AMD ADO5200IAA5DO Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 2.7GHz Socket AM2 Dual Core CPU Processor +
$22.95
Out of stock
SKU: T6G000550
Category: CPUs Processors
-
Description
-
Additional information
Description
AMD ADO5200IAA5DO Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 2.7GHz Socket AM2 Dual Core CPU Processor + Thermal Paste
| General information | |
| Type | CPU / Microprocessor |
| Market segment | Desktop |
| Family | AMD Athlon 64 X2 |
| Model number | 5200+ |
| CPU part numbers | ADO5200IAA5DO ADO5200DOBOX |
| Stepping codes | NAAFG NAAIG NAAWG |
| Frequency | 5200+ (rated)2700 MHz (real) |
| Clock multiplier | 13. |
| Package | 940-pin organic microPGA |
| Socket | Socket AM2 |
| Architecture / Microarchitecture | |
| Microarchitecture | K8 |
| Processor core | Brisbane |
| Core stepping | G2 |
| Manufacturing process | 0.065 micron 221 million transistors |
| Data width | 64 bit |
| The number of cores | 2 |
| The number of threads | 2 |
| Floating Point Unit | Integrated |
| Level 1 cache size | 2 x 64 KB 2-way associative instruction cache 2 x 64 KB 2-way associative data cache |
| Level 2 cache size | 2 x 512 KB exclusive 16-way associative cache |
| Physical memory | 1 TB |
| Virtual memory | 256 TB |
| Multiprocessing | Uniprocessor |
| Features |
|
| Low power features |
|
| On-chip peripherals |
|
| Electrical/Thermal parameters | |
| V core | 1. 325V / 1.35V / 1.375V |
| Maximum operating temperature | 55°C – 68°C |
| Thermal Design Power | 65 Watt |
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Socket AM2 ADA5200IAA6CS > 3SF Media
$59.95
Out of stock
SKU: ADA5200IAA6CS
Category: Assorted CPU
Weight: .3 lbs
Brand: AMD
This is a used AMD Athlon 64 X2 CPU / Processor for Socket AM2 motherboards. Tested and found to be in good working condition. CPU is in good condition and is guaranteed to arrive in working order. Please ensure compatibility before purchasing.
| General information | |
| Type | CPU / Microprocessor |
| Market segment | Desktop |
| Family | AMD Athlon 64 X2 |
| Model number | 5200+ |
| CPU part numbers | ADA5200IAA6CS is an OEM/tray microprocessor ADA5200CSBOX is a boxed microprocessor |
| Stepping code | CCBIF |
| Frequency (MHz) | 5200+ (rated) 2600 (real) |
| Clock multiplier | 13 |
| Package | 940-pin organic microPGA |
| Socket | Socket AM2 |
| Architecture / Microarchitecture | |
| Microarchitecture | K8 |
| Processor core | Windsor |
| Core stepping | F2 |
| Manufacturing process | 0. 09 micron243 million transistors |
| Data width | 64 bit |
| Number of cores | 2 |
| Floating Point Unit | Integrated |
| Level 1 cache size | 2 x 64 KB 2-way associative instruction cache 2 x 64 KB 2-way associative data cache |
| Level 2 cache size | 2 x 1 MB exclusive 16-way associative cache |
| Physical memory | 1 TB |
| Virtual memory (TB) | 256 |
| Multiprocessing | Uniprocessor |
| Features |
|
| Low power features |
|
| On-chip peripherals |
|
| Electrical/Thermal parameters | |
| V core (V) | 1. 3 / 1.35 |
| Maximum operating temperature (°C) | 55 – 70 |
| Thermal Design Power (W) | 89 |
| Notes on AMD ADA5200IAA6CS | |
|
|
Secure Payments
Search Products
Search for:
processor socket Am2 AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
| Type | CPU / Microprocessor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market segment | Desktop | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Family | AMD Athlon 64 X2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Model number | 5200+
|
CCBIF CCBXF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Frequency | 5200 + (rated) 2600 MHz (real) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
009
| Clock multiplier |
13 |
0006 | Socket |
Socket AM2 |
|
| Microarchitecture |
K8 |
Processor core |
Windsor |
Core stepping |
JH-F2 |
CPUID |
40F32 |
Manufacturing process |
0. |
 09 micron silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology 9 Data width |
64 bit |
|
2 |
Floating Point Unit 90 006
| Integrated |
Level 1 cache size |
2 x 64 KB 2-way set associative instruction caches |
2 x 64 KB 2-way set associative data caches Level 2 cache size |
7 1 TB |
Virtual memory |
256 TB |
Multiprocessing |
Uniprocessor |
Extensions and Technologies 900 06
|
|
Security Features |
|
Integrated graphics |
None |
Memory controller |
The number of controllers : 1 |
Memory channels: 2 Supported memory: DDR2-800 Maximum memory bandwidth (GB/s): 12.  8 43 |
Electrical / Thermal parameters |
V core |
1.3V / 1.35V |
Maximum operating temperature |
55°C — 70°C |
89 Watt |
| |
Write a review
Your name:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Your review
Warning: HTML is not supported! Use plain text!
Rating
12345
I have read Agreement and agree to terms and conditions
90,000 desktop multi-cores are getting closer to Athlon 64 FX
Whether we like it or not, AMD continues to expand its range of desktop dual-core processors for Socket AM2 with all sorts of combinations of just two parameters: core frequency and L2 cache size.
In this article, we will consider another variation on well-known topics — a processor with the same L2 cache as the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (1 MB per core), and the frequency is the same as that of the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (2.6 GHz). Thus, incorporating the main advantages of both previous models, he got the right to the proud name of Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (prolonged applause follows, turning into ovation).
However, since the desktop line has almost come close to the FX line, the FX-62 will obviously not be fattening for long: all that AMD can release without “moving” it to the side is a model with a frequency of 2.8 GHz and half the L2 cache. It is logical to assume that it will be called Athlon 64 X2 5400+.
However, there is a small surprise in this test. We think our regular readers know that thanks to the testing methodology that does not change from test to test, we, as a rule, test one processor exactly once, and subsequently use its results in later articles. True, this approach also has its drawbacks, especially when it comes to new CPUs — it may turn out that the «companions» available at the time of the first testing are not the best choice, which affects, among other things, the results.
As a rule, this can be easily detected: the results of a processor tested earlier, but faster in all respects, suddenly contradict the results of a weaker processor tested later (for example, they turn out to be corny worse). In the case of such “alarm calls”, there can be only one way out: test the “doubtful” CPU again. This is exactly what we did with the Athlon 64 FX-62. Thus, the FX-62 results in this article are updated, despite the fact that we have already reviewed this processor before. Hardware and software
Test bench configuration
| CPU | Mainboard | Memory |
| Athlon 64 FX-62 | Corsair CM2X1024-6400 (5-5-5-12) | |
| Athlon 64 X2 5200+ | ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe (BIOS 0 603) | Corsair CM2X1024-6400 (5-5-5-12) |
| Athlon 64 X2 5000+ | ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe (BIOS 0603) | Corsair CM2X1024-6400 (5-5-5-12) |
| Athlon 64 X2 4800+ | ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe (BIOS 0603) | Corsair CM2X1024-6400 (5-5-5-12) |
| Core 2 Duo E6600 | Intel D975XBX (BIOS 1181) | Corsair CM2X1024-6400 (5-5-5-12) |
| Core 2 Duo E6700 | Intel D975XBX (BIOS 1181) | Corsair CM2X1024-6400 (5-5-5-12) |
903 19
- Video card — GeForce 7800GTX 256 MB (Gigabyte)
- Stand memory — 2 GB (2 modules)
- Hard drive — Samsung SP1614C (SATA)
- Used coolers — standard, supplied with processors
- PSU — Chieftec GPS-550AB A
903 18
| Processor | Athlon 64 FX-62 | Athlon 64 X2 5200+ | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ | Athlon 64 X2 4800+ | Core 2 Duo E6600 | Core 2 Duo E6700 | ||||||
| Technology | 90 nm | 90 nm | 90 nm | 90 nm | 65 nm | 65 nm GHz | 2. 8 |
2.6 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.66 |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| L2 cache*, KB 90 006 | 2×1024 | 2×1024 | 2×512 | 2×1024 | 4096 | 4096 | ||||||
| Bus frequency**, MHz | 400 DDR2 | 400 DDR2 9 0006 | 400 DDR2 | 400 DDR2 | 266 QP | 266 QP | ||||||
| Multiplier | 14 | 13 | 12 | 9 | 10 | |||||||
| AM2 | AM2 | LGA775 | LGA775 | |||||||||
| Typical heat dissipation*** | 125 W | 89 W | 89 W | 89 W | 55-75 W | 55-75 W | ||||||
| AMD64/EM64T | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||
| 006 | — | |||||||||||
| Virtualization Technology | + | + | + | + | + | + |
9031 8 * — if «2x.
..» is indicated, then it means «for … for each core»
** — for AMD processors — memory controller bus frequency
*** — for Intel and AMD processors it is measured differently, therefore it is incorrect to compare directly
Software
- Windows XP Professional x64 Edition SP1.
- 3ds max 7.0
- Maya 6.5
- Lightwave 8.5 x64 Edition
- WinRAR 3.51
- 7-Zip 4.32 x64 Edition
- LAME 3 .98
- Monkey Audio 4.01
- OGG Encoder 2.8 (Lancer)
- Windows Media Encoder 9 x64 Edition
- MATLAB 7.1
- Pro/ENGINEER Wildfire 2.0
- SolidWorks 2005
- Microsoft Visual C++ Professional 6.0
- CPU RightMark 2005 Lite x64 Edition
- F.E.A.R. 1.3
- Half-Life 2
- Unreal Tournament 2004 build 3339
- Quake 4 Point Release 1.1
- FineReader Professional 8.0
- Adobe Photoshop CS2 (9.0)
- Can opus ProCoder 2.01.
30 - DivX 6.1.1
- Windows Media Video 9 VCM
- x264 v.438
- XviD 1.1.0 Release
- Apache 2.0.55 for Windows 9003 8
Drivers
- NVIDIA ForceWare 81.98
- NVIDIA nForce SMBus Driver 4.50
- Intel INF Update
Testing
Necessary preface to the diagrams
The form of presenting the results in the testing methodology we use has two features: firstly, all data types are reduced to one — integer relative «points» (the performance of the considered processor relative to the Pentium D 805, if the speed of the latter is taken as 100 points). Secondly, detailed results are presented in the form of a table in Microsoft Excel format, in the article itself there are only summary charts by benchmark classes.
3D modeling packages
AMD processors lined up in a fairly standard «ladder», from which only FX-62 is a little out of place. However, it surpasses the A64 X2 5200+ in performance no more than in frequency, so there is no obvious sedition, we can assume that the results are within the measurement error.
CAD (Computer Aided Design) packages
By comparing 4800+ with 5000+ and then 5000+ with 5200+, we can see that CAD applications react more favorably to frequency gain than to cache, and this is quite confirmed by comparing 5200+ with FX-62.
Compilation
Quite a standard situation, however, FX-62, as well as in testing 3D packages, is a little out of the general trend.
RightMark project
CPU RightMark reacts to the frequency — and almost does not react to the cache. A very descriptive illustration.
Processing bitmap images (photos)
Approximately the same situation as in the case of CADs — performance increases both with increasing frequency and with increasing cache size, but in the first case it is noticeably better.
WEB server
Brilliant result! The large 4800+ cache allowed it to catch up with the 5000+, and the FX-62’s clock advantage prevented it from overtaking the 5200+ in any way. Respecting the good old principle of Occam, we are left with nothing but the assumption that in this class of applications, the Socket AM2 platform ran into the performance of the memory subsystem (or a lack of cache — although increasing it can get rid of this problem only for a not very long period of time).
Packing files
Throw out the «low cache» 5000+ mentally from the diagram — and you will see an almost perfectly even «step». The conclusion is obvious.
Audio data encoding
5000+ is almost equal to 5200+, 5200+ loses to FX-62. In honor only frequency.
Video encoding
We have already seen something similar in CAD and 3D modeling packages.
Text recognition system
The situation is similar to the previous one.
3D games
Games like cache more than frequency. At least on the AMD platform. By the way, this is indirectly confirmed by the results of Intel processors, since with one active thread, their core gets all 4 megabytes of shared L2 at its disposal.
Total points
Efficiency in terms of frequency gigahertz
Conclusion
We didn’t expect anything unexpected, and didn’t see anything unexpected. The results of the retested Athlon 64 FX-62 removed all the «incomprehensibility» that arose in connection with its old results, and the overall performance of all top AMD dual-core processors lined up in a fairly even «ladder».