Intel Core i7 8700K vs i7 6700K: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 8700K
Intel Core i7 6700K
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.7 GHz Intel Core i7 8700K with 6-cores against the 4.0 GHz i7 6700K with 4-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i7 8700K
66
Core i7 6700K
59
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i7 8700K
41
Core i7 6700K
27
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i7 8700K
41
Core i7 6700K
41
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i7 8700K
51
Core i7 6700K
44
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 6700K and 8700K
Advantages of Intel Core i7 8700K
- Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666 RAM
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size
- Newer — released 2-years and 2-months later
- Around 7.
5 GB/s (22%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
- 12% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
- 13% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1242 vs 1097 points
Advantages of Intel Core i7 6700K
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than the Core i7 8700K – 91 vs 95 Watt
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700K
+7%
1219
Core i7 6700K
1137
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700K
+57%
8881
Core i7 6700K
5660
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700K
+10%
2781
Core i7 6700K
2534
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700K
+54%
13898
Core i7 6700K
9002
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700K
+14%
1251
Core i7 6700K
1102
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700K
+55%
6690
Core i7 6700K
4321
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 8700K and i7 6700K
General
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | October 5, 2017 | August 5, 2015 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Skylake |
| Model number | i7-8700K | i7-6700K |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | LGA-1151 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | HD Graphics 530 |
Performance
| Cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 3. 7 GHz |
4.0 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 37x | 40x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
| Transistors | — | 1.75 billions |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 95 W | 91 W |
Max. temperature |
100°C | — |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
| GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | — |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Shading Units | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Execution Units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15 W | — |
| Max. Resolution | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 8700K
0.38 TFLOPS
Core i7 6700K
n/a
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
Max. Memory Channels |
2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| Official site | Intel Core i7 8700K official page | Intel Core i7 6700K official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i7 8700K
11 (61.1%)
Core i7 6700K
7 (38.9%)
Total votes: 18
ompetitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel Core i7 8700K
2.
Intel Core i9 12900K and Intel Core i7 8700K
3.
Intel Core i7 12700K and Intel Core i7 8700K
4.
Intel Core i5 12600K and Intel Core i7 8700K
5.
Intel Core i5 12400F and Intel Core i7 8700K
6.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Intel Core i7 6700K
7.
Intel Core i7 12700K and Intel Core i7 6700K
8.
Intel Core i5 12600K and Intel Core i7 6700K
9.
Intel Core i5 12400 and Intel Core i7 6700K
10.
Intel Core i5 12400F and Intel Core i7 6700K
Intel i7 6700k vs 8700k Comparison Will Blow Your Mind
Explore More
Posted on
Advertisement
There are many new processors coming out in E4 of this 2020, but many users do not have the budget to get a new AMD Ryzen 9 5950x or Intel Rocket Lake series processor.
Intel i7 6700k vs 8700k comparison is the drip into the old and gold of intel processor pool – two mid range processors on which users can still depend on.
i7 6700k Vs 8700k Processor Overview
Intel Core i7 6700k was released on 2015, with 4.0 GHz base clock and 4 dedicated cores. Intel Core i7 8700k came into market 2 years after that, in 2017. The i7 6700k had 3.7 GHz of base clock speed which could be boosted up to 4.7 GHz, consisted of 6 dedicated processor cores. Both were based on 14 nm technology.
Intel i7 6700k Vs 8700k Release Dates
Intel i7 6700k, codename Skylake, was released on Q3 of 2015 with 4 cores and 8 threads. The successor Intel i7 8700k was released in Q4 of 2017 with 6 cores and 12 threads. But later 6700k was replaced by 7700k and not being made by Intel now. Same happened with 8700k when it was replaced with 9700k from Intel manufacturing.
Intel 6700k Vs 8700k Benchmark Comparisons
In a nutshell, 8700k outperforms 6700k in almost all of the segments if we compare 6700k vs 8700k with same amount of RAM and HDD.
The only place where 6700k performs similar to 8700k is the overclocked benchmark. But if we consider 6700k Overclock Vs 8700k then the Intel i7 6700k OC wins by a small margin.
6700k Vs 8700k Gaming Performance
Intel i7 8700k triumphs in the gaming performance due to its greater number of cores and threads than 6700k. Although the overclocked version of 6700k gives similar performance with same VRAM for any game other than the most recent AAA titles or old games with more than medium settings in full HD 1080p graphics resolution.
6700k Vs 8700k 1440p Gaming
Intel i7 6700k comes with inbuilt Intel High Definition Graphics 530 series whereas the Intel i7 8700k comes with Intel Ultra High Definition Graphics 630 series. Without saying, the later one trumps the former. Now 1440p gaming is not possible in any game released after 2019 with the inbuilt graphics for 6700k or 8700k either but many old games in 2015-2017 era runs smooth.
6700k Vs 8700k 4k Gaming
Since both the processors were released before 2018, 4K gaming was not a trend back by that time.
But both Intel i7 6700k and Intel i7 8700k supports mid to high budget dedicated graphics cards and 4k gaming is achievable by that. Although games in 4k will not run as smooth as any processor released after 2019 and getting a decent FPS in 4K may be far fetched as well.
6700k OC Vs 8700k Performance Difference
Being released 2 years before 8700k, the Intel i7 6700k is not a good match for 6700k Vs 8700k comparison. But a factory overclocked version of 6700k is completely different than the normal 6700k version, it is more optimized, more tunes and ready to deliver better performance.
6700k Vs 8700k Vs 9700k Comparisons
Intel i7 9700k is the latest from intel release in 2019, this processor is best of lot in the comparison of 6700k Vs 8700k Vs 9700k. Intel i7 9700k replaced the 8700k when it was released and gives a better performance all around. Intel i7 6700k is the lowest of the bunch, currently out of manufacturing by Intel.
6700k Overclock Vs 8700k Speed Comparison
Intel i7 6700k, when overclocked, gives a comparing performance against 8700k.
Although both processors have a difference of dedicated cores by 2 and base clock speed by 0.3 GHz, the overclocked version compensates for the difference by boosting up the clock speed from a base frequency of 4.0 GHz to 4.2 GHz.
i7 6700k Vs i7 8700k Price Differences
Since both Intel i7 6700k and 8700k has been stopped by Intel, they are only available at ecommerce sites like Amazon and Ebay. Intel i7 6700k Ebay price is around $280 whereas Intel i7 8700k Ebay price is around $380.
F.A.Q. on 6700k vs 8700k
How good is the Intel Core i7-6700K for gaming?
Intel Core i7-6700K is a budget processor released in 2015, it has Intel High Definition Graphics 530 series, so it will not an ideal processor for gaming. Although along with a dedicated graphics card it will perform quite well.
Is it worth to buy i7 6700k instead of i7 6700?
Intel i7 6700k, when overclocked, can perform better than i7 6700. So if you plan to overclock, it is worth to buy i7 6700k instead of i7 6700.
Does the i7 6700k bottleneck the 1080 Ti?
No, i7 6700k will not bottleneck the 1080 Ti, it will support the system.
Is i7 8700k overkill for gaming?
The Intel i7 8700k was released in 2017, so for today’s AAA titles, it is quite lagging behind.
Is the I7 6700 3.4GHz CPU good for gaming?
Yes the I7 6700 3.4GHz CPU is good for gaming.
What is the best, the Xeon X5670 or Core i7-8700K?
Core i7-8700K is mainstream desktop processor but Xeon X5670 is a server processor, so comparing both will not be appropriate.
Should I buy an i7-8700K and a GTX 1060 (6GB)?
Yes i7-8700K and a GTX 1060 (6GB) is a good combo for a budget level gaming computer.
Advertisement
Related News
Recent News
Latest News
Intel Core i7-8700K vs Intel Core i7-6700K
-
Intel Core i7-8700K Processor has 4.
70 GHz Turbo Speed (Intel Core i7-6700K : 4.20 GHz).
- Intel Core i7-8700K Processor’s Price is comparatively LESS ($303) than Intel Core i7-6700K Processor($339).
- Intel Core i7-8700K Processor’s has 6 Cores.
- Intel Core i7-8700K Processor’s has 12 Threads.
-
Intel Core i7-8700K Processor’s Graphics max dinamic Frequency (1.20 GHz) is comparativly better than Intel Core i7-6700K.
- Intel Core i7-6700K Processor has 4.00 GHz Clock Speed.
Essential Details
| CPU Name | Intel Core i7-8700K | Intel Core i7-6700K |
| CPU Code Name | Products formerly Coffee Lake | Products formerly Skylake |
| Generation | 8th Generation Intel Core i7s | 6th Generation Intel Core i7s |
| Device Category | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor No | i7-8700K | i7-6700K |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| CPU Release Date | 2017-10-01 | 2015-07-01 |
| Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| CPU Price |
$303 |
$339 |
| Product Url | Intel Core i7-8700K | Intel Core i7-6700K |
Graphics Specifications
| Processor Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
| Graphics Base Frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency |
1. 20 GHz
|
1.15 GHz |
| Graphics Video Max Memory | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Graphics Output | N/A | eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI |
| 4K Support | Yes, at 60Hz | Yes, at 60Hz |
Max Resolution (HDMI 1. 4)
|
[email protected] | [email protected] |
| Max Resolution (DP) | [email protected] | [email protected] |
| Max Resolution (eDP — Integrated Flat Panel) | [email protected] | [email protected] |
| Max Resolution (VGA) | N/A | N/A |
| DirectX* Support | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL* Support |
4. 5
|
4.5 |
| No of Displays Supported | N/A | N/A |
Memory Specifications
| Max Memory | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR4-2666 |
DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1. 35V
|
| Max No of Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Memory Supported | No | No |
Package Specifications
| Mother Board Socket Type | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 |
| Max CPU Configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Thermal Solution Specification | PCG 2015D (130W) | PCG 2015D (130W) |
| Max Temprature | 100°C | 64°C |
| Package Size |
37. 5mm x 37.5mm
|
37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Performance
| No of Cores | 6 | 4 |
| No of Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Processor Clock Speed |
3. 70 GHz
|
4.00 GHz |
| Processor Turbo Speed | 4.70 GHz | 4.20 GHz |
| TDP | 95 W | 91 W |
| L1 Cache | 12 MB Intel Smart Cache | 8 MB Intel Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | N/A | N/A |
| L3 Cache | N/A | N/A |
Advanced Technologies
| Turbo Boost Technology |
2. 0
|
2.0 |
| vPro Technology | Yes | No |
| Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | Yes | Yes |
| Bit Width | Yes | Yes |
| Thermal Monitoring Technologies | Yes | Yes |
| Instruction Set Extensions |
Intel SSE4. 1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2
|
Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 |
Expansion Options
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
| PCI Express Revision |
3. 0
|
3.0 |
| PCI Express Configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
| Max No of PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Security & Reliability
| Secure Key | Yes | Yes |
| Execute Disable Bit | Yes | Yes |
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K — For Honor with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.
00GHz
For Honor
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz
i7-6700K
i7-8700K
Multi-Thread Performance
11112 Pts
15970 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2352 Pts
2703 Pts
For Honor
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K in For Honor using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-6700K
i7-8700K
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
111.3 FPS |
| 1080p |
123.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
65.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
72.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
32.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
36.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
52.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
58. |
0 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
172.4 FPS |
| 1080p |
188.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
109.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
119.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
60.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
66.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
90.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
99.3 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
233.5 FPS |
| 1080p |
253.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
153.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
167.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
88.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
96.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
129. |
| w1440p |
140.6 FPS |
1 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
355.7 FPS |
| 1080p |
382.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
242.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
262.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
143.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
156.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
206.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
223.1 FPS |
i7-6700K
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
i7-8700K
- The i7-8700K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes.
More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads. - The i7-8700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
- The i7-8700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- The i7-8700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Compare i7-6700K vs i7-8700K specifications
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K Architecture
| i7-6700K | i7-8700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Skylake | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Core i7 (Skylake) |
Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR2L0 | SR3QR |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Aug 2015 | Oct 2017 |
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K Cache
| i7-6700K | i7-8700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 8MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K Cores
| i7-6700K | i7-8700K | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 4 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 | UHD Graphics 630 |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K Features
| i7-6700K | i7-8700K | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K Performance
| i7-6700K | i7-8700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 40.0x | 37.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
| TDP | 95 W | 95 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 4.7 GHz |
| Voltage | unknown | variable |
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K Physical
| i7-6700K | i7-8700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 94
Compare i7-6700K vs i7-8700K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
i7-8700K vs i7-6700K — Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with GTX 1660 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.
70GHz
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz
i7-8700K
i7-6700K
Multi-Thread Performance
15970 Pts
11112 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2703 Pts
2352 Pts
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
i7-8700K vs i7-6700K in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive using GTX 1660 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-8700K
i7-6700K
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
247.8 FPS |
| 1080p |
222.7 FPS |
| 1440p |
206.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
185.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
185.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
167.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
209. |
| w1440p |
188.6 FPS |
9 FPSHigh Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
334.2 FPS |
| 1080p |
306.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
287.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
263.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
264.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
241.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
291.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
267.3 FPS |
Medium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
420.7 FPS |
| 1080p |
389.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
369.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
341.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
342.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
316. |
| w1440p |
373.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
345.9 FPS |
4 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
593.5 FPS |
| 1080p |
557.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
532.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
498.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
498.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
465.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
537.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
503.2 FPS |
i7-8700K
- The i7-8700K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The i7-8700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads.
Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications. - The i7-8700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- The i7-8700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i7-6700K
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
Compare i7-8700K vs i7-6700K specifications
i7-8700K vs i7-6700K Architecture
| i7-8700K | i7-6700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Skylake |
| Generation | Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
Core i7 (Skylake) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR3QR | SR2L0 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Oct 2017 | Aug 2015 |
i7-8700K vs i7-6700K Cache
| i7-8700K | i7-6700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 12MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
i7-8700K vs i7-6700K Cores
| i7-8700K | i7-6700K | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 6 | 4 |
| # of Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | HD Graphics 530 |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-8700K vs i7-6700K Features
| i7-8700K | i7-6700K | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
i7-8700K vs i7-6700K Notes
| i7-8700K | i7-6700K |
|---|
i7-8700K vs i7-6700K Performance
| i7-8700K | i7-6700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37.0x | 40.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
| TDP | 95 W | 95 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.7 GHz | up to 4.2 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | unknown |
i7-8700K vs i7-6700K Physical
| i7-8700K | i7-6700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 98
Compare i7-8700K vs i7-6700K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i7-6700K vs Intel Core i7-8700K
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i7-6700K vs Intel Core i7-8700K
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-6700K on one side and the Intel Core i7-8700K on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 4,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 12 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Core i7-6700K | Intel Core i7-8700K | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Skylake | Coffee Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Skylake-S | Coffee Lake-S | ||||||
| Family | Core i7-6000 | Core i7-8000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | BX80662I76700K, BXC80662I76700K, CM8066201919901, SR2BR, SR2L0 |
BX80684I78700K, BXC80684I78700K, CM8068403358220, SR3QR, QNMK |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2015 | Q4 2017 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm++ | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 750.000.000 |
3.000.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 6 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 12 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 4,0 GHz | 3,7 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,2 GHz | 4,7 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 8 MB | 12 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
DDR4-2666 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 34,1 GB/s | 41,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 91 W | 95 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Coffee Lake) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 16 | 23 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 128 | 184 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1150 MHz | 1200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 268,8 GFLOPS | 423,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1151 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 64°C | 100°C | ||||||
| Crypto engine | — | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
||||||
| Security | — | Software Guard Extensions, Memory Protection Extensions, OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Boot Guard |
||||||
| Max display resolution | — | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 498 | 475 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 2. |
3.693 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 186 | 194 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 946 | 1.402 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 457 | 500 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 2.325 | 3.618 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.125 | 1.216 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 5.789 | 8.985 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.512 | 2.775 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 8. |
13.883 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
5.240 | 6.100 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
17.298 | 24.045 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
1.186 | 1.320 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
4.664 | 6.646 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
320,8 GFLOPS | 453,8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
190 pts / W | 253 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i7-8700K has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i7-8700K is bigger, that the PDT of Intel Core i7-6700K is lower. The Intel Core i7-8700K was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700K |
475 3.693 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
498 2.556 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 44%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700K |
194 1.  402 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
186 946 |
In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 48%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700K |
500 3.  618 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
457 2.325 |
In single core, the difference is 9%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 56%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700K |
1.  2168.985 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
1.125 5.789 |
In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 55%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700K |
2.  77513.883 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
2.512 8.942 |
In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 55%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700K |
6.100 24.  045 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
5.240 17.298 |
In single core, the difference is 16%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 39%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700K |
6.115 27.677 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
5.313 15.160 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 83%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700K |
5.646 21.101 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
3.  4017.369 |
In single core, the difference is 66%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 186%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700K |
6.084 28.485 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
5.277 17.860 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 59%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing.
This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700K |
1.320 6.646 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
1.186 4.664 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 42%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700K |
1.314 5.720 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
1.160 4.184 |
In single core, the difference is 13%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 37%.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-8700K |
1.080 6.572 |
| Intel Core i7-6700K |
1.047 4.276 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 54%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems.
Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i7-6700K AMD equivalentIntel Core i7-8700K AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i7-6700Intel Core i7-6700HQIntel Core i7-6700T
Intel Core i7-8700Intel Core i7-8700BIntel Core i7-8700T
Intel Core i7 8700K vs i7 6700K:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 8700K
Intel Core i7 6700K
Which is better: 6-core Intel Core i7 8700K at 3.7 GHz or i7 6700K with 4 cores at 4.0 GHz? To find out, read our comparison test of these 14nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one nucleus
Core i7 8700k
66 66
Core i7 6700k
59
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks where all nucleus
9 9,000 9,000 9,000
Core i7 8700k
41
Core i7 6700k
27
Energy efficiency
Energy Effect CHIP
Core i7 8700k
41
9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 41 9000 2
Core i7 8700K
51
Core i7 6700K
44
Key differences
What are the main differences between 6700K and 8700K
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 8700K
- Supports up to 128 GB DDR4-2666
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 4 MB more L3 cache
- Launched 2 years and 2 months later than rival1
- 7.
5 GB/s (22%) higher maximum memory bandwidth - 12% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz)
- 13% faster Geekbench v5 single-core test — 1242 and 1097 points
Reasons to choose Intel Core i7 6700K
- 4% lower than Core i7 8700K peak power consumption — 91 vs 95 Watts
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i7 8700K
+7%
1219
Core i7 6700K
1137
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i7 8700K
+57%
8881
Core i7 6700K
5660
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i7 8700K
+10%
2781
Core i7 6700K
2534
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i7 8700K
+54%
13898
Core i7 6700K
9002
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i7 8700K
+14%
1251
Core i7 6700K
1102
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i7 8700K
+55%
6690
Core i7 6700K
4321
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full specifications of Intel Core i7 8700K and i7 6700K
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | October 5, 2017 | August 5, 2015 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Skylake |
| Model number | i7-8700K | i7-6700K |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | LGA-1151 |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 630 | HD Graphics 530 |
Performance
| Cores | 6 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3. 7 GHz |
4.0 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 37x | 40x |
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| Level 1 cache | 64KB (per core) | 64KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 256KB (per core) | 256KB (per core) |
| Level 3 cache | 12MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Power consumption
| Number of transistors | — | 1.75 billion |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 W | 91W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | — |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
| GPU frequency | 350 MHz | — |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1200 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Shader blocks | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Computer units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15W | — |
Max. resolution |
4096×2304 — 60Hz | — |
Igpu Flops
Core i7 8700k
0.38 Teraflops
Core i7 6700k
N/D
Memory Support
| Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600 |
| Max. size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Number of channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| ECC support | No | No |
Other
| Site Intel Core i7 8700K | Site Intel Core i7 6700K | |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i7 8700K
11 (61.
1%)
Core i7 6700K
7 (38.9%)
Total votes: 18
Competitors
1.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7 8700K
2.
Intel Core i9 12900K vs. Intel Core i7 8700K
3.
Intel Core i7 12700K vs. Intel Core i7 8700K
4.
Intel Core i5 12600K vs. Intel Core i7 8700K
5.
Intel Core i5 12400F vs. Intel Core i7 8700K
6.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X vs Intel Core i7 6700K
7.
Intel Core i7 12700K vs. Intel Core i7 6700K
8.
Intel Core i5 12600K vs. Intel Core i7 6700K
9.
Intel Core i5 12400 vs. Intel Core i7 6700K
10.
Intel Core i5 12400F vs. Intel Core i7 6700K
What will you choose: Intel Core i7 6700K or i7 8700K?
Name
Message
Intel Core i7-6700 vs Intel Core i7-8700K: What is the difference?
52 BALLLA
Intel Core i7-6700
59 Ballla
Intel Core i7-8700k
VS
64 Facts compared to
Intel I7-6700
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 23 Is 6700 better than Intel Core i7-8700K?
- 30W below TDP?
65W vs 95W
Why is Intel Core i7-8700K better than Intel Core i7-6700?
- 38.
75% higher CPU speed?
6 x 3.7GHz vs 4 x 4GHz - 533MHz higher memory speed?
2666MHz vs 2133MHz - 4 more CPU threads?
12 vs 8 - 29°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
100°C vs 71°C - 0.5MB more L2 cache?
1.5MB vs 1MB - 2.02x higher PassMark score?
16270 vs 8045 - 0.7GHz higher turbo clock speed?
4.7GHz vs 4GHz - 4MB more L3 cache?
12MB vs 8MB
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Core i7-6700
vs
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Core i7-8700k
VS
Intel Core i5-12400
Intel Core i7-6700
VS
Intel Core i5-7500
Intel Core i7-8700k
VS 9000 Ryt
Intel Core i7-6700
VS
Intel Core i7-7700
Intel Core i7-8700k
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5500u
Intel Core i7-6700
VS 9000 VS
REMOMI
Intel Core i7-8700K
VS
Intel Core i7-9700k
Intel Core i7-6700
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i7-8700k
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 5600g 9,0003 9000
VS
Intel Core i7-4770
Intel Core i7-8700K
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-6700
VS
Intel Core I5-85500 Core I5-85500 CORE I5-85500 CORE I5-85500 CORE I5-85500 CORE I5-85500 CORE I5-85500 CORE I5-85500 CORE I5-85500 CORE I5-85500 CORE I5-85500 CORE I5-85500 CORE I5-85500 CORE I5-85500 Core-855500 Core-855500 Core-855500 Core-855500 Core-855500 CORE
vs
Intel Core i5-9600k
Intel Core i7-6700
VS
Intel Core i7-6700t
Intel Core i7-8700k
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 3700x
Intel Core INTEL CORE Core I7-2-22 Intel Core INTEL CORE I7-9000 2
AMD RYZEN 5 5600G
Intel Core i7-8700K
VS
Apple M1 Max
Intel Core i7-6700
VS
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i7-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87ATS I7-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-87-LADUTED M1
Price comparison
cheaper
Reviews of users
General rating
Intel Core i7-6700
0 Reviews of users
Intel Core i7-6700
/10
0 Reviews No reviews yet0003
10.
0 /10
1 Votes
Games
Reviews not yet
10.0 /10
1 VOTES
reviews yet not
/ 10
1 Votes
Reliability
reviews yet there is no
10.0837 /10
1 Votes
Energy efficiency
reviews yet not
10.0 /10
1 Votes
performance
1. Ski -resistance of the central processor
4 x 4GHZ
6 x 3.7GHZ
The central processor speed shows how many processing cycles per second can perform the processor, taking into account the processor, taking into account the processor, taking into account the processor, taking into account all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.7GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4.Unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i7-6700
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
Some processors come with unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
2MB/core
2MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2133MHz
2666MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
34.1GB/s
42.7GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Random Access Memory, Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4 memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports Memory Error Code
✖Intel Core i7-6700
✖Intel Core i7-8700K
Memory Error Code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-6700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-6700)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform test that measures the performance of a multi-core processor. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-6700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-6700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-6700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-6700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i7-6700
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔Intel Core i7-6700
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i7-6700
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔Intel Core i7-6700
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-6700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i7-6700
✔Intel Core i7-8700K
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i7-6700
✖Intel Core i7-8700K
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming using digital rights management ( DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-6700)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-8700K)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K — The Witcher 3 with GTX 1080 performance comparison
GTX 1080 with
Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz
The Witcher 3
GTX 1080 with
Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz
i7-6700K
i7-8700K
Multi-Thread Performance
11112 Pts
15970 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2352 Pts
2703 Pts
The Witcher 3
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K The Witcher 3 using GTX 1080 — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
i7-6700K
i7-8700K
Ultra quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
103. |
| 1080p |
114.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
77.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
80.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
45.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
47.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
65.6 FPS |
| w1440p |
68.3 FPS |
9 FPS High quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
162.7 FPS |
| 1080p |
176.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
126.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
130.9 FPS |
| 2160p |
80.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
83.2 FPS |
| w1440p |
110. |
| w1440p |
114.1 FPS |
3 FPS Medium quality
| Approval | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
221.5 FPS |
| 1080p |
238.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
176.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
181.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
115.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
119.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
155.0 FPS |
| w1440p |
160.0 FPS |
Low quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
339.2 FPS |
| 1080p |
362.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
274. |
| 1440p |
282.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
185.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
191.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
244.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
251.6 FPS |
9 FPS i7-6700K
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
i7-8700K
- The i7-8700K has a higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- The i7-8700K has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream.
This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications. - The i7-8700K has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
- The i7-8700K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware. Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
Compare i7-6700K vs i7-8700K specifications
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K Architecture
| i7-6700K | i7-8700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Skylake | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Core i7 (Skylake) |
Core i7 (Coffee Lake) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR2L0 | SR3QR |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Aug 2015 | Oct 2017 |
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K Cache
| i7-6700K | i7-8700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 8MB (shared) | 12MB (shared) |
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K Cores
| i7-6700K | i7-8700K | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 4 | 6 |
| # of Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 | UHD Graphics 630 |
| SMP# CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K Features
| i7-6700K | i7-8700K | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K Performance
| i7-6700K | i7-8700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Multiplier | 40.0x | 37.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
| TDP | 95W | 95W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 4.7 GHz |
| Voltage | unknown | variable |
i7-6700K vs i7-8700K Physical
| i7-6700K | i7-8700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA1151 | |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share your comments 94
Compare i7-6700K vs i7-8700K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need for Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
F1 2018
2018
Far Cry 5
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Shadow of War
2017
Total War: Warhammer II
2017
Wolfenstein II
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need for Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-3770K vs Core i7-6700K vs Core i7-4770K vs Core i7-7700K vs Core i7-8700K vs Core i7-9700K vs Core i7-10700K: 80+ game benchmarks, bottlenecks and streaming analysis
High-end Desktop processor released in 2010 with 4 cores and 8 threads.
with a base frequency of 3.4 GHz, a maximum speed of 3.8 GHz and a rated power of 95 W. The Core i7-2600K is based on the Sandy Bridge family, 32nm and is part of the Core i7 series.
High-end Desktop processor released in 2012 with 4 cores and 8 threads. with a base frequency of 3.5 GHz, a maximum speed of 3.9 GHz and a rated power of 77 watts. The Core i7-3770K is based on the Ivy Bridge family, 22nm and is part of the Core i7 series.
High-end Desktop processor released in 2015 with 4 cores and 8 threads. with a base frequency of 4 GHz, a maximum speed of 4.2 GHz and a rated power of 91 watts. The Core i7-6700K is based on the Skylake-S family, 14nm and is part of the Core i7 series.
High-end Desktop processor released in 2013 with 4 cores and 8 threads. with a base frequency of 3.5 GHz, a maximum speed of 3.9 GHz and a rated power of 84 watts. The Core i7-4770K is based on the Haswell 22nm family and is part of the Core i7 series.
High-end Desktop processor released in 2016 with 4 cores and 8 threads. with a base frequency of 4.2 GHz, a maximum speed of 4.5 GHz and a rated power of 91 watts. The Core i7-7700K is based on the Kaby Lake-S family, 14nm and is part of the Core i7 series.
High-end Desktop processor released in 2017 with 6 cores and 12 threads. with a base frequency of 3.7 GHz, a maximum speed of 4.7 GHz and a rated power of 95 W. The Core i7-8700K is based on the Coffee Lake family, 14nm and is part of the Core i7 series.
High-end Desktop processor released in 2018 with 8 cores and 8 threads. with a base frequency of 3.6 GHz, a maximum speed of 4.9 GHz and a rated power of 95 W. The Core i7-9700K is based on the Coffee Lake Refresh family, 14nm and is part of the Core i7 series.
High-end Desktop Processor released in 2020 with 8 cores and 16 threads. with a base frequency of 3.
8 GHz, a maximum speed of 5.1 GHz and a rated power of 125 W. The Core i7-10700K is based on the Comet Lake family, 14nm and is part of the Core i7 series.
|
Core i7-2600K RTX 2080 Ti 16GB 1866MHz 1080p ultra |
Core i7-3770K RTX 2080 Ti 16GB 1866MHz 1080p ultra |
Core i7-6700K RTX 2080 Ti 16GB 3200MHz 1080p ultra |
Core i7-4770K RTX 2080 Ti 16GB 1866MHz 1080p ultra |
Core i7-7700K RTX 2080 Ti 16GB 3200MHz 1080p ultra |
Core i7-8700K RTX 2080 Ti 16GB 3200MHz 1080p ultra |
Core i7-9700K RTX 2080 Ti 16GB 3200MHz 1080p ultra |
Core i7-10700K RTX 2080 Ti 16GB 3200MHz 1080p ultra |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| category | Desktop | Desktop | Desktop | Desktop | Desktop | Desktop | Desktop | Desktop |
| target | high-end | high-end | high-end | high-end | high-end | high-end | high end | high-end |
| compatible sockets | LGA1155 | LGA1155 | LGA1151 | LGA1150 | LGA1151 | LGA1151 | LGA1151 | LGA1200 |
| integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| cooler kit | Yes | Yes | No. |
Yes | No. | No | No. | No. |
| overclocking potential | 21% | 16% | 9% | 20% | 6% | 4% | 2% | 1% |
| 2010 | 2012 | 2015 | 2013 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2020 | |
| GPU Year | 2018 | 2018 | 2018 | 2018 | 2018 | 2018 | 2018 | 2018 |
| price | 317 USD | 294 USD | 339 USD | 399 USD | 339 USD | 395 USD | 374 USD | 410 USD |
| Price GPU | 1299 USD | 1299 USD | 1299 USD | 1299 USD | 1299 USD | 1299 USD | 1299 USD | 1299 USD |
| number of cores | 4 Cores | 4 Cores | 4 cores | 4 Cores | 4 Cores | 6 Cores | 8 Cores | 8 Cores |
| number of threads | 8 Threads | 8 Threads | 8 Threads | 8 Threads | 8 Threads | 12 Threads | 8 Threads | 16 Threads |
| core frequency | 3. 4GHz |
3.5GHz | 4GHz | 3.5GHz | 4.2GHz | 3.7GHz | 3.6GHz | 3.8GHz |
| increase frequency | 3.8GHz | 3.9GHz | 4.2GHz | 3.9GHz | 4.5GHz | 4. 7GHz |
4.9GHz | 5.1GHz |
| input power | 95W | 77W | 91W | 84W | 91W | 95W | 95W | 125W |
| GPU Power Consumption | 250W | 250W | 250W | 250W | 250W | 250W | 250W | 250W |
| value for money | 40. 4% |
43.4% | 33% | 32.6% | 33% | 43.8% | 48.8% | 56.6% |
| speed estimate | 52% | 56% | 71% | 62% | 75% | 87% | 89% | 94% |
| performance rating | 44% | 49% | 57% | 52% | 59% | 74% | 76% | 83% |
| game account | 71% | 78% | 82% | 80% | 84% | 92% | 93% | 94% |
| RAM bottleneck | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
| Speed bottleneck RAM | 20% | 20% | 5% | 20% | 5% | 6% | 6% | 6% |
max. 1080p bottleneck |
48.1% | 36.7% | 33% | 35.1% | 29.5% | 13% | 9.7% | 7.1% |
| max. 1440p bottleneck | 24% | 18.3% | 16.5% | 17.5% | 14. 8% |
6.5% | 4.9% | 3.6% |
| max. 4k bottleneck | 12% | 9.2% | 8.2% | 8.8% | 7.4% | 3.2% | 2.4% | 1.8% |
| GPU average 1080p FPS | 95. 7 FPS |
106.6 FPS | 131 FPS | 108.2 FPS | 135.1 FPS | 154.6 FPS | 158.4 FPS | 161.4 FPS |
| GPU average 1440p FPS | 86.9 FPS | 91 FPS | 109.2 FPS | 91.6 FPS | 110. 7 FPS |
118.2 FPS | 119.6 FPS | 120.8 FPS |
| GPU average 4K FPS | 57.3 FPS | 58.6 FPS | 68.6 FPS | 58.8 FPS | 69.1 FPS | 71.3 FPS | 71.8 FPS | 72.1 FPS |
An excellent base clock speed of 3.
5GHz helps the Core i7-3770K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-3770K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-3770K consumes less power at 77W.
With an efficient 22nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-3770K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-3770K is relatively newer.
An excellent base clock speed of 4GHz helps the Core i7-6700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-6700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-6700K consumes less power at 91W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-6700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-6700K is relatively newer.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.5GHz helps the Core i7-4770K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-4770K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-4770K consumes less power at 84W.
With an efficient 22nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-4770K has better thermal performance.
Core i7-4770K is relatively newer.
An excellent base clock speed of 4.2GHz helps the Core i7-7700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-7700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-7700K consumes less power at 91W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-7700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-7700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-8700K is a multi-threaded beast.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.7GHz helps the Core i7-8700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-8700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-8700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-8700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-9700K outperforms the Core i7-2600K in multitasking performance.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.6GHz helps the Core i7-9700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-9700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-9700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-9700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-10700K has 8 cores while the Core i7-2600K has 4. More cores improve multi-application and multi-threading performance.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.8GHz helps the Core i7-10700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-10700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
Core i7-2600K consumes less power at 95 W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-10700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-10700K is relatively newer.
An excellent base clock speed of 4GHz helps the Core i7-6700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-6700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-3770K consumes less power at 77W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-6700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-6700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-3770K consumes less power at 77W.
Core i7-4770K is relatively newer.
An excellent base clock speed of 4.2GHz helps the Core i7-7700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-7700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-3770K consumes less power at 77W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-7700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-7700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-8700K outperforms the Core i7-3770K in multitasking performance.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.7GHz helps the Core i7-8700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-8700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-3770K consumes less power at 77W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-8700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-8700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-9700K outperforms the Core i7-3770K in multitasking performance.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.6GHz helps the Core i7-9700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-9700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-3770K consumes less power at 77W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-9700K has better thermal performance.
Core i7-9700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-10700K is a multi-threaded beast.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.8GHz helps the Core i7-10700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-10700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-3770K consumes less power at 77W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-10700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-10700K is relatively newer.
An excellent base clock speed of 4GHz helps the Core i7-6700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-6700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-4770K consumes less power at 84W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-6700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-6700K is relatively newer.
An excellent base clock speed of 4.2GHz helps the Core i7-7700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-7700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-7700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-6700K has 4 cores while the Core i7-8700K has 6. More cores improve multi-application and multi-threading performance.
An excellent base clock speed of 4GHz helps the Core i7-6700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-8700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-6700K consumes less power at 91W.
The Core i7-8700K is relatively newer.
Core i7-9The 700K is a multi-threaded beast.
An excellent base clock speed of 4GHz helps the Core i7-6700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-9700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-6700K consumes less power at 91W.
The Core i7-9700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-10700K is a multi-threaded beast.
An excellent base clock speed of 4GHz helps the Core i7-6700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-10700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
Core i7-6700K consumes less power at 91 W.
The Core i7-10700K is relatively newer.
An excellent base clock speed of 4.2GHz helps the Core i7-7700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-7700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-4770K consumes less power at 84W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-7700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-7700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-4770K has 4 cores while the Core i7-8700K has 6. More cores improve multi-application and multi-threading performance.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.7GHz helps the Core i7-8700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-8700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-4770K consumes less power at 84W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-8700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-8700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-9700K outperforms the Core i7-4770K in multitasking performance.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.6GHz helps the Core i7-9700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-9700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-4770K consumes less power at 84W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-9700K has better thermal performance.
Core i7-9700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-10700K outperforms the Core i7-4770K in multitasking performance.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.8GHz helps the Core i7-10700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-10700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-4770K consumes less power at 84W.
Thanks to the efficient 14nm manufacturing process, the Core i7-10700K has better thermal performance.
The Core i7-10700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-8700K outperforms the Core i7-7700K in multitasking performance.
An excellent base clock speed of 4.2GHz helps the Core i7-7700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-8700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-7700K consumes less power at 91W.
The Core i7-8700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-9700K outperforms the Core i7-7700K in multitasking performance.
An excellent base clock speed of 4.2GHz helps the Core i7-7700K achieve better performance in most applications.
Core i7-9The 700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-7700K consumes less power at 91W.
The Core i7-9700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-10700K is a multi-threaded beast.
An excellent base clock speed of 4.2GHz helps the Core i7-7700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-10700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
Core i7-7700K consumes less power at 91 W.
The Core i7-10700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-8700K has 6 cores while the Core i7-9700K has 8. More cores improve multi-application and multi-threading tasks.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.7GHz helps the Core i7-8700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-9700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-9700K is relatively newer.
The Core i7-10700K outperforms the Core i7-8700K in multitasking performance.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.
8GHz helps the Core i7-10700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-10700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
Core i7-8700K consumes less power at 95 W.
The Core i7-10700K is relatively newer.
An excellent base clock speed of 3.8GHz helps the Core i7-10700K achieve better performance in most applications.
The Core i7-10700K has excellent clock speeds for gaming and single-threaded tasks.
The Core i7-9700K consumes less power at 95W.
The Core i7-10700K is relatively newer.
Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-3770K vs Core i7-6700K vs Core i7-4770K vs Core i7-7700K vs Core i7-8700K vs Core i7-9700K vs Core i7-10700K Specifications
The Intel Core i7-2600K is a 4-core Desktop processor launched in 2010.
it is part of the Core i7 line using the Sandy Bridge architecture with an LGA1155 socket.
the number of cores effectively doubles, to 8 threads.
The Core i7-2600K has 8MB L3 cache and runs at 3.4GHz by default, but can go up to 3.8GHz depending on workload.
Intel is building the Core i7-2600K on a 32nm manufacturing process.
You can freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on the Core i7-2600K, which makes overclocking much easier as you can set any overclocking frequency up to 4.6GHz.
The Intel processor supports dual channel ddr3 memory.
this processor has an integrated graphics solution (Intel HD Graphics 3000).
This processor can work on motherboards with the following chipsets: B65, B75, C204, C206, H55, H61, H67, H77, P67, Q67, Q77, Z68, Z75, Z77.
The Intel Core i7-3770K is a 4-core Desktop processor launched in 2012.
it is part of the Core i7 line using the Ivy Bridge architecture with an LGA1155 socket.
the number of cores effectively doubles, to 8 threads.
The Core i7-3770K has 8MB L3 cache and runs at 3.5GHz by default, but can go up to 3.
9GHz depending on workload.
Intel is building the Core i7-3770K on a 22nm manufacturing process.
You can freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on the Core i7-3770K, which makes overclocking much easier as you can set any overclock frequency up to 4.5GHz.
The Intel processor supports dual channel ddr3 memory.
this processor has an integrated graphics solution (Intel HD Graphics 4000).
This processor can work on motherboards with the following chipsets: B65, B75, C204, C206, H55, H61, H67, H77, P67, Q67, Q77, Z68, Z75, Z77.
The Intel Core i7-6700K is a 4-core Desktop processor launched in 2015.
it is part of the Core i7 line using the Skylake-S architecture with an LGA1151 socket.
the number of cores effectively doubles, to 8 threads.
The Core i7-6700K has 8MB L3 cache and runs at 4GHz by default, but can go up to 4.2GHz depending on workload.
Intel is building the Core i7-6700K on a 14nm manufacturing process.
You can freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on the Core i7-6700K, which makes overclocking much easier as you can set any overclock frequency up to 4.6GHz.
Intel processor supports dual channel ddr4 memory.
this processor has an integrated graphics solution (Intel HD Graphics 530).
This processor can work on motherboards with the following chipsets: B150, B250, B360, B365, C232, C236, C246, h210, h270, h370, h410, h470, Q170, Q270, Q370, Z170, Z270, Z370, Z390.
The Intel Core i7-4770K is a 4-core Desktop processor launched in 2013.
it is part of the Core i7 line using the Haswell architecture with an LGA1150 socket.
the number of cores effectively doubles, to 8 threads.
The Core i7-4770K has 8MB of L3 cache and runs at 3.5GHz by default, but can go up to 3.9GHz depending on workload.
Intel is building the Core i7-4770K on a 22nm manufacturing process.
You can freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on the Core i7-4770K, which makes overclocking much easier as you can set any overclocking frequency up to 4.
7GHz.
The Intel processor supports dual channel ddr3 memory.
this processor has an integrated graphics solution (Intel HD Graphics 4600).
this processor can work on motherboards with the following chipsets: B85, C222, C224, C226, H81, H87, H97, Q87, Z87, Z97.
The Intel Core i7-7700K is a 4-core Desktop processor launched in 2016.
it is part of the Core i7 line using the Kaby Lake-S architecture with an LGA1151 socket.
the number of cores effectively doubles, to 8 threads.
The Core i7-7700K has 8MB L3 cache and runs at 4.2GHz by default, but can go up to 4.5GHz depending on workload.
Intel is building the Core i7-7700K on a 14nm manufacturing process.
You can freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on the Core i7-7700K, which makes overclocking much easier as you can set any overclocking frequency up to 4.8GHz.
Intel processor supports dual channel ddr4 memory.
this processor has an integrated graphics solution (Intel HD Graphics 630).
This processor can work on motherboards with the following chipsets: B150, B250, B360, B365, C232, C236, C246, h210, h270, h370, h410, h470, Q170, Q270, Q370, Z170, Z270, Z370, Z390.
The Intel Core i7-8700K is a 6-core Desktop processor launched in 2017.
it is part of the Core i7 line using the Coffee Lake architecture with an LGA1151 socket.
the number of cores effectively doubles, to 12 threads.
The Core i7-8700K has 12MB L3 cache and runs at 3.7GHz by default, but can go up to 4.7GHz depending on workload.
Intel is building the Core i7-8700K on a 14nm manufacturing process.
You can freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on the Core i7-8700K, which makes overclocking much easier as you can set any overclock frequency up to 4.9GHz.
Intel processor supports dual channel ddr4 memory.
this processor has an integrated graphics solution (Intel UHD Graphics 630).
This processor can work on motherboards with the following chipsets: B150, B250, B360, B365, C232, C236, C246, h210, h270, h370, h410, h470, Q170, Q270, Q370, Z170, Z270, Z370, Z390.
The Intel Core i7-9700K is an 8-core Desktop processor launched in 2018.
it is part of the Core i7 line using the Coffee Lake Refresh architecture with an LGA1151 socket.
the number of cores effectively doubles, to 8 threads.
Core i7-9The 700K has 12.0 MB of L3 cache and runs at 3.6 GHz by default, but can go up to 4.9 GHz depending on the workload.
Intel is building the Core i7-9700K on a 14nm manufacturing process.
You can freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on the Core i7-9700K, which makes overclocking much easier as you can set any overclock frequency up to 5GHz.
Intel processor supports dual channel ddr4 memory.
this processor has an integrated graphics solution (Intel UHD Graphics 630).
This processor can work on motherboards with the following chipsets: B150, B250, B360, B365, C232, C236, C246, h210, h270, h370, h410, h470, Q170, Q270, Q370, Z170, Z270, Z370, Z390.
The Intel Core i7-10700K is an 8-core Desktop processor launched in 2020.
it is part of the Core i7 line using the Comet Lake architecture with an LGA1200 socket.
the number of cores effectively doubles, to 16 threads.
The Core i7-10700K has 16.00 MB of L3 cache and runs at 3.8 GHz by default, but can go up to 5.1 GHz depending on workload.
Intel is building the Core i7-10700K on a 14nm manufacturing process.
You can freely adjust the unlocked multiplier on the Core i7-10700K, which makes overclocking much easier as you can set any overclock frequency up to 5.2GHz.
with a 125W tdp, the Core i7-10700K consumes a lot of power, so good cooling is definitely a must.
Intel processor supports dual channel ddr4 memory.
this processor has an integrated graphics solution (Intel UHD Graphics 630).
this processor can work on motherboards with the following chipsets: B460, h510, Z470, Z490.
Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-3770K vs Core i7-6700K vs Core i7-4770K vs Core i7-7700K vs Core i7-8700K vs Core i7-9700K vs Core i7-10700K
8 
72 Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-3770K vs Core i7-6700K vs Core i7-4770K vs Core i7-7700K vs Core i7-8700K vs Core i7-9700K vs Core i7-10700K compatible
| Core i7-2600K | Core i7-3770K | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-4770K | Core i7-7700K | Core i7-8700K | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 77 Watt | 95 Watt | 84 Watt | 91 Watt | 95 Watt | 95 Watt | — |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | — | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | — |
| PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| PCIe revision | 2. 0 |
3.0 | 3.0 | Up to 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | — |
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3. 0 |
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 | LGA1151 | LGA1150 | LGA1151 | LGA1151 | LGA1151 | LGA 1200 |
4 GHz 
40 GHz 
4 x 32 kB Data
4 x 32 kB Data
4 x 32 kB Data
4 x 32 kB Data
4 x 32 kB Data
6 x 32 kB Data
8 x 32 kB Data
5 MB 
00 MB 
80 GHz 
0 Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-3770K vs Core i7-6700K vs Core i7-4770K versus Core i7-7700K vs Core i7-8700K vs Core i7-9700K vs Core i7-10700K
6 GB/s 
Memory Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-3770K vs Core i7-6700K vs Core i7-4770K vs Core i7-7700K vs Core i7-8700K vs Core i7-9700K vs Core i7-10700K specifications
| Core i7-2600K | Core i7-3770K | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-4770K | Core i7-7700K | Core i7-8700K | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64 bit support | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Die Size | 216 mm² | — | unknown | 177 mm² | unknown | unknown | unknown | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Die size | 216 mm2 | 160 mm2 | 122 mm2 | 177 mm2 | — | 149 mm2 | 178 mm2 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Includes CPU Cooler | Yes | Yes | No. |
No. | No. | No. | No. | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | 67 °C | 64 °C | 73 °C | 100 °C | 100 °C | 100 °C | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Multiplier | 34. 0x |
— | 40.0x | 35.0x | 42.0x | 37.0x | 36.0x | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | — | No. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of threads | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 8 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overclocking | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Package | FC-LGA10 | — | FC-LGA1151 | FC-LGA1151 | FC-LGA14C | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Part# | BX80623I72600K | BX80637I73770K | CM80662011 | BXF80646I74770K | CM8067702868535 | CM8068403358220 | CM8068403874212 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Part# | SR00C | — | SR2L0 | SR147 | SR33A | SR3QR | unknown | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SMP# CPUs | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Technology | 32 nm | 22nm | 14nm | 22nm | 14nm | 14 nm | 14nm | 14nm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tjunction max. |
— | — | — | — | — | — | 100 °C | 100 °C | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transistor count | 995 Million | 1400 million | — | 1400 Million | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transistors | 1,160 million | — | unknown | 1400 million | unknown | unknown | unknown | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unlocked | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Voltage | unknown | — | unknown | unknown | unknown | variable | unknown | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| tCaseMax | unknown | — | 72°C | 72°C | 72°C | 72°C | 72°C | — | Core i7-2600K | Core i7-3770K | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-4770K | Core i7-7700K | Core i7-8700K | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clear Video HD | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DirectX Version | 10. 1 |
11.0 | 12.0 | 11.1 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Execution units | 16 | 24 | 20 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FDI | + | + | — | + | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GPU (Turbo) | 1. 35 GHz |
1.15 GHz | 1.15 GHz | 1.25 GHz | 1.15 GHz | 1.20 GHz | 1.20 GHz | 1.20 GHz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GPU frequency | 0.85GHz | 0.65 GHz | 0.35 GHz | 0.35 GHz | 0.35 GHz | 0.35 GHz | 0. 35 GHz |
0.35 GHz | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Generation | 6 | 7 | 9 | 7.5 | 10 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 10.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Graphics max frequency | 1.35 GHz | 1.15 GHz | 1.15 GHz | 1.25 GHz | 1. 15 GHz |
1.2 GHz | 1.2 GHz | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| InTru 3D | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 3000 (850 — 1350 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 — 1150 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics 530 (350 — 1150 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics 4600 (400 — 1200 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics 630 (350 — 1150 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics 630 (350 — 1200 MHz) | Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 — 1200 MHz) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lithography | 32 nm | 22nm | 14 nm | 22nm | 14nm | 14nm | 14nm | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Max. displays |
2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quick Sync | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | — |
| Core i7-2600K | Core i7-3770K | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-4770K | Core i7-7700K | Core i7-8700K | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 20 Mh/s | 6. 5 Mh/s |
55 Mh/s | 7.1 Mh/s | 68 Mh/s | — | — | — |
| EDB | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | — |
| Identity Protection | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | — |
| TXT | — | — | — | — | — | + | + | — |
Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-3770K vs Core i7-6700K vs Core i7-4770K vs Core i7-7700K vs Core i7-8700K vs Core i7-9700K vs Core i7-10700K technologies and enhancements
1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX 9
| Core i7-2600K | Core i7-3770K | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-4770K | Core i7-7700K | Core i7-8700K | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPT | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | — |
| VT-d | — | — | + | — | + | + | + | — |
| VT-x | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-3770K vs Core i7-6700K vs Core i7-4770K vs Core i7-7700K vs Core i7-8700K vs Core i7-9700K vs Core i7-10700K Other
| Core i7-2600K | Core i7-3770K | Core i7-6700K | Core i7-4770K | Core i7-7700K | Core i7-8700K | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Packaging | Boxed | Boxed | OEM/Tray | Boxed | OEM/Tray | OEM/Tray | OEM/Tray | — |
bottleneck analysis
Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-3770K vs Core i7-6700K vs Core i7-4770K vs Core i7-7700K vs Core i7-8700K vs Core i7-9700K vs Core i7-10700K: 80+ game benchmarks, bottlenecks and streaming analysis based on test 6 games:
| CPU | GPU | RAM | resolution | quality settings | medium bottleneck (lower is better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-2600K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR3 1866MHz | 1080p | ultra | 46. 6% |
| Intel Core i7-3770K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR3 1866MHz | 1080p | ultra | 41.9% |
| Intel Core i7-6700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 29.3% |
| Intel Core i7-4770K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR3 1866MHz | 1080p | ultra | 41.2% |
| Intel Core i7-7700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 27. 5% |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 14% |
| Intel Core i7-9700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 11.8% |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 10.4% |
Grand Theft Auto V
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
Forza Horizon 4
Apex Legends
Battlefield V
Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-3770K vs Core i7-6700K vs Core i7-4770K vs Core i7-7700K vs Core i7-8700K vs Core i7-9700K vs Core i7-10700K Streaming Analysis
performance depends entirely on what game you plan to stream.
Streaming summary of Core i7-2600K, Core i7-3770K, Core i7-6700K, Core i7-4770K, Core i7-7700K, Core i7-8700K, Core i7-9700K, Core i7-10700K based on 9 games test:
| CPU | GPU | RAM | resolution | quality settings | medium bottleneck (lower is better) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-2600K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR3 1866MHz | 1080p | ultra | 47.2% |
| Intel Core i7-3770K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR3 1866MHz | 1080p | ultra | 47. 2% |
| Intel Core i7-6700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 47.2% |
| Intel Core i7-4770K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR3 1866MHz | 1080p | ultra | 47.2% |
| Intel Core i7-7700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 47.2% |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 40% |
| Intel Core i7-9700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 35% |
| Intel Core i7-10700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 32. 8% |
Destiny 2
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
Fortnite Battle Royale
Overwatch
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Apex Legends
Rainbow Six Siege
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
Battlefield V
Core i7-2600K vs Core i7-3770K vs Core i7-6700K vs Core i7-4770K vs Core i7-7700K vs Core i7-8700K vs Core i7-9700K vs Core i7-10700K: 80+ gaming tests
| CPU | GPU | RAM | resolution | quality settings | 80+ game average FPS | average FPS relative performance | 80+ game average low 1% FPS | low 1% FPS relative performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i7-10700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 246. 7 FPS |
100% | 205 FPS | 100% |
| Intel Core i7-9700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 243.8 FPS | 98.8% | 195.3 FPS | 95.3% |
| Intel Core i7-8700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 239.7 FPS | 97.2% | 189.8 FPS | 92.6% |
| Intel Core i7-7700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 216. |
87.8% | 161.9 FPS | 79% |
| Intel Core i7-6700K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1080p | ultra | 212.9 FPS | 86.3% | 159.1 FPS | 77.6% |
| Intel Core i7-4770K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR3 1866MHz | 1080p | ultra | 172.9 FPS | 70.1% | 130.5 FPS | 63.7% |
| Intel Core i7-3770K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR3 1866MHz | 1080p | ultra | 171. |
69.5% | 129.5 FPS | 63.2% |
| Intel Core i7-2600K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 16GB DDR3 1866MHz | 1080p | ultra | 161.7 FPS | 65.5% | 122.2 FPS | 59.6% |
Average FPS
Low 1% FPS
Intel vs AMD: Which Processor is Better?
Jul 12, 2020 — a rivalry for centuries, and a question that is often asked and asked. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM size and speed on gaming performance
Jul 5, 2020 — Does RAM size and speed affect gaming performance? is it worth investing in a high performance plunger kit? find out here.
Why should you always buy a mid-range and high-end gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 — Mid to high end builds perform very well for their price and are better than entry level builds in terms of power, durability and reliability and they offer a great bang for your buck especially when looking at their price per year advantage.
Should I buy a ready-made computer or a non-standard one?
Jun 11, 2020 — Prebuilt systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of each component in their assembly. Building your own computer is the best solution for those who want complete control over every aspect of their build. it provides the most complete customization options, from CPU to fans to lighting.
how to use cpuagent to find the correct processor
Jun 2, 2020 — how to find the right processor? Whether you’re building a computer or upgrading it, the processor matters a lot. cpuagent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right processor for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 — Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 — The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X’s capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 — Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X’s capabilities.
10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 — 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 — In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel’s latest.
critical reviews
The biggest draw of the Core i7-6700K, Intel’s first sixth-generation CPU, isn’t the performance. Rather, it’s the extra PCIe lanes that come with the supporting Z170 chipset, which may mean …
The all-new Intel Core i7-6700K – which pitches in at around $350 (about £225, or AU$475) – does not tear PC gaming a new one. It’s not a render monster like none before. It doesn’t take …
Intel’s platform flagship is the i7-6700K ($350), sticking to the well-known 4-core, 8-thread approach by way of matured hyperthreading technology. Prior to Skylake, Intel shipped its Devil’s …
Core i7 6700K Four CPU cores with Hyper-Threading, 4.0 GHz frequency, 4.20 GHz maximum Turbo Boost frequency, 8 MB last-level cache, dual-channel DDR3/DDR4 memory controller with 1600 MHz or 2133 …
The Core i7-6700K will ship with a “recommended customer pricing” of $350, while the i5-6600K will ship at $243.
That gives the i7-6700K the same initial MSRP as Devil’s Canyon, though the …
The Core i7-7700K ($350) is part of Intel’s seventh-generation Kaby Lake desktop processor family. These chips feature the same hardware decoding engine for 4K streaming from services like Netflix …
Intel Core i7-7700K. 8.2 Score. A wonderful serenity has taken possession of my entire soul, like these sweet mornings of spring which I enjoy with my whole heart. I am alone, and feel the charm of existence in this spot, which was created for the bliss of souls like mine. PROS. good low light camera;
Core i7-7700K performance. I’ve already discussed all of these aspects of Kaby Lake, but never rendered a final verdict. This is the short executive summary of the i7-7700K, focusing on a single …
Intel Core i7-7700K 8.2 Score. A wonderful serenity has taken possession of my entire soul, like these sweet mornings of spring which I enjoy with my whole heart.
I am alone, and feel the charm of existence in this spot, which was created for the bliss of souls like mine. PROS. Good low light camera
Intel Core i7-7700K Specifications, Technology and Chipset. The seventh generation of Intel Core chips should offer a minor improvement on the sixth-generation processors.
Intel Core i7-7700K 8.2 Score. A wonderful serenity has taken possession of my entire soul, like these sweet mornings of spring which I enjoy with my whole heart. I am alone, and feel the charm of existence in this spot, which was created for the bliss of souls like mine. PROS. good low light camera;
For instance, the i7-7700K is stepping in for the 6700K, while the 6600K will be replaced by the 7600K. Here’s a full breakdown of the Core i3, i5 and i7 S-Series processors.
Intel Core i7-7700K, i7-7700 and Core i5-7600K, i5-7600.
The launch includes a healthy array of seventh-generation -S, -H, -U, and -Y-series processors that include Core i7, i5, and i3 models …
Intel Core i7-8700K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.7GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W & Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 DRAM 3000MHz C15 Desktop Memory Kit — Black Bundle 4.7 out of 5 stars 3,305
The Core i7-8700K sits at the top of Intel’s stack of new mainstream consumer chips, above the six-core, six-thread Core i5-8400 that we tested in tandem with this chip, and edging out the now …
The Intel Core i7-8700K proves Team Blue is still the top dog in the processor world. Coffee Lake is a clear improvement over Kaby Lake with impressively higher single-core and multi-core numbers, and …
Core i7-8700K serves as this generation’s flagship, sporting six Hyper-Threaded cores.
Already, that’s a big increase from Kaby Lake’s 4C/8T maximum. It features the company’s highest clock rates …
The Core i7 8700K is the flagship from Intel’s 8th generation Coffee Lake processor lineup. It was released by Intel on October 5, 2017. The 8700K was Intel’s chance first to respond to AMD following the launch of their Ryzen CPUs earlier that year.
Intel’s 6-core 8th generation Core i7-8700K CPU is the reality check to high-performance, high-priced CPUs like the $2,000 Core i9 and $1,000 AMD Ryzen Threadripper.The real battle for the …
The Intel Core i7-10700K also has a rated base clock of 3.8GHz compared to 3.6GHz on the Intel Core i7-9700K. Both processors can boost one core using Intel’s Turbo Boost technology, with the i7 …
The $385 Core i7-9700K lands between the $500+ Core i9-9900K and the $263 Core i5-9600K in Intel’s line-up.
Like all new K-series processors, the -9700K is manufactured on Intel’s 14nm++ process.
The Bottom Line. Intel’s Core i7-9700K is a proficient mainstream CPU for gaming enthusiasts, but AMD’s Ryzen 7 3700X offers better value and better performance on many computing tasks.
Product Store Price; Intel Core i7-9700K Desktop Processor 8 … Intel Core i7-9700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.9 GHz Turbo unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
The Intel Core i7-9700K is a proficient mainstream CPU for gaming enthusiasts, but AMD’s Ryzen 7 3700X offers better value and better performance on many computing tasks.
My Core i7-9700K testbed is the same as for the Core i9-9900K. It includes the latest Nvidia’s 416.34 drivers for the GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition, all the current versions of the games, and …
Intel Core i7 9700K specs.
Intel has yet again refused to cede any ground to AMD in the great CPU struggle unfolding over these last few years. The i7 9700K marks Intel’s response to the Ryzen 7 …
The Core i7-9700K packs the same eight cores but can only process 8 simultaneous threads. It comes clocked at the same 3.6 GHz base frequency while the all-core and single-core clock speeds …
Core i7-9700K doesn’t use as much power as the Core i9-9900K. It even draws less power overclocked than a stock Core i9-9900K in both non-AVX and AVX stress tests. Bear in mind that the …
The Intel Core i7-10700K is an 8-core/16-thread part, a doubling in thread count over the 9th Gen Core i7-9700K, which is an 8-core/8-thread part. The L3 cache has also been increased by 33%, up from 12 MB to 16 MB. This is in fact an identical hardware configuration to the Core i9-9900K.
The Core i7-10700K leads in gaming, but cost-conscious shoppers may prefer Intel’s own Core i5-1600K, which is a better value for lower-cost gaming rigs.
This leaves the Core i7-10700K as a good …
In this review we’ll take a look at the Core i7-10700K, essentially the revenge of 9900K. Our review of the Core i9-10900K is here. I’m writing this as I just finish my Core i9 review and despite my enthusiasm about the Core i9-10900K, I feel like the Core i7-10700K is the sorry note you want to receive for that hot mess that was the 9900K …
The Core i7-10700K proved to be fairly easy to cool with a Corsair h215i 280mm AIO cooler. The chip peaked at 85C during a string of y-cruncher multi-threaded tests, and power peaked at slightly …
Tweet. Core i7-10700K processor review Pack it up, pack it in, let us begin. An overdue review is the 8-core Core i7-10700K processor from Intel. The 10th generation Intel Core desktop processors …
For this review, we were able to obtain the 10-core Core i9-10900K, the 8-core Core i7-10700K, and the 6-core Core i5-10600K.
Getting Complicated with Turbo.
The Intel Core i7-10700K also has a rated base clock of 3.8GHz compared to 3.6GHz on the Intel Core i7-9700K. Both processors can boost one core using Intel’s Turbo Boost technology, with the i7 …
Here’s our review and benchmarks of the Intel i7-10700K CPU, with a focus on the 10700K vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3900X, 3700X, and Intel i5-10600K. Tests for thermals, overclocking, production, & more …
We have with us to review the Intel Core i7-10700 processor. Today’s processor specimen is the non-K, non-unlocked variant of the Core i7-10700K. This chip has a fascinating specifications sheet because it is an 8-core/16-thread processor with 16 MB of L3 cache, which matches last generation’s Core i9-9900, yet the 10700 has the «Core i7» rating.
Comparison of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X and Intel Core i7-8700K
YouTube Premium
Do you want to save this video?
- Complain
Complain about video?
Sign in to report inappropriate content.
Did you like it?
Didn’t like it?
Ryzen 5 2600 vs i7-6700K | Which is Better Value For Money.
In this Video I’ll Show You Workstation and Gaming Benchmarks of amd Ryzen 5 2600 Vs. Intel Core i7-6700K (Both Paired with GTX 1080 Ti)
Stock Specs : amd Ryzen 5 2600 @ Stock ASUS B350 Prime Mobo 16GB DDR4 RAM @ 2666MHz
intel Core i7-6700K Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3 Mobo 16GB DDR4 RAM @ 2666MHz
amd Ryzen2GHz 2 X470 Pro Mobo 16GB DDR4 RAM @ 3200MHz
intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.8GHz Gigabyte GA-Z270-Gaming K3 Mobo 16GB DDR4 RAM @ 3200MHz
Corsair h200i v2 Cooler Zotac GTX 1080 Ti3 9000 HD Gaming Edition 2TB009 Test Edition 2TB009 :
Far Cry 5 Warhammer Vermintide Kingdom Come Deliverance Fortnite Battle Royale Star Wars Battlefront 2 Assassin’s Creed Origins Call of Duty World War 2 Wolfenstein 2 Middle-Earth : Shadow of War Battlefield 1 PlayerUnknown’s : BattleGround Rise of the Tomb Raider Grand Theft Auto 5 The Witcher 3 : Wild Hunt Rainbow Six Seige Overwatch CSGO Dota 2
Core i5-8600k Benchmarks/Comparison Playlist — https://goo. gl/kjuFhB
Core i7-8700 Overclocked Benchmarks/Comparison Playlist — https://goo.gl/LXxpdo — https://goo.gl/rmLg9T
Ryzen 1200 Benchmarks/Comparison Playlist — https://goo.gl/g3BFXj
Coffee Lake CPU Benchmarks/Comparison Playlist — https://goo.gl/4nY8vm
Core i7-8700K Benchmarks/Comparison Playlist — https://goo.gl/mdJ6Ub
GT 1030 Benchmarks/Comparison Playlist — https://goo.gl/PgPZJY
Test bench configuration with Ryzen 5 3600x
- Motherboard : Gigabyte B450M DS3H.
- Video card : Sapphire RX 5700 XT NITRO+.
- RAM : DDR4 HyperX Fury 2x8Gb Dual 3200MHz.
- M.2 : Apacer AS2280P2 240GB NVME (Windows 10).
- HDD : Western Digital Blue 1TB 7200RPM / 64MB Cache. Under games.
- Power supply : Chieftec A-135 850W.
- Video driver : Adrenalin 20.
2.2 (02/26/2020).
- Gameplay recording : AMD Relive.
General Information
The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.
Intel Atom E3805
A smaller size indicates a newer chip creation process.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
32-bit operating system can support up to 4 GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4 GB, which improves performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-6700
PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
With integrated graphics, you don’t need to buy a separate card.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-6700
Memory
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
Intel Xeon E7-8830
Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-6700
Testbed configuration with Ryzen 7 2700x 9 processor0024
- Processor : Ryzen 7 2700x, 8 cores, 16 theads 3.7GHz-4.3GHz.
- Motherboard : Asus Prime X470-PRO.
- Video card : Sapphire RX 5700 XT NITRO+.
- RAM : DDR4 HyperX Fury 4x8Gb Dual 3200MHz.
- M.2 : Apacer AS2280P2 240GB NVME (Windows 10).
- HDD : Western Digital Blue 1TB 7200RPM / 64MB Cache. Under games.
- Power supply : be quiet! System Power 750W.
- Video driver : Adrenalin 20.2.2 (02/26/2020).
- Gameplay recording : AMD Relive.
Functions
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to save power and reduce noise when it is under light load.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-6700
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-6700
It’s easier to get higher quality using virtualization if it’s hardware supported.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-6700
Many Intel processors use Hyperthreading technology, which means that each processor core can run on two threads at the same time, rather than like most processors that run on one thread at a time. every core. This means you will get better quality in some applications.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-6700
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i7-6700
NX bit helps protect your computer from virus attacks.
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 2600H and Intel Core i7-6700 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Technology, Virtualization, Image quality in graphics, Peripheral devices, Safety and reliability. Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps).
Coffee Lake desktop flagship: Core i7-8700K review
Intel is officially launching the 8th generation Intel Core processors today. The premature leak and subsequent announcement caused a real storm of discussion. Of course. Chips of the Coffee Lake family, although manufactured using a 14-nanometer process technology, have an increased number of cores and cache memory, which promises a significant performance boost. What in practice the owner of the CPU of the new family will get, we found out during testing of the 6-core flagship of the desktop line — Core i7-8700K.
Help
ZMIST
- 1 Architecture and layout
- 2 Model row Coffee Lake
- 3 Platform
- 4 processor Intel Core I7-8700K
- 9 Power Consumption
- 10 Results
9001 Games
Architecture and layout . For the first time, Core i7 / Core i5 processors for the mainstream desktop platform received 6 cores, and Core i3 moved into the category of 4-core chips. Qualitative changes took place throughout the history of the development of processors of these families, but here are quantitative ones — for the first time since the appearance of chips with the Nehalem architecture in 2008.
Coffee Lake processors are still using the 14nm process. The pendulum principle of the annual appearance of new architectures and production technologies has already sunk into oblivion. It would be naive to believe that such rates can be sustained indefinitely. Do not forget that the current interpretation of process indicators has long ceased to reflect the actual distance between the elements, but rather is used as some kind of marketing tool. Moreover, various manufacturers have their own interpretations of the terms “14 nm”, “10 nm”, etc. These values partly reflect the density of the arrangement of elements per unit area of a silicon wafer, but the values themselves are very arbitrary.
Course
Full Stack Exploration
Learn to follow a flexible schedule to become a universal expert in Back-end and Front-end knowledge. Earn $1300 per month
REGISTER!
Although the technological norms for the production of Coffee Lake have been maintained, the technology for manufacturing silicon wafers has been improved. Considering that Intel started using 14 nm back in 2015, it is obvious that the manufacturer has managed to improve the process since then. In mass production, any even minimal improvement increases the yield of suitable crystals, reducing the cost of their manufacture.
Let’s take a look at the topology of the Coffee Lake die, which is structurally very similar to what we saw in the Skylake/Kaby Lake case. Of course, you can immediately pay attention to the fact that the number of computing cores has been increased from four to six. This is exactly what the top silicon wafer configuration of the 8th generation Core chips is now. Along the way, from 8 MB to 12 MB, the maximum total cache memory of the third level (L3) has been increased.
Graphic part, called Intel UHD Graphics 630 without quantitative changes. There are still 24 computing modules operating at frequencies up to 1200 MHz. After increasing the number of x86 blocks, the specific area occupied by integrated graphics visually decreased noticeably. Now this is about a third of the entire die, while previously the GPU accounted for almost half.
For some time, Intel has not disclosed data on the number of transistors contained in the chips, as well as the actual area of the CPU chips. If it is difficult to calculate the number of semiconductors used, then with the dimensions of silicon wafers everything is much simpler. Inquisitive enthusiasts have already removed the heat distribution cover from Coffee Lake. As it turned out, the area of the new crystal is about 151 mm², while the Kaby Lake plate was more compact — about 126 mm². That is, the physical size of the chip has increased by about 20%. This means that the area of contact with the heat-distributing cover will be larger, which is important given the high heat transfer density. Here, any way to improve heat dissipation is good. Of course, relying on solder under the processor cover would be the height of frivolity. Here, Intel was not surprised — plastic material, also known as «thermal paste», is used to contact the protective heat spreader.
Coffee Lake lineup
Frankly speaking, Intel pleasantly pleased us by offering a good assortment of Coffee Lake already at the start. There were suggestions that only enthusiastic Core i7 / i5 with unlocked multipliers would be in the first wave, but as the announcement approached, it became clear that the manufacturer was preparing six desktop chips at once — two models each from the Core i7, Core i5 and Core i3 families.
The older line includes the Core i7-8700K with a free multiplier and the Core i7-8700 with slightly lower clock speeds and thermal package. Six-core chips support Hyper-Threading technology, allowing you to process up to 12 data streams simultaneously. Both processors have 12 MB of L3 cache.
The new Core i5 processors also received 6 processing cores. The Core i5-8600K allows you to experiment with overclocking, while the Core i5-8400 is content with a less aggressive frequency formula. Both chips have 9 MB of L3 cache, while the main difference from the processors of the older line is the lack of support for Hyper-Threading.
It’s still hard to believe, but Core i3 finally became a full-fledged 4-core chips. Core i3-8350K has a nominal operating frequency of 4.0 GHz, and an unlocked multiplier gives access to experiments. In addition, the older model received 8 MB of L3 cache. The youngest — Core i3-8100 — is content with 3.6 GHz and 6 MB L3. Both processors also nominally support DDR4-2400. Hyper-Threading technology is no longer available for Core i3, but this is the case when there is no need to regret — physical computing units are much better than virtual ones.
TDP for unlocked 6-core chips is 95W, while the Core i3-8350K is 91W. But the basic models in the lines fit into the usual framework of 65 watts.
As for the price, everything is very optimistic, considering the characteristics of the new CPUs. The older 6-core Coffee Lake models with the “K” index cost $15–20 more than the nominally previous chips of the Kaby Lake family, while the recommended cost of ordinary versions is completely identical. A 6-core Intel processor can now be purchased for $182, while a full-fledged 4-core chip will cost just $117. A historic moment, no less. Although, it’s not worth it to get too carried away. Retail prices, at least at the beginning of sales, will certainly be higher than recommended.
Platform
Coffee Lake processors are designed for the LGA1151 socket, however, these CPUs will still require new motherboards based on Intel 300 series chipsets. At the start, only the senior representative of the line — Intel Z370 will be available.
At first glance, the functionality of the Intel Z370 is no different from that of the Intel Z270. The chipset has 24 PCI Express 3.0 lanes, it can also manage PCI-E 3.0 processor lanes, dividing them in x16, x8+x8 or x8+x4+x4 proportions. Supports six SATA 6 Gb/s ports, ten USB 3.0 (USB 3.1 Gen1), and up to 14 USB 2.0 ports. Of course, it allows you to work with Intel Optane Memory and is connected to the processor via the same DMI 3.0 bus. The functional identity of the Intel Z370 and Intel Z270 can be seen even on the manufacturer’s website.
Why won’t owners of motherboards based on Intel Z270 and lower 200-series chipsets be able to use Coffee Lake? The matter is that for new chips other electric binding is provided.
Taking into account the fact that 6-core models appeared in the processor line, the manufacturer strengthened the power supply circuits by using about three dozen additional spare contacts. The proposed screenshot is not quite the right scale, but allows you to visually evaluate the increase in active VCC power pins, highlighted in red.
One might assume that at least the new Core i3s will work with previous generation boards, but the same crystal and electrical wiring is used for 4-core chips. Therefore, Core i3 will also need motherboards based on Intel 300.
At the start of the updated platform, only the top-end Intel Z370 is presented, and less functional chipsets of the line will appear only in 2018. Up to this point, even if you have the most affordable Locked Coffee Lake processor, you will have to use a relatively expensive Intel Z370 motherboard. Alas, in this case, you will have to overpay even for those functions that you can’t always use.
Board manufacturers have already prepared a whole line of various models that go on sale simultaneously with Coffee Lake processors. We have prepared reviews of several models (one, two), which, although they do not carry any functional revelations, have decent equipment and allow you to experiment with overclocking new CPUs.
In the history of the platform update, the not very pleasant moment is that backward compatibility has not been preserved either. That is, motherboards with Intel 300 chipsets cannot use Skylake / Kaby Lake processors. This is a much smaller loss than Coffee Lake’s lack of compatibility with Intel 100/200 motherboards, but it also reduces the opportunity for a staged upgrade.
Intel Core i7-8700K
We started our acquaintance with Coffee lake chips from the top model Core i7-8700K. As we already noted, this is a 6-core model with Hyper-Threading support, which allows processing up to 12 data streams simultaneously. The chip has a frequency formula of 3.7/4.7 GHz. A relatively low base value should not be alarming. In practice, even under load on all computing units, the processor runs at least at 4.3 GHz, while the Turbo Boost mechanism automatically accelerates individual cores up to 4.7 GHz.
Compared to the Core i7-7700K, the new flagship received not only two additional computing cores, but also a proportionally increased amount of cache memory. Shared L3 capacity increased from 8MB to 12MB. The thermal package also increased slightly — from 91 W to 95 W. However, given the quantitative changes and only a formal reduction in operating frequencies, it is even surprising that such measures were dispensed with. It seems that the manufacturer really managed to improve the manufacturing process of crystals.
Given that the processor socket has remained unchanged, the appearance of the processor is not much different from its predecessor. There are features of placing elements on the bottom surface, but nothing more.
Overclocking
Considering motherboards based on Intel Z370, we evaluated the frequency potential of our Core i7-8700K sample in express mode. The result, perhaps, exceeded expectations. The chip not only hit the 5000 MHz mark, but also remained stable at 5100 MHz with an air-cooled system.
Yes, the supply voltage needed to be increased to 1.34 V, but in any case, this is a very good result, which was not often achieved on 4-core Kaby Lake. Let’s not rush to final conclusions, nevertheless, we had an engineering sample of the processor for testing, but if retail copies of 6-core chips turn out to be also malleable in private terms, then this will be another argument «for».
Test bench configuration
| Processor | Intel Core i7-7700K (4.2/4.5 GHz) | Intel, www.intel.ua |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (3.4/3.8 GHz) | AMD, www.amd. |
|
| Cooler | Thermalright Archon Rev.A | Thermalright, www.thermalright.com |
| Video card | GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1080 Xtreme Gaming 8G (1759/10200MHz) | GIGABYTE, www.gigabyte.ua |
| Motherboard | GIGABYTE Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming (Intel Z370) | GIGABYTE, www.gigabyte.ua |
| MSI B350 Gaming Pro Carbon (AMD B350) | MSI, www.msi.com | |
| ASUS PRIME Z270-A (Intel Z270) | ASUS, www.asus.ua | |
| Memory | HyperX FURY HX426C15FBK2/16, DDR4-2666, 15-17-17, 16GB (2x8GB) | HyperX, www.hyperxgaming.com |
| Accumulator | HyperX Savage 960 GB (SHSS37A/960G) | HyperX, www.hyperxgaming.com |
| Power supply | Thermaltake Toughpower Grand TPG-1200M (1200 W) | Thermaltake, www.thermaltakeusa.com |
| Monitor | Acer Predator XB271HK (27″, 3840×2160) | Acer, www. |
Capacity
We used the Core i7-7700K processor for the Core i7-8700K performance, and the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 (3.4/3.8 GHz) processor in the competitive camp. At the moment, this 8-core model, although it costs a little more than Intel chips ($400), but perhaps price adjustments will follow after the launch of Coffee Lake.
Traditionally, we start testing new processors with Cinebench R15, which very quickly allows us to orientate ourselves in the capabilities of the processor in multi-threaded workloads. Scene rendering loads all computing blocks of chips. Whereas the single-threaded mode makes it possible to evaluate the performance per core/thread. As you can see, the 8-core Ryzen 7 1700X is out of competition here. The case when the amount allows you to get the desired result, despite the noticeably more modest performance indicators in terms of one thread. The Core i7-8700K noticeably improves the results of the Core i7-7700K, but even this was not enough to catch up with the AMD chip.
GeekBench 4.1.3 presents a set of diverse tasks. In multi-threaded mode, the Ryzen 7 1700X is ahead of the Core i7-7700K even though it has more modest single-threaded performance.
Everything is complicated with archivers. 7-Zip perfectly understands and accepts all 16 Ryzen 7 threads, but WinRAR is very demanding on the speed and delays of the memory subsystem. Judging by the very very serious increase when moving from Core i7-7700K to Core i7-8700K, he also managed the increased cache perfectly, placing most of the dictionary there.
When rendering in Blender, the Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700X processors go head to head.
In the Fryrender test, as well as video processing in HandBrake and Adobe Premier Pro CC, the balance of power of all test participants is very similar. The Core i7-8700K leads the way, and the Ryzen 7 1700X sits between both Intel chips, gravitating towards the 4-core Core i7-7700K.
Another synthetic test confirms this balance of power.
Games
Owners of the Core i7-7700K hardly had to complain about the lack of performance in games. The quad-core processor with Hyper-Threading and high operating frequency can handle current projects well. Can the Core i7-8700K make things even better? There is no limit to perfection. Over time, the requirements of games for CPU resources may increase, which means that additional headroom will not hurt. The positions of the Ryzen 7 1700X in this company are generally predictable, still few projects have decent optimization for chips with more than four cores. However, he will not be an extra either.
While testing the capabilities of processors in games, we used Full HD resolution and presets with medium graphics quality settings. In this case, the load is distributed between the processor and the video card. Modes with minimal picture quality and 720p resolution might have been even more visual, but they are infinitely far from real gaming situations. In turn, 4K and Ultra graphics modes minimize the influence of the processor on the final result.
Before gaming tests, some classic synthetics from Futuremark
3DMark subtests show that the Ryzen 7 1700X should not be brushed aside even when it comes to a gaming platform. At least the computing potential of 8 cores allows it not only to easily bypass the Core i7-7700K in the Fire Strike test, but even come close to the Core i7-8700K.
However, the harsh reality of life forces us to look at the balance of power from a different angle. In normal operation, the Core i7-8700K has a minimal advantage over the Core i7-7700K, especially the increase in the minimum fps values, which go beyond the measurement error. Ryzen 7 1700X in several projects in a row is inferior to about 20-30%. It would be good for an AMD chip to go up to 4 GHz, and fill it with DDR4-3200+ RAM. But in stock and on DDR4-2666 with medium timings, its capabilities look more modest than those of the Core i7.
In fairness, it should be noted that the advantage of Intel processors is not always so noticeable. In the same Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands and The Witcher: Wild Hunt, the difference is much more modest — only 5-10%. The Core i7-7700K and Core i7-8700K run very smoothly. Moreover, the minimum advantage is possible even for Kaby Lake.
Hitman seems to be multi-threaded, and responded well to the increase in cores of the Core i7-8700K, but she does not need all the resources of the Ryzen 7 1700X. As a result, another noticeable drawdown of the AMD chip.
Rise of the Tomb Raider also noted an increase in the number of computing cores, recalling the introduction of the Core i7-8700K. Of course, I wanted more growth than the modest 3%. The Ryzen 7 1700X is also good here, but still falls short of the top-end Core i7 in such modes.
The 6-core Core i7-8700K was only slightly faster than its predecessor when calculating moves in Sid Meier’s Civilization VI. Improving the results of the Core i7-7700K is not easy. With multi-threaded optimization in the game, it’s a bit tight, because the AMD-shaped eight has to think over all its moves longer than its opponents.
And we will end the gaming tests on a positive note, both for Intel and AMD chips. The built-in CPU benchmark in Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation registers a 25% advantage for the Core i7-8700K over the Core i7-7700K. Good multi-threaded optimization can significantly affect the results. In turn, the Ryzen 7 1700X, despite the fact that the actual operating frequency of the chip is almost 1 GHz lower, was able to overtake the flagship of the Kaby Lake line.
As you can see, for the advantage of the Core i7-8700K in games, good multi-threaded optimization is needed. Developers are moving in this direction, although not as actively as we would like. In any case, you can not be afraid that the top Coffee Lake, due to the declared base frequency, will be somewhere slower than the Core i7-7700K. The difference can be within the measurement error, and even then, rather with a plus sign. At the same time, the Core i7-8700K offers more computing resources, and if they are not in demand by the game itself, then they can come in very handy, for example, during the broadcast of game sessions and video recording.
Power consumption
The power consumption of the Core i7-8700K is higher than that of the Core i7-7700K, but under load the difference is within 10-15 watts.
A very reasonable price to pay for the extra two physical cores, more cache, and the performance boost they provide.
The power consumption of the Ryzen 7 1700X is higher, but we must admit that in normal mode, without additional overclocking, the performance of the AMD chip is quite acceptable. 14nm chips are much better than 32nm AMD FX in this respect.
Results
Still, healthy competition is a wonderful thing. It is unlikely that even at the beginning of this year, someone could have imagined that the 8th generation Intel Core processors would be a real revelation. We have already lost count, getting annual +5-10% performance gains with the next generation of processors, and the story of the unshakable positions of the Core i5-2500K has become a popular meme. A lot has changed this time.