Intel Xeon E5-2660 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670: What is the difference?
37points
Intel Xeon E5-2660
39points
Intel Xeon E5-2670
vs
61 facts in comparison
Intel Xeon E5-2660
Intel Xeon E5-2670
Why is Intel Xeon E5-2660 better than Intel Xeon E5-2670?
- 20W lower TDP?
95Wvs115W
Why is Intel Xeon E5-2670 better than Intel Xeon E5-2660?
- 18.18% faster CPU speed?
8 x 2.6GHzvs8 x 2.2GHz - 0.3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.3GHzvs3GHz - 4 higher clock multiplier?
26vs22 - 8.75% higher PassMark result?
13562vs12471 - 15.43% higher PassMark result (single)?
1721vs1491
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Intel Xeon E5-2660
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2640
Intel Xeon E5-2670
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2640
Intel Xeon E5-2660
vs
Intel Xeon E5-1620
Intel Xeon E5-2670
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2620
Intel Xeon E5-2660
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2665
Intel Xeon E5-2670
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2660
vs
Intel Xeon E5-4640
Intel Xeon E5-2670
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2650
Intel Xeon E5-2660
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2450
Intel Xeon E5-2670
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2667
Intel Xeon E5-2660
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2650
Intel Xeon E5-2670
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2660
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
Intel Xeon E5-2670
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2680
Intel Xeon E5-2660
vs
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2670
vs
Intel Xeon E5-4640 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2660
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2667
Intel Xeon E5-2670
vs
Intel Xeon E5-1620
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Intel Xeon E5-2660
1 User reviews
Intel Xeon E5-2660
10. 0/10
1 User reviews
Intel Xeon E5-2670
1 User reviews
Intel Xeon E5-2670
10.0/10
1 User reviews
Features
Value for money
10.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Performance
10.0/10
1 votes
10.0/10
1 votes
Reliability
10.0/10
1 votes
5.0/10
1 votes
Energy efficiency
6.0/10
1 votes
4.0/10
1 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
8 x 2.2GHz
8 x 2.6GHz
The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2.CPU threads
More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3.turbo clock speed
3.3GHz
When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4.L3 cache
A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
5.L1 cache
A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6.L2 cache
A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7.L2 core
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
8.clock multiplier
The clock multiplier controls the speed of the CPU.
9.Has an unlocked multiplier
✖Intel Xeon E5-2660
✖Intel Xeon E5-2670
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
Memory
1.Supports ECC memory
✔Intel Xeon E5-2660
✔Intel Xeon E5-2670
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
51.2GB/s
51.2GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
DDR (Double Data Rate) memory is the most common type of RAM. Newer versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy-efficient.
4.maximum memory amount
The maximum amount of memory (RAM) supported.
5.RAM speed
1600MHz
1600MHz
It can support faster memory, which will give quicker system performance.
6.memory channels
More memory channels increases the speed of data transfer between the memory and the CPU.
7.bus speed
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
8.bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between different components of a computer or device.
9.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
A higher version of eMMC allows faster memory interfaces, having a positive effect on the performance of a device. For example, when transferring files from your computer to the internal storage over USB.
Features
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Xeon E5-2660
✔Intel Xeon E5-2670
Multithreading technology (such as Intel’s Hyperthreading or AMD’s Simultaneous Multithreading) provides increased performance by splitting each of the processor’s physical cores into virtual cores, also known as threads. This way, each core can run two instruction streams at once.
2.SSE version
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing an image or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
3.Has AES
✔Intel Xeon E5-2660
✔Intel Xeon E5-2670
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
4.Has AVX
✔Intel Xeon E5-2660
✔Intel Xeon E5-2670
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial apps, as well as improving Linux RAID software performance.
5.bits executed at a time
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
NEON provides acceleration for media processing, such as listening to MP3s.
6.front-end width
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
The CPU can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), meaning that the CPU performs better
7.Has F16C
✖Intel Xeon E5-2660
✖Intel Xeon E5-2670
F16C is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
8.Has FMA3
✖Intel Xeon E5-2660
✖Intel Xeon E5-2670
FMA3 is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
9. Has FMA4
✖Intel Xeon E5-2660
✖Intel Xeon E5-2670
FMA4 is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting the contrast of an image or adjusting volume.
Benchmarks
1.Cinebench R20 (multi) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
2.Cinebench R20 (single) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark tool that measures a CPU’s single-core performance by rendering a 3D scene.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s multi-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Geekbench 5 result (single)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures a processor’s single-core performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
5.PassMark result
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using multiple threads.
6.PassMark result (single)
This benchmark measures the performance of the CPU using a single thread.
7.performance per watt
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
This means the CPU is more efficient, giving a greater amount of performance for each watt of power used.
8.Blender (bmw27) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
The Blender (bmw27) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
9.Blender (classroom) result
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures the performance of a processor by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render the scene in less time.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best Enterprise CPUs?
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Buy on Amazon
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 10
- 4 more threads: 24 vs 20
- Around 7% higher maximum core temperature: 84.5°C vs 79°C
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark — CPU mark: 22855 vs 22254
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core: 7047 vs 5962
Number of cores | 12 vs 10 |
Number of threads | 24 vs 20 |
Maximum core temperature | 84.5°C vs 79°C |
PassMark — CPU mark | 22855 vs 22254 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 7047 vs 5962 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 3. 30 GHz vs 3.10 GHz
- Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark — Single thread mark: 1826 vs 1665
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 — Single Core: 754 vs 705
Maximum frequency | 3.30 GHz vs 3.10 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 120 Watt |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1826 vs 1665 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 754 vs 705 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|
||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|
||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|
||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1665 | 1826 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 22855 | 22254 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 705 | 754 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 7047 | 5962 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture codename | Haswell | Haswell |
Launch date | Q3’14 | Q3’14 |
Place in performance rating | 872 | 847 |
Processor Number | E5-2670V3 | E5-2660V3 |
Series | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v3 Family | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v3 Family |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2. 30 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
Bus Speed | 9.6 GT/s QPI | 9.6 GT/s QPI |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 84.5°C | 79°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.10 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
Number of cores | 12 | 10 |
Number of QPI Links | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 24 | 20 |
VID voltage range | 0. 65V–1.30V | 0.65V–1.30V |
Max memory channels | 4 | 4 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 68 GB/s |
Maximum memory size | 768 GB | 768 GB |
Supported memory types | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
Package Size | 52. 5mm x 45mm | 52.5mm x 45mm |
Sockets supported | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA2011-3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 105 Watt |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 40 | 40 |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | x4, x8, x16 | x4, x8, x16 |
Scalability | 2S | 2S |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX2 | Intel® AVX2 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 46-bit | 46-bit |
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 with others
Intel
Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs
Intel
Xeon E3-1275 v3
Intel
Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs
AMD
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Intel
Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs
AMD
Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Intel
Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs
AMD
Opteron 3365
Intel
Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs
Intel
Xeon E3-1281 v3
Intel
Xeon E5-2670 v3
vs
Intel
Xeon E3-1270 v5
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 vs Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
|
|
|
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 vs Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 on one side and the Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the server sector, It has 10 cores, 20 threads, a maximum frequency of 3,3GHz. The second is used on the server segment, it has a total of 10 cores, 20 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3,3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Processor | Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 | Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 | ||||||
Market (main) | Server | Server | ||||||
ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) | ||||||
Microarchitecture | Ivy Bridge | Haswell | ||||||
Core name | Ivy Bridge-EP | Haswell-EP | ||||||
Family | Xeon E5-2600 v2 | Xeon E5-2600 v3 | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec | BX80635E52670V2, CM8063501375000, QEN3, QF6V, SR1A7 |
BX80644E52660V3, CM8064401446117, QFRZ, QGP1, SR1XR |
||||||
Release date | Q3 2013 | Q3 2014 | ||||||
Lithography | 22 nm | 22 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 5. 780.000.000 | 7.680.000.000 | ||||||
Cores | 20 | 20 | ||||||
Threads | 40 | 40 | ||||||
Base frequency | 2,5 GHz | 2,6 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 3,3 GHz | 3,3 GHz | ||||||
Bus speed | 16 GT/s | 19,2 GT/s | ||||||
Cache memory | 50 MB | 50 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 1.536 GB | 1.536 GB | ||||||
Memory types | DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600/1866 | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 | ||||||
Max # of memory channels | 8 | 8 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 119,4 GB/s | 136 GB/s | ||||||
Max PCIe lanes | 80 | 80 | ||||||
TDP | 230 W | 210 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 750W ATX Power Supply | 750W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | None | None | ||||||
Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011-3 | ||||||
Compatible motherboard | Socket
LGA 2011 Motherboard |
Socket LGA 2011-3 Motherboard | ||||||
Maximum temperature | 82°C | 79°C | ||||||
Crypto engine | — | AES New Instructions, Secure Key |
||||||
Security | — | OS Guard, Trusted Execution Technology, Execute Disable Bit |
||||||
CPU-Z single thread | 314 | 331 | ||||||
CPU-Z multi thread | 7. 348 | 7.048 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 single thread | 167 | 145 | ||||||
Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 2.306 | 2.824 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 single thread | 258 | 322 | ||||||
Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 4.931 | 5.948 | ||||||
PassMark single thread | 1.688 | 1.776 | ||||||
PassMark CPU Mark | 21.139 | 22.223 | ||||||
(Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core |
2.944 | 3.228 | ||||||
(Linux 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core |
37. 311 | 39.985 | ||||||
(Linux) Geekbench 5 single core |
649 | 664 | ||||||
(Linux) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
9.818 | 10.051 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
540,2 GFLOPS | 690,5 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
162 pts / W | 190 pts / W | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that the thermal dissipation power of Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 is less. The Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
CPU-Z — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
314 7. 348 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
331 7.048 |
In single core, the difference is -5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.
Cinebench R15 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
145 2.824 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
167 2. 306 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 22%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
Cinebench R20 — Multi-thread & single thread score | |
---|---|
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
322 5.948 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
258 4. 931 |
In single core, the difference is 25%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 21%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such as a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
1.776 22.223 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
1. 688 21.139 |
In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 5%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows 64-bit | |
---|---|
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
3.033 28.372 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
2. 563 27.526 |
In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 3%.
On Linux 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux 64-bit | |
---|---|
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
3.228 39.985 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
2.944 37.311 |
In single core, the difference is 10%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.
On Mac OS X 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Mac OS X 64-bit | |
---|---|
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
2.707 38.587 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
2. 954 28.052 |
In single core, the difference is -8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 38%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Windows | |
---|---|
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
668 8. 278 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
560 8.251 |
In single core, the difference is 19%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 0%.
On Linux:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — Linux | |
---|---|
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
664 10.051 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
649 9.818 |
In single core, the difference is 2%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.
On macOS:
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — macOS | |
---|---|
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
808 10.309 |
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 |
661 8. 793 |
In single core, the difference is 22%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 17%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 AMD equivalentDual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 AMD equivalent
See also:
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2Dual Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 2.
6GHz 25MB Cache 10 Core Processor
Choose Your Options
Details & Specs
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2660 v3 (25M Cache, 2.60 GHz) | |
Essentials | |
Product Collection | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v3 Family |
Code Name | Products formerly Haswell |
Vertical Segment | Server |
Processor Number | E5-2660V3 |
Off Roadmap | No |
Status | Launched |
Launch Date | Q3’14 |
Lithography | 22 nm |
Recommended Customer Price | $1445. 00 — $1449.00 |
Performance | |
# of Cores | 10 |
# of Threads | 20 |
Processor Base Frequency | 2.60 GHz |
Max Turbo Frequency | 3.30 GHz |
Cache | 25 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
Bus Speed | 9.6 GT/s |
# of QPI Links | 2 |
TDP | 105 W |
VID Voltage Range | 0.65V–1.30V |
Memory Specifications | |
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type) | 768 GB |
Memory Types | DDR4 2133 |
Max # of Memory Channels | 4 |
Max Memory Bandwidth | 68 GB/s |
Physical Address Extensions | 46-bit |
ECC Memory Supported ‡ | Yes |
Expansion Options | |
Scalability | 2S |
PCI Express Revision | 3 |
PCI Express Configurations ‡ | x4, x8, x16 |
Max # of PCI Express Lanes | 40 |
Package Specifications | |
Sockets Supported | FCLGA2011-3 |
Max CPU Configuration | 2 |
TCASE | 79°C |
Package Size | 52. 5mm x 45mm |
Advanced Technologies | |
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡ | 2 |
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility ‡ | Yes |
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡ | Yes |
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) ‡ | Yes |
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡ | Yes |
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) ‡ | Yes |
Intel® TSX-NI | No |
Intel® 64 ‡ | Yes |
Instruction Set | 64-bit |
Instruction Set Extensions | Intel® AVX2 |
Idle States | Yes |
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | Yes |
Intel® Demand Based Switching | Yes |
Thermal Monitoring Technologies | Yes |
Intel® Flex Memory Access | No |
Intel® Identity Protection Technology ‡ | No |
Security & Reliability | |
Intel® AES New Instructions | Yes |
Secure Key | Yes |
Intel® OS Guard | Yes |
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡ | Yes |
Execute Disable Bit ‡ | Yes |
PLEASE NOTE — STOCK PHOTOS ARE SHOWN AND MAY NOT BE THE ACTUAL UNIT SHIPPED
- SKU:
- E5-2660-V3-SR1XR
- Condition:
- Refurbished
Additional Information
Original Manufacturer: |
Intel |
FORM FACTOR: |
LGA2011-3 |
BASE FREQUENCY: |
2. 6 GHz |
APPLICATION SPECIFIC: |
10 Cores |
MODEL: |
Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
SUPPORTED MEMORY: |
DDR4 2133 |
RECOMMENDED LIMIT: |
105 Watts |
PRODUCT TYPE: |
Xeon E5-2600 v3 Family |
Warranty Information
All Processors sold separate from a Workstation or Server configuration are covered by a «30 Day Money Back Guarantee», and a «90 Day Limited Replacement Warranty» from the initial date of purchase.
Related Products
Customers Also Viewed
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
The Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 operates with 10 cores and 20 CPU threads. It run at 3.00 GHz base 2.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 95 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 2011 CPU socket. This version includes 20.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 40 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Ivy Bridge EP Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2013
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
The Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4 operates with 14 cores and 20 CPU threads. It run at 3.20 GHz base 2.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 105 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 2011-3 CPU socket. This version includes 35.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR4-2400 RAM and features 3. 0 PCIe Gen 40 lanes. Tjunction keeps below — degrees C. In particular, Broadwell E Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2016
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
Compare Detail
2.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
10 | Cores | 14 |
3.00 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.20 GHz |
2.60 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.40 GHz |
Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
22 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
DirectX Version | ||
Max. displays | ||
DDR3-1600 | Memory | DDR4-2400 |
4 | Memory channels | 4 |
Max memory | ||
Yes | ECC | Yes |
— | L2 Cache | — |
20.00 MB | L3 Cache | 35.00 MB |
3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
40 | PCIe lanes | 40 |
22 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
LGA 2011 | Socket | LGA 2011-3 |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q3/2013 | Release date | Q1/2016 |
Show more data |
Show more data |
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn’t count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Electric Usage Estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)
Power cost, dollar per kWh
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 | Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4 | |
95 W | Max TDP | 105 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Popular Comparision
Comments
Has subobject
«Has subobject» is a predefined property representing a container construct and is provided by Semantic MediaWiki. |
Xeon E5-2670 v3 — Intel#io + |
base frequency | 2,300 MHz (2.3 GHz, 2,300,000 kHz) + |
bus links | 2 + |
bus rate | 9,600 MT/s (9.6 GT/s, 9,600,000 kT/s) + |
bus speed | 4,800 MHz (4.8 GHz, 4,800,000 kHz) + |
bus type | QPI + |
chipset | C610 Series + |
clock multiplier | 23 + |
core count | 12 + |
core family | 6 + |
core model | 3F + |
core name | Haswell EP + |
core stepping | M1 + |
core voltage | 1.82 V (18.2 dV, 182 cV, 1,820 mV) + |
cpuid | 306F2 + |
designer | Intel + |
die area | 306.18 mm² (0.475 in², 3.062 cm², 306,180,000 µm²) + |
family | Xeon E5 + |
first announced | September 8, 2014 + |
first launched | September 8, 2014 + |
full page name | intel/xeon e5/e5-2670 v3 + |
has advanced vector extensions | true + |
has advanced vector extensions 2 | true + |
has extended page tables support | true + |
has feature | Advanced Vector Extensions +, Advanced Vector Extensions 2 +, Advanced Encryption Standard Instruction Set Extension +, Hyper-Threading Technology +, Turbo Boost Technology 2. 0 +, Enhanced SpeedStep Technology +, Trusted Execution Technology +, Intel vPro Technology +, Intel VT-x +, Intel VT-d +, Extended Page Tables +, Secure Key Technology + and OS Guard + |
has intel enhanced speedstep technology | true + |
has intel secure key technology | true + |
has intel supervisor mode execution protection | true + |
has intel trusted execution technology | true + |
has intel turbo boost technology 2 0 | true + |
has intel vpro technology | true + |
has intel vt-d technology | true + |
has intel vt-x technology | true + |
has locked clock multiplier | true + |
has second level address translation support | true + |
has simultaneous multithreading | true + |
has x86 advanced encryption standard instruction set extension | true + |
instance of | microprocessor + |
io voltage | 1. 2 V (12 dV, 120 cV, 1,200 mV) + |
io voltage tolerance | 3% + |
isa | x86-64 + |
isa family | x86 + |
l1d$ description | 8-way set associative + |
l1d$ size | 0.375 MiB (384 KiB, 393,216 B, 3.662109e-4 GiB) + |
l1i$ description | 8-way set associative + |
l1i$ size | 0.375 MiB (384 KiB, 393,216 B, 3.662109e-4 GiB) + |
l2$ description | 8-way set associative + |
l2$ size | 3 MiB (3,072 KiB, 3,145,728 B, 0.00293 GiB) + |
l3$ description | 20-way set associative + |
l3$ size | 30 MiB (30,720 KiB, 31,457,280 B, 0.0293 GiB) + |
ldate | September 8, 2014 + |
main image | + |
manufacturer | Intel + |
market segment | Server + |
max case temperature | 349. 15 K (76 °C, 168.8 °F, 628.47 °R) + |
max cpu count | 2 + |
max memory | 804,864 MiB (824,180,736 KiB, 843,961,073,664 B, 786 GiB, 0.768 TiB) + |
max pcie lanes | 40 + |
max storage temperature | 398.15 K (125 °C, 257 °F, 716.67 °R) + |
microarchitecture | Haswell + |
min case temperature | 273.15 K (0 °C, 32 °F, 491.67 °R) + |
min storage temperature | 248.15 K (-25 °C, -13 °F, 446.67 °R) + |
model number | E5-2670 v3 + |
name | Xeon E5-2670 v3 + |
part number | CM8064401544801 + and BX80644E52670V3 + |
platform | Grantley EP 2S + |
process | 22 nm (0.022 μm, 2.2e-5 mm) + |
release price | $ 1,589.00 (€ 1,430.10, £ 1,287.09, ¥ 164,191.37) + |
s-spec | SR1XS + |
s-spec (qs) | QFS0 + and QGP2 + |
series | E5-2600 + |
smp max ways | 2 + |
tdp | 120 W (120,000 mW, 0. 161 hp, 0.12 kW) + |
technology | CMOS + |
thread count | 24 + |
transistor count | 4,700,000,000 + |
turbo frequency (10 cores) | 2,600 MHz (2.6 GHz, 2,600,000 kHz) + |
turbo frequency (11 cores) | 2,600 MHz (2.6 GHz, 2,600,000 kHz) + |
turbo frequency (12 cores) | 2,600 MHz (2.6 GHz, 2,600,000 kHz) + |
turbo frequency (1 core) | 3,100 MHz (3.1 GHz, 3,100,000 kHz) + |
turbo frequency (2 cores) | 3,100 MHz (3.1 GHz, 3,100,000 kHz) + |
turbo frequency (3 cores) | 2,900 MHz (2.9 GHz, 2,900,000 kHz) + |
turbo frequency (4 cores) | 2,800 MHz (2.8 GHz, 2,800,000 kHz) + |
turbo frequency (5 cores) | 2,700 MHz (2.7 GHz, 2,700,000 kHz) + |
turbo frequency (6 cores) | 2,600 MHz (2.6 GHz, 2,600,000 kHz) + |
turbo frequency (7 cores) | 2,600 MHz (2. 6 GHz, 2,600,000 kHz) + |
turbo frequency (8 cores) | 2,600 MHz (2.6 GHz, 2,600,000 kHz) + |
turbo frequency (9 cores) | 2,600 MHz (2.6 GHz, 2,600,000 kHz) + |
word size | 64 bit (8 octets, 16 nibbles) + |
Intel Xeon E5-2660 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670: What is the difference?
Smartphone-graphic conductive headphones
37 BALLLA
Intel Xeon E5-2660
39 Ballla
Intel Xeon E5-2670
9000) facts in comparison of
Intel Xeon E.ENEN EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EENTEL XEON EEL Why is Intel Xeon E5-2660 better than Intel Xeon E5-2670?
- 20W below TDP?
95W vs 115W
Why is Intel Xeon E5-2670 better than Intel Xeon E5-2660?
- 18. 18% higher CPU speed?
8 x 2.6GHz vs 8 x 2.2GHz - 0.3GHz higher turbo clock speed?
3.3GHz vs 3GHz - 4 higher hour multiplier?
26 vs 22 - 8.75% higher PassMark score?
13562 vs 12471 - 15.43% higher PassMark score (single)?
1721 vs 1491
Which comparisons are the most popular?
Intel Xeon E5-2660
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2640
Intel Xeon E5-2670
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2640
Intel Xeon E5-2660
VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000-000 1620
Intel Xeon E5-2670
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2620
Intel Xeon E5-2660
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2665
Intel Xeon E5-2670
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2660 V4
Intel Xeon E5-2660
VS
Intel Xeon E5-4640
Intel Xeon E5-2670
VS 9000 VS 9000-9000-000. 2650
Intel Xeon E5-2660
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2450
Intel Xeon E5-2670
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2667
INTEL XEON E5-2660
VS 9000 VS 9000 VS 9000 -2650
Intel Xeon E5-2670
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2680 V4
Intel Xeon E5-2660
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V5
INTEL XEON E5-2670
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2680000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 E5-2660
VS
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V3
Intel Xeon E5-2670
VS
Intel Xeon E5-4640 V4
Intel E5-2660 9000 9000 9000 VS
Intel Xeon ENTEL ENTEL ENTEL ENTEL ENTELA
Intel Xeon E5-2670
vs
Intel Xeon E5-1620
Comparison prices
Users reviews
General rating
Intel Xeon E5-2660
1 Reviews of users
Intel Xeon E5-2660
9000 9000 9000 1 REGULATIONS.
Intel Xeon E5-2670
1 User reviews
Intel Xeon E5-2670
10.0 /10
1 User reviews
Value for money
0003
10.0 /10
1 votes
10.0 /10
1 Votes
performance
10.0 /10
1 Votes
10.0 /10 9000 9000 9000
10.0 /10
1 Votes
5.0 /10
1 Votes
Energy
6.0 /10
1 Votes
40 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 /10
1 votes
Performance
1.CPU speed
8 x 2.2GHz
8 x 2.6GHz
). It is calculated by adding the clock speeds of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors, each group of cores.
2nd processor thread
More threads result in better performance and better multitasking.
3. speed turbo clock
3.3GHz
When the processor is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
4.L3 cache
More L3 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
5.L1 cache
More L1 cache results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
6.L2 Cache
More L2 scratchpad memory results in faster results in CPU and system performance tuning.
7.core L2
0.25MB/core
0.25MB/core
More data can be stored in the L2 scratchpad for access by each processor core.
8.hour multiplier
The hour multiplier controls the processor speed.
9. Has an unlocked multiplier of
✖Intel Xeon E5-2660
✖Intel Xeon E5-2670
Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier and are easier to overclock, allowing for better performance in games and other applications.
Memory
1.Supports memory debug code
✔Intel Xeon E5-2660
✔Intel Xeon E5-2670
Memory debug code can detect and repair data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
2.max memory bandwidth
51.2GB/s
51.2GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3rd DDR memory version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
DDR (Double Data Rate Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory) is the most common type of main memory. New versions of DDR memory support higher maximum speeds and are more energy efficient.
4.Maximum memory
Maximum memory (RAM).
5.RAM speed
1600MHz
1600MHz
Can support faster memory which speeds up system performance.
6.Memory channels
More memory channels increase the speed of data transfer between memory and processor.
7.bus frequency
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device
8.Bus transfer rate
The bus is responsible for transferring data between various components of a computer or device.
9.eMMC version
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
A newer version of eMMC — built-in flash memory card — speeds up the memory interface, has a positive effect on device performance, for example, when transferring files from a computer to internal memory via USB.
Functions
1.uses multithreading
✔Intel Xeon E5-2660
✔Intel Xeon E5-2670
physical processor core into logical cores, also known as threads. Thus, each core can run two instruction streams at the same time.
SSE version 2.
SSE is used to speed up multimedia tasks such as editing images or adjusting audio volume. Each new version contains new instructions and improvements.
3. Has AES
✔Intel Xeon E5-2660
✔Intel Xeon E5-2670
AES is used to speed up encryption and decryption.
4. Has AVX
✔Intel Xeon E5-2660
✔Intel Xeon E5-2670
AVX is used to help speed up calculations in multimedia, scientific and financial applications, and to improve the performance of the Linux RAID program.
5. bits transmitted at the same time
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
NEON provides faster media processing such as MP3 listening.
6.interface width
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
The processor can decode more instructions per clock (IPC), which means that the processor performs better such as adjusting the picture contrast or adjusting the volume.
8. Has FMA3
✖Intel Xeon E5-2660
✖Intel Xeon E5-2670
FMA3 is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
9. Has FMA4
✖Intel Xeon E5-2660
✖Intel Xeon E5-2670
FMA4 is used to speed up tasks such as adjusting image contrast or adjusting volume.
Geotagging
1. Cinebench R20 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
Cinebench R20 is a benchmark that measures the performance of a multi-core processor by rendering a 3D scene.
2.Cinebench R20 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
Cinebench R20 is a test to evaluate the performance of a single core processor when rendering a 3D scene.
3.Geekbench 5 result (multi-core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures multi-core processor performance. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
4.Geekbench 5 result (single core)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
Geekbench 5 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. (Source: Primate Labs, 2022)
5. PassMark result
This benchmark measures CPU performance using multi-threading.
6. PassMark result (single)
This test measures processor performance using a thread of execution.
7. performance per watt
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
This means that the processor is more efficient, resulting in more performance per watt of power used.
8. Blender test result (bmw27)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
The Blender benchmark (bmw27) measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
9. Blender result (classroom)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2660)
Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Intel Xeon E5-2670)
The Blender (classroom) benchmark measures CPU performance by rendering a 3D scene. More powerful processors can render a scene in a shorter time.
Price Match
Cancel
Which Enterprise Processors are Best?
This page is currently only available in English.
Comparison of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 processors by all known characteristics in the categories: General Information, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security and Reliability, Technology, Virtualization.
Analysis of processor performance by benchmarks: PassMark — Single thread mark, PassMark — CPU mark, Geekbench 4 — Single Core, Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core.
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
versus
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
Benefits
Reasons to choose Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- 2 more cores, more applications to run simultaneously: 4 vs 10
- About 7% more max core temperature: 84. 5°C vs 79°C
- About 3% more performance in PassMark — CPU mark benchmark: 22855 vs 22254
- Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core performance about 18% better: 7047 vs 5962
20
Number of cores | 12 vs 10 |
Number of threads | 24 vs 20 |
Maximum core temperature | 84.5°C vs 79°C |
PassMark — CPU mark | 22855 vs 22254 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 7047 vs 5962 |
Reasons to choose Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
- About 6% more clock speed: 3.30 GHz vs 3.10 GHz
- About 14% less power consumption: 105 Watt vs 120 Watt
- PassMark — Single thread mark about 10% more performance: 1826 vs 1665
- Geekbench 4 — Single Core about 7% more performance: 754 vs 705
3. 30 GHz vs 3.10 GHz | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 120 Watt |
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1826 vs 1665 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 754 vs 705 |
Benchmark comparison
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
PassMark — Single thread mark |
|
|||
PassMark — CPU mark |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Single Core |
|
|||
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core |
|
Name | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | Intel Xeon E5-2660v3 |
---|---|---|
PassMark — Single thread mark | 1665 | 1826 |
PassMark — CPU mark | 22855 | 22254 |
Geekbench 4 — Single Core | 705 | 754 |
Geekbench 4 — Multi-Core | 7047 | 5962 |
Feature comparison
Intel Xeon E5-2670v3 | Intel Xeon E5-2660v3 | |
---|---|---|
Architecture name | Haswell | Haswell |
Production date | Q3’14 | Q3’14 |
Place in the ranking | 872 | 847 |
Processor Number | E5-2670V3 | E5-2660V3 |
Series | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v3 Family | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v3 Family |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Applicability | Server | Server |
Support 64 bit | ||
Base frequency | 2. 30 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
Bus Speed | 9.6 GT/s QPI | 9.6 GT/s QPI |
Process | 22nm | 22nm |
Maximum core temperature | 84.5°C | 79°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.10 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
Number of cores | 12 | 10 |
Number of QPI Links | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 24 | 20 |
Permissible core voltage | 0. 65V–1.30V | 0.65V–1.30V |
Maximum number of memory channels | 4 | 4 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 68 GB/s |
Maximum memory size | 768GB | 768GB |
Supported memory types | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Maximum number of processors in | 2 | 2 |
Package Size | 52. 5mm x 45mm | 52.5mm x 45mm |
Supported sockets | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA2011-3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 105 Watt |
Number of PCI Express lanes | 40 | 40 |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | x4, x8, x16 | x4, x8, x16 |
Scalability | 2S | 2S |
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection Technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key Technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology (TXT) | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology | ||
Idle States | ||
Extended instructions | Intel® AVX2 | Intel® AVX2 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 46-bit | 46-bit |
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |
Comparison Intel Xeon E5-2660 vs Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 which is better?
Home / Intel Xeon E5-2660 VS Intel Xeon E5-2670 V3
Intel Xeon E5-2660
5%
Devicelist
VS
Intel Xeon E5-2670 V3
6% 9000% 9000% 9000% 9000% 9000% 9000% DeviceList Score
We compared the specifications of Intel Xeon E5-2660 and Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 and compiled a list of benefits and comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.
Benefits of Intel Xeon E5-2660
Release price |
$85 -1504 $ (-94.7%) better than vs 1589 $ |
Value for money |
56.3% 49.7% (753%) better than vs 6.6% |
Maximum core temperature |
73°C -12°C (-14.1%) better than vs 85 °C |
Power Demand (TDP) |
95 W -25 W (-20.8%) better than vs 120 W |
Benefits of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Comparison winner
Core |
12 4 (50%) better than vs 8 |
threads |
24 8 (50%) better than vs 16 |
Maximum frequency |
3. 1 GHz 0.1 GHz (3.3%) better than vs 3 GHz |
Process |
22 nm -10 nm (-31.2%) better than vs 32 nm |
Number of transistors |
4700 million 4698 million (234900%) better than vs 2 million |
Passmark |
12901 for 4957 (62.4%) better than vs 7944 |
Permissible memory size |
768 GB 384 GB (100%) better than vs 384 GB |
General | |
Type |
|
Server | Server |
Architecture code name |
|
Sandy Bridge-EP | Haswell |
Cores A large number of cores improves performance in multi-threaded applications. |
|
8 | 12
4 (50%) better than |
Threads More threads help the cores process information more efficiently. Real performance will be noticeable in very specific tasks (video editing, databases). |
|
16 | 24
8 (50%) better than |
Base frequency |
|
2.2 GHz | n/a |
Process |
|
32 nm | 22 nm
-10 nm (-31.2%) better than |
Chip size |
|
435 mm2 | 306.18 mm2 |
Number of transistors |
|
2 million | 4700 million
4698 million (234900%) better than |
Maximum frequency Higher clock speed processors perform more calculations per second and thus provide better performance. |
|
3 GHz | 3.1 GHz
Better at 0.1 GHz (3.3%) than |
Support 64 bit |
|
Max. number of processors per configuration |
|
2 | 2 |
Socket |
|
FCLGA2011 | FCLGA2011-3 |
Series |
|
n/a | Intel Xeon E5 |
Release price |
|
$85
-1504 $ (-94.7%) better than |
1589 $ |
Value for money The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. |
|
56.3%
49.7% (753%) better than |
6.6% |
Tire |
|
n/a | 2 × 9. 6 GT/s |
Maximum core temperature |
|
73 °C
-12 °C (-14.1%) better than |
85°C |
vPro |
|
TXT Intel Trusted Execution Technology for hardware-based malware protection. For each protected program, the processor allocates its own isolated section of RAM. |
|
PCI Express revision |
|
3.0 | 3.0 |
Number of PCI-Express lanes |
|
40 | 40 |
Demand Based Switching |
|
+ | + |
PAE |
|
n/a | 46 bit |
Secure Key |
|
OS Guard |
|
n/a | + |
Flex Memory Access |
|
— | — |
FMA |
|
no data | + |
Level 1 Cache The fastest level of cache that works directly with the core. The larger the cache, the better the performance. |
|
64 KB (per core) | n/a |
Level 2 cache |
|
256 KB (per core) | 3 Mb |
Level 3 cache |
|
20480 Kb (total) | 30 Mb |
Power Demand (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, |
|
95W
-25 W (-20.8%) better than |
120 W |
EDB |
|
+ | + |
Permissible core voltage |
|
0.6V-1.35V | 0.65V–1.3V |
12901
4957 (62.4%) better than |
Technologies and Supplementary Instructions | ||
Advanced Instructions | Intel® AVX2 | |
Turbo Boost |
||
2. 0 | 2.0 | |
Idle States |
||
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) Technology from Intel that allows the processor to slow down to its lowest frequency to conserve power when the processor is idle. |
||
Thermal Monitoring |
||
Hyper-Threading Hardware technology from Intel that allows multiple threads to be processed on each processor core. For server applications, the performance improvement is up to 30%. |
||
AES-NI Technology from Intel that speeds up the AES encryption process. |
||
+ | + | |
AVX The presence of AVX instructions improves performance in floating point and processor-intensive operations |
||
RAM parameters | |
RAM types |
|
0550 | DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133 |
Allowable memory The maximum amount of RAM that can be used with this processor. |
|
384 GB | 768 GB
384 GB (100%) better than |
Number of memory channels |
|
4 | 4 |
ECC memory support EEC memory is designed specifically for systems with high requirements for data processing reliability. |
|
Virtualization technologies | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VT-x |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPT |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VT-d Virtualization technology from Intel allows you to forward devices on the PCI bus to the guest operating system so that it can work with them using its standard tools. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Simple household tasks |
Xeon E5-2690 v2 55.8 (+12.5%) Xeon E5-2670 v2 48.8 |
Demanding games and tasks |
Xeon E5-2690 v2 42. 8 (+22.7%) Xeon E5-2670 v2 33.1 |
Extreme |
Xeon E5-2690 v2 19.7 (+26.4%) Xeon E5-2670 v2 14.5 |
Different tasks require different CPU strengths. A system with few fast cores and low memory latency will be fine for the vast majority of games, but will be inferior to a system with a lot of slow cores in a rendering scenario.
We believe that a minimum of 4/4 (4 physical cores and 4 threads) processor is suitable for a budget gaming PC. At the same time, some games can load it at 100%, slow down and freeze, and performing any tasks in the background will lead to a drop in FPS.
Ideally, the budget shopper should aim for a minimum of 4/8 and 6/6. A gamer with a big budget can choose between 6/12, 8/8 and 8/16. Processors with 10 and 12 cores can perform well in games with high frequency and fast memory, but are overkill for such tasks. Also, buying for the future is a dubious undertaking, since in a few years many slow cores may not provide sufficient gaming performance.
When choosing a processor for your work, consider how many cores your programs use. For example, photo and video editors can use 1-2 cores when working with filtering, and rendering or converting in the same editors already uses all threads.
Data obtained from tests by users who tested their systems both with overclocking (maximum value in the table) and without (minimum). A typical result is shown in the middle, the more filled in the color bar, the better the average result among all tested systems.
Benchmarks
Benchmarks were run on stock hardware, that is, without overclocking and with factory settings. Therefore, on overclocked systems, the points can noticeably differ upwards. Also, small performance changes may be due to the BIOS version.
Cinebench R15 Multi Core
Intel E5-2690 V2
1413 (+28.7%)
Intel Xeon E5-2670 V2
9000 9000 Geekbench 5 Multi Core
INTELAL (+11.9%)
Intel Xeon E5-2670 V2
5876
Geekbench 3 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5-2690 V2
26502 Intel Xeon E5-2670 V2
2670 (+0.000)
Geekbench 3 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
37960
Intel Xeon E5-2670 V2
48560 (+21.8%)
Cinebench R11.5
Intel Xeon E5-2690 V2
1.39 (+0.7%)
Intel ENTEL ENTEL ENTEL ENTEL ENTEL ENTEL ENTEL ENTELA V2
1.38
Cinebench R11.5
Intel Xeon E5-2690 V2
14.66 (+11.8%)
Intel Xeon E5-2670 V2
Intel XEON ENTEL XEON ENTEL XEN 13109 (+13.6%)
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
11328
Characteristics
The data is not yet filled in, so the tables may lack information or existing functions may be omitted.
Basic
Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
DescriptionInformation about the processor, taken from the official website of the manufacturer. | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2690 v2 (25M Cache, 3.00 GHz) | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2670 v2 (25M Cache, 2.50 GHz) |
ArchitectureCode name for the microarchitecture generation. | Ivy Bridge EP | Ivy Bridge EP |
Process The manufacturing process, measured in nanometers. The smaller the technical process, the more perfect the technology, the lower the heat dissipation and power consumption. | 22 nm | 22 nm |
Release dateMonth and year of the processor’s availability. | 10-2017 | 10-2016 |
Model Official name. | E5-2690V2 | E5-2670V2 |
Cores The number of physical cores. | 10 | 10 |
ThreadsNumber of threads. The number of logical processor cores that the operating system sees. | 20 | 20 |
Multi-Threading Technology With Intel’s Hyper-threading and AMD’s SMT technology, one physical core is recognized as two logical cores by the operating system, thereby increasing processor performance in multi-threaded applications. | Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). | Hyper-threading (note that some games may not work well with Hyper-threading, you can disable the technology in the BIOS of the motherboard for maximum FPS). |
Base frequencyGuaranteed frequency of all processor cores at maximum load. Performance in single-threaded and multi-threaded applications and games depends on it. It is important to remember that speed and frequency are not directly related. For example, a new processor at a lower frequency may be faster than an old one at a higher one. | 3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Turbo FrequencyThe maximum frequency of a single processor core in turbo mode. Manufacturers allow modern processors to independently increase the frequency of one or more cores under heavy load, due to which performance is noticeably increased. It may depend on the nature of the load, the number of loaded cores, temperature and the specified limits. Significantly affects the speed in games and applications that are demanding on the frequency of the CPU. | 3.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
L3 cache size The third level cache acts as a buffer between the computer’s RAM and the processor’s level 2 cache. Used by all cores, the speed of information processing depends on the volume. | 25 MB | 25 MB |
Instructions | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Extended instruction set Allows you to speed up calculations, processing and execution of certain operations. Also, some games require instruction support. | AVX | AVX |
Embedded Options Available Two enclosure versions. Standard and designed for mobile devices. In the second version, the processor can be soldered on the motherboard. | No | No |
Bus frequency The speed of communication with the system. | 8 GT/s QPI | 8 GT/s QPI |
Number of QPI links | 2 | 2 |
TDPThermal Design Power is an indicator that determines the heat dissipation in standard operation. The cooler or water cooling system must be rated for a larger value. Remember that with a factory bus or manual overclocking, TDP increases significantly. | 130 W | 115 W |
Cooling system specifications |
Video core
Integrated graphics core Allows you to use your computer without a discrete graphics card. The monitor is connected to the video output on the motherboard. If earlier integrated graphics made it possible to simply work at a computer, today it can replace budget video accelerators and makes it possible to play most games at low settings. | ||
GPU base clockFrequency in 2D and idle. | No data | No data |
Maximum GPU frequencyMaximum 3D frequency. | No data | No data |
Intel® Wireless Display (Intel® WiDi) Supports Wireless Display technology using the Wi-Fi 802.11n standard. Thanks to it, a monitor or TV equipped with the same technology does not require a cable to connect. | ||
Supported monitorsThe maximum number of monitors that can be connected to the integrated video core at the same time. |
RAM
Maximum RAM Amount of RAM that can be installed on the motherboard with this processor. | 768 GB | 768 GB |
Supported type of RAM The type of RAM depends on its frequency and timings (speed), availability, price. | DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600/1866 | DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600/1866 |
RAM Channels The multi-channel memory architecture increases data transfer speed. On desktop platforms, two-channel, three-channel and four-channel modes are available. | 4 | 4 |
RAM bandwidth | 59.7 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |
ECC memory Support for error-correcting memory that is used in servers. Usually more expensive than usual and requires more expensive server components. However, second-hand server processors, Chinese motherboards and ECC memory sticks, which are sold relatively cheaply in China, have become widespread. | No data | No data |
PCI
PCI-E The PCI Express computer bus version. The bandwidth and power limit depend on the version. There is backward compatibility. | 3 | 3 |
PCI | x4, x8, x16 | x4, x8, x16 |
Number of PCI lanes | 40 | x4, x8, x16 |
Data Security
AES-NI The AES command set extension speeds up applications that use appropriate encryption. | No data | No data |
Intel® Secure Key An RDRAND instruction that allows you to create a high performance random number generator. | No data | No data |
Decoration
Dimensions | No data | No data |
Supported sockets | No data | No data |
Maximum processors per motherboard | No data | No data |
Which is better
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
- On average, gaming performance is 8% better.
- The speed of work in office applications and browsers is increased by 7%.
- In complex multi-threaded applications, faster and outperforms by 5%.
- The base frequency is 0.5 GHz higher.
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
- The price is $153 lower.
How are they similar?
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 runs with 12 and 24 CPU threads It runs at 3.10 GHz base 2.70 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 120 W . Processor plugs into LGA 2011-3 CPU socket This version includes 30.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 4 to support DDR4-2133 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 40 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, Haswell E Architecture is advanced beyond 22 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q3/2014
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4 runs with 14 and 24 CPU threads It runs at 3.20 GHz base 2.40 GHz all cores while TDP is set to 105 W . Processor connects to LGA CPU socket 2011-3 This version includes 35.00 MB of L3 cache on a single die, supports 4 to support DDR4-2400 RAM, and supports 3.0 PCIe Gen 40 . Tjunction is kept below — degrees C. In particular, the Broadwell E Architecture is advanced beyond 14 nm and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d . The product was launched Q1/2016
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
Show more details
Show more details
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11. 5 and is also based on Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor to Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is software used all over the world to create 3D forms. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a memory-intensive, cross-platform benchmark. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross-platform benchmark that is memory intensive. A fast memory will greatly push the result. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The single-core test uses only one CPU core, the number of cores or hyper-threading capability is not taken into account.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The multi-core test uses all the CPU cores and has a big advantage of hyper-threading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the processors listed below have been tested with CPU-Comparison. However, most of the processors were not tested and the results were evaluated by the secret patented CPU-Comparison formula. As such, they do not accurately reflect the actual values of Passmark CPU ratings and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Energy usage estimate
Average hours of use per day
Average CPU usage (0-100%)
Cost of electricity, USD/kWh
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | Intel Xeon E5-2660v4 | |
120 W | Max TDP | 105W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Operating cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Operating cost per year | NA |
popular comparison
Comments
It’s time to choose the winner. What is the difference and which is better in Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Intel Core i7-8700K comparison? Which processor is more powerful and faster? It is quite simple to determine — look at the comparative table of all characteristics. A processor with more cores/threads, as well as a higher frequency and large L2-L3 is the absolute winner!
Cores, base and turbo frequency of the processor
Who will win in the comparison of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Intel Core i7-8700K. The overall performance of a processor can be easily determined based on the number of cores, threads, base and turbo clock speed + L2-L3 volume. The more cores, L3, and clock speed, the more efficient the processor. Please note that high specifications require the use of a powerful cooling system.
2.30 GHz
Clock frequency
3.70 GHZ
12
Nuclei
6
3.10 GHZ
turbo (1 core)
4.70 GHZ
24
Number No
Overclocking
Yes
2. 70 GHz
Turbo (12 Cores)
Turbo (6 cores)
4.30 GHz
Processor family and generation19
0020 Internal graphics
It’s hard to compare Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs. Intel Core i7-8700K when graphics card function and specifications matter only in laptops. In workstations, this is not an advantage, due to the installation of an additional graphics accelerator.
GPU name
Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU frequency
0.35 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
1.20 GHz
Generation
9.5
version DirectX
12
Executive blocks
24
Number of shaders
—
Maximum memory
64 GB
3
Technology 9000 9000 9000 14 nm
Release date
Q4/2017
Hardware codec support
Here we are dealing with specifications that are used by some processor manufacturers. These figures are mostly technical and can be disregarded for comparative purposes.
No
h364
Decode / Encode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode
No
h365 8bit
Decode / Encode
No
h365 10bit
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
Decode / ENCODE
No
VP9
Decode / Encode
NO
VC-1
Decode
NO
AVC
Decode / ENCODE / ENCODE0003
RAM and PCIe
These are the memory standards supported by processors. The processor can support multi-channel RAM with a high clock speed, this directly affects its speed and performance.
DDR4-2133
Memorial type
DDR4-2666
Maximum memory
128 GB
4,0002 Memory channels
2
YES
ECC
No
9000
002 3.0
version PCIE
3.0
40
PCIE Lines
16
Crystation
Support for data encryption
YES
AES-Ni
YES
Memory & AMP; PCIe
Thermal management and TDP
Today’s systems are loaded with demanding games and workloads, which consequently unleash the full potential of the processor. When choosing between Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Intel Core i7-8700K, it is better to choose the option with less heat dissipation (TDP).
120 W
TDP
95 W
—
Maximum temperature
—
—
Maximum TDP
—
TDP Download
—
Technical details
30.00 MB
L3-CACHE
12.00 MB
22 NM
Technology
14 NM
Haswell E
Architecture
COFEE LAKE
9000 VT-X, VT-X EPT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT, VT -d, vPro
Virtualization
VT-X, VT-X EPT, VT-D
LGA 2011-3
SOCKET (connector)
LGA 1151-2
Q3/2014
Output
Q4/2017
Price
ca. 370 $
Instructions set (ISA)
EM64T
L2-CACHE
1.502 1.50 MB
Part Number
BX80684I78700K
devices compatible with this processor
You probably already know which devices use the processors. It can be a desktop computer or a laptop.
Unknown
Used in
PC
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
This synthetic benchmark will help you determine the actual processing power of a single CPU core. Cinebench R11.5 is based on MAXON CINEMA 4D and uses various test scenarios
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
149 (60%)
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
248 (100%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11.5 performs simultaneous cross-platform tests on all processor cores. Running realistic 3D scenes, this benchmark will unleash the full potential of your single-core Intel or AMD
processor
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
1754 (100%)
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
1596 (90%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on Cinema 4D Suite, a popular software for creating shapes and other things in 3D. The iGPU test uses the processor’s internal graphics unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2. 30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
532 (100%)
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The latter is used to create 3D models and shapes. Cinebench R15 is used to benchmark the performance of single core processors. Hyperthreading capability is not taken into account. It is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5. Like all new versions, the updated benchmark is based on Cinema 4 Suite 9 software0003
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
119 (57%)
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3. 70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
208 (100%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 can be used to test the performance of multi-core processors. The test produces accurate and reliable results. This benchmark is an updated version of Cinebench 11.5, which is based on Cinema 4 Suite soft.
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
1723 (100%)
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
1447 (83%)
Cinebench R20 (Single Core)
Cinebench R20 is based on Cinema 4 Suite. This is software used to create 3D shapes. The benchmark runs in single-core mode without considering the possibility of hyper-threading.
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
487 (100%)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
This is a new version of the benchmark based on Cinebench R15 (both versions are based on Cinema 4, the most popular 3D modeling software). Cinebench R20 is used for benchmark tests of multi-core processor performance and hyper-threading capability.
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2. 30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
3689 (100%)
Cinebench R23 (Single Core)
Cinebench R23 is a new version of the most popular single-core CPU rendering benchmark Cinebench. We have results for all modern processors
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
1209 (100%)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is a new version of the most popular multi-core CPU rendering benchmark, Cinebench. We have results for all modern processors
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
8960 (100%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a benchmark for 64-bit Intel and AMD processors. It uses a new power rating system for a single processor core. This software simulates real scenarios for accurate results
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
3221 (60%)
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3. 70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
5330 (100%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 supports multi-core AMD and Intel processors. Being based on MAXON CINEMA 4D, it allows you to get the real comparative potential of the processor
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
36612 (100%)
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
27445 (74%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is the latest software. Completely new algorithms provide fairly accurate test results for single-core processors.
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
701 (54%)
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
1283 (100%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 software package shows benchmark results for memory performance and multi-core processor speed. This takes into account the ability to hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
6951 (100%)
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3. 70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
6693 (96%)
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
We use the Blender benchmark to monitor CPU performance. Test results show how fast the device performs when performing multi-processor tasks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
2324 (100%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
It tests all and general CPU performance (math calculations, compression and decompression speed, 2D&3D graphics tests). Please note that data may differ from actual situations.
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
16765 (100%)
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3.70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
16265 (97%)
iGPU — FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
This test measures the performance of integrated graphics on Intel and AMD processors. The result is the calculated processing power in Single-Precision mode FP32
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
12x 2.30 GHz (3.10 GHz) HT
Intel Core i7-8700K
6x 3. 70 GHz (4.70 GHz) HT
461 (100%)
Popular processor comparisons
one. |
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs. Intel Core i7-8700K |
|
2. |
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs. Intel Core i5-10600K |
|
3. |
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
four. |
Intel Core i7-12700K vs. Intel Core i7-8700K |
|
5. |
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|
6. |
Intel Core i7-8700K vs. Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
7. |
Intel Core i7-8700K vs. Intel Celeron 3865U |
|
eight. |
AMD A10-5700 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|
9. |
Intel Core i7-8700K vs. AMD A8-7650K |
|
ten. |
Intel Core i5-4690 vs. Intel Core i7-8700K |
|
eleven. |
Intel Core i7-8700K vs. Intel Core M-5Y10 |
|
12. |
Intel Core i7-1160G7 vs. Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|
13. |
AMD A10-4600M vs. Intel Core i7-8700K |
|
fourteen. |
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs. Intel Atom x5-E8000 |
|
fifteen.
|