i7-6700K vs i9-9900K — Assassin’s Creed Odyssey with GTX 1050 Ti Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison
GTX 1050 Ti with
Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
GTX 1050 Ti with
Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz
i7-6700K
i9-9900K
Multi-Thread Performance
11112 Pts
20500 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2352 Pts
2908 Pts
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
i7-6700K vs i9-9900K in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey using GTX 1050 Ti — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions
i7-6700K
i9-9900K
Ultra Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
20.
|
| 1080p |
22.5 FPS
|
| 1440p |
15.6 FPS
|
| 1440p |
16.4 FPS
|
| 2160p |
11.0 FPS
|
| 2160p |
11.6 FPS
|
| w1440p |
14.2 FPS
|
| w1440p |
15.0 FPS
|
High Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
39.6 FPS
|
| 1080p |
43.
|
| 1440p |
31.8 FPS
|
| 1440p |
33.3 FPS
|
| 2160p |
23.4 FPS
|
| 2160p |
24.5 FPS
|
| w1440p |
29.3 FPS
|
| w1440p |
30.7 FPS
|
8 FPSMedium Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
59.1 FPS
|
| 1080p |
65.2 FPS
|
| 1440p |
48.
|
| 1440p |
50.1 FPS
|
| 2160p |
35.8 FPS
|
| 2160p |
37.4 FPS
|
| w1440p |
44.4 FPS
|
| w1440p |
46.5 FPS
|
1 FPSLow Quality
| Resolution | Frames Per Second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
98.2 FPS
|
| 1080p |
107.9 FPS
|
| 1440p |
80.5 FPS
|
| 1440p |
83.
|
| 2160p |
60.6 FPS
|
| 2160p |
63.3 FPS
|
| w1440p |
74.6 FPS
|
| w1440p |
78.0 FPS
|
8 FPSi7-6700K
- For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU’s with higher core count and lower core speed.
i9-9900K
- The i9-9900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
- The i9-9900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads.
Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications. - The i9-9900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
- The i9-9900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Compare i7-6700K vs i9-9900K specifications
i7-6700K vs i9-9900K Architecture
| i7-6700K | i9-9900K | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Skylake | Coffee Lake |
| Generation | Core i7 (Skylake) |
Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | SR2L0 | unknown |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Aug 2015 | Oct 2018 |
i7-6700K vs i9-9900K Cache
| i7-6700K | i9-9900K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 8MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
i7-6700K vs i9-9900K Cores
| i7-6700K | i9-9900K | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 4 | 8 |
| # of Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 | N/A |
| SMP # CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i7-6700K vs i9-9900K Features
| i7-6700K | i9-9900K | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
i7-6700K vs i9-9900K Performance
| i7-6700K | i9-9900K | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 40.0x | 36.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |
| TDP | 95 W | 95 W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 4.2 GHz | up to 5 GHz |
| Voltage | unknown | variable |
i7-6700K vs i9-9900K Physical
| i7-6700K | i9-9900K | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA14C | |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share Your Comments 94
Compare i7-6700K vs i9-9900K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Porovnání Intel Core i7-6700K vs.
Intel Core i9-9900K
Porovnání procesorů
Detail procesoru
Fotogalerie
Kde koupit?
Zobrazit recenze
Detail procesoru
Fotogalerie
Kde koupit?
Zobrazit recenze
Celkové hodnocení
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Nejlepší poměr cena/výkon
REMÍZA
REMÍZA
Obecné
Výrobce
Intel
Intel
Výrobní technologie
14 nm
14 nm
Oba procesory jsou vyráběny srovnatelnou technologií
Příkon (TDP)
91 W
95 W
Intel Core i7-6700K má o 4 % nižší příkon než Intel Core i9-9900K
Patice (Socket)
Intel 1151
Intel 1151 Coffee Lake
Počet jader a vláken
Počet jader procesoru
Intel Core i9-9900K má 2x více jader než Intel Core i7-6700K
Počet výpočetních vláken
neuvedeno
16
Frekvence
Základní frekvence procesoru
4 GHz
3,6 GHz
Intel Core i7-6700K má o 11 % vyšší základní frekvenci než Intel Core i9-9900K
Maximální frekvence (Boost)
neuvedeno
5 GHz
Možnost taktování
neuvedeno
ano
Výkon
Celkové skóre procesoru
8 948
18 563
Intel Core i9-9900K má obecně o 107 % vyšší celkový výkon než Intel Core i7-6700K
Skóre jednoho vlákna
2 513
2 949
Intel Core i9-9900K má o 17 % vyšší výkon na jednom výpočetním vlákně než Intel Core i7-6700K
Skóre herní fyziky
3 252
7 084
Intel Core i9-9900K má o 118 % vyšší výkon při výpočtu herní fyziky než Intel Core i7-6700K
Operační paměť
Maximální počet kanálů
neuvedeno
2
Grafická karta
Integrovaná grafická karta
neuvedeno
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Základní frekvence graf.
karty
neuvedeno
1200 MHz
Chladič
Chladič v balení
neuvedeno
ne
Další funkce a vlastnosti
Produktová řada
Intel Core i7
Intel Core i9
Kódový název
neuvedeno
Coffee Lake Refresh
Přibližná cena
Přibližná cena
již se neprodává
již se neprodává
Upozornění: Porovnání těchto produktů je vytvářeno automaticky na základě jejich parametrů, uživatelského hodnocení a ceny. Jedná se o systémové řešení pro usnadnění vašeho výběru, nikoli o přímé doporučení redakce Cena-Vykon.cz. Nalezli jste chybu v parametrech nebo se vám nezdá výsledné hodnocení? Dejte nám vědět!
Uživatelské hodnocení
0 % (
zobrazit recenze)
100 % (
zobrazit recenze)
Celkové hodnocení
PORAŽENÝ
VÍTĚZ
Nejlepší poměr cena/výkon
REMÍZA
REMÍZA
Další srovnání
|
Intel Core i7-6700K vs.  Intel Core i7-6700vs. Intel Core i5-6500 vs. Intel Core i7-7700K vs. Intel Core i5-6600K |
Intel Core i9-9900K vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs. Intel Core i7-9700K vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
i9-9900K vs i7-6700K — Call of Duty Modern Warfare vs GTX 1660
performance comparison
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
GTX 1660 with
Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz
i9-9900K
i7-6700K
Multi-Thread Performance
20500 Pts
11112 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2908 Pts
2352 Pts
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
i9-9900K vs i7-6700K Call of Duty Modern Warfare using GTX 1660 — processor performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium and Low Quality settings at 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K
i9-9900K
i7-6700K
Ultra quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
112. |
| 1080p |
98.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
80.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
71.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
47.8 FPS |
| 2160p |
42.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
68.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
60.8 FPS |
9 FPS High quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
174.5 FPS |
| 1080p |
156.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
130.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
118. |
| 2160p |
84.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
76.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
114.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
103.4 FPS |
2 FPS Medium quality
| Resolution | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
236.0 FPS |
| 1080p |
213.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
181.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
165.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
120.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
109. |
| w1440p |
160.1 FPS |
| w1440p |
145.9 FPS |
6 FPS Poor quality
| Permission | Frames per second |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
359.2 FPS |
| 1080p |
327.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
282.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
259.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
193.1 FPS |
| 2160p |
176.7 FPS |
| w1440p |
251.9 FPS |
| w1440p |
231. |
1 FPS i9-9900K
- The i9-9900K has a higher L3 cache. This is useful when you have significant multi-processor workloads, many computational processes at the same time. Rather on a server rather than a personal computer for interactive workloads.
- The i9-9900K has more cores. The advantage of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can process a separate data stream. This architecture greatly improves the performance of a system running parallel applications.
- The i9-9900K has more themes. Large programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to speed up execution.
- The i9-9900K has a higher turbo clock. Turbo Boost is a processor feature that will run at a processor clock speed faster than its base clock speed if certain conditions are present. This will allow older software that runs on fewer cores to run better on newer hardware.
Since games are also software, they are also applicable.
i7-6700K
- In some games, a processor with a higher clock speed, or with the technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), performs better than other processors with more cores and a lower core frequency.
Compare i9-9900K vs i7-6700K specifications
i9-9900K vs i7-6700K Architecture
| i9-9900K | i7-6700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake | Skylake |
| Generation | Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
Core i7 (Skylake) |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Part# | unknown | SR2L0 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Released | Oct 2018 | Aug 2015 |
i9-9900K vs i7-6700K Cache
| i9-9900K | i7-6700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cache L1 | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 16MB (shared) | 8MB (shared) |
i9-9900K vs i7-6700K Cores
| i9-9900K | i7-6700K | |
|---|---|---|
| # of Cores | 8 | 4 |
| # of Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Integrated Graphics | N/A | HD Graphics 530 |
| SMP# CPUs | 1 | 1 |
i9-9900K vs i7-6700K Features
| i9-9900K | i7-6700K | |
|---|---|---|
| MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.  2AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0 |
i9-9900K vs i7-6700K Notes
| i9-9900K | i7-6700K |
|---|
i9-9900K vs i7-6700K Performance
| i9-9900K | i7-6700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Frequency | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36.0x | 40.0x |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
| TDP | 95W | 95W |
| Turbo Clock | up to 5 GHz | up to 4. 2 GHz |
| Voltage | variable | unknown |
i9-9900K vs i7-6700K Physical
| i9-9900K | i7-6700K | |
|---|---|---|
| Die Size | unknown | unknown |
| Foundry | Intel | Intel |
| Package | FC-LGA14C | |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Transistors | unknown | unknown |
| tCaseMax | 72°C | 72°C |
Share your comments 0
Compare i9-9900K vs i7-6700K in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need for Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need for Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
it turned out that the CPU Core i9-9900K is so productive only because it is not subject to power limits
The Intel Core i9-9900K processor has been on sale for some time.
Thematic resources have already published their reviews and, it would seem, all points are placed.
But no. It’s no secret that the new Intel turned out to be very voracious. With a formal TDP of 95 W, the processor under load consumes 40-50 W more than the Core i7-8700K, whose TDP is declared at the same level.
Yes, TDP is not an indicator of power consumption, it is a requirement for processor heat dissipation, but it is determined based on the actual power consumption of the CPU. TechSpot resource specialists decided to delve into this issue.
In short, just like with modern video cards, Intel processors have power limits. Everyone knows that the maximum CPU frequency varies depending on how many cores are loaded. For example, for the same Core i9-9900K, the 5 GHz limit is declared under the condition that only one core is loaded, while all eight cores can operate at a maximum of 4.7 GHz. All this is just regulated depending on the power limit, which for this CPU is the same 95 watts.
That is, the maximum frequency in one case or another will be limited not by the CPU specifications, but by the power limit. This means that if, with a load on all eight cores, the processor’s power consumption reaches 95 W is already at a frequency of 4 GHz, then the frequency will not increase further, although it could.
However, it turned out that none of the motherboards used by the source specialists have any power limits for the Core i9-9900K by default, which means that the CPU frequencies are regulated not based on the limit, but on the basis of the maximum values provided by Intel . Simply put, the Core i9-9900K is never power-limited, so its power consumption is substantially higher than its predecessor at the same TDP. In fact, we have a situation that can be considered either as cunning (or even lies) on the part of Intel, or as the presence of a processor that always works in overclocked mode by default, and not in normal mode.
Against this background, the source decided to re-test this CPU, specifically limiting its power limit to the declared 95 watts.