reversed even though it was fixed and started over. Fixed memory. In addition to the chassis power switch, connect the main power supply with a 24 PIN to 12V cable, attach the graphics card, and connect it to the monitor to check the power supply. No problem with main parts. The inside of the case is narrower than I expected. If you install four 2.5-inch drives on the back of the PANZER MAX, the front panel cables and rear wiring cables will be crowded. The motherboard can only be screwed to the pins that are attached to the case in one place. In the case of all bolted connections, even if there is some misalignment, the misalignment will be corrected as the bolt is secured, but since it must be aligned with the pin first, it will not go in even if it is misaligned by 1mm. I had a hard time. Wiring after mounting the PSU. The motherboard heatsink is tall, and if the CPU cooler heatsink is attached on top, it will interfere by about 5mm. At first I thought to install the fan inside the case and install the fan outside the case, but I decided to install it on the front because the cooling effect was not to be expected. Remove the rail to install the CPU cooler heatsink from the front. Of course, the front air intake blows over the heatsink, but with this spec, the airflow inside the case will be weak (I thought), so add a 120mm air intake fan to sandwich the heatsink. I did it. Because the back side is expensive, I installed two 2.5″ HDDs and one 2″ HDD. I’ve installed a UHD-compatible Blu-ray drive for now, but it’s not easy to use, so I’ll do it later. ASUSTek BW-16D1HT UHD-capable hard disk Replaced by. On the back side 5″ drive and 2.5″ SATA drive and power cable is the main power cable, front USB port and audio system, chassis fan and LED cable, so it was difficult to route the cable. The SATA M.2 type is mounted just above the front panel connector. I first stuck it in the Ultra M. Recognize all connected drives, including WD M.2. All RBG cables connect to the RBG connector on the motherboard using two 4-pins and are installed using ASRock’s «ASRock Polychrome RGB» utility. download page ASRock Polychrome RGB exercise. System Configuration Processor: AMD Ryzen 2700x 3.7 GHz If you put a heatsink with a fan, the temperature of the CPU dropped about 3-5 degrees, but the MasterLiquid ML240L RGB cools well. The 1st gen Reisen was said to have a weak single threaded process and the Core i7 was better if it was a general purpose machine, but the 2nd gen seems to have overcome that. Moved to Cooler Master MasterCase MC500Moved Ryzen 5800X to MasterCase MC2700 to use Ryzen 500X with PANZER MAX and changed storage from SATA SSD to NVMe. Used parts
Comparison of instructions and technologies
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X | AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G | Short description | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision Boost | Self-overclocking technology from AMD. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X | AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pure Power | — | Technology to dynamically reduce the frequency and power consumption of the processor. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X | AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. | ||
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Processor streaming SIMD extension. |
||
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 2. | ||
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 3. | ||
| SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) | Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3. | ||
| SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4. | ||
| AES (Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions) | Command system extension. | ||
| AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) | Command system extension. |
||
| F16C (16-bit Floating-Point conversion) | 16-bit floating point conversion. | ||
| FMA3 (Fused Multiply-Add 3) | Multiply Add with Round One (FMA3). | ||
| SSE4A (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4A) | Processor Streaming SIMD 4A Extension. | ||
| AVX 2 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2) | Command extension 2. | ||
| BMI1 (Bit manipulation instructions 1) | BMI1 bit control command set. | ||
| AMD64 | 64-bit microprocessor architecture developed by AMD. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X | AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHA (Secure Hash Algorithm extensions) | — | Secure hash algorithm extensions. |
|
| SMAP (Supervisor Mode Access Prevention) | Supervisor mode access prevention. | ||
| SMEP (Supervisor Mode Execution Prevention) | Prevent execution in supervisor mode. | ||
| EVP (Enhanced Virus Protection) | Improved virus protection. |
| Name of technology or instruction | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X | AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD-V | AMD-V Virtualization Technology. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X | AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMT (Simultaneous MultiThreading) | Simultaneous multithreading. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The main rating is calculated according to the formula, taking into account indicators: test results for all programs, number of cores, threads, frequency, socket, year of release, auto-overclocking technologies, temperature data, instructions, structure , and much more. The results of the overall rating showed that the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X surpasses its rival Ryzen Embedded R1505G in most parameters. The Ryzen Embedded R1505G barely scores 479 compared to the competitor5.4 points.
PassMark CPU Mark
It includes a wide range of tools for a comprehensive assessment of the performance of computers, including the processor. Among the tests there are integer calculations, game physics calculations, encryption, compression, floating point calculations, checking extended instructions, multi-threaded and single-threaded tests. At the same time, it is possible to compare the obtained indicators with other configurations in a common database. This is perhaps the most famous benchmark in Runet. All of our processors have passed PassMark tests. Performance Test showed a clear advantage of the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X processor (17113 points) over the Ryzen Embedded R1505G (3969 points). Ryzen Embedded R1505G with a score of 3969 clearly loses in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
This benchmark for testing processors and video cards is very outdated by now. It uses the ray tracing method. Works on Windows, Mac operating systems. MAXON has appeared, and is based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. The Single-Core version in its test uses only one core and one thread for rendering. The basic speed testing mode is working with light, simulating global illumination, spatial light sources, multilevel reflections, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, and procedural shaders. It is possible to test many processor systems.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread is another benchmark in Cinebench R10 that already uses multi-thread and multi-core testing mode. Please note that the possible number of threads in this version is limited to sixteen.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-thread version of CINEBENCH R11.5 test, it has the ability to test the processor to the full, including all cores and threads. Different from older versions, 64 threads are supported here. Testing the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X in the Cinebench R11.5 benchmark gave 19.27 points, this indicates a higher performance of this model. While the Ryzen Embedded R1505G scores 3.91 points, it is way behind its rival in this test.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Good old multifunctional Cinebench version R11.5 from the Maxon team. In testing, as before, the ray tracing method is used, a complex three-dimensional space is calculated with a large number of translucent and glass and crystalline spheres. His tests are still relevant today. In this case, Single-Core tests happen using one core and one thread. The result of the test is the «frames per second» parameter. Testing in single-threaded mode of the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X processor in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed that with a score of 1.99 points, he is not much ahead of the competitor. But the Ryzen Embedded R1505G itself scored 1.63 points in this test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread Cinebench R15 — will load your system to the full, demonstrating what it is capable of. All threads and CPU cores are included in the process of rendering detailed 3D objects. It is ideal for modern multi-threaded CPUs from AMD and Intel, as it can use 256 computation threads. The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X, with a score of 1661.18, unequivocally scores higher in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its rival Ryzen Embedded R1505G lags far behind with a score of 264 in the test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench Release 15 is the latest tester from the Finnish Maxon team today. The Single Core version of the program uses 1 thread for rendering. A complex 3D scene is rendered with many light sources, objects and reflections. It tests the entire system: both video cards and processors. For processors, the result of the analysis is the value of PTS points, and for video cards, the number of frames per second. FPS. The single-threaded test of the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X processor in the Cinebench R15 program shows its high performance, the result is 181.17 points. Compared to it, its rival Ryzen Embedded R1505G fails this test with a score of 97 points.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 benchmark. It is cross-platform support for various operating systems and devices that makes Geekbench tests the most popular now. It’s Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core processor Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X received 35589.54 points, which is significantly higher than the Ryzen Embedded R1505G. In this test, the Ryzen Embedded R1505G receives an extremely low score of 6189 compared to the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
The program, like its earlier versions, can still be run on operating systems: Windows, Linux, Mac OS. The Single-Core version uses 1 thread. For the first time, both Android and iOS smartphones and tablets are supported in this version. The current single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing desktop PCs and laptops. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X scores higher in Geekbench 4.0 single thread test with a score of 5790.84 points. But its competitor Ryzen Embedded R1505G is doing much worse — 3168 points.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core benchmark Geekbench 3 — allows you to arrange a powerful synthetic test of your processor and show how productive your system is.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
The Geekbench cross-platform tester is often used to test the system under Mac, but it can be run on both Windows and Linux. The main purpose is to check the speed of the CPU. The Single Core version of the benchmark uses only one processor core and one thread.
Geekbench 2
Geekbench 2 is no longer up to date. Today there are newer updates, : 5v and 4v. On our site you can find almost two hundred CPU models that have test results in this program.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In essence, this is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD video files to the new H.264 format, the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. The frame rate processed per second is the result of the test. This test is faster compared to Pass 2, because the calculation is done at a constant speed. This is the most appropriate test for many threaded CPUs and many cores. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is significantly higher at 448.99 FPS But the Ryzen Embedded R1505G did a poor job, its speed was 92.43 FPS.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but encoding occurs at a variable rate. As a result, we get a higher quality video file. The resulting result is also measured in frames per second. You need to be aware that a very real task is being carried out, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of encoders. Therefore, the results of the checks realistically reflect the performance of the system. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 105.56 Frames / s. Its rival Ryzen Embedded R1505G showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 21.21 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
Based on DirectX 9.0 by the Finnish company Futuremark. This benchmark is very often used by fans to overclock processors and gamers and overclockers. CPUs are tested in two ways: the artificial intelligence calculates the pathfinding, and the second test emulates the system using PhysX. Benchmark for testing the processor, and video system. The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, with a score of 27653.38. The Ryzen Embedded R1505G processor coped worse with this task, receiving 5229.69 points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
We can say that almost 200 CPUs on our website have 3DMark Fire Strike Physics test data. It includes a math test that calculates game physics.
WinRAR 4.0
Everyone knows the data archiver. Checks were made under the control of Windows OS. The speed of compression was checked by the RAR algorithm, for this large amounts of random data were used. The resulting speed in the process of compression «Kb / s» — this is the result of the test. Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X has a clear advantage in WinRAR data compression and packing speed, the file processing result was 11494.87 Kb/s. The Ryzen Embedded R1505G was far behind it, the speed of which did not exceed 2256.24 Kb / s.
TrueCrypt AES
Not exactly a tester, but the results of its use can give an estimate of system performance. Our site shows the results of the encryption speed in gigabytes per second using the AES algorithm. It so happened that support for this program was stopped in 2014. It includes the function of encrypting disk partitions on the fly. The program can run on Windows, Mac OS X and Linux operating systems.
PC-CHEAP Gaming Computer AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8GB 1TB GTX 1660 6GB
home
Computers
Gaming computers
PC-CHEAP Gaming Computer AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 8GB 1TB GTX 1660 6GB
299 597
A photo
Description
Characteristics
Reviews
Similar products
Key features:
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7GHz
Motherboard
GIGABYTE B450M S2H
(+700)
ASUS PRIME A320M-K
(+900)
GIGABYTE B450M DS3H
(+1 400)
Gigabyte X570 GAMING X
(+9500)
ASRock X570 Steel Legend
(+12 500)
Video card
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
(-1,000)
GeForce RTX 2060 6 GB
(+8 000)
RAM
Hard disc
SSD Drum
Optical drive
Processor cooling 9000
DeepCool GAMMAXX 300 R
(+250)
Zalman CNPS10X
(+900)
Arctic Cooling Freezer 33
(+1 500)
Power supplies
Enclosure
Operating system
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64-bit
(+7 900)
Microsoft Windows 10 Professional 64-bit
(+12 100)
Warranty period
36 months for accessories
Supply
System unit, power cable, data sheet (warranty card)
Antivirus
ESET NOD32 Smart Security, 3 pcs for 1 year
(+1 500)
Kaspersky Internet Security Multi-Device English. 2 pcs 1 year
(+1 600)
Dr.Web Security Space 2 PC 1 year
(+1 700)
60 750
Buy
Buy in one click
Buy in credit
299597
Specifications
| Basic | |
|---|---|
| Processor |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 3. |
| Motherboard |
GIGABYTE GA-A320M-H GIGABYTE GA-A320M-H mATX, AM4, AMD A320, 2x DDR4 DIMM, 2133-3200MHz |
| Video card |
GeForce GTX 1660 6 GB GeForce GTX 1660 6 GB, GDDR5, 192 bit, DP, HDMI |
| RAM |
DDR4 8Gb DDR4 8Gb 2400/2666Mhz Kingston/Samsung/Crucial |
| Hard drive |
HDD 1000Gb 1000Gb SATA-III (7200rpm) 64Mb 3.5″ Seagate/Western digital/Toshiba |
| SSD drive |
Without SSD Without SSD |
| Optical drive |
Without DVD drive Without DVD drive |
| CPU cooler |
PCcooler GI-X3 PCcooler GI-X3 1151v2, AM4 |
| Power supplies |
500W 500W ATX (24+4+6pin, 120mm) |
| Body |
3Cott PALADIN II 3Cott PALADIN II ATX, mATX, front: USB x3, headphone, mic dimensions: 200x440x460 mm |
| Operating system |
Microsoft Windows 10 demo Microsoft Windows 10 demo version |
| Warranty period |
36 months for accessories 36 months for parts |
| Delivery set | System unit, power cable, technical data sheet (warranty card) System unit, power cable, data sheet (warranty card) |
| Antivirus |
Without antivirus protection Without antivirus protection |
Similar products
PC-CHEAP i5-8400 8GB 1TB GTX1660 6GB Gaming Computer
299 614
60 800
PC-CHEAP i5-8500 Gaming Computer, 8GB, 1TB, GTX1660 6GB
299 615
60 800
PC-CHEAP i5-8600 Gaming Computer, 8GB, 1TB, GTX1660 6GB
299 616
60 800
PC-CHEAP Ryzen 3 3200G 8GB 1TB RX 580 4GB Gaming Computer
299 935
60 800
PC-CHEAP Ryzen 3 3200G 8GB 1TB RX 580 8GB Gaming Computer
299 937
60 800
PC-CHEAP i5-7500 Gaming Computer, 4GB, 1TB, RX570 8GB
249 431
60 900
PC-CHEAP Ryzen 7 2700X 8GB 1TB GTX 1660 Ti 6GB Gaming Computer
290 908
60 900
PC-CHEAP i5-8400 Gaming Computer, 8GB, 1TB, GTX 1660 Ti 6GB
290 917
60 900
PC-CHEAP i5-8500 Gaming Computer, 8GB, 1TB, GTX 1660 Ti 6GB
290 918
60 900
PC-CHEAP i5-8600 8GB 1TB GTX 1660 Ti 6GB Gaming Computer
290 919
60 900
PC-CHEAP Ryzen 5 3600X 8GB 1TB GTX 1050 Ti 4GB Gaming Computer
299 974
60 900
PC-CHEAP 36 gaming computer
303 492
61 100
PC-CHEAP 29 gaming computer
303 485
61 250
PC-CHEAP i5-9500F Gaming Computer, 8GB, 1TB, SSD 120GB, RX 580 4GB
299 652
61 400
PC-CHEAP i5-9500F Gaming Computer, 8GB, 1TB, SSD 120GB, RX 580 8GB
299 654
61 400
PC-CHEAP Ryzen 3 3200G 8GB 1TB SSD 120GB GTX 1660 6GB
299 951
61 600
PC-CHEAP 30 gaming computer
303 486
61 750
PC-CHEAP 72 gaming computer
320 226
61 800
PC-CHEAP i3-9100F 8GB 1TB SSD 120GB RTX 2060 6GB Gaming Computer
299 645
61 850
PC-CHEAP i5-7400 Gaming Computer, 8GB, 1TB, RX580 8GB
249 436
62 050
2400 x — frwiki.
wiki
X 2400 is a range of individual wagon bodies from SNCF. XABDP 2400, called unified 600 hp, 79units built from 1951 to 1955 . They consist of 12 class seats 1- and 56 2 , with a length of 27 m and a maximum speed of 120 km/h . These wagons can be attached to trailers or paired, with each element having its own driver who communicates with each other via an audio signal.
Summary
- 1 History
- 2 Services provided
- 3 Holder deposits
- 4 Idle gear (2014 state)
- 5 Accidents and Incidents
- 6 Making model
- 7 Photo gallery
- 8 Bibliography
- 9 Notes and references
-
10 See also
- 10.
1 Related Articles
- 10.
Historic
The X 2400 series of wagons entered service on the rail network along with the X 3800, said Picasso . These wagons will lead to the disappearance of steam traction and the renewal of the wagon fleet.
Serial is when put into service, assigned to the Limoges depot and used for Massif Central lines. The cars are aggregated with unified trailers, in particular XR 7300, 7800 and 8100.
Many depots will also receive new machines, including Grenoble (with X 2410, X 2414 and X 2445 in 1954), Rennes, Lyon-Veze, Marseille, etc. Soon the X 2400 will be accompanied by a series of X 2800 cars equipped with one engine, but more powerful.
Maintenance cost of X 2400 is much higher than X 2800 with single engine, series will be transferred to depot in Rennes.
The advent of the X 2100 and X 2200 in the 1980s would make it possible to film the series until 1989 .
X 2464 will be phased out in 1988 and converted into an instrument for measuring electrical installations. He then covers the Corail livery based on charcoal grey, orange and white with the installation of gauge cartridges.
More than ten copies survive.
There are two sub-series X 2400:
- XABDP 2401 — 2469 weighing 43 tons , two 517G Renault engines 250 kW (340 hp).
- XABDP 2470 — 2479 weighing 44.5 tons , two Saurer engines 235 kW (320 hp).
Insured services
These wagons circulated on the French network, in particular:
- Paris-North — Beauvais
- Rennes — Saint-Brieuc
- Rennes — Saint-Malo
- Rennes — Nantes via Redon
- Rennes — Lorient via Auray
- Grenoble — Marseille via Vein along the line of the Alps (from 1954 to 1962)
- Clermont-Ferrand — Marseille via Nimes, when the relationship «Le Cévenol» was created (from 1954 to 1959)
- Lyon — Toulouse via Le Puy, Mende and Albi
- Bordeaux — Mont-de-Marsan via Morsenx
- Bordeaux — Sarlat via Le Buisson
- Bordeaux — Limoges via Perigueux
- Limoges — Agen
- Nantes — Limoges via Poitiers
- Clermont-Ferrand — Montlucon
- Marseille — Toulon
- Toulouse — Osh
Deposit holders
- Amiens (temporary)
- Batignolles-Remblay (temporary assignment)
- Kan (from 1954 to 1960)
- Châlons-sur-Marne, now Châlons-en-Champagne, (temporary assignment)
- Grenoble (with 3 copies in 1955 (X 2410, X 2414, X 2245), then 4 copies (until 1962), in Grenoble Highways Center)
- Limoges (from 1967 to 1987)
- Lyon-Perrache (traction extension and temporary assignment from 1951 to 1952)
- Lyon-Veze (from 1952 to 1961)
- Longo (from 1966 to 1969)
- Marseille-Blancard (from 1969 to 1974)
- Marseille-Saint-Charles (from 1955 to 1964, then moved to Marseille-Blancard)
- Metz-Sablon (temporary assignment in 1973)
- Montlucon (temporary job from 1951 to 1966)
- Nancy-Heilecourt (from 2470 to 247
to 1966) - Nantes-Blotero (from 1960 to 1966)
- Nimes (temporary assignment in 1969, then transfer to Marseille-Blancard in the same year)
- Rennes (from 1955 to 1989, last contributor)
- Rouen-Orleans (from 1955 to 1966)
- Sotteville (1958-1978)
- Strasbourg (from 1954 to 1966)
- Toulouse (from 1951 to 1962)
Equipment preserved (state 2014)
- X 2403: guarded by Chemins de Fer de la Haute Auvergne, secret MH (1997) .
- X 2413: Control panel preserved and displayed on the Cité du Train in Mulhouse.
- X 2419: rescued by CFT, Loire Valley), runs between Thore-la-Rochette and Troo. Secret MH (1997) .
- X 2423: Chemins de fer du Centre-Bretagne (CFCB) in Loudéac from
- X 2425: Upper Forez Railway from (ex Quercyrail)
- X 2426: Cotentin tourist train, sold at 1995 Pontaurai, then CF Touristique du Rhin, then ever since. at Association le Coni’fer -25370- Les Hôpitaux-Neufs (the one shown in 2 photos)
- X 2416: Preserved by CFTA, Réseau Breton de Carhaix (wrecked, broken up)
- X 2429: Retained by CFTA, Breton network in Qares (demotorised). It was sold to SNCF as the latter no longer had spare parts for the one it kept (X 2464), then it was broken up at Kulos.
- X 2448: Exploded due to poor conservation, spare parts were remanufactured for X 2403 «CFHA».
- X 2464: Measuring machine for SNCF electrical installations. Decommissioned 04 , parked at Le Mans. .
- X 2468: originally parked at Gitra, then moved to Toulouse, this car was sold to CFTSA in 2007.
- X 2475: time for Saint-Étienne (museum), abandoned project
Accidents and incidents
- X 2449 towing a unified trailer and two XR 8800s was destroyed by during a head-on collision at Chateaubourg.
Modeling
Craftsmen such as Loco-diffusion or Atmofer have edited the X 2400 as a set or as a set. Since 2008, Electrotren has reproduced several versions of this car in HO, the model was adopted by Jouef in 2019 with some improvements (new numbering, sound system, digitization).
Photo Gallery
Click a thumbnail to enlarge it.
Bibliography
- Jacques Defrance, Les Engins Moteurs Français (SNCF) 1.7.1982 , Éditions Frank Stenvalls, 1983. (ISBN 91-7266-073-2 )
- Jean-Hubert Lavy, Jean-Paul Demois, Vincent Cuni, Jean-Paul Katresus: «Portraits of the railways — X 2400 and X 2051: online, mountain people there. «, Ferrovissimo No. 22 , .
- Jérôme Mourier, «X 2400 on the Star of Vane», Voies Ferrées No. 169 , September-.
- Olivier Constant, SNCF Encyclopedia of Motor Equipment — Volume 4: Wagons from the 1950s to the Present (2), Special Issue Le Train .
- Sevenol Express , DVD, La Régordane.
- U 600 hp page.
Notes and links
-
↑ a and b Andre Papazian, Autorails de chez nous , MDM editions.
- ↑ . Please note n o PM15000759, Palissy bases, French Ministry of Culture
- ↑ Notice p o PM41000961, Palisse base, French Ministry of Culture
- ↑ CFTSA website, Wagon Equipment , «NOTE: XABDP 2468 sold. Left Attigny in June 2007 «read «Archive copy» (version dated November 11, 2008 at Internet Archive ) (Retrieved 08/25/2009)
- ↑ yann baude, « l’g 2400 electrotren Ho: a good quality model «, Loco Revue , P 733, , pp. c. 0024-5739 ) .
-
↑ Yann Baude, « X 2474: Sound and Light for the United Jouef «, Loco Revue , p about 866, , 30-31 ( ISSN 0024-5739 ) .