960 gtx vs 1050 ti: GTX 960 vs GTX 1050 Ti Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-4790K vs i7-6700K)

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1050-ti-vs-geforce-gtx-960%23memory-specs

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce RTX
2060

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
4090



Radeon RX
Vega 7



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce RTX
3090 Ti

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
1135G7

vs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 7
3700X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U



Ryzen 3
5300U










Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City









We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1050-ti-vs-geforce-gtx-960%23benchmarks

Popular graphics cards comparisons


GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs


GeForce RTX
3070



GeForce RTX
2060

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs


GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB



GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs


GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards


GeForce GTX
1050 Ti



GeForce RTX
4090



Radeon RX
Vega 7



GeForce RTX
3060



GeForce GTX
1650



GeForce RTX
3090 Ti

Popular CPU comparisons


Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Core i5
12400F



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Core i5
10400F



Core i5
1135G7

vs


Ryzen 5
5500U



Ryzen 5
5600X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600G



Ryzen 5
3600

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X



Ryzen 7
3700X

vs


Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular CPUs


Ryzen 5
5500U



EPYC
7h22



Core i3
1115G4



Core i5
1135G7



Ryzen 5
3500U



Ryzen 3
5300U










GeForce GTX 1050 TI VS GeForce GTX 960

Page Content
  • Graphic processor
  • video card
  • Memory
  • Render
  • Design and dimensions
  • 9002 GPU

    98 KB (PER SMM)

    Chip GP107

    32 32
    Kol-in SM 6
    Kesh L1 48 KB (Per SM)
    KSHES KB 1024 KB
    SMM SMM 8
    Pixel Lort

    44. 54 Gpixel/S

    44.54 Gpixel60

    Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
    Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

    versus

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

    Benefits

    Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

    • Newer video card, 1 year(s) 900 month(s) difference in release dates 9007 cores 9007 24% more: 1392 MHz vs 1127 MHz
    • Boost core clock 18% more: 1392 MHz vs 1178 MHz
    • A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 28 nm
    • Approximately 60% less power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
    • Maximum memory size is 2 times larger: 4 GB vs 2 GB
    • About 5% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 21864 vs 20858
    • About 3% more performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 73.733
    • Desktopbench5 benchmark — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 6% more: 843.503 vs 792.44

    • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 4% more: 5.071 vs 4.888
    • Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 50% more: 301.168 vs 200.825
    • About 18% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark: 8496 vs 7218
    • About 18% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 8496 vs 7218
    • Performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score about 2% better: 2339 vs 2286
    Release date 25 October 2016 vs 22 January 2015
    Core frequency 1392 MHz vs 1127 MHz
    Boost core clock 1392 MHz vs 1178 MHz
    Process 14 nm vs 28 nm
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
    Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
    PassMark — G3D Mark 6299 vs 6026
    Geekbench — OpenCL 21864 vs 20858
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758 vs 73.733
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503 vs 792.44
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071 vs 4.888
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168 vs 200.825
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 vs 7218
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3336 vs 3335
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 vs 7218
    GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3336 vs 3335
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 2339 vs 2286

    Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

    • 8% more texturing speed: 72 billion / sec vs 66.82 GTexel / s
    • 33% more shader processors: 1024 vs 768
    • 3 floating point performance % more: 2.413 gflops vs 2.138 gflops

    • About 3% more performance in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 673 vs 651
    • CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) performance about 43% faster: 35.338 vs 24.676
    Texturing speed 72 billion / sec vs 66.82 GTexel / s
    Number of shaders 1024 vs 768
    Floating point performance 2. 413 gflops vs 2.138 gflops
    PassMark — G2D Mark 673 vs 651
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.338 vs 24.676
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3691 vs 3687
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3691 vs 3687

    Benchmark comparison

    GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
    GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

    PassMark — G3D Mark
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    PassMark — G2D Mark
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    Geekbench — OpenCL
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    75.758
    73.733
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    843.503
    792.44
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    24.676
    35.338
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    301.168
    200.825
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps)
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score
    GPU 1
    GPU 2
    Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
    PassMark — G3D Mark 6299 6026
    PassMark — G2D Mark 651 673
    Geekbench — OpenCL 21864 20858
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758 73.733
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503 792.44
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071 4.888
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.676 35.338
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168 200.825
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 7218
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3687 3691
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3336 3335
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 7218
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3687 3691
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3336 3335
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 2339 2286

    Performance comparison

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
    Architecture Pascal Maxwell 2. 0
    Codename GP107 GM206
    Production date October 25, 2016 22 January 2015
    Price at first issue date $139 $199
    Ranking 351 369
    Price now $159.99 $229.99
    Type Desktop Desktop
    Price/performance ratio (0-100) 46.07 34. 63
    Boost core clock 1392MHz 1178MHz
    Core frequency 1392MHz 1127MHz
    Number of CUDA conveyors 768 1024
    Floating point performance 2.138 gflops 2.413 gflops
    Process 14nm 28nm
    Maximum temperature 97 °C
    Number of shaders 768 1024
    Texturing speed 66. 82 GTexel/s 72 billion / sec
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 120 Watt
    Number of transistors 3,300 million 2,940 million
    Video connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
    G-SYNC support
    Audio input for HDMI Internal
    HDCP
    Maximum resolution VGA 2048×1536
    Multi-monitor support
    Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Length 145mm 9.5″ (24.1cm)
    Additional power connectors None 1x 6-pins
    Tire PCI Express 3.0
    Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm)
    Recommended power supply 400 Watt
    SLI support 2x
    DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.

    2023 © All rights reserved