AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2304 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,6 GHz, its lithography is 7 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 3584 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,6 GHz, its lithography is 16 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Graphics card | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
Release date | Q1 2020 | Q1 2017 | ||||||
Model number | 215-0917338, Navi 10 XLE | GP102-350-K1-A1 | ||||||
GPU name | Navi 10 | GP102 | ||||||
Architecture | RDNA 1.![]() |
Pascal | ||||||
Generation | Navi RX 5000 | GeForce 10 | ||||||
Lithography | 7 nm | 16 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 10.300.000.000 | 11.800.000.000 | ||||||
Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 1.130 MHz | 1.481 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1.560 MHz | 1.582 MHz | ||||||
Memory frequency | 1.500 MHz | 1.376 MHz | ||||||
Effective memory speed | 12 Gbps | 11 Gbps | ||||||
Memory size | 6 GB | 11 GB | ||||||
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X | ||||||
Memory bus | 192 Bit | 352 Bit | ||||||
Memory bandwidth | 288,0 GB/s | 484,4 GB/s | ||||||
TDP | 150 W | 250 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 450W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
Multicard technology | — | 4-way SLI, 2-way SLI HB | ||||||
Outputs |
1x HDMI |
1x HDMI |
||||||
Maximum GPU Temperature | 110°C | 91°C | ||||||
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | 36 | 28 | ||||||
Shading units (cuda cores) | 2.![]() |
3.584 | ||||||
TMUs | 144 | 224 | ||||||
ROPs | 64 | 88 | ||||||
Cache memory | 3 MB | 2,8 MB | ||||||
Pixel fillrate | 99,8 GP/s | 139,2 GP/s | ||||||
Texture fillrate | 224,6 GT/s | 354,4 GT/s | ||||||
Performance FP16 (half) | 14,4 TFLOPS | 177,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
Performance FP32 (float) | 7,2 TFLOPS | 11,3 TFLOPS | ||||||
Performance FP64 (double) | 449,3 GFLOPS | 354,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
11.340 |
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT |
7.188 |
The difference is 58%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
Equivalence:
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT Nvidia equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti AMD equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Buy on Amazon
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 633.7x more texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 65911 vs 52155
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.981 vs 19.591
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 148.384 vs 25.833
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1018.396 vs 1002.573
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 vs 10 March 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 65911 vs 52155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.![]() |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.384 vs 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1018.396 vs 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
- Around 83% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 6 GB
- 7.
3x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 18484 vs 13819
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 941 vs 901
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 vs 201.527
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 13621
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 13621
- Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score: 9879 vs 7765
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
PassMark — G3D Mark | 18484 vs 13819 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 941 vs 901 |
CompuBench 1.![]() |
205.837 vs 201.527 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 vs 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 vs 13621 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 9879 vs 7765 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark — G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark — G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.![]() |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.![]() |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.![]() |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 13819 | 18484 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 901 | 941 |
Geekbench — OpenCL | 65911 | 52155 |
CompuBench 1.![]() |
201.527 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.981 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.384 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1018.396 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.![]() |
3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 7765 | 9879 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Architecture | RDNA 1.![]() |
Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 XLE | GP102 |
Launch date | 21 Jan 2020 | 10 March 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 148 | 155 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.![]() |
|
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1130 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.![]() |
|
Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Interface | PCIe 4.![]() |
PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | 10.5″ (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.![]() |
4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 484.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.![]() |