5700 xt vs 1080: RX 5700 XT vs GTX 1080 Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-8700K vs i7-6700K)

GeForce GTX 1080 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT Graphics cards Comparison

When comparing GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 5700 XT, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 5700 XT is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce GTX 1080

Check Price

Radeon RX 5700 XT

Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 1080	Radeon RX 5700 XT
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3. 0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Recommended system power (PSU)	500 Watt
	Check Price	Check Price

• Radeon RX 5700 XT has 25% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1080.
• GeForce GTX 1080 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 5700 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.
• GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 5700 XT have maximum RAM of 8 GB.
• Both cards are used in Desktops.
• GeForce GTX 1080 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon RX 5700 XT — with Navi / RDNA.
• Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1080 is 2 MHz higher, than Radeon RX 5700 XT.
• GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 5700 XT — by 7 nm process technology.
• Radeon RX 5700 XT is 262 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 1080.
• Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 5700 XT is 13990 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1080.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p	70−75	75−80
ultra / 1080p	50−55	55−60
QHD / 1440p	40−45	45−50
4K / 2160p	24−27	30−33
low / 720p	90−95	95−100
medium / 1080p	80−85	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5700 XT in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1080.
high / 1080p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−105	110−120
QHD / 1440p	75−80	85−90
4K / 2160p	45−50	50−55
low / 720p	150−160	160−170
medium / 1080p	120−130	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5700 XT in Battlefield 5 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 1080.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 5700 XT have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	250−260
medium / 768p	230−240	230−240
QHD / 1440p	150−160	150−160
4K / 2160p	100−110	100−110
high / 768p	220−230	220−230
GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 5700 XT have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p	70−75	70−75
medium / 1080p	50−55	50−55
GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 5700 XT have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 5700 XT have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	90−95	100−105
ultra / 1080p	85−90	95−100
QHD / 1440p	65−70	75−80
4K / 2160p	35−40	40−45
low / 720p	120−130	120−130
medium / 1080p	95−100	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5700 XT in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1080.
high / 1080p	140−150	150−160
ultra / 1080p	110−120	120−130
QHD / 1440p	75−80	85−90
4K / 2160p	21−24	21−24
low / 720p	260−270	260−270
medium / 1080p	170−180	180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5700 XT in Fortnite is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 1080.
high / 1080p	120−130	130−140
ultra / 1080p	95−100	100−110
QHD / 1440p	75−80	85−90
4K / 2160p	50−55	60−65
low / 720p	160−170	160−170
medium / 1080p	120−130	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5700 XT in Forza Horizon 4 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 1080.
low / 768p	170−180	170−180
medium / 768p	160−170	160−170
high / 1080p	130−140	130−140
ultra / 1080p	70−75	80−85
QHD / 1440p	65−70	70−75
4K / 2160p	65−70	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5700 XT in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1080.
high / 1080p	60−65	65−70
ultra / 1080p	50−55	55−60
QHD / 1440p	35−40	40−45
4K / 2160p	24−27	27−30
low / 720p	120−130	130−140
medium / 1080p	80−85	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5700 XT in Metro Exodus is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 1080.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon RX 5700 XT have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	120−130	140−150
ultra / 1080p	95−100	110−120
4K / 2160p	18−20	18−20
low / 720p	150−160	160−170
medium / 1080p	140−150	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5700 XT in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1080.
high / 1080p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
QHD / 1440p	30−33	30−35
4K / 2160p	20−22	21−24
low / 720p	120−130	130−140
medium / 1080p	85−90	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5700 XT in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1080.
low / 768p	260−270	280−290
medium / 768p	190−200	210−220
high / 1080p	110−120	130−140
ultra / 1080p	60−65	70−75
4K / 2160p	40−45	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5700 XT in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 1080.
low / 768p	220−230	300−350
ultra / 1080p	100−110	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 5700 XT in World of Tanks is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 1080.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 1080	Radeon RX 5700 XT
Architecture	Pascal	Navi / RDNA
Code name	Pascal GP104	Navi 10
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	6 May 2016	7 July 2019
Pipelines	2560	2560
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost Clock	1733 MHz	1905 MHz
Transistor count	7,200 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Texture fill rate	277. 3	304.8
Floating-point performance	8,873 gflops
Length	10.5″ (26.7 cm)	272 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	10 GB/s	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	—
G-SYNC support	+
VR Ready	+	+
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1. 2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA	+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)	0.48 kh/s
Multi Monitor		+
CUDA cores	2560
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Height	4.376″ (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	1045 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred)	3.09 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	27.63 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)	470 Sol/s
Width	2-slot
GPU Boost	3. 0
Siacoin / SC (Sia)	2.28 Gh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

Similar compares

• GeForce GTX 1080 vs Quadro RTX 5000 mobile
• GeForce GTX 1080 vs GeForce RTX 2060
• Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Quadro RTX 5000 mobile
• Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce RTX 2060
• GeForce GTX 1080 vs Quadro RTX 5000
• GeForce GTX 1080 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
• Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Quadro RTX 5000
• Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080: What is the difference?

57points

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

59points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

54 facts in comparison

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Why is AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080?

• 1. 52 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
  9.75 TFLOPSvs8.23 TFLOPS
• 4000MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
  14000MHzvs10000MHz
• 47.7 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
  304.8 GTexels/svs257.1 GTexels/s
• 128GB/s more memory bandwidth?
  448GB/svs320GB/s
• 172MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
  1905MHzvs1733MHz
• 3100million more transistors?
  10300 millionvs7200 million
• 0.8 newer version of OpenCL?
  2vs1.2
• 9nm smaller semiconductor size?
  7nmvs16nm

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 better than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT?

• 6.7 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
  128.6 GPixel/svs121.9 GPixel/s
• 45W lower TDP?
  180Wvs225W
• 750MHz faster memory clock speed?
  2500MHzvs1750MHz
• Supports ray tracing?
• 16 more render output units (ROPs)?
  80vs64
• Has Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP)?
• 5°C lower idle GPU temperature?
  30°Cvs35°C
• 5. 4dB lower load noise level?
  48.6dBvs54dB

Which are the most popular comparisons?

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

1 User reviews

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

9. 0/10

1 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

1 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

10.0/10

1 User reviews

Features

Value for money

8.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Gaming

9.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Performance

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

1 votes

Fan noise

5.0/10

1 votes

6.0/10

1 votes

Reliability

7.0/10

1 votes

7.0/10

1 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1605MHz

1607MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1905MHz

1733MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3. pixel rate

121.9 GPixel/s

128.6 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

9.75 TFLOPS

8.23 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

304.8 GTexels/s

257.1 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1750MHz

2500MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

14000MHz

10000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

448GB/s

320GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

256bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

HDMI 2.0

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1080

1. Home
2. VGA Benchmarks
3. Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1080

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  124%

• GeForce GTX 1080

  100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Radeon RX 5700 XT

24% higher gaming performance.

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute

Supports FreeSync

Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1080

45 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon RX 5700 XT .

Supports PhysX

Supports G-Sync

Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

---

HWBench recommends Radeon RX 5700 XT

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (72 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration

	Radeon RX 5700 XT		GeForce GTX 1080
GPU Name	Navi 10 (Navi 10 XT)	vs	GP104 (GP104-400-A1)
Fab Process	7 nm	vs	16 nm
Die Size	254 mm²	vs	314 mm²
Transistors	unknown	vs	7,200 million
Shaders	2560	vs	2560
Compute Units	40	vs	20
Core clock	1605 MHz	vs	1607 MHz
ROPs	64	vs	64
TMUs	256	vs	160

Memory Configuration

	Radeon RX 5700 XT		GeForce GTX 1080
Memory Type	GDDR6	vs	GDDR5X
Bus Width	256 bit	vs	256 bit
Memory Speed	1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective	vs	1251 MHz 10008 MHz effective
Memory Size	8192 Mb	vs	8192 Mb

Additional details

	Radeon RX 5700 XT		GeForce GTX 1080
TDP	225 watts	vs	180 watts
Release Date	7 Jul 2019	vs	27 May 2016

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  112. 30 GP/s

• GeForce GTX 1080

  102.80 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  449.30 GT/s

• GeForce GTX 1080

  257.10 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  448.00 GB/s

• GeForce GTX 1080

  320.00 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  8980.00 GFLOPs

• GeForce GTX 1080

  8228.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  78

• GeForce GTX 1080

  53

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  146

• GeForce GTX 1080

  108

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  82

• GeForce GTX 1080

  72

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  132

• GeForce GTX 1080

  111

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  162

• GeForce GTX 1080

  125

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  169

• GeForce GTX 1080

  129

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  61

• GeForce GTX 1080

  42

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  153

• GeForce GTX 1080

  121

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  133

• GeForce GTX 1080

  127

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  104

• GeForce GTX 1080

  106

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  101

• GeForce GTX 1080

  70

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  117

• GeForce GTX 1080

  110

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  109

• GeForce GTX 1080

  92

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  158

• GeForce GTX 1080

  159

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  176

• GeForce GTX 1080

  125

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  75

• GeForce GTX 1080

  58

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  44

• GeForce GTX 1080

  41

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  112

• GeForce GTX 1080

  99

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  68

• GeForce GTX 1080

  50

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  146

• GeForce GTX 1080

  128

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  117

• GeForce GTX 1080

  91

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  148

• GeForce GTX 1080

  127

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  127

• GeForce GTX 1080

  105

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  68

• GeForce GTX 1080

  54

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  59

• GeForce GTX 1080

  42

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  109

• GeForce GTX 1080

  84

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  59

• GeForce GTX 1080

  51

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  100

• GeForce GTX 1080

  84

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  121

• GeForce GTX 1080

  95

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  127

• GeForce GTX 1080

  96

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  38

• GeForce GTX 1080

  28

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  108

• GeForce GTX 1080

  86

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  106

• GeForce GTX 1080

  94

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  90

• GeForce GTX 1080

  69

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  76

• GeForce GTX 1080

  52

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  102

• GeForce GTX 1080

  84

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  76

• GeForce GTX 1080

  65

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  129

• GeForce GTX 1080

  114

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  120

• GeForce GTX 1080

  80

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  59

• GeForce GTX 1080

  45

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  36

• GeForce GTX 1080

  30

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  80

• GeForce GTX 1080

  68

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  54

• GeForce GTX 1080

  39

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  93

• GeForce GTX 1080

  83

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  78

• GeForce GTX 1080

  62

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  108

• GeForce GTX 1080

  91

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  85

• GeForce GTX 1080

  82

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  49

• GeForce GTX 1080

  40

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  33

• GeForce GTX 1080

  25

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  61

• GeForce GTX 1080

  49

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  33

• GeForce GTX 1080

  28

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  58

• GeForce GTX 1080

  51

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  68

• GeForce GTX 1080

  55

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  75

• GeForce GTX 1080

  57

FPS (higher is better)

Windows 10 x64, Ultra quality, DirectX12

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  18

• GeForce GTX 1080

  12

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  59

• GeForce GTX 1080

  47

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  60

• GeForce GTX 1080

  54

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  45

• GeForce GTX 1080

  36

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  43

• GeForce GTX 1080

  32

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  55

• GeForce GTX 1080

  45

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  38

• GeForce GTX 1080

  36

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  62

• GeForce GTX 1080

  58

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  67

• GeForce GTX 1080

  43

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  36

• GeForce GTX 1080

  28

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  20

• GeForce GTX 1080

  17

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  47

• GeForce GTX 1080

  38

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  34

• GeForce GTX 1080

  24

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  48

• GeForce GTX 1080

  41

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  40

• GeForce GTX 1080

  33

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  66

• GeForce GTX 1080

  53

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  44

• GeForce GTX 1080

  48

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

• Radeon RX 5700 XT

  30

• GeForce GTX 1080

  21

FPS (higher is better)

	VS
Radeon RX 5700 XT		GeForce RTX 2070 Super

	VS
Radeon RX 5700 XT		Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

	VS
GeForce GTX 1080		Radeon RX 6650 XT

	VS
GeForce GTX 1080		GeForce RTX 2060 Super

	VS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti		GeForce RTX 2080 Super

	VS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super		TITAN V

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Buy on Amazon

vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 676.6x more texture fill rate: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 45% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 11 GB
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16433 vs 15019
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16433 vs 15019

Launch date	4 Aug 2020 vs 10 March 2017
Texture fill rate	239. 8 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 11 GB
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16433 vs 15019
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16433 vs 15019

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1243 MHz
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1499 MHz
• Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
• 7. 3x more memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark: 936 vs 830
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark: 18397 vs 12622
• Around 14% better performance in Geekbench — OpenCL: 61026 vs 53335

Core clock speed	1481 MHz vs 1243 MHz
Boost clock speed	1582 MHz vs 1499 MHz
Pipelines	3584 vs 2560
Memory clock speed	11008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
PassMark — G2D Mark	936 vs 830
PassMark — G3D Mark	18397 vs 12622
Geekbench — OpenCL	61026 vs 53335
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 3712
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 3712
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark — G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
PassMark — G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark — G2D Mark	830	936
PassMark — G3D Mark	12622	18397
Geekbench — OpenCL	53335	61026
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16433	15019
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16433	15019
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3712	3716
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3712	3716
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3357
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3357
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)		205. 837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		2406.499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)		19.591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		25.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1002.573
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score		9899

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Architecture	RDNA 1. 0	Pascal
Code name	Navi 10	GP102
Launch date	4 Aug 2020	10 March 2017
Place in performance rating	105	86
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$699
Price now		$826.98
Value for money (0-100)		27. 48
Boost clock speed	1499 MHz	1582 MHz
Compute units	40
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	1481 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	16 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	479.7 GFLOPS (1:16)	91 °C
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.35 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7. 675 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	3584
Pixel fill rate	95.94 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	239.8 GTexel/s	354.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	10300 million	11,800 million
Floating-point performance		11,340 gflops
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Multi monitor support
Interface	PCIe 4. 0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt	600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Length		10.5″ (26.7 cm)
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4. 6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	11 GB
Memory bandwidth	384 GB/s	484.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	352 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	11008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5X
Shared memory		0
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GPU Boost
HDMI 2. 0b
PCIe 3.0
SLI
Virtual Reality

RX 5700 XT vs GTX 1080 ⚙️

0x1011.124MH/s142W0.078MH/W

Allium8.634MH/s128W0.067MH/W

Argon2d-dyn156.664KH/s132W1.187KH/W

Argon2d-ninja—KH/s—W—KH/W

Argon2d250595.571KH/s122W4. 882KH/W

Argon2d409630.031KH/s128W0.235KH/W

Astralhash11.748MH/s120W0.098MH/W

Autolykos256.68MH/s130W0.436MH/W

BCD23.57MH/s131W0.18MH/W

BMW512953.034MH/s184W5.18MH/W

BeamHashII37.5H/s135W0.278H/W

BeamHashIII19.85H/s120W0.165H/W

Blake (14r)3.112GH/s175W0.018GH/W

Blake (2b)0GH/s45W0GH/W

Blake (2s)4.61GH/s128W0. 036GH/W

Blake (2s-Kadena)0.817GH/s127W0.006GH/W

C1128.538MH/s79W0.361MH/W

CNReverseWaltz952.26H/s123W7.742H/W

Chukwa71.585KH/s129W0.555KH/W

Chukwa221.522KH/s125W0.172KH/W

ChukwaWRKZ87.48KH/s118W0.741KH/W

Circcash—KH/s—W—KH/W

Cortex0.041H/s107W0H/W

CryptoNight0.275KH/s89W0.003KH/W

CryptoNightAlloy385.14H/s105W3. 668H/W

CryptoNightArto739.49H/s105W7.043H/W

CryptoNightConceal1497.596H/s77W19.449H/W

CryptoNightFast1372.24H/s104W13.195H/W

CryptoNightGPU1725.52H/s133W12.974H/W

CryptoNightHaven918.021H/s97W9.464H/W

CryptoNightHeavy917.955H/s116W7.913H/W

CryptoNightHeavyX381.6H/s123W3.102H/W

CryptoNightLiteV71.466KH/s103W0.014KH/W

CryptoNightR718.4H/s117W6.14H/W

CryptoNightSaber766. 6H/s117W6.552H/W

CryptoNightStelliteV4739.31H/s103W7.178H/W

CryptoNightStelliteV51358.34H/s123W11.043H/W

CryptoNightTalleo0.006MH/s113W0MH/W

CryptoNightTurtle6.342KH/s113W0.056KH/W

CryptoNightUPX224.541KH/s98W0.25KH/W

CryptoNightV70.727KH/s77W0.009KH/W

CryptoNightV8714.9H/s103W6.941H/W

CryptoNightWOW—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightZLS1021.106H/s113W9. 036H/W

Cuckaroo29S6.16H/s150W0.041H/W

Cuckaroo29b6.14H/s115W0.053H/W

CuckooBFC149.78H/s147W1.019H/W

CuckooCycle6.28H/s131W0.048H/W

Curvehash767620000000H/s117W6560854700.855H/W

Darkcoin—H/s—W—H/W

Dedal7.59MH/s134W0.057MH/W

Eaglesong0.719GH/s128W0.006GH/W

Equihash0.534KH/s141W0.004KH/W

Equihash(125,4)34.84H/s136W0. 256H/W

Equihash(144,5)59.1H/s133W0.444H/W

Equihash(150,5)24.43H/s125W0.195H/W

Equihash(192,7)33.6H/s133W0.253H/W

Equihash(210,9)254H/s131W1.939H/W

Equihash(96,5)26.706KH/s129W0.207KH/W

Equihash+Scrypt25.404KH/s130W0.195KH/W

EquihashBTCZ51H/s121W0.421H/W

EquihashBTG52H/s129W0.403H/W

EquihashSAFE51H/s129W0.395H/W

Etchash35.158MH/s160W0. 22MH/W

Ethash35.158MH/s160W0.22MH/W

FiroPoW14.634MH/s203W0.072MH/W

Globalhash27.507MH/s70W0.393MH/W

Groestl13.318GH/s140W0.095GH/W

HMQ172511.689MH/s128W0.091MH/W

Handshake0.287GH/s129W0.002GH/W

HeavyHash364.669MH/s175W2.084MH/W

Hex17.052MH/s131W0.13MH/W

HoneyComb47.549MH/s131W0.363MH/W

Jeonghash5.808MH/s121W0. 048MH/W

KAWPOW12.908MH/s130W0.099MH/W

KangarooTwelve—MH/s—W—MH/W

Keccak0.855GH/s131W0.007GH/W

Keccak-C0.857GH/s128W0.007GH/W

Lyra2REv245.113MH/s51W0.885MH/W

Lyra2REv351.864MH/s129W0.402MH/W

Lyra2vc0ban39.852MH/s116W0.344MH/W

Lyra2z3.982MH/s128W0.031MH/W

MTP—MH/s—W—MH/W

MTP-TCR2.818MH/s98W0. 029MH/W

Myr-Groestl0.174GH/s199W0.001GH/W

NIST50.036GH/s92W0GH/W

NeoScrypt1.272MH/s68W0.019MH/W

Octopus10.25MH/s183W0.056MH/W

PHI161232.805MH/s123W0.267MH/W

PHI27.886MH/s128W0.062MH/W

Padihash0.262MH/s41W0.006MH/W

Pawelhash5.444MH/s136W0.04MH/W

Phi5—MH/s—W—MH/W

ProgPow11.551MH/s130W0. 089MH/W

ProgPowSERO12.557MH/s130W0.097MH/W

ProgPowZ—MH/s—W—MH/W

Quark0.001GH/s138W0GH/W

RandomKEVA583.24H/s—W—H/W

RandomSFX589.54H/s—W—H/W

RandomX786.7H/s133W5.915H/W

SHA-256csm1202.848MH/s128W9.397MH/W

ScryptSIPC929.1KH/s129W7.202KH/W

Skein0.593GH/s130W0.005GH/W

Skein2350.493MH/s152W2. 306MH/W

Skunkhash48.562MH/s132W0.368MH/W

SonoA3.061MH/s131W0.023MH/W

Tellor0GH/s131W0GH/W

Tensority0.002KH/s130W0KH/W

TimeTravel1041.124MH/s132W0.312MH/W

Tribus99.023MH/s133W0.745MH/W

Ubqhash36.086MH/s129W0.28MH/W

Verthash—MH/s—W—MH/W

VerusHash—MH/s—W—MH/W

X11k1.464MH/s101W0.014MH/W

X159. 223MH/s111W0.083MH/W

X16R25.332MH/s135W0.188MH/W

X16RT27.916MH/s129W0.216MH/W

X16RTVEIL27.857MH/s129W0.216MH/W

X16Rv223.137MH/s134W0.173MH/W

X16S21.679MH/s76W0.285MH/W

X1720.129MH/s126W0.16MH/W

X17R7.452MH/s126W0.059MH/W

X180.262MH/s116W0.002MH/W

X21S15.072MH/s121W0.125MH/W

X22i12. 911MH/s130W0.099MH/W

X25X4.789MH/s105W0.046MH/W

X3311.718MH/s155W0.076MH/W

Xevan4.685MH/s112W0.042MH/W

Zhash57.8H/s129W0.448H/W

cuckARoo24149.715H/s141W1.062H/W

cuckARoo296.12H/s43W0.142H/W

cuckARood295.444H/s137W0.04H/W

cuckARoom293.26H/s118W0.028H/W

cuckARooz293.67H/s124W0.03H/W

cuckAToo310. 97H/s114W0.009H/W

cuckAToo320.39H/s105W0.004H/W

cuckoo5.4MH/s111W0.049MH/W

vProgPow6.882MH/s207W0.033MH/W

How Does the GTX 1080 Ti Stack Up in 2019?

This is a straightforward comparison pitting the previous generation GeForce flagship, the GTX 1080 Ti head to head against the RTX 2070 Super and RX 5700 XT in 39 games. We’ll learn how the GTX 1080 Ti stacks up versus these new «mid-range» GPUs and if you should buy one, something that will be answered before this article is over.

For testing, representing the red team we have the PowerColor RX 5700 XT Red Devil and for the green team the MSI RTX 2070 Super X Trio and MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio. Our standard GPU test rig was used, comprising a Core i9-9900K clocked at 5GHz with 16GB of DDR4-3400 memory. We tested all games at 1440p and 4K resolutions, for a total of 39 titles.

As usual we’ll go through a few of these game benchmarks where we see noteworthy data to highlight and towards the end of the feature we’ll have a few big breakdown graphs comparing all the performance data.

First up we have the newly released Gears 5. The GTX 1080 Ti dominated the 2070 Super and 5700 XT, both newer GPUs averaged 76 fps at 1440p while the Pascal GPU pushed on to average 88 fps. The 1080 Ti was also 14% faster than the 2070 Super at 4K and 25% faster than the 5700 XT.

Control is another new addition to our battery of benchmarks, but this one seems to be very unoptimized. All three GPUs failed to average more than 60 fps at 1440p, so that’s pretty horrible. The game looks good, not amazing though, and certainly not good enough to justify this level of performance. So for now at least, Control looks to be a real fps pig.

Next up we have War Thunder and here the 1080 Ti edged out the 2070 Super by a 13% margin at 1440p, though both delivered similar 1% low performance. The 1080 Ti also blew away the 5700 XT by a 34% margin and we see a similar thing at 4K, despite similar 1% low performance.

World of Tanks plays very well on the GTX 1080 Ti, here the Pascal GPU was 15% faster than the 2070 Super and 24% faster than the 5700 XT. That’s a solid result for the older 1080 Ti, though frame rates were high with all GPUs at 1440p using maxed out settings. The 4K result was more impressive, 94 fps on average from the 1080 Ti enabled an extremely smooth gaming experience.

The GeForce GPUs are a little stronger in The Division 2, the 1080 Ti for example was 13% faster than the 5700 XT at 1440p and 15% faster at 4K. The 1080 Ti also edged out the 2070 Super at 1440p, but matched it at the 4K resolution.

Interestingly, both the 5700 XT and 2070 Super comfortably beat the 1080 Ti in Counter-Strike Global Offensive, but given the frame rates it’s hard to say how much it even matters. I also doubt many play at 4K but if you do, you can still expect over 200 fps with any one of these GPUs.

Recently the RTX series saw a 20-30% performance boost in Forza Horizon 4 with the latest drivers. However, there has been no performance uplift for the Pascal GPUs and as a result the 1080 Ti still trails the 5700 XT, at least at 1440p. The results are more competitive at 4K and here the 1080 Ti matched the 5700 XT and wasn’t a great deal slower than the 2070 Super.

Something we’ve noticed is how the older Pascal GPUs perform well in older titles, or at least titles with dated game engines. In Fortnite we see the 1080 Ti outclassing both the 2070 Super and 5700 XT at both 1440p and 4K. At the 4K resolution it was 14% faster than the 2070 Super, so a pretty handy win here.

Like Fortnite, PUBG uses the Unreal Engine 4 and so we see the 1080 Ti easily beating the 5700 XT, though this time it wasn’t much faster than the 2070 Super.

Performance in F1 2019 was virtually identical across these three GPUs with average frame rates ranging from 112 — 114 fps. The results at 4K were also very competitive, the GTX 1080 Ti matched the 5700 XT exactly.

Wolfenstein: Youngblood is a relatively new addition to our benchmark lineup and this one plays very well on the newer Turing GPUs. The 1080 Ti was 10% slower than the 2070 Super and when talking over 140 fps on average, that’s not a big deal. The 1080 Ti was comparable to the 5700 XT at both 1440p and 4K.

All three GPUs performed very well in Apex Legends, particularly at 1440p. The GTX 1080 Ti did beat the 5700 XT by a small margin while it wasn’t much slower than the newer RTX 2070 Super. Then at 4K the GeForce GPUs delivered basically identical performance while the 5700 XT fell away by around a 12% margin.

For testing Rainbow Six Siege we’re manually forcing a 100% render scale with TAA enabled. Here we see all GPUs able to average over 100 fps at 1440p, the 1080 Ti and 5700 XT delivered a similar 1% low result, but the Pascal GPU was a little faster on average. When compared to the 2070 Super the 1080 Ti was 8% slower and we see a similar thing at the 4K resolution as well.

The last game we’re going to look at before jumping into the 39 game breakdown is Monster Hunter World.

Here we see very competitive performance at both tested resolutions, the 1080 Ti was a smidgen faster than the 2070 Super and 5700 XT, but overall the gaming experience was much the same.

Power Consumption

A brief note about power consumption. We don’t include these on every game benchmark comparison since consumption figures don’t change from the initial testing and we refuse to include thermal data as that can vary significantly from one model to the next. E.g. not all RTX 2070 Super graphics cards run at the same temperature, so each individual model will present some variance. The same is true for power consumption. Some models are more power hungry than others, but the discrepancy here is smaller.

Anyway, when it comes to power consumption, the GTX 1080 Ti GPU consumes around 27% more power than the 2070 Super GPU and around 35% more than the 5700 XT GPU. ..

When comparing the entire system consumption the 1080 Ti consumed 15% more power than the 2070 Super and 12% more power than the 5700 XT. So while the newer GPUs are more efficient, it’s not exactly going to have a noticeable impact on your system.

Performance Summary

As expected the two year old flagship Pascal GPU still packs quite the punch and has no trouble keeping up with the current performance mid-range options from AMD and Nvidia. We’ve only looked at results for about a dozen titles, so let’s see how they compare across all 39 games tested.

GTX 1080 Ti vs. RTX 2070 Super

As you can see on the graph below, the older GTX Pascal was 3% faster on average at 1440p. Overall that means very similar performance on average, though we see big differences when looking at individual titles in some instances. The 1080 Ti, for example, was 16% faster in Gears 5, 15% faster in World of Tanks and 13% faster in Quake Champions and War Thunder. It was also up to 10% slower in CSGO and Wolfenstein Youngblood, 9% slower in Forza Horizon 4 and 8% slower in Rainbow Six Siege.

Of the 39 games tested the margin was seen to be 10% or less in 32 of them. Then we saw a 5% margin or less in 19 of the games tested. So as the 3% difference on average suggests, for the most part performance was similar.

GTX 1080 Ti vs. Radeon 5700 XT

When compared to the RX 5700 XT, the 1080 Ti was 9% faster on average at 1440p and as this figure suggests, the GeForce GPU came out on top in significantly more titles. The outliers include a 34% victory in War Thunder and 32% in Vermintide 2, while it was also quite a bit faster in World of Tanks and Metro Exodus.

Closing Remarks

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti remains a very capable graphics card in late 2019, no surprises there.

Many of you wanted this test to address mainly two questions: First, has Nvidia started to abandon Pascal with driver optimization, in other words, has the 1080 Ti began to slip behind Turing based GPUs such as the 2070 Super? And second, should you buy a 1080 Ti today, and what price range should you be aiming for?

Let’s take the driver optimization first. We’re not going to get into the Nvidia gimping or nerfing performance of older generations, as we’ve looked into this numerous times in the past and always found the claims to be bogus. Sure, at times we’ve seen driver bugs that hurt older generations as the focus is getting current-gen up to speed. We saw this when Forza Horizon 4 was first released as an example, but Nvidia always get those issues sorted.

Actually Forza Horizon 4 is a good example. Recently the RTX 2070 Super saw a 30% performance boost while the 1080 Ti got a zero percent boost. This means that upon release the 2070 Super was 13% slower than the 1080 Ti in this title, today it’s 10% faster. But is this an example of Nvidia adondaning optimizations for Pascal, or is it simply an example of the Turing architecture being better utilized? We’d lean towards the latter, perhaps they’re now taking better advantage of Turing’s concurrent FP32 and INT32 execution.

Whatever the case, as the only example we have here, it’s impossible to draw a real conclusion from it. What we can tell you is that upon release, the RTX 2070 (non super) was 17% slower than the 1080 Ti. We also know that on average the RTX 2070 is 12% slower than the 2070 Super, so the fact that the 1080 Ti is still 3% faster on average seems about right.

Now, should you buy the 1080 Ti? Only if the price is right. Looking at completed listings on eBay we see that GTX 1080 Ti’s are currently selling for about $500 with the most affordable example priced at around $450. Honestly we were expecting them to be much cheaper.

You can buy a brand new RTX 2070 Super for $510. Saving ~$60 for a second hand card that probably has been abused a bit, a 1080 Ti doesn’t seem like a smart investment. Moreover, you can snag brand new 5700 XT’s for around $425 right now, so given the 1080 Ti was on average only 9% faster, paying a little more for a second hand model doesn’t seem worth it. Based on today’s results, we wouldn’t pay more than $400 for a used GTX 1080 Ti, in fact they’d only start to tempt us around the $350 mark.

Shopping Shortcuts:

• AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT on Amazon
• AMD Radeon RX 5700 on Amazon
• GeForce RTX 2070 Super on Amazon
• GeForce RTX 2060 Super on Amazon
• GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen 9 3900X on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon
• AMD Ryzen 5 2600X on Amazon

0022 14000MHz vs 10000MHz

47.7 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
448GB/s vs 320GB/s

172MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
1905MHz vs 1733MHz

3100million more transistors?
10300 million vs 7200 million

0.8 newer version of OpenCL?
2 vs 1.2

Are 9nm smaller semiconductors?
7nm vs 16nm

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 better than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT?

• 6. 7 GPixel/s higher pixel speed?
  128.6 GPixel/s vs 121.9 GPixel/s
• 45W below TDP?
  180W vs 225W
• 750MHz faster memory speed?
  2500MHz vs 1750MHz
• Supports ray tracing?
• 16 more ROPs?
  80 vs 64
• Has DPFP?
• 5°C lower GPU idle temperature?
  30°C vs 35°C
• 5.4dB lower noise floor at full load?
  48.6dB vs 54dB

Which comparisons are the most popular?

AMD Radeon RX 5700XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

90 R004

Nvidia

Nvidia

0003

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080

VS

NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 3050 TI Laptop

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

VS

AMD Radeon RXT

NVIDIA GTX 9000

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

0004 1 reviews of users

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080

1 Reviews of users

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080

10. 0264 /10

1 Reviews of Users

904 /Quality 9000)

1 Votes

10.0 /10

1 Votes

Games

/10

1 VOTES

10.0 /10

1 VOTES

performance

10.0 /10

1 votes

10.0 /10 9000 VOTES

Reliability

7.0 /10

1 Votes

7.0 /10

1 Votes

1. Treatment frequency GP

1605MHz

1607MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.turbo GPU

1905MHz

1733MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

121.9 GPixel/s

128.6 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4. flops

9.75 TFLOPS

8.23 ​​TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

304.8 GTexels/s

257.1 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1750MHz

2500MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs imaging units

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

14000MHz

10000MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

448GB/s

320GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

256bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5. GDDR memory versions

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory debug code

✖AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5.GPU Temperature at Boot

Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

2.HDMI connectors

More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

HDMI 3.Version

HDMI 2.0

HDMI 2.0

New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti comparison which is better?

General information
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
0.76023392% 0.51130688% (205.4%) better than	0.248 %
Architecture
RDNA 1.0	Pascal
Codename
Navi 10	GP102
Type
Desktop	Desktop
Release price
$399 -300 $ (-42. 9%) better than	$699
Number of shaders
2560	3584 1024 (40%) better than
Core Clock
1605 MHz At 124 MHz (8.4%) better than	1481 MHz
Boost frequency
1905 MHz At 323 MHz (20.4%) better than	1582 MHz
Number of transistors
10.300 million	11.800 million
Process
7 nm -9 nm (-56.2%) better than	16 nm
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
225W -25 W (-10%) better than	250 W
Length
272 mm	26.7 cm
Additional power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
G-SYNC Support NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts.
Multi Monitor
+	n/a
SLI support
n/a	+
3D Vision
n/a	+
GPU Boost
n/a	+
VR Ready Technology from NVIDIA that gives manufacturers access to Multi res Shading, Context Priority, and GPU Direct virtual reality technologies.
+	n/a
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.
+	+
CUDA The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for parallel computing. For example, for the development and design of neural networks.
Maximum temperature
n/a	91 °C
Recommended power supply
n/a	600 Watt
Multi-monitor support
n/a	1
Ansel
Virtual Reality
n/a	+
Decred / DCR (Decred)
n/a	4. 6 Gh/s
Siacoin / SC (Sia)
n/a	2.96 Gh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
n/a	1 Sol/s
Video connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DirectX
12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Floating point performance
n/a	11.340 gflops
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
n/a	35 Mh/s

Memory
Memory type
GDDR6	GDDR5X
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.
8 GB	11 GB 3 GB (37.5%) better than
Memory bus width The larger the video memory bus width, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.
256 bit	352 bit 96 bits (37.5%) better than
Shared memory
n/a	—
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.
14000 MHz At 2992 MHz (27.2%) better than	11008 MHz
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective RAM the PC can use.
448	484.4 36.4 (8.1%) better than

Video card Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Geforce GTX 1080 Ti.

Comparison!

Author Roman Ignatiev Reading 7 min. Views 323 Posted 03/27/2020
Updated 03/27/2020

Hello everyone. Today we will compare two video cards — AMD Radeon RX
5700 XT and NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1080 Ti with reference specifications. Home
the purpose of the comparison is the ratio of price to performance of the flagships of the two manufacturers
video cards. To do this, we will compare the main characteristics of the reference
versions of the two models and conduct tests in 10 popular games in both Full HD and
in 2K resolution. So we start. Length 22 cm 26.6 cm Number of slots 2 slots 2 slots

First, let’s go over the external characteristics. Reference models RX 5700 XT and
Geforce GTX 1080 Ti does not differ much in size, however, the card is from NVIDIA
yet slightly longer than the competitor by a few centimeters. Both models have 2
slot.

	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
display port	3	3
HDMI	one	one
DVI	—	—

The cards also have a standard set of video outputs, consisting of three
Display Port and one HDMI connector. There is a noticeable absence of the old DVI and
fancy USB-Type C, which is a little puzzling given the cards’ high prices.

	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
TDP	225 W	250 W
Food	8+6-pin	8+6-pin

Power the 5700 XT and GTX 1080 Ti from one 8-pin and one 6-pin connector,
which is quite usual for mid-high segment cards. In terms of
consumption, the video card from NVIDIA will be a little more “gluttonous” than the Radeon. Her TDP
is 250W, while the RX 5700 XT is limited to 225W.

Capacity

	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
Memory size	8GB	11GB
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5X
Core frequency	1605-1905 MHz	1480-1582 MHz
Memory interface	256 bit	352 bit
CUDA cores	2560	3584

Performance-wise, the GTX 1080 Ti outperforms the
competitor. This is especially true for the number of CUDA cores and the amount of memory.
However, the card from AMD boasts more impressive core frequencies —
1605 MHz with a maximum overclock of up to 1905 MHz, while the maximum frequency
models from NVIDIA is limited to 1582 MHz. Also, the RX 5700 XT has more than
fast GDDR6 memory.

At first glance, the GTX 1080 Ti is clearly faster, but the card is noticeably more expensive
expensive. To determine if it’s worth paying extra for an NVIDIA graphics card, we
we will conduct tests in 10 modern games. In conjunction with our video cards, we will
use Intel Core i7 8700K processor. Projects will be launched with maximum
graphics settings in Full HD and 2K resolution.

Game tests

Borderlands 3	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	69	77	75	83	eight%
2K (2560×1440)	43	54	46	58	7%

The first game on our list will be Borderlands 3, a distinctive feature
which is a large open world. The game came out not only very big, but
and beautiful in terms of design. Both models perform well in both
Full HD resolution, and in 2K.

Resident Evil 2	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	136	152	145	162	7%
2K (2560×1440)	81	102	86	108	6%

The second game in our testing will be Resident Evil 2. The project is quite
was quickly announced and released, winning a lot of sympathy. Her
a distinctive feature was not only improved gameplay and an interesting plot, but
and great optimization. Both graphics cards handle this game well. GTX
The 1080 Ti is slightly ahead of its competitor, the RX 5700 XT.

Apex Legends	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	129	144	124	138	four%
2K (2560×1440)	87	109	81	102	6%

Despite the competition, the Apex Legends battle royale managed to shoot for
account of a thoughtful marketing campaign. The developers wanted to optimize
your game so that it works well on any hardware and they do it well
happened. On the RX 5700 XT graphics card, Apex Legends produces a minimum of 129 frames per
second, while the GTX 1080 Ti is only 124, which is pretty amazing.

Far Cry New Dawn	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	110	123	117	130	6%
2K (2560×1440)	75	95	80	100	5%

Ubisoft’s Far Cry New Dawn fits perfectly into the series. It’s the same
crazy and thoughtful open world with a bunch of different mechanics. Testing
demonstrates a slight advantage of the NVIDIA card, however, it does not exceed 5-6
percent in both Full HD and 2K resolution.

world war z	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	152	170	136	152	eleven%
2K (2560×1440)	98	124	87	109	12%

The Radeon RX 5700 XT does well in World War Z, where it puts out more than 100
fps in 2K resolution, not to mention Full HD. GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
ahead of her by 11-12 percent. The average frame rate fluctuates around 150-170
frames per second. Separately, I would like to highlight once again the higher minimum
the frame rate of the card from AMD. This indicates a more stable operation of the video card.

Gears of War 5	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	87	97	94	105	eight%
2K (2560×1440)	56	70	60	75	7%

Gears of War 5 plays well and is stable on both maps and the gap is
only 7%, which is a very good result for the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT.

Metro Exodus	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	61	68	64	72	6%
2K (2560×1440)	42	53	44	55	four%

The same can be said about Metro Exodus. Video cards have almost no
performance differences, especially at 2K resolution, where the gap is
only 4 percent. In general, the RX 5700 XT performs well in Full HD
resolution. Downgrading graphics is not required.

Need for Speed: Heat	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	80	89	87	97	9%
2K (2560×1440)	56	70	60	75	7%

Sequel to the popular racing series Need For Speed: Heat turned out very
ambiguous. Both video cards give a good frame rate and allow you to comfortably
play at 60 fps on ultra graphics settings, regardless of resolution. GTX
The 1080 Ti pulls ahead a bit. The difference is especially noticeable in Full HD
resolution.

Anthem	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	75	83	80	89	7%
2K (2560×1440)	53	67	55	70	four%

The controversial game Anthem from Ubisoft turned out to be boring and monotonous,
nothing to say about her beauty. The luscious open world is teeming with vegetation and
large waterfalls, which greatly loads the video card. One, compared models
do an excellent job with the game, delivering from 70 frames in Full HD resolution and from
55 in 2K.

RDR 2	AMD Radeon RX 5700XT	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition	Difference
FPS	Min.	Avg.	Min.	Avg.
1080p	51	57	55	61	7%
2K (2560×1440)	37	46	39	fifty	9%

And finally Read Dead Redemption 2. Even the top
the previous generation GTX 1080 Ti graphics card cannot cope with such an inconvenience.
optimized project by Rockstar studio. The game runs at 60 frames per
second with drawdowns up to 55, which is so high for a Full HD resolution and a map
level is pretty weird. RX 5700 XT also gives in this case at 7-9
percent.

Now we can summarize. Video cards turned out to be very interesting and
the winner in this test is NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1080 Ti. However, its price is much higher
than the Radeon RX 5700 XT, this is especially noticeable against the background of a rather small
framerate difference. The situation is further aggravated by the fact that the card from AMD came out
much later than the competitor, thereby having more offers from others
manufacturers, while finding a new GTX 1080 Ti at a good price can be
quite problematic. Therefore, in terms of price-quality ratio AMD Radeon RX
The 5700 XT is a better buy than the model from NVIDIA. 920

Average: 938 MHz

1607MHz

max 2457

Average: 938 MHz

GPU memory frequency

This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

1750MHz

max 16000

Average: 1326.6 MHz

1251MHz

max 16000

Average: 1326. 6 MHz

FLOPS

A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

9.5TFLOPS

max 1142.32

Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

8.8TFLOPS

max 1142.32

Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

Turbo GPU

If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all

1905 MHz

max 2903

Average: 1375.8 MHz

1733MHz

max 2903

Average: 1375.8 MHz

Texture size

A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all

304.8 GTexels/s

max 756.8

Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

257.1 GTexels/s

max 756.8

Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

Architecture name

RDNA 1.0

Pascal

Graphic processor name

Navi 10

GP104

memory capacity

This is the speed that the device saves or counts the information.

448GB/s

max 2656

Average: 198.3GB/s

320.3GB/s

max 2656

Average: 198.3 GB/s

Effective memory speed

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all

14000MHz

max 19500

Average: 6984.5 MHz

10000MHz

max 19500

Average: 6984.5 MHz

RAM

8GB

max 128

Average: 4.6 GB

8GB

max 128

Average: 4.6 GB

GDDR Memory Versions

Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all

6

Average: 4.5

5

Average: 4. 5

Memory bus width

A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all

256bit

max 8192

Average: 290.1bit

256bit

max 8192

Average: 290.1bit

Date of Release

2019-07-07 00:00:00

2016-05-06 00:00

Heat generation

Thermal heat (TDP)-the maximum possible amount energy dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all

225W

Average: 140. 4W

180W

Average: 140.4W

Process technology

The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

7 nm

Average: 47.5 nm

16 nm

Average: 47.5 nm

Number of transistors

The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates

10300 million

max 80000

Average: 5043 million

7200 million

max 80000

Average: 5043 million

PCIe version

Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all

four

Mean: 2.8

3

Mean: 2.8

Width

272mm

max 421.7

Average: 242.6mm

267mm

max 421.7

Average: 242.6mm

Purpose

Desktop

Desktop

DirectX

Used in demanding games, providing improved graphics

12

max 12.2

Average: 11.1

12

max 12.2

Average: 11. 1

OpenCL version

Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all

2.1

max 4.6

Average: 1.7

3

max 4.6

Average: 1.7

opengl version

Later versions provide better game graphics

4.6

max 4.6

Average: 4

4.6

max 4.6

Average: 4

Shader model version

6.5

max 6.6

Average: 5. 5

6.4

max 6.6

Average: 5.5

Vulkan version

1.3

1.3

Has HDMI output

HDMI output allows you to connect devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports. They can transmit video and audio to the display.

Yes

Yes

HDMI version

The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
Show all

2

max 2.1

Average: 2

2

max 2.1

Average: 2

DisplayPort

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort

3

Average: 2

3

Average: 2

Number of HDMI sockets

The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all

one

Average: 1. 1

one

Average: 1.1

HDMI

Yes

Yes

Passmark score

16495

max 29325

Average: 7628.6

14818

max 29325

Average: 7628.6

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score

138294

max 1

Average: 80042.3

117572

max 1

Average: 80042.3

3DMark Fire Strike Score

21686

max 38276

Average: 12463

16291

max 38276

Average: 12463

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score

24914

max 49575

Average: 11859. 1

20981

max 49575

Average: 11859.1

3DMark 11 Performance GPU score

34866

max 57937

Average: 18799.9

28678

max 57937

Average: 18799.9

3DMark Vantage Performance Score

65107

max 97887

Average: 37830.6

52526

max 97887

Average: 37830.6

3DMark Ice Storm GPU score

446992

max 533357

Average: 372425. 7

413045

max 533357

Average: 372425.7

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03

98

max 202

Average: 64

60

max 202

Average: 64

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01

136

max 232

Average: 121.3

96

max 232

Average: 121.3

SPECviewperf 12 — Showcase 9 score1904

135

max 175

Average: 108. 4

96

max 175

Average: 108.4

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01

45

max 107

Average: 39

33

max 107

Average: 39

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04

99

max 180

Average: 132.8

137

max 180

Average: 132.8

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01

12

max 21

Average: 10. 7

eight

max 21

Average: 10.7

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01

73

max 153

Average: 52.5

53

max 153

Average: 52.5

SPECviewperf 12 test evaluation — specvp12 catia-04

163

max 189

Average: 91.5

74

max 189

Average: 91.5

SPECviewperf 12 test score — Catia

156

max 189

Average: 88. 6

74

max 189

Average: 88.6

SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 3dsmax-05

183

max 316

Average: 189.5

max 316

Average: 189.5

SPECviewperf 12 test score — 3ds Max

168

max 269

Average: 169.8

max 269

Average: 169.8

Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB

Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB — Th200

Contents

1. Introduction
2. Features
3. Tests
4. Games
5. Key differences
6. Conclusion
7. Comments

Video card

Video card

Introduction

We compared two graphics cards: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Navi Generation (RX 5000) RDNA 1.0 Graphics Card Released Jul 7th, 2019. It comes with 8GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1750MHz, has 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector and draws up to 165W.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB is a Pascal-based GeForce 10 generation graphics card released by Never Released. It comes with 10GB of GDDR5X memory running at 1376MHz, has 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector and draws up to 165W.

Specification

Graphics Card

Name

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

12 (12_1)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

4.6

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

Cuda

6.1

Vulkan

1.2

1.2

Board Design

Heating

225W

250W

Power connectors

1x 6-Pin + 1x 8-Pin

1x 6-Pin + 1x 8-Pin

Width

Dual-Slot

Dual-Slot

Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics

3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB

Blender bmw27

Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB

Th200 RP

Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures the raw power of the components and gives a score, with a higher value indicating better performance.

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB
+8%

Games

1920×1080, Ultra

Game	Radeon RX 5700XT	GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB
Battlefield V
Cyberpunk 2077
DOOM Eternal
Far Cry 5
Hitman 3
Metro Exodus
Red Dead Redemption 2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
The Witcher 3
Average	111. 40 fps	0.00 fps

2560×1440, Ultra

Game	Radeon RX 5700XT	GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
Battlefield V
Cyberpunk 2077
DOOM Eternal
Far Cry 5
Hitman 3
Metro Exodus
Red Dead Redemption 2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
The Witcher 3
Average	84. 45 fps	0.00 fps

3840×2160, Ultra

Game	Radeon RX 5700XT	GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
Battlefield V
Cyberpunk 2077
DOOM Eternal
Far Cry 5
Hitman 3
Metro Exodus
Red Dead Redemption 2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Average	47. 62 fps	0.00 fps

Key Differences

Why is AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB?

Uses 10% less power — 225W vs 250W

More modern manufacturing process — 7nm vs 16nm

More advanced memory type — GDDR6 vs GDDR5X

Has 2% more bandwidth — 448.0 GB/ s vs 440.3 GB/s

Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB better than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT?

Has 8% better performance

Has 2 GB more memory

Has a slightly larger memory bus

Has a 10% faster pixel fill rate — 133.6 GPixel/s vs 121.9 GPixel/s

Has a 10% faster texture fill rate — 334.0 GTexel/s vs 304.8 GTexel/s

Has more texture units +40

Has 640 more shading units

Conclusion

Which is better GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB or Radeon RX 5700 XT?

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB delivers 8% better performance, consumes up to 12% more energy and holds 2 GB more memory. According to our research GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB 3990X is more powerful than the Radeon RX 5700 XT.

What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB?

The Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB. It is 6% more powerful, uses 38% more energy, and holds 2 GB more memory.

What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB?

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB. It is 7% more powerful, uses the same amount of energy, and holds 1 GB less memory.

How does Radeon RX 5700 XT perform compared to GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB and other graphics cards?

Relative performance

Total performance

Bench performance

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

vs Radeon RX 5700 XT: Should You Upgrade? — Accessories

Tiffany Garrett

Accessories

Midrange Radeon

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

Next generation mid-range Radeon

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is AMD’s latest generation mid-range graphics processor. It’s a decent 1080p performer that’s good enough for gaming systems that aim for 1080p at 60 FPS. It holds its spot in the top card slot from nearly two years ago pretty well and still performs well in its segment, even when compared to its RX 6700 XT successor.

See Best Buy

PLASS

• High performance 1080p
• can play games with a resolution of 1440p

Minuses

• only 8 GB of memory

AMD RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON RADEON mid-range offering in the Radeon RX 6000 series of GPUs. It is based on the RDNA 2 architecture, which offers a performance boost over the 5700 XT despite having a lot of internals. However, like all GPUs currently on the market, it is available in very limited quantities and at unreasonably high prices.

Watch Best Buy

Plus

• Good resolution 1080p
• is much better at 1440p
• 12 GB of memory

900

PAREN Radeon RX 6000 GPUs. This is a decent GPU in its own right, delivering a massive 30% performance increase over its predecessor, the RX 5700 XT. However, there are a few things holding it back: the base price itself isn’t the best value for money, and the move from the RX 5700 XT is not easy to justify. You should hold on to this RX 5700 XT for now. That’s why.

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and Radeon RX 5700 XT specifications

Source: Windows Central

open command prompt here Windows 10

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and RX 5700 XT do not differ much in terms of performance. The RX 6700 XT is based on the RDNA 2 architecture taken from the RDNA 5700 XT architecture. The manufacturing process remained the same — 7 nm TSMC. The architecture upgrade means the RX 6700 XT gets 17.2 billion transistors, up from 10.3 billion in the RX 5700 XT. Let’s take a closer look at the characteristics of the two cards.

1 x 8 pins, 1 x 6 pins

Note: Some AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and RX 5700 XT specifications may vary depending on AIB models.

The AMD RX 6700 XT has some improvements over the RX 5700 XT. While the manufacturing process remains the same, the 6700 XT has a larger die size, which means more transistors and performance impact, despite the core configurations being the same. However, the performance gap cannot justify switching to this one-generation upgrade. Let’s take a better look at the actual performance of the two cards.

warframe how to unlock eidolon plains

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs. Radeon RX 5700 XT in Real World

Source: AMD

Real world performance of RX 6700 XT is much better than RX 5700 XT. The 6700 XT runs at a higher clock speed and can deliver better performance figures with less power consumption thanks to RDNA 2 improvements. Hardware out of the box tested the two cards at the same 1.8GHz clock speed and found that the frame rates were nearly identical. However, the 6700 XT is better suited to run games in its default configuration, especially moving forward. Here is another test between ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger 12GB and ASUS ROG Strix AMD Radeon RX 5700XT 8GB, courtesy of YouTube channel. Benchmark .

However, the 6700 XT’s price-to-performance ratio isn’t great, and if you consider it an upgrade to the 5700 XT, there’s even less reason to upgrade. If you have an overclockable variant of the 5700 XT, you should be able to match the performance of the 6700 XT, which means very little that should leave you wanting this one-generation upgrade.

Can I uninstall Cortana on Windows 10?

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Radeon RX 5700 XT: Should You Upgrade?

No. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is not a bad card to buy on its own, but if viewed as an upgrade to the 5700 XT, it doesn’t make much sense. The price-to-performance ratio isn’t great when you consider the base price of the 6700 XT, but when you consider the insane prices the card is selling for right now, like any of the best graphics cards, the ratio gets even more diluted.

Basically, you’re paying a lot of dollars for an insufficient performance boost if you switch from the 5700 XT to the 6700 XT. Also, since overclocking the 5700 XT can give you a fair performance boost, there’s really no reason you should be considering this small upgrade. This is especially true given that higher-end cards in the RX 6000 series of GPUs, like the RX 6800 XT, offer better value for money if you’re looking to upgrade.

On the other hand, you might want to buy an RTX 30-series GPU instead, given that the ray tracing performance of AMD GPUs is still a bit slow compared to Team Green counterparts. The RX 6700 XT can compete with the 3060 Ti, which for the most part delivers similar performance at a significantly lower base price. However, if you’re moving from the 5700 XT, you might want to look a little higher for your next GPU, or hold on to your card until the GPU market stabilizes a bit. In any case, do not overpay for a new video card. Good game!

Radeon midranger of yesteryear

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

Good old RDNA

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is the champion of the latest RDNA based midrange generation.