Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 970: What is the difference?
54points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
49points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Gigabyte Mini-ITX
vs
54 facts in comparison
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 970?
- 456MHz faster GPU clock speed?
1506MHzvs1050MHz - 0.46 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
3.85 TFLOPSvs3.4 TFLOPS - 5 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
72.3 GPixel/svs67.3 GPixel/s - 28W lower TDP?
120Wvs148W - 249MHz faster memory clock speed?
2002MHzvs1753MHz - 996MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
8008MHzvs7012MHz - 1.5x more VRAM?
6GBvs4GB - 11.5 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
120. 5 GTexels/svs109 GTexels/s
Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060?
- 31.8GB/s more memory bandwidth?
224GB/svs192.2GB/s - 64bit wider memory bus width?
256bitvs192bit - 384 more shading units?
1664vs1280 - 800million more transistors?
5200 millionvs4400 million - 11°C lower load GPU temperature?
63°Cvs74°C - 24 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
104vs80 - 16 more render output units (ROPs)?
64vs48 - 2°C lower idle GPU temperature?
28°Cvs30°C
Which are the most popular comparisons?
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
AMD Radeon RX 580
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
AMD Radeon RX 580
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
AMD Radeon RX 570
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX350
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
AMD Radeon RX 570
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Manli GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Price comparison
User reviews
Overall Rating
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
3 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
7. 3/10
3 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
4 User reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
8.8/10
4 User reviews
Features
Value for money
7.3/10
3 votes
7.5/10
4 votes
Gaming
7.0/10
3 votes
8.3/10
4 votes
Performance
7.0/10
3 votes
7.8/10
4 votes
Fan noise
7.0/10
3 votes
5.8/10
4 votes
Reliability
7.0/10
3 votes
8.8/10
4 votes
Performance
1.GPU clock speed
1506MHz
1050MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.GPU turbo
1708MHz
1178MHz
When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
3. pixel rate
72.3 GPixel/s
67.3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
4.floating-point performance
3.85 TFLOPS
3.4 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.
5.texture rate
120.5 GTexels/s
109 GTexels/s
The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
2002MHz
1753MHz
The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.
7.shading units
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.
8.texture mapping units (TMUs)
TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.
9.render output units (ROPs)
The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.
Memory
1.effective memory speed
8008MHz
7012MHz
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.
2.maximum memory bandwidth
192.2GB/s
224GB/s
This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4.memory bus width
192bit
256bit
A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.
5.version of GDDR memory
Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.
6.Supports ECC memory
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.
Features
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
2.OpenGL version
OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.
3.OpenCL version
Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.
4.Supports multi-display technology
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.
5.load GPU temperature
A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.
6.supports ray tracing
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.
7. Supports 3D
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.
9.PassMark (G3D) result
This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.
Ports
1.has an HDMI output
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.
2.HDMI ports
More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.
3.HDMI version
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.0
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.
4.DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.
6.mini DisplayPort outputs
Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which are the best graphics cards?
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce GTX 970 Graphics cards Comparison
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 970, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let’s find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 970.
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
GeForce GTX 970
Check Price
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | GeForce GTX 970 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 148 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pins |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6.144 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 970 has 23% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 970.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is build with Pascal architecture, and GeForce GTX 970 — with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is 456 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 970.
- GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 970 — by 28 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is 240 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 970.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is 7993 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 970.
Game benchmarks
Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 970. | ||
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 970. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 970 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 970 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 970 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 970 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Far Cry 5 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 970. | ||
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
low / 720p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
medium / 1080p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 970. | ||
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 970. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 970. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Metro Exodus is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 970. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and GeForce GTX 970 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 970. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 970. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 970. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 970. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | GeForce GTX 970 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP106 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 19 July 2016 | 19 September 2014 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1664 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1708 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 136. 7 | 109 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 3,920 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | 10.5″ (26.7 cm) |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Shared memory | — | — |
G-SYNC support | + | + |
VR Ready | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1. 2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | + |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.48 kh/s | |
G-SYNC | + | |
CUDA cores | 1664 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376″ (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048×1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 478 Mh/s | |
Decred / DCR (Decred) | 1. 51 Gh/s | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 22.21 Mh/s | |
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) | 291.61 Sol/s | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce GTX 1070 mobile
- GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce GTX 1070 mobile
- GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs Radeon Pro Duo
- GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs Radeon Pro 5600M
- GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon Pro Duo
- GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon Pro 5600M
GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX 970
- Home
- VGA Benchmarks
- GeForce GTX 1060 vs GeForce GTX 970
-
GeForce GTX 1060
110%
-
GeForce GTX 970
100%
Relative performance
-
GeForce GTX 1060
117%
-
GeForce GTX 970
100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1060 |
17% higher gaming performance. |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 970 |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (61 combinations of games and resolutions).
Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 970 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
GPU Name | GP106 (GP106-400-A1) | vs | GM204 (GM204-200-A1) | |
Fab Process | 16 nm | vs | 28 nm | |
Die Size | 200 mm² | vs | 398 mm² | |
Transistors | 4,400 million | vs | 5,200 million | |
Shaders | 1280 | vs | 1664 | |
Compute Units | 10 | vs | 13 | |
Core clock | 1506 MHz | vs | 1050 MHz | |
ROPs | 48 | vs | 56 | |
TMUs | 80 | vs | 104 |
Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 970 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 | |
Bus Width | 192 bit | vs | 256 bit | |
Memory Speed | 2002 MHz 8008 MHz effective |
vs | 1753 MHz 7012 MHz effective |
|
Memory Size | 6144 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 970 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
TDP | 120 watts | vs | 148 watts | |
Release Date | 10 Jul 2016 | vs | 19 Sep 2014 |
-
GeForce GTX 1060
72. 30 GP/s
-
GeForce GTX 970
58.80 GP/s
GigaPixels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 1060
120.50 GT/s
-
GeForce GTX 970
109.20 GT/s
GigaTexels — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 1060
192.20 GB/s
-
GeForce GTX 970
224.40 GB/s
GB/s — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 1060
3855.00 GFLOPs
-
GeForce GTX 970
3494.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs — higher is better
-
GeForce GTX 1060
17380
-
GeForce GTX 970
15750
Points (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xAA
-
GeForce GTX 1060
70
-
GeForce GTX 970
64
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA,EP3 Gator Bait
-
GeForce GTX 1060
73
-
GeForce GTX 970
55
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
75
-
GeForce GTX 970
65
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality,DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
50
-
GeForce GTX 970
47
FPS (higher is better)
OpenGL, Ultra Quality, SMAA 1tx
-
GeForce GTX 1060
108
-
GeForce GTX 970
91
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Settings
-
GeForce GTX 1060
71
-
GeForce GTX 970
62
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality,DX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
83
-
GeForce GTX 970
76
FPS (higher is better)
Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
59
-
GeForce GTX 970
54
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 1060
90
-
GeForce GTX 970
79
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Ultra Quality, MSAA, 16x AF
-
GeForce GTX 1060
65
-
GeForce GTX 970
53
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
59
-
GeForce GTX 970
47
FPS (higher is better)
Maximun Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
84
-
GeForce GTX 970
77
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Very High Details, Pure Hair On, HBAO+
-
GeForce GTX 1060
78
-
GeForce GTX 970
63
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
52
-
GeForce GTX 970
44
FPS (higher is better)
DX12 , Ultra Quality,16x AF,Ambient Occlusion,Tessellation
-
GeForce GTX 1060
70
-
GeForce GTX 970
62
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce GTX 1060
59
-
GeForce GTX 970
53
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Details
-
GeForce GTX 1060
79
-
GeForce GTX 970
61
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF
-
GeForce GTX 1060
62
-
GeForce GTX 970
57
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Max Detail, FXAA, 16:1 AF
-
GeForce GTX 1060
70
-
GeForce GTX 970
64
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
51
-
GeForce GTX 970
44
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xAA
-
GeForce GTX 1060
49
-
GeForce GTX 970
41
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, High Quality, 8m samples, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 1060
49
-
GeForce GTX 970
41
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA,EP3 Gator Bait
-
GeForce GTX 1060
49
-
GeForce GTX 970
40
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
59
-
GeForce GTX 970
45
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality,DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
37
-
GeForce GTX 970
36
FPS (higher is better)
OpenGL, Ultra Quality, SMAA 1tx
-
GeForce GTX 1060
69
-
GeForce GTX 970
58
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Settings
-
GeForce GTX 1060
48
-
GeForce GTX 970
43
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality,DX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
54
-
GeForce GTX 970
44
FPS (higher is better)
Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
42
-
GeForce GTX 970
39
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 1060
63
-
GeForce GTX 970
55
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Ultra Quality, MSAA, 16x AF
-
GeForce GTX 1060
48
-
GeForce GTX 970
37
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Detail
-
GeForce GTX 1060
74
-
GeForce GTX 970
69
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
39
-
GeForce GTX 970
31
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Very High Details, Pure Hair On, HBAO+
-
GeForce GTX 1060
52
-
GeForce GTX 970
42
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
34
-
GeForce GTX 970
29
FPS (higher is better)
DX12 , Ultra Quality,16x AF,Ambient Occlusion,Tessellation
-
GeForce GTX 1060
52
-
GeForce GTX 970
45
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce GTX 1060
46
-
GeForce GTX 970
42
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Details
-
GeForce GTX 1060
56
-
GeForce GTX 970
44
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF
-
GeForce GTX 1060
42
-
GeForce GTX 970
40
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Max Detail, FXAA, 16:1 AF
-
GeForce GTX 1060
49
-
GeForce GTX 970
45
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
34
-
GeForce GTX 970
30
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xAA
-
GeForce GTX 1060
27
-
GeForce GTX 970
25
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA,EP3 Gator Bait
-
GeForce GTX 1060
24
-
GeForce GTX 970
21
FPS (higher is better)
Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
27
-
GeForce GTX 970
22
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality,DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
29
-
GeForce GTX 970
25
FPS (higher is better)
OpenGL, Ultra Quality, SMAA 1tx
-
GeForce GTX 1060
34
-
GeForce GTX 970
29
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Settings
-
GeForce GTX 1060
25
-
GeForce GTX 970
23
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality,DX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
26
-
GeForce GTX 970
20
FPS (higher is better)
Very high Quality, DX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
24
-
GeForce GTX 970
21
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
-
GeForce GTX 1060
32
-
GeForce GTX 970
27
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Ultra Quality, MSAA, 16x AF
-
GeForce GTX 1060
28
-
GeForce GTX 970
19
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Detail
-
GeForce GTX 1060
40
-
GeForce GTX 970
38
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
22
-
GeForce GTX 970
19
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Very High Details, Pure Hair On, HBAO+
-
GeForce GTX 1060
26
-
GeForce GTX 970
19
FPS (higher is better)
Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
17
-
GeForce GTX 970
14
FPS (higher is better)
DX12 , Ultra Quality,16x AF,Ambient Occlusion,Tessellation
-
GeForce GTX 1060
29
-
GeForce GTX 970
26
FPS (higher is better)
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
-
GeForce GTX 1060
27
-
GeForce GTX 970
25
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Very High Details
-
GeForce GTX 1060
29
-
GeForce GTX 970
24
FPS (higher is better)
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF
-
GeForce GTX 1060
24
-
GeForce GTX 970
18
FPS (higher is better)
DX12, Max Detail, FXAA, 16:1 AF
-
GeForce GTX 1060
27
-
GeForce GTX 970
23
FPS (higher is better)
Ultra Quality, Windows 10 x64
-
GeForce GTX 1060
18
-
GeForce GTX 970
16
FPS (higher is better)
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 580 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon RX 570 |
VS | ||
Radeon RX 5500 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
VS | ||
GeForce GTX 1660 | Radeon R9 Nano |
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
Nvidia GTX 970 vs GTX 1060 Graphics Card | Isn’t GTX 1060 Will Be Good Enough?
Nvidia has always followed the rule of xx60 being entry-level and xx70 being the mid-range option for any generation of the graphics card. But things get a bit more complicated when comparing a cross-generation product like the Gtx 970 and Gtx 1060.
Nonetheless, by comparing the specs and benchmarks from a few games we can easily find out if the Gtx 1060 can hold up against the previous generation mid-range Gtx 970.
Nvidia GTX 970 vs GTX 1060 Graphics Card – Specification Comparison
When it comes to specs GTX 1060 card being the newer generation, has a lot of improvement over the previous-gen GTX 970 cards. 1060 card uses the new Ansel architecture instead of the previous generation’s Maxwell 2.0 that can be found on the Gtx 970.
Cuda Cores and Clock Speed
The Gtx 970 actually has more Cuda cores than the Gtx 1060. It has 1664 Cuda core while the Gtx 1060 has 1280 for the 6 GB version and 1152 for the 3 GB version.
But the lack of Cuda cores is more than made up the boost clock. GTX 1060 has a base clock of 1506 MHz and a Boost clock speed of 1708 MHz. On the other hand, Gtx 970 has only a 1050 MHz base clock and 1178 MHz of Boost clock speed.
New Features
This Ansel architecture opens the card up to many different features such as VR, G-Sync, and in recent years ray tracing. These newer features cannot be used on the old Maxwell architecture that is found on Gtx 970.
Video Memory
The video memory also gets some boosts in the 1060 version if you choose to do so. The Gtx 970 has 4 GB of video memory while the Gtx 1060 comes with either 3 GB or 6 GB depending on the version. But even if the 3 GB version has less video memory it performs better while playing games because of the higher clock speed.
Thermal and Power Consumption
Thermal and power consumption are also optimized in the newer version of the graphics cards. GTX 1060 has a max temperature of 94 degrees C while the Gtx 970 has 98 degrees C.
Along with the lower temperature, the power consumption on the Gtx 1060 is also less than its previous version of Gtx 970. For comparison’s sake, a Gtx 1060 needs 120W power to use at maximum capacity. But the Gtx 970 has a recommended power of 145W.
For the lower power consumption on the newer model, you will only need 400W power for the whole computer which jumps up to 500W when you want to use a Gtx 970. As a result, you are getting more performance at a lower cost when using the Gtx 1060.
Benchmarks and FPS Comparison
A card can have all the features but they also have to do well in the real test. Only having more features or more cores is not enough if it doesn’t improve the performance. So here we have the result for both Gtx 970 and 1060 in a benchmark.
There is also a measure of FPS for a few popular games at the same resolution and system. This will help us find out which card performs better and gives more FPS while playing games.
Benchmark
According to the user benchmark in 3D games, the Gtx 1060 6GB version has 14% and the 3 GB version has 5% more speed than Gtx 970. The average score of the benchmark is 10% in Gtx 1060; 6 GB but only 2% in the 3 GB version.
While considering the lighting, reflection, and gravity (N-body calculation) they perform 15%, 10%, and 15% better respectively in terms of frame rate on Gtx 1060; 6GB. Overclock speed is also better on it; to be precise, 10% better than Gtx 970.
But this 10 to 15% boost begins to get small when we compare the Gtx 1060; 3 GB version. It has a 7% better frame rate while considering reflection and 5% better n-body calculation but lighting remains the same as its previous version of Gtx 970. The overclock score is 3% better and the overall score is 2% better than the Gtx 970.
Frame per Second (FPS) Comparison
After testing, the Gtx 1060; 3 GB version performs slightly better than the Gtx 970 but the 6 GB version has a pretty significant frame rate up while gaming.
GTA V
In GTA V, the Gtx 970 gives about 53 fps on average, whereas the Gtx 1060 6 GB gives 62 fps which is a 17% increase. The 3 GB version also performs a lot better for GTA V. It gives 60 fps in-game which is more than what it increases for other games.
Witcher 3
Here the Gtx 970 gives 48 fps and the Gtx 1060 6 GB gives 56 fps while 3 GB gives 51 fps. In both cases, it is a 17% and 6% increase respectively.
CS: GO
In counter-strike, the Gtx 970 actually performs 4% better at 156 fps than the Gtx 1060 3 GB which gives 150 fps. But the 6 GB version outshines both at a maximum of 160 fps.
LoL continues the trend of CS: GO. Here the Gtx 970 gives 156 fps while the Gtx 1060 3 GB gives 148 fps but 6 GB increases it to 178 fps.
PUBG and Fortnite
Both PUBG and Fortnite have better performance in Gtx 1060 cards. The 3 GB gives 64 and 98 fps respectively and 6 GB gives 68 and 101 fps respectively. On the other hand, the Gtx 970 gives 63 and 98 fps respectively for these games.
Conclusion
In every way, the Gtx 1060 is better than the Gtx 970. A few games may have a bit better fps on the 970 when compared to the 1060 3 GB but they are not too significant.
On top of that, the 970 these days goes for more than 1060 because of its rarity. So considering everything, the Gtx 1060 6 GB will be the best pick in any circumstances and the 3 GB version if there is budget constrain.
GTX 970 vs 1060 — NVIDIA GeForce Graphics Cards Comparison
One of the most heated topics in the case of graphics cards is the comparison among Nvidia gtx 970 vs 1060. GTX 970 has been on the market for a long time and has been making a great impact. However, GTX 1060 has come in the light recently. Due to that, it’s gained some great popularity.
So, if you want details on both the graphics card gtx 970 vs gtx 1060, then go through the rest of the categories below!
Specification Comparison Between GTX 970 vs 1060
In this section, you’ll get a comparison between GTX 1060 vs 970.
GTX 970 | GTX 1060 |
---|---|
Graphics Coprocessor: Nvidia | Graphics Coprocessor: gddr5 |
Memory Bus Width: 256 bits | Memory Bus Width: 192 bits |
Graphics Ram Type: GDDR5 | Graphics Ram Type: GDDR5 |
Built-In Media: NA | Built-In Media: Applicable |
Graphics Card Ram: 4Gb | Graphics Card Ram: 6 GB |
Dimensions: 10. 5 x 2 x 4.4 inches | Dimensions: 10.9 x 5.5 x 1.5 Inches |
Graphics Interface: PCI-E | Memory Clock Speed: 8,100 Mhz |
Memory Clock Speed: 7,010 MHz | — |
Price Comparison Between GTX 970 vs 1060
The price of a Graphics card gtx 1060 vs 970 can switch due to many factors. This happens due to seasonal discounts or new releases of cards or clearing out overloaded stock. The change happens quite often and there are other factors that trigger this fluctuation in prices. This is why it is essential for industries to refer to the price chart of gtx 1060 vs gtx 970. Based on this chart of 970 vs 1060 6GB, you can figure out what you are dealing with and how much you’re dealing with.
According to the Price Chart for GTX 970…
Based on what the chart says, the Nvidia Graphics card GTX 970 is available between the price range of $250 and $350. However, there’s been an upward trend going at the rate of $300.
In case you’re looking for 4Gb, you may want to consider paying $300.
This only implies that no matter how long it’s been since its release, GTX 970 holds value and it’s not likely to go down anytime soon. Unless GTX 1070 steals the showbiz.
According to the Price Chart for GTX 1060…
On the other hand, the price chart for GTX 1060 shows a steady move. The price range has been fluctuating among the range of $260 and $300. This price range is for the model which provides 6GB with DDR5 as the Ram type. The model has 3GB is trending at $200.
Based on the chart, it implies that the price range for GTX 1060 is more affordable than GTX 970. Also, that is considering the fact that it has more memory space to offer (6-4GB) compared to GTX 970.
Benchmark Comparison Between GTX 970 vs GTX 1060
The next factor which is helpful in gaining a bit more knowledge is the benchmark performance of the two Graphics cards. So let’s deal with a benchmark comparison for the two graphics cards.
Benchmark Performance for GTX 970
To analyze and test the usefulness of the card, it’s been tested with games and here’s what you’re looking at:
Ghost Recon [Video Game]
Released in the year 2017, Ghost Recon is a game with great graphics as the game has a vast environment view. Upon testing GTX 970 on it, it was found out that it ran smoothly at 1920×1080. However, here’s what the analysis shows:
Resolution 1280 x 720p | Resolution 1920 x 1080p | Resolution 2048 x 1080p | Resolution 3840 x 2160p |
---|---|---|---|
Low Preset: 140 Frames per second | Low Preset: 94. 3 Frames per second | Low Preset: 43.8 frames per second | The preset is very high in this case hence it produces 23.4 Frames per second |
Medium Preset (anti-aliasing): 121.2 Frames per second | Medium Preset (anti-aliasing): 73.6 Frames per second | Medium Preset (Anti-aliasing): 35.1 Frames per second | However, the performance is relatively good. But with the increased resolution, the performance did not do so well |
High Preset (anisotropic filtering 4x): 105.2 Frames per second | High Preset (anisotropic filtering 4x): 58. 5 Frames per second | High Preset (4x Anisotropic filter): 31 frames per second | — |
Benchmark Performance For GTX 1060
Now to test the performance of the GTX 1060 graphics card, the same is done:
Ghost Recon [Video Game]
Upon switching to the GTX 1060 graphics card and playing Ghost Recon, the following stats were recorded:
Resolution 1920 x 1080p | Resolution 2048 x 1080p | Resolution 3840 x 2160p |
---|---|---|
Preset (High) with anisotropic filter (4x): 78.8 Frames per second | Preset (High) with anisotropic filter (4x): 32. 8 Frames per second | Preset (Very High) with anisotropic filter (8x): 26.8 Frames per second |
Based on the above stats, the performance of GTX 1060 is much smoother at 1080p than it was for GTX 970. You may notice that a lot of frames in GTX 970 are being added with the setting being high on 1080p. But for GTX 1060 the frames are much more than that of GTX 970.
The Final Verdict; Which is Better – GTX 970 vs 1060?
Based on all the stats and performance recorded, along with the price chart review, it is needless to say the GTX 1060 satisfies all. 1060 is much faster in speed performance compared to 970 based on the game tests mentioned previously.
This is because it offers memory space much higher than GTX 970. It is cheaper according to the price chart and it is a newly released model.
However, 970 has its own values as well. So if you already have the GTX 970 graphics card then you may need to consider boosting it instead of going for the newly released model. Boosting it would require you to make an upgrade. And the cost for the up-gradation would cost you around $50 up to $120 which is not worth it.
Posted in: Graphics Card, Hardware
Five Years Later: Revisiting the GeForce GTX 970
Recently we’ve looked back at the GeForce GTX 980 Ti and the GTX 960, both popular GPUs from yesteryear. Those features have been warmly welcomed, but besides the overall positive responses what we noticed in common in your feedback was the request to test the GeForce GTX 970, which was the performance/value offering of the time and a GPU some of you are still rocking in today’s games with some success.
So today we’ve got an old fashioned GPU battle pitting the GeForce GTX 970 against the Radeon R9 290. Whether you’re looking to upgrade or not, it should be interesting to see after 5 years which GPU is the ultimate winner. ..
Quickly rewinding for a moment, Nvidia revealed the GTX 970 for the first time in September 2014, some ten months after the Radeon R9 290’s release. The GTX 970 was the newer product and unsurprisingly it came in offering a little extra performance at a slightly better price. AMD did respond with aggressive R9 290 price cuts but with the 970 generally 10-15% faster on average and considerably better power efficiency, it went on to be a best seller, despite the VRAM controversy.
Throughout 2015 the GTX 970 was typically the puncher GPU and with a slew of quality AIB models to pick from, it easily outsold the R9 290. However many of those who purchased the R9 290 were jumping up and down about how it would be a better investment down the track. At least today we can settle which GPU offers the best performance in 2019.
For this test we have 33 games tested at 1080p, a suitable resolution for these GPUs. We’ll look closely at the results for 13 of the titles before moving into a few head to head comparison graphs. As usual the test system used is powered by a Core i9-9900K clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3200 memory. Let’s see those blue bar graphs now…
Benchmarks
First up we have Apex Legends and right away we’re seeing pretty neck and neck performance between the GTX 970 and R9 290. This one’s too close to call and well within the margin of error. It’s safe to say performance is identical using either GPU. When compared to a modern GPU we’re looking at GTX 1060 3GB-like performance.
The Division 2 is a title that works exceptionally well with AMD hardware. As evidenced by Vega 64 beating the GTX 1080 and RTX 2060, while the RX 580 crushed the GTX 1060. With those comparisons previously established it comes as no surprise that the R9 290 dusts the GTX 970 beating it by a 19% margin. The 970 does perform significantly better than the 3GB 1060, but even so you’ll want to dial the quality settings down a little.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider is another title that sees AMD GPUs doing quite well and here the GTX 970 was 12% slower than the R9 290. The GTX 970 mimicked the GTX 1060 3GB, or I guess you could say the 1060 mimics the 970, either way performance was decent despite trailing the R9 290.
We promise the order of the games wasn’t chosen on purpose but here we have yet another title that works extremely well with AMD GPUs. Again, the GTX 970 was 12% slower than the R9 290, though despite that performance was still very playable. Still in three of the more recently released titles we’ve seen the R9 290 doing well.
Finally a solid win for the GTX 970, this time testing with Hitman 2 using the DirectX 11 API. The GeForce GPU was 12% faster though I should point out that enabling the new patched-in DX12 mode didn’t change things. The 970 was still the superior GPU in this title.
Performance in Just Cause 4 was similar using either GPU. The GeForce pulled ahead in our test when looking at the average frame rate, however the 1% low result was identical with both managing 40 fps, so overall the experience was much the same.
Moving on we find a close battle when testing with Resident Evil 2, here the R9 290 was just 6fps faster at 1080p and this meant the 970 performed more like a 3GB 1060, not a bad result given the average frame rate was 66 fps, but this one is still a win for the Radeon 290.
Fortnite is a game that favors Nvidia GPUs thanks to its use of the Unreal Engine 4. This can be seen when comparing the GTX 1060 and RX 580 for example, it can also be seen when comparing older GPUs such as the GTX 970 and R9 290. Here the 970 was 18% faster, delivering 87 fps on average.
The GTX 970 also stacks up really well in Metro Exodus with an average of 48 fps at 1080p using the ultra quality settings. This meant it was 23% faster than the R9 290, placing it basically on par with 6GB GTX 1060 and RX 590. So a very solid result for the old Maxwell GPU.
Next up we have Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege and here the GTX 970 is more competitive than I was expecting. I recall this being a very easy win for the R9 290 back in the day, but here it was just 5% on average. That said the 1% low performance was more consistent, though the experience was still extremely smooth with the 970.
Frame rates were surprisingly similar when testing with Battlefield V, here the GTX 970 was just 3 fps faster which comes to be a 5% margin. This is why we typically call it a tie when the margin is 5% or less. The GTX 970 did well in this title and as we’ve seen many times already, it’s often very similar to the 3GB GTX 1060.
World of Tanks is a game that doesn’t like AMD GPUs that much, or AMD GPUs don’t like World of Tanks. Either way it’s not great news for the red team. The R9 290 was able to deliver very playable performance but we see a 36% uplift when looking at the GTX 970 and that’s obviously significant.
And the last game we’re going to look at individually is Far Cry New Dawn and here we have a tie at 70 fps a piece. That placed both the GTX 970 and R9 290 on par with the 3GB 1060. Performance at 1080p using the ultra quality preset certainly was respectable and you won’t need to turn down any quality settings here.
Power Consumption
This is one area where the Maxwell GPUs had a big advantage over the AMD competition and it’s an advantage Nvidia still holds today. For what is a similar level of performance the R9 290 drove up system power consumption by 30%. This is why GTX 970 graphics cards typically run cooler and quieter than R9 290 cards.
Performance Summary
That’s how the GTX 970 and R9 290 stack up in those preliminary titles, seemed as though we saw quite a bit of back and forth. Based on what we’ve seen so far we don’t imagine the GTX 970 is still 10-15% faster like what most reviewers found back in late 2014. That said let’s see what the 33 game comparison has for us.
There’s your ‘fine wine’ working right there, a.k.a. AMD’s slow driver development. Seriously though, that’s an impressive comeback for the R9 290. Still the GeForce 970 was faster by a 5% margin or greater in 16 of the 33 games tested, while the R9 290 was faster by a 5% margin or greater in just 11 of the games.
So the GeForce GTX 970 was the more consistent performer, the smaller 3.5GB primary VRAM partition will have hurt it in Wolfenstein, especially with the settings used for testing. DiRT 4 also favors Radeon GPUs using CMAA, while Strange Brigade is an AMD sponsored title and well optimized for Radeon GPUs. AMD also does well in The Division 2, Sniper Elite 4, Forza Horizon 4, and Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
It was mostly the older titles, or Nvidia sponsored games where the green team did well, games such as World of Tanks, Warhammer II, Metro Exodus, Project Cars 2, and Fortnite, for example.
GeForce GTX 970 vs. GTX 1060 6GB
Moving on we decided to see how the GTX 970 stacks up against the GTX 1060 6GB. On average the 970 was 14% slower. So here we’re comparing a 2014 release with an MSRP of $330 to a 2016 release with a $250 MSRP. For those wondering back when we reviewed the GTX 1060 6GB at launch, the 970 was 15% slower, so no ‘Nvidia gimping’ as it’s often referred to appears to have taken place.
Of course, Nvidia doesn’t actively gimp performance, we’ve proven that’s a load of nonsense multiple times now, as have others. They are guilty of prioritizing newer architectures while optimizations for older generations tend to come later, if at all for the really old models.
GeForce GTX 970 vs. RTX 2060
Now if you’ve been holding out all these years for a $300-$400 upgrade, the GeForce RTX 2060 might be of interest.
Closing Remarks
There you have it, the GTX 970 went from ~10-15% faster four years ago to a percent faster in 2019 against the Radeon R9 290 based on our 33 game test sample that includes many newer titles.
Despite its 3.5GB of fast VRAM, the GTX 970 remains the more reliable performer which might surprise some of you, especially after you’ve no doubt heard over and over again how it’s doomed and will be completely useless before too long. It’s also the cooler GPU but most important of all, either solution will let you play games at 1080p comfortably all these years later.
The doomsday scenario still hasn’t happened and with a few minor tweaks the GTX 970 can carve its way through the latest and greatest titles at 1080p without an issue. To give credit where credit is due, the Radeon R9 290 is also extremely impressive in 2019.
We’re completely attributing the R9 290’s comeback to AMD’s driver development and not anything to do with the partitioned VRAM buffer or Nvidia neglecting driver support. The ‘fine wine’ here is all about AMD getting on top of driver optimization over the past few years.
Shopping Shortcuts:
- GeForce RTX 2060 on Amazon, Newegg
- GeForce RTX 2080 on Amazon, Newegg
- GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on Amazon, Newegg
- Radeon RX Vega 56 on Amazon, Newegg
- Radeon RX Vega 64 on Amazon, Newegg
- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X on Amazon, Newegg
- Intel Core i7-8700K on Amazon, Newegg
0026 vs 1050MHz
3.85 TFLOPS vs 3.4 TFLOPS
72.3 GPixel/s vs 67.3 GPixel/s
120W vs 148W
2002MHz vs 1753MHz
8008MHz vs 7012MHz
6GB vs 4GB
120.5 GTexels/s vs 109 GTexels/s
- 31.8GB/s more memory bandwidth?
224GB/s vs 192.2GB/s - 64bit wider memory bus?
256bit vs 192bit - 384 more stream processors?
1664 vs 1280 - 800million more transistors?
5200 million vs 4400 million - 11°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
63°C vs 74°C - 24 more texture units (TMUs)?
104 vs 80 - 16 more ROPs?
64 vs 48 - 2°C lower GPU idle temperature?
28°C vs 30°C
What are the most popular comparisons?
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
AMD Radeon RX 580
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
AMD Radeon RX 580
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Nvidia GeForce 900TX
003
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
AMD Radeon RX 570
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
Nvidia GeForce MX350
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
AMD Radeon RX 570
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Manli GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 970
vs
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
AMD Radeon RX 550
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
vs
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Price Comparison
User Reviews
Overall Rating
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
3 User Reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 10600003
7. 3 /10
3 reviews of users
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
4 Reviews of users
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
8.8 /10
9000 4 $ 9,0003
7.3 /10
3 Votes
7.5 /10
4 Votes
Games
7.0 /10
3 VOTES
9000 8.3 /10
4 Votes
performance
7.0270 /10
3 Votes
7.8 /10
4 Votes
9000
5.8 /10
4 Votes
Reliability
7.0270 /10
3 VOTES
8.8 /10 9000
VOTES
Production
1. TC0003
1506MHz
1050MHz
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.
2.turbo GPU
1708MHz
1178MHz
When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.
3. pixel rate
72.3 GPixel/s
67.3 GPixel/s
The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
4.flops
3.85 TFLOPS
3.4 TFLOPS
FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.
5.texture size
120.5 GTexels/s
109 GTexels/s
Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.
6.GPU memory speed
2002MHz
1753MHz
Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.
7.shading patterns
Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.
8.textured units (TMUs)
TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.
9 ROPs imaging units
ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.
Memory
1.memory effective speed
8008MHz
7012MHz
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.
2.max memory bandwidth
192.2GB/s
224GB/s
This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.
3.VRAM
VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.
4. memory bus width
192bit
256bit
Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.
5.GDDR memory versions
Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.
6. Supports memory debug code
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.
Functions
1.DirectX version
DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.
2nd version of OpenGL
The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.
OpenCL version 3.
Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.
4. Supports multi-monitor technology
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.
5.GPU Temperature at Boot
Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.
6.supports ray tracing
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.
7. Supports 3D
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).
8.supports DLSS
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.
9. PassMark result (G3D)
This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.
Ports
1.has HDMI output
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.
2.HDMI connectors
More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.
HDMI 3 version
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.0
Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.
4. DisplayPort outputs
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.
5.DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI.
Mini DisplayPort 6.outs
Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.
Price comparison
Cancel
Which graphic cards are better?
Which gaming graphics card is better — NVidia GeForce GTX 970 or GTX 1060?
The game video card is the «engine» of the entire game process. It depends on its characteristics whether the gamer will be able to plunge headlong into this magical action, whether he will “believe” what is happening. That is why it is not so easy to find a decent component. Often gamers hesitate between two options — GTX 970 and GTX 1060. Here are the pros and cons with a detailed comparison of popular cards.
See also: 3 popular types of matrices: IPS, PLS and TN — which monitor is better
NVidia GeForce GTX 1060
with rivals, she wins in many ways.
GeForce GTX 1060 from ASUS in 6GB fulfills its function: the gamer dissolves in the game, forgetting about the screen that separates him from what is happening. The manufacturer presents a maximum resolution of 7680×4320. In addition, the card’s HDMI ports support VR technology, which is essential for the immersive gaming enthusiast.
Useful: How to format a hard drive — standard tools and 6 special utilities
Another GTX 1060 manufacturer — MSI — keeps all the factors that ASUS is interested in, adding new nice «chips». This model is really worth buying for those who love powerful gaming battles in which the GPU works at full power. The original Airflow Control cooling system controls the temperature of the card, allowing you to get the most out of your card.
Gigabyte’s gaming video card also differs in its own cooling technology: it has 2 fans. The ingenious blade design and composite copper tube keep performance high even during the heaviest system loads.
Interesting: How to Check the Status of an SSD Drive in Windows and Mac — 10 Monitoring Software0003
- incredibly realistic picture;
- a huge amount of memory — 6GB, which opens up almost endless possibilities in the gameplay;
- VR every gamer dreams of;
- Almost silent cooling.
Only cost is against. Of course, you can find cheaper ones. Nevertheless, gamers continue to choose it: the characteristics are really impressive and more than pay off the investment.
NVidia GeForce GTX 970
The rival of the model described above is the GTX 970, which also appears frequently in recommendations and performs well in tests. It costs less, and therefore it is on it that many gamers stop. Although the model often loses to its modernized contemporaries.
Stay tuned: Should you buy a PS4 in 2018 or wait for the PlayStation 5?
The GTX970 (4Gb DDR5) from ASUS offers the user a maximum resolution of 2560×1600. Compared to the capabilities of newer cards, this is not the best indicator, but it is enough to start immersing yourself in the game world. But the bit depth of the card is 256 bits.
MSI’s variant also offers 256 bits, while raising the resolution to 4096 x 2160. The card supports GDDR5 memory type. Under the same conditions, there is a board from GIGABYTE on the market — it was this manufacturer who managed to make the model popular in gaming circles. Thanks to the original additions from the manufacturer, an efficient cooling system that allows you to maximize performance without losing graphics, it is more often than other options advised on the forums.
What they put «+» for:
- MSI GPUs and Gigabytes have good resolution;
- Inexpensive, especially when compared with new products.
It will turn out to count no less minuses:
- Fragility. Many users complain that she «lives» no more than 1-1.5 years.
- Performance is not up to par with other models on the market, even those in the same price range.
- Now the card has been discontinued, so it is quite difficult to find it.
Worth knowing: TOP 10 best USB keyboards
Both 970 and 1060 have certain advantages over their opponent in their characteristics. The presented options for video cards can easily find their user: the features of each of them will attract people with different goals and desires. But how to objectively understand and understand which model will become your best friend and assistant in any gaming battle? What is the difference and how significant is it? A comparison table of characteristics will help to cope with this.
Which is better? Each user decides for himself. Perhaps the inexpensive GTX 970 is suitable for beginners. It will help you understand and delve into the gaming world. And then you can switch to a more powerful model. Someone will immediately like a mega-productive option. The comparison of graphics cards presented in this article with an overview of key features and parameters will help you decide which one is the best for gaming.
Big test & comparison Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 in 2019
This material was written by a site visitor and has been rewarded.
Hello. Today we will test a cool video card from the company Nvidia on the Maxwell architecture, which was released in 2014. The GPU is currently doing very well with modern video games, so let’s take a look at the performance of the GPU in modern and popular games literally and compare with a direct competitor from the company AMD — Radeon R9 290 .
Enjoy watching and good mood!
recommendations
33 games were tested for this test at 1080p, a suitable resolution for these GPUs. Let’s take a look at the results for 13 titles before moving on to a few comparison charts. As usual, the test system used is equipped with a 5 GHz Core i9-9900K processor and 32 GB of DDR4-3200 memory
Testing
In Apex Legends , we immediately see excellent performance of the GTX 970 and R9 290. It is safe to say that the performance is the same when using any GPU. Compared to a modern GPU, we’re looking at the performance of the GTX 1060 3GB.
Division 2 — Works exceptionally well with AMD hardware. As evidenced by the Vega 64, beating the GTX 1080 and RTX 2060 while the RX 580 crushes the GTX 1060.0003
Shadow of the Tomb Raider is another game where AMD GPUs perform quite well and here the GTX 970 is 12% slower than the R9 290. The 970 is 12% slower than the R9 290, although despite this the performance is still very playable.
Finally a solid win for the GTX 970, this time testing in Hitman 2 using the DirectX 11 API. The GeForce GPU was 12% faster, though I should note that enabling DX12 mode didn’t change anything. 970 still fared better in this title.
Performance on the Just Cause 4 was consistent with either GPU. GeForce moved ahead in our test in terms of frame rate averages, but the low 1% score was identical for both cards.
Moving on, we see a close battle when testing in Resident Evil 2 , here the R9 290 was only 6fps faster at 1080p.
Fortnite is a game that favors Nvidia GPUs thanks to the use of Unreal Engine 4. This can be seen, for example, when comparing GTX 1060 and RX 580, and also when comparing older GPUs like GTX 970 and R9 290. Here the 970 was 18% faster, delivering an average of 87 fps.
The GTX 970 also performs very well in the Metro Exodus at an average of 48 fps at 1080p using ultra quality settings. It’s 23% faster than R9290, which makes it almost equal to the 6 GB GTX 1060 and RX 590. So this is a very good result for a Maxwell GPU.
Next is Rainbow Six Siege , and here the GTX 970 is more competitive than expected. The R9 290 is only 5% faster on average.
The GTX 970 excels at the Battlefield V , and as we’ve seen many times, the performance is similar to the GTX 1060 3GB.
World of Tanks is a game that doesn’t really like AMD GPUs, or AMD doesn’t like World of Tanks. In any case, this is not good news for the red team.
And the last game we’re going to look at is Far Cry New Dawn and here we have a 70fps tie. This put the GTX 970 and R9 290 on par with 3GB 1060. Performance at 1080p with the ultra quality preset was certainly respectable, and you don’t have to give up any quality settings here.
Power Consumption
This is one area where Maxwell GPUs have a big advantage over AMD’s competitors, and one that Nvidia still holds today. For the same performance level R9290 increased system power consumption by 30%. This is why GTX 970 graphics cards typically run cooler and quieter than R9 290 cards. at the end of 2014, however, let’s see what a comparison of 33 games reveals for us.
These were mostly old or Nvidia sponsored games where the green team did well, such as World of Tanks, Warhammer II, Metro Exodus, Project Cars 2 and Fortnite.
GeForce GTX 970 vs. GTX 1060 6GB
Moving on, we decided to compare the GTX 970 with the GTX 1060 6GB. On average, 970 is 14% slower. So here we are comparing the 2014 edition with a $330 MSRP to the 2016 edition with a $250 MSRP.
GeForce GTX 970 vs. RTX 2060
A test for those who decide to upgrade to RTX 2060
Conclusion
The doomsday scenario has not happened yet, and with a few minor changes to the GTX9 graphics70 will be able to carry the latest and greatest games in 1080p without any problems. To give credit — the Radeon R9 290 is also impressive in 2019.
We fully attribute the R9 290’s comeback to AMD’s quality drivers, which have been getting better lately. The «good wine» here is that AMD has been at the pinnacle of driver optimization over the past few years.
Translated and voiced from the site techspot
What video card do you currently use?
More interesting material, quality cosplay and excellent art you can find >HERE < !!!
This article was written by a site visitor and has been rewarded.
Which is better MSI GeForce GTX 970 or Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
MSI GeForce GTX 970
GPU base clock
The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a high clock speed.
1506MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
1050MHz
max 2457
Average: 938 MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
2002MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.6 MHz
1753MHz
max 16000
Average: 1326.6 MHz
FLOPS
The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
3.79TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92. 5 TFLOPS
3.37TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 92.5 TFLOPS
Turbo GPU
If the speed of the GPU drops below its limit, it can switch to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all
1708 MHz
max 2903
Average: 1375.8 MHz
1178MHz
max 2903
Average: 1375.8 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all
120.5 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
109. 2 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
Architecture name
Pascal
Maxwell
Graphic processor name
GP106
GM204
002
Memory bandwidth
This is the speed at which the device stores or reads information.
192.2GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
224.4GB/s
max 2656
Average: 198.3 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all
8008 MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984. 5 MHz
7012MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
6 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates to improve overall performance
Show all
5
Average: 4.5
5
Average: 4.5
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus means that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all
192bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
256bit
max 8192
Average: 290.1bit
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all
120W
Average: 140.4W
148W
Average: 140.4W
Process
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
16 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
28 nm
Average: 47.5 nm
Number of transistors
The higher their number, the more processor power it indicates
4400 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
5200 million
max 80000
Average: 5043 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed is provided by the expansion card used to connect the computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all
3
Mean: 2. 8
3
Mean: 2.8
Width
250mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
269mm
max 421.7
Average: 242.6mm
Height
111.2mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
111mm
max 180
Average: 119.1mm
DirectX
Used in demanding games for enhanced graphics
12
max 12.2
Average: 11.1
12
max 12. 2
Average: 11.1
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all
1.2
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
1.2
max 4.6
Average: 1.7
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4
Shader model version
6. 4
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
6.4
max 6.6
Average: 5.5
version VULKAN
1.2
1.1
version CUDA
6.1
is
HDMI Output
HDMI exit allows you to connect devices with ports of HDMI or Mini-HDMIs. They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Full display
Yes
Yes
DisplayPort
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort
3
Average: 2
3
Average: 2
DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI
one
Mean: 1. 4
one
Mean: 1.4
Number of HDMI sockets
The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all
one
Average: 1.1
Average: 1.1
HDMI
Yes
Yes
Passmark score
10047
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
9542
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU benchmark score
74947
max 1
Average: 80042. 3
71363
max 1
Average: 80042.3
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10818
max 38276
Average: 12463
9245
max 38276
Average: 12463
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
12560
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
11715
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
3DMark 11 Performance GPU score
16942
max 57937
Average: 18799. 9
15712
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
3DMark Vantage Performance score
42843
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
41418
max 97887
Average: 37830.6
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
230475
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
413849
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
Unigine Heaven 3.0 test score
8909
max 60072
Average: 2402
max 60072
Average: 2402
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Solidworks
45
max 202
Average: 62. 4
max 202
Average: 62.4
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 sw-03
45
max 202
Average: 64
max 202
Average: 64
SPECviewperf 12 evaluation — Siemens NX
6
max 212
Average: 14
max 212
Average: 14
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 showcase-01
63
max 232
Average: 121.3
max 232
Average: 121.3
SPECviewperf 12 score — Showcase
63
max 175
Average: 108. 4
max 175
Average: 108.4
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Medical
31
max 107
Average: 39.6
max 107
Average: 39.6
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 mediacal-01
31
max 107
Average: 39
max 107
Average: 39
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Maya
101
max 177
Average: 129.8
max 177
Average: 129.8
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 maya-04
101
max 180
Average: 132. 8
max 180
Average: 132.8
SPECviewperf 12 — Energy score
6
max 25
Average: 9.7
max 25
Average: 9.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 energy-01
6
max 21
Average: 10.7
max 21
Average: 10.7
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Creo
34
max 153
Average: 49.5
max 153
Average: 49.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 creo-01
34
max 153
Average: 52. 5
max 153
Average: 52.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — specvp12 catia-04
fifty
max 189
Average: 91.5
max 189
Average: 91.5
SPECviewperf 12 test score — Catia
fifty
max 189
Average: 88.6
max 189
Average: 88.6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970. Comparative specifications and benchmarks of video cards
VS
General information determine the winner between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970. Please note that the comparison is based on all indicators, and below are the ratings from synthetic benchmarks that determine different criteria in games and work applications.
136
Position in the performance rating
132
58.53 9000
Desktop
18 August 2016 (5 years ago)
Release date
19 September 2014 (7 years ago)
$199
Starting price
$ 329
$ 441 (2.2x MSRP)
Actual price
$ 290 (0.9x MSRP)
30.53
Cost
34.98
GP106 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000
Market Segment
Desktop
Specifications
Which graphics card is better in comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part, contained in the rating of video cards.
1152
conveyors
1664
1506 MHZ
Tibility of the kernel
1050 MHZ
1708 MHZ
Acceleration 9000 nm
Process
28 nm
120 Watt
Power Consumption (TDP)
148 Watt
123. 0
Number of texels processed per second10003
109 Billion/Sec
3.935 GFLOPS
Swimming of
3.920 GFLOPS
No data
Maximum temperature
9000
9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 115000 115000 115000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 / CUDA cores
1664
1708 MHz
Overclocking speed
1178 MHz
4.400 million million
Number of transistors
9.20003
120 Watt
TDP
148 Watt
Dimensions, connectors and compatibility The main types of connectors and connected interfaces
PCIe 3.0 X16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 X16
250 MM
Length
10.5 «(26.7 CM)
003
2X 6-PINS
No data
Options SLI
+
No data
Recommeded System Power (PSU)
500 WATT
9000
Height
4.376″ (11.1 cm)
Memory (frequency and overclocking)
Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications. What is the difference in type, base frequency, turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970:
GDDR5
Type of memory
GDDR5
3 GB
Maximum RAM AMOUNT
4 GB
192 BIT
DISTRUCTION of memory
9000 BIT
9000 /S
192.2 GB/S
Memorial capacity
224 GB/S
No data
DEMODED MODUCE
—
Support for ports and displays
Let’s find out the difference in the ports that are equipped with NVIDIA GeForce GTX video cards. 1060 3 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3X DisplayPort
Connections to
DUAL LINK DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3X DisplayPort 1.2
No data 9000 support
4 displays
n/a
HDCP
+
n/a
Maximum VGA resolution
2048×1536
n.a. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.
No data
3D Vision
+
No data
GPU Boost
2.0
No data
CUDA
+
No data
GeForce Experience
+
No data
Surround
+
No data
Adaptive Vertical Sync
GameStream
+ 9000
000
000 SHEFORCE SHADUPLAY
GameWorks
+
API support
The confrontation between the two rivals NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 is almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
12 (12_1)
Directx
12 (12_1)
4.6
Opengl
4.4
+
Vulkan
1.1.126
Shader Model 9000 9000 9000
OpenCL
1.2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 benchmark comparison
Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards
one. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
2. | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
3. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
four. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
5. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
6. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 | |
7. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
eight. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
9. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. AMD Radeon RX 590 | |
ten. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
eleven. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | |
12. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
13. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
fourteen. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs. AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
fifteen. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. AMD Radeon 630 |
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 and GTX 1060 in games and benchmarks
Map 1:
Map 2:
We compare video cards by 47 parameters. 35 of them are different.
Specifications
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | |
---|---|---|
GPU name | GM204 | GP106 |
GPU option | GM204-200-A1 | GP106-400-A1 |
Architecture | Maxwell 2. 0 | Pascal |
Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
Process | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Number of transistors | 5200 million | 4400 million |
Crystal area | 398 mm² | 200 mm² |
Graphic card
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | |
---|---|---|
Issue date | September 19, 2014 | July 19, 2016 |
Generation | GeForce 900 | GeForce 10 |
Predecessor | GeForce 700 | GeForce 900 |
Descendant | GeForce 10 | GeForce 20 |
Launch price | $329 | $299 |
Market price | $449 | $447 |
Data bus interface | PCIe 3. 0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Frequencies
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | |
---|---|---|
Base frequency | 1050 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Boost frequency | 1178 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Memory frequency | 1753 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | |
---|---|---|
Memory capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bus | 256 bit | 192 bit |
Memory speed | 7 Gb/s | 8 Gb/s |
Memory bandwidth | 224. 4 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
Render configuration
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | |
---|---|---|
Shader units | 1664 | 1280 |
Texture blocks | 104 | 80 |
Screen blocks | 56 | 48 |
L1 cache | 48 KB | 48 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1. 5 MB |
Nominal capacity
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | |
---|---|---|
Pixel Fill Rate | 65.97 GP/s | 82.03 GP/s |
Texture Fill Rate | 122. 5 GT/s | 136.7 GT/s |
Performance FP32 | 3.920 Tflops | 4.375 Tflops |
Performance FP64 | 122.5 GFlops | 136. 7 GFlops |
Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | |
---|---|---|
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4. 6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulcan | 1.1 | 1. 2 |
CUDA | 5.2 | 6.1 |
Shader model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Video card design
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | |
---|---|---|
Occupied slots | 2 | 2 |
Length | 267 mm | 250 mm |
Width | 111 mm | 111 mm |
Heat Sink Requirements | 148 W | 120 W |
Recommended PSU power | 300 W | 300 W |
Outputs | 1x DVI 1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI 1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort |
Power supply | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Board number | PG401 | PG410 SKU 30 |
Maximum temperature | 64°C | 76°C |
Maximum noise | 47. 5 dB | 47.1 dB |
FPS in games
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB leads the average by 14.3%
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
(2020)
Valorant
(2020)
Death Stranding
(2020)
Cyberpunk 2077
(2020)
Apex Legends
(2019)
Metro Exodus
(2019)
Red Dead Redemption 2
(2019)
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
(2017)
Overwatch
(2016)
Grand Theft Auto V
(2015)
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
(2012)
League of Legends
(2019)
The Witcher 3
(2015)
Borderlands 3
(2019)
Control
(2019)
Dirt Rally 2. 0
(2019)
Battlefield V
(2018)
Hitman 2
(2018)
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
(2018)
Rise of the Tomb Raider
(2016)
Ghost Recon Breakpoint
(2019)
FIFA 20
(2019)
F1 2019
(2019)
Just Cause 4
(2018)
Darksiders III
(2018)
Fallout 76
(2018)
F1 2018
(2018)
Fortnite
(2018)
Star Wars Battlefront 2
(2017)
Need for Speed Payback
(2017)
Dirt 4
(2017)
Rocket League
(2017)
Mass Effect Andromeda
(2017)
Ghost Recon Wildlands
(2017)
For Honor
(2017)
Resident Evil 7
(2017)
Dishonored 2
(2016)
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare
(2016)
Titanfall 2
(2016)
Farming Simulator 17
(2016)
Civilization VI
(2016)
Battlefield 1
(2016)
Mafia 3
(2016)
Deus Ex Mankind Divided
(2016)
Doom
(2016)
Hitman 2016
(2016)
The Division
(2016)
Far Cry Primal
(2016)
Rainbow Six Siege
(2015)
Fallout 4
(2015)
Dirt Rally
(2015)
Dragon Age: Inquisition
(2014)
BioShock Infinite
(2013)
Mirror’s Edge Catalyst
(2016)
XCOM 2
(2016)
Assassin’s Creed Syndicate
(2015)
Star Wars Battlefront
(2015)
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3
(2015)
Anno 2205
(2015)
Alien: Isolation
(2014)
The Sims 4
(2014)
Benchmark tests
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3D Mark Fire Strike Graphics
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
3D Mark Time Spy Graphics
3DMark Time Spy Score
3D Mark Vantage P
3DMark11P
3DMark11P GPU
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
ComputeMark v2. 1 Normal, Score
GFXBench 3.0 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen OGL
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit Sala GPUs-only
passmark
Unigine Valley 1.0 Extreme HD DirectX
Interesting information:
How to test the microphone.
Comparison video and benchmarks
Comparison GTX 970 VS GTX 1060 6Gb | Are they relevant in 2021?
Comparison GTX 970 VS GTX 1060 6Gb | Are they relevant in 2021?
GTX 970 VS GTX 1060 6GB IN 2021
GTX 970 vs. GTX 1060 (Test in 9 Games)
GTX 970 vs GTX 1060 6GB vs GTX 1650 (In 9 Games)
GTX970 (OC) vs GTX1060 6GB (Stock). Not everything is so simple, we understand what’s what.