A8-7200P [in 3 benchmarks]
AMD
A8-7200P
Buy
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Summary
AMD started AMD A8-7200P sales 4 June 2014. This is a Kaveri architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 28nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3300 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is FP3 processor with a TDP of 35 Watt. It supports DDR3-1866 memory.
It provides poor benchmark performance at
1.74%
of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 9654.
EPYC
9654
Compare
General info
A8-7200P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
Place in performance rating | 1928 | |
Market segment | Laptop | |
Series | AMD Kaveri | |
Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | |
Release date | 4 June 2014 (8 years old) |
Technical specs
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | |
Threads | 4 | |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | of 4.7 (FX-9590) |
Boost clock speed | 3. 3 GHz | of 7.3 (Ryzen 9 7900) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Die size | 245 mm2 | |
Maximum core temperature | 102 °C | of 110 (Atom x7-E3950) |
Number of transistors | 2410 Million | of 9900000 (Ryzen 5 7645HX) |
64 bit support | + | |
Windows 11 compatibility | — |
Compatibility
Information on A8-7200P compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | FP3 | |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 35 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A8-7200P. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 Controller | |
AES-NI | + | |
FMA | + | |
AVX | + | |
FRTC | 1 | |
PowerTune | — | |
TrueAudio | + | |
PowerNow | + | |
PowerGating | + | |
Out-of-band client management | + | |
VirusProtect | + | |
HSA | 1 |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
AMD-V | 1 | |
IOMMU 2.0 | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A8-7200P’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
Max memory channels | 2 | of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221) |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of GPU integrated into A8-7200P.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | |
iGPU core count | 4 | |
Enduro | + | |
Switchable graphics | 1 | |
UVD | + | |
VCE | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8-7200P’s integrated GPU.
DisplayPort | + | |
HDMI | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A8-7200P’s integrated GPU, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | |
Vulkan | 1 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
PCIe version | 3.0 | of 5 (Core i9-12900K) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A8-7200P. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A8-7200P
1.74
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
A8-7200P
2154
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A8-7200P
379
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
A8-7200P
1020
Relative perfomance
Overall A8-7200P performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.
Intel Core i5-4200U
101.15
AMD A10-5750M
100.57
Intel Pentium N4200
100
AMD A8-7200P
100
Intel Core m3-6Y30
99.43
Intel Core i5-2560M
98.85
AMD A10-7400P
98.28
A8-7200P Intel equivalent
We believe that the nearest equivalent to A8-7200P from Intel is Pentium N4200, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.
Pentium
N4200
Compare
Here are some closest Intel rivals to A8-7200P:
Intel Core i5-4200U
101.15
Intel Core i3-5010U
101.15
Intel Pentium N4200
100
AMD A8-7200P
100
Intel Core m3-6Y30
99.43
Intel Core i5-2560M
98.85
Intel Pentium 4405U
97.7
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Pentium
N4200
Compare
A10
5750M
Compare
Core m3
6Y30
Compare
Core i3
5010U
Compare
Core i5
4200U
Compare
Core M
5Y51
Compare
Best GPU for A8-7200P
People consider these graphics cards to be good for A8-7200P, according to our PC configuration statistics.
Radeon R5
Graphics
36.4%
Radeon R7
M260DX
9.1%
Quadro
600
4.5%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
4.5%
Radeon R5
M230
4.5%
Radeon R7
M340
4.5%
Radeon R5
M230 Rebrand
4.5%
Radeon R5
230
4. 5%
GeForce GTX
550 Ti
4.5%
Radeon HD
6670
4.5%
These are the fastest graphics cards for A8-7200P in our user configuration statistics.
There is a total of 22 configurations based on A8-7200P in our database.
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
4.5% (1/22)
GeForce GTX
550 Ti
4.5% (1/22)
GeForce
940MX
4.5% (1/22)
Radeon R7
M260DX
9. 1% (2/22)
Radeon HD
6670
4.5% (1/22)
Radeon R7
M340
4.5% (1/22)
Quadro
600
4.5% (1/22)
Radeon HD
8670M
4.5% (1/22)
Radeon R7
M260
4.5% (1/22)
Radeon R5
M230
4.5% (1/22)
User rating
Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about A8-7200P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD A8-7200P processor review: CPU specs, performance benchmarks
Buy on Amazon
A8-7200P processor released by AMD; release date: 4 June 2014. The processor is designed for laptop-computers and based on Kaveri microarchitecture.
CPU is unlocked for overclocking. Total number of cores — 4, threads — 4. Maximum CPU clock speed — 3.3 GHz. Maximum operating temperature — 102 °C. Manufacturing process technology — 28 nm. Cache size: L2 — 4 MB.
Supported memory types: DDR3.
Supported socket types: FP3. Power consumption (TDP): 100 Watt.
The processor has integrated graphics AMD Radeon R5 Graphics with the following parameters: maximum frequency — 626 MHz, cores count — 4.
Benchmarks
PassMark Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4. 0 T-Rex |
|
|
Name | Value |
---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1054 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 2154 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 1723 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 3972 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan | 1322 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan | 1322.000 Fps |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 3148 Frames |
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex | 3148.000 Fps |
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 388.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 |
Texture fill rate | 12. 13 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,410 million |
Games performance
1. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
2. Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)
3. Metro Exodus (2019)
4. Far Cry New Dawn (2019)
5. Apex Legends (2019)
6. Just Cause 4 (2018)
7. Darksiders III (2018)
8. Farming Simulator 19 (2018)
9. Hitman 2 (2018)
10. Assassin’s Creed Odyssey (2018)
11. Forza Horizon 4 (2018)
12. Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
13. F1 2018 (2018)
14. Monster Hunter World (2018)
15. Far Cry 5 (2018)
16. X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
17. Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)
18. Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
19. Fortnite (2018)
20. Destiny 2 (2017)
21. ELEX (2017)
22. The Evil Within 2 (2017)
23. Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
24. FIFA 18 (2017)
25. Ark Survival Evolved (2017)
26. F1 2017 (2017)
27. Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)
28. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
29. Dirt 4 (2017)
30. Rocket League (2017)
31. Prey (2017)
32. Mass Effect Andromeda (2017)
33. Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)
34. For Honor (2017)
35. Resident Evil 7 (2017)
36. Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
37. Civilization VI (2016)
38. Overwatch (2016)
39. Ashes of the Singularity (2016)
40. Hitman 2016 (2016)
41. The Division (2016)
42. Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
43. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
44. World of Warships (2015)
45. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
46. The Witcher 3 (2015)
47. Dirt Rally (2015)
48. Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
49. Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare (2014)
50. Alien: Isolation (2014)
51. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
52. Sims 4 (2014)
53. Wolfenstein: The New Order (2014)
54. Thief (2014)
55. X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
56. Battlefield 4 (2013)
57. Total War: Rome II (2013)
58. Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
59. Metro: Last Light (2013)
60. BioShock Infinite (2013)
61. StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
62. Tomb Raider (2013)
63. Diablo III (2012)
64. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
65. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
66. StarCraft 2 (2010)
67. World of Warcraft (2005)
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 39. 20 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 28.50 |
High, 1366×768 | 25.00 |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)
Low, 1280×720 | 30.90 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 9.90 |
Metro Exodus (2019)
Low, 1280×720 | 8.40 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 4.30 |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)
Low, 1280×720 | 6.00 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 2.00 |
Apex Legends (2019)
Low, 1280×720 | 15.40 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 7.00 |
Just Cause 4 (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 12.30 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 7.00 |
Darksiders III (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 22.50 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 11. 80 |
Farming Simulator 19 (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 39.00 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 14.00 |
Hitman 2 (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 7.40 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 3.50 |
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 10.00 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 4.00 |
Forza Horizon 4 (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 13.00 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 5.00 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 13.00 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 4.00 |
F1 2018 (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 12.00 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 12.00 |
Monster Hunter World (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 4. 00 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 1.00 |
Far Cry 5 (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 4.00 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 1.00 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 13.70 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 9.40 |
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 7.50 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 3.00 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 8.10 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 4.30 |
Fortnite (2018)
Low, 1280×720 | 28.00 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 7.00 |
Destiny 2 (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 10.00 |
ELEX (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 6. 00 |
The Evil Within 2 (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 6.00 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 8.00 |
FIFA 18 (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 42.60 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 19.40 |
Ark Survival Evolved (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 15.00 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 6.20 |
F1 2017 (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 18.00 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 13.00 |
High, 1920×1080 | 10.00 |
Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 12.10 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 35.20 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 32. 80 |
Dirt 4 (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 32.80 |
Rocket League (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 44.60 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 22.75 |
High, 1920×1080 | 16.30 |
Prey (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 21.50 |
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 12.20 |
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 10.90 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 5.20 |
For Honor (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 19.90 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 7.30 |
Resident Evil 7 (2017)
Low, 1280×720 | 28.60 |
Medium, 1920×1080 | 13.20 |
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)
Low, 1280×720 | 53. 40 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 36.10 |
Civilization VI (2016)
Low, 1024×768 | 29.40 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 12.10 |
Overwatch (2016)
Low, 1280×720 | 30.40 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 24.60 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)
Low, 1280×768 | 7.00 |
Hitman 2016 (2016)
Low, 1280×720 | 4.00 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 2.00 |
The Division (2016)
Low, 1280×720 | 18.20 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 11.30 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)
Low, 1024×768 | 17.03 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 10.70 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
Low, 1024×768 | 26. 90 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 21.60 |
World of Warships (2015)
Low, 1366×768 | 37.70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 28.80 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
Low, 1280×720 | 34.15 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 21.20 |
The Witcher 3 (2015)
Low, 1024×768 | 9.00 |
Dirt Rally (2015)
Low, 1024×768 | 59.70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 22.00 |
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 19.30 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 14.80 |
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 12.00 |
Alien: Isolation (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 24.15 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 15. 60 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
Low, 1280×720 | 19.15 |
Medium, 1344×756 | 12.40 |
Sims 4 (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 111.90 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 34.30 |
Wolfenstein: The New Order (2014)
Low, 1280×720 | 17.40 |
Medium, 1280×720 | 13.90 |
Thief (2014)
Low, 1024×768 | 9.90 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 6.80 |
High, 1366×768 | 5.70 |
X-Plane 10.25 (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 27.65 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 15.45 |
High, 1366×768 | 7.75 |
Battlefield 4 (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 16.50 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 12. 00 |
High, 1366×768 | 9.20 |
Total War: Rome II (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 27.00 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 20.30 |
High, 1366×768 | 17.10 |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 13.00 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 10.00 |
High, 1366×768 | 5.00 |
Metro: Last Light (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 13.95 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 10.60 |
High, 1366×768 | 6.45 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
Low, 1280×720 | 40.12 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 24.13 |
High, 1366×768 | 19.30 |
Ultra, 1920×1080 | 7.50 |
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 75. 30 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 28.30 |
High, 1366×768 | 17.60 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
Low, 1024×768 | 46.53 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 24.40 |
High, 1366×768 | 17.47 |
Diablo III (2012)
Low, 1024×768 | 50.70 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 34.55 |
High, 1366×768 | 27.70 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
Low, 1280×720 | 30.05 |
Medium, 1366×768 | 20.35 |
High, 1366×768 | 14.15 |
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
Low, 1024×768 | 52.65 |
High, 1366×768 | 25.65 |
StarCraft 2 (2010)
Low, 1024×768 | 81.40 |
Medium, 1360×768 | 24. 30 |
High, 1360×768 | 18.60 |
Ultra, 1920×1080 | 12.40 |
World of Warcraft (2005)
Low, 800×600 | 82.60 |
Medium, 1024×768 | 43.70 |
Specifications (specs)
Architecture codename | Kaveri |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors |
Launch date | 4 June 2014 |
OPN Tray | AM720PDGh54JA |
Place in performance rating | 1209 |
Series | AMD A8-Series APU for Laptops |
Vertical segment | Laptop |
64 bit support | |
Base frequency | 2. 4 GHz |
Compute Cores | 8 |
Die size | 245 mm |
L2 cache | 4 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 102 °C |
Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 4 |
Number of threads | 4 |
Transistor count | 2410 Million |
Unlocked | |
|
|
Max memory channels | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz |
Supported memory types | DDR3 |
Enduro | |
Graphics max frequency | 626 MHz |
iGPU core count | 4 |
Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
Switchable graphics | |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | |
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | |
DisplayPort | |
HDMI | |
DirectX | 12 |
Vulkan | |
Sockets supported | FP3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt |
PCI Express revision | 3. 0 |
AMD App Acceleration | |
AMD Elite Experiences | |
AMD HD3D technology | |
AMD Mantle API | |
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | |
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | |
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | |
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | |
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | |
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | |
Intel® AES New Instructions | |
Out-of-band client management | |
PowerGating | |
PowerNow | |
System Image Stability | |
TrueAudio | |
VirusProtect | |
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | |
IOMMU 2. 0 |
Buy Audi A8 2004 in Korsun-Shevchenkovsky: $7200
Gearbox
Blue
Information from the MVS database
Registration number |
CA1334CH |
Brand | Audi |
Model | A8 |
Rick release | 2004 |
Color |
Blue |
Engine volume | 4. 2 l. |
Fire type |
Gasoline |
Remaining registration |
05/28/2020 Revised by AUTOMOTO.UA for MBC base number: 05/28/2020 |
Basic information
for VIN code
VIN code
Probig from seller
185 ths. km
Additional characteristics
Bezpeka:
Anti-blocking system (ABS) • Immobilizer • Central locking • Tire pressure monitoring (TPMS) • ISOFIX fastening system • Pneumatic suspension
Comfort:
On-board computer • Board sensor
Later:
Omivach headlight
Exterior:
Fog lights
Mill:
Not beaty
Share
Share
1 proposition in Korsun-Shevchenkovskiy
All reviews
(112 reviews)
kwestigg
I bought a car from a car dealership in Petropavlovsk in 2006, before this car I had 120 Mercedes, after I got into the Audi I realized that this was heaven and earth, it seemed to me that I had moved to a sports car. Good handling, excellent hodovka properties, but the most that I liked is of course four-wheel drive. I drove it in such places where a person’s foot has not set foot, and snow was not an obstacle for it in winter, it breaks off like a bullet. The Audi was maximally stuffed, the engine capacity was 4.2 liters. began, replaced the thermostat, all the rollers, the pump almost fell from the price of replacing all this, it turned out that to replace these parts it was necessary to disassemble the floor of the muzzle. After about another 2-3 months, the box broke down, at first the reverse gear disappeared, followed by all the others, the repair cost me about 150,000 rubles. Well, in terms of comfort, it will not yield to more than one business class. nine0003
What can I say about the Audi A8 car? It is impossible to evaluate all the advantages of this car from the outside, only after you drive an Audi, you understand that this car was created for comfortable driving on our roads. I drove this car for more than 100 thousand km and can say: 1) Audi suspension is very reliable. Having changed the suspension once at the very beginning of operation, I drive; 2) The engine clearly responds to the gas pedal; 3) The box switches without slowing down, maintains the selected driving pace; 4) With the windows closed, you can’t hear what is happening on the street; 5) In winter — warm, cool in summer; 6) It goes chic along the highway, in the center — a little more than A4; speed of 140-160 km/h is 11l; On the uncleaned Moscow streets, there are NO equal cars of this class. My opinion: in a country where it is winter for half a year, you need to drive with all-wheel drive. Why am I selling? I want the same, but newer. nine0003
Read all reviews
Yak mi tested …
The new Audi A8 is a far cry from luxury style, cutting-edge technology and luxury comfort. The sedan attaches respect and reinforces the status. But there are parameters, in which the Audi A8 is clearly delivered to competitors. Would you like to know more? Read our review!
…
Read how we tested the Audi A8
Vigidnishe
$ {{ formatNumber(auto.price.usd) }}
{{ auto.mark.name }} {{ auto.model.name }}, {{ auto.years }}
{{ auto.mileage }} yew. km
{{ auto.engine_volume }} {{ auto.fuel.name }}
Propositions for car dealerships
Zim auto also jokes
$ {{ formatNumber(auto.price.usd) }}
{{ auto.mark.name }} {{ auto.model.name }}, {{ auto.years }}
{{ auto.mileage }} yew. km
{{ auto. engine_volume }} {{ auto.fuel.name }}
Central locking compressor used Audi A8 (D2, 4D) Audi A8 (D2, 4D) with delivery to Moscow
Buy central locking compressor for Audi A8 (D2, 4D) in Moscow : nine0003
Item in stock as of 01/24/2023 18:01:
sort item by
relevance to the price of the year of manufacture to the name of the part
10 940 .
In stockBUY
10 940 p.
In stockBUY
10 940 p.
In stockBUY
11 840
In stockBUY
12 840
In stockBUY
13 520
In StockBUY
|
|||||
AU911873 |
Central locking compressor | Audi A8 (D2) 1999-2002 |
10 940 In stockBUY |
||
|
|||||
nine0002 AU | Central locking compressor | Audi A8 (D2) 1999-2002 |
10 940 In stockBUY |
||
|
|||||
AU871786 |
Central locking compressor | Audi A8 (D2) 1999-2002 |
OEM: |
10 940 In stockBUY |
|
|
|||||
AU673309 |
Central locking compressor | Audi A8 (D2) 1994-1999 |
11 840 r. In stockBUY |
||
|
|||||
AU673308 |
Central locking compressor | Audi A8 (D2) 1994-1999 |
12 840 rubles In stockBUY |
||
|
|||||
nine0009 |
AU894143 |
central locking compressor | AUDI A8 D2 |
13 520 rubles In stockBUY |
|
|
Central locking compressor specifications:
Those. specifications:
Issue: | nineteen94–2002 (restyled in 1998) |
OEM numbers: | 4D0813545A |
Looking for a central locking compressor?
We will pick up and deliver spare parts for car A8 (D2, 4D)
to Moscow
Free delivery to pickup point.