Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT 8800GT Gaming Graphics Card 512MB DVI-I Compeve Compenet Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT 8800GT Gaming Graphics Card 512MB DVI-I [8800 GT]
CALL US : 866-546-7414
Categories |
DESCRIPTION
Condition: Refurbished REVIEWS |
© Copyright © 2022 Compeve Corporation.
Back to Top
GeForce 8800 GT [in 1 benchmark]
NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT
Buy
- Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
- Core clock speed 600MHz
- Max video memory 512MB
- Memory type GDDR3
- Memory clock speed 900MHz
- Maximum resolution
Summary
NVIDIA started GeForce 8800 GT sales 29 October 2007 at a recommended price of $349. This is Tesla architecture desktop card based on 65 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 512 MB of GDDR3 memory clocked at 0.9 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 57.6 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is single-slot card attached via PCIe 2.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 9″ (22. 9 cm). 6-pin & 8-pin power connector is required, and power consumption is at 105 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
1.76%
of a leader’s which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
GeForce
8800 GT
vs
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
General info
Of GeForce 8800 GT’s architecture, market segment and release date.
Place in performance rating | 889 | |
Value for money | 0.03 | |
Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | |
GPU code name | G92 | |
Market segment | Desktop | |
Release date | 29 October 2007 (14 years ago) | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Current price | $182 (0. 5x MSRP) | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Technical specs
GeForce 8800 GT’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce 8800 GT’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 112 | of 18432 (AD102) |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
Number of transistors | 754 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 105 Watt | of 900 (Tesla S2050) |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 33. 6 billion/sec | of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce 8800 GT’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 9″ (22.9 cm) | |
Height | Single Slot | |
Width | 1-slot | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
SLI options | 2-way |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce 8800 GT: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 8800 GT. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVIHDTV | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF |
Technologies
Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce 8800 GT. You’ll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit |
API support
APIs supported by GeForce 8800 GT, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of GeForce 8800 GT. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
8800 GT
1.76
- Passmark
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
8800 GT
516
Game benchmarks
Let’s see how good GeForce 8800 GT is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS
Popular games
Relative perfomance
Overall GeForce 8800 GT performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.
NVIDIA GeForce 615
106.82
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
105.11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
104.55
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
100
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
98.86
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
97.16
AMD Radeon HD 6570
97.16
AMD equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce 8800 GT from AMD is Radeon HD 7660D, which is slower by 3% and lower by 7 positions in our rating.
Radeon HD
7660D
Compare
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 8800 GT:
AMD Radeon HD 7650A
110. 8
AMD Radeon HD 6610M
109.09
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
104.55
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
100
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
97.16
AMD Radeon HD 6570
97.16
AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
96.02
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
GeForce
9800 GTX+
Compare
GeForce
9600 GT
Compare
GeForce
9800 GT
Compare
Radeon HD
3870
Compare
GeForce
8800 GTX
Compare
GeForce
8800 GTS 512
Compare
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with GeForce 8800 GT according to our statistics.
Core 2
Quad Q6600
4.9%
Core 2
Duo E8400
4.2%
Core 2
Duo E8500
3%
Core i3
2100
2.1%
Core 2
Duo E6750
1.7%
Core 2
Duo E7500
1.6%
Core i5
3470
1.3%
Core 2
Quad Q8400
1. 3%
Phenom X3
8450
1.2%
Core i3
3220
1.1%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about GeForce 8800 GT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB Review
NVIDIA graphics card review. Latest images, pricing and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT specs. Gaming GPU benchmarked against the biggest PC games like Fortnite, Minecraft and PUBG Should you buy this XFX graphics card?
This NVIDIA graphics card features the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT processor. The processor, also known as the GPU, is the most important component in any graphics card. PCGameBenchmark rates processors by how many of the top 1,000 PC games the chip can run. This PC graphics card has a chip that can run 386 of the top 1000 games — so we give it a 38% rating.
For a full list of the games that this card will run and the chance to compare it to similar cards check our graphics card comparison — we have tracked 15 cards with a similar GPU and 3 of them are cheaper than this setup — no need to wait for a sale or Black Friday 2022 to get the best price on a card like this.
Check out best deals on cheap graphics cards and the latest deals on Amazon.
XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB
PCGameBenchmark Rating: 15%
Best Price: | $313.99 |
---|
Check latest prices
Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.
XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB Specs
GPU |
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT |
---|---|
Weight |
2.3 lb (1.04 kg) |
Dimensions (L x W x H) |
17.78 cm x 5.59 cm x 15.24 cm 7 in x 2.2 in x 6 in |
Brand |
XFX |
Model Number |
PVT88PYDF4 |
Best Price: | $313.99 |
---|
Check latest prices
Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.
XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB PC Gaming Performance
This graphics card will run 159 of the top PC games. Use PCGameBenchmark’s Rate My PC service to test your current set up and set how it compares.
Can It Run GTA 5?
This XFX graphics card doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for GTA 5 but it can play the game with lowered settings.
Can It Run Fortnite?
This XFX graphics card doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for Fortnite but it can play the game with lowered settings.
Can It Run Apex Legends?
This XFX graphics card doesn’t meet the recommended system requirements for Apex Legends but it can play the game with lowered settings.
XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB Features
- PCI Express SLI-ready video card with full Microsoft DirectX 10 Support
- Full support for Microsoft DirectX 10.0 Shader Model 4.0
- PCI-Express and Open GL 2.0 support
- NVIDIA SLI Technology allows two graphics cards to run simultaneously
- Dual Link DVI for high resolution monitors (up to 2560×1600)
XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB DEALS — BEST prices
Best Price: | $313. 99 |
---|
Check latest prices
Network N earns commission from qualifying purchases via Amazon Associates and other programs.
Similar to XFX PVT88PYDF4 GeForce 8800GT 512MB
Here are a few other options…
EVGA 512-P3-N802-AR e-GeForce 8800 GT 51…
Rating: 15%
$269.99 |
GeForce 8800 GT |
— |
eVGA e-GeForce 8800 GT Superclocked Edit. ..
Rating: 15%
$299.99 |
GeForce 8800 GT |
— |
MSI NX8800GTS-T2D640EHDOC NVIDIA GeForce…
Rating: 15%
$280.01 |
GeForce 8800 GT |
— |
GIGABYTE GeForce 8800GT TurboForce | TweakTown
Video Cards & GPUs
NVIDIA GeForce GPU
The 8800GT is a terrific graphics card, period.
But let’s see if GIGABYTE can make their TurboForce edition stand out.
Published Mar 2, 2008 11:00 PM CST | Updated Tue, Nov 3 2020 7:04 PM CST
Manufacturer: GIGABYTE
13 minute read time
Introduction
GIGABYTE graphics cards seem to be few and far between these days because they like to do things a bit differently. We’re all for standing out from the pack, and the latest card from GIGABYTE to jump into that category would be the TurboForce Edition of the 8800GT.
GIGABYTE have a nice little thing going on at the moment; we get a card from them, it’s got a nice aftermarket cooler, it’s got some decent OC specs along with a pretty good bundle. This is always nice to see in the world of graphics cards, and at least it keeps it interesting.
They have also recently introduced their Ultra Durable 2 technology into their graphics cards to give them a bit more of an edge. Sure you pay more for a GIGABYTE graphics card, but we tend to find that it’s worth it. What we need to find out now though is whether or not you should spend more on the GIGABYTE 8800GT.
The Package
The front of the box looks very cool with its Neverwinter Nights 2 theme. Across the top of the card we can see the brand and some NVIDIA logos to the right. Smack bang in the middle of the box we have a giant NWN2 logo.
Moving around the box, the bottom gives us the model and some more details on the card. The right of the box lets us know that it’s a TurboForce Edition, comes with NWN2 and uses the Ultra Durable 2 technology.
Going to the back of the box we have mention of the Zalman fan across the top along with some more details on the card. The main focus on the back though is the Ultra Durable 2 highlight. This gives you an idea of what exactly you gain from these features. It’s nice to see GIGABYTE explain this as so often you see someone release a product with new fangled features but not actually explain the advantage.
Moving inside the package the cable department is pretty light. We have the little TV-Out box that we see with most GIGABYTE cards along with a DVI to VGA connector and Molex to PCI Express connector.
Paperwork wise there isn’t a whole lot more; manual, quick install guide and game manual along with a driver CD and a copy of Neverwinter Nights 2. The package isn’t all that exciting but GIGABYTE tends to let the features of the card do the talking more so than the bundle.
The Card
With the package out the way it’s time to move onto the card and see what exactly GIGABYTE has done with the 8800GT 512MB. The Zalman cooler that they use isn’t anything new, we’ve seen it used on the HD 3870 that GIGABYTE released a few months back.
With that said though, it really is a tried and tested cooler that seems to be extremely efficient. The copper in the middle of the cooler helps move the heat and the aluminum fins help the heat dissipate quickly.
Like the Leadtek 8800GT that also used a Zalman cooler, be it a different model GIGABYTE have chosen not to cool the memory on the card. While it probably isn’t needed people still like to have it cooled.
Having a quick look around the card there isn’t much else to it really. The rear of the card has a single PCI Express power connector that is needed while the top has a single SLI connector like the standard 8800GT.
The I/O department is also very standard with two Dual Link DVI ports and a single TV-Out port.
Specifications
GPU-Z doesn’t seem to be a big fan of the GIGABYTE offering which puts out some unknown figures, as seen below.
What we can tell you though is that the core is up from the stock 600MHz to a juicy 700MHz, the shader clock follows the big increase moving from 1500MHz to 1675MHz and finally the memory has moved from the stock 1800MHz DDR to 1900MHz DDR.
These are some pretty nice increases and should result to a card that can scream along.
Test System Setup and 3DMark06
Test System Setup
Processor(s): Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3GHz (333MHz x 9)
Cooling: Corsair Nautilus500 (Supplied by Corsair) with Arctic Cooling MX-2 Thermal Compound (Supplied by Arctic Cooling)
Motherboard(s): GIGABYTE X48-DQ6 (Supplied by GIGABYTE)
Memory: 2 X 1GB Kingston PC6400 DDR-2 3-3-3-10 (KHX6400D2ULK2/2G) (Supplied by Kingston)
Hard Disk(s): Seagate 250GB 7200RPM SATA-2 7200. 10 (Supplied by Seagate)
Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP2, Windows Vista
Drivers: Catalyst 8.1, Forceware 174.11 (9600GT Win XP), Forceware 171.16 (9600GT Win Vista)
We should all have a pretty good understanding of the upgraded test bed and lineup of games, so we won’t go into any detail there. What we’ve done though is compare the GIGABYTE 8800GT TurboForce against the Leadtek 8800GT which also carries a Zalman cooler and comes pre-overclocked, though not as highly. We’ve also included the Galaxy 9600GT to see what kind of gains a highly overclocked 8800GT offers us against the mildly overclocked Galaxy 9600GT.
3DMark06
Version and / or Patch Used: Build 110
Developer Homepage: http://www.futuremark.com
Product Homepage: http://www.futuremark.com/products/3dmark06/
Buy It Here
3DMark06 is the very latest version of the «Gamers Benchmark» from FutureMark. The newest version of 3DMark expands on the tests in 3DMark05 by adding graphical effects using Shader Model 3.0 and HDR (High Dynamic Range lighting) which will push even the best DX9 graphics cards to the extremes.
3DMark06 also focuses on not just the GPU but the CPU using the AGEIA PhysX software physics library to effectively test single and Dual Core processors.
We can see the superior overclock on the GIGABYTE 8800GT giving us a nice little jump on the overclocked Leadtek 8800GT.
Benchmarks — PT Boats: Knights of the Sea
PT Boats: Knights of the Sea
Version and / or Patch Used: Benchmark Demo
Developer Homepage: http://en.akella.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.pt-boats.net/
PT Boats: Knights of the Sea is a naval action simulator that places gamers in charge of a mosquito fleet of the Allied Forces, Russia or Germany during the height of World War II.
Using the latest Direct X 10 technology PT Boards — Knights of the Sea manages to apply a lot of stress to the components of today which in turn gives us quite an intensive benchmark.
Moving over to PT Boats we can see that the overclock doesn’t seem to be as helpful this time around.
Benchmarks — CINEBENCH R10
CINEBENCH R10
Version and / or Patch Used: Release 10
Developer Homepage: http://www.maxon.net/
Product Homepage: http://www.maxon.net
CINEBENCH is a real-world test suite that assesses your computer’s performace capabilities. MAXON CINEBENCH is based on MAXON’s award-winning animation software, CINEMA 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. MAXON software has been used in blockbuster movies such as Spider-Man, Star Wars, The Chronicles of Narnia and many more.
MAXON CINEBENCH runs several tests on your computer to measure the performance of the main processor and the graphics card under real world circumstances. The benchmark application makes use of up to 16 CPUs or CPU cores and is available for Windows (32-bit and 64-Bit) and Macintosh (PPC and Intel-based).
CINEBENCH manages to get a negative effect from the overclock with the score going down to about the same as the Galaxy 9600GT.
Benchmarks — Half Life 2 (Episode Two HDR)
Half Life 2 (Episode Two HDR)
Version and / or Patch Used: Latest from Steam
Timedemo or Level Used: Custom Timedemo
Developer Homepage: http://www.valvesoftware.com
Product Homepage: http://www.half-life2.com
Buy It Here
By taking the suspense, challenge and visceral charge of the original, and adding startling new realism, responsiveness and new HDR technology, Half-Life 2 Episode Two opens the door to a world where the player’s presence affects everything around him, from the physical environment to the behaviors even the emotions of both friends and enemies.
We benchmark Half Life 2 Episode Two with our own custom timedemos as to avoid possible driver optimizations using the «record demo_name» command and loading the timedemo with the «timedemo demo_name» command — For a full list of the commands, click here.
Episode Two manages to see some gains from the overclock, but with big numbers already they’re not exactly what you would call noticeable.
Benchmarks — World in Conflict
World in Conflict
Version and / or Patch Used: 1.0.0.5
Timedemo or Level Used: Built-in Test
Developer Homepage: http://www.massive.se
Product Homepage: http://www.worldinconflict.com
World in Conflict is a real-time strategy video game by Massive Entertainment and to be published by Sierra Entertainment for Windows (DX9 and DX10) and the Xbox 360.
The game is set in 1989 where economic troubles cripple the Soviet Union and threaten to dissolve it. However, the title pursues a «what if» scenario where, in this case, the Soviet Union does not collapse and instead pursues a course of war to remain in power. It is an intensive new game is sure to put plenty of stress on even the latest graphics cards and we use the built-in benchmarking for our testing.
WIC gets an FPS bump across the board when compared to the lesser overclocked Leadtek offering.
Benchmarks — Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
Enemy Territory: Quake Wars
Version and / or Patch Used: Latest Steam Version
Timedemo or Level Used: Custom time demo
Developer Homepage: http://www.splashdamage.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.enemyterritory.com/
Enemy Territory: Quake Wars is the latest Quake incarnation to make it out of the iD labs and carries with it a fast paced experience that manages to place a good amount of strain on your graphics card.
We use a custom made time demo which shows a bit of everything and manages to give us a good solid benchmark for the graphics cards that we test.
ETQW also sees a little increase at all resolutions, though nothing major.
Benchmarks — Crysis
Crysis
Version and / or Patch Used: 1.1
Timedemo or Level Used: Custom time demo
Developer Homepage: http://www.crytek.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.ea.com/crysis/
Buy It Here
From the makers of Far Cry, Crysis offers FPS fans the best-looking, most highly-evolving gameplay, requiring the player to use adaptive tactics and total customization of weapons and armor to survive in dynamic, hostile environments including Zero-G.
Real time editing, bump mapping, dynamic lights, network system, integrated physics system, shaders, shadows and a dynamic music system are just some of the state of-the-art features the CryENGINE 2 offers. The CryENGINE 2 comes complete with all of its internal tools and also includes the CryENGINE 2 Sandbox world editing system.
Crysis sees small bumps with the overclock, but again nothing major.
Benchmarks — Unreal Tournament 3
Unreal Tournament 3
Version and / or Patch Used: 1.1
Timedemo or Level Used:
Developer Homepage: http://www.epicgames.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.unrealtournament3.com/
Buy It Here
Following the formulae that made Unreal Tournament so great the third installment to the series has hit us recently with better than ever graphics. The games uses the latest Unreal Engine which like most modern day games when maxed out puts the pressure on our lineup of graphics cards.
UT3 manages to really make use of the overclocking with a gain of almost 10FPS at the highest resolution.
High Quality AA and AF
Our high quality tests let us separate the men from the boys and the ladies from the girls. If the cards weren’t struggling before they will start to now.
3DMark06
Moving back to 3DMark06, and this time with AA and AF on we can see the overclock from the GIGABYTE offering really throwing it out in front again.
Half Life 2 (Episode Two HDR)
Episode Two on the other hand shows just a slight increase that equates to about 5%.
World In Conflict
WIC sees a small bump again like our non AA/AF tests.
Benchmarks — 3DMark06 — XP
3DMark06
Version and / or Patch Used: Build 110
Developer Homepage: http://www.futuremark.com
Product Homepage: http://www.futuremark.com/products/3dmark06/
Buy It Here
3DMark06 is the very latest version of the «Gamers Benchmark» from FutureMark. The newest version of 3DMark expands on the tests in 3DMark05 by adding graphical effects using Shader Model 3.0 and HDR (High Dynamic Range lighting) which will push even the best DX9 graphics cards to the extremes.
3DMark06 also focuses on not just the GPU but the CPU using the AGEIA PhysX software physics library to effectively test single and Dual Core processors.
With Windows XP loaded up and a run of 3DMark we can again see the speed increase across all resolutions on the GIGABYTE 8800GT.
Benchmarks — CINEBENCH R10 — XP
CINEBENCH R10
Version and / or Patch Used: Release 10
Developer Homepage: http://www.maxon.net/
Product Homepage: http://www.maxon.net
CINEBENCH is a real-world test suite that assesses your computer’s performace capabilities. MAXON CINEBENCH is based on MAXON’s award-winning animation software, CINEMA 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. MAXON software has been used in blockbuster movies such as Spider-Man, Star Wars, The Chronicles of Narnia and many more.
MAXON CINEBENCH runs several tests on your computer to measure the performance of the main processor and the graphics card under real world circumstances. The benchmark application makes use of up to 16 CPUs or CPU cores and is available for Windows (32-bit and 64-Bit) and Macintosh (PPC and Intel-based).
Windows XP CINEBENCH performance paints a different picture with the GIGABYTE coming out ahead this time, though all cards are quite close to each other.
Benchmarks — World in Conflict — XP
World in Conflict
Version and / or Patch Used: 1.0.0.5
Timedemo or Level Used: Built-in Test
Developer Homepage: http://www.massive.se
Product Homepage: http://www.worldinconflict.com
World in Conflict is a real-time strategy video game by Massive Entertainment and to be published by Sierra Entertainment for Windows (DX9 and DX10) and the Xbox 360.
The game is set in 1989 where economic troubles cripple the Soviet Union and threaten to dissolve it. However, the title pursues a «what if» scenario where, in this case, the Soviet Union does not collapse and instead pursues a course of war to remain in power. It is an intensive new game is sure to put plenty of stress on even the latest graphics cards and we use the built-in benchmarking for our testing.
That small gain in World in Conflict is continued to be seen under Windows XP.
Benchmarks — Unreal Tournament 3 — XP
Unreal Tournament 3
Version and / or Patch Used: 1.1
Timedemo or Level Used:
Developer Homepage: http://www.epicgames.com/
Product Homepage: http://www.unrealtournament3.com/
Buy It Here
Following the formulae that made Unreal Tournament so great the third installment to the series has hit us recently with better than ever graphics. The games uses the latest Unreal Engine which like most modern day games when maxed out puts the pressure on our lineup of graphics cards.
At the lower resolution the lower clocked Leadtek comes out ahead here, though when we climb up in resolution the GIGABYTE offering continues to take the lead.
Benchmarks — Half Life 2 (Episode Two HDR) — XP
Half Life 2 (Episode Two HDR)
Version and / or Patch Used: Latest from Steam
Timedemo or Level Used: Custom Timedemo
Developer Homepage: http://www.valvesoftware.com
Product Homepage: http://www.half-life2.com
Buy It Here
By taking the suspense, challenge and visceral charge of the original, and adding startling new realism, responsiveness and new HDR technology, Half-Life 2 Episode Two opens the door to a world where the player’s presence affects everything around him, from the physical environment to the behaviors even the emotions of both friends and enemies.
We benchmark Half Life 2 Episode Two with our own custom timedemos as to avoid possible driver optimizations using the «record demo_name» command and loading the timedemo with the «timedemo demo_name» command — For a full list of the commands, click here.
Bumps across the board are seen with the GIGABYTE offering, though again we’ve already got big numbers coming out of all cards.
Temperature and Sound Tests
Temperature Tests
With the TES 1326 Infrared Thermometer literally in hand we found ourselves getting real-world temperatures from the products we test at load (3D clock speeds).
There are two places we pull temperature from — the back of the card directly behind the core and if the card is dual slot and has an exhaust point we also pull a temperate from there, as seen in the picture.
The older Zalman cooler the GIGABYTE uses runs the card just a little warmer then the newer cooler Leadtek use.
Sound Tests
Pulling out the TES 1350A Sound Level Meter we find ourselves quickly yelling into the top of it to see how loud we can be.
After five minutes of that we get a bit more serious and place the device two CM away from the fan on the card to find the maximum noise level of the card when idle (2D mode) and in load (3D mode).
The older cooler is also slightly louder.
Power Consumption Tests
Using our new PROVA Power Analyzer WM-01 or «Power Thingy» as it has become quickly known as to our readers, we are now able to find out what kind of power is being used by our test system and the associated graphics cards installed. Keep in mind; it tests the complete system (minus LCD monitor, which is plugged directly into AC wall socket).
There are a few important notes to remember though; while our maximum power is taken in 3DMark06 at the same exact point, we have seen in particular tests the power being drawn as much as 10% more. We test at the exact same stage every time; therefore tests should be very consistent and accurate.
The other thing to remember is that our test system is bare minimum — only a 7,200RPM SATA-II single hard drive is used without CD ROM or many cooling fans.
So while the system might draw 400 watts in our test system, placing it into your own PC with a number of other items, the draw is going to be higher.
Power usage on a whole is slightly up when compared to the Leadtek offering, nothing too major though.
Final Thoughts
The GIGABYTE 8800GT is quite the performer and continues to show good gains over the Leadtek offering. While the cooler might not be as effective due to it being louder and hotter than the newer Zalman used on the Leadtek, personally I think it looks better.
Value wise the GIGABYTE offering is pretty good; it comes in a little pricier than your normal brands, but that’s to be expected with the cooler and the massive overclock.
At the end of it all though, we feel a bit disappointed with the GIGABYTE 8800GT offering. When we tested the HD 3870 Ultra Durable 2 model the card ran cooler and with less power than the competition. The 8800GT on the other hand doesn’t really seem to have this advantage. Yes, it’s cooler than a reference design, but that’s to be expected with the aftermarket cooler. Power pretty much sits at the same level though.
On a whole the GIGABYTE 8800GT is a good card, the bundle isn’t bad with the inclusion of Neverwinter Nights 2 and the overclock on offer is very healthy. The card is going to be popular because GIGABYTE is a trusted brand which always put out quality products.
You’re not going to be disappointed with the GIGABYTE 8800GT TurboForce. It does what it’s supposed to do and does it well.
Shopping Information
PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.
United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon.com
United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon. co.uk
Australia: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon.com.au
Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon.ca
Deutschland: Finde andere Technik- und Computerprodukte wie dieses auf Amazon.de
Shawn Baker
Shawn takes care of all of our video card reviews. From 2009, Shawn is also taking care of our memory reviews, and from May 2011, Shawn also takes care of our CPU, chipset and motherboard reviews. As of December 2011, Shawn is based out of Taipei, Taiwan.
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT review: GPU specs, performance benchmarks
Buy on Amazon
GeForce 8800 GT videocard released by NVIDIA; release date: 29 October 2007. At the time of release, the videocard cost $349. The videocard is designed for desktop-computers and based on Tesla microarchitecture codenamed G92.
Core clock speed — 1500 MHz. Texture fill rate — 33.6 billion / sec. Pipelines — 112. Floating-point performance — 336.0 gflops. Manufacturing process technology — 65 nm. Transistors count — 754 million. Power consumption (TDP) — 105 Watt.
Memory type: GDDR3. Maximum RAM amount — 512 MB. Memory bus width — 256 Bit. Memory clock speed — 900 MHz. Memory bandwidth — 57.6 GB / s.
Benchmarks
PassMark G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
Name | Value |
---|---|
PassMark — G3D Mark | 516 |
PassMark — G2D Mark | 81 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex | 3346 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 3346.000 Fps |
Specifications (specs)
Architecture | Tesla |
Code name | G92 |
Launch date | 29 October 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 1201 |
Type | Desktop |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 112 |
Floating-point performance | 336. 0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C |
Pipelines | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million |
|
|
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 |
Multi monitor support | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2. 0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9″ (22.9 cm) |
SLI options | 2-way |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin |
DirectX | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 |
3D Vision | |
CUDA | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT with others
NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT
vs
ATI
All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT
vs
NVIDIA
GeForce 8600 GS
NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT
vs
NVIDIA
Quadro NVS 420
NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT
vs
ATI
Radeon HD 4860
NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT
vs
AMD
Radeon HD 7640G
NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT
vs
AMD
Radeon R6 M435DX
nVidia GeForce 8800 GT Review
Verdict
Key Specifications
- Review Price: £175. 00
The arrival of the nVidia GeForce 8800 GTX was close to a monumental event in the history of 3D graphics. It was the first card to support DirectX 10 and its associated unified shader model, it greatly improved image quality compared to nVidia’s previous generation of cards (finally catching up with ATI in this regard), and it blew every other card on the planet out the water in terms of performance. Unfortunately all this power also demanded an enormous price tag and, considering expected competition from ATI and the imminent release of cheaper mid-range cards based on the same technology, the GTX was deemed a card for the bleeding edge enthusiast only.
To remedy this nVidia launched the 8800 GTS 640MB the following month and the 8800 GTS 320MB a couple of months later still. They both offered close to the awesome performance of the GTX but at a much more reasonable price. However, at around £250-£300, they were still a bit too expensive for the gamer on a budget – these were lower high-end cards, not true mid-range parts. Of course, had we the benefit of hindsight we would have insisted that a GTS was worth saving every penny for because what followed throughout the rest of 2007 was one disappointment after another.
First came nVidia’s supposed mid-range parts, the 8600 GTS and 8600 GT, which were massively cut down versions of the 8800 series. They were smaller and quieter than the 8800 series, and had great new HD video processing capabilities but their gaming performance was way below expectations and try as we might, we just couldn’t see fit to ever recommend them, even though they were quite cheap. We then had ATI’s Radeon HD 2900 XT, which was level with the 8800 GTS 640MB in terms of performance but consumed a huge amount of power when under load and was still too expensive to call mid-range. Finally we had ATI’s attempt at true mid-range DX10 cards, in the shape of the HD 2600 XT and HD 2600 Pro, which were even better in terms of multimedia capabilities than nVidia’s 8600 series, but again lacked the horsepower to make for a worthwhile upgrade for any gamer with a previous generation card like the X1950 Pro or 7900 GS.
All of which brings us to now, a full year after the 8800 GTX first arrived, and the launch of the 8800 GT, the first true “refresh” of any of the DirectX 10 capable graphics card. It has been a long time in the making but with specs that rival the 8800 GTS and high street prices hovering around the £175-£200 mark, this could finally be the mid-range card we’ve all been waiting for. But before I evangelise the card too much, I should probably explain a bit more about what makes it so special.
As technology marches on and the transistor count of CPUs and GPUs alike continues to rise, there is a natural push for ever smaller transistors. The reduction in size brings with it less power consumption, which in turn means the chips don’t run as hot, and, because they produce smaller chips, more of them can fit onto each silicon wafer, reducing the relative manufacturing cost of each chip and theoretically giving us lower high street prices for our hardware. However, changing manufacturing processes can be a high risk business, which is why convention has it that manufacturers will release brand new architectures on existing tried and tested processes, as was the case with the 8800 GTX and HD 2900 XT. As the architecture then matures, with the introduction of lower powered mid-range parts and later refresh parts, the newer manufacturing process can be introduced.
It’s this path that the 8800 line has followed with the G80 core at the heart of the 8800 GTX and GTS being made using a 90nm process and the 8800 GT being powered by the G92 core that’s made using the newer 65nm process. Now the change may not seem like much but it actually equates to a 34 per cent reduction in size for any given chip design, or conversely a 34 per cent increase in space to manufacturer more chips on each wafer. The upshot of which is smaller, cheaper, less power hungry chips, and that can only be a good thing. However, the G92 isn’t just a die shrink, there’s a little more to it than that.
For a start, the video processing engine, dubbed VP2, that was featured on the 8600 range, has now found its way into the 8800 GT. So you can enjoy high-definition video without your system grinding to a halt. The final display engine that was controlled by a separate chip on the 8800 GTX is also now incorporated into G92. The result is a chip that actually has 73M more transistors than the 8800 GTX (754M vs. 681M) yet still has fewer stream processors, texture processing power, and ROPs than its more powerful brother.
A new version of nVidia’s transparency multisampling anti-aliasing algorithm has also been added to the 8800 GT’s arsenal, which should greatly improve image quality using this mode, while also maintaining great performance. Apart from this, though, there is little in the way of new graphics features with the new processor.
nVidia has evidently thought long and hard about exactly what areas of the previous 8800 cards were being under utilised and could be scaled back, along with which were more important to maintain. The result is a GPU design that sits somewhere between the 8800 GTX and 8800 GTS in terms of performance but with the features of the 8600 GTS thrown in. To all intents and purposes, this makes the 8800 GTS completely redundant, and the Radeon HD 2900 XT isn’t in that great a position either (we’ll just have to wait and see whether ATI’s upcoming 3850 and 2870 can change that situation though). Moreover, the 8800 GTX and Ultra should still offer more performance but have fewer features, cost significantly more and are more power hungry. The 8800 GT really is building a strong case for itself.
If it weren’t something even my colleagues would frown upon, I’d be inclined to say that the 8800 GT is a sexy card. The new cooler design is just very pleasing on the eye and, much as with the internal refinements of the G92, it just emanates the feeling of a matured design. It certainly looked the part on our nVidia branded test bed, anyway.
More important than the aesthetic aspects of the design, though, is the simple fact that nVidia has managed to squeeze all this power into a single slot card, which is not only a welcome change but really quite surprising. In fact, I dare say that having learned something of the specs of the 8800 GT, most people would’ve bet significant money on it requiring a dual slot cooler.
The reason why nVidia can get away with using such a slim design is the change in manufacturing process, which reduces the thermal envelope of the card to a level that a single slot cooler can cope with. In fact, it’s so thermally accomplished that the relatively small fan doesn’t even need to spin very fast to keep things cool, resulting in a card that remains near silent even during intense gaming. It does get quite hot to the touch and will require a decent amount of airflow within a case to prevent overheating, but in our open air test bed it didn’t become hot enough to require the fan to spin excessively.
Also as a result of the smaller manufacturing process, the 8800 GT consumes only 105W, even under full load. Therefore, only a single six-pin power connector is required to get the beast going at full pelt. This is another nice change and it’s a development we hope will turn into a trend not just a one off.
Output options are pretty standard fair with two dual-link HDCP enabled DVI-I sockets allowing for both analogue and digital connections to PC monitors and HDTVs, while a seven-pin analogue video port provides the usual composite and component options. The DVI connections can be used in conjunction with DVI-to-VGA and DVI-to-HDMI dongles so every connection option (bar the upcoming DisplayPort) is supported. However, nVidia is still choosing to make audio pass-through (for use with HDMI connections) an option for 3rd party vendors to implement rather than make it a requisite like ATI has. That’s a shame, considering this slim, cool, and quiet card could be perfect for a gaming biased HTPC.
The 8800 GT is actually the first graphics card ever to be PCI Express 2.0 compliant, which means it can communicate with memory at a rate of 16GB/sec – twice the previous standard. Though this may be of use to workstation applications and GPGPU computing situations it is largely going to go unnoticed to the average gamer, though this may change in the future. Either way, the standard is completely forwards and backwards compatible with all the previous versions of PCI Express so it isn’t something to worry about.
All the usual board partners will have stock available over the coming weeks. Most seem to be offering standard clocked and overclocked versions and there are also some bundled game offers around to sweeten the deal. We’ll be sure to get some of these cards in for testing over the coming weeks. For now, though, let’s take a look at how the reference board performs.
With the launch of some truly stellar gaming titles in the last few months, some of our tried and tested graphics benchmarks are looking a bit long in the tooth. So, for this review I’ve dropped Counter-Strike: Source in favour of Team Fortress 2, and I’ve added in the Crysis demo to see how these cards cope with the latest most demanding of games. Call Of Duty 2, 3DMark06, and Prey are still in there for the time being but this will probably be the last time they will be used for testing – we just need to iron out the kinks in our test code before the new benchmarks can be let loose.
As per usual, each game is run with full in-game detail settings at a variety of resolutions with varying degrees of anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering applied. For Call Of Duty 2, Prey, 3Dmark06, and Team Fortress 2, each setting is run three times and the average is taken so we end up with a pretty rock solid figure. For Crysis we’ve used the inbuilt timedemo that loops four times enabling us to calculate an average from the results. As it’s such a demanding game, though, we’ve kept in-game settings to high (rather than very-high) and also stuck to resolutions of just 1,280 x 1,024 and 1,680 x 1,050. We also use transparency anti-aliasing throughout our testing as we feel its a processing technique that greatly enhances image quality in a lot of games.
Our test platform consists of the following:
We generally find that any single card configuration struggles to cope at the resolutions demanded by a 30in monitor so we’ve stuck to testing at 1,920 x 1,200 and 1,600 x 1,200 (or 1,680 x 1,050), and 1,280 x 1,024 for these tests. We will, however, come back to test SLI and CrossFire configurations very soon so we will take a look at performance at 2,560 x 1,600 then.
As was to be expected, the 8800 GTX is still top of the pile (well, except for the 8800 Ultra, but we haven’t tested that here) but overall the 8800 GT makes a good show of itself, most notably staying ahead of the 8800 GTS for the majority of tests. At the highest resolutions and anti-aliasing settings, the reduced memory bandwidth of the 8800 GT lets it down and the 8800 GTS just creeps ahead on the odd occasion. However, considering the price difference, and all the other benefits of the new card, the 8800 GT would be the better bet every time.
Conversely, the 8800 GTX does enough to show why it still demands such a high price. While the other cards begin to drop off significantly as the resolution, anti-aliasing, and anisotropic filtering are cranked up, the 8800 GTX takes far less of a hit. In particular, Team Fortress 2 at 1,920 x 1,200 with 8xAA and 16xAF is nearly twice as fast with the 8800 GTX as it is with the 8800 GT. However, for the most part the 8800 GT is more than capable.
Of course none of this takes into account the incredibly poor framerates that all the cards produce when playing Crysis. Hopefully the full game will be slightly more optimised, while future driver updates from both ATI and nVIdia should also improve the situation. Otherwise, Crysis could prove to be unplayable for most people, which would be a huge shame because it looks incredible.
”’Verdict”’
While the nVidia 8800 GT doesn’t beat the established 8800 GTX, it provides close to the performance for a fraction of the price and also packs in more features to sweeten the deal. Add to this it’s small size, cool operation, and quiet running and you have a card that we can’t recommend highly enough. It’s simply phenomenal.
We had some anomalous results when 4x anti-aliasing was enabled on the 8800 series cards in Prey and Call Of Duty 2. This was down to the cards’ occasionally not displaying textures correctly which actually improves performance because there’s less post processing to be done. It’s a known issue and one we’ve yet to solve but I’ve included the results anyway, as you may also find you have similar issues.
Score in detail
-
Value 10
-
Features 10
-
Performance 9
GeForce 8800 GT video card [in 1 benchmark]
NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT
- PCIe 2.0 x16 interface
- Core clock 600MHz
- Video memory size 512MB
- Memory type GDDR3
- Memory frequency 900MHz
- Maximum resolution
Description
NVIDIA started selling GeForce 8800 GT 29October 2007 at a suggested price of $349. This is a desktop video card based on Tesla architecture and 65 nm manufacturing process, primarily designed for office use. It has 512 MB of GDDR3 memory at 0.9 GHz, and coupled with a 256-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 57.6 Gb / s.
In terms of compatibility, this is a single-slot PCIe 2.0 x16 card. The length of the reference version is 22.9 cm. An additional 6-pin & 8-pin power cable is required for connection, and the power consumption is 105 W.
It provides poor performance in tests and games at the level of
1.76%
from the leader, which is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
GeForce
8800 GT
or
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
General information 99 (A100 SXM4)
Value for money
To obtain an index, we compare the characteristics of video cards and their cost, taking into account the cost of other cards.
- 0
- 50
- 100
Features
GeForce 8800 GT’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. They indirectly speak about GeForce 8800 GT’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results. 939.8 (H200 SXM5)
compatibility and size
Information on GeForce 8800 GT compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one. For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply).
Operational memory
1
1
1
1
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce 8800 GT — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.
Memory type 9Memory bandwidth | 57.6 Gb/s | out of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Video outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 8800 GT. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Video Connectors | Dual Link DVIHDTV
API supportAPIs supported by GeForce 8800 GT, including their versions.
The NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT video card is based on a 65 nm process technology and is based on the G92-270 (G92) graphics processor. The power consumption of the video card is 125W, and the recommended power supply is 450W. NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT supports Microsoft DirectX 10 and OpenGL 2.1. Specifications for NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Please note: The table shows the reference characteristics of the video card, they may vary by different manufacturers. New drivers for NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTDownload drivers for video card NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Operating system: Version: (29000 mb) Obsolete Status: Out of date Operating system: 9000 Download (292.47 MB) Status: Obsolete Operating system: version: (186.17 MB) 9000 9000 9000 9000 Operating system: Version: Download (225. 04 MB) Status: Obsolete Driver for NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT video card is downloaded from the official site! Or use the GeForce Experience program — it will automatically select the necessary driver for your video card. Price in RussiaNVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT FAQWhat series is this video card?Video card series: GeForce 8 What is the power consumption and power requirements? Maximum power consumption is: 125W. Where can I download the GeForce 8800 GT driver?Video cards with 512 Mb memory:Video cards with GDDR3 memory type:Video cards with 256-bit bus:Comparative testing of four GeForce 8800GTS 512 and 8800GT / Video cards
With the release of a new series of GeForce 8800GTS 512 video cards, NVIDIA has significantly strengthened its positions. The new product replaced the more expensive, hotter and bulkier GeForce 8800GTX, and the only drawback compared to its predecessor was a narrower 256-bit memory bus (vs. . However, the novelty has undergone not only reductions, but also some improvements: the number of texture units has been increased from 32 to 64 pieces, which, of course, partly compensates for the simplifications in the map. Also, to compensate for the simplifications, the frequencies were increased compared to their predecessor, and the amount of video memory is easily expanded to 1 GB by simply installing larger-capacity chips, which, by the way, some manufacturers have already begun to do. But, despite the fact that the GeForce 8800GTS 512 replaced the GeForce 8800GTX, its main competitor is not its predecessor, but its closest relative GeForce 8800GT, and the whole point is in its lower price. Video cards GeForce 8800GTS 512 and GeForce 8800GT are not much different from each other, since GeForce 8800GT is a stripped-down version of GeForce 8800GTS 512 and, oddly enough, appeared on the market before the full-fledged version. Both video cards are equipped with 512 MB of video memory and, as today’s study showed, they have the same memory. The main differences lie in the GPU, and specifically, in the GT version, some of its functional blocks are disabled. See the table below for more details:
As you can see, the GeForce 8800GT differs from its older sister in the number of universal processors reduced to 112 and the number of texture units reduced to 56. Initially, the cards also differ in clock speeds, but this does not matter for our today’s review, since almost all cards have been factory overclocked. Let’s find out how the differences on paper are reflected in reality. Leadtek 8800GTS 512
Designers from Leadtek chose a bright orange color to attract
The face of the novelty was the image of a scene from a fictional
The reverse side of the box contains the characteristics of the video card, a list of the package and standard information from NVIDIA.
The package includes:
The Leadtek 8800GTS 512 graphics card is based on a reference design familiar
The reverse sides of the GeForce 8800GTS 512 and GeForce 8800GT look almost
Having removed the cooling system, we can again verify the identity of the boards.
External differences between the G92 chip in Leadtek 8800GTS 512 and the G92 chip in
The new video card uses the same Qimonda chips over time
The cooling system for the video card is aluminum with a copper plate.
The processing of the copper «core» is at a satisfactory level, but
After removing the casing from the cooling system, we see Differences, overclocking and cooling efficiency
The differences from the GeForce 8800GT lie in the increased from 112 to 128
In Leadtek 8800GTS 512, the frequencies correspond to the recommended ones and are equal to Now — about the heating of the video card, which we will check using
Video card Leadtek 8800GTS 512 heated up from 55 degrees in the state
After that, the temperature of the GPU did not rise above 64 Well, let’s meet the next member of our
ASUS EN8800GTS TOP
When looking at the packaging of powerful ASUS graphics cards,
It is worth taking the box by the handle, as at the first breath of the breeze, it
The back of the box contains a bit of everything, in particular, a brief
The complete set of the card is executed according to the principle “nothing
Externally, the video card is almost an exact copy of Leadtek 8800GTS 512, and
It is clear that the reverse side of the video card is also nothing
Under the cooling system is also nothing unusual. Power system in
The memory chips are manufactured by Qimonda and have a 1. 0 ns access time,
The appearance of the GPU does not reveal its noble
The cooling system of the ASUS EN8800GTS TOP video card is exactly the same as
The polishing quality of the copper core is satisfactory, as in
The heat from the copper core is distributed over the aluminum fins at Rated frequencies and overclocking
its factory overclock. The nominal frequencies of the novelty are 740/1780 MHz for the GPU We managed to overclock the card to the same frequencies as Leadtek 8800GTS 512: Well, now let’s go down a step and get acquainted with two
Leadtek 8800GT
Video card Leadtek 8800GT is a typical representative of the series
The box of Leadtek 8800GT is almost the same as that of the more expensive 8800GTS
The back side of the box contains brief information about the video card, its
The package includes:
The Leadtek 8800GT video card is made according to the reference design and looks different
The reverse side of the video card also does not stand out, however, after
The cooling system is based on a reference design and is well known
When examining the printed circuit board, attention is drawn to the absence
Like the previous participants in today’s testing, the memory chips in Rated frequencies and overclocking As already mentioned, the Leadtek 8800GT video card has a standard factory overclock. Its nominal frequencies are 678/1700 MHz for the GPU and 2000 MHz for the video memory. Not bad, Now let’s move on to the next participant in today’s test.
Palit 8800GT sonic
The face of the video card Palit 8800GT sonic is a fighting frog in a spectacular
The reverse side of the box does not contain anything remarkable, because everything
The package includes:
It should be noted that this is the first video card of the GeForce 8800GT class with
And here is the first surprise! Palit 8800GT sonic graphics card is based on
The reverse side of the video card also has differences, but it is still difficult for us
Since the height of the pillars between the heatsink for the GPU and
The cooling system is made of painted aluminum and consists of three
Changes in the design of the printed circuit board affected the power subsystem, minor
Like the rest of the participants in today’s testing, memory chips Cooling system efficiency and overclocking Check the efficiency of the proprietary cooling system used in
The video card warmed up from 51 to 61 degrees, which, in general, is very good Despite changes in the power subsystem and improved cooling, So we finished getting acquainted with the participants of today’s test,
Testing and conclusions
Today’s testing differs not only in what we compare
The change in the test platform is due to the fact that initially
We used ForceWare 169 drivers. 21 and ForceWare 169.25 for
Based on the results of the 3DMark tests, of course, you can see who
In the game Call of Duty 4, attention is drawn to the fact that
In the Call of Juarez game under Windows XP, the Leadtek 8800GTS 512 video card
Call of Juarez running on Windows Vista is having issues with
In the game Crysis under Windows XP, the alignment of forces has changed slightly, however
The problem in Windows Vista with a resolution of 1600×1200 did not pass by and
GeForce is the leader in Need for Speed Pro Street Racing
In the game Need for Speed Carbon, a familiar picture appears before us:
In the game Oblivion, the fact that when resolving
Prey turned out to be undemanding to all video cards, and they Terminals
The purpose of today’s testing was to find out how much Pros and cons of individual graphics cards: Leadtek 8800GTS 512Pros:
Cons:
ASUS EN8800GTS TOP
Cons:
Leadtek 8800GTPros:
Cons:
Palit 8800GT sonicPros:
Cons:
— Discuss the material in the conference0005
Specifications Nvidia GeForce GT 8800GPU
Performance
Memory
Energy consumption
Benchmarks GeForce GT 8800PassMark
3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill)
FarCry 3
SmallLux GPU 2.0d4
|