NVS 4200M [in 4 benchmarks]
NVIDIA
NVS 4200M
Buy
- Interface MXM
- Core clock speed 810
- Max video memory 1024 MB
- Memory type DDR3
- Memory clock speed 800
- Maximum resolution
Summary
NVIDIA started NVS 4200M sales 22 February 2011. This is a Fermi architecture notebook card based on 40 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 1 GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 800 GHz are supplied, and together with 64 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 12.8 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via MXM interface. Power consumption is at 25 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
0.66%
of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce RTX
4090
Compare
General info
Some basic facts about NVS 4200M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in performance rating | 1079 | |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | |
| GPU code name | GF119 | |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 (11 years old) | |
| Current price | $229 | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
NVS 4200M’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed.
These parameters indirectly speak of NVS 4200M’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Number of transistors | 292 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 25 Watt | of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
| Texture fill rate | 6.480 | of 969.9 (h200 SXM5 96 GB) |
| Floating-point performance | 155.52 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Dimensions and compatibility
Information on NVS 4200M’s compatibility with other computer components.
Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it’s notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | MXM |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on NVS 4200M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | of 22400 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
| Memory bandwidth | 12. 8 GB/s |
of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
| Shared memory | — |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on NVS 4200M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
APIs supported by NVS 4200M, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2. 1 |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of NVS 4200M. Overall performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
NVS 4200M
0.66
- Passmark
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
NVS 4200M
260
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280×1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
NVS 4200M
2298
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280×720 resolution, are relatively taxing.
Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
NVS 4200M
507
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU’s processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
NVS 4200M
1155
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of NVS 4200M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 13 Mh/s |
Gaming performance
Let’s see how good NVS 4200M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 13 |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 0−1 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 3−4 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 0−1 | |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 3−4 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7 | |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 3−4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3 | |
| Hitman 3 | 0−1 | |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7 | |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 |
Relative perfomance
Overall NVS 4200M performance compared to nearest competitors among mobile workstation video cards.
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
139.39
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
133.33
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
118.18
NVIDIA NVS 4200M
100
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
84.85
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
83.33
NVIDIA NVS 3100M
78.79
AMD equivalent
The nearest NVS 4200M’s AMD equivalent is FirePro M2000, which is faster by 61% and higher by 93 positions in our performance rating.
FirePro
M2000
Compare
Here are some closest AMD rivals to NVS 4200M:
ATI FirePro M7740
304.
55
ATI FirePro M5800
198.48
AMD FirePro M2000
160.61
NVIDIA NVS 4200M
100
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Quadro FX
880M
Compare
NVS
3100M
Compare
Quadro FX
2700M
Compare
Quadro NVS
5100M
Compare
FirePro
M2000
Compare
Quadro FX
2800M
Compare
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with NVS 4200M according to our statistics.
Core i5
2520M
26.8%
Core i7
2620M
12.3%
Core i7
2640M
11.6%
Core i5
2540M
6.7%
Core i7
2720QM
5.3%
Core i7
2760QM
4.6%
Core i7
2670QM
3.3%
Core i5
2450M
3.
2%
Core i5
2430M
3%
Core i5
2410M
2.6%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about NVS 4200M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Quadro NVS 4200M Folding@Home PPD Averages, Power Consumption & Research Projects
- GPU PPD
- Brands
- Nvidia
- GPU Folding@Home Profile
GPU FOLDING OVERVIEW
Folding@Home PPD for the Quadro NVS 4200M represents the averages of folding work unit
samples collected from a wide variety of users different computer hardware configurations.
Average values are used to
best represent folding PPD performance of a Quadro NVS 4200M across different F@H projects and user
variables such as power settings, overclocks, operating system and specific work units which can yield
wildly different highs and lows for PPD scores on the same GPU platform.
GPU PPD AVERAGE: ALL OS
964
Average of 33 most recent PPD samples
Data Samples: ALL OS
33
All Time
Stats as of Monday, 20 February 2023 18:10:31
TRY OUR BETTER F@H WEB CLIENT
Get more details on your GPU and CPU PPD in real-time, save money with folding time of use scheduling. Available for chrome, edge, brave and other chromium browsers.
GET IT FOR FREE NOW
GF108 [Quadro NVS 4200M] 155 — Nvidia
|
DATA SAMPLES INFO Filter applied, PPD samples all time |
RECENT AVERAGE FOLDING PERFORMANCE Based on the 500 most recent, available PPD samples by filter |
WORK UNIT PPD RECORDS All Time |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS FILTER | SAMPLES | PPD | WU Per 24hrs | Time Per WU | Points Per WU | BEST PPD | WORST PPD |
| All OS AVG | 33 | 964 | 0. 39 |
61 hrs 30 mins | 2,470 | 1,643 | 679 |
| Windows | 33 | 964 | 0.39 | 61 hrs 30 mins | 2,470 | 1,643 | 679 |
Recent Work Unit Research Type Allocations — Quadro NVS 4200M
Average PPD is impacted by the types of research work units being done as they return different amounts of points and take different amounts of time.
The following shows the work unit allocation of research causes to better understand changes in PPD over time for the Quadro NVS 4200M.
Quadro NVS 4200M kWh POWER CONSUMPTION & COST
Power consumption information for the Quadro NVS 4200M is based on an average wattage taken from
vendor information for the lowest and highest power draws for the GPU under folding@home compute loads.
Wattage information is only for the GPU and does not include the host computers power usage.
|
GPU Power Draw Watts — TDP |
Daily Power Usage kWh |
Points per kWh |
Daily Cost at $0. 10 per kWh |
Power Cost per 1m Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 W | 0.60 kWh | 1,607 | $0.06 | $62.241 |
Quadro NVS 4200M COMPUTE
VS kWH USAGE
DAY, MONTH, WEEK & YEAR
Folding@Home compute projections for the Quadro NVS 4200M can be used to help inform long term point goals and related costs based on 24/7 usage.
| Duration | Nick Name |
Points Average |
Work Units Average |
Power Usage kWh |
Power Cost at $0.10 per kWh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day | PPD | 964 | 0.39 | 0.60 kWh | $0.06 |
| Week | PPW | 6,748 | 2.73 | 4.20 kWh | $0.42 |
| Month | PPM | 29,321 | 11.87 | 18.25 kWh | $1.83 |
| Year | PPY | 351,860 | 142. 45 |
219.00 kWh | $21.90 |
5 BEST PPD RESEARCH PROJECTS — Quadro NVS 4200M
The following data is the average PPD values for Quadro NVS 4200M project work units based on multiple samples collected via the use of our Folding@Home dark mode web client.
| PPD Rank |
Project ID |
Cause Research |
PPD Average |
Points WU Average |
WUs Day Average |
WU Time Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18210 | alzheimers | 964 | 2,470 | 0.39 | 61 hrs 30 mins |
5 LOWEST PPD RESEARCH PROJECTS — Quadro NVS 4200M
The following data is the average PPD values for Quadro NVS 4200M project work units based on multiple samples collected via the use of our Folding@Home dark mode web client.
| PPD Rank |
Project ID |
Cause Research |
PPD Average |
Points WU Average |
WUs Day Average |
WU Time Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18210 | alzheimers | 964 | 2,470 | 0. 39 |
61 hrs 30 mins |
Video card NVS 4200M [in 4 benchmarks]
NVIDIA
NVS 4200M
- MXM interface
- Core frequency 810
- Video memory size 1024 MB
- Memory type DDR3
- Memory frequency 800
- Maximum resolution
Description
NVIDIA started NVS 4200M sales 22 February 2011. This is Fermi architecture notebook card based on 40 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. It has 1 GB of DDR3 memory at 800 GHz, and coupled with a 64-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 12.80 Gb / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a card connected via the MXM interface. Power consumption — 25 W.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of
0.66%
from the leader, which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
GeForce RTX
4090
Compare
General information
Value for money
To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of video cards and their cost, taking into account the cost of other cards.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Features
NVS 4200M’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak about the performance of NVS 4200M, but for an accurate assessment you need to consider the results of benchmarks and gaming tests.
Compatibility and dimensions
Parameters on NVS 4200M compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For laptop video cards, this is the estimated size of the laptop, the bus and the connection connector, if the video card is connected through the connector, and not soldered on the motherboard.
| Notebook size | 9Memory Parameters of the memory installed on NVS 4200M — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth.  For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.
1 1 9000
|
He gives the card a thorough evaluation, running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11, and 12 (the latter being done at 4K resolution whenever possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute. 
All tests make extensive use of volumetric lighting and tessellation and, despite being run at 1280×720, are relatively heavy. Support for 3DMark 11 ended in January 2020 and is now being replaced by Time Spy. 
Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests. 
61
