GeForce GTX 770 vs Radeon R9 280X Graphics cards Comparison
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today’s games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards’ performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don’t overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 770 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 280X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 770
Check Price
Radeon R9 280X
Check Price
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 280X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3. |
PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
|
Check Price |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 280X has 8% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 770.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 280X has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 770.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 770 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 280X — with GCN.
- GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Radeon R9 280X is 265 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 770.
Game benchmarks
| Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. |
||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. |
||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. |
||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. |
||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. |
||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. |
||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. |
||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 280X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Thaiti XTL |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 134 billion/sec | 128. 0 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,333 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
| Length | 10.5″ (26.7 cm) | 275 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.3 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Shared memory | — | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
| CUDA | + | |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0. 5 kh/s |
|
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | |
| Multi monitor support | 4 displays | |
| HDMI | + | + |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| 3D Vision | + | |
| 3D Vision Live | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 113 Mh/s | 494 Mh/s |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| Design | reference | |
| DisplayPort support | + | |
| CrossFire | + | |
| DDMA audio | + | |
| Decred / DCR (Decred) | 1. 07 Gh/s |
|
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 3.9 Mh/s | 14.42 Mh/s |
| Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 285 Sol/s | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Blu Ray 3D | + | |
| LiquidVR | + | |
| TressFX | + | |
| UVD | + | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
| PhysX | + | |
|
Check Price |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 770 vs FirePro W9000
- GeForce GTX 770 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- Radeon R9 280X vs FirePro W9000
- Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
Review: AMD Radeon R9 280X vs.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 at 4K — Graphics
AMD managed quite a clever move last Tuesday. The company practically rebranded its current mainstream and enthusiast graphics cards from Radeon HD 7000 to Radeon R9/R7. Yes, there is a tweak here and there, but for the most part, the new cards bear striking similarity to those on retailers’ shelves for all of this year. The kicker, as far as AMD is concerned, is the lower prices and improved bang-for-buck when compared to equivalent cards from Nvidia.
Appreciating there’s nothing really that new this time around — we’ll have to wait for the Radeon R9 290/X for a grounds-up architecture — it’s with some interest that we hear AMD messaging ‘4K’ for the best Radeons. That resolution assertion makes more sense for the upcoming R290/X cards, but there’s no harm in evaluating how the premier R9 card for now, the 280X, handles a 3,840×2,160-pixel resolution.
With that in mind, we’ve run the $299 R9 280X 3GB card up against a $399 GeForce GTX 770 2GB at 1,920×1,080, 2,560×1,440, and 3,840×2,160 resolutions.
Our launch-day review has already shown relative performance at the two lower settings, with the Radeon more than holding its own against the more expensive Nvidia card. Both produce excellent performance at 1,920×1,080 and more than acceptable framerates at a 27in monitor-friendly 2,560×1,440, granted, but 4K is a fundamentally larger load that’ll call the cards’ framebuffer and render output ability into serious question.
We’re using an Asus PQ321Q 4K monitor for testing. In-game image-quality settings range from high to ultra-high, and you can find a full breakdown of the testing methodology and equipment here. Note that we’re continuing to use lots of GPU-bustin’ antialiasing, to really put the hurt on the cards. The results will prove whether it’s possible to game on a 4K-resolution screen, with top-notch settings, using sub-£300 cards — and they’ll also set a foundation for the R9 290/X’s 4K numbers in due course.
Let’s begin by taking a look at performance in the most punishing game of all — Crysis 3.
|
Homepage: Crysis.com/us/crysis-3 | Publisher: Electronic Arts | Developer: Crytek |
Crysis 3 is a beautiful-looking game that continues to tax high-end systems. We’ve FRAPS’d a 30-second section near the start of the game, with lashing rain, numerous reflections and full DX11 pomp on show.
Remember that image-quality settings don’t change when spanning resolutions. These enthusiast-class cards do just fine at 1,920×1,080 but run into some difficultly at 2,560×1,440. 4K, however, represents a pixel-load that is 4x higher than 1,920×1,080, and it really does show.
At 4K, the game is dreadfully slow and laggy, to the point where it really is unplayable. Removal of the 4x AA setting isn’t enough to increase performance to an average of over 25fps. From an academic point of view it’s worth noting that the 3GB-equipped Radeon R9 280X loses less of its performance when moving from 2,560×1,440 to 3,840x,2,160.