Chart of graphics cards: PassMark Software — Video Card (GPU) Benchmark Charts

The Best Graphics Cards for Compact PCs in 2022

Editor’s Note: Before you dive into this guide, as you’ll see from some of the prices above, the availability and pricing situation for GPUs is anything but «normal» right now, and has been skewed since the start of the pandemic. If you plan to buy a card soon, also see this buying-strategies guide for advice on finding cards at a fair price. If you want to wait it out a bit longer, check out this how-to tutorial on getting the most performance from the GPU you already own.

The Best Graphics Card Deals This Week*

*Deals are selected by our commerce team

MSI Geforce RTX 3090 24GB Graphics Card
(Opens in a new window)
— $979.99

(List Price $2,009.99)
MSI Geforce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB Graphics Card
(Opens in a new window)
— $1,269.60

(List Price $1,400)
EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra Graphics Card
(Opens in a new window)
— $1,126. 99

(List Price $1,919.99)
Zotac Gaming RTX 3060 Twin Edge OC 12GB Graphics Card
(Opens in a new window)
— $420.57

(List Price $549.99)
Zotac Gaming RTX 3080 Ti Trinity OC Graphic Card
(Opens in a new window)
— $869.99

(List Price $1,149.99)

More About Our Picks

Zotac GeForce GTX 1650 Super Twin Fan

4.0 Excellent

Best Compact Graphics Card for Budget 1080p Play

Bottom Line:

Zotac’s punchy GeForce GTX 1650 Super Twin Fan is markedly better than the non-«Super» GTX 1650 and a solid, small version of this mainstream GPU for budget-focused 1080p gaming.

Pros

Much faster than original non-Super GeForce GTX 1650 in 1080p and 1440p gaming.
Runs quiet.
Priced competitively.
Impressively small in our Zotac test sample.

Cons

Underperforms on some games.
Runs hotter than the non-Super GTX 1650.

Read Our Zotac GeForce GTX 1650 Super Twin Fan Review

Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Super Twin Fan

4.0 Excellent

Best Compact Graphics Card for Mainstream 1080p Play

Bottom Line:

If you’ve been holding off on a mainstream video card for 1080p gaming, the GeForce GTX 1660 Super could be your trigger to buy: It’s a solid-playing, popularly priced waypoint between the GTX 1660 and GTX 1660 Ti.

Pros

Solid price-to-performance ratio for 1080p gaming.
Surprisingly good overclocking ceiling.

Cons

Some driver wrinkles in a few test games show scant improvement over GTX 1660.

Read Our Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Super Twin Fan Review

EVGA GeForce RTX 3050 XC Black Gaming 8G

4.0 Excellent

Best Compact Graphics Card for High-Refresh 1080p Play (Plus Ray-Tracing)

Bottom Line:

The GeForce RTX 3050 is a strong junior entry into Nvidia’s peerless lineup of «Ampere»-powered RTX 30 Series GPUs, and this EVGA XC Black card is a corker for 1080p play at a near-budget price.

Pros

Compact, twin-fan design
Full array of video ports in our test sample
Good price-to-performance ratio for its segment
Strong results in ray-tracing benchmarks
High overclock ceiling

Cons

Not as far ahead of AMD’s Radeon RX 6500 XT in some tests as we would have hoped
Relatively high power consumption for its class

Read Our EVGA GeForce RTX 3050 XC Black Gaming 8G Review

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 AMD Radeon RX 6600

3.5 Good

Best Compact Graphics Card for Budget 1440p Play

Bottom Line:

The XFX Speedster SWFT 210, based on AMD’s midrange Radeon RX 6600 GPU, is an able-enough short card for lower-end 1440p gaming with newer AAA games.

Pros

Competitive with GeForce RTX 3060 in frame rates and list price
Lower power requirements

Cons

Better with newer games than old
No significant overclocking headroom
Ran hot during our stress testing

Read Our XFX Speedster SWFT 210 AMD Radeon RX 6600 Review

EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming 12G

3. 5 Good

Best Compact Graphics Card for Mainstream 1440p Play

Bottom Line:

Suited to 1080p and 1440p gaming, EVGA’s XC Black Gaming 12G version of the GeForce RTX 3060 is an able performer, though Nvidia’s own RTX 3060 Ti outshines it on value.

Pros

Fast frame rates in multiplayer titles
Compact card design
Reasonable overclocking performance

Cons

Nontrivial performance drop versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Minor gains over previous (RTX 2060) generation
Pricey for its performance class

Read Our EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming 12G Review

Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Amp

4.0 Excellent

A Solid Previous-Gen Alternative to the GeForce RTX 3060

Bottom Line:

A fine value in the previous-generation GeForce RTX 20 lineup, the RTX 2060 is a worthy-enough 1440p pick if you can’t land an RTX 3060.

Pros

Faster than the GeForce GTX 1070 for less money.
Compact two-slot design.
Quiet fans.
Headroom for mild overclocking.

Cons

Unlike Nvidia RTX 2060 Founders Edition, lacks a VirtualLink USB Type-C port.
Priced higher than the GeForce GTX 1060 it replaces.
8GB of video memory would have been ideal.

Read Our Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Amp Review

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition

4.5 Outstanding

Best Semi-Compact Graphics Card for High-Refresh 1440p Play

Bottom Line:

If you want the best marriage of price, performance, and features for 4K and 1440p gaming, Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition is matched only by its own step-up RTX 3070 sibling.

Pros

Beats the RTX 2080 Super in most benchmarks
Great price-to-performance ratio
Stable launch drivers
Runs cool
Short PCB, redesigned cooling system make for a compact card

Cons

RTX 3070 gives an extra margin for 4K today and tomorrow

Read Our Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition Review

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition

5. 0 Exemplary

Best Semi-Compact Graphics Card for 4K Gaming

Bottom Line:

A fierce follow-up to its killer GeForce RTX 3080, Nvidia’s beautifully engineered RTX 3070 Founders Edition is a practically perfect graphics card. Gamers aiming for high-resolution, high-refresh 1440p or 4K play will find today’s best price-for-performance engine right here.

Pros

Incredibly fast for the price
Beautiful design
Great 4K gaming results
Innovative cooling system
Doesn’t run too hot

Cons

Expect a run on this card to rival the one on the RTX 3080

Read Our Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition Review

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

3.5 Good

Best Graphics Card for 4K Power in Recent AAA Games (If It Fits!)

Bottom Line:

AMD’s Radeon RX 6700 XT is a solid competitor to Nvidia’s lineup of midrange GPUs—if you stick to recent, optimized titles.

Pros

Competitive frame rates, in games that are optimized
SAM testing sees frame-rate gains in select titles
Debut MSRP is $20 below that of Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3070

Cons

DirectX 11-based games may run significantly slower than on competing Nvidia cards
Higher temperatures under stress than competing Nvidia cards
Radeon reference design is underwhelming compared with Nvidia’s RTX 30 Series Founders Editions
Coil whine under load in our sample card

Read Our AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT Review

A hulking, full-tower PC is always your best option if you want room for multiple graphics cards, general upgrades, or all the terabytes of storage you could ever reasonably afford. But these days, you don’t necessarily need one if you want a powerful PC that can handle editing high-def or 4K video, playing new AAA games at 4K, and powering virtual-reality (VR) headsets.

As more and more PC enthusiasts and boutique-PC builders have shown interest in compact performance systems, many case makers have offered up comparatively compact chassis that have room for midsize or even full-size graphics cards. For instance, the shoebox-shaped SilverStone Sugo 14 has room enough for a graphics card over a foot long. That means the largest and most powerful cards available, such as the Nvidia GeForce GTX 3080, should have just enough clearance in that case.

A handful of similarly compact PC cases have an even smaller footprint, yet enough room for beastly graphics cards. (You’ll want to check the specs.) Just note that specialized compact cases like these usually require a MicroATX or Mini-ITX motherboard, rather than a more standard (and often less expensive) full-size ATX motherboard. Their unusual proportions mean that they may be able to take big video cards, but not big mainboards.

It’s possible to build a gaming-ready system even smaller, using a truly trim case such as the Cooler Master Elite 110 (which is just 11 by 10 by 11 inches). It can include an upper-end processor and a graphics card like the Zotac GeForce GTX 1650 Super Twin Fan or one based on the GeForce GTX 1660 or GTX 1660 Super. Those cards aren’t extreme performers, but they do support VR gaming and can handle today’s hardiest non-VR titles on high settings at 1080p (1,920-by-1,080-pixel) resolution. (Interested in which cards are best for your VR headset? Check out our roundup of those GPUs(Opens in a new window) for the best picks.)

Measure Twice: How to Tell Which Graphics Cards Will Fit Your Case

For graphics-card considerations specifically (which is likely why you landed here), the most important thing is how much card clearance the PC chassis that you own (or are considering buying) has available. This is often listed on the chassis’ product page under «specifications,» or in an online manual. But in a pinch, you can pop off the side panel and do a rough estimate yourself, with a tape measure or ruler.

Inside the case, find the area where the PCI Express card expansion brackets are, usually at the back. This is the spot where the video-output ports on a graphics card will show through the back of the chassis. Measure from there, parallel to the PCI Express slot into which you’ll install your card, to the first obstruction you run across. That’s your maximum card length, assuming your card does not have power connectors sticking out of its trailing end. If it does, you’ll need to compensate for that. (Most of the time, these days, the connectors are on the top edge of the card.)

(Photo: Zlata Ivleva)

If you want to fit a high-end gaming card, also be sure there’s room for mounting the card across two expansion slots, because just about all such cards occupy at least two bracket positions across. Some very compact PC cases may not have very much space between the PCI Express slot you’ll use for a card and the nearby case wall, which might prevent you from installing a card at all. If you’re upgrading an existing system, at least an eyeball check is much advised.

The distance between the bracket area and the nearest object on the other side of the case (often a hard drive mount or bay, or the wall of the case itself) will determine how long a graphics card your system can handle. If the case has 10.5 inches of clearance or more, you’ll be able to fit at least some high-end cards, including a subset of ultra-high-end cards based on, say, Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3070 or GeForce RTX 3080. This also includes AMD’s high-end options like the Radeon RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT, which both measure in at exactly 10.5 inches each in reference versions. But some third-party versions of these cards are longer (much longer), so you need to check the details. Example: We’ve seen a few GeForce RTX 3070 cards under 10 inches, and some RTX 3060 Ti cards above 12 inches. Check those specs.

(Photo: Zlata Ivleva)

For smaller PC cases that still have room for a full-height graphics card, though, you’ll need an air-cooled card that may be 8 inches long or less. These are often Mini-ITX-mainboard cases that are very tight on space. That 8 inches may sound generously big enough, but as gaming-class graphics cards go, that’s not much wiggle room. But even here these days, you have a few options on that front.

Can Your Power Supply Handle a New Video Card?

Another factor to consider when building a compact PC is power supply (PSU) cable routing. While many cards on the market will keep their power-pin connection ports on top of the card (and equally as many compact or Mini-ITX cases are made to support this design), a few may opt to put the pin connector on the rear-facing edge of the card instead.

If you’re already working in a constrained space and every inch of the total card measurement matters, you’ll want to be sure that wherever your card plugs into the PSU (if it does at all, more on that below) is accommodating to all the other parts and pieces you’re trying to squeeze into a confined area.

That said, many compact cards won’t even ask you for a dedicated PSU power connection in the first place. Several options we have tested, including the 75-watt Zotac GeForce GTX 1650 OC, don’t need an external connection because they already pull all the watts they need from the PCI Express slot they’re plugged into.

Keep in mind that these cards have limitations on the amount of graphical horsepower and overclocking capacity they can support without an external power source. But if those aren’t major concerns of yours, then you might want to go this route to avoid any cabling issues in the first place.

Low-Profile Graphics Cards: A Low-Clearance Alternative

You’ll note that we’ve talked about card length, but not much about card height. A few thin PC cases (usually flat, broad ones meant for home-theater-PC use) accept only what are called «low-profile» expansion cards, among them low-profile PCI Express graphics cards. These cards are much shorter in the vertical dimension than an ordinary video card, and they can be outfitted with what’s known as a low-profile or «half-height» bracket. (You twist a screw or two to install the shorter bracket in place of the ordinary one.) This enables the card to mount on the vertically smaller PCI-slot frame.

There’s usually room for just two ports on a half-height bracket, or in a few cards we’ve seen, the half-height bracket is two slots wide, allowing for a third port. So know that multi-display connectivity is often a bit compromised on these cards, especially with the low-profile bracket attached.

Because low-profile boards are much smaller in surface area (and thus the room for a graphics chip, power circuitry, and cooling apparatus is reduced), they are budget-minded, basic cards, meant as a step up from CPU-integrated graphics or to add support for multiple displays.

So, Which Compact Graphics Card Should I Buy?

As always, size and features for video cards based on a given graphics chip can vary significantly, depending on the model and the card maker. Nvidia and AMD make «reference cards» based on their graphics processors. Third-party partners—MSI, Sapphire, EVGA, Asus, and many others—then make and sell their own branded cards, some of which adhere to the design of these reference boards. They also offer «custom» versions with slight differences in shape and size, the configuration of the ports, the amount and speed of onboard memory, and the cooling fans or heat sinks installed.

Compact video cards fall into that custom class. Because of that, if you’re shopping for a card for a compact system, or you have a particular case in mind, be sure the size, power, and cooling demands of the card you’re buying match up with the chassis you’re planning on putting it in. Few things in the gaming world are more frustrating than getting a promising new graphics card in the mail, or carting it home from the local superstore, only to find out it doesn’t fit in your PC, or your power supply doesn’t have the juice (or requisite connectors) to get it going.

If you have a bit more room to play with in your PC case, check out our roundup of the best graphics cards for 4K gaming, which will be bigger cards. (Also check out our master guide to the best graphics cards overall, heedless of size.) And complete your custom build with one of the top M.2 solid-state drives we’ve tested. These tiny SSDs are a perfect match if you’re space-strapped.

Cost Per Frame: Best Value Graphics Cards Right Now

For those who missed it, we recently published our GPU pricing update for April 2022, which saw prices for graphics cards continue to trend in the right direction… downward. We’ve been monitoring GPU prices for well over a year now and it’s great to see prices getting closer and closer to the MSRP.

But as we mentioned in that feature, it’s hard to say just how exciting that is for prospective buyers considering most of these products are now 18 months old and will likely be superseded by the end of this year by much more powerful next-gen hardware. Then again, we do believe that if gamers had the opportunity of buying an RTX 3070 for $730 or an RX 6700 XT for $570 earlier this year, they would have jumped at it. So while pricing still sucks compared to 2019, it could be worse, a lot worse. If you need evidence of that, just go back and check our GPU pricing update for May 2021 when the 3070 was closer to $1,600(!).

Anyway, for those of you who are now ready to buy, and aren’t willing to hold out for next gen products to arrive — because let’s be honest, pricing will almost certainly be inflated and availability will be poor around launch day — what should you buy now? For that, we’ve come up with some fresh data and created a cost per frame analysis.

The goal today is to test all current generation AMD and Nvidia GPUs to establish FPS performance and using that data, create some cost per frame comparisons. In total, there’s 17 current generation GPUs (or up to 18 if you include the RX 6400, but we don’t have one of those yet) and we don’t think we’re missing out on anything of true value there.

Because that’s a ton of GPUs to cover, we’ve only tested them in 6 games, but we’ve chosen the titles carefully based on recent 50 game benchmarks. The titles include Red Dead Redemption 2, Rainbow Six Siege, Far Cry 6, Hitman 3, Dying Light 2 and Shadow of the Tomb Raider.

Instead of going through the individual game data, we’ve calculated the geomean for the six games and will be using that to report cost per frame. The reason for using medium quality settings in almost all the games was to allow the entry-level models to achieve reasonable levels of performance, and then at the high-end we can look at the 4K data.

We tested at 1080p 1440p and 4K resolutions using the Ryzen 7 5800X3D with DDR4-3600 CL16 memory and resizable BAR enabled. We used pricing information gathered on April 20, which means that some price movement is to be expected, though the bulk of the data should be good.

With that said, the most valuable information here is the frame rate data. Simply select a performance tier you’re interested in, take the current pricing you’re looking at and divide that by the frame rate to get your cost per frame. Even if you are not in the United States, as we usually make recommendations based on pricing from that market, you can check pricing of the relevant products in your region and using the formula above you can easily come up with the option that makes the most sense for you.

Best Value at 1080p

The best value 1080p GPU right now is the Radeon RX 6600, coming in at a cost of $2.98 per frame in our testing. That makes it 16% cheaper than the 6500 XT per frame. What’s shocking about this data is that the 6500 XT would need to be priced at ~$170 just match the cost per frame of the RX 6600, and it would be doing so with half the VRAM, half the PCIe bandwidth, no hardware encoding, and complete absence of AV1 decoding.

In other words, even as the Radeon 6500 XT approaches its MSRP, it continues to be a horrible product that should have never sold for a dollar over $150 — in fact, $100 or less is far more fitting for this class of product. It’s crazy to think this GPU was selling for $270+ just months ago and some reviewers were recommending it simply because it was the cheapest new GPU you could buy.

The Radeon RX 6600 also makes a mockery of the RTX 3050 as the GeForce GPU costs 26% more per frame. It might be $10 cheaper, according to our pricing data, but because it’s 20% slower, it’s not a great deal.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti stacks up better despite costing more per frame. It’s $10 more than the 6700 XT and is only ~5% slower, so you could argue features such as DLSS help to offset that margin. For comparing more higher-end graphics cards let’s move to 1440p.

Best Value at 1440p

The margin between the Radeon 6700 XT and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti remains about the same at 1440p with the GeForce GPU costing roughly 7% more per frame. As we move beyond the mid-range though towards the higher-end models, AMD stacks up well.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is offering 5% more performance than the 12GB RTX 3080, suggesting that the 6 game sample is slightly more favorable towards AMD when compared to our 50 game testing, but we’re only talking about a 5% discrepancy, though do keep that in mind.

In terms of overall FPS performance, the 6800 XT, RTX 3080, 3080 12GB, 3080 Ti and even the 3090 are all pretty similar. The 3080 Ti and 6800 XT are a good match up here as they both averaged 157 fps in our testing, but the Radeon GPU is currently 24% cheaper in the US, making it more appealing in terms of cost per frame.

Best Value at 4K

As we’ve come to expect, Nvidia RTX Ampere GPUs stack up better at the higher 4K resolution and now the 6800 XT is on par with the 12GB 3080. With a wider range of games the RTX 3080 would pull ahead by around a 5-7% margin, and we know that because we recently tested them, but for the purpose of this feature it was not feasible to test 17 graphics cards across 50 games.

The data for the mid-range to lower end GPU models was spot on with what we saw across our 50 game testing, so we suspect the lower quality settings is what’s favoring AMD’s high-end models a little more in this scenario.

Here we’re seeing half a dozen AMD and Nvidia GPUs in that 90-105 FPS range, which includes the Radeon RX 6800 XT, 6900 XT, GeForce RTX 3080, 3080 12GB, 3080 Ti and 3090. The most affordable GeForce option is the original RTX 3080 for $1,000, whereas the 6800 XT is down at $920. That’s not a huge saving, so as usual it will come down to the importance you put on extra features, namely ray tracing performance and DLSS.

Where the GeForce range becomes ridiculous is with the RTX 3090 series. The 3090 at $1,700 is dumb and the 3090 Ti at $2,000 is equally silly. The high-end battle is fought out between the 6900 XT and RTX 3080 Ti, both offer a similar level of performance while the GeForce GPU costs 21% more.

Back in February we compared the 6900 XT and 3080 12GB head to head in 50 games and at the time the GeForce GPU was priced between $1600 — $1800, while the 6900 XT was closer to $1500 — $1600. The 3080 12GB was between $100 to $200 more expensive, which is still the case today. We think ray tracing and DLSS allow the GeForce GPU to command a 10% premium, but 20% is getting a bit too steep for us.

Best Value at 1440p (Australia)

Although a big portion of our audience is US based, we thought it’d be interesting to check out pricing trends in a few other regions, so let’s start with Australia. The best value option here is the 6600 XT, narrowly beating out the RX 6600, basically both Radeon 6600 series GPUs represent a similar level of value. Then we have the 6700 XT which just beat the 6500 XT in terms of value, but you know we take the 6500 XT’s cost per frame with a grain of salt given all the issues with that product. We’re also testing it with PCIe 4.0, meaning it would stack up far had use used PCIe 3.0.

The best value GeForce GPU in Australia is the RTX 3060 Ti or 3060. The 3060 Ti costs just 2% more than the 6700 XT per frame, so depending on the features you’re interested in the GeForce GPU could be a better value choice.

For those after a high-end GPU in Australia, the Radeon 6800 XT appears to be the way to go at $1350 AUD as it’s 23% cheaper than the RTX 3080 Ti for the same level of performance. Even if you go off our 50 game data where the 3080 12GB and 6800 XT delivered the same level of performance, the 6800 XT would amount to $9 per frame, making it 16% cheaper per frame than the 3080 12GB. That’s a large premium for superior ray tracing performance and DLSS support, but of course, it’s up to you to decide if those features are worth it.

Best Value at 1440p (Europe)

We also have some Euro pricing data, and here we see some significant changes in pricing trends. Using prices from Mindfactory, we see that the 6500 XT offers the lowest cost per frame at €210, but of course, the RX 6600 is significantly better value despite costing 86% more.

Interestingly, the RTX 3060 Ti ranks very well here and is the best value mid tier product, offering 6700 XT-like performance at a 10% discount. The RTX 3060 is also competitive with the 6600 XT.

As we get to the high-end parts, AMD does stack up well. The 6800 XT can be had for €950, while the original RTX 3080 costs €1140, making it a whopping 36% more expensive. Then when compared to the RTX 3080 12GB, we see that the GeForce GPU is fetching almost 50% more per frame and if we go off the 50 game data and say that these two GPUs are a match in terms of performance, the 12GB 3080 still comes out costing 41% more per frame.

Based on Mindfactory’s pricing, without question you would purchase the 6800 XT over any of the 3080 or 3090 series GPUs from Nvidia.

Closing Notes

That’s where things stand on the GPU front as of April 2022. Of course, pricing is highly volatile at the moment and may have changed for some models by the time you read this. Our advice is to work out which performance tier you’re after and then compare current pricing for those products.

The numbers here serve as a rough guide, but if you want to get highly accurate data for certain match ups then make sure to check out 50 game benchmarks. We’ve updated the data for most GPUs at this point. The only graphics card we strongly recommend you to avoid is the Radeon RX 6500 XT — and possibly the new 6400 XT which we might look at soon.

The Radeon RX 6600 is among the best value you are going to get right now for a budget graphics card, we wouldn’t go with anything below it. On the other side of the spectrum, the RTX 3090 and 3090 Ti should also be avoided, but not because they’re bad products, but because their price is still inflated and do not offer great value. We hope this guide is helpful to those of you buying a new graphics card right now.

Shopping Shortcuts:

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT on Amazon
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT on Amazon
AMD Radeon RX 6600 on Amazon
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 on Amazon
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 on Amazon
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 on Amazon

GPUCards | Scientific Volume Imaging

This page gives an overview of NVIDIA cards that can be used in combination with the Small, Medium, Large or Extreme GPU option in the latest version of Huygens for GPU acceleration. Over time this page will be refreshed, for a category overview of cards working with older versions of Huygens, please contact us.

For cards that are not included in this page: the option that is required in your license will depend on the amount of CUDA cores and amount of RAM that the card has according to the following specifications:

Small GPU option: for cards that have up to 1024 CUDA cores and up to 6 GB of video RAM (included with every Huygens license Free of Charge)
Medium GPU option: for cards that have up to 3072 CUDA cores and up to 8 GB of video RAM.
Large GPU option: for cards that have up to 8192 CUDA cores and up to 24 GB of video RAM.
Extreme GPU option: for cards that have up to 24576 CUDA cores and up to 64 GB of video RAM.

For the ideal combination with your CPU power check the various Performance Options in which we bundle your GPU and CPU power to let Huygens run extremely fast through your biggest data.

Huygens GPU acceleration is supported for Nvidia cards. These are supported by Windows and Linux, but not by Mac OS. If you have a valid GPU card but it’s not recognized by Huygens check out GPU checklist.

No Tabs

Small
Medium
Large
Extreme

Small GPU cards

The Small GPU option is required in your Huygens license in order to use small GPU cards. A small GPU option is included in every Huygens base license from 15.10 and later. Download the latest Huygens now.

GPU card	CUDA cores	VRAM
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	1536	6GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Super	1408	6GB
GeForce GTX 1660	1408	6GB
GeForce GTX 1650 Super	1408	4GB
GeForce GTX 1650	1024	4GB
GeForce GTX 1650	896	4GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	1280	3GB
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	1280	6GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	768	4GB
GeForce GTX 1050 (3GB)	768	3GB
GeForce GTX 1050 (2GB)	640	2GB
GeForce GTX 960	1024	2GB
GeForce GTX 950	786	2GB
GeForce GTX 780 Ti	2880	3GB
GeForce GTX 780	2304	3GB
GeForce GTX 750 Ti	640	2 GB
GeForce GTX 750	512	1GB or 2 GB
Quadro P2000	1024	5GB
Quadro P1000	640	4GB
Quadro M2000	768	4GB
Quadro K2200	640	4GB
Quadro T2000	1024	4 GB
Quadro T1000	768	4GB

Medium GPU cards

The Medium GPU option is required in your Huygens license in order to use medium GPU cards. Request Quote

GPU card	CUDA cores	VRAM
GeForce RTX 3070	5888	8GB
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER	3072	8GB
GeForce RTX 2080	2944	8GB
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER	2560	8GB
GeForce RTX 2070	2304	8GB
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER	2176	8GB
GeForce RTX 2060	1920	6GB
GeForce GTX 1080	2560	8GB
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	2432	8GB
GeForce GTX 1070	1920	8GB
GeForce GTX 980 Ti	2816	6GB
GeForce GTX 980	2048	4GB
GeForce GTX 970	1664	4GB
Quadro RTX 4000	2304	8GB
Quadro P4000	1792	8GB
Quadro M5000	2048	8GB
Quadro M4000	1664	8GB
Quadro P2200	1280	5GB
Tesla K20	2496	5GB

Large GPU cards

Large GPU option is required in your license in order to use Large GPU cards. Request Quote

GPU card	CUDA cores	VRAM
Titan RTX	4608	24GB
Titan V	5120	12GB
Titan-Xp (Pascal Generation)	3584	12GB
GeForce GTX Titan-X	3072	12GB
GeForce RTX 3090	10496	24GB
GeForce RTX 3080	8704	10GB
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB	8960	12GB
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti	10240	12GB
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti	4352	11GB
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti	3584	11GB
Tesla V100 (16GB version)	5120	16GB
Tesla P100	3584	16GB
Tesla P100 NVLINK	3584	16GB
Tesla P40	3840	24GB
Tesla M60	4096	16 GB
Tesla M40	3072	12GB or 24 GB
Tesla K80	4992	2 x 12GB
Tesla K40	2880	12GB
Quadro GP100	3584	16GB
Quadro RTX A5000	8192	24GB
Quadro RTX A4000	6144	16GB
Quadro RTX 6000	4608	24GB
Quadro RTX 5000	3072	16GB
Quadro P6000	3840	24GB
Quadro P5000	2560	16GB
Quadro M6000 24GB	3072	24GB
Quadro M6000	3072	12GB
Quadro K6000	2880	12GB

Extreme GPU cards

Extreme GPU option is required in your license in order to use the GPU cards below. Request Quote

GPU card	CUDA cores	VRAM
Tesla V100 (32GB version)	5120	32GB
Quadro RTX 8000	4608	48GB
Quadro GV100	5120	32GB
Titan V CEO Edition	5120	32GB
RTX A6000	10752	48 GB

Huygens 20.04

Huygens versions up to and including 20.04 support NVidia graphics cards with a Compute Capability of 3.0 or higher and a Cuda Toolkit version of 7.0 or higher.

Huygens 20.10

Compute Capability lower than 3.5 and Cuda Toolkit versions older than 8.0 are now deprecated. Huygens 20.10 does no longer support these for GPU acceleration. CPU computation and display on a monitor via these cards will continue to be supported.

Affected cards that are still supported in Huygens 20.04 but not in Huygens 20.10:
GeForce GTX 770, GeForce GTX 760, GeForce GT 740, GeForce GTX 690, GeForce GTX 680, GeForce GTX 670, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, GeForce GTX 660, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST, GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 650, GeForce GTX 880M, GeForce GTX 780M, GeForce GTX 770M, GeForce GTX 765M, GeForce GTX 760M, GeForce GTX 680MX, GeForce GTX 680M, GeForce GTX 675MX, GeForce GTX 670MX, GeForce GTX 660M, GeForce GT 750M, GeForce GT 650M, GeForce GT 745M, GeForce GT 645M, GeForce GT 740M, GeForce GT 730M, GeForce GT 640M, GeForce GT 640M LE, GeForce GT 735M, GeForce GT 730M;
Quadro K5000, Quadro K4200, Quadro K4000, Quadro K2000, Quadro K2000D, Quadro K600, Quadro K420, Quadro K500M, Quadro K510M, Quadro K610M, Quadro K1000M, Quadro K2000M, Quadro K1100M, Quadro K2100M, Quadro K3000M, Quadro K3100M, Quadro K4000M, Quadro K5000M, Quadro K4100M, Quadro K5100M, NVS 510, Quadro 410;
Tesla K10, GRID K340, GRID K520.

	Accelerated with GPU (CUDA)
Deconvolution algorithms
CMLE deconvolution	+ Multi GPU support: Operation Window, Batch Processor & Scripting
QMLE deconvolution	+ Multi GPU support: Operation Window, Batch Processor & Scripting
GMLE deconvolution	+ Multi GPU support: Operation Window, Batch Processor & Scripting
Tikhonov-Miller deconvolution
Workflow Processor	+ Multi GPU support
Deconvolution Wizard
Deconvolution Express
Batch Feeder
Localization algorithms for Huygens Localizer
MLE particle fitting
LSQ particle fitting
Center of mass particle fitting
Registration & Deconvolution
Object Stabilizer	+ Multi GPU support: Batch Processor
Drift correction	+ Multi GPU support: Batch Processor
Stitching & Decon Wizard	+ Multi GPU support: HuCore/HRM
Light-Sheet Decon & Fusion Wizard
Image processing commands
Image processing fitlers (min, max, variance ppu, avg, gauss)
Image properites functions (hist, stat, range)
Image processing commands 1 (estbg, phaseCorr)
Image processing commands 2 (getpix, setpix, cp, slice, multiMip, miniMip, sum)
Image processing commands 3 (shift, resample, mirror, hist2ch, label, perc, optrep)
Visualization & Analysis
2D slice renderers
3D SFP renderer	Since v. 19.04
3D MIP renderer	Since v.19.04
3D Surface renderer	Since v.19.04
Colocalization Analysis	+ Multi GPU support: HuCore/HRM
Object Analyzer	GPU support for labeling and rendering

GeForce Graphics Cards Now 14% Over MSRP, Radeon at Just 6% Over MSRP

The latest NVIDIA GeForce and AMD Radeon GPU pricing update have been published by 3DCenter, & once again shows that we are a step close to MSRP prices for gaming graphics cards.

NVIDIA GeForce & AMD Radeon GPU Prices Now Just 10% Over MSRP: Graphics Cards In Stock Everywhere!

In the latest report by 3DCenter, we can see that the GPU prices for both NVIDIA GeForce and AMD Radeon graphics cards continue to fall which shouldn’t be a surprise as that’s the trend we have witnessed since the end of 2021. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30 series prices now average at around 14% over MSRP while AMD’s Radeon RX 6000 series averages with a selling price of 6% over MSRP.

AMD Radeon & NVIDIA GeForce Graphics cards are back to normal MSRP prices & GPU availability is better than ever. (Image Credits: 3DCenter)

In addition to that, GPU supply is abundant and currently, there’s no retail outlet in the world that doesn’t have graphics cards on their store shelves (which wasn’t the case a few quarters back). The red and green teams have also announced various promos such as the ‘Restocked and Reloaded’ by NVIDIA and AMD also announcing how its Radeon RX 6000 series cards are available at MSRP-level prices.

AMD Radeon & NVIDIA GeForce Graphics Card Price Trend (Image Credits: 3DCenter):

	Dec 12	Jan 2	Jan 23	13 Feb	6 Mar	27 Mar	Apr 17	8th of May
AMD Radeon RX 6000	+83%	+78% -5PP	+63% -15PP	+45% -18PP	+35% -10PP	+25% -10PP	+12% -13PP	+6% -6PP
nVidia GeForce RTX 30	+87%	+85% -2PP	+77% -8PP	+57% -20PP	+41% -16PP	+25% -16PP	+19% -6PP	+14% -5PP
only Radeon RX 6700 XT, 6800 & 6800 XT and GeForce RTX 3060, 3060 Ti, 3070 & 3080-10GB	+105%	+101% -4PP	+88% -13PP	+68% -20PP	+55% -13PP	+38% -17PP	+26% -12PP	+22% -4PP

Talking about AMD prices first, once again, almost all graphics cards within the Radeon RX 6000 series are now available between +1 to +10% of MSRP. It is only the Radeon RX 6800 series cards that are still selling for an average of 30-35% over MSRP. This has been the case with these cards since their launch.

AMD Radeon RX 6000 Series Graphics Card Prices (RDNA 2 GPUs) via 3DCenter:

	6400	6500XT	6600	6600XT	6700XT	6800	6800XT	6900XT
miser	182-230€	199-320€	359-480€	425-570€	599-1199€	889-1209€	929-1470€	1114-1949€
alternates	N/A	220-299€	374-439€	479-579€	€629-799	925€	1019-1099€	1129-1399€
Caseking	188-211€	228-305€	399-438€	498-575€	640-957€	907-1145€	989-1207€	1199-1679€
computer universe	186-211€	215-260€	375-446€	479-660€	630-752€	937-1080€	966-1335€	1349-1767€
Hardwarecamp24	N/A	224€	389-449€	458-494€	769€	€959	1129-1149€	1249-1259€
media market	190€	205-310€	420-435€	450-560€	649-900€	1039€	1132-1229€	1206-1349€
Mindfactory	182-195€	199-260€	359-412€	425-556€	599-690€	€889-949	929-1031€	1114-1339€
notebooks cheaper	199€	199-269€	369-509€	449-529€	629-819€	€889-999	999-1180€	1160-1949€
Pro Shop	193-230€	€222-309	399-428€	514-575€	683-840€	950-1127€	1016-1349€	1300-1820€
List Price	$179	$199	$329	$379	$479	$579	$649	$999
Surcharge	from –10%	from –11%	from –3%	from -1%	from +11%	from +36%	from +27%	from -1%
Change as of 17th April	—	–6PP	+2PP	–7PP	–3PP	–5PP	–4PP	-1PP
Availability	★★★☆☆	★★★★★	★★★★★	★★★★★	★★★★★	★★★★☆	★★★★☆	★★★★★

The NVIDIA lineup averages around +14% prices over MSRP but it is just three cards at the moment, the RTX 3050, RTX 3060 Ti, and RTX 3070 which are priced over +20% of MSRP. The enthusiast RTX 3080 Ti can actually be found below the MSRP which is impressive given that it offers performance similar to the RTX 3090 Ti which costs several hundred dollars more.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30 Series Graphics Card Prices (Ampere GPUs) via 3DCenter:

	3050	3060	3060Ti	3070	3070Ti	3080 -10GB	3080Ti	3090
miser	348-500€	420-790€	€620-917	679-1079€	749-1491€	899-1491€	1299-1976€	1839-3074€
alternates	369-419€	449-499€	€619	789-799€	799-949€	999-1079€	1299-1699€	1999-2499€
Caseking	358-419€	486-651€	623-733€	796-898€	829-928€	965-1294€	1379-1850€	1999-2168€
computer universe	378-429€	469-790€	590-749€	799-961€	806-1491€	941-1140€	1416-1903€	1889-3164€
Hardwarecamp24	418€	N/A	649€	€779-899	788-869€	999-1279€	1399-1529€	1879-1994€
media market	359-421€	450-620€	811€	700€	799-1039€	960-1249€	1300-1869€	1800-2699€
Mindfactory	372-398€	449-479€	N/A	745-769€	789-899€	969-1064€	1298-1498€	1839-1990€
notebooks cheaper	358-500€	449-729€	630-710€	€679-899	749-1049€	€899-1199	1329-1532€	1879-2099€
Pro Shop	369-497€	470-624€	€675-701	770-983€	825-975€	1099-1200€	1399-1949€	2000-2249€
List Price	$249	$329	$399	$499	$599	$699	$1199	$1499
Surcharge	from +24%	from +13%	from +31%	from +21%	from +11%	from +14%	from -4%	from +6%
Change as of 17th April	+7p	–5PP	-1PP	–6PP	–7PP	–7PP	–5PP	–8PP
Availability	★★★★★	★★★★★	★★★★★	★★★★★	★★★★★	★★★★★	★★★★★	★★★★★

We recently saw the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT being sold at $100 US below its MSRP over at Newegg US. There are just a few cards that are currently in demand and would take a few more months to hit their MSRP figures but the vast majority of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30 and AMD Radeon RX 6000 lineup is currently being sold at normal prices. This along with prices now coming back at or below the MSRP means that the GPU market is out of the worse and prices/availability can now go back to normal.

Products mentioned in this post

Best GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Graphics Cards Available — Which One To Get?

Q3 is almost finished and we are slowly but surely moving to Q4. Still, graphics card prices continue to fall. We have seen RTX 3090 Ti selling for MSRP, but for the high-end graphics card, I think the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is still the best. Although, some of the best RTX 3080 (non-Ti) are not bad either. The GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is a cheaper version of the RTX 3090. It is also said to be a better buy than the RTX 3090, especially if you don’t need 24GB of VRAM. So, if you are in the market wondering which RTX 3080 Ti you should get, we listed here some of the best RTX 3080 Ti graphics cards in the market.

UPDATE: Note that as of September 17, 2022, EVGA has announced that they will no longer work with NVIDIA, ending the partnership immediately. They will continue to support and sell the RTX 30 series cards until all their stocks are sold. EVGA will also keep parts on hand for replacement and warranty purposes. Once all are consumed, they are finished with the graphics card business.

Best RTX 3080 Ti Graphics Cards Today

All GeForce RTX 3080 Ti graphics cards in the market are powered with the same 8nm GA102 GPU based on the Ampere architecture. It has 10240 CUDA cores, 320 TMUs, 112 ROPs, and 12GB of GDDR6X memory running on a 384-bit memory interface. These are all common to all RTX 3080 Ti graphics cards.

The main difference lies in the cooler design and PCB design. Some AIB advertises or highlights the boost clock speed of their graphics card. But at the end of the day, all of them will boost higher thanks to NVIDIA Boost technology. The graphics card only needs sufficient power and enough cooling to keep the GPU’s temperature at bay. With the conditions met, the GPU will eventually boost higher.

Below is a summary of all the graphics cards mentioned in this list. It is in alphabetical order. Later in the article, I’ll be categorizing them according to their (unique) features. I’ll also show you some performance numbers and answer some frequently asked questions regarding the RTX 3080 Ti GPU.

Model	Boost Clock	Cooler Design	PCI Slots	Power Connectors	Availability
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC Edition	1815 MHz	Tri-fan air cooling	2.9	3x 8-pin	Check here
ASUS ROG Strix LC GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC Gaming	1860 MHz	Hybrid (Liquid + Air)	2. 6	3x 8-pin	Check here
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC Edition	1785 MHz	Tri-fan air cooling	2.7	2x 8-pin	Check here
EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming	1800 MHz	Tri-fan air cooling	2.75	3x 8-pin	Check here
EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti XC3 Ultra Gaming	1725 MHz	Tri-fan air cooling	2.2	2x 8-pin	Check here
EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming	1725 MHz	Hybrid (Liquid + Air)	2	2x 8-pin	Check here
Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Master 12G	1770 MHz	Tri-fan air cooling	3.5	3x 8-pin	Check here
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Gaming OC 12G	1710 MHz	Tri-fan air cooling	2. 7	2x 8-pin	Check here
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Vision OC 12G	1710 MHz	Tri-fan air cooling	2.7	2x 8-pin	Check here
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Gaming X Trio 12G	1770 MHz	Tri-fan air cooling	2.7	3x 8-pin	Check here
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Ventus 3X 12G OC	1695 MHz	Tri-fan air cooling	2.7	2x 8-pin	Check here
MSI GeForce RTX 3080TI SUPRIM X 12G	1830 MHz	Tri-fan air cooling	2.75	3x 8-pin	Check here
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition	1670 MHz	Dual Fan Flow-Through	2	2x 8-pin	Check here

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Performance

To give you an idea of how fast the RTX 3080 Ti is, here are some performance benchmarks at 4K resolution with maximum or ultra graphics preset. Note that some RTX 3080 Ti will perform slightly faster than others, and some will slightly be slower. GPU cooling, power, and silicon lottery are also at play. But at the end of the day, all of the RTX 3080 Ti cards will perform within the same performance range. Most of the time, the difference is minimal and negligible. NVIDIA controls how these GPUs perform.

RTX 3080 Ti FAQs

What RTX 3080 Ti has the best cooler and great cooling performance?

From the list, the Asus ROG Strix LC and EVGA XC3 Ultra Hybrid, definitely, have the better cooling solution. The GPU is liquid-cooled, while the other components are air-cooled. Unfortunately, they are costly compared to air-cooled RTX 3080 Ti. The good news is, most RTX 3080 Ti with a tri-fan cooling system will offer anywhere from sufficient to excellent cooling performance.

What RTX 3080 Ti is the fastest out of the box?

Out of the box, the Asus ROG Strix LC RTX 3080 Ti, EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 and MSI RTX 3080 Ti SUPRIM X have the higher or faster boost clock speed. They come with a factory overclock settings. But like I mentioned earlier if the graphics card has enough power and the GPU is sufficiently cooled, it will eventually boost higher. My MSI Suprim X can achieve around ~2,000MHz(+/-) without additional tweaking or manual overclocking.

Is it worth it to buy an expensive RTX 3080 Ti graphics card?

Yes and no. It depends on how you define “worth”. Some people are okay to spend more on the design, looks, and aesthetics. But even the liquid-cooled RTX 3080 Ti will not perform significantly better compared to the air-cooled RTX 3080 Ti. For sure it will have an advantage since it has a better cooling solution. But is it worth it for you?

Most of the time, even the simplest RTX 3080 Ti, like NVIDIA RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition is enough already.

What’s the best CPU for the RTX 3080 Ti?

Generally speaking, you can pair the RTX 3080 Ti with any CPU. But if you are using a slower or entry-level CPU, its performance may be poor. So, since you are willing to spend thousands of dollars for an RTX 3080 Ti, it would only be wise to not skimp on the CPU.

I would recommend AMD’s Ryzen 9 5950X, 5900X, or Ryzen 7 5800X. For Intel, the latest 12th Gen Intel Core CPUs, like the Core i9-12900(K/F) and Core i7-12700(K/F) are currently some of the best in the market, especially in gaming. The older 10th gen and 11th gen CPUs are not bad either. But if you’re building a new system, I recommend that you jump to the latest 12th Gen Intel CPU since the performance difference from its predecessor is substantial.

Should I get an RTX 3080 Ti if I have a 1080p monitor?

No, definitely no! Just like what we have experienced on our RTX 3080 review, the GPU is being bottlenecked by the 1080p resolution. There’s some performance left on the table and it is simply not designed for lower resolutions.

What’s the best monitor for the RTX 3080 Ti?

4K (2160p) and 2K (1440p) would be the ideal resolution for the RTX 3080 Ti. You can check out our article on the best 4K gaming monitors here.

So, which RTX 3080 Ti should I get?

The RTX 3080 Ti graphics cards listed here are all good. It’s really up to you which one would you prefer and based on your budget.

Best GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Graphics Cards in General

EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming

EVGA’s RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming is another beast of a graphics card. It offers a higher factory overclock setting and a thick and substantial aluminum heatsink to cool the GPU and VRAM. The heatsink is cooled by three fans and there is RGB lighting on the front-side portion.

EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming available on Amazon.com here
For UK, check at Amazon UK here

Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC Edition

Aside from the EVGA FTW3 Ultra graphics cards, Asus’ ROG Strix series is also a popular graphics card. And the Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC Edition is no slouch in terms of being one of the best 3080 Ti card in the market. It has a 2.9-slot design, with three Axial-tech fan design, nice-looking RGB lighting, and its aesthetics is simple a headturner. It also feels premium on hand and its cooling solution is quite effective.

Asus ROG Strix RTX 3080 Ti OC Edition check on Amazon.com here.

MSI GeForce RTX 3080TI SUPRIM X 12G

Just like the EVGA FTW3, the MSI RTX 3080 Ti SUPRIM X is also a beast of a graphics card. It also requires three 8-pin power connectors and features a 20-phase power design. There’s a switch near the power connector that toggles between “silent” and “gaming” mode. Finally, it has some RGB lighting and this card feels heavy and premium on hand as well.

MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti SUPRIM X available on Amazon.com here.
For UK, check at Amazon UK here.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition is one of the best RTX 3080 Ti in the market. Not only that it comes with the base price, but it’s also professional-looking, sleek, and clean. The flow-through design is excellent at cooling the GPU and other components. As expected from a Founders Edition, it does feel premium on hand.

NVIDIA RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition available on Amazon.com here
For UK, check at Amazon UK here

Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Master 12G

This is definitely the “thiccest” RTX 3080 Ti on this list. The Aorus RTX 3080 Ti Master has three fans, with the middle one spinning in the opposite direction. It also has RGB lighting, but the unique feature of the RTX 3080 Ti Master are its dual BIOS, six output ports, and the (mini) LCD display on the rear-end front-side portion. Aside from displaying the GPU temperature, users can upload GIF and customize what will be displayed on the screen.

Aorus GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Master 12G available on Amazon.com here
For UK, check on Amazon UK here.

Also Good RTX 3080 Ti Graphics Card Alternatives

Below are more RTX 3080 Ti graphics cards that are not as premium as the cards mentioned above, but are generally cheaper and good options as well. These three features tri-fan cooling solution and they do perform as expected. The Gigabyte Vision is the only different card here since it has an all-white color scheme. Just choose which one do you prefer more when it comes to aesthetics.

MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Gaming X Trio 12G available on Amazon.com here or Amazon UK here
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Gaming OC 12G available on Amazon.com here
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Vision OC 12G available on Amazon.com here

Best RTX 3080 Ti with No (RGB) Lighting

Understandably, not all of us are a fan of RGB lighting. Some users don’t like RGB lighting or any kind of lighting at all. While you can disable the RGB lighting on the graphics card mentioned above, here are three RTX 3080 Ti that doesn’t have RGB lighting. The only exception is with the Asus TUF RTX 3080 Ti since the TUF logo on the rear end has a small RBG lighting. Nevertheless, all of these cards feature an all-black color scheme.

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC Edition available on Amazon.com here or Amazon UK here
EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti XC3 Ultra Gaming available on Amazon.com here
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Ventus 3X 12G OC available on Amazon.com here

Best Water-cooled RTX 3080 Ti Graphics Cards

For those who don’t mind spending more, money no object, and simply want the coolest and best performing RTX 3080 Ti, these two liquid-cooled RTX 3080 Ti would be your option.

ASUS ROG Strix LC GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC Edition Gaming

The Asus ROG Strix LC RTX 3080 Ti OC features a hybrid cooling solution. Its GPU is cooled by a 240mm radiator and the tube connecting the radiator and GPU copper plate is 560mm long. It also has RGB lighting on the fans and on the graphics card itself. In addition to the liquid cooling, there’s a blower-type fan that cools the aluminum heatsink that is in contact with the VRM and other components.

ASUS ROG STRIX LC RTX 3080 Ti OC available on Amazon.com here.
For UK, check on Amazon UK here.

EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti XC3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming

EVGA’s RTX 3080 Ti XC3 Ultra Hybrid is somewhat similar to Asus’ ROG Strix LC. But the XC3 Ultra Hybrid doesn’t have a head-turner RGB lighting. Only the logo on its side and at the back have RGB lighting. It generally has an all-black aesthetic, including the two 120mm fans cooling the radiator.

And unlike Asus’ liquid-cooled RTX 3080 Ti, the EVGA RTX 3080 Ti XC3 Ultra Hybrid occupies only two PCI slots and requires only two 8-pin PCIe power connectors.

EVGA RTX 3080 Ti XC3 Ultra Hybrid check on Amazon.com here
For UK, check on Amazon UK here.

There you have it, which do you think is the best RTX 3080 Ti graphics card for your use case? If you think the RTX 3080 Ti is too expensive and out of your budget, perhaps you may be interested in checking out some of the best RTX 3080 graphics cards instead. On the other hand, AMD’s flagship Radeon RX 6900 XT is also a 4K-capable graphics card, not to mention it is cheaper than the RTX 3080 Ti. Check out some of the best RX 6900 XT cards here.

2CryptoCalc — GPU Profitability Ranking

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Payback 74mo. Hashrate 58.9 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.54 $ 15.21 RVN	1 200 $	0.54 $15.21 RVN	74mo.	KAWPOW	58.9 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Payback 105mo. Hashrate 52 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.48 $ 13.43 RVN	1 500 $	0.48 $13.43 RVN	105mo.	KAWPOW	52 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Payback 66mo. Hashrate 47 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.43 $ 12.14 RVN	860 $	0.43 $12.14 RVN	66mo.	KAWPOW	47 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon VII	Ravencoin AMD Radeon VII Payback 87mo. Hashrate 42 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.39 $ 10.85 RVN	1 000 $Used	0.39 $10.85 RVN	87mo.	KAWPOW	42 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Payback 71mo. Hashrate 40 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.37 $ 10.33 RVN	780 $	0.37 $10.33 RVN	71mo.	KAWPOW	40 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Payback 71mo. Hashrate 36 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.33 $ 9.299 RVN	700 $	0.33 $9.299 RVN	71mo.	KAWPOW	36 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon RX 6800	Ravencoin AMD Radeon RX 6800 Payback 88mo. Hashrate 32.7 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.3 $ 8.447 RVN	790 $	0.3 $8.447 RVN	88mo.	KAWPOW	32.7 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon RX 6800XT	Ravencoin AMD Radeon RX 6800XT Payback 89mo. Hashrate 32.7 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.3 $ 8.447 RVN	800 $	0.3 $8.447 RVN	89mo.	KAWPOW	32.7 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon RX 6900XT	Ravencoin AMD Radeon RX 6900XT Payback 100mo. Hashrate 32.7 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.3 $ 8.447 RVN	900 $	0.3 $8.447 RVN	100mo.	KAWPOW	32.7 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Payback 63mo. Hashrate 30.5 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.28 $ 7.879 RVN	530 $	0.28 $7.879 RVN	63mo.	KAWPOW	30.5 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Payback 79mo. Hashrate 30.3 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.28 $ 7.827 RVN	660 $	0.28 $7.827 RVN	79mo.	KAWPOW	30.3 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Payback 73mo. Hashrate 30 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.28 $ 7.749 RVN	600 $	0.28 $7.749 RVN	73mo.	KAWPOW	30 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Payback 36mo. Hashrate 25 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.23 $ 6.458 RVN	250 $Used	0.23 $6.458 RVN	36mo.	KAWPOW	25 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon Vega 64	Ravencoin AMD Radeon Vega 64 Payback 65mo. Hashrate 25 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.23 $ 6.458 RVN	450 $	0.23 $6.458 RVN	65mo.	KAWPOW	25 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon Vega 56	Ravencoin AMD Radeon Vega 56 Payback 51mo. Hashrate 25 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.23 $ 6.458 RVN	350 $	0.23 $6.458 RVN	51mo.	KAWPOW	25 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon RX 5700	Ravencoin AMD Radeon RX 5700 Payback 57mo. Hashrate 24.8 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.23 $ 6.406 RVN	390 $	0.23 $6.406 RVN	57mo.	KAWPOW	24.8 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super	Aeternity NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Payback 78mo. Hashrate 8.22 Gps Mining Profit 24h 0.22 $ 3.010 AE	520 $	0.22 $3.010 AE	78mo.	CuckooCycle	8.22 Gps	AeternityPools listed: 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Payback 70mo. Hashrate 22.7 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.21 $ 5.864 RVN	440 $	0.21 $5.864 RVN	70mo.	KAWPOW	22.7 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon RX 6700XT	Ravencoin AMD Radeon RX 6700XT Payback 78mo. Hashrate 22.7 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.21 $ 5.864 RVN	490 $	0.21 $5.864 RVN	78mo.	KAWPOW	22.7 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070	Aeternity NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Payback 82mo. Hashrate 7.5 Gps Mining Profit 24h 0.2 $ 2.747 AE	500 $	0.2 $2.747 AE	82mo.	CuckooCycle	7.5 Gps	AeternityPools listed: 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super Payback 46mo. Hashrate 22.2 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.2 $ 5.735 RVN	280 $	0.2 $5.735 RVN	46mo.	KAWPOW	22.2 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	Aeternity NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Payback 36mo. Hashrate 6.2 Gps Mining Profit 24h 0.17 $ 2.271 AE	180 $Used	0.17 $2.271 AE	36mo.	CuckooCycle	6.2 Gps	AeternityPools listed: 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080	Aeternity NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Payback 41mo. Hashrate 6 Gps Mining Profit 24h 0.16 $ 2.197 AE	200 $Used	0.16 $2.197 AE	41mo.	CuckooCycle	6 Gps	AeternityPools listed: 2
NVIDIA P104-100	Aeternity NVIDIA P104-100 Payback 35mo. Hashrate 5.9 Gps Mining Profit 24h 0.16 $ 2.161 AE	170 $Used	0.16 $2.161 AE	35mo.	CuckooCycle	5.9 Gps	AeternityPools listed: 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060	Aeternity NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Payback 54mo. Hashrate 5.9 Gps Mining Profit 24h 0.16 $ 2.161 AE	260 $	0.16 $2.161 AE	54mo.	CuckooCycle	5.9 Gps	AeternityPools listed: 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	Bitcoin Gold NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Payback 38mo. Hashrate 55.5 Sol/s Mining Profit 24h 0.14 $ 0.007 BTG	160 $Used	0.14 $0.007 BTG	38mo.	Equihash 144_5	55.5 Sol/s	Bitcoin GoldPools listed: 7
AMD Radeon RX 5600XT	Ravencoin AMD Radeon RX 5600XT Payback 68mo. Hashrate 15.06 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.14 $ 3.890 RVN	280 $	0.14 $3.890 RVN	68mo.	KAWPOW	15.06 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Payback 65mo. Hashrate 15 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.14 $ 3.875 RVN	270 $	0.14 $3.875 RVN	65mo.	KAWPOW	15 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super Payback 61mo. Hashrate 14.2 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.13 $ 3.668 RVN	240 $	0.13 $3.668 RVN	61mo.	KAWPOW	14.2 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon RX 6600XT	Ravencoin AMD Radeon RX 6600XT Payback 84mo. Hashrate 13 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.12 $ 3.358 RVN	300 $	0.12 $3.358 RVN	84mo.	KAWPOW	13 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon RX 590	Ravencoin AMD Radeon RX 590 Payback 54mo. Hashrate 12 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.11 $ 3.100 RVN	180 $Used	0.11 $3.100 RVN	54mo.	KAWPOW	12 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon RX 580	Ravencoin AMD Radeon RX 580 Payback 53mo. Hashrate 11 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.1 $ 2.841 RVN	160 $Used	0.1 $2.841 RVN	53mo.	KAWPOW	11 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon RX 480	Ravencoin AMD Radeon RX 480 Payback 36mo. Hashrate 11 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.1 $ 2.841 RVN	110 $Used	0.1 $2.841 RVN	36mo.	KAWPOW	11 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660	Aeternity NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Payback 73mo. Hashrate 3.7 Gps Mining Profit 24h 0.1 $ 1.355 AE	220 $	0.1 $1.355 AE	73mo.	CuckooCycle	3.7 Gps	AeternityPools listed: 2
AMD Radeon RX 570	Ravencoin AMD Radeon RX 570 Payback 54mo. Hashrate 10 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.09 $ 2.583 RVN	150 $Used	0.09 $2.583 RVN	54mo.	KAWPOW	10 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
AMD Radeon RX 470	Ravencoin AMD Radeon RX 470 Payback 36mo. Hashrate 10 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.09 $ 2.583 RVN	100 $Used	0.09 $2.583 RVN	36mo.	KAWPOW	10 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060	Bitcoin Gold NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Payback 46mo. Hashrate 35 Sol/s Mining Profit 24h 0.09 $ 0.004 BTG	120 $Used	0.09 $0.004 BTG	46mo.	Equihash 144_5	35 Sol/s	Bitcoin GoldPools listed: 7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Payback 94mo. Hashrate 8.1 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.07 $ 2.092 RVN	210 $	0.07 $2.092 RVN	94mo.	KAWPOW	8.1 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	Ravencoin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Payback 52mo. Hashrate 7 Mh/s Mining Profit 24h 0.06 $ 1.808 RVN	100 $Used	0.06 $1.808 RVN	52mo.	KAWPOW	7 Mh/s	RavencoinPools listed: 3

List-table of Nvidia GeForce video cards | AMD news

Category: Video cards
Tags: #list_of_graphic_cards_GeForce, #list_of_video_cards_Nvidia, #nvidia_geforce
Description

Reviews (0)

Here is a detailed list-table of Nvidia GeForce video cards. The newest models are listed at the top of the list, the oldest ones at the bottom.

List table of Nvidia GeForce(GF) RTX4000 Series video cards
Nvidia GeForce RTX4000 video cards are based on 5nm Ada Lovelace architecture.

GeForce	GPU Name	Speed (Turbo)	Memory	PCIe	Bits	CUDA Cores	FP32	TWD
RTX4090	AD102-300	2235Mhz 2250Mhz	24Gb GDDR6X	4.0	384	16384	82.6 TFLOPs	450
RTX4080	AD103-300	2205Mhz 2508Mhz	16Gb GDDR6X	4.0	256	9728	48.8 TFLOPs	320
RTX4080 12Gb	AD104-400	2310Mhz 2685Mhz	12Gb GDDR6X	4. 0	192	9728	48.2 TFLOPs	285

List table of Nvidia GeForce(GF) RTX3000 Series video cards
Nvidia GeForce RTX3000 video cards are based on the 8nm Ampere architecture.

GeForce	GPU Name	Speed (Turbo)	Memory	PCIe	Bits	CUDA Cores	FP32	TWD
RTX3090Ti	GA102-350	1560Mhz 1860Mhz	24Gb GDDR6X	4.0	384	10752	40 TFLOPs	450
RTX3090	GA102-300	1395Mhz 1695Mhz	24Gb GDDR6X	4.0	384	10496	35.6 TFLOPs	350
RTX3080Ti	GA102-225	1365Mhz 1665Mhz	12Gb GDDR6X	4. 0	384	10240	34.1 TFLOPs	350
RTX3080	GA102-200	1440Mhz 1710Mhz	10Gb GDDR6X	4.0	320	8704	29.8 TFLOPs	320
RTX3070Ti	GA104-400	1575Mhz 1770Mhz	8Gb GDDR6X	4.0	256	6144	21.75 TFLOPs	290
RTX3070	GA104-300	1500Mhz 1725Mhz	8Gb GDDR6	4.0	256	5888	20.3 TFLOPs	220
RTX3060Ti	GA104-200	1410Mhz 1665Mhz	8Gb GDDR6	4.0	256	4864	16.2 TFLOPs	200
RTX3060	GA106-300	1320Mhz 1777Mhz	8Gb GDDR6	4.0	192	3584	12. 7 TFLOPs	170
RTX3050	GA106-150	1552Mhz 1777Mhz	8Gb GDDR6	4.0	128	2560	9.1 TFLOPs	130

List table of Nvidia GeForce(GF) RTX2000 Series video cards
Nvidia GeForce RTX2000 video cards are based on 12nm Turing architecture.

GeForce	GPU Name	Speed (Turbo)	Memory	PCIe	Bits	CUDA Cores	FP32	TWD
RTX2080Ti	TU102-300	1350Mhz 1545Mhz	11Gb GDDR6	3.0	352	4352	13.4 TFLOPs	250
RTX2080 Super	TU104-450	1350Mhz 1545Mhz	8Gb GDDR6	3.0	256	3072	11. 1 TFLOPs	250
RTX2080	TU104-400	1515Mhz 1710Mhz	8Gb GDDR6	3.0	256	2944	10.1 TFLOPs	215
RTX2070 Super	TU104-410	1605Mhz 1770Mhz	8Gb GDDR6	3.0	256	2560	9.1 TFLOPs	215
RTX2070	TU106-400	1410Mhz 1620Mhz	8Gb GDDR6	3.0	256	2304	7.5 TFLOPs	175
RTX2060 Super	TU106-410	1410Mhz 1620Mhz	8Gb GDDR6	3.0	256	2176	7.2 TFLOPs	175
RTX2060 12Gb	TU106-300	1470Mhz 1650Mhz	12Gb GDDR6	3.0	192	2176	7.2 TFLOPs	185
RTX2060	TU106-300	1365Mhz 1680Mhz	6Gb GDDR6	3. 0	192	1920	6.5 TFLOPs	160

List table of Nvidia GeForce(GF) GTX1600 Series video cards
Nvidia GeForce GTX1600 video cards are based on 12nm Turing architecture.

GeForce	GPU Name	Speed (Turbo)	Memory	PCIe	Bits	CUDA Cores	FP32	TWD
GTX1660Ti	TU116-400	1500Mhz 1770Mhz	6Gb GDDR6	3.0	192	1536	5.4 TFLOPs	120
GTX1660 Super	TU116-300	1530Mhz 1785Mhz	6Gb GDDR6	3.0	192	1408	5.1 TFLOPs	125
GTX1660	TU116-300	1530Mhz 1785Mhz	6Gb GDDR6	3. 0	192	1408	5.0 TFLOPs	120
GTX1650 Super	TU116-250	1530Mhz 1725Mhz	4Gb GDDR6	3.0	128	1280	4.4 TFLOPs	100
GTX1650	TU117-300	1485Mhz 1665Mhz	4Gb GDDR6	3.0	128	896	3.0 TFLOPs	75
GTX1630	TU117-150	1740Mhz 1785Mhz	4Gb GDDR6	3.0	64	512	1.83 TFLOPs	75

List table of Nvidia GeForce(GF) GTX1000 Series video cards
Nvidia GeForce GTX1000 video cards are based on 16nm Pascal architecture.

GeForce	GPU Name	Speed (Turbo)	Memory	PCIe	Bits	CUDA Cores	FP32	TWD
GTX1080Ti	GP102-350	1480Mhz 1582Mhz	11Gb GDDR5X	3. 0	352	3584	11.3 TFLOPs	250
GTX1080	GP104-400	1607Mhz 1733Mhz	8Gb GDDR5X	3.0	256	2560	8.9 TFLOPs	180
GTX1070Ti	GP104-300	1607Mhz 1683Mhz	8Gb GDDR5	3.0	256	2432	8.2 TFLOPs	180
GTX1070	GP104-200	1506Mhz 1683Mhz	8Gb GDDR5	3.0	256	1920	6.5 TFLOPs	150
GTX1060 6Gb_Video	GP106-400	1506Mhz 1708Mhz	6Gb GDDR5	3.0	192	1280	4.4 TFLOPs	120
GTX1060 5Gb_Video	PG410	1506Mhz 1708Mhz	5Gb GDDR5	3.0	160	1280	4. 3 TFLOPs	120
GTX1060 3Gb_Video	GP106-300	1506Mhz 1708Mhz	3Gb GDDR5	3.0	192	1152	3.9 TFLOPs	120
GTX1050Ti	GP107-400	1291Mhz 1392Mhz	4Gb GDDR5	3.0	128	768	2.1 TFLOPs	75
GTX1050 3Gb_Video	PG210	1392Mhz 1518Mhz	3Gb GDDR5	3.0	128	768	2.3 TFLOPs	75
GTX1050	GP107-300	1354Mhz 1455Mhz	2Gb GDDR5	3.0	128	640	1.9 TFLOPs	75
GTX1030	GP108-300	1227Mhz 1468Mhz	2Gb GDDR5	3.0	64	384	1.1 TFLOPs	30

List table of Nvidia GeForce(GF) GTX900 Series video cards
Nvidia GeForce GTX900 video cards are based on 28nm Maxwell architecture.

GeForce	GPU Name	Speed (Turbo)	Memory	PCIe	Bits	CUDA Cores	FP32	TWD
GTX980Ti	GM200-310	1000Mhz 1076Mhz	6Gb GDDR5	3.0	384	2816	6.1 TFLOPs	250
GTX980	GM204-400	1126Mhz 1216Mhz	4Gb GDDR5	3.0	256	2048	5.0 TFLOPs	165
GTX970	GM204-200	1051Mhz 1178Mhz	3.5Gb GDDR5	3.0	224	1664	3.9 TFLOPs	145
GTX960	GM206-300	1127Mhz 1178Mhz	2Gb GDDR5	3.0	128	1024	2. 4 TFLOPs	120
GTX950	GM206-250	1024Mhz 1188Mhz	2Gb GDDR5	3.0	128	768	1.8 TFLOPs	90

List table of Nvidia GeForce(GF) GTX700 Series video cards
Nvidia GeForce GTX700 video cards are based on 28nm Kepler architecture.

GeForce	GPU Name	Speed (Turbo)	Memory	PCIe	Bits	CUDA Cores	FP32	TWD
GTX780Ti	GK110-425	875Mhz 928Mhz	3Gb GDDR5	3.0	384	2880	5.4 TFLOPs	250
GTX780	GK110-300	863Mhz 900Mhz	3Gb GDDR5	3.0	384	2304	4. 2 TFLOPs	250
GTX770	GK104-425	1046Mhz 1084Mhz	2Gb GDDR5	3.0	256	1536	3.3 TFLOPs	230
GTX760Ti	GK104-325	915Mhz 980Mhz	2Gb GDDR5	3.0	256	1344	2.6 TFLOPs	170
GTX760	GK104-225	980Mhz 1033Mhz	2Gb GDDR5	3.0	256	1152	2.4 TFLOPs	170
GTX750Ti	GM107-400	1020Mhz 1085Mhz	2Gb GDDR5	3.0	128	640	1.4 TFLOPs	60
GTX750	GM107-300	1020Mhz 1085Mhz	1Gb GDDR5	3.0	128	512	1.1 TFLOPs	55
GT740	GK107-425	993Mhz	1Gb GDDR5	3. 0	128	384	0.8 TFLOPs	65
GT730	GF108-400	700Mhz	1Gb GDDR3	2.0	128	96:16:4	0.1 TFLOPs	50
GT720	GK208	797Mhz	1Gb GDDR3	2.0	64	192	0.3 TFLOPs	20

List table of Nvidia GeForce(GF) GTX600 Series video cards
Nvidia GeForce GTX600 video cards are based on 28nm Kepler architecture.

GeForce	GPU Name	Speed (Turbo)	Memory	PCIe	Bits	CUDA Cores	FP32	TWD
GTX690	2*GK104-400	915Mhz 1019Mhz	4Gb GDDR5	3. 0	512	3072	6.3 TFLOPs	300
GTX680	GK104-400	1006Mhz 1058Mhz	2Gb GDDR5	3.0	256	1536	3.3 TFLOPs	195
GTX670	GK104-325	915Mhz 980Mhz	2Gb GDDR5	3.0	256	1344	2.7 TFLOPs	170
GTX660Ti	GK104-300	915Mhz 980Mhz	2Gb GDDR5	3.0	192	1344	2.6 TFLOPs	150
GTX660	GK106-400	980Mhz 1033Mhz	2Gb GDDR5	3.0	192	960	2.0 TFLOPs	140
GTX650Ti	GK106-220	928Mhz	1Gb GDDR5	3.0	128	768	1.4 TFLOPs	110
GTX650	GK107-450	1058Mhz	1Gb GDDR5	3. 0	128	384	0.8 TFLOPs	64
GT640	GK107-300	900Mhz	2Gb GDDR3	3.0	128	384	0.7 TFLOPs	65
GT630	GF108-400	810Mhz	1Gb GDDR3	2.0	128	96	0.2 TFLOPs	65
GT620	GF108-100	700Mhz	1Gb GDDR3	2.0	64	96	0.13 TFLOPs	49
GT610	GF119-300	810Mhz	1Gb GDDR3	2.0	64	48	0.08 TFLOPs	29

List table of Nvidia GeForce(GF) GTX500 Series video cards
Nvidia GeForce GTX500 video cards are based on 40nm Fermi 2.0 architecture.

GeForce	GPU Name	Speed (Turbo)	Memory	PCIe	Bits	CUDA Cores	FP32	TWD
GTX590	2*GF110	612Mhz	3Gb GDDR5	2. 0	768	1024	2.5 TFLOPs	365
GTX580	GF110	782Mhz	1.5/3Gb GDDR5	2.0	384	512	1.6 TFLOPs	244
GTX570	GF110	742Mhz	1/2.5Gb GDDR5	2.0	320	480	1.4 TFLOPs	219
GTX560Ti	GF114	900Mhz	1/2Gb GDDR5	2.0	256	384	1.3 TFLOPs	170
GTX560	GF114	810Mhz	1/2Gb GDDR5	2.0	256	336	1.2 TFLOPs	150
GTX550Ti	GF116	910Mhz	1Gb GDDR5	2.0	192	192	0.7 TFLOPs	116
GT530	GF119	700Mhz	1/2Gb GDDR3	2. 0	128	96	0.3 TFLOPs	50
GT520	GF119	810Mhz	1/2Gb GDDR3	2.0	64	48	0.2 TFLOPs	29
GT510	GF119	523Mhz	1/2Gb GDDR3	2.0	64	48	0.1 TFLOPs	25

List of Nvidia GeForce(GF) GTX400 Series Video Cards Table
Nvidia GeForce GTX400 video cards are based on the 40nm Fermi architecture.

GeForce	GPU Name	Speed (Turbo)	Memory	PCIe	Bits	CUDA Cores	FP32	TWD
GTX480	GF100	700Mhz	1.5Gb GDDR5	2.0	384	480	1. 3 TFLOPs	250
GTX470	GF100	608Mhz	1.2Gb GDDR5	2.0	320	448	1.1 TFLOPs	215
GTX465	GF100	608Mhz	1.2Gb GDDR5	2.0	256	352	0.9 TFLOPs	200
GTX460 256bit	GF104	675Mhz	1/2Gb GDDR5	2.0	256	336	0.9 TFLOPs	160
GTX460 192bit	GF104	675Mhz	0.7/1.5Gb GDDR5	2.0	192	336	0.9 TFLOPs	150
GTS450 GDDR5	GF106	783Mhz	1/2Gb GDDR5	2.0	128	192	0.6 TFLOPs	106
GTS450 GDDR3	GF106	783Mhz	1/2Gb GDDR3	2. 0	128	192	0.6 TFLOPs	106
GT440 GDDR5	GF108	810Mhz	0.5/1Gb GDDR5	2.0	128	96	0.35 TFLOPs	65
GT440 GDDR3	GF108	810Mhz	1/2Gb GDDR3	2.0	128	96	0.35 TFLOPs	65
GT430	GF108	700Mhz	1/2Gb GDDR3	2.0	128	96	0.27 TFLOPs	49
GT420	GF108	700Mhz	1/2Gb GDDR3	2.0	128	48	0.12 TFLOPs	50
GT405	GT218	589Mhz	0.5/1Gb GDDR3	2.0	64	16	0.07 TFLOPs	25

Nvidia GeForce(GF) GTX300 Series Graphics Card Table List

GeForce	GPU Name	Speed (Turbo)	Memory	PCIe	Bits	CUDA Cores	FP32	TWD
GT340	GT215	550Mhz	0. 5/1Gb GDDR5	2.0	128	96	0.4 TFLOPs	69
GT330 256Bit	G92b	550Mhz	2Gb GDDR3	2.0	256	112	0.45 TFLOPs	75
GT330 128Bit	G92b	500Mhz	0.25-1Gb GDDR2	2.0	128	96	0.36 TFLOPs	75
GT320	GT215	540Mhz	1Gb GDDR3	2.0	128	72	0.3 TFLOPs	43
GT315	GT216	475Mhz	0.5/1Gb GDDR3	2.0	64	48	0.16 TFLOPs	33
GT310	GT218	589Mhz	0.5/1Gb GDDR2	2.0	64	16	0.07 TFLOPs	31

Nvidia GeForce(GF) GTX200 Series

9 graphics card list0017

GeForce GPU Name Speed (Turbo) Memory PCIe Bits CUDA Cores FP32 TWD GTX295 2*GT200b 576Mhz 4Gb GDDR3 2.

0 1024 480 1.8 TFLOPs 289 GTX285 GT200b 648Mhz 1/2Gb GDDR3 2.0 512 240 1.1 TFLOPs 204 GTX280 GT200 602Mhz 1Gb GDDR3 2.0 512 240 0.9 TFLOPs 204 GTX275 GT200b 633Mhz 0.9/1.8Gb GDDR3 2.0 448 240 1.0 TFLOPs 204 GTX260 rev.2 GT200b 576Mhz 0.9/1.8Gb GDDR3 2.0 448 216 0.8 TFLOPs 171 GTX260 GT200 576Mhz 0.9/1.8Gb GDDR3 2.0 448 192 0.7 TFLOPs 182 GTS250 G92b 738Mhz 0.

5/1/2Gb GDDR3 2.0 256 128 0.7 TFLOPs 69 GT240 GDDR5 GT215 550Mhz 0.5/1Gb GDDR5 2.0 128 96 0.4 TFLOPs 69 GT240 GDDR3 GT215 550Mhz 0.5/1Gb GDDR3 2.0 128 96 0.4 TFLOPs 69 GT230 G92b 650Mhz 0.5/1Gb GDDR3 2.0 256 48 0.23 TFLOPs 75 GT220 GDDR3 GT216 625Mhz 0.5/1/2Gb GDDR3 2.0 128 48 0.2 TFLOPs 58 GT220 DDR2 GT216 625Mhz 0.5/1/2Gb DDR2 2.0 128 48 0.2 TFLOPs 58 GT210 GDDR3 GT218 589Mhz 0.

5/1Gb GDDR3 2.0 64 16 0.07 TFLOPs 31 GT210 DDR2 GT218 589Mhz 0.5/1Gb DDR2 2.0 64 16:8:4 0.07 TFLOPs 31 GT205 GT218 589Mhz 0.5Gb DDR2 2.0 64 8 0.07 TFLOPs 31

Nvidia GeForce(GF) GT100 Series Video Card Table List

GeForce	GPU Name	Speed (Turbo)	Memory	PCIe	Bits	CUDA Cores	FP32	TWD
GTS150	G92b	738Mhz	1Gb GDDR3	2.0	256	128	0.7 TFLOPs	141
GT140	G94b	650Mhz	0. 5/1Gb GDDR3	2.0	256	64	0.3 TFLOPs	96
GT130	G94b	500Mhz	0.7/1.5Gb DDR2	2.0	192	48	0.18 TFLOPs	75
GT120	G96b	500Mhz	0.5/1Gb DDR2	2.0	128	32	0.13 TFLOPs	50
G100	G98	567Mhz	0.2/0.5/1Gb DDR2	2.0	64	8	0.03 TFLOPs	35

Comparative table of video cards. Compare video cards, characteristics. YourSputnik.Ru

The speed of modern computer games is highly dependent on the performance of the video adapter. To evaluate it will help test the video card in a special program. Such diagnostics will not hurt when buying a second-hand device to assess the condition of the video memory and graphics processor. Consider the best programs for checking a video card — from simple utilities to serious tools.

DxDiag

The fastest way to test a video card for performance is to use the built-in DxDiag utility in Windows. It is installed along with the DirectX tool that controls graphics in applications. Available in Windows 7, 8 and 10, to call, hold down Win + R and enter the dxdiag command.

On the Display tab, you will see the exact parameters of the video adapter. Check the «Notes» field, it will list the faults or indicate their absence. In this case, DxDiag will show only obvious failures that are detected in normal operation.

Nvidia Inspector

Nvidia video cards can be conveniently tested with the Nvidia Inspector utility. It shows the detailed characteristics of the device, allows you to monitor the frequency of the GPU and the operation of the cooling system, change the voltage and rotation of the fan, overclock the equipment. Works on Windows 7, XP and above, no installation required.

Checking a video card in Nvidia Inspector does not include testing, the utility provides statistical information.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 is a video processor embedded in Intel’s 10th generation mobile processors based on the Ice Lake architecture. This integrated graphics processor contains 64 execution units operating at frequencies up to 1.1 GHz. As a result, it provides a peak computing performance of 1.12 teraflops for FP32 operations and twice as much (2.24 teraflops) with reduced accuracy — FP16. The frequency of the G7 depends on the CPU model, and graphics performance is greatly affected by the TDP settings set by the manufacturer, as well as the quality of the power supply and cooling of the laptop.

In a computer game

You can check the video card performance in a computer game with modern graphics. It will load the device as much as possible, after which you can evaluate its performance. Before you check the performance of your video card, install the GPU-Z program. This application controls an important parameter — the temperature under load.

Download and run GPU-Z, in the lower left corner set the video adapter model. The program will show detailed information about video memory, DirectX version, shaders, driver. Go to the «Sensors» tab and look at the «GPU Temperature» field — this is the current temperature of the graphics adapter. Double-click on this value to show the maximum — Max will appear in the corner.

Now launch your favorite game without closing GPU-Z. Play for 30-40 minutes and check the temperature indicator — it should not exceed 90-95 degrees. If during testing the value rose above 100, the device is not in the best condition.

Early 2021 graphics card hierarchy

Tom’s Hardware has tested hundreds of Nvidia and AMD graphics cards from various manufacturers. This experience allowed them to create a rating based on the performance of different card models.

This rating includes cards of the current and previous generations, including the most productive ones. Whether you’re gaming or working on performance-heavy tasks like 4K video editing, a serious graphics card is essential. Processors in such cases play only a secondary role.

The table in this article is based on scores from graphics card analysis benchmarks. The best graphics cards are described in other articles based on a variety of factors, including price, power consumption, and efficiency. This ranking includes the recently introduced Radeon RX 6800 XT and RX 6800 graphics cards.0003

To help you decide which video card you need, use the table with dozens of test results. Maps are ranked from fastest to slowest. Based on test results from nine games at medium and ultra graphics settings at 1080p, 1440p, 4K. For comparison, the fastest card has a score of 100% and the rest are considered relative to it.

FurMark

The real stress test of the video card is carried out by the FurMark program. This free utility overclocks the adapter as much as possible by evaluating its stability and performance. How to check the video card for performance in FurMark:

Close other applications, including downloading files from the Internet.
Run the program, it will determine the device model, available resolution and current temperature.
Set the standard resolution in the «Resolution» field and open the settings by clicking the «Settings» button.
In the test options, check the boxes for «Dynamic background» and «Burn-in». Do not use the «Xtreme burn-in» mode if you do not understand the intricacies of computer equipment — it can burn video memory.
Return to the main screen, click «Burn -in test».
Confirm that you agree with the possible risks — rebooting the PC due to excessive load intensity.
Video card performance test starts.
You will see the temperature graph — in the first minutes it will start to rise sharply, then it will stabilize.

In a working device, the temperature will not exceed 100 degrees. At higher values, color artifacts will appear on the screen, the computer will restart, and the video driver will turn off.

Upon successful completion of the video card error test, you will see a window with the main indicators — laptop or PC parameters, maximum temperature, FPS. To compare the performance with the characteristics of users of similar devices, click on «Submit». A browser will open with a table in which you will evaluate your score.

If FurMark’s video card diagnostic fails, try troubleshooting. Inspect the device, if dust has stuck to the radiator — remove it with cotton swabs or blow it off with compressed air. Update the thermal paste on the chip yourself or contact the service center.

Comparative table of video cards. Compare video cards, characteristics.

Updated video card comparison table, new players and a new desire to compare video cards before buying. Or a comparative characteristic of video cards to the constant question — did I buy a good video card or not. Hello. So I gathered my strength and decided to update the comparative characteristics of video cards.

As you already know, new video cards Radeon and GeForce appeared on the market, the unhealthy «miracles» with prices subsided, and reasonable buyers began to take an interest in new video cards. So, it’s time to compare video cards in a slightly new way and with new participants. I am sure that the comparative table of Radeon and GeForce video cards, as before, will help you understand the importance of certain characteristics of video cards, tell you which “G” the seller is trying to promote, and save you from a Loch purchase. So, the table of video cards and what it all means …

Why do we need a comparison table of video cards. Many of you, thinking about which video card to buy, ask — why do you offer to buy a GeForce GTX 560 Ti video card in the computer assembly, and the store seller advised me another — GeForce GTX 560 SE, says — everything will fly. To which one often has to answer — a computer is an exact science, and numbers rule the ball here.

Forget about the existence of temptations and super discounts when assembling a computer, choosing PC components, and in particular, studying the comparative characteristics of video cards, ignore Loch’s turns of speech — super, cool, everything will fly, etc. They will not help you compare video cards, consider the characteristics that affect the performance of a video card, but they will very well help the seller to breed you.

General video card comparison table + video card performance table — this is the main food for your brain, if you want a good video card, turn off your ears, turn on your brain, compare video cards before buying. This will save you the question — did I buy a good video card or not.

Regrettably, but the lion’s share of users first buys a video card, and only then they find out that there is a comparative table of video cards, that video cards need to be compared before, and not after, that the comparative characteristics of video cards are not just numbers, but an accurate description of the capabilities and needs of your future video card.

When assembling a computer, I used to bet on three years, and not on someone else — cool, with a stupid quarterly replacement of «unsuccessful» components, which is what I wish you. And don’t ask if a good graphics card is Radeon HD 5550 / HD 6450 / Radeon R7 240 or GeForce GT 520 / GT 610 / GeForce GT 720, etc. — a video card performance table + a comparison table of video cards, taking into account the price, to help you.

For beginners — for those who have loaded the table of video cards with their computing units, frequencies. Under the table you will find explanations for the columns — what the comparative characteristics of video cards affect, what they are responsible for.

Comparative table of video cards Radeon and GeForce.

RTX 2080 TI 11GB

9002

900/33 1178/7000

-models Cart —

9002 WITH

9002 WL

450W

9002 GTX 660 2 GB
GK106/ /1033/6008

010021 GTX 650 1 gb

9002 3 1620/3200

9002 BIT 9002 BIT 9002 BIT 9002 BIT 9002 BIT 9002 BIT 9002 BIT 9002 BITS

— —

9002 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX 29 GTX0023

9002/23

182W

900 96/32/8/8/8/8/8/8/8/8/8/8/8/8/8/8/32/8/32/8/32/8/32/8/32/8/32/8/32/8/32/8/32/8/32/8/32/8/32/8/32/8/32/

BIT

9002 RX 460 2-0023

9002 30019

9002-

Tahiti

HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD 7550 HD0023

HD 6990 4 GB

9002 GD 6956 heb0023

HDer 1 GB

HD0022

-models Cart —

9002 W

-Card Models-

GPU

Frequency GPU

memory

Shina

TDP

— = GeForce = —

Crystal

/memory MHZ

Standard

—

TU102

4352/272/88

1350/14000

/14000

1350/14000

352 bit

250w

650W

RTX 2080 8gb

TU104

2944/184/64

1515/1710/14000

GDDR6

256 bit

215w

650W

RTX 2070 8gb

TU106

2304/144/64

1410/1620/14000

GDDR6

256 bit

175w

550W

GTX 1660 Ti 6gb

Tu1116

1536/96/48

1500/1770/12000

GDDR6

192 Bit

120W

450W

—

-0023

—

Titan Xp 12gb

GP102

3840/224/96

1405/1582/11000

GDDR5X

384 bit

250w

650W

Titan X 12GB

GP102

3584/224/96

1417/1530/10000

GDDR5x

384 Bit

250W

650W

GTX 110020 GP102

3584/224/88

1481/1582/11000

GDDR5X

352 bit

250w

650W

GTX 1080 8gb

GP104

2560/160/64

1607/1733/10000

GDDR5X

256 bit

180w

550W

GTX 1070Ti 8gb

GP104

2432/152/64

1607/1683/8000

GDDR5

256 bit

180w

550W

GTX 1070 8gb

GP104

1920/120/64

1506/1683/8000

GDDR5

256 bit

150w

500W

GTX 1060 6GB

GP106

1280/80/48

1506/1709/8000

GDDR5

BIT

120W

023

GP106

1152/72/48

1506/1709/8000

GDDR5

192 bit

120w

450W

GTX 1050Ti 4gb

GP107

768/48/32

1290/1392/7008

GDDR5

128 bit

75w

350W

GTX 1050 3gb

GP107

768/48/24

1392/1518/7008

GDDR5

96 bit

75w

300W

GTX 1050 2gb

GP107

640/40/32

1354/1455/7008

GDDR5

128 bit

75w

300W

GT 1030 2GB

GP108

384/24/16

1227/1468/6008

GDDR5

64 Bit

30W 9002 —

020 —

—

Titan X 12GB

GM200

3072/96

/1075/7000

GDDR5 388

GDDR 3

600W

GTX 980 Ti 4gb

GM200

2816/176/96

1000/1075/7000

GDDR5

384 bit

250w

600W

GTX 980 4 gb

GM204

2048/104/64

1126/1216/7000

GDDR5

256 bit

165w

500W

GTX 970 4 gb

GM204

1664/104/56

1050/1178/78/7000

GDDR5

256 BIT

145W

50023

GTX

GM206

GDDR5

128 bit

120w

400W

GTX 950 2 gb

GM206

768/48/32

1024/1188/6600

GDDR5

128 bit

90w

350W

—

— GEFORCE = —

GPU

Frequency GPU

Memory

Shina

TDP

Crystal

/memory MHZ

—

Titan Z 12gb 9002

2xgk110

5760/448/96

705/876/7000

GDDR5

2×384

375w

700W

GTX 780 Ti 3gb

GK110

2880/240/48

875 /928/7000

GDDR5

384 bit

250w

600W

Titan Black 6gb

GK110

2880/240/48

889/980/7000

GDDR5

384 bit

250w

600W

GTX Titan 6 gb

GK110

2688/224/48

836/876/6008

GDDR5

384 bit

250w

600W

GTX 780 3 gb

GK110

2304/192/48

863/900/7010

GDDR5

384 bit

250w

600W

GTX 770 2 gb

GK104

1538/ 128/32

1046/1085/7010

GDDR5

256 bit

230w

600W

GTX 760 2 gb

GK104

1152/96/32

980/1033/6008

GDDR5

256 bit

170w

500W

GTX 750 Ti 2gb

GM107

640/40/16

1020/1085/5400

GDDR5

128 bit

60w

300W

GTX 750 1 gb

GM107

512/32/16

1020/1085/5000

GDDR5

128 bit

55w

300W

GT 740 1 gb

GK107

384/32/16

993/5000

GDDR5

128 Bit

64W

350W

GT 730 902/5000

GDDR5

64 bit

25w

300W

GT 730 1 gb

GF108

96/16/4

700/1800

GDDR3

128 bit

49w

300W

020 —

—

GTX 690 4 GB

GK104

3072/256/64 915/1019/1019/1019/1019/AC ×256

300w

650W

GTX 680 2 gb

GK104

1538/128/32

1006/1058/6008

GDDR5

256 bit

195w

550W

GTX 670 2 gb

GK104

1344/112/32

915/980/6008

GDDR5

256 bit

170w

500W

GTX 660 Ti 2gb

GK104

1344/112/24

915/980/6008

GDDR5

192 Bit

150W

GDDR5

192 bit

140w

450W

650Ti Boost 2gb

GK106

768/64/24

980/1033/6008

GDDR5

192 bit

134w

450W

GTX 650 TI 1GB

GK106

768/64/16

925/925/5400

GDDR5

128 BIT 1

GK107

384/32/16

1058/1058/5000

GDDR5

128 bit

64w

400W

GT 640 2 gb

GK107

384/32/16

900/900/900/1784

GDDR3

128 Bit

65W

350W

GT 630 1 GB

GF108

GDDR5

128 BIT

65W

3002

GT 620 1 GB

GF108

96/16/4

700/1400/1800

GDDR3

GT 610 1 GB

GF1119

48/4

810/1620/1800

GDDR3

BIT

29W

300W

—

GTX 590 3 GB

GF110

1028/96

607/1215/3415/3415/3415/3415/3415/3415/3415/3415/3415/3415/3415/3415/3415/3415/3415IE

365w

700W

GTX 580 1. 5 gb

GF110

512/64/48

772/1544/4008

GDDR5

384 bit

244w

600W

GTX 570 1.2 gb

GF110

480/60/40

732/1464/3800

GDDR5

320 bit

219w

550W

GTX 480 1.5 gb

GF100

480/60/48

701/1402/3700

GDDR5

384 BIT

250W

60023

9002 GB

gf100 9002/58/58/58/58/58/58/58/58/58/58/58/58/58/58/58/58/ 1215/3348

GDDR5

320 bit

215w

550W

560 Ti 448C

GF110

448/56/40

732/1464/3600

GDDR5

320 bit

210w

550W

GTX 560 Ti 1gb

GF114

384/64/32

822/1644/4008

GDDR5

256 bit

170w

500W

GTX 560 1 gb

GF114

336/56/32

675/1620/4004

GDDR5

256 bit

160w

450W

GTX 560 SE 1

GF114

288/56/ 32

736/1472/3828

GDDR5

192 bit

150w

450W

GTX 465 1 gb

GF100

352/44/32

607/1215/3208

GDDR5

256 bit

200w

550W

GTX 460 v2 1gb

GF114

336/56/32

778/1556/4004

GDDR5

256 bit

160w

450W

GTX 460 1 gb

GF104

336/56/32

675/1350/3600

GDDR5

256 bit

160w

450W

GTX 460 SE 1

GF104

288/56/32

650/1300/ 1350/3600

GDDR5

BIT

150W

450W

GTX 550 TI 1GB

GF116

192/32/24

900/1800/1800/1800/1800/1800/1800/AM

116w

400W

GTS 450 1 gb

GF106

192/32/16

783/1566/3600

GDDR5

128 bit

106w

400W

GT 440 1 GB

GF108

96/16/4

810/1620/3200

GDDR5

128 Bit

65W

300W

9002 GB 9.

GB 9002 GB 9002 Gb 9002 GB 900 1 GB 900 1 GB 900 1 GB 16/4

700/1400/

64 BIT

29W

300W

—

480/160/56

576/1242/2000

GDDR3

2 × 448

289W

650W

9002 GTX 285 1 GB

/ 648/1476/2485

GDDR3

512 bit

204w

550W

GTX 280 1 gb

GT200

240/80/32

602/1296/2215

GDDR3

512 bit

236w

550W

GTX 275 896mb

GT200b

240/80/28

633/1404/2270

GDDR3

448 bit

219w

550W

GTX 260 896mb

GT200

216/72/28

576/1242/242/2000/2000

GDDR3

448 BIT

50023

9002 GTS 250 1 GB 9 16

738/1836/2200

GDDR3

256 BIT

150W

450W

GT 240 1 GB

128 bit

69w

300W

GT 220 1 gb

GT216

48/16/8

625/1360/1580

GDDR3

128 bit

58w

300W

GT 210 1 GB

gt218

16/8/4

589/1402/1000

DDR2

64 Bit

303

9800 GTX+ 1GB

128/64/16

738/1836/2200

GDDR3

256 BIT

150W

450W

G2/11 /1500/1800

GDDR3

256 bit

105w

400W

9600 GT 1 gb

G94

64/32/16

650/1625/1800

GDDR3

128 bit

96w

400W

9500 GT 1 GB

G96

32/16/8

550/1400/1600

GDDR3

9003

3003 9003 900WARE 900WARE 900WARY 900WARE 900WARE 900WARE 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900WAY 900W mb

G86

16 \ 8 \ 4

450/900/800

DDR2

64 Bit

40W

300W

—

— 9002 —

—

— Card Models —

GPU

GPU Clock

Memory

Bus

TDP

PSU

-= Radeon =-

Crystal

Blocks

/memory MHZ

Standard

memory

—

Radeon VII 16GB

VEGA 20

3840/240/64

1400/1750/2000

HBM2

4096BIT

300W

700W 900WEW 900W

RX Vega 64 8gb

Vega 10

4096/256/64

1274/1546/1890

HBM2

2048bit

295w

700W

RX Vega 56 8gb

Vega 10

3584/224/64

1156/1471/1600

HBM2

2048bit

210w

650W

RX 590 8gb

Polaris

2304/144/32

1469/1545/8000

GDDR5

256 bit

185w

600W

RX 580 8gb

Polaris

2304/144/32

1257/1340/8000

GDDR5

256 bit

185W

600w

RX 570 4-8GB

Polaris

2048/128/32

1168/1244/8000

GDDR5

256 256 BIT

BIT

BIT0056

RX 560 2-4GB

Polaris

1024/64/16

/1275/7000

GDDR5

BIT

80W RA

Polaris

512/32/32/16

1100/1183/7000

GDDR5

128 BIT

50W

300W

—

— 9002 —

—

RX 480 8gb

Polaris

2304/144/32

1120/1266/8000

GDDR5

256 bit

150w

500W

RX 470 4-8GB

Polaris

2048/128/32

926/1206/6600

GDDR5

BIT

120W

PARAR

896/48/16

1090/1200/7000

GDDR5

128 BIT

75W

30023

—

R9 Fury X 4gb

Fiji

4096/256/64

1050/1000

HBM

4096

275w

650W

R9 Nano 4gb

Fiji

4096/256/64

1000/1000

HBM

4096

175w

650W

R9 Fury 4gb

Fiji

3584/224/64

1000/ 1000

HBM

4096

275w

650W

R9 390X 8 gb

Hawaii

2816/176/64

1050/6000

GDDR5

512 bit

275w

650W

R9 390 8 gb

Hawaii

2560/160/64

1000/6000

GDDR5

512 bit

275w

650W

R9 380 4 gb

Tonga

1792/112/32

970/5700

GDDR5

256 bit

190w

550W

R7 370 2gb

Pitcairn

1024/64/32

975/5600

GDDR5

256 bit

110w

400W

R7 360 2gb

Bonaire

768/48/16

1050/6500

GDDR5

128 bit

100W

40023

R7 350x 2GB

C-VERDE

640/40/40/16

1000/4500

GDDR5

128 BIT

R7 350 2GB

C-RERDE

512/32/32/16

925/4500

GDDR5

128 Bit

—

-9002 —

—

R9 295X2 8 gb

2xHawaii

5632/352/128

1018/5000

GDDR5

2×512

500w

800W

R9 290X 4 gb

Hawaii

2816/176/64

1000/5000

GDDR5

512 bit

280w

650W

R9 290 4 gb

Hawaii

2560/160/64

947/5000

GDDR5

512 Bit

25023

600W

R9 0023

1000/6000

GDDR5

384 bit

250w

600W

R9 285 2 gb

Tonga

1792/112/32

918/5500

GDDR5

256 bit

190W

600W

R9 280 3 GB

TAHITI

1792/112/32

933/5000

384 BIT BIT BIT

019

R9 270X 2 gb

Pitcairn

1280/80/32

1050/5600

GDDR5

256 bit

180w

500W

R9 270 2 gb

Pitcairn

1280/80/32

925/5600

GDDR5

256 BIT

150W

450W

R7 265 2 GB

PitcaIRN

1023

/322

GDDR5

256 bit

140w

500W

R7 260X 2 gb

Bonaire

896/56/16

1100/6500

GDDR5

128 bit

115w

400W

022

C-Verde

640/40/16

1000/4500

GDDR5

128 Bit

80W

400W

R7 250 1 GB .

2.23.23.23.23.23.23.2ALA 8

1050/4600

GDDR5

128 BIT

59W

350W

240 1 GB

Oland

320/20/8

780/180/180/180/180/180/ALS bit

30W

300W

—

hd 9002 64

900/1000/6000

GDDR5

2 × 384

40023

750W

HD 7970 3 GB

2048/128/128/128/128/128/128/128/128/128/128/AP

384 bit

250w

550W

HD 7950 3 gb

Tahiti

1792/112/32

800/5000

GDDR5

384 bit

200w

520W

HD 7870 2 GB

Pitcairn

1280/80/32

1000/4800

GDDR5

256 Bit

175W

Pitcairn

1024/64/32

860/4800

GDDR5

256 bit

130w

450W

HD 7790 1 gb

Bonaire

896/56/16

1000/6000

GDDR5

128 BIT

85W

40023

HD 7770 1 GB

C-REDE

/40/16

1000/400/400/400/400/400/400/400/400/400/400/ALS

80w

400W

HD 7750 1 gb

C-Verde

512/32/16

800/4500

GDDR5

128 bit

55w

350W

—

CAYMAN

3072/192/64

2×256

375w

750W

HD 6970 2 gb

Cayman

1536/96/32

880/5500

GDDR5

256 bit

250w

600W

HD 6950 2 GB

Cayman

1408/88/32

800/5000

GDDR5

256 Bit

5503

Cayman

1280/80/32

750/4800

GDDR5

256 bit

180w

500W

HD 6870 X2 2gb

Barts

2240/112/64

900/4200

GDDR5

2 × 256

310W

70023

HD 6870 1 GB

BARTS

/56/32

900/4 900/4 900/4 900/4 900/4 900/4 900/4 900/4 900/4 900 900/4200 900/4200 900/4

151w

500W

HD 6850 1 gb

Barts

960/48/32

775/4000

GDDR5

256 bit

127w

450W

HD 6790 1 GB

Barts

800/40/16

840/4200

GDDR5

256 Bit

150W

50023

Jun 16

850/4800

GDDR5

128 bit

108w

400W

HD 6750 1 gb

Juniper

720/36/16

700/4600

GDDR5

128 bit

86W

400W

HD 6670 1 GB

Turks

480/24/8

800/4000

GDDR5

128 BIT 900W 900W 900W 900W 900W BITS

HD 6570 1 gb

Turks

480/24/8

650/4000

GDDR5

128 bit

60w

350W

HD 6450 1 gb

Caisoc

160/8/4

625/3600

GDDR5

64 BIT

27W

300W

HD 6350 1 GB

80/8/4

80/4/4/4/4 GDDR3

64 bit

19w

300W

—

HD 5970 2 gb

Cypress

3200/160/64

725/4000

GDDR5

2 × 256

294W

650W

HD 5870 1 GB

CyPress

1600/32 900/3

GDDR5

256 bit

188w

500W

HD 5850 1 gb

Cypress

1440/72/32

725/4000

GDDR5

256 bit

170w

500W

HD 5830 1 GB

CyPress

1120/56/16

800/4000

GDDR5

256 BIT

175W

Juniper

800/40/16

850/4800

GDDR5

128 bit

108w

400W

HD 5750 1 gb

Juniper

720/36/16

700/4600

GDDR5

128 BIT

86W

40023

HD 5670 1 GB

Redwood

400/20

775/475/475/475/475/475/475/475/475/475/475/475 775/4EN0023

61w

300W

HD 5570 1 gb

Redwood

400/20/8

650/1800

GDDR3

128 bit

43w

300W

HD 5550 1 GB

Redwood

320/16/8

550/1800

GDDR3

128 BIT

39W

300W

5 GB

CD0020 80/8/4

600/1600

GDDR3

64 BIT

19W

300W

—

— 9002

HD 4890 1 gb

RV790

800/40/16

850/3900

GDDR5

256 bit

190w

500W

HD 4870 1 gb

RV770

800/40/16

750/

GDDR3

256 bit

110w

400W

HD 4830 1 gb

RV770

640/32/16

575/1800

GDDR3

256 bit

100w

400W

HD 4770 1 gb

RV740

640/32/16

750/3200

GDDR5

128 bit

75w

350W

HD 4670 1 gb

RV730

320/32/8

750/2000

GDDR3

128 BIT

59W

300W

—

-0023

—

-= Radeon =-

GPU

Comp.

Frequency GPU

memory

Shina

TDP

Crystal

/memory MHZ

WITH

Comparative table of video cards — what the columns of the table indicate and what is the value of the comparative characteristics of video cards. Or we compare video cards with an understanding of the matter.

Card Models — the first column indicates the developer — Nvidia GeForce or AMD Radeon and is responsible for the hierarchy of models by power within the same line of video cards (first digit).

GPU is the name of the GPU die model. Sometimes the same stone is sold to us 2 times. Sometimes it doesn’t hurt to compare video cards anyway.

Compute units — in this case, the comparison table of video cards indicates the power of the graphics processor. Shader processors / texture units / ROP — rasterization units / their number is responsible for the performance of the video card. In simple words, evaluating only these comparative characteristics of video cards, you can understand how many «brains» and what potential video cards GeForce GT 720 — GeForce GTX Titan Z have, compare video cards in the AMD Radeon R7 240 — Radeon R9 line290X would also be helpful.

Important! The number of computing units in Radeon and GeForce video adapters is not directly compared, they are not identical.

GPU frequency – nominal (standard) frequency of the video card. For GeForce video cards up to the sixth series, the frequency of the GPU core / shader unit / memory in MHz. Since the 6 series, the comparative characteristics of video cards have changed a little — GPU frequency / auto-overclocking / memory frequency. For Radeon video cards, the core and blocks operate at the same frequency, hence the two values \u200b\u200b- the frequency of the GPU / memory.

Memory is the specified memory standard from the developer, the higher the number, the faster the memory. In cheaper models, manufacturers can reduce the amount of memory, they can, on the contrary, double it, but at the same time use the memory of the previous generation, and sometimes use the ancient DDR2. Which does not affect the performance of the video card in the best way.

Memory bus — a channel for data exchange between the graphics processor and the memory of the video card. In cheaper graphics cards (under $100), manufacturers can cut bandwidth. Important! never choose a video card by bus (sometimes it comes to insanity) — just specify the standard characteristics of the model.

TDP W — peak, maximum power consumption of the video card. The comparison table of video cards in this case indicates what the power consumption will be at maximum load on the video card, and in no case says that such consumption will be constant. All modern video cards have power-saving modes — the lower the load, the lower the power consumption of the video card.

PSU W — recommendation for choosing a power supply. The total power of the PSU is taken into account. It is planned to overclock the system — do not forget to throw in 50-100W, providing a margin of safety for the power supply.

That’s actually all the main comparative characteristics of video cards, which must be monitored. I hope that the comparison table of video cards will help you not to step on the rake of miserable buyers of the GeForce GTX 460 + SE, and now the GeForce GTX 560 — the name is the same, but the efficiency is different.

I’m not talking about cheaper models, where the characteristics of video cards are changed by the manufacturer as you like and often in the negative, but are presented to you by traders as an unprecedented achievement of science and technology.

Try to compare video cards from your store not only by price, but also by taking into account the standard characteristics of video cards from the developer AMD Radeon or Nvidia GeForce. And of course, do not forget to link the comparison of video card characteristics with the video card performance table (you will find the link just below).

Tests, performance table for video cards . Which video card to choose for a computer. Find out what video card is installed. Choosing a video card for PC. How to buy a PC for home. Download DirectX 9-eleven. Buy memory.

When copying material, a link to the site is required!

Best regards $ Denker.

Computer accessories.

Aida 64

The Aida 64 program evaluates the performance of the computer as a whole — the parameters of the video adapter, processor, hard drive. Stress tests are available to diagnose component stability. How to check the video card for serviceability in Aida 64: in the application, go to the «Tools» menu, from there run the «System stability test». In the settings, check the box next to «Stress GPU» to test the video card. Mobility Radeon HD 5470 Radeon HD 7850 Radeon HD 7750 Radeon HD 5570 Radeon HD 5850 Radeon HD 7570 Radeon HD 6870 Radeon HD 6770 Radeon R9 270x Radeon HD 3850 Radeon HD 4650 Radeon HD 5450 Radeon HD 4850 Radeon HD 5870 Radeon HD 7790 Radeon R7 240 Radeon HD 5750 Radeon HD 6570 (DDR3) Radeon R7 250 Radeon R7 260x Radeon HD 3870 Radeon HD 7970 X2 Radeon HD 6750 RADEON HD 6950 Radeon R9 280X Radeon HD 4670 Radeon HD 7970 Radeon HD 7950 Radeon HD 6450 (DDR3) Radeon HD 2600 Pro Radeon HD 6790 Radeon HD 7350 Radeon HD 8400 OEM Radeon R9 290x Radeon HD Radeon HD 6970 Radeon X1300 Radeon HD 6650M Radeon R7 260 Mobility Radeon HD 5650 Radeon 9600 Mobility Radeon HD 4570 Radeon R7 265 Radeon X1950 Pro Radeon HD 4770 0056
Radeon HD 8570M Radeon X1600 XT Radeon 9550 Radeon HD 8670M Radeon HD 5550 Radeon HD 8750M Radeon HD 7990 Radeon HD 4350 Radeon HD 6930 Radeon R7 360 0056
Radeon HD 2400 Pro Radeon X1650 Pro Radeon X700 Radeon HD 3870 X2 Radeon R7 250X Radeon 9600 Pro Radeon HD 5970 Radeon R5 230 Radeon HD 3450 Radeon R7 370 Radeon HD 4870 X2 Radeon X1950 GT 9 GT Radeon HD 6470M Radeon HD 6250M Radeon HD 7470 Radeon 9250 Radeon HD 4860 Radeon HD 6990 Radeon X300 Radeon HD 3650 (GDDR3) Radeon X800 GTO Radeon 8500 0023 Radeon HD 4830 Radeon X1550 Radeon 7500 Radeon HD 7650M Radeon R9 380 Radeon R9 290 Radeon HD 2900 XT Radeon X800 Radeon HD 7730 Radeon X1800 XT0023 Radeon HD 8570 OEM Radeon HD 7890 Radeon 7200 Radeon HD 6750M Radeon 9000 Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Radeon HD 7610M Radeon X1050 Radeon HD 2600 XT Radeon Radeon X1600 Pro Radeon HD 6490M Radeon X1300 XT Radeon X700 Pro Radeon HD 8350 OEM Radeon HD 8730M Radeon X850 XT PE Radeon R9 270 Radeon X600 Pro Radeon 9200 Pro Radeon HD 7670 Radeon Radeon Radeon X1300 Pro Radeon 9800 Pro DDR Radeon R9 285 Radeon X600 XT Radeon HD 8760 OEM Radeon X1900 XTX Radeon HD 7690M XT Radeon HD 8750 Radeon HD 7550M Radeon HD 8850M Radeon R9 295×2 Radeon X1950 XTX Radeon HD 8770 Radeon X1950 XT Radeon X550 Radeon R9 390X Radeon HD 2400 XT Radeon HD 3650 (GDDR2) Radeon HD 7970M Radeon HD 3670 Radeon 9700 Pro Radeon X800 RX Radeon X1900 GT Radeon R90 Radeon 9600 SE Radeon HD 8870M Radeon X1800 GTO Radeon X550 Radeon R9 280 Radeon HD 4650M Radeon X800 XL Radeon HD 8970 Radeon X800 GT Radeon R9 Fury X HD 2420023 Radeon X300 SE Radeon HD 6570 (DDR5) Radeon X800 Pro Radeon HD 8950 Radeon HD 2900 GT Radeon 9500 Pro Radeon HD 6450 (DDR5) Radeon HD 8670 OEM Radeon 9500 64 Radeon X1650 XT Radeon 9800 SE-256
0019
Radeon HD 8740 OEM Radeon HD 8970M Radeon X850 Pro Radeon 9000 Pro Radeon HD 7870 XT Radeon 9800 XT Radeon HD 8870 Radeon X800 XT Radeon HD 8830M Radeon X1650 Pro Radeon HD 8770M Radeon HD 8790M Radeon X1800 XL Radeon HD 8690M Radeon X1900 XT Radeon 9800 Pro DDR2 Radeon HD 3850 X2 Radeon X1050 Radeon HD Radeon HD 7950 GHz Edition Radeon VE 0020 Radeon X300 SE/256 Radeon HD 7530M Radeon HD 2400 Pro Radeon 9550 XT Radeon HD 7630M Radeon X700 XT Radeon 9550 SE Radeon X1300 Radeon HD 7510M Mobility Radeon HD 5850 Radeon 8500 LE/9100 ** RADEON HD 7950M Radeon X800 XT PE Mobility Radeon HD 5830 Radeon X800 GTO Radeon 9800 Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Radeon X300 SE/128 Radeon 9700 FirePro W7000 Radeon SDR FirePro Radeon 9500 128 Radeon X800 SE Radeon HD 8970 OEM FirePro S9000 Radeon HD 8590M Radeon 9800 SE-128 Radeon X1300 LE FirePro W9000 Radeon X1300 HM Radeon DDR Radeon X850 XT 0056
FirePro S10000 Radeon DDR OEM Radeon 9000 XT Radeon HD 8870 OEM Radeon X1300 HM FirePro W8000 Radeon LE Radeon HD 8950 OEM Radeon X1300 HM
OCCT

System stability can be evaluated by the OCCT program. It is used to overclock video cards and assess the possible harm from overloading the device. OCCT displays frequency, voltage, temperature, builds and saves graphs of parameter changes. Works with DirectX 9 versionsand 11.

How to check the performance of a video card in OCCT: go to the GPU tab and set the settings:

check duration — 10-15 minutes is enough;

approval;

shader complexity;

check the checkbox for errors.

During testing, you will see the current FPS and temperature of the video adapter. At the end, a summary table of the total values of the parameters is displayed. If 0 is specified in the Errors field, then no errors occurred during the verification process.

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a video processor built into some of the Intel Tiger Lake processors. This GPU has 96 or 80 Unified Shader Clusters and uses the 12th generation Intel graphics architecture. The operating frequency of the integrated graphics card varies from Intel Xe Graphics G7 from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. The slowest graphics option is installed in the Intel Core i5-1130G7 processor, in which the maximum frequency is 1100 MHz.

List-table of video cards nvidia geforce

Testing a new video card operation mode.

Next, you need to make sure that the video card is working correctly and stable. To test the video image, we will use the free FurMark utility. This program loads the video accelerator with work and displays a test video clip on the screen, by which you can determine the smoothness of rendering small details, the frequency of changing the picture, the temperature of the processor of the graphics adapter, its frequency and voltage.

Download, install and run FurMark. Next, press the button «BURN-IN test» and watch the video — a rotating object. If within one or several minutes there are no jumps, distortions, jamming and other similar phenomena on the images, then the video accelerator performance test at a new, increased frequency has been successfully passed.

Now you can proceed to the next stage of overclocking the video card — increasing the frequency of the device’s memory.

Practical work on replacing memory chips on a video card

High-quality work on replacing memory chips on a video card requires the use of a full-fledged soldering station with lower and upper board heating, the availability of stencils for microcircuits, as well as other small things necessary for soldering (flux, desoldering tools, solder balls of the required diameter for reballing, microscope, etc.) and diagnostics (post-card, multimeter), etc. After installing the chips and starting the video card, it is advisable to check the performance of the video memory subsystem using the MATS/MODS program (for Nvidia video cards).

Reballing donor GDDR5 memory chips (0.45 mm balls) on a special tool:

There are articles/videos on the Internet describing the successful practical implementation of work to increase the amount of video memory, for example, installing Samsung K4G80325FB-HC25 chips with 8 Gbps instead of K4G41325FE-HC25 4Gb on MSI GTX1060 AERO ITX 3G OC video card (article “Upgrading GTX1060 3Gb to 6Gb“). In this case, the memory chips were replaced, as well as the rearrangement of three control resistors of 100 kΩ each: R91->R84, R94->R86, R93->R85:

MSI GTX1060 AERO ITX 3G OC: Location of resistors on a stock and modified video card MSI GTX1060 AERO ITX 6G:

The same article shows a photo of the resistor configuration for running 6 GB of video memory on Palit 1060 Dual / StromX video cards:

1 GB to 2 GB. In this case, 8 Elpida memory chips (128 MB each) were replaced with Hynix MFR chips (256 MB each), another BIOS was flashed, and the card worked perfectly.

Soldering memory chips:

The presence of a number of articles and videos on the Internet indicates that it is quite possible in practice to upgrade video cards by installing memory chips with increased memory capacity on them.

Practice shows that the most successful memory upgrade of AMD video cards is possible when using BIOS from older models with the same video chip. For Nvidia video cards, the ability to upgrade depends on the performance of the configuration obtained by rearranging the resistors that control the operation of the memory.

How to overclock the Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT

By overclocking the Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT, you can increase its frequency. The result is an increase in card performance and fps during gameplay. Although it will still not work to run games whose minimum requirements it does not meet.

Special utilities such as MSI Afterburner or Nvidia Inspector will help you overclock the Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT video card.

After overclocking, mining by 9800 GT is possible but not recommended. Even with the advent of the new cryptocurrency Bitcoin Gold, which can be mined using GPUs, the performance will still be too low even to pay for electricity, especially at such a high TDP.

Benefits

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

Newer graphics card, release date difference 1 year(s) 0 month(s)

Core frequency 2. 5 times higher: 1375 MHz vs 540 MHz

3.1 times faster texturing speed: 26.4 billion / sec vs 8.6 billion / sec

Number of shader processors 3 times more: 96 vs 32

3.5 times better floating point performance: 264 gflops vs 76.16 gflops

A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 65 nm vs 80 nm

Memory clock 14% faster: 800 MHz vs 700 MHz

PassMark — G3D Mark 3x better performance: 353 vs 117

Performance in PassMark — G2D Mark about 74% better: 134 vs 77

Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Frames) about 55% better: 2160 vs 1397

Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — T-Rex (Fps) about 55% more: 2160 vs 1397

Features

Issue date 28 April 2008 vs 17 April 2007

Core frequency 1375 MHz vs 540 MHz

Texturing speed 26. 4 billion/sec vs 8.6 billion/sec

Number of shaders 96 vs 32

Floating point performance 264 gflops vs 76.16 gflops

Process 65 nm vs 80 nm

Memory frequency 800 MHz vs 700 MHz

Benchmarks

PassMark — G3D Mark 353 vs 117

PassMark — G2D Mark 134 vs 77

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 2160 vs 1397

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 2160 vs 1397

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT

2.2 times less power consumption: 47 Watt vs 105 Watt

The maximum memory size is about 33% larger: 512 MB vs 384 MB

Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt vs 105 Watt

Maximum memory size 512 MB vs 384 MB

Feature comparison

NVIDIA GeForce 210 NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

Architecture Tesla 2. 0 Tesla

Codename GT218 G92

Production date October 12, 2009 April 28, 2008

Price at first issue date $29.49 $49.99

Place in the ranking 1505 1195

Price now $32.99 $49.99

Type Desktop Desktop

Price/performance ratio (0-100) 6.81 13.43

Core frequency 1402MHz 1375 MHz

Number of CUDA conveyors 16 96

Floating point performance 39.36 gflops 264 gflops

Process 40nm 65nm

Maximum temperature 105 °C 105 °C

Number of shaders 16 96

Texturing speed 4. 16 GTexel/s 26.4 billion/sec

Power consumption (TDP) 30.5 Watt 105 Watt

Number of transistors 260 million 754 million

Audio input for HDMI Internal S/PDIF

Video connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV

HDMI

Maximum resolution VGA 2048×1536 2048×1536

Multi-monitor support

Tire PCI-E 2.0 PCI-E 2.0

Height 2.731″ (6.9 cm) 4.376″ (11.1 cm)

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16

Length 6.60″ (16.8cm) 9″ (22. 9 cm)

Additional power connectors None 6-pin

SLI support 2-way

DirectX 10.1 10.0

OpenGL 3.1 2.1

Maximum memory size 512MB 384MB

Memory bandwidth 8.0 GB/s 38.4 GB/s

Memory bus width 64 Bit 192 Bit

Memory frequency 500MHz 800MHz

Memory type GDDR2 GDDR3

CUDA

How to reinstall the video driver for the GeForce 9800 GT

The video adapter requires a properly working driver software to work properly. There are three ways to download and install new drivers on a computer with a 9 card800 GT:

Download from the manufacturer’s official resource. The only option that guarantees the correct operation and security of the PC.

Loading from third-party resources. A method in which you can not only download the driver for the Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT, but also infect your computer with a virus.

Using special utilities such as ‎DriverPack Solution, ‎DriverHub or Driver Booster Free. In this case, the driver may be out of date.

On the official website of Nvidia, you can find new versions of control programs for the video card, designed for various operating systems. The list of platforms supported by the card includes Windows 7 32 and 64 bit, Windows 10 and Linux. On other resources, you can find drivers for such rare operating systems as Solaris.

For Windows 10

File size: ~290.00 MB Driver version: 342.01 (WHQL) dated 12/14/2016; Language: Russian Operating system: Windows 10 32/64-bit, Windows 7 32/64-bit, Windows 8.1 32/64 -bit, Windows 8 32/64-bit, Windows Vista

Some background information

Memory chips with a density of 4 Gb (512 megabytes per chip) are installed in video cards with 3 gigabytes of video memory (6 pieces), and with a density of 8 Gb — in 6 gigabytes.

Specifications table for selected Hynix GDDR5 memory chips

Memory marking
Density, Gbit/Mb per chip Operating frequencies, GHz Voltage VDD (device operation) = VDDQ (I/O interface), V

H5GQ4h34AJR 4/512 7-8 1.55/1.35

4/512 7-8 1.35/1.5 (1.55)

4/512 6-7 1.35/1.5

4/512 4 1.5/1.5

4/512 5 1.35/1.35

H5GC8h34MJR 8/1024 6-7 1.35/1.5

8/1024 5-6 1.35/1.55

H5GQ4h34MFR-R2C
4/512 7-8
1.35/1.55

H5GC4h34MFR-T2C
4/512 5-6
1. 35/1.55

H5GQ2h34BFR-R2C (T2C)
2/256 7 (5-6)
1.55/1.55

H5GQ2h34AFR-R2C 2/256 7
1.6/1.6

The frequency of operation of Hynix memory chips is coded by the following designations, Gbps:

R4C — 8;

R2C — 7;

R0C — 7;

T2C — 5-6.

Marking of Samsung memory chips:

The fourth letter on the Samsung memory chip marking indicates their type:

N — GDDR2 SDRAM;

W — GDDR3 SDRAM;

J — GDDR3 SGRAM;

G — GDDR3 SGRAM;

Samsung memory density is determined by the fifth and sixth characters:

51 — 512 Mb, 8K/64ms;

52 — 512 Mb, 8K/32ms;

10 — 1G, 8K/32ms;

1G — 1G, 8K/64ms;

2G — 2G, 8K/64ms;

4G — 4G, 8K/64ms;

41 — 4G, 16K/32ms;

Samsung GDDR5 (170 BGA) Memory Specification Chart

Memory marking
Density, Gbit/Mb per chip Operating frequencies, GHz
Voltage, V

K4G80325FB-HC25
8/1024 8
1. 5

K4G20325FC
2/256 8
1.5

K4G20325FD-FC03 (FC03/04)
2/256 8
1.5

K4G41325FE-HC25
4/512 8
1.5

Micron GDDR5 memory specification table:

Memory marking
Revision Density, Gbit/Mb per chip Operating frequencies, GHz
Voltage, V

D9TCB(MT51J256M32HFB)
8/1024 6, 7, 8
1.5/1.35

Table with information about installed GDDR5 video memory in some Nvidia video cards:

— Micron010100 — Hynix

Video card name

Video memory size, GB

Note

Asus GeForce DUAL-GTX1060-3G

3

SK Hynix H5GQ4h34AJR

Palit GeForce GTX 1060 Super

6

Samsung K4G80325FB-HC25

Palit Dual GTX1060

6

Micron

Palit GeForce GTX 1060 JetStream

3

SK Hynix H5GQ4h34AJR

Inno3D GeForce GTX1060 Compact

3

Samsung K4G41325FE-HC25

MSI GTX 1060 OCV1v328 ver6. 2 and 7.0
3 Resistors defining memory straps (100 kΩ): R84 R85 R86 R87 R88 R8
00 — Samsung011100 — Hynix

6
R84 — R8
00 — Samsung

MSI GTX 1070 Armorv330 ver6.0

8

R831 R833 R837 R840 R843 R845000100 — Samsung010100 — Micron

MSI GTX1060 AERO ITX 3G OC

3

R91, R94, R93 Samsung

MSI GTX1060 AERO ITX OC 6
R84, R86, R85 Samsung

Picture of control resistors on Palit Dual GTX1060:

Currently, the following types of GDDR5 memory with 1 GB modules are most available:

Samsung — K4G80325FB — HC25 and HC28;

Hynix — H5GQ8h34MJR with different suffixes;

Micron — D9TCB, D9VVR, D9XSD series with different markings;

Elpida — does not produce high-density modules.

Video card temperature control.

FurMark also has the ability to control the heating temperature of the video card. The application interface shows a graph of the current processor temperature. Its temperature should not exceed 90 degrees C. If it exceeds this limit, then actions must be taken to increase the cooling of all components of the system unit and the video card as well. This may require cleaning the case and cooling fans from dust. Or installing an additional or more powerful cooler on the computer case, main processor or graphics accelerator.

Or if there is a problem, take a step back. End the test by pressing the Escape button. Return to the nVidia Inspektor program. Lower the Shader Clock and repeat the FurMark test.

What games can Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT

The test in the GeForce 9800 GT games carried out at the time showed the possibility of using a video card for budget gaming PCs. The minimum requirement for a computer that matches the card is a motherboard with PCI-Express 16x slots, 512-1024 MB of RAM, and a 500W power supply. It is also recommended to install the DX10 package.

The test results are as follows:

In the game Crysys (2009) when the resolution is set to 1280×1024 pixels. The 512 MB model delivers 22 to 30 fps, roughly on par with the HD 4770.

When you start the Stalker game (resolution 1680×1050 pixels), the picture change rate reaches 13-25 frames per second if you use an adapter with 512 MB GDDR5, and up to 30 if you install a gigabyte version on your computer.

Skyrim game with 512 MB card will not start at all, and gigabyte modification at minimum settings will show up to 65 fps.

Games released after 2011-2012 are not recommended to run with GeForce 9800 GT 512 MB. Most of them will show no more than 20 fps, the rest will not work. A version with 1 GB of memory is suitable, but it is also unlikely to provide an acceptable quality of the gameplay.

Instructions for overclocking the video card GeForce

Before starting, you need to determine at what frequencies the graphics adapter is currently operating. This can be done using the convenient and free GPU-Z program.

Download and install the program. After launching, the GPU-Z utility will show the operation data of your video accelerator.

We are interested in information about the frequency of the graphics core (GPU Clock), the frequency of shader units (Shader), the frequency of the video card’s memory (Memory).

Screenshot of the GPU-Z program.

Performance options are highlighted in green in the picture. In red, the frequency of the device that needs to be increased. It is necessary to increase the frequency by 10-15% no more. Otherwise, the risk of overheating of the video card and its failure will be high.

This program does not require installation. Download the program archive, unpack it and run the nvidiaInspector.exe file.

After starting in a new window, press the button «Show Overclocking» , then press «Yes».

You should see a window with sliders and buttons for overclocking your nVidia video card.

Screenshot of the nVidia Inspektor program.

In the right part of the program, first we will raise the value of the core clock (GPU Clock) and the frequency of the shader units (Shader Clock) will automatically rise, because these parameters are interconnected.

It is necessary to increase the Shader Clock frequency by no more than 15% of the initial operating frequency of the processor; to do this, move the slider to the right.

For the changes to take effect, they must be confirmed by pressing the button «Apply Clock&Voltage».

Benefits

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce 210

Newer graphics card, release date difference 1 year(s) 5 month(s)

Core clock about 2% faster: 1402 MHz vs 1375 MHz

A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 40 nm vs 65 nm

3.4 times less power consumption: 30. 5 Watt vs 105 Watt

The maximum memory size is about 33% larger: 512 MB vs 384 MB

Production date 12 October 2009 vs 28 April 2008

Core frequency 1402 MHz vs 1375 MHz

Process 40 nm vs 65 nm

Power consumption (TDP) 30.5 Watt vs 105 Watt

Maximum memory size 512 MB vs 384 MB

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO

6.3x faster texturing speed: 26.4 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s

Number of shader processors 6 times more: 96 vs 16

6.7 times better floating point performance: 264 gflops vs 39.36 gflops

Memory clock 60% faster: 800 MHz vs 500 MHz

3.6 times better performance in PassMark — G3D Mark benchmark: 353 vs 97

2.8x better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 134 vs 48

3. 1 times better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames): 2160 vs 688

3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps): 2160 vs 688

Features

Texturing speed 26.4 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s

Number of shaders 96 vs 16

Floating point performance 264 gflops vs 39.36 gflops

Memory frequency 800 MHz vs 500 MHz

Benchmarks

PassMark — G3D Mark 353 vs 97

PassMark — G2D Mark 134 vs 48

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 2160 vs 688

GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 2160 vs 688

Characteristics of GeForce 9800 GT video card

Graphics adapter parameters fully meet the requirements of gaming applications in 2008-2009. The main characteristics of the Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT are as follows:

G92-270 GPU;

GPU frequency — 550 to 600 MHz;

Memory frequency — 1400-1800 MHz;

Bit depth — 256 bits;

Maximum data transfer rate — 57.6 GB / s;

Supported image resolution is up to 2560×1600.

The video card supports Nv technology >Overview GeForce 9800 GT

The power consumption of the 9800 GT is quite high — at 105 W, so it requires a powerful power supply for its operation. The manufacturer recommends using at least 450 watts. To run modern games, you should choose a more productive PSU — 500 or 600 watts.

In order to maintain the normal temperature of the GeForce 9800 GT video card, all modifications are equipped with active cooling systems — usually with one cooler.

The video adapter has the following connectors for connecting peripheral devices:

2 DVI, to which you can also connect ordinary VGA and HDMI cables through adapters;

TV-Out for analog signal output;

MIO that can combine two cards.

The maximum value of the effective frequency of the video card is 2000 MHz, which allows you to overclock it by 11-30%, depending on the model. It is worth considering that a noticeable increase in performance can lead to severe overheating.

Temperature control.

An overclocked device raises the temperature of the entire computer system unit. Therefore, at first it is necessary to control data from temperature sensors not only from the video card, but also from the motherboard and the main processor. The most convenient way to do this is with a free program SpeedFan.

This program not only displays the temperatures of all sensors of the system unit: processor, memory, graphics accelerator, hard drive, motherboard chipset, but also allows you to configure the mode of operation of the cooling system.

If the temperature of any sensor is high, then care must be taken to improve air cooling in the computer case. To do this, clean the cracks and air ducts from dust. If necessary, install or change cooling fans — coolers for intake and exhaust.

Power consumption table for NVIDIA GeForce GTX and RTX

11/17/2021
Computer

78 Views

Power consumption is one of the main characteristics of any video card. The fact is that video cards, like central processing units, are one of the main consumers of energy in a computer. Current mid-range models typically require 150 to 250 watts of power, while flagship models can require up to 300 watts.

Naturally, these requests must be satisfied by the power supply. Otherwise, the computer may not work stably, blue screens, sudden reboots, and other problems are possible. Therefore, when assembling a computer, it is extremely important to take into account power consumption and choose a power supply that can cope with such a load.

In this article, we provide a table of power consumption for NVIDIA GeForce GTX and RTX graphics cards, starting from the GTX 400 Series, which were released in 2010, and ending with the RTX 2080 Ti and TITAN RTX, which appeared in 2019-m.

Table of Contents

Power Consumption Chart
Power consumption of NVIDIA TITAN

graphics cards

Power consumption for NVIDIA Quadro

graphics cards

Power consumption for RTX 3090, 3080, 3070 graphics cards

RTX 2060, 2070, 2080 (Super) graphics card power consumption

Power consumption for GTX 1650, 1660 (Super, Ti)

Power consumption for GTX 1050, 1060, 1070, 1080 (Ti)

Power consumption for GTX 9 graphics cards50, 960, 970, 980 (Ti)

Power consumption for GTX 750, 760, 770, 780 (Ti)

Power consumption for GTX 650, 660, 670, 680, 690 (Ti, Ti Boost)

Power consumption for GTX 550, 560, 570, 580, 590 (Ti)

Power consumption for GTX 450, 460, 465, 470, 480 graphics cards

Table of power consumption of video cards

The table shows two values, «Power consumption» and «Recommended PSU power».

Power consumption is the power consumption of the video card that will be required from the power supply, this parameter can be used to estimate the total power consumption of the entire computer.

The recommended PSU power is the power of the power supply for a computer with this video card, as recommended by NVIDIA. The recommended power supply capacity is calculated based on typical components and in most cases is sufficient for stable operation of the computer.

For most work and gaming computers with mid-range processors and without overclocking, a power supply with the power recommended by NVIDIA will be sufficient. But, if you are using a flagship processor, plan to overclock components or upgrade the system, then you need to choose a more powerful PSU. Usually in such cases, 100-150 watts above the recommended value will be more than enough.

Power consumption of NVIDIA TITAN graphics cards

Model name Power consumption (W) Recommended PSU power (W)

NVIDIA TITAN RTX 280 650

NVIDIA TITAN V 250 600

NVIDIA TITAN Xp 250 600

NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal) 250 600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 250 600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Black 250 600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN 250 600

Power consumption of NVIDIA Quadro graphics cards

Model name Power consumption (W) Recommended PSU power (W)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 295 W —

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 295 W —

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 265 W —

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 160 W —

RTX 3090, 3080, 3070 Power Consumption

Model Name Power consumption (W) Recommended PSU power (W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 350 750

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 320 750

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 220 650

Power consumption for RTX 2060, 2070, 2080 (Super)

Model name Power consumption (W) Recommended PSU power (W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 260 650

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super 250 650

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 225 650

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super 215 650

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 175 550

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super 175 550

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 160 500

Power consumption for GTX 1650, 1660 (Super, Ti)

Model name Power consumption (W) Recommended PSU power (W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 120 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super 125 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 120 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super 100 350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 75 300

Power consumption for GTX 1050, 1060, 1070, 1080 (Ti)

Model name Power consumption (W) Recommended PSU power (W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 250 600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 180 500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 180 500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 150 500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 120 400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 75 300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 75 300

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 30 300

Power consumption for GTX 950, 960, 970, 980 (Ti)

Model name Power consumption (W) Recommended PSU power (W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 250 600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 165 500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 145 500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 120 400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 90 350

Power consumption for GTX 750, 760, 770, 780 (Ti)

Model name Power consumption (W) Recommended PSU power (W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 250 600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 250 600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 230 600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 170 500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 60 300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 55 300

Power consumption for GTX 650, 660, 670, 680, 690 (Ti, Ti Boost)

Model name Power consumption (W) Recommended PSU power (W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 300 650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 195 550

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 170 500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti 150 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 140 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 134 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti 110 400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 64 400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 130 450

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 (GDDR5) 49 300

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 (DDR3) 65 350

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 65 300

NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 49 300

Power consumption for GTX 550, 560, 570, 580, 590 (Ti)

Model name Power consumption (W) Recommended PSU power (W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 365 700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 244 600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 219 550

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 170 500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 150 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti 116 400

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 29 300

Power consumption for GTX 450, 460, 465, 470, 480

Model name Power consumption (W) Recommended PSU power (W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 250 600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 220 550

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 200 550

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 160 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 106 400

What do the numbers and letters in the names of Nvidia graphics cards mean?

GPU </th> <th> ETHASH </th> <th> Zhash </th> <th> BEAM3 </th> <th> Grin32 </th> <th> MTP </th> <th> ProgPow </th> <th> KawPow </th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> GTX1050Ti 4GB </strong> </td> <td/> <td> 20-22H/s <br /> 75W </td> <td> 5H/s <br /> 80W </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td/> <td> 5 6mh/s <br /> 53W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> GTX1060 6GB </strong> </td> <td> 17-23MH/S <br /> 90W </td> <td> 35-40H/S <br /> 90W </td> <td> 9.3H/S </td> <td> <td> <td> 1,1MH 90W </td> <td> 7.3MH/S <br /> 90W </td> <td> 10-12MH/S <br /> 90W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> GTX1070 </strong> </td> <p> 24-28MH/S120W </td> <td> 60-65H/S130W </td> <td> 16.6 H/S130W 900W 4h/S130W </td> <td> 2.5MH/S <br /> 130W </td> <td> 12MH/S <br /> 130W </td> <td> 14-15MH/S <br /> 130W </td> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> GTX1070707028 </td> <td> 25-29MH/S 900W s <br /> 130W </td> <td> 18.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/3.bp.blogspot.com/-lBGSnyijdVQ/USTy66MyRuI/AAAAAAAAATQ/C-yvH7HTdak/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/ielts+package-+line+graph.jpg' /> 4H/s <br /> 150W </td> <td> 0.4H/s <br /> 150W </td> <td> 2.5MH/S </td> <td> 13MH/S <br /> 130W </td> <td> 15-16MH/S <br /> 130W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> GTX1080 </strong> </td> <td> 30-37MH/S <br /> 150W </td> <td> 67-73H/S 9002 , 9h/s <br /> 150W </td> <td> 0.4h/s <br /> 180W </td> <td> 2.6MH/S <br /> 150W </td> <td> 15MH/S </td> <td> 16-18MH/S </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <p>2 GTX1080 </p> <p>3 </td> <td> 40MH/S </p> <td> 190W </td> <td> 89-99H/s <br /> 200W </td> <td> 27.6H/s <br /> 190W </td> <td> 0.63H/s <br /> 190W </td> <td> 3.9MH/S <br /> 190W </td> <td> 18MH/S <br /> 200W </td> <td> 23-27MH/S <br /> 210W </td> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> GTX1650 </p> <p>3 </p> <td> 14-16MH/S <br /> 55W 900W 9-25H/S 900W <br /> 70W </td> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> GTX1660 </strong> </td> <td> 20-25Mh/s <br /> 90W </td> <td> 37H/s <br /> 90W </td> <td> 12H/s <br /> 90W </td> <td> </td> <td> 2Mh/s <br /> 88W </td> <td> 9, 8Mh/s <br /> 90W </td> <td> 10Mh/s <br /> 90W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> GTX1660S </strong> </td> <td> 25-31MH/S <br /> 110W </td> <td> 39H/S <br /> 110W </td> <td> 16,790W </td> <td> 0.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/i.pinimg.com/736x/78/dd/8e/78dd8e40fd52f29622f7f6112580b8e3.jpg' /> 26H/S </td> <td> 2,2MH/S 1002MH/S 10023 </p> <td> 2.2MH/S </p> <td> 2,2MH/S </p> <td> 2,2MH/S </p> <td> 2,2MH S <br /> 120W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> GTX16660TI </strong> </td> <td> 24-31.5MH/S <br /> 100W </td> <td> 47H/S <br /> 90W </td> <td> 12.5H/S </td> </td> <p> 9002 ,8MH/s <br /> 90W </td> <td> 15-16Mh/s <br /> 128W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX2060 </strong> </td> <td> 25-30MH/S <br /> 130W </td> <td> 54H/S <br /> 1302 </p> <td> 18H/S <br /> 130W </td> <td/> 2.1MH/S <br /> 130W </td> <td> 15.7MH/S 900W </p> <td> 17MH/S <br /> 125W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX2060S </strong> </td> <td> 36-42 MH/S <br /> 140W </td> <td> 74 H/S <br /> 160W </td> </td> <td> </td> <p> 900.9 3.2 MH/S/S S 9007 MH/S S 9007 MH/S S 9007 MH/S S 9007 MH/S S 9007 MH/S 9003 </p> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX2070 </strong> </td> <td> 36-42Mh/s <br /> 150W </td> <td> 76h/s <br /> 160W </td> <td> 19h/s <br /> 150W </td> <td> 0.5H/S <br /> 15023 </p> <td> 3.3MH/S <br /> 150W </td> <td> 19.1MH/S150W </td> <td> 21-22MH/S 200W 200W 200W 200W 200W 200W 200W 200W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX2070S </strong> </td> <td> 36-42MH/S <br /> 150W </td> <td> 86H/S <br /> 180W </td> <td> 26H/S <br /> 180W </td> <td> 0.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/benative.vn/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/cach-nhan-xet-bieu-do-bang-tieng-anh.png' /> 6H/S <br /> 175W </td> <td> 4,5,1MH 27Mh/s <br /> 210W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX2080 </strong> </td> <td> 36-44Mh/s <br /> 150W </td> <td> 95-99H/S190W </td> <td> 26.5h/S 190W </td> <td> 0.65H/S190W </td> <td> 3.9MH/S190W </td> <td> 24.8MH/S190W </td> </tr> <p> <b> </p> <p>2 RTX20S RTX20S /S <br /> 150W </td> <td/> <td/> <td> 0.84H/S <br /> 200W </td> <td> 4.4MH/S210W </td> <td/> <td> 28.6 MH/S <br /> 210W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX2080 22023 </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> </td> <td> 133H/s <br /> 220W </td> <td> 32H/s <br /> 220W </td> <td> 1H/S <br /> 220W </td> <td> 5.5MH/S <br /> 220W </td> <td> 31MH/S <br /> 220W </td> <td> 35-37MH/S <br /> 210W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <p>2 RTX3060 </strong> </td> <td> 25-50MH/S* 900W. 900W. 72h/s <br /> 160W </td> <td> 26.4 H/S <br /> 160W </td> <td> </td> <td> 3MH/S <br /> 180W </td> <td> 24.7MH/S <br /> 160W </td> <td> 24MH/S <br /> 180W </tr> </td> <p>2 RTX 30884 40MH/s** <br /> 130W </td> <td/> <td> </td> <td/> <td> </td> <td/> <td/> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <p>2 RTX306060TI </strong> </td> <td> 55-63MH/S <br /> 130W </td> </td> <td> 33H/S <br /> 170W </td> <p> 0.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/cdn2.vectorstock.com/i/1000x1000/52/96/infographic-chart-graphics-diagram-charts-data-vector-26755296.jpg' /> 53H/S </td> </td> <td> 4.2MH/S <br /> 17 <br /> 170W </td> <td> 30.5MH/s200W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX3060TI LHR </strong> </td> <td> 30-45 MH/s** <br /> 130W </td> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX3070 </strong> </td> <td> 55-63MH/s <br /> 135W </td> <td> 107h/s <br /> 210W </td> <td> 31H/S <br /> 180W </td> <td> 0.63H/S <br /> 180W </td> <td> 4.4MH/S <br /> 210W </td> <td/> <td> 31.5MH/S <br /> 180W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <p>2 RTX30 RTX 30-45 MH/s** <br /> 135W </td> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX3070ti </strong> </td> <td> 80Mh/s* <br /> 185W </td> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td> 4,6Mh/s <br /> 270W </td> <td/> <td> 41Mh/s <br /> 280W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX3080 </strong> </td> <td> 95-105MH/S <br /> 240W </td> <td/> <td> </td> <td> 1H/S <br /> 320W </td> <td> 5MH/S <br /> 320W </p> <td/> <td> 50MH/S <br /> 270W 270 23.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/i.pinimg.com/originals/18/97/77/189777e463a2f8baff86e4beb6097f2c.jpg' /> </p> <td data-align="left"> <p>2 RTX 3084 /s ** <br /> 240W </td> <td/> <td/> <td>0 </p> <td>0 </p> <td/> <td/> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX308080TI </strong> </td> <td> 57-85MH/S* <br /> 250W </td> <td> 150H/S </td> <p> 330, <br /> 330W <br /> 330W <br />3 s <br /> 300W </td> <td/> <td> 60Mh/s <br /> 350W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX3090 </strong> </td> <td> 100-122Mh/s <br /> 350W </td> <td/> <td> 56H/s <br /> 330W </td> <td> 1,1H/s <br /> 325W </td> <td> 7,2Mh/s <br /> 320W </td> <td> 52Mh/s <br /> 370W </td> <td> 61Mh/s <br /> 370W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> CMP 30HX </strong> </td> <td> 32Mh/s <br /> 75W </td> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td> 15MH/s <br /> 130W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> CMP 50HX </strong> </td> <td> 58Mh/s <br /> 140W </td> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td> 4.5MH/S <br /> 200W </td> <td>0 </p> <td> 30MH/S <br /> 200W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> CMP 70HX </strong> </p> <td> 81MH/S <br /> 190W </td> <td> 63H/S <br /> 210W </td> <p> 900.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/ncss-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Bar-Chart1.png' /> 23 900.23 900.4.4.4/SE </p> <td> 2,9Mh/s <br /> 210W </td> <td/> <td> 31 Mh/s <br /> 210W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> CMP 90HX </strong> </td> <td> 101Mh/s <br /> 230W </td> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td> 42Mh/s250W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> CMP 170HX </strong> </td> <td> 160Mh/s <br /> 210W </td> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td> 5,5MH/s <br /> 250W </td> <td> 55Mh/s <br /> 250W </td> <td> 56Mh/s <br /> 250W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX A2000 </strong> </td> <td> 40Mh/s <br /> 65W </td> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td/> <td> 15Mh/s <br /> 70W </td> </tr> <tr> <td data-align="left"> <strong> RTX A4000 </strong> </td> <td> 63Mh/s <br /> 160W </td> <td> 87H/s <br /> 160W </td> <td> 31H/s <br /> 160W </td> <td> </td> <td> </td> <td/> <td> 24Mh/s <br /> 160W </td> </tr> <tr>2883 NBminer, Gminer, kawpowminer </li> </ul> <p> <strong> The hashrate and power consumption of video cards indicated above in the tables should be understood as possible values, since they depend on a large number of factors: the miner program, the manufacturer (vendor) of the video card, the memory manufacturer, overclocking and downvolting.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/i.pinimg.com/originals/75/f3/f7/75f3f7d17d7b88e07e250b75ace0c0aa.jpg' /> </strong> </p> <h2> Video card comparison table — online presentation </h2> <p> Similar presentations: </p> <p> 3D printing and 3D printer </p> <p> Video card. Types of video cards </p> <p> Apple analysis </p> <p> Current and voltage transformers </p> <p> Transistors </p> <p> LG washing machine device. Electrical </p> <p> Switchgear designs. (Lecture 15) </p> <p> Electrical safety. Rules for the technical operation of electrical installations </p> <p> Magnetic starters and contactors </p> <p> Work on HF and VHF radio stations. Antennas of military radio stations. (Topic 5.1) </p> <p><h3> 1. Video card comparison table </h3> <p> FONYUSHKIN F <br /> FOR THE ORDER </p> <h3> 2. Green camp </h3> <p> The most common reference cards <br /> or <br /> the middle of the model range <br /> were taken for representatives, because if you take everything there will be about a thousand <br /> slides </p> <h3> 3. Riva 128 </h3> <p> equipped with 2 megabytes Nvidia8 new at that time <br /> SGRAM-memory, <br /> connected to the graphics processor <br /> by a 128-bit <br /> bus at a frequency of 100 MHz.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/2.bp.blogspot.com/-wd_E-CG2XoY/WR0Dcgf578I/AAAAAAAAAXc/DqRgO7y7R68y4VogL5IdDb3DPCqcEkuTgCLcB/s640/gb1.jpg' /> Its <br /> bandwidth <br /> was 1.6 GB / s <br /> ATI analogue: Rage Pro 8MB <br /> Recommended processor: <br /> Pentium I-II <br /> AMD K6-2 450MHz <br /> year 1995 <br /> Frequency <br /> Memory: 100 </p> <h3> 4. Riva TNT </h3> <p> NVIDIA Equipped Riva TNT 16MU with drama drama. with <br /> GPU <br /> 128-bit bus at <br /> 100 MHz. Its bandwidth was <br /> 1.76 <br /> GB / s <br /> Ati analogue: Rage Pro <br /> Recommended processor: <br /> Pentium II-III 500 MHz <br /> Amd k6-2 <br /> year 1997 <br /> Frequency <br /> Core: 90 Memory: 110 </p> <h3> 5. Riva TNT2 </h3> <p> NVIDIA Equipped Riva <br /> TNT2 32th megabytes <br /> SDRAM memory, <br /> graphic <br /> processor 128-bit <br /> MSC at a frequency of 15 MSC. <br /> Its bandwidth <br /> Ability was <br /> 2.4 GB/C <br /> ATI analogue: Rage 128 Pro <br /> Recommended <br /> Processor: <br /> Pentium III 600MHz <br /> AMD K6-3 <br /> Frequencies <br /> Core: 125 memory: 150 900 </p> <h3> 6. GEFORCE </h3> <p> Nvidia equipped these <br /> cards with 32 megabytes of <br /> DDR memory, <br /> connected to a </p> <p> graphics processor by a 256-bit <br /> bus at 200 <br /> MHz.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/st3.depositphotos.com/16253490/19507/v/450/depositphotos_195074736-stock-illustration-set-of-9-simple-editable.jpg' /> Its bandwidth <br /> Ability was <br /> 6.4GB/C <br /> ATI analogue: Rage 128 Pro <br /> Recommended <br /> processor: <br /> Pentium III 750 MHz <br /> AMD K6-3 <br /> 1999 <br /> Frequency <br /> Memory: 300 </p> <h3> 7. GEFORCE 2 MX400. MX400 </h3> <p> Nvidia equipped these <br /> cards with 64 megabytes of DDR memory connected to <br /> graphics processor <br /> 64-bit <br /> bus at 200 MHz. <br /> Its bandwidth <br /> Ability was <br /> 2.9GB/C <br /> ATI analogue: Rage 128 Pro <br /> Recommended <br /> Processor: <br /> Pentium III 750 MHz <br /> AMD Athlon <br /> Frequencies <br /> Memory: 366 900 </p> <h3> 8. GEFORCE. these cards are </h3> <p> with 128 megabytes of DDR memory connected to the <br /> graphics processor <br /> by a 128-bit <br /> bus at 200 MHz. <br /> Her pass is <br /> The ability was <br /> 7.3GB/C <br /> ATI analogue: Radeon 7500 <br /> Recommended <br /> processor: <br /> Pentium III 850MHz <br /> AMD Athlon <br /> 2001 <br /> Frequency <br /> Memory: 460 </p> <h3> 9 </h3> <p> with 128 megabytes of DDR memory connected to the <br /> graphics processor <br /> by a 128-bit <br /> bus at 200 MHz.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/1.bp.blogspot.com/-QhAOecnAv5o/XvH8H9ZHItI/AAAAAAABAMY/XRxJFd3c_MobmHGhv5Xli6d-cwSqFhc1QCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/M2Pwh.gif' /> <br /> Its bandwidth was <br /> 8.1GB/s <br /> Ati equivalent : Radeon 9500 <br /> Recommended <br /> Processor: <br /> Pentium IV 1700MHz <br /> AMD Athlonxp <br /> Frequency <br /> Core: 275 Memory: 512 </p> <h3> 10. GeForce FX 5600 </h3> <p> NVIDIA equipped these cards of <br /> DDRPAMATIA, connected by the 9001 <br /> bus at 200 MHz. <br /> Its bandwidth was </p> <p> 8.8GB/s <br /> Ati analog: Radeon 9600 <br /> Recommended <br /> processor: <br /> Pentium IV 2400MHz <br /> Amd AthlonXP <br /> Year 2003-2004 <br /> Frequencies <br /> Core: 325 Memory: 550 </p> <h3> 11. Introduced concepts </h3> <p> GTX-Top models. They started with the 7th series and exist until <br /> now <br /> GTO- Top models but with reduced frequencies. <br /> Appeared from the 7th series and lasted until the ninth <br /> GTS-Pre-top models. Were only in the 8th 100th and 200th <br /> series <br /> GSO- Medium models with increased frequencies. <br /> Existed only in the 9th series <br /> GT-Medium and mid-starter models. Appeared from the 6th <br /> series, there are still <br /> GS — Initial models.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/ieltsliz.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/IELTS-bar-chart.jpg' /> There were 7 to 8 series </p> <h3> 12. GeForce 6600 </h3> <p> Nvidia equipped these <br /> cards with 256 <br /> megabytes of GDDR memory, connected to a </p> <p> graphics processor with a 128-bit bus at a frequency of <br /> 200 MHz. Its bandwidth <br /> Ability was <br /> 8.8GB/C <br /> ATI analogue: Radeon X550 <br /> Recommended <br /> processor: <br /> Pentium IV 2800MHz <br /> AMD Athlon64 <br /> Frequencies <br /> Core: 300 Memory: 550 900 </p> <h3> 13. GEFORCE 7. GEFORCE 7. GEFORCE.2801 Vendors equipped these </h3> <p> cards with 256 <br /> megabytes of GDDR3 memory connected to the </p> <p> graphics processor by a 128-bit <br /> bus at 200 <br /> MHz. Its bandwidth <br /> Ability was <br /> 22.4GB/C <br /> ATI analogue: Radeon X1550 <br /> Recommended <br /> processor: <br /> Core 2 Duo 2000 MHz <br /> AMD Athlon64x2 <br /> Frequency <br /> Core: 560 memory: 1400 </p> <h3>. Vendors equipped these </h3> <p> cards with 256 megabytes of <br /> GDDR3 memory or 512yu <br /> GDDR2 connected to a <br /> GPU <br /> 128-bit bus at <br /> 200 MHz.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/i.pinimg.com/originals/66/20/25/662025ba8a4d99014cbdd136f10e6655.png' /> Its bandwidth <br /> Ability was <br /> 22.4GB/C <br /> ATI analogue: Radeon X1800XT <br /> Recommended processor: <br /> Core 2 Duo 2600MHz <br /> AMD Athlon64x2 <br /> frequency <br /> Core: 540 Memory: 1400/700 <br /> 9600. </h3> <p> Vendors equipped these <br /> cards with 512 megabytes of GDDR3, <br /> connected to the <br /> graphics processor with a 256-bit <br /> bus at 200 MHz. Her <br /> Passing capacity <br /> was 57.6GB/C <br /> ATI analogue: Radeon HD2900 <br /> Recommended processor: <br /> Core 2 Duo 2800MHz <br /> AMD Athlon64x2 <br /> Frequencies <br /> Core: 650 Memory: 900 900 </p> <h3> 16. GEFORCE 15 AKA. A rare oem piece of hardware </h3> <p> Vendors equipped these <br /> cards with 512 megabytes of GDDR3, <br /> connected to a <br /> graphics processor with a 256-bit <br /> bus at a frequency of 200 MHz. Its <br /> bandwidth was 57.6GB/s </p> <p> Analog Ati : Radeon HD2900 <br /> Recommended processor: <br /> Core 2 Duo 2800 MHz <br /> AMD Athlon64x2 <br /> 2009 <br /> This is the renamed GTX9800+ <br /> which will become GTS250 <br /> Frequency <br /> Memory: 650 Memory: GTX 260 </h3> <p> VNDs 9001 , <br /> connected to the <br /> graphics processor by a 448-bit <br /> bus at a frequency of 200 MHz.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/creativecan.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/image481.jpg' /> Its <br /> throughput of <br /> was 111.9GB/s <br /> Ati equivalent : Radeon HD3870 <br /> Recommended processor: <br /> Core 2 Duo 2800MHz <br /> AMD athlon64x2 <br /> 2009 <br /> Frequency <br /> Core: 576 Memory: 1000 </p> <h3> 18. GT 340 </h3> <p> They were </h3> <p> Vendors equipped these <br /> cards with 1024 <br /> megabytes of GDDR5, <br /> connected to a </p> <p> graphics processor with a 256-bit <br /> bus at a frequency of 200 <br /> MHz. Its bandwidth was </p> <p> 115.2GB/s <br /> Ati analogue: Radeon <br /> HD6870 <br /> Recommended <br /> Processor: <br /> Core 2 QUAD 2800MHz <br /> AMD Phenom X3 <br /> 2010 <br /> Frequency <br /> Core: 675 Memory: 3600 </p> <h3> 20. GTX 560 </h3> <p> Vendoras Equipped these <br /> cards <br /> GDDR, connected with meters <br />, connected processor with a 256-bit <br /> bus at a frequency of 200 MHz. <br /> Its throughput of <br /> was 128.2GB/s <br /> Ati analog: Radeon HD7870 <br /> Recommended <br /> processor: <br /> Core 2 quad 2800MHz <br /> Amd Phenom x4 <br /> Year 2011 <br /> Clocks <br /> Core: 810 Memory: 4008 </p> <h3> Its </h3> <p> bandwidth <br /> was 144.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/i.pinimg.com/originals/a5/9f/0e/a59f0ecae4caadbe90b664101f564bd5.jpg' /> 2GB/C <br /> ATI analogue: Radeon R9 270 <br /> Recommended processor: <br /> Core 2 QUAD 2800MHz <br /> AMD Phenom X4 <br /> 2012 <br /> Frequency <br /> Memory: 6008 </p> <h3> 22. GTX 760. equipped these </h3> <p> card with 2048 MB <br /> GDDR5 connected to <br /> GPU <br /> 256-bit bus at <br /> 200 MHz. Its bandwidth <br /> Ability was <br /> 154.2GB/C <br /> ATI analogue: Radeon R7 370 <br /> Recommended processor: <br /> Core i5 2800MHz <br /> AMD FX6300 <br /> 2013 <br /> Frequencies <br /> Memory: 6008 </p> <h3> 23. GTX 860 OPS 9. </h3> <p> megabytes of GDDR5, <br /> coupled to a 256-bit 9 <br /> graphics processor0015 bus at 200 MHz. Its <br /> bandwidth <br /> was 154.2GB/C <br /> ATI analogue: Recommended <br /> processor: <br /> Core i5 2800 MHz <br /> year 2014 <br /> Frequency <br /> Memory: 5008 </p> <h3> 24. GTX 960 </h3> <p> Vendoras equipped these <br /> cards or these <br /> cards or these <br /> cards or these <br /> cards or 4096 <br /> megabytes of GDDR5, <br /> connected to the <br /> graphics processor <br /> by a 128-bit <br /> bus at a frequency of 200 <br /> MHz.<img loading='lazy' src='/800/600/http/i.redd.it/eypw5ts1tih11.png' /></p> </div> <div class="entry-footer"> <div class="entry-meta taxonomies"> </div> </div> </div> </div> </article> <nav class="navigation post-navigation" aria-label="Записи"> <h2 class="screen-reader-text">Навигация по записям</h2> <div class="nav-links"><div class="nav-previous"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/phenom-x2-b59-amd-phenom-ii-x2-b59-hwbot.html" rel="prev"><span class="nav-subtitle">Previous:</span> <span class="nav-title">Phenom x2 b59: AMD Phenom II X2 B59 @ HWBOT</span></a></div><div class="nav-next"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/intel-core-ranking-best-processors-october-2022.html" rel="next"><span class="nav-subtitle">Next:</span> <span class="nav-title">Intel core ranking: Best Processors — October 2022</span></a></div></div> </nav> </main> </div> <div class="col-lg-4"> <aside id="secondary" class="widget-area"> <section id="search-2" class="widget widget_search"><form role="search" method="get" class="search-form" action="https://cbmssymposium.org/"> <label> <span class="screen-reader-text">Найти:</span> <input type="search" class="search-field" placeholder="Поиск…" value="" name="s" /> </label> <input type="submit" class="search-submit" value="Поиск" /> </form></section> <section id="recent-posts-2" class="widget widget_recent_entries"> <h2 class="widget-title">Свежие записи</h2> <ul> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/intel-pentium-dual-core-6000-please-click-the-green-button-to-continue.html">Intel pentium dual core 6000: Please click the green button to continue.</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/rivatuner-osd-not-display-in-league-of-legends-reddit-dive-into-anything-3.html">Rivatuner osd not display in league of legends: Reddit — Dive into anything</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/980-ti-wattage-nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti-specs-2.html">980 ti wattage: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Specs</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/a6-5200m-amd-a-series-a6-5200-notebook-processor-4.html">A6-5200M: AMD A-Series A6-5200 Notebook Processor</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/miscellaneous/g502-lightspeed-review-logitech-g502-lightspeed-review-rtings-com-4.html">G502 lightspeed review: Logitech G502 LIGHTSPEED Review — RTINGS.com</a> </li> </ul> </section><section id="recent-comments-2" class="widget widget_recent_comments"><h2 class="widget-title">Свежие комментарии</h2><ul id="recentcomments"></ul></section><section id="archives-2" class="widget widget_archive"><h2 class="widget-title">Архивы</h2> <ul> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/10'>Октябрь 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/09'>Сентябрь 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/08'>Август 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/07'>Июль 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/06'>Июнь 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/05'>Май 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/04'>Апрель 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/03'>Март 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/02'>Февраль 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2023/01'>Январь 2023</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/12'>Декабрь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/11'>Ноябрь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/10'>Октябрь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/09'>Сентябрь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/08'>Август 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/07'>Июль 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/06'>Июнь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/05'>Май 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/04'>Апрель 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/03'>Март 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/02'>Февраль 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2022/01'>Январь 2022</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/12'>Декабрь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/11'>Ноябрь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/10'>Октябрь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/09'>Сентябрь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/08'>Август 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/07'>Июль 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/06'>Июнь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/05'>Май 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/04'>Апрель 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/03'>Март 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/02'>Февраль 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2021/01'>Январь 2021</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/12'>Декабрь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/11'>Ноябрь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/10'>Октябрь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/09'>Сентябрь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/08'>Август 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/07'>Июль 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/06'>Июнь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/05'>Май 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/04'>Апрель 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/03'>Март 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/02'>Февраль 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2020/01'>Январь 2020</a></li> <li><a href='https://cbmssymposium.org/2019/12'>Декабрь 2019</a></li> </ul> </section><section id="categories-2" class="widget widget_categories"><h2 class="widget-title">Рубрики</h2> <ul> <li class="cat-item cat-item-5"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/amd">Amd</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-7"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/benchmark">Benchmark</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-8"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/cpu">Cpu</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-4"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/gpu">Gpu</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-3"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/miscellaneous">Miscellaneous</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-11"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/monitor">Monitor</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-12"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/playstation">Playstation</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-6"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/radeon">Radeon</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-9"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/windows">Windows</a> </li> <li class="cat-item cat-item-10"><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/category/xbox">Xbox</a> </li> </ul> </section><section id="meta-2" class="widget widget_meta"><h2 class="widget-title">Мета</h2> <ul> <li><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-login.php">Войти</a></li> <li><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/feed">Лента записей</a></li> <li><a href="https://cbmssymposium.org/comments/feed">Лента комментариев</a></li> <li><a href="https://ru.wordpress.org/">WordPress.org</a></li> </ul> </section></aside> </div> </div> </div> </section> <footer id="colophon" class="site-footer"> <div class="col-lg-12"> <div class="site-info"> 2024 © All rights reserved </div> </div> </footer> </div> <style type="text/css"> .pgntn-page-pagination { text-align: left !important; } .pgntn-page-pagination-block { width: 60% !important; padding: 0 0 0 0; } .pgntn-page-pagination a { color: #1e14ca !important; background-color: #ffffff !important; text-decoration: none !important; border: 1px solid #cccccc !important; } .pgntn-page-pagination a:hover { color: #000 !important; } .pgntn-page-pagination-intro, .pgntn-page-pagination .current { background-color: #efefef !important; color: #000 !important; border: 1px solid #cccccc !important; } .archive #nav-above, .archive #nav-below, .search #nav-above, .search #nav-below, .blog #nav-below, .blog #nav-above, .navigation.paging-navigation, .navigation.pagination, .pagination.paging-pagination, .pagination.pagination, .pagination.loop-pagination, .bicubic-nav-link, #page-nav, .camp-paging, #reposter_nav-pages, .unity-post-pagination, .wordpost_content .nav_post_link,.page-link, .page-links,#comments .navigation, #comment-nav-above, #comment-nav-below, #nav-single, .navigation.comment-navigation, comment-pagination { display: none !important; } .single-gallery .pagination.gllrpr_pagination { display: block !important; } </style> <link rel='stylesheet' id='pgntn_stylesheet-css' href='https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-content/plugins/pagination/css/nav-style.css?ver=6.4.2' media='all' /> <script src="https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-content/themes/lolipop/assets/js/bootstrap.min.js?ver=1.0.3" id="bootstrap-js-js"></script> <script src="https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-content/themes/lolipop/assets/js/popper.min.js?ver=1.0.3" id="popper-js-js"></script> <script src="https://cbmssymposium.org/wp-content/themes/lolipop/assets/js/navigation.js?ver=1.0.3" id="lolipop-navigation-js-js"></script> <style>iframe,object{width:100%;height:480px}img{max-width:100%}</style><script type="text/javascript">jQuery(document).ready(function($){$('.mylink').replaceWith(function(){return'<a href="'+$(this).attr('data-url')+'" title="'+$(this).attr('title')+'">'+$(this).html()+'</a>'})});new Image().src="//counter.yadro.ru/hit?r"+escape(document.referrer)+((typeof(screen)=="undefined")?"":";s"+screen.width+"*"+screen.height+"*"+(screen.colorDepth?screen.colorDepth:screen.pixelDepth))+";u"+escape(document.URL)+";h"+escape(document.title.substring(0,150))+";"+Math.random();</script> </body> </html> <script src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/7d0fa10a/cloudflare-static/rocket-loader.min.js" data-cf-settings="0d09f585314fd8f1ab2f46a0-|49" defer></script>

Chart of graphics cards: PassMark Software — Video Card (GPU) Benchmark Charts

The Best Graphics Cards for Compact PCs in 2022

The Best Graphics Card Deals This Week*

More About Our Picks

Zotac GeForce GTX 1650 Super Twin Fan

Bottom Line:

Pros

Cons

Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Super Twin Fan

Bottom Line:

Pros

Cons

EVGA GeForce RTX 3050 XC Black Gaming 8G

Bottom Line:

Pros

Cons

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 AMD Radeon RX 6600

Bottom Line:

Pros

Cons

EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming 12G

Bottom Line:

Pros

Cons

Zotac GeForce RTX 2060 Amp

Bottom Line:

Pros

Cons

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition

Bottom Line:

Pros

Cons

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition

Bottom Line:

Pros

Cons

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Bottom Line:

Pros

Cons

Measure Twice: How to Tell Which Graphics Cards Will Fit Your Case

Can Your Power Supply Handle a New Video Card?

Low-Profile Graphics Cards: A Low-Clearance Alternative

So, Which Compact Graphics Card Should I Buy?

Cost Per Frame: Best Value Graphics Cards Right Now

Best Value at 1080p

Best Value at 1440p

Best Value at 4K

Best Value at 1440p (Australia)

Best Value at 1440p (Europe)

Closing Notes

Shopping Shortcuts:

GPUCards | Scientific Volume Imaging

Small GPU cards

Medium GPU cards

Large GPU cards

Extreme GPU cards

Huygens 20.04

Huygens 20.10

Accelerated with GPU (CUDA)

GeForce Graphics Cards Now 14% Over MSRP, Radeon at Just 6% Over MSRP

NVIDIA GeForce & AMD Radeon GPU Prices Now Just 10% Over MSRP: Graphics Cards In Stock Everywhere!

Products mentioned in this post

Best GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Graphics Cards Available — Which One To Get?

Best RTX 3080 Ti Graphics Cards Today

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Performance

RTX 3080 Ti FAQs

What RTX 3080 Ti has the best cooler and great cooling performance?

What RTX 3080 Ti is the fastest out of the box?

Is it worth it to buy an expensive RTX 3080 Ti graphics card?

What’s the best CPU for the RTX 3080 Ti?

Should I get an RTX 3080 Ti if I have a 1080p monitor?

What’s the best monitor for the RTX 3080 Ti?

So, which RTX 3080 Ti should I get?

Best GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Graphics Cards in General

EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming

Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC Edition

MSI GeForce RTX 3080TI SUPRIM X 12G

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition

Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Master 12G