960 gtx vs 1050 ti: GTX 960 vs GTX 1050 Ti Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-4790K vs i7-6700K)

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City

We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1050-ti-vs-geforce-gtx-960%23memory-specs

Popular graphics cards comparisons

GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs

GeForce RTX
3060

GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs

GeForce RTX
3070

GeForce RTX
2060

vs

GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs

GeForce GTX
1650

GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs

GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB

GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs

GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

GeForce RTX
4090

Radeon RX
Vega 7

GeForce RTX
3060

GeForce GTX
1650

GeForce RTX
3090 Ti

Popular CPU comparisons

Ryzen 5
5600X

vs

Core i5
12400F

Ryzen 5
3600

vs

Core i5
10400F

Core i5
1135G7

vs

Ryzen 5
5500U

Ryzen 5
5600X

vs

Ryzen 5
5600G

Ryzen 5
3600

vs

Ryzen 5
5600X

Ryzen 7
3700X

vs

Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular CPUs

Ryzen 5
5500U

EPYC
7h22

Core i3
1115G4

Core i5
1135G7

Ryzen 5
3500U

Ryzen 3
5300U

Page not found — Technical City

Page not found — Technical City

We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/geforce-gtx-1050-ti-vs-geforce-gtx-960%23benchmarks

Popular graphics cards comparisons

GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs

GeForce RTX
3060

GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

vs

GeForce RTX
3070

GeForce RTX
2060

vs

GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

vs

GeForce GTX
1650

GeForce GTX
1660 Super

vs

GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB

GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

vs

GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

GeForce RTX
4090

Radeon RX
Vega 7

GeForce RTX
3060

GeForce GTX
1650

GeForce RTX
3090 Ti

Popular CPU comparisons

Ryzen 5
5600X

vs

Core i5
12400F

Ryzen 5
3600

vs

Core i5
10400F

Core i5
1135G7

vs

Ryzen 5
5500U

Ryzen 5
5600X

vs

Ryzen 5
5600G

Ryzen 5
3600

vs

Ryzen 5
5600X

Ryzen 7
3700X

vs

Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular CPUs

Ryzen 5
5500U

EPYC
7h22

Core i3
1115G4

Core i5
1135G7

Ryzen 5
3500U

Ryzen 3
5300U

GeForce GTX 1050 TI VS GeForce GTX 960

Page Content

• Graphic processor
• video card
• Memory
• Render
• Design and dimensions

9002 GPU

98 KB (PER SMM)

Chip	GP107	32	32
Kol-in SM	6	—
Kesh L1	48 KB (Per SM)
KSHES KB	1024 KB
SMM SMM	—	8

Pixel Lort	44. 54 Gpixel/S	44.54 Gpixel60 Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support. Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 Benefits Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) Newer video card, 1 year(s) 900 month(s) difference in release dates 9007 cores 9007 24% more: 1392 MHz vs 1127 MHz Boost core clock 18% more: 1392 MHz vs 1178 MHz A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 14 nm vs 28 nm Approximately 60% less power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt Maximum memory size is 2 times larger: 4 GB vs 2 GB About 5% more performance in Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark: 21864 vs 20858 About 3% more performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 73.733 Desktopbench5 benchmark — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) about 6% more: 843.503 vs 792.44 Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) about 4% more: 5.071 vs 4.888 Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 50% more: 301.168 vs 200.825 About 18% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) benchmark: 8496 vs 7218 About 18% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 8496 vs 7218 Performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score about 2% better: 2339 vs 2286 Release date 25 October 2016 vs 22 January 2015 Core frequency 1392 MHz vs 1127 MHz Boost core clock 1392 MHz vs 1178 MHz Process 14 nm vs 28 nm Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt vs 120 Watt Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB PassMark — G3D Mark 6299 vs 6026 Geekbench — OpenCL 21864 vs 20858 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758 vs 73.733 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503 vs 792.44 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071 vs 4.888 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168 vs 200.825 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 vs 7218 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3336 vs 3335 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 vs 7218 GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3336 vs 3335 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 2339 vs 2286 Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 8% more texturing speed: 72 billion / sec vs 66.82 GTexel / s 33% more shader processors: 1024 vs 768 3 floating point performance % more: 2.413 gflops vs 2.138 gflops About 3% more performance in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 673 vs 651 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) performance about 43% faster: 35.338 vs 24.676 Texturing speed 72 billion / sec vs 66.82 GTexel / s Number of shaders 1024 vs 768 Floating point performance 2. 413 gflops vs 2.138 gflops PassMark — G2D Mark 673 vs 651 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.338 vs 24.676 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3691 vs 3687 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3691 vs 3687 Benchmark comparison GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 PassMark — G3D Mark GPU 1 GPU 2 PassMark — G2D Mark GPU 1 GPU 2 Geekbench — OpenCL GPU 1 GPU 2 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) GPU 1 GPU 2 75.758 73.733 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) GPU 1 GPU 2 843.503 792.44 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) GPU 1 GPU 2 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) GPU 1 GPU 2 24.676 35.338 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) GPU 1 GPU 2 301.168 200.825 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) GPU 1 GPU 2 GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) GPU 1 GPU 2 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score GPU 1 GPU 2 Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 PassMark — G3D Mark 6299 6026 PassMark — G2D Mark 651 673 Geekbench — OpenCL 21864 20858 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758 73.733 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503 792.44 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071 4.888 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.676 35.338 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168 200.825 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 7218 GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3687 3691 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3336 3335 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 7218 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3687 3691 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3336 3335 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 2339 2286 Performance comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 Architecture Pascal Maxwell 2. 0 Codename GP107 GM206 Production date October 25, 2016 22 January 2015 Price at first issue date $139 $199 Ranking 351 369 Price now $159.99 $229.99 Type Desktop Desktop Price/performance ratio (0-100) 46.07 34. 63 Boost core clock 1392MHz 1178MHz Core frequency 1392MHz 1127MHz Number of CUDA conveyors 768 1024 Floating point performance 2.138 gflops 2.413 gflops Process 14nm 28nm Maximum temperature 97 °C Number of shaders 768 1024 Texturing speed 66. 82 GTexel/s 72 billion / sec Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 120 Watt Number of transistors 3,300 million 2,940 million Video connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort G-SYNC support Audio input for HDMI Internal HDCP Maximum resolution VGA 2048×1536 Multi-monitor support Interface PCIe 3. 0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 145mm 9.5″ (24.1cm) Additional power connectors None 1x 6-pins Tire PCI Express 3.0 Height 4.376″ (11.1 cm) Recommended power supply 400 Watt SLI support 2x DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.