750 ti vs 660: Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti: What is the difference?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti: What is the difference?

39points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

41points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

EVGAEVGA Superclocked

vs

54 facts in comparison

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti?

  • 0.58 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    1.88 TFLOPSvs1.31 TFLOPS
  • 3.3 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    19.6 GPixel/svs16.3 GPixel/s
  • 152MHz faster memory clock speed?
    1502MHzvs1350MHz
  • 608MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    6008MHzvs5400MHz
  • 37.6 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    78.4 GTexels/svs40.8 GTexels/s
  • 57.6GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    144GB/svs86.4GB/s
  • 64bit wider memory bus width?
    192bitvs128bit
  • 320 more shading units?
    960vs640

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 660?

  • 80W lower TDP?
    60Wvs140W
  • 10°C lower load GPU temperature?
    62°Cvs72°C
  • 5°C lower idle GPU temperature?
    25°Cvs30°C
  • 9. 1dB lower load noise level?
    38.3dBvs47.4dB
  • 3dB lower idle noise level?
    37.8dBvs40.8dB
  • 37W lower power consumption when idle?
    73Wvs110W
  • 96mm narrower?
    145mmvs241mm

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX130

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX150

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

vs

Nvidia GeForce 940MX

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

MSI Radeon RX 580

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX110

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon Vega 8

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

vs

AMD Radeon HD 7850

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

vs

Zotac GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC Edition

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

1 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

10. 0/10

1 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

2 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

10.0/10

2 User reviews

Features

Value for money

8.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

2 votes

Gaming

9.0/10

1 votes

8.5/10

2 votes

Performance

6.0/10

1 votes

7.5/10

2 votes

Fan noise

No reviews yet

 

5.5/10

2 votes

Reliability

10.0/10

1 votes

10.0/10

2 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

980MHz

1020MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1032MHz

1085MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3. pixel rate

19.6 GPixel/s

16.3 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

1.88 TFLOPS

1.31 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

78.4 GTexels/s

40.8 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1502MHz

1350MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

6008MHz

5400MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

144GB/s

86.4GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

192bit

128bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 660)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 660)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti Graphics cards Comparison

When comparing GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card — this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce GTX 660

Check Price

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Check Price

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 660 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 60 Watt
Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin None
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • GeForce GTX 660 has 133% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 660 is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 750 Ti — with Maxwell.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 40 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660.
  • GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • GeForce GTX 660 is 4 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 660 is 1 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 20−22 20−22
ultra / 1080p 12−14 12−14
QHD / 1440p 6−7 6−7
4K / 2160p 5−6 5−6
low / 720p 40−45 40−45
medium / 1080p 24−27 24−27
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p 30−35 30−35
ultra / 1080p 27−30 27−30
QHD / 1440p 10−12 10−12
4K / 2160p 8−9 8−9
low / 720p 65−70 65−70
medium / 1080p 35−40 35−40
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p 50−55 50−55
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 230−240 230−240
medium / 768p 200−210 200−210
ultra / 1080p 120−130 120−130
QHD / 1440p 90−95 90−95
4K / 2160p 50−55 50−55
high / 768p 160−170 160−170
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 50−55 50−55
medium / 1080p 55−60 55−60
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 768p 100−110 100−110
ultra / 1080p 80−85 80−85
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p 24−27 24−27
ultra / 1080p 21−24 21−24
QHD / 1440p 18−20 18−20
4K / 2160p 8−9 8−9
low / 720p 50−55 50−55
medium / 1080p 27−30 27−30
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p 30−35 30−35
ultra / 1080p 24−27 24−27
QHD / 1440p 16−18 16−18
low / 720p 120−130 120−130
medium / 1080p 70−75 70−75
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p 30−35 30−35
ultra / 1080p 24−27 24−27
QHD / 1440p 14−16 14−16
4K / 2160p 12−14 12−14
low / 720p 65−70 65−70
medium / 1080p 35−40 35−40
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p 100−110 100−110
medium / 768p 90−95 90−95
high / 1080p 40−45 40−45
ultra / 1080p 16−18 16−18
QHD / 1440p 7−8 7−8
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p 12−14 12−14
ultra / 1080p 10−11 10−11
QHD / 1440p 10−11 10−11
4K / 2160p 3−4 3−4
low / 720p 40−45 40−45
medium / 1080p 18−20 18−20
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 1080p 110−120 110−120
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p 14−16 14−16
low / 720p 70−75 70−75
medium / 1080p 18−20 18−20
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p 14−16 14−16
ultra / 1080p 10−11 10−11
QHD / 1440p 1−2 1−2
4K / 2160p 1−2 1−2
low / 720p 35−40 35−40
medium / 1080p 21−24 21−24
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p 70−75 70−75
medium / 768p 45−50 45−50
high / 1080p 24−27 24−27
ultra / 1080p 14−16 14−16
4K / 2160p 8−9 8−9
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p 90−95 90−95
medium / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 40−45 40−45
high / 768p 55−60 55−60
GeForce GTX 660 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 660 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Architecture Kepler Maxwell
Code name GK106 GM107
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 6 September 2012 18 February 2014
Pipelines 960 640
Core clock speed 980 MHz 1020 MHz
Boost Clock 1033 MHz 1085 MHz
Transistor count 2,540 million 1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 78. 4 billion/sec 43.40
Floating-point performance 1,981 gflops 1,389 gflops
Length 9.5″ (24.1 cm) 5.7″ (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width 192-bit GDDR5 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6.0 GB/s 5.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth 144.2 GB/s 86.4 GB/s
Shared memory
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.3 4.4
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126 1.1. 126
CUDA + +
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.25 kh/s
CUDA cores 960 640
Bus support PCI Express 3.0 PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm) 4.376″ (11.1 cm)
SLI options +
Multi monitor support 4 displays 4 displays
HDMI + +
HDCP + +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048×1536 2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal Internal
3D Blu-Ray +
3D Gaming + +
3D Vision + +
3D Vision Live +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 66 Mh/s 183 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred) 0. 51 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 2.3 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 74.4 Sol/s
Blu Ray 3D +
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 660 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti


GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti


  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
  • GeForce GTX 660

    121%

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    100%

Relative performance

  • GeForce GTX 660

    106%

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 660
6% higher gaming performance.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 750 Ti
80 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 660 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 660

The GeForce GTX 660 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (9 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 660 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU Name GK106 (GK106-400-A1) vs GM107 (GM107-400-A2)
Fab Process 28 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 221 mm² vs 148 mm²
Transistors 2,540 million vs 1,870 million
Shaders 960 vs 640
Compute Units 5 vs 5
Core clock 980 MHz vs 1020 MHz
ROPs 24 vs 16
TMUs 80 vs 40

Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 660 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Memory Type GDDR5 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 192 bit vs 128 bit
Memory Speed 1502 MHz


6008 MHz effective
vs 1350 MHz

5400 MHz effective
Memory Size 2048 Mb vs 2048 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GTX 660 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
TDP 140 watts vs 60 watts
Release Date 6 Sep 2012 vs 18 Feb 2014
  • GeForce GTX 660

    19. 60 GP/s

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    16.32 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 660

    78.40 GT/s

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    40.80 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 660

    144.00 GB/s

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    86.40 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 660

    1882.00 GFLOPs

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    1305.60 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 660

    6800

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    5610

Points (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality,2x MSAA,16x AF, HBAO

  • GeForce GTX 660

    43

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    37

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality,DDOD, FX AA

  • GeForce GTX 660

    50

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    48

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Very High Quality, FXAA

  • GeForce GTX 660

    30

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    25

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF

  • GeForce GTX 660

    42

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    36

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 660

    39

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    36

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra, DDOD, FXAA

  • GeForce GTX 660

    31

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    30

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 660

    25

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    23

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF

  • GeForce GTX 660

    27

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    36

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 660

    37

  • GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    34

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce GTX 660 Radeon R9 370
VS
GeForce GTX 660 Radeon R9 270
VS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti Radeon RX Vega 11
VS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti Radeon Vega 8
VS
Radeon 550X 640SP Radeon RX 550X
VS
Radeon RX 550X Radeon RX 550X 640SP

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Qualcomm Adreno 660








Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Qualcomm Adreno 660

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti on one side and Qualcomm Adreno 660 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 640 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the smartphone segment, with 2 execution units, it includes 512 shading units, a maximum frequency of 0,8 GHz, its lithography is 5 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Qualcomm Adreno 660
Market (main)

Desktop

Smartphone
Release date

Q1 2014

Q1 2021
Model number

GM107-400-A2


GPU name

GM107

Adreno 660
Architecture

Maxwell

Adreno
Generation

GeForce 700

6xx
Lithography

28 nm

5 nm
Bus interface

PCIe 3. 0 x16

IGP
GPU base clock

1,02 GHz

792 MHz
GPU boost clock

1,09 GHz

840 MHz
Memory type

GDDR5

LPDDR5-3200
Memory bus

128 Bit

64 Bit
TDP

60 W


Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

5


Execution units

2
Shading units (cuda cores)

640

512
TMUs

40


ROPs

16


Cache memory

2 MB

1 MB
Pixel fillrate

17,4 GP/s

2,7 GP/s
Performance FP32 (float)

1,4 TFLOPS

1,7 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)

43,4 GFLOPS

3,4 TFLOPS
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Qualcomm Adreno 660

1.720,3
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

1.389

The difference is 24%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

Smartphones with the graphics card Qualcomm Adreno 660:

Asus ROG Phone 5Asus ROG Phone 5 ProAsus ROG Phone 5 UltimateAsus ROG Phone 5sAsus ROG Phone 5s ProAsus Zenfone 8Asus Zenfone 8 FlipHuawei P50 Pro SD888Huawei P50 SD888Lenovo Legion Duel 2Motorola Edge 30 FusionMotorola Moto G200 5GOnePlus 9OnePlus 9 ProOnePlus 9RT 5GOppo Find X3 ProOppo Find X5Oppo K10 ProRealme GT 2Realme GT 5GSamsung Galaxy S21 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GSharp Aquos R6Sony Xperia 1 IIISony Xperia 5 IIISony Xperia Pro-IVivo iQOO 7Vivo iQOO 7 LegendVivo iQOO 9Vivo iQOO 9 SEVivo X60 Pro+Vivo X70 Pro+Xiaomi 11T ProXiaomi Black Shark 4 ProXiaomi Black Shark 5 RSXiaomi Mi 11Xiaomi Mi 11 ProXiaomi Mi 11 UltraXiaomi Mi 11i 5GXiaomi Mi 11X ProXiaomi Mix 4Xiaomi Mix FoldXiaomi Redmi K40 ProXiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ZTE nubia Red Magic 6ZTE nubia Red Magic 6 ProZTE nubia Red Magic 6RZTE nubia Red Magic 6S Pro

Processors with the graphics card Qualcomm Adreno 660:

Qualcomm SM8325 Snapdragon 888 4GQualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5GQualcomm SM8350-AC Snapdragon 888+ 5G

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti AMD equivalentQualcomm Adreno 660 Nvidia equivalentQualcomm Adreno 660 AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti GPU Comparison

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

14 %

16%
slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

18 FPS

5 FPS
significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

13 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS

Identical

11 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

12 FPS

2 FPS
slightly higher City frame rate

10 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

0 FPS
slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 660 and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Geekbench (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

12,510

45%
significantly higher Geekbench (CUDA) score

Geekbench (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

5,449

5%
slightly higher Geekbench (Metal) score

Geekbench (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11,381

12,954

13%
slightly higher Geekbench (OpenCL) score

Geekbench (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10,693

12,372

15%
slightly higher Geekbench (Vulkan) score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

1,317

3%
slightly higher 3DMark Graphics score

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

980 MHz

1,020 MHz

4%
slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1,032 MHz

1,085 MHz

5%
slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

33%
slightly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

49%
significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

144 GB/s

66%
significantly higher memory bandwidth

86 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

60 W

133%
significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

21 Gigapixels/s

18%
slightly higher pixel rate

17 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

83 Gigatexels/s

90%
significantly higher texture rate

43 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2 TFLOPS

2 TFLOPS

6%
slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

960

49%
significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

80

100%
significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

24

49%
significantly more render output processors

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

200th
of 526

218th
of 526

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

February 2014

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11. 0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.5


GeForce GTX 660 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti specs and performance

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 660 graphics card is better than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has slightly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 3 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a significantly lower TDP at 60 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 660 at 140 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 660 over the GeForce GTX 750 Ti.

Latest posts

How to choose a power supply for your gaming PC: wattage and efficiencyJuly 11, 2022

How to compare GPUs and GPUs: find the best components for gamingJuly 02, 2022

Best PC benchmarking tools 2022: how to performance test your gaming PCJuly 02, 2022

Popular GPU Comparisons

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 3060

Radeon RX 570 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

GTX 660 vs GTX 750 Ti: compare as placas de vídeo Nvidia | Placas

Publicidade

Placas mais rodadas da Nvidia ainda despertam interesse e podem ser suficientes para games mais leves; veja as diferenças, preços e recursos oferecidos pelas duas.

Por Filipe Garrett, para o TechTudo


Divulgação/Bluecase

GeForce GTX 660 e GeForce GTX 750 Ti são duas placas de vídeo pertencentes às gerações mais antigas da Nvidia, mas que ainda podem ser opções interessantes para quem tem orçamento mais apertado. Um exemplar da GTX 750 Ti chega a custar R$ 599 atualmente e pode ainda dar conta de games mais leves – como CS:GO – com performance competitiva. O mesmo vale para GTX 660, que atualmente se tornou mais difícil de ser encontrada em lojas online.

Apesar do desempenho aceitável para gamers mais modestos, os dispositivos têm suas limitações em virtude da passagem do tempo. Pensando nisso, o TechTudo explica a seguir as especificações técnicas, recursos e eventuais sacrifícios envolvidos no uso das GeForce de dez e oito anos atrás.

🔎 DisplayPort ou HDMI? Saiba qual é a melhor para cada situação

GTX 660 já tem dez anos de idade — Foto: Divulgação/EVGA

📝 Qual é a melhor placa de vídeo barata? Comente no Fórum TechTudo

Especificações

Tanto GeForce GTX 660 quanto GeForce GTX 750 Ti são produtos mais antigos da Nvidia. A 660 foi lançada em 2012 e é composta de um processador gráfico de 640 núcleos CUDA, capaz de rodar em velocidades de 980 a 1.032 MHz. Já a GTX 750 Ti é um pouco mais recente, tendo surgido no mercado em 2014 com uma GPU de 960 núcleos CUDA e velocidades de 1.020 a 1.085 MHz.

A GTX 660 oferece um total de 2 GB de RAM GDDR5. Com uma interface de 192 bits, a placa troca dados entre memória dedicada e processador gráfico a uma taxa de 144 GB/s. Já a GTX 750 Ti é encontrada em duas versões no que diz respeito à memória RAM. A mais simples vem com 2 GB de GDDR5 que, por meio de uma conexão de 128 bits, troca dados com a GPU a 86 GB/s. Também é possível encontrar versões da 750 Ti com 4 GB de memória.

Tecnologias mais recentes, como aceleração de Ray Tracing em tempo real e DLSS, não são oferecidas por nenhuma das duas placas.

Desempenho

As duas placas podem dar conta de games mais leves — Foto: Divulgação/EVGA

Em relação à performance, não se pode esperar milagres: enquanto a 750 Ti chegou a ser comparada com o PS4 na época de lançamento, a GTX 660 já soma dez anos de idade. Assim, a tarefa de usar qualquer uma das duas para rodar games recentes pode frustrar quem exige resoluções altas e grande qualidade gráfica.

Para encarar games com as duas placas, pode ser necessário aceitar resoluções abaixo do Full HD e também vários sacrifícios em termos de configurações. Entretanto, se seu perfil para games é voltado a títulos antigos e/ou mais leves — algo como CS:GO e outros games com foco em eSports —, pode ser possível curtir jogos com performance aceitável em 720p.

Em uma comparação direta entre as duas, a vantagem tende a ficar com a GTX 660, apesar dos clocks inferiores. A placa tem memória mais rápida e pode render até 17% mais, de acordo com a média de comparações disponíveis no GPU UserBenchmark.

Recursos

Sendo produtos de arquiteturas antigas da Nvidia, as duas GeForce carecem de suporte a recursos mais recentes. Além de tecnologias mais direcionadas a games, como o DLSS e o Ray Tracing, não há aceleração via hardware para o processamento de vídeo HEVC (h. 265).

Esse é um detalhe importante porque, geralmente, quem procura placas de vídeo mais antigas tende a usá-las em HTPCs e computadores dedicados à multimídia. Sem o suporte ao HEVC, o usuário pode ter dificuldade em reproduzir arquivos de vídeo de alta qualidade.

Consumo de energia

Falta de suporte a HEVC contraindica as duas placas para o uso em HTPCs — Foto: Divulgação/Gigabyte

As duas placas de vídeo diferem bastante no que diz respeito à energia. Enquanto a GTX 660 aparece com uma TDP de 140 W, a GTX 750 Ti vai a 60 W. Vale lembrar que TDP é um índice que fabricantes usam para estimar a quantidade de energia a qual o componente subaproveita e libera na forma de calor.

Embora esse valor não seja um indicador direto de consumo, ele serve para indicar níveis de eficiência e também de ruído. Placas que esquentam mais precisam de sistemas de refrigeração mais robustos, que tendem a ser mais barulhentos.

A Nvidia também indica a capacidade mínima da fonte de energia para alimentar as duas placas com segurança, além do restante do PC. Para a GTX 660, a sugestão é de 300 W, enquanto a 750 Ti precisa de uma unidade de 250 W mínimos.

Preço – GTX

Geforce GTX 660 é mais difícil de encontrar atualmente — Foto: Divulgação/Nvidia

É muito difícil que você consiga encontrar as duas placas novas no mercado: com dez e oito anos de vida, os dois produtos já saíram de linha. Além disso, ambos são tecnologicamente defasados e foram substituídos por várias gerações e novas arquiteturas de Nvidia e também AMD.

Não encontramos a GTX 660 à venda na internet. Já a GTX 750 Ti, que é um pouco mais recente, aparece em alguns sites: em nossas pesquisas, encontramos o produto novo a R$ 599 na versão de 2 GB, enquanto a opção de 4 GB aparece por R$ 620.

Custo-benefício

Como se tratam de equipamentos mais antigos, é incerto até que ponto o investimento em tecnologias com praticamente uma década de idade valem à pena. Do ponto de vista técnico, a GTX 660 oferece performance superior nas comparações disponíveis, mas a GTX 750 Ti é mais fácil de encontrar.

Entretanto, uma dica é procurar placas mais recentes. GTX 1050 Ti e GTX 1650 são boas opções do lado da Nvidia, assim como a linha Radeon RX 400 (em especial modelos 470 e 480) serão apostas mais racionais em termos de vida útil e desempenho.

Ficha técnica de GTX 750 Ti e GTX 660

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. GeForce GTX 660

Especificações GeForce GTX 750 Ti GeForce GTX 660
Lançamento Fevereiro de 2014 Setembro de 2012
Núcleos 640 núcleos CUDA 960 núcleos CUDA
Velocidades 1. 020 a 1.085 MHz 980 a 1.032 MHz
Memória RAM 2 ou 4 GB GDDR5 2 GB GDDR5
Velocidade de memória 5,4 Gb/s 6 Gb/s
Interface de memória 128 bits 192 bits
Largura de banda 86 GB/s 144 GB/s
TDP 60 W 140 W

Com informações de Nvidia (1/2) e GPU UserBenchmark

No vídeo abaixo, veja cinco coisas que só quem jogou em lan houses vai lembrar

5 coisas que só quem jogou em lan houses vai lembrar

0026 vs 1.31 TFLOPS

  • 3.3 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    19.6 GPixel/s vs 16.3 GPixel/s
  • 152MHz faster memory speed?
    1502MHz vs 1350MHz
  • 608MHz higher effective clock speed?
    6008MHz vs 5400MHz
  • 37. 6 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
    144GB/s vs 86.4GB/s
  • 64bit wider memory bus?
    192bit vs 128bit
  • 320 more stream processors?
    960 vs 640
    • 80W below TDP?
      60W vs 140W
    • 10°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
      62°C vs 72°C
    • 5°C lower GPU idle temperature?
      25°C vs 30°C
    • 9.1dB lower noise floor at full load?
      38.3dB vs 47.4dB
    • 3dB lower idle noise?
      37.8dB vs 40.8dB
    • 37W lower standby power consumption?
      73W vs 110W
    • 96mm narrower?
      145mm vs 241mm

    Which comparisons are the most popular?

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX130

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 550

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX150

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    VS

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 10500003

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX110

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    vs

    AMD Radeon Vega 8

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    0003

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 6400

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    vs

    0003

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    10. 0 /10

    2 Reviews of Users

    Functions

    Cost Refract

    8.0

    1 VOTES 9000

    Games

    /10

    1 Votes

    8.5 /10

    2 Votes

    6.0 /10

    1 VOTES

    9000

    004

    7.5 /10

    2 VOTES

    Fan noise

    Reviews not yet

    5.5 /10

    2 Votes

    9000 /10

    2 votes

    Performance

    1.GPU clock speed

    980MHz

    1020MHz

    The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

    2.turbo GPU

    1032MHz

    1085MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel rate

    19.6 GPixel/s

    16.3 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    1.88 TFLOPS

    1.31 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    78.4 GTexels/s

    40.8 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    1502MHz

    1350MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    6008MHz

    5400MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    144GB/s

    86.4GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width

    192bit

    128bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5. versions of GDDR memory

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5.GPU Temperature at Boot

    Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7.Supports 3D

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI-based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 660)

    More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    HDMI version 3

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 660)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti)

    New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    6.mini DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.

    Price Match

    Cancel

    Which graphics cards are better?

    Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 which is better?

    General information

    Price-quality ratio

    The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

    54%

    12.7% (30.8%) better than

    41. 3%

    Architecture

    Maxwell Kepler

    Codename

    GM107 GK106

    Type

    Desktop Desktop

    Release price

    $149

    -80 $ (-34.9%) better than

    229 $

    Number of shaders

    640 960

    320 (50%) better than

    Core frequency

    1020 MHz

    40 MHz (4.1%) better than

    980 MHz

    Boost frequency

    1085 MHz

    At 52 MHz (5%) better than

    1033 MHz

    Number of transistors

    1.870 million 2.540 million

    Process

    28 nm 28 nm

    Interface

    PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

    Power Demand (TDP)

    Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation,
    the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.

    60W

    -80 W (-57.1%) better than

    140 W

    Length

    14.5 cm 24.1 cm

    Additional power connectors

    no 1x 6-pin

    G-SYNC support

    NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts.

    SLI support

    n/a +

    3D Vision

    + +

    GPU Boost

    + +

    GeForce Experience

    + n/a

    CUDA

    The CUDA architecture enables applications that are optimized for
    parallel computing. For example, for the development and design of neural networks.

    Multi-monitor support

    4 4

    Decred / DCR (Decred)

    0.51 Gh/s n/a

    Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)

    1 Sol/s n/a

    Bus

    PCI Express 3.0 PCI Express 3.0

    Number of CUDA cores

    A large number of CUDA cores improve performance in graphics computing,
    especially affect anti-aliasing and lighting in games, the speed of training neural networks.

    640 960

    320 (50%) better than

    Height

    11.1 cm 11.1 cm

    HDCP

    + +

    Maximum resolution via VGA

    2048×1536 2048×1536

    Audio input for HDMI

    internal internal

    HDMI

    Blu Ray 3D

    + n/a

    3D Gaming

    + +

    3D Vision Live

    + n/a

    FXAA

    TXAA

    Adaptive VSync

    + +

    3D Blu-ray

    n/a +

    Video connectors

    1x Dual Link DVI-I, 1x Dual Link DVI-D, 1x mini-HDMI 1x Dual Link DVI-I, 1x Dual Link DVI-D, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

    DirectX

    12 (11_0) 12 (11_0)

    Floating point performance

    1. 389 gflops 1.981 gflops

    Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)

    2.3 Mh/s n/a
    Memory

    Memory type

    GDDR5 GDDR5

    Maximum memory

    Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with lots of textures,
    use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.

    2 GB 2 GB

    Memory bus width

    The wider the video memory bus, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better the performance in demanding games.

    128bit 192 bit

    64 bit (50%) better than

    Shared memory

    n/a

    Memory frequency

    A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.

    5.4MHz 6 MHz

    0.6 MHz (11.1%) better than

    Memory bandwidth

    The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use.

    86.4 144.2

    57.8 (66.9%) better than

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti.

    VS

    General Info

    The General Information section of the Video Card Comparison List provides information on release date, type, overall rating and other useful data to determine the winner between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Please note that the comparison takes place on all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications.

    $ 149

    $ 321 (1.4x MSRP)

    Actual price

    $ 273 (1.8x msrp)

    4.45 9000

    Market Segment

    Desktop

    Specifications

    Which graphics card is better in NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti comparison in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part contained in the rating of video cards.

    60 Watt

    Dimensions, connectors and compatibility

    Let’s discuss the dimensions (length, width, height) of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti video cards. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces

    PCIe 3.0 X16

    Interface

    PCIE 3.0 X16

    9.5 «(24.1 CM)

    length

    5.7″ (14.5 CM)

    9000 ONE 6-PIN

    Additional power supply for additional power supply

    None

    +

    Options SLI

    No data

    PCI Express 3.0

    Support for tire

    PCI Express 3.0

    4.376 «(11.1 CM)

    Height

    4.376″ (11.1 CM)

    Memory (Frequency and Acertain)

    9000 Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications. The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing. What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti:

    GDDR5

    Type of memory

    GDDR5

    2 GB

    Maximum RAM AMOUNT

    2 GB

    192-bit GDDR5 9000 5. 4 GB/S

    144.2 GB/S

    memory capacity

    86.4 GB/S

    No data

    Separated memory

    Support for ports and displays

    Let’s find out the difference in the ports that are equipped with navidia video cards GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.

    Internal

    +

    HDMI

    +

    Technology

    Let’s see what the difference is. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.

    +

    3D Vision

    +

    +

    GPU Boost

    +

    +

    CUDA

    +

    No data

    GeForce Experience

    9000 +

    9000

    +

    +

    3D Gaming

    +

    No data

    3D Vision Live

    +

    +

    +

    FXAA

    +

    +

    TXAA

    +

    +

    ADAPTIVE VSYNC

    3D Blu-Ray

    N/A

    API support

    The confrontation between the two rivals NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.

    12 (11_0)

    DirectX

    12 (11_0)

    4.3

    Opengl

    4.6

    1.1.126

    VULKAN

    9000

    OpenCL

    1.2

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti benchmark comparison

    Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards

    one. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
    2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
    3. NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
    four. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. AMD Radeon R7 350
    5. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs. AMD Radeon RX 550
    6. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 550
    7. Intel HD Graphics 520 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
    eight. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
    9. Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
    ten. Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
    eleven. Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
    12. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. AMD Radeon HD 6930
    13. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
    fourteen. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs. NVIDIA GeForce 820M
    fifteen.

    967MHz

    max 2457

    Average: 938 MHz

    1020MHz

    max 2457

    Average: 938 MHz

    GPU memory frequency

    This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

    1502MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326.6 MHz

    1350MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326. 6 MHz

    FLOPS

    A measure of the processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

    2.5TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

    1.4TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

    Turbo GPU

    If the speed of the GPU drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
    Show all

    1046MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375.8 MHz

    1085MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375.8 MHz

    Texture size

    A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
    Show all

    108 GTexels/s

    max 756.8

    Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

    40.8 GTexels/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3 GB/s

    86.4GB/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3 GB/s

    Effective memory speed

    The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
    Show all

    6008MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984.5 MHz

    5400MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984. 5 MHz

    RAM

    3GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    2GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    GDDR Memory Versions

    Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
    Show all

    5

    Average: 4.5

    5

    Average: 4.5

    Memory bus width

    A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
    Show all

    192bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290. 1bit

    128bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    Heat dissipation (TDP)

    Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
    Show all

    150W

    Average: 140.4 W

    60W

    Average: 140.4 W

    Process

    The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

    28 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    28 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    Number of transistors

    The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates

    3540 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    1870 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    PCIe version

    Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
    Show all

    3

    Mean: 2.8

    3

    Mean: 2.8

    Width

    270mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    145mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    Height

    111mm

    max 180

    Average: 119.1mm

    111mm

    max 180

    Average: 119.1mm

    DirectX

    Used in demanding games for enhanced graphics

    eleven

    max 12. 2

    Average: 11.1

    12

    max 12.2

    Average: 11.1

    OpenCL version

    Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
    Show all

    1.1

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    3

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    opengl version

    Later versions provide better game graphics

    4.3

    max 4.6

    Average: 4

    4.6

    max 4. 6

    Average: 4

    Shader model version

    5.1

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    5.1

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    version Vulkan

    1.1

    1.3

    version CUDA

    is

    5

    HDMI Output HDMI Aviation HDMI allows you to connect devices with HDMI ports or mini-hdmi. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
    Full display

    Yes

    Yes

    DisplayPort

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort

    one

    Average: 2

    Average: 2

    DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI

    2

    Mean: 1. 4

    2

    Mean: 1.4

    HDMI

    Yes

    Yes

    Passmark score

    4281

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    3852

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score

    37003

    max 1

    Average: 80042.3

    30722

    max 1

    Average: 80042.3

    3DMark Fire Strike Score

    4639

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    3942

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score

    5323

    max 49575

    Average: 11859. 1

    4208

    max 49575

    Average: 11859.1

    3DMark 11 Performance GPU Score

    8247

    max 57937

    Average: 18799.9

    5270

    max 57937

    Average: 18799.9

    3DMark Vantage Performance score

    23251

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    21176

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    Unigine Heaven 3.0 test score

    77

    max 60072

    Average: 2402

    53

    max 60072

    Average: 2402

    Unigine Heaven 4. 0 test score

    759

    max 4818

    Average: 1291.1

    530

    max 4818

    Average: 1291.1

    Octane Render test score OctaneBench

    41

    max 125

    Average: 47.1

    34

    max 125

    Average: 47.1

    Comparison of GeForce GTX 850M and GeForce GTX 660 Ti. What’s better?

    GeForce GTX 850M

    GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    March, 2014 | 902MHz | 2GB DDR3

    August, 2012 | 915MHz | 2GB GDDR5

    Edelmark rating
    6. 3

    Edelmark rating
    6.4

    General comparison

    Game performance

    Video card tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation , Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.

    GeForce GTX 850M 5.6 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 6.5 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 750 Ti 6.1 out of 10

    Graphics

    Tested on: T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor.

    GeForce GTX 850M 6.0 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 6. 3 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 750 Ti 7.4 out of 10

    Computing power

    Tests used: Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining.

    GeForce GTX 850M 5.8 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 6.0 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 750 Ti 5.7 out of 10

    Output per W

    Tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive , Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP.

    GeForce GTX 850M 7.3 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 6.8 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 750 Ti 7.7 out of 10

    Noise and power

    Video card tests were performed on: TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level.

    GeForce GTX 850M 9.7 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 7.3 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 750 Ti 9.6 out of 10

    Overall graphics card rating

    GeForce GTX 850M 6.3 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 6.4 out of 10
    GeForce GTX 750 Ti 6.8 out of 10

    Benefits

    Why is the GeForce GTX 850M better?

    Better 3DMark 11 rating 16.135 vs 8. 415 More than 90% better 3DMark 11 rating
    Significantly lower power consumption 45W vs 150W 3.3x lower power consumption

    Why is the GeForce GTX 660 Ti better?

    Much better 3DMark06 rating 22.997 vs 4,385.5 Approximately 5.2x better 3DMark06 rating
    Better PassMark score 4.686 vs 1.499 Approximately 3.2x better PassMark score of
    Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6.008 MHz vs 2.002 MHz More than 3x effective memory clock speed
    Better 3DMark vantage rating 27.687 vs 14,358.5 Approximately 95% better 3DMark vantage score
    Much higher frame rate in diablo III 217. 7 fps vs 61fps More than 3.5x faster frame rate in diablo III
    Higher memory bandwidth 144.2 GB/s vs 32 GB/s More than 4.5x memory bandwidth
    Faster texture processing speed 102.5 GTexel/s vs 36.1 GTexel/s More than 2.8x faster texture rendering
    Better floating point performance 2,459.5 GFLOPS vs 1,154.6 GFLOPS Approximately 2.2x better floating point performance
    More texture units 112 vs 40 72 more texture units
    Much higher frame rate in battlefield 3 46.4 vs 22 More than 2x the frame rate in battlefield 3
    better cloud gate test 20.13 vs 16.13 Approximately 25% better cloud gate test
    Faster pixel fill rate 25. 62 GPixel/s vs 14.43 GPixel/s Approximately 80% faster pixel fill rate
    More shaders 1.344 vs 640 704 more shader units
    Significantly higher memory clock speed 1.502 MHz vs 1.001 MHz More than 50% higher memory clock speed
    Higher frame rate BioShock infinite 62.9 fps vs 28.4 fps Approximately 2.2x faster frame rate BioShock infinite
    Higher crysis 3 frame rate 30.3 fps vs 14fps Approximately 2.2x faster crysis 3 frame rate
    Better PassMark direct rating 2.546 vs 1.215 More than 2x better direct score PassMark
    More raster operation blocks 24 vs 16 8 more raster operation blocks

    Comparative benchmarks (benchmarks)

    Bitcoin mining

    GeForce GTX 850M 150. 96 mHash/s
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 82.19 mHash/s

    Face Recognition

    GeForce GTX 850M 37.72 mPixels/s
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 41.36 mPixels/s

    T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)

    GeForce GTX 850M 3,359.34
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3,358.74

    Manhattan test (GFXBench 3.0)

    GeForce GTX 850M 3,714.7
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3,716.62

    Fire Strike 9 test0134

    GeForce GTX 850M 26.99
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 49.97

    Sky Diver test

    GeForce GTX 850M 225.07
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 334.44

    Thief

    GeForce GTX 850M 18. 4
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 40.9

    Battlefield 4

    GeForce GTX 850M 20.4
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti 42


    Tags:compare, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, GeForce GTX 850M

    Gtx 680 vs gtx 750 ti • Web cheat sheet for internet entrepreneurs!

    Contents

    • 1 Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti?
    • 2 Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 680?
      • 2.1 What are the most popular comparisons?
    • 3 General information
    • 4 ⇡#test stand, testing methodology
    • 5 ⇡#acceleration, temperature, energy consumption
    • 6 ⇡ Conclusions
      • 8.1 Recommended reading

    Why is the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti?

    • 1.78 TFLOPS over 9 FLOPS0029

    Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 680?

    • GPU frequency 14MHz over

    What are the most popular comparisons?

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    AMD Radeon RX 550

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Asus GeForce GTX 950

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

    AMD Radeon RX 560

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    AMD Radeon R7 260X

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

    Palit GeForce GTX 700003

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

    Nvidia GeForce MX130

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Zotac GeForce GTX 760

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

    Asus Radeon RX 560 OC 4GB

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    75 Nvidia GeForce GTX00003

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Gigabyte Radeon RX 570

    General Information

    A higher transistor count usually indicates a newer, more powerful processor.

    Nvidia Quadro GV100

    The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.

    A smaller size indicates a newer chip creation process.

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.

    Valeriy Kosikhin

    February 18, 2014

    ⇡#

    Test bench, testing method

    Test bench configuration
    CPU Intel Core i7-3960X @ 4.6 GHz (100×46) Intel Core i7-3970X @ 4.6 GHz (100×46)
    Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Pro
    RAM DDR3 Kingston HyperX 4×2 GB @ 1600 MHz, 9-9-9
    ROM Intel SSD 520 240 GB
    Power supply Corsair AX1200i, 1200W Seasonic Platinum-1000, 1000 W
    CPU cooler Thermalright Archon
    Housing CoolerMaster Test Bench V1. 0
    Operating system Windows 7 Ultimate X64 Service Pack 1
    AMD card software AMD Catalyst 14.1 Beta
    Software for NVIDIA cards 332.21 WHQL

    Corsair AX1200i power supply stand is used to measure system power. Power-saving CPU technologies are disabled in all tests. The PCI-Express bus operates in 3.0 mode. To activate PCI-E 3.0 on GeForce 600 and 700 series video cards in a system based on the X79 chipset, a patch from NVIDIA is applied.

    In the NVIDIA driver settings, the CPU is always selected as the processor for PhysX calculation. For AMD, the Tesselation setting is always moved from the AMD Optimized state to Use application settings. In CrossFire configurations, the Frame Pacing option remains enabled.

    mission

    Benchmark set
    Program API Settings Anisotropic filtering, FSAA Resolution
    3DMark 2011 DirectX 11 Profile Extreme
    3DMark DirectX 11 Fire Strike test (not Extreme)
    Unigine Heaven 4 DirectX 11 DirectX 11, max. quality, tessellation in Extreme mode AF 16x, AA Off 1920×1080 / 2560×1440
    Crysis Warhead + Framebuffer Crysis Warhead Benchmarking Tool DirectX 10 DirectX 10, max. quality. Demo Frost Flythrough AF 16x, AA Off 1920×1080 / 2560×1440
    DiRT Showdown. Built-in benchmark DirectX 11 Max. quality, Global Illumination incl. Shibuya track, 8 cars AF, AA Off 1920×1080 / 2560×1440
    Far Cry 3 + FRAPS DirectX 11 DirectX 11, max. quality, HDAO. Start mission Secure the Outpost AF, AA Off 1920×1080 / 2560×1440
    Tomb Raider. Built-in benchmark DirectX 11 Max. quality AF 16x, AA Off 1920×1080 / 2560×1440
    Bioshock Infinite. Built-in benchmark DirectX 11 Max. quality. Postprocessing: Normal AF 16x, AA Off 1920×1080 / 2560×1440
    Crysis 3 + FRAPS DirectX 11 Max. quality. Beginning of Post Human AF 16x, AA Off 1920×1080 / 2560×1440
    Metro: Last Light. Built-in benchmark DirectX 11 Max. quality AF 16x, SSAA Off 1920×1080 / 2560×1440
    Company of Heroes 2. Built-in benchmark DirectX 11 Max. quality AF 16x, AA Off 1920×1080 / 2560×1440
    Batman: Arkham Origins. Built-in benchmark DirectX 11 Max. quality AF, AA Off 1920×1080 / 2560×1440
    Battlefield 4 + FRAPS DirectX 11 Max. quality AF 16x, AA Off 1920×1080 / 2560×1440

    Test participants

    The following video cards took part in the performance test:

    ⇡#

    Overclocking, temperature, power consumption

    The GPU Boost 2.0 auto-overclocking mechanism is quite aggressive for such a compact core. On the reference board, the frequency peaks at 1150MHz and the GPU voltage rises up to 1.156V. In idle, the frequency and voltage are 135MHz and 0.956V. The maximum voltage, however, is slightly lower: 1.143 V.

    Of the two video cards, we tried to overclock ASUS, since it has additional power, and the nominal frequency of memory chips is higher. As a result, we managed to get 1207 MHz on the GPU and 6300 MHz on the memory chips. There is no reaction to attempts to raise the voltage using GPU Boost. And yet — an excellent result for such a modest card. Perhaps the GPU could have been better, but the available overclocking utilities do not allow you to shift the GPU frequency by more than 135 MHz.

    In terms of peak power, the system with the GeForce GTX 750 Ti slightly surpassed the stand with the GTX 650 Ti. The difference with the main competitor from AMD — Radeon R7 260X — is colossal. By the way, unlike other video cards in this test, the results of the GTX 750 Ti were obtained under load in Far Cry 3 instead of Crysis 3 (which is similar) for the reason that Crysis 3 did not start in our build on the GTX 750 Ti. The overclocked ASUS GeForce GTX 750 Ti OC Edition has completely different numbers, and yet the card remains more economical compared to the Radeon R7 260X.

    Despite the modest cooling system, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti reference sample heats up quite moderately. The large aluminum heatsink on the ASUS board is more than enough to dissipate heat from the GM107 even with additional overclocking.

    ⇡#

    Performance: synthetic tests

    3DMark 2011

    • The difference between the GTX 750 Ti and the GTX 650 Ti is obvious.
    • The

    • GTX 750 Ti is also a lot faster than the Radeon R7 260X, but can’t match the Radeon R9270.

    3DMark

    • The next test is even more favorable to the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. In fact, here the GTX 750 Ti differs little from the GTX 660, and when overclocked it surpasses it.
    • The

    • Radeon R7 260X is defeated again, and the R9 270 is still out of reach.

    ⇡#Performance: gaming tests

    Crysis Warhead

    • The test leaders were the Radeon R7 260X and R9 270. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti cannot keep up with them, except perhaps with significant overclocking.

    DiRT Showdown

    • Another benchmark favoring AMD GPUs. The Radeon R7 260X is out of reach for the GeForce GTX 750 Ti even when overclocking the latter.

    Far Cry 3

    • Fortune continues to favor the Radeon R7 260X. The performance of the GTX 750 Ti is clearly not enough to compete on an equal footing.

    Tomb Raider

    • GTX 750 Ti wins over R7 260X.
    • The

    • R9 270 is still faster than the GTX 750 Ti.
    • For the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, the test in WQHD resolution was too hard due to the small amount of memory — 1 GB.

    Bioshock Infinite

    • Not only does the GTX 750 Ti outperform the Radeon R7 260X at stock clock speeds, it can also compete with the Radeon R9 270 when overclocked.

    Crysis 3

    • In Crysis 3, we were unable to boot the system with the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Apparently, the point is in the version of the game that is used for tests.

    Metro: Last Light

    • Another victory for the GeForce GTX 750 Ti over its main competitor, the Radeon R7 260X.
    • Overclocking gives a good effect, but still does not allow you to reach the level of the Radeon R9 270.

    Company of Heroes 2

    • The first places on the podium were taken by AMD video adapters.
    • All that the GeForce GTX 750 Ti could do was once again confirm its superiority over the GTX 650 Ti.

    Batman: Arkham Origins

    • At stock frequencies, the GTX 750 Ti came close to the Radeon R9 270, and after overclocking, its performance is even higher.

    Battlefield 4

    • With a slight advantage, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti left behind the Radeon R7 260X. For R9270 in this game, the novelty cannot keep up.

    ⇡# Conclusions

    In five out of nine test games (excluding Crysis 3, where the GeForce GTX 750 Ti did not run), the video adapter on the junior Maxwell GPU with a power consumption of 60 W defeated the Radeon R7 260X, whose TDP is 115 W. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti with a TDP of 110 W was also left behind in all tests without exception. The result is amazing without exaggeration. How else can you comment on the fact that NVIDIA, while staying within the 28 nm process, has managed to almost double the performance per watt? However, for the GM107 chip as part of a desktop video adapter, energy efficiency is not yet the main advantage. More importantly, as a replacement for GK107, GM107 will also find application in laptops, where it will bring a huge increase in performance with the same thermal package.

    GM107 also allows you to predict the contours of upcoming high-end GPUs based on the Maxwell architecture. If the same performance-per-watt leap can be replicated at the scale of larger GPUs, then NVIDIA might be able to completely revamp the GPU lineup without waiting for the transition to a 20nm manufacturing node. But in the coming months, we can hardly expect new products from Maxwell. The top segment of the GeForce 700 line has not yet completed its life cycle. In general, the strategy is reasonable — to test the new architecture on a compact core before releasing a flagship GPU. This is what AMD did earlier, first releasing GCN 1.1 in the form of Bonaire, and only then the big Hawaii GPU. The analogy with GCN 1.1 continues in that Maxwell, in addition to optimizing power consumption, in general, is no different from Kepler from a practical point of view. 960 CUDA cores, 80 texturing units and 16 rasterization units. Its base clock frequency is 1085 MHz, and the maximum frequency reaches 1163 MHz. Video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with a frequency of 5500 MHz and a 128-bit data bus.

    The junior graphics adapter is based on a stripped-down NVIDIA GM107 processor, which consists of 768 CUDA cores, 64 texturing units and 16 rasterization units. CPU and Memory Clocks GTX 750 Ti is based on a GPU that consists of 960 CUDA cores, 80 texture units and 16 ROP units. So far, it is not known exactly whether this processor is called GM107 or GM117, but it is clear that it operates at a clock frequency of 1098/1176 MHz. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with an effective frequency of 1350 MHz. The maximum memory bandwidth can reach 86.4 GB/s.

    Regarding the performance NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti , then, judging by the test results in 3DMARK 11, it is 7 % faster than the NVIDIA GTX 650 TI:

    GeForce GTX 750 Ti due early next month; its cost will be slightly higher than the AMD Radeon R7 260X ($150).

    Video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 The Ti is based on a 28nm GPU named GeForce Maxwell 117 (GM117), which is rumored to have 960 CUDA cores, 80 texture units, and 32 ROP units. The GPU should run at a base frequency of 1033 MHz and a turbo frequency of 1098 MHz, while the 2 GB of GDDR5 memory available to the graphics card has an effective frequency of 6008 MHz.

    Model NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti The is planned as a replacement for the entry-level graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti. With it, NVIDIA will continue its traditional approach to the release of video cards, when graphics solutions based on the latest processor are first presented with low-performance models, and a little later with high-performance ones.

    From the performance tests distributed by the Chinese website Baidu, it follows that the video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is on average

    26% slower than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660, but 16% and 21% faster respectively AMD Radeon R7 260 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti. This AMD video card is one of the direct competitors of NVIDIA’s novelty, which will be sold at a price slightly higher than the cost of the first one ($150).

    Rumors say NVIDIA graphics card GeForce 9The 1376 GTX 750 Ti will be based on the latest NVIDIA GeForce Maxwell 117 GPU, based on a 28nm process. During the development of the Maxwell processor, the developers focused on energy efficiency, not performance, which is confirmed by the test results. However, the comparison of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 cannot be called completely correct, since the new video card is probably being prepared as a replacement for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti model, and not the one involved in benchmark.

    It follows from the tests that between the new video card and the graphics solution of the Kepler generation, the difference varies from 3-10% in 3DMark to 30% in Unigine Valley, which gives an average of about 15% difference. Unfortunately, the testers do not reveal the technical characteristics of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti , but there is no doubt that it will be faster than solutions of a similar level from the GeForce GTX 600 series. new video card ASUS GeForce GTX 750 Ti (GTX750TI-OC-2GD5), the support page of which also appeared on the official website of the Taiwanese company. It should go on sale February 18th. It is expected to be one of the first models based on the new generation of NVIDIA Maxwell microarchitecture GPUs.

    Judging by the name, the ASUS GeForce GTX 750 Ti (GTX750TI-OC-2GD5) supports 2 GB of GDDR5 memory and uses an optimized frequency formula. This suggests that NVIDIA allowed partners to immediately present models with a modified design and overclocked parameters.

    The pre-order price of the novelty is fixed at an approximate level of $225 / €155.

    This new high performance graphics card is a graphics solution codenamed ATLAS, which will be sold under the name NVIDIA Tesla K40 . As already mentioned, the NVIDIA Tesla K40 is based on the GK180 GPU, which consists of 2880 CUDA cores. Peak single-precision computing performance of the GK180 processor is over 4 teraflops. The NVIDIA Tesla K40 graphics card is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 288 GB/s. CPU Heat Dissipation NVIDIA Tesla K40 does not exceed 235W.

    NVIDIA plans to officially unveil the new graphics card on October 16th or 17th, just a few days after the AMD Radeon R9 290X goes on sale. Around the same time, NVIDIA is going, in addition to the release of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Ti, to reduce prices for older Kepler models.

    GPU for NVIDIA 9The 1376 GeForce GTX 750 Ti consists of 960 CUDA cores, 80 texturing units and 32 ROPs, so this video card should be slightly faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 model (it has 24 ROPs). The base frequency of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti GPU is 1033MHz and the GPU Boost frequency is 1098MHz. The video card has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with an effective frequency of 6008 MHz and a 256-bit data bus. The maximum memory bandwidth is 192.3 Gb/s.

    The performance of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti was tested with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti running at the same clock speeds of 1833/108 MHz. Based on the results, we can conclude that NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 10% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660, but 8% slower than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti.

    The release of video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti may take place this month, but the exact date is still unknown.

    For a while it seemed that NVIDIA had no plans to further develop the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 700 series, but a few days ago the ChinaDIY website published information from which it follows that the entry-level graphics card is being prepared for release NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti , which will replace the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

    Judging by the screenshot of the GPU-Z program, the video card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is based on a GPU that consists of 960 CUDA cores, 80 texture units and 32 ROP units. It can be assumed that this GPU is a modified GK106, which is in NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti runs at 1033/1098 MHz. The video card also has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory using a 256-bit data bus.

    Model NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti seems to be the most overclocked video card in the series, which will be slightly behind NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760.

    2022 © All rights reserved