AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences
|
|
|
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Zen 2 | K8 | ||||||
| Core name | Matisse | Brisbane | ||||||
| Family | Ryzen 5 3000 | Athlon 64 X2 5000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec |
100-000000031, |
ADO5000DOBOX, |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2019 | Q3 2008 | ||||||
| Lithography | 7 nm FinFET | 65 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 4. 800.000.000 |
221.000.000 | ||||||
| Cores | 6 | 2 | ||||||
| Threads | 12 | 2 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,6 GHz | 2,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 4,2 GHz | — | ||||||
| High performance cores |
— |
2 Cores 2 Threads @ 2,6 GHz |
||||||
| Cache memory | 32 MB | 1 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 128 GB | 8 GB | ||||||
| Memory types |
DDR4-3200 |
DDR2-800 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 47,68 GB/s | 12,8 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 20 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | None | None | ||||||
| Socket | AM4 | AM2 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket AM4 Motherboard | Socket AM2 Motherboard | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 95°C | 68°C | ||||||
| Security |
— |
Enhanced Virus Protection |
||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 509 | 88 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 4. 039 |
164 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 195 | 62 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 1.564 | 115 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.570 | 881 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 17.842 | 757 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 single core |
5.470 | 1.243 | ||||||
| (Windows) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
27.530 | 2.069 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
484 GFLOPS | 11,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
424 pts / W | 32 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 was designed earlier.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
509 4.039 |
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
88 164 |
In single core, the difference is 478%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2363%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
195 1.  564 |
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
62 115 |
In single core, the difference is 215%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1260%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
2.570 17.842 |
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
881 757 |
In single core, the difference is 192%.
In multi-core, the differential gap is 2257%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
On Windows:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.470 27.530 |
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
1.243 2.069 |
In single core, the difference is 340%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1231%.
On Linux:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
5.  78230.309 |
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
1.251 1.881 |
In single core, the difference is 362%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1511%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Equivalence:
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Intel equivalentAMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Intel equivalent
See also:
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
Athlon 3000G vs Ryzen 5 3600
Availability
AMD Athlon 3000G 2-Core, 4-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy on Amazon
$58
In Stock
Updated 18347 minutes ago
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy on Amazon
$89
In Stock
Updated 18345 minutes ago
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters.
However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 136 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 — $58.0 vs $89.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Ryzen 5 3600 — $0.41 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 — 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn’t have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 8% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Athlon 3000G — 151 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G — 12 vs 4 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
140
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.
41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$58
100%
Value Winner
AMD Athlon 3000G 2-Core, 4-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for $58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18347 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 3600
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
69%
Price, $
$89
65%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Ryzen 5 3600
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Ultra
137
FPS
149
FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
High
287
FPS
357
FPS
Valorant
Very High
125
FPS
199
FPS
League of Legends
Epic
157
FPS
166
FPS
Fortnite
High
575
FPS
630
FPS
Minecraft
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
934
59%
Multi-Core
1947
28%
Ryzen 5 3600
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1557
100%
Multi-Core
6772
100%
|
AMD Athlon 3000G |
vs |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
|
Nov 20th, 2019 |
Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Athlon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Matisse |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
|
Desktop |
Segment |
Desktop |
| 2 | Cores |
6 |
| 4 | Threads |
12 |
3. 5 GHz |
Base Clock Speed |
3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
|
35 W |
TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size |
7 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier |
36.0x |
|
Radeon Vega 3 |
Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Athlon 3000G or Ryzen 5 3600
Grand Theft Auto V, 1920 x 1080, High
Skytech Archangel Gaming PC
93
FPS
$
8.6
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Ryzen 5 3600
8 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$799.99
In Stock
Updated 13863 minutes agoSkytech Blaze 3.0 Black Gaming PC
111
FPS
$
8.56
/FPS
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$949.99
In Stock
Updated 13862 minutes agoSkytech Chronos Mini Gaming PC
93
FPS
$
9.
35
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$869.99
In Stock
Updated 13863 minutes agoSkytech Shadow 3.0 Gaming PC
121
FPS
$
8.26
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$999.99
In Stock
Updated 13862 minutes agoSkytech Archangel Gaming PC
107
FPS
$
8.78
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$939.99
In Stock
Updated 13863 minutes agoSkytech Chronos Gaming PC
107
FPS
$
11.21
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,199.99
In Stock
Updated 13862 minutes agoiBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC
56
FPS
$
15.5
/FPS
GeForce GT 710
Ryzen 5 3600
8 GB, 240 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$868
In Stock
Updated 13862 minutes agoSkyTech Blaze II Gaming Computer PC
93
FPS
$
12.
9
/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,199.99
In Stock
Updated 13862 minutes agoiBUYPOWER Pro Gaming PC
57
FPS
$
13.3
/FPS
GeForce GT 730
Ryzen 5 3600
8 GB, 240 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$757.97
In Stock
Updated 13862 minutes agoSkytech Azure Gaming PC
129
FPS
$
10.08
/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Ryzen 5 3600
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,299.99
In Stock
Updated 13862 minutes ago
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
Athlon 3000G
Ryzen 5 5500
Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 5500
Athlon 3000G
Core i3-12100F
$89.98
Ryzen 5 3600
Core i3-12100F
$89.98
Athlon 3000G
Core i5-10400F
$111.07
Ryzen 5 3600
Core i5-10400F
$111.
07
Athlon 3000G
Ryzen 3 3200G
$99.99
Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 3 3200G
$99.99
Athlon 3000G
Core i3-10100
$107.55
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ [in 1 benchmark]
AMD
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
- Interface
- Core frequency
- Video memory size
- Memory type
- Memory frequency
- Maximum resolution
Description
AMD started Athlon 64 X2 3600+ sales in January 2001. This is a Brisbane architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at home systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads and is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, the maximum frequency is 2000 MHz, the multiplier is locked.
In terms of compatibility, this is an AMD Socket AM2 processor with a TDP of 89W.
We don’t have any test results for the Athlon 64 X2 3600+.
General
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of the Athlon 64 X2 3600+, as well as when sales started and cost at that time.
| Performance ranking | not included | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Architecture code name | Brisbane (2001-2008) | |
| Release date | January 2001 (22 years ago) | |
| Price now | $70 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Features
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ quantitative parameters such as number of cores and threads, clock speeds, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. They indirectly speak about the performance of the processor, but for an accurate assessment it is necessary to consider the results of the tests.
| Core | 2 | |
| 2 | ||
| Maximum frequency | 2GHz | of 6 (Core i9-13900KS) |
| L1 cache | 256K | of 7475. 2 (Apple M2 Pro 10-Core) |
| L2 Cache | 512K | of 36864 (Apple M2 Max) |
| Level 3 cache | 0 KB | of 786432 (EPYC 7773X) |
| Process | 90 nm | of 4 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) |
| Chip size | 156 mm 2 | |
| Transistors | 154M | of 9
0 (Ryzen 5 7645HX) |
| Support 64 bit | + | |
| Windows 11 compatible | — |
9002 compatible 1
Information on Athlon 64 X2 3600+ compatibility with other computer components. Useful, for example, when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.
Please note that the power consumption of some processors can significantly exceed their nominal TDP even without overclocking.
Some may even double their claims if the motherboard allows you to adjust the power settings of the processor.
| Max. number of processors per configuration | 1 | of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) |
| Socket | AM2 900 41 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 W | out of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Benchmark tests
These are the results of Athlon 64 X2 3600+ performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest processor at the moment.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widely used benchmark that consists of 8 different tests, including integer and floating point calculations, extended instruction tests, compression, encryption, and game physics calculations. Also includes a separate single-threaded test.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
610
Best graphics cards for Athlon 64 X2 3600+
We have 341 Athlon 64 X2 3600+ based configurations in our database.
According to statistics, these cards are most often used with Athlon 64 X2 3600+:
GeForce GTS
450
5.6%
GeForce GT
730
5%
GeForce
210
3.5%
GeForce
6150 SE + nForce 430
3.2%
GeForce GT
630
3.2%
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
2.9%
GeForce
8400GS
2.9%
GeForce
8600 GT
2.6%
GeForce
9500 GT
2.6%
Radeon HD
2600 PRO
2.
3%
Here are the most powerful video cards used with Athlon 64 X2 3600+ according to user statistics:
GeForce RTX
4090
0.3% (1/341)
GeForce RTX
3090 Ti
0.3% (1/341)
GeForce RTX
3060
0.6% (2/341)
Radeon RX
6500XT
0.3% (1/341)
Radeon RX
5500XT
0.3% (1/341)
Radeon RX
580
0.3% (1/341)
Radeon RX
470
0.3% (1/341)
GeForce GTX
1650
0.3% (1/341)
Radeon RX
570
0.6% (2/341)
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
2.9% (10/341)
User rating
Here you can see the rating of the processor by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about the Athlon 64 X2 3600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+ or Intel Pentium Dual T3400
- Main Page
- >
- Processors
- >
- Compare
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+ vs Intel Pentium Dual T3400
90 007 >
Family
- Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+
Compare
Family
- Pentium Dual T3200
Compare 9 0008
Gaming speed
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+
25.8 (+6% )
Pentium Dual T3400
24.
3
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Office speed
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+
29.8 (+10%)
Pentium Dual T3400
27.1
Everyday performance such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance. Performance in resource high-capacity tasks that load a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, certain periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Price
The data is obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks |
|
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+ 22.1 (+1%) Pentium Dual T3400 21.8 |
Demanding games and tasks |
|
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+ 4.6 (+28%) Pentium Dual T3400 3.6 |
Extreme |
|
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+ 1 (+43%) Pentium Dual T3400 0. |
7 Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use.
For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Features
Main
| Socket Installed in motherboards with a suitable socket. Note that a socket is not guaranteed to be compatible. The manufacturer may not add support to the BIOS. | ||
| Manufacturer Firm | AMD | Intel |
Performance
| Cores The total number of physical cores. | 2 | 2 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. |
2 | 2 |
| Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Missing | Missing |
| Base frequencyThe guaranteed frequency of all cores (P-cores in the case of the corresponding architecture) of the processor at maximum load. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 2 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
Cache and RAM
Video core
PCI
Detailed information
