AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-5930K
UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-5930K
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
BX80648I75930K
YD2600BBAFBOX
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 423,438 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
35,813 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 90% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 72% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 72%
Great: 90%
SPEED RANK: 183rd / 1368
Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier |
Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier |
Workstation 71% Battleship |
387,625 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 4. 15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59%
Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 305th / 1368
Gaming 73% Battleship |
Desktop 75% Battleship |
Workstation 65% Battle cruiser |
Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed |
80.1 % | Faster effective speed. +10% |
72.6 % |
Memory Avg. Memory Latency |
86.7 Pts | Lower memory latency. +14% |
76 Pts | |||
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed |
103 Pts | 107 Pts | +4% | |||
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed |
204 Pts | 205 Pts | +0% | |||
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed |
396 Pts | Slightly faster quad-core speed. +6% |
373 Pts | |||
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed |
657 Pts | Slightly faster octa-core speed. +7% |
616 Pts |
Memory OC Memory Latency |
94.6 Pts | Lower OC memory latency. +11% |
85. 3 Pts | |||
1-Core OC Single Core Speed |
125 Pts | Slightly faster OC single-core speed. +6% |
118 Pts | |||
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed |
247 Pts | Slightly faster OC dual-core speed. +5% |
235 Pts | |||
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed |
475 Pts | Slightly faster OC quad-core speed. +6% |
450 Pts | |||
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed |
787 Pts | Faster OC octa-core speed. +12% |
700 Pts |
Market Share
Based on 56,230,587 CPUs tested.
See market share leaders
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0. 07 % | 0.65 % | Hugely higher market share. +829% |
|||
Value Value For Money |
82.5 % | +3% | 80.2 % | |||
User Rating UBM User Rating |
58 % | 77 % | Much more popular. +33% |
|||
Price Price (score) |
$250 | $194 | Cheaper. +23% |
Age Newest |
98 Months | 54 Months | Much more recent. +45% |
|||
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP) |
140 Watts | 65 Watts | Much more energy efficient. +54% |
|||
Cores CPU Processing Cores |
6 cores | 6 cores | ||||
Threads CPU Processing Threads |
12 threads | 12 threads | ||||
Lithography Manufacturing process |
22 nm | 12 nm | Much newer manufacturing. +45% |
|||
Base Clock Base Clock Speed |
3.5 GHz | +3% | 3.4 GHz | |||
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed |
3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz | Slightly faster turbo frequency. +5% |
|||
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed |
996 Pts | Slightly faster OC 64-core speed. +10% |
907 Pts | |||
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed |
839 Pts | Slightly faster 64-core speed. +5% |
796 Pts |
Series CPU Architecture |
Haswell-E | Zen+ | ||||
Socket Motherboard Socket |
LGA2011-V3 | AM4 | ||||
Graphics Integrated Graphics |
None | None |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.
We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark. com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Intel Core i5-12600K
-
Intel Core i5-12400F
-
Intel Core i5-13600K
-
Intel Core i7-12700K
-
Intel Core i5-12400
-
Intel Core i9-13900K
-
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
-
Intel Core i3-12100F
-
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
-
Intel Core i3-12100
-
Intel Core i7-11700K
-
Intel Core i5-11400F
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-5930K
Summary
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
116%
-
Intel Core i7-5930K
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
111%
-
Intel Core i7-5930K
100%
Relative performance
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
122%
-
Intel Core i7-5930K
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
11% higher single threaded performance. |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 22% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking. |
75 watts lower power draw. |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Around 16% higher average synthetic performance. |
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-5930K |
None |
Gaming
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-5930K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMX | ||||
3DNow! | ||||
SSE | ||||
SSE2 | ||||
SSE3 | ||||
SSE4A | ||||
AMD64 | ||||
CnQ | ||||
NX bit | ||||
AMD-V | ||||
SMT | ||||
SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4. 2 | ||||
AVX | ||||
AVX2 | ||||
EIST | ||||
Intel 64 | ||||
XD bit | ||||
VT-x | ||||
VT-d | ||||
HTT | ||||
AES-NI | ||||
TSX | ||||
TXT | ||||
CLMUL | ||||
FMA3 | ||||
F16C | ||||
BMI1 | ||||
BMI2 | ||||
Boost 2.0 |
Architecture
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-5930K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | AMD Zen+ | vs | Intel_Haswell | |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
Memory Support | DDR4 | vs | DDR4 | |
Codename | Zen | vs | Haswell-E | |
Release Date | Mar 2018 | vs | Sep 2014 |
Cores
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-5930K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cores | 6 | vs | 6 | |
Threads | 12 | vs | 12 | |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-5930K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 96 KB (per core) | vs | 64 KB (per core) | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | vs | 256 KB (per core) | |
L3 Cache | 16384 KB (shared) | vs | 15360 KB (shared) |
Physical
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-5930K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | vs | Intel Socket 2011-3 | |
Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown | |
Package | uPGA | vs | ||
Die Size | 192mm² | vs | 356mm² | |
Process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Performance
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-5930K | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cpu Frequency | 3400 MHz | vs | 3500 MHz | |
Turbo Clock | 3900 MHz | vs | 3700 MHz | |
Base Clock | 100 MHz | vs | 100 MHz | |
Voltage | unknown | vs | unknown | |
TDP | 65 W | vs | 140 W |
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
4290 points
-
Intel Core i7-5930K
4144 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
27376 points
-
Intel Core i7-5930K
28224 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 (simulated)
161. 51
-
Intel Core i7-5930K (simulated)
144.92
points — higher is better
-
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 (simulated)
1325.06
-
Intel Core i7-5930K (simulated)
1083.94
points — higher is better
VS | ||
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
VS | ||
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i5-11400 |
VS | ||
Intel Core i7-5930K | Intel Core i7-11800H |
VS | ||
Intel Core i7-5930K | Intel Core i7-11700F |
VS | ||
Intel Core i5-12600K | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
VS | ||
Intel Core i5-12600KF | AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Core i7-5930K
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Core i7-5930K processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technology, Virtualization, Graphics, Security and Reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
versus
Intel Core i7-5930K
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 7 month(s)
- Approximately 42% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 66.8 °C
- Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm FinFET vs 22 nm
- L1 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache is 2 times (s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L3 cache by about 7% more means more data can be saved in it for quick access
- 2.2 times less power consumption: 65 Watt vs 140 Watt
- Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 9% higher: 2250 vs 2059
- Approximately 28% increase in PassMark — CPU mark performance: 13243 vs 10335
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) performance approximately 12% increase: 0.922 vs 0.82
approx. : 3.9 GHz vs 3.70 GHz
19 April 2018 vs September 2014 | |
Maximum frequency | 3. 9 GHz vs 3.70 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 66.8°C |
Process | 12nm FinFET vs 22nm |
Level 1 cache | 576 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 3 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 16 MB vs 15360 KB (shared) |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 140 Watt |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2250 vs 2059 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 13243 vs 10335 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.922 vs 0.82 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-5930K
- About 1% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 979 vs 974
- About 9 in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance% more: 5795 vs 5321
- About 7% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark: 6123 vs 5745
- About 60% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark: 74.236 vs 46.475
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 979 vs 974 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 5795 vs 5321 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 6123 vs 5745 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 74.236 vs 46.475 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2600
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-5930K
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||||
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
Name | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-5930K |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 2250 | 2059 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 13243 | 10335 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 974 | 979 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 5321 | 5795 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 5745 | 6123 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 46.475 | 74.236 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.922 | 0.82 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.58 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.407 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.385 |
Performance comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i7-5930K | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Zen+ | Haswell E |
Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | |
Production date | April 19, 2018 | September 2014 |
OPN PIB | YD2600BBAFBOX | |
OS Support | Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Place in the ranking | 824 | 1145 |
Price now | $159. 99 | $597.99 |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors | Intel® Core™ X-series Processors |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 24.89 | 6.72 |
Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
Price at first issue date | $613 | |
Processor Number | i7-5930K | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 3. 4 GHz | 3.50 GHz |
Crystal area | 213 mm | 356 mm |
Level 1 cache | 576KB | 64 KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 3MB | 256 KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 16MB | 15360 KB (shared) |
Process | 12nm FinFET | 22nm |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 66.8 °C |
Maximum frequency | 3. 9 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 6 |
Number of threads | 12 | 12 |
Number of transistors | 4940 Million | 2600 million |
Unlocked | ||
Bus Speed | 0 GT/s | |
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | 4 |
Supported memory frequency | 2933MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 64GB | |
Maximum number of processors per configuration | 1 | 1 |
Supported sockets | AM4 | FCLGA2011-3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 140 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 52. 5mm x 45.0mm | |
PCI Express 9 revision0046 | 3.0×16 | 3.0 |
Number of PCI Express lanes | 40 | |
Scalability | 1S Only | |
AMD Ryzen VR-Ready Premium | ||
AMD SenseMI | ||
AMD StoreMI technology | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4. 2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® Smart Response Technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Integrated graphics | None | |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) |
Intel Core i5 9300H vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 9300H
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Which is better: 4-core laptop Intel Core i5 9300H at 2. 4GHz or a 6-core AMD Ryzen 5 2600 desktop at 3.4GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single stream capacity
NanoReview rating
Final processor score
Core i5 9300H
42
Ryzen 5 2600
46
Key differences
What are the main differences between 2600 and 9300H
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 9300H
- Supports up to 128GB DDR4-2666
- 31% lower than Ryzen 5 2600 peak power consumption — 45 vs 65 watts
- Arrived 7 months later than rival
- Integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 5% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4. 1 GHz vs. 3.9 GHz)
Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Has 8 MB more L3 cache
- Unlocked multiplier
- Has 2 more physical cores
- More modern process — 912 vs 14 nanometers /
- 5%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i5 9300H
+11%
1121
Ryzen 5 2600
1008
Cinebench R23 (Multi-core)
Core i5 9300H
90 Ryzen 2 0 30 90
+49%
7055
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i5 9300H
+5%
2344
Ryzen 5 2600
2242
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
+70%
13171
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i5 9300H
+1%
1042
Ryzen 5 2600
1029
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i5 9300H
90 Ryzen2 3558 9005
+57%
5601
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i5 9300H and AMD Ryzen 5 2600
General information
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
Release date | April 23, 2019 | September 11, 2018 |
Type | For laptop | Desktop |
Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | Coffee Lake | Zen+ |
Model number | i5-9300H | — |
Socket | BGA-1440 | AM4 |
Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
Cores | 4 | 6 |
Number of threads | 8 | 12 |
Frequency | 2. 4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.1 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Bus frequency | — | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | — | 34x |
Bus speed | 8 GT/s | — |
Level 1 cache | 128KB (per core) | 96KB (per core) |
Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 512KB (per core) |
Level 3 cache | 8MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Power consumption
Number of transistors | — | 4.8 billion |
Process | 14 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 65 W |
Critical temperature | 100°C | 95°C |
Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
Boost GPU frequency | 1050 MHz | — |
Shader blocks | 192 | — |
TMUs | 24 | — |
ROPs | 3 | — |
Computer units | 24 | — |
TGP | 15 W | — |
Max. resolution | 4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i5 9300H
0.38 teraflops
Ryzen 5 2600
n/a
Memory type | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2933 |
Max. size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. bandwidth | 41.8 GB/s | 43.71 GB/s |
ECC 9 support0046 | No | Yes |
Other
Official site | Site Intel Core i5 9300H | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 website |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i5 9300H
6 (46.