Fx 5000m: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M — NotebookCheck.net Tech

25 февраля, 2023

Quadro 5000M vs Quadro FX 5800 Graphics cards Comparison

In this comparison between Quadro 5000M and Quadro FX 5800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today’s games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards’ performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don’t overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 5000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 5800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro 5000M

Check Price

Quadro FX 5800

Check Price

Quadro 5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5000M here:

Quadro 5000M Laptops

Main Specs

  Quadro 5000M Quadro FX 5800
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 189 Watt
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
 

Check Price

Check Price
  • Quadro FX 5800 has 89% more power consumption, than Quadro 5000M.
  • Quadro 5000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro FX 5800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
  • Quadro FX 5800 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 5000M.
  • Quadro 5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro FX 5800 — in Desktops.
  • Quadro 5000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro FX 5800 — with Tesla 2.0.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro FX 5800 is 205 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.
  • Quadro 5000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 5800 — by 55 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 5800 is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro 5000M.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 10−11 3−4
ultra / 1080p 6−7 1−2
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 21−24 14−16
medium / 1080p 12−14 5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p 16−18 8−9
ultra / 1080p 14−16 6−7
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 35−40 20−22
medium / 1080p 18−20 8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p 45−50 45−50
high / 1080p − 40−45
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
Quadro 5000M and Quadro FX 5800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p 170−180 120−130
medium / 768p 140−150 95−100
ultra / 1080p 70−75 45−50
QHD / 1440p 40−45 24−27
4K / 2160p 30−33 −
high / 768p 100−110 70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p 55−60 70−75
ultra / 1080p 27−30 20−22
medium / 1080p 45−50 40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 5800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 5000M.
low / 768p 95−100 75−80
medium / 768p 75−80 55−60
ultra / 1080p 45−50 30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p 12−14 4−5
ultra / 1080p 10−12 4−5
4K / 2160p 4−5 1−2
low / 720p 27−30 14−16
medium / 1080p 12−14 5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p 18−20 12−14
ultra / 1080p 14−16 7−8
QHD / 1440p − 4−5
low / 720p 75−80 55−60
medium / 1080p 35−40 16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Fortnite is 60% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p 16−18 7−8
ultra / 1080p 14−16 6−7
QHD / 1440p 4−5 0−1
low / 720p 35−40 21−24
medium / 1080p 20−22 9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p 65−70 50−55
medium / 768p 55−60 −
high / 1080p 18−20 9−10
ultra / 1080p 8−9 4−5
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
medium / 720p − 40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p 6−7 2−3
ultra / 1080p 5−6 0−1
4K / 2160p 1−2 0−1
low / 720p 18−20 8−9
medium / 1080p 9−10 4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p 100−110 85−90
high / 1080p − 65−70
ultra / 1080p 90−95 −
medium / 1080p 95−100 −
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p 18−20 −
ultra / 1080p 14−16 12−14
low / 720p 40−45 27−30
medium / 1080p 20−22 14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p 12−14 6−7
ultra / 1080p 8−9 4−5
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 18−20 8−9
medium / 1080p 12−14 8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p 35−40 18−20
medium / 768p 21−24 12−14
high / 1080p 12−14 6−7
ultra / 1080p 8−9 4−5
4K / 2160p 7−8 1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p 90−95 70−75
medium / 768p 50−55 35−40
ultra / 1080p 24−27 16−18
high / 768p 45−50 30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5000M in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Quadro FX 5800.

Full Specs

  Quadro 5000M Quadro FX 5800
Architecture Fermi Tesla 2.0
Code name Fermi GT200B
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Release date 27 July 2010 11 November 2008
Pipelines 320 240
Core clock speed 405 MHz 610 MHz
Transistor count 3,100 million 1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 55 nm
Texture fill rate 16. 20 48.80
Floating-point performance 518.4 gflops 622.1 gflops
Length 267 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 1200 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s 102.4 GB/s
Shared memory —
DirectX 12 (11_0) 11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model 5.1 4.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3
OpenCL 1.1 1.1
Vulkan N/A N/A
CUDA + 1. 3
Laptop size large
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • Quadro 5000M vs FirePro M5100
  • Quadro 5000M vs GeForce GTX 480M
  • Quadro FX 5800 vs FirePro M5100
  • Quadro FX 5800 vs GeForce GTX 480M
  • Quadro 5000M vs GeForce GTX 260
  • Quadro 5000M vs Quadro K620M
  • Quadro FX 5800 vs GeForce GTX 260
  • Quadro FX 5800 vs Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev.

2


Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 5000M and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies.
Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

Buy on Amazon


vs

NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2

Buy on Amazon

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 62% higher core clock speed: 405 MHz vs 250 MHz
  • 16. 2x more texture fill rate: 16.2 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 140 nm
  • 14x more maximum memory size: 1792 MB vs 128 MB
  • 6x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 400 MHz







Launch date 27 July 2010 vs 6 March 2003
Core clock speed 405 MHz vs 250 MHz
Texture fill rate 16.2 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 140 nm
Maximum memory size 1792 MB vs 128 MB
Memory clock speed 2400 MHz vs 400 MHz

Compare benchmarks


GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2


Name NVIDIA Quadro 5000M NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2
PassMark — G3D Mark 2060
PassMark — G2D Mark 426
Geekbench — OpenCL 23008
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 5249
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 5249
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 7205
GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) 7205

Compare specifications (specs)





















NVIDIA Quadro 5000M NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2
Architecture Fermi Rankine
Code name GF100 NV34 B1
Launch date 27 July 2010 6 March 2003
Place in performance rating 354 not rated
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Core clock speed 405 MHz 250 MHz
Floating-point performance 518. 4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 140 nm
Pipelines 320
Texture fill rate 16.2 GTexel / s 1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt
Transistor count 3,100 million 45 million
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Interface MXM-B (3. 0) AGP 8x
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors

None
DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 9.0a
OpenGL 4.6 1.5 (2.1)
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 128 MB
Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB / s 3.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 2400 MHz 400 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR
Shared memory 0
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
ECC (Error Correcting Code)

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare NVIDIA Quadro 5000M with others




NVIDIA
Quadro 5000M



vs



NVIDIA
Quadro FX 5500




NVIDIA
Quadro 5000M



vs



AMD
FirePro W7100




NVIDIA
Quadro 5000M



vs



AMD
FirePro W7170M




NVIDIA
Quadro 5000M



vs



AMD
FirePro W4300




NVIDIA
Quadro 5000M



vs



AMD
Radeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile




NVIDIA
Quadro 5000M



vs



AMD
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)

FX Series Industrial Fans Order online

FX Series Fans

The FX Series medium pressure industrial centrifugal fans have a volute-shaped steel welded casing. The fans are supplied with a bracket. They allow you to mount the fans to walls, ceilings, floors and welding tables through a flange, as well as orient the volute body in any position, including: parallel or perpendicular to the carrier plane. If necessary, the fans are equipped with a noise-absorbing housing (option).

EuroLux fans are used for various applications where extraction of clean or slightly polluted air is required (dust content not more than 0.1 g/m 3 ):

  • Exhaust removal
  • Smoke and oil mist removal
  • Removal of non-adhesive and non-explosive dust

    • Industrial centrifugal fans of the FX series, according to GOST 5976-90, are medium pressure fans.

    Performance range: 150-5000 m 3 /h.

    Pressure range: 300-3600 Pa.

    Advantages:

    • impeller with backward curved blades;
    • high efficiency;
    • low noise;
    • durable steel body.

    In addition, our design bureau developed a mobile version of the FX series fans, which received the FD marking, designed specifically to solve the problems of effectively maintaining sanitary and hygienic air parameters in industrial premises during welding work in hard-to-reach remote places and confined spaces, which is most in demand in such industries as shipbuilding, car building, mechanical engineering, etc.

    Model range and specifications
    Marking Specifications Weight and dimensions
    Model Art. No. Production m 3 /h Pressure, Pa Email power. kW Voltage Frequency, V / Hz L,

    mm

    		M,

    mm

    		H,

    mm

    		D

    mm

    		m,

    kg

    Small to medium capacity (floor or wall mounted)
    «FX-500» 110 19 09 150-900 1000-300 0.37 220 / 50 367 410 389 160 10
    110 19 01 150-900 1000-300 0.37 3×380 / 50 367 410 389 160 10
    «FX-800» 110 19 10 350-1400 1400-600 0. 55 220 / 50 382 613 516 200 19.6
    110 19 02 350-1400 1400-600 0.55 3×380 / 50 382 613 516 200 19.6
    «FX-1000» 110 19 11 300-1600 1600-500 0.75 220 / 50 396 613 517 200 22
    110 19 03 300-1600 1600-500 0.75 3×380 / 50 396 613 517 200 22
    «FX-1400» 110 19 12 500-2100 1600-700 1.1 220 / 50 420 700 655 250 24
    110 19 04 500-2100 1600-700 1. 1 3×380 / 50 420 700 655 250 24
    «FX-2000» 110 1913 800-2500 3300-900 1.5 220 / 50 411 722 655 250 28
    110 19 05 800-2500 3300-900 1.5 3×380 / 50 411 722 655 250 28
    «FX-2500» 110 19 06 700-3200 2600-800 2.2 3×380 / 50 492 648 568 250 37
    «FX-3000» 110 19 07 800-2700 3600-800 3.0 3×380 / 50 500 670 660 250 48
    «FX-5000» 110 19 08 1500-7000 3600-800 4. 0 3×380 / 50 535 720 702 315 64

    Compare NVIDIA Quadro 5000M and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 EP

    Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 5000M and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 EP video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
    Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T -Rex (Fps).

    NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

    versus

    NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 EP

    Benefits

    Reasons to choose NVIDIA Quadro 5000M

    • Newer graphics card, release date difference 5 year(s) 10 month(s)

      • times

      more: 16. 2 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s

    • A newer manufacturing process for the video card allows it to be more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 40 nm vs 130 nm
    • 14 times the maximum memory size(s): 1792 MB vs 128 MB
    • 6 times the memory frequency: 2400 MHz vs 400 MHz
    Release date 27 July 2010 vs 1 September 2004
    Texturing speed 16.2 GTexel/s vs 1.7 GTexel/s
    Process 40 nm vs 130 nm
    Maximum memory size 1792MB vs 128MB
    Memory frequency 2400 MHz vs 400 MHz

    Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 EP

    • About 5% more core clock: 425 MHz vs 405 MHz
    Core frequency 425 MHz vs 405 MHz

    Benchmark comparison

    GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
    GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 EP

    Name NVIDIA Quadro 5000M NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 EP
    PassMark — G3D Mark 2060
    PassMark — G2D Mark 426
    Geekbench — OpenCL 23008
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 5249
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 5249
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 7205
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 7205

    Performance comparison

    NVIDIA Quadro 5000M NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700EP
    Architecture Fermi Rankine
    Codename GF100 NV36 A1
    Production date July 27, 2010 September 1, 2004
    Place in the ranking 354 not rated
    Type Mobile workstation Desktop
    Core frequency 405 MHz 425MHz
    Floating point performance 518. 4 gflops
    Process 40nm 130nm
    Number of shaders 320
    Texturing speed 16.2 GTexel/s 1.7 GTexel/s
    Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt
    Number of transistors 3,100 million 82 million
    Video connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
    Interface MXM-B (3.

    2023 © All rights reserved