Core i7 2600 vs core i5 2400: Intel Core i5-2400 vs i7-2600

Why is Intel Core i7-2600 better than Intel Core i5-2400?

• 9.68% faster CPU speed?
  4 x 3.4GHzvs4 x 3.1GHz
• 4 more CPU threads?
  8vs4
• 43.56% higher PassMark result?
  8328vs5801
• 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
  3.8GHzvs3.4GHz
• 2MB bigger L3 cache?
  8MBvs6MB
• 11.73% higher PassMark result (single)?
  1915vs1714
• 0.5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
  2MB/corevs1.5MB/core
• 165million more transistors?
  1160 millionvs995 million

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Intel Core i5-2400

vs

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i7-2600

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i5-2400

vs

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Core i7-2600

vs

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Core i5-2400

vs

Intel Core i3-4130

Intel Core i7-2600

vs

Intel Core i5-4440

Intel Core i5-2400

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-2600

vs

Intel Core i5-3570

Intel Core i5-2400

vs

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-2600

vs

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Core i5-2400

vs

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core i7-2600

vs

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i5-2400

vs

Intel Core i3-3240

Intel Core i7-2600

vs

AMD Ryzen 3 3200G

Intel Core i5-2400

vs

AMD A8-7600

Intel Core i7-2600

vs

Intel Core i5-7400

Intel Core i5-2400

vs

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i7-2600

vs

Intel Core i5-3330

Intel Core i5-2400

vs

Intel Pentium J3710

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Intel Core i5-2400

3 User reviews

Intel Core i5-2400

5. 3/10

3 User reviews

Intel Core i7-2600

2 User reviews

Intel Core i7-2600

9.0/10

2 User reviews

Features

Value for money

6.7/10

3 votes

9.5/10

2 votes

Gaming

2.0/10

3 votes

7.0/10

2 votes

Performance

4.0/10

3 votes

7.5/10

2 votes

Reliability

4.7/10

3 votes

8.5/10

2 votes

Energy efficiency

5.0/10

3 votes

6.0/10

2 votes

Performance

1.CPU speed

4 x 3.1GHz

4 x 3.4GHz

The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.

2. CPU threads

More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.

3.turbo clock speed

3.4GHz

3.8GHz

When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

4.Has an unlocked multiplier

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-2600

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.

5.L2 cache

A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

6.L3 cache

A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

7.L1 cache

A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.

8.L2 core

0.25MB/core

0. 25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

9.L3 core

1.5MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in the L3 cache for access by each core of the CPU.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1333MHz

1333MHz

It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

21GB/s

21GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.DDR memory version

DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.

4.memory channels

More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.

5. maximum memory amount

The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.

6.bus transfer rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7.Supports ECC memory

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-2600

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-2600)

A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.

9.bus speed

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-2600)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

Benchmarks

1.PassMark result

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.

2.PassMark result (single)

This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-2600)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

4.Cinebench R20 (multi) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-2600)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 (single) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-2600)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-2600)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7.Blender (bmw27) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-2600)

The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

8.Blender (classroom) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-2600)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.

9.performance per watt

This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.

Features

1.uses multithreading

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-2600

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.

2.Has AES

✔Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-2600

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3.Has AVX

✔Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-2600

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.

4.SSE version

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5.Has F16C

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-2600

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

6.bits executed at a time

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-2600)

NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.

7.Has MMX

✔Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-2600

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-2600

A technology integrated into the processor to secure the device for use with features such as mobile payments and streaming video using digital rights management (DRM).

9.front-end width

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i7-2600)

The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best CPUs?

Intel Core i7-2600 vs Intel Core i5-2400

Summary

• Intel Core i7-2600

  123%

• Intel Core i5-2400

  100%

Relative performance

• Intel Core i7-2600

  111%

• Intel Core i5-2400

  100%

Relative performance

• Intel Core i7-2600

  135%

• Intel Core i5-2400

  100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider Intel Core i7-2600

11% higher single threaded performance.

Much higher multi threaded performance (around 35% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.

Around 23% higher average synthetic performance.

Reasons to consider Intel Core i5-2400

None

Gaming

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-2600

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

Productivity

HWBench recommends Intel Core i7-2600

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Features

Intel Core i7-2600			Intel Core i5-2400
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4. 2
AVX
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
TXT
VT-x
VT-d
Hyper-Threading AES-NI
AES-NI

Architecture

Cores

Cache

Physical

Performance

• Intel Core i7-2600

  3800 points

• Intel Core i5-2400

  3400 points

Points — higher is better

• Intel Core i7-2600

  16320 points

• Intel Core i5-2400

  12400 points

Points — higher is better

• Intel Core i7-2600

  10998

• Intel Core i5-2400

  8204

points — higher is better

• Intel Core i7-2600

  3104

• Intel Core i5-2400

  2812

points — higher is better

• Intel Core i7-2600

  11841

• Intel Core i5-2400

  8872

points — higher is better

• Intel Core i7-2600

  2865

• Intel Core i5-2400

  2633

points — higher is better

• Intel Core i7-2600 (simulated)

  129

• Intel Core i5-2400 (simulated)

  112. 11

points — higher is better

• Intel Core i7-2600 (simulated)

  614

• Intel Core i5-2400 (simulated)

  441.52

points — higher is better

Intel Core i7-2600 Benchmarks — Geekbench Browser

i5-2400 vs i7-2600 — Fortnite Battle Royale with GTX 950 Benchmarks 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K Comparison

GTX 950 with

Intel Core i5-2400 @ 3.10GHz

Fortnite Battle Royale

GTX 950 with

Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.40GHz

i5-2400
i7-2600

Multi-Thread Performance

5953 Pts

8196 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1747 Pts

1921 Pts

Fortnite Battle Royale

i5-2400 vs i7-2600 in Fortnite Battle Royale using GTX 950 — CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-2400
i7-2600

Ultra Quality

High Quality

Medium Quality

Low Quality

i5-2400

i7-2600

Compare i5-2400 vs i7-2600 specifications

Share Your Comments 0

Compare i5-2400 vs i7-2600 in more games

Elden Ring

2022

God of War

2022

Overwatch 2

2022

Forza Horizon 5

2021

Halo Infinite

2021

Battlefield 2042

2021

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

2020

Valorant

2020

Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War

2020

Death Stranding

2020

Marvel’s Avengers

2020

Godfall

2020

Cyberpunk 2077

2020

Apex Legends

2019

Anthem

2019

Far Cry New Dawn

2019

Resident Evil 2

2019

Metro Exodus

2019

World War Z

2019

Gears of War 5

2019

F1 2019

2019

GreedFall

2019

Borderlands 3

2019

Call of Duty Modern Warfare

2019

Red Dead Redemption 2

2019

Need For Speed: Heat

2019

Forza Horizon 4

2018

Fallout 76

2018

Hitman 2

2018

Just Cause 4

2018

Monster Hunter: World

2018

Strange Brigade

2018

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

2017

Fortnite Battle Royale

2017

Need For Speed: Payback

2017

For Honor

2017

Project CARS 2

2017

Forza Motorsport 7

2017

Overwatch

2016

Dishonored 2

2016

Grand Theft Auto V

2015

Total War: Attila

2015

Rocket League

2015

Need For Speed

2015

Project CARS

2015

Rainbow Six Siege

2015

Dragon Age: Inquisition

2014

Far Cry 4

2014

GRID Autosport

2014

Shadow of Mordor

2014

The Talos Principle

2014

Battlefield 4

2013

Crysis 3

2013

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

2012

League of Legends

2009

Minecraft

2009

Intel Core i5-2400S vs Intel Core i7-2600

Comparing technical specs and benchmarks

VS

Intel Core i5-2400S 32 nm — 2. 50 GHz DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333 

Intel Core i7-2600 32 nm — 3.40 GHz DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333 

Intel Core i5-2400S

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i5-2400S vs. Intel Core i7-2600

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In comparison between Intel Core i5-2400S and Intel Core i7-2600, you should choose the model which has more cores and threads with base and turbo frequencies. All the features influence the system’s high-speed performance.

4 / 4

CPU Cores / Threads

4 / 8

No

Hyperthreading

Yes

No

Overclocking

No

2.50 GHz

Frequency

3.40 GHz

3.30 GHz

Turbo Frequency (1 Core)

3.80 GHz

No turbo

Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)

No turbo

Intel Core i5-2400S vs. Intel Core i7-2600

CPU generation and family

4

CPU Cores

4

ca. 174 $

Market price

ca. 270 $

6

Generation

6

Intel Core i5-2400S vs. Intel Core i7-2600

Internal Graphics

Some manufacturers build a graphic core in many CPUs being an additional advantage. If you use a video card which is separated from a CPU, we recommend you skip this comparison as there is no need to compare Intel Core i5-2400S to Intel Core i7-2600 across a built-in video card.

Intel HD Graphics 2000

GPU name

Intel HD Graphics 2000

0.85 GHz

GPU frequency

0.85 GHz

1.10 GHz

GPU (Turbo)

1.35 GHz

6

Execution units

6

48

Shader

48

2

Max. displays

2

6

Generation

6

10.1

Direct X

10.1

32 nm

Technology

32 nm

Q1/2011

Release date

Q1/2011

Intel Core i5-2400S vs. Intel Core i7-2600

Hardware codec support

Pay attention to support of different technological options by CPUs. The general performance is not influenced. In the interest of time, you can skip this section.

No

h365 8bit

No

No

h365 10bit

No

Decode / Encode

h364

Decode / Encode

No

VP8

No

No

VP9

No

Decode / Encode

AVC

Decode / Encode

Decode

VC-1

Decode

No

JPEG

No

Intel Core i5-2400S vs. Intel Core i7-2600

Memory & PCIe

Modern CPUs support memory which operates in a multi-channel regime that provides high-speed data exchange and improves productivity. The higher the ram’s clock frequency, its standard (for example, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum space in a system are, the better it is.

PCIe version

2.0

PCIe lanes

16

DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333

Memory type

DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333

32 GB

Max. Memory

32 GB

2

Memory channels

2

No

ECC

No

Yes

AES-NI

Yes

Intel Core i5-2400S vs.

Intel Core i7-2600
Thermal Management

High-performance and powerful CPUs require the essence of a good power supply. Here you learn how much TDP Intel Core i5-2400S and Intel Core i7-2600 have. We recommend paying attention to the model which has lower TDP.

65 W

TDP

95 W

—

TDP up

—

—

TDP down

—

—

Tjunction max.

—

Intel Core i5-2400S vs. Intel Core i7-2600

Technical details

Here is the main information which can define the best CPU comparing technical specifications. Thus, the higher cash L2 and L3, the better it is. The lower the technological process of CPU production, the better it is. Another important factor is a production year that directly influences the manufacturer’s support terms and the opportunity of a system modernization at minimal cost in the future.

6.00 MB

L3-Cache

8.00 MB

Sandy Bridge

Architecture

Sandy Bridge

32 nm

Technology

32 nm

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

Virtualization

VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d

LGA 1155

Socket

LGA 1155

Q1/2011

Release date

Q1/2011

Intel Core i5-2400S vs.

Intel Core i7-2600
Devices using this processor

In completing the comparison between Intel Core i5-2400S and Intel Core i7-2600, you can learn in which computer systems these models are used.

Unknown

Used in

Unknown

Popular comparisons with these processors

1.		AMD FX-4300 vs. Intel Core i7-2600
2.		Intel Core i7-2600 vs. AMD A8-7650K
3.		Intel Core i5-2400S vs. Intel Core i5-8300H
4.		Intel Core i5-2400S vs. Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
5.		Intel Core i5-2400S vs. Intel Celeron J4005
6.		AMD A10-4600M vs. Intel Core i7-2600
7.		AMD A6-9225 vs. Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i7-2600 vs Intel Core i5-7500












Intel Core i7-2600 vs Intel Core i5-7500

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i7-2600 on one side and the Intel Core i5-7500 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 4 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,8GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,8 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Processor		Intel Core i7-2600				Intel Core i5-7500
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
ISA		x86-64 (64 bit)				x86-64 (64 bit)
Microarchitecture		Sandy Bridge				Kaby Lake
Core name		Sandy Bridge				Kaby Lake-S
Family		Core i7-2000				Core i5-7000
Part number(s), S-Spec		BX80623I72600, CM8062300834302, SR00B				CM8067702868012, BXC80677I57500, BX80677I57500, SR335
Release date		Q1 2011				Q1 2017
Lithography		32 nm				14 nm+
Transistors		1. 160.000.000				—
Cores		4				4
Threads		8				4
Base frequency		3,4 GHz				3,4 GHz
Turbo frequency		3,8 GHz				3,8 GHz
Bus speed		5 GT/s				8 GT/s
Cache memory		8 MB				6 MB
Max memory capacity		32 GB				64 GB
Memory types		DDR3 1066/1333				DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600
Max # of memory channels		2				2
Max memory bandwidth		21 GB/s				38,4 GB/s
Max PCIe lanes		16				16
TDP		95 W				65 W
Suggested PSU		600W ATX Power Supply				600W ATX Power Supply
GPU integrated graphics		Intel HD Graphics 2000				Intel HD Graphics 630
GPU execution units		6				24
GPU shading units		48				192
GPU base clock		800 MHz				350 MHz
GPU boost clock		1350 MHz				1100 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point		110,4 GFLOPS				384 GFLOPS
Socket		LGA1155				LGA1151
Compatible motherboard		Socket LGA 1155 Motherboard				Socket LGA 1151 Motherboard
Maximum temperature		72. 6°C				100°C
CPU-Z single thread		362				414
CPU-Z multi thread		1.723				1.563
Cinebench R15 single thread		121				155
Cinebench R15 multi-thread		614				605
Cinebench R23 single thread		695				1.050
Cinebench R23 multi-thread		3.263				4.004
PassMark single thread		1.727				2.273
PassMark CPU Mark		5. 321				6.057
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core		3.468				4.353
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core		11.183				12.306
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance		132,7 GFLOPS				233,1 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio		118 pts / W				189 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i5-7500 is less. The Intel Core i5-7500 was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.













	CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-2600	362 1. 723
Intel Core i5-7500	414 1.563

In single core, the difference is -13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 10%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.













	Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i7-2600	121 614
Intel Core i5-7500	155 605

In single core, the difference is -22%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.













	Cinebench R23 — Multi-thread & single thread score
Intel Core i5-7500	1.050 4.004
Intel Core i7-2600	695 3.263

In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 23%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.













	PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread
Intel Core i5-7500	2.273 6.057
Intel Core i7-2600	1.727 5. 321

In single core, the difference is 32%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 14%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Windows 64-bit:













	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit
Intel Core i5-7500	4.353 12.306
Intel Core i7-2600	3.468 11.183

In single core, the difference is 26%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 10%.

On Linux 64-bit:













	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit
Intel Core i5-7500	5.085 14.319
Intel Core i7-2600	3.790 10.590

In single core, the difference is 34%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 35%.

On Mac OS X 64-bit:













	Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit
Intel Core i5-7500	4.829 14.081
Intel Core i7-2600	3.498 11.280

In single core, the difference is 38%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 25%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Equivalence:

Intel Core i7-2600 AMD equivalentIntel Core i5-7500 AMD equivalent

See also:

Intel Core i7-2600KIntel Core i7-2600S

Intel Core i5-750Intel Core i5-7500T

Intel Core i5-2400 vs Intel Core i7-2600: What is the difference?

32 BALLLA

Intel Core i5-2400

36 Ballla

Intel Core i7-2600

Winter when comparing

VS

64 Facts compared to

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core iNTEL CORE INTEL CORE INTE Why is Intel Core i5-2400 better than Intel Core i7-2600?

Why is Intel Core i7-2600 better than Intel Core i5-2400?

• 9. 68% faster CPU speed?
  4 x 3.4GHz vs 4 x 3.1GHz
• 4 more CPU threads?
  8 vs 4
• 43.56% higher PassMark score?
  8328 vs 5801
• 0.4GHz higher turbo clock speed?
  3.8GHz vs 3.4GHz
• 2MB more L3 cache?
  8MB vs 6MB
• 11.73% higher PassMark score (single)?
  1915 vs 1714
• 0.5MB/core more L3 cache per core?
  2MB/core vs 1.5MB/core
• 165million more transistors?
  1160 million vs 995 million

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Intel Core i5-2400

vs

Intel Core i3-3220

Intel Core i7-2600

vs

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel0 Core i50003

VS

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Core i7-2600

VS

Intel Core i5-3470

Intel Core i5-2400

9000

9000 9000 2600

VS

Intel Core i5-44440

Intel Core i5-2400

VS

Intel Core i7-3770

Intel Core i7-2600

I5-3570 9000 9000 9000) -2400

vs

Intel Core i3-6100

Intel Core i7-2600

VS

Intel Core i5-6500

Intel Core i5-2400

VS

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel Core I7-2600 9000 9000

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel Core i5-2400

VS

Intel Core i3-3240

Intel Core i7-2600

AMD RYZEN 3 3200G 9000

AMD A8-7600

Intel Core i7-2600

VS

Intel Core i5-7400

Intel Core i5-2400

VS

Intel Core i5-4570

Intel I7-2600

Intel Core i5-2400

VS

Intel Pentium J3710

Complexation prices

Users Reviews

0003

5. 3 /10

3 reviews of users

Intel Core i7-2600

2 Reviews of users

Intel Core i7-2600

/10

2 Reviews of Users

Functions and qualities

6.7 /10

3 Votes

/10

2 Votes

Games

2.0 /10

3 VOTES

9000 9000 9000 90 9.0 9.0 9 /10

2 Votes

performance

4.0 /10

3 Votes

7.5 /10

2 Votes

Reliability

4.7 /10 9000 /10

2 Votes

Energy Efficiency

5.0 /10

3 Votes

6.0215 /10

2 Votes

003

4 x 3.1GHz

4 x 3.4GHz

CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second a processor can perform, given all its cores (processors). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.

2nd processor thread

More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.

3.speed turbo clock

3.4GHz

3.8GHz

When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

4. Unlocked

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-2600

Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.

5.L2 cache

More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

6.L3 cache

More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

7.L1 cache

More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.

8.core L2

0.25MB/core

0.25MB/core

More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

9.core L3

1.5MB/core

2MB/core

More data can be stored in L3 scratchpad for access by each processor core.

Memory

1.RAM speed

1333MHz

1333MHz

Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.

2.max memory bandwidth

21GB/s

21GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. DDR version

DDR (Dynamic Dynamic Random Access Memory Double Data Rate) is the most common type of RAM. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.

4.Memory channels

More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.

5.maximum memory capacity

Maximum memory capacity (RAM).

6.bus baud rate

The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.

7. Supports Memory Error Code

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-2600

Memory Error Code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

8.eMMC version

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-2600)

The newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.

9.bus frequency

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-2600)

The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device

Geotagging

1. PassMark result

This test measures processor performance using multi-threading.

2. PassMark result (single)

This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.

3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-2600)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs,2022)

4. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-2600)

Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.

5.Cinebench R20 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-2600)

Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.

6.Geekbench 5 result (single core)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-2600)

Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)

7. Blender test result (bmw27)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-2600)

The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

8.Blender result (classroom)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-2600)

The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.

9.performance per watt

This means that the processor is more efficient, giving more performance per watt of power used.

Functions

1.uses multithreading

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-2600

Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides higher performance by dividing each physical processor core into logical cores, also known as like streams. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.

2. Has AES

✔Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-2600

AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.

3. Has AVX

✔Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-2600

AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.

4.Version SSE

SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.

5. Has F16C

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-2600

F16C is used to speed up tasks such as image contrast adjustment or volume control.

6.bits transmitted at the same time

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-2600)

NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.

7. Has MMX

✔Intel Core i5-2400

✔Intel Core i7-2600

MMX is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.

8.Has TrustZone

✖Intel Core i5-2400

✖Intel Core i7-2600

The technology is integrated into the processor to ensure device security when using features such as mobile payments and video streaming using digital rights management technology ( DRM).

9.interface width

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i5-2400)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Core i7-2600)

The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better

Price comparison

Cancel

Which CPUs are better?

Comparison Intel Core i5-2400 vs Intel Core i7-2600 which is better?

Main / Processor / Intel Core i5-2400 vs Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i5-2400

39%

Devicelist

VS

Intel Core i7-2600

7%

Devicelist

We compared the characteristics of Intel Core i5-2400 and Intel Core I7-2600 and Intel Core I7-2600 compiled a list of benefits and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.

Benefits Intel Core i5-2400

Release price

$60 -187 $ (-75.7%) better than vs 247 $

Value for money

83.2% 45.5% (120.7%) better than vs 37.7%

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

5260 240 (4.8%) better than vs 5020

Benefits of Intel Core i7-2600

Comparison winner

threads

8 4 (100%) better than vs 4

Base frequency

3.4 GHz 0. 3 GHz (9.7%) better than vs 3.1 GHz

Maximum frequency

3.8 GHz 0.4 GHz (11.8%) better than vs 3.4 GHz

Passmark

5375 1578 (41.6%) better than vs 3797

General
Type
Desktop	Desktop
Architecture code name
Sandy Bridge	Sandy Bridge
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.
4	4
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).
4	8 4 (100%) better than
Base frequency
3.1GHz	3.4 GHz Better than at 0.3 GHz (9.7%)
Process
32 nm	32 nm
Chip size
216 mm2	216 mm2
Number of transistors
1 million	1 million
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.
3.4GHz	3.8 GHz Better than at 0.4 GHz (11.8%)
Support 64 bit
Max. number of processors in configuration
1	1
Socket
LGA1155	LGA1155
Series
Core i5 (Desktop)	n/a
Release price
$60 -187 $ (-75.7%) better than	247 $
Value for money The sum of all device benefits divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
83.2% 45.5% (120.7%) better than	37.7%
Maximum core temperature
73 °C	73 °C
vPro
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.
PCI Express revision
2.0	2.0
Number of PCI-Express lanes
16	16
Identity Protection
+	+
Flex Memory Access
+	+
Quick Sync
+	+
FDI
+	+
Fast Memory Access
+	+
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance.
64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache
256 KB (per core)	256 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache
6144 Kb (total)	8192 Kb (total)
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
95W	95 W
EDB
+	+
InTru 3D
+	+

		5375 1578 (41.6%) better than
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
4425	n/a
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
15344	n/a
x264 encoding pass 1
137	n/a
x264 encoding pass 2
27	n/a
TrueCrypt AES
2	n/a
3DMark06 CPU
5715	n/a
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
5260 240 (4. 8%) better than	5020
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
3194	n/a

Technologies and Supplementary Instructions
Extended Instructions0578		Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
Turbo Boost
2.0	2.0
Idle States
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Technology from Intel that reduces the processor frequency to a minimum to save power when the processor is idle.
Thermal Monitoring
Hyper-Threading Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.
AES-NI Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process.
+	+
AVX The presence of AVX instructions improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations applications.

RAM parameters
RAM types
	DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.
32 GB	32 GB
Number of memory channels
2	2

Virtualization technologies
EPT
VT-d Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.

Integrated graphics
		1.35 GHz
Maximum number of monitors
2	2
Clear Video HD
Video core The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card.
+	+

Comparison Intel Core i5-2400 vs Intel Core i7-2600K which is better?

Home / Intel Core i5-2400 VS Intel Core i7-2600K

Intel Core i5-2400

39% 9000

We compared the specifications of Intel Core i5-2400 and Intel Core i7-2600K and compiled a list of benefits and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.

Benefits Intel Core i5-2400

Release price

$60 -257 $ (-81. 1%) better than vs 317 $

Value for money

83.2% 10.3% (14.1%) better than vs 72.9%

vPro

vs

TXT

vs

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

5260 240 (4.8%) better than vs 5020

Benefits of Intel Core i7-2600K

Comparison winner

threads

8 4 (100%) better than vs 4

Base frequency

3.4GHz 0.3 GHz (9.7%) better than vs 3.1 GHz

Maximum frequency

3. 8 GHz 0.4 GHz (11.8%) better than vs 3.4 GHz

Passmark

5499 1702 (44.8%) better than vs 3797

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

4809 384 (8.7%) better than vs 4425

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

18608 3264 (21.3%) better than vs 15344

x264 encoding pass 1

145 8 (5.8%) better than vs 137

x264 encoding pass 2

37 10 (37%) better than vs 27

TrueCrypt AES

3 1 (50%) better than vs 2

3DMark06 CPU

6669 954 (16. 7%) better than vs 5715

General
Type
Desktop	Desktop
Architecture code name
Sandy Bridge	Sandy Bridge
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. At the moment, increasing the number of processor cores is one of the priorities for increasing performance.
4	4
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases).
4	8 4 (100%) better than
Base frequency
3.1 GHz	3.4 GHz Better than at 0. 3 GHz (9.7%)
Process
32 nm	32 nm
Chip size
216 mm2	216 mm2
Number of transistors
1 million	1 million
Maximum frequency Faster clocked processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance.
3.4GHz	3.8 GHz Better than at 0.4 GHz (11.8%)
Support 64 bit
Max. number of processors in configuration
1	1
Socket
LGA1155	LGA1155
Series
Core i5 (Desktop)	Intel Core i7 (Desktop)
Release price
$60 -257 $ (-81. 1%) better than	317 $
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
83.2% 10.3% (14.1%) better than	72.9%
Maximum core temperature
73 °C	73 °C
vPro
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM.
PCI Express revision
2.0	2.0
Number of PCI-Express lanes
16	16
Identity Protection
+	+
Flex Memory Access
+	+
Quick Sync
+	+
FDI
+	+
Fast Memory Access
+	+
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance.
64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache
256 KB (per core)	256K (per core)
Level 3 Cache
6144 Kb (total)	8 MB (total)
Free multiplier
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
95W	95 W
EDB
+	+
InTru 3D
+	+

		5499 1702 (44. 8%) better than
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
4425	4809 384 (8.7%) better than
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
15344	18608 3264 (21.3%) better than
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
n/a	129
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
n/a	614
WinRAR 4.0
n/a	3486
x264 encoding pass 1
137	145 8 (5.8%) better than
x264 encoding pass 2
27	37 10 (37%) better than
TrueCrypt AES
2	3 1 (50%) better than
3DMark06 CPU
5715	6669 954 (16. 7%) better than
Geekbench 2
n/a	7754
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
n/a	3015
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
n/a	11547
3DMark Fire Strike Physics
5260 240 (4.8%) better than	5020
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
3194	n/a

Technologies and additional instructions
Extended instructions
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® 8	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
Turbo Boost
2.0	+
Idle States
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Technology from Intel that reduces the processor frequency to a minimum to save power when the processor is idle.
Thermal Monitoring
Hyper-Threading Intel hardware technology that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%.
AES-NI Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process.
+	+
AVX The presence of AVX instructions improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations applications.

RAM parameters
RAM types
DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333	DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor.
32 GB	32 GB
Number of memory channels
2	2

Virtualization Technologies
VT-x
EPT
VT-d Intel virtualization technology allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools.

Integrated graphics
		1.35 GHz
Maximum number of monitors
2	2
Clear Video HD
Video core The presence of the video core allows you to use your computer without using a video card.
+	+

Intel Core i7-2600 vs. Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i7-2600 runs with 4 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 3.80 GHz base No turbo all cores while TDP is set to 95 W .Processor connects to LGA 1155 CPU socket This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 2 to support DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 RAM, and supports 2.0 PCIe Gen 16 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Sandy Bridge S Architecture is advanced over 32 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT . The product was launched Q1/2011

Intel Core i5-2400

Intel Core i5-2400 runs with 4 and 8 CPU threads It runs at 3.40 GHz base No turbo all cores while TDP is set to 95 W .Processor connects to LGA 1155 CPU socket This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on a single chip, supports 2 to support DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 RAM, and supports PCIe Gen . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Sandy Bridge S Architecture is advanced over 32 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT . Product was launched Q1/2011

Intel Core i7-2600

Intel Core i5-2400

Compare Parts

3.40GHz	Frequency	3.10 GHz
4	Cores	4
3.80GHz	Turbo (1 core)	3.40 GHz
no turbo	Turbo (all cores)	No turbo
Yes	Hyper Threading	No.
No.	Overclocking	No.
normal	Basic architecture	normal
Intel HD Graphics 2000	GPU	Intel HD Graphics 2000
1.35GHz	GPU (Turbo)	1.10 GHz
32nm	Technology	32 nm
1.35GHz	GPU (Turbo)	1.10 GHz
10. 1	DirectX Version	10.1
2	Max. displays	2
DDR3-1066 DDR3-1333	memory size	DDR3-1066 DDR3-1333
2	Memory channels	2
	Maximum memory
No.	ECC	No.
—	L2 Cache	—
	L3 Cache	6.00 MB
2.0	PCIe version
16	PCIe lanes
32nm	Technology	32 nm
LGA 1155	Connector	LGA 1155
95 W	TDP	95W
VT-x, VT-x EPT	Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT
Q1/2011	Release date	Q1/2011
Show more details		Show more details

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor to Cinebench R20 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor to Cinebench R15 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D shapes. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.

iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Theoretical processing performance of the processor’s internal graphics unit with simple precision (32 bits) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS specifies how many billions of floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

Energy usage estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU usage (0-100%)

Cost of electricity, USD/kWh

929Popular comparison
Comparative analysis of the Intel Core i7-2600K and Intel Core i5-2400 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphical Interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel Core i7-2600K

versus

Intel Core i5-2400

Advantages

Reasons to choose Intel Core i7-2600K

• The processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows you to easily make an overclocking
• by 4 flows more: 8 VS 4
• by 12% more clock speed: 3.80 GHz vs 3.40 GHz
• The L3 cache is about 33% larger, which means more data can be stored in it for quick access
• PassMark — Single thread mark about 10% better performance: 1741 vs 1579
• PassMark — CPU mark about 43% better performance: 5492 vs 3847
• Geekbench 4 — Single Core performance about 22 % more: 811 vs 665
• About 45% more performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core benchmark: 3117 vs 2147
• About 49% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score% more: 3342 vs 2247
• Performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) about 51% more: 4.524 vs 2.995
• Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) in 8.3 times(es) greater: 77.745 vs 9.378
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) performance approximately 65% ​​greater: 0.602 vs 0.364
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) performance ) about 24% more: 2.129vs 1.721
• Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) about 21% better: 5.018 vs 4.139

Intel Core i7-2600		Intel Core i5-2400
95 W	Max TDP	95W
NA	Power consumption per day (kWh)	NA
NA	Operating cost per day	NA
NA	Power consumption per year (kWh)	NA
NA	Operating cost per year	NA

Unlocked	Unlocked / Locked
Number of threads	8 vs 4
Maximum frequency	3.80 GHz vs 3.40 GHz
Level 3 cache	8192 KB vs 6144 KB (shared)
PassMark — Single thread mark	1741 vs 1579
PassMark — CPU mark	5492 vs 3847
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	811 vs 665
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	3117 vs 2147
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	3342 vs 2247
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.524 vs 2.995
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	77.745 vs 9.378
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.602 vs 0.364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	2.129 vs 1.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	5.018 vs 4.139

Benchmark comparison

CPU 1: Intel Core i7-2600K
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-2400

PassMark — Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
PassMark — CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2	77.745
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	CPU 1 CPU 2

Name	Intel Core i7-2600K	Intel Core i5-2400
PassMark — Single thread mark	1741	1579
PassMark — CPU mark	5492	3847
Geekbench 4 — Single Core	811	665
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core	3117	2147
3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score	3342	2247
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.524	2.995
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	77.745	9.378
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.602	0.364
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	2.129	1.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	5.018	4.139

Feature comparison

configuration

	Intel Core i7-2600K	Intel Core i5-2400
Architecture name	Sandy Bridge	Sandy Bridge
Issue date	January 3, 2011	January 2011
Price at first issue date	$317	$60
Place in the rating	1585	1969
Price now	$189. 99	$83.99
Processor Number	i7-2600K	i5-2400
Series	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors	Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status	Discontinued	Launched
Price/performance ratio (0-100)	13.10	20.89
Applicability	Desktop	Desktop
Support 64 bit
Base frequency	3. 40 GHz	3.10 GHz
Bus Speed ​​	5 GT/s DMI	5 GT/s DMI
Crystal area	216 mm	216 mm
Level 1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
Level 2 cache	1024KB	256 KB (per core)
Level 3 cache	8192KB	6144 KB (shared)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Maximum core temperature	72. 6°C	72.6°C
Maximum frequency	3.80 GHz	3.40 GHz
Number of cores	4	4
Number of threads	8	4
Number of transistors	995 Million	1160 million
Unlocked
Maximum number of memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	21 GB/s	21 GB/s
Maximum memory size	32GB	32GB
Supported memory types	DDR3 1066/1333	DDR3 1066/1333
Device ID	0x112	0x102
Graphics base frequency	850MHz	850MHz
Graphics max dynamic frequency	1. 35 GHz	1.10 GHz
Maximum GPU clock	1.35 GHz	1.1 GHz
Intel® Clear Video Technology HD
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
Intel® InTru™ 3D Technology
Intel® Quick Sync Video
Integrated graphics	Intel® HD Graphics 3000	Intel® HD Graphics 2000
Maximum number of monitors supported	2	2
WiDi support
Low Halogen Options Available
Maximum number of processors in	1	1
Package Size	37. 5mm x 37.5mm	37.5mm x 37.5mm
Supported sockets	LGA1155	LGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	95 Watt
Number of PCI Express lanes	16	16
PCI Express revision	2.0	2.0
Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Identity Protection Technology
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT)
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology
Flexible Display interface (FDI)
Idle States
Extended instructions	Intel® SSE4. 1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
Intel 64
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Fast Memory Access
Intel® Flex Memory Access
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility
Thermal Monitoring
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)

Intel Core i7-2600 and Core i5-2400

• Introduction
• Architecture and range
• Motherboard MSI P67A-GD65
• Packaging and contents
• Design and features of the

board

• BIOS Setup Capabilities
• Test bench
• Test Method
• Test participants
• Acceleration
• Performance testing
• Conclusion

This is the case when you don’t have to explain «what, who, where and from which side». Overclockers have been waiting for the announcement of the new Intel LGA1155 platform for a long time, and now, new processors and chipsets have finally been officially presented.

Testing a fundamentally new platform is a long and laborious process. There are many nuances here, a detailed review of the new architecture, a study of performance in professional use and in gaming tests, overclocking capabilities of new CPUs in different conditions, a detailed comparison with competitors by price groups, and so on deserve a separate article. In this regard, this material does not claim to be absolute completeness. The author has tried to reflect the main points, briefly touching on as many aspects of the use of the new platform as possible in order to help readers get a first impression of it with an eye to practical use.

Behind the brief wording «Intel introduces Sandy Bridge» is a «major» update of the entire processor market. Models in the LGA1155 design will replace the current Core i3 / i5 / i7, which means they will fall into several segments at once: from affordable (mainstream) to productive (enthusiast). Of course, Intel and laptops, for which models of processors with low power consumption were developed, did not go unnoticed. And for desktop computers, the following processor models were presented:

Core i7 family

• Intel Core i7-2600
• Intel Core i7-2600K
• Intel Core i7-2600S

Core i5 family

• Intel Core i5-2500
• Intel Core i5-2500K
• Intel Core i5-2500S
• Intel Core i5-2500T
• Intel Core i5-2400
• Intel Core i5-2400S
• Intel Core i5-2390T
• Intel Core i5-2300

recommendations

Core i3 family

• Intel Core i3-2120
• Intel Core i3-2100
• Intel Core i3-2100T

A total of 14 new CPUs. The Core i5 family turned out to be the most extensive — eight processors, this is understandable — Intel specialists pay increased attention to the «middle class». There are only three models in the older and younger Core i7 and Core i3 lines.

Pay attention to the abundance of letter designations: the letters K, T, S. If you do not look at these letters, only one model with the 2600 index remains in the Core i7 family, and the Core i5 line is reduced to four processors 2500/2400/2390/2300. By the way, the four-digit numerical designation indicates the use of the new Sandy Bridge architecture, so, despite the preservation of the familiar “Core i3 / i5 / i7” in the name of the processors, there is no confusion.

Another interesting fact is the absence of the «Extreme» model among the listed processors. This is logical, because even the older Core i7-2600 are quad-core processors, while the current Intel flagship — Core-i7-980X — is a priori a more efficient six-core CPU.

Now is the time to bring to your attention a detailed table of characteristics of the new «desktop» Intel processors. In this case, division by families is used, since there are many processors, and in a single table you will get a «porridge» that is inconvenient for perception.

Intel Core i7

Model name	i7-2600	i7-2600K	i7-2600S
Base frequency, MHz	3400	3400	2800
TDP level, W	95	95	65
Hyper Threading	There is	There is	There is
Number of computing cores / processed threads	4/8	4/8	4/8
Recommended frequency DDR3 memory, MHz	1333	1333	1333
Video core frequency, MHz	before 1350	before 1350	before 1350
Cache L3 size, MB	eight	eight	eight
Price, USD	294	317	unknown

Intel Core i5

Model name	i5-2300	i5-2390T	i5-2400	i5-2400S	i5-2500	i5-2500S	i5-2500T	i5-2500K
Base frequency, MHz	2800	2700	3100	2500	9418	2700	2300	3300
TDP level, W	95	35	95	65	95	65	45	95
Hyper Threading	Not	There is	Not	Not	Not	Not	Not	Not
Number of computing cores / processed threads	4/4	2/4	4/4	4/4	4/4	4/4	4/4	4/4
Recommended frequency DDR3 memory, MHz	1333	1333	1333	1333	1333	1333	1333	1333
Video core frequency, MHz	up to 1100	up to 1100	up to 1100	up to 1100	up to 1100	up to 1100	Before 1250	up to 1100
Cache L3 size, MB	6	3	6	6	6	6	6	6
Price, USD	177	unknown	184	unknown	205	unknown	unknown	216

Intel Core i3

Model name	Intel Core i3-2100	Intel Core i3-2100T	Intel Core i3-2120
Base frequency, MHz	3100	2500	3300
TDP level, W	65	35	65
Hyper Threading	There is	There is	There is
Number of computing cores / processed threads	2/4	2/4	2/4
Recommended frequency DDR3 memory, MHz	1333	1333	1333
Video core frequency, MHz	up to 1100	up to 1100	up to 1100
Cache L3 size, MB	3	3	3
Price, USD	117	unknown	138

It turns out a very logical series of models where Core i7 is clearly separated from Core i5: older quad-core CPUs have Hyper Threading support and increased Cache memory. The difference in cost between these families of processors is very significant. If they ask for $177 for the i5-2300, and $205 for the older i5-2500, then you will have to pay almost $300 for the Core i7-2600. In general, the situation is similar to that for the LGA1156 platform, where there is also a large price gap between the Core-i5 and i7 models.

The already mentioned letter designations indicate models with reduced energy consumption (letters S and T) and a free multiplier (K).

The Core-i3 family is a dual-core CPU, one of these processors is also among the Core i5 — the i5-2390T model, but this is more of a marketing ploy.

In addition to the halved number of cores, Core i3 processors differ from their older counterparts in the lack of support for Turbo Boost technology. The auto-overclocking technology already well known from previous generations of Intel processors has been improved (Intel specialists call it Turbo Boost 2.0). Now the frequencies of the cores can vary within a wider range, in addition, overclocking at the maximum load of one, two and four cores uses its own algorithms.

The system is able to temporarily increase the frequency and voltage of the processor cores, even if the TDP is outside the limits specified by the manufacturer. This takes into account data on power consumption and temperature of the processor.

Practice is more important than theory, but I will mention some of the key features of Sandy Bridge, illustrated with slides from the official presentation (the previous image is also taken from this source).

The succession of generations within the framework of the Tick-Tock strategy (architectural and process technology upgrades) is shown in the following image:

Interestingly, Intel positions the quad-core Sandy Bridge processors lower than the current Bloomfield and Lynnfield, at least as shown in the diagram:

The new 32nm processor die includes four processing cores, a graphics core, a memory controller, and the so-called System Agent. This is the designation of the block containing the entire «strapping» of the computing cores: a dual-channel DDR3 memory controller, PCI-Express 2.0 controllers, a power management module, blocks responsible for displaying an image if an integrated video core is used, and so on.

Core structure:

Schematic with comments:

All elements of the processor core are connected by a high-performance ring bus. This solution is designed to increase the speed of exchange between the components of the kernel. Importantly, this technology makes it easy to increase the number of CPU cores by simply adding them to the «ring». The bus is not homogeneous, it is divided into «rings» Acknowledge Ring, Data Ring, Request Ring, Snoop Ring.

Another feature of the new processor is the obligatory presence of an integrated video core, there are no models without it. I don’t really like the idea of ​​paying extra for an extra kernel block, because many users (especially overclockers) do not need it at all.

For example, on this slide, Intel directly states that the integrated graphics are suitable only for «light» games, while «enthusiasts» are advised to use a discrete graphics card. More detailed characteristics of the video core are presented on the slide below:

Along with the processors, new chipsets of the sixtieth series were also presented. Their list includes four items, the characteristics of which can be seen by reading the following slide:

Intel H67… chipsets are of the greatest interest

… and Intel P67.

These will be used on most motherboards for new processors. The Intel H67 chipset ensures the operation of the video core integrated into the processor, while the P67 lacks this feature. But only it is capable of overclocking the processor, the rest of the «chipsets» do not have Performance Tuning functions («performance tuning»).

The test stand was based on the MSI P67A-GD65 motherboard. Below is a brief overview of it. By this I mean that I will not thoroughly study the board to the last detail and consider every single BIOS Setup setting. You understand, there are so many interesting things in today’s material, the author does not want to bore the reader with excessive details. Otherwise, I will try to study the consumer qualities of the «motherboard» as fully as possible and evaluate them.

The motherboard comes in a light colored cardboard box.

The enumeration of the product’s key features occupies both sides of the box: here is a mention of a high-quality «military-grade» element base (an old MSI «trick» that has been actively advertised for several years), indications of advanced overclocking capabilities of the board and the availability of promising SATA 6 Gb / s and USB 3.0.

In addition to the required items, the package includes a couple of nice optional accessories.

Here is the composition of the kit in the form of a list:

• Three SATA

cables

• Molex->SATA power adapter
• Bridge Crossfire
• Centipede kit for connecting devices to the internal connectors of the board
• Rear panel cover for housing
• Set of probes for connecting a multimeter to test points on the board
• Rear panel with two USB 3.0 ports

In addition, the motherboard was generously supplied with various kinds of «waste paper»: in the box there were as many as three instructions for working with the board, two of which are very voluminous books. Such a quantity of printed materials can be considered redundant, but for an inexperienced user, additional materials will not be superfluous.

The motherboard is designed in traditional MSI blue-black color scheme. As always, textolite with a dark brown mask was used in the production.

The motherboard is an ATX form factor with standard dimensions of 305 x 244 mm and is therefore compatible with most modern cases (except special small models).

Number of expansion slots, as expected for an ATX board, seven:

The Intel P67 logic set, although it is the oldest in the «sixtieth» series, can only provide one full-speed PCI Express 2.0 16x slot. In the case of using two video cards, you will have to be content with the PCIe 2.0 8x + 8x formula, which can slightly reduce the performance of powerful SLI and Crossfire bundles. I also note that on the board under study, only the connector that is located closer to the CPU socket is full-fledged. The second one always runs at half speed (8x), so you won’t be able to «move» a powerful single video card away from the CPU cooler (to improve the temperature regime).

LGA 1155 processors are equipped with a memory controller that can only work with DDR3 modules in a maximum of two-channel mode. This shows another similarity with the previous LGA1156 platform. Not surprisingly, the board in question is equipped with four memory slots.

Connectors traditionally for MSI products are equipped with latches on both sides, which can make it a little difficult to replace modules in an assembled system unit. As for operating modes, the manufacturer claims support for frequencies up to DDR3-2133 MHz. Supported «bars» up to 4 GB, which allows you to gain up to 16 GB of memory when using all the slots.

The motherboard has eight SATA connectors. Color division (four white and four black connectors) indicates different revisions of the interface: SATAII 3 Gb/s and SATA 6 Gb/s, respectively. In this case, the «old» and «new» connectors are soldered equally. This is a timely step, most of the new models of drives (both SSD and HDD) today are already equipped with a SATA 6 Gb / s interface. Motherboards of the previous generation, as a rule, were equipped with only a couple of more modern connectors.

The LGA1155 processor socket itself is almost indistinguishable from its predecessor LGA1156. Despite the almost complete identity of the sockets, the LGA1155 and LGA1156 processors cannot be installed in a «non-native» socket. In addition to the fact that a safety slot will prevent this, the “wiring” of contacts inside the socket has also been significantly changed, in particular, the power now “hangs” in a completely different place.

On a positive note, LGA1155 platforms are great for LGA1156-mounted CPU coolers.

The processor power converter is made according to an eight-phase scheme.

The motherboard, as befits a product with overclocking ambitions, is equipped with buttons to control the open stand.




There are three buttons in total, the usual Start and Reset, as well as «OC Genie». The latter involves a small factory overclocking according to the prescribed algorithm.

I sometimes devote an entire section of the article to interesting cooling systems for top motherboards. In this case, this was not necessary due to the simplicity of the CO design.

It consists of three elements: a small patch heatsink serving the southbridge, and a pair of heatpipe-coupled heatsinks on the MOSFETs of the CPU converter. A definite plus: in all cases, fastening is carried out by means of spring-loaded screws, and not primitive plastic latches. On the whole, the CO design is uncomplicated, but a decent area of ​​radiators should ensure normal temperature conditions for the board components.

Since the cooling system has been removed, it’s time to take a picture of the Intel P67. He is in front of you:

The back panel of the board has a wide range of connectors. This once again emphasizes that this is not a budget «motherboard» at all, but a solid product, which should become the top LGA1155 board in the MSI assortment in the coming months.

As for the USB connectors, there are ten of them at once, and two of them belong to the most modern USB 3. 0 revision (highlighted in blue). The NEC UPD720200F1 controller is responsible for the interface hardware. There are two such chips on the board — a couple more USB 3.0 connectors can be activated by connecting an additional rear panel, which I mentioned in the «Packaging and accessories» section.

The eSATA connection is implemented using the widely used Jmicron JMB362 controller. There are two corresponding connectors on the rear panel. The capabilities of the controller allow you to organize a RAID array of levels 0 and 1.

The motherboard is equipped with a high-quality eight-channel Realtek ALC892 audio codec. On the rear panel there is a standard rack of six analog mini-jack connectors, in the «digital» sound can be output through a pair of S / PDIF connectors (optical and coaxial).

Firewire connection based on VIA VT6308P controller. One IEEE 1394 connector is on the rear panel, one more can be used additionally. The network connection is provided by the Realtek RTL8111E controller, on the rear panel there is a corresponding RJ-45 connector (twisted pair).

To complete the review of the rear panel, it remains to mention only the good old PS / 2 for connecting a keyboard or mouse and the Clear CMOS button (reset BIOS settings).

As a result of the section, the motherboard left a good impression. Among the key features of the device are the presence of a large number of USB 3.0 and SATA 6 Gb / s connectors, support for the FireWire interface, the use of a good eight-channel audio codec ALC892. A high-quality multi-phase processor power supply system, made using a high-quality element base (which the manufacturer is very proud of), is designed to provide good opportunities for overclocking the processor.

I will note one more point. It is known that with the advent of the new platform, the first motherboards of all manufacturers are released «in a hurry» in order to ensure support for new processors as soon as possible. More advanced products usually appear a little later, they have extended functionality and (usually) improved overclocking capabilities.