AMD FX-8370E vs AMD FX-6300
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8370E and AMD FX-6300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
AMD FX-8370E
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD FX-6300
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-8370E
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
- 2 more threads: 8 vs 6
- Around 13% higher clock speed: 4.
3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
- Around 1% higher maximum core temperature: 71 °C vs 70.50°C
- Around 33% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1501 vs 1489
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 5331 vs 4176
- 5.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 2859 vs 527
- 6.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 11715 vs 1914
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.383 vs 6.905
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 20.879 vs 16.195
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.401 vs 0.339
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.984 vs 0.85
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.
33 vs 4.767
Launch date | September 2014 vs October 2012 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 6 |
Maximum frequency | 4.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz |
Maximum core temperature | 71 °C vs 70.50°C |
L2 cache | 8192 KB vs 6 MB |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1501 vs 1489 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 5331 vs 4176 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 2859 vs 527 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 11715 vs 1914 |
CompuBench 1.![]() |
9.383 vs 6.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.879 vs 16.195 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.401 vs 0.339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.984 vs 0.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.33 vs 4.767 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-8370E
CPU 2: AMD FX-6300
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.![]() |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.![]() |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-8370E | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1501 | 1489 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 5331 | 4176 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 2859 | 527 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 11715 | 1914 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | 2098 |
CompuBench 1.![]() |
9.383 | 6.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.879 | 16.195 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.401 | 0.339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.984 | 0.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.33 | 4.767 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FX-8370E | AMD FX-6300 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Vishera | Vishera |
Launch date | September 2014 | October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1323 | 1981 |
Price now | $223.![]() |
$58.99 |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.27 | 31.81 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
OPN PIB | FD6300WMHKBOX | |
OPN Tray | FD6300WMW6KHK | |
Series | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors | |
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 315 mm | 315 mm |
L2 cache | 8192 KB | 6 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm SOI |
Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | 70.![]() |
Maximum frequency | 4.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 6 |
Number of threads | 8 | 6 |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.075 V — Max: 1.2875 V | Min: 1.15 V — Max: 1.3875 V |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 1200 million |
Unlocked | ||
Base frequency | 3.![]() |
|
L1 cache | 288 KB | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR3 |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3+ | AM3+ |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
PCI Express revision | n / a | 3.![]() |
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD FX-8370E with others
AMD
FX-8370E
vs
AMD
Athlon II X3 415e
AMD
FX-8370E
vs
Intel
Core i7-3970X
AMD
FX-8370E
vs
Intel
Core i5-4430S
AMD
FX-8370E
vs
Intel
Core i5-4590S
AMD
FX-8370E
vs
AMD
A8-6500B
AMD
FX-8370E
vs
AMD
A6 PRO-7400B
AMD FX-6300 vs.
AMD FX-8370E
AMD FX-6300
The AMD FX-6300 operates with 6 cores and 6 CPU threads. It run at 4.10 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 95 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below 71 °C degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q4/2012
AMD FX-8370E
The AMD FX-8370E operates with 8 cores and 6 CPU threads. It run at 4.30 GHz base 3.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 95 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q3/2014
AMD FX-6300
AMD FX-8370E
Compare Detail
3.50 GHz | Frequency | 3.30 GHz |
6 | Cores | 8 |
4.10 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.30 GHz |
4.10 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.80 GHz |
No | Hyperthreading | No |
Yes | Overclocking | Yes |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
32 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
DirectX Version | ||
Max. displays | ||
Memory | DDR3-1866 | |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | Yes |
— | L2 Cache | — |
8.![]() |
L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
3.0 | PCIe version | |
PCIe lanes | ||
32 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
AM3+ | Socket | AM3+ |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V |
Q4/2012 | Release date | Q3/2014 |
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
AMD FX-6300 | AMD FX-8370E | |
95 W | Max TDP | 95 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
AMD FX-6300 vs AMD FX-8370E
Summary
-
AMD FX-6300
100%
-
AMD FX-8370E
117%
Relative performance
-
AMD FX-6300
100%
-
AMD FX-8370E
102%
Relative performance
-
AMD FX-6300
100%
-
AMD FX-8370E
125%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider AMD FX-6300 |
None |
Reasons to consider AMD FX-8370E |
Much higher multi threaded performance (around 25% higher).![]() |
This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below). |
Around 17% higher average synthetic performance. |
Gaming
HWBench recommends AMD FX-8370E
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWBench recommends AMD FX-8370E
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Features
AMD FX-6300 | AMD FX-8370E | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMX | ||||
SSE | ||||
SSE2 | ||||
SSE3 | ||||
SSSE3 | ||||
SSE4.1 | ||||
SSE4.![]() |
||||
SSE4a | ||||
AMD64 | ||||
AMD-V | ||||
AES | ||||
AVX | ||||
CLMUL | ||||
CVT16 | ||||
EVP | ||||
FMA4 | ||||
XOP | ||||
Turbo Core | ||||
HT3.1 |
Architecture
AMD FX-6300 | AMD FX-8370E | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Architecture | AMD Piledriver | vs | AMD Piledriver | |
Market | Desktop | vs | Desktop | |
Memory Support | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 | |
Codename | Vishera | vs | Vishera | |
Release Date | Oct 2012 | vs | Sep 2014 |
Cores
AMD FX-6300 | AMD FX-8370E | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cores | 6 | vs | 8 | |
Threads | 6 | vs | 8 | |
SMPs | 1 | vs | 1 | |
Integrated Graphics | No | vs | No |
Cache
AMD FX-6300 | AMD FX-8370E | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
L1 Cache | 288 KB | vs | 384 KB | |
L2 Cache | 6144 KB | vs | 8192 KB | |
L3 Cache | 8192 KB (shared) | vs | 8192 KB (shared) |
Physical
AMD FX-6300 | AMD FX-8370E | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ | vs | AMD Socket AM3+ | |
Max Case Temp | unknown | vs | unknown | |
Package | uPGA | vs | uPGA | |
Die Size | 315mm² | vs | 315mm² | |
Process | 32 nm | vs | 32 nm |
Performance
AMD FX-6300 | AMD FX-8370E | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cpu Frequency | 3500 MHz | vs | 3300 MHz | |
Turbo Clock | 4100 MHz | vs | 4300 MHz | |
Base Clock | 200 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | |
Voltage | 1.![]() |
vs | 1.45 V | |
TDP | 95 W | vs | 95 W |
-
AMD FX-6300
2501 points
-
AMD FX-8370E
2623 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD FX-6300
10504 points
-
AMD FX-8370E
13205 points
Points — higher is better
-
AMD FX-6300
978
-
AMD FX-8370E
1236
points per second — higher is better
-
AMD FX-6300
15918
-
AMD FX-8370E
19481
MIPS — higher is better
-
AMD FX-6300
71.98
-
AMD FX-8370E
74.39
points — higher is better
-
AMD FX-6300
267.49
-
AMD FX-8370E
339.29
points — higher is better
-
AMD FX-6300
417
-
AMD FX-8370E
523
points — higher is better
points — higher is better
VS | ||
AMD FX-6300 | AMD Athlon Silver 3050GE |
VS | ||
AMD FX-6300 | AMD Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE |
VS | ||
AMD FX-8370E | AMD Ryzen 5 3580U |
VS | ||
AMD FX-8370E | Intel Core i7-10710U |
VS | ||
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 | Intel Pentium Gold G6500 |
VS | ||
Intel Pentium Gold G6500 | AMD Ryzen 3 4300U |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
CPU — Prozessor Vergleich und Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | AMD FX-8370E | |
3.50 GHz | Taktfrequenz | 3.30 GHz |
4.10 GHz | Turbo (1 Kern) | 4.30 GHz |
4.10 GHz | Turbo (alle Kerne) | 3.80 GHz |
6 | Kerne | 8 |
Nein | Hyperthreading | Nein |
Ja | Übertaktbar ? | Ja |
8 MB | Cache | 8 MB |
Grafik | ||
Grafiktakt | ||
Kein Turbo | Grafiktakt (Turbo) | Kein Turbo |
Generation | ||
DirectX Version | ||
0 | Max.![]() |
0 |
Einheiten | ||
Nein | Codec h364 | Nein |
Nein | Codec JPEG | Nein |
Nein | Codec h365 8bit | Nein |
Nein | Codec h365 10bit | Nein |
Nein | Codec VP8 | Nein |
Nein | Codec VP9 | Nein |
Nein | Codec VC-1 | Nein |
Nein | Codec AVC | Nein |
DDR3-1866 | Arbeitsspeicher | DDR3-1866 |
2 | Speicherkanäle | 2 |
Ja | ECC | Ja |
PCIe Version | ||
0 | PCIe Leitungen | 0 |
Vishera | Architektur | Vishera |
32nm | Fertigung | 32nm |
AM3+ | Sockel | AM3+ |
95W | TDP | 95W |
Ja | AES-NI | Ja |
AMD-V | Virtualisierung | AMD-V |
Q4/2012 | Erscheinungsdatum | Q3/2014 |
ca.![]() |
Preis | ca. 170 Euro |
|
|
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 ist ein Benchmark zur Leistungsmessung des Prozessors. Er basiert auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Single-Core Test nutzt nur einen CPU-Kern, die Anzahl der Kerne sowie Hyperthreading beeinflussen das Ergebnis nicht.
6x 3.5 GHz (4.1 GHz)
8x 3.3 GHz (4.3 GHz)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 ist ein Benchmark zur Leistungsmessung des Prozessors. Er basiert auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Multi-Core Test bezieht alle CPU-Kerne mit ein und zieht einen großen Nutzen aus Hyperthreading.
6x 3.5 GHz (4.1 GHz)
8x 3.3 GHz (4.3 GHz)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU)
Beim iGPU-Test wird die Prozessoreigene Grafikeinheit benutzt um per OpenGL Berechnungen durchzuführen.
6x 3.5 GHz (4.1 GHz)
8x 3.3 GHz (4.3 GHz)
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 ist die Weiterentwicklung von Cinebench 11.5 und basiert ebenso auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Single-Core Test nutzt nur einen CPU-Kern, die Anzahl der Kerne sowie Hyperthreading beeinflussen das Ergebnis nicht.
6x 3.5 GHz (4.1 GHz)
8x 3.3 GHz (4.3 GHz)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 ist die Weiterentwicklung von Cinebench 11.5 und basiert ebenso auf der Cinema 4D Suite, einem weltweit eingesetzten Programm, das benutzt wird um 3D-Inhalte und Formen zu generieren. Der Multi-Core Test bezieht alle CPU-Kerne mit ein und zieht einen großen Nutzen aus Hyperthreading.
6x 3.5 GHz (4.1 GHz)
8x 3.3 GHz (4.3 GHz)
Passmark CPU Mark
Beim PassMark CPU Mark werden unter anderem Primzahlberechnungen durchgeführt um die Leistung des Prozessors zu bestimmen. Es werden alle CPU-Kerne sowie Hyperthreading benutzt.
6x 3.5 GHz (4.1 GHz)
8x 3.3 GHz (4.3 GHz)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Der Geekbench 3 Benchmark misst die Leistung des Prozessors und bezieht dabei auch den Arbeitsspeicher mit ein. Ein schnellerer Arbeitsspeicher kann das Ergebnis stark verbessern. Der Single-Core Test nutzt nur einen CPU-Kern, die Anzahl der Kerne sowie Hyperthreading beeinflussen das Ergebnis nicht.
6x 3.5 GHz (4.1 GHz)
8x 3.3 GHz (4.3 GHz)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Der Geekbench 3 Benchmark misst die Leistung des Prozessors und bezieht dabei auch den Arbeitsspeicher mit ein. Ein schnellerer Arbeitsspeicher kann das Ergebnis stark verbessern. Der Multi-Core Test bezieht alle CPU-Kerne mit ein und zieht einen großen Nutzen aus Hyperthreading.
6x 3.5 GHz (4.1 GHz)
8x 3.3 GHz (4.3 GHz)
Die häufigsten Vergleiche mit diesen Prozessoren
Zurück zum CPU-Vergleich
Hinweis: Wir übernehmen keine Gewähr für die Richtigkeit der hier angezeigten Informationen.
AMD FX-8370E vs. Intel Core i7-7700K
Cpu Benchmark with benchmarks
AMD FX-8370E | Intel Core i7-7700K | |
3.30 GHz | Frequency | 4.20 GHz |
4.30 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.50 GHz |
3.80 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 4.40 GHz |
8 | Cores | 4 |
No | Hyperthreading ? | Yes |
Yes | Overclocking ? | Yes |
normal | Core architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
DirectX Version | 12 | |
Max.![]() |
3 | |
DDR3-1866 | Memory | |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max. Memory | ||
Yes | ECC | No |
— | L2 Cache | — |
8.00 MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
PCIe version | 3.0 | |
PCIe lanes | 16 | |
32 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
AM3+ | Socket | LGA 1151 |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
AMD-V | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q3/2014 | Release date | Q1/2017 |
show more detail | show more detail |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Benchmark. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Benchmark’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Popular Comparision
AMD FX-8370E vs. Intel Core i7-7700K — Cpu Benchmark Specs & Test
5 of 40 rating(s)
1 | 2020 | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 9 5950X |
$ 710.0 | ||||
2 | 2021 | Intel Core i7-12700K
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i7-12700K |
$ 470.0 | ||||
3 | 2021 | Intel Core i9-12900K
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i9-12900K |
$ 590.![]() |
||||
4 | 2022 | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
$ 450.0 | ||||
5 | 2021 | Intel Core i9-11900K
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i9-11900K |
$ 488.0 | ||||
6 | 2020 | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 9 5900X |
$ 499.0 | ||||
7 | 2021 | Intel Core i5-12600K
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i5-12600K |
$ 290.0 | ||||
8 | 2020 | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 7 5800X |
$ 399.0 | ||||
9 | 2021 | Intel Core i7-11700K
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i7-11700K |
$ 410.![]() |
||||
10 | 2020 | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 5600X |
$ 299.0 | ||||
11 | 2020 | Intel Core i9-10900K
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i9-10900K |
$ 590.0 | ||||
12 | 2018 | Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i9-9900K |
$ 835.0 | ||||
13 | 2020 | Intel Core i7-10700K
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i7-10700K |
$ 409.1 | ||||
14 | 2021 | Intel Core i5-11600K
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i5-11600K |
$ 262.0 | ||||
15 | 2018 | Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i7-9700K |
$ 410.0 | ||||
16 | 2018 | Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i9-9900 |
$ 440.0 | ||||
17 | 2021 | Intel Core i5-11400
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i5-11400 |
$ 182.0 | ||||
18 | 2022 | Intel Core i5-12400
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i5-12400 |
$ 143.0 | ||||
19 | 2018 | Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-8086K |
$ 553.0 | ||||
20 | 2018 | Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-9700 |
$ 330.![]() |
||||
21 | 2018 | Intel Core i7-9700F @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-9700F |
$ 368.0 | ||||
22 | 2020 | Intel Core i5-10600K
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i5-10600K |
$ 236.8 | ||||
23 | 2017 | Intel Core i7-8700K @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-8700K |
$ 369.9 | ||||
24 | 2017 | Intel Core i9-7940X @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i9-7940X |
$ 1,192.1 | ||||
25 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 7 3700X |
$ 330.0 | ||||
26 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 9 3900X |
$ 499.![]() |
||||
27 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 7 3800X |
$ 399.0 | ||||
28 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 9 3950X |
$ 750.0 | ||||
29 | 2020 | Intel Core i5-10400
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i5-10400 |
$ 182.0 | ||||
30 | 2018 | Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-9600K |
$ 280.0 | ||||
31 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 5 3600
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 3600 |
$ 199.0 | ||||
32 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 3600X |
$ 249.![]() |
||||
33 | 2018 | Intel Core i5-9600KF @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-9600KF |
$ 215.0 | ||||
34 | 2022 | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 7 5700X |
$ 300.0 | ||||
35 | 2022 | AMD Ryzen 5 5500
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 5500 |
$ 160.0 | ||||
36 | 2022 | Intel Core i3-12300
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i3-12300 |
$ 143.0 | ||||
37 | 2017 | Intel Core i5-8600K @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-8600K |
$ 377.7 | ||||
38 | 2017 | Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i9-7900X |
$ 1,380.0 | ||||
39 | 2017 | Intel Core i9-7980XE @ 2.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i9-7980XE |
$ 2,005.5 | ||||
40 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 3500X |
$ 160.5 | ||||
41 | 2022 | Intel Core i3-12100
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i3-12100 |
$ 122.0 | ||||
42 | 2017 | Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-8700 |
$ 454.5 | ||||
43 | 2017 | Intel Core i9-7920X @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i9-7920X |
$ 1,096.![]() |
||||
44 | 2017 | Intel Core i9-7960X @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i9-7960X |
$ 2,000.0 | ||||
45 | 2019 | Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-9400F |
$ 170.0 | ||||
46 | 2019 | Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-9400 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
47 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 5 3500
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 3500 |
$ 148.0 | ||||
48 | 2021 | Intel Core i3-11300
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i3-11300 |
$ 143.0 | ||||
49 | 2018 | Intel Core i5-8600 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i5-8600 |
$ 244.5 | ||||
50 | 2017 | Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-7740X |
$ 349.0 | ||||
51 | 2020 | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 3 3300X |
$ 120.0 | ||||
52 | 2020 | AMD Ryzen 3 3100
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 3 3100 |
$ 90.0 | ||||
53 | 2021 | Intel Core i3-11100
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i3-11100 |
$ 122.0 | ||||
54 | 2020 | Intel Core i3-10300
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i3-10300 |
$ 143.0 | ||||
55 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
$ 900.![]() |
||||
56 | 2018 | Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-8500 |
$ 239.0 | ||||
57 | 2016 | Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-7700K |
$ 355.0 | ||||
58 | 2017 | Intel Core i7-7820X @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-7820X |
$ 930.0 | ||||
59 | 2014 | Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-4790K |
$ 307.0 | ||||
60 | 2020 | Intel Core i3-10100
>> compare FX-8370E vs Core i3-10100 |
$ 122.0 | ||||
61 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
$ 1,720.![]() |
||||
62 | 2017 | Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-7640X |
$ 250.0 | ||||
63 | 2017 | Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-8400 |
$ 200.0 | ||||
64 | 2019 | Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-9350KF |
$ 224.0 | ||||
65 | 2019 | Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-9320 |
$ 162.0 | ||||
66 | 2019 | Intel Core i3-9100 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-9100 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
67 | 2017 | Intel Core i3-8350K @ 4.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i3-8350K |
$ 184.0 | ||||
68 | 2019 | Intel Core i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-9100F |
$ 105.0 | ||||
69 | 2017 | Intel Core i5-7600K @ 3.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-7600K |
$ 251.0 | ||||
70 | 2016 | Intel Core i7-6950X @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-6950X |
$ 1,576.0 | ||||
71 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
$ 680.0 | ||||
72 | 2015 | Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-6700K |
$ 335.![]() |
||||
73 | 2016 | Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-6900K |
$ 1,200.0 | ||||
74 | 2017 | Intel Core i7-7800X @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-7800X |
$ 370.0 | ||||
75 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 7 2700X |
$ 305.0 | ||||
76 | 2018 | Intel Core i3-8300 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-8300 |
$ 179.4 | ||||
77 | 2016 | Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-7700 |
$ 325.1 | ||||
78 | 2017 | Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i5-7600 |
$ 240.0 | ||||
79 | 2015 | Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-6700 |
$ 433.7 | ||||
80 | 2016 | Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-6800K |
$ 420.0 | ||||
81 | 2017 | Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-8100 |
$ 130.0 | ||||
82 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-4770K |
$ 285.0 | ||||
83 | 2014 | Intel Core i7-4790 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-4790 |
$ 279.![]() |
||||
84 | 2015 | Intel Core i7-5775C @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-5775C |
$ 450.0 | ||||
85 | 2014 | Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-5930K |
$ 499.0 | ||||
86 | 2016 | Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-6850K |
$ 550.0 | ||||
87 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 2600X |
$ 210.0 | ||||
88 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
$ 420.0 | ||||
89 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i7-4770 |
$ 240.0 | ||||
90 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4771 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-4771 |
$ 300.0 | ||||
91 | 2014 | Intel Core i7-4790S @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-4790S |
$ 342.6 | ||||
92 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 7 2700 |
$ 249.2 | ||||
93 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
$ 350.0 | ||||
94 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4770S @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-4770S |
$ 250.![]() |
||||
95 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4960X @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-4960X |
$ 770.0 | ||||
96 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4690 |
$ 200.0 | ||||
97 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4690K |
$ 200.0 | ||||
98 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4690S @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4690S |
$ 269.9 | ||||
99 | 2015 | Intel Core i5-6600K @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-6600K |
$ 288.9 | ||||
100 | 2016 | Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i5-7500 |
$ 210.0 | ||||
101 | 2014 | Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-5820K |
$ 300.0 | ||||
102 | 2014 | Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-5960X |
$ 770.0 | ||||
103 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen 5 2600
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 2600 |
$ 150.0 | ||||
104 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 7 1800X |
$ 250.0 | ||||
105 | 2012 | Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-3970X |
$ 954.![]() |
||||
106 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 1600X |
$ 178.4 | ||||
107 | 2017 | Intel Core i3-7350K @ 4.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-7350K |
$ 230.0 | ||||
108 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4670 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4670 |
$ 188.0 | ||||
109 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4670K @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4670K |
$ 250.0 | ||||
110 | 2018 | Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4670R |
$ 276.0 | ||||
111 | 2015 | Intel Core i5-5675C @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i5-5675C |
$ 400.0 | ||||
112 | 2015 | Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-6600 |
$ 220.0 | ||||
113 | 2012 | Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-3770 |
$ 179.0 | ||||
114 | 2012 | Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-3770K |
$ 249.0 | ||||
115 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-3960X |
$ 800.0 | ||||
116 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-4930K |
$ 399.![]() |
||||
117 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4590 |
$ 185.0 | ||||
118 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 7 1700X |
$ 200.0 | ||||
119 | 2017 | Intel Core i3-7320 @ 4.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-7320 |
$ 174.8 | ||||
120 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4570 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4570 |
$ 175.0 | ||||
121 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4590S |
$ 198.0 | ||||
122 | 2017 | Intel Core i5-7400 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i5-7400 |
$ 213.5 | ||||
123 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-2700K @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-2700K |
$ 200.0 | ||||
124 | 2012 | Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-3770S |
$ 200.0 | ||||
125 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-3930K |
$ 399.0 | ||||
126 | 2013 | Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-4820K |
$ 500.0 | ||||
127 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 3400G |
$ 150.![]() |
||||
128 | 2017 | Intel Core i3-7300 @ 4.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-7300 |
$ 210.0 | ||||
129 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 1500X |
$ 144.9 | ||||
130 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 5 1600
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 1600 |
$ 155.0 | ||||
131 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 2400G |
$ 159.0 | ||||
132 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 7 1700
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 7 1700 |
$ 190.0 | ||||
133 | 2015 | Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i5-6500 |
$ 234.4 | ||||
134 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-2600 |
$ 150.0 | ||||
135 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-2600K @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-2600K |
$ 198.0 | ||||
136 | 2012 | Intel Core i7-3820 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-3820 |
$ 200.0 | ||||
137 | 2019 | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 3 3200G |
$ 99.0 | ||||
138 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3570 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3570 |
$ 140.![]() |
||||
139 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3570K |
$ 144.0 | ||||
140 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4570S |
$ 221.6 | ||||
141 | 2016 | Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-6402P |
$ 190.0 | ||||
142 | 2018 | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 3 2200G |
$ 98.0 | ||||
143 | 2017 | Intel Core i3-7100 @ 3.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-7100 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
144 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3550 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3550 |
$ 330.0 | ||||
145 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3550S @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3550S |
$ 341.0 | ||||
146 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3570S |
$ 285.0 | ||||
147 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 3 1300X |
$ 125.0 | ||||
148 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-2550K |
$ 130.0 | ||||
149 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3470 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3470 |
$ 125.![]() |
||||
150 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3475S |
$ 143.5 | ||||
151 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4460 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
152 | 2014 | Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4460S |
$ 660.0 | ||||
153 | 2015 | Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-6400 |
$ 200.0 | ||||
154 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4440 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4440 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
155 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4440S |
$ 463.0 | ||||
156 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-2600S @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-2600S |
$ 200.0 | ||||
157 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-2500 |
$ 105.0 | ||||
158 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-2500K |
$ 124.0 | ||||
159 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3450 |
$ 128.0 | ||||
160 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3470S |
$ 140.![]() |
||||
161 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4430 |
$ 180.0 | ||||
162 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 5 1400
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 5 1400 |
$ 134.0 | ||||
163 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3450S @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3450S |
$ 100.0 | ||||
164 | 2017 | AMD Ryzen 3 1200
>> compare FX-8370E vs Ryzen 3 1200 |
$ 95.0 | ||||
165 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-2450P |
$ 90.0 | ||||
166 | 2011 | Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i5-2500S |
$ 75.0 | ||||
167 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-3340 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3340 |
$ 262.0 | ||||
168 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-4430S |
$ 160.0 | ||||
169 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-990X @ 3.47GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-990X |
$ 350.0 | ||||
170 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-2400 |
$ 84.0 | ||||
171 | 2013 | Intel Core i5-3340S @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3340S |
$ 150.![]() |
||||
172 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3350P |
$ 170.0 | ||||
173 | 2011 | Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-2320 |
$ 195.3 | ||||
174 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-2380P |
$ 90.0 | ||||
175 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3330 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
176 | 2012 | Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-3330S |
$ 95.0 | ||||
177 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-980X @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i7-980X |
$ 220.0 | ||||
178 | 2013 | AMD FX-9590 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-9590 |
$ 122.0 | ||||
179 | 2011 | Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-2310 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
180 | 2011 | Intel Core i5-2400S @ 2.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-2400S |
$ 65.7 | ||||
181 | 2011 | Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-2405S |
$ 164.4 | ||||
182 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-980 |
$ 200.![]() |
||||
183 | 2013 | AMD FX-9370 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-9370 |
$ 178.9 | ||||
184 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-680 |
$ 90.0 | ||||
185 | 2014 | AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-8370 |
$ 135.0 | ||||
186 | 2014 | AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-8370E |
$ 180.0 | ||||
187 | 2011 | Intel Core i5-2300 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-2300 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
188 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i7-970 |
$ 150.0 | ||||
189 | 2009 | Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-975 |
$ 180.0 | ||||
190 | 2012 | AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-8350 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
191 | 2014 | Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-4370 |
$ 450.0 | ||||
192 | 2015 | Intel Core i3-6320 @ 3.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-6320 |
$ 160.0 | ||||
193 | 2013 | AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon X4 760K |
$ 46.![]() |
||||
194 | 2012 | AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-8320 |
$ 79.5 | ||||
195 | 2015 | Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-6300 |
$ 143.0 | ||||
196 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-655K |
$ 60.0 | ||||
197 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-670 |
$ 90.0 | ||||
198 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-880 @ 3.07GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-880 |
$ 583.0 | ||||
199 | 2009 | Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i7-960 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
200 | 2008 | Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-965 |
$ 140.0 | ||||
201 | 2015 | Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-4170 |
$ 150.0 | ||||
202 | 2014 | Intel Core i3-4360 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-4360 |
$ 280.0 | ||||
203 | 2015 | Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-6100 |
$ 166.1 | ||||
204 | 2013 | AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-8300 |
$ 80.![]() |
||||
205 | 2014 | Intel Core i3-4160 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-4160 |
$ 140.0 | ||||
206 | 2013 | Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-4340 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
207 | 2014 | Intel Core i3-4350 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-4350 |
$ 170.0 | ||||
208 | 2016 | Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-6098P |
$ 133.7 | ||||
209 | 2009 | Intel Core i5-660 @ 3.33GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-660 |
$ 49.0 | ||||
210 | 2009 | Intel Core i7-870 @ 2.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i7-870 |
$ 310.0 | ||||
211 | 2009 | Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-950 |
$ 245.0 | ||||
212 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Extreme X9770 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs X9770 |
$ 1,609.0 | ||||
213 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Extreme X9775 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs X9775 |
$ 1,806.0 | ||||
214 | 2014 | AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-8320E |
$ 98.9 | ||||
215 | 2011 | AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-8150 |
$ 383.![]() |
||||
216 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X6 1100T |
$ 200.0 | ||||
217 | 2014 | Intel Core i3-4150 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-4150 |
$ 260.0 | ||||
218 | 2013 | Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-4330 |
$ 180.0 | ||||
219 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-650 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
220 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-661 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
221 | 2011 | Intel Core i7-860S @ 2.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i7-860S |
$ 200.0 | ||||
222 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-875K @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-875K |
$ 200.0 | ||||
223 | 2008 | Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-940 |
$ 70.7 | ||||
224 | 2012 | AMD Athlon X4 740 Quad Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon X4 740 |
$ 277.0 | ||||
225 | 2011 | AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-8120 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
226 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X6 1090T |
$ 396.![]() |
||||
227 | 2010 | Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-760 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
228 | 2009 | Intel Core i7-860 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-860 |
$ 290.0 | ||||
229 | 2010 | Intel Core i7-930 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-930 |
$ 60.0 | ||||
230 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E8600 @ 3.33GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E8600 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
231 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Extreme X9650 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs X9650 |
$ 909.0 | ||||
232 | 2013 | Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i3-4130 |
$ 140.0 | ||||
233 | 2013 | AMD FX-6350 Six-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-6350 |
$ 130.0 | ||||
234 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X6 1075T
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X6 1075T |
$ 260.0 | ||||
235 | 2008 | Intel Core i7-920 @ 2.67GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i7-920 |
$ 174.0 | ||||
236 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E8500 |
$ 40.0 | ||||
237 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 965
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 965 |
$ 59.![]() |
||||
238 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X6 1055T |
$ 185.0 | ||||
239 | 2013 | Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-3250 |
$ 95.0 | ||||
240 | 2009 | Intel Core i5-750 @ 2.67GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5-750 |
$ 160.5 | ||||
241 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q6850 |
$ 1,496.0 | ||||
242 | 2012 | AMD FX-6300 Six-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-6300 |
$ 59.0 | ||||
243 | 2012 | Intel Core i3-3240 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i3-3240 |
$ 46.0 | ||||
244 | 2013 | Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-3245 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
245 | 2018 | Intel Pentium Gold G5600 @ 3.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium Gold G5600 |
$ 100.9 | ||||
246 | 2011 | AMD Athlon II X3 460
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X3 460 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
247 | 2012 | AMD FX-6200 Six-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-6200 |
$ 340.0 | ||||
248 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 955
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 955 |
$ 130.![]() |
||||
249 | 2011 | AMD Phenom II X4 960T
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 960T |
$ 135.0 | ||||
250 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X4 B97
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 B97 |
$ 90.0 | ||||
251 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X6 1045T
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X6 1045T |
$ 175.0 | ||||
252 | 2011 | Intel Core i3-2130 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-2130 |
$ 70.0 | ||||
253 | 2012 | Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-3220 |
$ 34.9 | ||||
254 | 2012 | Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i3-3225 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
255 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Duo E7500 @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E7500 |
$ 15.0 | ||||
256 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Duo E7600 @ 3.06GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E7600 |
$ 120.0 | ||||
257 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E8400 |
$ 9.8 | ||||
258 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Extreme Q6800 @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q6800 |
$ 1,125.0 | ||||
259 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q9650 |
$ 69.![]() |
||||
260 | 2018 | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium Gold G5400 |
$ 123.9 | ||||
261 | 2018 | Intel Pentium Gold G5500 @ 3.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium Gold G5500 |
$ 100.3 | ||||
262 | 2011 | AMD Athlon II X2 270
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X2 270 |
$ 24.0 | ||||
263 | 2012 | AMD Athlon II X2 B28
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X2 B28 |
$ 49.1 | ||||
264 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X3 455
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X3 455 |
$ 116.9 | ||||
265 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X4 645
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X4 645 |
$ 50.![]() |
||||
266 | 2011 | AMD Phenom II X4 840
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 840 |
$ 90.0 | ||||
267 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X6 1035T |
$ 189.0 | ||||
268 | 2013 | Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-3210 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
269 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E8300 @ 2.83GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E8300 |
$ 20.0 | ||||
270 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 2.83GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q9550 |
$ 49.0 | ||||
271 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X2 265
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X2 265 |
$ 82.![]() |
||||
272 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X3 450
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X3 450 |
$ 40.0 | ||||
273 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X4 640
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X4 640 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
274 | 2011 | AMD Phenom II X2 565
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X2 565 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
275 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 940
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 940 |
$ 120.0 | ||||
276 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 945
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 945 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
277 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X4 B95
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 B95 |
$ 73.![]() |
||||
278 | 2011 | Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-2120 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
279 | 2011 | Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-2125 |
$ 199.0 | ||||
280 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6850 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E6850 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
281 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E7300 @ 2.66GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E7300 |
$ 20.0 | ||||
282 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E7400 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E7400 |
$ 29.0 | ||||
283 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E8200 @ 2.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs E8200 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
284 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Extreme X6800 @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs X6800 |
$ 263.6 | ||||
285 | 2010 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 @ 2.83GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q9500 |
$ 35.0 | ||||
286 | 2017 | Intel Pentium G4620 @ 3.70GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G4620 |
$ 105.9 | ||||
287 | 2016 | Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-2102 |
$ 58.0 | ||||
288 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 @ 2.83GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q9505 |
$ 190.![]() |
||||
289 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G3258 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G3258 |
$ 178.3 | ||||
290 | 2015 | Intel Pentium G3470 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G3470 |
$ 104.3 | ||||
291 | 2015 | Intel Pentium G4520 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G4520 |
$ 110.9 | ||||
292 | 2017 | Intel Pentium G4600 @ 3.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G4600 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
293 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X2 260
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X2 260 |
$ 20.0 | ||||
294 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X3 435
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X3 435 |
$ 50.![]() |
||||
295 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X3 440
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X3 440 |
$ 47.0 | ||||
296 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X3 445
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X3 445 |
$ 91.0 | ||||
297 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X4 630
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X4 630 |
$ 43.0 | ||||
298 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X4 635
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X4 635 |
$ 70.0 | ||||
299 | 2012 | AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X4 641 |
$ 91.5 | ||||
300 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X2 550
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X2 550 |
$ 50.![]() |
||||
301 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X2 555
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X2 555 |
$ 142.1 | ||||
302 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 820
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 820 |
$ 75.0 | ||||
303 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 920
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 920 |
$ 67.0 | ||||
304 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 925
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 925 |
$ 160.0 | ||||
305 | 2011 | Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-2100 |
$ 60.0 | ||||
306 | 2011 | Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs i3-2105 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
307 | 2012 | Intel Core i5 750S @ 2.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i5 750S |
$ 100.0 | ||||
308 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G3450 @ 3.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G3450 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
309 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G3460 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G3460 |
$ 288.2 | ||||
310 | 2017 | Intel Pentium G4560 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G4560 |
$ 103.1 | ||||
311 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X2 250
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X2 250 |
$ 39.![]() |
||||
312 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X2 255
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X2 255 |
$ 65.2 | ||||
313 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X2 B24
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X2 B24 |
$ 40.0 | ||||
314 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X4 620
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X4 620 |
$ 60.0 | ||||
315 | 2011 | AMD Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X4 631 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
316 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X2 545
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X2 545 |
$ 44.0 | ||||
317 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X2 B55
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X2 B55 |
$ 48.![]() |
||||
318 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X3 720
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X3 720 |
$ 70.0 | ||||
319 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X3 B73
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X3 B73 |
$ 75.0 | ||||
320 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 810
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 810 |
$ 116.0 | ||||
321 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 910
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 910 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
322 | 2010 | AMD Phenom II X4 910e
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 910e |
$ 157.0 | ||||
323 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6750 @ 2.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs E6750 |
$ 13.0 | ||||
324 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E7200 |
$ 75.0 | ||||
325 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.66GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q9450 |
$ 335.0 | ||||
326 | 2015 | Intel Pentium G4500 @ 3.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G4500 |
$ 85.3 | ||||
327 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 6400+ |
$ 260.0 | ||||
328 | 2009 | AMD Athlon 7850 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 7850 |
$ 209.![]() |
||||
329 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X2 245
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X2 245 |
$ 35.0 | ||||
330 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X2 B22
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X2 B22 |
$ 36.0 | ||||
331 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X3 425
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X3 425 |
$ 104.2 | ||||
332 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 9950 |
$ 180.0 | ||||
333 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X3 710
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X3 710 |
$ 84.5 | ||||
334 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 805
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 805 |
$ 174.![]() |
||||
335 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X4 905e
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X4 905e |
$ 212.4 | ||||
336 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E4700 @ 2.60GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E4700 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
337 | 2010 | Intel Core2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E6700 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
338 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q8400 |
$ 99.5 | ||||
339 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q9400 |
$ 34.0 | ||||
340 | 2015 | Intel Pentium G3260 @ 3.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G3260 |
$ 105.0 | ||||
341 | 2016 | AMD Athlon X4 845
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon X4 845 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
342 | 2013 | AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-4350 |
$ 130.0 | ||||
343 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q6700 |
$ 45.0 | ||||
344 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q8300 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
345 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q9300 |
$ 50.![]() |
||||
346 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G3250 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G3250 |
$ 110.0 | ||||
347 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G3420 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G3420 |
$ 110.0 | ||||
348 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G3430 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G3430 |
$ 90.0 | ||||
349 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G3440 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G3440 |
$ 159.9 | ||||
350 | 2015 | Intel Pentium G4400 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G4400 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
351 | 2009 | AMD Athlon 7750 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 7750 |
$ 148.![]() |
||||
352 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X2 215
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X2 215 |
$ 12.0 | ||||
353 | 2010 | AMD Athlon II X2 220
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X2 220 |
$ 32.2 | ||||
354 | 2009 | AMD Athlon II X2 240
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon II X2 240 |
$ 35.0 | ||||
355 | 2017 | AMD Athlon X4 950
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon X4 950 |
$ 60.0 | ||||
356 | 2012 | AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-4300 |
$ 53.4 | ||||
357 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9750 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 9750 |
$ 60.![]() |
||||
358 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9850 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 9850 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
359 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6600 @ 2.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E6600 |
$ 15.0 | ||||
360 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G2140 @ 3.30GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G2140 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
361 | 2009 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5800+ |
$ 25.0 | ||||
362 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 6000+ |
$ 46.0 | ||||
363 | 2016 | AMD Athlon X4 880K
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon X4 880K |
$ 90.![]() |
||||
364 | 2013 | AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-4200 |
$ 228.2 | ||||
365 | 2010 | AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 9450e |
$ 105.0 | ||||
366 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 9550 |
$ 40.0 | ||||
367 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 9600B |
$ 147.2 | ||||
368 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 9650 |
$ 55.0 | ||||
369 | 2009 | AMD Phenom II X3 705e
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom II X3 705e |
$ 152.![]() |
||||
370 | 2010 | Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-560 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
371 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E4600 @ 2.40GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E4600 |
$ 158.0 | ||||
372 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6550 @ 2.33GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E6550 |
$ 15.0 | ||||
373 | 2014 | Intel Pentium G3240 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G3240 |
$ 80.0 | ||||
374 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5200+ |
$ 53.1 | ||||
375 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5400+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5400+ |
$ 53.![]() |
||||
376 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5600+ |
$ 150.0 | ||||
377 | 2009 | AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 7550 |
$ 60.0 | ||||
378 | 2012 | AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-4170 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
379 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 8600 |
$ 53.0 | ||||
380 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 8600B |
$ 53.0 | ||||
381 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 8650 |
$ 50.![]() |
||||
382 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 9500 |
$ 60.0 | ||||
383 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 9600 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
384 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E6400 |
$ 20.0 | ||||
385 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E6420 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
386 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E4500 @ 2.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E4500 |
$ 40.0 | ||||
387 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs Q6600 |
$ 40.0 | ||||
388 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Quad Q8200 @ 2.33GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Q8200 |
$ 23.0 | ||||
389 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G2130 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G2130 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
390 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G3220 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G3220 |
$ 120.0 | ||||
391 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5200+ |
$ 53.1 | ||||
392 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5400+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5400+ |
$ 53.![]() |
||||
393 | 2014 | AMD Athlon X4 860K
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon X4 860K |
$ 64.0 | ||||
394 | 2016 | AMD Athlon X4 870K
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon X4 870K |
$ 80.0 | ||||
395 | 2011 | AMD FX-4100 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-4100 |
$ 130.0 | ||||
396 | 2012 | AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs FX-4130 |
$ 76.0 | ||||
397 | 2010 | Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-550 |
$ 180.0 | ||||
398 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5000+ |
$ 331.![]() |
||||
399 | 2009 | AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon Dual 5000B |
$ 95.0 | ||||
400 | 2015 | AMD Athlon X4 840
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon X4 840 |
$ 78.7 | ||||
401 | 2011 | AMD E2-3200 APU
>> compare FX-8370E vs E2-3200 APU |
$ 8.0 | ||||
402 | 2008 | AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 8450 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
403 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 9350e |
$ 3,382.1 | ||||
404 | 2009 | AMD Phenom X3 8550
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom X3 8550 |
$ 170.![]() |
||||
405 | 2010 | Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-540 |
$ 21.0 | ||||
406 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G2030 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G2030 |
$ 41.0 | ||||
407 | 2012 | Intel Pentium G2120 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G2120 |
$ 46.0 | ||||
408 | 2012 | Intel Pentium G870 @ 3.10GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G870 |
$ 97.0 | ||||
409 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 5000+ |
$ 331.5 | ||||
410 | 2009 | AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 5000 |
$ 100.![]() |
||||
411 | 2010 | AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 5200 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
412 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4600+ |
$ 360.0 | ||||
413 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4800+ |
$ 460.0 | ||||
414 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 9150e |
$ 40.0 | ||||
415 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E4400 @ 2.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E4400 |
$ 9.0 | ||||
416 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs E6320 |
$ 50.0 | ||||
417 | 2011 | Intel Pentium G860 @ 3.00GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G860 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
418 | 2009 | AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 5000 |
$ 100.0 | ||||
419 | 2010 | AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 5200 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
420 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4600+ |
$ 360.0 | ||||
421 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4800+ |
$ 460.![]() |
||||
422 | 2010 | Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs i3-530 |
$ 20.0 | ||||
423 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G2020 @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G2020 |
$ 32.9 | ||||
424 | 2011 | Intel Pentium G850 @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G850 |
$ 30.0 | ||||
425 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4200+ |
$ 130.0 | ||||
426 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4400+ |
$ 60.0 | ||||
427 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 8250e Triple-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 8250e |
$ 47.![]() |
||||
428 | 2009 | AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core
>> compare FX-8370E vs Phenom 9100e |
$ 40.0 | ||||
429 | 2009 | Intel Core2 Duo E4300 @ 1.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E4300 |
$ 158.0 | ||||
430 | 2008 | Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 1.86GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs E6300 |
$ 13.0 | ||||
431 | 2013 | Intel Pentium G2010 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G2010 |
$ 34.9 | ||||
432 | 2012 | Intel Pentium G645 @ 2.90GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G645 |
$ 95.0 | ||||
433 | 2011 | Intel Pentium G840 @ 2.![]() >> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G840 |
$ 35.0 | ||||
434 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4200+ |
$ 130.0 | ||||
435 | 2008 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+
>> compare FX-8370E vs Athlon 64 X2 Dual 4400+ |
$ 60.0 | ||||
436 | 2012 | Intel Pentium G640 @ 2.80GHz
>> compare FX-8370E vs Pentium G640 |
$ 25.0 |
Intel Core i5-6300HQ or AMD FX-8370E
- >
- Processors
- >
- Comparison
- >
- Intel Core I5-6300HQ VS AMD FX-8370e
Core i5-6200u
Compare
Compare
Compare
Family
- FX-8300
Compare - FX-8320
Compare - FX-8320E
Compare - FX-8350
Compare - FX-8370
Compare
Speed in games
Core i5-6300HQ
FX-8370E 900. 2 (+0.37)
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Speed in office use
Core i5-6300HQ
57.1 (+0.4%)
FX-8370E
56.9
Performance in everyday work, such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i5-6300HQ
30.2
FX-8370E
33.1 (+8.8%)
The performance of all cores and their number have the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
Core i5-6300HQ 52.4 (+8.2%) FX-8370E 48.1 |
Demanding games and tasks |
Core i5-6300HQ 27.1 FX-8370E 27.1 |
Extreme |
Core i5-6300HQ 5.3 FX-8370E 7. |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests of users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Basic
Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Core™ i5-6300HQ Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.![]() |
|
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Skylake | |
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 14 | No data |
Date of Issue The month and year the processor was released. | 09-2018 | 09-2017 |
Model Official name. | i5-6300HQ | |
Cores The number of physical cores. | 4 | 8 |
ThreadsNumber of threads.![]() |
4 | 8 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized by the operating system as two logical cores, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Missing | Missing |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 2.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Turbo frequency The maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode.![]() |
3.2 | No data |
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 6 | No data |
Instructions | 64-bit | |
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations.![]() |
SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 | |
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No | No |
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
Number of QPI links | ||
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 45 | No data |
Cooling system specifications |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card.![]() |
Intel® HD Graphics 530 | |
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | 350 | No data |
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. | 950 | No data |
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | No data | |
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time.![]() |
3 |
RAM
Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 64 | No data |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | |
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 2 | |
RAM bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | |
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory, which is used in servers. |
No data | No data |
PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | 3 | No data |
PCI configuration options | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Number of PCI lanes | 16 | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 |
Data Protection
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. |
No data | No data |
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
Dimensions | No data | No data |
Supported sockets | No data | No data |
Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which one is better
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
- 0% faster performance in office applications and browsers
AMD FX-8370E
- On average, gaming performance is 0% better.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 2%.
- The number of physical cores is 4 more.
- The number of threads is increased by 4.
- The base frequency is increased by 1 GHz.
What are similar
- Prices for new processors are approximately equal.
AMD A4-6300 vs AMD FX-8370E
- Main
- CPU Comparison
 / 
 / 
Overall score
Issued
Q2/2013
Issued
Q3/2014
Overall score
Differences
Characteristics
Performance Tests
Comments
Differences
Reasons to choose
AMD A4-6300
Report a bug
-
Higher clock speed
3.70 GHz 3.30 GHz
About 11%
higher clock speed -
Power per Watt
65W 95W
1.
46 times less heat generated by the processor, W.
Positions in benchmark results
Reasons to choose
AMD FX-8370E
Report a bug
-
More cores
8 2
4 more cores
-
Higher Turbo clock speed
4.30 GHz 3.90 GHz
About 9% better overclocked clock speed
Positions in benchmark results
Features
Specification list:
AMD A4-6300
AMD FX-8370E
Processor generation and series
CPU cores and base frequency
-
Frequency
3.70 GHz 3.30 GHz
-
CPU Cores
2 8
-
Turbo (1 Core)
3.
90 GHz 4.30 GHz
-
Threads
2 8
-
Hypertrading
No No
-
Acceleration
No Yes
-
Kernel architecture
normal normal
Integrated graphics
-
GPU
AMD Radeon HD 8370D no iGPU
-
GPU frequency
0.76GHz
-
GPU (Turbo)
no turbo no turbo
-
Processing units
2
-
Shaders
128
-
Max.
GPU Memory
2GB —
-
Max. displays
2
-
Generation
5
-
DirectX Version
11.2
-
Tech. process
32nm
-
Issue
Q2/2013
Hardware codec support
Memory and PCIe
-
Memory type
DDR3-1866 DDR3-1866
-
ECC
No Yes
-
Memory channels
2 2
Encryption
-
AES-NI
Yes Yes
Power consumption
-
TDP (PL1)
65W 95W
Technical details
-
Instruction set (ISA)
x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
-
Virtualization
AMD-V AMD-V
-
ISA Extensions
SSE4a, SSE4.
1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
-
Cash L3
1.00MB 8.00MB
-
Architecture
Richland (Piledriver) Vishera (Bulldozer)
-
Tech. process
32 nm 32 nm
-
Socket
FM2 AM3+
-
Issue
Q2/2013 Q3/2014
Used in 9 devices0053
Benchmarks
Real CPUs
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC — benchmark for a single processor core, includes stress tests that simulate real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid , iOS
AMD A4-6300
AMD FX-8370E
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using multi-core and hyper-trading, Mac includes stress tests that simulate real 3D scenarios for Windows, , Linux, Android, iOS
AMD A4-6300
AMD FX-8370E
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance in file compression, encryption, and physics-related tasks.
AMD A4-6300
AMD FX-8370E
Latest comparisons
Intel Core i9-9940X
Intel Xeon E-2224
Intel Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i7-8700K
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
Intel Core i7-5930K
Intel Xeon Gold 6152
Intel Xeon E-2176G
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Intel Core i9-11900KF
Intel Celeron G5900
Intel Xeon E-2224G
Intel Core i5-9400T
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
Intel Celeron N3450
Intel Celeron 3205U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Intel Xeon W-11955M
Intel Pentium Gold G6420T
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2
AMD FX-4350
Intel Core i7-7660U
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
Intel Core i5-12500E
Intel Core i5-12600K
Intel Atom C3808
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
AMD FX-6300 vs AMD FX-8370: What is the difference?
smartphonesgraphic cardswireless headphonesCPU
40 Ballla
AMD FX-6300
33 BALLLA
AMD FX-8370
VS
64 Facts compared to
AMD FX-6300
AMD FX-8370
AMD FX-8370 AMP -8370?
- 9.
5°C higher than maximum operating temperature?
70.5°C vs 61°C - 30W below TDP?
95W vs 125W - Has unlocked multiplier?
- 0.33MB/core more L3 cache per core?
1.33MB/core vs 1MB/core
Why is AMD FX-8370 better than AMD FX-6300?
- 1.52x higher CPU speed?
8 x 4GHz vs 6 x 3.5GHz - 2 more CPU threads?
8 vs 6 - 2MB more L2 cache?
8MB vs 6MB - 2.19x higher PassMark score?
9049 vs 4125 - 96KB more L1 cache?
384KB vs 288KB - 32.06% higher PassMark result (overclocked)?
9952 vs 7536 - 8.0 higher performance per watt?
88.0 vs 80.0
Which comparisons are the most popular? AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD FX-63500053
Intel Core i5-4570
AMD FX-8370
vs
Intel Core i7-7700
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD FX-8370
vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD FX-6300
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD FX-9370
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD Phenom II X4 955
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD A8-7600
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD FX- 8350
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD Phenom II X4 955
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD FX-8370
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD FX-6300
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U /10
0 Reviews of users
Functions
The price ratio
9. 0 /10
2 Votes
Reviews still not
8.0 /10 9005)
reviews yet there is no
performance
8.5 /10
2 Votes
reviews yet there is no
Reliability
8.5 /10
2 Votes
reviews yet there is no
Energy efficiency
7.5 /10
2 Votes
9003 9003 9003 9000 GHz
8 x 4GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second the processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2.processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3.speed turbo clock
4.1GHz
4.3GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has unlocked multiplier
✔AMD FX-6300
✖AMD FX-8370
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.core L2
1MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1.33MB/core
1MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
1866MHz
1866MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
21GB/s
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.DDR version
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4 memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.max memory
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
6.baud rate bus
5.4GT/s
5.4GT/s
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports memory troubleshooting code
✖AMD FX-6300
✖AMD FX-8370
Memory error recovery code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
Benchmark Blender (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multi-threading
✖AMD FX-6300
✖AMD FX-8370
processor into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔AMD FX-6300
✔AMD FX-8370
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔AMD FX-6300
✔AMD FX-8370
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔AMD FX-6300
✔AMD FX-8370
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
6 bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔AMD FX-6300
✔AMD FX-8370
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. TrustZone enabled
✖AMD FX-6300
✖AMD FX-8370
Technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and digital rights management (DRM) video streaming .
9. interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-6300)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (AMD FX-8370)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
This page is currently only available in English.
Compare AMD FX-8370E and AMD FX-6300
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-8370E and AMD FX-6300 processors according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Technologies, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
AMD FX-8370E
versus
AMD FX-6300
Benefits
Reasons to choose AMD FX-8370E
- Newer processor, release date difference 1 year(s) 11 month(s)
- processor unlocked, easily unlocked, multiplier unlocked
overclocking
- 2 more cores, the ability to run more applications simultaneously: 8 vs 6
- 2 more threads: 8 vs 6
- About 13% more clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
- About 1% more maximum core temperature: 71 °C vs 70.50°C
- About 33% more L2 cache means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- PassMark — Single thread mark about 1% more performance: 1501 vs 1489
- PassMark — CPU mark about 28% more performance: 5331 vs 4176
- Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance 5.
4 times more: 2859vs 527
- About 36% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 11715 vs 1914
- About 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.383 vs 6.905
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 29% faster: 20.879 vs 16.195
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 18% faster: 0.401 vs 0.339
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) about 16% better: 0.984 vs 0.85
- Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 12% better: 5.33 vs 4.767
Production date | September 2014 vs October 2012 |
Unlocked | Unlocked / Locked |
Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 6 |
Maximum frequency | 4. |
Maximum core temperature | 71°C vs 70.50°C |
Level 2 cache | 8192 KB vs 6 MB |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1501 vs 1489 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 5331 vs 4176 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 2859 vs 527 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 11715 vs 1914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.383 vs 6.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20. |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.401 vs 0.339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.984 vs 0.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.33 vs 4.767 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: AMD FX-8370E
CPU 2: AMD FX-6300
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1. |
|
|||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
Name | AMD FX-8370E | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1501 | 1489 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 5331 | 4176 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 2859 | 527 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 11715 | 1914 |
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 0 | 2098 |
CompuBench 1. |
9.383 | 6.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.879 | 16.195 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.401 | 0.339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.984 | 0.85 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.33 | 4.767 |
Feature comparison
AMD FX-8370E | AMD FX-6300 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Vishera | Vishera |
Production date | September 2014 | October 2012 |
Place in the ranking | 1323 | 1981 |
Price now | $223. |
$58.99 |
Price/performance ratio (0-100) | 10.27 | 31.81 |
Applicability | Desktop | Desktop |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
OPN PIB | FD6300WMHKBOX | |
OPN Tray | FD6300WMW6KHK | |
Series | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors | |
Support 64 bit | ||
Crystal area | 315 mm | 315 mm |
Level 2 cache | 8192KB | 6MB |
Process | 32nm | 32nm SOI |
Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | 70. |
Maximum frequency | 4.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 6 |
Number of threads | 8 | 6 |
Voltage P0 Vcore | Min: 1.075 V — Max: 1.2875 V | Min: 1.15V — Max: 1.3875V |
Number of transistors | 1200 million | 1200 million |
Unlocked | ||
Base frequency | 3. |
|
Level 1 cache | 288KB | |
Level 3 cache | 8MB | |
Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR3 |
Supported memory frequency | 1866MHz | |
Maximum number of processors in configuration | 1 | 1 |
Supported sockets | AM3+ | AM3+ |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
PCI Express revision | n/a | 3. |
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |
AMD FX-8370 vs. AMD FX-8370E
AMD FX-8370
AMD FX-8370 runs with 8 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.30 GHz base 4.15 GHz all cores while the TDP is set to 125 W .The processor connects to an AM3+ CPU socket This version includes 8. 00 MB of L3 cache on a single chip, supports 2 to support DDR3-1866 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is advanced beyond 32 nm and supports AMD-V . The product was launched Q3/2014
AMD FX-8370E
AMD FX-8370E runs with 8 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 4.30 GHz base 3.80 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 95 W .CPU connects to AM3+ CPU socket This version include 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1866 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is advanced beyond 32 nm and supports AMD-V . The product was launched Q3/2014
AMD FX-8370
AMD FX-8370E
Compare details
GHz | Frequency | 3.30 GHz |
8 | Cores | 8 |
4.30GHz | Turbo (1 core) | 4. |
4.15GHz | Turbo (all cores) | 3.80 GHz |
No. | Hyper Threading | No. |
Yes | Acceleration | Yes |
normal | Basic architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
no turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
32nm | Technology | 32nm |
no turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
DirectX Version | ||
Max. displays | ||
DDR3-1866 | memory size | DDR3-1866 |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Maximum memory | ||
Yes | ECC | Yes |
— | L2 Cache | — |
8. |
L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
PCIe version | ||
PCIe lanes | ||
32nm | Technology | 32nm |
AM3+ | Connector | AM3+ |
125W | TDP | 95W |
AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V |
Q3/2014 | Release date | Q3/2014 |
Show more details |
Show more details |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive cross-platform test. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Estimated energy use
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
AMD FX-8370 | AMD FX-8370E | |
125W | Max TDP | 95W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Operating cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Operating cost per year | NA |
Comments
GT 1030 with FX-6300 references in Ultra quality settings
Compare with
Select. .AMD Radeon HD 6850 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6870 — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon HD 6950 — RUB 16,398AMD Radeon HD 6970 — RUB 19,619 ₽ 45,847AMD Radeon HD 7750 — ₽ 9,183AMD Radeon HD 7750M — ₽ 56,276AMD Radeon HD 7790 — ₽ 9,773AMD Radeon HD 7850 — ₽ 16,332AMD Radeon HD 7850M — ₽ 63,229AMD Radeon HD 7950 — ₽ 9,773AMD Radeon HD 7950M — ₽ 67,0999AMD Radeon HD 7970 — ₽ 19,611AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHZ Edition — ₽ 19,611amd Radeon HD 7970M — ₽ 70.772AMD RADEON HD 700 — ₽ 65.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5,524AMD RADEN AMD Radeon R5 — RUB 46,569AMD Radeon R5 — RUB 45,979AMD Radeon R7 250 — RUB 6,231AMD Radeon R7 265 — RUB 9,773AMD Radeon R7 370 — RUB 13,249AMD Radeon R9 270 — RUB 18,037 AMD Radeon R9 280,9D2 280X — RUB 22,957AMD Radeon R9 285 — RUB 24,924AMD Radeon R9 290 — RUB 20,333AMD Radeon R9 290X — RUB 26,170AMD Radeon R9295x2 — ₽ 98,319AMD Radeon R9 380 — ₽ 19,611amd Radeon R9 380x — ₽ 15.020AMD Radeon R9 390 — ₽ 30,4999AMD Radeon R9 390X — ₽ 32,467AMD Radeon R9 Fury — ₽ 36,00amd Radeon R9 Fury X — ₽ 42.
5 Fury X — ₽ 42.5 Fury x — ₽ 42.5 Fury Fury M270X — ₽ 66,639AMD Radeon R9 M280X — ₽ 70,181AMD Radeon R9 M280X 2GB — ₽ 70,181AMD Radeon R9 M290X — ₽ 79,298AMD Radeon R9 M380 — ₽ 70,444AMD Radeon R9 Nano — ₽ 100,287AMD Radeon RX 460 — ₽ 9,183AMD Radeon RX Radeon RX 470 Mobile — RUB 42,306 AMD Radeon RX 480 — RUB 26,170 AMD Radeon RX 480 Mobile — RUB 83,627AMD Radeon RX 540 Mobile — RUB 42,306AMD RX 550 — RUB RX 480 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB — RUB 11,085AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB — RUB 13,052AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile — RUB 60,540AMD Radeon RX 560 — RUB 6.493AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile — $64,737AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT — $18,300AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile — $42,043AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile 2GB — $64,737 RX 5700 — RUB 22,891AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT — RUB 26,170AMD Radeon RX 580 — RUB 9,904AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile — RUB 85,726AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile — RUB 85,726AMD Radeon RX 590 — RUB 36 AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT — RUB 31,418AMD Radeon RX 6800 — RUB 37,977AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT — RUB 42,568AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT — $65,524AMD Radeon RX VEGA 10 — $41,453AMD Radeon RX VEGA 3 — $37,190AMD Radeon RX VEGA 6 — $73,395AMD Radeon RX VEGA 8 — $39,420AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 — $17.
64 Radeon RX Vega 56 — $17.64 Mobile — ₽ 103,567AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 — ₽ 27,482AMD Radeon VII — ₽ 43,552ATI Radeon HD 4870 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q — RUB 84,086NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile — RUB 49,193NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 2GB — RUB 69,657NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — ₽ 8,461NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q — ₽ 83,299NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile — ₽ 57,457NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB — ₽ 11,150NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB — ₽ 10,429NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max -Q — ₽ 77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile — ₽ 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 — ₽ 21,579NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q — ₽ 72,543NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile — ₽ 102,255NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti — ₽ 32,992NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 — RUB 34,238NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q — RUB 128,229NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile — ₽ 121,801NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti — ₽ 52,931NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 — ₽ 9,773NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q — ₽ 81,266NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile — ₽ 75,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER — ₽ 10,494NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER — ₽ 15,020NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti — ₽ 18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — ₽ 77,724NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile — ₽ 115,307NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 — ₽ 29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 — ₽ 42,568NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti — ₽ 13,052NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 — ₽ 10,035NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti — ₽ 14,430NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 — ₽ 22,891NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 — ₽ 3,214NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti — ₽ 4,198NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost — ₽ 11,085NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti — ₽ 19,611NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M — ₽ 64,737NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 — ₽ 5,182NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX — ₽ 69,394NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 — ₽ 31,811NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M — ₽ 71,034NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 — ₽ 28,794 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti — ₽ 18,300NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 — ₽ 20,989NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M — ₽ 67,951NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 — ₽ 11,741NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M — ₽ 72,149NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 — ₽ 23,285NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti — ₽ 26,892NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M — ₽ 76,216NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 — ₽ 5,838NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M — ₽ 69,919NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 — ₽ 29,450NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB — ₽ 81,922NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 — ₽ 16,332NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti — ₽ 40,600NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX — ₽ 88,219NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN — ₽ 42,634NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK — ₽ 65,524NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X — ₽ 72,083 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 — $22.
891NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile — ₽ 72,411NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — ₽ 26,236NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 — ₽ 30,762NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q — ₽ 99,434NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile — ₽ 113,077NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — ₽ 45,454NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q — ₽ 116,226NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile — ₽ 127,376NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti — ₽ 77,855NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti — $16,332NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 — $21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti — ₽ 39,288NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 — ₽ 13,118NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 — ₽ 21,579NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti — ₽ 26,170NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 — ₽ 32,729NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 — ₽ 45,847NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti — ₽ 52,406NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 — ₽ 98,319NVIDIA TITAN RTX — $163,909NVIDIA TITAN V — $196,704NVIDIA TITAN Xp — ₽ 78,642
Change CPU to
Select. .AMD Athlon 5000 Dual-Core — RUB 6555.7AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core — RUB 1967AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ — RUB 8523.4 — RUB 23609.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+ — RUB 30168.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ — RUB 21742.4AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 6DAM56 5400+ — RUB 3482.2AMD Athlon 64 X4 Dual Core 5400+ X2 Dual Core 5600+ — RUB 9835.2AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+ — RUB 1639.1AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ — RUB 3013.9AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ — RUB 17050.1AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core — RUB 3935.4 AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B — $ 6231.1AMD Athlon II X2 215 — $ 786.4AMD Athlon II X2 220 — $ 2111.3 II X2 255 — RUB 4277.8AMD Athlon II X2 260 — RUB 1311.1AMD Athlon II X2 265 — RUB 5436.1AMD Athlon II X2 270 — RUB 1573.5AMD Athlon II X2 B22 — RUB 2358AMD Athlon II X2AMD II2 X20. — ₽ 3217.2AMD Athlon II X3 425 — ₽ 6835.1AMD Athlon II X3 435 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon II X3 440 — ₽ 3079.5AMD ATHLON II X3 445 — ₽ 5968.7AMD athlon II X3 450 — ₽ 2622.
9AMD ATHLON II X3 455 — ₽ 7664.2AMD ATHLON II X3 460 — ₽ 3278.8AMD ATHO X4 620 — ₽ 3932.1AMD ATHLON 28 Athlon II X4 631 Quad-Core — $ 5247.2AMD Athlon II X4 635 — $ 4588AMD Athlon II X4 640 — $ 5243.9AMD Athlon II X4 641 Quad-Core — $ 6001.5 — ₽ 18168.4AMD Athlon X4 760K Quad Core — ₽ 3017.1AMD Athlon X4 840 — ₽ 5164.6AMD Athlon X4 845 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Athlon X4 860K — ₽ 4196.4AMD ATHLON X4 870K — ₽ 5246.5AMD Athlon X4 880K — ₽ 5902.4AMD ATHLON X4 950 — ₽ 3934.7AMD E2-3200 APU — ₽ 524.1AMD FX -4100 Quad -Core — ₽ 8526AMD FX -4130 QUAD -₽ 4984. FX-4170 Quad-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-4200 Quad-Core — RUB 14968.3AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core — RUB 3501.9AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-6200 Six-Core — RUB 22297.3FX -6300 Six-Core — RUB 3869.2AMD FX-6350 Six-Core — RUB 8526AMD FX-8120 Eight-Core — RUB 6558.3AMD FX-8150 Eight-Core — RUB 25153.8AMD FX-8300 Eight-Core — RUB 5285.9AMD 8320 Eight-Core — ₽ 5214.4AMD FX-8320E Eight-Core — ₽ 6484.9AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core — RUB 5246.5 AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core — RUB 8853.
3AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core — RUB 11805.5 Phenom 8250e Triple-Core — ₽ 3082.1AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core — ₽ 1964.4AMD Phenom 8600 Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core — ₽ 3475.6AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenom 9100e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9350e Quad-Core — ₽ 221830AMD Phenom 9450e Quad-Core — ₽ 6887AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core — ₽ 3934.7AMD Phenom 9550 Quad-Core — ₽ 2620.3AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core — ₽ 3276.2AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core — ₽ 9654.2AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core — ₽AMD-Core 360 ₽ 3932.1AMD Phenom 9850 Quad -Core — ₽ 3279.5AMD Phenom 9950 Quad -Core — ₽ 11804.9AMD Phenom II X2 545 — ₽ 2884.6AMD Phenom II X2 550 — ₽ 3278.8AMD PHENOM II X2 555 — ₽ 9323AMD PEN 1967AMD Phenom II X2 B550.6AMD Phenom II X3 B73 — ₽ 4919.3AMD Phenom II X4 805 — ₽ 11412AMD Phenom II X4 810 — ₽ 7607.8AMD Phenom II X4 820 — ₽ 4916AMD Phenom II X4 840 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X4 905E — ₽ 13 905E — ₽ 13 910 — ₽ 65559AMD Phenom II X4 910e — ₽ 10297AMD Phenom II X4 920 — ₽ 4393.
9AMD Phenom II X4 925 — ₽ 10493.7AMD Phenom II X4 940 — ₽ 7870.1AMD PHENOM II X4 945 — ₽ 3278.8AMD Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd Phenomd AMD Phenom II X4 960T — RUB 8854 AMD Phenom II X4 965 — RUB 3902.6AMD Phenom II X4 B95 — RUB 4784.8AMD Phenom II X4 B97 — ₽ 5899.8AMD Phenom II X6 1035T — ₽ 12396.5AMD Phenom II X6 1045T — ₽ 11478.3AMD Phenom II X6 1055T — ₽ 12134.2AMD Phenom II X6 1075T — ₽ 17052.7AMD PHENOM II X6 1090T — ₽ 259978.90T — ₽ 259978.90T ₽ 13117.3AMD Phenom X3 8550 — ₽ 11147AMD RYZEN 3 1200 — ₽ 6230.4AMD RYZEN 3 1300X — ₽ 8198.1AMD RYZEN 3 2200G — ₽ 6427.2AMD RYZEN 3 3100 — ₽ 5903.1AMD RYZEN 3 3200G — ₽ 6493.4AMD RYZEN 3300 — AMD Ryzen 5 1400 — $ 8789.1AMD Ryzen 5 1500X — $ 9503.3AMD Ryzen 5 1600 — $ 10165.8AMD Ryzen 5 1600X — $ 11701.3837.8AMD RYZEN 5 2600X — ₽ 13773.2AMD RYZEN 5 3400G — ₽ 9837.8AMD RYZEN 5 3500 — ₽ 9707.3AMD RYZEN 5 3500X — ₽ 10527.2AMD RYZEN 5 3600 — ₽ 13052.4AMD RYZEN 5 3600X — ₽ 16331.
AMD RYZEN 5 5600X — ₽ 19611.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700 — ₽ 12461.4AMD RYZEN 7 1700X — ₽ 13117.3AMD RYZEN 7 1800X — ₽ 16396.8AMD RYZEN 7 2700 — ₽ 16347AMD RYZEN 7 2700X — ₽ 20004.3AMD RYZEN 7, 3700X — ₽ ₽ ₽ ¦ 3800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — RUB 19676.3AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — RUB 26170.4AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D — RUB 29514.8AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 3950X — ₽ 49192.5AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — ₽ 32729.4AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — ₽ 46568.9AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — ₽ 22955.8AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — ₽ 27547.1AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — ₽ 44600.5 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — ₽ 59030.3AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — ₽ 112814.1Intel Core i3-10100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-10300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-11100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-11300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-12100 — ₽ 8002Intel Core i3-12300 — ₽ 9379.4Intel Core i3-2100 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 3934.7Intel Core i3-2102 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 3804.2Intel Core i3-2105 @ 3.10GHz — RUB 5246.5Intel Core i3-2120 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 1967.7Intel Core i3-2125 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 13052.
2Intel Core0 @ 3.40GHz — $ 4590.6Intel Core i3-3210 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3Intel Core i3-3220 @ 3.30GHz — $ 2289.1Intel Core i3-3225 @ 3.30GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i3-3245 @ 3.40GHz — $ 5246.5 Intel Core i3-3250 @ 3.50GHz — $ 6230.4 Intel Core i3-4130 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9181.9 3.60GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i3-4170 @ 3.70GHz — Rs. 9837.8Intel Core i3-4330 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 11805.5Intel Core i3-4340 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 3.70GHz — $18361.9Intel Core i3-4370 @ 3.80GHz — $29513.5Intel Core i3-530 @ 2.93GHz — $1311.8Intel Core i3-540 @ 3.07GHz — $1377.4Intel Core i3-550 @ 3.20GHz — $1377.4 Intel Core i3-560 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 1966.4Intel Core i3-6098P @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8772Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz — RUB 10895.2Intel Core i3-6300 @ 3.80GHz — RUB 9Intel Core i3-7320 @ 3.90GHz Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 8526 i3-9100F @ 3.60GHz — $ 6886.3Intel Core i3-9320 @ 3.70GHz — $ 10625.6Intel Core i3-9350KF @ 4.00GHz — $ 14691.537.4 Intel Core i5-10600K — $15533.7 Intel Core i5-11400 — $11937.4 Intel Core i5-11600K — $ 17184.
6 ₽ 5246.5Intel Core i5-2310 @ 2.90GHz — ₽ 5245.9Intel Core i5-2320 @ 3.00GHz — ₽ 12806.4Intel Core i5-2380P @ 3.10GHz — ₽ 5902.4Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz — ₽ tel5 Core508.9 2400S @ 2.50GHz — $4309.3 Intel Core i5-2405S @ 2.50GHz — $10783Intel Core i5-2450P @ 3.20GHz — $ 5902.4Intel Core i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz — $6886.3 Intel Core i5-2500S @ 2.70GHz — ₽ 4918.6Intel Core i5-2550K @ 3.40GHz — Rs. 8526Intel Core i5-3330 @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-3330S @ 2.70GHz — Rs. 2.80GHz — $ 9837.8 Intel Core i5-3350P @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6 Intel Core i5-3450 @ 3.10GHz — $ 8394.9 Intel Core i5-3470S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9188.5 Intel Core i5-3475S @ 2.90GHz — RUB 9412.2 GHz — ₽ 9181.9Intel Core i5-3570K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 9444.3Intel Core i5-3570S @ 3.10GHz — RUB 18693.2Intel Core i5-4430 @ 3.00GHz — RUB 11805.5Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70-44Intel Core i5-4430S @ 2.70-44Intel Core05 @ 3.10GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-4440S @ 2.80GHz — $ 30366.2Intel Core i5-4460 @ 3.20GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-4460S @ 2.
90GHz — $ 43288.7 Intel Core i5-4570S @ 2.90GHz — $14536.7 Intel Core i5-4590 @ 3.30GHz — $12133.5Intel Core i5-4590S @ 3.00GHz — $12986.2 3.40GHz — ₽ 16396.8Intel Core i5-4670R @ 3.00GHz — Rs. 18102.8Intel Core i5-4690 @ 3.50GHz — Rs. 13117.3Intel Core i5-4690K @ 3.50GHz — Rs. @ 3.10GHz — $ 26235.3 Intel Core i5-6400 @ 2.70GHz — $ 13117.3 Intel Core i5-6402P @ 2.80GHz — $ 12461.4 Intel Core i5-650 @ 3.20GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i5-655K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 3934.7 Intel Core i5-660 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 3213.9 Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz — RUB 14429.148.3Intel Core i5-661 @ 3.33GHz — Rs. 6558.3Intel Core i5-670 @ 3.47GHz — Rs. 5902.4Intel Core i5-680 @ 3.60GHz — Rs. @ 2.67GHz — $ 10527.2 Intel Core i5-7500 @ 3.40GHz — $ 13773.2 Intel Core i5-760 @ 2.80GHz — $ 6558.3 Intel Core i5-7600 @ 3.50GHz — $ 15739.6 Intel Core i5-7640X @ 4.00GHz — $16396.8 Intel Core i5-8400 @ 2.80GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i5-8500 @ 3.00GHz — $15676 GHz — ₽ 24770.1Intel Core i5-9400 @ 2.90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9400F @ 2.
90GHz — $ 11149.6Intel Core i5-9600K @ 3.70GHz — $ 18364.5 i7-11700K — $ 26891.9Intel Core i7-12700K — $ 30826.6Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz — $ 9837.2 -2700K @ 3.50GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.40GHz — $11740Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz — $16330.6Intel Core i7-3770S @ 3.10GHz — $13117.3Intel Core i7-3820 13117.3Intel Core i7-3930K @ 3.20GHz — RUB 26169.1Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz — RUB 52471.3Intel Core i7-3970X @ 3.50GHz — RUB 62572.2Intel Core i7-4770 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 15740.9Intel Core i7-4770K 20tel Core135 3.20GHz — RUB 22470.5 Intel Core i7-4820K @ 3.70GHz — RUB 32794.3 Intel Core i7-4930K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 26169.1514.8Intel Core i7-5820K @ 3.30GHz — RUB 19676.3Intel Core i7-5930K @ 3.50GHz — RUB 32728.1Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.00GHz — RUB 50503.6Intel Core i7-6700 @ 3.40GHz — RUB 28444 Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.40GHz — RUB 27547.1 Intel Core i7-6850K @ 3.60GHz — RUB 36073.8 Intel Core i7-7700 @ 3.60GHz — RUB 21325.3 Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz — RUB 23283.8 Intel Core i7-7740X @ 4.
30GHz — RUB 22890.3 GHz — ₽ 60998Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.00GHz — Rs. Intel Core i7-8700 @ 3.70GHz -930 @ 2.80GHz — $3934.7Intel Core i7-940 @ 2.93GHz — $4637.2Intel Core i7-950 @ 3.07GHz — $16069.6Intel Core i7-960 @ 3.20GHz — $6558.3Intel Core i7-965 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9181.9Intel Core i7-970 @ 3.20GHz — $ 9837.2Intel Core i7-9700 @ 3.00GHz — $ 21644 Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 11805.5 Intel Core i7-980 @ 3.33GHz — RUB 13116.7 Intel Core i7-980X @ 3.33GHz — RUB 14428.5 ₽ 38698.1Intel Core i9-11900K — ₽ 32007.9Intel Core i9-12900K — ₽ 38697.4Intel Core i9-7900X @ 3.30GHz — ₽
Change Variant To
Select..ASL GT 1030 BattleASL GT 1030 SkynetASL GT 1030 WarhawkASUS GT 1030ASUS GT 1030 Silent BRKASUS GT 1030 Silent CSMASUS PHOENIX GT 1030ASUS PHOENIX GT 1030 OCBIOSTAR GT 1030Colorful GT 1030Colorful GT 1030 0DBColorful GT 1030 Gold EditionColorful GT 1030 Gold Edition V2Colorful GT 1030 Gold Edition V3Colorful GT 1030 Low ProfileEMTEK HV GT 1030EMTEK XENON GT 1030EVGA GT 1030 SCEVGA GT 1030 SC Low ProfileEVGA GT 1030 SC Passive Low ProfileGALAX GT 1030GALAX GT 1030 EXOC WhiteGALAX GT 1030 TigerGIGABYTE GT 1030 Low ProfileGIGABYTE GT 1030 OCGIGABYTE GT 1030 Silent Low ProfileGainward GT 1030 SilentFXGainward GT 1030 WhirlwindGainward GT 1030 WindwardInno3D GT 1030 0dBKFA2 GT 1030KFA2 GT 1030 EXOC WhiteKUROTOSHIKOU GT 1030 Low ProfileKUROTOSHIKOU GT 1030 Low Profile OCLeadtek WinFast GT 1030MAXSUN GT 1030 Hammer M.