Core i5-6600K vs Core i5-2500K
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1635 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Fortnite than Core i5-2500K — 269 vs 242 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K — 91 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-6600K — $89.86 vs $160.65
- Up to 38% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-6600K — $0.37 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn’t have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0. 6/FPS
38%
Price, $
$160.65
55%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-6600K Skylake LGA 1151, BX80662I56600K
Buy for $160.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
242
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.86
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5 i5-2500K 3.30 GHz Processor — Socket h3 LGA-1155
Buy for $89.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
1000
FPS
903
FPS
League of Legends
612
FPS
550
FPS
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
271
FPS
241
FPS
Apex Legends
249
FPS
224
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
436
FPS
391
FPS
VALORANT
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6600K
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1092
100%
Multi-Core
3596
100%
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
798
63%
Multi-Core
2632
63%
Intel Core i5-6600K |
vs |
Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3. |
Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz |
Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
91 W |
TDP | 95 W |
14 nm |
Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x |
Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics |
Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
i5-6600K vs i5-2500K — Call of Duty Modern Warfare with GTX 1070 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1070 with
Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.50GHz
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
GTX 1070 with
Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz
i5-6600K
i5-2500K
Multi-Thread Performance
8053 Pts
6477 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2147 Pts
1897 Pts
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
i5-6600K vs i5-2500K in Call of Duty Modern Warfare using GTX 1070 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i5-6600K
i5-2500K
Ultra Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
107.
|
1080p |
94.1 FPS
|
1440p |
77.6 FPS
|
1440p |
67.7 FPS
|
2160p |
46.3 FPS
|
2160p |
40.4 FPS
|
w1440p |
66.3 FPS
|
w1440p |
57.9 FPS
|
High Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
167.8 FPS
|
1080p |
149.
|
1440p |
127.2 FPS
|
1440p |
113.3 FPS
|
2160p |
81.9 FPS
|
2160p |
72.8 FPS
|
w1440p |
111.3 FPS
|
w1440p |
99.1 FPS
|
Medium Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
227.9 FPS
|
1080p |
205.3 FPS
|
1440p |
176.
|
1440p |
158.8 FPS
|
2160p |
117.4 FPS
|
2160p |
105.2 FPS
|
w1440p |
156.3 FPS
|
w1440p |
140.4 FPS
|
Low Quality
Resolution | Frames Per Second |
---|---|
1080p |
347.9 FPS
|
1080p |
316.5 FPS
|
1440p |
276.0 FPS
|
1440p |
250.
|
2160p |
188.6 FPS
|
2160p |
170.0 FPS
|
w1440p |
246.2 FPS
|
w1440p |
222.9 FPS
|
i5-6600K
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The i5-6600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
- The i5-6600K has a smaller process size.
The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-2500K
Compare i5-6600K vs i5-2500K specifications
i5-6600K vs i5-2500K Architecture
i5-6600K | i5-2500K | |
---|---|---|
Codename | Skylake | Sandy Bridge |
Generation | Core i5 (Skylake) |
Core i5 (Sandy Bridge) |
Market | Desktop | Desktop |
Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Part# | SR2BV | SR008 |
Production Status | unknown | End-of-life |
Released | Jul 2015 | Jan 2011 |
i5-6600K vs i5-2500K Cache
i5-6600K | i5-2500K | |
---|---|---|
Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
Cache L3 | 6MB (shared) | 6MB (shared) |
i5-6600K vs i5-2500K Cores
i5-6600K | i5-2500K | |
---|---|---|
# of Cores | 4 | 4 |
# of Threads | 4 | 4 |
Integrated Graphics | N/A | Intel HD 3000 |
SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i5-6600K vs i5-2500K Features
i5-6600K | i5-2500K |
---|
i5-6600K vs i5-2500K Notes
i5-6600K | i5-2500K |
---|
i5-6600K vs i5-2500K Performance
i5-6600K | i5-2500K | |
---|---|---|
Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Frequency | 3.![]() |