GeForce FX 5700 [in 1 benchmark]
NVIDIA
GeForce FX 5700
Buy
- Interface AGP 8x
- Core clock speed 425 MHz
- Max video memory 128 MB
- Memory type DDR
- Memory clock speed 500 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Summary
NVIDIA started GeForce FX 5700 sales 23 October 2003. This is Rankine architecture desktop card based on 130 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 128 MB of DDR memory clocked at 0.5 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 16 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is single-slot card attached via AGP 8x interface. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 25 Watt.
We have no data on GeForce FX 5700 benchmark results.
General info
Of GeForce FX 5700’s architecture, market segment and release date.
| Place in performance rating | not rated | |
| Architecture | Rankine (2003−2005) | |
| GPU code name | NV36 | |
| Market segment | Desktop | |
| Release date | 23 October 2003 (18 years ago) | |
| Current price | $212 | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Technical specs
GeForce FX 5700’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce FX 5700’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Core clock speed | 425 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Number of transistors | 82 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 25 Watt | of 900 (Tesla S2050) |
| Texture fill rate | 1. 700 |
of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce FX 5700’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 8x | |
| Width | 1-slot | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce FX 5700: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce FX 5700.
As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API support
APIs supported by GeForce FX 5700, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 9.0a | |
| OpenGL | 1.5 (2.1) | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile) |
| OpenCL | N/A | |
| Vulkan | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of GeForce FX 5700. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
- Passmark
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite.
It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
FX 5700
40
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with GeForce FX 5700 according to our statistics.
Pentium
N4200
6.3%
Pentium 4
2.66
3.1%
Core i7
2630QM
3.
1%
Core i3
1005G1
3.1%
Core i5
2400
3.1%
FX
6300
3.1%
Pentium Silver
N5030
3.1%
Pentium 4
P4 3.0
3.1%
Pentium 4
1.5
3.1%
Celeron D
346
3.1%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about GeForce FX 5700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
GeForce FX 5700 LE — Technical City
NVIDIA
GeForce FX 5700 LE
Buy
- Interface AGP 8x
- Core clock speed 250 MHz
- Max video memory 128 MB
- Memory type DDR
- Memory clock speed 400 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Summary
NVIDIA started GeForce FX 5700 LE sales 1 March 2004. This is Rankine architecture desktop card based on 130 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 128 MB of DDR memory clocked at 0.4 GHz are supplied, and together with 64 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 3.
2 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is single-slot card attached via AGP 8x interface.
We have no data on GeForce FX 5700 LE benchmark results.
General info
Of GeForce FX 5700 LE’s architecture, market segment and release date.
| Place in performance rating | not rated | |
| Architecture | Rankine (2003−2005) | |
| GPU code name | NV36 | |
| Market segment | Desktop | |
| Release date | 1 March 2004 (18 years ago) | |
| Current price | $160 | of 49999 (A100 SXM4) |
Technical specs
GeForce FX 5700 LE’s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce FX 5700 LE’s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Core clock speed | 250 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
| Number of transistors | 82 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti) |
| Texture fill rate | 1.000 | of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce FX 5700 LE’s compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it’s interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 8x | |
| Width | 1-slot |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce FX 5700 LE: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth.
Note that GPUs integrated into processors don’t have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) |
| Memory bandwidth | 3.2 GB/s | of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce FX 5700 LE. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API support
APIs supported by GeForce FX 5700 LE, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 9.0a | |
| OpenGL | 1.5 (2.1) | of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile) |
| OpenCL | N/A | |
| Vulkan | N/A |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance of GeForce FX 5700 LE. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
We have no data on GeForce FX 5700 LE benchmark results.
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with GeForce FX 5700 LE according to our statistics.
Celeron D
325
25%
Atom x5
Z8350
25%
Core i3
2100
25%
Pentium
G4400
25%
User rating
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about GeForce FX 5700 LE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For extreme gaming get the Alienware Aurora, featuring the combined power of the NVIDIA nForce3 MCP, the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra GPU, and an AMD Athlon 64 FX CPU. 
Stunning cinematic graphics and lifelike characters at blazing speeds and ultra-high resolutions are now a reality. Verto® 5950 Ultra utilizes the most advanced DDR memory technology for unparalleled performance providing the industry’s most compatible and reliable gaming platform.
Winner of the Firing Squad Bull’s Eye Award, this package delivers everything you need for the ultimate install-and-play gaming experience. 
Remember to play it «the way it’s meant to be played» on NVIDIA hardware.
NVIDIA’s GeForce FX 5700 Ultra GPU
FOR NEARLY a year, ATI’s mid-range Radeons have owned the performance crown for mid-range graphics. ATI’s dominance started with the Radeon 9500 Pro, continued with the Radeon 9600 Pro, and was most recently refreshed with the 9600 XT. NVIDIA took a stab at the mid-range with its GeForce FX 5600s, but not even a faster respin of the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra had enough punch to take on the Radeon 9600 line, especially in DirectX 9 applications.
Before the Radeon 9500 Pro came along, NVIDIA’s GeForce4 Ti 4200 was the most widely recommended graphics card for budget-conscious enthusiasts.
NVIDIA knows what it takes to be a mid-range market leader. With memories of the GeForce4 Ti 4200’s glory no doubt in mind, NVIDIA is ready to put up a fight for the mid-range performance crown with the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra. The 5700 Ultra is powered by a new NV36 graphics chip and promises more shader power, higher clock speeds, and greater memory bandwidth than its predecessor. On paper, NVIDIA’s third shot at this generation’s mid-range graphics crown looks pretty good, but does it have the charm to capture the hearts and minds of budget-conscious gamers and PC enthusiasts? Will this be NVIDIA’s third strike with the budget-conscious crowd? Read on as we unleash the FX 5700 Ultra on ATI’s Radeon 9600 cards to find out.
Introducing NV36
The GeForce FX 5700 line is based on NVIDIA’s new NV36 graphics chip, which is essentially a mid-range version of the high-end NV35 chip found in NVIDIA’s GeForce FX 5900 and 5900 Ultra. The NV36-powered GeForce FX 5700 Ultra will replace the mid-range FX 5600 Ultra at a suggested retail price of $199, and is expected on retail shelves starting this Sunday.
NV36 doesn’t represent a major redesign of NVIDIA’s current GeForce FX architecture, but the chip does have a number interesting characteristics that are worth highlighting.
- 4×1-pipe design – Like NV31, NV36 has four pixel pipelines with a single texture unit per pipe. The chip behaves like a four-pipe design regardless of the kind of rendering being done, which makes it a little bit easier to understand than something like NV30, which can act like eight-pipe chip under certain circumstances.
- 128-bit memory bus – NV36’s memory bus is 128 bits wide, just like NV31’s. However, NV36 supports DDR2 and GDDR3 memory types in addition to standard DDR SDRAM. Initially, GeForce FX 5700 Ultra cards will ship with DDR2 memory chips running at 450MHz, but board manufacturers may eventually exploit the chip’s compatibility with different memory types to produce budget cards with DDR SDRAM or more exotic offerings with GDDR3.
- ‘mo shader power – The GeForce FX 5600 Ultra’s shader performance never really cut it against ATI’s mid-range Radeons, so NVIDIA has beefed up shaders for NV36.
The chip boasts three vertex units that conspire to deliver triple the vertex processing power of NV31. NVIDIA also re-architected its programmable pixel shader for NV36, though no specific pixel shader performance claims are being made.
- Chip fabrication by IBM – Unlike the rest of NVIDIA’s NV3x graphics chips, NV36 is being manufactured using IBM’s 0.13-micron fabrication process. NV36 is the first product to emerge from NVIDIA’s recently announced partnership with IBM, and NVIDIA is quite happy with how well things have worked out so far. NV36 isn’t built using low-k dielectrics like NV38 or ATI’s RV360 GPUs, but it’s still clocked at a speedy 475MHz on the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra.
What’s particularly impressive about NV36’s fabrication is the fact that NVIDIA was able to get its very first chip sample from IBM up and running Quake just 50 minutes after the chip entered NVIDIA’s testing lab. A testament to IBM’s mad fabrication skills, the first A01 spin of NV36 silicon is actually being used for retail versions of the chip.
Overall, NV36 doesn’t represent a radical departure from the GeForce FX architecture; the chip should share all the perks that go along with “cinematic computing,” but it will also inherit a number of quirky personality traits that have thus far had a negative impact on performance.
NVIDIA continues to reiterate the fact that its entire GeForce FX line is sensitive to instruction ordering and pixel shader precision. Optimized code paths can help NV36 and the rest of the GeForce FX line realize their full potential, but NVIDIA’s new Detonator 50 driver also has a few tricks up its sleeve to improve performance. You can read all about the Detonator 50 drivers in our GeForce FX 5950 Ultra review.
NV36: NVIDIA’s first GPU fabbed by IBM
The specs
Perhaps to illustrate just how close the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is to store shelves, NVIDIA sent out retail cards instead of standard reference review samples. The eVGA e-GeForce FX 5700 Ultra that showed up on my doorstep came in a full retail box, shrink-wrapped and everything.
Let’s have a quick look at the card’s spec sheet.
| GPU | NVIDIA NV36 |
| Core clock | 475MHz |
| Pixel pipelines | 4 |
| Peak pixel fill rate | 1900 Mpixels/s |
| Texture units/pixel pipeline | 1 |
| Textures per clock | 4 |
| Peak texel fill rate | 1900 Mtexels/s |
| Memory clock | 906MHz* |
| Memory type | BGA DDR2 SDRAM |
| Memory bus width | 128-bit |
| Peak memory bandwidth | 14. 5GB/s |
| Ports | VGA, DVI, composite and S-Video outputs |
| Auxiliary power connector | 4-pin Molex |
NVIDIA’s reference spec calls for an effective memory clock of 900MHz, but our sample’s memory was running at 906MHz
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is all about high clock speeds and fancy memory. Quite honestly, I didn’t expect cards with 450MHz DDR2 memory chips to hit $200 price points this soon, but I’m certainly not going to complain. Profit margins on GeForce FX 5700 Ultras may be slimmer than with other cards, but that’s a good thing for consumers looking for the most bang for their buck.
Here’s a few nudies of the e-GeForce FX 5700 Ultra to drool over before we get started with the benchmarks.
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra looks imposing, and it is
475MHz with a single-slot cooler that doesn’t sound like a Dustbuster.
Imagine that!
BGA DDR2 memory chips bring in the bandwidth
(Insert incessant whining about the lack of dual DVI here)
Our testing methods
As ever, we did our best to deliver clean benchmark numbers. Tests were run three times, and the results were averaged.
Our test system was configured like so:
| System | ||
| Processor | Athlon XP ‘Thoroughbred’ 2600+ 2.083GHz | |
| Front-side bus | 333MHz (166MHz DDR) | |
| Motherboard | DFI LANParty NFII Ultra | |
| Chipset | NVIDIA nForce2 Ultra 400 | |
| North bridge | nForce2 Ultra 400 SPP | |
| South bridge | nForce2 MCP-T | |
| Chipset drivers | NVIDIA 2. 45 |
|
| Memory size | 512MB (2 DIMMs) | |
| Memory type | Corsair XMS3200 PC2700 DDR SDRAM (333MHz) | |
| Graphics card | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra 128MB GeForce FX 5700 Ultra 128MB |
Radeon 9600 Pro 128MB Radeon 9600 XT 128MB |
| Graphics driver | Detonator FX 52.16 | CATALYST 3.8 |
| Storage | Maxtor DiamondMax Plus D740X 7200RPM ATA/100 hard drive | |
| OS | Microsoft Windows XP Professional | |
| OS updates | Service Pack 1, DirectX 9. 0b |
|
Today we’ll be comparing the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra to the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev 2), and to a couple of Radeon 9600 flavors from ATI. NVIDIA was able to get us a set of WHQL-certified Detonator FX 52.16 drivers for testing, giving us our first peek at Microsoft-approved Detonator 50 drivers. The Detonator FX 52.16 drivers should be available for public download today.
The test system’s Windows desktop was set at 1024×768 in 32-bit color at a 75Hz screen refresh rate. Vertical refresh sync (vsync) was disabled for all tests.
We used the following versions of our test applications:
- FutureMark 3DMark03 Build 330
- Codecreatures Benchmark Pro
- Comanche 4 demo benchmark
- Quake III Arena v1.31 with trdemo1.dm_67
- Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory with demo0000.dm_82
- Serious Sam SE v1.07 with Demo0003
- Unreal Tournament 2003 with trtest1.dem
- Splinter Cell v1.2 with TRKalinatekDemo.bin
- Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness v49 patch
- Gun Metal benchmark v1.
20
- ShaderMark 2.0
- rthdribl 1.2
- Halo 1.02
- AquaMark3
All the tests and methods we employed are publicly available and reproducible. If you have questions about our methods, hit our forums to talk with us about them.
Fill rate
Theoretical fill rate and memory bandwidth peaks don’t necessarily dictate real-world performance, but they’re a good place to start.
| Core clock (MHz) | Pixel pipelines | Peak fill rate (Mpixels/s) | Texture units per pixel pipeline | Peak fill rate (Mtexels/s) | Memory clock (MHz) | Memory bus width (bits) | Peak memory bandwidth (GB/s) | |
| Radeon 9600 Pro | 400 | 4 | 1600 | 1 | 1600 | 600 | 128 | 9. 6 |
| Radeon 9600 XT | 500 | 4 | 2000 | 1 | 2000 | 600 | 128 | 9.6 |
| GeForce FX 5600 Ultra | 400 | 4 | 1600 | 1 | 1600 | 800 | 128 | 12. 8 |
| GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | 475 | 4 | 1900 | 1 | 1900 | 906 | 128 | 14.5 |
When it comes to theoretical peaks, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is simply a monster. The card’s 475MHz core clock speed yields pixel and texel fill rates that rival the Radeon 9600 XT, but the real story is the card’s memory bandwidth. With DDR2 memory chips running at an effective 906MHz, the 5700 Ultra offers a whopping 14.5GB/s of memory bandwidth50% more bandwidth than the Radeon 9600 XT. ATI has caught some flack for the Radeon 9600 XT’s relatively unimpressive memory bandwidth, but the card has thus far held its own quite nicely against the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra.
Against the bandwidth-rich 5700 Ultra, the Radeon 9600 XT may not be so lucky.
Of course, theoretical peaks are sometimes worth little more than the paper they’re printed on. Let’s see how the FX 5700 Ultra’s fill rate specs pan out in practice.
In 3DMark03’s fill rate tests, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra delivers the best single-textured fill rate performance, but is stuck behind both Radeons when it comes to multitexturing.
Shaders
When NVIDIA claimed that NV36’s shader power was much improved, it wasn’t kidding. In 3DMark03’s pixel shader 2.0 test, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is 50% faster than the 5600 Ultra, but even then it can’t catch the Radeon 9600 Pro. Vertex shaders are another story, though. The 5700 Ultra bursts to the front of the pack in 3DMark03’s vertex shader test. Most striking is the fact that the 5700 Ultra delivers more than double the vertex shader performance of the 5600 Ultra.
ShaderMark 2.0
ShaderMark 2.0 is brand new and includes some anti-cheat measures to prevent drivers from applying questionable optimizations. The Radeons run the benchmark with straight pixel shader 2.0 code, but I’ve included results for the GeForce FX cards with partial-precision and extended pixel shaders, as well.
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra shows significantly better pixel shader performance in ShaderMark than the 5600 Ultra; in many cases the 5700 Ultra doubles the frame rate of its predecessor. However, as much of an improvement as the 5700 Ultra is over the 5600 Ultra, the card still can’t catch either Radeon 9600 in ShaderMark. Because NVIDIA’s Detonator FX drivers have yet to expose NV36’s hardware support for floating point texture formats, the GeForce FX cards aren’t able to complete a number of ShaderMark’s tests. Unfortunately, NVIDIA hasn’t yet set a timetable for including floating point texture support in its GeForce FX drivers, and it’s unclear when the functionality will be exposed to applications.
Quake III Arena
Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory
Unreal Tournament 2003
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers improved performance in a number of first-person shooters, but we’re not looking at a revolution here. With the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and Radeon 9600 XT each winning three of six tests, this one’s a wash.
Comanche 4
Codecreatures Benchmark Pro
Gun Metal benchmark
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra comes out ahead in Comanche, Codecreatures, and Gun Metal. The card’s performance with antialiasing enabled is especially impressive, as is its huge performance advantage over the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra in Gun Metal.
Serious Sam SE
Serious Sam SE has always performed well on NVIDIA hardware, and that doesn’t change with the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra.
The 5700 Ultra even comes out ahead with antialiasing and aniso enabled.
Splinter Cell
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the only card to really distance itself from the pack in Splinter Cell and offer consistently better frame rates across multiple resolutions.
3DMark03
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and Radeon 9600 XT split 3DMark03’s game tests, but the Radeon comes out ahead by a hair if we look at the overall score. Notice how much the FX 5700 Ultra improves on its predecessor’s performance in the pixel shader-packed Mother Nature test; NVIDIA’s managed to improve performance by almost 50%.
Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness
Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness gets its own special little intro here because its publisher, EIDOS Interactive, has released a statement claiming that the V49 patch, which includes a performance benchmark, was never intended for public release.
Too late, the patch is already public. We’ve used these extreme quality settings from Beyond3D to give the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra a thorough workout in this DirectX 9 game.
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra does a lot better in Tomb Raider than the 5600 Ultra, but the Radeons still have a healthy lead. What’s worse, both GeForce FX cards refuse to run with 4X antialiasing and 8X aniso at resolutions above 1024×768.
It’s important to note that Tomb Raider’s benchmark mode uses the default DirectX 9 code path rather than the NVIDIA-optimized path that’s used when the game is actually being played normally. The scores you see above aren’t necessarily a reflection of Tomb Raider gameplay performance, but they do show how poorly the GeForce FX 5700 can perform when it’s forced to deal with an unoptimized DirectX 9 code path. Still, the 5700 Ultra’s performance is much-improved over the 5600 Ultra, and NVIDIA’s latest drivers have significantly improved the performance of both cards.
AquaMark3
In AquaMark3, GeForce FX 5700 Ultra performs well until antialiasing and aniso are enabled. The card doesn’t perform particularly poorly with 4X antialiasing and 8X aniso, but it’s well behind the Radeon 9600 XT and even a hair behind the 9600 Pro.
Halo
I used the “-use20” switch with the Halo benchmark to force the game to use version 2.0 pixel shaders.
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is much faster than its predecessor in Halo and even has enough horsepower to best the Radeon 9600 XT. Halo’s benchmark timedemo only runs through cut scenes, so the frame rates you see aren’t necessarily a reflection of gameplay performance. However, Halo’s cut scenes are all done using the game engine, so the benchmark mode is a valid tool for graphics performance comparisons.
Real-Time High-Dynamic Range Image-Based Lighting
To test the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra’s performance with high-dynamic-range lighting, we logged frame rates via FRAPS in this technology demo at its default settings.
The demo uses high-precision texture formats and version 2.0 pixel shaders to produce high-dynamic-range lighting, depth of field, motion blur, and glare, among other effects.
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra manages to double the 5600 Ultra’s performance in the rthdribble demo, but ATI’s Radeons still have a pretty significant lead, especially at lower resolutions. Unfortunately, the images generated by both GeForce FX cards in this demo have a few issues. Either 16-bit floating point precision really isn’t enough for high dynamic range lighting, or NVIDIA’s drivers need to expose the GeForce FX’s support for floating point texture formats in order for rthdribble to work properly.
Edge antialiasing
In Unreal Tournament 2003, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is really only playable with 4X antialiasing. There’s some weirdness going on with the card’s 2X antialiasing performance, which is dreadful on both the FX 5700 and 5600 Ultras.
Unfortunately, NVIDIA’s antialiasing doesn’t look quite as good as ATI’s gamma-corrected SMOOTHVISION, either.
Texture antialiasing
In Serious Sam SE, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra suffers roughly the same performance hit with each level of anisotropic filtering as its competition.
Overclocking
In testing, I was able to get my GeForce FX 5700 Ultra stable at core and memory clock speeds of 560 and 950MHz, respectively. Considering that the card’s cooler isn’t noticeably louder than what one may find on a GeForce FX 5600 Ultra or Radeon 9600 XT, I’m quite happy with an 85MHz core overclock.
Of course, just because I was able to get my sample stable and artifact-free at 560/950 doesn’t mean that every GeForce FX 5700 Ultra will be capable of those speeds. Then again, some cards may have the potential to hit even higher clock speeds. Overclocking is never guaranteed and can potentially damage hardware, so be careful.
Overclocking the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra gives the card a nice little performance boost, but remember that the Radeon 9600 XT appears to be quite comfortable with overclocking, too.
Conclusions
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra cards will be available in retail stores this Sunday and are expected to sell for around $199. This isn’t even close to a paper launch, folks. The card’s $200 price point puts it in direct competition with the Radeon 9600 XT, but 9600 XTs seem to be a little scarce at the moment.
Overall, the 5700 Ultra’s performance in DirectX 8-class games is impressive, and the card even handles DirectX 9 titles like Halo with aplomb. However, the 5700 Ultra’s performance with unoptimized code paths and synthetic pixel shader tests is a little discouraging looking forward. With more compiler tuning and driver tweaking, NVIDIA may improve the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra’s performance further, but the potential for future performance gains is hard to quantify and impossible to guarantee. At the very least, NVIDIA’s willingness to help developers optimize code paths should ensure that games and applications milk every last drop of performance from the GeForce FX architecture.
Since the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra beat out the Radeon 9600 XT in nearly every real-world game we tested today, it’s tempting to reinstate NVIDIA as the king of mid-range graphics. However, the Radeon 9600 XT is faster in Unreal Tournament 2003, which is particularly important title considering how many future games will use the Unreal engine. It’s also worth noting that ATI’s mid-range Radeons offer superior gamma-corrected antialiasing and a coupon for Half-Life 2, both important considerations for enthusiasts and gamers alike.
So I’m not quite ready to crown NVIDIA as the new mid-range graphics king, but I still feel pretty good about recommending the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra over the Radeon 9600 XT for gamers who have $200 to spend and need a graphics card by the end of the weekend. The Radeon 9600 XT’s performance in synthetic DirectX 9-class benchmarks makes it feel like a safer bet, but NVIDIA’s new run-time compiler has me a little more excited about the GeForce FX’s performance potential in future titles.
The fact that the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra rips through today’s current games and uses some pretty swanky hardware for a $200 graphics card doesn’t hurt, either.
Of course, if you don’t need to pick up a new graphics card this weekend, I’d hold off just a little while longer. We’ll be comparing the rendering output and image quality of ATI and NVIDIA’s newest graphics chips with the latest drivers in an upcoming article; the benchmarks we saw today are just the beginning.
BFG GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
Bjorn3D.com Reviewer
October 23, 2003
Hardware, Reviews & Articles
Leave a comment
Check out this brief look at the newest cards to become members of the GeForce FX family. Thanks to BFG, we weren’t just stuck with a reference 5700 Ultra. We have a retail 5700 and it’s a great overclocker. Additionally, we tested and overclocked the reference 5950 Ultra from NVIDIA.
It’s smokin’ too!
Introduction
Today, we’re going to take a quick look at the newest members of NVIDIA’s GeForce FX family — the 5700 Ultra and 5950 Ultra, replacements for the 5600 Ultra and 5900 Ultra, respectively. Usually this means that we have only reference cards to benchmark, but thanks to BFG Tech, we have a retail 5700 Ultra in our possession and that’s what will be featured in this article. Although we don’t have a BFG 5950 in our hands, we do have some pictures of it to show you. The 5950 benchmarks will be from the NVIDIA reference unit.
A lot of people have been anxiously awaiting the replacement of the 5600 Ultra since it didn’t quite impress customers as much as NVIDIA had hoped. In addition to the new card, new drivers (version 52.16) are also bringing hope back into the NVIDIA camp. The mid-range performance market is certainly about to get more interesting. ATI’s 9600 Pro and 9600 XT won’t be the quick answer any more when someone asks, “What card should I get if I can’t afford the $500 ones and only want to spend $200?” The 5950 will also be packing more punch to fight back against the 9800 XT.
The method for obtaining this boost in performance for NVIDIA’s mid-range and top level GPUs is to increase the clock speeds (of course). The 5700 Ultra is boasting a 475 MHz core and 900 MHz memory clock (up from 400/800 on the 5600 Ultra) while the 5950 Ultra is sporting a 475 MHz core and a 950 MHz memory clock (up from 450/850 on the 5900 Ultra). In addition to the speed boost, BFG’s 5700 Ultra is rocking some nice DDR2 memory!
Okay, let’s get to the review, but before we do I just want to point out a couple things. This article is just a brief look at both cards. I have only had the 5700 in my hands for two days now, so I’ve done as much as I could and still get sleep. I turn 25 in a couple days, so I’m getting old and need that sleep. ? We just want to give you a feel for what these new cards offer and how NVIDIA is trying to get your attention back. First, let’s enter the Asylum … and discuss the BFG Tech Asylum GeForce FX 5700 Ultra, and then we’ll cover the reference 5950 Ultra from NVIDIA.
Asylum 5700 Ultra Features and Specs
Features:
- AGP 8X (compatible with 4x and 2x AGP 2.0 compliant slots)
- Up to 4 pixels per clock rendering engine
- Up to 16 textures per pass
- NVIDIA CineFX 2.0 engine
- NVIDIA nView multi-display technology
- NVIDIA Forceware unified software environment (USE)
- NVIDIA UltraShadow technology enhances performance of bleeding-edge games that use complex shadows
- Free 24/7 Tech Support
- Lifetime Warranty
- 128-bit Studio-precision color
Some Key Points Worth Mentioning About the Card:
- NV36 (5700 Ultra) is 0.13 micron @ IBM
- It is NEW ARCHITECTURE
- ASYLUM cards are built with DDR2 (not all companies will use DDR2; they may use DDR1)
- BFG’s MSRP at launch is $199.
99 ($219.99 with a $20 Mail In Rebate Everyday) - BFG has implemented an upgraded fan solution on this product that exhibits superior thermal resistance to the reference fan
This will definitely be of interest to some of you. We are now starting to see IBM produced parts, and the NV36 is new architecture. Also, as I mentioned before, the Asylum 5700 Ultra uses 128MB of DDR2 memory, but other companies may just opt to stick with DDR1.
Specifications:
- GPU: NVIDIA® GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
- Bus Type: AGP
- Memory: 128MB DDR2
- Core Clock: 475MHz
- Memory Clock: 900Mhz (effective)
- RAMDAC: Dual 400MHz
- API Support: Microsoft® DirectX® 9.0, OpenGL for Microsoft® Windows®
- Connectors: VGA, DVI, S-Video out
- 356 million vertices/sec.
- 14.4GB/sec. memory bandwidth
Included In Box:
- Asylum GeForce FX 5700 Ultra graphics card
- Quick Install Manual
- DVI to VGA connector
- Driver CD, which includes:
- NVIDIA Forceware graphics driver (52.
16) - NVIDIA GeForce FX and GeForce4 demos
- Full installation manual (PDF)
- NVIDIA NVDVD 2.0 multimedia software
- Windowblinds BFG / Asylum Windows XP skins
- NVIDIA Forceware graphics driver (52.
The included bundle is okay, but I’d like to see a game included (who wouldn’t, right?). I think BFG aims to be a cost leader though, so including a bigger bundle might not be the best strategy for them, and that’s understandable. No game is probably better than an old game no one is going to enjoy anyway. The inclusion of NVDVD 2.0 and the Windowblinds skins is a nice touch. The card also looks pretty cool with its blue PCB and the silver HSF (heatsink / fan) with the Asylum logo. You can also see the ramsinks on the memory chips. Overall, it’s a very nice design by BFG.
A couple of things you can’t help but notice (especially since I tried to use the pictures to point them out) are that this card requires a power connection and it’s pretty long.
The last picture shows the Asylum 5700 Ultra above the MSI 5900, and they are actually the same length! I didn’t expect that, but it’s not necessarily a bad thing. The extra real estate on the PCB allows for less crowding of components, which is a good thing. The length may cause issues in some systems though. I have never had problems with a long card though, so just keep all that in mind.
Let’s move on to the next page to take a quick look at what type of performance and overclocking the Asylum 5700 Ultra offers.
Asylum 5700 Ultra Performance / Overclocking
As I stated before, this is a retail 5700 Ultra board from BFG, so if you go out and purchase one, you can reasonably expect similar performance. When testing the Asylum 5700 Ultra, I unfortunately did not have any Radeon 9600s of any type on hand for comparison. I also did not have a reference 5700 Ultra available for testing. So, I decided to run all the benchmarks I did at stock speed and at a good overclock speed … can you say 1GHz? Hold on now, we’re not quite ready for that yet.
There will be many reviews out today and tomorrow that will feature a 5700 Ultra versus 9600 XTs and Pros, so please just bare with me. As of right now (2:30 in the morning), I know of one review that has comparisons already, and that’s Hexus.net’s review of the 9600 XT. Feel free to check that out if such a comparison is your main concern.
Test System:
- Motherboard: Chaintech Zenith 7NJS nForce2
- Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2500+ (stock speed, 166 FSB)
- Memory: Corsair TWINX512-3200 (2x256MB XMS3200)
- Hard Drive: Western Digital Special Edition 80GB 8MB buffer
- Optical Drive: Plextor PlexWriter 40/12/40A
- NVIDIA Drivers: Detonator 52.16, “Quality” image setting
- DirectX Version: 9.0b
Before I just spill the results, a little discussion about the overclocking is due. As per my normal procedure, I used the CoolBits registry hack to provide clock frequency adjustments in the display driver control panel.
I also used the “Auto Detect” feature and allowed CoolBits to find the “best” stable overclock, which just happened to be 522MHz core / 1000MHz memory. Oh yeah, 1 GHz lovin’! Okay, maybe a 100MHz overclock isn’t much to get overly excited about, but upping a video card’s memory clock to 1 GHz just sounds cool, doesn’t it? I was able to complete 3DMark2001SE at 570 / 1000, but the image quality in Nature was compromised. Therefore, I stuck with 522 / 1000 for this review. No need to keep you waiting any longer. Here are my benchmark results.
3DMark2001SE (Bld 330)
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
3DMark2003 (Bld 320)
|
||||||||||||
AquaMark3
For the AquaMark3 test, I just ran the basic, default benchmark and recorded the score.
The settings for this test are 1024x768x32, no anti-aliasing (AA), 4x anisotropic filtering (AF) and very high details.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Gun Metal Benchmark 2 — Benchmark 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
44Unreal Tournament 2003
For the UT2K3 tests, I used HardOCP’s UT2K3 Benchmark utility. I ran the high quality test and then averaged all the average framerate scores. That is the score you see reported below.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
54As you can see, the card performs quite well in these tests. This limited testing obviously can’t tell the whole story, but I really wish I had a 9600 XT for comparison. I think you would see the Asylum 5700 Ultra beating up on it a bit, especially at the overclocked setting. There is also image quality (IQ) to consider as well. I didn’t notice any strange IQ problems while running the benchmarks, and I’ve heard that the 52.xx drivers have cleared up many previous problems. Keeping all this in mind makes it easy to see that the mid-range performance market is just now really heating up.
The Asylum 5700 Ultra so far appears to be a great card. It overclocked easily and was absolutely stable at 522 / 1000 MHz. My 5900 Ultra only outperforms it by about 1100 3DMarks when it’s overclocked at these speeds. I think it’s a very impressive and great looking card.
BFG definitely has a winner here, and if the Asylum 5700 Ultra’s performance is a fair indication of what to expect from other 5700 Ultras, then NVIDIA has hit a home run as well.
Now, let’s move on to the big papa of the bunch — the 5950 Ultra.
NVIDIA 5950 Ultra
While we were not lucky enough to also get ahold of a retail 5950 Ultra, Scott does have an NVIDIA reference 5950 that he ran several benchmarks with. He compared it to a reference 5900 Ultra to show us just how much better we can expect the 5950 to perform. Before we get to those benchmarks though, let’s take a brief look at the 5950’s specs and look at the card itself.
Specifications:
- GPU: NVIDIA® GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
- Bus Type: AGP
- Memory: 256MB DDR
- Core Clock: 475MHz
- Memory Clock: 950Mhz
- Connectors: VGA, DVI, S-Video out
- 356 million vertices/sec.
- 30.4GB/sec. memory bandwidth
Interesting New Design for the 5950
Interestingly enough, the 5950 Ultra is actually not as long as the 5900 Ultra! You can see in the first picture above that the 5950 Ultra is around an inch shorter (5900 on top, 5950 on bottom in pic). You can also see (in the second pic) that the 5950 Ultra is two-slot design, just like the 5900 Ultra. The final shot shows how much taller the new cooling solution is than the 5900 Ultra’s cooler. The 5950’s cooler is make sure it takes up as much of that two-slot area as possible!
I can’t wait to see what types of cooling units NVIDIA’s partners will come up with to keep the 5950 Ultra cool. I’m guessing most will go for something flatter and smaller, if it can still cool sufficiently of course. Here is what BFG’s Asylum 5950 Ultra looks like. Note the heatpipe at the top of the card. Cool looking design if you ask me.
I think we will have one of these for review very soon, so check back here if you’d like to find out more about it.
I’m looking forward to seeing how it performs.
Performance / Overclocking
Test System:
- Motherboard: ASUS A7N8X Deluxe 2.0 nForce2
- Processor: AMD Athlon XP 3000+ @ 3200+ (400MHz FSB)
- Memory: 1GB Corsair PC3200 (2x512MB XMS3200)
- Hard Drive: Maxtor DiamondMax 9 200GB ATA 133 7200RPM
- Optical Drive: Sony DVD RW 500UA
- NVIDIA Drivers: Detonator 52.16, “Quality” image setting
- DirectX Version: 9.0b
3DMark2001SE (bld 330)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5900 Ultra (450/850)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5900 Ultra (450/850)3DMark2003 (Bld 330)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5900 Ultra (450/850)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5900 Ultra (450/850)AquaMark3
|
|||||||||||||||
5900 Ultra (450/850)As you can see from the AquaMark3 results, Scott was able to overclock the reference 5950 Ultra to 550 / 1020 MHz, which is a decent overclock. The boost in performance from that overclock and the overall performance of the 5950 Ultra versus the 5900 Ultra is pretty impressive. With more serious cooling, I wonder just how high the 5950 Ultra could go.
Conclusion
Armed with new and improved drivers and two new promising graphics cards, NVIDIA has stepped up its efforts in the battle to win your hard earned (or hardly earned or stolen or found) Benjamins. Despite what your feelings for NVIDIA or ATi might be, I think it’s hard to ignore the fact that this competition is good for all of us – the consumer, NVIDIA, ATi, OEMs, etc.
I can’t wait to see what’s next!
I’m not sure what the MSRP will be on the 5950s when they hit shelves, but at $200 (after rebate), the Asylum 5700 Ultra from BFG is a great option to consider if you’ll be hunting for a new video card soon.
Previous Antec Minuet Case
Next NVIDIA Editors’ Day 2003
Check Also
Valve is an interesting company that seems to try to be a lot of things at the same time. Games company, software hub/store and hardware company. Valve is all of these.
When it comes to hardware the company has had mixed success. I think many of us remember the Steam Machines. These compact computers running SteamOS, a Linux based OS, were supposed to make Windows PC’s obsolete for gaming. They didn’t succeed. Valve also released a specific controller, the Steam Controller, which also did not exactly set the world on fire.
In hindsight though both these products have paved the way for the product I am testing today, the Steam Deck, Valves attempt to compete with the Nintendo Switch in the handheld market.
The Crucial P5 Plus is the successor the P5 that Crucial launched last year and is the first PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD from the company. The latest model dropped the 256GB model, so the starting available capacity for the P5 Pro is 500GB. Additionally, the drive is also available in 1TB and a new storage capacity of 2TB model. The P54 Plus is priced similar to the P5 though there is a slight bump in the price where drive is retailed at $107.99(500GB), $179.99(1TB), and $367.99(2TB). The 2TB model is definitely a welcome addition and if we judge by the price per gigabyte, the 1TB model would be the most economical option. Despite the slight bump in the price, the P5 Plus are still priced competitively against its competitors. The question is, just how well would the performance backing it up? We shall find it out today.
PNY Verto nVidia GeForce FX5700LE 128Mb TVout/DVI — The Lowdown! | Page 4
crazylegs
Member Extraordinaire
-
-
#61
Yeah let me know if you find out kenny won’t you.
I need a stable overclock that i can lock the card to for my customer what do you recommend chris, nothing to hyper just a decent increase in horse power and so it doesn’t run to warm for longevity….you got me….savvy….
Advertisements
Kenny
-
-
#62
What are the stock clock speeds at the mo? Are they the «normal» 225 core/ 400 memory?
My penny-and-a-half… minimum 275 core/ 440 memory. Will be absolutely stable at those speeds and not too hot either, as long as your client will not be playing Doom3 or half-life 2…
But i`m not Chris so…
Kenny
crazylegs
Member Extraordinaire
-
-
#63
Thanks kenny for the info.
….right just clocked to those specs and is running sweet and i have installed half life 2 on this machine to see how good this leadtech card is and i must say i’m impressed.
Medium Detail and it is playing very smoothly this card i recommend to anyone, its got a superb alloy heatsink and winfast fan assembly attached as standard and you can hardly hear it.
It’s also got it’s own Speedrunner overclocking utility from leadtek, coupled with that superb alloy heatsink and fan, leadtek obviously have expanded on those overclocking abilities…
Thanks for all your assistance on this matter kenny, and chris for the initial 5700le review of which i wouldn’t have bought this particular card without.
I think my man will be more than pleased…
ChristopherP
-
-
#64
sorted
Kenny
-
-
#65
It plays half-life 2 no bother? excellent! well.
.. i`ve learned something from this as well I didnt think the 5700LE would be able to cut it… 😀
I think you`re the first persaon i`ve ever helped out on this forum! YEE-AS!
ChristopherP
-
-
#66
Push it higher! Push it higher!!
Run 3DMark2003 on it also
Advertisements
crazylegs
Member Extraordinaire
-
-
#67
Can’t push it too high chris its for a customer.
.don’t wanna burn it up now do i.
for your info chris using the leadtek speedrunner utility it will go to 295/ 510 but as it’s not my card too scared to keep it there to run benchmarks, so leadtek really know there stuff with these cards don’t they, it may also have slighlty faster memory on the winfast cards, that iv’e heard on other forums.
3dmark03 gives me 2197 marks not bad i’m sure you’l agree considering i have locked it on a more conservative 275/ 440, but yes this thing is a flying machine and superb overclocker.
Thinking about buying another one of these for my spare pc.
ChristopherP
-
-
#68
Cool, sounds good I gotta get some sleep.
..just got back from a awesome party
Kenny
-
-
#69
thats a damn fine score for those speeds… thats not far off my scores when I had 500/485!!! hopefully my new mobo/proc will help my scores, although I think 3DMark tries to put all the work on the GPU…
-
-
#70
you should at least be able to hit a substained 300. since its the same gpu as the reg 5700.
the only prob you may run into, is they may have switched to a lower quality memory or cooling for the gpu. even still, spend 15 on cooling and you doubled the worth of the card with the 5700 speeds at a constant rate. if that isnt ok, check out power color’s 9800se. If you check out the post on it on here you’ll see why. good luck
DocDunning
-
-
#71
Hi all, from a newbie to this forum.
floppybootstomp said:
… I have the card now, have fitted it, but the Arctic VGA cooler I ordered was the wrong one …
Click to expand…
I’ve recently bought a PNY FX5700LE like some of you, and found this thread which has made interesting reading.
I bought an Arctic cooler as well for a 5700 card, but it seems that the PNY card isn’t to Nvidia spec, and the cooler needs 4 mounting holes whereas the card only has two. Like you say —
And now the fan on this card is driving me spare with its persistent whining. I’ve taken the fan out of its cage and tried to pad the places where it attaches, but it still makes a noise.
Has anyone found a way either to make it quiet, or else found an alternative cooler like the Arctic?
TIA for any help or advice.
Advertisements
Kenny
-
-
#72
Hows it goin? Welcome to PCreview…
Apparently there is definately an Arctic cooler with just 2 mounting pins for the card- as far as I know, all 5700LE`s have just 2 mounting pins, the PNY card is prabably normal spec, u just got unlucky with the cooler, like Mr Flops.
I have a Zalman Northbridge cooler that has adjustable attachment pins. ie the mounting holes can be moved because they`re on runners. It`s also bigger than the heatsink on the 5700LE I have (Gainward) but i`m having trouble setting up a fan for it.
I also had an idea of fitting a CPU heatsink to the card, using some inventiveness and.. probably a bit of luck. If I manage it, i`ll post some pics.
As for cooling the memory, I was looking at cutting a CPU heatsink in 2 and using thermal epoxy or similar to place the Heatsink bits across the memory to help with overclocking. Again, if I manage it i`ll let y`all know.
Kenny
P.S…. if you find a way of making a cradle, you could maybe try an 8cm fan underneath the card, blowing up. Better airflow and a lower RPM… cant hurt
DocDunning
-
-
#73
Thanks, Kenny
I’ve looked at the Arctic website, and you’re right, there’s a «Revision 2» of the cooler which does only have the two pins.
Anyway, I’m looking at the Zalman options right now. And I flogged the cooler on Ebay for £1 less than I bought it for, so that’s not a complete disaster.
floppybootstomp
sugar ‘n spikes
-
-
#74
Hiya Doc
Sold it on Ebay eh?
Righteyho, that’s where I’m off to then…
Kenny
-
-
#75
I think I saw that particular auction when i was havin a quick look at 5700 prices.
.. its a small world
ChristopherP
-
-
#76
Nope…just a small country.
Advertisements
Kenny
-
-
#77
Back to the FX5700LE… whats the difference between the LE and the nomal 5700? Is the difference is much as is it is in the 6800Le/ vanilla? Ie… if I flash my card BIOS to that of a 5700… am I gonna see a jump in performance?
Kenny
ChristopherP
-
-
#78
If you have your card at 5700 speeds already then probably not.
.. the card will jut be recognised as a 5700 vanilla and the speeds will be set at 5700 stock…
You can always try it and find out
Kenny
-
-
#79
Lol…. indeed I could, but if theres little performance increase, i become lazy
Advertisements
ChristopherP
-
-
#80
Characteristics of NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE / Overclockers.
ua
- News
- Specifications
- Reviews
- Processors
- Motherboards
- Memory
- Video cards
- Cooling systems
- Enclosures
- Power supplies
- Accumulators
- Peripherals
- Systems
4 (2) Verdniy conveyors 3 TMU 1 (2) MSC 200-220 (400-440) (400-440) Memory Shin DDR -128 Bit Memory volume 128 /256 MB PSP, GB / s 6.4 — 7.0 textures per 900,9004 Textures per pass 16 Pixel Shaders 2+ Vertex Shaders 2+ Fill Rate, Mpix/s 1000 Fill Rate, Mtex/s 1000 Smoothing (Max) SS & MS — 8x Anisotropic filtration (MAX) 8x 9005 Directx 9004LFury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770Radeon HD 7750Radeon HD 6990Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Radeon HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 43500 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3870 X2Radeon HD 3870Radeon HD 3850Radeon HD 3690Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 3470Radeon HD 3450Radeon HD 3300 (IGP)Radeon HD 3200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3100 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT GDDR4Radeon HD 2600 XTRadeon HD 2600 PRORadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon HD 2400 PRORadeon HD 2350Radeon X1950 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1950 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTRadeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1300 XT on RV530ProRadeon X1300 XT on RV535ProRadeon X1300 CERadeon X1300 ProRadeon X1300Radeon X1300 LERadeon X1300 HMRadeon X1050Radeon X850 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X850 XT CrossFire EditionRadeon X850 XT Radeon X850 Pro Radeon X800 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X800 XLRadeon X800 GTO 256MBRadeon X800 GTO 128MBRadeon X800 GTO2 256MBRadeon X800Radeon X800 ProRadeon X800 GT 256MBRadeon X800 GT 128MBRadeon X800 SERadeon X700 XTRadeon X700 ProRadeon X700Radeon X600 XTRadeon X600 ProRadeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBR adeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProNVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4080 16GBGeForce RTX 4080 12GBGeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev. 
2GeForce RTX 3060GeForce RTX 3050GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce RTX 2080 SuperGeForce RTX 2080GeForce RTX 2070 SuperGeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2060 SuperGeForce RTX 2060GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce GTX 1660 SuperGeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX 1650 SuperGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6GeForce GTX 1650 rev.3GeForce GTX 1650 rev.2GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 1630GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce GTX 1080GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce GTX 1070GeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1060 3GBGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce GTX 1050GeForce GT 1030GeForce GTX Titan XGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 980GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 780GeForce GTX 770GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 750GeForce GT 740GeForce GT 730GeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 660GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGeForce GTX 650 TiGeForce GTX 650GeForce GT 640 rev.2GeForce GT 640GeForce GT 630 rev.2GeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 580GeForce GTX 570GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 560GeForce GTX 550 TiGeForce GT 520GeForce GTX 480GeForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 460 1024MBGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce GTS 450GeForce GT 440 GDDR5GeForce GT 440 GDDR3GeForce GT 430GeForce GT 420GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 260 rev.
2GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTS 250GeForce GTS 240GeForce GT 240GeForce GT 230GeForce GT 220GeForce 210Geforce 205GeForce GTS 150GeForce GT 130GeForce GT 120GeForce G100GeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce 9800 GTXGeForce 9800 GTSGeForce 9800 GTGeForce 9800 GX2GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 9600 GSO (G94)GeForce 9600 GSOGeForce 9500 GTGeForce 9500 GSGeForce 9400 GTGeForce 9400GeForce 9300GeForce 8800 ULTRAGeForce 8800 GTXGeForce 8800 GTS Rev2GeForce 8800 GTSGeForce 8800 GTGeForce 8800 GS 768MBGeForce 8800 GS 384MBGeForce 8600 GTSGeForce 8600 GTGeForce 8600 GSGeForce 8500 GT DDR3GeForce 8500 GT DDR2GeForce 8400 GSGeForce 8300GeForce 8200GeForce 8100GeForce 7950 GX2GeForce 7950 GTGeForce 7900 GTXGeForce 7900 GTOGeForce 7900 GTGeForce 7900 GSGeForce 7800 GTX 512MBGeForce 7800 GTXGeForce 7800 GTGeForce 7800 GS AGPGeForce 7800 GSGeForce 7600 GT Rev.2GeForce 7600 GTGeForce 7600 GS 256MBGeForce 7600 GS 512MBGeForce 7300 GT Ver2GeForce 7300 GTGeForce 7300 GSGeForce 7300 LEGeForce 7300 SEGeForce 7200 GSGeForce 7100 GS TC 128 (512)GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MBGeForce 6800 UltraGeForce 6800 GT 256MBGeForce 6800 GT 128MBGeForce 6800 GTOGeForce 6800 256MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 128MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 LE PCI-EGeForce 6800 256MB AGPGeForce 6800 128MB AGPGeForce 6800 LE AGPGeForce 6800 GS AGPGeForce 6800 GS PCI-EGeForce 6800 XTGeForce 6600 GT PCI-EGeForce 6600 GT AGPGeForce 6600 DDR2GeForce 6600 PCI-EGeForce 6600 AGPGeForce 6600 LEGeForce 6200 NV43VGeForce 6200GeForce 6200 NV43AGeForce 6500GeForce 6200 TC 64(256)GeForce 6200 TC 32(128)GeForce 6200 TC 16(128)GeForce PCX5950GeForce PCX 5900GeForce PCX 5750GeForce PCX 5550GeForce PCX 5300GeForce PCX 4300GeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce FX 5900 UltraGeForce FX 5900GeForce FX 5900 ZTGeForce FX 5900 XTGeForce FX 5800 UltraGeForce FX 5800GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-3GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-2GeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5700 LEGeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.
2)GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.1)GeForce FX 5600 XTGeForce FX 5600GeForce FX 5500GeForce FX 5200 UltraGeForce FX 5200GeForce FX 5200 SEGeForce 4 Ti 4800GeForce 4 Ti 4800-SEGeForce 4 Ti 4200-8xGeForce 4 Ti 4600GeForce 4 Ti 4400GeForce 4 Ti 4200GeForce 4 MX 4000GeForce 4 MX 440-8x / 480GeForce 4 MX 460GeForce 4 MX 440GeForce 4 MX 440-SEGeForce 4 MX 420GeForce 3 Ti500GeForce 3 Ti200GeForce 3GeForce 2 Ti VXGeForce 2 TitaniumGeForce 2 UltraGeForce 2 PROGeForce 2 GTSGeForce 2 MX 400GeForce 2 MX 200GeForce 2 MXGeForce 256 DDRGeForce 256Riva TNT 2 UltraRiva TNT 2 PRORiva TNT 2Riva TNT 2 M64Riva TNT 2 Vanta LTRiva TNT 2 VantaRiva TNTRiva 128 ZXRiva 128 9Fury XRadeon R9 FuryRadeon R9 NanoRadeon R9 390XRadeon R9 390Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 380Radeon R7 370Radeon R7 360Radeon R9 295X2Radeon R9 290XRadeon R9 290Radeon R9 280XRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 280Radeon R9 270XRadeon R9 270Radeon R7 265Radeon R7 260XRadeon R7 260Radeon R7 250Radeon R7 240Radeon HD 7970Radeon HD 7950Radeon HD 7870 XTRadeon HD 7870Radeon HD 7850Radeon HD 7790Radeon HD 7770Radeon HD 7750Radeon HD 6990Radeon HD 6970Radeon HD 6950Radeon HD 6930Radeon HD 6870Radeon HD 6850Radeon HD 6790Radeon HD 6770Radeon HD 6750Radeon HD 6670 GDDR5Radeon HD 6670 GDDR3Radeon HD 6570 GDDR5Radeon HD 6570 GDDR3Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5Radeon HD 6450 GDDR3Radeon HD 5570 GDDR5Radeon HD 3750Radeon HD 3730Radeon HD 5970Radeon HD 5870Radeon HD 5850Radeon HD 5830Radeon HD 5770Radeon HD 5750Radeon HD 5670Radeon HD 5570Radeon HD 5550Radeon HD 5450Radeon HD 4890Radeon HD 4870 X2Radeon HD 4870Radeon HD 4860Radeon HD 4850 X2Radeon HD 4850Radeon HD 4830Radeon HD 4790Radeon HD 4770Radeon HD 4730Radeon HD 4670Radeon HD 4650Radeon HD 4550Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 4350Radeon HD 43500 (IGP 890GX) Radeon HD 4200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3870 X2Radeon HD 3870Radeon HD 3850Radeon HD 3690Radeon HD 3650Radeon HD 3470Radeon HD 3450Radeon HD 3300 (IGP)Radeon HD 3200 (IGP)Radeon HD 3100 (IGP)Radeon HD 2900 XT 1Gb GDDR4Radeon HD 2900 XTRadeon HD 2900 PRORadeon HD 2900 GTRadeon HD 2600 XT DUALRadeon HD 2600 XT GDDR4Radeon HD 2600 XTRadeon HD 2600 PRORadeon HD 2400 XTRadeon HD 2400 PRORadeon HD 2350Radeon X1950 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1950 XTXRadeon X1950 XTRadeon X1950 PRO DUALRadeon X1950 PRORadeon X1950 GTRadeon X1900 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1900 XTXRadeon X1900 XTRadeon X1900 GT Rev2Radeon X1900 GTRadeon X1800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X1800 XT PE 512MBRadeon X1800 XTRadeon X1800 XLRadeon X1800 GTORadeon X1650 XTRadeon X1650 GTRadeon X1650 XL DDR3Radeon X1650 XL DDR2Radeon X1650 PRO on RV530XTRadeon X1650 PRO on RV535XTRadeon X1650Radeon X1600 XTRadeon X1600 PRORadeon X1550 PRORadeon X1550Radeon X1550 LERadeon X1300 XT on RV530ProRadeon X1300 XT on RV535ProRadeon X1300 CERadeon X1300 ProRadeon X1300Radeon X1300 LERadeon X1300 HMRadeon X1050Radeon X850 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X850 XT CrossFire EditionRadeon X850 XT Radeon X850 Pro Radeon X800 XT Platinum EditionRadeon X800 XTRadeon X800 CrossFire EditionRadeon X800 XLRadeon X800 GTO 256MBRadeon X800 GTO 128MBRadeon X800 GTO2 256MBRadeon X800Radeon X800 ProRadeon X800 GT 256MBRadeon X800 GT 128MBRadeon X800 SERadeon X700 XTRadeon X700 ProRadeon X700Radeon X600 XTRadeon X600 ProRadeon X550 XTRadeon X550Radeon X300 SE 128MB HM-256MBR adeon X300 SE 32MB HM-128MBRadeon X300Radeon X300 SERadeon 9800 XTRadeon 9800 PRO /DDR IIRadeon 9800 PRO /DDRRadeon 9800Radeon 9800 SE-256 bitRadeon 9800 SE-128 bitRadeon 9700 PRORadeon 9700Radeon 9600 XTRadeon 9600 PRORadeon 9600Radeon 9600 SERadeon 9600 TXRadeon 9550 XTRadeon 9550Radeon 9550 SERadeon 9500 PRORadeon 9500 /128 MBRadeon 9500 /64 MBRadeon 9250Radeon 9200 PRORadeon 9200Radeon 9200 SERadeon 9000 PRORadeon 9000Radeon 9000 XTRadeon 8500 LE / 9100Radeon 8500Radeon 7500Radeon 7200 Radeon LE Radeon DDR OEM Radeon DDR Radeon SDR Radeon VE / 7000Rage 128 GL Rage 128 VR Rage 128 PRO AFRRage 128 PRORage 1283D Rage ProNVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4080 16GBGeForce RTX 4080 12GBGeForce RTX 3090 TiGeForce RTX 3090GeForce RTX 3080 TiGeForce RTX 3080 12GBGeForce RTX 3080GeForce RTX 3070 TiGeForce RTX 3070GeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce RTX 3060 rev.
2GeForce RTX 3060GeForce RTX 3050GeForce RTX 2080 TiGeForce RTX 2080 SuperGeForce RTX 2080GeForce RTX 2070 SuperGeForce RTX 2070GeForce RTX 2060 SuperGeForce RTX 2060GeForce GTX 1660 TiGeForce GTX 1660 SuperGeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX 1650 SuperGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6GeForce GTX 1650 rev.3GeForce GTX 1650 rev.2GeForce GTX 1650GeForce GTX 1630GeForce GTX 1080 TiGeForce GTX 1080GeForce GTX 1070 TiGeForce GTX 1070GeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 1060 3GBGeForce GTX 1050 TiGeForce GTX 1050 3GBGeForce GTX 1050GeForce GT 1030GeForce GTX Titan XGeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX 980GeForce GTX 970GeForce GTX 960GeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX TitanGeForce GTX 780 TiGeForce GTX 780GeForce GTX 770GeForce GTX 760GeForce GTX 750 TiGeForce GTX 750GeForce GT 740GeForce GT 730GeForce GTX 690GeForce GTX 680GeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 660 TiGeForce GTX 660GeForce GTX 650 Ti BoostGeForce GTX 650 TiGeForce GTX 650GeForce GT 640 rev.2GeForce GT 640GeForce GT 630 rev.2GeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 580GeForce GTX 570GeForce GTX 560 TiGeForce GTX 560GeForce GTX 550 TiGeForce GT 520GeForce GTX 480GeForce GTX 470GeForce GTX 465GeForce GTX 460 SEGeForce GTX 460 1024MBGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce GTS 450GeForce GT 440 GDDR5GeForce GT 440 GDDR3GeForce GT 430GeForce GT 420GeForce GTX 295GeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 280GeForce GTX 275GeForce GTX 260 rev.
2GeForce GTX 260GeForce GTS 250GeForce GTS 240GeForce GT 240GeForce GT 230GeForce GT 220GeForce 210Geforce 205GeForce GTS 150GeForce GT 130GeForce GT 120GeForce G100GeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce 9800 GTXGeForce 9800 GTSGeForce 9800 GTGeForce 9800 GX2GeForce 9600 GTGeForce 9600 GSO (G94)GeForce 9600 GSOGeForce 9500 GTGeForce 9500 GSGeForce 9400 GTGeForce 9400GeForce 9300GeForce 8800 ULTRAGeForce 8800 GTXGeForce 8800 GTS Rev2GeForce 8800 GTSGeForce 8800 GTGeForce 8800 GS 768MBGeForce 8800 GS 384MBGeForce 8600 GTSGeForce 8600 GTGeForce 8600 GSGeForce 8500 GT DDR3GeForce 8500 GT DDR2GeForce 8400 GSGeForce 8300GeForce 8200GeForce 8100GeForce 7950 GX2GeForce 7950 GTGeForce 7900 GTXGeForce 7900 GTOGeForce 7900 GTGeForce 7900 GSGeForce 7800 GTX 512MBGeForce 7800 GTXGeForce 7800 GTGeForce 7800 GS AGPGeForce 7800 GSGeForce 7600 GT Rev.2GeForce 7600 GTGeForce 7600 GS 256MBGeForce 7600 GS 512MBGeForce 7300 GT Ver2GeForce 7300 GTGeForce 7300 GSGeForce 7300 LEGeForce 7300 SEGeForce 7200 GSGeForce 7100 GS TC 128 (512)GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MBGeForce 6800 UltraGeForce 6800 GT 256MBGeForce 6800 GT 128MBGeForce 6800 GTOGeForce 6800 256MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 128MB PCI-EGeForce 6800 LE PCI-EGeForce 6800 256MB AGPGeForce 6800 128MB AGPGeForce 6800 LE AGPGeForce 6800 GS AGPGeForce 6800 GS PCI-EGeForce 6800 XTGeForce 6600 GT PCI-EGeForce 6600 GT AGPGeForce 6600 DDR2GeForce 6600 PCI-EGeForce 6600 AGPGeForce 6600 LEGeForce 6200 NV43VGeForce 6200GeForce 6200 NV43AGeForce 6500GeForce 6200 TC 64(256)GeForce 6200 TC 32(128)GeForce 6200 TC 16(128)GeForce PCX5950GeForce PCX 5900GeForce PCX 5750GeForce PCX 5550GeForce PCX 5300GeForce PCX 4300GeForce FX 5950 UltraGeForce FX 5900 UltraGeForce FX 5900GeForce FX 5900 ZTGeForce FX 5900 XTGeForce FX 5800 UltraGeForce FX 5800GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-3GeForce FX 5700 Ultra /DDR-2GeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5700 LEGeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.
2)GeForce FX 5600 Ultra (rev.1)GeForce FX 5600 XTGeForce FX 5600GeForce FX 5500GeForce FX 5200 UltraGeForce FX 5200GeForce FX 5200 SEGeForce 4 Ti 4800GeForce 4 Ti 4800-SEGeForce 4 Ti 4200-8xGeForce 4 Ti 4600GeForce 4 Ti 4400GeForce 4 Ti 4200GeForce 4 MX 4000GeForce 4 MX 440-8x / 480GeForce 4 MX 460GeForce 4 MX 440GeForce 4 MX 440-SEGeForce 4 MX 420GeForce 3 Ti500GeForce 3 Ti200GeForce 3GeForce 2 Ti VXGeForce 2 TitaniumGeForce 2 UltraGeForce 2 PROGeForce 2 GTSGeForce 2 MX 400GeForce 2 MX 200GeForce 2 MXGeForce 256 DDRGeForce 256Riva TNT 2 UltraRiva TNT 2 PRORiva TNT 2Riva TNT 2 M64Riva TNT 2 Vanta LTRiva TNT 2 VantaRiva TNTRiva 128 ZXRiva 128
You can simultaneously select
up to 10 video cards by holding Ctrl- U.A. | EN
GeForce FX 5700 LE video card
NVIDIA
GeForce FX 5700LE- AGP interface 8x
- Core frequency 250 MHz
- Video memory size 128 MB
- Memory type DDR
- Memory frequency 400 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Description
NVIDIA started GeForce FX 5700 LE sales 1 March 2004.
This is Rankine architecture desktop card based on 130 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. It has 128 MB of DDR memory at 0.4 GHz, and coupled with a 64-bit interface, this creates a bandwidth of 3.200 Gb / s. In terms of compatibility, this is a single-slot card connected via the AGP 8x interface.
We don’t have test results for the GeForce FX 5700 LE.
General information
Information about the type (desktop or laptop) and architecture of GeForce FX 5700 LE, as well as sales start time and cost at that time.
place in the performance rating A RANKINE (2003–2005)
of 939.8 (h200 SXM5) Compatibility and dimensions
Information on GeForce FX 5700 LE compatibility with other computer components. Useful for example when choosing the configuration of a future computer or to upgrade an existing one.
For desktop video cards, these are the interface and connection bus (compatibility with the motherboard), the physical dimensions of the video card (compatibility with the motherboard and case), additional power connectors (compatibility with the power supply). Interface AGP 8x 1 Slot Parameters of memory installed on GeForce FX 5700 LE — type, size, bus, frequency and bandwidth. For video cards built into the processor that do not have their own memory, a shared part of the RAM is used.
Memorial capacity 3.200 GB/s of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260) Video
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce FX 5700 LE. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for laptop ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Video connectors Vulkan N/A Benchmarks
These are the results of the GeForce FX 5700 LE’s rendering performance tests in non-gaming benchmarks. The overall score is set from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the fastest video card at the moment.
We don’t have test results for the GeForce FX 5700 LE.
Other graphics cards
Here we recommend several video cards that are more or less similar in performance to the one considered.
Recommended Processors
According to our statistics, these processors are most commonly used with the GeForce FX 5700 LE.
Celeron D
325
25%
Atom x5
Z8350
25%
Core i3
2100
25%
Pentium
G4400
25%
User rating
Here you can see the rating of the video card by users, as well as put your own rating.
Tips and comments
Here you can ask a question about the GeForce FX 5700 LE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
performance overview and gaming performance tests
The GeForce FX 5700 LE graphics card was released by NVIDIA, released on March 1, 2004. The graphics card is designed for desktop computers and is based on the Rankine architecture codenamed NV36 A1.
Core frequency — 250 MHz. Texturing speed — 1 GTexel / s. Technological process — 130 nm. The number of transistors is 82 million.
Memory type: DDR. The maximum memory size is 128 MB. Memory bus width — 64 Bit. Memory frequency — 400 MHz. The memory bandwidth is 3.2 GB / s.
Benchmarks
PassMark
G3D MarkTop 1 GPU This GPU PassMark
G2D MarkTop 1 GPU This GPU Name Value PassMark — G3D Mark 25 PassMark — G2D Mark 147 Features
Architecture Rankine Codename NV36 A1 Production date March 1, 2004 Place in the ranking 980 Type Desktop Core frequency 250MHz Process 130nm Texturing speed 1 GTexel/s Number of transistors 82 million Video connectors 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video Interface AGP 8x DirectX 9. 
0a OpenGL 1.5 (2.1) Maximum memory size 128MB Memory bandwidth 3.2GB/s Memory bus width 64 Bit Memory frequency 400MHz Memory type DDR Navigation
Choose your graphics card
Compare graphics cards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE with other graphics cards
NVIDIA
GeForce FX 5700 LEversus
NVIDIA
GeForce4 420 GoNVIDIA
GeForce FX 5700LEversus
NVIDIA
QuadroFX 2000NVIDIA
GeForce FX 5700 LEversus
ATI
Radeon 9600XTNVIDIA
GeForce FX 5700LEversus
NVIDIA
GeForce 6200 SE Turbo CacheNVIDIA
GeForce FX 5700 LEversus
NVIDIA
Quadro FX 5600NVIDIA
GeForce FX 5700LEversus
NVIDIA
QuadroFX 1600MNVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE
Top specifications and features
- GPU base clock
- Memory Bandwidth
- GPU memory frequency
- Technological process
- Versions of GDDR memory
Performance
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE:
1165
Best score:
Memory
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE:
18
Best score:
General Information
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE:
504
Best score:
Features
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE:
84
Best score:
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE:
21
Best score:
Description
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE graphics card based on Rankine architecture has 82 million transistors, tech.
process 130 nm. The frequency of the graphics core is 250 MHz. DDR1, 400MHz frequency and 3.2Gb/s maximum bandwidth. At the same time, the maximum number of points for today is 260261 points.
Directx version — 9. OpenGL version — 2.1.
In our tests, the video card scores 2292 points.Why NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE is better than others
Has no merit
- The base clock frequency of the GPU is 250 MHz. This parameter is lower than 85%
- Memory bandwidth 3.2 GB/s. This setting is lower than 80%
- GPU memory frequency 400 MHz. This parameter is lower than 74%
- Technological process 130 nm. This setting is higher than 90%
- GDDR memory version 1 . This parameter is lower than that of 80%
- Number of transistors 82 million. This setting is lower than 85%
- DirectX 9 . This parameter is lower than that of 93%
- Memory bus width 64 bit. This parameter is lower than 85%
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE Review
Performance
Memory
general information
Functions
Ports
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE Review: Highlights
GPU base clockThe graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
250MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
2457MHz
GPU memory frequencyThis is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
400MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.6 MHz
16000 MHz
Texture speed1.002
max 940
Average: 65.6
940
Architecture nameRankine
GPU nameNV36
Memory bandwidthThis is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
3.2GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.
3 GB/s
2656GB/s
Maximum memory0.128GB
max 128
Average: 3.9 GB
128GB
GDDR Memory VersionsLatest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show allone
Average: 4.5
6
Memory bus widthA wide memory bus indicates that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all64bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
8192bit
Release dateMarch 2004
Mean value:
Process technologyThe small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
130 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
4nm
Number of transistorsThe higher the number, the more powerful the processor is
82 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
80000 million
DestinationDesktop
DirectXUsed in demanding games providing enhanced graphics
9
max 12.2
Average: 11.1
12.2
opengl versionLater versions provide quality game graphics
2.1
max 4.6
Average: 4
4.
6
VGAYes
FAQ
What version of RAM does NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE support GDDR1.
What is the architecture of the video card NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE
Rankine.
What version of DirectX does NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE support
DirectX 9.
When was the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE released?
March 2004.
leave your feedback
Category: Connection type -> AGP (Video cards), page 1
You are here
Home » Connection type
A video card from the manufacturer Aopen in which the GeForce FX 5700 LE video processor from the GeForce line supports 2 monitors with a maximum resolution of 2048×1536. This GPU operates at a frequency of 250 MHz processor built on a 130 nm process with a GDDR memory type, a memory capacity of 128 MB and a memory frequency of 440 MHz, where the memory exchange bus is 128 bits.
The additional features of this Aopen video card, codenamed NV36, are as follows: Low Profile card, known x length and height data. Number of fans in the cooling system 1. A video card from the manufacturer Aopen in which the GeForce FX 5700 LE video processor from the GeForce line supports 2 monitors with a maximum resolution of 2048×1536. This GPU operates at a frequency of 250 MHz processor built on a 130 nm process with a GDDR memory type, a memory capacity of 128 MB and a memory frequency of 440 MHz, where the memory exchange bus is 128 bits. The additional features of this Aopen video card, codenamed NV36, are as follows: Low Profile card, known x length and height data. Number of fans in the cooling system 1.
Video card from manufacturer ASUS in which the GeForce FX 5700 LE video processor from the GeForce line supports 2 monitors with a maximum resolution of 2048×1536. This GPU runs on a 250 MHz processor built on a 130 nm process with a GDDR memory type, a memory capacity of 128 MB and a memory frequency of 400 MHz, where the memory exchange bus is 64 bits.
The additional characteristics of this video card from ASUS with the code name NV36 are as follows: , known data about the length and height x . Number of fans in the cooling system 1. Video card from manufacturer GIGABYTE in which the video processor GeForce FX 5700 LE from the GeForce line supports 2 monitors with a maximum resolution of 2048×1536. This GPU runs on a 250 MHz processor built on a 130 nm process with a GDDR memory type, a memory capacity of 128 MB and a memory frequency of 400 MHz, where the memory exchange bus is 64 bits. Additional characteristics of this video card from GIGABYTE company codenamed NV36 are as follows: , known length and height data x . Number of fans in the cooling system 1.
A video card from the manufacturer Leadtek in which the GeForce FX 5700 LE video processor from the GeForce line supports 2 monitors with a maximum resolution of 2048×1536. This GPU runs on a 250 MHz processor built on a 130 nm process with a GDDR memory type, a memory capacity of 256 MB and a memory frequency of 440 MHz, where the memory exchange bus is 128 bits.
The additional characteristics of this video card from Leadtek company codenamed NV36 are as follows: , known data about the length and height x . Number of fans in the cooling system 1. A video card from Albatron, in which the GeForce FX 5700 LE video processor from the GeForce line supports 2 monitors with a maximum resolution of 2048×1536. This GPU operates at a frequency of 250 MHz processor built on a 130 nm process with a GDDR memory type, a memory capacity of 128 MB and a memory frequency of 400 MHz, where the memory exchange bus is 128 bits. The additional characteristics of this video board from Albatron company codenamed NV36 are as follows: , known length and height data x . Number of fans in the cooling system 1.
A video card from Albatron, in which the GeForce FX 5700 LE video processor from the GeForce line supports 2 monitors with a maximum resolution of 2048×1536. This GPU runs on a 250 MHz processor built on a 130 nm process with a GDDR memory type, a memory capacity of 256 MB and a memory frequency of 400 MHz, where the memory exchange bus is 128 bits.
The additional characteristics of this video board from Albatron company codenamed NV36 are as follows: , known length and height data x . Number of fans in the cooling system 1. Video card from the Palit manufacturer in which the GeForce FX 5700 LE video processor from the GeForce line supports 2 monitors with a maximum resolution of 2048×1536. This GPU runs on a 250 MHz processor built on a 130 nm process with a GDDR memory type, a memory capacity of 256 MB and a memory frequency of 400 MHz, where the memory exchange bus is 128 bits. Additional characteristics of this video board from Palit company codenamed NV36 are as follows: , known data about the length and height x . Number of fans in the cooling system 1.
Video card from the Palit manufacturer in which the GeForce FX 5700 LE video processor from the GeForce line supports 2 monitors with a maximum resolution of 2048×1536. This GPU operates at a frequency of 250 MHz processor built on a 130 nm process with a GDDR memory type, a memory capacity of 128 MB and a memory frequency of 400 MHz, where the memory exchange bus is 128 bits.
Additional characteristics of this video board from Palit company codenamed NV36 are as follows: , known data about the length and height x . Number of fans in the cooling system 1. A video card from the manufacturer Inno3D in which the GeForce FX 5500 video processor from the GeForce line supports 2 monitors with a maximum resolution of 2048×1536. This GPU operates at a frequency of 270 MHz processor built on a 150 nm process with a GDDR memory type, a memory capacity of 256 MB and a memory frequency of 400 MHz, where the memory exchange bus is 128 bits. Additional characteristics of this video board from Inno3D company codenamed NV34 are as follows: , known length and height data 160 x 110 mm. There are no fans in the cooling system (passive cooling).
Pages
- 1
- 2
- next ›
- latest »
See also
Video card GIGABYTE Radeon R7 250 (720 MHz, GDDR3 2048 MB 1600 MHz 128 bit)
The video card is produced under the GIGABYTE brand, which implements the Radeon R7 250 video processor under the general line of processors.
The maximum possible image sizes that this board can reproduce: 4096×2160. The technical parameters of the GPU are as follows: the oscillation frequency of the processor cycles is 720 MHz. Lithography used for the map: 28 nm. The available video memory size of this board is 2048 MB. The type of memory used is GDDR3. The bus on which the exchange with the memory takes place is: 128 bits. The memory frequency operates at 1600 MHz. GIGABYTE Radeon R7 260X video card (1188MHz, GDDR5 2048MB 6500MHz 128bit)
The video card is produced under the GIGABYTE brand which implements the Radeon R7 260X video processor under the general line of Radeon processors. The maximum possible image sizes that this board can reproduce: 4096×2160. The technical parameters of the GPU are as follows: the oscillation frequency of the processor cycles is 1188 MHz. Lithography used for the map: 28 nm. The available video memory size of this board is 2048 MB.
The type of memory used is GDDR5. The bus on which the exchange with the memory takes place is: 128 bits. The memory frequency operates at 6500 MHz. Video card Palit GeForce GT 430 (700 MHz, GDDR3 1024 MB 1400 MHz 128 bit)
The video card is produced under the Palit brand, which implements the GeForce GT 430 video processor under the general line of GeForce processors. The maximum possible image dimensions that this board can reproduce is 2560×1600. The technical parameters of the GPU are as follows: the oscillation frequency of the processor cycles is 700 MHz. Lithography used for the map: 40 nm. The available video memory size of this board is 1024 MB. The type of memory used is GDDR3. The bus on which the exchange with the memory takes place is: 128 bits. The memory frequency operates at 1400 MHz.
Information about the technical characteristics of the goods indicated on the pages of the site is for reference only and does not mean that the goods are available from sellers on the radio market.
Specify the availability of goods directly from sellers , contacting them at the contacts listed in the catalog of radio market companies.
Moscow, 17 Kostromskaya st.0001
Advantages
Defects
Comment
Grade
I accept the terms
providing data.- NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE graphics card
- 256 MB GDDR video memory
- core/memory frequency: 250/440 MHz
- DVI, VGA, TV-out connectors
- DirectX 9 support.
0, OpenGL 1.5 - work with 2 monitors
Average rating Video card Leadtek GeForce FX 5700 LE 250Mhz AGP 256Mb 440Mhz 128 bit DVI TV — 4.33
A total of 3 reviews are known about Video Card Leadtek GeForce FX 5700 LE 250Mhz AGP 256Mb 440Mhz 128 bit DVI TVFrom 11 sources we collected 3 negative, negative and positive reviews.
We will show all the advantages and disadvantages of the Leadtek GeForce FX 5700 LE 250Mhz AGP 256Mb 440Mhz 128 bit DVI TV video card revealed during use by users. We do not hide anything and post all positive and negative honest customer reviews about the Leadtek GeForce FX 5700 LE 250Mhz AGP 256Mb 440Mhz 128 bit DVI TV video card, and also offer alternative analogues. Is it worth it to buy — the decision is only yours!
Best deals on Video card Leadtek GeForce FX 5700 LE 250Mhz AGP 256Mb 440Mhz 128 bit DVI TV
Recalls updated on 04.10.2022
write a feedback
Name hidden, 10/27/2019
Advantages: overclocked the memory to 500
GPU to 320
if they are exceeded by instantaneous overheating, but it works like a perpetual motion machine for them
she is already 9 years old — a rarity)))Disadvantages: she is already 9 years old — a rarity)
Comment: at one time she gave heat
game of 2007 for her limitVitaly V.
, 05/13/2019
Pros: Great addition to a 4 year old computer but not now.
Disadvantages: This video card is obsolete, in order to enjoy all the graphic details of new games you need something new.
Comment: I’ve been using this video card for 4 years, and still new games, such as the upcoming C&C: Red Alert 3, work well with this video card at minimum settings. Although NFS: Most Wanted and NFS: Carbon worked very civilly with a monitor resolution of 1024×768 and settings set to high quality textures.
Eugene G., 03/12/2019
Advantages: To date, none, but good performance in games of the generation of this card.
Disadvantages: Graphics processing speed
Doesn’t pull at least games of 2008, I don’t talk about new ones at allComment: I have been using vidyaha for more than 5 years.
