Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti: What is the difference?
39points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
41points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
EVGAEVGA Superclocked
vs
54 facts in comparison
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti?
- 0.58 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
1.88 TFLOPSvs1.31 TFLOPS - 3.3 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
19.6 GPixel/svs16.3 GPixel/s - 152MHz faster memory clock speed?
1502MHzvs1350MHz - 608MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
6008MHzvs5400MHz - 37.6 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
78.4 GTexels/svs40.8 GTexels/s - 57.6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
144GB/svs86.4GB/s - 64bit wider memory bus width?
192bitvs128bit - 320 more shading units?
960vs640
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 660?
- 80W lower TDP?
60Wvs140W - 10°C lower load GPU temperature?
62°Cvs72°C - 5°C lower idle GPU temperature?
25°Cvs30°C - 9. 1dB lower load noise level?
38.3dBvs47.4dB - 3dB lower idle noise level?
37.8dBvs40.8dB - 37W lower power consumption when idle?
73Wvs110W - 96mm narrower?
145mmvs241mm
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX130
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX150
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
MSI Radeon RX 580
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX110
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
AMD Radeon HD 7850
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC Edition
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
1 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
10. 0/10
1 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
10.0/10
2 User reviews
Features
Value for money
8.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Gaming
9.0/10
1 votes
8.5/10
2 votes
Performance
6.0/10
1 votes
7.5/10
2 votes
Fan noise
No reviews yet
5.5/10
2 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
2 votes
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
980MHz
1020MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
1032MHz
1085MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3. pixel rate
19.6 GPixel/s
16.3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
1.88 TFLOPS
1.31 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
78.4 GTexels/s
40.8 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1502MHz
1350MHz
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
6008MHz
5400MHz
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
144GB/s
86.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
192bit
128bit
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5.load GPU temperature
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7. Supports 3D
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 660)
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.HDMI version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 660)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti Graphics cards Comparison
When comparing GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 660
Check Price
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Check Price
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 60 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 660 has 133% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 660 is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 750 Ti — with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 40 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660.
- GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 660 is 4 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 660 is 1 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK106 | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 6 September 2012 | 18 February 2014 |
Pipelines | 960 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78. 4 billion/sec | 43.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Length | 9.5″ (24.1 cm) | 5.7″ (14.5 cm) |
Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB/s | 86.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1. 126 |
CUDA | + | + |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.25 kh/s | |
CUDA cores | 960 | 640 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | 4 displays |
HDMI | + | + |
HDCP | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | 2048×1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
3D Gaming | + | + |
3D Vision | + | + |
3D Vision Live | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 66 Mh/s | 183 Mh/s |
Decred / DCR (Decred) | 0. 51 Gh/s | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.3 Mh/s | |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 74.4 Sol/s | |
Blu Ray 3D | + | |
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 660 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
-
GeForce GTX 660
121%
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
100%
Relative performance
-
GeForce GTX 660
106%
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 660 |
6% higher gaming performance. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
80 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 660 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 660
The GeForce GTX 660 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (9 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 660 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
GPU Name | GK106 (GK106-400-A1) | vs | GM107 (GM107-400-A2) | |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm | |
Die Size | 221 mm² | vs | 148 mm² | |
Transistors | 2,540 million | vs | 1,870 million | |
Shaders | 960 | vs | 640 | |
Compute Units | 5 | vs | 5 | |
Core clock | 980 MHz | vs | 1020 MHz | |
ROPs | 24 | vs | 16 | |
TMUs | 80 | vs | 40 |
Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 660 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 | |
Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | |
Memory Speed | 1502 MHz
6008 MHz effective |
vs | 1350 MHz 5400 MHz effective |
|
Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
GeForce GTX 660 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
TDP | 140 watts | vs | 60 watts | |
Release Date | 6 Sep 2012 | vs | 18 Feb 2014 |
-
GeForce GTX 660
19. 60 GP/s
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
16.32 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 660
78.40 GT/s
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
40.80 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 660
144.00 GB/s
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
86.40 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 660
1882.00 GFLOPs
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1305.60 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 660
6800
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5610
Points (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality,2x MSAA,16x AF, HBAO
-
GeForce GTX 660
43
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
37
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality,DDOD, FX AA
-
GeForce GTX 660
50
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
48
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Very High Quality, FXAA
-
GeForce GTX 660
30
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
25
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF
-
GeForce GTX 660
42
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 660
39
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra, DDOD, FXAA
-
GeForce GTX 660
31
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
30
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 660
25
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
23
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF
-
GeForce GTX 660
27
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
36
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 660
37
-
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
34
FPS (higher is better)
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 660 | Radeon R9 370 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 660 | Radeon R9 270 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon Vega 8 |
VS | ||
Radeon 550X 640SP | Radeon RX 550X |
VS | ||
Radeon RX 550X | Radeon RX 550X 640SP |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Qualcomm Adreno 660
|
|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Qualcomm Adreno 660
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti on one side and Qualcomm Adreno 660 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 640 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the smartphone segment, with 2 execution units, it includes 512 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0,8 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Graphics card | Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Qualcomm Adreno 660 | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Smartphone | ||||||
Release date | Q1 2014 | Q1 2021 | ||||||
Model number | GM107-400-A2 | — | ||||||
GPU name | GM107 | Adreno 660 | ||||||
Architecture | Maxwell | Adreno | ||||||
Generation | GeForce 700 | 6xx | ||||||
Lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm | ||||||
Bus interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | IGP | ||||||
GPU base clock | 1,02 GHz | 792 MHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1,09 GHz | 840 MHz | ||||||
Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR5-3200 | ||||||
Memory bus | 128 Bit | 64 Bit | ||||||
TDP | 60 W | — | ||||||
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | 5 | — | ||||||
Execution units | — | 2 | ||||||
Shading units (cuda cores) | 640 | 512 | ||||||
TMUs | 40 | — | ||||||
ROPs | 16 | — | ||||||
Cache memory | 2 MB | 1 MB | ||||||
Pixel fillrate | 17,4 GP/s | 2,7 GP/s | ||||||
Performance FP32 (float) | 1,4 TFLOPS | 1,7 TFLOPS | ||||||
Performance FP64 (double) | 43,4 GFLOPS | 3,4 TFLOPS | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
---|---|
Qualcomm Adreno 660 |
1.720,3 |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
1.389 |
The difference is 24%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
Smartphones with the graphics card Qualcomm Adreno 660:
Asus ROG Phone 5Asus ROG Phone 5 ProAsus ROG Phone 5 UltimateAsus ROG Phone 5sAsus ROG Phone 5s ProAsus Zenfone 8Asus Zenfone 8 FlipHuawei P50 Pro SD888Huawei P50 SD888Lenovo Legion Duel 2Motorola Edge 30 FusionMotorola Moto G200 5GOnePlus 9OnePlus 9 ProOnePlus 9RT 5GOppo Find X3 ProOppo Find X5Oppo K10 ProRealme GT 2Realme GT 5GSamsung Galaxy S21 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GSharp Aquos R6Sony Xperia 1 IIISony Xperia 5 IIISony Xperia Pro-IVivo iQOO 7Vivo iQOO 7 LegendVivo iQOO 9Vivo iQOO 9 SEVivo X60 Pro+Vivo X70 Pro+Xiaomi 11T ProXiaomi Black Shark 4 ProXiaomi Black Shark 5 RSXiaomi Mi 11Xiaomi Mi 11 ProXiaomi Mi 11 UltraXiaomi Mi 11i 5GXiaomi Mi 11X ProXiaomi Mix 4Xiaomi Mix FoldXiaomi Redmi K40 ProXiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ZTE nubia Red Magic 6ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 6RZTE nubia Red Magic 6S Pro
Processors with the graphics card Qualcomm Adreno 660:
Qualcomm SM8325 Snapdragon 888 4GQualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5GQualcomm SM8350-AC Snapdragon 888+ 5G
Equivalence:
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti AMD equivalentQualcomm Adreno 660 Nvidia equivalentQualcomm Adreno 660 AMD equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti GPU Comparison
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?
GPU Comparison
Quickly search and compare graphics cards
Overall Score
General gaming and workstation score
14 %
16%
slightly better overall score
Flux Core frame rate
Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes
18 FPS
5 FPS
significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
13 FPS
Electron frame rate
Randomly generated noise sphere test
11 FPS
Identical
11 FPS
City frame rate
Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering
12 FPS
2 FPS
slightly higher City frame rate
10 FPS
Clouds frame rate
Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test
10 FPS
0 FPS
slightly higher Clouds frame rate
Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 660 and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.
Download GPU Benchmark
Geekbench (CUDA) score
CUDA compute benchmark
12,510
45%
significantly higher Geekbench (CUDA) score
Geekbench (Metal) score
Metal compute benchmark
5,449
5%
slightly higher Geekbench (Metal) score
Geekbench (OpenCL) score
OpenCL compute benchmark
11,381
12,954
13%
slightly higher Geekbench (OpenCL) score
Geekbench (Vulkan) score
Vulkan compute benchmark
10,693
12,372
15%
slightly higher Geekbench (Vulkan) score
3DMark Graphics score
High-end graphics benchmark
1,317
3%
slightly higher 3DMark Graphics score
Core Clock Speed
Nominal chip frequency
980 MHz
1,020 MHz
4%
slightly higher core clock speed
Boost Clock Speed
Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met
1,032 MHz
1,085 MHz
5%
slightly higher boost clock speed
Memory
Onboard memory size for textures and vertices
4 GiB
33%
slightly more memory
Memory Bus Width
Number of parallel lines to the memory chips
192 Bit
49%
significantly larger memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory Bandwidth
Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory
144 GB/s
66%
significantly higher memory bandwidth
86 GB/s
TDP
Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU
60 W
133%
significantly lower TDP
Pixel Rate
Number of pixels that can be rendered per second
21 Gigapixels/s
18%
slightly higher pixel rate
17 Gigapixels/s
Texture Rate
Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second
83 Gigatexels/s
90%
significantly higher texture rate
43 Gigatexels/s
Floating Point Performance
Raw number of floating point operations per second
2 TFLOPS
2 TFLOPS
6%
slightly better floating point performance
Shading Units
Number of processors dedicated to shader processing
960
49%
significantly more shading units
Texture Mapping Units
Number of processors dedicated to applying textures
80
100%
significantly more texture mapping units
Render Output Processors
Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering
24
49%
significantly more render output processors
Rank
Ranking in the hardwareDB database
200th
of 526
218th
of 526
Release date
The official date of release of this chip
—
February 2014
Memory Type
The type of memory used by this chip
GDDR5
GDDR5
DirectX Support
Maximum version of DirectX supported
11. 0
12.0
OpenGL Support
Maximum version of OpenGL supported
4.5
4.5
GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti specs and performance
For gaming, the GeForce GTX 660 graphics card is better than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in our tests.
In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.
Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has slightly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 3 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.
In addition, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a significantly lower TDP at 60 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 660 at 140 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.
In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 660 over the GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Latest posts
How to choose a power supply for your gaming PC: wattage and efficiencyJuly 11, 2022
How to compare GPUs and GPUs: find the best components for gamingJuly 02, 2022
Best PC benchmarking tools 2022: how to performance test your gaming PCJuly 02, 2022
Popular GPU Comparisons
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT
GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500 XT
GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 3060
Radeon RX 570 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT
GTX 660 vs GTX 750 Ti: compare as placas de vídeo Nvidia | Placas
Publicidade
Placas mais rodadas da Nvidia ainda despertam interesse e podem ser suficientes para games mais leves; veja as diferenças, preços e recursos oferecidos pelas duas.
Por Filipe Garrett, para o TechTudo
Divulgação/Bluecase
GeForce GTX 660 e GeForce GTX 750 Ti são duas placas de vídeo pertencentes às gerações mais antigas da Nvidia, mas que ainda podem ser opções interessantes para quem tem orçamento mais apertado. Um exemplar da GTX 750 Ti chega a custar R$ 599 atualmente e pode ainda dar conta de games mais leves – como CS:GO – com performance competitiva. O mesmo vale para GTX 660, que atualmente se tornou mais difícil de ser encontrada em lojas online.
Apesar do desempenho aceitável para gamers mais modestos, os dispositivos têm suas limitações em virtude da passagem do tempo. Pensando nisso, o TechTudo explica a seguir as especificações técnicas, recursos e eventuais sacrifícios envolvidos no uso das GeForce de dez e oito anos atrás.
? DisplayPort ou HDMI? Saiba qual é a melhor para cada situação
GTX 660 já tem dez anos de idade — Foto: Divulgação/EVGA
? Qual é a melhor placa de vídeo barata? Comente no Fórum TechTudo
Especificações
Tanto GeForce GTX 660 quanto GeForce GTX 750 Ti são produtos mais antigos da Nvidia. A 660 foi lançada em 2012 e é composta de um processador gráfico de 640 núcleos CUDA, capaz de rodar em velocidades de 980 a 1.032 MHz. Já a GTX 750 Ti é um pouco mais recente, tendo surgido no mercado em 2014 com uma GPU de 960 núcleos CUDA e velocidades de 1.020 a 1.085 MHz.
A GTX 660 oferece um total de 2 GB de RAM GDDR5. Com uma interface de 192 bits, a placa troca dados entre memória dedicada e processador gráfico a uma taxa de 144 GB/s. Já a GTX 750 Ti é encontrada em duas versões no que diz respeito à memória RAM. A mais simples vem com 2 GB de GDDR5 que, por meio de uma conexão de 128 bits, troca dados com a GPU a 86 GB/s. Também é possível encontrar versões da 750 Ti com 4 GB de memória.
Tecnologias mais recentes, como aceleração de Ray Tracing em tempo real e DLSS, não são oferecidas por nenhuma das duas placas.
Desempenho
As duas placas podem dar conta de games mais leves — Foto: Divulgação/EVGA
Em relação à performance, não se pode esperar milagres: enquanto a 750 Ti chegou a ser comparada com o PS4 na época de lançamento, a GTX 660 já soma dez anos de idade. Assim, a tarefa de usar qualquer uma das duas para rodar games recentes pode frustrar quem exige resoluções altas e grande qualidade gráfica.
Para encarar games com as duas placas, pode ser necessário aceitar resoluções abaixo do Full HD e também vários sacrifícios em termos de configurações. Entretanto, se seu perfil para games é voltado a títulos antigos e/ou mais leves — algo como CS:GO e outros games com foco em eSports —, pode ser possível curtir jogos com performance aceitável em 720p.
Em uma comparação direta entre as duas, a vantagem tende a ficar com a GTX 660, apesar dos clocks inferiores. A placa tem memória mais rápida e pode render até 17% mais, de acordo com a média de comparações disponíveis no GPU UserBenchmark.
Recursos
Sendo produtos de arquiteturas antigas da Nvidia, as duas GeForce carecem de suporte a recursos mais recentes. Além de tecnologias mais direcionadas a games, como o DLSS e o Ray Tracing, não há aceleração via hardware para o processamento de vídeo HEVC (h. 265).
Esse é um detalhe importante porque, geralmente, quem procura placas de vídeo mais antigas tende a usá-las em HTPCs e computadores dedicados à multimídia. Sem o suporte ao HEVC, o usuário pode ter dificuldade em reproduzir arquivos de vídeo de alta qualidade.
Consumo de energia
Falta de suporte a HEVC contraindica as duas placas para o uso em HTPCs — Foto: Divulgação/Gigabyte
As duas placas de vídeo diferem bastante no que diz respeito à energia. Enquanto a GTX 660 aparece com uma TDP de 140 W, a GTX 750 Ti vai a 60 W. Vale lembrar que TDP é um índice que fabricantes usam para estimar a quantidade de energia a qual o componente subaproveita e libera na forma de calor.
Embora esse valor não seja um indicador direto de consumo, ele serve para indicar níveis de eficiência e também de ruído. Placas que esquentam mais precisam de sistemas de refrigeração mais robustos, que tendem a ser mais barulhentos.
A Nvidia também indica a capacidade mínima da fonte de energia para alimentar as duas placas com segurança, além do restante do PC. Para a GTX 660, a sugestão é de 300 W, enquanto a 750 Ti precisa de uma unidade de 250 W mínimos.
Preço – GTX
Geforce GTX 660 é mais difícil de encontrar atualmente — Foto: Divulgação/Nvidia
É muito difícil que você consiga encontrar as duas placas novas no mercado: com dez e oito anos de vida, os dois produtos já saíram de linha. Além disso, ambos são tecnologicamente defasados e foram substituídos por várias gerações e novas arquiteturas de Nvidia e também AMD.
Não encontramos a GTX 660 à venda na internet. Já a GTX 750 Ti, que é um pouco mais recente, aparece em alguns sites: em nossas pesquisas, encontramos o produto novo a R$ 599 na versão de 2 GB, enquanto a opção de 4 GB aparece por R$ 620.
Custo-benefício
Como se tratam de equipamentos mais antigos, é incerto até que ponto o investimento em tecnologias com praticamente uma década de idade valem à pena. Do ponto de vista técnico, a GTX 660 oferece performance superior nas comparações disponíveis, mas a GTX 750 Ti é mais fácil de encontrar.
Entretanto, uma dica é procurar placas mais recentes. GTX 1050 Ti e GTX 1650 são boas opções do lado da Nvidia, assim como a linha Radeon RX 400 (em especial modelos 470 e 480) serão apostas mais racionais em termos de vida útil e desempenho.
Ficha técnica de GTX 750 Ti e GTX 660
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. GeForce GTX 660
Especificações | GeForce GTX 750 Ti | GeForce GTX 660 |
Lançamento | Fevereiro de 2014 | Setembro de 2012 |
Núcleos | 640 núcleos CUDA | 960 núcleos CUDA |
Velocidades | 1. 020 a 1.085 MHz | 980 a 1.032 MHz |
Memória RAM | 2 ou 4 GB GDDR5 | 2 GB GDDR5 |
Velocidade de memória | 5,4 Gb/s | 6 Gb/s |
Interface de memória | 128 bits | 192 bits |
Largura de banda | 86 GB/s | 144 GB/s |
TDP | 60 W | 140 W |
Com informações de Nvidia (1/2) e GPU UserBenchmark
No vídeo abaixo, veja cinco coisas que só quem jogou em lan houses vai lembrar
5 coisas que só quem jogou em lan houses vai lembrar
0026 vs 1.31 TFLOPS
19.6 GPixel/s vs 16.3 GPixel/s
1502MHz vs 1350MHz
6008MHz vs 5400MHz
144GB/s vs 86.4GB/s
192bit vs 128bit
960 vs 640
- 80W below TDP?
60W vs 140W - 10°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
62°C vs 72°C - 5°C lower GPU idle temperature?
25°C vs 30°C - 9.1dB lower noise floor at full load?
38.3dB vs 47.4dB - 3dB lower idle noise?
37.8dB vs 40.8dB - 37W lower standby power consumption?
73W vs 110W - 96mm narrower?
145mm vs 241mm
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX130
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX150
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 10500003
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX110
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
0003
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
vs
0003
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
10. 0 /10
2 Reviews of Users
Functions
Cost Refract
8.0
1 VOTES 9000
Games
/10
1 Votes
8.5 /10
2 Votes
6.0 /10
1 VOTES
9000
004
7.5 /10
2 VOTES
Fan noise
Reviews not yet
5.5 /10
2 Votes
9000 /10
2 votes
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
980MHz
1020MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.turbo GPU
1032MHz
1085MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3.pixel rate
19.6 GPixel/s
16.3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
1.88 TFLOPS
1.31 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.
5.texture size
78.4 GTexels/s
40.8 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
1502MHz
1350MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
6008MHz
5400MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.max memory bandwidth
144GB/s
86.4GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
192bit
128bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5. versions of GDDR memory
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
6. Supports memory debug code
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5.GPU Temperature at Boot
Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7.Supports 3D
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI-based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2.HDMI connectors
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 660)
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.
HDMI version 3
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 660)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)
New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.
Price Match
Cancel
Which graphics cards are better?
Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 which is better?
General information | |
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
54%
12.7% (30.8%) better than |
41. 3% |
Architecture |
|
Maxwell | Kepler |
Codename |
|
GM107 | GK106 |
Type |
|
Desktop | Desktop |
Release price |
|
$149
-80 $ (-34.9%) better than |
229 $ |
Number of shaders |
|
640 | 960
320 (50%) better than |
Core frequency |
|
1020 MHz
40 MHz (4.1%) better than |
980 MHz |
Boost frequency |
|
1085 MHz
At 52 MHz (5%) better than |
1033 MHz |
Number of transistors |
|
1.870 million | 2.540 million |
Process |
|
28 nm | 28 nm |
Interface |
|
PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
60W
-80 W (-57.1%) better than |
140 W |
Length |
|
14.5 cm | 24.1 cm |
Additional power connectors |
|
no | 1x 6-pin |
G-SYNC support NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts. |
|
SLI support |
|
n/a | + |
3D Vision |
|
+ | + |
GPU Boost |
|
+ | + |
GeForce Experience |
|
+ | n/a |
CUDA The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for |
|
Multi-monitor support |
|
4 | 4 |
Decred / DCR (Decred) |
|
0.51 Gh/s | n/a |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) |
|
1 Sol/s | n/a |
Bus |
|
PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing, |
|
640 | 960
320 (50%) better than |
Height |
|
11.1 cm | 11.1 cm |
HDCP |
|
+ | + |
Maximum resolution via VGA |
|
2048×1536 | 2048×1536 |
Audio input for HDMI |
|
internal | internal |
HDMI |
|
Blu Ray 3D |
|
+ | n/a |
3D Gaming |
|
+ | + |
3D Vision Live |
|
+ | n/a |
FXAA |
|
TXAA |
|
Adaptive VSync |
|
+ | + |
3D Blu-ray |
|
n/a | + |
Video connectors |
|
1x Dual Link DVI-I, 1x Dual Link DVI-D, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x Dual Link DVI-I, 1x Dual Link DVI-D, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DirectX |
|
12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Floating point performance |
|
1. 389 gflops | 1.981 gflops |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) |
|
2.3 Mh/s | n/a |
Memory | |
Memory type |
|
GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures, |
|
2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better the performance in demanding games. |
|
128bit | 192 bit
64 bit (50%) better than |
Shared memory |
|
— | n/a |
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data. |
|
5.4MHz | 6 MHz
0.6 MHz (11.1%) better than |
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use. |
|
86.4 | 144.2
57.8 (66.9%) better than |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
VS
General Info
The General Information section of the Video Card Comparison List provides information on release date, type, overall rating and other useful data to determine the winner between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Please note that the comparison takes place on all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications.
$ 149
$ 321 (1.4x MSRP)
Actual price
$ 273 (1.8x msrp)
4.45 9000
Market Segment
Desktop
Specifications
Which graphics card is better in NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti comparison in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part contained in the rating of video cards.
60 Watt
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility
Let’s discuss the dimensions (length, width, height) of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti video cards. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces
PCIe 3.0 X16
Interface
PCIE 3.0 X16
9.5 «(24.1 CM)
length
5.7″ (14.5 CM)
9000 ONE 6-PIN
Additional power supply for additional power supply
None
+
Options SLI
No data
PCI Express 3.0
Support for tire
PCI Express 3.0
4.376 «(11.1 CM)
Height
4.376″ (11.1 CM)
Memory (Frequency and Acertain)
9000 Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications. The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing. What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti:
GDDR5
Type of memory
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM AMOUNT
2 GB
192-bit GDDR5 9000 5. 4 GB/S
144.2 GB/S
memory capacity
86.4 GB/S
No data
Separated memory
—
Support for ports and displays
Let’s find out the difference in the ports that are equipped with navidia video cards GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.
Internal
+
HDMI
+
Technology
Let’s see what the difference is. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.
+
3D Vision
+
+
GPU Boost
+
+
CUDA
+
No data
GeForce Experience
9000 +
9000
+
+
3D Gaming
+
No data
3D Vision Live
+
+
+
FXAA
+
+
TXAA
+
+
ADAPTIVE VSYNC
3D Blu-Ray
N/A
API support
The confrontation between the two rivals NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.3
Opengl
4.6
1.1.126
VULKAN
9000
OpenCL
1.2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti benchmark comparison
Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards
one. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. | NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
four. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. AMD Radeon R7 350 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs. AMD Radeon RX 550 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 550 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. | Intel HD Graphics 520 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
eight. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. | Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ten. | Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
eleven. | Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. AMD Radeon HD 6930 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fourteen. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs. NVIDIA GeForce 820M | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fifteen. |
967MHz max 2457 Average: 938 MHz 1020MHz max 2457 Average: 938 MHz GPU memory frequency This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth 1502MHz max 16000 Average: 1326.6 MHz 1350MHz max 16000 Average: 1326. 6 MHz FLOPS A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS. 2.5TFLOPS max 1142.32 Average: 92.5 TFLOPS 1.4TFLOPS max 1142.32 Average: 92.5 TFLOPS Turbo GPU If the speed of the GPU drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance. 1046MHz max 2903 Average: 1375.8 MHz 1085MHz max 2903 Average: 1375.8 MHz Texture size A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second. 108 GTexels/s max 756.8 Average: 145.4 GTexels/s 40.8 GTexels/s max 2656 Average: 198.3 GB/s 86.4GB/s max 2656 Average: 198.3 GB/s Effective memory speed The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better. 6008MHz max 19500 Average: 6984.5 MHz 5400MHz max 19500 Average: 6984. 5 MHz RAM 3GB max 128 Average: 4.6 GB 2GB max 128 Average: 4.6 GB GDDR Memory Versions Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance 5 Average: 4.5 5 Average: 4.5 Memory bus width A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card. 192bit max 8192 Average: 290. 1bit 128bit max 8192 Average: 290.1bit Heat dissipation (TDP) Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed. 150W Average: 140.4 W 60W Average: 140.4 W Process The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip. 28 nm Average: 47.5 nm 28 nm Average: 47.5 nm Number of transistors The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates 3540 million max 80000 Average: 5043 million 1870 million max 80000 Average: 5043 million PCIe version Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance. 3 Mean: 2.8 3 Mean: 2.8 Width 270mm max 421.7 Average: 242.6mm 145mm max 421.7 Average: 242.6mm Height 111mm max 180 Average: 119.1mm 111mm max 180 Average: 119.1mm DirectX Used in demanding games for enhanced graphics eleven max 12. 2 Average: 11.1 12 max 12.2 Average: 11.1 OpenCL version Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be 1.1 max 4.6 Average: 1.7 3 max 4.6 Average: 1.7 opengl version Later versions provide better game graphics 4.3 max 4.6 Average: 4 4.6 max 4. 6 Average: 4 Shader model version 5.1 max 6.6 Average: 5.5 5.1 max 6.6 Average: 5.5 version Vulkan 1.1 1.3 version CUDA is 5 HDMI Output HDMI Aviation HDMI allows you to connect devices with HDMI ports or mini-hdmi. They can transmit video and audio to the display. Yes Yes DisplayPort Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort one Average: 2 Average: 2 DVI outputs Allows connection to a display using DVI 2 Mean: 1. 4 2 Mean: 1.4 HDMI Yes Yes Passmark score 4281 max 29325 Average: 7628.6 3852 max 29325 Average: 7628.6 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score 37003 max 1
Average: 80042.3 30722 max 1
Average: 80042.3 3DMark Fire Strike Score 4639 max 38276 Average: 12463 3942 max 38276 Average: 12463 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score 5323 max 49575 Average: 11859. 1 4208 max 49575 Average: 11859.1 3DMark 11 Performance GPU Score 8247 max 57937 Average: 18799.9 5270 max 57937 Average: 18799.9 3DMark Vantage Performance score 23251 max 97887 Average: 37830.6 21176 max 97887 Average: 37830.6 Unigine Heaven 3.0 test score 77 max 60072 Average: 2402 53 max 60072 Average: 2402 Unigine Heaven 4. 0 test score 759 max 4818 Average: 1291.1 530 max 4818 Average: 1291.1 Octane Render test score OctaneBench 41 max 125 Average: 47.1 34 max 125 Average: 47.1 Comparison of GeForce GTX 850M and GeForce GTX 660 Ti. What’s better?
General comparisonGame performanceVideo card tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation , Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
GraphicsTested on: T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor.
Computing powerTests used: Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining.
Output per WTested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive , Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP.
Noise and powerVideo card tests were performed on: TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level.
Overall graphics card rating
BenefitsWhy is the GeForce GTX 850M better?
Why is the GeForce GTX 660 Ti better?
Comparative benchmarks (benchmarks)Bitcoin mining
Face Recognition
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)
Manhattan test (GFXBench 3.0)
Fire Strike 9 test0134
Sky Diver test
Thief
Battlefield 4
Tags:compare, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, GeForce GTX 850M Gtx 680 vs gtx 750 ti • Web cheat sheet for internet entrepreneurs!Contents
Why is the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti?
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 680?
What are the most popular comparisons?Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti AMD Radeon RX 550 Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus GeForce GTX 950 Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060 Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 AMD Radeon RX 560 Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti AMD Radeon R7 260X Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Palit GeForce GTX 700003 Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Nvidia GeForce MX130 Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Zotac GeForce GTX 760 Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 AMD Radeon RX 570 Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Asus Radeon RX 560 OC 4GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti 75 Nvidia GeForce GTX00003 Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Gigabyte Radeon RX 570 General InformationA higher transistor count usually indicates a newer, more powerful processor. Nvidia Quadro GV100 The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption. A smaller size indicates a newer chip creation process. AMD Radeon RX 570 PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.
⇡#Test bench, testing method
Corsair AX1200i power supply stand is used to measure system power. Power-saving CPU technologies are disabled in all tests. The PCI-Express bus operates in 3.0 mode. To activate PCI-E 3.0 on GeForce 600 and 700 series video cards in a system based on the X79 chipset, a patch from NVIDIA is applied. In the NVIDIA driver settings, the CPU is always selected as the processor for PhysX calculation. For AMD, the Tesselation setting is always moved from the AMD Optimized state to Use application settings. In CrossFire configurations, the Frame Pacing option remains enabled.
Test participants The following video cards took part in the performance test: ⇡#Overclocking, temperature, power consumption The GPU Boost 2.0 auto-overclocking mechanism is quite aggressive for such a compact core. On the reference board, the frequency peaks at 1150MHz and the GPU voltage rises up to 1.156V. In idle, the frequency and voltage are 135MHz and 0.956V. The maximum voltage, however, is slightly lower: 1.143 V. Of the two video cards, we tried to overclock ASUS, since it has additional power, and the nominal frequency of memory chips is higher. As a result, we managed to get 1207 MHz on the GPU and 6300 MHz on the memory chips. There is no reaction to attempts to raise the voltage using GPU Boost. And yet — an excellent result for such a modest card. Perhaps the GPU could have been better, but the available overclocking utilities do not allow you to shift the GPU frequency by more than 135 MHz. In terms of peak power, the system with the GeForce GTX 750 Ti slightly surpassed the stand with the GTX 650 Ti. The difference with the main competitor from AMD — Radeon R7 260X — is colossal. By the way, unlike other video cards in this test, the results of the GTX 750 Ti were obtained under load in Far Cry 3 instead of Crysis 3 (which is similar) for the reason that Crysis 3 did not start in our build on the GTX 750 Ti. The overclocked ASUS GeForce GTX 750 Ti OC Edition has completely different numbers, and yet the card remains more economical compared to the Radeon R7 260X. Despite the modest cooling system, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti reference sample heats up quite moderately. The large aluminum heatsink on the ASUS board is more than enough to dissipate heat from the GM107 even with additional overclocking. ⇡#Performance: synthetic tests 3DMark 2011
The 3DMark
The ⇡#Performance: gaming testsCrysis Warhead
DiRT Showdown
Far Cry 3
Tomb Raider
The Bioshock Infinite
Crysis 3
Metro: Last Light
Company of Heroes 2
Batman: Arkham Origins
Battlefield 4
⇡# ConclusionsIn five out of nine test games (excluding Crysis 3, where the GeForce GTX 750 Ti did not run), the video adapter on the junior Maxwell GPU with a power consumption of 60 W defeated the Radeon R7 260X, whose TDP is 115 W. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti with a TDP of 110 W was also left behind in all tests without exception. The result is amazing without exaggeration. How else can you comment on the fact that NVIDIA, while staying within the 28 nm process, has managed to almost double the performance per watt? However, for the GM107 chip as part of a desktop video adapter, energy efficiency is not yet the main advantage. More importantly, as a replacement for GK107, GM107 will also find application in laptops, where it will bring a huge increase in performance with the same thermal package. GM107 also allows you to predict the contours of upcoming high-end GPUs based on the Maxwell architecture. If the same performance-per-watt leap can be replicated at the scale of larger GPUs, then NVIDIA might be able to completely revamp the GPU lineup without waiting for the transition to a 20nm manufacturing node. But in the coming months, we can hardly expect new products from Maxwell. The top segment of the GeForce 700 line has not yet completed its life cycle. In general, the strategy is reasonable — to test the new architecture on a compact core before releasing a flagship GPU. This is what AMD did earlier, first releasing GCN 1.1 in the form of Bonaire, and only then the big Hawaii GPU. The analogy with GCN 1.1 continues in that Maxwell, in addition to optimizing power consumption, in general, is no different from Kepler from a practical point of view. 960 CUDA cores, 80 texturing units and 16 rasterization units. Its base clock frequency is 1085 MHz, and the maximum frequency reaches 1163 MHz. Video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with a frequency of 5500 MHz and a 128-bit data bus. The junior graphics adapter is based on a stripped-down NVIDIA GM107 processor, which consists of 768 CUDA cores, 64 texturing units and 16 rasterization units. CPU and Memory Clocks GTX 750 Ti is based on a GPU that consists of 960 CUDA cores, 80 texture units and 16 ROP units. So far, it is not known exactly whether this processor is called GM107 or GM117, but it is clear that it operates at a clock frequency of 1098/1176 MHz. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with an effective frequency of 1350 MHz. The maximum memory bandwidth can reach 86.4 GB/s. Regarding the performance NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti , then, judging by the test results in 3DMARK 11, it is 7 % faster than the NVIDIA GTX 650 TI: GeForce GTX 750 Ti due early next month; its cost will be slightly higher than the AMD Radeon R7 260X ($150). Video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 The Ti is based on a 28nm GPU named GeForce Maxwell 117 (GM117), which is rumored to have 960 CUDA cores, 80 texture units, and 32 ROP units. The GPU should run at a base frequency of 1033 MHz and a turbo frequency of 1098 MHz, while the 2 GB of GDDR5 memory available to the graphics card has an effective frequency of 6008 MHz. Model NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti The is planned as a replacement for the entry-level graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti. With it, NVIDIA will continue its traditional approach to the release of video cards, when graphics solutions based on the latest processor are first presented with low-performance models, and a little later with high-performance ones. From the performance tests distributed by the Chinese website Baidu, it follows that the video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is on average 26% slower than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660, but 16% and 21% faster respectively AMD Radeon R7 260 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti. This AMD video card is one of the direct competitors of NVIDIA’s novelty, which will be sold at a price slightly higher than the cost of the first one ($150). Rumors say NVIDIA graphics card GeForce 9The 1376 GTX 750 Ti will be based on the latest NVIDIA GeForce Maxwell 117 GPU, based on a 28nm process. During the development of the Maxwell processor, the developers focused on energy efficiency, not performance, which is confirmed by the test results. However, the comparison of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 cannot be called completely correct, since the new video card is probably being prepared as a replacement for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti model, and not the one involved in benchmark. It follows from the tests that between the new video card and the graphics solution of the Kepler generation, the difference varies from 3-10% in 3DMark to 30% in Unigine Valley, which gives an average of about 15% difference. Unfortunately, the testers do not reveal the technical characteristics of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti , but there is no doubt that it will be faster than solutions of a similar level from the GeForce GTX 600 series. new video card ASUS GeForce GTX 750 Ti (GTX750TI-OC-2GD5), the support page of which also appeared on the official website of the Taiwanese company. It should go on sale February 18th. It is expected to be one of the first models based on the new generation of NVIDIA Maxwell microarchitecture GPUs. Judging by the name, the ASUS GeForce GTX 750 Ti (GTX750TI-OC-2GD5) supports 2 GB of GDDR5 memory and uses an optimized frequency formula. This suggests that NVIDIA allowed partners to immediately present models with a modified design and overclocked parameters. The pre-order price of the novelty is fixed at an approximate level of $225 / €155. This new high performance graphics card is a graphics solution codenamed ATLAS, which will be sold under the name NVIDIA Tesla K40 . As already mentioned, the NVIDIA Tesla K40 is based on the GK180 GPU, which consists of 2880 CUDA cores. Peak single-precision computing performance of the GK180 processor is over 4 teraflops. The NVIDIA Tesla K40 graphics card is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 288 GB/s. CPU Heat Dissipation NVIDIA Tesla K40 does not exceed 235W. NVIDIA plans to officially unveil the new graphics card on October 16th or 17th, just a few days after the AMD Radeon R9 290X goes on sale. Around the same time, NVIDIA is going, in addition to the release of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Ti, to reduce prices for older Kepler models. GPU for NVIDIA 9The 1376 GeForce GTX 750 Ti consists of 960 CUDA cores, 80 texturing units and 32 ROPs, so this video card should be slightly faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 model (it has 24 ROPs). The base frequency of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti GPU is 1033MHz and the GPU Boost frequency is 1098MHz. The video card has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with an effective frequency of 6008 MHz and a 256-bit data bus. The maximum memory bandwidth is 192.3 Gb/s. The performance of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti was tested with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti running at the same clock speeds of 1833/108 MHz. Based on the results, we can conclude that NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 10% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660, but 8% slower than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti. The release of video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti may take place this month, but the exact date is still unknown. For a while it seemed that NVIDIA had no plans to further develop the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 700 series, but a few days ago the ChinaDIY website published information from which it follows that the entry-level graphics card is being prepared for release NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti , which will replace the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti. Judging by the screenshot of the GPU-Z program, the video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is based on a GPU that consists of 960 CUDA cores, 80 texture units and 32 ROP units. It can be assumed that this GPU is a modified GK106, which is in NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti runs at 1033/1098 MHz. The video card also has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory using a 256-bit data bus. Model NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti seems to be the most overclocked video card in the series, which will be slightly behind NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760. |