What Are Their Differences (5 Aspects)
What is the Crucial MX300? What is the Crucial MX500? What are the differences between MX300 and MX500? Which one is better? This post will elaborate on the differences between MX300 and MX500. Besides, a MiniTool program will be introduced for you to upgrade your hard drive without data loss.
SSD is one of the most popular devices in the storage market and there are a lot of SSD manufacturers around the world such as Samsung, Toshiba, SanDisk, Kingston, Crucial, etc. Here, we focus on Crucial SSDs. It has developed a lot of solid-state drives, such as BX500, MX500, MX300, and so on.
In this post, we will explorer and compare Crucial MX300 and Crucial MX500. Crucial MX300 vs MX500, what are their differences and which one is better?
What Is Crucial MX300?
Crucial MX300
Crucial MX300 SSD is one of the famous Crucial SSDs and it comes with a large storage size that can reach up to 2TB, allowing you to store a lot of files and data. Crucial MX300 SSD comes with a good read and write performance so that it improves the system performance. With it, you can boot up the computer almost instantly.
The Crucial MX300 SSD is available in two different form factors: 2.5-inch form factor and m.2 form factor. With an endurance rating of up to 220TB total bytes written, the Crucial MX300 is engineered with Micron 3D NAND to deliver years of fast performance. The 3D NAND leverages larger NAND cells to improve performance and prolong endurance.
Crucial MX500 SSD
Crucial MX500 SSD is the first Crucial’s drive based on Micron’s 64-layer 3D TLC NAD and it is the second generation of Crucial’s mainstream MX series using TLC NAND. The Crucial MX500 SSD comes with a large storage size so that it can hold all your irreplaceable files and it saves almost everything your system does.
With the Crucial MX500 SSD, you can start your system in seconds, load files almost instantly, and accelerate the most demanding applications.
The Crucial MX500 SSD is available in both 2.5-inch and M.2 2260 form factors.
After learning some basic information about Crucial MX300 and Crucial MX500, what are their differences and which one is better?
MX300 vs MX500: What Are Their Differences?
In this section, we will cover the differences between Crucial MX300 and Crucial MX500. To know more information, keep on your reading.
1. MX300 vs MX500: Form Factor and Interface
In a solid-state drive, the form factor decides and prescribes the size, shape and other physical specifications of a drive and it would be a key feature of an SSD. The hard disk interface is the connection part between the hard disk and the host system. It is used to transfer data between the hard disk cache and the host memory. Besides, the hard disk interface determines the connection speed between hard disk and computer.
As MX300 and MX500, what are their form factors and interfaces?
The Crucial MX300 SSD is available in both 2.
5-inch form factor and m.2 form factor, with the SATA 6.0 Gb/s interface. The Crucial MX500 SSD is also available in 2.5-inch form factor and M.2 form factor, with the SATA 6.0 Gb/s interface.
As for Crucial MX500 vs MX300, there is no difference in form factor and interface.
2. MX300 vs MX500: Capacity
As for Crucial MX300 vs MX500, we will compare their storage size, which is necessary to be considered when choosing an SSD since a larger one enables you to save more files and data.
According to its official site, both MX300 and MX500 come with four different capacities. Look at the following chart:
| Crucial MX300 SSD | Crucial MX500 SSD | |
| Capacity | 275GB, 525GB, 1TB, 2TB | 250GB, 500GB, 1TB, 2TB |
Hence, as for Crucial MX300 vs MX500, there is no big difference in capacity. Both Crucial SSDs provide a larger storage size which reaches up to 2TB.
3. MX300 vs MX500: Performance
When selecting a hard drive or an SSD, performance would be the most important factor to be considered. An SSD with good performance enables your computer to run faster and boosts the computer performance.
Now, we will compare the performance of Crucial MX300 1TB and Crucial MX500 1TB. Look at the following chart.
| Crucial MX300 SSD 1TB | Crucial MX500 SSD 1TB | |
| Sequential Read | 530 MB/s | 560 MB/s |
| Sequential Write | 510 MB/s | 510 MB/s |
| Random Read | 92,000 IOPS | 95,000 IOPS |
| Random Write | 83,000 IOPS | 90,000 IOPS |
From the above chart, you can find that the Crucial MX500 SSD 1TB is faster than the Crucial MX300 SSD 1TB. Besides, Crucial MX500 SSD 1TB provides better random read and write.
Of course, you can choose to test the hard drive performance by yourself.
3. MX300 vs MX500: Reliability and Warranty
As for Crucial MX500 vs Crucial MX300, we will show you the fourth aspect – reliability and warranty.
Both Crucial MX500 and Crucial MX300 SSD provide good reliability and warranty. The Crucial MX300 SSD provides 220TB Total Bytes Written (TBW), equal to 120GB per day for 5 years. The Crucial MX500 SSD provides 360 TBW, equal to 197GB per day for 5 years.
Besides, the Crucial MX300 provides a limited 3-year warranty, and the Crucial MX500 provides a limited 5-year warranty. So, from the comparison, you can find that the Crucial MX500 SSD is a bit better than the Crucial MX300 SSD in reliability and warranty.
4. MX300 vs MX500: Price
Here, we will mention the last difference between Crucial MX300 and Crucial MX500 – Price. The budget is always the key factor to be considered when selecting a suitable hard drive.
According to Crucial’s official site, the Crucial MX500 SSD 1TB is $114.
99. But the official site shows that the Crucial MX300 1TB is not available now. But you can choose to purchase it from third-party platforms, such as Amazon, Newegg, etc. Hence, you can check its price on third-party platforms.
Another thing you need to know is that the price of SSD may vary due to the different capacities. In general, the larger SSD is, the more expensive it is.
Which One Is Better?
From the above chart, you have known some differences between MX300 vs MX500. Apart from the above, of course, they also have some other differences. After reading the above part, you may have a general understanding of what the differences are and which one is better.
In my opinion, the Crucial MX500 SSD would be better than the Crucial MX300 SSD. You can choose the suitable one for you. But when selecting the SSD, you need to check the interface of your computer and select the suitable one.
This post clearly elaborates on the differences between Crucial MX300 SSD and Crucial MX500 SSD.
It is a fantastic post. Click to Tweet
Both Crucial MX300 and Crucial MX500 SSDs come with a large storage size and provide transfer speed. So, you can choose to upgrade your hard drive to Crucial MX300 SSD or Crucial MX500 SSD so that make Windows run faster.
But you may wonder how can you upgrade your hard drive? As to upgrade the hard drive, the traditional way is to remove the original one and install the new hard drive, and then reinstall the operating system. However, this way will lead to data loss.
So, here, we will show you a new way to upgrade the hard drive without data loss or migrate your system to the Crucial MX300 or Crucial MX500 SSD without data loss.
How to Migrate OS to Crucial MX300 or Crucial MX500?
In this section, we will show you a way to migrate OS to Crucial MX300 or Crucial MX500 SSD without data loss.
To do that, you may need an SSD clone tool. Thus, MiniTool ShadowMaker is recommended. It is a clone tool that can help you to upgrade your hard drive without data loss.
Besides, it is a piece of professional backup software, designed to back up files, folders, disks, partitions, and the operating system.
Now, we will show you how to use it to migrate OS to Crucial MX300 or Crucial MX500 SSD.
1. Connect the Crucial MX300 or Crucial 500 SSD to your computer.
2. Download MiniTool ShadowMaker from the following button, install it and launch it.
Free Download
3. Click Keep Trial.
4. After entering its main interface, go to the Tools page.
5. Then choose the Clone Disk feature to continue.
6. Next, click the Source module to select disk clone source. Here, you need to choose the original hard drive. Then click Finish.
7. Click the Destination module to choose a target disk to save the cloned files. Here, you need to choose the Crucial MX300 SSD or Crucial MX500 SSD. Then click Finish.
8. Then you will receive a warning message which tells you that all data on the target disk will be destroyed. If there are important files on it, please back up them first.
9. Then the disk cloning process will begin. Please do not interrupt the cloning process until it is finished.
When the disk cloning process is finished, you will receive a warning message that tells you the original disk and the target disk have the same signature and either of them will be marked as offline. Hence, you need to remove or disconnect the original hard drive. If you want to boot your computer from the target disk, you can enter the BIOS to change the boot order.
Once all steps are finished, you have migrated your operating system to the Crucial MX300 or Crucial MX500 SSD without data loss.
To sum up, this post has shown what the Crucial MX300 SSD and Crucial MX500 SSD are and also shown their differences among the 5 aspects. From the comparison, you can find that the Crucial MX500 SSD is a little better than the Crucial MX300 SSD.
Besides, this post also introduced MiniTool ShadowMaker for you to upgrade the hard drive without data loss. If you want to do that, try it.
If you have any different ideas for Crucial MX300 SSD and Crucial MX500 SSD or have any problem with MiniTool program, you can leave a message in the comment zone or feel free to contact us via the email [email protected] and we will reply to you as soon as possible.
MX300 vs MX500 FAQ
What is the difference between Crucial MX500 and BX500?
Crucial MX500 and Crucial BX500 are two series of different Crucial SSDs. They are different from form factor, capacity, performance, reliability, warranty, price, and other aspects.
Which Crucial SSD is the best?
Crucial has developed a lot of different solid-state drives and each one has specific features. So, it would be difficult to judge which Crucial SSD is the best. But you can judge then via the performance, storage size, and other factors.
Does Crucial SSD have DRAM?
The Crucial SSD has DRAM. The 250GB/500GB models get 256MB/512 DRAM cache buffer, while the 1TB/2TB models come with 1GB/2GB DRAM cache buffer.
The Crucial MX500 1TB SSD Review: Breaking The SATA Mold
by Billy Tallison December 19, 2017 8:00 AM EST
- Posted in
- SSDs
- Storage
- Crucial
- Micron
- Silicon Motion
- 3D NAND
- SM2258
- 3D TLC
90 Comments
|
90 Comments
IntroductionAnandTech Storage Bench — HeavyAnandTech Storage Bench — LightRandom PerformanceSequential PerformanceMixed Read/Write PerformancePower ManagementConclusion
Most of the time, it seems like all the interesting new developments in the SSD market are in the NVMe segment, while SATA SSDs are stuck with the same performance limits and decreasing endurance.
The Crucial MX500 bucks the trend by setting several surprising performance records while offering competitive mainstream pricing.
The MX500 is a more well-rounded product than its predecessor, the Crucial MX300. The MX300’s performance takes a serious hit when it is full or subjected to heavy write loads, but the MX500 retains much more of its performance and does a better job of keeping latency under control. It is still subject to some of the pitfalls of TLC NAND with SLC write caching, but they are mitigated about as well as on any of its competitors.
Several of our synthetic benchmarks returned results for the MX500 that are far above any previous SATA SSD we’ve tested. The Crucial MX500 is faster at handling short bursts of I/O than any of its competitors, and even outperforms some NVMe drives with MLC NAND. This is exactly the kind of performance that a consumer SSD should focus on: increasing responsiveness, rather than trying to get a high score on a benchmark of throughput with queue depths that consumer workloads never hit.
These optimizations translate into some of the highest average data rates on our ATSB Heavy and Light test that we’ve seen from a SATA SSD. In favorable conditions (which also happen to be the most common and realistic) of a drive that isn’t full and does get TRIM commands from the OS, the MX500 will generally hold its own against any other SATA drive. It isn’t at the top of every benchmark—under sustained I/O it isn’t any faster than most of its current-generation competition. But for most users, there’s no need to pay any extra for the performance of a Samsung drive.
The MX500’s power management seems to have taken a step backwards from the impressively efficient MX300. The MX500 is still a reasonable option even for mobile use, but it’s a bit disappointing to see that Micron had to sacrifice efficiency on almost every test to improve performance on most of them. The MX500’s idle power consumption is also a bit higher than the MX300, but not enough that we worry about something being broken.
(It’s also possible that our new power measurement equipment is contributing to higher readings; we’ll rule out such potential discrepancies over coming weeks by re-testing the back catalog of drives.)
The Crucial MX500 does not stand out as being the top SATA SSD, but it is clearly a top-tier choice. Micron has extended the warranty to 5 years and increased the write endurance rating to match. The performance and power consumption of the Crucial MX500 are suitable for almost every consumer use case. We look forward to the rest of the capacities arriving next year.
| SATA SSD Price Comparison | |||
| 240-275GB | 480-525GB | 960-1050GB | |
| Crucial MX500 | TBA | TBA | $259.99 (26¢/GB) |
| Crucial BX300 | $87.99 (37¢/GB) | $149.99 (31¢/GB) | |
| Crucial MX300 | $89. 99 (33¢/GB) |
$139.99 (27¢/GB) | $272.00 (26¢/GB) |
| Samsung 850 EVO | $84.99 (34¢/GB) | $139.99 (28¢/GB) | $289.99 (29¢/GB) |
| Samsung 850 PRO | $109.99 (43¢/GB) | $223.42 (44¢/GB) | $399.99 (39¢/GB) |
| SanDisk Ultra 3D | $79.99 (32¢/GB) | $139.99 (28¢/GB) | $279.99 (28¢/GB) |
| WD Blue 3D NAND | $79.99 (32¢/GB) | $139.99 (28¢/GB) | $279.99 (28¢/GB) |
| Toshiba TR200 | $74.99 (31¢/GB) | Out of Stock | Out of Stock |
| Intel 545s | $99.99 (39¢/GB) | $171.99 (34¢/GB) | |
In terms of performance, the SATA drive to beat has long been the Samsung 850 PRO, but its much cheaper sibling the 850 EVO also offers great performance in most use cases and is the most important competitor for mainstream SSDs.
The 1TB Samsung 850 EVO is currently selling for $289.99. With the MX500 arriving at $259.99 for the same capacity but with a longer warranty, higher everyday performance and better power efficiency, Samsung needs to change something. The rest of the industry will also have to respond, because the MX500’s MSRP is beating the holiday street prices on competitors like the SanDisk Ultra 3D.
The NAND flash shortage is starting to ease as everybody (except SK Hynix) ramps up their 64-layer 3D NAND production. By setting an aggressive introductory price, it is clear that Micron expects SSD prices to be in decline, and they intend for the MX500 to remain an economical choice for the near future. If they can keep the MX500 ahead of the pace of price drops, they have a good chance at recapturing the broad market appeal that once made the MX100 such a clear-cut recommendation. Given how the recent Crucial BX300 is also aggressively positioned, they are probably going to keep up the pressure.
Buy Crucial MX500 1TB on Amazon.com
Power Management
IntroductionAnandTech Storage Bench — HeavyAnandTech Storage Bench — LightRandom PerformanceSequential PerformanceMixed Read/Write PerformancePower ManagementConclusion
PRINT THIS ARTICLE
Crucial MX300 2TB vs Crucial MX500 2.5″ 2TB: What’s the difference?
SSD type.
SSD cache
RAM
Solid State Drives/ DRAM-based SSDs use high-speed RAM as a buffer/cache and perform better than non-DRAM SSDs that use slower NAND flash or system RAM (HMB).0003 This is an NVMe SSD
✖Crucial MX300 2TB
✖Crucial MX500 2.5″ 2TB
NVMe SSDs use the PCIe interface, which has a higher bandwidth than the SATA interface. This results in much faster read/ records compared with SSDs using SATA interface
ROM
2048GB
2000GB
ROM is a built-in space for storing system data, applications and user data in the device.
device
Storage type SSD
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Crucial MX300 2TB)
The storage type determines how many bits of data are written to each memory location. These storage types include SLC (one bit per cell), MLC (two bits per cell), and TLC (three bits per cell). The fewer bits written to each cell, the higher the speed and reliability.
PCI Express (PCIe) version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Crucial MX300 2TB)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Crucial MX500 2.5″ 2TB)
PCI Express (PCIe) is a high speed expansion card standard that is used to connect a computer to its peripherals. New versions support higher bandwidth and provide higher performance.
Controller Channels
(Crucial MX300 2TB)
The controller is the processor that controls the functions of the SSD.The number of channels indicates the number of memory chips that this controller can access at the same time.In general, the more channels the controller has SSD, the better the performance.
Terabytes written (TBW)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Crucial MX300 2TB)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Crucial MX500 2.5″ 2TB)
Terabytes written (TBW) is a measure of the life of an SSD and is often covered by the manufacturer’s warranty. Higher TBW can indicate greater reliability over a longer period.
MTBF
1.5million hours
1.8million hours
MTBF is the manufacturer’s estimate of the average amount of time a device will run before it fails.
Technical comparison Crucial MX300 SSD vs Samsung 860 EVO
April 23, 2020
Matt Mills
Hardware, Tips and Tricks
0
When you are looking to buy a new SSD and you are looking for a good performance / performance / price ratio, for sure the first two brands that come to mind will be Crucial and Samsung and that is that their SSDs are always in the top lists sales. Today we are going to do technical comparison of two of these top selling SSDs: Decisive MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO to determine which one is technically better and which one is worth buying.
Both devices are available in the same format and capacities, and at very affordable prices given their power. If we take the currently best-selling 1TB versions as an example, these are their non-offer selling prices:
As you can see, the price difference between them is only about 20 euros, which should put the Samsung SSD, which costs more, and theoretically better. But is it really so? Let’s check it out.
Comparative Crucial MX500 vs Samsung 860 EVO
Najlepszy hotel do uzyskania bezpł…
Please enable JavaScript baju
| Samsung 860 EVO | crucial MX500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Format | 2.5″, M.2, mSATA | 2.5″, M.2 |
| Interface | SATA 3 | |
| Capacity (GB) | 250, 500, 1024, 2048, 4096 | 250, 500, 1000, 2000 901 04 |
| Vel. reading | 550 MB/s | 560 MB/s |
Vel. Write |
520 MB/s | 510 MB/s |
| MTBF | Up to 2,400 TBT (4 TB) | Up to 700 TB (2 TB) |
| Technology | V-type NAND | 3D NAND |
| Warranty | 5 years | 5 years |
Many manufacturers can vary read and write speeds depending on capacity, but this does not apply to these two SSDs, so it seems to us that they are not even painted to be able to make a technical comparison. In this case, the Crucial SSD is a little higher in terms of read speed, but Samsung in writing takes the same advantage that Samsung uses in this area, so in terms of theoretical performance, we can say that they are is practically related to .
If Samsung uses relative advantages, that means the maximum capacity it offers, given that the Crucial MX500 can only be found in capacities up to 2 TB, while Samsung 860 EVO is offered in capacities up to 4 TB double In terms of durability, Samsung SSD takes the lead again, which thanks to V-NAND technology provides unparalleled durability, although in terms of warranty, both are backed by 5 years .
We are going to analyze the technologies that both SSDs support.
Critical MX500
- Dynamic write acceleration.
- Redundant independent NAND array (RAIN).
- Adaptive thermal protection.
- Integrated immunity to energy loss.
- Device sleep support (DevSleep).
- Active garbage collection.
- TRIM support
- Self Testing and Reporting Technology (SMART).
- Error correction code (ECC).
- Multi-step data integrity algorithm.
Samsung 860 EVO
- TurboWrite intelligent technology.
- Error Correction Code (ECC).
- Data integrity algorithm.
- Active garbage collection.
- TRIM support
- 1 GB cache.
- DevSleep.
- 256-bit AES, TCG Opal and IEEE 1667 encryption.
Again, we find that both SSDs are quite technologically advanced. Crucial’s SSD takes some advantage with its built-in power loss protection, but that’s something Samsung’s SSDs also have, though they don’t point it out as it has 1GB of cache, just to protect data in the event of a power loss.