AMD FirePro 2270 vs Nvidia GT 1030
UserBenchmark: AMD FirePro 2270 vs Nvidia GT 1030
- CPU
- GPU
- SSD
- HDD
- RAM
- USB
VS
YouTube*NEW*
About
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 172,287 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
171,815 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 15% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
Worst Bench: 12% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
Poor: 12%
Great: 15%
SPEED RANK: 228th / 688
472 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 1% Dell(1028 0126) 512MB
Worst Bench: 1% Dell(1028 0126) 512MB
Poor: 1%
Great: 1%
SPEED RANK: 590th / 688
| Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed |
14. |
Insanely faster effective speed. +1,562% |
0.86 % |
| Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
17.6 fps | Insanely better lighting effects. +1,331% |
1.23 fps | |||
| Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
17.1 fps | Hugely better reflection handling. +819% |
1.86 fps | |||
| MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
13.8 fps | Hugely faster multi rendering. +689% |
1.75 fps | |||
| Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
18. 8 fps |
Insanely faster NBody calculation. +2,511% |
0.72 fps |
| Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) |
19 fps | Insanely better peak lighting effects. +1,384% |
1.28 fps | |||
| Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) |
21.7 fps | Hugely better peak reflection handling. +843% |
2.3 fps | |||
| MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) |
16.3 fps | Hugely faster peak multi rendering. +715% |
2 fps | |||
| Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) |
20 fps | Insanely faster peak NBody calculation. +2,310% |
0.83 fps |
Market Share
Based on 56,032,894 GPUs tested.
See market share leaders
| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) |
0.63 % | Insanely higher market share. +∞% |
0 % | |||
| User Rating UBM User Rating |
60 % | More popular. +20% |
50 % |
| Age Newest |
65+ Months | Much more recent. +36% |
102+ Months | |||
| Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
19. 8 fps |
Insanely better peak texture detail. +1,137% |
1.6 fps | |||
| Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
17.9 fps | Hugely faster peak complex splatting. +842% |
1.9 fps | |||
| Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) |
17.7 fps | Insanely better texture detail. +1,064% |
1.52 fps | |||
| Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) |
16.3 fps | Hugely faster complex splatting. +876% |
1.67 fps |
ADVERTISEMENT
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build)
Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.
CHOOSE A COMPONENT:
CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance)
November 2022 GPU Rankings.
We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated — User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money — Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed — Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build)
Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming
Desktop
ProGaming
CPUGPUSSDHDDRAMUSB
How it works
- — Download and run UserBenchmark.
- — CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- — GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- — Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- — RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- — SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
- — Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- — Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- — See speed test results from other users.
- — Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- — Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- — Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best User Rated
-
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
-
Nvidia RTX 3070
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
-
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
-
Nvidia RTX 3080
-
Nvidia RTX 4090
-
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
-
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB
-
Nvidia RTX 2060
-
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
-
AMD RX 6600-XT
-
AMD RX 5600-XT
About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube
Feedback
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs AMD FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 and AMD FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
Buy on Amazon
vs
AMD FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
Buy on Amazon
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 92% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 6.9x more texture fill rate: 33.1 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
- 11x better floating-point performance: 1,059 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 2100 MHz vs 1200 MHz
| Launch date | 12 March 2018 vs 31 January 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1152 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 33. 1 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,059 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 2100 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
GPU 2: AMD FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 | AMD FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 636 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 | AMD FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GP108 | Cedar |
| Launch date | 12 March 2018 | 31 January 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1396 | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Boost clock speed | 1379 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1152 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,059 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 33. 1 GTexel / s |
4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 292 million |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x DMS-59 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Length | 145 mm | 170 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| DirectX | 12. 0 (12_1) |
11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.8 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 with others
NVIDIA
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
vs
NVIDIA
GeForce 7100 + nForce 630i
NVIDIA
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
vs
ATI
Radeon HD 3650
NVIDIA
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
vs
NVIDIA
Quadro FX 770M
NVIDIA
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
vs
AMD
Radeon HD 7650M
NVIDIA
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
vs
NVIDIA
GeForce GT 630 OEM
NVIDIA
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
vs
AMD
Radeon HD 8280E
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM and AMD FirePro 2270
Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM and AMD FirePro 2270 according to all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
versus
AMD FirePro 2270
Benefits
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
- Newer graphics card, approx. 875 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.9x more texture speed: 14 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more shader processors: 192 vs 80
- 3.5 times better floating point performance: 336.
0 gflops vs 96 gflops - A newer manufacturing process for the graphics card to make it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Maximum size 2 times more memory(s): 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 49% more memory frequency: 1782 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) performance 3 times more(a ) more: 0.475 vs 0.157
- About 94% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.19 vs 9.367
- 3.8x more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames): 2029 vs 539
3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps): 2029 vs 539
| Release date | 24 April 2012 vs 31 January 2011 |
| Core frequency | 875 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texturing speed | 14 GTexel/s vs 4. 8 GTexel/s |
| Number of shaders | 192 vs 80 |
| Floating point performance | 336.0 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Process | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory frequency | 1782 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.475 vs 0.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.19 vs 9.367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 2029 vs 539 |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
2029 vs 539 |
Reasons to choose AMD FirePro 2270
- 3.3 times less power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
| TDP | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro 2270
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|||
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|||
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) |
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM | AMD FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.907 | |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
182.993 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.475 | 0.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.65 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.19 | 9.367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) | 2029 | 539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 2029 | 539 |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 147 | |
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 195 | |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 2564 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Frames) |
1231 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 1231 |
Performance comparison
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM | AMD FirePro 2270 | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Codename | GK107 | Cedar |
| Production date | 24 April 2012 | 31 January 2011 |
| Place in the ranking | 1398 | 1388 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Core frequency | 875MHz | 600MHz |
| Floating point performance | 336. 0 gflops |
96 gflops |
| Process | 28nm | 40nm |
| Number of shaders | 192 | 80 |
| Texturing speed | 14 GTexel/s | 4.8 GTexel/s |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Number of transistors | 1,270 million | 292 million |
| Video connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DMS-59 |
| Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 |
PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145mm | 170mm |
| Additional power connectors | None | None |
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Maximum memory size | 1GB | 512MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 9.6 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory frequency | 1782 MHz | 1200MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4.
VS
General Information
The General Information section of the Video Card Comparison list provides release date, type, overall rating and other useful data to determine the winner between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4. Please note that the comparison takes place on all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that define different criteria in games and work applications.
1052
Position in the performance rating
2870
1.74
Price and quality ratio
0.27
Curie
Architecture
G71
2
Desktop
20 April 2006 (15 years ago)
Release date
12 March 2018
$699
Starting price
$ 79
$ 100 (0.1x MSRP)
Actual price
$ 100,0003
0.01
Reason and quality
no data
G71
Codular name GPU
No data
Worktation 9000
N/A
Specifications
Which graphics card is better in NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 comparison in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part contained in the ranking video cards.
No data
conveyors
384
325 MHZ
Tibility of the nucleus
1152 MHZ
Acceleration
1379 MHZ
278 Million
90 nm
Process
14 nm
65 Watt
Power Consumption (TDP)
20 Watt
7.800
Number of texels processed per second,
0003
33.10
No data
Operations with a swimming of
1.059 GFLOPS
278 Million
Number of transistors
No data
65 WATT
Size
None
Let’s discuss the dimensions (length, width, height) of NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 video cards. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces
PCIE 1.0 X16
Interface
PCIE 3.0 X4
173 MM
length
145 MM
None
Additional power
None
Memory (frequency and acceleration)
Memory plays an important role in games and graphics applications.
The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better. It directly affects the speed and efficiency of data processing. What is the difference in type, base and turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4:
GDDR3
Memorial type
DDR4
256 MB
Maximum RAM AMOUNT
2 GB
256 BIT
Memory Bit
64 BIT
1250 MHZ
200 MHA
Memo 40 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
16.8 GB/s
Port and display support
Let’s find out the difference in ports that NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 graphics cards are equipped with. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connections
1x DVI, 1x HDMI
API Support
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 is almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 benchmark comparison
Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards
| one. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 | |
| 2. |
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs. NVIDIA QuadroFX 1500
|
|
| 3. | AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 | |
| four. | NVIDIA QuadroFX 1500 vs. NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | |
| 5. |
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
|
|
| 6. | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 | |
| 7. | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs. NVIDIA GeForce 930M | |
| eight. |
AMD Radeon RX 590 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
|
|
| 9. | AMD Cayman vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 | |
| ten. | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs. AMD Radeon RX 480 | |
| eleven. |
NVIDIA QuadroFX 1500 vs. AMD FirePro 2270
|
|
| 12. | NVIDIA QuadroFX 1500 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 | |
| 13. | AMD Radeon RX 5500 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 | |
| fourteen. |
Intel HD Graphics 3000 vs.
|