Atom n270 vs pentium: Intel Atom N270 @ 1.60GHz vs Intel Pentium 4 1.60GHz [cpubenchmark.net] by PassMark Software

Intel Atom N270 vs Intel Pentium 4-M 1.70


Comparative analysis of Intel Atom N270 and Intel Pentium 4-M 1.70 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark.

Intel Atom N270

Buy on Amazon


vs

Intel Pentium 4-M 1.70

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Atom N270

  • CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
  • 7x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 10x lower typical power consumption: 2.5 Watt vs 30 Watt
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 175 vs 173






Launch date 1 March 2008 vs March 2002
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 130 nm
L1 cache 56 KB vs 8 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 2. 5 Watt vs 30 Watt
PassMark — CPU mark 175 vs 173

Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 4-M 1.70

  • Around 6% higher clock speed: 1.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
  • Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 426 vs 164




Maximum frequency 1.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
Maximum core temperature 100°C vs 90°C
PassMark — Single thread mark 426 vs 164

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: Intel Atom N270
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4-M 1. 70



PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2





Name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium 4-M 1.70
PassMark — Single thread mark 164 426
PassMark — CPU mark 175 173

Compare specifications (specs)





































Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium 4-M 1. 70
Architecture codename Diamondville Northwood
Launch date 1 March 2008 March 2002
Launch price (MSRP) $44
Place in performance rating 3101 2915
Processor Number N270
Series Legacy Intel Atom® Processors Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Vertical segment Mobile Mobile
64 bit support
Base frequency 1. 60 GHz 1.70 GHz
Bus Speed 533 MHz FSB 400 MHz FSB
Die size 26 mm2 131 mm2
Front-side bus (FSB) 533 MHz
L1 cache 56 KB 8 KB
L2 cache 512 KB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 130 nm
Maximum core temperature 90°C 100°C
Maximum frequency 1. 6 GHz 1.7 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Number of threads 2
Transistor count 47 million 55 million
VID voltage range 0.9V-1.1625V 1.3V
Maximum case temperature (TCase)

100 °C
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 22mm x 22mm 35mm x 35mm
Sockets supported PBGA437 PPGA478
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 2. 5 Watt 30 Watt
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Atom N270 with others




Intel
Atom N270



vs



Intel
Atom Z530




Intel
Atom N270



vs



Intel
Atom Z520




Intel
Atom N270



vs



Intel
Core 2 Duo SL9600




Intel
Atom N270



vs



AMD
Athlon Silver 7120U

Intel Atom N270 vs Intel Pentium 4-M 1.

80


Comparative analysis of Intel Atom N270 and Intel Pentium 4-M 1.80 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark.

Intel Atom N270

Buy on Amazon


vs

Intel Pentium 4-M 1.80

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Atom N270

  • CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
  • 7x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 10x lower typical power consumption: 2.5 Watt vs 30 Watt





Launch date 1 March 2008 vs April 2002
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 130 nm
L1 cache 56 KB vs 8 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 2. 5 Watt vs 30 Watt

Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 4-M 1.80

  • Around 13% higher clock speed: 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
  • Around 11% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 90°C
  • 2.8x better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 451 vs 164




Maximum frequency 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
Maximum core temperature 100°C vs 90°C
PassMark — Single thread mark 451 vs 164

Compare benchmarks


CPU 1: Intel Atom N270
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 4-M 1.80



PassMark — Single thread mark

CPU 1
CPU 2


PassMark — CPU mark

CPU 1
CPU 2





Name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium 4-M 1. 80
PassMark — Single thread mark 164 451
PassMark — CPU mark 175 175

Compare specifications (specs)





































Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium 4-M 1.80
Architecture codename Diamondville Northwood
Launch date 1 March 2008 April 2002
Launch price (MSRP) $44
Place in performance rating 3101 2876
Processor Number N270
Series Legacy Intel Atom® Processors Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor
Status Discontinued Discontinued
Vertical segment Mobile Mobile
64 bit support
Base frequency 1. 60 GHz 1.80 GHz
Bus Speed 533 MHz FSB 400 MHz FSB
Die size 26 mm2 131 mm2
Front-side bus (FSB) 533 MHz
L1 cache 56 KB 8 KB
L2 cache 512 KB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 130 nm
Maximum core temperature 90°C 100°C
Maximum frequency 1. 6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Number of threads 2
Transistor count 47 million 55 million
VID voltage range 0.9V-1.1625V 1.3V
Maximum case temperature (TCase)

100 °C
Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 22mm x 22mm 35mm x 35mm
Sockets supported PBGA437 PPGA478
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 2. 5 Watt 30 Watt
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Intel 64
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare Intel Atom N270 with others




Intel
Atom N270



vs



Intel
Atom Z530




Intel
Atom N270



vs



Intel
Atom Z520




Intel
Atom N270



vs



Intel
Core 2 Duo SL9600




Intel
Atom N270



vs



AMD
Athlon Silver 7120U

Comparison of Intel Atom N270 vs Intel Pentium III 1333

Similarities
Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1333
Two models from intel
Two models of processors came out in approximately the same time period
CPUs are identical in terms of number va cores: 1 core

processor family

processor family

9 0008

Differences
Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1333
Atom N270 belongs to the Atom Pentium III 1333 belongs to the Pentium
Atom N270 belongs to the Atom N-series processors Pentium III 1333 belongs to the Pentium 3 processor line
The core architecture of the Atom N270 processor is called Diamondville The core architecture of the Pentium III 1333 processor is called Tualatin
Atom N270 is a mobile processor Pentium III 1333 is a desktop processor
Intel Atom N270 runs on BGA437 socket Intel Pentium III 1333 works on socket 370
FSB data Intel Atom N270 — 667 MHz FSB FSB data Intel Pentium III 1333 — 133 MHz FSB
Atom N270 significantly outperforms in terms of number of threads, 2 vs. 1 Pentium III 1333 loses a lot in terms of number of threads, 1 vs. 2
9001 6 Atom N270 slightly outperforms in terms of base clock speed , 1600 MHz compared to 1333 MHz Pentium III 1333 Pentium III 1333 is slightly inferior in terms of frequency, 1333 MHz versus 1600 MHz
Atom N270 in terms of technology features wins a lot, its process technology is 45 nanometers, in comparison with 130 nm from a competitor Pentium III 1333 9
The number of transistors in the Atom N270 processor is slightly higher, 47 million versus 44 million 900 16 Pentium III 1333 includes some fewer transistors, 44 million vs 47 million0017

The Pentium III 1333 needs more powerful cooling, since its heat dissipation is 29.9 W
Atom N270’s possible core temperature threshold is much higher and reaches 90 degrees. And this is a significant plus The threshold for the possible temperature of the cores of the Pentium III 1333 is 69 degrees. Not much inferior to the Atom N270 processor
The first level cache of the Atom N270 processor is much larger than that of the Pentium III 1333 and equals 56 KB The size of the first level cache in the Pentium III 1333 processor is much smaller compared to the Atom N270 and is equal to 32 KB
The L2 cache in the Atom N270 processor is much larger compared to the Pentium III 1333 and is equal to 512 KB 9 0017

The second-level cache of the Pentium III 1333 CPU is much smaller than that of the Atom N270 and is equal to 256 Kilobytes

Comparison of instructions and technologies

Technologies for auto-overclocking and increasing processor power
Technology or instruction name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1333 Short description
Turbo Boost Intel Auto Overclocking Technology.
Energy saving technologies
Technology or instruction name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1333 Brief description
EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep) Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Energy Saving Technology.
Stop Grant state Energy saving status.
Extended Stop Grant State Energy saving status (Advanced technology).
Sleep state Sleep state.
Deep Sleep state Deep sleep state.
Deeper Sleep state Deeper sleep state.
Enhanced Deeper Sleep state Improved state of deeper sleep.
AutoHalt state Auto stop status.
Thermal Monitoring Temperature monitoring.
Idle States Idle states.
Standard extension set
Name of technology or instruction Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1333 Short description
MMX (Multimedia Extensions) Multimedia extensions.
SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) Streaming SIMD processor extension.
SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 2.
SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 3.
SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3.
NX (Execute disable bit) Execution disable bit.
Safety Technology
Technology or instruction name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1333 Short description
TXT (Trusted Execution Technology) Trusted Execution Technology.
EDB (Execute Disable Bit) Execute trip bit.
Virtualization Technologies
Technology or instruction name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1333 Short description
VT-x (Virtualization technology) Virtualization technology.
VT-d (Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O) Virtualization technology for directed I/O.
Other technologies and instructions
Technology or instruction name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1333 Short description
Hyper Threading Hyperthreading technology.
Dynamic FSB frequency switching Dynamic FSB switching.
DBS (Demand Based Switching) Switching on request.

Benchmarks

Overall performance rating

The main rating can be calculated according to the formula, taking into account the indicators: test results of all benchmarks, socket, number of cores, threads, year of release, temperature, automatic overclocking technologies, clock frequency, instructions, architecture, and much more. The results of the overall rating showed that the Pentium III 1333 processor is not much superior to its rival Atom N270. The Atom N270 processor itself managed to score 203.36 points, slightly outperforming its competitor.

PassMark CPU Mark

This is perhaps the most famous benchmark tester on the Internet. The benchmark has a large pool of tools for evaluating PC data, in particular the CPU. Among which are floating point calculations, integer calculations, encryption, extended instruction checking, compression, game physics calculations, multi-threaded and single-threaded tests. In particular, you can compare the received data with the rest of the configurations in the common database. All CPUs presented on our website have been tested in PassMark. The Performance Test showed a slightly better performance of the Pentium III 1333 processor (201 points) over the Atom N270 (175 points). The Atom N270 falls slightly behind in this test.

Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

Single version — in its test uses only one core and one thread for rendering. Uses the ray tracing method. MAXON appeared, it was based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. It is possible to test multi-processor systems. Works on Windows, Mac operating systems. The basic performance testing mode is spatial light sources, working with light, simulated global illumination, multilevel reflections, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, and procedural shaders. This benchmark for testing video cards and processors is already outdated by now.

Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test

Multi-Thread is another test option in the Cinebench R10 benchmark, which already uses multi-thread and multi-core testing method. It is important to note that the possible number of threads in this version of the program is limited to 16.

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-thread test

64-bit version of CINEBENCH R11.5 test, it can load the processor to 100, including all cores and threads. Unlike older versions, 64 threads are supported here. Testing the Atom N270 in Cinebench version R11.5 gave 0.38 points, which indicates a higher performance of this model. While the Pentium III 1333 scores 0.24, it is far behind its rival in this test.

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

Excellent fully functional Cinebench version R11.5 from the Maxon team. The tests still use the ray tracing process, rendering a high-poly 3d room with a large number of crystalline and glass and translucent balls. In this Single-Core variant, tests are performed using one core and one thread. His tests have not lost their relevance today. The result of the check is the value «number of frames per second». The single-thread test results for the Atom N270 in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed high performance compared to the competitor, with a score of 0.38 points. But the Pentium III 1333 itself, scoring 0.24 points in this test, is far behind it.

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-thread test

Multi-Thread Cinebench 15 — will load your system to the full, showing everything it can. Ideal for testing new multi-threaded CPUs from Intel and AMD. it can use 256 computational threads. In testing, all threads and CPU cores will be used when rendering complex 3D objects. The Atom N270 with a score of 34.35 scores unconditionally more points in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its competitor Pentium III 1333 is far behind with a score of 20.9 in the test7 points.

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

Cinebench R15 is the most up-to-date benchmark from the Finns from Maxon today. It tests the entire system: both video cards and CPU. For the CPU, the result of the analysis is the value of PTS points, and for video controllers, the value of frames per second. FPS. A complex 3D scene is rendered with many detailed objects, light sources and reflections. In this version of the Single Core program, only one thread is used for rendering. The single-threaded test of the Atom N270 processor in the Cinebench R15 program indicates its high performance, the result is 34.57 points. Compared to it, its Pentium III 1333 competitor fails this test with a score of 21.18 points.

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-thread test

Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-thread test. It is the wide cross-platform support for a variety of devices and operating systems that makes Geekbench benchmarks the most valuable at the present time. It’s already In Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core, the Atom N270 processor scored 808, which is significantly higher than the Pentium III 1333. In this test, the Pentium III 1333 processor scores a very low score of 504. 1 points — compared to the Atom N270.

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

Single-Core test uses 1 thread. This product, like its earlier versions, is still running on operating systems running Windows, Mac OS, Linux. For the first time in this version, mobile devices on iOS and Android operating systems are also supported. The latest single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 to date for desktop and laptop testing. The Atom N270 scored higher in Geekbench 4’s single-threaded test, with a score of 632, but not far ahead of the competition. But the Pentium III 1333 itself also showed a good score of 506.36 points, slightly losing its place to the Atom N270 model.

Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-thread test

Multi-Thread version of Geekbench 3 — will allow you to make a strong synthetic test of your processor and show how stable your system is.

Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

The 32-bit version of the program loads one CPU core and one thread. The cross-platform benchmark Geekbench is often used to test the system under Mac, but it can work on both Linux and Windows. The main purpose is to check the efficiency of the CPU.

Geekbench 2

In our archive you can find up to 200 CPU models that have test data in this program. Today, there are newer options, the current fifth and 4v. Today, the version of the Geekbench 2 tester is out of date.

X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1

In fact, this is a practical test of system performance by transcoding HD video files to H.264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. This test is faster than Pass 2 because it encodes at the same speed. The number of frames processed per second. is the result of the test. This is the most appropriate test for multi-threaded CPUs and multi-cores. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Atom N270 is significantly higher and amounts to 9.66 fps. But the Pentium III 1333 coped poorly with the task, its speed was 6.04 FPS.

X264 HD 4.

0 Pass 2

This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the rendering is already happening at a variable rate. As a result, we get a better quality video file. The resulting result is also determined by frames per second. You need to understand that a very real task is being performed, and the x264 codec is used in many video encoders. And this means that the results of the checks realistically reflect the effectiveness of the platform. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Atom N270 processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 2.05 Frames / s. Its competitor Pentium III 1333 showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 1.33 FPS.

3DMark06 CPU

This test is often used by overclockers, gamers and overclockers. Benchmark program for evaluating the performance of the central processor and video system. The processors are tested in 2 ways: the AI ​​does the pathfinding and the other test emulates the game engine using PhysX. Created using the DirectX 9.0 API by the Finnish company Futuremark. The Atom N270 performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, with a score of 483. The processor Pentium III 1333 coped worse with this task with 314.62 points.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Approximately 200 processors on our website have 3DMark FSP data. It presents a math test that performs game physics calculations.

WinRAR 4.0

Everyone knows the file archiver. The tests were run under the Windows operating system. The speed of compression by the RAR algorithm was tested, for this large volumes of randomly generated files were used. The resulting speed in the process of compression «Kb / s» — this is the result of testing. Atom N270 has a clear advantage in WinRAR data compression and packing speed, the result of file processing was 363 Kb/s. The Pentium III 1333 was far behind it, the speed of which did not exceed 172.97 Kb/s.

TrueCrypt AES

Not really a tester, but the results of his work can give an estimate of system performance. Our site shows the results of encryption speed in gigabytes per second using the AES algorithm. It can run on various Windows, Mac OS X and Linux operating systems. Unfortunately support for this program was stopped on May 28, 2014. The program has a built-in ability to instantly encrypt disk partitions.

Comparison Intel Atom N270 vs Intel Pentium III 1000B0001

Features and benefits of both

processors

900 15 Both models were released at the same time
Similarities
Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1000B
Both processors from intel brand
Processors are similar in terms of the number of cores: 1 core
Differences
Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1000B
Atom N270 belongs to the Atom processor family Pentium III 1000B belongs to the Pentium processor family
Atom N270 belongs to the processor Atom N-series Pentium III 1000B belongs to the Pentium 3 processor line
The core architecture of the Atom N270 processor is called Diamondville The core architecture of the Pentium III 1000B processor is called Coppermine
Atom N270 is a mobile processor Pentium III 1000B is a desktop processor 17

Intel Pentium III 1000B running on socket Slot 1
system bus Intel Atom N270 — 667 MHz FSB System bus data Intel Pentium III 1000B — 133 MHz FSB
Atom N270 confidently overtakes in terms of the number of threads, 2 vs. 1 Pentium III 1000B significantly loses in terms of the number of threads, 1 vs. 2
Atom N270 significantly outperforms in terms of frequency, 1600 MHz compared to 1000 MHz in the competitor Pentium III 1000B Pentium III 1000B significantly lags behind in terms of base frequency, 1000 MHz vs. 1600 MHz
Atom N270 wins in terms of manufacturability, its manufacturing process is 45 nanometers, versus 180 nanometers for the rival Pentium III 1000B Pentium III 1000B is less technologically advanced, since its manufacturing process is much larger and is 180 nm 016 Pentium III 1000B has a significantly lower number of transistors, 28 million vs. 47 million0017

The Pentium III 1000B needs a more powerful cooling system, since its TDP reaches 26.1 Watts
The Atom N270 core temperature threshold is much higher and equals 90 degrees Celsius. And this is an undeniably significant plus Pentium III 1000B maximum core temperature threshold is 70 degrees. Not significantly behind the Atom N270 processor
The Atom N270 CPU has a much larger level 1 cache compared to the Pentium III 1000B and is equal to 56 Kilobytes The L1 cache size of the Pentium III 1000B processor is much smaller compared to the Atom N270 and is equal to 32 KB byte L2 cache the CPU Pentium III 1000B is much smaller compared to the Atom N270 and equals 256 Kilobytes

Comparison of instructions and technologies

Technologies for auto-overclocking and increasing processor power
Technology or instruction name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1000B Short description
Turbo Boost Intel Auto Overclocking Technology.
Energy saving technologies
Technology or instruction name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1000B Brief description
EIST (Enhanced Intel SpeedStep) Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Energy Saving Technology.
Stop Grant state Energy saving status.
Extended Stop Grant State Energy saving status (Advanced technology).
Sleep state Sleep state.
Deep Sleep state Deep sleep state.
Deeper Sleep state Deeper sleep state.
Enhanced Deeper Sleep state Improved state of deeper sleep.
AutoHalt state Auto stop status.
Thermal Monitoring Temperature monitoring.
Idle States Idle states.
Standard extension set
Name of technology or instruction Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1000B Short description
MMX (Multimedia Extensions) Multimedia extensions.
SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) Streaming SIMD processor extension.
SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 2.
SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 3.
SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3.
NX (Execute disable bit) Execution disable bit.
Safety Technology
Technology or instruction name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1000B Short description
TXT (Trusted Execution Technology) Trusted Execution Technology.
EDB (Execute Disable Bit) Execute trip bit.
Virtualization Technologies
Technology or instruction name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1000B Short description
VT-x (Virtualization technology) Virtualization technology.
VT-d (Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O) Virtualization technology for directed I/O.
Other technologies and instructions
Technology or instruction name Intel Atom N270 Intel Pentium III 1000B Short description
Hyper Threading Hyperthreading technology.
SMM (System Management mode) System control mode.
Dynamic FSB frequency switching Dynamic FSB switching.
DBS (Demand Based Switching) Switching on request.

Benchmarks

Overall performance rating

The main rating can be calculated according to the formula, taking into account all indicators, such as test results for all programs, instructions, clock speed, temperature data, automatic overclocking technologies, number of cores and threads, architecture, socket, year of release, and other indicators . The results of the overall rating showed that the Atom N270 processor is not much superior to its rival Pentium III 1000B. The Pentium III 1000B processor itself managed to score 187. 6 points, slightly outperforming its competitor.

PassMark CPU Mark

The benchmark has a large set of tests for a large-scale assessment of the performance of computers, in particular the CPU. Among them are encryption, game physics calculations, floating point calculations, extended instruction checking, integer calculations, compression, single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. In particular, you can compare indicators with other configurations in the database. Almost all processors presented on our website have been tested in PassMark. Perhaps the most popular benchmark in Runet. Performance Test showed a slightly better performance of the Atom N270 processor (175 points) over the Pentium III 1000B (158 points). The Pentium III 1000B falls slightly behind in this test.

Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

Single version — in its test it uses only one thread for rendering and one core. MAXON appeared, it is based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. Uses the method of geometric optics — ray tracing. It is possible to test multi-processor systems. This benchmark for video cards and processors is now out of date. Works on Windows, Mac OS X. The main speed testing mode is photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, working with light, global illumination simulation, multilevel reflections, spatial light sources, and procedural shaders.

Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test

Multi Core is another test variant in the Cinebench R10 benchmark that already uses multi-threaded and multi-core testing mode. Please note that the possible number of threads in this version is limited to sixteen.

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

64-bit version of the CINEBENCH 11.5 benchmark — which has the ability to test the processor to the full, including all cores and threads. Differs from previous versions, 64 threads are used here. Testing the Atom N270 in Cinebench version R11.5 gave 0.38 points, which indicates a higher performance of this model. While the Pentium III 1000B gets 0.19points, much inferior to his opponent in this test.

Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

Good old fully functional Cinebench 11.5 from the Maxon team. His tests have not lost their relevance today. In checks, as before, the ray tracing method is used, a complex 3D space is calculated with a large number of crystalline and glass and translucent balls. In this case, Single-Core tests are performed using one thread and one core. The test score is the «Frames Per Second» value. The single-thread test results for the Atom N270 in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed high performance compared to the competitor, with a score of 0.38 points. But the Pentium III 1000B itself scored 0.19 in this testpoints, far behind him.

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-thread test

The multi-thread version of Cinebench 15 will test your build to the fullest, demonstrating everything it can. All threads and CPU cores are involved in the process of rendering detailed 3D models. The program is suitable for new multi-threaded CPUs from AMD and Intel, as it can use 256 computing threads. The Atom N270 with a score of 34.35 scores unconditionally more points in the Multi-Core test from Cinebench 15. While its competitor Pentium III 1000B lags far behind with 16.48 points in the test.

Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

Cinebench Release 15 is the most up-to-date benchmark from the Finns from Maxon. A complex 3D scene is rendered with a large number of light sources, objects and reflections. With the help of this program, they test the entire system: both processors and video cards. For processors, the result of the analysis will be the value of PTS points, and for video cards, the value of frames per second. FPS. In the Single Core version, only 1 thread is used for rendering. The single-threaded test of the Atom N270 processor in the Cinebench R15 program indicates its high performance, the result is 34.57 points. Compared to it, its Pentium III 1000B competitor fails this test with a score of 16. 63 points.

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test

64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 benchmark. It is the multi-platform support for various devices and operating systems that makes Geekbench tests the most popular now. It’s Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core processor Atom N270 received 808 points, which is significantly higher than the Pentium III 1000B. In this test, the Pentium III 1000B scores a very low score of 397.17 compared to the Atom N270.

Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test

This benchmark, like its earlier versions, can be run on systems running Linux, Mac OS, Windows. The Single-Core test uses one processor thread. For the first time, Android and iOS smartphones are also supported in this version of the program. The latest single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 to date for testing desktop PCs and laptops. The Atom N270 scored higher in the Geekbench 4.0 single-thread test with a score of 632. But its competitor Pentium III 1000B is doing much worse — 396. 68 points.

Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-threaded test

Multi Core version of Geekbench 3 — will allow you to make a strong synthetic test of your build and show the stability of your system.

Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test

Geekbench is a cross-platform benchmark that is often used to evaluate Mac systems, although it will run on both Linux and Windows. The main purpose is to test the efficiency of the CPU. The Single Core version of the test uses only one CPU core and one thread.

Geekbench 2

In our archive you can find about 200 CPU models that have test results in this benchmark. At the moment there are newer versions: 5v and the fourth. An almost completely outdated version of the Geekbench 2 tester.

X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1

In essence, this is a practical test of processor performance by transcoding HD files to the new H.264 format, the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. This is the most appropriate test for multi-core and multi-thread processors. The number of frames processed per second is the result of the check. This test is faster than Pass 2 because it encodes at a constant rate. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Atom N270 is significantly higher and amounts to 9.66 fps. But the Pentium III 1000B coped poorly with the task, its speed was 4.75 FPS.

X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2

This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the rendering is performed at a variable rate. The resulting value is also measured in frames per second. It is important to understand that a very real task is being carried out, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of video programs. As a result, we get better video quality. Therefore, the results of the checks really reflect the effectiveness of the platform. When measuring the speed of video file compression by the Atom N270 processor in mpeg4 format, the result was 2.05 Frames / s. Its competitor Pentium III 1000B showed a much lower video encoding rate compared to it — 1. 05 FPS.

3DMark06 CPU

CPUs are tested in two ways: the artificial intelligence calculates the pathfinding, and the second test simulates the engine using PhysX. Benchmark program for testing video system, and CPU. Based on DirectX 9.0 by Futuremark. This benchmark is often used by overclockers and gamers and those who like to overclock processors. The Atom N270 performed significantly faster in the pathfinding and game physics tests, with a score of 483. The processor Pentium III 1000B coped worse with this task with 248.65 points.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Approximately two hundred CPUs on our Internet resource have data in the 3DMark Fire Strike Physics test. It includes an accurate test that calculates in-game physics.

WinRAR 4.0

Everyone knows the file archiver. The checks were made under Windows. The speed of compression into the RAR format was estimated; for this, large volumes of random files were used.