Intel Core i5 6200U vs i5 5200U: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 6200U
Intel Core i5 5200U
We compared two 2-core laptop CPUs: the 2.3 GHz Intel Core i5 6200U against the 2.2 GHz i5 5200U. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i5 6200U
38
Core i5 5200U
35
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i5 6200U
9
Core i5 5200U
7
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i5 6200U
58
Core i5 5200U
58
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i5 6200U
30
Core i5 5200U
28
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 5200U and 6200U
Advantages of Intel Core i5 6200U
- Supports up to 32 GB DDR4-2133 RAM
- Newer PCI Express version – 3.
0
- Around 8.5 GB/s (33%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
- Newer — released 8-months later
- 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz)
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i5 6200U
+13%
713
Core i5 5200U
630
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 6200U
+44%
1701
Core i5 5200U
1183
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i5 6200U
+5%
1595
Core i5 5200U
1525
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i5 6200U
+21%
3042
Core i5 5200U
2516
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i5 6200U
+8%
700
Core i5 5200U
651
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 6200U
+14%
1561
Core i5 5200U
1368
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 6200U and i5 5200U
General
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | September 1, 2015 | January 5, 2015 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Skylake | Broadwell |
| Model number | i5-6200U | i5-5200U |
| Socket | BGA-1356 | BGA-1168 |
| Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 520 | HD Graphics 5500 |
Performance
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base Frequency | 2. 3 GHz |
2.2 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Bus frequency | — | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | — | 22x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 4 GT/s | 5 GT/s |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 3MB (shared) | 3MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
| Transistors | 1.7 billions | — |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 15 W | 15 W |
Max. temperature |
100°C | 105°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 520 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L-1600, LPDDR3-1600 |
| Memory Size | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| Official site | Intel Core i5 6200U official page | Intel Core i5 5200U official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3. 0 |
2.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 12 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i5 6200U
9 (56.3%)
Core i5 5200U
7 (43.8%)
Total votes: 16
ompetitors
1.
Intel Core i3 1005G1 and i5 6200U
2.
Intel Core i5 1135G7 and i5 5200U
3.
Intel Core i3 1005G1 and i5 5200U
Intel Core i5-6200U vs Intel Core i5-5200U
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i5-6200U vs Intel Core i5-5200U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i5-6200U on one side and the Intel Core i5-5200U on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2,8GHz. The second is used on the laptop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2,7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Core i5-6200U | Intel Core i5-5200U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Laptop | Laptop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Skylake | Broadwell | ||||||
| Core name | Skylake-U | Broadwell-U | ||||||
| Family | Core i5-6000 | Core i5-5000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | FJ8066201930409, SR2EY |
FH8065801620204, SR23Y |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2015 | Q1 2015 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 750.000.000 |
1.300.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,3 GHz | 2,2 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 2,8 GHz | 2,7 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 4 GT/s | 5 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 3 MB | 3 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 32 GB | 16 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 34,1 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 12 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 15 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 520 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 24 | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 403,2 GFLOPS | 364,8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA1356 | BGA1168 | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 100°C | 105°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 279 | 224 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 785 | 761 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 115 | 110 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 282 | 260 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 674 | 610 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 1. 685 |
1.174 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 1.583 | 1.506 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 3.014 | 2.499 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.857 | 2.818 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
5.570 | 5.175 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
93,5 GFLOPS | 54,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
371 pts / W | 345 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i5-6200U is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. Both were produced in the same year.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6200U |
279 785 |
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
224 761 |
In single core, the difference is 25%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 3%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6200U |
115 282 |
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
110 260 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6200U |
674 1.685 |
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
610 1.174 |
In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 44%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6200U |
1.583 3.014 |
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
1.506 2.499 |
In single core, the difference is 5%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 21%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6200U |
2.857 5.570 |
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
2.818 5.175 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 8%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6200U |
3.399 6.231 |
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
2.931 5.074 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6200U |
3.103 5.107 |
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
2.436 4.184 |
In single core, the difference is 27%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 22%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-6200U |
3.  0485.949 |
| Intel Core i5-5200U |
3.133 5.602 |
In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 6%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i5-6200U AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-5200U AMD equivalent
Intel Core i5-6200U vs.
Intel Core i5-5200U
Intel Core i5-6200U
The Intel Core i5-6200U operates with 2 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.80 GHz base 2.70 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1356 CPU socket. This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2133 SO-DIMM RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Skylake U Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2015
Intel Core i5-5200U
The Intel Core i5-5200U operates with 2 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.70 GHz base 2.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1168 CPU socket. This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Broadwell U Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d.
The product was launched on Q1/2015
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core i5-5200U
Compare Detail
| 2.30 GHz | Frequency | 2.20 GHz |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2.80 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 2.70 GHz |
| 2.70 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.50 GHz |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
|
Intel HD Graphics 520 |
GPU |
Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
| 1.00 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz |
| 14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| 1.00 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 11.2 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR4-2133 SO-DIMM | Memory | DDR3-1600 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
3. 00 MB |
L3 Cache | 3.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 2.0 |
| 12 | PCIe lanes | 12 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| BGA 1356 | Socket | BGA 1168 |
| 15 W | TDP | 15 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q3/2015 | Release date | Q1/2015 |
|
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D.
The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
| Intel Core i5-6200U | Intel Core i5-5200U | |
| 15 W | Max TDP | 15 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
Intel Core i5 5200U Vs Intel Core i5 6200U Comparison in Bangladesh: Benchmark, Specs and Performance
Discuss
Should you use Intel Core i5 5200U or Intel Core i5 6200U? Well, your search ends here.
Find out which Laptop chipset would work best for you. Compare the two models on the basis of their Performance, memory, IGPU and benchmark scores. Intel Core i5 5200U is manufactured by Intel in Bangladesh whereas Intel Core i5 6200U is manufactured by Intel in Bangladesh. Base frequency and memory size are the primary matrices to judge the overall speed and performance of the chipset. Intel Core i5 5200U has a Base frequency of 2.2 GHz and 16 GB memory size whereas Intel Core i5 6200U has a base frequency of 2.3 GHz and 32 GB memory.
Check detailed comparison below to compare specification for both models. Don’t forget to check out expert opinion as well.
+ Read More
Laptop Chipsets
Hide Common features
Power |
||
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 15 W | 15 W |
| Max. temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
Laptops Chipsets
General |
||
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | January 5, 2015 | September 1, 2015 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Broadwell | Skylake |
| Model number | i5-5200U | i5-6200U |
| Socket | BGA-1168 | BGA-1356 |
| Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 5500 | HD Graphics 520 |
Performance |
||
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base Frequency | 2. 2 GHz |
2.3 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | |
| Multiplier | 22x | |
| Bus Bandwidth | 5 GT/s | 4 GT/s |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 3MB (shared) | 3MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
IGPU |
||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | Intel HD Graphics 520 |
| GPU Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory |
||
| Memory types | DDR3L-1600, LPDDR3-1600 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. Memory Bandwidth |
25.6 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | No |
Misc |
||
| PCI Express Version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 12 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
| Official page | https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/85212/intel-core-i5-5200u-processor-3m-cache-up-to-2-70-ghz.html | https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/88193/intel-core-i5-6200u-processor-3m-cache-up-to-2-80-ghz.html |
Benchmarks |
||
| Cinebench R23 (Single-Core) | 624 | 707 |
| Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core) | 1170 | 1691 |
| Passmark CPU (Single-Core) | 1510 | 1574 |
| Passmark CPU (Multi-Core) | 2490 | 3000 |
| Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) | 657 | 710 |
| Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) | 1340 | 1578 |
Browse Chipsets By
Similar Comparison
Popular Laptops
-
Asus VivoBook 15 (2020) M515DA-EJ301T Laptop (AMD Ryzen 3/ 4GB/ 1TB HDD/ Win 10 Home)
BDT 37,362
-
Lenovo Ideapad 330 (81D2008WIN) Lpatop (Ryzen 5 Quad Core/ 8GB/ 1TB/ freeDOS)
BDT 34,846
-
Lenovo IdeaPad D330 Laptop (Intel Celeron N4100/ 4GB/ 128GB SSD/ Win10)
BDT 37,487
-
HP 245 G7 Laptop (AMD Ryzen 3/ 4GB/ 256GB SSD/ FreeDos)
BDT 36,237
-
HP 245 G7 (1S3P0PA) Laptop (AMD Ryzen 3/ 4GB/ 1TB HDD/ FreeDos)
BDT 33,737
-
Dell E7440 Laptop (4th Gen Pentium Dual Core/ 16GB/ 500GB/ Win 8)
BDT 30,000
-
HP 250 G6 (4QG14PA) Laptop (7th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ FreeDOS)
BDT 36,486
-
HP 15-db1069AU (9VJ83PA) Laptop (AMD Ryzen 3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ Win10)
BDT 33,237
-
Lenovo V110 (80TCA00PIH) Laptop (7th Gen AMD A6/ 4GB/ 1TB/ Win10)
BDT 29,998
-
HP 14q-cs0009TU (5DZ92PA) Laptop (7th Gen Ci3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ FreeDOS)
BDT 32,221
-
Asus VivoBook 14 (2020) X415JA-EK302TS Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ Win10)
BDT 43,737
-
Dell Inspiron 3511 Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 8GB/ 256GB SSD/ Windows 10)
BDT 46,862
-
Dell Inspiron 3511 Laptop (11th Gen Core i3/ 8GB/ 1TB 256GB SSD/ Win10)
BDT 49,362
-
Dell Latitude 3410 Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 8GB/ 1TB/ FreeDOS)
BDT 42,625
-
Dell Inspiron 3501 Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ Win10 Home)
BDT 46,872
-
Lenovo Ideapad Slim 3i (81WD00JYIN) Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 1 TB/ Win10)
BDT 49,987
-
HP 15s-GR0012AU Laptop (AMD Ryzen 3 3250U/ 8GB/ 1TB 256GB SSD/ Win10 Home)
BDT 47,487
-
Dell Latitude 3400 Laptop (8th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ Ubuntu)
BDT 41,737
-
HP 250 G7 (2A9A5PA) Laptop (Celeron Dual Core/ 4GB/ 1TB/ Win10)
BDT 43,623
-
HP 250 G7 (1S5F6PA) Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 1TB/ FreeDOS)
BDT 42,487
-
Asus VivoBook 15 (2020) M515DA-EJ501T Laptop (AMD Ryzen 5/ 8GB/ 1TB HDD/ Win 10)
BDT 51,825
-
Asus VivoBook 15 (2020) M515DA-EJ521T Laptop (AMD Ryzen 5/ 4GB/ 256GB SSD/ Win 10)
BDT 51,875
-
Asus VivoBook 15 (2020) M515DA-EJ511T Laptop (AMD Ryzen 5/ 8GB/ 512GB SSD/ Win 10)
BDT 55,555
-
Asus VivoBook 14 (2020) X415JA-EK092TS Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 8GB/ 1TB 128GB SSD/ Win10)
BDT 51,237
-
Asus VivoBook 14 (2020) M415DA-EK512TS Laptop (AMD Ryzen 5/ 8GB/ 512GB SSD/ Win 10)
BDT 57,487
-
Asus VivoBook 14 (2020) X415JA-EK094TS Laptop (10th Gen Core i5/ 8GB/ 512GB SSD/ Win10)
BDT 62,242
-
Asus VivoBook 14 (2020) M415DA-EK502TS Laptop (AMD Ryzen 5/ 8GB/ 1TB HHD/ Win 10)
BDT 51,975
-
Asus VivoBook 14 (2020) X415JA-EK312TS Laptop (10th Gen Core i3/ 4GB/ 256GB SSD/ Win10)
BDT 59,623
-
Dell Inspiron 3511 Laptop (11th Gen Core i3/ 8GB/ 1TB 256GB SSD/ Win11)
BDT 55,187
-
Dell Inspiron 3511 Laptop (11th Gen Core i3/ 8GB/ 1TB HDD/ Win11)
BDT 53,075
-
Dell Latitude 3420 Laptop (11th Gen Core i5/ 16GB/ 1TB 256GB SSD/ Win10 Pro)
BDT 101,875
-
Dell Latitude 3420 Laptop (11th Gen Core i5/ 8GB/ 1TB 512GB SSD/ Win10 Pro)
BDT 110,337
-
Dell Latitude 3420 Laptop (11th Gen Core i5/ 8GB/ 1TB 256GB SSD/ Win10 Pro)
BDT 100,937
-
Dell Latitude 3420 Laptop (11th Gen Core i5/ 4GB/ 1TB HDD/ Win10 Pro)
BDT 96,873
-
Dell Latitude 3420 Laptop (11th Gen Core i5)
BDT 98,625
-
Dell Latitude 3410 Laptop (10th Gen Core i7/ 8GB/ 1TB/ Ubuntu)
BDT 97,162
-
Dell Latitude 3410 Laptop (10th Gen Core i7/ 8GB/ 1TB/ Win10 Pro)
BDT 107,800
-
Lenovo Thinkpad E14 (20YES00900) Laptop
BDT 99,998
-
Dell Inspiron 5518 Laptop (11th Gen Core i7/ 16GB/ 1TB SSD/ Win10/ 2GB Graph)
BDT 122,487
-
Dell Alienware M15 Laptop (8th Gen Ci5/ 8GB/ 1TB/ Win10/ 6GB Graph)
BDT 124,998
User Reviews
NA out of 5
0 Ratings & 0 Review
Detailed Comparison of Intel Core i5 5200U vs Intel Core i5 6200U
Intel Core i5 5200U has been announced on January 2015 whereas Intel Core i5 6200U has been announced on September 2015.
Check out detailed comparison with key specs below:
Passmark Score: Intel Core i5 5200U vs Intel Core i5 6200U
Passmark Score consists of 4 parameters: CPU, GPU, MEM, and UX. The Passmark score measures the performance of the CPU. Passmark score is that measures a processor’s single core performance and evaluates multi core performance. The Passmark score value of Intel Core i5 5200U is 2490 whereas Passmark score value of Intel Core i5 6200U is 3000.
Memory Comparison: Intel Core i5 5200U vs Intel Core i5 6200U
Coming to the Memory, Intel Core i5 5200U has a memory size of 16 GB while Intel Core i5 6200U comes up with 32 GB. Max. Memory Channels used in the first compared laptop chipset is 2 and Max. Memory Channels used in the other laptop chipset 2.
Performance Comparison: Intel Core i5 5200U vs Intel Core i5 6200U
Intel Core i5 5200U has 2 cores with 4 threads whereas Intel Core i5 6200U has 2 cores with 4 threads. Intel Core i5 5200U has base frequency of 2.
2 GHz whereas Intel Core i5 6200Uhas base frequency of 2.3 GHz.
FAQs
Q. Which model has higher Geekbench 5 (multi-core) score — Intel Core i5 5200U or Intel Core i5 6200U?
Intel Core i5 6200U has higher Geekbench 5 score with total score of 1578 compare to Intel Core i5 5200U with a score of 1340.
Q. Which model has higher Passmark CPU (multi-core) score — Intel Core i5 5200U or Intel Core i5 6200U?
Intel Core i5 6200U has higher Passmark CPU score with total score of 3000 compare to Intel Core i5 5200U with a score of 2490.
Q. Which model has higher base frequency among Intel Core i5 5200U and Intel Core i5 6200U?
Intel Core i5 6200U has a higher base frequency of 2.3 GHz compared to Intel Core i5 5200U with 2.2 GHz base frequency.
Q. Intel Core i5 5200U vs Intel Core i5 6200U, which model has higher bandwidth?
Intel Core i5 6200U with 34.1 GB/s bandwidth is better than Intel Core i5 5200U with 25.6 GB/s bandwidth.
Q.
Which model has higher number of cores — Intel Core i5 5200U or Intel Core i5 6200U?
Both Intel Core i5 6200U and Intel Core i5 5200U have same cores value of 2 cores.
Comparison Intel Core i5-5200U vs Intel Core i5-6200U what is better?
Home / CPU / Intel Core i5-5200U vs Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core i5-5200U
44%
DeviceList score
vs
Intel Core i5-6200U
48%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of Intel Core i5-5200U and Intel Core i5-6200U and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022 year.
Intel Core i5-5200U benefits
|
WinRAR 4.0 |
|
2327 286 (14%) better
vs
2041
|
Intel Core i5-6200U benefits
Winner in comparison
|
Maximum frequency |
|
2. 0.1 GGz (3.7%) better
vs
2.7 GGz
|
|
Transistor count |
|
1750 million 450 million (34.6%) better
vs
1300 million
|
|
Price-quality ratio |
|
76.4 % 1.3 % (1.7%) better
vs
75.1 %
|
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
100 °C -5 °C (-4.8%) better
vs
105 °C
|
|
Passmark |
|
3041 483 (18.9%) better
vs
2558
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
|
4383 247 (6%) better
vs
4136
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
9872 1231 (14.
vs
8641
|
|
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core |
|
115 7 (6.5%) better
vs
108
|
|
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core |
|
289 30 (11.6%) better
vs
259
|
|
x264 encoding pass 1 |
|
100 15 (17.6%) better
vs
85
|
|
x264 encoding pass 2 |
|
19 3 (18.8%) better
vs
16
|
|
3DMark06 CPU |
|
3787 426 (12.
vs
3361
|
|
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core |
|
2726 239 (9.6%) better
vs
2487
|
|
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core |
|
5797 804 (16.1%) better
vs
4993
|
|
3DMark Fire Strike Physics |
|
3700 410 (12.5%) better
vs
3290
|
|
Maximum memory size |
|
32 Gb 16 Gb (100%) better
vs
16 Gb
|
8 GGz
2%) better
7%) better| General information | |
|
Type |
|
|
Architecture codename |
|
| Broadwell-U | Skylake |
|
Number of cores A large number of cores improves performance in multithreaded applications. |
|
| 2 | 2 |
|
Number of threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| 4 | 4 |
|
Base frequency |
|
| 2.2 GGz | no data |
|
Manufacturing process technology |
|
| 14 nm | 14 nm |
|
Crystal size |
|
| 82 2 | 99 2 |
|
Transistor count |
|
| 1300 million | 1750 million
450 million (34.6%) better
|
|
Maximum frequency Processors with high clock speeds perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
| 2.7 GGz | 2.8 GGz
0.1 GGz (3.7%) better
|
|
64 bit support |
|
|
Max number of CPUs in a configuration |
|
| 1 | 1 |
|
Socket |
|
| FCBGA1168 | FCBGA1356 |
|
AMD-V |
|
|
Series |
|
| Intel Core i5 | Intel Core i5 |
|
Start price |
|
| 281 USD | 281 USD |
|
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
| 75.1 % | 76.4 %
1.3 % (1.7%) better
|
|
Maximum core temperature |
|
| 105 °C | 100 °C
-5 °C (-4.8%) better
|
|
vPro |
|
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware protection against malware. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
|
|
PCI Express revision |
|
| 2.0 | 3.0 |
|
PCI-Express line count |
|
| 12 | 12 |
|
Secure Key |
|
|
MPX |
|
| no data | + |
|
Identity Protection |
|
| + | + |
|
SGX |
|
| no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
|
OS Guard |
|
| + | + |
|
Flex Memory Access |
|
| + | + |
|
Quick Sync |
|
| + | + |
|
eDP |
|
| + | + |
|
HDMI |
|
| + | + |
|
VGA maximum resolution |
|
| no data | N/A |
|
My WiFi |
|
| no data | + |
|
FDI |
|
| + | no data |
|
Fast Memory Access |
|
| + | no data |
|
L1 Cache More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. |
|
| 64K ( ) | 128 |
|
L2 Cache |
|
| 256K ( ) | 512 |
|
L3 Cache |
|
| 3 () | 3 |
|
Maximum Case Temperature (tcase) |
|
| 105 °C | no data |
|
Power Consumption (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load,
|
|
| 15 Wt | 15 Wt |
|
EDB |
|
| + | + |
|
video memory size |
|
| 16 | 32 |
|
Clear Video |
|
| + | + |
|
InTru 3D |
|
| + | + |
|
4K resolution support |
|
| no data | + |
|
DisplayPort |
|
| + | + |
|
DVI |
|
| no data | + |
|
Smart Response |
|
| + | + |
Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).| Benchmarks | |
|
Passmark |
|
| 2558 | 3041
483 (18.
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core |
|
| 4136 | 4383
247 (6%) better
|
|
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core |
|
| 8641 | 9872
1231 (14.2%) better
|
|
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core |
|
| 108 | 115
7 (6.5%) better
|
|
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core |
|
| 259 | 289
30 (11.6%) better
|
|
WinRAR 4.0 |
|
| 2327
286 (14%) better
|
2041 |
|
x264 encoding pass 1 |
|
| 85 | 100
15 (17.
|
|
x264 encoding pass 2 |
|
| 16 | 19
3 (18.8%) better
|
|
TrueCrypt AES |
|
| 2 | 2 |
|
3DMark06 CPU |
|
| 3361 | 3787
426 (12.7%) better
|
|
Geekbench 2 |
|
| 5926 | no data |
|
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core |
|
| 2487 | 2726
239 (9.6%) better
|
|
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core |
|
| 4993 | 5797
804 (16.1%) better
|
|
Geekbench 4. |
|
| no data | 3507 |
|
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core |
|
| no data | 6502 |
|
3DMark Fire Strike Physics |
|
| 3290 | 3700
410 (12.5%) better
|
9%) better
6%) better
0 64-bit single-core| Technologies and extensions | |
|
Advanced instructions |
|
| Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
|
Turbo Boost |
|
| 2.0 | 2.0 |
|
Idle States |
|
|
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. |
|
|
Thermal Monitoring |
|
|
Hyper-Threading More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
|
AES-NI More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
| + | + |
|
AVX The presence of AVX commands improves performance in floating-point operations and in processor-demanding
|
|
Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).| RAM parameters | |
|
Supported memory types |
|
| DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, LPDDR3-1333, LPDDR3-1600 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
|
Maximum memory size The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
|
| 16 Gb | 32 Gb
16 Gb (100%) better
|
|
Max memory channels |
|
| 2 | 2 |
| Virtualization technologies | |
|
VT-x |
|
|
EPT |
|
|
VT-d Intel’s virtualization technology allows devices on the PCI bus to be forwarded to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. |
|
| Graphics specifications | |
|
maximum frequency of the graphics core |
|
| 900 | 1.00 |
|
Maximum number of monitors |
|
| 3 | 3 |
|
Clear Video HD |
|
|
Integrated graphics The presence of a video core allows you to use a computer without using a video card. |
|
| + | + |
|
Maximum resolution via HDMI 1.4 |
|
| 2560X1600@60Hz | 4096×2304@24Hz |
|
Maximum resolution via eDP |
|
| no data | 4096×2304@60Hz |
|
Maximum resolution via DisplayPort |
|
| 3840×2160@60Hz | 4096×2304@60Hz |
|
DirectX |
|
| 11.2/12 | 12 |
|
OpenGL |
|
| 4.3 | 4.5 |
Intel Core i5-6200U vs. Intel Core i5-5200U
Cpu Benchmark with benchmarks
| Intel Core i5-6200U | Intel Core i5-5200U | |
| 2.30 GHz | Frequency | 2.20 GHz |
2. 80 GHz |
Turbo (1 Core) | 2.70 GHz |
| 2.70 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.50 GHz |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| Yes | Hyperthreading ? | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 11.2 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR4-2133 SO-DIMM | Memory | DDR3-1600 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| No | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| 3.00 MB | L3 Cache | 3.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 2.0 |
| 12 | PCIe lanes | 12 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| BGA 1356 | Socket | BGA 1168 |
| 15 W | TDP | 15 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q3/2015 | Release date | Q1/2015 |
| show more detail | show more detail |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot.
The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Benchmark. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Benchmark’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Popular Comparision
Intel Core i5-6200U vs. Intel Core i5-5200U — Cpu Benchmark Specs & Test
4.2 of 44 rating(s)
Intel Core i5 6200U vs i5 5200U:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 6200U
Intel Core i5 5200U
Which is better: Intel Core i5 6200U at 2.3 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 2.8) or i5 5200U at 2.2 GHz (with Turbo Boost up to 2.7)? To find out, read our comparative testing of these 2-core laptop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i5 6200u
38
Core i5 5200u
35
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nucleus 9000 are involved0003
Core i5 6200u
Core i5 5200u
7
Energy efficiency
Energy Effect CHIP
Core i5 6200u
58
9000,0002 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 58 9000 5000 5000 58 9000 5000 5000 5000 58 9000 5000 5000 58 9000 5000 5000 58 9000 5000 5000 58 9000 0002
Core i5 6200U
30
Core i5 5200U
28
Key differences
What are the main differences between 5200U and 6200U
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 6200U
- Supports up to 32 GB DDR4-2133
- New PCI Express 3.
0 standard - 8.5 GB/s (33%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
- Introduced 8 months later than rival
- 4% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (2.8 GHz vs. 2.7 GHz)
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i5 6200U
+13%
713
Core i5 5200U
630
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i5 6200U
+44%
1701
Core i5 5200U
1183
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i5 6200U
+5%
1595
Core i5 5200U
1525
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i5 6200U
+21%
3042
Core i5 5200U
2516
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i5 6200U
+8%
700
Core i5 5200U
651
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i5 6200U
+14%
1561
Core i5 5200U
1368
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full specifications of Intel Core i5 6200U and i5 5200U
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | September 1, 2015 | January 5, 2015 |
| Type | For laptop | For laptop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Skylake | Broadwell |
| Model number | i5-6200U | i5-5200U |
| Socket | BGA-1356 | BGA-1168 |
| Integrated graphics | HD Graphics 520 | HD Graphics 5500 |
Performance
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Frequency | 2. 3 GHz |
2.2 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 2.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Bus frequency | — | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | — | 22x |
| Bus speed | 4 GT/s | 5 GT/s |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | — |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 256KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 3MB (shared) | 3MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | 1.7 billion | — |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15W | 15W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
| Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 520 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory support
| Memory type | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L-1600, LPDDR3-1600 |
Max. size |
32 GB | 16 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i5 6200U | Site Intel Core i5 5200U |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 12 | 12 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i5 6200U
9 (56.3%)
Core i5 5200U
7 (43.8%)
Total votes: 16
Competitors
1.
Intel Core i3 1005G1 vs i5 6200U
2.
Intel Core i5 1135G7 vs i5 5200U
3.
Intel Core i3 1005G1 vs i5 5200U
What will you choose: Intel Core i5 5200U or i5 6200U?
Name
Message
Intel Core i5-6200U vs. Intel Core i5-5200U
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core i5-6200U runs with 2 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 2.80 GHz base 2.70 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 15 W . The processor connects to a BGA 1356 CPU socket This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR4-2133 SO-DIMM RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 12. Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Skylake U Architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2015
Intel Core i5-5200U
Intel Core i5-5200U runs with 2 and 4 CPU threads It runs at 2.
70 GHz base 2.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set to 15 W . The CPU connects to a BGA 1168 CPU socket This the version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1600 RAM, and supports 2.0 PCIe Gen 12. Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Broadwell U Architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q1/2015
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Core i5-5200U
Intel HD Graphics 520
Intel HD Graphics 5500
00GHz Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result.
The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform test that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
| Intel Core i5-6200U | Intel Core i5-5200U | |||
| 15W | Max TDP | 15W | ||
2GHz / 8GB / 256GB better than Dell Latitude 14 7000 E7470 14″ Intel0 Core i5 283?
5 «Intel Core i5-4300U 1.9GB / 4GB / 128GB 
3GHZ / 4GB / 128GB 
6 » Intel Xeon E3 E3-1505M 2.8GHz / 16GB / 512GB 
Random Access Memory 
With more internal storage, you can store more files and apps on your device. 
Geekbench 5 result (single core) 
(Dell Latitude 14 7000 E7470 14″ Intel Core i5 6200U 2.3GHz / 4GB / 128GB) 
(Dell Latitude 14 E7450 14″ Intel i5 5200U 2.2GHz / 8GB / 256GB) 
(Dell Latitude 14 E7450 14″ Intel i5 5200U 2.2GHz / 8GB / 256GB) 
charging time 
A higher number of megapixels means that the front camera can capture more detail, which is an important factor for taking selfies high resolution 
3GHz / 4GB / 128GB 
L1 cache | Intel Core i5-6200U | Intel Core i3-5005U | |
| 2.30GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| 2.80GHz | Turbo (1 core) | No turbo |
| 2.70GHz | Turbo (all cores) | No turbo |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| yes | Hyperthreading ? | yes |
| No | Overclocking? | No |
| normal | Basic architecture | normal |
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 11. 2 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR4-2133 SO-DIMM | memory size | DDR3-1600 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max. memory size | ||
| No | ECC | No |
| — | L2 Cache | — |
| L3 Cache | 3.00 MB | |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 2.0 |
| 12 | PCIe lanes | 12 |
| 14nm | Technology | 14nm |
| BGA 1356 | Socket | BGA 1168 |
| 15W | TDP | 15W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q3/2015 | Issue date | Q1/2015 |
| show more details | show more details |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite.
Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result.
The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies that can also be textured and animated in the program. The Blender test creates predefined scenes and measures the time(s) required for the entire scene. The less time it takes, the better. We chose the bmw27 as our reference scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform test that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have passed CPU-Benchmark testing. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Benchmark formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Popular comparison
Intel Core i5-6200U vs. Intel Core i3-5005U — Cpu Benchmark 9 specs and test0003
4.4 of 46 rating (s)
characteristics Intel Core i5-5200U Broadwell, price, test, competitors
- Main page
- >
39 intel intel
Processor Core i5-5200U
Number of cores — 2, manufactured according to 14 nm process technology, Broadwell architecture.
Thanks to Hyper-Threading technology, the number of threads is 4, which is twice the number of physical cores and increases the performance of multi-threaded applications and games.
Core i5-5200U base frequency — 2.2 GHz. The maximum frequency in Intel Turbo Boost mode reaches 2.7 GHz. Please note that the Intel Core i5-5200U cooler must cool processors with a TDP of at least 15W at stock frequencies. When overclocked, the requirements increase.
With the built-in Intel® HD Graphics 5500, the computer can run without a discrete graphics card because the monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard.
Price in Russia
Want to buy Core i5-5200U cheaply? Look at the list of stores that already sell the processor in your city.
Family
- Core i5-5250U
- Core i5-5257U
- Core i5287U
- Core i5-5300U
- A400 240GB
SEMICE OF INTEL CORE I5-5224
, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office applications.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Performance in resource-intensive tasks loading a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
||
| Minimum | Average | Maximum |
| 52 | Memory: 78 | 89 |
|
Memory 82 |
||
| 30 | 1 core: 69 | 84 |
|
1 core 33.8 |
||
| 56 | 2 cores: 117 | 145 |
|
2 cores 29. |
||
1
Demanding games and tasks |
||
| Minimum | Average | Maximum |
| 83 | 4 cores: 171 | 200 |
|
4 cores 21.6 |
||
| 99 | 8 cores: 174 | 201 |
|
8 cores 11.2 |
Extreme |
||
| Minimum | Average | Maximum |
| 106 | All cores: 175 | |
|
All cores 3. |
1 Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R20 Single Core
Intel Pentium G4560
259
Intel Core i3-3220
254
Intel Core i5-2400
253
Intel Core m5-6Y54
250
Intel Core i7- 2820Qm
249
Intel Core i5-5200u
248
Intel Core i7-3630Q
245
Intel Core i5-4210m 9000 242 9000
Intel M310026 2310026 23100 3210M
231
Intel Pentium G3258
231
Cinebench R20 Multi Core
AMD Phenom II X4 945
606
Intel Core i7-8500Y
602
AMD Athlon II X4 645
601
Intel Core i5-4310U
595
Intel Core i5-5300U
593
Intel Core i5200u
584
AMD Athlon II X4 640 9000 582
AMD Athlon II X40003
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
544
AMD Athlon II X4 630
544
AMD A6-3650 APU
542
Geekbench 3 Single Core
Intel Core i7-4750HQ
2830
Intel Core i7 -4500U
2827
Intel Core i5-4300M
2821
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
2820
Intel Core i5-5250U
2816
Intel Core i5-5200U
2816
Intel Core i5- 5250U
2816
Intel Core m5-6Y54
2804
Intel Pentium G3450
2778
Intel Core i5-4300U
2760
Intel Celeron G3900
2758
Cinebench R11.
5
Intel Pentium G3258
1.32
Intel Core i5-4258U
1.31
Intel Pentium G3240
1.3
Intel Core i3-6167u 9000. 1.3
Intel Core5-6Y5000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
003
Intel Core i5-5200U
1.27
Intel Core i5-5250U
1.27
Intel Celeron G1850
1.27
Intel Pentium G3220
1.27
Intel Core M-5Y51
1.25
Intel Core M-5Y70
1.25
Cinebench R11.5 Igpu, Opengl
Intel Core i7-4770
32.1
Intel Core i7-4799 9000 32.1 9000.26 9000 INTEL CORE I77.
26 INTEL CORE INTL0026 Intel Core i7-4790
32.1
Intel Core i5-5300U
31.5
Intel Core i5-5200U
31.5
Intel Core i5-5300U
31.5
Intel Core i3-6100U
30.8
Intel Core i5-6200U
30.8
Intel Core i3-6167U
30.8
Intel Core i3-5010U
30.8
Passmark
Intel Core i7-4500U
2538
Intel Xeon E5520
2536
Intel Xeon X5460
2530
Intel Core i5-3230M
2526
AMD Phenom II X4 965
2518
Intel Core i5-5200U
2518
AMD Phenom II X4 965
2518
Intel Core i5-5250u
2506 2506
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650
2482
Intel Core i5-4300U
2481
Intel Core
24000 9000 9000 9000 24000 9000 24000 9000 20024
FPS measured by us in popular games on Intel Core i5-5200U and compliance with system requirements.
Please note that the official requirements of developers in games do not always match the data of real tests. Also, the result is strongly influenced by the overclocking of the system and the graphic settings in the game. We test at high settings in FullHD resolution to get numbers close to real gameplay.
On average for all gaming tests, the processor scored 44.8 points out of 100, where 100 is the fastest gaming processor to date.
We have put together a list of the parts that users most often choose when building a computer based on the Core i5-5200U. Also with these components, the best results in tests and stable operation are achieved.
The most popular config: motherboard for Intel Core i5-5200U — Lenovo 80E5, graphics card — Radeon HD 6770, SSD — 850 Evo 250GB.
Characteristics
The data is not yet filled in, therefore the tables may lack information or existing functions may be omitted.
Basic
| Manufacturer | Intel |
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. |
Intel® Core™ i5-5200U Processor (3M Cache, up to 2.70 GHz) |
| ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Broadwell |
| Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 nm |
| Date of issueMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 09-2017 |
| Model Official name. | i5-5200U |
| Cores The number of physical cores. | 2 |
| ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 4 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. |
Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, for maximum FPS you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard). |
| Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 2.2 GHz |
Turbo frequencyThe maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. |
2.7 GHz |
| L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 3 MB |
| Instructions | 64-bit |
| Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 |
| Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No |
| Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. |
15W |
Video core
| Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | Intel® HD Graphics 5500 |
| GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | 300 MHz |
| Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. | 900 MHz |
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. |
Yes |
| Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. | 3 |
RAM
| Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 16 GB |
| Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
| RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 |
| RAM bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s |
PCI
PCI-E The computer bus version of PCI Express. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. |
2 |
| PCI configuration options | 4×1, 2×4 |
| Number of PCI lanes | 12 |
Data security
| AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. | Yes |
| Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | Yes |
Design
Competitors
Please note that competitors are selected automatically based on performance in a particular task. Therefore, some may puzzle you. We are improving our selection algorithm, treat with understanding.
Compare
Intel Core i5-5200U vs AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.
Ka)
Intel Core i5-5200U vs AMD Phenom II X4 B45
Intel Core i5-5200U vs AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)
Intel Core i5-5200U vs AMD Phenom II X3 720
Intel Core i5-5200U vs AMD Phenom II X4 910e
Intel Core i5-5200U vs AMD A6-3650 APU
Intel Core i5-5200U — processor overview. Tests and specifications
The Intel Core i5-5200U processor is designed based on 14 nm process technology and Broadwell architecture. The base clock is 2.20 GHz and the maximum turbo clock is 2.
70 GHz. The Intel Core i5-5200U contains 2 processor cores. To make the right choice for upgrading your computer, check out the detailed specifications and test results. Please check your motherboard socket compatibility before choosing.
2.5
From 2
Hitesti Score
TOP 10 processors
Most popular on the site
Intel Celeron N4020
2x 1.10 GHz (2.80 GHz)
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
6x 2.
10 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
Intel Celeron J4125
4x 2.00 GHz (2.70 GHz)
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
2x 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) HT
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
8x 1.80 GHz (4.30 GHz) HT
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
2x 2.
30 GHz (3.20 GHz)
Intel Core i3-1115G4
2x 1.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4x 2.40 GHz (4.00 GHz) HT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
6x 3.70 GHz (4.20 GHz) HT
Intel Celeron N4500
2x 1.
10 GHz (2.90 GHz)
Buy here:
AliExpress
General information
Base and maximum clock speed of the Intel Core i5-5200U processor, number of processor cores and threads. The more the better (marked in green).
CPU cores, base and turbo speeds
The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on its number of cores and threads, as well as its standard and turbo clock speeds. The more GHz, cores and L2-L3 cache a processor has, the better. Please note that high specs require a powerful cooling system and a quality chipset (check the VRM on the motherboard).
| Clock frequency: | 2.20 GHz | Number of cores: | 2 | |
| Turbo (1 core): | 2. 70 GHz |
Number of threads: | 4 | |
| Turbo (2 Cores): | 2.50GHz | Hyper trading: | Yes | |
| Acceleration: | No |
Internal graphics
Some manufacturers (most often Intel) supplement processors with graphics chips, this solution is especially popular in laptops, but ineffective in workstations and gaming stations.
The higher the clock speed of the video card and the more memory on board, the better.
| GPU name: | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |||
| GPU frequency: | 0.30 GHz | GPU (Turbo): | 0.90 GHz | |
| Generation: | 8 | DirectX version: | 11. 2 |
|
| Execution units: | 24 | Number of shaders: | 192 | |
| Maximum memory: | 16GB | Number of monitors: | 3 | |
| Technology: | 14nm | Release date: | Q1/2015 | |
Hardware codec support
Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers.
These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.
| h364: | Decode/Encode | |||
| JPEG: | Decode | |||
| h365 8bit: | No. | |||
| h365 10bit: | No. |
|||
| VP8: | Decode | |||
| VP9: | No. | |||
| VC-1: | Decode | |||
| AVC: | Decode/Encode | |||
RAM and PCIe
These are the memory standards supported by processors.
The higher the standard and clock frequency with the amount of RAM, the better the performance and speed of the processor. It is also worth considering the possibility of memory operation in multichannel mode.
| Memory type: | DDR3-1600 | Memory channels: | 2 | |
| ECC: | No. | PCIe version: | 2. 0 |
|
| PCIe lanes: | 12 |
Encryption
Support for data encryption
| AES-NI: | Yes |
Thermal management and TDP
| TDP: | 15W | Maximum temperature: | — | |
| Maximum TDP: | — | TDP down: | — |
Technical details
These are key parameters that will help you determine which processor is best.
Pay special attention to the release date, the technological aspects of the manufacturing process (measured in nanometers) and the third level (L3) cache.
| L3-Cache: | 3.00 MB | Technology: | 14nm | |
| Architecture: | Broadwell | Virtualization: | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | |
| Socket: | BGA 1168 | Release date: | Q1/2015 |
Devices compatible with this processor
You probably already know which devices use processors.
It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.
| Used in: | Unknown | |||
This synthetic benchmark will help you determine the actual processing power of a single CPU core. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and uses various test scenarios
Intel Core i5-6442EQ
4x 1.90 GHz (2.70 GHz)
Intel Core m5-6Y54
2x 1.
10 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Core i3-4160T
2x 3.10 GHz (No turbo) HT
Intel Core i7-4510U
2x 2.
00 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
Cinebench R11.5 performs simultaneous cross-platform tests on all processor cores. Running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will unleash the full potential of your single-core Intel or AMD 9 processor0003
AMD Phenom II X4 900e
4x 2.40 GHz (No turbo)
AMD Phenom II X3 B77
3x 3.20 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.
20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
AMD A8-7600
4x 3.10 GHz (3.80 GHz)
Intel Pentium G3450
2x 3.40 GHz (No turbo)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a popular software for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the processor’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Intel Core i7-4770T
4x 2.
50 GHz (3.70 GHz) HT
Intel Core i7-4770
4x 3.40 GHz (3.90 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Xeon E3-1505L v5
4x 2.
00 GHz (2.80 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-6200U
2x 2.30 GHz (2.80 GHz) HT
The latter is used to create 3D models and shapes. Cinebench R15 is used to benchmark the performance of single core processors. Hyperthreading capability is not taken into account. It is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5. Like all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite
software
Intel Core i5-4310U
2x 2.00 GHz (3.
00 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-6442EQ
4x 1.90 GHz (2.70 GHz)
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-4360U
2x 1.
50 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT
Intel Core i3-4130T
2x 2.90 GHz (No turbo) HT
Cinebench R15 can be used to test the performance of multi-core processors. The test produces accurate and reliable results. This benchmark is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5, which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.
Intel Core m3-7Y32
2x 1.10 GHz (3.00 GHz) HT
Intel Pentium Silver N5030
4x 1.
10 GHz (3.10 GHz)
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-4258U
2x 2.40 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT
Intel Core i3-5157U
2x 2.
50 GHz (No turbo) HT
Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. This is software used to create 3D shapes. The benchmark runs in single-core mode without considering the possibility of hyper-threading.
Intel Core m5-6Y54
2x 1.10 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
8x 2.60 GHz (3.40 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.
20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-4590T
4x 2.00 GHz (3.00 GHz)
Intel Core i5-3210M
2x 2.50 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
This is a new version of the benchmark based on Cinebench R15 (both versions are based on Cinema 4, the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for benchmark tests of multi-core processor performance and hyper-threading capabilities.
Intel Core i5-4310U
2x 2.00 GHz (3.00 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-5300U
2x 2.30 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-L16G7
5x 1.
40 GHz (3.00 GHz)
Intel Core i5-4260U
2x 1.40 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Geekbench 3 is a benchmark for 64-bit Intel and AMD processors. It uses a new power rating system for a single processor core. This software simulates real scenarios for accurate results
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U
2x 2.50 GHz (3.40 GHz) HT
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
2x 2.
50 GHz (3.40 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Core m5-6Y54
2x 1.10 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-6198DU
2x 2.
30 GHz (2.80 GHz) HT
Geekbench 3 supports multi-core AMD and Intel processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows you to get the real comparative potential of the
processor
Intel Core i5-4200M
2x 2.50 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
Intel Core i3-4130T
2x 2.90 GHz (No turbo) HT
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.
20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
AMD FX-4150
4x 3.90 GHz (4.10 GHz)
AMD Phenom II X4 B95
4x 3.00 GHz (No turbo)
Geekbench 5 is the latest software. Completely new algorithms provide fairly accurate test results for single-core processors.
Intel Core i5-4460T
4x 1.
90 GHz (2.70 GHz)
Intel Core i3-5157U
2x 2.50 GHz (No turbo) HT
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-4260U
2x 1.
40 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Celeron G1840
2x 2.80 GHz (No turbo)
Geekbench 5 software package shows benchmark results for memory performance and multi-core processor speed. This takes into account the ability to hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron G3900
2x 2.80 GHz (No turbo)
AMD Phenom II X4 810
4x 2.
60 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Pentium G3420
2x 3.20 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
4x 1.
10 GHz (2.70 GHz)
It tests all and general CPU performance (math calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphics tests). Please note that data may differ from actual situations.
AMD A8-3870K
4x 3.10 GHz (No turbo)
Intel Core i5-7Y57
2x 1.20 GHz (3.30 GHz) HT
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.
20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Pentium G3450
2x 3.40 GHz (No turbo)
AMD FX-7500
4x 2.10 GHz (3.30 GHz)
This test measures the performance of integrated graphics on Intel and AMD processors. The result is the calculated processing power in Single-Precision mode FP32
Intel Core i5-4300U
2x 1.
90 GHz (2.90 GHz) HT
AMD A8-4500M
4x 1.90 GHz (2.80 GHz)
Intel Core i5-5200U
2x 2.20 GHz (2.70 GHz) HT
Intel Core i7-3920XM
4x 2.