Apple M1 vs Intel Core i3-4130 Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Apple M1 vs Intel Core i3-4130
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple M1 on one side and the Intel Core i3-4130 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,2GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Apple M1 | Intel Core i3-4130 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Laptop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | ARMv8.5-A (64-bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Firestorm, Icestorm | Haswell | ||||||
| Core name | Firestorm, Icestorm | Haswell-DT | ||||||
| Family | M series | Core i3-4000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
APL1102, T8103 |
BX80646I34130, |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2020 | Q3 2013 | ||||||
| Lithography | 5 nm FinFET N5 | 22 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 33. 700.000.000 |
1.400.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,1 GHz | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,2 GHz | — | ||||||
| Energy cores |
4x Apple Icestorm @ 2,06 GHz |
— |
||||||
| High performance cores |
4x Apple Firestorm @ 3,2 GHz |
— |
||||||
| Cache memory | 12 MB | 3 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
LPDDR4X-4266 |
DDR3-1333/1600, |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 68,25 GB/s | 25,6 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | — | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 14 W | 54 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | — | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Apple M1 GPU 8-Core | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | ||||||
| GPU cores | 8 | — | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 128 | 20 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 1. 024 |
160 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 350 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1.278 MHz | 1150 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 2.610 GFLOPS | 368 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | SoC | LGA1150 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | — | Socket LGA 1150 Motherboard | ||||||
| AI accelerator |
AI accelerator 16-core |
— |
||||||
| AI computing operations per seconds | 11 TOPS | — | ||||||
| Connectivity | Thunderbolt 3, USB4, USB 3. 1 Gen 2 |
— | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 197 | 130 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.063 | 330 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 412 | 300 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 2.104 | 760 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.503 | 557 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 7.794 | 1.698 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 3.721 | 1.871 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 15. 015 |
3.258 | ||||||
| (iOS 64-bit | Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
7.537 | 3.578 | ||||||
| (iOS 64-bit | Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
28.254 | 6.620 | ||||||
| (macOS | Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
1.526 | 735 | ||||||
| (macOS | Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
6.481 | 1.581 | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
2.047 pts / W | 123 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Apple M1 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-4130 is bigger, that the PDT of Apple M1 is lower. The Apple M1 was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Apple M1 |
197 1.063 |
| Intel Core i3-4130 |
130 330 |
In single core, the difference is 52%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 222%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Apple M1 |
412 2.104 |
| Intel Core i3-4130 |
300 760 |
In single core, the difference is 37%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 177%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Apple M1 |
1.  5037.794 |
| Intel Core i3-4130 |
557 1.698 |
In single core, the difference is 170%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 359%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Apple M1 |
3.  72115.015 |
| Intel Core i3-4130 |
1.871 3.258 |
In single core, the difference is 99%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 361%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Apple M1 |
1.526 6.481 |
| Intel Core i3-4130 |
796 1.  657 |
In single core, the difference is 92%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 291%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Apple M1 Intel equivalentApple M1 AMD equivalentIntel Core i3-4130 AMD equivalent
See also:
Apple M1 MaxApple M1 Pro (10 cores)Apple M1 Pro (8 cores)Apple M1 UltraApple M2Apple M2 MaxApple M2 Pro
Intel Core i3-4130T
Apple M1 vs Intel Core i3-10110U Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
Apple M1 vs Intel Core i3-10110U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple M1 on one side and the Intel Core i3-10110U on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the laptop sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,2GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | Apple M1 | Intel Core i3-10110U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Laptop | Notebook | ||||||
| ISA | ARMv8. 5-A (64-bit) |
x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Firestorm, Icestorm | Comet Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Firestorm, Icestorm | Comet Lake-U | ||||||
| Family | M series | Core i3-10000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
APL1102, T8103 |
FJ8070104307606, |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2020 | Q3 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 5 nm FinFET N5 | 14 nm++ | ||||||
| Transistors | 33. 700.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 2,1 GHz | 2,1 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 3,2 GHz | 4,1 GHz | ||||||
| Energy cores |
4x Apple Icestorm @ 2,06 GHz |
— |
||||||
| High performance cores |
4x Apple Firestorm @ 3,2 GHz |
— |
||||||
| Cache memory | 12 MB | 4 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
LPDDR4X-4266 |
DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133, LPDDR4-2933 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 68,25 GB/s | 45,8 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | — | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 14 W | 15 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Apple M1 GPU 8-Core | Intel UHD Graphics (Comet Lake) | ||||||
| GPU cores | 8 | — | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 128 | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 1. 024 |
192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | — | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1.278 MHz | 1000 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 2.610 GFLOPS | 422,4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | SoC | BGA1528 | ||||||
| AI accelerator |
AI accelerator 16-core |
— |
||||||
| AI computing operations per seconds | 11 TOPS | — | ||||||
| Crypto engine |
— |
AES New Instructions, |
||||||
| Security |
— |
Software Guard Extensions, |
||||||
| Max display resolution |
— |
4096 x 2304@60Hz |
||||||
| Connectivity | Thunderbolt 3, USB4, USB 3. 1 Gen 2 |
— | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 197 | 157 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.063 | 354 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 412 | 393 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 2.104 | 893 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 1.503 | 1.023 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 7.794 | 2.312 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 3.721 | 2.350 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 15. 015 |
4.081 | ||||||
| (iOS 64-bit | Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
7.537 | 4.395 | ||||||
| (iOS 64-bit | Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
28.254 | 8.103 | ||||||
| (macOS | Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
1.526 | 961 | ||||||
| (macOS | Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
6.481 | 1.994 | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
2.047 pts / W | 540 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Apple M1 has more cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i3-10110U is bigger, that the PDT of Apple M1 is lower. The Apple M1 was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Apple M1 |
197 1.063 |
| Intel Core i3-10110U |
157 354 |
In single core, the difference is 25%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 200%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Apple M1 |
412 2.104 |
| Intel Core i3-10110U |
393 893 |
In single core, the difference is 5%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 136%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Apple M1 |
1.503 7.794 |
| Intel Core i3-10110U |
1.023 2.312 |
In single core, the difference is 47%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 237%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Apple M1 |
3.721 15.015 |
| Intel Core i3-10110U |
2.350 4.081 |
In single core, the difference is 58%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 268%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On macOS:
| Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
|---|---|
| Apple M1 |
1.526 6.481 |
| Intel Core i3-10110U |
926 2.033 |
In single core, the difference is 65%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 219%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Apple M1 Intel equivalentApple M1 AMD equivalentIntel Core i3-10110U AMD equivalent
See also:
Apple M1 MaxApple M1 Pro (10 cores)Apple M1 Pro (8 cores)Apple M1 UltraApple M2Apple M2 MaxApple M2 Pro
Intel Core i3-10110Y
Intel Core i3 1115G4 vs Apple M1:
performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i3 1115G4
Apple M1
Which is better: 2-core Intel Core i3 1115G4 at 1.
7-3.0 GHz or Apple M1 with 8 cores at 3.2 GHz? To find out, read our comparative testing of these notebook processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications.
- Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one core
Core i3 1115G4
59 9000 3,0003
Apple M1
76
Multi -WEACH IS
Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei are involved
- Supports up to 64GB DDR4-3200
Reasons to choose the Apple M1
- Has 6 more physical cores
- More modern process — 5 vs. 10 nanometers
- 39% faster in single core Geekbench v5 — 1759 and 1263 points
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i3 1115G4
1340
Apple M1
+14%
1529
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i3 1115G4
3147
Apple M1
+147%
7787
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i3 1115G4
2696
Apple M1
+39%
3747
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i3 1115G4
6218
Apple M1
+130%
14284
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i3 1115G4
1275
Apple M1
+38%
1760
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i3 1115G4
2557
Apple M1
+205%
7799
Add your Cinebench R23 results
Specifications
List of full technical specifications of Intel Core i3 1115G4 and Apple M1
General information
| Manufacturer | Intel | Apple |
| Release date | September 2, 2020 | November 20, 2020 |
| Type | For laptop | For laptop |
| Instruction set architecture | x86-64 | ARMv8 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake | Apple M1 |
| Model number | i3-1115G4 | — |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics Xe G4 | Apple M1 GPU |
Processor
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Frequency | 1. 7-3.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz |
| Max. frequency in Turbo Boost | 4.1 GHz | — |
| Cores | — | 4 |
| threads | — | 4 |
| Frequency | — | 2.1 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 8 |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | — |
| Multiplier | 17-30x | — |
| Tire speed | 4 GT/s | — |
| Level 1 cache | 96KB (per core) | 192KB (per core) |
| Level 2 cache | 1280KB (per core) | 12MB (shared) |
| Level 3 cache | 6MB (shared) | — |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| Number of transistors | — | 16 billion |
| Process | 10 nanometers | 5 nanometers |
| Socket | BGA-1449 | Apple M-Socket |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-28W | 14W |
| Critical temperature | 100°C | — |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 | Apple M1 GPU |
| GPU frequency | 300 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Boost GPU frequency | 1250 MHz | 1278 MHz |
| Shader blocks | 384 | 1024 |
| TMUs | 24 | 64 |
| ROPs | 12 | 32 |
| Computer units | 48 | 128 |
| TGP | 15W | 15W |
Max. resolution |
— | 6016×3384 — 60Hz |
Igpu Flops
Core i3 1115g4
0.84 Teraflops
Apple M1
2.6 Teraflops
9000 9000 9000
Other
| Official site | Site Intel Core i3 1115G4 | — |
| PCI Express Version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Max. PCI Express lanes | 16 | — |
Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i3 1115G4
12 (27.