5930K vs ryzen 2600: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-5930K

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-5930K

UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-5930K

  • CPU
  • GPU
  • SSD
  • HDD
  • RAM
  • USB

BX80648I75930K

YD2600BBAFBOX

VS

YouTube*NEW*

About

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 423,438 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

35,813 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 90% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 72% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)

Poor: 72%

Great: 90%

SPEED RANK: 183rd / 1368

Gaming 80%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 71%

Battleship

387,625 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 82% Base clock 4. 15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)

Poor: 59%

Great: 82%

SPEED RANK: 305th / 1368

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 65%

Battle cruiser

Effective Speed

Effective CPU Speed
80.1 % Faster effective speed.
+10%
72.6 %
Memory

Avg. Memory Latency
86.7 Pts Lower memory latency.
+14%
76 Pts
1-Core

Avg. Single Core Speed
103 Pts 107 Pts +4%
2-Core

Avg. Dual Core Speed
204 Pts 205 Pts +0%
4-Core

Avg. Quad Core Speed
396 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+6%
373 Pts
8-Core

Avg. Octa Core Speed
657 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+7%
616 Pts
Memory

OC Memory Latency
94.6 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11%
85. 3 Pts
1-Core

OC Single Core Speed
125 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+6%
118 Pts
2-Core

OC Dual Core Speed
247 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+5%
235 Pts
4-Core

OC Quad Core Speed
475 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+6%
450 Pts
8-Core

OC Octa Core Speed
787 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+12%
700 Pts

Market Share

Based on 56,230,587 CPUs tested.

See market share leaders

Market Share

Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0. 07 % 0.65 % Hugely higher market share.
+829%
Value

Value For Money
82.5 % +3% 80.2 %
User Rating

UBM User Rating
58 % 77 % Much more popular.
+33%
Price

Price (score)
$250 $194 Cheaper.
+23%
Age

Newest
98 Months 54 Months Much more recent.
+45%
TDP

Thermal Design Power (TDP)
140 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+54%
Cores

CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 6 cores
Threads

CPU Processing Threads
12 threads 12 threads
Lithography

Manufacturing process
22 nm 12 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+45%
Base Clock

Base Clock Speed
3.5 GHz +3% 3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock

Turbo Clock Speed
3.7 GHz 3.9 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+5%
64-Core

OC Multi Core Speed
996 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+10%
907 Pts
64-Core

Avg. Multi Core Speed
839 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+5%
796 Pts
Series

CPU Architecture
Haswell-E Zen+
Socket

Motherboard Socket
LGA2011-V3 AM4
Graphics

Integrated Graphics
None None

ADVERTISEMENT

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance)
October 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB

How it works
  • — Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark. com.
  • — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • — See speed test results from other users.
  • — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12600K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12400F

  •   

    Intel Core i5-13600K

  •   

    Intel Core i7-12700K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-12400

  •   

    Intel Core i9-13900K

  •   

    AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

  •   

    Intel Core i3-12100F

  •   

    AMD Ryzen 5 3600

  •   

    Intel Core i3-12100

  •   

    Intel Core i7-11700K

  •   

    Intel Core i5-11400F

About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube
Feedback

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-5930K

Summary

  • AMD Ryzen 5 2600

    116%

  • Intel Core i7-5930K

    100%

Relative performance

  • AMD Ryzen 5 2600

    111%

  • Intel Core i7-5930K

    100%

Relative performance

  • AMD Ryzen 5 2600

    122%

  • Intel Core i7-5930K

    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider AMD Ryzen 5 2600
11% higher single threaded performance.
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 22% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
75 watts lower power draw.
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Around 16% higher average synthetic performance.
Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-5930K
None

Gaming

HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.


Productivity

HWBench recommends AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel Core i7-5930K
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSE4A
AMD64
CnQ
NX bit
AMD-V
SMT
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
AVX2
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
VT-d
HTT
AES-NI
TSX
TXT
CLMUL
FMA3
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Boost 2.0

Architecture
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel Core i7-5930K
Architecture AMD Zen+ vs Intel_Haswell
Market Desktop vs Desktop
Memory Support DDR4 vs DDR4
Codename Zen vs Haswell-E
Release Date Mar 2018 vs Sep 2014

Cores
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel Core i7-5930K
Cores 6 vs 6
Threads 12 vs 12
SMPs 1 vs 1
Integrated Graphics No vs No

Cache
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel Core i7-5930K
L1 Cache 96 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache 512 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache 16384 KB (shared) vs 15360 KB (shared)

Physical
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel Core i7-5930K
Socket AMD Socket AM4 vs Intel Socket 2011-3
Max Case Temp unknown vs unknown
Package uPGA vs
Die Size 192mm² vs 356mm²
Process 14 nm vs 22 nm

Performance
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel Core i7-5930K
Cpu Frequency 3400 MHz vs 3500 MHz
Turbo Clock 3900 MHz vs 3700 MHz
Base Clock 100 MHz vs 100 MHz
Voltage unknown vs unknown
TDP 65 W vs 140 W
  • AMD Ryzen 5 2600

    4290 points

  • Intel Core i7-5930K

    4144 points

Points — higher is better

  • AMD Ryzen 5 2600

    27376 points

  • Intel Core i7-5930K

    28224 points

Points — higher is better

  • AMD Ryzen 5 2600 (simulated)

    161. 51

  • Intel Core i7-5930K (simulated)

    144.92

points — higher is better

  • AMD Ryzen 5 2600 (simulated)

    1325.06

  • Intel Core i7-5930K (simulated)

    1083.94

points — higher is better

VS
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel Core i5-11400
VS
Intel Core i7-5930K Intel Core i7-11800H
VS
Intel Core i7-5930K Intel Core i7-11700F
VS
Intel Core i5-12600K Intel Core i5-12600KF
VS
Intel Core i5-12600KF AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Core i7-5930K

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Core i7-5930K processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technology, Virtualization, Graphics, Security and Reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

versus

Intel Core i7-5930K

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2600

  • Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 7 month(s)
  • approx. : 3.9 GHz vs 3.70 GHz

  • Approximately 42% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 66.8 °C
  • Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 12 nm FinFET vs 22 nm
  • L1 cache is about 50% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • L2 cache is 2 times (s) larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • L3 cache by about 7% more means more data can be saved in it for quick access
  • 2.2 times less power consumption: 65 Watt vs 140 Watt
  • Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 9% higher: 2250 vs 2059
  • Approximately 28% increase in PassMark — CPU mark performance: 13243 vs 10335
  • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) performance approximately 12% increase: 0.922 vs 0.82
Date Issue
19 April 2018 vs September 2014
Maximum frequency 3. 9 GHz vs 3.70 GHz
Maximum core temperature 95°C vs 66.8°C
Process 12nm FinFET vs 22nm
Level 1 cache 576 KB vs 64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 3 MB vs 256 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 16 MB vs 15360 KB (shared)
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt vs 140 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark 2250 vs 2059
PassMark — CPU mark 13243 vs 10335
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.922 vs 0.82

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-5930K

  • About 1% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 979 vs 974
  • About 9 in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance% more: 5795 vs 5321
  • About 7% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark: 6123 vs 5745
  • About 60% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) benchmark: 74.236 vs 46.475
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 979 vs 974
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 5795 vs 5321
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 6123 vs 5745
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 74.236 vs 46.475

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 2600
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-5930K

PassMark — Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
46.475
74.236
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
Name AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel Core i7-5930K
PassMark — Single thread mark 2250 2059
PassMark — CPU mark 13243 10335
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 974 979
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 5321 5795
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 5745 6123
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 46.475 74.236
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.922 0.82
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.58
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 3.407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 8.385

Performance comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Intel Core i7-5930K
Architecture name Zen+ Haswell E
Family AMD Ryzen Processors
Production date April 19, 2018 September 2014
OPN PIB YD2600BBAFBOX
OS Support Windows 10 — 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Place in the ranking 824 1145
Price now $159. 99 $597.99
Series AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors Intel® Core™ X-series Processors
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 24.89 6.72
Applicability Desktop Desktop
Price at first issue date $613
Processor Number i7-5930K
Status Discontinued
Support 64 bit
Base frequency 3. 4 GHz 3.50 GHz
Crystal area 213 mm 356 mm
Level 1 cache 576KB 64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 3MB 256 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 16MB 15360 KB (shared)
Process 12nm FinFET 22nm
Maximum core temperature 95°C 66.8 °C
Maximum frequency 3. 9 GHz 3.70 GHz
Number of cores 6 6
Number of threads 12 12
Number of transistors 4940 Million 2600 million
Unlocked
Bus Speed ​​ 0 GT/s
Maximum number of memory channels 2 4
Supported memory frequency 2933MHz
Supported memory types DDR4 DDR4 1600/1866/2133
Maximum memory bandwidth 68 GB/s
Maximum memory size 64GB
Maximum number of processors per configuration 1 1
Supported sockets AM4 FCLGA2011-3
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 140 Watt
Thermal Solution Wraith Stealth
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size 52. 5mm x 45.0mm
PCI Express 9 revision0046

3.0×16 3.0
Number of PCI Express lanes 40
Scalability 1S Only
AMD Ryzen VR-Ready Premium
AMD SenseMI
AMD StoreMI technology
Intel® AES New Instructions
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Extended instructions Intel® SSE4. 2, Intel® AVX2
Intel 64
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® Smart Response Technology
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)
Integrated graphics None
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)

Intel Core i5 9300H vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600:

performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i5 9300H

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Which is better: 4-core laptop Intel Core i5 9300H at 2. 4GHz or a 6-core AMD Ryzen 5 2600 desktop at 3.4GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.

  1. Overview
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Features
  5. Comments

Overview

Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview

Single stream capacity

NanoReview rating

Final processor score

Core i5 9300H

42

Ryzen 5 2600

46

Key differences

What are the main differences between 2600 and 9300H

Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 9300H

  • Supports up to 128GB DDR4-2666
  • 31% lower than Ryzen 5 2600 peak power consumption — 45 vs 65 watts
  • Arrived 7 months later than rival
  • Integrated graphics accelerator Intel UHD Graphics 630
  • 5% higher frequency in Turbo Boost (4. 1 GHz vs. 3.9 GHz)

Reasons to choose AMD Ryzen 5 2600

  • Has 8 MB more L3 cache
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • More modern process — 912 vs 14 nanometers /
  • 5%) higher maximum memory bandwidth

Benchmark tests

Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (single core)

Core i5 9300H
+11%

1121

Ryzen 5 2600

1008

Cinebench R23 (Multi-core)

Core i5 9300H

90 Ryzen 2 0 30 90
+49%

7055

Passmark CPU (single core)

Core i5 9300H
+5%

2344

Ryzen 5 2600

2242

Passmark CPU (multi-core)
+70%

13171

Geekbench 5 (single core)

Core i5 9300H
+1%

1042

Ryzen 5 2600

1029

Geekbench 5 (multi-core)

Core i5 9300H

90 Ryzen2 3558 9005
+57%

5601

▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23

Specifications

List of full technical specifications for Intel Core i5 9300H and AMD Ryzen 5 2600

General information

Manufacturer Intel AMD
Release date April 23, 2019 September 11, 2018
Type For laptop Desktop
Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Zen+
Model number i5-9300H
Socket BGA-1440 AM4
Integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 No

Performance

Cores 4 6
Number of threads 8 12
Frequency 2. 4 GHz 3.4 GHz
Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 4.1 GHz 3.9 GHz
Bus frequency 100 MHz
Multiplier 34x
Bus speed 8 GT/s
Level 1 cache 128KB (per core) 96KB (per core)
Level 2 cache 256KB (per core) 512KB (per core)
Level 3 cache 8MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Unlocked multiplier No Yes

Power consumption

Number of transistors 4.8 billion
Process 14 nanometers 12 nanometers
Power consumption (TDP) 45 W 65 W
Critical temperature 100°C 95°C
Integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU frequency 350 MHz
Boost GPU frequency 1050 MHz
Shader blocks 192
TMUs 24
ROPs 3
Computer units 24
TGP 15 W
Max. resolution 4096×2304 — 60Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i5 9300H

0.38 teraflops

Ryzen 5 2600

n/a

901 memory support0017

Memory type DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 DDR4-2933
Max. size 128 GB 64 GB
Number of channels 2 2
Max. bandwidth 41.8 GB/s 43.71 GB/s
ECC 9 support0046

No Yes

Other

Official site Site Intel Core i5 9300H AMD Ryzen 5 2600 website
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
Max. PCI Express lanes 16 20
Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Poll

What processor do you think is the best?

Core i5 9300H

6 (46.