8800Gt geforce: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Specs

Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT 8800GT Gaming Graphics Card 512MB DVI-I Compeve Compenet Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT 8800GT Gaming Graphics Card 512MB DVI-I [8800 GT]

CALL US : 866-546-7414

Categories

DESCRIPTION

Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT Graphics Adapter 512MB PCIe x16 Dual DVI-I HDTV
   
Manufacturer Nvidia
Model number GeForce 8800 GT
SKU GeForce 8800GT nVidia
   
Description                                                                                                                                           
GeForce 8800 GT is the ideal combination of power, performance, and price, GeForce 8800 GT offers GeForce 8 Series goodness, 112 processor cores, and a 256-bit frame buffer for jealousy-inducing DirectX 10 gameplay at ultra fast frame rates.
   
Specifications                                                                                                                                      
Form factor Single slot, full height
CUDA cores 112
Graphics clock 600 MHz
Processor clock 1500MHz
Texture fill rate 33. 6 bill/sec
Memory clock 900 MHz
Memory 512MB
Memory interface 256-bit
Bus interface PCIe 2.0 x16
SLI Yes
Connectors 2x DVI-I DL
1x HDTV
Monitor support 2
Max resolution 2560×1600
Thermal solution Active heatsink
   
Package                                                                                                                                                
Condition Refurbished
Contents Video card, DVI to VGA adapter, driver CD
Warranty 30 days
   

Condition:

Refurbished

REVIEWS

© Copyright © 2022 Compeve Corporation.

Back to Top

GeForce 8800 GT [in 1 benchmark]


NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT

Buy

  • Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 600MHz
  • Max video memory 512MB
  • Memory type GDDR3
  • Memory clock speed 900MHz
  • Maximum resolution

Summary

NVIDIA started GeForce 8800 GT sales 29 October 2007 at a recommended price of $349. This is Tesla architecture desktop card based on 65 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 512 MB of GDDR3 memory clocked at 0.9 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 57.6 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is single-slot card attached via PCIe 2.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 9″ (22. 9 cm). 6-pin & 8-pin power connector is required, and power consumption is at 105 Watt.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at


1.76%

of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.


GeForce
8800 GT

vs


GeForce RTX
3090 Ti

General info


Of GeForce 8800 GT’s architecture, market segment and release date.

Place in performance rating 889
Value for money 0.03
Architecture Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name G92
Market segment Desktop
Release date 29 October 2007 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP) $349
Current price $182 (0. 5x MSRP) of 49999 (A100 SXM4)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs


GeForce 8800 GT’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce 8800 GT’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 112 of 18432 (AD102)
CUDA cores 112
Core clock speed 600 MHz of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Number of transistors 754 million of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti)
Thermal design power (TDP) 105 Watt of 900 (Tesla S2050)
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C
Texture fill rate 33. 6 billion/sec of 939.8 (h200 SXM5)
Floating-point performance 336.0 gflops of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements


Information on GeForce 8800 GT’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 9″ (22.9 cm)
Height Single Slot
Width 1-slot
Supplementary power connectors 6-pin & 8-pin
SLI options 2-way

Memory


Parameters of memory installed on GeForce 8800 GT: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width 256 Bit of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed 900 MHz of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti)
Memory bandwidth 57.6 GB/s of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)

Video outputs and ports


Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 8800 GT. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Display Connectors Dual Link DVIHDTV
Multi monitor support +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048×1536
Audio input for HDMI S/PDIF

Technologies


Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce 8800 GT. You’ll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) 128bit

API support


APIs supported by GeForce 8800 GT, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX 11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model 4.0
OpenGL 2.1 of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile)
OpenCL 1.1
Vulkan N/A
CUDA +

Benchmark performance


Non-gaming benchmark performance of GeForce 8800 GT. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.


8800 GT
1.76

  • Passmark
Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%


8800 GT
516


Game benchmarks


Let’s see how good GeForce 8800 GT is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS
Popular games

Relative perfomance


Overall GeForce 8800 GT performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.



NVIDIA GeForce 615
106.82


NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
105.11


AMD Radeon HD 8670D
104.55


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
100


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
98.86


AMD Radeon HD 7660D
97.16


AMD Radeon HD 6570
97.16

AMD equivalent


We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce 8800 GT from AMD is Radeon HD 7660D, which is slower by 3% and lower by 7 positions in our rating.


Radeon HD
7660D


Compare


Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 8800 GT:


AMD Radeon HD 7650A
110. 8


AMD Radeon HD 6610M
109.09


AMD Radeon HD 8670D
104.55


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
100


AMD Radeon HD 7660D
97.16


AMD Radeon HD 6570
97.16


AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
96.02

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.


GeForce
9800 GTX+


Compare


GeForce
9600 GT


Compare


GeForce
9800 GT


Compare


Radeon HD
3870


Compare


GeForce
8800 GTX


Compare


GeForce
8800 GTS 512


Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with GeForce 8800 GT according to our statistics.


Core 2
Quad Q6600

4.9%


Core 2
Duo E8400

4.2%


Core 2
Duo E8500

3%


Core i3
2100

2.1%


Core 2
Duo E6750

1.7%


Core 2
Duo E7500

1.6%


Core i5
3470

1.3%


Core 2
Quad Q8400

1. 3%


Phenom X3
8450

1.2%


Core i3
3220

1.1%

User rating


Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


Questions and comments


Here you can ask a question about GeForce 8800 GT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB Review

NVIDIA graphics card review. Latest images, pricing and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT specs. Gaming GPU benchmarked against the biggest PC games like Fortnite, Minecraft and PUBG Should you buy this XFX graphics card?

This NVIDIA graphics card features the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT processor. The processor, also known as the GPU, is the most important component in any graphics card. PCGameBenchmark rates processors by how many of the top 1,000 PC games the chip can run. This PC graphics card has a chip that can run 386 of the top 1000 games — so we give it a 38% rating.

For a full list of the games that this card will run and the chance to compare it to similar cards check our graphics card comparison — we have tracked 15 cards with a similar GPU and 3 of them are cheaper than this setup — no need to wait for a sale or Black Friday 2022 to get the best price on a card like this.

Check out best deals on cheap graphics cards and the latest deals on Amazon.

XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB
PCGameBenchmark Rating: 15%

Best Price: $313.99

Check latest prices


Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.

XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB Specs

GPU
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Weight
2.3 lb (1.04 kg)
Dimensions (L x W x H)
17.78 cm x 5.59 cm x 15.24 cm
7 in x 2.2 in x 6 in
Brand
XFX
Model Number
PVT88PYDF4
Best Price: $313.99

Check latest prices


Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.

XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB PC Gaming Performance

This graphics card will run 159 of the top PC games. Use PCGameBenchmark’s Rate My PC service to test your current set up and set how it compares.

Can It Run GTA 5?

This XFX graphics card doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for GTA 5 but it can play the game with lowered settings.

Can It Run Fortnite?

This XFX graphics card doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for Fortnite but it can play the game with lowered settings.

Can It Run Apex Legends?

This XFX graphics card doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for Apex Legends but it can play the game with lowered settings.

XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB Features

  • PCI Express SLI-ready video card with full Microsoft DirectX 10 Support
  • Full support for Microsoft DirectX 10.0 Shader Model 4.0
  • PCI-Express and Open GL 2.0 support
  • NVIDIA SLI Technology allows two graphics cards to run simultaneously
  • Dual Link DVI for high resolution monitors (up to 2560×1600)

XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB DEALS — BEST prices

Best Price: $313. 99

Check latest prices


Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.

Similar to XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB

Here are a few other options…

EVGA 512-P3-N802-AR e-GeForce 8800 GT 51…

Rating: 15%

$269.99

GeForce 8800 GT

eVGA e-GeForce 8800 GT Superclocked Edit. ..

Rating: 15%

$299.99

GeForce 8800 GT

MSI NX8800GTS-T2D640EHDOC NVIDIA GeForce…

Rating: 15%

$280.01

GeForce 8800 GT

GIGABYTE GeForce 8800GT TurboForce | TweakTown

Video Cards & GPUs

NVIDIA GeForce GPU

The 8800GT is a terrific graphics card, period.

But let’s see if GIGABYTE can make their TurboForce edition stand out.

Published Mar 2, 2008 11:00 PM CST   |   Updated Tue, Nov 3 2020 7:04 PM CST

Manufacturer: GIGABYTE

13 minute read time

Introduction

GIGABYTE graphics cards seem to be few and far between these days because they like to do things a bit differently. We’re all for standing out from the pack, and the latest card from GIGABYTE to jump into that category would be the TurboForce Edition of the 8800GT.

GIGABYTE have a nice little thing going on at the moment; we get a card from them, it’s got a nice aftermarket cooler, it’s got some decent OC specs along with a pretty good bundle. This is always nice to see in the world of graphics cards, and at least it keeps it interesting.

They have also recently introduced their Ultra Durable 2 technology into their graphics cards to give them a bit more of an edge. Sure you pay more for a GIGABYTE graphics card, but we tend to find that it’s worth it. What we need to find out now though is whether or not you should spend more on the GIGABYTE 8800GT.

The Package

The front of the box looks very cool with its Neverwinter Nights 2 theme. Across the top of the card we can see the brand and some NVIDIA logos to the right. Smack bang in the middle of the box we have a giant NWN2 logo.

Moving around the box, the bottom gives us the model and some more details on the card. The right of the box lets us know that it’s a TurboForce Edition, comes with NWN2 and uses the Ultra Durable 2 technology.

Going to the back of the box we have mention of the Zalman fan across the top along with some more details on the card. The main focus on the back though is the Ultra Durable 2 highlight. This gives you an idea of what exactly you gain from these features. It’s nice to see GIGABYTE explain this as so often you see someone release a product with new fangled features but not actually explain the advantage.

Moving inside the package the cable department is pretty light. We have the little TV-Out box that we see with most GIGABYTE cards along with a DVI to VGA connector and Molex to PCI Express connector.

Paperwork wise there isn’t a whole lot more; manual, quick install guide and game manual along with a driver CD and a copy of Neverwinter Nights 2. The package isn’t all that exciting but GIGABYTE tends to let the features of the card do the talking more so than the bundle.

The Card

With the package out the way it’s time to move onto the card and see what exactly GIGABYTE has done with the 8800GT 512MB. The Zalman cooler that they use isn’t anything new, we’ve seen it used on the HD 3870 that GIGABYTE released a few months back.

With that said though, it really is a tried and tested cooler that seems to be extremely efficient. The copper in the middle of the cooler helps move the heat and the aluminum fins help the heat dissipate quickly.

Like the Leadtek 8800GT that also used a Zalman cooler, be it a different model GIGABYTE have chosen not to cool the memory on the card. While it probably isn’t needed people still like to have it cooled.

Having a quick look around the card there isn’t much else to it really. The rear of the card has a single PCI Express power connector that is needed while the top has a single SLI connector like the standard 8800GT.

The I/O department is also very standard with two Dual Link DVI ports and a single TV-Out port.

Specifications

GPU-Z doesn’t seem to be a big fan of the GIGABYTE offering which puts out some unknown figures, as seen below.

What we can tell you though is that the core is up from the stock 600MHz to a juicy 700MHz, the shader clock follows the big increase moving from 1500MHz to 1675MHz and finally the memory has moved from the stock 1800MHz DDR to 1900MHz DDR.

These are some pretty nice increases and should result to a card that can scream along.

Test System Setup and 3DMark06

Test System Setup

Processor(s): Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3GHz (333MHz x 9)
Cooling: Corsair Nautilus500 (Supplied by Corsair) with Arctic Cooling MX-2 Thermal Compound (Supplied by Arctic Cooling)
Motherboard(s): GIGABYTE X48-DQ6 (Supplied by GIGABYTE)
Memory: 2 X 1GB Kingston PC6400 DDR-2 3-3-3-10 (KHX6400D2ULK2/2G) (Supplied by Kingston)
Hard Disk(s): Seagate 250GB 7200RPM SATA-2 7200. 10 (Supplied by Seagate)
Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP2, Windows Vista
Drivers: Catalyst 8.1, Forceware 174.11 (9600GT Win XP), Forceware 171.16 (9600GT Win Vista)

We should all have a pretty good understanding of the upgraded test bed and lineup of games, so we won’t go into any detail there. What we’ve done though is compare the GIGABYTE 8800GT TurboForce against the Leadtek 8800GT which also carries a Zalman cooler and comes pre-overclocked, though not as highly. We’ve also included the Galaxy 9600GT to see what kind of gains a highly overclocked 8800GT offers us against the mildly overclocked Galaxy 9600GT.

3DMark06

Version and / or Patch Used: Build 110
Developer Homepage: http://www.futuremark.com
Product Homepage: http://www.futuremark.com/products/3dmark06/
Buy It Here

3DMark06 is the very latest version of the «Gamers Benchmark» from FutureMark. The newest version of 3DMark expands on the tests in 3DMark05 by adding graphical effects using Shader Model 3.0 and HDR (High Dynamic Range lighting) which will push even the best DX9 graphics cards to the extremes.

3DMark06 also focuses on not just the GPU but the CPU using the AGEIA PhysX software physics library to effectively test single and Dual Core processors.

We can see the superior overclock on the GIGABYTE 8800GT giving us a nice little jump on the overclocked Leadtek 8800GT.

Benchmarks — PT Boats: Knights of the Sea

PT Boats: Knights of the Sea

Version and / or Patch Used: Benchmark Demo
Developer Homepage: http://en.akella.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.pt-boats.net/

PT Boats: Knights of the Sea is a naval action simulator that places gamers in charge of a mosquito fleet of the Allied Forces, Russia or Germany during the height of World War II.

Using the latest Direct X 10 technology PT Boards — Knights of the Sea manages to apply a lot of stress to the components of today which in turn gives us quite an intensive benchmark.

Moving over to PT Boats we can see that the overclock doesn’t seem to be as helpful this time around.

Benchmarks — CINEBENCH R10

CINEBENCH R10

Version and / or Patch Used: Release 10
Developer Homepage: http://www.maxon.net/
Product Homepage: http://www.maxon.net

CINEBENCH is a real-world test suite that assesses your computer’s performace capabilities. MAXON CINEBENCH is based on MAXON’s award-winning animation software, CINEMA 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. MAXON software has been used in blockbuster movies such as Spider-Man, Star Wars, The Chronicles of Narnia and many more.

MAXON CINEBENCH runs several tests on your computer to measure the performance of the main processor and the graphics card under real world circumstances. The benchmark application makes use of up to 16 CPUs or CPU cores and is available for Windows (32-bit and 64-Bit) and Macintosh (PPC and Intel-based).

CINEBENCH manages to get a negative effect from the overclock with the score going down to about the same as the Galaxy 9600GT.

Benchmarks — Half Life 2 (Episode Two HDR)

Half Life 2 (Episode Two HDR)

Version and / or Patch Used: Latest from Steam
Timedemo or Level Used: Custom Timedemo
Developer Homepage: http://www.valvesoftware.com
Product Homepage: http://www.half-life2.com
Buy It Here

By taking the suspense, challenge and visceral charge of the original, and adding startling new realism, responsiveness and new HDR technology, Half-Life 2 Episode Two opens the door to a world where the player’s presence affects everything around him, from the physical environment to the behaviors even the emotions of both friends and enemies.

We benchmark Half Life 2 Episode Two with our own custom timedemos as to avoid possible driver optimizations using the «record demo_name» command and loading the timedemo with the «timedemo demo_name» command — For a full list of the commands, click here.

Episode Two manages to see some gains from the overclock, but with big numbers already they’re not exactly what you would call noticeable.

Benchmarks — World in Conflict

World in Conflict

Version and / or Patch Used: 1.0.0.5
Timedemo or Level Used: Built-in Test
Developer Homepage: http://www.massive.se
Product Homepage: http://www.worldinconflict.com

World in Conflict is a real-time strategy video game by Massive Entertainment and to be published by Sierra Entertainment for Windows (DX9 and DX10) and the Xbox 360.

The game is set in 1989 where economic troubles cripple the Soviet Union and threaten to dissolve it. However, the title pursues a «what if» scenario where, in this case, the Soviet Union does not collapse and instead pursues a course of war to remain in power. It is an intensive new game is sure to put plenty of stress on even the latest graphics cards and we use the built-in benchmarking for our testing.

WIC gets an FPS bump across the board when compared to the lesser overclocked Leadtek offering.

Benchmarks — Enemy Territory: Quake Wars

Enemy Territory: Quake Wars

Version and / or Patch Used: Latest Steam Version
Timedemo or Level Used: Custom time demo
Developer Homepage: http://www.splashdamage.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.enemyterritory.com/

Enemy Territory: Quake Wars is the latest Quake incarnation to make it out of the iD labs and carries with it a fast paced experience that manages to place a good amount of strain on your graphics card.

We use a custom made time demo which shows a bit of everything and manages to give us a good solid benchmark for the graphics cards that we test.

ETQW also sees a little increase at all resolutions, though nothing major.

Benchmarks — Crysis

Crysis

Version and / or Patch Used: 1.1
Timedemo or Level Used: Custom time demo
Developer Homepage: http://www.crytek.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.ea.com/crysis/
Buy It Here

From the makers of Far Cry, Crysis offers FPS fans the best-looking, most highly-evolving gameplay, requiring the player to use adaptive tactics and total customization of weapons and armor to survive in dynamic, hostile environments including Zero-G.

Real time editing, bump mapping, dynamic lights, network system, integrated physics system, shaders, shadows and a dynamic music system are just some of the state of-the-art features the CryENGINE 2 offers. The CryENGINE 2 comes complete with all of its internal tools and also includes the CryENGINE 2 Sandbox world editing system.

Crysis sees small bumps with the overclock, but again nothing major.

Benchmarks — Unreal Tournament 3

Unreal Tournament 3

Version and / or Patch Used: 1.1
Timedemo or Level Used:
Developer Homepage: http://www.epicgames.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.unrealtournament3.com/
Buy It Here

Following the formulae that made Unreal Tournament so great the third installment to the series has hit us recently with better than ever graphics. The games uses the latest Unreal Engine which like most modern day games when maxed out puts the pressure on our lineup of graphics cards.

UT3 manages to really make use of the overclocking with a gain of almost 10FPS at the highest resolution.

High Quality AA and AF

Our high quality tests let us separate the men from the boys and the ladies from the girls. If the cards weren’t struggling before they will start to now.

3DMark06

Moving back to 3DMark06, and this time with AA and AF on we can see the overclock from the GIGABYTE offering really throwing it out in front again.

Half Life 2 (Episode Two HDR)

Episode Two on the other hand shows just a slight increase that equates to about 5%.

World In Conflict

WIC sees a small bump again like our non AA/AF tests.

Benchmarks — 3DMark06 — XP

3DMark06

Version and / or Patch Used: Build 110
Developer Homepage: http://www.futuremark.com
Product Homepage: http://www.futuremark.com/products/3dmark06/
Buy It Here

3DMark06 is the very latest version of the «Gamers Benchmark» from FutureMark. The newest version of 3DMark expands on the tests in 3DMark05 by adding graphical effects using Shader Model 3.0 and HDR (High Dynamic Range lighting) which will push even the best DX9 graphics cards to the extremes.

3DMark06 also focuses on not just the GPU but the CPU using the AGEIA PhysX software physics library to effectively test single and Dual Core processors.

With Windows XP loaded up and a run of 3DMark we can again see the speed increase across all resolutions on the GIGABYTE 8800GT.

Benchmarks — CINEBENCH R10 — XP

CINEBENCH R10

Version and / or Patch Used: Release 10
Developer Homepage: http://www.maxon.net/
Product Homepage: http://www.maxon.net

CINEBENCH is a real-world test suite that assesses your computer’s performace capabilities. MAXON CINEBENCH is based on MAXON’s award-winning animation software, CINEMA 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. MAXON software has been used in blockbuster movies such as Spider-Man, Star Wars, The Chronicles of Narnia and many more.

MAXON CINEBENCH runs several tests on your computer to measure the performance of the main processor and the graphics card under real world circumstances. The benchmark application makes use of up to 16 CPUs or CPU cores and is available for Windows (32-bit and 64-Bit) and Macintosh (PPC and Intel-based).

Windows XP CINEBENCH performance paints a different picture with the GIGABYTE coming out ahead this time, though all cards are quite close to each other.

Benchmarks — World in Conflict — XP

World in Conflict

Version and / or Patch Used: 1.0.0.5
Timedemo or Level Used: Built-in Test
Developer Homepage: http://www.massive.se
Product Homepage: http://www.worldinconflict.com

World in Conflict is a real-time strategy video game by Massive Entertainment and to be published by Sierra Entertainment for Windows (DX9 and DX10) and the Xbox 360.

The game is set in 1989 where economic troubles cripple the Soviet Union and threaten to dissolve it. However, the title pursues a «what if» scenario where, in this case, the Soviet Union does not collapse and instead pursues a course of war to remain in power. It is an intensive new game is sure to put plenty of stress on even the latest graphics cards and we use the built-in benchmarking for our testing.

That small gain in World in Conflict is continued to be seen under Windows XP.

Benchmarks — Unreal Tournament 3 — XP

Unreal Tournament 3

Version and / or Patch Used: 1.1
Timedemo or Level Used:
Developer Homepage: http://www.epicgames.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.unrealtournament3.com/
Buy It Here

Following the formulae that made Unreal Tournament so great the third installment to the series has hit us recently with better than ever graphics. The games uses the latest Unreal Engine which like most modern day games when maxed out puts the pressure on our lineup of graphics cards.

At the lower resolution the lower clocked Leadtek comes out ahead here, though when we climb up in resolution the GIGABYTE offering continues to take the lead.

Benchmarks — Half Life 2 (Episode Two HDR) — XP

Half Life 2 (Episode Two HDR)

Version and / or Patch Used: Latest from Steam
Timedemo or Level Used: Custom Timedemo
Developer Homepage: http://www.valvesoftware.com
Product Homepage: http://www.half-life2.com
Buy It Here

By taking the suspense, challenge and visceral charge of the original, and adding startling new realism, responsiveness and new HDR technology, Half-Life 2 Episode Two opens the door to a world where the player’s presence affects everything around him, from the physical environment to the behaviors even the emotions of both friends and enemies.

We benchmark Half Life 2 Episode Two with our own custom timedemos as to avoid possible driver optimizations using the «record demo_name» command and loading the timedemo with the «timedemo demo_name» command — For a full list of the commands, click here.

Bumps across the board are seen with the GIGABYTE offering, though again we’ve already got big numbers coming out of all cards.

Temperature and Sound Tests

Temperature Tests

With the TES 1326 Infrared Thermometer literally in hand we found ourselves getting real-world temperatures from the products we test at load (3D clock speeds).

There are two places we pull temperature from — the back of the card directly behind the core and if the card is dual slot and has an exhaust point we also pull a temperate from there, as seen in the picture.

The older Zalman cooler the GIGABYTE uses runs the card just a little warmer then the newer cooler Leadtek use.

Sound Tests

Pulling out the TES 1350A Sound Level Meter we find ourselves quickly yelling into the top of it to see how loud we can be.

After five minutes of that we get a bit more serious and place the device two CM away from the fan on the card to find the maximum noise level of the card when idle (2D mode) and in load (3D mode).

The older cooler is also slightly louder.

Power Consumption Tests

Using our new PROVA Power Analyzer WM-01 or «Power Thingy» as it has become quickly known as to our readers, we are now able to find out what kind of power is being used by our test system and the associated graphics cards installed. Keep in mind; it tests the complete system (minus LCD monitor, which is plugged directly into AC wall socket).

There are a few important notes to remember though; while our maximum power is taken in 3DMark06 at the same exact point, we have seen in particular tests the power being drawn as much as 10% more. We test at the exact same stage every time; therefore tests should be very consistent and accurate.

The other thing to remember is that our test system is bare minimum — only a 7,200RPM SATA-II single hard drive is used without CD ROM or many cooling fans.

So while the system might draw 400 watts in our test system, placing it into your own PC with a number of other items, the draw is going to be higher.

Power usage on a whole is slightly up when compared to the Leadtek offering, nothing too major though.

Final Thoughts

The GIGABYTE 8800GT is quite the performer and continues to show good gains over the Leadtek offering. While the cooler might not be as effective due to it being louder and hotter than the newer Zalman used on the Leadtek, personally I think it looks better.

Value wise the GIGABYTE offering is pretty good; it comes in a little pricier than your normal brands, but that’s to be expected with the cooler and the massive overclock.

At the end of it all though, we feel a bit disappointed with the GIGABYTE 8800GT offering. When we tested the HD 3870 Ultra Durable 2 model the card ran cooler and with less power than the competition. The 8800GT on the other hand doesn’t really seem to have this advantage. Yes, it’s cooler than a reference design, but that’s to be expected with the aftermarket cooler. Power pretty much sits at the same level though.

On a whole the GIGABYTE 8800GT is a good card, the bundle isn’t bad with the inclusion of Neverwinter Nights 2 and the overclock on offer is very healthy. The card is going to be popular because GIGABYTE is a trusted brand which always put out quality products.

You’re not going to be disappointed with the GIGABYTE 8800GT TurboForce. It does what it’s supposed to do and does it well.

Shopping Information

PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.

United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon.com

United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon. co.uk

Australia: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon.com.au

Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon.ca

Deutschland: Finde andere Technik- und Computerprodukte wie dieses auf Amazon.de

Shawn Baker

Shawn takes care of all of our video card reviews. From 2009, Shawn is also taking care of our memory reviews, and from May 2011, Shawn also takes care of our CPU, chipset and motherboard reviews. As of December 2011, Shawn is based out of Taipei, Taiwan.

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT review: GPU specs, performance benchmarks

Buy on Amazon

GeForce 8800 GT videocard released by NVIDIA; release date: 29 October 2007. At the time of release, the videocard cost $349. The videocard is designed for desktop-computers and based on Tesla microarchitecture codenamed G92.

Core clock speed — 1500 MHz. Texture fill rate — 33.6 billion / sec. Pipelines — 112. Floating-point performance — 336.0 gflops. Manufacturing process technology — 65 nm. Transistors count — 754 million. Power consumption (TDP) — 105 Watt.

Memory type: GDDR3. Maximum RAM amount — 512 MB. Memory bus width — 256 Bit. Memory clock speed — 900 MHz. Memory bandwidth — 57.6 GB / s.

Benchmarks





PassMark
G3D Mark

Top 1 GPU
This GPU


PassMark
G2D Mark

Top 1 GPU
This GPU


GFXBench 4. 0
T-Rex

Top 1 GPU
This GPU

69225 Frames

3346 Frames

GFXBench 4.0
T-Rex

Top 1 GPU
This GPU

69225.000 Fps

3346.000 Fps






Name Value
PassMark — G3D Mark 516
PassMark — G2D Mark 81
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex 3346 Frames
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex 3346.000 Fps

Specifications (specs)




































Architecture Tesla
Code name G92
Launch date 29 October 2007
Launch price (MSRP) $349
Place in performance rating 1201
Type Desktop
Core clock speed 1500 MHz
CUDA cores 112
Floating-point performance 336. 0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C
Pipelines 112
Texture fill rate 33.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 105 Watt
Transistor count 754 million

Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV
Maximum VGA resolution 2048×1536
Multi monitor support
Bus support PCI-E 2. 0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 9″ (22.9 cm)
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors 6-pin & 8-pin
DirectX 10.0
OpenGL 2.1
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz
Memory type GDDR3
3D Vision
CUDA
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) 128bit

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT with others




NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT



vs



ATI
All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO




NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT



vs



NVIDIA
GeForce 8600 GS




NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT



vs



NVIDIA
Quadro NVS 420




NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT



vs



ATI
Radeon HD 4860




NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT



vs



AMD
Radeon HD 7640G




NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT



vs



AMD
Radeon R6 M435DX

nVidia GeForce 8800 GT Review

Verdict

Key Specifications

  • Review Price: £175. 00

The arrival of the nVidia GeForce 8800 GTX was close to a monumental event in the history of 3D graphics. It was the first card to support DirectX 10 and its associated unified shader model, it greatly improved image quality compared to nVidia’s previous generation of cards (finally catching up with ATI in this regard), and it blew every other card on the planet out the water in terms of performance. Unfortunately all this power also demanded an enormous price tag and, considering expected competition from ATI and the imminent release of cheaper mid-range cards based on the same technology, the GTX was deemed a card for the bleeding edge enthusiast only.


To remedy this nVidia launched the 8800 GTS 640MB the following month and the 8800 GTS 320MB a couple of months later still. They both offered close to the awesome performance of the GTX but at a much more reasonable price. However, at around £250-£300, they were still a bit too expensive for the gamer on a budget – these were lower high-end cards, not true mid-range parts. Of course, had we the benefit of hindsight we would have insisted that a GTS was worth saving every penny for because what followed throughout the rest of 2007 was one disappointment after another.

First came nVidia’s supposed mid-range parts, the 8600 GTS and 8600 GT, which were massively cut down versions of the 8800 series. They were smaller and quieter than the 8800 series, and had great new HD video processing capabilities but their gaming performance was way below expectations and try as we might, we just couldn’t see fit to ever recommend them, even though they were quite cheap. We then had ATI’s Radeon HD 2900 XT, which was level with the 8800 GTS 640MB in terms of performance but consumed a huge amount of power when under load and was still too expensive to call mid-range. Finally we had ATI’s attempt at true mid-range DX10 cards, in the shape of the HD 2600 XT and HD 2600 Pro, which were even better in terms of multimedia capabilities than nVidia’s 8600 series, but again lacked the horsepower to make for a worthwhile upgrade for any gamer with a previous generation card like the X1950 Pro or 7900 GS.


All of which brings us to now, a full year after the 8800 GTX first arrived, and the launch of the 8800 GT, the first true “refresh” of any of the DirectX 10 capable graphics card. It has been a long time in the making but with specs that rival the 8800 GTS and high street prices hovering around the £175-£200 mark, this could finally be the mid-range card we’ve all been waiting for. But before I evangelise the card too much, I should probably explain a bit more about what makes it so special.

As technology marches on and the transistor count of CPUs and GPUs alike continues to rise, there is a natural push for ever smaller transistors. The reduction in size brings with it less power consumption, which in turn means the chips don’t run as hot, and, because they produce smaller chips, more of them can fit onto each silicon wafer, reducing the relative manufacturing cost of each chip and theoretically giving us lower high street prices for our hardware. However, changing manufacturing processes can be a high risk business, which is why convention has it that manufacturers will release brand new architectures on existing tried and tested processes, as was the case with the 8800 GTX and HD 2900 XT. As the architecture then matures, with the introduction of lower powered mid-range parts and later refresh parts, the newer manufacturing process can be introduced.


It’s this path that the 8800 line has followed with the G80 core at the heart of the 8800 GTX and GTS being made using a 90nm process and the 8800 GT being powered by the G92 core that’s made using the newer 65nm process. Now the change may not seem like much but it actually equates to a 34 per cent reduction in size for any given chip design, or conversely a 34 per cent increase in space to manufacturer more chips on each wafer. The upshot of which is smaller, cheaper, less power hungry chips, and that can only be a good thing. However, the G92 isn’t just a die shrink, there’s a little more to it than that.

For a start, the video processing engine, dubbed VP2, that was featured on the 8600 range, has now found its way into the 8800 GT. So you can enjoy high-definition video without your system grinding to a halt. The final display engine that was controlled by a separate chip on the 8800 GTX is also now incorporated into G92. The result is a chip that actually has 73M more transistors than the 8800 GTX (754M vs. 681M) yet still has fewer stream processors, texture processing power, and ROPs than its more powerful brother.


A new version of nVidia’s transparency multisampling anti-aliasing algorithm has also been added to the 8800 GT’s arsenal, which should greatly improve image quality using this mode, while also maintaining great performance. Apart from this, though, there is little in the way of new graphics features with the new processor.

nVidia has evidently thought long and hard about exactly what areas of the previous 8800 cards were being under utilised and could be scaled back, along with which were more important to maintain. The result is a GPU design that sits somewhere between the 8800 GTX and 8800 GTS in terms of performance but with the features of the 8600 GTS thrown in. To all intents and purposes, this makes the 8800 GTS completely redundant, and the Radeon HD 2900 XT isn’t in that great a position either (we’ll just have to wait and see whether ATI’s upcoming 3850 and 2870 can change that situation though). Moreover, the 8800 GTX and Ultra should still offer more performance but have fewer features, cost significantly more and are more power hungry. The 8800 GT really is building a strong case for itself.

If it weren’t something even my colleagues would frown upon, I’d be inclined to say that the 8800 GT is a sexy card. The new cooler design is just very pleasing on the eye and, much as with the internal refinements of the G92, it just emanates the feeling of a matured design. It certainly looked the part on our nVidia branded test bed, anyway.

More important than the aesthetic aspects of the design, though, is the simple fact that nVidia has managed to squeeze all this power into a single slot card, which is not only a welcome change but really quite surprising. In fact, I dare say that having learned something of the specs of the 8800 GT, most people would’ve bet significant money on it requiring a dual slot cooler.


The reason why nVidia can get away with using such a slim design is the change in manufacturing process, which reduces the thermal envelope of the card to a level that a single slot cooler can cope with. In fact, it’s so thermally accomplished that the relatively small fan doesn’t even need to spin very fast to keep things cool, resulting in a card that remains near silent even during intense gaming. It does get quite hot to the touch and will require a decent amount of airflow within a case to prevent overheating, but in our open air test bed it didn’t become hot enough to require the fan to spin excessively.


Also as a result of the smaller manufacturing process, the 8800 GT consumes only 105W, even under full load. Therefore, only a single six-pin power connector is required to get the beast going at full pelt. This is another nice change and it’s a development we hope will turn into a trend not just a one off.

Output options are pretty standard fair with two dual-link HDCP enabled DVI-I sockets allowing for both analogue and digital connections to PC monitors and HDTVs, while a seven-pin analogue video port provides the usual composite and component options. The DVI connections can be used in conjunction with DVI-to-VGA and DVI-to-HDMI dongles so every connection option (bar the upcoming DisplayPort) is supported. However, nVidia is still choosing to make audio pass-through (for use with HDMI connections) an option for 3rd party vendors to implement rather than make it a requisite like ATI has. That’s a shame, considering this slim, cool, and quiet card could be perfect for a gaming biased HTPC.


The 8800 GT is actually the first graphics card ever to be PCI Express 2.0 compliant, which means it can communicate with memory at a rate of 16GB/sec – twice the previous standard. Though this may be of use to workstation applications and GPGPU computing situations it is largely going to go unnoticed to the average gamer, though this may change in the future. Either way, the standard is completely forwards and backwards compatible with all the previous versions of PCI Express so it isn’t something to worry about.

All the usual board partners will have stock available over the coming weeks. Most seem to be offering standard clocked and overclocked versions and there are also some bundled game offers around to sweeten the deal. We’ll be sure to get some of these cards in for testing over the coming weeks. For now, though, let’s take a look at how the reference board performs.

With the launch of some truly stellar gaming titles in the last few months, some of our tried and tested graphics benchmarks are looking a bit long in the tooth. So, for this review I’ve dropped Counter-Strike: Source in favour of Team Fortress 2, and I’ve added in the Crysis demo to see how these cards cope with the latest most demanding of games. Call Of Duty 2, 3DMark06, and Prey are still in there for the time being but this will probably be the last time they will be used for testing – we just need to iron out the kinks in our test code before the new benchmarks can be let loose.


As per usual, each game is run with full in-game detail settings at a variety of resolutions with varying degrees of anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering applied. For Call Of Duty 2, Prey, 3Dmark06, and Team Fortress 2, each setting is run three times and the average is taken so we end up with a pretty rock solid figure. For Crysis we’ve used the inbuilt timedemo that loops four times enabling us to calculate an average from the results. As it’s such a demanding game, though, we’ve kept in-game settings to high (rather than very-high) and also stuck to resolutions of just 1,280 x 1,024 and 1,680 x 1,050. We also use transparency anti-aliasing throughout our testing as we feel its a processing technique that greatly enhances image quality in a lot of games.


Our test platform consists of the following:

We generally find that any single card configuration struggles to cope at the resolutions demanded by a 30in monitor so we’ve stuck to testing at 1,920 x 1,200 and 1,600 x 1,200 (or 1,680 x 1,050), and 1,280 x 1,024 for these tests. We will, however, come back to test SLI and CrossFire configurations very soon so we will take a look at performance at 2,560 x 1,600 then.

As was to be expected, the 8800 GTX is still top of the pile (well, except for the 8800 Ultra, but we haven’t tested that here) but overall the 8800 GT makes a good show of itself, most notably staying ahead of the 8800 GTS for the majority of tests. At the highest resolutions and anti-aliasing settings, the reduced memory bandwidth of the 8800 GT lets it down and the 8800 GTS just creeps ahead on the odd occasion. However, considering the price difference, and all the other benefits of the new card, the 8800 GT would be the better bet every time.


Conversely, the 8800 GTX does enough to show why it still demands such a high price. While the other cards begin to drop off significantly as the resolution, anti-aliasing, and anisotropic filtering are cranked up, the 8800 GTX takes far less of a hit. In particular, Team Fortress 2 at 1,920 x 1,200 with 8xAA and 16xAF is nearly twice as fast with the 8800 GTX as it is with the 8800 GT. However, for the most part the 8800 GT is more than capable.


Of course none of this takes into account the incredibly poor framerates that all the cards produce when playing Crysis. Hopefully the full game will be slightly more optimised, while future driver updates from both ATI and nVIdia should also improve the situation. Otherwise, Crysis could prove to be unplayable for most people, which would be a huge shame because it looks incredible.


”’Verdict”’


While the nVidia 8800 GT doesn’t beat the established 8800 GTX, it provides close to the performance for a fraction of the price and also packs in more features to sweeten the deal. Add to this it’s small size, cool operation, and quiet running and you have a card that we can’t recommend highly enough. It’s simply phenomenal.

We had some anomalous results when 4x anti-aliasing was enabled on the 8800 series cards in Prey and Call Of Duty 2. This was down to the cards’ occasionally not displaying textures correctly which actually improves performance because there’s less post processing to be done. It’s a known issue and one we’ve yet to solve but I’ve included the results anyway, as you may also find you have similar issues.

Score in detail

  • Value 10

  • Features 10

  • Performance 9

GeForce 8800 GT video card [in 1 benchmark]

NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT

  • PCIe 2.0 x16 interface
  • Core clock 600MHz
  • Video memory size 512MB
  • Memory type GDDR3
  • Memory frequency 900MHz
  • Maximum resolution

Description

NVIDIA started selling GeForce 8800 GT 29October 2007 at a suggested price of $349. This is a desktop video card based on Tesla architecture and 65 nm manufacturing process, primarily designed for office use. It has 512 MB of GDDR3 memory at 0.9 GHz, and coupled with a 256-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 57.6 Gb / s.

In terms of compatibility, this is a single-slot PCIe 2.0 x16 card. The length of the reference version is 22.9 cm. An additional 6-pin & 8-pin power cable is required for connection, and the power consumption is 105 W.

It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of

1.76%

from the leader, which is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.


GeForce
8800 GT

or


GeForce RTX
3090 Ti

General information 99 (A100 SXM4)

Value for money

To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of video cards and their cost, taking into account the cost of other cards.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Features

GeForce 8800 GT’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak about GeForce 8800 GT’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results. 939.8 (H200 SXM5) Swimming point 336.0 GFLOPS of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

compatibility and size

Information on GeForce 8800 GT compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply). 6-PIN & PIN Support SLI 2-WAY

Operational memory

1

1

1

1
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce 8800 GT — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.

Memory type 9Memory bandwidth 57.6 Gb/s out of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)

Video outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 8800 GT. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Video Connectors Dual Link DVIHDTV

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) 128bit

API support

APIs supported by GeForce 8800 GT, including their versions.

9005


Overall benchmark performance

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800 GT
1.76

  • Passmark
Passmark

This is a very common benchmark included in the Passmark PerformanceTest package. He gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation by running four separate tests for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the latter is done in 4K resolution if possible), and a few more tests using DirectCompute.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

8800 GT
516


Game tests

FPS in popular games on the GeForce 8800 GT, as well as compliance with system requirements. Remember that the official requirements of the developers do not always match the data of real tests.

Medium FPS
Popular games

Relative performance

Overall GeForce 8800 GT performance compared to its nearest desktop counterparts.


NVIDIA GeForce 615
106.82

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
105.11

AMD Radeon HD 8670D
104.55

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
100

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
98.86

AMD Radeon HD 7660D
97.16

AMD Radeon HD 6570
97.16

Competitor from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce 8800 GT from AMD is Radeon HD 7660D, which is slower by 3% on average and lower by 7 positions in our rating.


Radeon HD
7660D

Compare

Here are some of AMD’s nearest GeForce 8800 GT competitors:

AMD Radeon HD 7650A
110. 8

AMD Radeon HD 6610M
109.09

AMD Radeon HD 8670D
104.55

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
100

AMD Radeon HD 7660D
97.16

AMD Radeon HD 6570
97.16

AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
96.02

Other video cards

Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.


GeForce
9800 GTX+

Compare


GeForce
9600 GT

Compare


GeForce
9800 GT

Compare


Radeon HD
3870

Compare


GeForce
8800 GTX

Compare


GeForce
8800 GTS 512

Compare

Recommended Processors

According to our statistics, these processors are most often used with the GeForce 8800 GT.


Core 2
Quad Q6600

4.9%


Core 2
Duo E8400

4.2%


Core 2
Duo E8500

3%


Core i3
2100

2.1%


Core 2
Duo E6750

1.7%


Core 2
Duo E7500

1.6%


Core i5
3470

1.3%


Core 2
Quad Q8400

1.3%


Phenom X3
8450

1.2%


Core i3
3220

1. 1%

User rating

Here you can see the rating of the video card by users, as well as put your own rating.


Tips and comments

Here you can ask a question about the GeForce 8800 GT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Video card NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

Specifications
Drivers
Price

DirectX 11.1 (10_0)
Sheder Model
Name: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Series: GeForce 8
GPU model: G92-270 (G92)
CUDA cores: 112
Base clock : 600 MHz
Memory speed: 1.8
Gbps
Memory: 512
Mb GDDR3 (256-bit)

The NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT video card is based on a 65 nm process technology and is based on the G92-270 (G92) graphics processor.
The card supports Directx 10. NVIDIA placed 512 megabytes of GDDR3 RAM, which is connected using a 256-bit interface.
The graphics processor runs at 600 MHz. The number of CUDA cores is 112, with a speed of 1800 Mbps.

The power consumption of the video card is 125W, and the recommended power supply is 450W.

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT supports Microsoft DirectX 10 and OpenGL 2.1.

Specifications for NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

GPU specifications:
Model: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Series: GeForce 8, Desktop
GPU model: G92-270 (G92)
Process: 65nm
CUDA cores: 112
Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs): 14
Texture Units (TMUs): 32
Base clock: 600MHz
Number of transistors: 754 million
Memory specifications:
Memory capacity: 512
Mb
Memory type: GDDR3
Memory bus: 256-bit
Memory speed: 1800 Mbps
(1. 8
Gbps)
Memory clock: 900MHz
Texture Fill Rate: 19.2 GTexel/s
Display support:
Maximum digital resolution: 2560×1600
Maximum VGA resolution: 2048×1536
Standard connectors: DVI-I DualLink, S-Video
Multi-monitor support: Yes
HDMI: Yes, Via adapter
Audio input for HDMI: SPDIF
Thermal data:
Max GPU temperature: 105℃
Energy consumption (TDP): 125 W
Recommended Nutritional Requirements: 450 W
Additional power connectors: 6-pin
Video card dimensions:
Height: 11. 1 cm
Length: 22.86 cm
Width: 1 slot
Technologies and capabilities:
CUDA: Yes
PhysX: Yes
3D Vision: Yes
3D games: Yes
DirectX: 10
OpenGL: 2.1
Tire: PCI-Express 1.0 x16
Support OS: Microsoft Windows 7-10, Linux, FreeBSDx86

Please note: The table shows the reference characteristics of the video card, they may vary by different manufacturers.


New drivers for NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

Download drivers for video card NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

Operating system:
Windows 10 64 -by
Release date:
December 14, 2016

Version:
342. 01 WhQL

(29000 mb) Obsolete

MD5


342.01 WHQL

Status: Out of date

MD5

Operating system:
Windows 8 64-bit, 8.1 64-bit, 7 64-bit, Vista 64 -by
Release date:
December 14, 2016

9000

Download (292.47 MB)

Status: Obsolete

MD5

Operating system:
Windows XP 32 -by
Release date:
July 29, 2014

version:
340.52 WhQL

(186.17 MB) 9000 9000 9000 9000

MD5
|
Release Notes (PDF)

Operating system:
Windows XP 64-bit
Windows Server 2003 x64
Release date:
July 29, 2014

Version:
1256 WHQL

Download (225. 04 MB)

Status: Obsolete

MD5
|
Release Notes (PDF)

Driver for NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT video card is downloaded from the official site!

Or use the GeForce Experience program — it will automatically select the necessary driver for your video card.

Price in Russia

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT FAQ

What series is this video card?

Video card series: GeForce 8

What is the power consumption and power requirements?

Maximum power consumption is: 125W.

Recommended power supply: 450W.

Auxiliary power connectors: 6-pin .

Where can I download the GeForce 8800 GT driver?


Video cards with 512 Mb memory:

Video cards with GDDR3 memory type:

Video cards with 256-bit bus:

Comparative testing of four GeForce 8800GTS 512 and 8800GT / Video cards

With the release of a new series of GeForce 8800GTS 512 video cards, NVIDIA has significantly strengthened its positions. The new product replaced the more expensive, hotter and bulkier GeForce 8800GTX, and the only drawback compared to its predecessor was a narrower 256-bit memory bus (vs. . However, the novelty has undergone not only reductions, but also some improvements: the number of texture units has been increased from 32 to 64 pieces, which, of course, partly compensates for the simplifications in the map. Also, to compensate for the simplifications, the frequencies were increased compared to their predecessor, and the amount of video memory is easily expanded to 1 GB by simply installing larger-capacity chips, which, by the way, some manufacturers have already begun to do. But, despite the fact that the GeForce 8800GTS 512 replaced the GeForce 8800GTX, its main competitor is not its predecessor, but its closest relative GeForce 8800GT, and the whole point is in its lower price. Video cards GeForce 8800GTS 512 and GeForce 8800GT are not much different from each other, since GeForce 8800GT is a stripped-down version of GeForce 8800GTS 512 and, oddly enough, appeared on the market before the full-fledged version. Both video cards are equipped with 512 MB of video memory and, as today’s study showed, they have the same memory. The main differences lie in the GPU, and specifically, in the GT version, some of its functional blocks are disabled. See the table below for more details:

GeForce
8800GTS512
GeForce 8800 GT
Graphics Processing Unit (GPU): G92 G92
Number of universal processors 128 112
Quantity
texture blocks
64 56
Bit depth
memory bus, bit
256 256
Type of
memory
GDDR-3 GDDR-3
Interfaces 2x
Dual-Link DVI, TV-out, HDMI (via adapter)
2x Dual-Link DVI, TV-out, HDMI (via adapter)
Systemic
tire
PCI Express 2. 0 x16 PCI Express 2.0 x16

As you can see, the GeForce 8800GT differs from its older sister in the number of universal processors reduced to 112 and the number of texture units reduced to 56. Initially, the cards also differ in clock speeds, but this does not matter for our today’s review, since almost all cards have been factory overclocked. Let’s find out how the differences on paper are reflected in reality.

Leadtek 8800GTS 512

Designers from Leadtek chose a bright orange color to attract
attention to their video card, and they were absolutely right: the new product does not
will go unnoticed.

The face of the novelty was the image of a scene from a fictional
«shooters», under which are located technical
graphics card specifications and bonus note — full version
games Neverwinter Nights 2.

The reverse side of the box contains the characteristics of the video card, a list of the package and standard information from NVIDIA.

The package includes:

  • adapter for powering PCI-express cards;
  • S-video > S-video + component out splitter;
  • DVI to D-sub adapter;
  • CD with drivers;
  • Power DVD 7 CD;
  • CD with the full version of Newervinter Nights 2;
  • brief instructions for installing a video card.

The Leadtek 8800GTS 512 graphics card is based on a reference design familiar
we have more on GeForce 8800GT boards. Outwardly, the novelty is distinguished
«two-story» cooling system, which, in
unlike its predecessor, it throws hot air out of the
computer. The advantages of such a solution are obvious, and the reason for using
advanced cooling system is most likely not something
that the “new” chip heats up more, but what
big money buyer has every right to get the best product.
After all, to be honest, the reference system of the GeForce 8800GT is not the best
in a way that fulfills its responsibilities.

The reverse sides of the GeForce 8800GTS 512 and GeForce 8800GT look almost
identical and differ in that the 8800GTS 512 version has all elements
mounted. However, we can see the differences later on the example
video cards Leadtek 8800GT, but for now let’s get into the new product «under
hood».

Having removed the cooling system, we can again verify the identity of the boards.
However, pay attention to the right side of the board, where the
power subsystem. Where the GeForce 8800GT is empty and there are only
seats, Leadtek 8800GTS 512 has a densely populated space
radioelements. It turns out that the GeForce 8800GTS 512 has a more complex
power subsystem than GeForce 8800GT. Basically, it is not surprising
because the GeForce 8800GTS 512 has high operating frequencies, and,
consequently, more stringent requirements for food quality.

External differences between the G92 chip in Leadtek 8800GTS 512 and the G92 chip in
no GeForce 8800GT video cards.

The new video card uses the same Qimonda chips over time
1.0 ns sampling, as in the GeForce 8800GT. Set of eight chips
forms 512 MB of video memory. Rated frequency for similar chips
is 2000 MHz DDR, however the actual frequency set in
video card, a little lower.

The cooling system for the video card is aluminum with a copper plate.
This combination of two materials has been used for a long time and allows
achieve the desired efficiency with less weight and lower
price.

The processing of the copper «core» is at a satisfactory level, but
no more.

After removing the casing from the cooling system, we see
amazing picture: they are engaged in heat removal from the copper base
as many as three heat pipes that go to different parts of the radiator from
aluminum plates. This scheme serves to evenly distribute
heat, and the large dimensions of the radiator should in the best way
affect the quality of cooling, which cannot be said about the reference system
cooling GeForce 8800GT. There are also three heat pipes, but their dimensions
noticeably smaller, as are the dimensions of the radiator itself.

Differences, overclocking and cooling efficiency

The differences from the GeForce 8800GT lie in the increased from 112 to 128
the number of universal processors, as well as the frequencies of operation
the entire GPU.

In Leadtek 8800GTS 512, the frequencies correspond to the recommended ones and are equal to
650/1625 MHz for the GPU and 1944 MHz for the video memory.

Now — about the heating of the video card, which we will check using
Oblivion games at max settings.

Video card Leadtek 8800GTS 512 heated up from 55 degrees in the state
rest up to 71 degrees, the noise from the fan was practically not
heard. However, this was not enough for overclocking, and with the help of
using the same Riva Tuner, we increased the fan speed up to 50%
from the possible maximum.

After that, the temperature of the GPU did not rise above 64
degrees while keeping the noise level low. video card
Leadtek 8800GTS 512 overclocked to 756/1890 MHz for GPU and 2100
MHz for video memory. Such high frequencies were not available for GeForce
8800GT, apparently, because of the simplified power system.

Well, let’s meet the next member of our
today’s testing — the ASUS EN8800GTS TOP video card.

ASUS EN8800GTS TOP

When looking at the packaging of powerful ASUS graphics cards,
you get the feeling that this is not a video card at all, but, for example,
motherboard. It’s all about large dimensions; for example in our
case, the size of the box is noticeably larger than that of the first participant
today’s testing. Large area on the front of the package
allowed to fit a large image of a branded archer girl and
a considerable chart showing a 7% faster speed compared to
«Regular» GeForce 8800GTS 512. Abbreviation
«TOP» in the name of the video card indicates that it
has been factory overclocked. The disadvantage of packaging is that it is not obvious
that the video card belongs to the GeForce 8800GTS 512 series, but, by and large
count, it’s the little things. At first, it surprises that there are too few on the box
information, however, the truth is revealed later, by itself, and in
literally.

It is worth taking the box by the handle, as at the first breath of the breeze, it
opens like a book. The information under the cover is completely dedicated to
proprietary utilities from ASUS, in particular, ASUS Gamer OSD, which is now
can not only change the brightness / contrast / color in real
time, but also show the FPS value, as well as record video and
take screenshots. The second described utility called Smart
Doctor is designed to monitor the value of supply voltages and
frequencies of the video card, and also allows you to overclock it. It’s impossible not to say
about the fact that the ASUS proprietary utility can change two GPU frequencies, then
there is a core and a shader block. This brings her close to the famous
Riva Tuner utility.

The back of the box contains a bit of everything, in particular, a brief
description of the Video Security utility to be used
computer as a «smart» system
video surveillance online.

The complete set of the card is executed according to the principle “nothing
extra»:

  • adapter for powering PCI-express cards;
  • S-video > component out adapter;
  • DVI to D-sub adapter;
  • bag for 16 discs;
  • CD with drivers;
  • Documentation CD;
  • brief instructions for installing a video card.

Externally, the video card is almost an exact copy of Leadtek 8800GTS 512, and
this is not surprising: both cards are based on the reference design
and, most likely, produced at the same factory on order
NVIDIA itself, and only then sent to Leadtek and ASUS. In other words, today
a card from Leadtek could well become a card from ASUS, and vice versa.

It is clear that the reverse side of the video card is also nothing
differs from that of Leadtek 8800GTS 512, except that they have stickers
different branded.

Under the cooling system is also nothing unusual. Power system in
the right side of the board is fully assembled, in the center — the graphics processor
G92 with 128 active stream processors and eight memory chips,
overall forming 512 MB.

The memory chips are manufactured by Qimonda and have a 1. 0 ns access time,
which corresponds to a frequency of 2000 MHz.

The appearance of the GPU does not reveal its noble
origin, same as Leadtek 8800GTS 512.

The cooling system of the ASUS EN8800GTS TOP video card is exactly the same as
for the video card Leadtek 8800GTS 512: it is mounted in an aluminum heatsink
copper «core» for heat dissipation from the GPU.

The polishing quality of the copper core is satisfactory, as in
predecessors.

The heat from the copper core is distributed over the aluminum fins at
three copper heat pipes. In the effectiveness of this solution, we
already convinced by the example of the first card.

Rated frequencies and overclocking

its factory overclock. The nominal frequencies of the novelty are 740/1780 MHz for the GPU
(against 650/1625 MHz for Leadtek) and 2072 MHz for video memory (against 1944
MHz from Leadtek). Note that for memory chips with an access time of 1.0
ns nominal clock frequency is 2000 MHz.

We managed to overclock the card to the same frequencies as Leadtek 8800GTS 512:
756/1890 MHz for GPU and 2100 MHz for video memory at speed
fan 50% of maximum.

Well, now let’s go down a step and get acquainted with two
video cards of the GeForce 8800GT class.

Leadtek 8800GT

Video card Leadtek 8800GT is a typical representative of the series
GeForce 8800GT and, in fact, differs little from the majority. All salt
that GeForce 8800GT video cards are cheaper
«advanced» GeForce 8800GTS 512, so no
become less interesting.

The box of Leadtek 8800GT is almost the same as that of the more expensive 8800GTS
512. The differences are in the smaller thickness, the absence of a handle for
carrying and, of course, in the name of the video card. Inscription
«extreme» after the name of the video card refers to its
factory overclock.

The back side of the box contains brief information about the video card, its
advantages and equipment list. By the way, in our case
missing game Neverwinter Nights 2 and installation instructions
video cards.

The package includes:

  • adapter for powering PCI-express cards;
  • S-video > S-video + component out splitter;
  • DVI to D-sub adapter;
  • CD with drivers;
  • Power DVD 7 CD;
  • CD with the full version of Newervinter Nights 2;
  • brief instructions for installing a video card.

The Leadtek 8800GT video card is made according to the reference design and looks different
only a sticker on the casing of the cooling system.

The reverse side of the video card also does not stand out, however, after
acquaintances with the video card GeForce 8800GTS 512 attract attention
the missing row of chip capacitors on the left side of the board.

The cooling system is based on a reference design and is well known
us from previous reviews.

When examining the printed circuit board, attention is drawn to the absence
elements on the right side of the map, which, as we have seen,
mounted in version 8800GTS 512. Otherwise, quite ordinary
board with «cut» up to 112 stream processors
G92 GPU and eight memory chips in total
forming 512 MB.

Like the previous participants in today’s testing, the memory chips in
Leadtek 8800GT are manufactured by Qimonda and have an access time of 1.0
ns, which corresponds to 2000 MHz.

Rated frequencies and overclocking

As already mentioned, the Leadtek 8800GT video card has a standard factory overclock. Its nominal frequencies are 678/1700 MHz for the GPU and 2000 MHz for the video memory. Not bad,
however, despite such a considerable factory overclocking, the video card showed
not the best result with manual overclocking, only 713/1782 MHz for
GPU and 2100 MHz for video memory. Recall that
participants in previous reviews overclocked to frequencies of 740/1800 MHz for
video processor and 2000-2100 MHz for video memory. We also note that
we achieved this result at maximum fan speed
cooling systems, since, as we have already said, the reference system is
The GeForce 8800GT doesn’t cope with its duties in the best way.

Now let’s move on to the next participant in today’s test.

Palit 8800GT sonic

The face of the video card Palit 8800GT sonic is a fighting frog in a spectacular
decoration. Silly, but very funny! However, our life is
nonsense, and remembering this once again does not hurt at all. passing
from fun to business, you should pay attention to the lower right corner, where
there is a sticker indicating the frequencies of the video card and its other
characteristics. The frequencies of the novelty are almost the same as those of the GeForce 8800GTS
512: 650/1625 MHz for GPU and 1900 MHz for
video memory, which is only 44 MHz less than the 8800GTS 512.

The reverse side of the box does not contain anything remarkable, because everything
interesting is located on the front side.

The package includes:

  • adapter for powering PCI-express cards;
  • S-video > component out adapter;
  • S-video adapter > tulip;
  • DVI to D-sub adapter;
  • DVI to HDMI adapter;
  • CD with drivers;
  • CD with the full version of Tomb Raider The Legend;
  • brief instructions for installing a video card.

It should be noted that this is the first video card of the GeForce 8800GT class with
adapter DVI > HDMI, which was in our test
laboratories; Previously, only a few were equipped with such an adapter.
AMD Radeon video cards.

And here is the first surprise! Palit 8800GT sonic graphics card is based on
printed circuit board of our own design and equipped with a proprietary system
cooling.

The reverse side of the video card also has differences, but it is still difficult for us
judge the pros and cons of the new design. But about the installation of components
video card and its quality, we can fully judge.

Since the height of the pillars between the heatsink for the GPU and
the board is less than the gap between them, and the radiator is mounted
screws without any damping pads, very curved itself
graphics chip board and substrate. Unfortunately, this can lead to
their deterioration, and the problem is not the strength of the textolite, from
which the board is made, and in the tracks, which, when tensioned, can
burst. However, it is not at all necessary that this will happen, but
manufacturer should have paid more attention to fixing systems
cooling on their video cards.

The cooling system is made of painted aluminum and consists of three
parts — for the graphics processor, video memory and
power subsystems. Heat sink base for GPU not
shines with any special treatment, and as a heat-conducting
interface applied solid gray mass.

Changes in the design of the printed circuit board affected the power subsystem, minor
elements were replaced with larger ones, their layout changed. AT
otherwise, we have a well-known GeForce 8800GT with a graphics
G9 processor2 and eight video memory chips, totaling 512
Mb.

Like the rest of the participants in today’s testing, memory chips
manufactured by Qimonda and have a 1.0 ns access time.

Cooling system efficiency and overclocking

Check the efficiency of the proprietary cooling system used in
Palit 8800GT sonic, we will be using the game Oblivion with maximum
settings, however, as always.

The video card warmed up from 51 to 61 degrees, which, in general, is very good
result. However, the fan speed increased noticeably, in
as a result of which the already not quiet cooling system became distinctly
heard in general. Therefore, the video card from Palit is difficult
Recommend to lovers of silence.

Despite changes in the power subsystem and improved cooling,
video card Palit 8800GT sonic overclocked to the usual
frequencies 734/1782 MHz for the GPU and 2000 MHz for
video memory.

So we finished getting acquainted with the participants of today’s test,
so let’s move on to reviewing the test results.

Testing and conclusions

Today’s testing differs not only in what we compare
four video cards among themselves, but also by the fact that we produced it on
different from the test stand you are familiar with, the configuration of which is as follows:

Test bench
Processor Intel Core 2 Quad QX6850 2.93 GHz
Motherboard Foxconn N687AA chipset-based
NVIDIA nForce 680i SLI
RAM Corsair Dominator DDRII-800, 2x 1024
Mb, 5-5-5-15 2T
Operating system Windows XP+SP2+DirectX 9. 0c /
Windows Vista for DX10 Test
Power supply 730 W

The change in the test platform is due to the fact that initially
it was planned to test video cards Leadtek 8800GTS 512 and ASUS
EN8800GTS TOP in SLI mode, but, unfortunately, the ASUS graphics card
the end of the tests could not stand our bullying, and the idea collapsed. Therefore we decided
move SLI testing into a separate article as soon as we have the necessary
«iron», but for now we will limit ourselves to tests of single
video cards. We will compare seven video cards with each other, one of
which is overclocked to frequencies 756/1890/2100 MHz GeForce
8800GTS 512. GeForce 8800GT and
GeForce 8800GTX running on recommended by NVIDIA
frequencies. To make it easier for you to navigate, we present a table with
clock frequencies of all test participants:

video cards GPU clock, core/shader unit,
MHz
Effective video memory frequency, MHz
Leadtek 8800GTS 512 650 / 1625 1944
ASUS EN8800GTS TOP 740 / 1780 2072
Leadtek 8800GT 678 / 1674 2000
Palit 8800GT 650 / 1625 1900
Overclocked GeForce 8800GTS 512 (on
diagram 8800GTS 512 756/1890/2100)
756 / 1890 2100
GeForce 8800GT (on the diagram 8800GT) 600 / 1500 1800
GeForce 8800GTX (in the diagram
8800GTX)
575 / 1350 1800

We used ForceWare 169 drivers. 21 and ForceWare 169.25 for
Windows XP and Windows Vista respectively. Getting to know the results
testing will traditionally start with 3DMark tests:

Based on the results of the 3DMark tests, of course, you can see who
stronger and who is weaker, but the difference is so small that there are obvious
leaders are not. However, it is worth noting that the most
the most expensive of the participants — the video card GeForce 8800GTX — took
last places. To complete the picture, please refer to
the results of gaming tests, which, as before, we produced with
4x anti-aliasing and 16x anisotropic filtering.

In the game Call of Duty 4, attention is drawn to the fact that
the video card Leadtek 8800GT is almost on a par with Leadtek 8800GTS 512, and
ASUS EN8800 TOP graphics card almost keeps up with the overclocked GeForce
8800GTS 512. The video card Palit 8800GT was in the penultimate place,
slightly outperforming the reference GeForce 8800GT. The winner was
video card GeForce 8800GTX, apparently due to the wider (according to
compared with other test participants) memory bus.

In the Call of Juarez game under Windows XP, the Leadtek 8800GTS 512 video card
goes almost on a par with the GeForce 8800GTX, which is no longer saved
wide memory bus. Note the fact that the Leadtek 8800GT video card from
does not lag behind them, and at a resolution of 1024×768 it even overtakes that
due to the higher compared to the other two video cards
frequencies. The leaders are the video card from ASUS and overclocked GeForce
8800GTS 512, and in the penultimate place is again a video card from Palit,
immediately after the GeForce 8800GT.

Call of Juarez running on Windows Vista is having issues with
resolution of 1600×1200, in which there were large differences in
speeds and sometimes very strong «brakes».
We assume that the problem lies in the lack of video memory in such
heavy mode, and whether it is or not, we will check in the next review on
An example of an ASUS 8800GT video card with 1 GB of video memory. We immediately notice
that there were no problems with the GeForce 8800GTX. Based on the same results
at two lower resolutions, it can be seen that the alignment of forces compared to
Windows XP has not changed much, except for GeForce 8800GTX
reminded of her noble origin, but did not become a leader.

In the game Crysis under Windows XP, the alignment of forces has changed slightly, however
in fact, everything remains the same: video cards Leadtek 8800GTS 512 and
Leadtek 8800GT are on the same level, the leaders are
ASUS EN8800GTS TOP video cards and overclocked GeForce 8800GTS 512, and
the last place goes to the video card GeForce 8800GT. We also note that
the fact that as the resolution grows, the gap between the overclocked GeForce
8800GTS 512 and GeForce 8800GTX shrink due to wider bus
the memory of the latter. However, high clock speeds still prevail,
and yesterday’s champion remains out of work.

The problem in Windows Vista with a resolution of 1600×1200 did not pass by and
Crysis game, passing only GeForce 8800GTX. As in the game Call of Juarez,
there were jerks in speed and in some places a very strong fall
performance, sometimes below one frame per second. On the basis of
results at two lower resolutions, you can see that this time
video card Leadtek 8800GTS 512 overtook its younger sister, taking the third
place. The first places went to ASUS EN8800GTS TOP video cards,
overclocked GeForce 8800GTS 512 and GeForce 8800GTX, which
1280×1024 finally took the lead.

GeForce is the leader in Need for Speed ​​Pro Street Racing
8800GTX, and at a resolution of 1024×768 — by a wide margin. Followed by
it is followed by the Leadtek 8800GTS 512 video card, followed by ASUS EN8800GTS TOP and
overclocked GeForce 8800GTS 512, and the last places left for the cards
GeForce 8800GT and Palit 8800GT sonic. Because the GeForce
8800GTX became the leader, we can conclude that there is a strong dependence
games from video memory bandwidth. After that you can
guess why the overclocked versions of the GeForce 8800GTS 512 turned out to be
slower than the non-overclocked version. Apparently, the reason for this is the increased
video memory delays due to an increase in its clock frequency.

In the game Need for Speed ​​Carbon, a familiar picture appears before us:
video cards Leadtek 8800GTS 512 and Leadtek 8800GT are approximately on a par,
the first places were taken by the overclocked GeForce 8800GTS 512 and ASUS EN8800GTS
TOP, and the last place is occupied by GeForce 8800GT. GeForce graphics card
The 8800GTX looks good, but nothing more.

In the game Oblivion, the fact that when resolving
1024×768 overclocked video card GeForce 8800GTS 512 and ASUS EN8800GTS
TOP took the last places. We hypothesized that it was due to the increased
due to the increase in the frequency of memory delays, and they turned out to be right: after
lowering the memory frequency of the overclocked video card GeForce 8800GTS 512
up to par, it showed a result of over 100 frames per second. As
growth in resolution, the situation returns to normal, and the former outsiders
become leaders. Incidentally, noteworthy is the fact that
Leadtek 8800GT overtakes Leadtek 8800GTS 512, apparently
affects the high frequency of the shader unit.

Prey turned out to be undemanding to all video cards, and they
arranged according to their clock frequencies. Is it GeForce
8800GTX behaved a little differently, but this is understandable, because it has more
a wide memory bus, and the game is highly dependent on its bandwidth
capabilities.

Terminals

The purpose of today’s testing was to find out how much
video cards differ from each other, and how much the high price is justified
on the «advanced» GeForce 8800GTS 512 video card.
Based on the results obtained, it can be seen that the maps are very close to each other.
friend, and this despite the fact that according to the characteristics of the GeForce 8800GTS 512
outperforms GeForce 8800GT, including active functional
blocks inside the GPU. Obvious advantages of the new GeForce 8800GTS video cards
512 are a high-quality and quiet cooling system and larger than
GeForce 8800GT, overclocking potential. Deserves special attention
video card from ASUS, which, thanks to factory overclocking, takes
leading position. Of course, you can overclock the card yourself, moreover,
most likely, all video cards GeForce 8800GTS 512
«take» the frequencies of the video card from ASUS. AT
In general, we note once again that the new family of video cards based on
based on G9 graphics chips2 turned out to be very successful and may well
replace the recent leader GeForce 8800GTX.

Pros and cons of individual graphics cards:

Leadtek 8800GTS 512

Pros:

  • high-quality cooling system;
  • good overclocking potential;
  • solid equipment;
  • bright and convenient packaging.

Cons:

  • not noticed.
ASUS EN8800GTS TOP
  • Pros:
  • factory overclock;
  • high-quality cooling system;
  • has good overclocking potential.

Cons:

  • package is too big and uncomfortable.
Leadtek 8800GT

Pros:

  • factory overclocked;
  • solid equipment.

Cons:

  • not noticed.
Palit 8800GT sonic

Pros:

  • factory overclocked;
  • alternative cooling system;
  • solid equipment.

Cons:

  • heavily curved board in the GPU area;
  • noticeable fan noise.

— Discuss the material in the conference0005

  • Issue date: February, 2008;
  • Video card memory size: 512 MB;
  • Video memory type: GDDR3;
  • GPU frequency: 700 MHz.

Specifications Nvidia GeForce GT 8800

GPU

processors

GPU manufacturer Nvidia
GPU name G92
Platform Desktop
Clock frequency 700MHz
Two No
Reference card Nvidia GeForce GT 8800 GT 600 MHz 512 MB

Performance

Number of shaders 112
TMU 56
Number of ROPs 16
Pixel fill rate 11.2GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 39.2 GTexel/s
Number of floating point operations (FLOPS) 392 GFLOPS

Memory

Memory clock 1.010 MHz
Effective memory frequency 2. 020 MHz
Memory bus width 256bit
Video memory size 512MB
Memory type GDDR3
Memory bandwidth 64.6 GB/s

Energy consumption

Energy consumption 125W
Standby noise level 40.4dB
Noise under load 40.4 dB
Standby power consumption 136W
Power consumption under load 264W

Benchmarks GeForce GT 8800

PassMark

GeForce GT 8800 754
GeForce GT 610 354
GeForce GT 730 922

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill)

GeForce GT 8800 15.68
GeForce GT 730 n/a
GeForce GT 610 n/a

FarCry 3

GeForce GT 8800 34
GeForce GT 610 31
GeForce GT 730 n/a

SmallLux GPU 2.

0d4

020320203202032032020

Render Simultaneously to Buffer No.

GeForce GT 8800

I’m still on HD 7750 1gb — and nothing like DS3 — +/-30 on low, witcher 3 also on low +/-30, fallout4 — you can play medium, but too long downloads — so which is medium / low — 45 fps. I don’t play the rest. well, tanks from 45 to 75 on average. The map is already obsolete. although my son plays on an even older one (on my former computer) there with a 945+ hd 4850 hair dryer — and she doesn’t even support direct 10.

Commentator, you need to throw away the card and buy a new one, because the manufacturer in our current capitalist system means just that. The product must work out the warranty period, become morally obsolete or fail, so that the user buys a new one in a beautiful package, but whether he needs it or not is another matter. In general, you need to act according to the circumstances, in the video one of the possible solutions …

2 years ago a similar vidyuha died — left it for spare parts (thank God the spare parts were not useful) after viewing there was hope for restoration (purely for the sake of sporting interest) but I will resolder completely — good equipment allows . … thanks for the \»stimulus\» looked — I remembered what was lying around — so as not to practice …. THANKS!!!!!


Tags:512 MB, 700 MHz, GDDR3, GeForce GT 8800, GPU, Nvidia

GeForce 8800 GT Chipset — NVIDIA WORLD

1500

Rending block frequency in 3D mode, MHz

Frequency of operation of rendering blocks (TMU and ROP) when using 3D functions

600
9,0002 transistor

Technological process, nm

GPU manufacturing standard

65

Computing units

Number of shader processors (SPU)

112

texture blocks

Number of texture blocks (TMU)

56

Rasteurization blocks

000) 16

Maximum applied textures per pass

56

Computational performance, gigaflops

Maximum color depth per channel, bit

Internal for 3D rendering

32

Expanded dynamic color rendering (HDR), bit

128 8

MPEG-2 Decoding

Supported Video Decoding Levels

Specifications GeForce 8800GTS GeForce 8800GTX GeForce 8800Ultra GeForce 8800GT GeForce 8800GTS
GPU G80 G80 G80 G92 G92
Process (nm) 90 90 90 65 65
Standard chip frequencies (MHz) 500 575 612 600 650
Standard memory frequencies (MHz) 1600 1800 2160 1400/1800 (256/512 MB) 1940
Video memory (MB) 320/640 768 768 256/512 512
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3 GDDR3 GDDR3 GDDR3
Communication bus width 320 bit 384 bits 384 bits 256 bit 256 bit
Number of conveyors 96 128 128 112 128
DirectX 9 support0060

DirectX 10 DirectX 10 DirectX 10 DirectX 10 DirectX 10

So, let’s start with the basics, with the first representatives of the glorious GeForce 8800 family. Initially, Nvidia offered three Hi-End video cards: GeForce 8800 GTS 320 Mb, GeForce 8800 GTS 640 Mb, and GeForce 8800 GTX 768 Mb.

These video adapters were intended primarily as high performance solutions for 3D applications, with a focus on future DX10 games. Those who are interested in knowing the whole “inside and out” of video cards should refer to the comparison table of the most significant parameters of the models presented, but we will analyze only significant differences in the course of the text and comment on any features of a particular video card. GeForce 8800 GTS at the time of release was considered the most affordable graphics card with DirectX 10 support and high performance. Indeed, even the youngest of the family — GeForce 8800 GTS 320 Mb demonstrated consistently high results in DX9-games. Interestingly, some advanced users, wanting to save their money and get high performance in games, opted for the GeForce 8600 GTS SLI, but the price difference was not so big, and a bundle of two 8600 GTS was still inferior to a full-fledged 8800 GTS . The difference between the 8800 GTS 320 Mb and 8800 GTS 640 Mb is minimal, and lies in the amount of on-board video memory (320 Mb and 640 respectively). GeForce 8800GTX is a more powerful variant than video cards with the GTS suffix, it features increased frequencies (chip frequency — 575 MHz, memory — 1800 MHz), a large amount of video memory (768 MB GDDR3), an increased memory bus (384 bits), plus an increase in the number of pipelines , from 96 on GTS versions, up to 128 on GTX. Some time later, the GeForce 8800 Ultra comes out, positioned by the company as the highest-performance solution from Nvidia, however, if you look objectively, the main and only difference between the GeForce 8800 Ultra video cards and their GTX counterparts is increased to 612 for the chip, and up to 2160 for the memory frequencies. Despite the minimal differences, the cost of the 8800 Ultra was an order of magnitude higher than that of the 8800 GTX, as a result, many economical overclockers acted simply: they bought a GeForce 8800 GTX, and overclocked to the level of 8800 Ultra, or even higher, getting more FPS for less money . It would seem that Nvidia has excellent, productive video cards, what more could you want? However, the release of games using the capabilities of DirectX 10 showed how pale such representatives of the line as 8800 GTS 320 Mb and 8800 GTS 640 Mb look, because in new generation games these adapters are simply not capable of providing the required level of performance, and with the release of Crysis even such flagships as the GeForce 8800 GTX, as well as the Ultra version, looked clearly unconvincing. I had to do something…

And so, at the end of October, Nvidia announces its new graphics processor — G92. A little later, the announcement of new video cards based on the G92 — GeForce 8800 GT follows.

The novelty is the first representative of a new line of promising video cards based on the G92, with support for the promising PCI Express 2.0 standard.

The company planned to position the GeForce 8800 GT lower than the 8800 GTS, however, thanks to improved technical characteristics, in some game tests the new product not only did not lag behind, but at times showed higher performance than the GeForce 8800 GTX, and all this at a significantly lower cost! Probably switching to G92 had a very positive effect on overall performance. By the way, there are currently two varieties of 8800 GT on the market — with 512 MB GDDR3, and a cheaper version equipped with only 256 MB of video memory. In turn, we recommend to refrain from buying the younger version with 256 MB, since many modern games already need 512 MB, while buying a GeForce 8800 GT 256 MB looks at least unreasonable. Next was announced GeForce 8800 GTS 512 Mb, built on G92, and consequently, we got a more efficient video adapter than GeForce 8800GT.

Compared to the GT version, the new 8800 GTS received more pipelines (128 versus 112 for the 8800 GT), as well as, as usual, slightly increased frequencies. And judging by the numerous tests on the net, this video card not only outperforms the younger 8800 GT (which looks quite logical), but also in most cases shows its superiority over the GeForce 8800 GTX! Summing up the above, it becomes clear that the future belongs to new video cards based on the G92.

I’d like to say a few words about DirectX 10. It’s no secret that games like Crysis show a very nice picture in this mode, and future games like Far Cry 2 should provide even more realistic graphics, and therefore new feeling from the game. But, unfortunately, even such powerful video cards as the GeForce 8800 Ultra and GeForce 8800 GTS (G92) cannot provide a comfortable FPS level with high-quality graphics settings. Of course, you can assemble an SLI, or even a 3Way-SLI system, but not everyone is ready to spend such large sums for games, so we will leave such extreme solutions. However, if you are considering buying a new PC or upgrading your video system, it is worth remembering that none of today’s video cards can provide smooth and beautiful gaming in the latest DX-10 games, so, in our opinion, it is worth either waiting for the release of new generation video cards, or to purchase a proven, powerful, and relatively inexpensive solution like GeForce 8800 GT 512 Mb, but if your system already has a video card based on the G80 core, then you should postpone the upgrade of the video card for the future.

And now a brief conclusion. The purpose of this article is to help you understand various modifications of GeForce 8800 video cards and make the right purchase. For example, it is obvious that today it is unreasonable to buy old video cards based on G80, such as GeForce 8800GTS 320 Mb, GeForce 8800GTS 640 Mb, GeForce 8800GTX, GeForce 8800 Ultra, it is much better to look for GeForce 8800 GT 512 Mb, and GeForce GTS 512 Mb (G92), at a relatively low price, you will get decent performance on par with the much more expensive GeForce 8800 GTX. However, if your computer is equipped with an old GeForce 8800 GTS 320 Mb, it’s better to sit out on a proven solution and in the future invest in new Nvidia boards based on the promising G92. It is necessary to mention an important nuance related to the operation of the GeForce 8800 GT and the new 8800 GTS. As already mentioned, video cards support PCI Express 2.0, as a result of which some users have big problems with hardware compatibility on some motherboards, as a result of which the video card simply does not work .

2022 © All rights reserved