Porovnanie Intel Core i3-8100 vs. AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Porovnanie procesorov
Detail procesora
Fotogaléria
Kde kúpiť?
Zobraziť recenzie
Detail procesora
Fotogaléria
Kde kúpiť?
Zobraziť recenzie
Celkové hodnotenie
PORAZENÝ
VÍŤAZ
Najlepší pomer cena/výkon
REMÍZA
REMÍZA
Všeobecné
Výrobca
Intel
AMD
Výrobná technológia
14 nm
14 nm
Oba procesory sú vyrábané porovnateľnou technológiou
Príkon (TDP)
65 W
65 W
Oba procesory majú rovnaký príkon
Pätice (Socket)
Intel 1151
AMD AM4
Počet jadier a vlákien
Počet jadier procesora
Oba procesory majú rovnaký počet jadier
Počet výpočtových vlákien
Frekvencia
Základná frekvencia procesora
3,6 GHz
3,5 GHz
Intel Core i3-8100 má o 3 % vyššiu frekvenciu procesoru ako AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Maximálna frekvencia (Boost)
neuvedené
3,7 GHz
Možnosť taktovania
neuvedené
áno
Výkon
Celkové skóre procesora
6 171
6 772
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G má všeobecne o 10 % vyšší celkový výkon ako Intel Core i3-8100
Skóre jedného vlákna
2 236
2 059
Intel Core i3-8100 má o 9 % vyšší výkon na jednom výpočetnom vlákne ako AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Skóre hernej fyziky
3 385
1 678
Intel Core i3-8100 má o 102 % vyšší výkon pri výpočte hernej fyziky ako AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Operačná pamäť
Podporovaný typ pamäte
neuvedené
DDR4
Maximálny počet kanálov
neuvedené
2
Grafická karta
Integrovaná grafická karta
neuvedené
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Základná frekvencia graf. karty
neuvedené
1100 MHz
Chladič
Chladič v balení
neuvedené
áno
Typ chladiča
neuvedené
Wraith Stealth
Ďalšie funkcie a vlastnosti
Produktový rad
Intel Core i3
AMD Ryzen 3
Mikroarchitektúra
neuvedené
Zen
Kódový názov
neuvedené
Raven Ridge
Približná cena
Približná cena
už sa nepredáva
už sa nepredáva
Upozornenie: Porovnanie týchto produktov je vytvárané automaticky na základe ich parametrov, uživateľského hodnotenia a ceny. Ide o systémové riešenie pre uľahčenie vášho výberu, nie o priame odporúčanie redakcie Cena-Vykon.sk. Našli ste chybu v parametroch alebo sa vám nezdá výsledné hodnotenie? Dajte nám vedieť!
Užívateľské hodnotenie
80 % (
zobraziť recenzie)
100 % (
zobraziť recenzie)
Celkové hodnotenie
PORAZENÝ
VÍŤAZ
Najlepší pomer cena/výkon
REMÍZA
REMÍZA
Ďalšie porovnanie
|
Intel Core i3-8100 vs.  Intel Pentium Gold G5400vs. AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs. AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs. Intel Celeron G4900 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs. AMD Ryzen 3 3200G vs. Intel Core i3-9100F vs. AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs. AMD Athlon 220GE |
Comparativa del Ryzen 3 2200G vs i3-8100 en juegos actuales
Procesadores
En el día de hoy vamos a ver una comparativa de dos procesadores de AMD e Intel que están diseñados para la gama baja, estos son; El AMD Ryzen 3 2200G y el i3-8100 de Intel. Ambas propuestas están más o menos en el mismo rango de precio (110 vs 140 euros aproximadamente en Amazon España).
Antes de pasar a los resultados, hagamos un repaso de que es lo que ofrece cada uno.
El chip Ryzen 3 2200G posee 4 núcleos y funciona a una velocidad de reloj base de 3.5GHz, y puede llegar a 3.7GHz en plena carga. Este chip integra una GPU Vega 8, aunque no se utilizara en esta comparativa.
El i3-8100 de Intel también tiene una configuración de 4 núcleos y 4 hilos, funcionando a 3.6GHz como frecuencia base. El chip también integra una GPU (HD Intel 630), que no se utiliza para nada.
Análisis de los resultados
Para la comparativa realizada por la gente de NJTech, se utilizó una tarjeta gráfica MSI GTX 1070 Armor y 16GB de memoria DDR4. En el caso del Ryzen 3 2200G, se incluyó los resultados haciendo un overclocking a 3.9GHz.
Si hablamos de los resultados, el i3-8100 gana en prácticamente todas las comparativas, pero el margen es muy pequeño, de pocos fps. Sobretodo cuando se incluyen los resultados con overclocking al Ryzen 3.
Esto nos hace preguntarnos si realmente vale la pena pagar ese costo extra por el i3-8100 y no apostar directamente por un Ryzen 3 2200G que viene desbloqueado para aumentar las frecuencias mediante overclocking. Recordemos que este i3 de Intel viene bloqueado y no es posible hacer un OC manual.
Como opinión personal, creo que la elección esta bastante clara entre ambos, pero que opináis vosotros. ¿Que procesador preferís de estos dos para jugar?
Fuente
NJTech
Los datos de carácter personal que nos facilite mediante este formulario quedarán registrados en un fichero de Miguel Ángel Navas Carrera, con la finalidad de gestionar los comentarios que realizas en este blog. La legitimación se realiza a través del consentimiento del interesado. Si no se acepta no podrás comentar en este blog. Puedes consultar Política de privacidad. Puede ejercitar los derechos de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición en info@profesionalreview.
com
Artículos relacionados
Compare AMD Ryzen 3 1200 vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
| AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | AMD Ryzen 3 2200g | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two processors from AMD | |||||||||||||||
| Two processors belong to the Unified class Ryzen | 9000 | 9000 | Ryzen 3 | ||||||||||||
| both processors appeared in one time period | |||||||||||||||
| Both models belong to the table type | |||||||||||||||
| Two processors operate on the SOCKET AM4 | Processors contain 4 nuclei | ||||||||||||||
| These CPUs have built-in overclocking capability | |||||||||||||||
| The technical process of both CPUs is 14 nm | |||||||||||||||
| Thermal discharge of these CPU is 65 WATT | Channel for working with RAM in both processors is 2 | ||||||||||||||
| The largest RAM in these processors is 64 GB | Two processors support PCI-Express version 3. 0 |
||||||||||||||
| Both processors support 64-bit architecture | |||||||||||||||
| The chip area of the two processor models is almost the same | |||||||||||||||
| CPU have the same Kesh first 384 KB | CPU have the same cache 2nd 2048 KB | ||||||||||||||
| AMD RYZEN 3 1200 | AMD RYZEN 3 2222 Ryzen 3 1200 processor core architecture is called Summit Ridge | 0017 | RYZEN 3 2200G slightly overtakes in terms of frequency, 3500 megagez versus 3100 MHz for competitor |
|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 1200 lags slightly in terms of turbo frequency, 3400 MHz against 3700 meghartz at the rival | Ryzen 3 2200g does not win much. in terms of turbo frequency, 3700 MHz versus 3400 MHz for the competitor Ryzen 3 1200 | |
| The Ryzen 3 1200 processor has a slightly higher number of transistors, 4800 million versus 4500 million | Ryzen 3 2200G model includes a little less transistors, 4500 million versus 4800 million Not far behind the Ryzen 3 2200G | The Ryzen 3 2200G has a marginally higher temperature limit of 105 degrees |
| second | The Ryzen 3 2200G has a slightly higher RAM channel width of 46. 933 Gb/s |
|
| Ryzen 3 1200 supports much more PCI Express lanes than its competitor | than its competitor | |
| The Ryzen 3 1200 CPU L3 cache is much larger compared to the Ryzen 3 2200G and equals 8192 Kilobytes | The Ryzen 3 2200G CPU L3 cache is much less than the Ryzen 3 1200 and 12006 Kb |
Comparison of instructions and technologies
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precision Boost | Self-overclocking technology from AMD. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMX (Multimedia Extensions) | Multimedia extensions. |
||
| SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions) | Processor streaming SIMD extension. | ||
| SSE2 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 2) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 2. | ||
| SSE3 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 3) | Streaming SIMD Processor Extension 3. | ||
| SSSE3 (Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extension 3) | Additional SIMD extensions for streaming 3. | ||
| SSE4 (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4) | Processor Streaming SIMD Extension 4. | ||
| AES (Intel Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions) | Command system extension. |
||
| AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions) | Command system extension. | ||
| F16C (16-bit Floating-Point conversion) | 16-bit floating point conversion. | ||
| FMA3 (Fused Multiply-Add 3) | Multiply Add with Round One (FMA3). | ||
| SSE4A (Streaming SIMD Extensions 4A) | Processor Streaming SIMD 4A Extension. | ||
| AVX 2 (Advanced Vector Extensions 2) | Command extension 2. | ||
| BMI1 (Bit manipulation instructions 1) | BMI1 bit control command set. | ||
| AMD64 | 64-bit microprocessor architecture developed by AMD. |
||
| FMA (Fused Multiply-Add) | — | Fused multiplication-addition. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHA (Secure Hash Algorithm extensions) | Secure hash algorithm extensions. | ||
| SMAP (Supervisor Mode Access Prevention) | Supervisor Mode Access Prevention. | ||
| SMEP (Supervisor Mode Execution Prevention) | Prevent execution in supervisor mode. | ||
| EVP (Enhanced Virus Protection) | Improved virus protection. |
| Technology or instruction name | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | Short description |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD-V | AMD-V Virtualization Technology. |
Benchmarks
Overall performance rating
The rating can be calculated by an internal formula, taking into account indicators: test results in programs, number of cores and threads, frequency, socket, temperature data, instructions, automatic overclocking technologies, architecture, year of manufacture, and also other characteristics. The results of the overall rating showed that the Ryzen 3 2200G processor is not much superior to its rival Ryzen 3 1200. The Ryzen 3 1200 processor itself was able to score 7571.86 points, slightly losing to the competitor.
PassMark CPU Mark
It includes a wide range of tools for a comprehensive assessment of computer performance, including the CPU.
Among which are floating point calculations, integer calculations, game physics calculations, encryption, extended instruction checking, compression, multi-threaded and single-threaded tests. It is also possible to compare the received data with the rest of the configurations in the database. Perhaps the most famous benchmark tester on the Internet. All of our processors have passed PassMark testing. The Performance Test showed slightly better performance for the Ryzen 3 2200G (6768 points) over the Ryzen 3 1200 (6407 points). The Ryzen 3 1200 trails marginally in this test.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
This benchmark for video cards and processors is outdated today. The method of geometric optics is used — ray tracing. MAXON has appeared, and is based on the 3D editor Cinema 4D. The basic mode of passing performance tests is spatial light sources, multilevel reflections, working with light, simulating global illumination, photorealistic rendering of a 3D scene, and procedural shaders.
The test is carried out in operating systems Windows, Mac OS X. Single-Thread version — in its work it uses only one thread for rendering and one core. It is possible to check many processor systems. The Ryzen 3 2200G performs better in the Cinebench 10 single-thread test with a score of 4625. The Ryzen 3 1200 falls short in this test with a score of 4178.
Cinebench 10 (32 bit) Multi-thread test
Multi-Thread version is another test method in Cinebench R10 benchmark, which uses multi-thread and multi-core test method. It is important to consider that the possible number of threads in this version of the program is limited to sixteen. In Cinebench R10 multi-threaded testing, the Ryzen 3 2200G scored 16684 points, a marginal advantage over the Ryzen 3 1200 competitor.61 points.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi-threaded version of the CINEBENCH R11.5 benchmark, — can load the processor to the full, using all threads and cores.
Unlike older versions, 64 threads are used here. Testing the Ryzen 3 2200G in the Cinebench 11.5 benchmark showed a result of 6.7 points, slightly ahead of its competitor. At this time, the Ryzen 3 1200 gets its 5.5 points, which fully justifies their close positions in the ranking.
Cinebench 11.5 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Good old fully functional Cinebench 11.5 from Maxon. In this Single-Core variant, tests happen by using one thread and one core. In the tests, the ray tracing process is also used, a complex 3D room is calculated with a large number of crystalline and glass and translucent balls. His tests have not lost their relevance today. The validation metrics is the FPS setting. Testing in single-threaded mode of the Ryzen 3 2200G processor in Cinebench 11.5 Single-Core showed that with a score of 1.68 points, it does not lead much ahead of the competitor. But the Ryzen 3 1200 itself scored 1.53 points in this test.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
Multi Core Cinebench 15 will load your system to the full, showing everything that it is capable of.
All threads and CPU cores are involved in rendering highly detailed 3D models. It is ideal for modern multi-threaded processors from AMD and Intel, as it is capable of using 256 threads. The Ryzen 3 2200G, with a score of 577, doesn’t win much in the multi-threaded Cinebench r15 benchmark. Slightly behind it is the Ryzen 3 1200, gaining 480 points.
Cinebench 15 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
Cinebench 15 is the latest benchmark from the Finnish company Maxon. In this version of Single Core, only 1 thread is involved in rendering. A complex 3D scene is rendered with a large number of light sources, objects and reflections. It performs a system test: both video cards and CPU. For the CPU, the result of the calculation will be the number of PTS points, and for video cards, the value of frames per second. FPS. The single-threaded test of the Ryzen 3 2200G processor in the Cinebench R15 program showed a result of 146 points, slightly ahead of the competitor. With a score of 135 on this test, the Ryzen 3 1200 is not far behind.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Multi-threaded test
This is already a 64-bit multi-threaded Geekbench 4 benchmark. It is the wide cross-platform support for various devices and operating systems that makes Geekbench tests the most common today. In Geekbench 4 64-bit multi-core, the Ryzen 3 2200G received a score of 11105, slightly higher than the Ryzen 3 1200. In this test, the Ryzen 3 1200 scores its 10545 points.
Geekbench 4.0 (64-bit) Single-threaded test
The program still runs on OS: Windows, Mac OS, Linux. The Single-Core version uses one processor thread. The latest single-threaded version of Geekbench 4 for testing laptops and desktop PCs. For the first time in this version of the benchmark, mobile devices on Android and iOS are also supported. The Ryzen 3 2200G scored higher in Geekbench 4’s single-threaded test, with a score of 4082, but not far ahead of the competition. But the Ryzen 3 1200 itself also showed a good score of 3881 points, slightly losing ground to the Ryzen 3 2200G model.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Multi-threaded benchmark
Multi-thread version of Geekbench 3 benchmark — can allow you to stress test your PC and show the stability of your system.
Geekbench 3 (32 bit) Single-threaded test
Geekbench multi-platform tester is often used to test the system under Mac, but it will run on both Linux and Windows. The main purpose is to test the performance of processors. The 32-bit version of the benchmark loads no more than one CPU core and one thread.
Geekbench 2
On our site you can find up to 200 processor models that have test results in this benchmark. To date, there are newer options: the fifth and 4v. A very outdated version of the Geekbench 2 tester.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 1
In essence, this is a practical test of system performance by transcoding HD video files to H.264 format or the so-called MPEG 4 x264 codec. This test is faster than Pass 2 because it renders at a constant rate.
The number of frames processed per second. is the test result. This is the most suitable test for multi-core and multi-threaded CPUs. The MPEG 4 video processing speed of the Ryzen 3 2200G is slightly higher than that of the Ryzen 3 1200, at 184 FPS. Ryzen 3 1200 was able to score 160 FPS, slightly behind the first processor.
X264 HD 4.0 Pass 2
This is a slightly different, slower test based on video file compression. You need to understand that a completely real task is being simulated, and the x264 codec is used in a large number of encoders. As a result, we get a better quality video file. The same MPEG4 x264 codec is used, but the processing occurs at a variable rate. The final value is also determined by frames per second. Therefore, the test results realistically assess the effectiveness of the platform. During the encoding of a video file by the Ryzen 3 2200G processor into mpeg4 format, a processing speed of 40 Frames / s was obtained. While the Ryzen 3 1200 trailed slightly behind with 33 FPS.
3DMark06 CPU
Benchmark program for checking the CPU and video system. This benchmark is often used by overclockers, overclockers and gamers alike. Created using the DirectX library by the Finnish team Futuremark. Processors are tested in two ways: the game AI does pathfinding, and the second test emulates the game’s physics engine using PhysX. The Ryzen 3 2200G performed slightly faster in the gaming physics, pathfinding tests, gaining up to 6636 points. The Ryzen 3 1200 also coped with these tasks, showing a good result of 5419points.
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
Approximately 200 processors on our site have 3DMark FSP data. It introduces an arithmetic test that does the game physics calculations.
WinRAR 4.0
Everyone knows the file archiver. The checks were made under the control of the Windows operating system. The speed of compression in RAR archive was tested, large volumes of random files were taken for these purposes.
The resulting speed in the compression process «Kb / s» — this is the test indicator. Ryzen 3 2200G has a clear advantage in WinRAR data compression and packing speed, the file processing result was 3229Kb/s. It was far behind Ryzen 3 1200, the speed of which did not exceed 2481 Kb / s.
TrueCrypt AES
This is not exactly a benchmark, but the results of its use will help evaluate the performance of the entire computer. It can fully function in OS: Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. The program includes the ability to quickly encrypt disk partitions. Our site shows the results of the encryption speed in gigabytes per second when using the AES algorithm. Unfortunately, support for this program was stopped on May 28, 2014. The Ryzen 3 2200G handled AES partition encryption a little faster, with a speed of 3.1 Gb / s. For the Ryzen 3 1200, this figure was 2.6 Gb / s.
AMD Athlon 200GE vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
AMD Athlon 200GE
VS
WINNER
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Rating: 2 points
AMD Athlon 200GE
Rating: 1 points
Test results
Performance
Memory specification
Interfaces and communications
Key features
Top specifications and features
- Heat dissipation (TDP)
- Technological process
- Number of transistors
- Geekbench score 5
- Number of Cores
Thermal Dissipation (TDP)
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G: 65 W
AMD Athlon 200GE: 35 W
Process
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G: 14 nm
AMD Athlon 200GE: 14 nm
Number of transistors
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G: 4940 million
AMD Athlon 200GE: 4800 million
Geekbench 5 score
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G: 827.
05
AMD Athlon 200GE:
Cores
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G: 4
AMD Athlon 200GE: 2
Description
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G runs at 3.5Hz, second AMD Athlon 200GE runs at 3.2Hz. AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is capable of overclocking up to 3.7 Hz, and the second up to No data Hz. The maximum power consumption of the first processor is 65W, while that of AMD Athlon 200GE is 35W.
In terms of architecture, AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is based on 14nm technology. AMD Athlon 200GE on 14 nm architecture.
Regarding processor memory. AMD Ryzen 3 2200G can support DDR4. Maximum supported size N/A MB. It should be noted that the maximum memory bandwidth is 43.7. Second AMD Athlon 200GE processor capable of DDR support No data available. The bandwidth is 39.7. And the maximum amount of supported RAM is No data MB.
Graphics. The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G has a Radeon Vega 8 Graphics graphics core. The frequency of which is — 1100 MHz.
AMD Athlon 200GE received the Radeon Vega 3 Graphics video core. Here the frequency is 1000 MHz.
How processors perform in benchmarks. PassMark AMD Ryzen 3 2200G scored No data. And AMD Athlon 200GE scored No data points.
Why AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is better than AMD Athlon 200GE
- Number of transistors 4940 million vs 4800 million, up 3%
- Number of cores 4 vs. 2, 100% more
- CPU base clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz, 9% higher
- L2 cache size 2 MB vs 1 MB, 100% more
- L1 cache size 384 KB vs 192 KB, 100% more
- Max. memory bandwidth 43.7 GB/s vs 39.7 GB/s, 10% more
- Memory frequency 2933 MHz vs 2667 MHz, 10% more
Comparison AMD RYZEN 3 2200G and AMD Athlon 200ge: Main points
AMD Ryzen 3 2200g
AMD ATHLON 200GE GEEKBENSH 5 (Multi-Core)
2662.128
max 23628.202
Average: 5219.
2
max 23628.202
Average: 5219.2
Geekbench score 5
827.05
max 1600.56
Average: 936.8
max 1600.56
Average: 936.8
Cinebench R11.5 /64bit test score (Multi-Core)
6.5191
max 45.3622
Average: 5.3
max 45.3622
Average: 5.3
Number of threads
The more threads, the higher the performance of the processor, and it will be able to perform several tasks at the same time.
Show all
4
max 256
Average: 10.
7
4
max 256
Average: 10.7
L1 cache size
A large amount of L1 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all
384KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
192KB
max 4608
Average: 299.3 KB
L2 cache size
L2 cache with large scratchpad memory to increase processor speed and overall system performance.
Show all
2MB
max 512
Average: 4.5 MB
1MB
max 512
Average: 4.
5 MB
L3 cache size
A large amount of L3 memory accelerates results in the CPU and system performance settings
Show all
4MB
max 768
Average: 16.3 MB
4MB
max 768
Average: 16.3 MB
Maximum Turbo Clock Speed
When the processor’s speed drops below its limit, it can jump to a higher clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
3.7GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
GHz
max 5.5
Average: 3.2 GHz
Number of cores
4
max 72
Mean: 5.
8
2
max 72
Mean: 5.8
Processor base clock speed
3.5GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
3.2GHz
max 4.7
Average: 2.5 GHz
Unlocked CPU multiplier
Some processors have an unlocked multiplier, which makes them faster and better in games and other applications.
Yes
No
Graphics
Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Max. number of processors in configuration
1
Mean: 1.3
1
Mean: 1.
3
DDR version
4
Mean: 3.5
Mean: 3.5
Max. memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
43.7GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
39.7GB/s
max 352
Average: 41.4 GB/s
Memory frequency
The RAM can be faster to improve system performance.
Show all
2933MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.2 MHz
2667MHz
max 4800
Average: 2106.
2 MHz
Max. number of memory channels
2
max 16
Mean: 2.9
2
max 16
Mean: 2.9
ECC memory support
Memory debugging code is used when it is necessary to avoid data corruption in scientific computing or server startup. It finds possible errors and repairs data corruption.
Show all
Yes
N/A
ECC memory technology support
Yes
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
max 4.6
Average: 4.1
Intel® AES-NI Commands
AES is required to speed up encryption and decryption.
Yes
Yes
sse version
Allows you to speed up multimedia tasks (such as volume control). Each subsequent version has a number of improvements
Show all
4.2
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
4.2
max 4.2
Average: 4.1
Socket
AM4
AM4
Process
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
14 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
14 nm
Average: 36.8 nm
Number of transistors
The higher the number, the more powerful the processor is
4940 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.
3 million
4800 million
max 57000
Average: 1517.3 million
Heat Dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
65W
Average: 67.6 W
35W
Average: 67.6 W
PCI Express Edition
3
Mean: 2.9
3
Mean: 2.9
Line
AMD Ryzen Processors
AMD Athlon Processors
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
1100MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
1000MHz
max 2400
Average: 535.8 MHz
Supports 64-bit system
A 64-bit system can support more than 4 GB of RAM as opposed to a 32-bit system. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
Full text
Yes
Yes
Maximum processor temperature
Reset may occur if the maximum temperature at which the processor operates is exceeded.
Show all
95°C
max 110
Average value: 96 °C
95°C
max 110
Average value: 96 °C
Codename
Raven Ridge
Zen
Purpose
Boxed Processor
Boxed Processor
FAQ
Can AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and AMD Athlon 200GE run in 4K?
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G — Not available.
AMD Athlon 200GE — No data available.
How many PCIe lanes
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G — Not available. AMD Athlon 200GE — No data available.
How much RAM do they support?
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G supports No GB data. AMD Athlon 200GE supports N/AGB.
How fast are processors?
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G clocked at 3.5 GHz.2 GHz.
How many cores does the processor have?
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G has 4 cores. AMD Athlon 200GE has 2 cores.
Do processors support ECC memory?
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G — has. AMD Athlon 200GE — No data available.
Does AMD Ryzen 3 2200G have integrated graphics?
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G — Radeon Vega 8 Graphics. AMD Athlon 200GE — Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
What RAM does the
support? AMD Ryzen 3 2200G supports DDR4. AMD Athlon 200GE supports DDR No data available.
What is the socket of the processors?
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G uses AM4. AM4 is used to install AMD Athlon 200GE.