Core i7-4790K vs Core i7-8700K
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4790K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4790K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4790K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790K
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i7-8700K — $220.0 vs $340.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone than Core i7-8700K — $1.18 vs $1.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K — 88 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone than Core i7-4790K — 190 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790K — 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4790K
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
186
98%
Value, $/FPS
$1. 18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$220
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7 i7-4790K Quad-core (4 Core) 4 GHz Processor — Socket h4 LGA-1150 Pack CM8064601710501
Buy for $220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
66%
Price, $
$340
64%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-8700K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.7GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4790K
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
248
FPS
270
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
434
FPS
471
FPS
VALORANT
996
FPS
1079
FPS
League of Legends
1330
FPS
1438
FPS
Minecraft
270
FPS
296
FPS
Apex Legends
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4790K
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1061
86%
Multi-Core
3956
61%
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1240
100%
Multi-Core
6477
100%
|
Intel Core i7-4790K |
vs |
Intel Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date |
Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
| 4 | Cores |
6 |
| 8 | Threads |
12 |
|
4. |
Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed |
4.7 GHz |
|
88 W |
TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size |
14 nm |
|
40.0x |
Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
0 GHzi7-8700K vs i7-4790K — Project CARS with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz
Project CARS
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz
i7-8700K
i7-4790K
Multi-Thread Performance
15970 Pts
11183 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2703 Pts
2530 Pts
Project CARS
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K in Project CARS using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-8700K
i7-4790K
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
96. |
| 1080p |
90.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
73.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
68.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
51.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
48.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
66.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
62.6 FPS |
1 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
152.4 FPS |
| 1080p |
144.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
121.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
114.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
89.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
84.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
112.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
106.0 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
208. |
| 1080p |
198.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
169.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
160.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
128.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
121.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
157.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
149.3 FPS |
7 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
321.2 FPS |
| 1080p |
306.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
264.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
252.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
204.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
194.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
247.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
236.1 FPS |
i7-8700K
- The i7-8700K has higher Level 3 Cache.
This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads. - The i7-8700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The i7-8700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- The i7-8700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
- The i7-8700K has a smaller process size.
The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i7-4790K
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
- The i7-4790K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
Compare i7-8700K vs i7-4790K specifications
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Architecture
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Haswell |
| Generation | Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
Core i7 (Haswell) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Part# | SR3QR | unknown |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Oct 2017 | May 2014 |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Cache
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 12MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Cores
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 4 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD 4600 |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Features
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Notes
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K |
|---|
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Performance
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37.0x | 40.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
| TDP | 95 W | 88 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.7 GHz | up to 4.4 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | unknown |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Physical
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | 177 mm² |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Transistors | unknown | 1400 million |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 98
Compare i7-8700K vs i7-4790K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K — Project CARS vs GTX 1660 performance comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.
70GHz
Project CARS
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz
i7-8700K
i7-4790K
Multi-Thread Performance
15970 Pts
11183 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2703 Pts
ProjectS
0006
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K in Project CARS using GTX 1660 — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
i7-8700K
i7-4790K
Ultra quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
96.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
90.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
73.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
68.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
51.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
48. |
| w1440p |
66.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
62.6 FPS |
3 FPS High quality
| Approval | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
152.4 FPS |
| 1080p |
144.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
121.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
114.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
89.8 FPS |
| 2160p | nine0002 84.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
112.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
106.0 FPS |
Medium quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
208.7 FPS |
| 1080p |
198. |
| 1440p | |
| 1440p |
160.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
128.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
121.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
157.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
149.3 FPS |
4 FPS Low quality
| Resolution | |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
321.2 FPS |
| 1080p |
306.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
264.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
252.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
204.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
194.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
247.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
236. |
1 FPS i7-8700K
- The i7-8700K has a higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- The i7-8700K has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications. nine0354
- The i7-8700K has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
- The i7-8700K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware.
Since games are also software, they are also applicable. nine0354
- i7-8700K The i7-8700K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can turn on and off, the faster it can work. And transistors that turn on and off with less power are more efficient, reducing the operating power or «dynamic power» required by the processor.
i7-4790K
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock) performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency. nine0354
- i7-4790K The i7-4790K is more energy efficient and generates less heat.
Compare i7-8700K vs i7-4790K specifications
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Architecture
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Haswell |
| Generation | Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
Core i7 (Haswell) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Part# | SR3QR | unknown |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Oct 2017 | May 2014 |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Cache
| i7-8700K | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 12MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Cores
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 4 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD 4600 |
| SMP# CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Features
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Notes
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K |
|---|
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Performance
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100MHz |
| Frequency | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37.0x | 40.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
| TDP | 95W | 88W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.7 GHz | up to 4.4 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | unknown |
i7-8700K vs i7-4790K Physical
| i7-8700K | i7-4790K | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | 177 mm² |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Transistors | unknown | 1400 million |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share your comments 98
Compare i7-8700K vs i7-4790K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need for Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need for Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i7-12700K vs.
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-12700K
Intel Core i7-12700K runs with 12 and 20 CPU threads It runs at 3.60 GHz (5.00 GHz) base 2.70 GHz (3.80 GHz) all cores while TDP set to 125 W . Processor connects to LGA 1700 CPU socket This version includes 25.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-3200DDR5-4800 RAM, and supports 5.0 PCIe Gen 20 . Tjunction is kept below 100°C degrees C. In particular, Alder Lake S architecture is advanced beyond 10 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q4/2021
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-4790K runs with 4 and 20 CPU threads It runs at 4.40 GHz base 4.20 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 88 W .The processor connects to LGA 1150 CPU socket This the version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 for RAM support, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Devils Canyon S Architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d .
The product was launched Q2/2014
Intel Core i7-12700k
Intel Core i7-4790k
Compare parts
| 3.60 GHZ (5.00 GHZ) | Frequency | 4.00 GHz |
| 12 | Cores | 4 |
| 3.60 GHz (5.00 GHz) | Turbo (1 core) | 4.40 GHz |
| 2.70 GHz (3.80 GHz) | Turbo (all cores) | 4.20 GHz |
| Yes | Hyper Threading | Yes |
| Yes | Acceleration | Yes |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Basic architecture | normal |
| Intel UHD Graphics 770 | GPU |
Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
| 1.50GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.25 GHz |
| 10nm | Technologies | 22 nm |
| 1.50GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1. 25 GHz |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 11.1 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR4-3200DDR5-4800 | memory size | |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | nine0047 | |
| Yes | ECC | No. |
| 12.00MB | L2 Cache | — |
| 25.00MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 10nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| LGA 1700 | Connector | LGA 1150 |
| 125 W | TDP | 88W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q4/2021 | Release date | Q2/2014 |
|
Show more details |
Show more details |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0007
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0007
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes.
The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0007
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0007
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test.
A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second. nine0007
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform test that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
nine0007
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account. nine0007
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.