AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5-2500K
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i5-2500K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
AMD FX-8350
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i5-2500K
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8350
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 14% higher clock speed: 4. 2 GHz vs 3.70 GHz
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6024 vs 4112
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 2751 vs 2657
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.886 vs 3.325
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.424 vs 0.384
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.137 vs 4.627
Launch date | 23 October 2012 vs January 2011 |
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 4. 2 GHz vs 3.70 GHz |
L1 cache | 384 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared) |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6024 vs 4112 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2751 vs 2657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.886 vs 3.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.424 vs 0.384 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.137 vs 4.627 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-2500K
- Around 19% higher maximum core temperature: 72.6°C vs 61°C
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1702 vs 1580
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 806 vs 566
- Around 18% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score: 1575 vs 1337
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 78.071 vs 21.912
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.818 vs 1.199
Maximum core temperature | 72.6°C vs 61°C |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1702 vs 1580 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 806 vs 566 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 1575 vs 1337 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 78.071 vs 21.912 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.818 vs 1.199 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-8350
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-2500K
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-8350 | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1580 | 1702 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6024 | 4112 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 566 | 806 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2751 | 2657 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 1337 | 1575 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.886 | 3.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.912 | 78.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.424 | 0.384 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.199 | 1.818 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.137 | 4.627 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FX-8350 | Intel Core i5-2500K | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Vishera | Sandy Bridge |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Launch date | 23 October 2012 | January 2011 |
OPN PIB | FD8350FRHKBOX | |
OPN Tray | FD8350FRW8KHK | |
Place in performance rating | 2095 | 2086 |
Price now | $79. 99 | $123.99 |
Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.95 | 15.38 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | |
Processor Number | i5-2500K | |
Status | Discontinued | |
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 4 GHz | 3. 30 GHz |
Die size | 315 mm | 216 mm |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 61°C | 72.6°C |
Maximum frequency | 4. 2 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Number of threads | 8 | 4 |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2 V — Max: 1.4 V | |
Transistor count | 1200 Million | 1160 million |
Unlocked | ||
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 1066/1333 |
Max memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3+ | LGA1155 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 95 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm | |
PCI Express revision | n / a | 2.0 |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Device ID | 0x112 | |
Graphics base frequency | 850 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1. 10 GHz | |
Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |
Intel Core i5 8350U vs i5 1145G7: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 8350U
Intel Core i5 1145G7
We compared two 4-core laptop CPUs: the 1. 7 GHz Intel Core i5 8350U against the 1.1-2.6 GHz i5 1145G7. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i5 8350U
40
Core i5 1145G7
63
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i5 8350U
14
Core i5 1145G7
21
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i5 8350U
50
Core i5 1145G7
69
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i5 8350U
32
Core i5 1145G7
49
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 1145G7 and 8350U
Advantages of Intel Core i5 1145G7
- Newer — released 3-years and 1-month later
- Supports up to 64 GB DDR4-3200 RAM
- 50% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1373 vs 914 points
- More modern manufacturing process – 10 versus 14 nanometers
- Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size
- Newer PCI Express version – 4. 0
- 22% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz)
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i5 8350U
803
Core i5 1145G7
+74%
1400
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 8350U
2486
Core i5 1145G7
+93%
4799
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i5 8350U
2050
Core i5 1145G7
+37%
2817
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i5 8350U
6268
Core i5 1145G7
+62%
10161
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i5 8350U
922
Core i5 1145G7
+50%
1379
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 8350U
3175
Core i5 1145G7
+38%
4392
Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 8350U and i5 1145G7
General
Vendor | Intel | Intel |
Released | August 21, 2017 | September 1, 2020 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
Codename | — | Tiger Lake |
Model number | i5-8350U | i5-1145G7 |
Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 620 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU |
P-Cores | 4 | 4 |
P-Threads | 8 | 8 |
Base Frequency (P) | 1. 7 GHz | 1.1-2.6 GHz |
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 3.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
Total Cores | 4 | 4 |
Total Threads | 8 | 8 |
Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
Multiplier | 17x | 11-26x |
Bus Bandwidth | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s |
L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1280K (per core) |
L3 Cache | 6MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
Unlocked Multiplier | — | No |
Package
Fabrication process | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Socket | BGA-1356 | BGA-1449 |
TDP | 15 W | 12-28 W (configurable) |
Peak temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU |
GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
GPU Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Shading Units | 192 | 640 |
TMUs | 24 | 40 |
ROPs | 3 | 20 |
Execution Units | 24 | 80 |
TGP | 15 W | 15 W |
Max. Resolution | 4096×2304 — 60 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i5 8350U
0.38 TFLOPS
Core i5 1145G7
1.41 TFLOPS
Memory Support
Memory types | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 |
Memory Size | 32 GB | 64 GB |
Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
Max. Memory Bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | — |
ECC Support | No | No |
Official site | Intel Core i5 8350U official page | Intel Core i5 1145G7 official page |
PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 16 |
Extended instructions | SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | — |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i5 8350U
0 (0%)
Core i5 1145G7
5 (100%)
Total votes: 5
ompetitors
1.
Intel Core i5 8350U vs AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
2.
Intel Core i5 8350U vs Intel Core i7 8650U
3.
Intel Core i5 1145G7 vs Intel Core i5 1235U
4.
Intel Core i5 1145G7 vs Intel Core i7 1260P
5.
Intel Core i5 1145G7 vs Intel Core i5 1240P
6.
Intel Core i5 1145G7 vs Intel Core i7 1255U
7.
Intel Core i5 1145G7 vs Intel Core i5 1245U
Compare other CPUs (480+)
So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i5 1145G7 or i5 8350U?
Name
Message
Promotion
AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5-10400: comparison
Intel Core i5-10400
AMD FX-8350
VS
WINNER
Intel Core i5-10400
Rating: 18 points
AMD FX-8350
Rating: 9 points
Test results
Technology
Performance
Memory specification
Interfaces and communications
Main features0003
Top specifications and features
- PassMark CPU score
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Processor RAM
- Technological process
- Geekbench score 5
PassMark CPU score
Intel Core i5-10400: 13156
AMD FX-8350: 6274
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
Intel Core i5-10400: 65 W
AMD FX-8350: 125 W
CPU RAM
Intel Core i5-10400: 64 GB
AMD FX-8350: GB
Process technology
Intel Core i5-10400: 14 nm
AMD FX-8350: 32 nm
Geekbench score 5
Intel Core i5-10400: 1058. 746
AMD FX-8350: 556.944
Description
Intel Core i5-10400 processor running at 2.9Hz, the second AMD FX-8350 runs at 4 Hz. Intel Core i5-10400 is capable of overclocking up to 4.3 Hz, and the second up to 4.2 Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 65W, while the AMD FX-8350 has 125W.
Regarding the architecture, the Intel Core i5-10400 is built on 14 nm technology. AMD FX-8350 on 32 nm architecture.
Regarding processor memory. Intel Core i5-10400 can support DDR4. The maximum supported volume is 128 MB. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 41.6. The second processor AMD FX-8350 is capable of supporting DDR3. The bandwidth is 21. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is No data MB.
Graphics. The Intel Core i5-10400 has an Intel UHD 630 graphics core. Its frequency is 350 MHz. AMD FX-8350 received a Discrete Graphics Card Required video core. Here the frequency is No data MHz.
How processors perform in benchmarks. In the PassMark benchmark, the Intel Core i5-10400 scored 13156. And the AMD FX-8350 scored 6274.
Why Intel Core i5-10400 is better than AMD FX-8350
- PassMark CPU score 13156 vs 6274 , 110% higher
- Thermal Dissipation (TDP) 65 W vs 125 W, -48% less
- Process 14 nm vs 32 nm, -56% less
- Geekbench 5 score of 1058.746 vs 556.944 , up 90%
- Number of threads 12 vs. 8, 50% more
Comparison of Intel Core i5-10400 and AMD FX-8350: highlights0015
The PassMark test considers read speed, write speed, and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all
13156
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
6274
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
5379. 907
max 23628.202
Average: 5219.2
2704.032
max 23628.202
Average: 5219.2
Geekbench score 5
1058.746
max 1600.56
Average: 936.8
556.944
max 1600.56
Average: 936.8
AES
Yes
Yes
Support for Intel Optane memory
there is
no data 9000
N/A
Intel Trusted Execution Technology
N/A
N/A
Intel Boot Guard
Yes
N/A
Number of threads
The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all
12
max 256
Average: 10.7
8
max 256
Average: 10.7
L1 cache size
A large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all
384KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
384KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
L2 cache size
An L2 cache with a large amount of scratchpad memory can increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all
1.5MB
max 512
Average: 4. 5 MB
8MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
L3 cache size
A large amount of L3 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all
12MB
max 768
Average: 16.3 MB
8MB
max 768
Average: 16.3 MB
Maximum clock speed in Turbo 9 mode0015
When the processor’s speed drops below its limit, it may jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
4.3GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
4.2GHz
max 5. 5
Average: 3.2 GHz
Number of cores
6
max 72
Mean: 5.8
8
max 72
Mean: 5.8
Processor base clock speed
2.9GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
4GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
Frequency with Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0
4.3GHz
max 5.1
Average: 3.5 GHz
GHz
max 5.1
Average: 3. 5 GHz
Max. number of PCI Express lanes
16
max 64
Average: 22.7
max 64
Average: 22.7
PCI Express Configurations
Up to 1×16. 2×8. 1×8+2×4
No data
Idle states
Yes
n/a
Turbo Boost technology
Turbo Boost is a technology that allows the processor to operate at a frequency higher than the maximum. This increases its productivity (including when performing complex tasks)
Show all
2
Mean: 1.9
Mean: 1.9
Turbo Boost Max 3.0
N/A
N/A
Graphics
Intel UHD 630
Discrete Graphics Card Required
Max. graphics system frequency
1.1GHz
max 1.55
Average: 1.1 GHz
GHz
max 1.55
Average: 1.1 GHz
Max. number of processors in configuration
1
Mean: 1.3
1
Mean: 1.3
DDR version
4
Mean: 3.5
3
Mean: 3.5
Max. memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
41.6GB/s
max 352
Average: 41. 4 GB/s
21GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
Memory frequency
RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
Show all
2666MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
1866 MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
Max. number of memory channels
The greater the number, the higher the data transfer rate from memory to processor
2
max 16
Mean: 2.9
max 16
Mean: 2.9
Max. memory size
The largest amount of RAM memory.
128GB
max 6000
Average: 404.4 GB
GB
max 6000
Average: 404.4 GB
System bus frequency
Data between computer components and other devices is transferred via the bus.
Show all
8 GT/s
max 1600
Average: 156.1 GT/s
5.4 GT/s
max 1600
Average: 156.1 GT/s
ECC memory support
Memory debugging code is used when it is necessary to avoid data corruption in scientific computing or server startup. It finds possible errors and repairs data corruption.
Show all
N/A
N/A
CPU RAM
64 GB
max 128
Average: 34.8 GB
GB
max 128
Average: 34.8 GB
Max. resolution (DP)
4096 x [email protected]
n.a.
vPro
n.a. Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)
Yes
N/A
OpenCL
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
Intel® AES-NI Commands
AES is needed to speed up encryption and decryption.
Yes
Yes
Hyper-Threading
Many Intel processors use state-of-the-art hyper-precision technology. Thus, each processor core works simultaneously on two threads, which significantly increases performance. Most processors work on the principle: one thread per core, therefore, their performance is lower.
Full text
Yes
N/A
OpenGL
Used by some applications to connect GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
4.5
max 4.6
Mean: 4.4
max 4.6
Mean: 4.4
AVX
AVX allows you to increase the speed of calculations in multimedia, financial and scientific applications, it also improves the performance of Linux RAID.
Full text
Yes
No data
sse version
Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as volume control). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show all
4.2
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
4.2
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
Support 4K
You can view images in the highest quality
There are
No data
SOKKET
FCLGA1200
ThRYMAL Monitoring 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
003
SIPP
No
No data
TSX
no data
TXT 9000 No data
Secure Key
Yes
No data
Identity Protection
Yes
No data
SGX
There is
No data
OS Guard
No data
VT-D 9000
No data 9000 9000 VT-X 9000
there is
no data
009
Clear Video
There is
No data 9000 The small size of semiconductors means that this is a new generation chip.
14 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
32 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
65W
Average: 67.6W
125W
Average: 67.6W
PCI Express Edition
3
Mean: 2.9
Mean: 2.9
condition
Launched
No data 9000
PCG 2015C
n.a. Device ID
0x9BC8 / 0x9BC5
n. a.
350MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
Supports 64-bit system
A 64-bit system, unlike a 32-bit system, can support more than 4 GB of RAM. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Show all
Yes
N/A
DirectX
Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.1
Average: 12
max 12.1
Average: 12
Maximum processor temperature
Reset may occur if the maximum temperature at which the processor operates is exceeded.
Show all
100°C
max 110
Average value: 96 °C
61°C
max 110
Average value: 96 °C
OpenGL
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
4.5
max 4.6
Mean: 4.4
max 4.6
Mean: 4.4
Turbo GPU
If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
1100MHz
max 2100
Average: 1091 MHz
MHz
max 2100
Average: 1091 MHz
Support for monitors
Multiple monitors can be connected to the device, which makes it easier to work by increasing the working space.
Show all
3
Mean: 2.9
Mean: 2.9
Codename
Comet Lake
Vishera
Purpose
Desktop
Boxed Processor
FAQ
Can the Intel Core i5-10400 and AMD FX-8350 run in 4K?
Intel Core i5-10400 — has. AMD FX-8350 — No data available.
How many PCIe lanes
Intel Core i5-10400 — 16. AMD FX-8350 — Not available.
How much RAM is supported?
Intel Core i5-10400 supports 128 GB. AMD FX-8350 supports N/AGB.
How fast are the processors?
Intel Core i5-10400 runs at 2.9 GHz.
How many cores does the processor have?
Intel Core i5-10400 has 6 cores. AMD FX-8350 has 8 cores.
Do processors support ECC memory?
Intel Core i5-10400 — no. AMD FX-8350 — No data available.
Does the Intel Core i5-10400 have integrated graphics?
Intel Core i5-10400 — Intel UHD 630. AMD FX-8350 — Discrete Graphics Card Required
What kind of RAM does the
Intel Core i5-10400 support DDR4. AMD FX-8350 supports DDR3.
What is the socket of the processors?
FCLGA1200 is used to install the Intel Core i5-10400. AMD FX-8350 is installed using AM3+.
What architecture is used?
The Intel Core i5-10400 is based on the Comet Lake architecture. AMD FX-8350 is based on the Vishera architecture.
Is the multiplier unlocked on the Intel Core i5-10400 processor?
Intel Core i5-10400 — Not available. AMD FX-8350 — has.
How do processors perform in benchmarks?
According to PassMark, the Intel Core i5-10400 scored 13156 points. AMD FX-8350 scored 6274 points.
What is the maximum frequency of the processors?
The maximum frequency of the Intel Core i5-10400 reaches 4.3 Hz. The maximum frequency of the AMD FX-8350 reaches 4.2 Hz.
How much energy do they consume?
The power consumption of the Intel Core i5-10400 can be up to 65 watts. AMD FX-8350 has up to 65 watts.
AMD FX-8350
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i3-7100
VS
Intel Core i5-2400
Intel Core i7-3770
VS
Intel Core i7-8700K
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
VS
Intel Core i7-6850K
Intel Core i7-4770K
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
AMD A10-7870K
VS
AMD A10-7890K
AMD Ryzen 3 1200
VS
Intel Core i3-6100
AMD A8-5500
VS
Intel Core i5-10400
Intel Core i5-3570
VS
Intel Core i5-3570T
Intel Core i5-4670
VS
Intel Core i5-4670S
Intel Core i7-4770
VS
Intel Core i7-8700?
AMD FX-8370
VS
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Xeon E7-8890v4
VS
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160
Intel Core i5-2390T
VS
Intel Core i5-2500
AMD FX-8320
VS
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Core i3-9100F
VS
Intel Core i5-9400F
Intel Core i5-4670K
VS
Intel Core i5-7600K
Intel Core i3-2100
VS
Intel Core i3-6100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Intel Core i5-7600K
VS
Intel Core i5-9400F
Compare AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i5-750
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i5-750 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technology, Virtualization, Security and Reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
AMD FX-8350
versus
Intel Core i5-750
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD FX-8350
- Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 1 month(s)
- 4 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 8 vs 4
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Approximately 31% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.20 GHz
- Newer manufacturing process allows the processor to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
- L1 cache approximately 50% larger, means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache is 8 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 28% higher: 1580 vs 1233
- 2. 4x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6024 vs 2508
- About 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 566 vs 502
- Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance about 73% more: 2751 vs 1587
- 17.4 times more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 9.886 vs 0.569
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark /s) by about 94% increase: 0.424 vs 0.218
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 66% increase: 7.137 vs 4.294
9004 overclock
Release date | 23 October 2012 vs 23 September 2009 |
Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 4. 2 GHz vs 3.20 GHz |
Process | 32nm SOI vs 45nm |
Level 1 cache | 384 KB vs 256 KB |
Level 2 cache | 8MB vs 1MB |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1580 vs 1233 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6024 vs 2508 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 566 vs 502 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2751 vs 1587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9. 886 vs 0.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.424 vs 0.218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.199 vs 1.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.137 vs 4.294 |
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-750
- About 19% more max core temperature: 72.7°C vs 61°C
- About 32% less power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Benchmark3 performance About 32% more Fire Strike — Physics Score: 1761 vs 1337
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2.3x more performance: 49.474 vs 21.912
Maximum core temperature | 72. 7°C vs 61°C |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 1761 vs 1337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 49.474 vs 21.912 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD FX-8350
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-750
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||||
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
Name | AMD FX-8350 | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1580 | 1233 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 6024 | 2508 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 566 | 502 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 2751 | 1587 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 1337 | 1761 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.886 | 0.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.912 | 49.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.424 | 0.218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.199 | 1.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.137 | 4.294 |
Performance comparison
AMD FX-8350 | Intel Core i5-750 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Vishera | Lynnfield |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Production date | October 23, 2012 | 23 September 2009 |
OPN PIB | FD8350FRHKBOX | |
OPN Tray | FD8350FRW8KHK | |
Place in the rating | 2095 | 2502 |
Price now | $79. 99 | $160.50 |
Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 32.95 | 6.78 |
Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
Price at first issue date | $150 | |
Processor Number | i5-750 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 4 GHz | 2. 66 GHz |
Crystal area | 315 mm | 296 mm2 |
Level 1 cache | 384KB | 256KB |
Level 2 cache | 8MB | 1MB |
Level 3 cache | 8MB | 8MB |
Process | 32nm SOI | 45nm |
Maximum core temperature | 61°C | 72.7°C |
Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz | 3. 20 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Number of threads | 8 | 4 |
Voltage P0 Vcore | Min: 1.2V — Max: 1.4V | |
Number of transistors | 1200 Million | 774 million |
Unlocked | ||
Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | |
System bus (FSB) | 2500 MHz | |
Permissible core voltage | 0. 6500V-1.4000V | |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 1066/1333 |
Maximum number of memory channels | 2 | |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 16GB | |
Maximum number of processors in | 1 | 1 |
Supported sockets | AM3+ | LGA1156 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 95 Watt |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm | |
PCI Express revision | n/a | 2.0 |
Number of PCI Express lanes | 16 | |
PCIe configurations | 1×16, 2×8 | |
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® SSE4.
|