Best cooling solution for i9-9900K
jegi20029
-
-
#1
Hello, I am looking for a new cooler as my cooler that I have right now is not doing the job. My cpu is OC @ 5GHZ @ 1.3 volts and temps when benchmarking are 95+ degrees. At idle it’s anywhere from 55-60 degrees. The cooler that I have right now is the h215i pro platinum from Corsair. Will a 360mm AIO benefit this situation? I don’t feel comfortable leaving it as is because the pc is on 24/7. I was hoping that someone could help me with this issue.
Thanks
neeyik
Posts: 1,980 +2,300
-
-
#2
What CPU do you have? Those temperatures seem rather high for a h215i Pro, though. For example, I have a i7-9700K that runs at stock with a h250i Pro and it does hit those kinds of temperature, even with a small FFT Prime95 torture test. At idle, it averages around 37 C. I’d personally strip everything down, reapply some decent thermal paste, clear dust out of the fans and radiators, before considering replacing the cooler.
jegi20029
-
-
#3
neeyik said:
What CPU do you have? Those temperatures seem rather high for a h215i Pro, though.
For example, I have a i7-9700K that runs at stock with a h250i Pro and it does hit those kinds of temperature, even with a small FFT Prime95 torture test. At idle, it averages around 37 C. I’d personally strip everything down, reapply some decent thermal paste, clear dust out of the fans and radiators, before considering replacing the cooler.
Click to expand…
Hello
So I have the i9-9900k and I have tried new thermal paste even swapped out for some Noctua fans no difference what so ever
neeyik
Posts: 1,980 +2,300
-
-
#4
Well Hardware Unboxed used the same cooler on a 9900K:
So while 95 degrees C is still pretty hot, it would seem for that cooler, it’s perhaps not a huge surprise. Looks like a bigger AIO will be the best way forward, although there will be better people on the forums to advise you. What I can say is don’t get the h250i: it’s performance doesn’t justify the price (although I got it mostly for noise reasons).
Click to expand…
I was looking at the Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II it is a 360 mm aio is this cooler any better it comes with a 6-year warranty and claims to be a pretty quiet aio…
neeyik
Posts: 1,980 +2,300
-
-
#6
Quiet isn’t good for cooling though — this is the problem with the h250i; it’s very quiet under normal settings, but the cooling performance is nothing special for a 360mm radiator.
It’s only when you have the fans at full rpm, do you get a decent amount of heat being transferred from the CPU, but at a serious cost to noise levels.
MaikuTech
Posts: 1,127 +189
-
-
#7
jegi20029 said:
I was looking at the Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II it is a 360 mm aio is this cooler any better it comes with a 6-year warranty and claims to be a pretty quiet aio…
Click to expand…
I would suggest you read this guide here first:
Your corsair watercooler should be keeping that core i9 cool.
I recommend the nzxt kraken for water cooling as it will get the job done.
For cooling with air, which I highly recommend against for speeds past 4.3ghz.
Your other problem is setting up correctly and case fans.
martinsmith
Posts: 50 +3
-
-
#8
Noctua NH-D15 CPU Cooler is the best cooler
9900k mit h215i.
.. | Die Hardware-Community für PC-Spieler
Lowpinger
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
#1
… wie der titel schon andeutet verwende ich einen i9 9900k unter der h215i welche wiederum mit 4x Akasa Apache im Push ‘n Pull bei 800u/min «beatmet» wird
das system is auf 4.5Ghz fixiert mit einem avx offset von 0, dabei gönnt sich die cpu max 1.2v
wenn ich das system out of the box laufen lasse, schiessen die temps in klassischen prime95 / linx oder anderen avx anwendungen unter last straight durch die decke (100°C+)
daher hab ich das system eingebremst, dennoch kommt es teilweise vor das die cpu trotzdem in den 90°C+ Throttle rennt
kühler is korrekt montiert, als WLP dient Thermal Grizzly’s Kryonaut
is die h215i einfach zu schwach? sollte ich auf die h250i Pro oder nen NH-D15 upgraden?
oder gibts einfachere lösungen?
System:
CPU: i9 9900k
Board: Z390 Aorus Master
RAM: Aorus RGB Memory 3200 (4x8GB)
GPU: Gigabyte 2080Ti
PSU: Corsair AX 760
SSD: Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB
Abductee
PCGH-Community-Veteran(in)
-
-
-
-
#2
Ich mag mich jetzt täuschen, aber sollte die CPU nicht bei hoher AVX Last den Takt senken?
Zumindest in den Werkseinstellungen indirekt über die TDP.
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
Lowpinger
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
-
#3
selbst mit stock bios settings out of the box macht sie das nicht, alle core 4.7ghz, rennt dann ins thermal throttle von knapp 100° und drosselt sich dann, das is aber nich sinn und zweck
Sinusspass
BIOS-Overclocker(in)
-
-
-
-
#4
Wie viel Leistung zieht der 9900k denn, wenn er überhitzt?
Grundsätzlich ist die h215i nicht zu schwach, die Fläche reicht bei angemessener Drehzahl durchaus aus.
Eine h250 hätte nur geringfügig mehr Fläche, ein Nh D15 wäre auch nicht besser dran.
Andererseits, was jucken dich Prime/LinX Temperaturen? Das ist zwar nett für einen Test zur Kühlleistung, im Alltag wird man da aber kaum rankommen, erst recht nicht, wenn man mit dem System nur zockt.
Zu guter letzt, welches Gehäuse nutzt du?
Lowpinger
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
-
#5
hey sinus, je nach test gönnt sich die cpu laut hwinfo 150- 190W Package
als gehäuse dient ein Cougar Panzer Max, die AiO steckt der front mit push ‘n pull, ins gehäuse, im heck ein 120er der rauszieht, und im deckel 2x 140 die rausziehen
wegen gaming: wenn ich gerade mal CoD MW mit 144FPS laufen lasse
CPU: 30-40% Last bei ~70°C
GPU: 70% Last bei 62°C
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
-
-
-
-
#6
Lowpinger schrieb:
das system is auf 4.5Ghz fixiert mit einem avx offset von 0, dabei gönnt sich die cpu max 1.2v
Zum Vergrößern anklicken….
Du musst mit Offset arbeiten. Für Max AVX ist der Wasserkasten schlicht zu schwach.
Du kannst die CPU problemlos mit 5GHz fahren, aber eben nur für Games. In Anwendungen solltest du ein Offset einsetzen, da dir sonst alles abraucht.
Lowpinger
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
-
#7
problem daran is leider das immer mehr games mit AVX arbeiten, bringen also 5ghz nix wenn die games avx nutzen und die cpu dann auf den offset wert geht, dann kann ich die cpu gleich fix auf «xy ghz» setzen das sie nich ständig zwischen non avx und avx offset hin und her taktet und nich zu heiß wird
oder seh ich das falsch?
hab testweise mal das eingestellt: multi 47 allcore, avx offset 4
CoD MW allcore 4.
3ghz
csgo allcore 4.3ghz
division 2 4.3ghz
breakpoint 4.3ghz
wie man unschwer erkennen kann, fast alles nutz avx, macht als 5ghz null sinn
brauch ich als ne andere kühllösung um die abwärme in den griff zu bekommen
nachtrag: CoD MW läuft jetzt seit ca. 15min, das liquid in der h215i liegt jetzt schon knapp 50°C, das kann doch nich normal sein
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
Abductee
PCGH-Community-Veteran(in)
-
-
-
-
#8
Versuch mal das Powerlimit auf 150W zu beschränken.
Sinusspass
BIOS-Overclocker(in)
-
-
-
-
#9
Wenn die Flüssigkeit warm wird, funktioniert die Kühlung auch. Dann muss nur noch die Wärme vom Wasser an die Luft übertragen werden, da hilft nur mehr Lüfterdrehzahl. 50°C lesen sich aber nach ziemlich geringer Drehzahl, was sagt die Drehzahl bzw. Lüfterkurve?
Lowpinger
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
-
#10
Abductee schrieb:
Versuch mal das Powerlimit auf 150W zu beschränken.
Zum Vergrößern anklicken….
erledigt, keinerlei änderungen, liquid wird wieder 50°C und wärmer, cpu rennt ins 100°C limit und drosselt
Lowpinger
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
-
#11
Sinusspass schrieb:
Wenn die Flüssigkeit warm wird, funktioniert die Kühlung auch. Dann muss nur noch die Wärme vom Wasser an die Luft übertragen werden, da hilft nur mehr Lüfterdrehzahl. 50°C lesen sich aber nach ziemlich geringer Drehzahl, was sagt die Drehzahl bzw. Lüfterkurve?
Zum Vergrößern anklicken….
lüfterkurve is im bios syncron geschaltet, gekoppelt an die cpu, 50% (900u/min) sind perma da, ab 80°C laufen die lüfter auf 100% (1300u/min)
claster17
Volt-Modder(in)
-
-
-
-
#12
Kann die h215i die Lüfter nicht selbst regeln? Das geschieht normalerweise über die Wassertemperatur.
Sinusspass
BIOS-Overclocker(in)
-
-
-
-
#13
Sollte eigentlich reichen, aber dein Wasser ist 25-30°C über der Raumtemperatur.
Das sollte mit einem 280er Radiator und einem Gehäuse mit Meshfront niemals passieren, nicht bei der Lüfterdrehzahl. Vor allem, wenn die Lüfterdrehzahl unter Volllast eben 1300 Umdrehungen beträgt. Wie warm ist die Luft, die aus dem Radiator rauskommt?
Ich weiß nicht genau, wie die Aio intern aufgebaut ist, explizit geht es um die Position des internen Temperatursensors. Möglich wäre, dass der Kreislauf größtenteils verstopft ist und der Temperatursensor nahe am Cpukühler sitzt. Damit wird das Kühlwasser in Cpunähe eben sehr warm und der interne Sensor zeigt entsprechende Werte an, zudem ist die Performance des Kühlblocks stark eingeschränkt, was die Temperaturen erklärt. Läuft die Pumpe denn auf voller Leistung?
Lowpinger
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
-
#14
claster17 schrieb:
Kann die h215i die Lüfter nicht selbst regeln? Das geschieht normalerweise über die Wassertemperatur.
Zum Vergrößern anklicken….
ja kann sie, wollte aber das alle lüfter also raditor und systemfans zusammenarbeiten
somit kann der airflow im rechner auch gleich die abwärme der 2080ti wegschaffen
@sinusspass:
ja pumpe läuft auf performance mit 3000u/min
die luft hinterm radiator is handwarm
Sinusspass
BIOS-Overclocker(in)
-
-
-
-
#15
Wie warm sind die Schläuche nahe am Kühlblock und wie warm ist dieser selbst?
Lowpinger
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
-
#16
Sinusspass schrieb:
Wie warm sind die Schläuche nahe am Kühlblock und wie warm ist dieser selbst?
Zum Vergrößern anklicken.
…
kühlblock is unter plastik kA wie warm es darunter is, schläuche sind mit stoff «gesleeved» und sehr dick keine temperatur zu erfühlen
Sinusspass
BIOS-Overclocker(in)
-
-
-
-
#17
Man sollte eigentlich schon was dadurch fühlen können, auch Plastik und Sleeve leiten Wärme.
Andererseits bringt uns das so nicht weiter. Es könnte sein, dass der verbaute Temperatursensor defekt ist, üblicherweise kommen dann aber völlig irrsinnige Werte bei rum, daher würde ich davon nicht ausgehen.
Falls du einen vergleichbaren Kühler zum Gegentesten in deinem Umfeld hast, wäre das eine Option. Falls sich dabei herausstellt, dass mit dem anderen Kühler sich auch nichts ändert, liegt es an der Wärmeübertragung in der Cpu, aber davon würde ich bei 150W nicht ausgehen. Falls sich an den Temperaturen aber etwas ändert, ist der Kühler defekt, sofern noch Garantie drauf ist, ist das dann ein Fall dafür. Wenn du keinen Kühler zum Gegentesten hast, kannst du nur davon ausgehen, dass der Kühler defekt ist; dann ist das eben einfach ein Garantiefall. 50°C Wasser sind bei 150-200W eben einfach zu hoch, außer es sind 35°C+ in der Stube.
Lowpinger
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
-
#18
nein leider keine kühler zum testen
da auch anscheinend keine wirklichen tips helfen würde ich direkt nen neuen holen
die frage is nur welcher Noctua NH-D15 oder die Corsair h250i Pro ???
Abductee
PCGH-Community-Veteran(in)
-
-
-
-
#19
Die h215i lässt sich doch per iCUE steuern/auslesen, da solltest du auch die Wassertemperatur und Pumpendrehzahl sehen können.
Lowpinger
Freizeitschrauber(in)
-
-
-
#20
pumpe bei 3000u/min
wasser unter last 48-54°C
Corsair iCUE h215i RGB PRO XT
- TWEAK
- Hardware
- Cooling
There is no way around the fact that PC cooling is an important part of both office desktops as well as massive gaming rigs. Corsair is one of the major players on the market when it comes to PC cooling, and in this review, we take a look at its new iCUE h215i RGB PRO XT water cooler.
By Berleburg
24 apr. 2020 10:27 am
f
t
For many years, Corsair has been a renowned manufacturer of all-in-one (AIO) coolers. AIO coolers are water coolers that can be installed in your PC, and they are a whole lot easier to install than a custom water cooling loop. In this review, we’ll be checking out the h215i RGB PRO XT CPU cooler, which is its newest addition to the h215i series.
First, let’s look at the hard facts.
Specifications
-
Cooling Warranty: Five years
-
Cold Plate Material: Copper
-
Radiator Material: Aluminum
-
PWM: Yes
-
CORSAIR iCUE Compatibility: Yes
-
Tubing Length 380 mm
-
Cold Plate Dimensions: 56 x 56 cm
-
Tubing Material: Black Sleeved Low-Permeation Rubber
-
Radiator Dimensions: 322 mm x 137 mm x 27 mm
-
Fan Dimensions: 120 mm x 25 mm
-
Fan Speed: 2000 RPM
-
Number of Fans: 2
-
Cooling Socket Support: Intel 1150/1151/1155/1156, Intel 2011/2066, AMD AM3/AM2, AMD AM4, AMD sTR4, AMD sTRX4
-
Lighting: RGB
-
Radiator Size: 280 mm
-
Fan Model: ML series
-
Fan Control Method: PWM
-
AMD Processors Supported: Ryzen Threadripper, Ryzen, Phenom II, Athlon II, FX, A-Series, Opteron, Sempron, Athlon 64
-
Intel Processors Supported: Core i9, Core i7, Core i5, Core i3, Pentium, Celeron
-
Fan Airflow: 63 CFM
-
Fan Static Pressure: 3.
0 mm-h3O -
Noise Level: 36 dBA
We are dealing with a 280 mm cooler, which means that the radiator has a size that will support the use of two 140 mm fans. The included Corsair ML fans make use of magnetic levitation instead of an ordinary ball bearing inside the fan. This should equate to less noise and vibrations when the fan runs at higher speeds. These fans will run between 400 RPM and 2000 RPM.
Since this is a 280 mm cooler, you have to make sure that your case will support a cooler of this size. Most cases support 120, 240 and 360 mm radiators, but a 280 mm cooler is slightly wider, which is important to note.
Packaging and Content
Let’s have a look at what’s important and that is what you get for your buck with this cooler. The box sports the typical Corsair colors: black and yellow. On the front, we find an image of the cooler and a note about its RGB lighting feature. The rest of the box just lists some basic information about the product such as the dimensions and supported processors.
In terms of processor support, this cooler essentially supports every AMD and Intel processor produced the past 15 years. As such, unless you are using a prehistoric relic as your daily driver, you should be all good.
Once we get it out from its dwelling, we see the beast in all its glory. A substantial 322 mm x 137 mm x 27 mm radiator and an RGB-lit pump head with a 56 mm cold plate that are connected to each other via 380 mm dark-sleeved tubing. You also find the two ML140 fans that are black with gray fan blades, mounting brackets for various processors and motherboards, a lot of screws and a couple of cables and a manual. We highly recommend not discarding the manual up front since it will provide valuable information regarding which screws and brackets are used for your CPU and motherboard combo.
A Closer Look
Before we get to the installation, let’s have a closer look at the goodies.
The cooler is black in the sense that the radiator, the pump and the tubes are completely black.
This means that this cooler will fit into most builds. Unfortunately, the two included fans have gray fan blades, and would’ve been cooler if they too were black now that there aren’t any RGB lights anyways. After all, these aren’t cheap fans and therefore not some that you’d be likely to replace just like that.
The pump has a glossy finish on the top and a Corsair logo at the center. It looks really good, but this also means that you cannot rotate the pump to your liking. So, you have only one choice of orientation if you, like myself, cannot stand a logo that is lying down or upside down. The radiator is matte black.
On the underside of the pump there’s a large cooling plate that would even be able to pair with AMD’s Threadripper CPUs. There’s also some pre-applied thermal compound so you don’t have to deal with that. Unfortunately, no extra thermal compound has been included. The tubes feed into the side of the pump and can be twisted to each side, which gives you a lot of flexibility compared to earlier models, where the tubes went straight down into the pump, leaving you with very little in terms of flexibility.
We of course also have to take a look at the RGB lighting. In this case, we only get that on the pump itself. As mentioned, we have a Corsair logo on the front-facing part of the pump, and around it we get a ring that is also RGB lit. In total, we get 16 adjustable RGB LEDs that can be controlled via Corsair’s iCUE software. There’s an abundance of various light modes to choose from, and you can also create your own as I’ve done in the image below.
It is also using the iCUE software that you control the fan and pump speed. There are four presets to choose from: Quiet, Balanced, Extreme and Zero RPM. The first three are pretty much self-explanatory, and Zero RPM basically means that the fans are idle as long as the cooling fluid remains below 40 °C, in which case you basically have passive cooling. Only the pump will continue running since it of course needs to keep the cooling fluid flowing.
Installation
Now, let’s have a look at the installation.
Firstly, I attach the two included Corsair ML140 fans to the radiator.
I’m fortunate to be using an AM4 platform from AMD, which means that I don’t have to swap out the backplate or the brackets on the motherboard itself. However, the cooling kit comes with an Intel bracket pre-installed, which needs to be removed before we can move on. This is easily done by pulling them off from each side. It sounds simple, but it does actually require a decent amount of force. Once those two brackets have been removed, the correct AMD brackets can be fitted on by clicking them on from each side.
You also have to make sure to position the brackets correctly, as shown on the image below. If not, you run the risk of having the cooler not being in proper contact with the processor, thereby rendering it quite redundant.
Once the brackets are in place, you add the included screws and loops.
The whole thing can now simply be installed onto the default brackets that are located on every AM4 motherboard.
With the cooler in place, it’s time to look at the cables. It’s actually quite simple. The two 4-pin PWM connectors from the fans are connected to the Y-cable that is located on the pump. You then connect the two connectors from the pump to respectively a SATA power connector and the CPU_FAN header on the motherboard. That’s basically it.
If you want to be able to control the cooler via the iCUE software, the included USB cable needs to be connected on the side of the pump and then to an available USB 2.0 connector on the motherboard.
That concludes the installation process.
Performance
CPU: AMD Ryzen 2700
Software (benchmark): CPU-Z
Software (monitoring): HWiNFO64
Test Procedure:
Our test procedure involves warming up the system with a CPU-Z stress test for 10/30 minutes (air/water). After that, we let it continue for 2 minutes, whilst measuring the average temperature in HWiNFO64.
We then subtract the room temperature at that given time and arrive at a delta temperature in order to provide as neutral a result as possible. The fans and pump are set to run at full speed so we get an idea of the maximum performance. This should provide us with a good indication of what the cooler is capable of and whether it can handle more or less than what we throw at it.
Measurements:
Room temperature: ~26.6 °C
Fan speed: ~1600 RPM
As we can detect, the Corsair iCUE h215i RGB PRO XT performs quite well in our test. The performance of the cooler is equal to, if not better than, that of some of the 360 mm coolers that we’ve tested, which in and of itself is very impressive.
Noise Level:
In our tests, where we let the fans run at maximum speed, we’ll of course also experience quite a bit more noise compared to normal circumstances where you’d likely opt for a more balanced performance. During normal use, we struggle to even hear the cooler, and especially so when it is using the Zero RPM profile.
On Extreme, which is what we used during our test, we peaked at around 34 dB at a 30 cm distance. This places the iCUE h215i RGB PRO XT in the middle of the bunch of coolers we tested in recent time. It’s also quite common for smaller fans, such as 120 mm and even 80 mm, to be more noisy than larger fans. Albeit, 140 mm isn’t much larger than a 120 mm, but in some cases, it can make a difference.
Price
Corsair iCUE h215i RGB PRO XT is priced at $139.99. This is, in my view, a quite fair price when you consider the performance of it compared to — even larger — competing products. However, the price is still substantially higher than some of the best air coolers that deliver the same level of performance, but at the same time are quieter and offer other advantages as well.
Conclusion
During this test, we’ve covered everything there is to cover on the cooler. The iCUE h215i RGB PRO XT is a potent cooler that with its 280 mm size performs really well, and especially so when we compare it to its larger 360 mm brethren. Our tests indicate that we basically get the same level of performance as we’d get with some of the larger coolers. The included ML140 fans are quiet, and it’s an awesome feature to be able to put them completely to sleep when the temperature is below 40 °C using the Zero RPM profile.
If we look at the design, it’s the RGB lights on the pump that stand out the most with its 16 individually programmable RGB LEDs. If you’re not into RGBs you can fortunately turn it off completely. The fans do not offer any lighting, and I would’ve liked if the fans were completely black instead of a boring gray color. I’d also have preferred if the tubes were a bit shorter since they could give you some space problems if you run a smaller case with limited room.
I like the idea of the fan cables going into the pump, but I would probably have preferred if they were connected to a hub on the radiator instead. It would also have been nice if these cables were hidden under the sleeving of the tubes. With the current implementation, you have to manage quite a lot of cables, and it isn’t always easy to make it look good. I’m not that big of a fan of the SATA power connection since I find it annoying when anything other than SSDs and HDDs demand SATA power. However, it’s way better than having me use a 4-pin molex connector which we still see from other manufacturers. That madness has to stop, and the sooner the better!
Corsair has put together a very reasonable product, and I’d definitely recommend it if you’ve got room for a 280 mm radiator in your case. This might be the deciding factor since it is not all cases that offer support of a radiator this size.
Corsair iCUE h215i RGB PRO XT gets a fine score of 9/10. It’s a cooler that performs really well and that comes with some good fans that are very quiet during normal workload.
Pros
-
Reasonable performance
-
16 programmable RGB LEDs on the pump
-
Easy installation, especially on an AM4 platform
-
Two included Corsair ML140 fans
-
Zero RPM preset
-
Sleeved tubes
-
Fair price compared to competing products
Cons
-
Many cables that require management
-
Lack of fan control via BIOS or motherboard software
-
Tubes possibly a bit too long
Corsair h215i Platinum AIO Cooler Review
Skip to content
Posted inCooling
by David Schroth
Introduction
Image Credit: Corsair
Today will again be using our new AIO test platform that is capable of putting out enough heat to make even the devil sweat. We do this to test AIO liquid cooling solutions that are likely to be used with some of today’s most demanding CPUs. So, on the bench today is the Corsair h215i Platinum liquid CPU water cooler ( CW-9060038-WW) which is currently the second most capable cooler in Corsair’s Hydro Series.
Corsair h215i Platinum Overview
The Corsair h215i Platinum is an all in one (AIO) CPU cooler that is designed to work on a wide variety of sockets, including Intel’s LGA 1150/1151/1155/1156/1200/1366/2011/2066 and AMD’s AM2/AM3/AM4. While this covers most high-end desktop processors, it is not compatible with the Threadripper’s TR4 socket without purchasing bracket number CW-8960054.
RGB Water Block
Image credit: CoolIT
The water block is different from many other related models in Corsair’s lineup as they are once more are using CoolIT (as opposed to Asetek) for their products. The design features a rectangular copper base plate with flattened pyramid-shaped, or trapezoid-shaped, cooling fines to increase heat dissipation. The cooling interface is slightly larger than in other Corsair h21x models. This is paired with a liquid-cooled stator and a patented split-flow design to complete the package here.
The cube-shaped water block includes the pump and measures approximately 60x60x38mm making it one of the smaller options we have seen. It supports the AMD am4 socket.
Pump
Image Credit: CoolIT
The pump used with the Corsair AIO h215i Platinum is the standard CoolIT E3 design. This design is supposed to result in excellent performance and noise reduction along with providing excellent durability (MTTF rated at 80,000 hours at 60 degrees Celsius). Additionally, while the pump is supposed to be PWM capable, you have to use the included adapter for that. This is a bit of a Corsair “lock-in”.
Radiator
The liquid CPU cooler radiator is designed to hold two 140mm fans and measures 315 mm x 143 mm x 29 mm and is, per Corsair’s advertising, meant for “low-noise cooling and bold styling”. By our count, the aluminum radiator sports a density of 21 fins per inch.
Fans
The included ML140 PRO RGB fans are Corsair’s standard-sized ML 140mm PWM fans that have a magnetic levitation bearing. The ML140 PRO RGB support a listed fan speed of 400 to 1,200 RPM on their specs, but we saw peak fan speeds of 1,800 RPM, at a reported noise level of 10 to 20.4 dB(A). The stated airflow is 55.4 CFM with a static pressure of 1.27 mm h3O.
RGB
Image Credit: Corsair
There are addressable RGB led lighting features in the water block as well as fans included with the h215i Platinum today. The RGB connectivity is provided through a proprietary 4 pin connector and locks you into Corsair’s ecosystem of fan and light control via the iCUE software. This is much less user friendly than all of the other options we have reviewed to date that allow you to use baked in options with various motherboards on the market for running your RGB light show.
Let’s move on now to our test setup and installation of the Corsair h215i Platinum.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Don’t Miss Out on More FPS Review Content!
Recent News
Ethereum Executes The Merge, Reducing Energy Consumption “by ~99.95%”
Resident Evil 4 Remake Announced for PlayStation 4, More Details to Be Shared at New Resident Evil Showcase in October
Blade Runner 2099: Amazon Greenlights Live-Action Series, with Ridley Scott Executive Producing
ASRock Announces Its First Gaming Monitors, including Phantom Gaming PG34WQ15R2B with Built-In Wi-Fi
Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves Collection Arrives on PC October 19, 2022, Confirms Naughty Dog
T-FORCE Launches VULCANα DDR5 Gaming Memory for AMD AM5 Platform
Tagged: AIO, cooler, Corsair, h215i, platinum
David is a computer hardware enthusiast that has been tinkering with computer hardware for the past 25 years.
More by David Schroth
Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — test AiO z chłodnicą 280 mm
Łukasz Sierant
|| 0
- Spodobało Ci się? Podziel się ze znajomymi!
-
Udostępnij
-
Tweetnij
- Skomentuj
1. Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — test AiO z chłodnicą 280 mm
2. Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — radiator i wentylatory
3. Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — wentylatory
4. Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — blok wodny i montaż
5. Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — oprogramowanie
6. Metodologia testowa
7. Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — wydajność 9900K
8. Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — wydajność 12600K
9. Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — wydajność przy 38 dBA 9900K
10. Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — wydajność przy 38 dBA 12600K
11. Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — pomiar ciśnienia akustycznego
12. Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — analiza termowizyjna kamerą FLIR
13. Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE — podsumowanie i ocena
Testy wydajności zostały przeprowadzone w obudowie typu benchtable i pomieszczeniu o temperaturze 22-23 stopni Celsjusza. Prezentowane wyniki zostały wykonane ponownie, ponieważ zmieniliśmy procesor na Core i9-9900K, czyli znacznie wydajniejszy i wymagający dla układów chłodzeń niż i7 7700K. Metodologia testów opisana została na wcześniejszej stronie.
Na wykresach podane są osiągane prędkości obrotowe wentylatorów, ewentualnie pomp cieczy chłodzącej.
Przy maksymalnych obrotach pompy i wentylatorów, Corsair iCUE h215i RGB ELITE jest zaraz za modelami AIO z chłodnicą 360 mm.
- Spodobało Ci się? Podziel się ze znajomymi!
-
Udostępnij
-
Tweetnij
- Skomentuj
Tagi
Chłodzenie procesoraAIOCorsairiCUEh215i
Łukasz Sierant
Z-ca redaktora naczelnego
Zgłoś autorowi błąd na stronie
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
Kolejny proponowany artykuł z kategorii
|
0009
9000 512 KB
Advantages: The best option in terms of performance, price and quality on the day of my purchase.
Heats up a little with a relatively inexpensive cooler.
Excellent performance, enough for any game with a decent graphics card.
Comment: I bought it successfully when it was inexpensive.
The processor is chic, everything suits.
Dmitry
July 30, 2021
Belgorod
\ Using experience: more than 9 years0175
Appraisal
5
Pros: — Topstone for 1151v2, better performance.
— 8 cores / 16 threads
— Good stock clocks + overclockable
— 5 year headroom (hopefully)
Cons: — Mediocre solder
— Pretty hot
Comment: 9900k was scalped (-8-10gr.~) and successfully overclocked on a Fractal Design S36 Blackout + kryonaut to the cover. UPD. kryonaut loses its properties after a few months, I do not recommend. Now I use mastergel/nh-2
What I came to now is below
(this is permanent for games!!! not link voltages!!! link on the screenshots to the review):
1. 5.0 GHz 1.31 V BIOS VCORE [LLC-4 — in load 1.26V VCORE, 1.24V VR OUT] [AVX-0]
2. 5.1GHz 1.38V BIOS VCORE [LLC-4 — load 1.34V VCORE, 1.32V VR OUT] [AVX-0]
3. 5.2GHz 1.45V BIOS VCORE [LLC-4 — in load 1.4V VCORE, 1.38V VR OUT] [AVX-0]
1. 4300-17-17-17-36 CR2 [1.44V DRAM] 1.25V SA/IO ( 2x8Gb F4-3600C15 B-DIE SR)
2. 4000-16-16-16-34 CR2 [1.42V DRAM] 1.21V SA/IO (2x16Gb F4-4000C19-32GTZKK B-DIE DR) — permanent
3. 4200-16-16-16-34 CR2 [1.47V DRAM] 1.26V SA/IO (2x16Gb F4-4000C19V-32GTZKK B-DIE DR)
writes that cooling with a top-end nokuta is the same as with top-end water, I have bad news for you — you can’t use the materiel.
I consider it important to add — disabling hyperthreading lowered the temperature by 15 degrees, the voltage on vcore (5000) to 1.25V and the stone took 5200 to 1.36V. In games, performance has improved. But there is not much point in doing this, in some games stutters appear and in parallel it will not work to do anything in the background — this solution is a kind of alternative in the heat with budget cooling.
1 MSI MEG Z390 ACE
2 Intel Core [email protected] (5.2GHz for winter)
3 Fractal Design Celsius S36 Blackout
4 nVidia GeForce GTX1080 Ti EVGA GAMING PCI-E 11264Mb (11G-P4-5390-K ) +400MHz mem
5 G.Skill Trident F4000-C19-8GTZKK @ OC 4200-16-16-16 36.3 ns
6 Fractal Design R6
7 Fractal Design Ion+ 760P
8 SSD#1 — 250Gb SSD Samsung 970 EVO Plus
9 SSD#2 — 1Tb SSD WD Black SN750
10 HDD#1 — 2Tb SATA-III Western Digital Gold
12 3x Noctua NF-F14 industrial PPC PWM
13 1x Fractal Design VENTURI 140mm
14 Monitor ASUS XG279Q
15 UPS CYBERPOWER 1300VA
Maxim Pakhtunov
April 13, 2021
Moscow and Moscow region
\ Using experience: more than 9 years0175
Appraisal
5
Advantages: 5 ghz 1. 32 v passes avx2 at 70-80 degrees. Cooling Corsair h215i capellix elite. I ordered from Yandex Market.
Weaknesses: —
Andrey A.
February 27, 2021
Syktyvkar
\ Usage experience: less than 9 months0175
Appraisal
4
Advantages: 4700 MHz for all cores
Comment: The Deepcool NEPTWIN WHITE cooler (150 W) copes with a bang in stock, I have not seen more than 76 degrees in games. didn’t do any tests.
SECTOR
January 23, 2021
\ Usage experience: less than 9 months0175
Appraisal
5
Pros: Noticeable performance boost over i5. It’s like the i5, only with a turbo: while the i5 is still processing, the i9 has already finished everything. Comfort is felt in everything: when launching applications, in processing operations. You can compare both cars with 120 and 180 hp. It seems to be both the norms, but the 180 rides softer, lighter and more comfortable.
Comment: I used to have i5 9600k, also a good percentage.
shkolnic10 s.
November 30, 2020,
Moscow and Moscow region
\ Usage experience: less than 9 months0175
Appraisal
3
Advantages: steers, performance is enough for everything
Disadvantages: heats up, overclocking is difficult, poor load distribution among the cores.
is not a purchase for 2020, because it is a direct analogue of 10700k
Al. T.
October 25, 2020,
Belgorod
\ Experience of use: several months
Score
5
Advantages: Just a rocket for home use.
Disadvantages: Price and heat dissipation. You need to have a high-quality CBO or dropsy.
Comment: I use be quite! Dark rock 4. In toys, the temperature is about 62-65 degrees.
Dmitry Zh
June 23, 2020
Moscow and Moscow region
Appraisal
5
Advantages: I9 990k performance for 2020 in home use without any complaints, with a margin for future
Disadvantages: A beautiful figure of 5. 00 GHz on the box!!! But this figure is not for all cores, but in turbo boost for 1 core .. you can take 5 GHz for all cores, but the temperature even under nzxt kraken x72 for all cores reaches over 90 degrees ..
Comment: I am very pleased with the processor in general, it’s not worth driving it 5×8 — there’s little sense, and there are much more problems with consumption and temperature ..
Yuri Kh.
March 29, 2020
Moscow and Moscow region
\ Usage experience: less than 9 months0175
Appraisal
5
Pros: Very fast, even stock.
Faults: — Very hot.
— Hopes for overclocking are not particularly justified. The NH-D15S cooler, with two valves, in a closed case, is not enough to keep it from throttling in prime, with AVX, and this is at 4.7 on all cores, it puts out more than 220 watts at the same time and goes into throttling, but it works.
— Trying to set 5 for all cores, in prime (AVX), leads to horror in the form of 260 — 270 watts of heat, instant overheating, and reboot after 10-20 seconds of the test. Looks like you need to add voltage and it’s much better to cool for this ..
— It was not possible to reduce the heating by undervolting, without loss of stability (or frequencies), even by -0.07 volts. Under normal conditions, it seems to work at a reduced voltage, but the prime is pouring with errors, within 2-8 hours of the test.
— Looks like I was just not very lucky with the copy, I took OEM, maybe someone already tested it, before selling it, there is no packaging. I think that with the boxed option, the chances of buying a more successful one are higher.
— My mother is normal, ASUS Strix Z390-E Gaming.
— In principle, if prime9 is excluded from the tests5, then 5 GHz for all cores works quite well for me, without an undervolt. In all programs, even in Cinebench, it also loads well, but not as brutally as prime.
Comment: Proc is a beast, but without dropsy it is almost impossible to squeeze something else out of it, although there are no such programs where it would not be enough in stock.
Konstantin
March 23, 2020
Belgorod
\ Usage experience: less than 9 months0175
Appraisal
5
Advantages: 8 cores, multi-threading, performs well in games.
Disadvantages: Pretty high heat dissipation, but I would not consider this a disadvantage, and it’s clear that for such a processor you need to take very powerful cooling, and expensive motherboards for these percents.
Comment: You should take it only in conjunction with a powerful video card such as 2080,2080ti and take a motherboard with good cooling of the power circuits.
Gleb Safonov
February 11, 2020,
Moscow and Moscow region
\ Usage experience: less than 9 months0175
Corsair h215i Platinum review: Flagship RGB LSS
You will be surprised, but I’ll start the story about the closed water cooling system Corsair h215i Platinum RGB . .. with the rules for installing LSS. The highest point of the closed circuit should not be the pump. This will kill the cooling much ahead of schedule. The bubbles that will inevitably be in the cycle will get into the pump and stay there. interfering with circulation. And breaking the pump!
Read the review — click on the picture
1. Corsair h215i Platinum 9 video review0175
2. How NOT to do it
3. h215i Platinum vs h215i Pro XT
4. Testing
5. Test bench
6. Corsair h215i Platinum RGB results
7.
Prices in stores
7.1. Ukraine
7.2. Russia
Video review Corsair h215i Platinum
Don’t want to read? Watch the video:
How NOT to do it
If you want all the details, Gamers Nexus has a video, come check it out. Now — why I started with this. The fact is that I now use the Vinga Ark case (which was reviewed by a certain Denis Zaichenko, who then gave it to me). Which spoiled my nerves as much as saved them. But last time I ruined it due to the impossibility of installing a 280 mm dropsy on the front panel as it should be, with a radiator ABOVE the pump …
Well, in general, I once again crawled home tired to zero, tried to screw the radiator into the front of the case, it didn’t work for me with the Xiaomi electronic screwdriver, I uncovered the screwdriver and on the second screw … the nozzle flew off a little.
And can you remember, they say, is Corsair’s dropsy related to the injury of a 6-terabyte player with footage of ASUS RTX 2070 tests? Yes, you remember correctly. Then I too was tired as a dog. Because, guys, fatigue is not a one-time event in life. Unfortunately. When you’re tired, you don’t think. And I didn’t have a cooler, in addition to dropsy.
And these are two lessons for you. First — if you are tired, try to rest at least a little, then do business. And secondly, when assembling a PC, a screwdriver is a danger. A screwdriver, even an electric one, is normal, it will not work to pierce the radiator with it. But a screwdriver is a last resort.
h215i Platinum vs h215i Pro XT
But now about the LSS itself. And I’ll start with what I had on the Corsair iCUE h215i RGB PRO XT review. Also a fat thing, also 280 mm, but without RGB on the turntables. Its cost was, if anything, about 5,000 hryvnia. Platinum will cost 6,000+, as I wrote earlier.
Platinum corrects this omission. Turntables are luxurious. And by the way, the pump has more options for RGB patterns. BUT! Here is the question. And then 280 mm, and then 280 mm. Are any of them more productive? Thanks to the Corsair forum and user c-attack, this issue has been completely resolved.
The price plus or minus is the same, if anything, Platinum is a little more expensive. BUT! The h215i Pro is a model created in partnership with Asetek, one of the top water bottle OEMs worldwide.
See also: Corsair 4000D Airflow body review: Mid-tower with excellent mesh
The h215i Pro has three fixed pump speeds, 1100, 2160 and 2850 rpm, ML140 spinners with a maximum speed of 1100 RPM. h215i Platinum is made in partnership with CoolIT, it has much faster turntables — speeds up to 2000 rpm, but there are only two pump speeds. 2400 and 2900.
Plus — a much more abundant RGB backlight and the ability to control it WITHOUT synchronization with the motherboard via the RGB connector. And now — the main news. I didn’t just talk about h215i Pro, not h215i Pro XT. Because XT IS ALSO MADE by CoolIT, at least the pump.
Information from the same forum. And it turns out that h215i Pro XT is the essence of h215i Platinum, but without RGB. The pump modes are the same, everything else is the same. At the same time, both Asetek and CoolIT have their own advantages and disadvantages. For example, thermal paste applied to the heel, wow, a good phrase, in the case of CoolIT, it allows you to completely cover the processor on the X99 platform, unlike a competitor.
But Asetek has a lower pump speed — and if maximum silence is important, then this is your choice. But it will be problematic to find an old woman, the model has been replaced by Pro XT.
Testing
The performance of dropsies, however, is similar. I mean, Pro XT and Platinum. Or rather, the level of the best turrets like the Noctua NH-D15, and, funny, 360 mm dropsy. That is, for example, the Core i9-9900K at 5.2 GHz for all cores will work in all tests, including Prime95, and not overheat.
Click to enlarge
However, let’s get to the details.
Test bench
Tests were carried out in my home, freshly upgraded PC:
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- ASRock X570 Extreme4 Motherboard
- RAM HyperX Fury DDR4 2×32 GB 3600 MHz
- SSD Goodram CX400 1 TB
- SSD Western Digital Black SN750 250 GB
- HDD Western Digital Blue 2×1 TB 7200RPM
- HDD Western Digital Purple 6TB 5400RPM
- HDD Seagate IronWolf ST6000VN001 6TB 5400RPM
- PSU be quiet! Power Zone 1000W
- Manli GTX 1080 Ti
- Casing Vinga Ark
Actually, one of the best modern processors, the heir to the throne of R5 1600 — AMD Ryzen 5 3600X . Slightly better than the best-selling AMD Ryzen 5 3600, a little more powerful, a little more expensive. Not an overkill, but just right. Well, the rest is in the list above.
In the role of half of the RAM is the HyperX Fury DDR4 kit 2 × 32 GB 3600 MHz. No more Ryzen is needed, and for such a volume, any video editor will drool on lonely evenings. I speak from experience.
My finally overclocked to 4.2 GHz at a voltage of 1.35 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X for the cooler, of course, did not become a problem, and I rested solely on the possibilities of silicon. Peak 77 degrees Celsius at room temperature 26 — generally with a margin.
Click to enlarge
And this is at a fixed turntable speed of 1000 rpm, which was produced through the iCUE Software application that dropsy supports.
However, all the problems of the h215 Pro XT also apply to Platinum. Namely, backlight synchronization only works within the Corsair ecosystem and with ASUS AuraSync. All the rest are in flight. BUT! And the fastenings for different sockets on the pump are very tight, the grooves are too narrow.
And that’s it. So the cooling system is a topchik.
Results for Corsair h215i Platinum RGB
Do you want results? There are results for you. Corsair h215i Platinum RGB is like h215i Pro XT, only more beautiful. In fact, even more beautiful. If you are investing in a case with a transparent sidewall and generally an aesthete, then invest in Platinum and you will be in chocolate, whichever processor you choose for yourself.
Well, except that HEDT like Threadripper or Epyc got it from somewhere. There are coolers for this. And for everything else — there is h215i Platinum. Recommended!
Russia
- All stores
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs. Intel Core i9-9900K in games
In this article, we will compare AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs. Intel Core i9-9900K in 36 games. For more information on the capabilities of the new Ryzen series, check out the Ryzen 5 3600, Ryzen 7 3700X, and Ryzen 9 reviews.3900X.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X tested using a Gigabyte X570 Aorus Xtreme motherboard and two configurations. The first is the R9 3900X with a Wraith Spire RGB cooler and DDR4-3200 CL14 memory. The second configuration with PBO + AutoOC overclocking, DDR4-3600 CL16 memory and Corsair Hydro h215i water cooling system.
To test the Intel Core i9-9900K, we used the Gigabyte Z390 Ultra motherboard and also two configurations. The first with DDR4-3200 CL14 memory and Corsair h215i cooling. The second configuration with DDR4-3600 CL16 memory and processor overclocking to 5 GHz. 9The 3900X falls 4% behind in stock performance comparison. This difference is halved when both processors are overclocked, and we can say that the i9-9900K pulls the performance of the RTX 2080 Ti to the maximum.
StarCraft II
StarCraft II performed the worst in this comparison. The Intel Core i9 is 19% faster than the Ryzen 9 3900X without overclocking at medium frame rates. Overclocked, the 9900K was 12% faster, which is also a strong performance advantage. The gap in the minimum was smaller, but it was.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Another game where AMD’s new processor falls behind is Shadow of the Tomb Raider. The Intel Core i9-9900K is 17% faster here, which is a big difference.
Monster Hunter: World
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X performed well in Monster Hunter: World. Both processors produced the same average FPS, but at the minimum, Ryzen 9 had a 13% better result. Once overclocked, the 3900X was the clear winner, showing not only a great minimum FPS, but also a slight improvement in average frame rates.
Apex Legends
The Core i9-9900K returned to its Apex Legends winning position, although here the R9 3900X was only ~7% slower, losing 10 fps on average FPS. In overclocking, the processor from AMD lagged behind more — by 10%.
Fortnite
In another battle royale we tested, Fortnite, the Ryzen 9 3900X was fast enough, it still fell behind. On average, FPS is a difference of 5%, and at a minimum, 13%.
Resident Evil 2
The results in Resident Evil 2 are interesting: the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X was 6% slower on average FPS but delivered a stronger minimum FPS, beating the i9-9900K by 4%. When overclocked, the average frame rate was almost the same, while the Ryzen still delivered better minimum FPS. In general, the gameplay was the same. Assassin’s Creed Odyssey3900X. The processor from Ryzen performs better in the minimum FPS for a few frames.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
In Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the Ryzen 9 3900X was faster than the Core i9-9900K, although the gameplay at such FPS is no different.
Battlefield V
In Battlefield V, the Ryzen 9 3900X underperformed the i9-9900K, lagging 8% on average FPS and 11% behind on minimum FPS. Similar difference in acceleration.
F1 2019
In F1 2019, the Ryzen 9 3900X was 7% slower, but after overclocking, this difference decreased to 3%, since both processors provided a similar level of performance.
Far Cry New Dawn
Far Cry New Dawn is not optimized for AMD processors and here the Ryzen 9 3900X was 9% slower and 10% slower in overclocking.
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
The third and final battle royale we tested is PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds. Intel Core i9-9900K was faster overall, but the Ryzen 9 3900X was only 4% slower in average FPS.
World of Tanks
In World of Tanks we see the Ryzen 9 3900X running 8% slower on average FPS. However, both processors delivered over 200 frames per second.
Results
Overall, the Intel Core i9-9900K is a faster gaming processor. Ryzen offers other benefits, but before we get to that, let’s take a look at the performance graph across all 36 games we tested.
On average, the Ryzen 9 3900X was 6% slower than the i9-9900K in games. There were a few games where the Ryzen 9 3900X came out ahead, but there were many more games where it fell behind by a small margin. Then there were games where the R9 3900X was 10% or more slower, and 7 games where the Ryzen was up to 16% slower.
When both processors are overclocked, the result is the same. Here the R9 3900X was only 5% slower on average, so overclocking the i9-9900K to 5GHz doesn’t give it an advantage.
Conclusions
The previous review found the Ryzen 9 3900X to be 8% slower on average in 9 games. After adding 27 more games, the situation has not changed much.
As for the cost of processors, the new results also do not change much. If you don’t use the cooler that comes with the Ryzen 9 3900X, then this processor ends up being a little more expensive per frame compared to the Core i9-9900K. However, if you plan to use the Wraith Spire RGB then 3900X turns out to be a little cheaper than the processor from Intel. After all, they both cost about $500 and depending on what you use your computer for, one might be better than the other.
If you plan to use your PC for a variety of tasks, not only playing games, but also creating videos, 3D models, or performing tasks that require a twelve-core processor, then the Ryzen 9 3900X will be the best buy. For performance tasks in general Ryzen 99 mm w.c. pillar
We found this ad 3 years ago
Click Follow and the system will automatically notify you of new offers from all bulletin boards
Go to announcement
Complaint type
OtherCopyright infringementProhibited informationAd out of datePornographySpam
Comment
Show original
Address (Click on the address to view the map)
MoscowMore ads
Sell liquid cooling system for PC processor. Selling due to uselessness.
Computer accessories and components
21 days ago
Source
More efficient Corsair ML 140 Pro Led fans are installed on the LSS. Also, unfortunately, one of the mother’s fasteners is missing (which is behind the motherboard) and there are traces of curling liquid metal, but the surface is perfectly smooth, I think this will not affect the cooling efficiency. The rest of the szho is fully working and complete.
Computer accessories and components
a month ago
Source
Excellent working condition Fitted with i7 8700k 320mm processor 140mm cooler Fits all Intel Am3
Computer accessories and parts
a month ago
Source
Water cooling system from a reliable manufacturer. It was installed for only a month, after which I changed the computer. Big guarantee from DNS. Very productive for its form factor. The level of two-section similar systems and expensive supercoolers. Compact and aesthetically different look. Dropsy of the latest revision. I sell only in Sevastopol, or your arrival in the city. corsair corsair h75 h60 h210i h210 phanteks asus razer alphacool cooler master gamer storm noctua thermaltake ekwb cougar deepcool enermax evga gigabyte lian li msi nzxt kraken xpg water cooling
Computer accessories and components
a month ago
Source
Selling Corsair iCUE h215i ELITE CAPELLIX water cooling system. Specifications in the last photo. Dropsy was bought on June 12 this year in Online Trade. Reason for sale: I miscalculated and it did not fit into the case 😀 It is brand new. Full set + receipt. The only thing was that the fans were screwed and twisted. I did not touch the pump, the factory thermal paste is in place. On the 5th photo, how it looks in the case (I had to buy the same one, but 240mm)
Computer accessories and components
a month ago
Source
I will sell a good dropsy, in excellent condition. It is paired with i5 10400, the temperature is not higher than 50 degrees. Complete set, all questions in pm or call
2 months ago
Source
Worked a month after it was replaced by dropsy with backlight.
Computer accessories and components
2 months ago
Source
Selling smart processor Intel Core i5-6600 4 cores/4 threads at 3. 3 GHz, turbo boost up to 3.9 GHz, 6 MB cache. In combination with a GIGABYTE GTX 1060 6 GB graphics card, G1 Gaming runs many voracious (including «processor») games at high / maximum settings (we checked RDR 2, The Witcher 3, Elden Ring, Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, Fallout 4/76, Skyrim and etc.). Old man, but smart. All the time I was only in the socket and under the water cooling of the Corsair h210i PRO XT, the temperature did not rise above 55 degrees at 100% load. Bargaining when buying a set: * Motherboard ASUS PRIME B250M-PLUS * RAM Kingston HyperX FURY Black Series [HX424C15FB2/8] 2400 MHz — 2 pcs. 8 GB each * Power Supply Zalman GVM 700W [ZM700-GVM] 700W, 80+ Bronze, EPS12V, APFC, 20+4 pin, 1x 4+4 pin CPU, 6 SATA, 2x 6+2 pin PCI-E
Computer accessories and components
3 month ago
Source
Corsair h215i RGB Platinum water cooling system. In perfect condition. Still under warranty (3 more years).
Computer accessories and components
3 month ago
Source
General specifications Processor socket AM2, AM4, AM3, AM3+, LGA 1151, LGA 1150, FM1, LGA 1155, LGA 1156, LGA 1151-v2, LGA 2011-3 (Narrow ILM), LGA 2011 (Narrow ILM), sTR4 , SP3, LGA 2011-3 (Square ILM), LGA 2011 (Square ILM), LGA 1200 Heatsink material aluminum Cooler dimensions (WxHxD) 137x27x322 mm Number of fans 2 Fan diameter 140 mm Fan thickness 25mm Speed 2200 rpm Airflow 63 CFM Noise level 36 dB Magnetic centered bearing type Optional Connector type 4-pin PWM Illumination color RGB
Computer accessories and components
3 month ago
Source
Reliable liquid cooling for the computer from corsair h75 with two fans for compact systems or can be installed on the back for blowing. The section is one and at the same time it is quite powerful in terms of performance than most of even two sections. Beautiful white lighting on the pump looks more impressive than standard coolers, while dissipating heat at the level of expensive super coolers. The pump is quiet and has a 5-year guarantee for dropsy from the CSN. In excellent condition, you can say «store» as when buying, while cheaper. In the store, the price is about 10 tr. Mounts for Intel and AMD. sale in sevastopol in person corsair corsair h75 h60 h210i h210 phanteks asus razer alphacool cooler master gamer storm noctua thermaltake ekwb cougar deepcool enermax evga gigabyte lian li msi nzxt kraken xpg svo sho water cooling
Computer accessories and components
3 month ago
Source
Bought 3 years ago to cool under a very hot processor. Since I’m not overclocking anything more, the meaning in it is gone. I can sell it together with the corsair x460 case, since it won’t suit everyone. Very powerful cooling screws 140mm have a rotation speed of 2400 rpm at maximum roar such that the neighbors hear. From the fans alone, the temperature in the case drops to room temperature. In a minute .
Computer accessories and components
4 months ago
Source
I will sell excellent water, the temperature of the proca is not higher than 50 degrees. The previous owner changed the antifreeze in dropsy, because of this, the bolts on the pump are a little licked, which does not affect the operation in any way and you will not see this until you remove the system. Also, the straps were tightened , covered with threads. Any checks in my or your PC.
Computer accessories and components
6 months ago
Source
Water cooling for the processor Famous Corsair Model with an enlarged radiator and 140×140 turntables! ! ! Keep this in mind. Not every case has the ability to install a 280mm Corsair h210i radiator. Ideal condition. Bodyanka was used for 3 weeks! So you can say that it’s new! Cooler native Corsair Quiet pump with backlight Works perfectly. No box or receipt! Fastening only under intel! Avito delivery only through boxbury If you get too confused, you can check on the spot. But this is to sort out the whole computer new! The price before the rise of the dollar was for 12+ tr Now I can’t even imagine. Probably more than 20 for sure
Computer accessories and components
6 months ago
Source
The h215i corsair cooling system was with the 7700k processor for about a year. After the upgrade, the case has decreased and the radiator does not fit) This kit contains 3 mounts — for lga (intel) am and fm and the most important am4 original adapter (original was bought separately)
Computer accessories and components
6 months ago
Source
CSN warranty balance 26 months. The condition is completely correct. Cooling was not opened, not repaired. Magnetic levitation fans. The tightness is not broken, the tubes and braid are intact. Radiator 280mm. Fan size 140mm. Backlight only on the pump, fans without backlight. Bargaining minimum
Computer accessories and components
6 months ago
Source
I sell the cooling system. Used in good condition. Complete set in the photo, nothing else. There is a check. Bought on 10/26/2019. Warranty 5 years.
Computer accessories and components
6 months ago
Source
Corsair iCUE h215i Elite Capellix
Computer accessories and parts
7 months ago
Source
New. Delivery to other regions is possible.
Computer accessories and components
9 months ago
Source
Sell CBO Corsair h210i GTX. Excellent condition, complete with box. Type: water cooling Purpose: processor Socket Intel: 1150, 1155/1156, 2011/2011 v3, 2066, 1151/1151 v2, 1200 Socket AMD: AM2/AM3/FM1/FM2, AM4 Fan diameter: 2×120 mm RPM: up to 2400 rpm
Computer accessories and components
9 months ago
Source
Attention! Festima. Ru is a search engine for ads from popular sites.
We do not sell goods, do not store images and personal data.
All images belong to their respective authors
Denial of responsibility
Login
All services become available without restrictions
You will be able to use the Festima.Ru service on different devices.
It’s convenient and free
RTX 4060 and 4060 Ti Performance Leaked News — NVIDIA WORLD
Insider @QbitLeaks reveals the performance of upcoming NVIDIA RTX 4060 Ti and RTX 4060 graphics cards.
FinalWire Ltd has released an update to its incredibly powerful and popular information and test utility AIDA64, which has received the number 6.75.
Also, the company began to release two new products under the similar AIDA64 Network Audit 6. 75 brand. This utility consists of special tools for network auditing, collection and management of tools for corporate networks.
The new version of the utility received, basically, replenishment of its own database. Hardware support has also been improved and bugs fixed.
The full list of changes in AIDA64 6.75 is below:
- Improved support for AMD Zen 4 processors and AM5 motherboards.
- Added GPU details for AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, 6750 XT, 6950 XT.
- Added GPU details to Glenfly Arise.
- Added GPU details for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and GeForce GTX 1630.
- Fixed SMTP TLS 1.2 support.
The utility, as usual, is offered in four editions, which can be purchased on the developers’ website.
Download AIDA64 6.75 utility.
testing APU graphics cardsAMDNVIDIARadeonAIDA64benchmarksutilities
comment on related news
TechPowerUp
NVIDIA GeForce MX550 graphics card based on Turing architecture is designed for thin multimedia notebooks. This is a very interesting segment as it delivers comparable performance to CPU-integrated solutions, raising the question of the need for a discrete graphics card at all.
The first test of the MX550 has appeared on the PassMark website. This card scored 5014 in the G3D Mark test, which is almost identical to the Vega 8 GPU built into AMD Ryzen 95900HS.
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS graphics in the same benchmark show 4968 points, which is only 0.9% less, and more than fits into the statistical error. Of course, PassMark is not the most popular graphic benchmark, and the number of results in it is very limited. Only 9 iGPU 5900HS results are offered for comparison.
NVIDIA MX550 Test Results in PassMark MX550 vs. Ryzen 9 5900HS in PassMark
The MX550 graphics card is based on the TU117 GPU, the slowest variant of the Turing processor. It doesn’t have ray tracing or DLSS, but it’s unlikely anyone would want to use them given its baseline performance. So far, NVIDIA hasn’t confirmed the heat dissipation of the MX550. Most likely, we will receive more information by the time of its release, which is scheduled for «this spring».
testingrumorsVega 8Ryzen 9GPUMX550PassMarkvideocardslaptopsTuringNVIDIAbenchmarks
comment related news And now, after more than one year, we still have not seen its specifications.
Despite the obvious presence of the GT 1030 on the driver download page, this graphics card is nowhere to be found, either in retail sales or even in pre-built computers. Even a year later, the company has not presented its technical characteristics.
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
The company’s website states that the card is based on the Pascal GP108 GPU, but everything else remained a mystery. However, an unknown user ran tests on the GT 1010 graphics card in the Geekbench benchmark, finally confirming its specifications.
GeForce GT 1010 driver selection
As expected, the GT 1010 model has 256 CUDA cores (two of the three TPCs are active). The board has 2 GB of video memory at a speed of 1468 MHz. It appears to be using GDDR6 memory with a bandwidth of 6 Gb/s, just like the GT 1030.
Testing GT 1010
As for performance, it is extremely low. The graphics test scored 35% less than the GT 1030, which is to be expected with a third of the CPU disabled.
testGeForce GT 1010video cardsNVIDIAbenchmarks
comment on related news
Videocardz
FinalWire has published a new version of their wonderful test program AIDA63, number 63.
The main innovations of the novelty include:
- Extended support for AMD Epyc 7003 Milan.
- Supports SteelSeries Apex 5 OLED display.
- Supports Aqua Computer High Flow Next sensor.
- Monitor Corsair H60i, h200i, h215i, h250i RGB Pro XT liquid coolers.
- Improvements for motherboards based on Intel B560 and Z590 chipsets.
- NZXT smart device sensors support.
- Show GPU information for AMD Radeon RX 6600 and 6700 series.
- Displaying information about the graphics processor for nVIDIA CMP 30HX, CMP 40HX, GeForce GT 1010.
The utility, as usual, is offered in four editions, which can be purchased on the developer’s website.
Download AIDA64 utility 6.33.
testingNZXTZen 3GeForce GT 1010CPUvideo cardsprocessorsAMDCorsairNVIDIARadeon RX 67006600AIDA64benchmarksutilities
0002 FinalWire Ltd. Published the final version of its popular information and test utility AIDA64. The new version of the application received the number 6.32. It is noteworthy that the beta version of AIDA64 6.30.5523 with big changes in the video card database was released just a couple of days ago.
The final version 6.32 received improved support for the Zen 3 processor architecture, as well as an expanded graphics card database, which was changed in the previous beta version.
Full list of AIDA64 6.30.5523 beta changes includes:
- Added AVX2 and FMA 64-bit acceleration benchmarks for Ryzen 5000 series processors based on AMD Zen 3 architecture.
- Added support for EVGA iCX3 sensors.
- Added details for the AMD Radeon RX 6000 series graphics cards.
- Added details for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050, GeForce RTX 3060, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti graphics cards.
The utility, as usual, is offered in four editions, which can be purchased on the developers’ website.
Download AIDA64 utility 6.32.
testingZen 3Ryzen 5000CPUvideo cardsprocessorsAMDNVIDIAGeForce RTX 30xxAIDA64benchmarksutilities
published a beta version of its incredibly powerful information and test utility AIDA64, which received the number 6.30.5523, the main feature of the release was a significant expansion of the base of video cards.
As you know, NVIDIA has already released part of the GeForce 3000 video cards, and there is no doubt that next year we will see both new, more affordable models of desktop video cards and mobile versions of accelerators. Information about these video cards has appeared in the AIDA64 6. 30.5523 beta utility. Information about them is partially obtained from the PCI ID repository, which means it can be based on rumors. Nevertheless, the replenishment came out impressive.
AIDA 64
Full changelog of AIDA64 6.30.5523 beta includes:
- Improved dynamic update when number of rows changes.
- Improved detection of XMP profiles with the highest frequencies.
- Added information for AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (Navi 21).
- Added information for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 (GA107).
- Added information for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (GA106).
- Added information for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile / Max-Q (GA106M).
- Added information for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (GA104M).
- Added information for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile 16GB (GA104M).
- Added information for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile / Max-Q (GA104M).
- Added information for NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti (GA102).
- Added information for NVIDIA Quadro T500 (TU117GL).
- Added information for NVIDIA RTX A40 (GA102GL).
- Added support for ITE IT8638 sensors.
- Added support for Dell SMI on Vostro 3501, Vostro 3671, Vostro 3888.
- Added support for certain sensor information from Asus Prime X299 Edition 30, Vanguard B85 motherboards.
- Added support for certain information from MSI MS-7C67 sensors.
The utility, as usual, is offered in four editions, which can be purchased on the developers’ website.
Download AIDA64 utility 6.30.5523 beta.
testing video cardAMDNVIDIAGeForce RTX 30xxAIDA64benchmarksutilities
comment on related news
KitGuru
Benchmarks of the upcoming NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti graphics card have been leaked online, showing that the card has amazing performance.
Published screenshots of map testing in 3DMARK Fire Strike and 3DMARK Time Spy. The NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti card is rumored to launch on December 2nd for a suggested price of under $400, making it the most affordable Ampere-based card to date. At the same time, the accelerator has remarkable performance. If the pictures are correct, then the RTX 3060 Ti even beats the RTX 2080 Super, which had a starting price of $700.
NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti
Based on the above images, Videocardz concluded that the RTX 3070 is only 11-13% faster than the RTX 3060 Ti. And with factory overclocking, that gap can close even further, making the RTX 3060 Ti almost perfect for gamers.
NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti Test in 3DMark Fire StrikeNVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti Test in 3DMark Time Spy
Videocardz also notes that some retailers are already receiving the RTX 3060 Ti within a month, which should allow these cards to be on sale for at least some time rather than being sold out in minutes, as is the case with most gaming systems these days.
testingrumors3DMarkvideo cardsNVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Tibenchmarks
comment on similar news
Most likely, we are talking about the new top-end video card of the Ampere family, because it demonstrates a 30% performance increase in DirectX 12 compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition.
3D Mark Time Spy
As usual for cards that haven’t been announced yet, the specifications given in the test are a little strange. So, the GPU frequency is 1935 MHz, and memory — 6 GHz. Of course, this is a strange frequency. Reviewers note that it is caused by the lack of «calibration» of the driver, and in the final version everything should be correct.
Testing an unknown Ampere video card in Time Spy
The specifications of three video cards based on the GA102 processor were also published. These models are:
- 2nd Gen TITAN RTX: GA102-400-A1, 5376 CUDA, 24GB GDDR6X, 17Gbps, 384bit, 816GB/s.
- RTX 3090: GA102-300-A1, 5248 CUDA, 12GB GDDR6X, 21Gbps, 384bit, 1008GB/s.
- RTX 3080: GA102-200-Kx-A1, 4352 CUDA, 10GB GDDR6X, 19Gbps, 320bit, 760GB/s.
testing 3DMarkAmpere video cardsNVIDIAbenchmarks
comment on similar news
In the Fire Strike test, when working with an Intel Core i9-9900K processor, the new video card scored only 5538 points. Purely graphical score was 5960 points.
And that’s not very impressive. The old GeForce GTX 750 Ti scores 5402 in the same test. As for the GTX 1050, this accelerator is 500-800 points ahead of Intel, which makes the DG1 results even more meager.
Intel Xe DG1 graphics card
Also, past Geekbench results showed that the DG1 is not much faster than the NVIDIA MX250, which means that AMD and NVIDIA do not need to worry about their market.
But not everything is so bad. For example, the Intel solution turned out to be a third faster in terms of graphics than the MX350. In general, Xe graphics will not be a breakthrough. Now its goal is to assess the market and its own capabilities. Perhaps promotion as part of laptops. Well, competitors have absolutely nothing to worry about.
testing video cardXeAMDIntelNVIDIAbenchmarks
comment on related news However, he still had to release another beta version, which was numbered 12.
The MSI Afterburner 4. 6.0 beta 12 utility contains a number of fixes that make it easier to work with the utility’s interface. Their list is given below:
MSI Afterburner
- Fixed issues with incorrect display of the voltage / frequency curve on some AMD GPUs with unusual voltage tables.
- The visible voltage/frequency range in the curve editor on AMD GPUs has now been extended to accommodate the maximum and minimum voltages and frequencies in P-State.
- Added support for some future NVIDIA Turing processors.
- Now the «Mark maximum» and «Mark minimum» commands are available in the context menu of the monitoring window, even if no history fragment is selected.
- Now, while monitoring, you can press the button to capture a screenshot of the graphs, which is easy to print. The screenshot contains the MSI Afterburner watermark, which can be changed by editing the overlay.png file in the .\Graphics folder.
- Now you can hold down the Del key in the monitoring history and, by clicking with the mouse, remove unwanted graphs.
You can download the MSI Afterburner utility from our website.
testingmonitoringvideo cardsTuringAMDNVIDIAGPUsMSI Afterburnerbenchmarksutilities
comment on related news
Unlike the RTX 2060, NVIDIA introduced the Titan RTX graphics card on the official website. So far, it is not possible to get it due to problems with suppliers, but some enthusiasts still got it, despite the price of $ 2,500.
Naturally, after the appearance of the video card, the first benchmarks appeared. Of course, enthusiasts immediately overclocked their boards, so we have not pure performance.
NVIDIA Titan RTX
graphics card However, the graphics card has a standard hardware configuration that includes a TU102 GPU consisting of 4608 CUDA cores, 288 texture units, 96 ROPs, 576 tensor cores, 72 RT cores. The board also houses 24GB of GDDR6 memory at 672GB/s.
Overclocked to 2070 MHz GPU and 2025 MHz memory, the card scored 41,109 in 3DMark.
Titan RTX test results in 3DMark Fire Strike
Amazing result. It is worth the fate that this is one of the first tests of a video card, which means that in the future professional overclockers will be able to achieve much better performance.
3DMark video cardsNVIDIAGeForce TITAN RTXbenchmarks
comment on similar news
Eteknix
The new generation of GPU codenamed Turing from NVIDIA was no exception.
All of the information below should be taken with good skepticism, however, we report that the results of testing the performance of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1170 graphics card have been leaked to the Web.
GeForce GTX 1170 3DMark test
The 3DMark test was run on a machine with an Intel Core i5-8600K processor, and the result is amazing — the new accelerator outperformed the fastest consumer graphics card GTX 1080 Ti. The GTX 1170 itself received a 256-bit wide memory bus and 16 GB GDDR6, and the GPU clock speed was an incredible 2. 5 GHz.
3DMark FireStrike
Video Card Test Summary In our test, the GeForce GTX 1170 outperformed not only the GTX 1080 Ti, but every other graphics card on the market. Even with the year-old Radeon RX Vega 64, AMD didn’t stand a chance.
testingrumorsvideo cardsNVIDIAbenchmarks
1 comment
Alexey commented on the new version of the program, briefly reporting the changes literally as follows: create your own tools based on RTSS, a little bit of joy for miners (so that they, freeloaders, fall right into hell :)) and minor interface changes” .
Changelog for MSI Afterburner 4.4.1 is below:
- Fixed application crash when running with 8 NVIDIA GPUs on the latest NVIDIA driver.
- Fixed GPU sorting in the General tab with more than 10 GPUs installed.
- Added voltage control for NVIDIA P104-100 and P106-100 mining cards.
- MSI Afterburner now displays a notification in the NVIDIA Control Panel Dashboard when attempting to overclock an NVIDIA 10×0 series GPU with debug mode enabled.
- Added Frame Rate Min, Frame Rate Average, Frame Rate Max, 1% Frame Rate Drop, 0.1% Frame Rate Drop graphs. Graphs repeat the benchmark statistics displayed in the OSD, but give more freedom when customizing the OSD.
- Improved OSD layout editor. Now it is possible to customize the style of OSD charts independently for each chart.
- Updated RivaTuner Statistics Server to version 7.0.1.
As far as RivaTuner Statistics Server 7.0.1 is concerned, it has received some fairly large changes that we wrote about earlier.
The list of RTSS changes includes:
- Improved the built-in benchmark engine: added 1/0.1% frame rate drop statistics calculation. This result is now stored in the benchmark results file.
- Updated SDK: Added an open source RTSSFrametimePipeSample example that demonstrates the implementation of RTSS in third-party benchmarking software. Now it is possible to create your own benchmarking software and get real-time frame rate data for it from RivaTuner Statistics Server.
Also improved are text placement tags that can take negative values.
The card was run on a system with a Core i9-7900X processor, where the video card scored 6200 points in the test with the Extreme preset at 1440p.
Overall, performance was as expected. In comparison, the regular GTX 1070 scores 5500 points, while the GTX 1080 traditionally scores 7000.
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is expected to be unveiled next week and will go on sale seven days later, in early November.
As expected, the new card actually destroyed the GTX 980Ti and outperformed even the Titan X. In the Firestrike Extreme test, the card scored 10367 points, while in the Firestrike Ultra it scored 4998 «parrots». This is 20% faster than the Titan X and even faster than the 980Ti and Fury X. In the good old 3DMark 11, the new card also performs well. So, GP104 showed 27683 and 9338 points in the Performance and Extreme tests, respectively.
Of course, 3DMark is a synthetic test that is only close to real gaming loads, but even dry performance data in teraflops shows a 33% increase in the new video accelerator.
Well, the GTX 1080 is only two days away from its official release, so we’re sure to see a lot more tests of specific consumer solutions in the coming days.
testing3DMark video cardsNVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080benchmarks
comment on similar news
Eteknix
Performance results of the new NVIDIA graphics card, known as Titan, have appeared on the web.
NVIDIA’s new flagship accelerator is rumored to have an amazing X7107 score in 3DMark 11, so if this number is real, then the future green accelerator is just a real beast!
Now the fastest single-processor video accelerator, the GeForce GTX 680, in 3DMark 11 shows about 3250-3300 «parrots», and the dual-processor version, the GTX 690, can produce up to 6000 points.
The long-awaited GK110 GPU, which will be used in consumer systems in GeForce Titan 780 video cards, is equipped with 2880 shaders. It is also rumored to have 14 SMX clusters (there will be 15 in total, but one will be disabled), so only 2688 shaders will be in operation.
The GeForce Titan 780, or whatever it will be called, is also rumored to be released by the end of February.
And of course, don’t forget that the presented screenshot could simply be someone’s joke. Also, even if this is a true benchmark, the graphics card can be overclocked, probably using liquid nitrogen.
testingrumors3DMarkvideo cardsNVIDIAGeForce Titanbenchmarks
6 comments related news
Guru of 3D
A few days ago, Intel released a new A7 ARC Alchemist graphics card benchmark in Control. In that YouTube video, the Intel accelerator worked on the same level with the RTX 3060. However, then the video was replaced with another one, with the game Cyberpunk 2077, and then completely restricted from viewing.
Now the company has released new test charts showing the advantage of Intel. Intel offers more performance per dollar than the competition, according to new benchmarks. Despite the impressive range of games to compare, Intel’s Ryan Shrout notes that this result is not typical for all games.
ARC A750 versus NVIDIA RTX 3060 benchmark in games like Cyberpunk 2077, Control, F1 2021, Borderlands 3 and Fortnite. These are all DirectX 12 games, and it has been previously reported that Intel A-series accelerators with older APIs do not perform well.
Benchmark A750 vs. RTX 3060
Earlier it was reported that Intel will release its cards to the global market already «this summer». Since summer is already ending, we will probably learn a lot more information about these accelerators in the near future.
testingIntel Arc graphics cardsGeForce RTX 3060benchmarks
comment related news
Overclock 3D
0175
This graphics card is based on the Zhaoxin KX-6000 GPU which offers 8 cores up to 3GHz. The card supports x86 systems and has 4K output, but that’s where the benefits end.
The GPU debuted back in 2019, so it’s not the newest model, but due to the limited release, it was only able to be tested now.
Zhaoxin KX-6000 graphics card
The card has a nominal performance of 1.5 teraflops, which is 318% faster than the previous generation, but in 3DMark 11 the results are not so encouraging.
The performance of the Glenfly Arise-GT-10C0 is identical to the Kepler-based NVIDIA GT 630 from 2012, according to the benchmark.
Testing Zhaoxin KX-6000
Thus, Chinese manufacturers have a very long way to bring their products to a competitive state.
testingZhaoxinGPUbenchmark video cards
1 Comment related news
Videocardz
The Arc A380 belongs to the entry-mid range, and for $160 it is positioned as an alternative to the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT and RX 6400, which it confidently outperformed in the 3DMark Port Royal and Time Spy tests. However, the reality turned out to be much sadder, and in games the card does not even reach the RX 6400.
Game benchmarks of the Inte Arc A380 card
Game testing was carried out in League of Legends, PUBG, GTA V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 5 and Red Dead Redemption 2.
The first three tests were run in DirectX 11, and the A380 was 22% to 26% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 6400. The gap narrowed with DirectX 12 in SoTR and Forza 5, where the gap was 10%. The best result was in RDR2, which uses the Vilkan API. Here, the GTX 1650 is 7% behind, and 9% behind the RX 6400.%. As for the RX 6500 XT, it’s in a league of its own.
It is worth noting that now the availability of video cards on the market is stabilizing, prices are dropping to those recommended by manufacturers, and therefore it will be very difficult for Intel to sell a solution of this level for $160.
testingIntel ArcA380video cardsIntelbenchmarks
comment on related news This utility was used to test a video accelerator from Shanghai Zhaoxin Semiconductor Company.
The test used Zhaoxin KaiXian processor, Zhaoxin motherboard and Zhaoxin Glenfly video card. The test results are for OpenCL, and they provide some insight into performance. The test result is very sad, Geekbench OpenCL shows 579 points.
In comparison, the GTX 1650 scores 38,000 points and the RTX 3070 scores 135,000.
Zhaoxin
Video Card As for the test machine, it looks quite modern. An 8-core, 8-thread, 2.7GHz processor with 8GB of DDR4 RAM, a Glenfly Arise 1020 discrete graphics card with 24 compute units and 2GB of RAM, and this configuration does not align well with the disastrous OpenCL results in Geekbench 5.
Benchmarking Zhaoxin GPU in Geekbench
Scroll to the bottom of the list of results to understand how weak the OpenCL score of 579 is in Geekbench 5. This is where you can find vintage AMD iGPUs from 2011, such as the Radeon HD 6480G and Radeon HD 6410D, or more recent mobile GPUs like the Mali-G52 from 2018 and the Mali-T860 from 2016, which turn out to be comparable to the Glenfly Arise 1020.
comment on related news
Tom’s Hardware
Intel Arc Alchemist mobile graphics cards have started to appear in laptops, but in reality they can be found in the only model — Samsung Book 2 Pro, which is sold exclusively in Korea.
In addition to Arc A350M graphics, this laptop also features a Core i7-1260P processor, 1080p AMOLED screen, 32GB DDR5 memory and a 1TB SSD. The Arc A350M GPU contains 6 Xe cores, 6 trace units, clocked at 1150 MHz. The video memory subsystem is limited to a 64-bit bus and 4 GB GDDR6.
GPU Intel Arc
But what about the performance of this graphics? It turned out that this card is in the expected range. At 30W, it was 14% slower than the NVIDIA GTX 1650 in 3DMark Time Spy and 22% slower in Fire Strike. At the same time, the Arc A350M turned out to be 17% faster than the entry-level MX450 card from NVIDIA, while the TDP is also 17% higher. In the 3DMark Port Royal test, the Intel card scored 200 points.
Arc 350M test results
Of course, for a 6 nm accelerator, the performance turned out to be quite mediocre. However, the company continues to work on driver optimization, increasing frequencies, so by June, when these accelerators become more affordable, their speed may noticeably increase.
testingGPUArcIntel Arc 350M3DMarkvideo cardsnotebooksbenchmarks
comment related news
Guru of 3D
Intel’s Arc Alchemist line of graphics cards is scheduled for release this quarter. So far, all the information about their performance has been based on rumors, guesses and leaks, according to which, the best graphics card manufactured by Intel, the DG2-512EU, will compete with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. SiSoftware, which has information about its performance. The Arc Alchemist graphics card has a GPU consisting of 4096 cores and 12.8 GB GDDR6 video memory. It is quite possible that this is a software error, because it was previously reported that the card will receive 16 GB of VRAM. The GPU clock speed during testing was 2.1 GHz, however, there is no information on whether this frequency is base or in Boost mode.
Intel Xe GPUs
In terms of scene fill rate, the DG2-512EU was able to achieve a result of 9017.
52 MP/s, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti delivers 8369.51 MPix/s in the same test group.
Benchmark DG2-512EU by SiSoftware
At the same time, the Intel card also has advantages in floating point calculations with half, double and quarter precision. NVIDIA’s solution turned out to be faster at single precision.
Benchmark RTX 3070 Ti by SiSoftware
Thus, the average advantage of the Intel solution is 7%. Of course, these are not play tests, but they clearly show the great potential of Arc Alchemist.
testing Intel ArcAlchemist video cards benchmark
comment on related news
TechPowerUp
A new graphics product from Intel, the Arc Alchemist series, is back in the benchmark. This time, his test was checked in Ashes of the Singularity.
In testing, the system was based on the flagship Core i9-12900K processor, as well as a graphics card that appears to be an engineering sample of Xe-HPG DG2, i.
e. Intel Arc Alchemist a320. Testing took place at 1080p with the Medium preset. As a result, the card scored 12500 points, reaching 126.9k / s.
Intel Arc Alchemist
It seems that Intel has turned out to be quite a powerful processor, but it still cannot outperform top-end solutions from AMD, let alone NVIDIA. This top-end GPU will receive 16 GB of GDDR6 video memory with a bandwidth of 16-18 GB / s and a bus width of 256 bits. Power consumption will be 225 W.
Testing DG2 in Ashes of the Singularity
It is worth noting that the Ashes of the Singularity test is notorious for its unreliability and unstable results. Some time ago, we were shown the speed of the new Intel GPU in Geekbench. For certain, everything will become known at the beginning of next year, when the card goes on sale.
testingAshes of the SingularityDG2Intel Arcvideo cardsbenchmarks
comment on related news
TweakTown
The next version of this powerful information and test system has received new benchmarks for Intel Alder Lake and Raptor Lake processors, as well as improved support for DDR5 memory with all its new features. In addition, support for some new video cards has been added.
AIDA64
Full list of changes in AIDA64 6.60 is below:
- Added AVX-512 and AVX2 hardware accelerated benchmarks for Alder Lake and Raptor Lake processors.
- Improved support for Intel Raptor Lake processors and DDR5 memory modules.
- Added support for DDR5 XMP 3.0 profiles.
- Added support for Windows 10 Update 21h3.
- Added support for Windows 11 and Windows Server 2022.
- Added preliminary support for Intel Meteor Lake CPU.
Test results include GPU-Z screenshots and multiple test charts for the Radeon RX 6600M accelerator. Tests were conducted on an AMD Ryzen 7 5800H processor-based laptop with 32GB DDR4-3200 RAM.
The first set of tests included a run on the 3DMark set.