2700X vs 9700k: Please click the green button to continue.

Ryzen 7 2700x vs Intel Core-i7 9700k


• Nick Miller

Here we have compared two 8-core desktop gaming CPUs: the 3.6 GHz Intel Core i7 9700K against the 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 2700X. 

Ryzen 7 2700x

Check Latest Price

Critic Reviews

“Outstanding performance, low temperatures and an excellent price: the newest top-end Ryzen is a superlative octa-core…”

by Expert Reviews

Intel Core-i7 9700k

Check Latest Price

Critic Reviews

“For the enthusiasts among us who have some breathing room in their budgets, Core i7-9700K is a much smarter choice for gaming than the pricey Core i9-9900K. It serves up similar performance at a significantly lower price. It’s no slouch in heavier…”

by Tom’s Hardware

General

Vendor AMD Intel
Released April 19, 2018 October 8, 2018
Launch price 329 USD 385 USD
Type Desktop Desktop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen+ Coffee Lake
Model number i7-9700K
Socket AM4 LGA-1151
Integrated GPU No UHD Graphics 630

Performance

Cores 8 8
Threads 16 8
Base Frequency 3.7 GHz 3.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency 4.3 GHz 4. 9 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 37x 36x
Bus Bandwidth 8 GT/s
L1 Cache 96K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 512K (per core) 256K (per core)
L3 Cache 16MB (shared) 12MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Power

Transistors 4.8 billions
Fabrication process 12 nm 14 nm
TDP 105 W 95 W
Max. temperature 85°C 100°C

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU Base Clock 350 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1000 MHz
Shading Units 192
TMUs 24
ROPs 3
Execution Units 24
TGP 15 W
Max. Resolution 4096×2304 – 60 Hz

Memory support

Memory types DDR4-2933 DDR4-2666
Memory Size 64 GB 128 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 43.71 GB/s 41.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official site AMD Ryzen 7 2700X official page Intel Core i7 9700K official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 16
Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Benefits of buying Ryzen 7 2700X

  • etter manufacturing process-12nm vs 14nm
  • Higher CPU and RAM speeds
  • Larger Cache sizes on L1, L2, and L3
  • More number of threads- Hyper-threading support
  • Better RAM
  • Higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Benefits of buying Intel Core-i7 9700K

  • Features a larger RAM size
  • Integrated GPU
  • Better single-core performance
  • Less power consumption-95W vs 105
  • Superior Turbo Boost frequency
  • 15C higher maximum working temperature

Contents

Ryzen 7 2700x Features

The Ryzen 7 2700X is an excellent processor that belongs to the 2000 series released by AMD in 2018. It is based on the company’s improved Zen+ architecture that has boosted its overall performance.

The 2700X is built on a 12nm fabrication process that packs 8 cores, with hyper-threading, which means that each core executes two threads at once, making a total of 16 threads. The hyper-threading support and more cores allow it to handle severe workloads without any trouble, enabling it to be a workstation.

The jump from Zen to Zen+ architecture has allowed AMD to offer considerably higher clock speeds. It clocks up to 3.7GHz on the Base frequency and 4.3GHz on Turbo Boost frequency. It also features a DDR4-2933 RAM with 64GB memory size and memory bandwidths up to 43.71GB/s.

The 2700X also offers a 4MB of L2 cache size and a shared 16MBof L3 Cache size that ensures to provide you with an outstanding performance, especially in gaming.

This processor comes with a 105W TDP with a maximum functioning temperature of up to 85C. It also bundles the Wraith Prism stock cooler to keep the temperatures down for exceptional performance and consumes less power.

This is without a doubt a great workstation, a perfect choice for multitaskers. But, if you’re a gaming fan and you’re not so pleased with its gaming performance, you can pair it with a decent graphics card that will squeeze way more superior performance than most of the high-end processors out there in the market. 

Intel Core-i7 9700K Features

The Core-i7 9700K is Intel’s 9th generation Coffee Lake Core-i7 processor that has been on the bucket list of most of the gamers around the world due to its simply outstanding single-core performance.

Surprisingly, Intel has increased the number of cores on its new processors, but they lack hyper-threading support. The 9700K shockingly does not support hyper-threading; it features 8 cores and 8 threads on a 14nm manufacturing process. But, its superb single-core performance and an integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 GPU makes it one of the best gaming processor out there.

It offers up to 3. 6GHz on the Base frequency and an impressive 4.9GHz on Turbo Boost frequency. The higher clock speeds and an integrated GPU make sure to provide you with the ultimate gaming experience. It also packs a 2MB of L2 cache size and a shared 12MB of L3 cache size, which is not that much great compared to AMD’s Cache sizes, but still, it does its job decently.

The 9700K also features a DDR4-2666 RAM with 128GB space and memory bandwidths up to 41.6GB/s and no ECC support. This processor also comes with a 95W TDP with maximum operational temperature up to 100C; it does not come with a bundled cooler like the Ryzen processor, so there are more chances of overheating and consuming more power.

It is also very risky and dangerous for overclockers because without a bundled cooler; you have very few chances of clocking more frequencies than its factory settings and more chances of destroying the processor.          

The 2700X or Intel’s i7-9700K?

The Ryzen 2700X and Intel’s Core-i7 9700K are both exceptional processors with reasonable prices. If we compare both the processors, one performs exceptionally well in the Gaming area, while the other excels in multitasking.

Although Intel’s 9700K lacks hyper-threading, its outstanding single-core performance and higher boost frequency make it one of the best gaming processors.

The 9700K is way ahead of the 2700X in almost every game we tested on both the processors. Saying that, it does not mean that the 2700X is poor in gaming performance; it just cannot compete with the level Intel’s 9700K is offering.

You have to keep in mind that AMD’s 2700X is about $50 cheaper than the 9700K, and you can save some bucks by getting the 2700X. You can further spend that saved bucks on aftermarket stuff like decent graphics cards or a better cooler, which will boost your processor’s performance even more. 

On the other hand, the multi-threading support by 2700X makes it a perfect processor for daily productive work. Intel’s 9700K lacks Hyper-threading, but still, it offers a decent performance when a serious workload is thrown towards it.

However, the multi-threading supports by 2700X and higher number of threads gives it a significant boost in productivity work; it made sure to handle severe workloads without any hassle.

Winding-up

If you’re a true gaming enthusiast and want to buy a processor solely for gaming purposes, then you should go for the Intel Core-i7 9700K. Its exceptional single-threaded performance and higher turbo boost frequency ensure to provide you with superior gaming performance.

In comparison, the 2700X features a higher number of cores and threads, making it an excellent gaming processor and making sure to be the perfect processor for content-creators and multitaskers. So, if you’re using your system for other stuff than just gaming, like content creating and running photo/video apps, then you should get your hands on the 2700X.

It offers an excellent multi-threaded performance that handles serious workloads with ease compared to the 9700K, and its gaming performance is also quite excellent, sitting quite close to the 8700K on the performance chart.

In our opinion, the Ryzen 7 2700X is the better processor here because it offers almost the same gaming performance and much better multi-threaded performance. The Ryzen processor is also relatively cheaper than the 9700K; you can also spend the saved bucks on aftermarket stuff for your 2700X, enabling you to squeeze more performance out of your processor.

Related:
Ryzen 7 3800x vs Intel i7 9700k
Ryzen 5 3600x vs Ryzen 7 3700x
Motherboard For Ryzen 7 3700X

Nick Miller

It’s Nick Miller a 25 year old tech enthusiast and senior editor at Flexgate, i try to make tech simple for the everyday person.
You will find review about tech, tools and Computer hardware here.

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K — Need For Speed with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X



Need For Speed


GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3. 60GHz



Ryzen 7 2700X
i7-9700K

Multi-Thread Performance

16960 Pts

17589 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2190 Pts

2834 Pts

Need For Speed

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K in Need For Speed using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions


Ryzen 7 2700X
i7-9700K


Ultra Quality










Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

89.1 FPS

1080p

101.9 FPS

1440p

68.8 FPS

1440p

77. 9 FPS

2160p

45.9 FPS

2160p

52.0 FPS

w1440p

61.3 FPS

w1440p

69.5 FPS

High Quality










Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

143.0 FPS

1080p

160.1 FPS

1440p

114.8 FPS

1440p

127.6 FPS

2160p

81. 3 FPS

2160p

90.4 FPS

w1440p

104.1 FPS

w1440p

115.8 FPS

Medium Quality










Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

196.8 FPS

1080p

218.3 FPS

1440p

160.9 FPS

1440p

177.3 FPS

2160p

116.6 FPS

2160p

128. 9 FPS

w1440p

146.9 FPS

w1440p

162.2 FPS

Low Quality










Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p

304.5 FPS

1080p

334.6 FPS

1440p

252.9 FPS

1440p

276.7 FPS

2160p

187.3 FPS

2160p

205.7 FPS

w1440p

232. 4 FPS

w1440p

254.8 FPS

Ryzen 7 2700X
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen 7 2700X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i7-9700K
  • The i7-9700K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i7-9700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K specifications

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Architecture









Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
Codename Zen Coffee Lake
Generation Ryzen 7
(Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))
Core i7
(Coffee Lake Refresh)
Market Desktop Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 DDR4
Part# unknown unknown
Production Status Active Active
Released Apr 2018 Oct 2018
Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Cache





Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
Cache L1 96K (per core) 64K (per core)
Cache L2 512K (per core) 256K (per core)
Cache L3 16MB (shared) 12MB (shared)
Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Cores






Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
# of Cores 8 8
# of Threads 16 8
Integrated Graphics N/A UHD Graphics 630
SMP # CPUs 1 1
Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Features



Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4. 1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
XFR 2
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0
Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Notes



Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.
Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Performance









Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
Frequency 3. 7 GHz 3.6 GHz
Multiplier 37.0x 36.0x
Multiplier Unlocked Yes Yes
TDP 105 W 95 W
Turbo Clock up to 4.35 GHz up to 4.9 GHz
Voltage variable unknown
Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Physical









Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
Die Size 192 mm² unknown
Foundry GlobalFoundries Intel
Package µOPGA-1331 FC-LGA14C
Process Size 12 nm 14 nm
Socket AMD Socket AM4 Intel Socket 1151
Transistors 4800 million unknown
tCaseMax unknown 72°C


Share Your Comments 0

Compare Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K in more games

Resident Evil 4

2023


A Plague Tale: Requiem

2023


Hogwarts Legacy

2023


The Last of Us Part I

2023


Forspoken

2023


The Callisto Protocol

2023


Dead Space

2023


Elden Ring

2022


God of War

2022


Overwatch 2

2022


F1 22

2022


Dying Light 2

2022


Total War: Warhammer III

2022


Spider-Man Remastered

2022


Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II

2022


Forza Horizon 5

2021


Halo Infinite

2021


Battlefield 2042

2021


Hitman 3

2021


Far Cry 6

2021


Guardians of the Galaxy

2021


Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020


Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020


Valorant

2020


Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020


Death Stranding

2020


Marvel’s Avengers

2020


Godfall

2020


Cyberpunk 2077

2020


Watch Dogs: Legion

2020


Apex Legends

2019


Anthem

2019


Far Cry New Dawn

2019


Resident Evil 2

2019


Metro Exodus

2019


World War Z

2019


Gears of War 5

2019


F1 2019

2019


GreedFall

2019


Borderlands 3

2019


Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019


Red Dead Redemption 2

2019


Need For Speed: Heat

2019


Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018


Battlefield V

2018


Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018


Final Fantasy XV

2018


Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018


Forza Horizon 4

2018


Fallout 76

2018


Hitman 2

2018


Just Cause 4

2018


Monster Hunter: World

2018


Strange Brigade

2018


Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017


Dawn of War III

2017


Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017


Destiny 2

2017


PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017


Fortnite Battle Royale

2017


Need For Speed: Payback

2017


For Honor

2017


Project CARS 2

2017


Forza Motorsport 7

2017


Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016


Battlefield 1

2016


Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

2016


Doom

2016


F1 2016

2016


Total War: Warhammer

2016


Overwatch

2016


Dishonored 2

2016


Grand Theft Auto V

2015


Rocket League

2015


Need For Speed

2015


Project CARS

2015


Rainbow Six Siege

2015


Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012


League of Legends

2009


Minecraft

2009

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K — Fallout 76 vs GTX 1660 performance comparison

GTX 1660 with

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

Fallout 76

GTX 1660 with

Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3. 60GHz


Ryzen 7 2700X
i7-9700K

Multi-Thread Performance

16960 Pts

17589 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2190 Pts

2834 Pts

900 03 Fallout 76

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K in Fallout 76 using GTX 1660 — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K

Ryzen 7 2700X
i7-9700K


Ultra quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

104.0 FPS

1080p

119.0 FPS

1440p

69.1 FPS

1440p

78.2 FPS

2160p

37. 9 FPS

2160p

42.9 FPS

w1440p

57.2 FPS

w1440p

64.8 FPS

High quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

162.8 FPS

1080p

182.3 FPS

1440p

115.3 FPS

1440p

128.0 FPS

2160p

68.9 FPS

2160p

76.7 FPS

w1440p

98. 1 FPS

w1440p

109.1 FPS

Medium quality
Resolution Frames per second
1080p

221.7 FPS

1080p

245.7 FPS

1440p

161.4 FPS

1440p

177.8 FPS

2160p

99.9 FPS

2160p

110.4 FPS

w1440p

139.0 FPS

w1440p

153.5 FPS

Poor quality
Permission Frames per second
1080p

339. 4 FPS

1080p

372.3 FPS

1440p

253.7 FPS

1440p

277.5 FPS

2160p

161.9 FPS

2160p

178.0 FPS

w1440p

220.9 FPS

w1440p

242.1 FPS

Ryzen 7 2700X
  • Ryzen 7 2700X has higher level 2 cache. The data/instructions that need to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU doesn’t have to wait for the very slow DDR
  • RAM

  • Ryzen 7 2700X has a higher level 3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
  • Ryzen 7 2700X has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
  • In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
  • Ryzen 7 2700X The Ryzen 7 2700X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
i7-9700K
  • i7-9700K The i7-9700K is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i7-9700K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.

Compare Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K specifications

Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Architecture
Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
Codename Zen Coffee Lake
Generation Ryzen 7
(Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))
Core i7
(Coffee Lake Refresh)
Market Desktop Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 DDR4
Part# unknown unknown
Production Status Active Active
Released Apr 2018 Oct 2018
Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Cache
Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
Cache L1 96K (per core) 64K (per core)
Cache L2 512K (per core) 256K (per core)
Cache L3 16MB (shared) 12MB (shared)
Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Cores
Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
# of Cores 8 8
# of Threads 16 8
Integrated Graphics N/A UHD Graphics 630
SMP# CPUs 1 1
Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Features
Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4. 1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
EVP
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
XFR 2
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0
Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Notes
Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
This processor comes with an unlocked base clock multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking. This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.
Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Performance
Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
Base Clock 100 MHz 100 MHz
Frequency 3. 7 GHz 3.6 GHz
Multiplier 37.0x 36.0x
Multiplier Unlocked Yes Yes
TDP 105W 95W
Turbo Clock up to 4.35 GHz up to 4.9 GHz
Voltage variable unknown
Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K Physical
Ryzen 7 2700X i7-9700K
Die Size 192 mm² unknown
Foundry GlobalFoundries Intel
Package µOPGA-1331 FC-LGA14C
Process Size 12 nm 14 nm
Socket AMD Socket AM4 Intel Socket 1151
Transistors 4800 million unknown
tCaseMax unknown 72°C

Share your comments 0

Compare Ryzen 7 2700X vs i7-9700K in more games

Resident Evil 4

2023

A Plague Tale: Requiem

2023

Hogwarts Legacy

2023

The Last of Us Part I

2023

Forspoken

2023

The Callisto Protocol

2023

Dead Space

2023

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

F1 22

2022

Dying Light 2

2022

Total War: Warhammer III

2022

Spider-Man Remastered

2022

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Hitman 3

2021

Far Cry 6

2021

Guardians of the Galaxy

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Watch Dogs: Legion

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need for Speed: Heat

2019

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

2018

Battlefield V

2018

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4

2018

Final Fantasy XV

2018

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

2018

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

Assassin’s Creed Origins

2017

Dawn of War III

2017

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017

Destiny 2

2017

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

2016

Battlefield 1

2016

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

2016

Doom

2016

F1 2016

2016

Total War: Warhammer

2016

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed ​​

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

9700k vs 2700x | Tags | Overclockers.

ru

A

B

IN

G

D

E

AND

W

AND

Y

TO

L

M

H

ABOUT

P

R

WITH

T

At

F

X

C

H

W

SCH

Kommersant

S

b

E

YU

I

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

X

Y

Z

Codefox

July 9, 2019

Today, a lot of tests in the so-called «working» applications cover only a narrow sector of 3d people and video editors. It is even rarer to find performance tests in graphics packages and office applications. But what if everything is serious about you and you are, for example, a developer of software, websites or mob…

Effective advertising for your business

In Belarus, the 10th convoy of PMC «Wagner» was noticed moving along a changed route

«It will destroy tanks at a distance of up to 100 km» — Defense24 told about the Russian Hermes 07 Russia is testing a new nuclear bomber Tu-160M ​​and Tu-160M2

A video of the joint flight of the heavy drone S-70 «Okhotnik» and the board of the Russian Aerospace Forces appeared on the network

Prigozhin registered a new company on the territory of Belarus near the Wagner PMC camp

NASA scientists: July 2023 will be the hottest month in the last several thousand years 07 After the hate, the Ukrainian Armed Forces engineers copied the Russian «Mangals» and began to install them on their tanks

The American MaxxPro armored personnel carrier got stuck in the sands of the Donbass roads

iPhone 15 Pro devices may be in short supply at the start of sales

Telegraph: RF Armed Forces are not going to retreat anywhere, the Armed Forces of Ukraine have only frontal attacks on Russian trenches

The total hash rate of the Kaspa network exceeded 2.