A86410: AMD A-Series A8-6410 Notebook Processor

A8-6410 [in 15 benchmarks]

AMD
A8-6410

Buy

Interface

Core clock speed

Max video memory

Memory type

Memory clock speed

Maximum resolution

Summary

AMD started AMD A8-6410 sales 1 June 2014. This is Beema architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 28nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2400 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is FT3b processor with a TDP of 15 Watt. It supports DDR3L-1866 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

1.76%

of a leader’s which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

A8
6410

EPYC
7h22

General info

A8-6410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance rating	2052
Market segment	Laptop
Series	AMD A-Series
Architecture codename	Beema (2014)
Release date	1 June 2014 (8 years ago)
Current price	$334	of 18494 (Xeon Platinum 8280M)

Technical specs

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4
Base clock speed	2 GHz	of 4. 7 (Ryzen 9 7900X)
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	of 5.8 (Core i9-13900KF)
L2 cache	2048 KB	of 12288 (Core 2 Quad Q9550)
Chip lithography	28 nm	of 5 (Ryzen 9 7950X)
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	of 110 (Atom x7-E3950)
Number of transistors	930 Million	of 9900000 (Ryzen 9 7950X)
64 bit support	+
Windows 11 compatibility	—

Compatibility

Information on A8-6410 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.

Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	FT3b
Thermal design power (TDP)	15 Watt	of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A8-6410. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI	+
FMA	FMA4
AVX	+
PowerTune	—
TrueAudio	—
PowerNow	+
PowerGating	+
Out-of-band client management	—
VirusProtect	+

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

AMD-V	1
IOMMU 2.0	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A8-6410’s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3L-1866	of 5200 (Ryzen 9 7950X)
Max memory channels	1	of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPU integrated into A8-6410.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Enduro	+
Switchable graphics	1
UVD	+
VCE	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6410’s integrated GPU.

DisplayPort	+
HDMI	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6410’s integrated GPU, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12
Vulkan	1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.

PCIe version

2.0

of 5 (Ryzen 9 7950X)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A8-6410. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6410
1.76

Passmark

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

3DMark06 CPU

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 encoding pass 1

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 69%

A8-6410
1775

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

A8-6410
255

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

A8-6410
747

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A8-6410
1887

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A8-6410
5872

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-6410
2866

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A8-6410
2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A8-6410
165

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A8-6410
49

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11. 5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A8-6410
0.6

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A8-6410
12

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A8-6410
54

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

A8-6410
3756

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

A8-6410
1277

Relative perfomance

Overall A8-6410 performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook CPUs.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
101.14

Intel Core i5-2557M
101.14

Intel Core i3-4000M
100

AMD A8-6410
100

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9100
99. 43

AMD A10-4657M
98.86

Intel Core i7-820QM
98.3

Intel equivalent

We believe that the nearest equivalent to A8-6410 from Intel is Core i3-4000M, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.

Core i3
4000M

Compare

Here are some closest Intel rivals to A8-6410:

Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
101.14

Intel Core i5-2557M
101.14

Intel Core i3-4000M
100

AMD A8-6410
100

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9100
99. 43

Intel Core i7-820QM
98.3

Intel Pentium 4425Y
97.73

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Core i3
4000M

Compare

Core i5
2557M

Compare

A10
5745M

Compare

A8
5557M

Compare

A10
7300

Compare

Core i5
4302Y

Compare

Recommended graphics cards

These graphics cards are most commonly used with A8-6410 according to our statistics.

Radeon R5
Graphics

49.3%

Radeon R5
M330

10.3%

Radeon R7
M260

8.1%

Radeon R5
M230

4.3%

Radeon R5
M240

2.3%

Radeon
8500

1.3%

Radeon
Graphics

1.2%

Radeon HD
8570M

1. 1%

Radeon R7
Graphics

0.9%

Radeon HD
8550M

0.8%

User rating

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Page not found — Technical City

We couldn’t find such page: /en/cpu/a8-6410%23characteristics

Popular graphics cards comparisons

GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

GeForce RTX
3060

GeForce RTX
3060 Ti

GeForce RTX
3070

GeForce RTX
2060

GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

GeForce GTX
1650

GeForce GTX
1660 Super

GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB

GeForce GTX
1660 Ti

GeForce GTX
1660 Super

Popular graphics cards

GeForce GTX
1050 Ti

GeForce RTX
4090

Radeon RX
Vega 7

GeForce RTX
3060

GeForce GTX
1650

GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB

Popular CPU comparisons

Ryzen 5
5600X

Core i5
12400F

Ryzen 5
3600

Core i5
10400F

Core i5
1135G7

Ryzen 5
5500U

Ryzen 5
5600X

Ryzen 5
5600G

Ryzen 5
3600

Ryzen 5
5600X

Ryzen 7
3700X

Ryzen 5
5600X

Popular CPUs

Ryzen 5
5500U

EPYC
7h22

Core i3
1115G4

Core i5
1135G7

Ryzen 5
3500U

Ryzen 3
5300U

Processor A8-6410 [in 15 benchmarks]

AMD
A8-6410

Interface
Core frequency
Video memory size
Memory type
Memory frequency
Maximum resolution

Description

AMD started AMD A8-6410 sales 1 June 2014. This is Beema architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads and is manufactured using 28nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 2400MHz, the multiplier is locked.

In terms of compatibility, this is an FT3b socket processor with a TDP of 15W. It supports DDR3L-1866 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at

1.76%

from the leader, which is AMD EPYC 7h22.

A8
6410

EPYC
7h22

General information

Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the A8-6410, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.

place in the performance rating	2052
Type	0060	+
Compatibility with Windows 11	—

compatibility

Information on A8-6410 compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.

Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking. Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.

TrueAudio — PowerNow + PowerGating + Out-of-band — VirusProtect +
Virtualization technologies

Technologies supported by the A8-6410 that accelerate the performance of virtual machines are listed.

AMD-V 1

Immu 2. 0 +

9021
Types, maximum size and number of channels of RAM supported by A8-6410. Higher memory frequency may be supported depending on the motherboard.

9DisplayPort

RAM types +

HDMI +

built -in video — support API

APIs supported by the A8-6410 integrated graphics card, including their versions.

DirectX Directx® 12

VULKAN 1

Peripherals

A8-6410 supported peripherals and how to connect them.

CHILDER PCI Express 2.0 of 5 (Core i9-12900K)

Tests in the benchmarks

These are the results of the A8-6410 performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The total score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.

Overall performance in tests

This is our overall performance rating. We regularly improve our algorithms, but if you find any inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in the comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6410
1.76

Passmark

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

3DMark06 CPU

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 encoding pass 1

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.

Benchmark coverage: 69%

A8-6410
1775

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can accurately measure performance. This version uses only one processor core.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

A8-6410
255

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application designed as CPU benchmarks that independently recreate certain real world tasks that can be used to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available processor cores.

Benchmark coverage: 37%

A8-6410
747

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is a very outdated ray tracing benchmark for processors developed by the authors of Cinema 4D — Maxon. The Single-Core version uses a single CPU thread to render a futuristic motorcycle model.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A8-6410
1887

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 that uses all processor threads. The possible number of threads in this version is limited to 16.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A8-6410
5872

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is an outdated set of benchmarks based on DirectX 9 by Futuremark. Its processor part contains two tests, one of which calculates the pathfinding of game AI, the other emulates game physics using the PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-6410
2866

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 that uses all processor threads. This version supports a maximum of 64 threads.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A8-6410
2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes referred to as Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 that uses all of the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A8-6410
165

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (Release 15) is a benchmark created by Maxon, the creator of the popular Cinema 4D 3D modeling package. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench using more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes referred to as Single-Thread) uses only one CPU thread to render a room full of mirror balls and complexly shaped lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A8-6410
49

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old Maxon development benchmark. authors of Cinema 4D. It has been superseded by later versions of Cinebench which use more modern variants of the Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads one CPU thread with ray tracing, rendering a glossy room full of crystal spheres and lights.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A8-6410
0.6

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower MPEG4 x264 video compression benchmark, resulting in a variable bit rate output file. This results in a better quality of the resulting video file, as a higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. The benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A8-6410
12

x264 encoding pass 1

The x264 benchmark uses the MPEG 4 x264 compression method to encode the sample video in HD (720p). Pass 1 is a faster option that produces an output file at a constant bit rate. Its result is measured in frames per second, that is, how many frames of the source video file were encoded in one second on average.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

A8-6410
54

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

A8-6410
3756

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 6%

A8-6410
1277

Relative performance

Overall performance of the A8-6410 compared to its closest competitor in notebook processors.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
101.14

Intel Core i5-2557M
101.14

Intel Core i3-4000M
100

AMD A8-6410
100

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9100
99.43

AMD A10-4657M
98.86

Intel Core i7-820QM
98.3

Competitor from Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to A8-6410 from Intel is Core i3-4000M, which is approximately equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.

Core i3
4000M

Compare

Here are some of Intel’s closest competitors to the A8-6410:

Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
101.14

Intel Core i5-2557M
101.14

Intel Core i3-4000M
100

AMD A8-6410
100

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9100
99.43

Intel Core i7-820QM
98.3

Intel Pentium 4425Y
97.73

Other processors

Here we recommend several processors that are more or less similar in performance to the reviewed one.

Core i3
4000M

Compare

Core i5
2557M

Compare

A10
5745M

Compare

A8
5557M

Compare

A10
7300

Compare

Core i5
4302Y

Compare

Recommended video cards

According to our statistics, these video cards are most often used with A8-6410:

Radeon R5
Graphics

49. 3%

Radeon R5
M330

10.4%

Radeon R7
M260

8.1%

Radeon R5
M230

4.3%

Radeon R5
M240

2.3%

Radeon
8500

1.3%

Radeon
Graphics

1.2%

Radeon HD
8570M

1.1%

Radeon R7
Graphics

0.9%

Radeon HD
8550M

0.8%

User rating

Here you can see the evaluation of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.