Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/titan-xp-vs-geforce-rtx-2080-ti%23characteristics
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
Page not found
Page not found
We couldn’t find such page: /en/video/titan-xp-vs-geforce-rtx-2080-ti%23memory-specs
Popular graphics cards comparisons
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
2060 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3060
GeForce RTX
3060 Ti
vs
GeForce RTX
3070
GeForce GTX
1060 6 GB
vs
Radeon RX
580
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
vs
GeForce RTX
3050 8 GB
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
vs
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular graphics cards
GeForce RTX
4090
Radeon RX
580
Radeon RX
Vega 7
GeForce GTX
1050 Ti
GeForce GTX
1660 Super
GeForce GTX
1650
Popular CPU comparisons
Ryzen 5
5600X
vs
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
10400F
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5500
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i5
10400F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Core i3
12100F
Ryzen 5
3600
vs
Ryzen 5
5600X
Popular CPUs
EPYC
9654
Ryzen 5
5500U
Core i3
1115G4
Core i5
12400F
Core i5
1135G7
Ryzen 5
3600
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector’s Edition Galactic Empire
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector’s Edition Galactic Empire video cards by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G2D Mark, PassMark — G3D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
versus
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector’s Edition Galactic Empire
Benefits
Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Newer graphics card, 5 year(s) difference in release dates 7 month(s)
- Core frequency approx.
10% more: 1545 MHz vs 1405 MHz - Boost core clock 10% more: 1740 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- 330x faster texturing speed: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process for the video card makes it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.8 times less power consumption : 90 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Release Date | 2022 vs 4 November 2017 |
| Core frequency | 1545 MHz vs 1405 MHz |
| Boost core clock | 1740 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
| Texturing speed | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel/s |
| Process | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to choose NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector’s Edition Galactic Empire
- 67% more shader processors: 3840 vs 2304
- 3x more max memory size(s): 12 GB vs 4 GB 900 20
- Memory frequency in 6.
5 times more: 11408 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective - Geekbench — OpenCL performance about 31% better: 65520 vs 50032
| Number of shader processors | 3840 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 12GB vs 4GB |
| Memory frequency | 11408 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 65520 vs 50032 |
Benchmark comparison
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector’s Edition Galactic Empire
| Geekbench — OpenCL |
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector’s Edition Galactic Empire |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark — G2D Mark | 960 | |
| PassMark — G3D Mark | 13010 | |
| Geekbench — OpenCL | 50032 | 65520 |
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
296.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | |
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) |
3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score | 10148 |
Performance comparison
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector’s Edition Galactic Empire | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Codename | GA107 | GP102 |
| Production date | 2022 | November 4, 2017 |
| Place in the ranking | 59 | 163 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price at first issue date | $1,199 | |
| Boost core clock | 1740MHz | 1582MHz |
| Core frequency | 1545 MHz | 1405MHz |
| Process | 8nm | 16nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125. 3 GFLOPS (1:64) |
|
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
| Number of shaders | 2304 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 55.68GPixel/s | |
| Texturing speed | 125.3 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel/s |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Floating point performance | 12. 150 gflops |
|
| Number of transistors | 11,800 million | |
| Video connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Form factor | Dual slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 267mm |
| Recommended power supply | 250 Watt | |
| Additional power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4. 4 inches |
|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulcan | ||
| Maximum memory size | 4GB | 12GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 547. 6 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory frequency | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 11408MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
specs and tests in 12 games and 1 benchmark
NVIDIA started selling TITAN Xp on April 6, 2017 for a suggested price of $199. This is a desktop video card based on Pascal architecture with a 16 nm process technology. It has 12 GB of GDDR5X memory with a frequency of 1426 MHz, a 384-bit bus, which provides a bandwidth of 114 Gb / s.
The card occupies 2 slots, connected via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. The reference version is 267mm long, 112mm wide and 40mm high.
The card requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin auxiliary power cables, the claimed maximum power consumption is 250 watts.
Specifications
GPU
- GPU option
- GP102-450-A1
- Architecture
- Pascal
- Manufacturer
- TSMC
- Process
- 16 nm
- Number of transistors
- 11800 million
- Crystal area
- 471 mm²
Graphic card
- Release date
- April 6, 2017
- Generation
- GeForce 10
- Predecessor
- GeForce 900
- Descendant
- GeForce 20
- Launch price
- $199
- Market price
- $1199
- Data bus interface
- PCIe 3.
0 x16
Frequencies
- Base frequency
- 1405 MHz
- Boost frequency
- 1582 MHz
- Memory frequency
- 1426 MHz
Memory
- Memory capacity
- 12 GB
- Memory type
- GDDR5X
- Memory bus
- 384 bit
- Memory speed
- 114 Gb/s
- Memory bandwidth
- 547.6 GB/s
Render configuration
- Shader blocks
- 3840
- Texture blocks
- 240
- Raster blocks
- 96
- Streaming multiprocessors
- 30
- L1 cache
- 48 KB
- L2 cache
- 3 MB
Rated output
- Pixel fill rate
- 151.
9 HP/s
- Texture Fill Rate
- 379.7 GT/s
- Performance FP16
- 189.8 GFlops
- Performance FP32
- 12.15 Tflops
- Performance FP64
- 379.7 GFlops
Graphics
- DirectX
- 12 (12_1)
- OpenGL
- 4.6
- OpenCL
- 1.2
- Vulkan
- 1.2
- CUDA
- 6.1
- Shader model
- 6.4
Video card design
- Occupied slots
- 2
- Length
- 267 mm
- Width
- 112 mm
- Height
- 40 mm
- Heat Sink Requirements
- 250 W
- Recommended PSU power
- 600 W
- Outlets
- 1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort
- Power supply
- 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
- Board number
- PG611 SKU 30
- Maximum temperature
- 82 °C
- Maximum noise
- 50 dB
FPS in games
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
(2020)
Better than NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.
|
1920×1080 / Ultra / 57.8 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 50.1 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 33.9 |
Valorant
(2020)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.
|
1920×1080 / Ultra / 253.3 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 207.1 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 180.2 |
Death Stranding
(2020)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.
|
1920×1080 / Ultra / 114.7 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 89.0 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 54.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077
(2020)
Better than AMD Radeon VII, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT.
|
1920×1080 / Ultra / 57.8 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 53.9 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 35.4 |
Apex Legends
(2019)
Better than NVIDIA TITAN V, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.
|
1920×1080 / Ultra / 162.1 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 120.7 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 72.0 |
Metro Exodus
(2019)
Better than NVIDIA TITAN V, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.
|
1920×1080 / Ultra / 84.3 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 65.4 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 41.2 |
Red Dead Redemption 2
(2019)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER.
|
1920×1080 / Ultra / 59.3 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 48.5 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 30.8 |
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds
(2017)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 6800.
|
1920×1080 / Ultra / 130.2 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 98.9 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 56. |
5
Overwatch
(2016)
Better than NVIDIA TITAN RTX, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 6800.
|
1920×1080 / Ultra / 248.2 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 171.8 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 87.8 |
Grand Theft Auto V
(2015)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 6800.
|
1920×1080 / Ultra / 152.7 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 115. |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 68.7 |
3
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
(2012)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
|
1920×1080 / Ultra / 116.4 |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 97.0 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 87.4 |
League of Legends
(2019)
Better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, but worse than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
|
1920×1080 / Ultra / 218. |
2560×1440 / Ultra / 121.4 |
3840×2160 / Ultra / 48.5 |
4
Benchmark tests
Passmark: 18633 Better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, but worse than AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT.
Comparison with other graphics cards
Map 1:
Map 2:
Video reviews and tests
NVIDIA TITAN Xp — What is the most powerful graphics card in the world capable of?
NVIDIA TITAN Xp — What is the world’s most powerful graphics card capable of?
NVIDIA Titan XP Review
GTX Titan Xp STAR WARS EDITION SLI Test & Classic Unboxing
NVidia Titan Xp Review vs. 1080 Ti: $200 Per Percentage Point
TITAN X 12GB in 2021! Tests in games and synthetics (Cyberpunk 2077, RDR2, GTA 5)
The Nvidia GeForce Titan X Pascal in 2022 – The RTX 3060 Killer!
TITAN RTX vs TITAN V vs TITAN Xp Test in 8 Games 4K
RTX 2080 vs TITAN Xp Test in 8 Games 4K (i7 8700k)
Another new NVIDIA TITAN XP??? PLEASE STOP IT! *RANT*
RTX 3060 Ti 8GB vs TITAN V 12GB vs TITAN Xp 12GB
I was Bored So I Bought a GTX Titan XP.