8350 vs i5: AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5-13600K

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5-2500K


Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i5-2500K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Security & Reliability.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD FX-8350

Buy on Amazon


vs

Intel Core i5-2500K

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8350

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
  • 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
  • Around 14% higher clock speed: 4. 2 GHz vs 3.70 GHz
  • Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
  • Around 46% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6024 vs 4112
  • Around 4% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 2751 vs 2657
  • 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.886 vs 3.325
  • Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.424 vs 0.384
  • Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.137 vs 4.627













Launch date 23 October 2012 vs January 2011
Number of cores 8 vs 4
Number of threads 8 vs 4
Maximum frequency 4. 2 GHz vs 3.70 GHz
L1 cache 384 KB vs 64 KB (per core)
L2 cache 8 MB vs 256 KB (per core)
L3 cache 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared)
PassMark — CPU mark 6024 vs 4112
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2751 vs 2657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.886 vs 3.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.424 vs 0.384
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.137 vs 4.627

Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-2500K

  • Around 19% higher maximum core temperature: 72.6°C vs 61°C
  • Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1702 vs 1580
  • Around 42% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 806 vs 566
  • Around 18% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score: 1575 vs 1337
  • 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 78.071 vs 21.912
  • Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.818 vs 1.199








Maximum core temperature 72.6°C vs 61°C
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
PassMark — Single thread mark 1702 vs 1580
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 806 vs 566
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 1575 vs 1337
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 78.071 vs 21.912
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.818 vs 1.199

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: AMD FX-8350
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-2500K











PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Single Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core

CPU 1
CPU 2


3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2

21.912

78.071

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2


CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1
CPU 2













Name AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i5-2500K
PassMark — Single thread mark 1580 1702
PassMark — CPU mark 6024 4112
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 566 806
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2751 2657
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 1337 1575
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.886 3.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 21.912 78.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.424 0.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.199 1.818
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.137 4.627

Compare specifications (specs)



































































AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i5-2500K
Architecture codename Vishera Sandy Bridge
Family AMD FX-Series Processors
Launch date 23 October 2012 January 2011
OPN PIB FD8350FRHKBOX
OPN Tray FD8350FRW8KHK
Place in performance rating 2095 2086
Price now $79. 99 $123.99
Series AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Value for money (0-100) 32.95 15.38
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)

$289
Processor Number

i5-2500K
Status

Discontinued
64 bit support
Base frequency 4 GHz 3. 30 GHz
Die size 315 mm 216 mm
L1 cache 384 KB 64 KB (per core)
L2 cache 8 MB 256 KB (per core)
L3 cache 8 MB 6144 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm SOI 32 nm
Maximum core temperature 61°C 72.6°C
Maximum frequency 4. 2 GHz 3.70 GHz
Number of cores 8 4
Number of threads 8 4
P0 Vcore voltage Min: 1.2 V — Max: 1.4 V
Transistor count 1200 Million 1160 million
Unlocked
Bus Speed

5 GT/s DMI
Supported memory frequency 1866 MHz
Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3 1066/1333
Max memory channels

2
Maximum memory bandwidth

21 GB/s
Maximum memory size

32 GB
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM3+ LGA1155
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available

Package Size

37. 5mm x 37.5mm
PCI Express revision n / a 2.0
Max number of PCIe lanes

16
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology

Flexible Display interface (FDI)

Idle States

Instruction set extensions

Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
Intel 64

Intel® Fast Memory Access

Intel® Flex Memory Access

Intel® Hyper-Threading technology

Intel® Turbo Boost technology

Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility

Thermal Monitoring

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)

Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Device ID

0x112
Graphics base frequency

850 MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency

1. 10 GHz
Graphics max frequency

1.1 GHz
Intel® Clear Video HD technology

Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)

Intel® InTru™ 3D technology

Intel® Quick Sync Video

Processor graphics

Intel® HD Graphics 3000
Number of displays supported

2
Wireless Display (WiDi) support

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)

Intel® Identity Protection technology

Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Intel Core i5 8350U vs i5 1145G7: performance comparison

VS

Intel Core i5 8350U

Intel Core i5 1145G7

We compared two 4-core laptop CPUs: the 1. 7 GHz Intel Core i5 8350U against the 1.1-2.6 GHz i5 1145G7. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors

Single-Core Performance

Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks

Core i5 8350U

40

Core i5 1145G7

63

Performance

Measure performance when all cores are involved

Core i5 8350U

14

Core i5 1145G7

21

Power Efficiency

The efficiency score of electricity consumption

Core i5 8350U

50

Core i5 1145G7

69

NanoReview Final Score

Generic CPU rating

Core i5 8350U

32

Core i5 1145G7

49

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 1145G7 and 8350U

Advantages of Intel Core i5 1145G7

  • Newer — released 3-years and 1-month later
  • Supports up to 64 GB DDR4-3200 RAM
  • 50% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1373 vs 914 points
  • More modern manufacturing process – 10 versus 14 nanometers
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size
  • Newer PCI Express version – 4. 0
  • 22% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz)

Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Core i5 8350U

803

Core i5 1145G7
+74%

1400

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Core i5 8350U

2486

Core i5 1145G7
+93%

4799

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Core i5 8350U

2050

Core i5 1145G7
+37%

2817

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Core i5 8350U

6268

Core i5 1145G7
+62%

10161

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Core i5 8350U

922

Core i5 1145G7
+50%

1379

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Core i5 8350U

3175

Core i5 1145G7
+38%

4392

Submit your Cinebench R23 result

By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 8350U and i5 1145G7

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released August 21, 2017 September 1, 2020
Type Laptop Laptop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Tiger Lake
Model number i5-8350U i5-1145G7
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 620 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 4
P-Threads 8 8
Base Frequency (P) 1. 7 GHz 1.1-2.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 3.6 GHz 4.4 GHz
Total
Total Cores 4 4
Total Threads 8 8
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 17x 11-26x
Bus Bandwidth 4 GT/s 4 GT/s
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 96K (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) 1280K (per core)
L3 Cache 6MB (shared) 8MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No

Package

Fabrication process 14 nm 10 nm
Socket BGA-1356 BGA-1449
TDP 15 W 12-28 W (configurable)
Peak temperature 100°C 100°C
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 620 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1100 MHz 1300 MHz
Shading Units 192 640
TMUs 24 40
ROPs 3 20
Execution Units 24 80
TGP 15 W 15 W
Max. Resolution 4096×2304 — 60 Hz

iGPU FLOPS

Core i5 8350U

0.38 TFLOPS

Core i5 1145G7

1.41 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory types DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267
Memory Size 32 GB 64 GB
Max. Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 37.5 GB/s
ECC Support No No
Official site Intel Core i5 8350U official page Intel Core i5 1145G7 official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 12 16
Extended instructions SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors

Core i5 8350U

0 (0%)

Core i5 1145G7

5 (100%)

Total votes: 5

ompetitors

1.
Intel Core i5 8350U vs AMD Ryzen 5 5500U

2.
Intel Core i5 8350U vs Intel Core i7 8650U

3.
Intel Core i5 1145G7 vs Intel Core i5 1235U

4.
Intel Core i5 1145G7 vs Intel Core i7 1260P

5.
Intel Core i5 1145G7 vs Intel Core i5 1240P

6.
Intel Core i5 1145G7 vs Intel Core i7 1255U

7.
Intel Core i5 1145G7 vs Intel Core i5 1245U

Compare other CPUs (480+)

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i5 1145G7 or i5 8350U?

Name

Message

Promotion

AMD FX-8350 vs Intel Core i5-10400: comparison

Intel Core i5-10400

AMD FX-8350

VS

WINNER

Intel Core i5-10400

Rating: 18 points

AMD FX-8350

Rating: 9 points

Test results

Technology

Performance

Memory specification

Interfaces and communications

Main features0003

Top specifications and features

  • PassMark CPU score
  • Heat dissipation (TDP)
  • Processor RAM
  • Technological process
  • Geekbench score 5

PassMark CPU score

Intel Core i5-10400: 13156
AMD FX-8350: 6274

Thermal Dissipation (TDP)

Intel Core i5-10400: 65 W
AMD FX-8350: 125 W

CPU RAM

Intel Core i5-10400: 64 GB
AMD FX-8350: GB

Process technology

Intel Core i5-10400: 14 nm
AMD FX-8350: 32 nm

Geekbench score 5

Intel Core i5-10400: 1058. 746
AMD FX-8350: 556.944

Description

Intel Core i5-10400 processor running at 2.9Hz, the second AMD FX-8350 runs at 4 Hz. Intel Core i5-10400 is capable of overclocking up to 4.3 Hz, and the second up to 4.2 Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 65W, while the AMD FX-8350 has 125W.

Regarding the architecture, the Intel Core i5-10400 is built on 14 nm technology. AMD FX-8350 on 32 nm architecture.

Regarding processor memory. Intel Core i5-10400 can support DDR4. The maximum supported volume is 128 MB. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 41.6. The second processor AMD FX-8350 is capable of supporting DDR3. The bandwidth is 21. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is No data MB.

Graphics. The Intel Core i5-10400 has an Intel UHD 630 graphics core. Its frequency is 350 MHz. AMD FX-8350 received a Discrete Graphics Card Required video core. Here the frequency is No data MHz.

How processors perform in benchmarks. In the PassMark benchmark, the Intel Core i5-10400 scored 13156. And the AMD FX-8350 scored 6274.

Why Intel Core i5-10400 is better than AMD FX-8350

  • PassMark CPU score 13156 vs 6274 , 110% higher
  • Thermal Dissipation (TDP) 65 W vs 125 W, -48% less
  • Process 14 nm vs 32 nm, -56% less
  • Geekbench 5 score of 1058.746 vs 556.944 , up 90%
  • Number of threads 12 vs. 8, 50% more

Comparison of Intel Core i5-10400 and AMD FX-8350: highlights0015

The PassMark test considers read speed, write speed, and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all

13156

max 89379

Average: 6033.5

6274

max 89379

Average: 6033.5

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

5379. 907

max 23628.202

Average: 5219.2

2704.032

max 23628.202

Average: 5219.2

Geekbench score 5

1058.746

max 1600.56

Average: 936.8

556.944

max 1600.56

Average: 936.8

AES

Yes

Yes

Support for Intel Optane memory

there is

no data 9000

N/A

Intel Trusted Execution Technology

N/A

N/A

Intel Boot Guard

Yes

N/A

Number of threads

The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all

12

max 256

Average: 10.7

8

max 256

Average: 10.7

L1 cache size

A large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all

384KB

max 4608

Average: 299.3 KB

384KB

max 4608

Average: 299.3 KB

L2 cache size

An L2 cache with a large amount of scratchpad memory can increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all

1.5MB

max 512

Average: 4. 5 MB

8MB

max 512

Average: 4.5 MB

L3 cache size

A large amount of L3 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all

12MB

max 768

Average: 16.3 MB

8MB

max 768

Average: 16.3 MB

Maximum clock speed in Turbo 9 mode0015

When the processor’s speed drops below its limit, it may jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all

4.3GHz

max 5.5

Average: 3.2 GHz

4.2GHz

max 5. 5

Average: 3.2 GHz

Number of cores

6

max 72

Mean: 5.8

8

max 72

Mean: 5.8

Processor base clock speed

2.9GHz

max 4.7

Average: 2.5 GHz

4GHz

max 4.7

Average: 2.5 GHz

Frequency with Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0

4.3GHz

max 5.1

Average: 3.5 GHz

GHz

max 5.1

Average: 3. 5 GHz

Max. number of PCI Express lanes

16

max 64

Average: 22.7

max 64

Average: 22.7

PCI Express Configurations

Up to 1×16. 2×8. 1×8+2×4

No data

Idle states

Yes

n/a

Turbo Boost technology

Turbo Boost is a technology that allows the processor to operate at a frequency higher than the maximum. This increases its productivity (including when performing complex tasks)
Show all

2

Mean: 1.9

Mean: 1.9

Turbo Boost Max 3.0

N/A

N/A

Graphics

Intel UHD 630

Discrete Graphics Card Required

Max. graphics system frequency

1.1GHz

max 1.55

Average: 1.1 GHz

GHz

max 1.55

Average: 1.1 GHz
Max. number of processors in configuration

1

Mean: 1.3

1

Mean: 1.3

DDR version

4

Mean: 3.5

3

Mean: 3.5

Max. memory bandwidth

This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.

41.6GB/s

max 352

Average: 41. 4 GB/s

21GB/s

max 352

Average: 41.4 GB/s

Memory frequency

RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
Show all

2666MHz

max 4800

Average: 2106.2 MHz

1866 MHz

max 4800

Average: 2106.2 MHz

Max. number of memory channels

The greater the number, the higher the data transfer rate from memory to processor

2

max 16

Mean: 2.9

max 16

Mean: 2.9

Max. memory size

The largest amount of RAM memory.

128GB

max 6000

Average: 404.4 GB

GB

max 6000

Average: 404.4 GB

System bus frequency

Data between computer components and other devices is transferred via the bus.
Show all

8 GT/s

max 1600

Average: 156.1 GT/s

5.4 GT/s

max 1600

Average: 156.1 GT/s

ECC memory support

Memory debugging code is used when it is necessary to avoid data corruption in scientific computing or server startup. It finds possible errors and repairs data corruption.
Show all

N/A

N/A

CPU RAM

64 GB

max 128

Average: 34.8 GB

GB

max 128

Average: 34.8 GB

Max. resolution (DP)

4096 x [email protected]

n.a.

vPro

n.a. Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)

Yes

N/A

OpenCL

4.5

max 4.6

Average: 4.1

max 4.6

Average: 4.1

Intel® AES-NI Commands

AES is needed to speed up encryption and decryption.

Yes

Yes

Hyper-Threading

Many Intel processors use state-of-the-art hyper-precision technology. Thus, each processor core works simultaneously on two threads, which significantly increases performance. Most processors work on the principle: one thread per core, therefore, their performance is lower.
Full text

Yes

N/A

OpenGL

Used by some applications to connect GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all

4.5

max 4.6

Mean: 4.4

max 4.6

Mean: 4.4

AVX

AVX allows you to increase the speed of calculations in multimedia, financial and scientific applications, it also improves the performance of Linux RAID.
Full text

Yes

No data

sse version

Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as volume control). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show all

4.2

max 4.2

Average: 4.1

4.2

max 4.2

Average: 4.1

Support 4K

You can view images in the highest quality

There are

No data

SOKKET

FCLGA1200

ThRYMAL Monitoring 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

003

SIPP

No

No data

TSX

no data

TXT 9000 No data

Secure Key

Yes

No data

Identity Protection

Yes

No data

SGX

There is

No data

OS Guard

No data

VT-D 9000

No data 9000 9000 VT-X 9000

there is

no data

009

Clear Video

There is

No data 9000 The small size of semiconductors means that this is a new generation chip.

14 nm

Average: 36.8 nm

32 nm

Average: 36.8 nm

Heat dissipation (TDP)

Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all

65W

Average: 67.6W

125W

Average: 67.6W

PCI Express Edition

3

Mean: 2.9

Mean: 2.9

condition

Launched

No data 9000

PCG 2015C

n.a. Device ID

0x9BC8 / 0x9BC5

n. a.

350MHz

max 2400

Average: 535.8 MHz

MHz

max 2400

Average: 535.8 MHz

Supports 64-bit system

A 64-bit system, unlike a 32-bit system, can support more than 4 GB of RAM. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Show all

Yes

N/A

DirectX

Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics

12

max 12.1

Average: 12

max 12.1

Average: 12

Maximum processor temperature

Reset may occur if the maximum temperature at which the processor operates is exceeded.
Show all

100°C

max 110

Average value: 96 °C

61°C

max 110

Average value: 96 °C

OpenGL

Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all

4.5

max 4.6

Mean: 4.4

max 4.6

Mean: 4.4

Turbo GPU

If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all

1100MHz

max 2100

Average: 1091 MHz

MHz

max 2100

Average: 1091 MHz

Support for monitors

Multiple monitors can be connected to the device, which makes it easier to work by increasing the working space.
Show all

3

Mean: 2.9

Mean: 2.9

Codename

Comet Lake

Vishera

Purpose

Desktop

Boxed Processor

FAQ

Can the Intel Core i5-10400 and AMD FX-8350 run in 4K?

Intel Core i5-10400 — has. AMD FX-8350 — No data available.

How many PCIe lanes

Intel Core i5-10400 — 16. AMD FX-8350 — Not available.

How much RAM is supported?

Intel Core i5-10400 supports 128 GB. AMD FX-8350 supports N/AGB.

How fast are the processors?

Intel Core i5-10400 runs at 2.9 GHz.

How many cores does the processor have?

Intel Core i5-10400 has 6 cores. AMD FX-8350 has 8 cores.

Do processors support ECC memory?

Intel Core i5-10400 — no. AMD FX-8350 — No data available.

Does the Intel Core i5-10400 have integrated graphics?

Intel Core i5-10400 — Intel UHD 630. AMD FX-8350 — Discrete Graphics Card Required

What kind of RAM does the

Intel Core i5-10400 support DDR4. AMD FX-8350 supports DDR3.

What is the socket of the processors?

FCLGA1200 is used to install the Intel Core i5-10400. AMD FX-8350 is installed using AM3+.

What architecture is used?

The Intel Core i5-10400 is based on the Comet Lake architecture. AMD FX-8350 is based on the Vishera architecture.

Is the multiplier unlocked on the Intel Core i5-10400 processor?

Intel Core i5-10400 — Not available. AMD FX-8350 — has.

How do processors perform in benchmarks?

According to PassMark, the Intel Core i5-10400 scored 13156 points. AMD FX-8350 scored 6274 points.

What is the maximum frequency of the processors?

The maximum frequency of the Intel Core i5-10400 reaches 4.3 Hz. The maximum frequency of the AMD FX-8350 reaches 4.2 Hz.

How much energy do they consume?

The power consumption of the Intel Core i5-10400 can be up to 65 watts. AMD FX-8350 has up to 65 watts.

AMD FX-8350

VS

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i3-7100

VS

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i7-3770

VS

Intel Core i7-8700K

AMD Ryzen 7 1800X

VS

Intel Core i7-6850K

Intel Core i7-4770K

VS

Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3

AMD A10-7870K

VS

AMD A10-7890K

AMD Ryzen 3 1200

VS

Intel Core i3-6100

AMD A8-5500

VS

Intel Core i5-10400

Intel Core i5-3570

VS

Intel Core i5-3570T

Intel Core i5-4670

VS

Intel Core i5-4670S

Intel Core i7-4770

VS

Intel Core i7-8700?

AMD FX-8370

VS

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Xeon E7-8890v4

VS

Intel Xeon Platinum 8160

Intel Core i5-2390T

VS

Intel Core i5-2500

AMD FX-8320

VS

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

Intel Core i3-9100F

VS

Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i5-4670K

VS

Intel Core i5-7600K

Intel Core i3-2100

VS

Intel Core i3-6100

AMD Ryzen 5 1600

VS

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Intel Core i5-7600K

VS

Intel Core i5-9400F

Compare AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i5-750

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8350 and Intel Core i5-750 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technology, Virtualization, Security and Reliability.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD FX-8350

versus

Intel Core i5-750

Benefits

Reasons to choose AMD FX-8350

  • Newer processor, release date difference 3 year(s) 1 month(s)
  • 9004 overclock

  • 4 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 8 vs 4
  • 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
  • Approximately 31% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.20 GHz
  • Newer manufacturing process allows the processor to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
  • L1 cache approximately 50% larger, means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • L2 cache is 8 times larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
  • Performance in the PassMark — Single thread mark benchmark is about 28% higher: 1580 vs 1233
  • 2. 4x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 6024 vs 2508
  • About 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 566 vs 502
  • Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance about 73% more: 2751 vs 1587
  • 17.4 times more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) benchmark: 9.886 vs 0.569
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark /s) by about 94% increase: 0.424 vs 0.218
  • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 66% increase: 7.137 vs 4.294
Release date 23 October 2012 vs 23 September 2009
Unlocked Unlocked / Locked
Number of cores 8 vs 4
Number of threads 8 vs 4
Maximum frequency 4. 2 GHz vs 3.20 GHz
Process 32nm SOI vs 45nm
Level 1 cache 384 KB vs 256 KB
Level 2 cache 8MB vs 1MB
PassMark — Single thread mark 1580 vs 1233
PassMark — CPU mark 6024 vs 2508
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 566 vs 502
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2751 vs 1587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9. 886 vs 0.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.424 vs 0.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.199 vs 1.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.137 vs 4.294

Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-750

  • About 19% more max core temperature: 72.7°C vs 61°C
  • About 32% less power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
  • Benchmark3 performance About 32% more Fire Strike — Physics Score: 1761 vs 1337
  • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2.3x more performance: 49.474 vs 21.912
Maximum core temperature 72. 7°C vs 61°C
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 1761 vs 1337
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 49.474 vs 21.912

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: AMD FX-8350
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-750

PassMark — Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
21.912
49.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
Name AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i5-750
PassMark — Single thread mark 1580 1233
PassMark — CPU mark 6024 2508
Geekbench 4 — Single Core 566 502
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2751 1587
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 1337 1761
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.886 0.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 21.912 49.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.424 0.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.199 1.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 7.137 4.294

Performance comparison

configuration

AMD FX-8350 Intel Core i5-750
Architecture name Vishera Lynnfield
Family AMD FX-Series Processors
Production date October 23, 2012 23 September 2009
OPN PIB FD8350FRHKBOX
OPN Tray FD8350FRW8KHK
Place in the rating 2095 2502
Price now $79. 99 $160.50
Series AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Price/performance ratio (0-100) 32.95 6.78
Applicability Desktop Desktop
Price at first issue date $150
Processor Number i5-750
Status Discontinued
Support 64 bit
Base frequency 4 GHz 2. 66 GHz
Crystal area 315 mm 296 mm2
Level 1 cache 384KB 256KB
Level 2 cache 8MB 1MB
Level 3 cache 8MB 8MB
Process 32nm SOI 45nm
Maximum core temperature 61°C 72.7°C
Maximum frequency 4.2 GHz 3. 20 GHz
Number of cores 8 4
Number of threads 8 4
Voltage P0 Vcore Min: 1.2V — Max: 1.4V
Number of transistors 1200 Million 774 million
Unlocked
Bus Speed ​​ 2.5 GT/s DMI
System bus (FSB) 2500 MHz
Permissible core voltage 0. 6500V-1.4000V
Supported memory frequency 1866 MHz
Supported memory types DDR3 DDR3 1066/1333
Maximum number of memory channels 2
Maximum memory bandwidth 21 GB/s
Maximum memory size 16GB
Maximum number of processors in 1 1
Supported sockets AM3+ LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size 37. 5mm x 37.5mm
PCI Express revision n/a 2.0
Number of PCI Express lanes 16
PCIe configurations 1×16, 2×8
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Idle States
Extended instructions Intel® SSE4.

2024 © All rights reserved