Intel Core i7 8700K vs AMD Ryzen 9 5900X: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i7 8700K
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.7 GHz Intel Core i7 8700K with 6-cores against the 3.7 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 5900X with 12-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i7 8700K
65
Ryzen 9 5900X
84
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i7 8700K
41
Ryzen 9 5900X
98
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i7 8700K
41
Ryzen 9 5900X
63
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i7 8700K
51
Ryzen 9 5900X
87
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 5900X and 8700K
Advantages of Intel Core i7 8700K
- Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than the Ryzen 9 5900X – 95 vs 105 Watt
- More than 10° C higher critical temperature
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Has 52 MB larger L3 cache size
- Newer — released 3-years and 1-month later
- More modern manufacturing process – 7 versus 14 nanometers
- Has 6 more physical cores
- Newer PCI Express version – 4.
0
- 32% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test — 1644 vs 1242 points
- Around 6.08 GB/s (15%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
- 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.8 GHz vs 4.7 GHz)
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700K
1221
Ryzen 9 5900X
+29%
1572
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700K
8911
Ryzen 9 5900X
+132%
20671
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700K
2773
Ryzen 9 5900X
+26%
3499
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700K
13998
Ryzen 9 5900X
+184%
39783
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i7 8700K
1252
Ryzen 9 5900X
+33%
1659
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i7 8700K
6653
Ryzen 9 5900X
+114%
14216
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 8700K and AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
General
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | October 5, 2017 | October 8, 2020 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Vermeer |
| Model number | i7-8700K | — |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | AM4 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Cores | 6 | 12 |
| Threads | 12 | 24 |
| Base Frequency | 3. 7 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 37x | 37x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 8 GT/s | — |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 64MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| TDP | 95 W | 105 W |
| Max. temperature | 100°C | 90°C |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | — |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | — |
| Shading Units | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Execution Units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15 W | — |
Max. Resolution |
4096×2304 — 60 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i7 8700K
0.38 TFLOPS
Ryzen 9 5900X
n/a
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 47.68 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i7 8700K official page | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 16 | 20 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
— |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i7 8700K
0 (0%)
Ryzen 9 5900X
10 (100%)
Total votes: 10
ompetitors
1.
Intel Core i9 12900K or i7 8700K
2.
Intel Core i5 12600K or i7 8700K
3.
Intel Core i7 12700K or AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
4.
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H or Ryzen 9 5900X
5.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D or Ryzen 9 5900X
6.
Intel Core i7 13700K or AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
7.
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X or Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 7 5800X vs Core i7-8700K
Availability
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy on Amazon
$254.99
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Availability
Intel Core i7-8700K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.
7GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy on Amazon
$330
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-8700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 1127 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-8700K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
-
Performs up to 16% better in League of Legends than Core i7-8700K — 1252 vs 1081 FPS
-
Up to 23% cheaper than Core i7-8700K — $254.99 vs $330.0
-
Up to 35% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-8700K — $0.2 vs $0.31 per FPS
-
Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700K — 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
League of Legends
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 7 5800X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
1252
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.
2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$254.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $254.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
1081
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
65%
Price, $
$330
77%
Intel Core i7-8700K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.7GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Resolution
1920×1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 7 5800X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
316
FPS
271
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
550
FPS
472
FPS
VALORANT
1252
FPS
1081
FPS
League of Legends
349
FPS
296
FPS
Apex Legends
289
FPS
248
FPS
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 5800X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Single-Core
1671
100%
Multi-Core
10337
100%
Core i7-8700K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1245
66%
Multi-Core
6510
41%
|
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
vs |
Intel Core i7-8700K |
|---|---|---|
|
Nov 5th, 2020 |
Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vermeer | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
|
8 |
Cores | 6 |
|
16 |
Threads | 12 |
|
3. |
Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP |
95 W |
|
7 nm |
Process Size | 14 nm |
|
38.0x |
Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics |
UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
8 GHzBuilds Using Ryzen 7 5800X or Core i7-8700K
League of Legends, 1080p, High
Skytech Prism II Gaming PC
1213
FPS
$
1.65
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Ryzen 7 5800X
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,999.99
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
CYBERPOWERPC Gamer Supreme Liquid Cool Gaming PC
720
FPS
$
1.
93
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Ryzen 7 5800X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,389.99
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
ROG Strix GA15DK Gaming Desktop PC
1015
FPS
$
1.52
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Ryzen 7 5800X
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,539
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
HP OMEN 30L Gaming Desktop PC
1213
FPS
$
1.57
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Ryzen 7 5800X
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,909
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
2022 HP OMEN Gaming Desktop PC
1213
FPS
$
1.
4
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Ryzen 7 5800X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,699
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
HP OMEN 30L Gaming Desktop PC
1213
FPS
$
1.66
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Ryzen 7 5800X
64 GB, 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,009
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
HP OMEN 30L Gaming Desktop PC
1213
FPS
$
1.52
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Ryzen 7 5800X
32 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,849
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
HP OMEN 30L Gaming Desktop PC
1213
FPS
$
1.
87
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Ryzen 7 5800X
64 GB, 2 TB SSD + 8 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$2,269
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Thermaltake Reactor 380 Liquid-Cooled PC
1213
FPS
$
1.64
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Ryzen 7 5800X
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,993.97
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
iBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC
1213
FPS
$
1.61
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3080
Ryzen 7 5800X
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,949.99
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons.
Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Ryzen 5 5600X
$175.99
Ryzen 7 5800X
$254.99
Ryzen 7 5800X
$254.99
Ryzen 5 3600
$135.89
Ryzen 7 5800X
$254.99
Ryzen 9 5900X
$384.99
Ryzen 7 5800X
$254.99
Ryzen 5 3600X
Ryzen 7 5800X
$254.99
Ryzen 5 2600
Core i7-8700K
Core i7-12700K
$358.99
Core i5-12600K
$279.99
Ryzen 7 5800X
$254.99
Core i5-12600K
$279.99
Core i7-8700K
Ryzen 9 5950X
$610.68
Ryzen 7 5800X
$254.99
I built my PC on an i7 8700K, wouldn’t it be better with Ryzen?
Table of Contents
At present, Intel still offers the best gaming performance. However, there is no longer a huge performance gap. Especially if you take into account several aspects. I built my PC on i7 8700K — but my friends chose AMD stones and say that it’s better this way .
.. Let’s see.
What is the difference between Intel core i7 and core i9?
- Intel K series chips unlocked, all Ryzen too.
- All Intel consumer chips have 6 cores or less. Ryzen offers 6 or 8 cores in this range.
- Intel doesn’t have the best motherboard compatibility. With a free BIOS update, each AM4 MB socket will support a range of Ryzen series processors.
- There are no coolers in the Intel K series. Risen in the current composition has a cooler with each model. Pretty decent coolers by the way.
- 8700k is currently more expensive. Then add the Hyper 212 Evo cooler with its price. Opposition 2700x with cooler included will be a third cheaper.
- Intel overclocks better, but needs to compensate for multithreading losses in some workloads.
Yes, Ryzen processors tend to be cheaper than Intel processors, but those savings are fading fast. Due to the need for improved RAM in Ryzen. The Intel processor doesn’t care if you put in 1 stick or 4.
The Intel processor doesn’t care if you use 2133 or 3000 MHz. BUT your Ryzen… can’t use high MHz or dual speed and you know what happens with Ryzen… It sucks.
Ryzen, with its huge core count, is unique in how it’s designed. Ryzen cores work in pairs, not alone. This does not mean that Ryzen is bad, on the contrary, 4 paired messages are sent per paired main cycle.
That’s why Ryzen needs superior RAM…it eats data. If you can’t provide Ryzen with data, you’d better choose Core 2 Duo. In short, the money savings… are not really as big as everyone would like them to be. **
So who is ahead then?
AMD’s last 2 years have not been perfect. However, next year, when Ryzen 2 comes out on 7nm technology, Intel should be very worried. The smart instructions from Intel should now be gone.
With this, any AM4 motherboard owner will be able to upgrade to the new processor easily. Only with CPU replacement and free BIOS update.
Intel has been the leader for 10 years. Their methods are quite anti-competitive and they had no competition. This is all changing and like many other things in today’s society. The support of industrial giants is unpopular.
First, let’s get one thing out of the way: CPU performance is the least impactful aspect of gaming performance.
For a well-made Premium game, you will always see 95-100% GPU usage and around 20-30% CPU usage. If we are talking about a decent 8th gen or Ryzen.
All this talk of fighting between Intel and AMD is essentially meaningless (or makes very little sense) for gaming. Unless you’re a few generations behind (but then that’s a different kind of chatter).
What’s true is that no matter what application is currently running on your desktop (including the browsers your single-threaded web applications are running). They are becoming more and more parallelized. And rely more and more on sharing more and more data (which is where IO and storage come in).
play).
We’ve actually upgraded most of our lineup and made it multi-threaded wherever we could share our data. You need cores, you need threads, you need the processor’s ability to process them consistently quickly.
And with today’s technology, you need PCIe lanes to quickly connect peripherals.
Intel doesn’t understand this
I put it on a separate line for emphasis. They consider the Hyper Threading as a bonus, they actually released the 9th gen i7 in 2018. Yes, in 2018, without him. Lol.
All I’m going to say about this case is Lol. They also consider having more than 16 PCIe lanes to be «high-end». No, it’s not. It wasn’t 3 years ago, but it’s certainly not the case now.
At some point a couple of years ago they figured it out. I have an i7-5930K at work, which at the time cost less than an i9-9900K but had 40 lanes and 6 HT cores. Since my peripherals are directly connected to the CPU, I use about 28. And I don’t have to rely on PCH because it’s all about x4 equivalent bandwidth.
Imagine M.2 NVMe storage sitting directly on CPU lanes rather than chipset lanes, sharing bandwidth and latency with all other interruptible hardware.
When I think about upgrading to 9900K, I actually think I’m downgrading everything for improved single core performance. And this is not the feeling that your potential customers might feel :).
Views Today: 140
Similar Posts
How to Choose Android Games
Best Webcams for Streaming, Zoom Calling and Online Classes
Best 4K TVs for Xbox Series X and PS5
How to Choose a Good Mail Server?
i7-3770K vs i7-8700K — Minecraft vs GTX 1660 performance comparison
i7-3770K
i7-8700K
Ultra quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
549.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
671.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
253. |
| 1440p |
309.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
126.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
154.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
203.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
248.6 FPS |
4 FPS High quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
631.4 FPS |
| 1080p |
738.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
340.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
400.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
192.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
227.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
284.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
335.1 FPS |
Medium quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
713. |
| 1080p |
804.9 FPS |
| 1440p |
427.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
491.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
257.6 FPS |
| 2160p |
299.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
365.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
421.6 FPS |
7 FPS Low quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
878.3 FPS |
| 1080p |
938.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
601.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
672.7 FPS |
| 2160p |
388.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
443.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
527. |
