Intel Core i3-6100 vs Intel Core i5-2400: What is the difference?
51points
Intel Core i3-6100
32points
Intel Core i5-2400
Comparison winner
vs
64 facts in comparison
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-2400
Why is Intel Core i3-6100 better than Intel Core i5-2400?
- 800MHz higher ram speed?
2133MHzvs1333MHz - 27.4°C higher maximum operating temperature?
100°Cvs72.6°C - 18nm smaller semiconductor size?
14nmvs32nm - 44W lower TDP?
51Wvs95W - 1 newer version of PCI Express (PCIe)?
3vs2 - 13.1GB/s more memory bandwidth?
34.1GB/svs21GB/s - 20.07% higher PassMark result (single)?
2058vs1714 - 1.9 newer version of DirectX?
12vs10.1
Why is Intel Core i5-2400 better than Intel Core i3-6100?
- 1.
68x faster CPU speed?
4 x 3.1GHzvs2 x 3.7GHz - 500MHz faster GPU clock speed?
850MHzvs350MHz - 0.5MB bigger L2 cache?
1MBvs0.5MB - 5.59% higher PassMark result?
5801vs5494 - 3MB bigger L3 cache?
6MBvs3MB - 128KB bigger L1 cache?
256KBvs128KB
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Core i3-6100
vs
Intel Celeron J4005
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel Core i3-6100
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i3-6100
vs
Intel Core i5-4440
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i3-6100
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i3-6100
vs
Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i3-6100
vs
Intel Core i5-7500
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Core i3-6100
vs
Intel Core i3-7100
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i3-6100
vs
Intel Core i5-6600
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i5-4570
Intel Core i3-6100
vs
Intel Pentium G4560
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Pentium J3710
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Core i3-6100
0 User reviews
Intel Core i3-6100
0.
0/10
0 User reviews
Intel Core i5-2400
3 User reviews
Intel Core i5-2400
5.3/10
3 User reviews
Features
Value for money
No reviews yet
6.7/10
3 votes
Gaming
No reviews yet
2.0/10
3 votes
Performance
No reviews yet
4.0/10
3 votes
Reliability
No reviews yet
4.7/10
3 votes
Energy efficiency
No reviews yet
5.0/10
3 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
2 x 3.7GHz
4 x 3.1GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.
CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6100)
3.4GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Core i3-6100
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8.
L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
9.L3 core
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2133MHz
1333MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
34.1GB/s
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
5.
maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
6.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7.Supports ECC memory
✔Intel Core i3-6100
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
9.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.
(Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
Benchmarks
1.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
2.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
8.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown.
Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6100)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i3-6100
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.Has AES
✔Intel Core i3-6100
✔Intel Core i5-2400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3.Has AVX
✔Intel Core i3-6100
✔Intel Core i5-2400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
4.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5.Has F16C
✔Intel Core i3-6100
✖Intel Core i5-2400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
6.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
7.Has MMX
✔Intel Core i3-6100
✔Intel Core i5-2400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i3-6100
✖Intel Core i5-2400
A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).
9.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best CPUs?
i3-6100 so với i5-2400 — Fortnite Battle Royale với RX 580 So sánh hiệu suất
RX 580 with
Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz
Fortnite Battle Royale
RX 580 with
Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz
i3-6100
i5-2400
Multi-Thread Performance
5491 Pts
5953 Pts
Single-Thread Performance
2107 Pts
1747 Pts
Fortnite Battle Royale
i3-6100 vs i5-2400 trong Fortnite Battle Royale sử dụng RX 580 — CPU so sánh hiệu suất tại siêu, cao, trung bình, và thấp Cài đặt với độ phân giải 1080p, 1440p, độ phân giải 4K Chất lượng
i3-6100
i5-2400
Chất lượng cực
| Giải quyết | Khung hình/giây |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
43. |
| 1080p |
49.8 FPS |
| 1440p |
28.6 FPS |
| 1440p |
32.4 FPS |
| 2160p |
15.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
17.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
23.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
26.6 FPS |
8 FPSChất lượng cao
| Giải quyết | Khung hình/giây |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
78.1 FPS |
| 1080p |
87.1 FPS |
| 1440p |
54.0 FPS |
| 1440p |
60.2 FPS |
| 2160p |
31.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
34.8 FPS |
| w1440p |
45.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
50.7 FPS |
Chất lượng trung bình
| Giải quyết | Khung hình/giây |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
112. |
| 1080p |
124.5 FPS |
| 1440p |
79.4 FPS |
| 1440p |
88.0 FPS |
| 2160p |
47.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
52.4 FPS |
| w1440p |
67.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
74.8 FPS |
3 FPSChất lượng thấp
| Giải quyết | Khung hình/giây |
|---|---|
| 1080p |
180.8 FPS |
| 1080p |
199.2 FPS |
| 1440p |
130.3 FPS |
| 1440p |
143.5 FPS |
| 2160p |
79.3 FPS |
| 2160p |
87.5 FPS |
| w1440p |
111.3 FPS |
| w1440p |
123.1 FPS |
i3-6100
i5-2400
Compare i3-6100 vs i5-2400 specifications
i3-6100 vs i5-2400 Architecture
| i3-6100 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i3-6100 vs i5-2400 Cache
| i3-6100 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i3-6100 vs i5-2400 Cores
| i3-6100 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i3-6100 vs i5-2400 Features
| i3-6100 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i3-6100 vs i5-2400 Performance
| i3-6100 | i5-2400 |
|---|
i3-6100 vs i5-2400 Physical
| i3-6100 | i5-2400 |
|---|
Chia sẻ ý kiến của bạn 89
Compare i3-6100 vs i5-2400 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i5 8250U vs i3 6100: performance comparison
VS
Intel Core i5 8250U
Intel Core i3 6100
We compared two CPUs: the 1.
6 GHz Intel Core i5 8250U (laptop) with 4-cores against the 3.7 GHz i3 6100 (desktop) with 2-cores. On this page, you’ll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments (1)
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Core i5 8250U
46
Core i3 6100
51
Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Core i5 8250U
17
Core i3 6100
12
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
Core i5 8250U
58
Core i3 6100
46
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Core i5 8250U
36
Core i3 6100
35
Key Differences
What are the key differences between 6100 and 8250U
Advantages of Intel Core i5 8250U
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than the Core i3 6100 – 15 vs 51 Watt
- Has 2 more physical cores
- Has 3 MB larger L3 cache size
- Newer — released 2-years later
- Around 3.
4 GB/s (10%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Advantages of Intel Core i3 6100
- Supports up to 64 GB DDR4-2133 RAM
Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Core i5 8250U
902
Core i3 6100
+7%
963
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 8250U
+28%
3117
Core i3 6100
2434
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Core i5 8250U
1937
Core i3 6100
+15%
2226
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i5 8250U
+43%
6000
Core i3 6100
4184
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Core i5 8250U
862
Core i3 6100
+9%
939
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Core i5 8250U
+40%
2867
Core i3 6100
2045
▶️ Submit your Cinebench R23 result
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon.
This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 8250U and i3 6100
General
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | August 21, 2017 | September 1, 2015 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake R | Skylake |
| Model number | i5-8250U | i3-6100 |
| Socket | BGA-1356 | LGA-1151 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 620 | HD Graphics 530 |
Performance
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base Frequency | 1. 6 GHz |
3.7 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | 3.4 GHz | — |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 16x | 37x |
| Bus Bandwidth | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 6MB (shared) | 3MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
| Fabrication process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 15 W | 51 W |
| Max. temperature | 100°C | — |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | — |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Shading Units | 192 | — |
| TMUs | 24 | — |
| ROPs | 3 | — |
| Execution Units | 24 | — |
| TGP | 15 W | — |
Max. Resolution |
4096×2304 — 60 Hz | — |
iGPU FLOPS
Core i5 8250U
0.38 TFLOPS
Core i3 6100
n/a
Memory support
| Memory types | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600 |
| Memory Size | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| Official site | Intel Core i5 8250U official page | Intel Core i3 6100 official page |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 12 | 16 |
| Extended instructions | SSE4. 1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 |
Cast your vote
Choose between two processors
Core i5 8250U
4 (66.7%)
Core i3 6100
2 (33.3%)
Total votes: 6
ompetitors
1.
Intel Core i3 1115G4 or Intel Core i5 8250U
2.
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U or Intel Core i5 8250U
3.
Apple M1 or Intel Core i5 8250U
4.
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U or Intel Core i5 8250U
5.
Intel Core i3 12100 or Intel Core i3 6100
Intel Core i3-6100 vs Intel Core i5-8250U
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i3-6100 vs Intel Core i5-8250U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i3-6100 on one side and the Intel Core i5-8250U on the other side.
The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,7GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Core i3-6100 | Intel Core i5-8250U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Notebook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Skylake | Kaby Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Skylake-S | Kaby Lake Refresh | ||||||
| Family | Core i3-6000 | Core i5-8000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | CM8066201927202, BX80662I36100, BXC80662I36100, SR2HG |
FJ8067703282221, SR3LA |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2015 | Q3 2017 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm+ | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 400.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,7 GHz | 1,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | 3,4 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 4 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 3 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 32 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 |
||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 34,1 GB/s | 37,5 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 12 | ||||||
| TDP | 51 W | 15 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | — | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Kaby Lake) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 24 | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 403,2 GFLOPS | 441,6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1151 | BGA1356 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | — | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 65°C | 100°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 408 | 381 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1. 104 |
1.979 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 157 | 146 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 362 | 538 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 880 | 831 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 2.418 | 3.182 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.208 | 1.931 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 4.159 | 5.930 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.260 | 3.718 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
8. 188 |
11.054 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
130,9 GFLOPS | 163,2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
161 pts / W | 737 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i5-8250U has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Intel Core i3-6100 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i5-8250U is less. The Intel Core i5-8250U was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
381 1.979 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
408 1.  104 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 79%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
146 538 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
157 362 |
In single core, the difference is 8%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 49%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
831 3.182 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
880 2.418 |
In single core, the difference is 6%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 32%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
1.931 5.930 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
2.208 4.  159 |
In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 43%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
3.718 11.054 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
4.260 8.188 |
In single core, the difference is 15%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 35%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
3.735 8.808 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
3.059 5.545 |
In single core, the difference is 22%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 59%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
4.221 13.834 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
3.938 6.460 |
In single core, the difference is 7%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 114%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8250U |
3.924 11.936 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
4.482 8.743 |
In single core, the difference is 14%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 37%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices.
For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i3-6100 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-8250U AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i3-6100TIntel Core i3-6100U
Intel Core i3-6100 vs Intel Core i5-8365U
|
|
|
|
|
Intel Core i3-6100 vs Intel Core i5-8365U
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i3-6100 on one side and the Intel Core i5-8365U on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 2 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,7GHz. The second is used on the notebook segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 4,1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | Intel Core i3-6100 | Intel Core i5-8365U | ||||||
| Market (main) | Desktop | Notebook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Skylake | Coffee Lake | ||||||
| Core name | Skylake-S | Whiskey Lake-U | ||||||
| Family | Core i3-6000 | Core i5-8000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), S-Spec | CM8066201927202, BX80662I36100, BXC80662I36100, SR2HG |
CL8068404064503, SRF9Z |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2015 | Q2 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm++ | ||||||
| Transistors | 1. 400.000.000 |
— | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 3,7 GHz | 1,6 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | — | 4,1 GHz | ||||||
| Bus speed | 8 GT/s | 4 GT/s | ||||||
| Cache memory | 3 MB | 6 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 34,1 GB/s | 37,5 GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 | ||||||
| TDP | 51 W | 15 W | ||||||
| Suggested PSU | 600W ATX Power Supply | — | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Whiskey Lake) | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 24 | 24 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 192 | 192 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 350 MHz | 300 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 403,2 GFLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | LGA1151 | BGA1528 | ||||||
| Compatible motherboard | Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard | — | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 65°C | 100°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 408 | 458 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 1. 104 |
2.255 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 157 | 170 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 362 | 570 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 367 | 420 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 906 | 1.410 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 single thread | 880 | 851 | ||||||
| Cinebench R23 multi-thread | 2.418 | 2.920 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | 2.208 | 2.204 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Mark | 4. 159 |
6.386 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
4.260 | 4.387 | ||||||
| (Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
8.188 | 12.816 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
130,9 GFLOPS | 186,52 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
161 pts / W | 854 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon | ||||||||
| eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Intel Core i5-8365U has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Core i5-8365U is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i5-8365U is less. The Intel Core i5-8365U was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8365U |
458 2.  255 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
408 1.104 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 104%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8365U |
170 570 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
157 362 |
In single core, the difference is 8%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 57%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8365U |
420 1.410 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
367 906 |
In single core, the difference is 14%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 56%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
| Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8365U |
851 2.920 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
880 2.418 |
In single core, the difference is 3%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.
| PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8365U |
2.204 6.386 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
2.208 4.  159 |
In single core, the difference is 0%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 54%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8365U |
4.387 12.816 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
4.260 8.188 |
In single core, the difference is 3%.
In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 57%.
On Linux 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8365U |
4.954 14.192 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
3.059 5.545 |
In single core, the difference is 62%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 156%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8365U |
3.997 11.433 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
3.938 6.460 |
In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 77%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Core i5-8365U |
4.619 13.507 |
| Intel Core i3-6100 |
4.482 8.743 |
In single core, the difference is 3%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 54%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices.
For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Equivalence:
Intel Core i3-6100 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-8365U AMD equivalent
See also:
Intel Core i3-6100TIntel Core i3-6100U
Intel Core i3-6100 vs Intel Core i5-480M
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i3-6100 and Intel Core i5-480M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.
5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
Intel Core i3-6100
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Core i5-480M
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-6100
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 2.93 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 8x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 2211 vs 1174
- 3.
2x better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 4156 vs 1310 - 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 906 vs 393
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 1976 vs 845
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.581 vs 0.531
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 47.944 vs 25.017
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.3 vs 0.12
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.387 vs 0.919
| Launch date | September 2015 vs 4 December 2010 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz vs 2.93 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) vs 3072 KB |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 8 GB |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2211 vs 1174 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 4156 vs 1310 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 906 vs 393 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1976 vs 845 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
2.581 vs 0.531 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 47.944 vs 25.017 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.3 vs 0.12 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.387 vs 0.919 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-480M
- Around 62% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 65°C
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 51 Watt
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.073 vs 3.445
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 65°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 51 Watt |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
5.073 vs 3.445 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-6100
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-480M
| PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-6100 | Intel Core i5-480M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 2211 | 1174 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 4156 | 1310 |
| Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 906 | 393 |
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 1976 | 845 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 2255 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
2.581 | 0.531 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 47.944 | 25.017 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.3 | 0.12 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.387 | 0.919 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.445 | 5.073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1558 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3264 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 5567 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1558 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3264 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 5567 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i3-6100 | Intel Core i5-480M | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture codename | Skylake | Arrandale |
| Launch date | September 2015 | 4 December 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $110 | $81 |
| Place in performance rating | 999 | 2438 |
| Price now | $147. 49 |
$80.60 |
| Processor Number | i3-6100 | i5-480M |
| Series | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.96 | 8.79 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3. 70 GHz |
2.66 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 2.5 GT/s DMI |
| Die size | 150 mm | 81 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) | 3072 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 65°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3. 7 GHz |
2.93 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 382 million |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 2400 MHz | |
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34. 1 GB/s |
17.1 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 8 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR3 800/1066 |
| Device ID | 0x1912 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 766 MHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | 766 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | [email protected] | |
| Max resolution over eDP | [email protected] | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1. 4 |
[email protected] | |
| Max resolution over VGA | N / A | |
| Max resolution over WiDi | 1080p | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37. 5mm x 37.5mm |
rPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | BGA1288, PGA988 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 | 1×16 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Intel Core i3-6100 vs Intel Core i5-2400: What is the difference?
51 BALLLA
Intel Core i3-6100
32 Ballla
Intel Core i5-2400
Winter when comparing
VS
64 Facts compared to
Intel Core i3-6100 9000 Why is Intel Core i3-6100 better than Intel Core i5-2400?
- 800MHz higher RAM speed?
2133MHz vs 1333MHz - Is the maximum operating temperature higher than 27.
4°C?
100°C vs 72.6°C - Are 18nm semiconductors smaller?
14nm vs 32nm - 44W below TDP?
51W vs 95W - 1 newer PCI Express (PCIe) version?
3 vs 2 - 13.1GB/s more memory bandwidth?
34.1GB/s vs 21GB/s - 20.07% higher PassMark score (single)?
2058 vs 1714 - 1.9 newer version of DirectX?
12 vs 10.1
Why is Intel Core i5-2400 better than Intel Core i3-6100?
- 1.68x higher CPU speed?
4 x 3.1GHz vs 2 x 3.7GHz - GPU frequency 500MHz higher?
850MHz vs 350MHz - 0.5MB more L2 cache?
1MB vs 0.5MB - 5.59% higher PassMark score?
5801 vs 5494 - 3MB more L3 cache?
6MB vs 3MB - 128KB more L1 cache?
256KB vs 128KB
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Core i3-6100
vs
Intel Celeron J4005
Intel Core i5-2400
vs
Intel Core i3-3220
Intel0 Core i3
0004 VS
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i5-3470
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-440
VS
Intel Core i3-4130
Intel Core i3-6100
VS
Intel Core i7-3770
Intel Core i5-2400
I7-3770 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 6100
vs
Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
Intel Core i3-10100
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-7500
VS
VS
-3240
Intel Core i3-6100
VS
Intel Core i3-7100
Intel Core i5-2400
VS
AMD A8-7600
VS
-6600
Intel Core i5-2400
3 Reviews of users
Intel Core i5-2400
5.
3 /10
3 Reviews of users
Functions
Reviews
Reviews are not yet
9024 9000 9000 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 /10 9000 / votes
Games
No reviews yet
2.0 /10
3 votes
Performance
No reviews yet 9000 3 9000 3
004
4.0 /10
3 Votes
Reliability
Reviews not yet
4.7 /10
3 VOTES
Energy efficiency
9000 3 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
2 x 3.7GHz
4 x 3.1GHz
CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, considering all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3. turbo clock speed
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100)
3.4GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4. Has an unlocked multiplier of
✖Intel Core i3-6100
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing you to get better performance in games and other applications.
5.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
8.
core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
9.core L3
1.5MB/core
1.5MB/core
More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad memory to access each processor core.
Memory
1.RAM speed
2133MHz
1333MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
2.max memory bandwidth
34.1GB/s
21GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3. DDR version
DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
5.maximum memory capacity
Maximum memory capacity (RAM).
6.bus baud rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
7. Supports Memory Error Code
✔Intel Core i3-6100
✖Intel Core i5-2400
Memory Error Code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
8.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
A newer version of eMMC — Built-in Flash Memory Card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
9.
bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
Geotagging
1. PassMark result
This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.
2. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)
4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
7. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
8.Blender result (classroom)
Unknown.
Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100)
This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Core i3-6100
✖Intel Core i5-2400
physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
2. Has AES
✔Intel Core i3-6100
✔Intel Core i5-2400
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
3. Has AVX
✔Intel Core i3-6100
✔Intel Core i5-2400
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
4.Version SSE
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
5. Has F16C
✔Intel Core i3-6100
✖Intel Core i5-2400
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.
6.bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
7. Has MMX
✔Intel Core i3-6100
✔Intel Core i5-2400
MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
8. Has TrustZone
✖Intel Core i3-6100
✖Intel Core i5-2400
The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management technology ( DRM).
9.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i3-6100)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means the processor performs better
Price comparison
Cancel
Which CPUs are better?
Intel Core i3-6100 or Intel Core i5-2400S
- Main Page
- >
54.1
Performance in games and similar applications, according to our tests.
The performance of 4 cores, if any, and performance per core has the greatest impact on the result, since most games do not fully use more than 4 cores.
The speed of caches and working with RAM is also important.
Office speed
Core i3-6100
61.2 (+8%)
Core i5-2400S
56.3
Performance in everyday work such as browsers and office programs.
The performance of 1 core has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications use only one, ignoring the rest.
Similarly, many professional applications such as various CADs ignore multi-threaded performance.
Speed in heavy applications
Core i3-6100
30.2 (+4%)
Core i5-2400S
29
Performance in resource-intensive tasks that load a maximum of 8 cores.
The performance of all cores and their number has the greatest impact on the result, since most of these applications willingly use all the cores and increase the speed accordingly.
At the same time, some periods of work can be demanding on the performance of one or two cores, for example, applying filters in the editor.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems with and without overclocking. Thus, you see the average values corresponding to the processor.
Speed of numerical operations
Simple household tasks
Core i3-6100
59.
8 (+15.1%) Core i5-2400S
50.8
Demanding games and tasks
Core i3-6100
24.9 (+9.2%)
Core i5-2400S
22.6
Extreme
Core i3-6100
4.9 (+8.2%)
Core i5-2400S
4.5
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor to work with, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings.
Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version. Passmark
Intel Core i3-6100
4161 (+25.4%)
Intel Core i5-2400S
3106
.
Basic
Manufacturer Intel Intel DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. Intel® Core™ i3-6100 Processor (3M Cache, 3.70 GHz) Intel® Core™ i5-2400S Processor (6M Cache, up to 3.30 GHz) ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. Skylake Sandy Bridge Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. 
14 nm 32 nm Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. 09-2018 09-2016 Model Official name. i3-6100 i5-2400S Cores The number of physical cores. 2 4 ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. 4 4 Multithreading TechnologyWith Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores in the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. 
Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). Missing Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. 3.7 GHz 2.5 GHz Turbo frequency The maximum frequency of one processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. 
Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. No data 3.3 L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. 3 MB 6 MB Instructions 64-bit 64-bit Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 SSE4.1/4.2, AVX Embedded Options Available Two housing versions. 
Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. Yes No Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. 8 GT/s DMI3 5 GT/s DMI Number of QPI links TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. 51W 65 W Cooling system specifications PCG 2015C (65W) Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. 
The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. Intel® HD Graphics 530 Intel® HD Graphics 2000 GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. 350 MHz 850 MHz Max GPU ClockMaximum 3D clock. 1050MHz 1100 MHz Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology over Wi-Fi 802.11n. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. No data No data Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. 
3 2 RAM
Maximum amount of RAMThe amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. 64 GB 32 GB Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V DDR3 1066/1333 RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. 2 2 RAM bandwidth 34.1 GB/s 21 GB/s ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. 
Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. No data No data PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. 3 2 PCI configuration options
Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Number of PCI lanes 16 Up to 1×16, 2×8, 1×8+2×4 Data Protection
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. 
No data No data Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. No data No data Decoration
Dimensions No data No data Supported sockets No data No data Maximum processors per motherboard No data No data Which is better
Intel Core i3-6100
- On average, gaming performance is 1% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 5%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 0%.
- The base frequency is 1.2 GHz higher.
Intel Core i5-2400S
- The price is $75 less
- The number of physical cores is 2 more.
i3-6100 vs i5-2400 — Fortnite Battle Royale with RX 580 performance comparison
RX 580 with
Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz
Fortnite Battle Royale
RX 580 with
Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz
i3-6100
i5-2400Authorization Frames per second 1080p 43.8 FPS
1080p 49.8 FPS
1440p 28.6 FPS
1440p 32.4 FPS
2160p 15.3 FPS
2160p 17.
3 FPS w1440p 23.4 FPS
w1440p 26.6 FPS
High quality
Resolution Frames per second 1080p 78.1 FPS
1080p 87.1 FPS
1440p 54.0 FPS
1440p 60.2 FPS
2160p 31.3 FPS
2160p 34.8 FPS
w1440p 45.4 FPS
w1440p 50.7 FPS
Medium quality
Resolution Frames per second 1080p 112.3 FPS
1080p 124.
5 FPS 1440p 79.4 FPS
1440p 88.0 FPS
2160p 47.3 FPS
2160p 52.4 FPS
w1440p 67.3 FPS
w1440p 74.8 FPS
Low quality
Resolution Frames per second 1080p 180.8 FPS
1080p 199.2 FPS
1440p 130.3 FPS
1440p 143.5 FPS
2160p 79.3 FPS
2160p 87.5 FPS
w1440p 111.3 FPS
w1440p 123.
1 FPS i3-6100
i5-2400
Compare i3-6100 vs i5-2400 specifications
i3-6100 i5-2400 i3-6100 vs i5-2400 Cache
i3-6100 i5-2400 i3-6100 vs i5-2400 Cores
i3-6100 i5-2400 i3-6100 vs i5-2400 Features
i3-6100 i5-2400 i3-6100 vs i5-2400 Performance
i3-6100 i5-2400 i3-6100 vs i5-2400 Physical
i3-6100 i5-2400 Share your comments 89
Compare i3-6100 vs i5-2400 in more games
Elden Ring
2022
God of War
2022
Overwatch 2
2022
Forza Horizon 5
2021
Halo Infinite
2021
Battlefield 2042
2021
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator
2020
Valorant
2020
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
2020
Death Stranding
2020
Marvel’s Avengers
2020
Godfall
2020
Cyberpunk 2077
2020
Apex Legends
2019
Anthem
2019
Far Cry New Dawn
2019
Resident Evil 2
2019
Metro Exodus
2019
World War Z
2019
Gears of War 5
2019
F1 2019
2019
GreedFall
2019
Borderlands 3
2019
Call of Duty Modern Warfare
2019
Red Dead Redemption 2
2019
Need For Speed: Heat
2019
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey
2018
Battlefield V
2018
Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
2018
Final Fantasy XV
2018
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
2018
Forza Horizon 4
2018
Fallout 76
2018
Hitman 2
2018
Just Cause 4
2018
Monster Hunter: World
2018
Strange Brigade
2018
Assassin’s Creed Origins
2017
Dawn of War III
2017
Ghost Recon Wildlands
2017
Destiny 2
2017
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
2017
Fortnite Battle Royale
2017
Need For Speed: Payback
2017
For Honor
2017
Project CARS 2
2017
Forza Motorsport 7
2017
Ashes of the Singularity
2016
Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
2016
Battlefield 1
2016
Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
2016
Doom
2016
F1 2016
2016
Hitman
2016
Rise of the Tomb Raider
2016
The Division
2016
Total War: Warhammer
2016
Overwatch
2016
Dishonored 2
2016
DiRT Rally
2015
Grand Theft Auto V
2015
The Witcher 3
2015
Rocket League
2015
Need For Speed
2015
Project CARS
2015
Rainbow Six Siege
2015
Battlefield 4
2013
Crysis 3
2013
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
2012
League of Legends
2009
Minecraft
2009
Intel Core i5 7400 vs i3 6100: 9 performance comparison0001
VS
Intel Core i5 7400
Intel Core i3 6100
Which is better: 4-core Intel Core i5 7400 at 3.
0 GHz or i3 6100 with 2 cores at 3.7 GHz? To find out, read our comparison test of these 14nm desktop processors in popular benchmarks, games and heavy applications. - Overview
- Differences
- Performance
- Features
- Comments
Overview
Overview and comparison of the main metrics from NanoReview
Single -flow performance
Rating in tests using one kernel
Core i5 7400
49
Core i3 6100
51
Multi -flow performance
Tests in benchmarks, where all nuclei
Core 74000 9000 are involved 17
Core i3 6100
12
Energy efficiency
Efficiency of energy consumption by chip
Core i5 7400
44
Core i3 6100
NanoreView
Final Core
Key differences
What are the main differences between 6100 and 7400
Reasons to choose Intel Core i5 7400
- Has 2 physical cores more
- Has 3 MB more L3 cache
- Introduced 1 year and 4 months later than the competitor
- 1.
66 GB/s (5%) higher maximum memory bandwidth
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3 6100
- 22% lower than Core i5 7400 peak power consumption — 51 vs 65 Watts
Benchmark tests
Compare the results of processor tests in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (single core)
Core i5 7400
930
Core i3 6100
+4%963
Cinebench R23 (multi-core)
Core i5 7400
+40%3397
Core i3 6100
2434
Passmark CPU (single core)
Core i5 7400
2114
Core 60010
+5%2226
Passmark CPU (multi-core)
Core i5 7400
+32%5520
Core i3 6100
4184
Geekbench 5 (single core)
Core i5 7400
892
Core i3 6100
+5%939
Geekbench 5 (multi-core)
Core i5 7400
+51%3093
Core i3 6100
2045
▶️ Add your score to Cinebench R23
Specifications
List of full specifications of the Intel Core i5 7400 and i3 6100
General Information
Manufacturer Intel Intel Release date January 3, 2017 September 1, 2015 Type Desktop Desktop Instruction set architecture x86-64 x86-64 Codename Kaby Lake Skylake Model number i5-7400 i3-6100 Socket LGA-1151 LGA-1151 Integrated graphics HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 530 Capacity
Number of cores 4 2 Number of threads 4 4 Frequency 3. 
0 GHz 3.7 GHz Max. frequency in Turbo Boost 3.5 GHz — Bus frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz Multiplier 30x 37x Tire speed 8 GT/s 8 GT/s Level 1 cache 64KB (per core) 64KB (per core) Level 2 cache 256KB (per core) 256KB (per core) Level 3 cache 6MB (shared) 3MB (shared) Unlocked multiplier No No Power consumption
Process technology 14 nanometers 14 nanometers Power consumption (TDP) 65 W 51 W Critical temperature 100°C — Integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 630 Intel HD Graphics 530 GPU frequency 350 MHz — Boost GPU frequency 1000 MHz 1050 MHz Shader blocks 192 — TMUs 24 — ROPs 3 — Computer units 24 — TGP 15W — Max. 
resolution 4096×2304 — 60Hz — Igpu Flops
Core i5 7400
0.44 Teraflops
Core I3 6100
N/D
Memory Support
Memory type DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1600 DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600 Max. size 64 GB 64 GB Number of channels 2 2 Max. bandwidth 35.76 GB/s 34.1 GB/s ECC support No Yes Other
Official site Site Intel Core i5 7400 Site Intel Core i3 6100 PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0 Max. PCI Express lanes 16 16 Extended instructions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2 SSE4.1, SSE4. 
2, AVX-2 Poll
What processor do you think is the best?
Core i5 7400
6 (46.2%)
Core i3 6100
7 (53.8%)
Total votes: 13
Competitors
1.
Core i5 7400 and Core i5 124002.
Core i3 6100 and Core i3 12100What will you choose: Intel Core i3 6100 or i5 7400?
Name
Message
Compare Intel Core i3 6100 and Intel Core i5 3470S
Comparison of Intel Core i3-6100 and Intel Core i5-3470 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical interfaces, Image quality in Graphics, Graphics API Support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T- Rex (Fps). Intel Core i3-6100
VS
Intel Core i5-3470
Benchmarks
General result
on the basis of 2 tests: Intel Core 3470S faster than 0.93%
3000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 Core I5 3470S100.93
Passmark
Intel Core i5 3470s faster than 15.
13% Intel Core I3 6100
5453
3470SA
6278 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
673
Geekbench 4 — Single Core CPU 1 906 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core CPU 1 1976 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score CPU 1 2275 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) CPU 1 2.581 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation 70673 47.944 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) CPU 1 0.3 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) CPU 1 1.387 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) CPU 1 3.445 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) CPU 1 5567 GFXBench 4. 
0 — T-Rex (Fps)
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 2275 2698 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.581 3.259 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 47.944 9.692 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.3 0.398 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.387 1.851 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 3.445 5.43 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1558 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3264 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 5567 1503 GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1558 65°C 69. 
1°C Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Core i3-6100
- Newer processor, release dates approximately 3 year(s) 4 month(s) apart
93 % more clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 3.60 GHz
- Newer manufacturing process of the processor allows it to be more powerful, but with less power consumption: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Maximum memory size is 2 times larger: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- About 51% less power consumption: 51 Watt vs 77 Watt
- About 16% more performance in PassMark benchmark — Single thread mark: 2234 vs 1932
- About 23% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core benchmark: 906 vs 734
- 4.9 times more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 47.944 vs 9.692
- 3.7 times more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) benchmark more: 5567 vs 1503
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 5567 vs 1503 Reasons to choose Intel Core i5-3470
- 2 more cores, ability to run more applications at the same time: 49 vs 2 9002 more maximum core temperature: 67.
4°C vs 65°C - L1 cache is 2x(s) larger, means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- L2 cache is 2x(s) larger, means more data can be stored in it save in it for quick access
- Approximately 50% larger L3 cache, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
- Performance in PassMark benchmark — CPU mark approximately 11% higher: 4634 vs 4167
- Performance in Geekbench 4 benchmark — Multi-Core approximately 21% more: 2396 vs 1976
- About 19% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score benchmark: 2698 vs 2275
- About 26% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Faceels Detection (mPix/s) benchmark: 3.259vs 2.581
- About 33% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.398 vs 0.3
- About 33% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.851 vs 1.387
- Approximately 58% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.
43 vs 3.445
Specs 3
669 Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core 2396 vs 1976 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score 2698 vs 2275 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.259 vs 2.581 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.398 vs 0.3 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.851 vs 1.387 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining ( mHash/s) Memory
Can support faster memory that speeds up system performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Intel Xeon Gold 6262V
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
Intel Xeon Gold 5215L
Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-3570K
General information
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
A smaller size indicates a newer chip manufacturing process.
Also Read: Blu-ray Disc Type: What is BD-5, BD-9, BD-25, BD-50, BD-XL, BD-R and BD-RE
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Product Requirements The heat sink (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.
Intel Atom E3805
32-bit operating system can support up to 4 GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4 GB, which improves performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-3570
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.
Functions
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-3570
Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under light load.
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-3570
It’s easier to get better quality using virtualization if it’s hardware supported.
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel’s advanced transistor technology for low power consumption and high speed.
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-3570
Many Intel processors use Hyperthreading technology, which means that each processor core can run on two threads at the same time, and not like most processors that run on a single thread for each core.
This means you will get better quality in some applications. Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-3570
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
General information
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
A smaller size indicates a newer chip manufacturing process.
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
The heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that the cooling system will have to dissipate. A lower TDP also usually means less power consumption.
Intel Atom E3805
32-bit operating system can support up to 4 GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4 GB, which improves performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-3570K
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. Newer versions support higher throughput and provide better performance.
Memory
Can support faster memory that speeds up system performance.
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
Intel Xeon Gold 6262V
Maximum amount of memory (RAM).
Intel Xeon Gold 5215L
Memory error recovery code can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Core i5-3570
What is better Intel Core i3-6100 or Intel Core i5-4440
Intel Core I5-4440
interl.
PassMark CPU score The PassMark benchmark considers read speed, write speed, and seek time when testing SSD performance.
Show all4967
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
4031
max 89379
Average: 6033.5
AES
there is
there are
Technologies of thermal control
There are
Protective Protection Technology Intel
0003
four
max 256
Average: 10.7
L1 cache size
A large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all256KB
max 4608
Average: 299.
3 KB
128KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
L2 cache size
Large scratchpad L2 cache to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all1MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
0.5MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
L3 cache size
A large amount of L3 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all6MB
max 768
Average: 16.3 MB
3MB
max 768
Average: 16.
3 MB
Maximum clock speed in Turbo mode
When the processor speed drops below its limit, it can jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all3.3GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
Number of cores
four
max 72
Mean: 5.8
2
max 72
Mean: 5.8
Processor base clock speed
3.1GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
3.
7GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
Frequency with Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0
3.3GHz
max 5.1
Average: 3.5 GHz
GHz
max 5.1
Average: 3.5 GHz
Max. number of PCI Express lanes
16
max 64
Average: 22.7
16
max 64
Average: 22.7
PCI Express Configurations
Up to 1×16. 2×8. 1×8+2×4
Up to 1×16. 2×8. 1×8+2×4
Idle States
Yes
Yes
Turbo Boost Technology
Turbo Boost is a technology that allows the processor to run at over its maximum frequency.
This increases its productivity (including when performing complex tasks)
Show all2
Mean: 1.9
Mean: 1.9
Max. graphics system frequency1.1GHz
max 1.55
Average: 1.1 GHz
1.05GHz
max 1.55
Average: 1.1 GHz
Number of PCI-Express lanes
16
16
Max. number of processors in configuration
one
Mean: 1.3
one
Mean: 1.3
DDR version
3
Mean: 3.
5
four
Mean: 3.5
Max. memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
25.6GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
34.1GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
Memory frequency
RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
Show all1600MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
2133MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
Max.
number of memory channels 2
max 16
Mean: 2.9
2
max 16
Mean: 2.9
Max. memory capacity
Largest RAM memory capacity.
32GB
max 6000
Average: 404.4 GB
64 GB
max 6000
Average: 404.4 GB
System bus frequency
Data between computer components and other devices is transferred via the bus.
Show all5 GT/s
max 1600
Average: 156.1 GT/s
8 GT/s
max 1600
Average: 156.
1 GT/s
ECC memory support
Memory debugging code is used when it is necessary to avoid data corruption in scientific computing or server startup. It finds possible errors and repairs data corruption.
Full displayNo
Yes
Processor RAM
2GB
max 128
Average: 34.8 GB
64 GB
max 128
Average: 4.1
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
Intel® AES-NI Commands
AES is needed to speed up encryption and decryption.
Yes
Yes
Hyper-Threading Technology
Many Intel processors use state-of-the-art hyper-threading technology.
Thus, each processor core works simultaneously on two threads, which significantly increases performance. Most processors work on the principle: one thread per core, therefore, their performance is lower.
Show allNo
Yes
OpenGL
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.3
max 4.6
Mean: 4.4
4.5
max 4.6
Mean: 4.4
AVX
AVX allows you to increase the speed of calculations in multimedia, financial and scientific applications, it also improves the performance of Linux RAID.
Show allYes
Yes
sse version
Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as volume control).
Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show all4.2
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
4.2
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
Socket
FCLGA1150
FCLGA1151
there is
there is
OS Guard
is
VT-D
There are
9108 VT-X
there is
there is
Quick Sync Video
there is
there are
Clear Video HD
are
Intru 3D0003
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
1400 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.
3 million
1350 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all84W
Average: 67.6 W
51W
Average: 67.6W
PCI Express Edition
3
Mean: 2.9
3
Mean: 2.9
condition
Discontinved
Launched
Release date
01.
07.2013 07/01/2015
Available options for built -in systems
No
is
Cooling Specifications
PCG 2013d
PCG 2015c (65W)
Corps
37.5mm
37.5mm x 37.5mm x 37.5mm x 37.5mm x 37.5mm X
0x412
0x1912
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
350MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
350MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
Supports 64-bit system
A 64-bit system can support more than 4 GB of RAM, unlike a 32-bit system. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Full textYes
Yes
OpenGL
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.3
max 4.6
Mean: 4.4
4.5
max 4.6
Mean: 4.4
Turbo GPU
If the speed of the GPU drops below its limit, then to improve performance, it can go to a high clock speed.
Show all1100MHz
max 2100
Average: 1091 MHz
1050MHz
max 2100
Average: 1091 MHz
Monitor support
Multiple monitors can be connected to the device, making it easier to work by increasing the working space.
- 2 more cores, ability to run more applications at the same time: 49 vs 2 9002 more maximum core temperature: 67.