760 vs 660 ti: Nvidia GTX 660-Ti vs 760

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 760: What is the difference?

44points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

45points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Comparison winner

vs

54 facts in comparison

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 760?

  • 0.2 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    2.46 TFLOPSvs2.26 TFLOPS
  • 2.1 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    25.6 GPixel/svs23.5 GPixel/s
  • 20W lower TDP?
    150Wvs170W
  • 7.9 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    102 GTexels/svs94.1 GTexels/s
  • 192 more shading units?
    1344vs1152
  • 6°C lower load GPU temperature?
    75°Cvs81°C
  • 16 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
    112vs96
  • 18W lower power consumption while under peak load?
    318Wvs336W

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti?

  • 65MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    980MHzvs915MHz
  • 48. 2GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    192.2GB/svs144GB/s
  • 64bit wider memory bus width?
    256bitvs192bit
  • 52MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    1032MHzvs980MHz
  • 8 more render output units (ROPs)?
    32vs24
  • 361 higher PassMark (G3D) result?
    5053vs4692
  • Has Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP)?
  • 1.9GPixel/s higher 3DMark Vantage Pixel Fill result?
    12.3GPixel/svs10.4GPixel/s

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon R9 270X

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX250

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX350

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon R7 360

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX330

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 550

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

vs

Nvidia GeForce 940MX

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

vs

Nvidia GeForce MX150

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon R7 370

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

vs

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 570

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

0 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

0. 0/10

0 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

1 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

7.0/10

1 User reviews

Features

Value for money

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

1 votes

Gaming

No reviews yet

 

6.0/10

1 votes

Performance

No reviews yet

 

5.0/10

1 votes

Fan noise

No reviews yet

 

9.0/10

1 votes

Reliability

No reviews yet

 

7.0/10

1 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

915MHz

980MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

980MHz

1032MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

25. 6 GPixel/s

23.5 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

2.46 TFLOPS

2.26 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

102 GTexels/s

94.1 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1502MHz

1502MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

6008MHz

6008MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

144GB/s

192.2GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

192bit

256bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti)

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 760)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 760 Graphics cards Comparison

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 760, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 660 Ti stacks up against GeForce GTX 760, check out specs charts below.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Check Price

GeForce GTX 760

Check Price

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 660 Ti GeForce GTX 760
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 170 Watt
Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors Two 6-pin Two 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • GeForce GTX 760 has 13% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 760 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 760 are build with Kepler architecture.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 is 65 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 760 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Both graphics cards are the same length of 9 mm.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 is 2994 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 21−24 24−27
ultra / 1080p 12−14 14−16
QHD / 1440p 8−9 9−10
4K / 2160p 5−6 6−7
low / 720p 40−45 45−50
medium / 1080p 27−30 30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p 35−40 35−40
ultra / 1080p 30−35 30−35
QHD / 1440p 14−16 18−20
4K / 2160p 9−10 10−11
low / 720p 70−75 75−80
medium / 1080p 40−45 40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Battlefield 5 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p 50−55 50−55
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 760 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 230−240 240−250
medium / 768p 210−220 210−220
ultra / 1080p 120−130 130−140
QHD / 1440p 100−110 100−110
4K / 2160p 55−60 60−65
high / 768p 170−180 180−190
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 55−60
medium / 1080p 55−60 55−60
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 760 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 768p 110−120 110−120
ultra / 1080p 85−90 85−90
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 760 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p 27−30 30−35
ultra / 1080p 24−27 27−30
QHD / 1440p 20−22 21−24
4K / 2160p 9−10 9−10
low / 720p 55−60 60−65
medium / 1080p 30−33 30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p 35−40 35−40
ultra / 1080p 27−30 30−35
QHD / 1440p 16−18 18−20
low / 720p 130−140 140−150
medium / 1080p 75−80 85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Fortnite is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p 35−40 40−45
ultra / 1080p 27−30 30−35
QHD / 1440p 16−18 18−20
4K / 2160p 14−16 16−18
low / 720p 75−80 80−85
medium / 1080p 40−45 45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p 110−120 110−120
medium / 768p 95−100 100−110
high / 1080p 45−50 45−50
ultra / 1080p 18−20 20−22
QHD / 1440p 9−10 10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p 14−16 16−18
ultra / 1080p 10−12 12−14
QHD / 1440p 10−12 12−14
4K / 2160p 3−4 4−5
low / 720p 40−45 45−50
medium / 1080p 20−22 21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p 120−130 120−130
medium / 1080p 110−120 110−120
GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 760 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p 14−16 14−16
low / 720p 75−80 80−85
medium / 1080p 18−20 18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
high / 1080p 16−18 18−20
ultra / 1080p 10−12 12−14
QHD / 1440p 3−4 4−5
4K / 2160p 2−3 3−4
low / 720p 40−45 45−50
medium / 1080p 21−24 24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p 80−85 90−95
medium / 768p 50−55 55−60
high / 1080p 27−30 30−35
ultra / 1080p 16−18 16−18
4K / 2160p 9−10 10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
low / 768p 90−95 90−95
medium / 768p 60−65 60−65
ultra / 1080p 40−45 45−50
high / 768p 55−60 55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 660 Ti.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 660 Ti GeForce GTX 760
Architecture Kepler Kepler
Code name GK104 GK104
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 16 August 2012 25 June 2013
Pipelines 1344 1152
Core clock speed 915 MHz 980 MHz
Boost Clock 980 MHz 1033 MHz
Transistor count 3,540 million 3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 102. 5 billion/sec 94.1 billion/sec
Floating-point performance 2,459.5 gflops 2,378 gflops
Length 9.5″ (24.1 cm) 9.5″ (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width 192-bit GDDR5 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6.0 GB/s 3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 144.2 GB/s 192.2 GB/s
Shared memory
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.3 4.3
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126 1. 1.126
CUDA + +
CUDA cores 1344 1152
Bus support PCI Express 3.0 PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm) 4.376″ (11.1 cm)
SLI options + +
Multi monitor support 4 displays 4 displays
HDMI + +
HDCP + +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048×1536 2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal Internal
3D Blu-Ray +
3D Gaming + +
3D Vision + +
3D Vision Live +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 99 Mh/s 83 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 3. 5 Mh/s
Blu Ray 3D +
Minimum recommended system power 500 Watt
PhysX +
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 M390X
  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Quadro P1000
  • GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon R9 M390X
  • GeForce GTX 760 vs Quadro P1000
  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 M395X
  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
  • GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon R9 M395X
  • GeForce GTX 760 vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 760


GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 760


  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GeForce GTX 760
  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    102%

  • GeForce GTX 760

    100%

Relative performance

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    100%

  • GeForce GTX 760

    117%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 760
17% higher gaming performance.
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 760

The GeForce GTX 760 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (9 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 660 Ti GeForce GTX 760
GPU Name GK104 (GK104-300-KD-A2) vs GK104 (GK104-225-A2)
Fab Process 28 nm vs 28 nm
Die Size 294 mm² vs 294 mm²
Transistors 3,540 million vs 3,540 million
Shaders 1344 vs 1152
Compute Units 7 vs 6
Core clock 915 MHz vs 980 MHz
ROPs 24 vs 32
TMUs 112 vs 96

Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 660 Ti GeForce GTX 760
Memory Type GDDR5 vs GDDR5
Bus Width 192 bit vs 256 bit
Memory Speed 1502 MHz


6008 MHz effective
vs 1502 MHz


6008 MHz effective
Memory Size 2048 Mb vs 2048 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GTX 660 Ti GeForce GTX 760
TDP 150 watts vs 170 watts
Release Date 16 Aug 2012 vs 25 Jun 2013
  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    25. 60 GP/s

  • GeForce GTX 760

    23.50 GP/s

GigaPixels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    102.00 GT/s

  • GeForce GTX 760

    94.10 GT/s

GigaTexels — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    144.00 GB/s

  • GeForce GTX 760

    192.00 GB/s

GB/s — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    2460.00 GFLOPs

  • GeForce GTX 760

    2258.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs — higher is better

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    8790

  • GeForce GTX 760

    8600

Points (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra, 4x MSAA, 16x AF, HBAO

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    19

  • GeForce GTX 760

    24

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra, DDOD, FXAA

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    36

  • GeForce GTX 760

    41

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    29

  • GeForce GTX 760

    37

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA,EP3 Gator Bait

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    26

  • GeForce GTX 760

    34

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality,DDOD, FX AA

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    59

  • GeForce GTX 760

    64

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Very High Quality, FXAA

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    37

  • GeForce GTX 760

    39

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    47

  • GeForce GTX 760

    52

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    43

  • GeForce GTX 760

    54

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, AAA standard, 16xAF, Motion Blur normal, Tesselation normal

  • GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    39

  • GeForce GTX 760

    41

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce GTX 660 Ti Radeon RX 550
VS
GeForce GTX 660 Ti Radeon R9 370X
VS
GeForce GTX 760 Radeon RX 550
VS
GeForce GTX 760 Radeon R9 370X
VS
Radeon RX 560X Radeon RX 560D
VS
Radeon RX 560D Radeon RX 560

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti








Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 1152 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,0 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 1344 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,0 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
Release date

Q2 2013

Q3 2012
Model number

GK104-225-A2

GK104-300-KD-A2
GPU name

GK104

GK104
Architecture

Kepler

Kepler
Generation

GeForce 700

GeForce 600
Lithography

28 nm

28 nm
Transistors

3. 540.000.000

3.540.000.000
Bus interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock

980 MHz

915 MHz
GPU boost clock

1,03 GHz

980 MHz
Memory frequency

1.502 MHz

1.502 MHz
Effective memory speed

6 GB/s

6 GB/s
Memory size

2 GB

2 GB
Memory type

GDDR5

GDDR5
Memory bus

256 Bit

192 Bit
Memory bandwidth

192,3 GB/s

144,2 GB/s
TDP

170 W

150 W
Suggested PSU 500W ATX Power Supply 450W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology

SLI-ready

SLi 3 Way
Outputs

2x DVI
1x HDMI
1x DisplayPort

2x DVI
1x HDMI
1x DisplayPort


Maximum GPU Temperature

97°C

97°C
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

6

7
Shading units (cuda cores)

1. 152

1.344
TMUs

96

112
ROPs

32

24
Cache memory

512 KB

384 KB
Pixel fillrate

24,8 GP/s

27,4 GP/s
Texture fillrate

99,1 GT/s

109,8 GT/s
Performance FP32 (float)

2,4 TFLOPS

2,6 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)

99,1 GFLOPS

109,8 GFLOPS
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2.634
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

2.378

The difference is 11%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

See also:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 TiNvidia GeForce GTX 760 X2Nvidia GeForce GTX 760MNvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce GTX 660

GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce GTX 660 — Th200

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Specifications
  3. Benchmarks
  4. Key Differences
  5. Conclusion
  6. Comments

Graphics card

Graphics card

Introduction

We compared two GPUs: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 versus the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. On this page you will learn about the key differences between graphics cards and find out which has the best specs and performance.

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 is a graphics card of the GeForce 700 generation based on the Kepler architecture, launched on Jun 25th, 2013. It comes with 2 Gb of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1502 MHz, requires 2x 6-pin power connectors and consumes up to 170 Watts.

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 is a graphics card of the GeForce 600 generation based on the Kepler architecture, launched on Sep 6th, 2012. It comes with 2 Gb of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1502 MHz, requires 1x 6-pin power connectors and consumes up to 140 Watts.

Specifications

Graphics Card

Name

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Release Date

Jun 25th, 2013

Sep 6th, 2012

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16

Graphics Processor

Die Size

294 mm²

221 mm²

Memory

Bandwidth

192.3 GB/s

144.2 GB/s

Theoretical Performance

Pixel Rate

24.77 GPixel/s

20.64 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

99. 07 GTexel/s

82.56 GTexel/s

FP32 (float) performance

2.378 TFLOPS

1.981 TFLOPS

FP64 (double) performance

99.07 GFLOPS (1:24)

82.56 GFLOPS (1:24)

Clock Speeds

Base Clock

980 MHz

980 MHz

Boost Clock

1032 MHz

1032 MHz

Memory Clock

1502 MHz

1502 MHz

Render Config

Shading Units

1152

960

Texture Units

96

80

Raster Units

32

24

Graphics Features

DirectX

12 (11_0)

12 (11_0)

OpenGL

4.6

4.6

OpenCL

3.0

3.0

Cuda

3.0

3.0

Vulkan

1.1

1.1

Board Design

TDP

170W

140W

Power Connectors

2x 6-pin

1x 6-pin

Slot Width

Dual-slot

Dual-slot

Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics

3DMark is a computer benchmarking tool created and developed by UL, to measure the performance of computer hardware. Running 3DMark produces a 3DMark score, with higher numbers indicating better performance.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
+28%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Blender bmw27

Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own Benchmark, which is widely used to determining the rendering performance of processors and graphics cards. Benchmark measures the time needed to render bmw27 scene.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
+26%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Th200 RP

Th200 RP is a test created by Th200. It measures raw power of the components and gives score, with higher number indicating better performance.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
+24%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Key Differences

Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660?

Newer — released 9 months later

Has 24% better performance

Has 64 bit wider memory bus

Has 34% higher bandwidth — 192. 3 GB/s versus 144.2 GB/s

Has 21% higher pixel rate — 24.77 GPixel/s versus 20.64 GPixel/s

Has 20% higher texture rate — 99.07 GTexel/s versus 82.56 GTexel/s

Has 16 more texture units

Has 8 more raster units

Has 192 more shading units

Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760?

Consumes up to 18% less energy — 140 Watts versus 170 Watts

Conclusion

Which is better GeForce GTX 760 or GeForce GTX 660?

The GeForce GTX 760 delivers 24% better performance, consumes up to 22% more energy and holds same amount of memory. Based on our research GeForce GTX 760 is more powerful than GeForce GTX 660.

What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 760?

The Radeon R9 270X is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 760. It is 2% more powerful, uses 6% more energy, and holds same amount of memory.

What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce GTX 760?

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce GTX 760. It is 1% more powerful, uses 12% less energy, and holds same amount of memory.

How does GeForce GTX 760 perform compared to GeForce GTX 660 and other graphics cards?

Relative performance

Global performance

Desktop performance

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 review

In our review of the GeForce GTX 770 we noted that Nvidia’s second-generation «Kepler» graphics cards were all about boosting performance while increasing value — a noble sentiment for sure, but with a sticker price in the £300 region, that’s still a hell of a lot of money to shell out for just one component of a gaming PC. The GTX 760, the latest addition to the product line-up, looks like a much more tempting proposition. Priced at £210/$250 (though expect the odd partner card at the £200 level), it offers most of the performance of the more expensive GTX 670, and in the process puts the £240/$300 Radeon HD 7950 in a very difficult position. Could we have found a new enthusiasts’ favourite?

Nvidia says that the GTX 760 is designed to replace the outgoing GTX 660 Ti, in itself a highly regarded piece of kit. Looking at the specs, the new card actually has fewer CUDA core units — 1152 vs. the 1344 found in the Ti (and indeed the GTX 670). The key difference is bandwidth: the constricted 192-bit memory bus of the Ti is given the boot in exchange for a full 256-bit interface, upping peak bandwidth from 144.2GB/s to 192.2GB/s. Base clock rises to 980MHz compared to the 660 Ti’s 915MHz, while the auto-overclocking boost clock reaches 1033MHz (up from 980MHz). Additionally, the amount of ROPs rises from 24 to 32 — very useful for operating at higher resolutions. In essence then, Nvidia has traded cores for more speed and extra bandwidth, opening up the opportunity for more satisfying performance at display formats like 2560×1440.

But it’s the comparison with the more powerful GTX 670 that is perhaps more intriguing — the new card may only have 85 per cent of the CUDA cores, but base clocks are around seven per cent faster, and GPU Boost 2.0 technology could well help even the odds. Bearing in mind the price difference between the two cards, the idea of getting something approaching GTX 670-level performance in the £200/$250 price-bracket is mouthwatering.

In reviewing the GTX 760, we actually find ourselves with two review subjects: we have the standard reference card from Nvidia while MSI offered up its Twin Frozr IV «N760TF 2GD5/OC» model. As you can see from the product gallery below, the difference is night and day — the MSI product features a massive heatsink cooled by two large fans, and we’re promised «military grade» component quality too. It also ships with a mild overclock, taking us up to 1085MHz core, 1150MHz boost — thus taking performance even closer to the GTX 670 ideal. Acoustically, it’s a massive leap over the reference card — it’s very quiet indeed, and clearly more adept at handling the high temperatures that GPUs run at. Given that you’re paying just £10 more for the MSI-customised version of the card, that’s pretty good value.

Caption

Attribution

It’s pretty clear from the reference design that the lower models in the Nvidia line-up aren’t going to receive the same kind of love as the more expensive cards. The metallic chassis and ultra-quiet cooler reserved for the GTX 770, GTX 780 and Titan remains the preserve of the high end, meaning that the GTX 760 is rather bog-standard by comparison — all plastic and noticeably louder. On the flipside, this does mean that Nvidia’s partners will be able to provide some pretty compelling customised efforts, of which the MSI model is just one. The question is, beyond the aesthetics, what kind of performance can we extract from this mid-range second-gen Kepler, and just how much do you sacrifice in terms of pure performance over the more expensive offerings available from Nvidia and AMD?

We kick off with our flagship standard — Crysis 3. While its «very high» settings are off the table at 1080p and higher (unless you’re happy with ballpark 30fps performance), moving down a notch to the «high» level still stresses a PC more than the vast majority of games out there at max settings, meaning that if the GTX 760 can acquit itself well with the Crytek showpiece, it should be more than capable of handling any game you have in your library. Here we engage v-sync and SMAA 2x, our anti-aliasing method of choice for this demanding title. We also compare performance head-to-head at two key resolutions: 1920×1080 (full HD standard 1080p in other words) and 2560×1440, the emerging new 2.5K standard for PC gameplay.

The results are pleasing — for the most part we stay well north of 50fps at 1080p resolution, while 2560×1440 (or 1440p if you will) sees performance mostly remain well north of 30fps. Retaining v-sync and introducing a frame-rate limit could produce some silky smooth results here, especially once Crytek’s excellent motion blur techniques are factored in. We’ve also included a second, much shorter video, offering up a comparison of Crysis 3 running the exact same content on the GTX 670 as well as our recent Radeon HD 7950 review subject at both stock and overclocked settings (effectively giving us a spectrum of what you can expect from various HD 7950 models).

The results are especially interesting. The GTX 760 offers a small boost over the stock HD 7950, while the GTX 670 and the overclocked HD 7950 duke it out for top dog honours, but the major takeaway here is that the actual delta in performance between the subjects is rather low. Factor in how much additional cash is required to achieve that small extra boost and the main takeaway here is that there’s clearly a law of diminishing returns kicking in the more money you end up paying. What would happen if you delved into Crysis 3’s advanced graphics menus and adjusted a couple of the effects-specific settings downwards a notch, equalising performance? Would you notice the difference? It’s food for thought. As it is, our HD 7950 at stock frequencies is outclassed by the cheaper GTX 760, while the GTX 670 is only really offering a 2-4fps advantage, yet costs £60 to £80 more.

«On the performance intensive Crysis 3 gameplay test, the GeForce GTX 760 remains within striking distance of much more expensive products.»

Crysis 3 at high settings with SMAA 2x and v-sync engaged. Here we’re comparing 1920×1080 and 2560×1440 performance with the GTX 760 running at stock frequencies.

Alternative comparison:

  • Crysis 3: GeForce GTX 760 vs. GeForce GTX 670 vs. Radeon HD 7990 vs. Radeon HD 7990 (overclocked)

Some might say that our definition of gameplay conditions — specifically the utilisation of v-sync — could be something of a leveller (the GPU effectively stalls waiting for the beginning of the next vertical refresh before it renders the frame), and that the value of a graphics card is perhaps better illustrated through examination of top-end, unbounded performance. Additionally, this is only a test of a single game, where a range of titles best represents the product’s capability across a range of titles.

So with all that in mind, let’s take a look at the GTX 760 across a range of gaming benchmarks in comparison with a small selection of more expensive graphics cards. We’re sticking with our standard tests for the more expensive cards, kicking off with an «everything maxed» approach to BioShock Infinite, Tomb Raider, Sleeping Dogs, Hitman: Absolution, Metro 2033 and Metro: Last Light running at 1080p resolution. The GTX 760 is actually represented twice here — first in its stock, reference form, and secondly via the custom MSI card, which arrives with a mild factory overclock — an additional 65MHz (count ’em) added to both base and boost clock.

Results place the GTX 760 as a quality performer for its price point. It comfortably beats our vanilla HD 7950 at the benchmarks which most accurately reflect gameplay — BioShock and Tomb Raider — and battles it very closely on the bandwidth-sucking monsters like Hitman: Absolution and the Metro games. We see a mild increase in performance on the MSI overclocked model, sometimes no difference and even the odd negative adjustment. In truth, benchmarking is an often imprecise science as you have no idea what the OS is up to any given point and how much CPU effort is being exerted on tasks that may be occurring in the background.

More positively, the comparisons with the GTX 670 reveal a very close match — indeed, it even moves ahead in a couple of tests. Perhaps it’s another example of the margin of error in effect, but the fact that it’s so close at all bearing in mind the price differential is very compelling for a product that’s much cheaper. [Update: We’ve updated the table with results from our overclocked HD 7950. With ALUs running at 1020MHz, and RAM at 1370MHz it’s faster than the stock speeds of the current Boost edition of the card, but it gives you some idea of the range of performance AMD’s closest competitor has. Unfortunately we did not have a boost edition card available for testing.]

«The GTX 760 is either very close to, the same as, or better than the GTX 670 running identical tests on the exact same PC. Impressive.»

The GTX 760, GTX 670 and a vanilla Radeon HD 7950 are all compared running a range of gaming benchmarks at 1080p resolution, on max settings, with v-sync disabled for maximum performance. Visualising FPS puts a lot into perspective.

1920×1080 GTX 760 GTX 760 OC GTX 670 GTX 770 HD 7950 (non-boost) HD 7950 (OC)
BioShock Infinite, DX11 Ultra DDOF 65. 9FPS 67.4FPS 69.7FPS 77.3FPS 58.6FPS 66.6FPS
Tomb Raider, Ultra, FXAA 76.8FPS 79.5FPS 78.7FPS 94.2FPS 75.3FPS 87.6FPS
Metro 2033, Very High, 4x MSAA 31.5FPS 30.0FPS 31.0FPS 33.5FPS 33.5FPS 36.5FPS
Metro: Last Light, Very High, SSAA 27.0FPS 27.5FPS 26.5FPS 33.5FPS 27.0FPS 30.5FPS
Hitman: Absolution, Ultra, 8x MSAA 31.0FPS 29.8FPS 31.4FPS 33.7FPS 32.4FPS 36.7FPS
Sleeping Dogs, Extreme 41.1FPS 43.8FPS 39.1FPS 48.0FPS 40.8FPS 46.8FPS

We also had a quick shot at overclocking the MSI card via its bundled Afterburner software — we were rock-solid stable at an additional 130MHz over the reference card, gleaning an extra frame or two on all benchmarks. Open up the taps on the power consumption limits and you should be good for a little more clock-speed on the CUDA cores, and a small boost to the memory speed too — but don’t expect miracles here.

Next up, we re-run the tests, moving up to the increasingly popular 2560×1440 resolution. Nvidia’s press material appears to position the GTX 760 as the ultimate price vs. performance product for the most popular gaming resolution — 1920×1080 or its 16:10 equivalent, 1920×1200 — but both the HD 7950 and the GTX 670 acquit themselves well here and as the GTX 760 restores the 256-bit GDDR5 memory bus, bandwidth certainly shouldn’t be a problem. Recognising that ultimate settings isn’t going to produce a great experience here, we move the quality dial down a notch, so ultra becomes very high, and very high becomes high and so forth.

What we see is a virtual re-run of the 1080p differentials, though the HD 7950 does close the gap in BioShock Infinite, moving ever-so slightly ahead in Sleeping Dogs, but the fact remains that we’re just a couple of percentage points or thereabouts behind the GTX 670, even drawing level in certain cases. Hitman: Absolution sees the GTX 670 retaining a small advantage, while Sleeping Dogs sees the GTX 760 drawing ahead. Run both cards in identical PCs side by side and we’d warrant that nobody would be able to tell the difference. Even acoustically, the two reference design examples we had seemed very similar indeed, though the MSI version was almost silent by comparison — in itself perhaps worth the small additional premium over a card based on the standard design.

«Seemingly designed with top-end 1080p gaming in mind, the GTX 760’s 256-bit bus ensures that there’s plenty of bandwidth available for more demanding resolutions.»

2560×1440 GTX 760 GTX 760 OC GTX 670 GTX 770 HD 7950 (non-boost) HD 7950 (OC)
BioShock Infinite, DX11 Very High 60.0FPS 61.6FPS 62.9FPS 74.7FPS 59.9FPS 68.4FPS
Tomb Raider, High, FXAA 73. 4FPS 75.8FPS 76.5FPS 93.1FPS 68.4FPS 78.6FPS
Metro 2033, High, 4x MSAA 24.5FPS 24.5FPS 24.0FPS 26.5FPS 26.5FPS 28.0FPSFPS
Metro: Last Light, High, No SSAA 34.5FPS 34.5FPS 34.0FPS 43.0FPS 35.4FPS 40.0FPS
Hitman: Absolution, High, 8x MSAA/2x MSAA 19.6FPS/ 37.9FPS 19.9FPS/ 38.7FPS 21.2FPS/ 40.3FPS 22.8FPS/ 45.2FPS 21.8FPS/ 40.3FPS 25.6FPS/ 48.7FPS
Sleeping Dogs, High 47.4FPS 51.5FPS 46.5FPS 56.8FPS 48.1FPS 55.3FPS

Nvidia is being very aggressive with the rollout of its second-generation Keplers. The GTX 770 offers build quality and performance advantages over both the GTX 670 and the GTX 680, but at £330/$399 it clearly remains a premium product. The GTX 760 is different beast entirely — it punches above its weight in the price/performance departments, effectively offering a GTX 670 experience for GTX 660 Ti money. After working with the card for a few days, we were fully expecting a price point to compete with the vanilla HD 7950, but instead Nvidia has comprehensively beaten it.

Bearing in mind how closely both AMD and Nvidia tend to tie percentile increases in performance with their price points, this is a bold move that could redefine the mid-range £200/$250 GPU market. GTX 670 inventory should drop in price, the still-decent GTX 660 Ti more so, while immense pressure is placed on both the AMD HD 7950 and the cut-down version, the HD 7870 XT — both good cards, but suddenly looking rather expensive for what they offer at stock performance levels.

Factor in the options that Nvidia includes that AMD doesn’t — such as more fully featured 3D support, adaptive v-sync, the GeForce experience auto-settings selector ,plus the introduction of new cool stuff like ShadowPlay (Nvidia’s answer to the Game DVRs coming to next-gen console) in addition to the firm’s day-one driver support for major games — and the overall package looks even more enticing. These aren’t frivolous value-added extras, they’re genuinely useful options. The only real negative point you can possibly level at the GTX 760 concerns the 2GB memory allocation — with the arrival of the new consoles, all bets are off on what the RAM requirement for next-gen titles will actually be, and how that will affect the PC versions.

Overall though, the GTX 760 is clearly a very strong product, offering bags of performance at a really competitive price that will drive down the cost of a range of GPUs from both AMD and Nvidia. What’s not to like?

0026 vs 2.26 TFLOPS

  • 2.1 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    25.6 GPixel/s vs 23.5 GPixel/s
  • 20W below TDP?
    150W vs 170W
  • 7.9 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
    102 GTexels/s vs 94.1 GTexels/s
  • 192 more stream processors?
    1344 vs 1152
  • 6°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
    75°C vs 81°C
  • 16 more texture units (TMUs)?
    112 vs 96
  • 18W lower power consumption at peak load?
    318W vs 336W
    • GPU frequency 65MHz higher?
      980MHz vs 915MHz
    • 48. 2GB/s more memory bandwidth?
      192.2GB/s vs 144GB/s
    • 64bit wider memory bus?
      256bit vs 192bit
    • 52MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
      1032MHz vs 980MHz
    • 8 more ROPs?
      32 vs 24
    • 361 higher PassMark score (G3D)?
      5053 vs 4692
    • Has DPFP?
    • 1.9GPixel/s higher 3DMark Vantage Pixel Fill?
      12.3GPixel/s vs 10.4GPixel/s

    Which comparisons are the most popular?

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 550

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    vs

    AMD Radeon R9 270X

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX250

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    vs

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 16500003

    vs

    AMD Radeon R7 360

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX330

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 550

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    vs

    NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 TI

    VS

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GT 1030 DDR4

    NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 760

    VS

    NVIDIA GEFORCE MX15000 9000 9000 9000

    003

    vs

    AMD Radeon R7 370

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX Vega 8

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 570

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    Price Match

    User Reviews

    Overall Rating

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    0 User Reviews

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 6600003

    0. 0 /10

    0 reviews of users

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

    1 Reviews of users

    NVIDIA GTX 760

    9000

    reviews not yet

    10.0 /10

    1 Votes

    Reviews are not

    6.0 /10 9 9 9

    1 votes

    performance

    reviews yet not

    5.0271 /10

    1 Votes

    reviews no

    /10

    1 Votes 9000

    No reviews yet

    7.0 /10

    1 votes

    80MHz

    The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

    2.turbo GPU

    980MHz

    1032MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel rate

    25.6 GPixel/s

    23.5 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4. flops

    2.46 TFLOPS

    2.26 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    102 GTexels/s

    94.1 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    1502MHz

    1502MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    6008MHz

    6008MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    144GB/s

    192.2GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3.VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width

    192bit

    256bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5. versions of GDDR memory

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5.GPU Temperature at Boot

    Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI-based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti)

    More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    HDMI version 3

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 760)

    New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5.DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    6.mini DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.

    Price match

    Cancel

    Which graphics cards are better?

    Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB vs MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC: What is the difference?

    44points

    Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    45points

    MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    Comparison winner

    vs

    5

    facts in comparison

    Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    Why is Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB better than MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC?

    • 0. 14 TFLOPS above FLOPS?
      2.46 TFLOPS vs 2.32 TFLOPS
    • 1.5 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
      25.6 GPixel/s vs 24.1 GPixel/s
    • 20W below TDP?
      150W vs 170W
    • 5.4 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
      102 GTexels/s vs 96.6 GTexels/s
    • 1.5x more VRAM?
      3GB vs 2GB
    • 192 more stream processors?
      1344 vs 1152
    • 6°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
      75°C vs 81°C
    • 16 more texture units (TMUs)?
      112 vs 96

    Why is MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC better than Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB?

    • GPU frequency 91MHz higher?
      1006MHz vs 915MHz
    • 48.2GB/s more bandwidth?
      192.2GB/s vs 144GB/s
    • 64bit wider memory bus?
      256bit vs 192bit
    • 92MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
      1072MHz vs 980MHz
    • 8 more ROPs?
      32 vs 24
    • 361 higher PassMark (G3D) result?
      5053 vs 4692
    • Has DPFP?
    • 1. 9GPixel/s higher 3DMark Vantage Pixel Fill?
      12.3GPixel/s vs 10.4GPixel/s

    Which comparisons are the most popular?

    Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce MX330

    MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC0003

    Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    vs

    Manli GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gallardo

    MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    vs

    Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1060

    Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 570

    MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 470

    Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    vs

    Qualcomm Adreno 506

    MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    vs

    Asus GeForce GTX 680 DirectCU II V2

    Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    vs

    AMD Radeon RX 480

    MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    vs

    AMD Radeon R9 380

    Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

    MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    vs

    Asus ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

    DirectCU 60003

    vs

    Asus Dual GeForce GTX 1060

    MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    vs

    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 550 4GB

    Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    vs

    AMD Radeon R9 280X

    MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    vs

    MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor 8GB

    Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    vs

    ASRock Radeon RX 6500 XTOC Challenger ITX

    MSI0003

    VS

    ASUS DUAL GEFORCE GTX 1650

    COMPUTION OF PRICES

    Users Reviews

    Productivity

    1. TECTION FECTION GP

    915MHz

    1006MHz

    GPU (GPU) has a higher bore.

    2.turbo GPU

    980MHz

    1072MHz

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel rate

    25.6 GPixel/s

    24.1 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    2.46 TFLOPS

    2.32 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    102 GTexels/s

    96.6 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    1502MHz

    1502MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    6008MHz

    6008MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    144GB/s

    192.2GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3. VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width

    192bit

    256bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5. GDDR memory versions

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    ✖MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1. DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    ✔MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5.GPU Temperature at Boot

    Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    ✖MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7.Supports 3D

    ✔Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    ✔MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    ✖MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB

    ✔MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream video and audio to the connected HD display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB)

    More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

    HDMI version 3

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II 3GB)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (MSI GeForce GTX 760 OC)

    New versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5. DVI outputs

    Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

    Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

    Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

    Price match

    Cancel

    Which graphics cards are better?

    Which is better NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

    Base clock speed GPU

    The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.

    980MHz

    max 2457

    Average: 938 MHz

    915MHz

    max 2457

    Average: 938 MHz

    GPU memory frequency

    This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth

    1502MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326. 6 MHz

    1502MHz

    max 16000

    Average: 1326.6 MHz

    FLOPS

    The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.

    2.4TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

    2.42TFLOPS

    max 1142.32

    Average: 92.5 TFLOPS

    Turbo GPU

    If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
    Show all

    1032MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375.8 MHz

    980MHz

    max 2903

    Average: 1375. 8 MHz

    Texture size

    A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
    Show all

    94.1 GTexels/s

    max 756.8

    Average: 145.4 GTexels/s

    102 GTexels/s
    92.3GB/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3 GB/s

    144GB/s

    max 2656

    Average: 198.3 GB/s

    Effective memory speed

    The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
    Show all

    6008MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984. 5 MHz

    6008MHz

    max 19500

    Average: 6984.5 MHz

    RAM

    2GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    2GB

    max 128

    Average: 4.6 GB

    GDDR Memory Versions

    Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
    Show all

    5

    Average: 4.5

    5

    Average: 4.5

    Memory bus width

    A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
    Show all

    256bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    192bit

    max 8192

    Average: 290.1bit

    Release date

    2013-06-25 00:00:00

    2012-08-16 00:00

    Heat release (TDP)

    Thermal Requirements (TDP)-maximum possible number energy dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
    Show all

    170W

    Average: 140.4 W

    150W

    Average: 140.4 W

    Process technology

    The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.

    28 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    28 nm

    Average: 47.5 nm

    Number of transistors

    The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates

    3540 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    3540 million

    max 80000

    Average: 5043 million

    PCIe version

    Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
    Show all

    3

    Mean: 2. 8

    3

    Mean: 2.8

    Width

    241mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    241mm

    max 421.7

    Average: 242.6mm

    Height

    111mm

    max 180

    Average: 119.1mm

    111mm

    max 180

    Average: 119.1mm

    Purpose

    Desktop

    Desktop

    DirectX

    Used in demanding games, providing improved graphics

    12

    max 12.2

    Average: 11. 1

    eleven

    max 12.2

    Average: 11.1

    OpenCL version

    Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
    Show all

    3

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    1.1

    max 4.6

    Average: 1.7

    opengl version

    Later versions provide better game graphics

    4.6

    max 4.6

    Average: 4

    4.3

    max 4.6

    Average: 4

    Shader model version

    5. 1

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    5.1

    max 6.6

    Average: 5.5

    version VULKAN

    1.1

    1.1

    version CUDA

    3

    is

    HDMI Output HDMI Availability HDMI allows you to connect devices with ports of HDMI or Mini-HDMI. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
    Show all

    Yes

    Yes

    DisplayPort

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort

    one

    Average: 2

    one

    Average: 2

    DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI

    2

    Mean: 1. 4

    2

    Mean: 1.4

    Number of HDMI connectors

    The greater the number, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
    Show all

    one

    Average: 1.1

    Average: 1.1

    HDMI

    Yes

    Yes

    Passmark score

    4681

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    4281

    max 29325

    Average: 7628.6

    3DMark Cloud Gate GPU test score

    39347

    max 1

    Average: 80042. 3

    37003

    max 1

    Average: 80042.3

    3DMark Fire Strike Score

    5322

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    4639

    max 38276

    Average: 12463

    3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score

    5840

    max 49575

    Average: 11859.1

    5323

    max 49575

    Average: 11859.1

    3DMark 11 Performance GPU score

    7803

    max 57937

    Average: 18799. 9

    8247

    max 57937

    Average: 18799.9

    3DMark Vantage Performance score

    28492

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    23251

    max 97887

    Average: 37830.6

    Unigine Heaven 3.0 score

    74

    max 60072

    Average: 2402

    77

    max 60072

    Average: 2402

    Unigine Heaven 4.0 score

    834

    max 4818

    Average: 1291.1

    759

    max 4818

    Average: 1291. 1

    Octane Render test score OctaneBench

    43

    max 125

    Average: 47.1

    42

    max 125

    Average: 47.1

    fly in the ointment… GECID.com. Page 1

    ::>Video cards
    >2019
    > Gameplay testing of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 video card in 30 games: a fly in the ointment in a barrel of honey…

    03-22-2019

    Page 1
    Page 2
    One page

    The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 is based on the 28nm Kepler microarchitecture and was released to the market in the summer of 2013. It is based on the then popular GK104 chip, various variations of which also formed the basis of the GeForce GTX 770, GTX 680, GTX 670 and GTX 660 Ti video cards.

    In the case of the GeForce GTX 760, it includes 1152 CUDA cores, 96 texture units, and 32 raster units. The base frequency was 980 MHz, and the dynamic rises to 1033 MHz. Video memory is represented by GDDR5 chips with a total capacity of 2 or 4 GB with an effective frequency of 6 GHz and a 256-bit bus.

    In the market, it competed with the AMD Radeon HD 7950 and HD 7950 with Boost.

    We did not have a GeForce GTX 760, but colleagues from the Overclockers.ua website again helped out. They borrowed a Palit GeForce GTX 760 JetStream model for testing, which stands out with a factory GPU overclock of 10% and memory by 3%.

    In addition, it uses DrMOS chips in its power circuits, and for cooling there is a massive cooler with three 6mm heat pipes, an aluminum radiator and two 88mm fans. As a result, the GPU temperature did not exceed 75°C at a critical value of 97°C, and the clock frequency in games was 1202 MHz.

    The following stand was used for testing:

    • Intel Core i7-7740X
    • Thermaltake Water 3.0 Riing RGB 240
    • ASUS TUF X299 MARK 1
    • 2 x 8 GB DDR4-2133 G.SKILL Sniper X
    • Apacer PANTHER AS330 240 GB / 960 GB
    • Seagate ST2000DX001 2TB
    • Seasonic Snow Silent 1050 1050W
    • Thermaltake Core P3
    • AOC U2879VF

    An external system with AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K was used to record gameplay in Full HD resolution, i.e. without loss of performance.

    Following the new tradition, we will start the GeForce GTX 760 test with a comparison with the current video card, so that it will be easier for you to navigate when upgrading the system. To do this, we chose the ASUS GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Phoenix model with a compact single-fan cooler and reference clock speeds.

    Its GPU has fewer CUDA cores, texture and raster units, but they work at higher speeds. Also, the GeForce GTX 1050 has 3 GB of video memory, but with a 96-bit bus, so its bandwidth is much lower than that of the GeForce GTX 760. In a word, without tests you can’t figure out which of them is better.

    PUBG at low settings requires a little more than 2 GB of video memory, but on a system with a 760th RAM load, this does not increase higher. The GTX 1053 is 3 FPS faster on average, but loses by the same margin on very rare events.

    In Kingdom Come: Deliverance the situation is already unambiguous: the GTX 1053 breaks ahead by a maximum of 5 FPS. Here it is already clearly seen that the 760th compensates for the lack of video memory from the RAM.

    In The Evil Within 2 the gap between video cards is within 3-5 fps, which in this case is equivalent to a maximum of 23%. In both cases, the GPU is not fully loaded, according to monitoring, but the 760 also had to use RAM to store game data.

    The situation looks very interesting in The Crew 2 . The game needs less than 2 GB of VRAM, so the buffer size is not important. And here the quantity won over the quality: the 1 and 0.1% Low indicators of the GeForce GTX 760 turned out to be 4-6 FPS higher, which is equivalent to a bonus of 16-22%.

    With heavy Far Cry 5 , the situation returns to normal: the lack of video memory leads to the use of a slower RAM, which negatively affects speed performance. The advantage of the GTX 1053 rises to 12 FPS or 30%.

    Subtotal. The 3GB GeForce GTX 1050 is faster in games that require more than 2GB of VRAM. If the buffer is enough with a margin, then the advantage is for the 760th due to the larger number of structural blocks in the GPU and the greater bandwidth of the video memory. We recommend that owners of this video card upgrade to at least the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, and preferably 1060, RX 570 or RX 580. If you wish, you can wait for the GTX 1660 price drop or the debut of AMD Navi.

    If you are only looking at the GeForce GTX 760 in the secondary market, then let’s evaluate its capabilities in diverse games. By tradition, let’s start with simpler projects.

    At ultra settings in the HD client World of Tanks on some cards requires more than 2 GB of video memory, which is fraught with the appearance of microfreezes. With the maximum profile, such problems do not arise. Even the rate of very rare events does not fall below 50 fps, so you can easily unnerve your opponents in a fast tank.

    Kino’s profile in War Thunder didn’t cause any problems for the 760th. The video memory is enough with a small margin, the average speed rises above 60 FPS, and everything was comfortable with the controls.

    In a good way, in ARK: Survival Evolved you need to fine-tune the settings in order to achieve the optimal ratio of picture quality and video speed. But we didn’t have time for this, so we just took an average profile and began to study the location. Dinosaurs sometimes came across, but more often the stators slipped, so the 0.1% Low fell below 10 fps.

    In RUST , it has traditionally taken more time to select the settings than to record the final gameplay. And in the end, it turned out as always: a playable frame rate in an already explored location and friezes as a gift when running through unexplored fields.

    Research shows that the transition to the Free-to-Play model and the addition of the Danger Zone mode has boosted CS:GO online statistics. At low settings, we get more than 170 FPS on average, without any stuttering of the video sequence and control. Video memory needs less than 1 GB.
    9Fury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770Radeon HD 7750Radeon HD 6990Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Radeon HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 43500 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3870 X2Radeon HD 3870Radeon HD 3850Radeon HD 3690Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 3470Radeon HD 3450Radeon HD 3300 (IGP)Radeon HD 3200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3100 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT GDDR4Radeon HD 2600 XTRadeon HD 2600 PRORadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon HD 2400 PRORadeon HD 2350Radeon X1950 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1950 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTRadeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1300 XT on RV530ProRadeon X1300 XT on RV535ProRadeon X1300 CERadeon X1300 ProRadeon X1300Radeon X1300 LERadeon X1300 HMRadeon X1050Radeon X850 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X850 XT CrossFire EditionRadeon X850 XT Radeon X850 Pro Radeon X800 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X800 XLRadeon X800 GTO 256MBRadeon X800 GTO 128MBRadeon X800 GTO2 256MBRadeon X800Radeon X800 ProRadeon X800 GT 256MBRadeon X800 GT 128MBRadeon X800 SERadeon X700 XTRadeon X700 ProRadeon X700Radeon X600 XTRadeon X600 ProRadeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBR adeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProNVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev. 2GeForce RTX 3060GeForce RTX 3050GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce RTX 2080 SuperGeForce RTX 2080GeForce RTX 2070 SuperGeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2060 SuperGeForce RTX 2060GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce GTX 1660 SuperGeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX 1650 SuperGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6GeForce GTX 1650 rev.3GeForce GTX 1650 rev.2GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 1630GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce GTX 1080GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce GTX 1070GeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1060 3GBGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce GTX 1050GeForce GT 1030GeForce GTX Titan XGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 980GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 780GeForce GTX 770GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 750GeForce GT 740GeForce GT 730GeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 660GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGeForce GTX 650 TiGeForce GTX 650GeForce GT 640 rev.2GeForce GT 640GeForce GT 630 rev.2GeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 580GeForce GTX 570GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 560GeForce GTX 550 TiGeForce GT 520GeForce GTX 480GeForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 460 1024MBGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce GTS 450GeForce GT 440 GDDR5GeForce GT 440 GDDR3GeForce GT 430GeForce GT 420GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 260 rev. 2GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTS 250GeForce GTS 240GeForce GT 240GeForce GT 230GeForce GT 220GeForce 210Geforce 205GeForce GTS 150GeForce GT 130GeForce GT 120GeForce G100GeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce 9800 GTXGeForce 9800 GTSGeForce 9800 GTGeForce 9800 GX2GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 9600 GSO (G94)GeForce 9600 GSOGeForce 9500 GTGeForce 9500 GSGeForce 9400 GTGeForce 9400GeForce 9300GeForce 8800 ULTRAGeForce 8800 GTXGeForce 8800 GTS Rev2GeForce 8800 GTSGeForce 8800 GTGeForce 8800 GS 768MBGeForce 8800 GS 384MBGeForce 8600 GTSGeForce 8600 GTGeForce 8600 GSGeForce 8500 GT DDR3GeForce 8500 GT DDR2GeForce 8400 GSGeForce 8300GeForce 8200GeForce 8100GeForce 7950 GX2GeForce 7950 GTGeForce 7900 GTXGeForce 7900 GTOGeForce 7900 GTGeForce 7900 GSGeForce 7800 GTX 512MBGeForce 7800 GTXGeForce 7800 GTGeForce 7800 GS AGPGeForce 7800 GSGeForce 7600 GT Rev.2GeForce 7600 GTGeForce 7600 GS 256MBGeForce 7600 GS 512MBGeForce 7300 GT Ver2GeForce 7300 GTGeForce 7300 GSGeForce 7300 LEGeForce 7300 SEGeForce 7200 GSGeForce 7100 GS TC 128 (512)GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MBGeForce 6800 UltraGeForce 6800 GT 256MBGeForce 6800 GT 128MBGeForce 6800 GTOGeForce 6800 256MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 128MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 LE PCI-EGeForce 6800 256MB AGPGeForce 6800 128MB AGPGeForce 6800 LE AGPGeForce 6800 GS AGPGeForce 6800 GS PCI-EGeForce 6800 XTGeForce 6600 GT PCI-EGeForce 6600 GT AGPGeForce 6600 DDR2GeForce 6600 PCI-EGeForce 6600 AGPGeForce 6600 LEGeForce 6200 NV43VGeForce 6200GeForce 6200 NV43AGeForce 6500GeForce 6200 TC 64(256)GeForce 6200 TC 32(128)GeForce 6200 TC 16(128)GeForce PCX5950GeForce PCX 5900GeForce PCX 5750GeForce PCX 5550GeForce PCX 5300GeForce PCX 4300GeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce FX 5900 UltraGeForce FX 5900GeForce FX 5900 ZTGeForce FX 5900 XTGeForce FX 5800 UltraGeForce FX 5800GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-3GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-2GeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5700 LEGeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev. 2)GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.1)GeForce FX 5600 XTGeForce FX 5600GeForce FX 5500GeForce FX 5200 UltraGeForce FX 5200GeForce FX 5200 SEGeForce 4 Ti 4800GeForce 4 Ti 4800-SEGeForce 4 Ti 4200-8xGeForce 4 Ti 4600GeForce 4 Ti 4400GeForce 4 Ti 4200GeForce 4 MX 4000GeForce 4 MX 440-8x / 480GeForce 4 MX 460GeForce 4 MX 440GeForce 4 MX 440-SEGeForce 4 MX 420GeForce 3 Ti500GeForce 3 Ti200GeForce 3GeForce 2 Ti VXGeForce 2 TitaniumGeForce 2 UltraGeForce 2 PROGeForce 2 GTSGeForce 2 MX 400GeForce 2 MX 200GeForce 2 MXGeForce 256 DDRGeForce 256Riva TNT 2 UltraRiva TNT 2 PRORiva TNT 2Riva TNT 2 M64Riva TNT 2 Vanta LTRiva TNT 2 VantaRiva TNTRiva 128 ZXRiva 128 9Fury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770Radeon HD 7750Radeon HD 6990Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Radeon HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 43500 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3870 X2Radeon HD 3870Radeon HD 3850Radeon HD 3690Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 3470Radeon HD 3450Radeon HD 3300 (IGP)Radeon HD 3200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3100 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT GDDR4Radeon HD 2600 XTRadeon HD 2600 PRORadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon HD 2400 PRORadeon HD 2350Radeon X1950 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1950 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTRadeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1300 XT on RV530ProRadeon X1300 XT on RV535ProRadeon X1300 CERadeon X1300 ProRadeon X1300Radeon X1300 LERadeon X1300 HMRadeon X1050Radeon X850 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X850 XT CrossFire EditionRadeon X850 XT Radeon X850 Pro Radeon X800 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X800 XLRadeon X800 GTO 256MBRadeon X800 GTO 128MBRadeon X800 GTO2 256MBRadeon X800Radeon X800 ProRadeon X800 GT 256MBRadeon X800 GT 128MBRadeon X800 SERadeon X700 XTRadeon X700 ProRadeon X700Radeon X600 XTRadeon X600 ProRadeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBR adeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProNVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev. 2GeForce RTX 3060GeForce RTX 3050GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce RTX 2080 SuperGeForce RTX 2080GeForce RTX 2070 SuperGeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2060 SuperGeForce RTX 2060GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce GTX 1660 SuperGeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX 1650 SuperGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6GeForce GTX 1650 rev.3GeForce GTX 1650 rev.2GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 1630GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce GTX 1080GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce GTX 1070GeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1060 3GBGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce GTX 1050GeForce GT 1030GeForce GTX Titan XGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 980GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 780GeForce GTX 770GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 750GeForce GT 740GeForce GT 730GeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 660GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGeForce GTX 650 TiGeForce GTX 650GeForce GT 640 rev.2GeForce GT 640GeForce GT 630 rev.2GeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 580GeForce GTX 570GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 560GeForce GTX 550 TiGeForce GT 520GeForce GTX 480GeForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 460 1024MBGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce GTS 450GeForce GT 440 GDDR5GeForce GT 440 GDDR3GeForce GT 430GeForce GT 420GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 260 rev. 2GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTS 250GeForce GTS 240GeForce GT 240GeForce GT 230GeForce GT 220GeForce 210Geforce 205GeForce GTS 150GeForce GT 130GeForce GT 120GeForce G100GeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce 9800 GTXGeForce 9800 GTSGeForce 9800 GTGeForce 9800 GX2GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 9600 GSO (G94)GeForce 9600 GSOGeForce 9500 GTGeForce 9500 GSGeForce 9400 GTGeForce 9400GeForce 9300GeForce 8800 ULTRAGeForce 8800 GTXGeForce 8800 GTS Rev2GeForce 8800 GTSGeForce 8800 GTGeForce 8800 GS 768MBGeForce 8800 GS 384MBGeForce 8600 GTSGeForce 8600 GTGeForce 8600 GSGeForce 8500 GT DDR3GeForce 8500 GT DDR2GeForce 8400 GSGeForce 8300GeForce 8200GeForce 8100GeForce 7950 GX2GeForce 7950 GTGeForce 7900 GTXGeForce 7900 GTOGeForce 7900 GTGeForce 7900 GSGeForce 7800 GTX 512MBGeForce 7800 GTXGeForce 7800 GTGeForce 7800 GS AGPGeForce 7800 GSGeForce 7600 GT Rev.2GeForce 7600 GTGeForce 7600 GS 256MBGeForce 7600 GS 512MBGeForce 7300 GT Ver2GeForce 7300 GTGeForce 7300 GSGeForce 7300 LEGeForce 7300 SEGeForce 7200 GSGeForce 7100 GS TC 128 (512)GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MBGeForce 6800 UltraGeForce 6800 GT 256MBGeForce 6800 GT 128MBGeForce 6800 GTOGeForce 6800 256MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 128MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 LE PCI-EGeForce 6800 256MB AGPGeForce 6800 128MB AGPGeForce 6800 LE AGPGeForce 6800 GS AGPGeForce 6800 GS PCI-EGeForce 6800 XTGeForce 6600 GT PCI-EGeForce 6600 GT AGPGeForce 6600 DDR2GeForce 6600 PCI-EGeForce 6600 AGPGeForce 6600 LEGeForce 6200 NV43VGeForce 6200GeForce 6200 NV43AGeForce 6500GeForce 6200 TC 64(256)GeForce 6200 TC 32(128)GeForce 6200 TC 16(128)GeForce PCX5950GeForce PCX 5900GeForce PCX 5750GeForce PCX 5550GeForce PCX 5300GeForce PCX 4300GeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce FX 5900 UltraGeForce FX 5900GeForce FX 5900 ZTGeForce FX 5900 XTGeForce FX 5800 UltraGeForce FX 5800GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-3GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-2GeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5700 LEGeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev. 2)GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.1)GeForce FX 5600 XTGeForce FX 5600GeForce FX 5500GeForce FX 5200 UltraGeForce FX 5200GeForce FX 5200 SEGeForce 4 Ti 4800GeForce 4 Ti 4800-SEGeForce 4 Ti 4200-8xGeForce 4 Ti 4600GeForce 4 Ti 4400GeForce 4 Ti 4200GeForce 4 MX 4000GeForce 4 MX 440-8x / 480GeForce 4 MX 460GeForce 4 MX 440GeForce 4 MX 440-SEGeForce 4 MX 420GeForce 3 Ti500GeForce 3 Ti200GeForce 3GeForce 2 Ti VXGeForce 2 TitaniumGeForce 2 UltraGeForce 2 PROGeForce 2 GTSGeForce 2 MX 400GeForce 2 MX 200GeForce 2 MXGeForce 256 DDRGeForce 256Riva TNT 2 UltraRiva TNT 2 PRORiva TNT 2Riva TNT 2 M64Riva TNT 2 Vanta LTRiva TNT 2 VantaRiva TNTRiva 128 ZXRiva 128

    You can simultaneously select
    up to 10 video cards by holding Ctrl

    Reviews of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti:

    • Review and testing of video card MSI N660Ti PE 2GD5/OC

      MSI N660Ti PE 2GD5/OC

    • Review and testing of the video card ASUS GTX660 TI-DC2O-2GD5

      ASUS GTX660 TI-DC2O-2GD5

    • Review and testing of the video card Palit GTX 660 Ti JetStream

      Palit GTX 660 Ti Jetstream

    • And the fight continues again. GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce GTX 660 by KFA2 versus Radeon HD 7870 and Radeon HD 7850 by HIS with Catalyst 12.11 driver

      KFA2 GeForce GTX 660 Ti EX OC 2GB

    • First look at GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Zotac GTX 660 Ti AMP! Edition

      Zotac GTX 660 Ti AMP! Edition

    Gtx 670 vs gtx 760

    Introduction

    At the end of May, the GeForce GTX 770 video card was released, and about a month later, the next representative of the NVIDIA graphics accelerator family saw the light — $ 250 GeForce GTX 760, the successor to the GTX 660 Ti / GTX 670 and another new addition to NVIDIA’s line of enthusiast graphics cards based on the Kepler architecture. Designed as a counterweight to the Radeon HD 7950, this model, as it will become clear from our review, can not only outperform its competitor in terms of performance, but also become a more attractive solution in terms of price. NVIDIA didn’t reinvent the wheel, focusing on operating frequencies, power consumption, and high yields.

    Traditionally, the release of new NVIDIA video cards began with top models and continued with cards of a lower level. The release of the GeForce GTX 770 on the GK104 core in a high-performance version marked an update in the $400 price segment, and now fresh blood has arrived in the sub-$300 segment in the form of the GeForce GTX 760 on the same GK104 core, only in a less «muscular» version.

    Whereas the GeForce GTX 770 completely supplanted the GeForce GTX 680, putting the GeForce GTX 670 in a difficult position, the model with the index 760 will do about the same, but on a different front, not only replacing the GeForce GTX 660 Ti, but also occupying the rest of the market , formerly owned by the GeForce GTX 670. Thus, NVIDIA is targeting a performance segment in between the GTX 660 Ti and GTX 670, while maintaining a $249 price point.0003

    Note that this is also the only GK104 desktop card that potentially ships with 3 graphics clusters (GPCs). Although 2 multiprocessor modules in 1 graphics cluster are disabled, they are still physically present on the chip. On the other hand, as experience shows, this circumstance does not have a significant impact on performance, which allows us to talk more about the technical, rather than practical, significance of this moment.

    Like the GTX 770, the 760 has quite high frequencies for the GK104. GTX 770 base frequency of 980MHz is 65MHz (7%) higher than both the GTX 670 and GTX 660 Ti, which helps offset the lack of an SMX module seen when comparing the GTX 760 to the GTX 670 and GTX 660 Ti. At the same time, the GTX 760’s rasterization performance is higher than even the 670’s. As a result, we get a product whose performance varies between the GTX 660 Ti and GTX 670, depending on the type of workload, and usually the scales are leaning towards the GTX 670. In general, we have 92% of the shader and texture performance of the GTX 660 Ti and 43% more high performance in rasterization. Although the memory frequency of 6 GHz remained unchanged, the presence of a full 256-bit bus in the GTX 760 allows us to talk about a 33% advantage in video memory bandwidth compared to the GTX 660 Ti.

    In terms of performance, another trick of the GeForce GTX 760 when compared to the 600-series cards, which will soon give way to the 700-series cards, is the support for GPU Boost 2.0 technology, which is more advanced than 1st generation GPU Boost. Subject to favorable thermal conditions, our copy supports auto-overclocking (Boost) up to 1149 MHz, which is more than 100 MHz higher than 1033 MHz as the officially declared frequency in this mode. There is more noticeable and more frequent turbo overclocking compared to the GTX 660 Ti. So, despite the theoretically lower shader performance compared to the GTX 660 Ti, the 760 loses to its predecessor in only one benchmark, and not a gaming one at that.

    Meanwhile, the TDP for the GTX 760 is claimed to be 170W, which is the same as the GTX 670. With GPU Boost 2.0 tweaks to allow the GTX 760 to reach its TDP more frequently, the GTX 760 will actually consume the same or more than the 670, not to mention the GTX 660 Ti. As with the GTX 770, NVIDIA had little choice but to raise the TDP to squeeze more juice. On the other hand, 170 watts were chosen for a reason, because. this level will allow NVIDIA partners to reuse the design of their 670 cards due to the same power dissipation value. Idle power consumption, on the other hand, will be a bit less because, like the 770, the GTX 760 uses idle mode with lower frequencies to save a couple of watts.

    Further, with the release of the GTX 760, there has been some narrowing of the assortment of NVIDIA desktop graphics cards. In conditions when the presence of high-end cards on the GK110 in one part of the spectrum and the price of «communal apartments» in the segment of less than $500 push prices down, the range of cards based on the GK104 chip narrows from three (GTX 660 Ti, GTX 670, GTX 680 — 600th series) up to two (GTX 770, GTX 760 — 700 series). The configurations used by NVIDIA leave room for maneuver (if any), but at the moment we can talk about only two cards on the GK104 in the 700 series — these are the GTX 770 and GTX 760, reshaping the old segments. Below is a comparison table showing the price tier match between AMD and NVIDIA cards as of June this year.

    With a price at the time of release of $ 249 GTX 760 you can with

    GeForce GTX 670 vs GeForce GTX 970 (benchmarks)

    «.. And now, it happened! A few days ago I bought the long-awaited video card —

    GeForce GTX 970 . I will not go into details of what sophistication it was worth going to in order to get in the shortest possible time the same considerable, in modern times, denyuzhka (the collapsed rupee, motherfucking his leg, thoroughly spoiled the life, one way or another, for all citizens of our country), but all yet — here it is, the treasured box is already flaunting on my windowsill!

    The MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming 4G graphics card in all its glory.

    Below are some photos of the video card and the package taken from the Internet.

    As far as I know, the first shipments included a rubberized gaming mat with MSI branding. I didn’t get the first batch.

    Without hesitation, I installed the card, drivers and started overclocking. The card worked easily at frequencies of 1504/7800. The temperature in especially «heavy» games is kept at around 70 degrees, in less demanding ones, sometimes it does not even reach 62 degrees. It is worth mentioning here that the manufacturer provides for a silent («passive») mode of operation of the video card, which means that the fans turn on only when the chip temperature reaches 62 degrees. In a number of non-demanding games, the video card fans do not spin at all, which at first discouraged me a little)

    The idle temperature stays within 32 degrees, the fans, of course, sleep. You can only hear how the case fans work and the quiet rustle of the processor fans.

    I will give the result of overclocking and temperature in the screenshot below:

    I will compare the performance of this video card with a video card that has served me faithfully for more than 2 years — Zotac GeForce GTX 670 AMP Edition .

    This video card has an efficient cooling system that occupies 3 expansion slots. In addition, the card has a decent factory overclock.

    Today we will compare the performance of video cards in a number of popular benchmarks, both synthetic and gaming. I’ll make a reservation right away that some of them are already “junk” today. Naturally, I wanted to test video cards in current, recently released games, but, unfortunately, they do not have a built-in benchmark.

    Also, to my great regret, there will be no comparative tests in the benchmarks of such games as Thief and Sleeping Dogs . While testing the GTX 670 video card in these games, I was not attentive and made an unfortunate oversight — I forgot to turn off v-sync. Or rather, I turned it off myself, but forgot to turn off the “triple buffering” parameter, which, like vsync, limits the number of fps. I no longer have the GTX 670 video card in my hands, so I won’t be able to test it again, alas . .

    • CPU: Intel Core i5 4670k @ 4.3 GHZ
    • Cooler: Nzxt Havik 140
    • MB: ASROCK Z87 EXTREME 4
    • RAM.20
    • HDD: 3TB Seagate Barracuda [ST3000DM001]
    • HDD: 640 Gb WD Calivar Blue [WD6400AAKS]
    • HDD: 250 Gb Seagate Barracuda [ST3250620AS] Titanium
    • Video: MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming 4G [1504/7800]
    • Video: Zotac GeForce GTX 670 AMP! [1216/6800]
    • PSU: Chieftec Nitro II BPS-850C2
    • Case: Zalman Z9 Plus
    • Monitor: BenQ EW2730
    • OC: Windows® 8.1 Pro 64-bit

    So the time has come to sum up. As you can see, in the tested benchmarks, the new card has an average 50-60% increase compared to the previous card, in some places the increase is twofold.

    The card pleased with good overclocking potential, excellent temperature and noise characteristics. The only drawback I noticed is that in some situations the chokes whistle at the card. Noticed while loading levels / in the game menu in some games. This disadvantage is often manifested in the entire series of GTX 9 video cards.1861 GeForce GTX 760 49.3 GeForce GTX 670MX 18.6

    Bioshock Infinite

    GeForce GTX 760 65.3
    GeForce GTX 670MX 27.9

    Crysis 3

    GeForce GTX 760 33.3
    GeForce GTX 670MX 13.8

    Metro: Last Light

    GeForce GTX 760 29.4
    GeForce GTX 670MX 18.3

    FarCry 3

    GeForce GTX 760 35.65
    GeForce GTX 670MX 13.45

    Hitman: Absolution

    GeForce GTX 760 40.7
    GeForce GTX 670MX 12.65

    0021

    The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 is based on the 28nm Kepler microarchitecture and was released to the market in the summer of 2013. It is based on the then popular GK104 chip, various variations of which also formed the basis of the GeForce GTX 770, GTX 680, GTX 670 and GTX 660 Ti video cards.

    In the case of the GeForce GTX 760, it includes 1152 CUDA cores, 96 texture units, and 32 raster units. The base frequency was 980 MHz, and the dynamic rises to 1033 MHz. Video memory is represented by GDDR5 chips with a total capacity of 2 or 4 GB with an effective frequency of 6 GHz and a 256-bit bus.

    In the market, it competed with the AMD Radeon HD 7950 and HD 7950 with Boost.

    We didn’t have a GeForce GTX 760, but again our colleagues from Overclockers.ua came to the rescue. They borrowed a Palit GeForce GTX 760 JetStream model for testing, which stands out with a factory GPU overclock of 10% and memory by 3%.

    In addition, DrMOS chips are used in its power circuits, and for cooling there is a massive cooler with three 6mm heat pipes, an aluminum radiator and two 88mm fans. As a result, the GPU temperature did not exceed 75°C at a critical value of 97°C, and the clock frequency in games was 1202 MHz.

    The following bench was used for testing:

    An external system with AVerMedia Live Gamer 4K was used to record gameplay in Full HD resolution, that is, without loss of performance.

    Following the new tradition, we will start the GeForce GTX 760 test with a comparison with the current video card, so that it will be easier for you to navigate when upgrading the system. To do this, we chose the ASUS GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Phoenix model with a compact single-fan cooler and reference clock speeds.

    Its GPU has fewer CUDA cores, texture and raster units, but they work at higher speeds. Also, the GeForce GTX 1050 has 3 GB of video memory, but with a 96-bit bus, so its bandwidth is much lower than that of the GeForce GTX 760. In a word, without tests you can’t figure out which of them is better.

    PUBG at low settings requires a little more than 2 GB of video memory, but in a system with a 760th RAM load, this does not increase higher. The GTX 1053 is 3 FPS faster on average, but loses by the same margin on very rare events.

    In Kingdom Come: Deliverance the situation is already unambiguous: the GTX 1053 breaks out by a maximum of 5 FPS. Here it is already clearly seen that the 760th compensates for the lack of video memory from the RAM.

    In The Evil Within 2 the gap between video cards is within 3-5 fps, which in this case is equivalent to a maximum of 23%. In both cases, the GPU is not fully loaded, according to monitoring, but the 760 also had to use RAM to store game data.

    The situation looks very interesting in The Crew 2 . The game needs less than 2 GB of VRAM, so the buffer size is not important. And here the quantity won over the quality: the 1 and 0.1% Low indicators of the GeForce GTX 760 turned out to be 4-6 FPS higher, which is equivalent to a bonus of 16-22%.

    With heavy Far Cry 5 , the situation returns to its usual course: lack of video memory leads to the use of a slower RAM, which negatively affects performance. The advantage of the GTX 1053 rises to 12 FPS or 30%.

    Subtotal. The 3GB GeForce GTX 1050 is faster in games that require more than 2GB of VRAM. If the buffer is enough with a margin, then the advantage is for the 760th due to the larger number of structural blocks in the GPU and the greater bandwidth of the video memory. We recommend that owners of this video card upgrade to at least the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, and preferably 1060, RX 570 or RX 580. If you wish, you can wait for the GTX 1660 price drop or the debut of AMD Navi.

    If you are only looking at the GeForce GTX 760 in the secondary market, then let’s evaluate its capabilities in diverse games. By tradition, let’s start with simpler projects.

    At ultra settings in the HD client World of Tanks on some cards requires more than 2 GB of video memory, which is fraught with the appearance of microfreezes. With the maximum profile, such problems do not arise. Even the rate of very rare events does not fall below 50 fps, so you can easily unnerve your opponents in a fast tank.

    Kino’s profile in War Thunder didn’t cause any problems for the 760th. The video memory is enough with a small margin, the average speed rises above 60 FPS, and everything was comfortable with the controls.

    In a good way, in ARK: Survival Evolved you need to fine-tune the settings in order to achieve the optimal ratio of picture quality and video speed. But we didn’t have time for this, so we just took an average profile and began to study the location. Dinosaurs sometimes came across, but more often the stators slipped, so the 0.1% Low fell below 10 fps.

    In RUST , it has traditionally taken more time to select the settings than to record the final gameplay. And in the end, it turned out as always: a playable frame rate in an already explored location and friezes as a gift when running through unexplored fields.

    Research shows that the transition to the Free-to-Play model and the addition of the Danger Zone mode has boosted CS:GO online statistics. At low settings, we get more than 170 FPS on average, without any stuttering of the video sequence and control. Video memory needs less than 1 GB. GPU 1 73.814

    30.505
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) GPU 1 787.83

    705.293
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) GPU 1 4.888 CompuBench 1.51861 35.416 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) GPU 1 188.234 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) GPU 1 7094 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) GPU 1 3691 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) GPU 1 3335 GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

    Geekbench — OpenCL 20638 10421 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 73.814 30.505 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 787.83 705.293 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.888 3.08 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.338 35.416 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 188.234 62.69 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 7094 3581 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3691 3691 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3335 6694 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 7094 3581 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3691 3691 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3335 6694 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 0 0

    GeForce GTX 760 Video Card Review

    921

    9

  • Click here to share content on Facebook. (Opens in a new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in a new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in a new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in a new window)
  • Over the past few months, NVIDIA has seriously upgraded its line of discrete graphics adapters. After the announcement of the top GeForce GTX TITAN and GeForce GTX 780, the performance GeForce GTX 770 was introduced. According to the manufacturer, now is the right time to upgrade video cards of the middle price segment, which means it’s time GeForce GTX 760 . What does NVIDIA offer for gamers who are willing to spend about $90,997 $250, on a video card?

    Judging by previous announcements by NVIDIA, it’s easy to see that the manufacturer plans to make the most of the Kepler graphics architecture. The company’s resources are not unlimited, and there is no serious need for fundamentally new solutions yet. Therefore, the very fact that the GeForce GTX 760 video card is based on the GK104 graphics processor is unlikely to surprise anyone.

    Recall that this GPU in various variations is also used for the GeForce GTX 680, GTX 670, GTX 660 Ti and even the recently introduced GTX 770. Undoubtedly, for a more affordable solution, the chip will be somewhat simplified. Let’s see what went under the knife. So, in the GK104 version used for the GeForce GTX 760, two of the eight SMX modules are deactivated. This means that the number of processors in comparison with the maximum configuration is reduced by 384 — from 1536 to 1152. In this case, about a quarter of CUDA blocks are not used. The number of texture units (TMU) is 92-bit bus, the GTX 760 received a 256-bit backbone. With the same GDDR5 clock frequency (6008 MHz), the memory subsystem bandwidth in this case differs by about a third — 192 GB / s versus 144 GB / s.

    Another effective way to increase performance is to increase the operating clock speed of the GPU. The base value in this case is 980 MHz, while the average value after dynamic acceleration is 1033 MHz. Like other representatives of the GeForce GTX 700 line, the new product supports advanced GPU Boost 2.0 auto-overclocking technology, which allows you to more efficiently use the potential of the GPU.

    If the previously presented GeForce GTX 770, in fact, was a turbocharged modification of the GTX 680, then the GeForce GTX 760 uses a combination of parameters that is not typical for devices of the previous line. Probably, a decrease in the number of computing units will allow the use of crystals that have not been validated for use in older video card models. Despite the fact that production according to 28nm standards is already well established on TSMC lines, technological marriage takes place in any case, the only question is its extent. GK104 is a fairly large crystal with an area of ​​294 mm2, and if there was even the slightest opportunity to reduce the cost of production, the manufacturer probably used it. However, this is only an assumption, accurate information about such issues is classified information.

    For the reference GeForce GTX 760 graphics card, the developer uses the design previously used for the GTX 670/GTX 660 Ti/GTX 660 adapters, with a compact 17 cm PCB and a rather simple cooling system equipped with a centrifugal fan. There was no trace left of the «titanium» decoration of the older models. A neat, albeit nondescript bar with a black plastic casing does not occupy more than two expansion slots and, thanks to its rather compact dimensions (length — 240 mm), can fit into virtually any case.

    The top cover covers the circuit board tightly enough, so that most of the heated air will be removed outside the system unit through the ventilation grill on the interface panel. The mounting plate already traditionally contains four video outputs — two DVI, as well as full-length HDMI and DisplayPort.

    GeForce GTX 760 has a claimed TDP of 170W. At the same time, to connect additional power, the adapter of the reference sample contains two six-pin connectors, and the recommended power of the PSU used in the system is 500 W.

    To test the capabilities of the GeForce GTX 760, we used a reference model with the recommended frequency formula — 980/1033 MHz, 6008 MHz.

    In progress

    The efficiency of the reference cooling system is moderate. In idle mode, the standard cooler cools the GPU to 30-33 C, the fan speed is at the level of 1100 rpm. Under load, the temperature of the graphics chip rises to 80-82 degrees. To ensure such performance, the fan rotates at a frequency of about 2100 rpm. The emitted noise in this case is at an average level.

    The GeForce GTX 760 has a very aggressive dynamic auto-overclocking algorithm. At the base 980 MHz, the frequency of the graphics processor rises from the base up to 1150 MHz, and in this mode the chip works for quite a long time. In resource-intensive synthetic tests that warm up the video card to the maximum, GPU Boost 2.0 increased the processor frequency to 1090-1110 MHz.

    Overclocking

    If we talk about additional overclocking, then the GeForce GTX 760 certainly has a certain margin of safety, but it is not so great. In this case, the Power Limit parameter can be increased by 15%, and the manufacturer allows increasing the temperature limit level up to 95 C. The voltage on the GPU varies within 12 mV. Using the arsenal of available tools, we managed to increase the base clock frequency of the processor to 1091 MHz (+11%) without affecting stability. In this case, the auto-overclocking mechanism accelerated the GPU under load to about 1250-1260 MHz. In general, a typical value for GK104. We also managed to speed up the memory somewhat — the test copy of the adapter allowed us to increase the frequency from the recommended 6008 to 7050 MHz (+ 17%).

    GeForce GTX 760 based on the reference design and equipped with 2 GB of memory is priced at $249 by the manufacturer. For Ukraine, the recommended cost is 2290 UAH. (

    $280). Models with 4 GB of memory will probably cost $20-30 more, as well as modifications with original cooling systems and increased clock speeds. Frankly, the declared price of the GeForce GTX 760 frankly pleased. If we evaluate the current cost of video cards of this class, then, to the delight of users and the sadness of sellers with a good stock of graphics adapters, this step cannot be called otherwise than dumping by NVIDIA.

    Performance

    Comparing the capabilities of the GeForce GTX 760 with those of the older model of the new line, we note that they are separated by 15-25%. After overclocking, the new product manages in some cases to compensate for such a gap, but this is still more of an exception. NVIDIA managed to diversify devices into different niches and forced modifications will not compete with video cards that nominally occupy a higher level. Of course, this is good first of all for the manufacturer.

    The confrontation between the GeForce GTX 660 Ti and the GeForce GTX 760 is very interesting. As you can see, in most cases, the increased bandwidth of the memory bus, the number of rasterization units, as well as the increased clock frequency can more than compensate for the decrease in computing units and TMU modules. In normal modes, the GTX 760 outperforms its predecessor by about 5-15%. However, given the difference in the number of functional blocks and the actual methods for achieving a given level of performance, the delta of these adapters varies markedly.

    The GeForce GTX 760 competitor from the AMD camp is formally the Radeon HD 7950, which is available in retail for $320. However, we decided to complicate the task for a beginner a little, offering him to compete with the Radeon HD 7970 with the recommended frequency formula — 925/5500 MHz. Surprisingly, the GeForce GTX 760 did not look like a «whipping boy» in competition with a higher-class opponent. Yes, the new product on the GK104 is predictably outperformed by the Radeon HD 7970 in synthetic tests (albeit less than expected), but in games it sometimes competed on equal terms with the venerable AMD accelerator. Modification Radeon HD 79The 70 GHz Edition is already well ahead of the GTX 760, but considering the price difference, it would be quite strange if the situation was different.