Gt 580m: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — NotebookCheck.net Tech

GeForce GT 730M vs GeForce GTX 580M Graphics cards Comparison

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 730M and GeForce GTX 580M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 730M and GeForce GTX 580M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GeForce GT 730M

Check Price

GeForce GTX 580M

Check Price

GeForce GT 730M and GeForce GTX 580M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GT 730M and GeForce GTX 580M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 730M or GeForce GTX 580M here:

GeForce GT 730M Laptops

GeForce GTX 580M Laptops

Main Specs

  GeForce GT 730M GeForce GTX 580M
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 100 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 MB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
 

Check Price

Check Price

  • GeForce GTX 580M has 203% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 730M.
  • GeForce GT 730M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 580M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
  • GeForce GT 730M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 580M.
  • Both cards are used in Laptops.
  • GeForce GT 730M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 580M — with Fermi.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GT 730M is 105 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 580M.
  • GeForce GT 730M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 580M — by 40 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 730M is 300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 580M.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p 0−1 10−12
ultra / 1080p 0−1 6−7
QHD / 1440p 0−1 1−2
low / 720p 10−11 24−27
medium / 1080p 2−3 14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p 18−20
ultra / 1080p 2−3 16−18
QHD / 1440p 0−1 2−3
low / 720p 10−12 40−45
medium / 1080p 3−4 20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Battlefield 5 is 420% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p 50−55 45−50
high / 1080p 45−50
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 730M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 580M.
low / 768p 110−120 180−190
medium / 768p 80−85 150−160
ultra / 1080p 30−35 75−80
QHD / 1440p 45−50
4K / 2160p 9−10 30−33
high / 768p 55−60 110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p 70−75 55−60
ultra / 1080p 12−14 30−35
medium / 1080p 45−50 45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p 70−75 95−100
medium / 768p 40−45 80−85
ultra / 1080p 16−18 50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Dota 2 is 75% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p 1−2 12−14
ultra / 1080p 12−14
4K / 2160p 0−1 5−6
low / 720p 8−9 30−33
medium / 1080p 2−3 14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p 20−22
ultra / 1080p 5−6 14−16
QHD / 1440p 1−2
low / 720p 45−50 80−85
medium / 1080p 5−6 40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p 2−3 20−22
ultra / 1080p 16−18
QHD / 1440p 0−1 5−6
low / 720p 12−14 40−45
medium / 1080p 4−5 21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p 40−45 70−75
medium / 768p 60−65
high / 1080p 2−3 21−24
ultra / 1080p 2−3 9−10
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
medium / 720p 30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p 1−2 7−8
ultra / 1080p 0−1 5−6
4K / 2160p 0−1 1−2
low / 720p 2−3 21−24
medium / 1080p 10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p 85−90 100−110
high / 1080p 55−60
ultra / 1080p 95−100
medium / 1080p 100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p 14−16 20−22
ultra / 1080p 12−14 16−18
low / 720p 24−27 45−50
medium / 1080p 14−16 21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p 12−14
ultra / 1080p 8−9
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 3−4 21−24
medium / 1080p 14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 633% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p 6−7 40−45
medium / 768p 5−6 24−27
high / 1080p 2−3 14−16
ultra / 1080p 9−10
4K / 2160p 0−1 7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 575% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p 70−75 95−100
medium / 768p 35−40 55−60
ultra / 1080p 12−14 27−30
high / 768p 27−30 45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in World of Tanks is 54% more, than GeForce GT 730M.

Full Specs

  GeForce GT 730M GeForce GTX 580M
Architecture Kepler Fermi
Code name GK107 N12E-GTX2
Type Laptop Laptop
Release date 1 January 2013 28 June 2011
Pipelines 384 384
Core clock speed 725 MHz 620 MHz
Transistor count 1,270 million 1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Texture fill rate 23. 20 39.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance 552.2 gflops 952.3 gflops
Memory bus width 64/128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 — 2000 MHz 1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s 96.0 GB/s
Shared memory
DirectX 12 API 12 API
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
OpenCL 1.1 1.1
Vulkan 1.1.126 N/A
CUDA + +
CUDA cores 384
Bus support PCI Express 3. 0, PCI Express 2.0 PCI-E 2.0
SLI options +
HDMI +
3D Blu-Ray +
3D Gaming +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 31 Mh/s 40 Mh/s
Laptop size medium sized large
Standard memory configuration DDR3/GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840×2160
LVDS signal support Up to 1920×1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840×2160
HDCP content protection +
7. 1 channel HD audio on HDMI +
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming +
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder +
Optimus + +
Blu-Ray 3D Support +
3D Vision / 3DTV Play +
 

Check Price

Check Price

Similar compares

  • GeForce GT 730M vs HD Graphics 6000
  • GeForce GT 730M vs Radeon HD 5670
  • GeForce GTX 580M vs HD Graphics 6000
  • GeForce GTX 580M vs Radeon HD 5670
  • GeForce GT 730M vs Quadro K620
  • GeForce GT 730M vs Radeon HD 6970M
  • GeForce GTX 580M vs Quadro K620
  • GeForce GTX 580M vs Radeon HD 6970M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M Specs, Price, and FPS in Games


2 GB GDDR5 256-bit 96 GB/s
Memory Size Memory Type Memory Bus Memory Bandwidth

Pixel Fillrate

9. 92 GPixel/s

2%

Texture Fillrate

39.68 GTexel/s

4%

Availability

No items available

Processor

Resolution

Select game resolution

Graphics Settings

Select game graphics

Offset

Apply Offset

Value Rating

Performance Rating

Value per FPS

You will receive

… FPS

Alternatives for GeForce GTX 580M

1080p, High

No alternatives — this is the best option

Specifications

General
Release Date Jun 28th, 2011
Generation GeForce 500M
Outputs None
Power Connectors None
Power Consumption 100 W
Performance
Base Clock Speed 620 MHz
Memory Clock Speed 750 MHz
Pixel Fillrate 9. 92 GPixel/s
Texture Fillrate 39.68 GTexel/s
Memory
Memory Size 2 GB
Memory Type GDDR5
Memory Bus 256-bit
Memory Bandwidth 96 GB/s

Builds Using NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

1080p, High

Find out which of the 2 GPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

$976.6

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

$844.99

GeForce RTX 2060

$269.99

GeForce RTX 3050

$289.99

GeForce RTX 2060

$269.99

Radeon RX 6600

$259.99

Radeon RX 6600

$259.99

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

$279.99

GeForce RTX 3050

$289.99

GeForce GTX 1650

$184.99

GeForce GTX 1070

GeForce RTX 3060

$379.99

Refine results to filter 325 graphics cards by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a GPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.

Found 325 GPUs.

Popularity

Graphics Card

Performance

GeForce RTX 3050

Release Date: Jan 4th, 2022


Performance Rating


$289.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Radeon RX 6600

Release Date: Oct 13th, 2021


Performance Rating


$259.99 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 3060

Release Date: Jan 12th, 2021


Performance Rating


$379.99 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Release Date: May 31st, 2021


Performance Rating


$679.99 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Release Date: Dec 1st, 2020


Performance Rating


$501.03 on Amazon

In Stock


Radeon RX 6500 XT

Release Date: Jan 19th, 2022


Performance Rating


$179. 99 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Release Date: May 31st, 2021


Performance Rating


$976.6 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 2060

Release Date: Jan 7th, 2019


Performance Rating


$269.99 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

Release Date: Dec 7th, 2021


Performance Rating


$279.99 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

Release Date: Jan 11th, 2022


Performance Rating


$844.99 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 3070

Release Date: Sep 1st, 2020


Performance Rating


$549.99 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Release Date: Oct 29th, 2019


Performance Rating


$224 on Amazon

In Stock


Radeon RX 6700 XT

Release Date: Mar 3rd, 2021


Performance Rating


$399.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Radeon RX 6600 XT

Release Date: Jul 30th, 2021


Performance Rating


$328. 81 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce GTX 1070

Release Date: Jun 10th, 2016


Performance Rating


$589 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Release Date: Jan 12th, 2021


Performance Rating



GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Release Date: Jan 27th, 2022


Performance Rating


$1,499.99 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 3080

Release Date: Sep 1st, 2020


Performance Rating


$739 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

Release Date: Jul 9th, 2019


Performance Rating


$339.99 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Release Date: Mar 10th, 2017


Performance Rating


$649 on Amazon

In Stock


Radeon RX 6800 XT

Release Date: Oct 28th, 2020


Performance Rating


$589.99 on Amazon

In Stock


Radeon RX 580

Release Date: Apr 18th, 2017


Performance Rating


$209. 95 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Release Date: May 11th, 2021


Performance Rating



GeForce GTX 1650

Release Date: Apr 23rd, 2019


Performance Rating


$184.99 on Amazon

In Stock


GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

Release Date: Jul 9th, 2019


Performance Rating


$768 on Amazon

In Stock


  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • Next

Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M what is better?

Home / Graphics Card / NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

46%

DeviceList score

vs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

59%

DeviceList score

We compared the characteristics of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022 year.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M benefits

Winner in comparison

Core Frequency

775 MGz

155 MGz (25%) better

vs

620 MGz

Technological process

28 nm

-12 nm (-30%) better

vs

40 nm

Power Consumption (TDP)

33 Wt

-67 Wt (-67%) better

vs

100 Wt

Memory clock speed

1600 MGz

100 MGz (6.7%) better

vs

1500 MGz

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M benefits

Number of shader processors

384

192 (100%) better

vs

192

Memory bus width

256 bit

192 bit (300%) better

vs

64 bit

Memory Bandwidth

96

83. 2 (650%) better

vs

12.8









































General information

Price-quality ratio

The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

no data 94.4 %

Architecture

Kepler 2.0 Fermi 2.0

Code name

GK208 GF114

Type

Для ноутбуков Для ноутбуков

Number of shader processors

192 384

192 (100%) better

Core Frequency

775 MGz

155 MGz (25%) better

620 MGz

Frequency in Boost mode

758 MGz no data

Number of transistors

915 млн 1,950 млн

Technological process

28 nm

-12 nm (-30%) better

40 nm

Interface

PCIe 2. 0 x8 MXM-B (3.0)

Power Consumption (TDP)

The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load,
the larger the value — the more the requirements for cooling and energy consumption increase.

33 Wt

-67 Wt (-67%) better

100 Wt

Additional power connectors

no data нет

SLI support

no data +

3D Vision

no data +

GPU Boost

+ no data

CUDA

The presence of the CUDA architecture allows you to use applications that are optimized for
parallel computing. For example, for the development and design of neural networks.

Bus

PCI Express 2.0 PCI-E 2.0

Number of CUDA cores

A large number of CUDA cores increase performance in graphics computing,
especially affecting anti-aliasing and lighting in games, and the speed of training neural networks.

no data 384

HDMI

OpenCL

1.1 1.1

Support for analog VGA monitors

до 2048×1536 no data

DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support)

до 2560×1600 no data

H. 264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p Video Decode

+ no data

3D Gaming

no data +

FXAA

Verde Drivers

+ no data

3D Blu-Ray

no data +

Support for edp 1.2 signal

до 2560×1600 no data

TrueHD and DTS-HD audio streaming

+ no data

Blu-Ray 3D support

+ no data

Direct Compute

+ no data

Video connectors

No outputs No outputs

DirectX

12 API 12 API

Floating-point performance

240. 0 gflops 952.3 gflops

Optimus

+ +

DirectX 11

no data DirectX 11

Standard Memory size

DDR3 no data

LVDS signal support

до 1920×1200 no data

HDCP Content Protection

+ no data

7.1-channel HD audio via HDMI

+ no data
Benchmarks







Memory

Memory type

DDR3 GDDR5

Maximum RAM amount

Large amount of video memory allows you to run demanding games with a lot of textures,
use high-resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.

2 2

Memory bus width

The wider the video memory bus width, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better the performance in demanding games.

64 bit 256 bit

192 bit (300%) better

Shared memory

Memory clock speed

A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.

1600 MGz

100 MGz (6.7%) better

1500 MGz

Memory Bandwidth

The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective RAM your PC can use.

12.8 96

83. 2 (650%) better

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — review. GPU Benchmark & Specs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M graphics card (also called GPU) comes in 369 in the performance rating. It is a good result. The graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M runs with the minimal clock speed 620 MHz. It is featured by the acceleration option and able to run up to . The manufacturer has equipped NVIDIA with GB of 2 MB memory, clock speed 1500 MHz and bandwidth 96.0 GB/s.


The power consumption of the graphics card is 100 Watt, and the fabrication process is only 40 nm. Below you will find the main data on the compatibility, sizes, technologies and gaming performance test results. Also you can read and leave the comments.


Let’s take a closer look at the most important specifications of the graphics card. To have a good idea what a graphics card is the best, we recommend to use comparison service.

1.0
Out of 1
Hitesti score

Popular graphics cards

Most viewed

AMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Intel UHD Graphics 630

Intel UHD Graphics 600

NVIDIA Quadro T1000

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Intel HD Graphics 530

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Intel HD Graphics 4600

Intel HD Graphics 520

Buy here:

AliExpress

General info

The basic set of information will help you find out the graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M release date and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of the release and the average current price. This data also includes the architecture employed by the producer, and the chip’s codename.

Place in performance rating: 431
Value for money (0-100): 10.47
Architecture: Fermi
Code name: GF114
Type: Laptop
Release date: 28 June 2011 (10 years ago)
Price now: $170
Value for money: 2.60
GPU code name: N12E-GTX2
Market segment: Laptop

Technical specs

This is the important information that defines the graphics card’s capacity. The simpler the device production process, the better. The core’s power frequency is responsible for its speed (direct correlation) while the elaboration of signals is performed by the transistors (the more transistors, the faster the computations are carried out).

Pipelines: 384
Core clock speed: 620 MHz
Transistor count: 1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology: 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP): 100 Watt
Texture fill rate: 39.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance: 952. 3 gflops
CUDA cores: 384
Pipelines / CUDA cores: 384
Number of transistors: 1,950 million
Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Today there are numerous form factors for PC cases, so it is extremely important to know the length of the graphics card and the types of its connection. This will help facilitate the upgrade process.

Interface: MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors: None
Laptop size: large
SLI options: +
Bus support: PCI-E 2. 0

Memory

The internal main memory is used for storing data while conducting computations. Contemporary games and professional graphic apps have high requirements for the memory’s volume and capacity. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and fast the graphics card is. Type of memory, the capacity and bandwidth for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M.

Memory type: GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount: 2 MB
Memory bus width: 256 Bit
Memory clock speed: 1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth: 96.0 GB/s
Shared memory:

Video outputs and ports

As a rule, all contemporary graphics cards feature several connection types and additional ports. Knowing these peculiarities is crucial for avoiding problems with connecting the graphics card to the monitor or other peripheral devices.

Display Connectors: No outputs

Technologies

Each graphic card manufacturer complements its products with branded technologies that are used both in games and in the working process. Below is the list of peculiar features that you may find rather useful.

3D Vision: +
CUDA: +
Optimus: +
3D Gaming: +
3D Blu-Ray: +
DirectX 11: DirectX 11

API support

All API-supported NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M are listed below.

DirectX: 12 API
OpenGL: 4.5
Vulkan: N/A
Shader Model: 5.1
OpenCL: 1.1

Overall gaming performance

All tests have been based on FPS counter. Let’s have a look on what place NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M has been taken in the gaming performance test (calculation has been made in accordance with the game developer recommendations about system requirements; it can differ from the real world situations).

Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2. 0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Death Stranding (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

F1 2020 (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Gears Tactics (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Doom Eternal (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Legend
5 Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates.
May Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates.
30 Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 25fps or more
40 Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more
60 Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more
May Run Fluently – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to show fluent frame rates.
? Uncertain – The testing of this graphics cards on this game showed unexpected results. A slower card might be able to produce higher and more consistent frame rates when running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. No reliable data interpolation can be made based on the performance of similar cards of the same category.
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To obtain individual results, move your cursor over the value.

AMD equivalent

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

Compare

Benchmark

Benchmarks help determine the performance in standard tests for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M. We have listed the world’s most famous benchmarks so that you could obtain accurate results in each (see the description). Graphics card preliminary testing is especially important in the presence of high loads so that the user could see to what extent the graphic processing unit copes with computations and data elaboration.

Overall benchmark performance

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130

10.66%

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

10.55%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

10.55%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

10.54%

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

10.51%

This benchmark analyzes the videocard’s game power with the use of Direct X 11 (multi-threading, tessellation, shader computations).

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

AMD FirePro W5130M

AMD Radeon HD 7770

This Direct X10-based benchmark contains AI tests, physics, and 6 computing tests.

AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

AMD Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI

PassMark is a great benchmark that gets updated regularly and shows relevant information on the graphics card’s performance.

ATI Radeon HD 5870

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

1.0
Out of 1
Hitesti score

Share on social network:

In order to leave a review you need to log in

Reviews of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

 

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

VS

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

AMD Radeon RX 480

AMD Radeon R9 M275X

AMD Radeon HD 8750M

AMD Caicos

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI

AMD Radeon HD 7990

NVIDIA Quadro P520

AMD Radeon RX 540

AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)

XFX GeForce 7600 GT 580M AGP Review

Firing Squad has another AGP video card review up, this time for an nVidia 7600 GT based model from XFX.   This review includes performace comparisons with the PowerColor Radeon x1950 AGP card the reviewed previously.

You can find the review here.

Like this:

Like Loading…

This entry was posted in Hardware on by Wilhelm Arcturus.

Search

Search for:

Strange Google Magic!

Follow Blog via Email

Email Address:

Join 3,121 other followers

Categories

CategoriesSelect CategoryAncient Gaming  (69)Blizzard  (492)blog thing  (234)Books  (23)Camelot Unchained  (33)Casual Games  (35)CCP  (323)Daybreak Game Company  (175)Diablo II  (86)Diablo III  (143)Dungeons & Dragons Online  (45)Elite: Dangerous  (3)entertainment  (5,854)EVE Online  (2,053)   Null Sec  (815)EverQuest  (640)EverQuest II  (782)EverQuest Next  (48)Facebook  (35)Fantasy Movie League  (106)Feeds  (1)Forza  (12)Friday Bullet Points  (66)Gaming Industry Trends  (10)General  (52)Guild Wars 2  (50)Hardware  (90)Humor  (239)In Person  (64)Instance Group  (404)iPad  (18)Kickstarter  (92)Landmark  (27)LEGO Products  (35)Lord of the Rings Online  (466)Lost Ark  (24)Mail Bag  (19)memes  (9)Minecraft  (142)Misc MMOs  (198)MMO Design  (114)Month in Review  (193)Movies  (126)MUDs  (45)Need for Speed World  (35)Neverwinter  (13)Neverwinter Nights 2  (4)New World  (37)Nintendo  (126)Nintendo DS Hardware  (143)Other PC Games  (158)Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen  (26)Path of Exile  (14)Pirates of the Burning Sea  (32)PlanetSide 2  (26)PlayStation 3  (19)Podcasts  (97)Pokemon  (256)Pokemon Go  (127)polls  (54)Project: Gorgon  (24)Quote of the Day  (129)Random  (8)Rift  (163)RPGs  (9)Runes of Magic  (25)Shroud of the Avatar  (35)Sony Online Entertainment  (343)Star Citizen  (24)Star Trek Online  (78)Star Wars: The Old Republic  (86)Steam  (134)Strategy Group  (28)SuperData Research  (61)Television  (28)The Elder Scrolls Online  (15)Torchlight II  (20)TorilMUD  (78)Valheim  (59)Vanguard SOH  (137)War Thunder  (17)Warhammer Online  (96)Wii  (62)WildStar  (22)WordPress. com  (25)World of Tanks  (91)World of Warcraft  (1,528)World of Warplanes  (15)World of Warships  (7)WoW Classic  (271)YouTube  (210)Zynga  (26)

Recent Posts

  • A Brief History of Goon Leadership in EVE Online
  • Level 100 Heroic Upgrades are Coming to EverQuest, but Level 85 Upgrades will Remain
  • One Way Trip to Perrigen Falls
  • Sixty Eight in the Blade’s Edge Mountains
  • What Will it Mean to have a Bunch of 20 Year Old MMORPGS?
  • Sixteen Years of Driving the Blog
  • Back Home in Delve Once More
  • Tough Times for Plague Zombies
  • Still some Quests to be done in Nagrand
  • CCP Announces the Uprising Expansion for EVE Online
  • Postcards from the Yulai Bot Bash 2022
  • Flight in Pre-Patch Outland
  • The EVE Online August MER and the End of a Flat Summer
  • GM Week Offers You a Chance to Shoot a Capital Ship in Yulai Once More
  • The Labors of Blaugust 2022

A Random Post

  • Roll The Dice at TAGN!

MMO Commentary

  • Aywren Sojourner
  • Battle Stance
  • Bio Break
  • Blessing of Kings
  • Chasing Dings!
  • Contains Moderate Peril
  • Endgame Viable
  • EVE Online Pictures
  • Gamer of Passion
  • Going Commando
  • Growing Up in Azeroth
  • Hardcore Casual
  • I HAS PC
  • Inner Sanctum of the Ninveah
  • Inventory Full
  • Kaylriene
  • Keen and Graev’s Gaming Blog
  • Kill Ten Rats
  • Killed in a Smiling Accident
  • Kitty Kitty Boom Boom
  • Knifesedge Blogs
  • Low Sec Lifestyle
  • Mail Valtar
  • Me vs. Myself and I
  • Nomadic Gamers
  • Occasional Hero
  • pΘtshΘt
  • Psychochild’s Blog
  • Raph Koster’s Website
  • Stabbed Up
  • Tales of the Aggronaut
  • The Nosy Gamer
  • Tish Tosh Tesh
  • To Game For Life
  • Ulalu

MMO News & Study

  • Blizzard Watch
  • EVE News 24
  • Imperium News
  • Massively Overpowered
  • MMO Fallout
  • MMORPG.com
  • New Eden Post
  • Terra Nova
  • The EQ2 Wire
  • The EverQuest Show
  • VirginWorlds MMO News

The Games I Play

  • EVE Online
  • Pokemon Go
  • World of Warcraft

The Games I Watch

  • Diablo II
  • Diablo III
  • EverQuest
  • EverQuest II
  • Forza Horizon
  • Games on Steam
  • Guild Wars 2
  • Lord of the Rings Online
  • Lost Ark
  • Minecraft
  • New World
  • Path of Exile
  • Pokemon
  • Project: Gorgon
  • Rift
  • Runes of Magic
  • Toril MUD
  • Valheim
  • World of Tanks

The Humor Supplement

  • Bent Objects
  • The Bloggess
  • The Daily WTF
  • The Tolkien Sarcasm Page
  • xkcd
  • Zero Punctuation

What Else Do I Read?

  • Ars Technica
  • ASCII by Jason Scott
  • I, Cringely
  • Popehat
  • QA Hates You
  • Register Hardware
  • TechDirt
  • The Digital Antiquarian
  • Wait But Why

Archives

Archives
Select Month September 2022  (17) August 2022  (32) July 2022  (31) June 2022  (31) May 2022  (32) April 2022  (33) March 2022  (35) February 2022  (29) January 2022  (33) December 2021  (33) November 2021  (32) October 2021  (34) September 2021  (30) August 2021  (31) July 2021  (32) June 2021  (34) May 2021  (43) April 2021  (31) March 2021  (31) February 2021  (33) January 2021  (33) December 2020  (41) November 2020  (33) October 2020  (44) September 2020  (32) August 2020  (36) July 2020  (38) June 2020  (33) May 2020  (34) April 2020  (31) March 2020  (28) February 2020  (27) January 2020  (29) December 2019  (32) November 2019  (38) October 2019  (38) September 2019  (33) August 2019  (49) July 2019  (38) June 2019  (33) May 2019  (34) April 2019  (29) March 2019  (34) February 2019  (26) January 2019  (28) December 2018  (41) November 2018  (37) October 2018  (35) September 2018  (37) August 2018  (40) July 2018  (34) June 2018  (32) May 2018  (31) April 2018  (32) March 2018  (29) February 2018  (27) January 2018  (29) December 2017  (32) November 2017  (33) October 2017  (27) September 2017  (30) August 2017  (38) July 2017  (29) June 2017  (29) May 2017  (30) April 2017  (25) March 2017  (24) February 2017  (26) January 2017  (27) December 2016  (32) November 2016  (26) October 2016  (28) September 2016  (25) August 2016  (36) July 2016  (33) June 2016  (31) May 2016  (29) April 2016  (31) March 2016  (30) February 2016  (29) January 2016  (32) December 2015  (24) November 2015  (30) October 2015  (30) September 2015  (32) August 2015  (42) July 2015  (29) June 2015  (29) May 2015  (29) April 2015  (26) March 2015  (28) February 2015  (31) January 2015  (30) December 2014  (24) November 2014  (29) October 2014  (32) September 2014  (31) August 2014  (39) July 2014  (32) June 2014  (26) May 2014  (30) April 2014  (35) March 2014  (31) February 2014  (31) January 2014  (37) December 2013  (29) November 2013  (31) October 2013  (30) September 2013  (28) August 2013  (28) July 2013  (34) June 2013  (29) May 2013  (33) April 2013  (34) March 2013  (39) February 2013  (28) January 2013  (31) December 2012  (27) November 2012  (37) October 2012  (39) September 2012  (38) August 2012  (42) July 2012  (38) June 2012  (27) May 2012  (41) April 2012  (36) March 2012  (44) February 2012  (33) January 2012  (40) December 2011  (43) November 2011  (42) October 2011  (44) September 2011  (43) August 2011  (32) July 2011  (30) June 2011  (37) May 2011  (47) April 2011  (41) March 2011  (44) February 2011  (47) January 2011  (38) December 2010  (46) November 2010  (37) October 2010  (31) September 2010  (33) August 2010  (33) July 2010  (33) June 2010  (30) May 2010  (19) April 2010  (35) March 2010  (37) February 2010  (35) January 2010  (37) December 2009  (38) November 2009  (28) October 2009  (29) September 2009  (23) August 2009  (35) July 2009  (27) June 2009  (27) May 2009  (26) April 2009  (30) March 2009  (31) February 2009  (27) January 2009  (29) December 2008  (28) November 2008  (35) October 2008  (39) September 2008  (30) August 2008  (30) July 2008  (29) June 2008  (28) May 2008  (31) April 2008  (32) March 2008  (28) February 2008  (28) January 2008  (33) December 2007  (33) November 2007  (35) October 2007  (34) September 2007  (43) August 2007  (45) July 2007  (45) June 2007  (40) May 2007  (38) April 2007  (42) March 2007  (35) February 2007  (41) January 2007  (59) December 2006  (47) November 2006  (53) October 2006  (38) September 2006  (18)

Top Posts

  • Flight in Pre-Patch Outland
  • One Way Trip to Perrigen Falls
  • Level 100 Heroic Upgrades are Coming to EverQuest, but Level 85 Upgrades will Remain
  • A Brief History of Goon Leadership in EVE Online
  • The Altar of Zul and Jintha’alor
  • Minecraft and the Search for a Warm Ocean
  • Stuck in the Gym in Pokemon Go
  • Sixty Eight in the Blade’s Edge Mountains
  • Alamo teechs u 2 play DURID!
  • 20 Games that Defined the Apple II

TAGN Spams Twitter

  • A Brief History of Goon Leadership in EVE Online tagn. wordpress.com/2022/09/17/a-b… 4 hours ago
  • Halcyon Dawn Eagle #TweetFleet evepics.wordpress.com/2022/09/16/hal… 1 day ago
  • Level 100 Heroic Upgrades are Coming to EverQuest, but Level 85 Upgrades will Remain tagn.wordpress.com/2022/09/16/lev… 1 day ago
  • RT @20thcenturymarc: The last thing I did before starting work today was put the Imperial March over King Charles’ entrance to Westminster… 1 day ago
  • One Way Trip to Perrigen Falls tagn.wordpress.com/2022/09/15/one… 2 days ago
  • Hrmm, @Steam does this sound at all like you? Just checking.
    (Or, if you prefer, Epic or Nintendo or Sony or Mic… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 days ago
  • Vigil on the Loose #TweetFleet evepics.wordpress.com/2022/09/14/vig… 3 days ago
  • Sixty Eight in the Blade’s Edge Mountains tagn.wordpress.com/2022/09/14/six… 3 days ago
  • Vendor A had me invite their partner Vendor B to their product demo. B called us back after the demo and said they… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 days ago
  • I setup a new overview preset for the Yulai bot bash last week and I think I have finally fixed all of the thing I… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 days ago
  • What Will it Mean to have a Bunch of 20 Year Old MMORPGS? tagn.wordpress.com/2022/09/13/wha… 4 days ago

Follow @wilhelm2451

Release Flags of All Nations!

Spam Blocked

1,794,859 spam blocked by Akismet

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M in 3 Benchmarks

It is time to review NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M benchmark performance. The base clock speed is 620 MHz, whilst its speed in turbo boost and supplementary overclocking (maximum) is .


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M process technology is 40 nm that is a good result of the release date.


NVIDIA manufacture has equipped graphic chips with 96. 0 GB/s bandwidth and 620 MHz clock speed. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M maximum memory is 2 MB.


We recommend you learn all technical specifications in separate sections for a common understanding and high-speed of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M.

2.5
Out of 2
CMPTEK score

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

VS

AMD Radeon HD 6970M (284 views)

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (176 views)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M (174 views)

NVIDIA Quadro P520 (173 views)

Intel UHD Graphics 600 (171 views)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (169 views)

Intel UHD Graphics 630 (166 views)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (164 views)

Intel HD Graphics 4600 (157 views)

NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (153 views)

General Information

Here is the release date, code name, core architecture, launch and current price. It is the general information to start learning NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M.

Place in performance rating: 448
Value for money (0-100): 10.47
Architecture: Fermi
Code name: GF114
Type: Laptop
Release date: 28 June 2011 (10 years ago)
Price now: $170
Value for money: 2. 43
GPU code name: N12E-GTX2
Market segment: Laptop

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Technical Specifications

Here are key features that determine NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M performance in benchmarks and other apps. The higher the figures are, the better it is. Please pay attention to all the characteristics provided. For example, the clock frequency directly affects the high-speed, and processing data and performing calculations (e.g, for mining) depend on the number of transistors. Also, check the TDP figure, because modern graphics cards may require a powerful PSU.

Pipelines: 384
Core clock speed: 620 MHz
Transistor count: 1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology: 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP): 100 Watt
Texture fill rate: 39. 7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance: 952.3 gflops
CUDA cores: 384
Pipelines / CUDA cores: 384
Number of transistors: 1,950 million
Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Dimensions and Compatibility

Nowadays, it is very important to know the dimensions — length, width and height of a desktop graphics card — and understand which power connector is included in the package. Also, please pay attention to the PCIe interface.

Interface: MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors: None
Laptop size: large
SLI options: +
Bus support: PCI-E 2.0

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — GPU RAM Frequency and Speed

Graphics Card Ram is a key element in computing and data storage — type, size, clock frequency and bandwidth — that directly affect the speed of work in gaming and working apps, which are currently quite demanding on graphics card resources. Note please the memory standard. The higher it is, the better it is. Let’s learn more about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M video memory specifications.

Memory type: GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount: 2 MB
Memory bus width: 256 Bit
Memory clock speed: 1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth: 96.0 GB/s
Shared memory:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Port and Display Support

In most cases, today all the problems connector compatibility can be solved with adapters or backwards-compatible cables such as HDMI / DVI. But, for general information, you learn below which ports are supported by NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M.

Display Connectors: No outputs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Technologies

Healthy competition drives progress, so each manufacturer tries to surprise its consumer with special technologies available in this graphics card. This can be useful in graphics or gaming apps.

3D Vision: +
CUDA: +
Optimus: +
3D Gaming: +
3D Blu-Ray: +
DirectX 11: DirectX 11

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — API support

Here are general standards for DirectX and other unified complexes for the development of 3D images supported by NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M .

DirectX: 12 API
OpenGL: 4.5
Vulkan: N/A
Shader Model: 5.1
OpenCL: 1.1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Mining hashrates

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256): 40 Mh/s

Overall NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M Gaming Performance

Find out to what extent NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M is suitable for gaming! We have compiled a database of popular games and their system requirements* that allows you to quickly and easily estimate its gaming performance at different screen resolutions. Graphics card gaming test is based on FPS. * There is a little margin error in the estimation of data.

Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — Timedemo

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Death Stranding (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

F1 2020 (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Gears Tactics (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Doom Eternal (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Legend
5 Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
30 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more.
40 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more.
60 Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more.
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
? Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate.
Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

AMD equivalent

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

Start Comparing

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M in Benchmarks

Let’s sum up the review by comparing the benchmarks results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M 5 competitive models similar in technical specifications. The first block is the overall result for all benchmarks, then all the others, which this particular model was tested on.

The higher the benchmark score, the faster a video card performs in graphics apps and modern games. If you have any additional questions, please leave them in the comments, we will definitely help!

Overall benchmark performance

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130

10.66%

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

10.55%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

10.55%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

10.54%

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

10.51%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

The result of the 3DMark 11 benchmark evaluation supports tessellation, compute shaders and graphics card multithreading will show which graphics card model is better and faster in games. The higher the score of the video card in the 3DMark 11 benchmark, the better.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

AMD FirePro W5130M

AMD Radeon HD 7770

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage Performance reveals the real performance of video cards tested by users in their computers. Only the best graphics card deserves the highest score in the 3DMark Vantage Performance benchmark.

AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

AMD Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI

Passmark GPU

Passmark is an effective benchmark that displays true results on the speed of data processing by GPU cores. We present the results of the evaluation of the performance of a video card in the modern Passmark benchmark, which evaluates the performance of a video card using its own rendering algorithms. The higher the score, the more powerful the graphics card.

ATI Radeon HD 5870

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

2. 5
Out of 2
CMPTEK score

 

0026

  • 2x more VRAM?
    4GB vs 2GB
  • 74mm narrower?
    193mm vs 267mm
    • 1.27 TFLOPS over FLOPS?
      1.58 TFLOPS vs 0.31 TFLOPS
    • 21.46 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
      24.7 GPixel/s vs 3.24 GPixel/s
    • 452MHz faster memory speed?
      1002MHz vs 550MHz
    • 2908MHz higher effective clock speed?
      4008MHz vs 1100MHz
    • 36.4 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
      192.4GB/s vs 17.6GB/s
    • 256bit wider memory bus?
      384bit vs 128bit
    • 416 more stream processors?
      512 vs 96

    Which comparisons are the most popular?

    Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

    vs

    Asus GeForce GT 630 2GB

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce 940MX

    Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GT 630 OEM 1GB

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070

    Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

    vs

    Asus GeForce GTX 950

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    AMD Radeon HD 6950

    Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

    vs

    MSI GeForce GTX 460 Hawk

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    AMD Radeon R9 270X

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

    VS

    AMD Radeon RX 5500003

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti

    Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    vs

    AMD Radeon 535

    Price Comparison

    User Reviews

    Performance

    2. turbo GPU

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 580)

    When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

    3.pixel rate

    3.24 GPixel/s

    24.7 GPixel/s

    The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    4.flops

    0.31 TFLOPS

    1.58 TFLOPS

    FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

    5.texture size

    13 GTexels/s

    49.4 GTexels/s

    Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

    6.GPU memory speed

    550MHz

    1002MHz

    Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

    7.shading patterns

    Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

    8.textured units (TMUs)

    TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

    9 ROPs imaging units

    ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

    Memory

    1.memory effective speed

    1100MHz

    4008MHz

    The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

    2.max memory bandwidth

    17.6GB/s

    192.4GB/s

    This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

    3. VRAM

    VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

    4.memory bus width

    128bit

    384bit

    Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

    5.GDDR memory versions

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB)

    Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as faster transfer rates, which improve performance.

    6. Supports memory debug code

    ✖Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

    Functions

    1.DirectX version

    DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

    2nd version of OpenGL

    The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

    OpenCL version 3.

    Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

    4. Supports multi-monitor technology

    ✔Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

    5. GPU temperature at boot

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB)

    Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

    6.supports ray tracing

    ✖Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

    7. Supports 3D

    ✔Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

    8.supports DLSS

    ✖Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

    ✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

    9. PassMark result (G3D)

    This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

    Ports

    1.has HDMI output

    ✔Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

    ✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

    Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

    2.HDMI connectors

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 580)

    More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices such as game consoles and TVs at the same time.

    HDMI version 3

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB)

    Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 580)

    Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

    4. DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

    5. DVI outputs

    Allows connection to a display using DVI.

    6.mini DisplayPort outputs

    Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.

    Price Match

    Cancel

    Which graphics cards are better?

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580. Comparative specifications and benchmarks of video cards

    VS

    General information winner between NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580. Please note that the comparison is based on all indicators, and below are ratings from synthetic benchmarks that determine different criteria in games and work applications.

    382

    Position in the performance rating

    271

    No data

    Price ratio

    35.62 9000

    Type

    Desktop

    1 April 2013 (8 years ago)

    Release date

    9 November 2010 (11 years ago)

    No data

    9The initial price

    $ 499

    $ 545

    Actual price

    $ 37 (0. 1x MSRP)

    1.21

    2.64

    N14P-GT

    Market Segment

    Desktop

    Specifications

    Which graphics card is better in NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 comparison in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part contained in the rating of video cards.

    768

    conveyors

    512 9000 No data

    Power consumption (TDP)

    244 Watt

    No data

    Number of texels processed in 1 second

    49.4 Billion /SEC

    No data

    Operations with a swimming of

    1.581.1 GFLOPS

    No data

    Maximum temperature

    97 ° C

    No data

    CUDA

    512 9000 9000

    768 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 CUDA Cores

    512

    1300 Million

    Number of Transistors

    3,000 million

    N/A

    Rated Thermal Power

    244 Watt

    Dimensions, connectors and compatibility

    Let’s discuss the dimensions (length, width, height) of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 video cards. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces

    No data

    Interface

    PCIe 2.0 x16

    n.a.

    Length

    10.5″ (267 mm) (26.7 cm)

    n.a.0003

    Laptop Size

    No data

    No data

    Options SLI

    +

    No data

    Support for tires

    PCI-E 2.0 X 16

    No data

    4.376 «(111 MM) (11.1 cm)

    Memory (frequency and overclocking)

    Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications.The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better.It directly affects the processing speed and efficiency What is the difference in type, base frequency, turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580:

    DDR3, GDDR5

    Type of memory

    GDDR5

    2x 2x 2x

    Maximum RAM AMOUNT

    1536 MB

    2X 128 BIT

    Bit

    384 BIT

    20000 MHIS

    2004 MHz (4008 data rate)

    n. a.0021

    Let’s find out the difference in ports that NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 graphics cards are equipped with. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.

    No data

    Connections to the display

    Mini HDMITWO DUAL LINK DVI

    No data

    Multi Monitor Support

    +

    No data

    9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 20,000,000 20,000,000 20,000,000 20,000 20000 200000004 Audio input for HDMI

    Internal

    N/A

    HDMI

    +

    Technology

    Let’s see what the difference is. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.

    No data

    3D Vision

    +

    +

    GPU BOOST

    No data

    +

    CUDA

    +

    No data

    SUROROROROROROUD

    +

    NO data

    DSR

    +

    API support

    The confrontation between the two rivals NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 is almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.

    DirectX 11, Shader 5.0

    DirectX

    12 (11_0)

    n.a.0004 Vulkan

    +

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 benchmark comparison

    Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards

    one. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 vs. AMD Radeon HD 7870XT
    2. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
    3. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
    four. NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs. AMD Radeon Pro 560X
    5. NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs. NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT
    6. NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
    7. NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs. AMD Radeon R9 M390
    eight. AMD Cayman vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
    9. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
    ten. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
    eleven. NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
    12. NVIDIA P106-090 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
    13. NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
    fourteen. NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs. AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
    fifteen. NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs. AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

    Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs AMD Radeon RX 580 which is better?

    Home / Video card / Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 VS AMD Radeon RX 580

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 and AMD Radeon RX 580 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.

    Benefits NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030

    Value for money

    63. 5%

    8.4% (15.2%) better than

    vs

    55.1%

    Release price

    $79

    -150$ (-65.5%) better than

    vs

    229 $

    Boost frequency

    1468 MHz

    128 MHz (9.6%) better than

    vs

    1340 MHz

    Power Demand (TDP)

    30 W

    -155 W (-83.8%) better than

    vs

    185 W

    Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 580

    Comparison winner

    Number of shaders

    2304

    1920 (500%) better than

    vs

    384

    Core frequency

    1257 MHz

    29 MHz (2. 4%) better than

    vs

    1228 MHz

    Maximum memory

    8 GB

    6 GB (300%) better than

    vs

    2 GB

    Memory bus width

    256 bit

    192 bits (300%) better than

    vs

    64 bit

    Memory frequency

    8000 MHz

    1992 MHz (33.2%) better than

    vs

    6008 MHz

    Memory bandwidth

    256

    207.94 (432.7%) better than

    vs

    48.06

    General information

    Price-quality ratio

    The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.

    63.5%

    8.4% (15.2%) better than

    55.1%

    Architecture

    Pascal GCN 4.0

    Codename

    GP108 Polaris 20

    Type

    Desktop Desktop

    Release price

    $79

    -150 $ (-65.5%) better than

    229 $

    Number of shaders

    384 2304

    1920 (500%) better than

    Core clock

    1228MHz 1257 MHz

    29 MHz (2.4%) better than

    Boost frequency

    1468 MHz

    At 128 MHz (9. 6%) better than

    1340 MHz

    Number of transistors

    1.800 million 5.700 million

    Process

    14 nm 14 nm

    Interface

    PCIe 3.0 x4 PCIe 3.0 x16

    Power Demand (TDP)

    Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation,
    the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.

    30W

    -155 W (-83.8%) better than

    185 W

    Length

    145 mm 241 mm

    Additional power connectors

    no 1x 8-pin

    G-SYNC support

    NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts.

    Multi Monitor

    + no data

    VR Ready

    Technology from NVIDIA that gives manufacturers access to Multi res Shading, Context Priority, and GPU Direct virtual reality technologies.

    + no data

    Vulkan

    NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs).
    It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.

    + no data

    Multi-Projection

    NVIDIA’s Multi-Projection technology improves graphics card performance when building virtual worlds. Images for the left and right eyes are calculated simultaneously.

    + no data

    Video connectors

    1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

    DirectX

    12 (12_1) 12 (12_0)

    Floating point performance

    1. 127 gflops 6.175 gflops
    benchmark
    9,0003
    Memory
    GDDR50738

    GDDR5

    Maximum memory

    Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with a lot of textures,
    use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.

    2 GB 8 GB

    6 GB (300%) better than

    Memory bus width

    The larger the video memory bus width, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.

    64 bit 256 bit

    192 bits (300%) better than

    Shared memory

    no data

    Memory frequency

    A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.

    6008 MHz 8000 MHz

    At 1992 MHz (33.2%) better than

    Memory bandwidth

    The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use.

    48.06 256

    207.94 (432.7%) better than

    Comparison of GeForce GTX 580 and GeForce GT 630M. What to choose?

    GeForce GTX 580

    GeForce GT 630M

    December, 2010 | 810MHz | 1.5GB GDDR5

    March, 2012 | 800MHz | 2GB GDDR5

    Edelmark rating
    6.4

    Edelmark rating
    5.8

    Overall Comparison

    Game Performance

    Tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.

    GeForce GTX 580 6.7 out of 10
    GeForce GT 630M 5.2 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 5.1 out of 10

    Graphics

    Tested on: T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor.

    GeForce GTX 580 6.1 out of 10
    GeForce GT 630M 5.3 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 5.4 out of 10

    Computing power

    Tested on: Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining.

    GeForce GTX 580 6.2 out of 10
    GeForce GT 630M 5.2 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 5.3 out of 10

    Output per W

    Tests used: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive , Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP.

    GeForce GTX 580 6.4 out of 10
    GeForce GT 630M 7.0 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 6.9 out of 10

    Noise and power

    Video card tested on: TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level.

    GeForce GTX 580 6.3 out of 10
    GeForce GT 630M 9.8 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 9.7 out of 10

    Overall graphics card rating

    GeForce GTX 580 6.3 out of 10
    GeForce GT 630M 5.8 out of 10
    GeForce GT 740M 5.9 out of 10

    Benefits

    Why is the GeForce GTX 580 better?

    score

    direct rating

    Substantially better 3DMark score of 11 24.765 vs 8.610 Approximately 3x better 3DMark 11 rating
    Substantially better PassMark 5. 018 vs 678 Approximately 7.5x better PassMark score of
    Significantly better 3DMark vantage rating 24.202.5 vs 3.985 More than 6x better 3DMark vantage rating
    Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 148.809 vs 19.285 Approximately 7.8x better than CLBenchmark score raytrace
    Significantly higher memory bandwidth 193.5 GB/s vs 32 GB/s More than 6x memory bandwidth
    Better 3DMark06 rating 6.065 vs 1.051 More than 5.8x better 3DMark06 rating of
    Much better cloud gate test 20.46 vs 7.71 Approximately 2.8x better than cloud gate test
    Many more raster operation blocks 48 vs 4 44 more raster operation blocks
    Much better test manhattan 3,709. 32 vs 2,068.17 Approximately 80% better manhattan 9 test0738
    Faster pixel fill rate 25.92 GPixel/s vs 3.2GPixel/s More than 8x faster pixel fill rate
    Better floating point performance 1.659 GFLOPS vs 307.2GFLOPS Approximately 5.5x better floating point performance
    Significantly higher frame rate crysis 3 40 vs 4.45 Approximately 9x faster crysis 3 frame rate
    Faster texture processing 51.84 GTexel/s vs 12.8 GTexel/s More than 4x faster texture rendering
    More texture units 64 vs 16 48 more texture units
    Better face recognition quality score 35.72 mPixels/s vs 5. 06 mPixels/s More than 7x better face recognition quality score
    Better PassMark direct rating 1.855 vs 373 Approximately 5x better PassMark
    More shaders 512 vs 96 416 more shader units
    Wider memory bus 384bit vs 128bit 3x wider memory bus
    Slightly higher memory clock speed 1.008 MHz vs 900MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed

    Why is the GeForce GT 630M better?

    Significantly lower power consumption 33W vs 244W 7.4x lower power consumption

    Comparative benchmarks (benchmarks)

    Bitcoin mining

    GeForce GTX 580 142. 43 mHash/s
    GeForce GT 630M 20.98 mHash/s

    Face Recognition

    GeForce GTX 580 35.72 mPixels/s
    GeForce GT 630M 5.06 mPixels/s

    T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)

    GeForce GTX 580 3,350.98
    GeForce GT 630M 2,994.54

    Manhattan test (GFXBench 3.0)

    GeForce GTX 580 3,709.32
    GeForce GT 630M 2,068.17

    Fire Strike Test

    GeForce GTX 580 43.53
    GeForce GT 630M 7.52

    Sky Diver test

    GeForce GTX 580 293.1
    GeForce GT 630M 60.47

    Crysis 3

    GeForce GTX 580 40
    GeForce GT 630M 4. 45

    Battlefield 3

    GeForce GTX 580 65
    GeForce GT 630M 8.3


    Tags:compare, GeForce GT 630M, GeForce GTX 580

    ᐅ Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800 reviews — 97 honest customer reviews of Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800

    mobile phone

    Advantages

    Defects

    Comment

    Estimated

    I accept the terms
    providing data.

    • Android smartphone
    • multi-touch touch screen (capacitive)
    • screen diagonal 3.2″, resolution 240×400
    • 3 MP camera, autofocus
    • 170 MB memory, microSD cards (TransFlash)
    • support for Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, 3G, GPS
    • weight 113 g, WxHxD 55x114x13 mm, acc. 1500 mAh

    Average rating Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800 — 3.94
    A total of 97 reviews are known about the Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800

    Looking for positive and negative reviews about the Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800?

    We collected 97 negative, negative and positive reviews from 11 sources.

    We will show all the advantages and disadvantages of the Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800 identified by users. We do not hide anything and post all the positive and negative honest customer reviews about the Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800, and also offer alternative analogues. Is it worth it to buy — the decision is only yours! 9Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800

    write a feedback

    Zuykov Vladimir, 01.03.2019

    Advantages:
    Android 2.1, I hope it will still be 2.2, I dream of 2.3, touchwiz3 is not bad
    Processor 667 MHz, smart phone
    Good screen for such a price. Both in color and size.
    Nothing creaks in the case.
    Accurate GPS, there is a magnetic compass.
    WiFi is quite sensitive.
    BlueTooth 3.

    Disadvantages:
    Glossy body (it doesn’t bother me personally)
    To get the memory card, you need to remove the cover. You don’t need to turn off your phone.
    Sometimes GPS searches for satellites for a long time, it is treated by turning the GPS off and on — after this procedure it finds for 10s somewhere.
    Likes to eat the Internet by default, is treated by disabling synchronization.

    Comment:
    In general, I’m happy as an elephant, smart phone, not weak battery. Personally, gloss doesn’t scare me. Someone won’t like it.

    Guest, 04/18/2017

    Advantages:
    Excellent smart (for its time in 2010-2011) for reasonable money.

    Disadvantages:
    When using smart as smart, and not just a phone, you have to charge every day.
    There are drawbacks, but they are downright gourmet:
    1. It is impossible (even with third-party programs) to turn on the recording of a telephone conversation.
    2. The FM radio does not have an equalizer and cannot output sound to a Bluetooth stereo headset.
    3. The amps are too thick on the supplied vacuum earpieces.

    Comment:
    Almost all the shortcomings described in the reviews are caused by ignorance of the settings (for example, by standard means, you can assign the receive and hang up keys).
    The phone out of the box, although good, but the full potential is revealed for the enthusiast after:
    1. Updates to Androyd 2.2 (of obvious advantages — it adds a menu to turn off the Internet and a built-in task manager)
    2. Change the firmware to a modified one that allows you to almost double the processor frequency. (I only need the maximum frequency for listening to Internet radio in good quality)
    3. Obtaining root rights. (allows you to install a bunch of software that expands the phone’s capabilities)
    4. Replacing the standard recovery menu with CWM. (allows you to backup internal memory, which allows you to experiment without fear)
    5. Mounting data on a memory card (which completely solves the problem with a lack of internal memory)
    In general, for a year and a half I have not been happy with this miracle of technology. Well, except that I plan to change the battery soon.

    Guest, 01/13/2015

    Advantages:
    The interface is convenient, I got used to it quickly. This is where the + ends.

    Disadvantages:
    Hangs if several applications are loaded, sometimes only reboot saves. It’s really not very comfortable to hold in your hand (but, after several falls, everything is in order). You should have an unlimited Internet using this phone, otherwise it eats traffic. The speaker almost immediately began to wheeze a little, and in general the sound during a conversation is so-so. Loses network often. The volume of the call is not very loud, it is not audible in the bag. And the most important disadvantage: there is not enough internal memory space, you can’t install many applications, but you want a lot of them !!!

    Comment:
    This is my first touch phone. I was happy as a child, but not for long. A few months, then I realized that it was probably possible to make this device more worthy! In general, I do not recommend!

    Kemstach Anton, 08/15/2014

    Advantages:
    Let’s start with the fact that the phone OC Android 2.1 is a big plus. The screen instantly responds to minor touches with your fingers. Very good despite the fact that the case is very easily soiled, but this does not bother me in principle. Samsung has been producing just glossy cases lately.
    The price is 10000, I even think that this is not enough for such a smartphone. The battery holds up well. Nice headset included. The card and SIM are under the cover, which is convenient for me. It lies well in the hand, preventing it from falling out of the hands (although many say that it is slippery, depending on which hands: D).
    Powerful processor and enough RAM to run many applications.
    Swype. A very handy thing.
    3G plows well, but I haven’t tried WI-FI yet ((
    Bluetooth 3.0
    Screen 3.2 inches, 240×400 resolution is enough for.

    Disadvantages:
    There is one disadvantage for me: it is difficult to install animated wallpapers (I never installed them). It’s all. What I write below does not apply to me.
    And now I will write something that buyers may not like.
    1) The screen is 240×400, for those who like to play, some games will not have a very good graph or they will slow down.
    2) The camera is average, although there are many shooting functions
    3) Eats money because of the Internet, so sort it out there, download APNdroid to disable the Internet

    Comment:
    This is my first smartphone. Great model!
    I am very satisfied with the purchase, I spend all day on the phone, on the Internet, a very convenient smartphone. I would classify it as informational. It is very convenient to receive any information through the phone. The phone is loud, the call is impossible not to hear. I have a 3 year warranty. Tip: set up unlimited internet!
    The market is very convenient to climb, a lot of free programs and games.
    I advise you to download the following programs:
    1)APNdroid-to disable the Internet
    2)Advanced Task Manager — to disable all applications
    3)Dr. Web-very convenient and high-quality antivirus
    4)Android Optimizer-multifunctional application (Clear the cache, Remove programs, phone and battery information, «kill the process», etc.
    5)Easy Uninstaller-uninstall programs
    6)Mail agent . ru-just convenient ICQ
    Listen to music through the headset-super!
    To sum up again: Excellent model that will keep you satisfied for a very long time))

    Guest, 03/26/2014

    Advantages:
    Convenience, size, versatility. Despite endless falls and bumps, it has been living for more than a year

    Disadvantages:
    1. There is no Internet shutdown function. Uses it uncontrollably whenever he wants. Unlimited solves the problem, but not in roaming. 2. Smooth body — constantly slips and falls. 3. Well, the network very often disappears. 4. There is no language switch button. Because I constantly communicate in 2 languages, it bothers me to get into the settings

    Guest, 19.03.2014

    Advantages:
    -Android (I upgraded to version 2.3.7 CyanogenMod7, which significantly increased the speed of work, the amount of internal memory, root rights appeared, got rid of unnecessary built-in programs. )
    -Full set of options … bluetooth, wi-fi , GPS, HSDPA.
    — Against the background of other devices, decent battery life, enough for a day at full load (a day — several hours of Internet, an hour of navigation, 10-15 calls, instant messengers) )
    -Communication keeps stable (operator with a red logo, well, the one who is always one step ahead)
    -Presence of mechanical control buttons
    -No creaks and backlashes, does not creak in the hand
    -Price — 6990 r.

    Disadvantages:
    Not significant. In my opinion, there is not enough mechanical joystick control, a flash as a flashlight would not hurt, well, an easily soiled screen (like all touch phones) … I think these are all nit-picking

    Comment:
    Android as a blank, with «straight hands» and a bright mind, you can completely sharpen the device to fit your needs. If you do not want to bother, it’s easier to buy a device with a «hard» firmware and enjoy life. The Internet is full of information about firmware, programs, etc. , you just need to spend a little of your precious time. In general, I am very satisfied with the purchase, a good workhorse that meets all my requirements.

    kov serg, 12/15/2013

    Advantages:
    Good phone!!! Nimble, bright. GPS works great!!! For navigation behind the wheel is quite enough. Put navitel and city guide. Everything works, satellites hold. With surfing on an Internet, too, no problems. The connection is stable, the volume of the call and the speakers is good. swype keyboard.

    Disadvantages:
    Marked case. The price of 11000 for the PCT is still a little expensive. The battery lasts two days.

    Comment:
    Decent smartphone for more or less acceptable money.

    Guest, 11/20/2013

    Advantages:
    -Wi-Fi
    -Bluetooth 3.0
    -Support for cards up to 32GB
    -multitouch
    -complete headphones please)
    -sound 5.1,
    -HD video,
    -G-sensors
    -0wype4 — handwriting recognition
    -0wype4 text

    Disadvantages:
    — size 240×400, creepy, but not deadly . ..
    — does not play mp4
    — does not support JAVA,
    — market — semi-paid, what’s free — demo … the rest for $
    — the sensor only reacts to the touch of live skin, i.e. remove the phone without gloves, and those who have thumbs — may not hit the buttons when typing.
    — when connected to a PC, there are a lot of hemorrhoids, even the instructions do not help.
    — The task manager does not disable the application, as if the function is there, but the body hangs when pressed …
    — The navigator cannot determine the location.
    — not enough space (170mb) to install applications…
    — androin 2.1 — too old for this model…
    — the player does not understand Cyrillic… and if you rename the songs yourself, it still does not help…
    — the camera is not happy, it shoots at 1.3, 2mp maximum …
    -zoom — when approaching, the image is generally the same as on a 0.3 camera
    — Changing the card only if the cover is removed … troubles. ..
    — body-soap… it will just jump out of your hands.
    — TOTALLY DEPENDS ON THE INTERNET!!!

    Comment:
    Value for money — not happy, of course, if you look at the characteristics, it’s better to take C6 or 5800 (despite the old OS), the minuses cross out everything +, why HD, if mp4 does not even support. If you take dvd-rip then through certain programs. The latest bluetooth is not seen by devices that are a little less than a year old. because there is an old version.
    In general: Taking this body is only in the hope of the future, (android update !!!, the appearance of bluetooth 3.0 in other bodies, etc.)
    IMHO: I do not advise…

    Ralko Anton, 10/11/2013

    Advantages:
    Android 2.1, WiFi, Fast processor 666MHz,
    Battery 1500 mAh, GPS, loud speaker.
    Put a flask on 8gb does not buggy does not slow down
    Multitouch, Bluetooth 3.0, pulls movies without
    conversion, Camera takes norms Bright screen.

    Disadvantages:
    No flash, I would like more resolution

    Comment:
    In general, the phone is good for such a price (10000r)

    Guest, 05/03/2013

    Advantages:
    Sufficient processor frequency
    Wi-fi (with AP support)
    Cool headphones included))
    A lot of firmware on the Internet
    quite usable camera
    good reception
    GPS
    and much more

    Battery

    Disadvantages:
    , of course , but this is a problem everywhere
    Samsung seems to have abandoned our body, the firmware is not updated

    Comment:
    Very good for its money. If you cheat: install a custom one (CyanogenMod, for example, a very good thing), then we have a plus: overclocking, the ability to install FlashPlayer (it even works). Next, about the video accelerator: the guys from XDA are hammering the library, there are already results, most likely someday they will make their own drivers

    Babushkin Ivan, 03/21/2013

    Advantages:
    Good phone for the money.
    It has a lot of pluses:
    — on the model with a white color of the case, there are no stains from fingers;
    — a screen with a coating that allows you to remove all prints by swiping a couple of times on a shirt sleeve;
    — ease of setup and refinement using Android — you can change almost everything — the look of the «desktop», the program for sms / calls / contacts, the type of animation, battery icons, etc.
    — the battery lasts three days (I hardly use gps, because I don’t need it)
    — it’s not slippery for me personally (as they say here)
    — the card and SIM card change without removing the battery
    — a very good ratio of functionality and price, I chose for a long time, I studied almost all models and thousands of reviews)) If you pay more, you will get more pixels and faster percents. Only the difference can be felt only in games, are you ready to pay big money for mobile games)? I do not like them, for all other tasks the power of the phone is more than enough.

    Disadvantages:
    — the resolution is small, although I don’t consider this a full-fledged disadvantage, because with a higher resolution, there is more load on the percent, more battery consumption
    — complete headphones without a clothespin (well, these are nitpicks) I use (Advanced Task Manager), it does not allow memory to be clogged
    — a built-in camera without a flash, that is, it doesn’t matter if it’s indoors, it’s better outdoors. This is how all cameras behave, this cannot be canceled) The more light — the better the photo, because the shutter is released faster

    Comment:
    When I bought it, I was afraid that a day or two is the maximum for a smartphone (this is my first smart phone). To prolong battery life, I turned off vibration and sounds when I click on the screen (they annoy me, I always turned them off), downloaded APN Droid to cut off the Internet (a convenient widget, other programs, by the way, do not always turn off the Internet). Also disabled gps, wi-fi, bluetooth and background synchronization (and normal too).
    What the hell is this synchronization, tell me? Waiting for a letter — check (or turn on the function), and if not, it’s better to let the battery live longer)
    The resolution of 240×400 turned out to be quite sufficient — it is convenient to read (especially fb2 through a cool reader), the diagonal is good. Video pulls up to 720 by 400 — and much more, the picture will not be clearer)) Moreover, it is easier for the processor to cope with this resolution and less brakes.
    The volume of the speaker is good, even through Skype (via gprs) everything is perfectly audible.
    I liked the unlocking of the screen through the picture — it can be quickly removed and reliably protected from the curious)
    It’s unusual that on the sides, apart from the volume rocker, there are no more buttons / connectors / plugs .. But it’s beautiful, I like it)
    I can’t say how much the screen or case is scratched — I don’t use it so much, there’s nothing yet. But it already depends on the owner. I wear neat and in a rag case. I will also buy a screen protector. If you wear it with iron keys, in a tool box or in your teeth, it will probably still pokotsatsya))
    Soon they promise a new firmware (2.2), I’m waiting for it until I install the left ones, because I plan that the phone will honestly work for a year- one and a half (I took it with a 3-year warranty) and will break on its own, making it possible to exchange it for a newer model))
    I am satisfied with the purchase, I also recommend it because the price for this model is the same in Moscow and in the regions. Competitor — ski optimus 1 does not like it outwardly and does not inspire confidence at all)
    P. S. From the programs I use:
    desktop — launcher pro
    sms — handcent sms
    player — poweramp
    reader — cool reader
    navigation — navitel and Yandex. maps
    network lock — APNDroid
    browser — opera

    Masterkov Andrey, 15.02.2013

    Advantages:
    holds a charge for a very long time (with intensive use 2-3 days), bright enough display, the ability to upgrade to Android 2. 2
    loud speaker that does not stall even in a case!!!
    is fast enough (if you periodically reset the cache)
    hot swap for SIM and microSD cards !!!!!
    fits comfortably in the hand,
    is a very fast GPS (though after firmware version 2.2).

    Disadvantages:
    not without them:
    rather weak camera and low video resolution,
    inconvenient full-time keyboard with thumbs (treated by installing alternative options),
    no 3D graphics accelerator (some toys slow down).

    Comment:
    I have been using the device for 10 months. The battery hasn’t let me down yet… For a business person, the most important thing is that you can install a lot of useful software and at the same time it will not sit down in 3-4 hours, as they say about many competitors… To be honest, I wanted to change it to a new one, but then I came across an updated one software, reflashed the device and calmed down on this, because many regular jambs are now fixed.
    In general, if you have hands and an understanding that this is not just a toy or a phone, but a mini computer based on the Android operating system, then take it — you won’t regret it, it’s worth your money!!!

    Mizyunova Inna, 01/09/2013

    Advantages:
    good case, no backlash, fits perfectly in the hand, the sensor is sensitive, the sound in the headphones is good, supports 5. 1, the headphone jack is standard, it’s great! By the way, I like the battery, well, maybe it’s because I don’t «use» it as before, I’ve played enough … in general, there is enough charge for 3 days. I immediately bought a film for the screen, but the case is not scratched (although I wear it in a case …)

    Disadvantages:
    headphones are some kind of perversion!!! and DOES NOT SUPPORT animated wallpapers, well, maybe you need to flash it, I’m not risking it yet. still a terrible camera, but I don’t need it … although when shooting on a phone, the text can be distinguished. There is still little built-in memory, applications are automatically installed in the phone, it’s not buzzing … well, that’s all.

    Comment:
    when buying, I considered only models on the Android platform. After reading hundreds of reviews, I settled on this phone. I have had it for about six months now, absolutely everything suits me in it, but this is after I remade it «for myself» by installing a bunch of all sorts of useful programs, because standard programs are a quiet horror, even a calendar without registering in the Google market I didn’t want to work . .. I also immediately advise you to install APNdroid, otherwise the phone eats all your money on the Internet. Another useful program is TasKiller, it closes all applications. the phone itself can only minimize them, there is no tray. Everything that I expected from this phone, I received in full 🙂

    popov artem, 01/05/2013

    DPCs:
    Android
    Processor
    Good sound
    Shusty
    No flash

    Disadvantages:
    The headset is not very suitable for
    Camera not very

    Comment:
    for price 2400 hryvnias (9200 rubles) can be on the Internet stores to buy for 2200 gr (8800 rubles) I like it while very satisfied, of course there are problems with Kies, but what to do. Video without recoding a lot is also a big plus (well, for me anyway). Of course, after symbian, the android is beyond praise, there is no headache with certificates, and the system, as for me, is an order of magnitude better

    Rakovsky Vladimir, 12/19/2012

    Advantages:
    The design is cooler than today’s flagships 🙂 and the display is what you need!
    From the characteristics in practice in my GT-I5800 inside instead of 170 MB 194 MB! The camera is normal. Everything is average! And how many times has it fallen over the years and everything works without glitches.
    3G and Wi-Fi on top!
    Otherwise, the gold standard of a budget android smartphone in terms of money and functionality! For which he was credited by various reviews in the top 10 optimal purchases!

    Disadvantages:
    Slows down when everything is working, but it’s no wonder the RAM is only 256 MB.
    First of all, the internal memory is still not enough for applications.
    Pre-installed all sorts of nonsense that is treated by root!
    It’s a shame Bluetooth 2.1, not 3.0 at all.
    Flash player not working only Puffin browser will help!
    Not updated above OS 2.2, sorry!!!
    At the same time, Ceanogen mod did not find any sensible one.

    Comment:
    I have been using it since 2011 and am generally satisfied!
    Everything still works fine!
    This in itself is not bad.

    Petrov Evgeniy, 12/18/2012

    Advantages:
    1) android pleased. very handy OS.
    2) you need to connect to your computer only as a removable disk.
    3) games and programs are quickly installed and generally very fast.
    4) video, it takes almost all formats, it seems without brakes
    5) the sound is pleasant
    6) the sensor is good.
    7) great games. Better than Simba. sorry for the current that there are no heroes, as on WM 9No Maybe that’s why there are no games in 3D. (I really wanted to play avatar 3D)
    4) not all games come with this resolution. (but there are many)

    Comment:
    I use games, listen to music, radio, watch movies. Internet, I don’t need a camera, so I can’t say anything about working with them.
    In general, I do not regret the purchase. beautiful and easy to handle. I also installed the program and lost the battery and saves it from the Internet.
    even dad approved my purchase and friends.

    Semenov Anton, 10/14/2012

    Advantages:
    A small price for bodies on the Android 2. 1 platform, good response speed, excellent touch screen. Supports most applications from the market.

    Disadvantages:
    From time to time, both cellular and 3g communication disappears (very infuriating). Small screen size. Pretty low frequency of the processor 600Hz. Not enough memory.

    Tatiana, 09/01/2012

    Advantages:
    adequate price (6000r with delivery), good body, all in one, the screen is of sufficient quality for me, I set the backlight to 25%. the battery holds 3-4 days

    Disadvantages:
    to replace the memory card, you need to remove the cover, the usb connection logic is not entirely clear — when you select «as a removable disk», you still need to mount the disk — I could not think of this for two days, so I often took out the card :).

    Comment:
    I am satisfied. although I didn’t understand the enthusiasm for android — it’s no better than Windows (yes, maybe worse, the settings are poorer). But I coped with everything: a reader, a keyboard, turning off the mobile Internet, navigation — everything works.
    has not yet been able to update the firmware..

    upd March 2014 normal flight. the same firmware
    upd March 2018 works, only the battery no longer holds. Well, it’s obsolete.
    upd is no longer used, but is being replaced .. everything works

    Miroshnichenko Alexey, 27.08.2012

    Advantages:
    Compact communicator. With a good network, the Internet works great. Mini-computer, navigator camera and player in your pocket.

    Disadvantages:
    Slippery, clogged and scratched body after 8 months of operation. Brake processor. Sometimes, in order to launch a notebook and urgently call, you have to wait half a minute: ((The flash player does not work on standard firmware, you can’t reflash during the warranty period 🙁 Free programs on the Market Weak battery The display is small — but be more discomfort in your pocket 🙂

    Comment:
    I bought an inexpensive communicator and did not expect more, so it’s a shame to complain 🙂

    Kisileva Irina, 26. 08.2012

    Advantages:
    excellent value for money

    Disadvantages:
    case

    Comment:
    I love this phone, although I gave it to my husband to use, replacing it with a miracle from HTC. But I can say with confidence that for the entire time of its operation, I did not regret a single minute that I (quite by accident) acquired it. I am very sorry that it was discontinued ((Its only drawback was the case material, but these are trifles in the presence of a lining and a protective film. This is an ideal phone in its price category, which has never let me down.

    Guest, 18.08.2012

    Advantages:
    comfortable.

    Disadvantages:
    well, the screen is scratched very quickly, the charge takes 3-5 hours to sit down, download 3 applications, everything is buggy, the call is impossible to accept, it breaks very quickly

    Bronnikov Alexey, 25.07.2012

    Advantages:
    Everything that was described above! GPS works great even with a complete lack of money on the account, you just need to install Navitel, and not use the default navigator! how many times he did not try to include everything in the bestolka!

    Disadvantages:
    The camera is not very good
    Accepting or rejecting a call is terribly inconvenient (or maybe I haven’t figured out the settings yet)
    After the call ends, the window with the contact data is kept (why?) And what does it hold for 3 seconds, which is very inconvenient when you need to perform some other action!
    And there are a lot of other shortcomings, but as I understand it, the flaw is not in the device, but in the firmware!

    Comment:
    Definitely worth the money, but with a different firmware!

    Rigin Anton, 07/05/2012

    Advantages:
    Relatively low price.

    Disadvantages:
    The phone is buggy, the latest official version of Android — 2.2, is already hopelessly outdated. Custom firmware solves some of the problems but not all, and even adds new ones.
    The screen resolution is too small.
    Processor 667 MHz — this is no comment at all … Although, you can overclock, of course.

    Comment:
    If a couple of years ago it could still be called a more or less good smartphone, now I see no reason to buy, except for temporary use or misbehaving children.;)

    Guest, 06/09/2012

    Advantages:
    1) Android (and a lot of software with it)
    2) The battery is super, it holds.
    3) Design — pleases, very very much!
    4) Not buggy (well, almost)
    5) Price (penny!)
    6) The sound is super, the signal catches — super
    7) Multi-touch

    Disadvantages:
    1) They already wrote here … a cap on top above the field for Charging — well, it’s too frail
    2) GPS does not work for me personally in Moscow. Only worked once

    Comment:
    During the use I managed to get acquainted with the phone — it’s just a super model for such money! Competitors out, samsung pleased, I hope it will serve faithfully.

    Guest, 04.05.2012

    Advantages:
    I sat down to think about the merits of this device and caught myself thinking that nothing comes to mind except a convenient calculator and a more or less normal player.

    Disadvantages:
    There is no need to think too much: it almost constantly loses the network, and regardless of the telecom operator — at first I thought that there were problems with the operator, I changed it — the network both disappeared and disappears; hangs very, well, just very, often, the way out of this situation is a reboot, but it does not always save; it’s not realistic to get through to me — 7 and 10 calls end with the fact that no matter how I try to pick up the phone, I can’t do it — the call acceptance button on the display works, but it constantly returns to its place, what it accepted, what it didn’t accept call — reboot and try, if the network is working, to call back the one who tried to call me in vain and this can continue 100500 times and no result (a very strange glitch).

    Comment:
    The phone is 1.5 years old. I paid 2500 UAH for it. The first half of the year worked like clockwork, but then everything listed above in the «lack» began. The service center said that the problems with the operator changed and nothing changed for the better, and the service center again blamed the operator, and it doesn’t matter that they, the operators, are different, but the problems are the same. I suffered with it for two months, and then I gave it up — now I have two phones in my bag — an ever-living Nokia and this «miracle» that I use as a means to update the status in VK or Twitter, well, the player.

    maxbol73, 04/19/2012

    Advantages:
    Excellent, fast smartphone! Very convenient menu (unlike Sony-android). Download any application. The price matches the quality. Nothing worse than the vaunted HTC.

    Weaknesses:
    Slightly slowed down. After flashing everything just flies.

    Comment:
    I recommend it to everyone!!! You can immediately buy an inexpensive leather case, and you do not need a protective film.

    Guest, 03/31/2012

    Advantages:
    After that disgusting phone with which I had to live a couple of years before, the new one seemed like a miracle, especially for such money.
    User-friendly interface, you can figure it out on your own without problems
    Bright screen
    Android 2.1
    Rarely slows down, works fast
    Wonderful screen sensitivity, it’s very nice
    The player is very convenient, and the phone sounds loud and good
    When you listen to the radio, the name and author of the song are displayed
    A lot of convenient applications from the Market, you can customize your phone individually for your purposes
    Compared with friends, it seemed very similar to HTS

    Disadvantages:
    Still, Android is only 2.1, not 2.2, however, it is possible to update the firmware, but the 2.2 firmware itself is not yet available, and you can’t watch videos on the Internet, because the flash player do not download
    It is inconvenient that the volume of music and multimedia is combined, i. e. if before that you listened to music, and then start the game, then the sounds of this game will be played, try to remove it — reduce the volume of the incoming call, you need to somehow dodge and look for a suitable moment, i.e. the volume key combines all three settings at once, this is inconvenient. It may seem like a completely minor drawback, but it actually infuriates
    Does not support live wallpapers (although not everyone needs them)
    The charge does not hold very well, especially at first
    A lot of things that are incomprehensible to a simple user, for example, how to turn off GPRS, I had to knock down the settings, but there is probably an easier way, but about it the instructions say nothing
    The camera is not great and without a flash (but I never use it, so it doesn’t matter to me)
    The back panel, behind which the SIM card is, opens with great difficulty

    Comment:
    There were a lot of shortcomings, but the pros have already been said better than me
    In general, I really like my phone, but, of course, there are much better ones, but they cost quite differently, so they are good for their price. 4+

    Kruglikov Andrey, 24.02.2012

    Advantages:
    Androyd 2.1 works well and that the main thing is not stupid.
    Good signal reception and speaker audibility

    Disadvantages:
    is not a special design. Well, perhaps the size and resolution of the screen.

    Comment:
    Optimal for your money))))

    AntonovVR, 02/23/2012

    Advantages:
    The best phone for the money

    Comment:
    Used Samsung 5700 Spica for half a year and 5800 for half a year. , memory, in short — everything is a little better).
    Except screen. More precisely, permissions — it is less. But this is not a big problem, it is a trifle, one might say. So feel free to take 5800.

    Afanasiev Vyacheslav, 01/28/2012

    Advantages:
    For its price, the bright screen, the presence of Android with the prospect of switching to the next version, the design, the quality of the case and it plays the role of a phone well can be considered advantages:) Widgets are pleasing. I installed AutoRotate OnOff, BatteryLife, Minimalistic Text and Power Management. It is also convenient to move frequently used contacts to desktops (this compensates for the weak search in the notebook). The most normal ICQ surprisingly turned out to be a mail agent …)) I would never have thought)

    Disadvantages:
    loses network when switching GSM/3G.
    The Wi-Fi antenna is terribly weak (where the Nokia 5800 catches stably, the sams switches to a hedgehog …).
    After 4.5 months, the sound from the loudspeaker began to disappear (the standard melody was used, the phone did not drop). Now the device is in service. I’m starting to regret a little that I overpaid by buying it at the beginning of sales.
    The disadvantages for someone include Android’s invincible greed for the Internet. As a result — a decrease in time in standby mode and money in the personal account. I cured it by connecting cheap internet. Voice dialing from a headset is not supported … It’s a pity. I’m used to Nokia. The quality and volume of sound after the Nokia 5800 is not at all pleasing … But it seems to have reconciled until it happened (see above) It’s a pity there is no Samsung vibration from pressing the screen (only for the «select» action and buttons). In the current version of Android, navigation through contacts is frankly weak. For owners of huge notebooks, this is a minus.

    Comment:
    The Galaxy 580 was bought to replace the Nokia 5800 that started to turn off for no reason. The first time I bought the body simply on the basis of «I liked it in the store.» Transferred a huge notebook from Nokia through synchronization with Google. I downloaded the synchronization program on the Nokia 5800 (from the software update menu), set it up for a Google account, and uploaded it. And then on the Galaxy 580 just synchronized with it. Everything is fine, though several dozen numbers out of about 800 pieces have disappeared, and these are numbers that were marked in Nokia as a «default number». I don’t know who is to blame. Transferred what he found lost manually. I almost never use GPS and a camera due to the presence of a GPS navigator and a camera. The main camera reads QR codes. Macro will also work)

    Manufacturers

    show more

    Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

    Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
    Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM

    versus

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

    Benefits

    Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM

    • Newer graphics card, release date difference 4 year(s) 5 month(s)
    • Newer graphics card production process allows3 make it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 28 nm vs 40 nm

    1544 MHz vs 823 MHz0029

  • 2. 7 times more shader processors: 512 vs 192
  • 5 times more floating point performance: 1,581.1 gflops vs 316.0 gflops
  • 3 times more max memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB
  • 11% more memory clock: 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) vs 1800 MHz
  • Release date 9 April 2015 vs 9 November 2010
    Process 28 nm vs 40 nm
    Core clock 1544 MHz vs 823 MHz
    Texturing speed 49.4 billion / sec vs 13.17 GTexel / s
    Number of shaders 512 vs 192
    Floating point performance 1,581.1 gflops vs 316.0 gflops
    Maximum memory size 1536MB vs 512MB
    Memory frequency 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) vs 1800 MHz

    Benchmark comparison

    GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM
    GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

    Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
    PassMark — G3D Mark 4518
    PassMark — G2D Mark 462
    Geekbench — OpenCL 14740
    CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 40.048
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 866.884
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.333
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 32.378
    CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 132.363
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5953
    GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3717
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3357
    GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5953
    GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3717
    GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3357
    3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score 809

    Performance comparison

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
    Architecture Kepler 2. 0 Fermi 2.0
    Codename GK208B GF110
    Issue date April 9, 2015 November 9, 2010
    Place in the rating not rated 541
    Type Desktop Desktop
    Price at first issue date $499
    Price now $289.88
    Price/performance ratio (0-100) 19. 21
    Core frequency 823MHz 1544 MHz
    Floating point performance 316.0 gflops 1,581.1 gflops
    Process 28nm 40nm
    Number of shaders 192 512
    Texturing speed 13.17 GTexel/s 49.4 billion / sec
    Number of CUDA conveyors 512
    Maximum temperature 97 °C
    Power consumption (TDP) 244 Watt
    Number of transistors 3,000 million
    Video connectors No outputs Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
    Audio input for HDMI Internal
    HDMI
    Maximum resolution VGA 2048×1536
    Multi-monitor support
    Interface PCIe 2. 0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
    Tire PCI-E 2.0×16
    Height 4.376″ (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
    Length 10.5″ (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
    SLI support 3-way
    Additional power connectors One 6-pin and One 8-pin
    DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
    OpenGL 4.

    2022 © All rights reserved