Gt 580m: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — NotebookCheck.net Tech

GeForce GT 730M vs GeForce GTX 580M Graphics cards Comparison

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 730M and GeForce GTX 580M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 730M and GeForce GTX 580M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GeForce GT 730M

Check Price

GeForce GTX 580M

Check Price

GeForce GT 730M and GeForce GTX 580M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GT 730M and GeForce GTX 580M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 730M or GeForce GTX 580M here:

GeForce GT 730M Laptops

GeForce GTX 580M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GT 730M	GeForce GTX 580M
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 MB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 580M has 203% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 730M.
GeForce GT 730M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 580M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GT 730M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 580M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GT 730M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 580M — with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 730M is 105 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 580M.
GeForce GT 730M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 580M — by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 730M is 300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 580M.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p	0−1	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	24−27
medium / 1080p	2−3	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	10−12	40−45
medium / 1080p	3−4	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Battlefield 5 is 420% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 730M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 580M.
low / 768p	110−120	180−190
medium / 768p	80−85	150−160
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
QHD / 1440p	−	45−50
4K / 2160p	9−10	30−33
high / 768p	55−60	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p	70−75	95−100
medium / 768p	40−45	80−85
ultra / 1080p	16−18	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Dota 2 is 75% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p	1−2	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	8−9	30−33
medium / 1080p	2−3	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	5−6	14−16
QHD / 1440p	1−2	−
low / 720p	45−50	80−85
medium / 1080p	5−6	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p	2−3	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p	40−45	70−75
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p	1−2	7−8
ultra / 1080p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	2−3	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	−	95−100
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p	14−16	20−22
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	24−27	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	3−4	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 633% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p	6−7	40−45
medium / 768p	5−6	24−27
high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 575% more, than GeForce GT 730M.
low / 768p	70−75	95−100
medium / 768p	35−40	55−60
ultra / 1080p	12−14	27−30
high / 768p	27−30	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 580M in World of Tanks is 54% more, than GeForce GT 730M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GT 730M	GeForce GTX 580M
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK107	N12E-GTX2
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 January 2013	28 June 2011
Pipelines	384	384
Core clock speed	725 MHz	620 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	23. 20	39.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	552.2 gflops	952.3 gflops
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 — 2000 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	96.0 GB/s
Shared memory	—	—
DirectX	12 API	12 API
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	+
CUDA cores		384
Bus support	PCI Express 3. 0, PCI Express 2.0	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options		+
HDMI	+
3D Blu-Ray		+
3D Gaming		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	31 Mh/s	40 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Standard memory configuration	DDR3/GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840×2160
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920×1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840×2160
HDCP content protection	+
7. 1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+
Optimus	+	+
Blu-Ray 3D Support	+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Similar compares

GeForce GT 730M vs HD Graphics 6000
GeForce GT 730M vs Radeon HD 5670
GeForce GTX 580M vs HD Graphics 6000
GeForce GTX 580M vs Radeon HD 5670
GeForce GT 730M vs Quadro K620
GeForce GT 730M vs Radeon HD 6970M
GeForce GTX 580M vs Quadro K620
GeForce GTX 580M vs Radeon HD 6970M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M Specs, Price, and FPS in Games

Memory Size	Memory Type	Memory Bus	Memory Bandwidth
2 GB	GDDR5	256-bit	96 GB/s

Pixel Fillrate

9. 92 GPixel/s

Texture Fillrate

39.68 GTexel/s

Availability

No items available

Processor

Resolution

Select game resolution

Graphics Settings

Select game graphics

Offset

…

Apply Offset

Value Rating

Performance Rating

Value per FPS

You will receive

… FPS

Alternatives for GeForce GTX 580M

1080p, High

No alternatives — this is the best option

Specifications

General
Release Date	Jun 28th, 2011
Generation	GeForce 500M
Outputs	None
Power Connectors	None
Power Consumption	100 W

Performance
Base Clock Speed	620 MHz
Memory Clock Speed	750 MHz
Pixel Fillrate	9. 92 GPixel/s
Texture Fillrate	39.68 GTexel/s

Memory
Memory Size	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5
Memory Bus	256-bit
Memory Bandwidth	96 GB/s

Builds Using NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

1080p, High

Find out which of the 2 GPUs performs better, view a side-by-side specification comparison.

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

$976.6

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

$844.99

GeForce RTX 2060

$269.99

GeForce RTX 3050

$289.99

GeForce RTX 2060

$269.99

Radeon RX 6600

$259.99

Radeon RX 6600

$259.99

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

$279.99

GeForce RTX 3050

$289.99

GeForce GTX 1650

$184.99

GeForce GTX 1070

GeForce RTX 3060

$379.99

Refine results to filter 325 graphics cards by performance, release date, price, and value. Click on a GPU to view more in-depth specifications and game FPS.

Found 325 GPUs.

Popularity

Graphics Card

Performance

GeForce RTX 3050

Release Date: Jan 4th, 2022

Performance Rating

$289.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Radeon RX 6600

Release Date: Oct 13th, 2021

Performance Rating

$259.99 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 3060

Release Date: Jan 12th, 2021

Performance Rating

$379.99 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Release Date: May 31st, 2021

Performance Rating

$679.99 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Release Date: Dec 1st, 2020

Performance Rating

$501.03 on Amazon

In Stock

Radeon RX 6500 XT

Release Date: Jan 19th, 2022

Performance Rating

$179. 99 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Release Date: May 31st, 2021

Performance Rating

$976.6 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 2060

Release Date: Jan 7th, 2019

Performance Rating

$269.99 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

Release Date: Dec 7th, 2021

Performance Rating

$279.99 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

Release Date: Jan 11th, 2022

Performance Rating

$844.99 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 3070

Release Date: Sep 1st, 2020

Performance Rating

$549.99 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Release Date: Oct 29th, 2019

Performance Rating

$224 on Amazon

In Stock

Radeon RX 6700 XT

Release Date: Mar 3rd, 2021

Performance Rating

$399.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Radeon RX 6600 XT

Release Date: Jul 30th, 2021

Performance Rating

$328. 81 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce GTX 1070

Release Date: Jun 10th, 2016

Performance Rating

$589 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Release Date: Jan 12th, 2021

Performance Rating

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Release Date: Jan 27th, 2022

Performance Rating

$1,499.99 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 3080

Release Date: Sep 1st, 2020

Performance Rating

$739 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

Release Date: Jul 9th, 2019

Performance Rating

$339.99 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Release Date: Mar 10th, 2017

Performance Rating

$649 on Amazon

In Stock

Radeon RX 6800 XT

Release Date: Oct 28th, 2020

Performance Rating

$589.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Radeon RX 580

Release Date: Apr 18th, 2017

Performance Rating

$209. 95 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Release Date: May 11th, 2021

Performance Rating

GeForce GTX 1650

Release Date: Apr 23rd, 2019

Performance Rating

$184.99 on Amazon

In Stock

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

Release Date: Jul 9th, 2019

Performance Rating

$768 on Amazon

In Stock

Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M what is better?

Home / Graphics Card / NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

46%

DeviceList score

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

59%

DeviceList score

We compared the characteristics of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022 year.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M benefits

Winner in comparison

Core Frequency

775 MGz

155 MGz (25%) better

620 MGz

Technological process

28 nm

-12 nm (-30%) better

40 nm

Power Consumption (TDP)

33 Wt

-67 Wt (-67%) better

100 Wt

Memory clock speed

1600 MGz

100 MGz (6.7%) better

1500 MGz

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M benefits

Number of shader processors

384

192 (100%) better

192

Memory bus width

256 bit

192 bit (300%) better

64 bit

Memory Bandwidth

83. 2 (650%) better

12.8

General information
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
no data	94.4 %
Architecture
Kepler 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name
GK208	GF114
Type

Number of shader processors
192	384 192 (100%) better
Core Frequency
775 MGz 155 MGz (25%) better	620 MGz
Frequency in Boost mode
758 MGz	no data
Number of transistors
915	1,950
Technological process
28 nm -12 nm (-30%) better	40 nm
Interface
PCIe 2. 0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Power Consumption (TDP) The calculated heat output shows the average heat output in operation under load, the larger the value — the more the requirements for cooling and energy consumption increase.
33 Wt -67 Wt (-67%) better	100 Wt
Additional power connectors
no data
SLI support
no data	+
3D Vision
no data	+
GPU Boost
+	no data
CUDA The presence of the CUDA architecture allows you to use applications that are optimized for parallel computing. For example, for the development and design of neural networks.

Bus
PCI Express 2.0	PCI-E 2.0
Number of CUDA cores A large number of CUDA cores increase performance in graphics computing, especially affecting anti-aliasing and lighting in games, and the speed of training neural networks.
no data	384
HDMI

OpenCL
1.1	1.1
Support for analog VGA monitors
2048×1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support)
2560×1600	no data
H. 264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p Video Decode
+	no data
3D Gaming
no data	+
FXAA

Verde Drivers
+	no data
3D Blu-Ray
no data	+
Support for edp 1.2 signal
2560×1600	no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio streaming
+	no data
Blu-Ray 3D support
+	no data
Direct Compute
+	no data
Video connectors
No outputs	No outputs
DirectX
12 API	12 API
Floating-point performance
240. 0 gflops	952.3 gflops
Optimus
+	+
DirectX 11
no data	DirectX 11
Standard Memory size
DDR3	no data
LVDS signal support
1920×1200	no data
HDCP Content Protection
+	no data
7.1-channel HD audio via HDMI
+	no data

Benchmarks

Memory
Memory type
DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount Large amount of video memory allows you to run demanding games with a lot of textures, use high-resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.
2	2
Memory bus width The wider the video memory bus width, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better the performance in demanding games.
64 bit	256 bit 192 bit (300%) better
Shared memory
—	—
Memory clock speed A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.
1600 MGz 100 MGz (6.7%) better	1500 MGz
Memory Bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective RAM your PC can use.
12.8	96 83. 2 (650%) better

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — review. GPU Benchmark & Specs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M graphics card (also called GPU) comes in 369 in the performance rating. It is a good result. The graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M runs with the minimal clock speed 620 MHz. It is featured by the acceleration option and able to run up to . The manufacturer has equipped NVIDIA with GB of 2 MB memory, clock speed 1500 MHz and bandwidth 96.0 GB/s.

The power consumption of the graphics card is 100 Watt, and the fabrication process is only 40 nm. Below you will find the main data on the compatibility, sizes, technologies and gaming performance test results. Also you can read and leave the comments.

Let’s take a closer look at the most important specifications of the graphics card. To have a good idea what a graphics card is the best, we recommend to use comparison service.

1.0
Out of 1
Hitesti score

Popular graphics cards

General info

The basic set of information will help you find out the graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M release date and its purpose (laptops or PCs), as well as the price at the time of the release and the average current price. This data also includes the architecture employed by the producer, and the chip’s codename.

Place in performance rating:		431
Value for money (0-100):		10.47
Architecture:		Fermi
Code name:		GF114
Type:		Laptop
Release date:		28 June 2011 (10 years ago)
Price now:		$170
Value for money:		2.60
GPU code name:		N12E-GTX2
Market segment:		Laptop

Technical specs

This is the important information that defines the graphics card’s capacity. The simpler the device production process, the better. The core’s power frequency is responsible for its speed (direct correlation) while the elaboration of signals is performed by the transistors (the more transistors, the faster the computations are carried out).

Pipelines:		384
Core clock speed:		620 MHz
Transistor count:		1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology:		40 nm
Power consumption (TDP):		100 Watt
Texture fill rate:		39.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance:		952. 3 gflops
CUDA cores:		384
Pipelines / CUDA cores:		384
Number of transistors:		1,950 million
Thermal design power (TDP):		100 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Today there are numerous form factors for PC cases, so it is extremely important to know the length of the graphics card and the types of its connection. This will help facilitate the upgrade process.

Interface:		MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors:		None
Laptop size:		large
SLI options:		+
Bus support:		PCI-E 2. 0

Memory

The internal main memory is used for storing data while conducting computations. Contemporary games and professional graphic apps have high requirements for the memory’s volume and capacity. The higher this parameter, the more powerful and fast the graphics card is. Type of memory, the capacity and bandwidth for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M.

Memory type:		GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount:		2 MB
Memory bus width:		256 Bit
Memory clock speed:		1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth:		96.0 GB/s
Shared memory:		—

Video outputs and ports

As a rule, all contemporary graphics cards feature several connection types and additional ports. Knowing these peculiarities is crucial for avoiding problems with connecting the graphics card to the monitor or other peripheral devices.

Display Connectors:

No outputs

Technologies

Each graphic card manufacturer complements its products with branded technologies that are used both in games and in the working process. Below is the list of peculiar features that you may find rather useful.

3D Vision:		+
CUDA:		+
Optimus:		+
3D Gaming:		+
3D Blu-Ray:		+
DirectX 11:		DirectX 11

API support

All API-supported NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M are listed below.

DirectX:		12 API
OpenGL:		4.5
Vulkan:		N/A
Shader Model:		5.1
OpenCL:		1.1

Overall gaming performance

All tests have been based on FPS counter. Let’s have a look on what place NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M has been taken in the gaming performance test (calculation has been made in accordance with the game developer recommendations about system requirements; it can differ from the real world situations).

Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2. 0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — TimedemoHalo InfiniteFarming Simulator 22Battlefield 2042Forza Horizon 5Riders RepublicGuardians of the GalaxyBack 4 BloodDeathloopF1 2021Days GoneResident Evil VillageHitman 3Cyberpunk 2077Assassin´s Creed ValhallaDirt 5Watch Dogs LegionMafia Definitive EditionCyberpunk 2077 1.5GRID LegendsDying Light 2Rainbow Six ExtractionGod of War

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Death Stranding (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

F1 2020 (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Gears Tactics (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Doom Eternal (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Legend
5	Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates.
	May Stutter – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to stutter and show low frame rates.
30	Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 25fps or more
40	Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 35fps or more
60	Fluent – According to all known benchmarks with the specified graphical settings, this game is expected to run at 58fps or more
	May Run Fluently – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. According to interpolated information obtained from graphics cards of similar efficiency levels, the game is likely to show fluent frame rates.
?	Uncertain – The testing of this graphics cards on this game showed unexpected results. A slower card might be able to produce higher and more consistent frame rates when running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – The performance of this graphics cards with this game is not well explored yet. No reliable data interpolation can be made based on the performance of similar cards of the same category.
The value in the fields reflects the average frame rate across the entire database. To obtain individual results, move your cursor over the value.

AMD equivalent

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

Compare

Benchmark

Benchmarks help determine the performance in standard tests for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M. We have listed the world’s most famous benchmarks so that you could obtain accurate results in each (see the description). Graphics card preliminary testing is especially important in the presence of high loads so that the user could see to what extent the graphic processing unit copes with computations and data elaboration.

Overall benchmark performance

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130

10.66%

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

10.55%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

10.55%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

10.54%

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

10.51%

This benchmark analyzes the videocard’s game power with the use of Direct X 11 (multi-threading, tessellation, shader computations).

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

AMD FirePro W5130M

AMD Radeon HD 7770

This Direct X10-based benchmark contains AI tests, physics, and 6 computing tests.

AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

AMD Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI

PassMark is a great benchmark that gets updated regularly and shows relevant information on the graphics card’s performance.

ATI Radeon HD 5870

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

1.0
Out of 1
Hitesti score

Share on social network:

In order to leave a review you need to log in

Reviews of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

AMD Radeon RX 480

AMD Radeon R9 M275X

AMD Radeon HD 8750M

AMD Caicos

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI

AMD Radeon HD 7990

NVIDIA Quadro P520

AMD Radeon RX 540

AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)

XFX GeForce 7600 GT 580M AGP Review

Firing Squad has another AGP video card review up, this time for an nVidia 7600 GT based model from XFX. This review includes performace comparisons with the PowerColor Radeon x1950 AGP card the reviewed previously.

You can find the review here.

Like this:

Like Loading…

This entry was posted in Hardware on January 5, 2007 by Wilhelm Arcturus.

Search

Search for:

Strange Google Magic!

Follow Blog via Email

Email Address:

Join 3,121 other followers

A Random Post

Roll The Dice at TAGN!

MMO Commentary

Aywren Sojourner
Battle Stance
Bio Break
Blessing of Kings
Chasing Dings!
Contains Moderate Peril
Endgame Viable
EVE Online Pictures
Gamer of Passion
Going Commando
Growing Up in Azeroth
Hardcore Casual
I HAS PC
Inner Sanctum of the Ninveah
Inventory Full
Kaylriene
Keen and Graev’s Gaming Blog
Kill Ten Rats
Killed in a Smiling Accident
Kitty Kitty Boom Boom
Knifesedge Blogs
Low Sec Lifestyle
Mail Valtar
Me vs. Myself and I
Nomadic Gamers
Occasional Hero
pΘtshΘt
Psychochild’s Blog
Raph Koster’s Website
Stabbed Up
Tales of the Aggronaut
The Nosy Gamer
Tish Tosh Tesh
To Game For Life
Ulalu

MMO News & Study

Blizzard Watch
EVE News 24
Imperium News
Massively Overpowered
MMO Fallout
MMORPG.com
New Eden Post
Terra Nova
The EQ2 Wire
The EverQuest Show
VirginWorlds MMO News

The Games I Play

EVE Online
Pokemon Go
World of Warcraft

The Games I Watch

Diablo II
Diablo III
EverQuest
EverQuest II
Forza Horizon
Games on Steam
Guild Wars 2
Lord of the Rings Online
Lost Ark
Minecraft
New World
Path of Exile
Pokemon
Project: Gorgon
Rift
Runes of Magic
Toril MUD
Valheim
World of Tanks

The Humor Supplement

Bent Objects
The Bloggess
The Daily WTF
The Tolkien Sarcasm Page
xkcd
Zero Punctuation

What Else Do I Read?

Ars Technica
ASCII by Jason Scott
I, Cringely
Popehat
QA Hates You
Register Hardware
TechDirt
The Digital Antiquarian
Wait But Why

TAGN Spams Twitter

A Brief History of Goon Leadership in EVE Online tagn. wordpress.com/2022/09/17/a-b… 4 hours ago
Halcyon Dawn Eagle #TweetFleet evepics.wordpress.com/2022/09/16/hal… 1 day ago
Level 100 Heroic Upgrades are Coming to EverQuest, but Level 85 Upgrades will Remain tagn.wordpress.com/2022/09/16/lev… 1 day ago
RT @20thcenturymarc: The last thing I did before starting work today was put the Imperial March over King Charles’ entrance to Westminster… 1 day ago
One Way Trip to Perrigen Falls tagn.wordpress.com/2022/09/15/one… 2 days ago
Hrmm, @Steam does this sound at all like you? Just checking.
(Or, if you prefer, Epic or Nintendo or Sony or Mic… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 days ago
Vigil on the Loose #TweetFleet evepics.wordpress.com/2022/09/14/vig… 3 days ago
Sixty Eight in the Blade’s Edge Mountains tagn.wordpress.com/2022/09/14/six… 3 days ago
Vendor A had me invite their partner Vendor B to their product demo. B called us back after the demo and said they… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 days ago
I setup a new overview preset for the Yulai bot bash last week and I think I have finally fixed all of the thing I… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 days ago
What Will it Mean to have a Bunch of 20 Year Old MMORPGS? tagn.wordpress.com/2022/09/13/wha… 4 days ago

Follow @wilhelm2451

Release Flags of All Nations!

Spam Blocked

1,794,859 spam blocked by Akismet

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M in 3 Benchmarks

It is time to review NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M benchmark performance. The base clock speed is 620 MHz, whilst its speed in turbo boost and supplementary overclocking (maximum) is .

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M process technology is 40 nm that is a good result of the release date.

NVIDIA manufacture has equipped graphic chips with 96. 0 GB/s bandwidth and 620 MHz clock speed. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M maximum memory is 2 MB.

We recommend you learn all technical specifications in separate sections for a common understanding and high-speed of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M.

2.5
Out of 2
CMPTEK score

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

AMD Radeon HD 6970M (284 views)

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (176 views)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M (174 views)

NVIDIA Quadro P520 (173 views)

Intel UHD Graphics 600 (171 views)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (169 views)

Intel UHD Graphics 630 (166 views)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (164 views)

Intel HD Graphics 4600 (157 views)

NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (153 views)

General Information

Here is the release date, code name, core architecture, launch and current price. It is the general information to start learning NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M.

Place in performance rating:		448
Value for money (0-100):		10.47
Architecture:		Fermi
Code name:		GF114
Type:		Laptop
Release date:		28 June 2011 (10 years ago)
Price now:		$170
Value for money:		2. 43
GPU code name:		N12E-GTX2
Market segment:		Laptop

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Technical Specifications

Here are key features that determine NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M performance in benchmarks and other apps. The higher the figures are, the better it is. Please pay attention to all the characteristics provided. For example, the clock frequency directly affects the high-speed, and processing data and performing calculations (e.g, for mining) depend on the number of transistors. Also, check the TDP figure, because modern graphics cards may require a powerful PSU.

Pipelines:		384
Core clock speed:		620 MHz
Transistor count:		1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology:		40 nm
Power consumption (TDP):		100 Watt
Texture fill rate:		39. 7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance:		952.3 gflops
CUDA cores:		384
Pipelines / CUDA cores:		384
Number of transistors:		1,950 million
Thermal design power (TDP):		100 Watt

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Dimensions and Compatibility

Nowadays, it is very important to know the dimensions — length, width and height of a desktop graphics card — and understand which power connector is included in the package. Also, please pay attention to the PCIe interface.

Interface:		MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors:		None
Laptop size:		large
SLI options:		+
Bus support:		PCI-E 2.0

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — GPU RAM Frequency and Speed

Graphics Card Ram is a key element in computing and data storage — type, size, clock frequency and bandwidth — that directly affect the speed of work in gaming and working apps, which are currently quite demanding on graphics card resources. Note please the memory standard. The higher it is, the better it is. Let’s learn more about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M video memory specifications.

Memory type:		GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount:		2 MB
Memory bus width:		256 Bit
Memory clock speed:		1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth:		96.0 GB/s
Shared memory:		—

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Port and Display Support

In most cases, today all the problems connector compatibility can be solved with adapters or backwards-compatible cables such as HDMI / DVI. But, for general information, you learn below which ports are supported by NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M.

Display Connectors:

No outputs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Technologies

Healthy competition drives progress, so each manufacturer tries to surprise its consumer with special technologies available in this graphics card. This can be useful in graphics or gaming apps.

3D Vision:		+
CUDA:		+
Optimus:		+
3D Gaming:		+
3D Blu-Ray:		+
DirectX 11:		DirectX 11

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — API support

Here are general standards for DirectX and other unified complexes for the development of 3D images supported by NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M .

DirectX:		12 API
OpenGL:		4.5
Vulkan:		N/A
Shader Model:		5.1
OpenCL:		1.1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Mining hashrates

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256):

40 Mh/s

Overall NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M Gaming Performance

Find out to what extent NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M is suitable for gaming! We have compiled a database of popular games and their system requirements* that allows you to quickly and easily estimate its gaming performance at different screen resolutions. Graphics card gaming test is based on FPS. * There is a little margin error in the estimation of data.

Select games to view
Horizon Zero DawnDeath StrandingF1 2020Gears TacticsDoom EternalHunt ShowdownEscape from TarkovHearthstoneRed Dead Redemption 2Star Wars Jedi Fallen OrderNeed for Speed HeatCall of Duty Modern Warfare 2019GRID 2019Ghost Recon BreakpointFIFA 20Borderlands 3ControlF1 2019League of LegendsTotal War: Three KingdomsRage 2Anno 1800The Division 2Dirt Rally 2.0AnthemMetro ExodusFar Cry New DawnApex LegendsJust Cause 4Darksiders IIIFarming Simulator 19Battlefield VFallout 76Hitman 2Call of Duty Black Ops 4Assassin´s Creed OdysseyForza Horizon 4FIFA 19Shadow of the Tomb RaiderStrange BrigadeF1 2018Monster Hunter WorldThe Crew 2Far Cry 5World of Tanks enCoreX-Plane 11.11Kingdom Come: DeliveranceFinal Fantasy XV BenchmarkFortniteStar Wars Battlefront 2Need for Speed PaybackCall of Duty WWIIAssassin´s Creed OriginsWolfenstein II: The New ColossusDestiny 2ELEXThe Evil Within 2Middle-earth: Shadow of WarFIFA 18Ark Survival EvolvedF1 2017Playerunknown’s Battlegrounds (2017)Team Fortress 2Dirt 4Rocket LeaguePreyMass Effect AndromedaGhost Recon WildlandsFor HonorResident Evil 7Dishonored 2Call of Duty Infinite WarfareTitanfall 2Farming Simulator 17Civilization VIBattlefield 1Mafia 3Deus Ex Mankind DividedMirror’s Edge CatalystOverwatchDoomAshes of the SingularityHitman 2016The DivisionFar Cry PrimalXCOM 2Rise of the Tomb RaiderRainbow Six SiegeAssassin’s Creed SyndicateStar Wars BattlefrontFallout 4Call of Duty: Black Ops 3Anno 2205World of WarshipsDota 2 RebornThe Witcher 3Dirt RallyGTA VDragon Age: InquisitionFar Cry 4Assassin’s Creed UnityCall of Duty: Advanced WarfareAlien: IsolationMiddle-earth: Shadow of MordorSims 4Wolfenstein: The New OrderThe Elder Scrolls OnlineThiefX-Plane 10. 25Battlefield 4Total War: Rome IICompany of Heroes 2Metro: Last LightBioShock InfiniteStarCraft II: Heart of the SwarmSimCityTomb RaiderCrysis 3Hitman: AbsolutionCall of Duty: Black Ops 2World of Tanks v8Borderlands 2Counter-Strike: GODirt ShowdownDiablo IIIMass Effect 3The Elder Scrolls V: SkyrimBattlefield 3Deus Ex Human RevolutionStarCraft 2Metro 2033Stalker: Call of PripyatGTA IV — Grand Theft AutoLeft 4 DeadTrackmania Nations ForeverCall of Duty 4 — Modern WarfareSupreme Commander — FA BenchCrysis — GPU BenchmarkWorld in Conflict — BenchmarkHalf Life 2 — Lost Coast BenchmarkWorld of WarcraftDoom 3Quake 3 Arena — Timedemo

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Death Stranding (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

F1 2020 (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Gears Tactics (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Doom Eternal (2020)

low

1280×720

med.

1920×1080

high

1920×1080

ultra

1920×1080

QHD

2560×1440

4K

3840×2160

Legend
5	Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
	May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
30	Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more.
40	Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more.
60	Fluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more.
	May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
?	Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate.
	Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. The interpolation in the same category is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

AMD equivalent

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

Start Comparing

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M in Benchmarks

Let’s sum up the review by comparing the benchmarks results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M 5 competitive models similar in technical specifications. The first block is the overall result for all benchmarks, then all the others, which this particular model was tested on.

The higher the benchmark score, the faster a video card performs in graphics apps and modern games. If you have any additional questions, please leave them in the comments, we will definitely help!

Overall benchmark performance

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130

10.66%

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

10.55%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

10.55%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

10.54%

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

10.51%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

The result of the 3DMark 11 benchmark evaluation supports tessellation, compute shaders and graphics card multithreading will show which graphics card model is better and faster in games. The higher the score of the video card in the 3DMark 11 benchmark, the better.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

AMD FirePro W5130M

AMD Radeon HD 7770

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage Performance reveals the real performance of video cards tested by users in their computers. Only the best graphics card deserves the highest score in the 3DMark Vantage Performance benchmark.

AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

AMD Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI

Passmark GPU

Passmark is an effective benchmark that displays true results on the speed of data processing by GPU cores. We present the results of the evaluation of the performance of a video card in the modern Passmark benchmark, which evaluates the performance of a video card using its own rendering algorithms. The higher the score, the more powerful the graphics card.

ATI Radeon HD 5870

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

AMD Radeon HD 6970M

2. 5
Out of 2
CMPTEK score

0026

2x more VRAM?
4GB vs 2GB

74mm narrower?
193mm vs 267mm

1.27 TFLOPS over FLOPS?
1.58 TFLOPS vs 0.31 TFLOPS
21.46 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
24.7 GPixel/s vs 3.24 GPixel/s
452MHz faster memory speed?
1002MHz vs 550MHz
2908MHz higher effective clock speed?
4008MHz vs 1100MHz
36.4 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more memory bandwidth?
192.4GB/s vs 17.6GB/s
256bit wider memory bus?
384bit vs 128bit
416 more stream processors?
512 vs 96

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

Asus GeForce GT 630 2GB

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

Nvidia GeForce 940MX

Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

Nvidia GeForce GT 630 OEM 1GB

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070

Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

Asus GeForce GTX 950

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

AMD Radeon HD 6950

Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

MSI GeForce GTX 460 Hawk

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

AMD Radeon R9 270X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

AMD Radeon RX 5500003

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

AMD Radeon 535

Price Comparison

User Reviews

Performance

2. turbo GPU

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 580)

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

3.24 GPixel/s

24.7 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

0.31 TFLOPS

1.58 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measure of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

13 GTexels/s

49.4 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

550MHz

1002MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs imaging units

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

1100MHz

4008MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

17.6GB/s

192.4GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3. VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

128bit

384bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5.GDDR memory versions

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB)

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as faster transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory debug code

✖Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5. GPU temperature at boot

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB)

Lower boot temperature means the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✖Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 580

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

2.HDMI connectors

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 580)

More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices such as game consoles and TVs at the same time.

HDMI version 3

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Asus GeForce GT 630 4GB)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 580)

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5. DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using mini DisplayPort.

Price Match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580. Comparative specifications and benchmarks of video cards

General information winner between NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580. Please note that the comparison is based on all indicators, and below are ratings from synthetic benchmarks that determine different criteria in games and work applications.

382

Position in the performance rating

271

No data

Price ratio

35.62 9000

Type

Desktop

1 April 2013 (8 years ago)

Release date

9 November 2010 (11 years ago)

No data

9The initial price

$ 499

$ 545

Actual price

$ 37 (0. 1x MSRP)

1.21

2.64

N14P-GT

Market Segment

Desktop

Specifications

Which graphics card is better in NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 comparison in manufacturing process, power consumption, and GPU base and turbo frequency is the most important part contained in the rating of video cards.

768

conveyors

512 9000 No data

Power consumption (TDP)

244 Watt

No data

Number of texels processed in 1 second

49.4 Billion /SEC

No data

Operations with a swimming of

1.581.1 GFLOPS

No data

Maximum temperature

97 ° C

No data

CUDA

512 9000 9000

768 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 CUDA Cores

512

1300 Million

Number of Transistors

3,000 million

N/A

Rated Thermal Power

244 Watt

Dimensions, connectors and compatibility

Let’s discuss the dimensions (length, width, height) of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 video cards. As well as the main types of connectors and connected interfaces

No data

Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

n.a.

Length

10.5″ (267 mm) (26.7 cm)

n.a.0003

Laptop Size

No data

Options SLI

No data

Support for tires

PCI-E 2.0 X 16

No data

4.376 «(111 MM) (11.1 cm)

Memory (frequency and overclocking)

Graphics card memory plays an important role in both gaming and graphics applications.The higher the standard ( GDDR ), the better.It directly affects the processing speed and efficiency What is the difference in type, base frequency, turbo frequency, GDDR bandwidth between NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580:

DDR3, GDDR5

Type of memory

GDDR5

2x 2x 2x

Maximum RAM AMOUNT

1536 MB

2X 128 BIT

Bit

384 BIT

20000 MHIS

2004 MHz (4008 data rate)

n. a.0021

Let’s find out the difference in ports that NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 graphics cards are equipped with. Pay attention to the number of ports and the maximum resolution of supported monitors.

No data

Connections to the display

Mini HDMITWO DUAL LINK DVI

No data

Multi Monitor Support

No data

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 20,000,000 20,000,000 20,000,000 20,000 20000 200000004 Audio input for HDMI

Internal

N/A

HDMI

Technology

Let’s see what the difference is. It is worth noting that NVIDIA and AMD use different technologies.

No data

3D Vision

GPU BOOST

No data

CUDA

No data

SUROROROROROROUD

NO data

DSR

API support

The confrontation between the two rivals NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 is almost over. Hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not taken into account in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.

DirectX 11, Shader 5.0

DirectX

12 (11_0)

n.a.0004 Vulkan

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 benchmark comparison

Popular comparisons with selected graphics cards

one.		NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 vs. AMD Radeon HD 7870XT
2.		NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
3.		NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
four.		NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs. AMD Radeon Pro 560X
5.		NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs. NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT
6.		NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
7.		NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs. AMD Radeon R9 M390
eight.		AMD Cayman vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
9.		NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
ten.		NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
eleven.		NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
12.		NVIDIA P106-090 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
13.		NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
fourteen.		NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs. AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
fifteen.		NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs. AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs AMD Radeon RX 580 which is better?

Home / Video card / Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 VS AMD Radeon RX 580

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 specifications of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 and AMD Radeon RX 580 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022.

Benefits NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030

Value for money

63. 5%

8.4% (15.2%) better than

55.1%

Release price

$79

-150$ (-65.5%) better than

229 $

Boost frequency

1468 MHz

128 MHz (9.6%) better than

1340 MHz

Power Demand (TDP)

30 W

-155 W (-83.8%) better than

185 W

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 580

Comparison winner

Number of shaders

2304

1920 (500%) better than

384

Core frequency

1257 MHz

29 MHz (2. 4%) better than

1228 MHz

Maximum memory

8 GB

6 GB (300%) better than

2 GB

Memory bus width

256 bit

192 bits (300%) better than

64 bit

Memory frequency

8000 MHz

1992 MHz (33.2%) better than

6008 MHz

Memory bandwidth

256

207.94 (432.7%) better than

48.06

General information
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The more%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues.
63.5% 8.4% (15.2%) better than	55.1%
Architecture
Pascal	GCN 4.0
Codename
GP108	Polaris 20
Type
Desktop	Desktop
Release price
$79 -150 $ (-65.5%) better than	229 $
Number of shaders
384	2304 1920 (500%) better than
Core clock
1228MHz	1257 MHz 29 MHz (2.4%) better than
Boost frequency
1468 MHz At 128 MHz (9. 6%) better than	1340 MHz
Number of transistors
1.800 million	5.700 million
Process
14 nm	14 nm
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4	PCIe 3.0 x16
Power Demand (TDP) Calculated thermal power shows the average heat dissipation in load operation, the larger the value, the more the requirements for cooling and power consumption increase.
30W -155 W (-83.8%) better than	185 W
Length
145 mm	241 mm
Additional power connectors
no	1x 8-pin
G-SYNC support NVIDIA G-SYNC technology delivers a smooth gaming experience with variable refresh rates and the elimination of visual artifacts.

Multi Monitor
+	no data
VR Ready Technology from NVIDIA that gives manufacturers access to Multi res Shading, Context Priority, and GPU Direct virtual reality technologies.
+	no data
Vulkan NVIDIA’s Vulkan technology allows developers to gain low-level access to the GPU to optimize graphics commands (better than OpenGL and Direct3D APIs). It is an open, free, cross-platform standard available for all platforms.
+	no data
Multi-Projection NVIDIA’s Multi-Projection technology improves graphics card performance when building virtual worlds. Images for the left and right eyes are calculated simultaneously.
+	no data
Video connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DirectX
12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Floating point performance
1. 127 gflops	6.175 gflops

benchmark

9,0003

Memory
GDDR50738	GDDR5
Maximum memory Large video memory allows you to run demanding games with a lot of textures, use high resolution monitors, provide more opportunities for cryptocurrency mining.
2 GB	8 GB 6 GB (300%) better than
Memory bus width The larger the video memory bus width, the more data is transferred to the GPU per unit of time and the better performance in demanding games.
64 bit	256 bit 192 bits (300%) better than
Shared memory
—	no data
Memory frequency A high memory frequency has a positive effect on the speed of a video card with a large amount of data.
6008 MHz	8000 MHz At 1992 MHz (33.2%) better than
Memory bandwidth The higher the data transfer bandwidth, the more effective amount of RAM the PC can use.
48.06	256 207.94 (432.7%) better than

Comparison of GeForce GTX 580 and GeForce GT 630M. What to choose?

GeForce GTX 580	GeForce GT 630M
December, 2010 \| 810MHz \| 1.5GB GDDR5	March, 2012 \| 800MHz \| 2GB GDDR5

Edelmark rating 6.4	Edelmark rating 5.8

Overall Comparison

Game Performance

Tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.

GeForce GTX 580	6.7 out of 10
GeForce GT 630M	5.2 out of 10
GeForce GT 740M	5.1 out of 10

Graphics

Tested on: T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor.

GeForce GTX 580	6.1 out of 10
GeForce GT 630M	5.3 out of 10
GeForce GT 740M	5.4 out of 10

Computing power

Tested on: Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining.

GeForce GTX 580	6.2 out of 10
GeForce GT 630M	5.2 out of 10
GeForce GT 740M	5.3 out of 10

Output per W

Tests used: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive , Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP.

GeForce GTX 580	6.4 out of 10
GeForce GT 630M	7.0 out of 10
GeForce GT 740M	6.9 out of 10

Noise and power

Video card tested on: TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level.

GeForce GTX 580	6.3 out of 10
GeForce GT 630M	9.8 out of 10
GeForce GT 740M	9.7 out of 10

Overall graphics card rating

GeForce GTX 580	6.3 out of 10
GeForce GT 630M	5.8 out of 10
GeForce GT 740M	5.9 out of 10

Benefits

Why is the GeForce GTX 580 better?

score

direct rating

Substantially better 3DMark score of 11	24.765	vs	8.610	Approximately 3x better 3DMark 11 rating
Substantially better PassMark	5. 018	vs	678	Approximately 7.5x better PassMark score of
Significantly better 3DMark vantage rating	24.202.5	vs	3.985	More than 6x better 3DMark vantage rating
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score	148.809	vs	19.285	Approximately 7.8x better than CLBenchmark score raytrace
Significantly higher memory bandwidth	193.5 GB/s	vs	32 GB/s	More than 6x memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark06 rating	6.065	vs	1.051	More than 5.8x better 3DMark06 rating of
Much better cloud gate test	20.46	vs	7.71	Approximately 2.8x better than cloud gate test
Many more raster operation blocks	48	vs	4	44 more raster operation blocks
Much better test manhattan	3,709. 32	vs	2,068.17	Approximately 80% better manhattan 9 test0738
Faster pixel fill rate	25.92 GPixel/s	vs	3.2GPixel/s	More than 8x faster pixel fill rate
Better floating point performance	1.659 GFLOPS	vs	307.2GFLOPS	Approximately 5.5x better floating point performance
Significantly higher frame rate crysis 3	40	vs	4.45	Approximately 9x faster crysis 3 frame rate
Faster texture processing	51.84 GTexel/s	vs	12.8 GTexel/s	More than 4x faster texture rendering
More texture units	64	vs	16	48 more texture units
Better face recognition quality score	35.72 mPixels/s	vs	5. 06 mPixels/s	More than 7x better face recognition quality score
Better PassMark direct rating	1.855	vs	373	Approximately 5x better PassMark
More shaders	512	vs	96	416 more shader units
Wider memory bus	384bit	vs	128bit	3x wider memory bus
Slightly higher memory clock speed	1.008 MHz	vs	900MHz	More than 10% higher memory clock speed

Why is the GeForce GT 630M better?

Significantly lower power consumption	33W	vs	244W	7.4x lower power consumption

Comparative benchmarks (benchmarks)

Bitcoin mining

GeForce GTX 580	142. 43 mHash/s
GeForce GT 630M	20.98 mHash/s

Face Recognition

GeForce GTX 580	35.72 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 630M	5.06 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)

GeForce GTX 580	3,350.98
GeForce GT 630M	2,994.54

Manhattan test (GFXBench 3.0)

GeForce GTX 580	3,709.32
GeForce GT 630M	2,068.17

Fire Strike Test

GeForce GTX 580	43.53
GeForce GT 630M	7.52

Sky Diver test

GeForce GTX 580	293.1
GeForce GT 630M	60.47

Crysis 3

GeForce GTX 580	40
GeForce GT 630M	4. 45

Battlefield 3

GeForce GTX 580	65
GeForce GT 630M	8.3

Tags:compare, GeForce GT 630M, GeForce GTX 580

ᐅ Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800 reviews — 97 honest customer reviews of Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800

mobile phone

Advantages

Defects

Comment

Estimated

I accept the terms
providing data.

Android smartphone
multi-touch touch screen (capacitive)
screen diagonal 3.2″, resolution 240×400
3 MP camera, autofocus
170 MB memory, microSD cards (TransFlash)
support for Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, 3G, GPS
weight 113 g, WxHxD 55x114x13 mm, acc. 1500 mAh

Average rating Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800 — 3.94
A total of 97 reviews are known about the Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800

Looking for positive and negative reviews about the Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800?

We collected 97 negative, negative and positive reviews from 11 sources.

We will show all the advantages and disadvantages of the Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800 identified by users. We do not hide anything and post all the positive and negative honest customer reviews about the Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800, and also offer alternative analogues. Is it worth it to buy — the decision is only yours! 9Samsung Galaxy 580 GT-I5800

write a feedback

Zuykov Vladimir, 01.03.2019

Advantages:
Android 2.1, I hope it will still be 2.2, I dream of 2.3, touchwiz3 is not bad
Processor 667 MHz, smart phone
Good screen for such a price. Both in color and size.
Nothing creaks in the case.
Accurate GPS, there is a magnetic compass.
WiFi is quite sensitive.
BlueTooth 3.

Disadvantages:
Glossy body (it doesn’t bother me personally)
To get the memory card, you need to remove the cover. You don’t need to turn off your phone.
Sometimes GPS searches for satellites for a long time, it is treated by turning the GPS off and on — after this procedure it finds for 10s somewhere.
Likes to eat the Internet by default, is treated by disabling synchronization.

Comment:
In general, I’m happy as an elephant, smart phone, not weak battery. Personally, gloss doesn’t scare me. Someone won’t like it.

Guest, 04/18/2017

Advantages:
Excellent smart (for its time in 2010-2011) for reasonable money.

Disadvantages:
When using smart as smart, and not just a phone, you have to charge every day.
There are drawbacks, but they are downright gourmet:
1. It is impossible (even with third-party programs) to turn on the recording of a telephone conversation.
2. The FM radio does not have an equalizer and cannot output sound to a Bluetooth stereo headset.
3. The amps are too thick on the supplied vacuum earpieces.

Comment:
Almost all the shortcomings described in the reviews are caused by ignorance of the settings (for example, by standard means, you can assign the receive and hang up keys).
The phone out of the box, although good, but the full potential is revealed for the enthusiast after:
1. Updates to Androyd 2.2 (of obvious advantages — it adds a menu to turn off the Internet and a built-in task manager)
2. Change the firmware to a modified one that allows you to almost double the processor frequency. (I only need the maximum frequency for listening to Internet radio in good quality)
3. Obtaining root rights. (allows you to install a bunch of software that expands the phone’s capabilities)
4. Replacing the standard recovery menu with CWM. (allows you to backup internal memory, which allows you to experiment without fear)
5. Mounting data on a memory card (which completely solves the problem with a lack of internal memory)
In general, for a year and a half I have not been happy with this miracle of technology. Well, except that I plan to change the battery soon.

Guest, 01/13/2015

Advantages:
The interface is convenient, I got used to it quickly. This is where the + ends.

Disadvantages:
Hangs if several applications are loaded, sometimes only reboot saves. It’s really not very comfortable to hold in your hand (but, after several falls, everything is in order). You should have an unlimited Internet using this phone, otherwise it eats traffic. The speaker almost immediately began to wheeze a little, and in general the sound during a conversation is so-so. Loses network often. The volume of the call is not very loud, it is not audible in the bag. And the most important disadvantage: there is not enough internal memory space, you can’t install many applications, but you want a lot of them !!!

Comment:
This is my first touch phone. I was happy as a child, but not for long. A few months, then I realized that it was probably possible to make this device more worthy! In general, I do not recommend!

Kemstach Anton, 08/15/2014

Advantages:
Let’s start with the fact that the phone OC Android 2.1 is a big plus. The screen instantly responds to minor touches with your fingers. Very good despite the fact that the case is very easily soiled, but this does not bother me in principle. Samsung has been producing just glossy cases lately.
The price is 10000, I even think that this is not enough for such a smartphone. The battery holds up well. Nice headset included. The card and SIM are under the cover, which is convenient for me. It lies well in the hand, preventing it from falling out of the hands (although many say that it is slippery, depending on which hands: D).
Powerful processor and enough RAM to run many applications.
Swype. A very handy thing.
3G plows well, but I haven’t tried WI-FI yet ((
Bluetooth 3.0
Screen 3.2 inches, 240×400 resolution is enough for.

Disadvantages:
There is one disadvantage for me: it is difficult to install animated wallpapers (I never installed them). It’s all. What I write below does not apply to me.
And now I will write something that buyers may not like.
1) The screen is 240×400, for those who like to play, some games will not have a very good graph or they will slow down.
2) The camera is average, although there are many shooting functions
3) Eats money because of the Internet, so sort it out there, download APNdroid to disable the Internet

Comment:
This is my first smartphone. Great model!
I am very satisfied with the purchase, I spend all day on the phone, on the Internet, a very convenient smartphone. I would classify it as informational. It is very convenient to receive any information through the phone. The phone is loud, the call is impossible not to hear. I have a 3 year warranty. Tip: set up unlimited internet!
The market is very convenient to climb, a lot of free programs and games.
I advise you to download the following programs:
1)APNdroid-to disable the Internet
2)Advanced Task Manager — to disable all applications
3)Dr. Web-very convenient and high-quality antivirus
4)Android Optimizer-multifunctional application (Clear the cache, Remove programs, phone and battery information, «kill the process», etc.
5)Easy Uninstaller-uninstall programs
6)Mail agent . ru-just convenient ICQ
Listen to music through the headset-super!
To sum up again: Excellent model that will keep you satisfied for a very long time))

Guest, 03/26/2014

Advantages:
Convenience, size, versatility. Despite endless falls and bumps, it has been living for more than a year

Disadvantages:
1. There is no Internet shutdown function. Uses it uncontrollably whenever he wants. Unlimited solves the problem, but not in roaming. 2. Smooth body — constantly slips and falls. 3. Well, the network very often disappears. 4. There is no language switch button. Because I constantly communicate in 2 languages, it bothers me to get into the settings

Guest, 19.03.2014

Advantages:
-Android (I upgraded to version 2.3.7 CyanogenMod7, which significantly increased the speed of work, the amount of internal memory, root rights appeared, got rid of unnecessary built-in programs. )
-Full set of options … bluetooth, wi-fi , GPS, HSDPA.
— Against the background of other devices, decent battery life, enough for a day at full load (a day — several hours of Internet, an hour of navigation, 10-15 calls, instant messengers) )
-Communication keeps stable (operator with a red logo, well, the one who is always one step ahead)
-Presence of mechanical control buttons
-No creaks and backlashes, does not creak in the hand
-Price — 6990 r.

Disadvantages:
Not significant. In my opinion, there is not enough mechanical joystick control, a flash as a flashlight would not hurt, well, an easily soiled screen (like all touch phones) … I think these are all nit-picking

Comment:
Android as a blank, with «straight hands» and a bright mind, you can completely sharpen the device to fit your needs. If you do not want to bother, it’s easier to buy a device with a «hard» firmware and enjoy life. The Internet is full of information about firmware, programs, etc. , you just need to spend a little of your precious time. In general, I am very satisfied with the purchase, a good workhorse that meets all my requirements.

kov serg, 12/15/2013

Advantages:
Good phone!!! Nimble, bright. GPS works great!!! For navigation behind the wheel is quite enough. Put navitel and city guide. Everything works, satellites hold. With surfing on an Internet, too, no problems. The connection is stable, the volume of the call and the speakers is good. swype keyboard.

Disadvantages:
Marked case. The price of 11000 for the PCT is still a little expensive. The battery lasts two days.

Comment:
Decent smartphone for more or less acceptable money.

Guest, 11/20/2013

Advantages:
-Wi-Fi
-Bluetooth 3.0
-Support for cards up to 32GB
-multitouch
-complete headphones please)
-sound 5.1,
-HD video,
-G-sensors
-0wype4 — handwriting recognition
-0wype4 text

Disadvantages:
— size 240×400, creepy, but not deadly . ..
— does not play mp4
— does not support JAVA,
— market — semi-paid, what’s free — demo … the rest for $
— the sensor only reacts to the touch of live skin, i.e. remove the phone without gloves, and those who have thumbs — may not hit the buttons when typing.
— when connected to a PC, there are a lot of hemorrhoids, even the instructions do not help.
— The task manager does not disable the application, as if the function is there, but the body hangs when pressed …
— The navigator cannot determine the location.
— not enough space (170mb) to install applications…
— androin 2.1 — too old for this model…
— the player does not understand Cyrillic… and if you rename the songs yourself, it still does not help…
— the camera is not happy, it shoots at 1.3, 2mp maximum …
-zoom — when approaching, the image is generally the same as on a 0.3 camera
— Changing the card only if the cover is removed … troubles. ..
— body-soap… it will just jump out of your hands.
— TOTALLY DEPENDS ON THE INTERNET!!!

Comment:
Value for money — not happy, of course, if you look at the characteristics, it’s better to take C6 or 5800 (despite the old OS), the minuses cross out everything +, why HD, if mp4 does not even support. If you take dvd-rip then through certain programs. The latest bluetooth is not seen by devices that are a little less than a year old. because there is an old version.
In general: Taking this body is only in the hope of the future, (android update !!!, the appearance of bluetooth 3.0 in other bodies, etc.)
IMHO: I do not advise…

Ralko Anton, 10/11/2013

Advantages:
Android 2.1, WiFi, Fast processor 666MHz,
Battery 1500 mAh, GPS, loud speaker.
Put a flask on 8gb does not buggy does not slow down
Multitouch, Bluetooth 3.0, pulls movies without
conversion, Camera takes norms Bright screen.

Disadvantages:
No flash, I would like more resolution

Comment:
In general, the phone is good for such a price (10000r)

Guest, 05/03/2013

Advantages:
Sufficient processor frequency
Wi-fi (with AP support)
Cool headphones included))
A lot of firmware on the Internet
quite usable camera
good reception
GPS
and much more

Battery

Disadvantages:
, of course , but this is a problem everywhere
Samsung seems to have abandoned our body, the firmware is not updated

Comment:
Very good for its money. If you cheat: install a custom one (CyanogenMod, for example, a very good thing), then we have a plus: overclocking, the ability to install FlashPlayer (it even works). Next, about the video accelerator: the guys from XDA are hammering the library, there are already results, most likely someday they will make their own drivers

Babushkin Ivan, 03/21/2013

Advantages:
Good phone for the money.
It has a lot of pluses:
— on the model with a white color of the case, there are no stains from fingers;
— a screen with a coating that allows you to remove all prints by swiping a couple of times on a shirt sleeve;
— ease of setup and refinement using Android — you can change almost everything — the look of the «desktop», the program for sms / calls / contacts, the type of animation, battery icons, etc.
— the battery lasts three days (I hardly use gps, because I don’t need it)
— it’s not slippery for me personally (as they say here)
— the card and SIM card change without removing the battery
— a very good ratio of functionality and price, I chose for a long time, I studied almost all models and thousands of reviews)) If you pay more, you will get more pixels and faster percents. Only the difference can be felt only in games, are you ready to pay big money for mobile games)? I do not like them, for all other tasks the power of the phone is more than enough.

Disadvantages:
— the resolution is small, although I don’t consider this a full-fledged disadvantage, because with a higher resolution, there is more load on the percent, more battery consumption
— complete headphones without a clothespin (well, these are nitpicks) I use (Advanced Task Manager), it does not allow memory to be clogged
— a built-in camera without a flash, that is, it doesn’t matter if it’s indoors, it’s better outdoors. This is how all cameras behave, this cannot be canceled) The more light — the better the photo, because the shutter is released faster

Comment:
When I bought it, I was afraid that a day or two is the maximum for a smartphone (this is my first smart phone). To prolong battery life, I turned off vibration and sounds when I click on the screen (they annoy me, I always turned them off), downloaded APN Droid to cut off the Internet (a convenient widget, other programs, by the way, do not always turn off the Internet). Also disabled gps, wi-fi, bluetooth and background synchronization (and normal too).
What the hell is this synchronization, tell me? Waiting for a letter — check (or turn on the function), and if not, it’s better to let the battery live longer)
The resolution of 240×400 turned out to be quite sufficient — it is convenient to read (especially fb2 through a cool reader), the diagonal is good. Video pulls up to 720 by 400 — and much more, the picture will not be clearer)) Moreover, it is easier for the processor to cope with this resolution and less brakes.
The volume of the speaker is good, even through Skype (via gprs) everything is perfectly audible.
I liked the unlocking of the screen through the picture — it can be quickly removed and reliably protected from the curious)
It’s unusual that on the sides, apart from the volume rocker, there are no more buttons / connectors / plugs .. But it’s beautiful, I like it)
I can’t say how much the screen or case is scratched — I don’t use it so much, there’s nothing yet. But it already depends on the owner. I wear neat and in a rag case. I will also buy a screen protector. If you wear it with iron keys, in a tool box or in your teeth, it will probably still pokotsatsya))
Soon they promise a new firmware (2.2), I’m waiting for it until I install the left ones, because I plan that the phone will honestly work for a year- one and a half (I took it with a 3-year warranty) and will break on its own, making it possible to exchange it for a newer model))
I am satisfied with the purchase, I also recommend it because the price for this model is the same in Moscow and in the regions. Competitor — ski optimus 1 does not like it outwardly and does not inspire confidence at all)
P. S. From the programs I use:
desktop — launcher pro
sms — handcent sms
player — poweramp
reader — cool reader
navigation — navitel and Yandex. maps
network lock — APNDroid
browser — opera

Masterkov Andrey, 15.02.2013

Advantages:
holds a charge for a very long time (with intensive use 2-3 days), bright enough display, the ability to upgrade to Android 2. 2
loud speaker that does not stall even in a case!!!
is fast enough (if you periodically reset the cache)
hot swap for SIM and microSD cards !!!!!
fits comfortably in the hand,
is a very fast GPS (though after firmware version 2.2).

Disadvantages:
not without them:
rather weak camera and low video resolution,
inconvenient full-time keyboard with thumbs (treated by installing alternative options),
no 3D graphics accelerator (some toys slow down).

Comment:
I have been using the device for 10 months. The battery hasn’t let me down yet… For a business person, the most important thing is that you can install a lot of useful software and at the same time it will not sit down in 3-4 hours, as they say about many competitors… To be honest, I wanted to change it to a new one, but then I came across an updated one software, reflashed the device and calmed down on this, because many regular jambs are now fixed.
In general, if you have hands and an understanding that this is not just a toy or a phone, but a mini computer based on the Android operating system, then take it — you won’t regret it, it’s worth your money!!!

Mizyunova Inna, 01/09/2013

Advantages:
good case, no backlash, fits perfectly in the hand, the sensor is sensitive, the sound in the headphones is good, supports 5. 1, the headphone jack is standard, it’s great! By the way, I like the battery, well, maybe it’s because I don’t «use» it as before, I’ve played enough … in general, there is enough charge for 3 days. I immediately bought a film for the screen, but the case is not scratched (although I wear it in a case …)

Disadvantages:
headphones are some kind of perversion!!! and DOES NOT SUPPORT animated wallpapers, well, maybe you need to flash it, I’m not risking it yet. still a terrible camera, but I don’t need it … although when shooting on a phone, the text can be distinguished. There is still little built-in memory, applications are automatically installed in the phone, it’s not buzzing … well, that’s all.

Comment:
when buying, I considered only models on the Android platform. After reading hundreds of reviews, I settled on this phone. I have had it for about six months now, absolutely everything suits me in it, but this is after I remade it «for myself» by installing a bunch of all sorts of useful programs, because standard programs are a quiet horror, even a calendar without registering in the Google market I didn’t want to work . .. I also immediately advise you to install APNdroid, otherwise the phone eats all your money on the Internet. Another useful program is TasKiller, it closes all applications. the phone itself can only minimize them, there is no tray. Everything that I expected from this phone, I received in full 🙂

popov artem, 01/05/2013

DPCs:
Android
Processor
Good sound
Shusty
No flash

Disadvantages:
The headset is not very suitable for
Camera not very

Comment:
for price 2400 hryvnias (9200 rubles) can be on the Internet stores to buy for 2200 gr (8800 rubles) I like it while very satisfied, of course there are problems with Kies, but what to do. Video without recoding a lot is also a big plus (well, for me anyway). Of course, after symbian, the android is beyond praise, there is no headache with certificates, and the system, as for me, is an order of magnitude better

Rakovsky Vladimir, 12/19/2012

Advantages:
The design is cooler than today’s flagships 🙂 and the display is what you need!
From the characteristics in practice in my GT-I5800 inside instead of 170 MB 194 MB! The camera is normal. Everything is average! And how many times has it fallen over the years and everything works without glitches.
3G and Wi-Fi on top!
Otherwise, the gold standard of a budget android smartphone in terms of money and functionality! For which he was credited by various reviews in the top 10 optimal purchases!

Disadvantages:
Slows down when everything is working, but it’s no wonder the RAM is only 256 MB.
First of all, the internal memory is still not enough for applications.
Pre-installed all sorts of nonsense that is treated by root!
It’s a shame Bluetooth 2.1, not 3.0 at all.
Flash player not working only Puffin browser will help!
Not updated above OS 2.2, sorry!!!
At the same time, Ceanogen mod did not find any sensible one.

Comment:
I have been using it since 2011 and am generally satisfied!
Everything still works fine!
This in itself is not bad.

Petrov Evgeniy, 12/18/2012

Advantages:
1) android pleased. very handy OS.
2) you need to connect to your computer only as a removable disk.
3) games and programs are quickly installed and generally very fast.
4) video, it takes almost all formats, it seems without brakes
5) the sound is pleasant
6) the sensor is good.
7) great games. Better than Simba. sorry for the current that there are no heroes, as on WM 9No Maybe that’s why there are no games in 3D. (I really wanted to play avatar 3D)
4) not all games come with this resolution. (but there are many)

Comment:
I use games, listen to music, radio, watch movies. Internet, I don’t need a camera, so I can’t say anything about working with them.
In general, I do not regret the purchase. beautiful and easy to handle. I also installed the program and lost the battery and saves it from the Internet.
even dad approved my purchase and friends.

Semenov Anton, 10/14/2012

Advantages:
A small price for bodies on the Android 2. 1 platform, good response speed, excellent touch screen. Supports most applications from the market.

Disadvantages:
From time to time, both cellular and 3g communication disappears (very infuriating). Small screen size. Pretty low frequency of the processor 600Hz. Not enough memory.

Tatiana, 09/01/2012

Advantages:
adequate price (6000r with delivery), good body, all in one, the screen is of sufficient quality for me, I set the backlight to 25%. the battery holds 3-4 days

Disadvantages:
to replace the memory card, you need to remove the cover, the usb connection logic is not entirely clear — when you select «as a removable disk», you still need to mount the disk — I could not think of this for two days, so I often took out the card :).

Comment:
I am satisfied. although I didn’t understand the enthusiasm for android — it’s no better than Windows (yes, maybe worse, the settings are poorer). But I coped with everything: a reader, a keyboard, turning off the mobile Internet, navigation — everything works.
has not yet been able to update the firmware..

upd March 2014 normal flight. the same firmware
upd March 2018 works, only the battery no longer holds. Well, it’s obsolete.
upd is no longer used, but is being replaced .. everything works

Miroshnichenko Alexey, 27.08.2012

Advantages:
Compact communicator. With a good network, the Internet works great. Mini-computer, navigator camera and player in your pocket.

Disadvantages:
Slippery, clogged and scratched body after 8 months of operation. Brake processor. Sometimes, in order to launch a notebook and urgently call, you have to wait half a minute: ((The flash player does not work on standard firmware, you can’t reflash during the warranty period 🙁 Free programs on the Market Weak battery The display is small — but be more discomfort in your pocket 🙂

Comment:
I bought an inexpensive communicator and did not expect more, so it’s a shame to complain 🙂

Kisileva Irina, 26. 08.2012

Advantages:
excellent value for money

Disadvantages:
case

Comment:
I love this phone, although I gave it to my husband to use, replacing it with a miracle from HTC. But I can say with confidence that for the entire time of its operation, I did not regret a single minute that I (quite by accident) acquired it. I am very sorry that it was discontinued ((Its only drawback was the case material, but these are trifles in the presence of a lining and a protective film. This is an ideal phone in its price category, which has never let me down.

Guest, 18.08.2012

Advantages:
comfortable.

Disadvantages:
well, the screen is scratched very quickly, the charge takes 3-5 hours to sit down, download 3 applications, everything is buggy, the call is impossible to accept, it breaks very quickly

Bronnikov Alexey, 25.07.2012

Advantages:
Everything that was described above! GPS works great even with a complete lack of money on the account, you just need to install Navitel, and not use the default navigator! how many times he did not try to include everything in the bestolka!

Disadvantages:
The camera is not very good
Accepting or rejecting a call is terribly inconvenient (or maybe I haven’t figured out the settings yet)
After the call ends, the window with the contact data is kept (why?) And what does it hold for 3 seconds, which is very inconvenient when you need to perform some other action!
And there are a lot of other shortcomings, but as I understand it, the flaw is not in the device, but in the firmware!

Comment:
Definitely worth the money, but with a different firmware!

Rigin Anton, 07/05/2012

Advantages:
Relatively low price.

Disadvantages:
The phone is buggy, the latest official version of Android — 2.2, is already hopelessly outdated. Custom firmware solves some of the problems but not all, and even adds new ones.
The screen resolution is too small.
Processor 667 MHz — this is no comment at all … Although, you can overclock, of course.

Comment:
If a couple of years ago it could still be called a more or less good smartphone, now I see no reason to buy, except for temporary use or misbehaving children.;)

Guest, 06/09/2012

Advantages:
1) Android (and a lot of software with it)
2) The battery is super, it holds.
3) Design — pleases, very very much!
4) Not buggy (well, almost)
5) Price (penny!)
6) The sound is super, the signal catches — super
7) Multi-touch

Disadvantages:
1) They already wrote here … a cap on top above the field for Charging — well, it’s too frail
2) GPS does not work for me personally in Moscow. Only worked once

Comment:
During the use I managed to get acquainted with the phone — it’s just a super model for such money! Competitors out, samsung pleased, I hope it will serve faithfully.

Guest, 04.05.2012

Advantages:
I sat down to think about the merits of this device and caught myself thinking that nothing comes to mind except a convenient calculator and a more or less normal player.

Disadvantages:
There is no need to think too much: it almost constantly loses the network, and regardless of the telecom operator — at first I thought that there were problems with the operator, I changed it — the network both disappeared and disappears; hangs very, well, just very, often, the way out of this situation is a reboot, but it does not always save; it’s not realistic to get through to me — 7 and 10 calls end with the fact that no matter how I try to pick up the phone, I can’t do it — the call acceptance button on the display works, but it constantly returns to its place, what it accepted, what it didn’t accept call — reboot and try, if the network is working, to call back the one who tried to call me in vain and this can continue 100500 times and no result (a very strange glitch).

Comment:
The phone is 1.5 years old. I paid 2500 UAH for it. The first half of the year worked like clockwork, but then everything listed above in the «lack» began. The service center said that the problems with the operator changed and nothing changed for the better, and the service center again blamed the operator, and it doesn’t matter that they, the operators, are different, but the problems are the same. I suffered with it for two months, and then I gave it up — now I have two phones in my bag — an ever-living Nokia and this «miracle» that I use as a means to update the status in VK or Twitter, well, the player.

maxbol73, 04/19/2012

Advantages:
Excellent, fast smartphone! Very convenient menu (unlike Sony-android). Download any application. The price matches the quality. Nothing worse than the vaunted HTC.

Weaknesses:
Slightly slowed down. After flashing everything just flies.

Comment:
I recommend it to everyone!!! You can immediately buy an inexpensive leather case, and you do not need a protective film.

Guest, 03/31/2012

Advantages:
After that disgusting phone with which I had to live a couple of years before, the new one seemed like a miracle, especially for such money.
User-friendly interface, you can figure it out on your own without problems
Bright screen
Android 2.1
Rarely slows down, works fast
Wonderful screen sensitivity, it’s very nice
The player is very convenient, and the phone sounds loud and good
When you listen to the radio, the name and author of the song are displayed
A lot of convenient applications from the Market, you can customize your phone individually for your purposes
Compared with friends, it seemed very similar to HTS

Disadvantages:
Still, Android is only 2.1, not 2.2, however, it is possible to update the firmware, but the 2.2 firmware itself is not yet available, and you can’t watch videos on the Internet, because the flash player do not download
It is inconvenient that the volume of music and multimedia is combined, i. e. if before that you listened to music, and then start the game, then the sounds of this game will be played, try to remove it — reduce the volume of the incoming call, you need to somehow dodge and look for a suitable moment, i.e. the volume key combines all three settings at once, this is inconvenient. It may seem like a completely minor drawback, but it actually infuriates
Does not support live wallpapers (although not everyone needs them)
The charge does not hold very well, especially at first
A lot of things that are incomprehensible to a simple user, for example, how to turn off GPRS, I had to knock down the settings, but there is probably an easier way, but about it the instructions say nothing
The camera is not great and without a flash (but I never use it, so it doesn’t matter to me)
The back panel, behind which the SIM card is, opens with great difficulty

Comment:
There were a lot of shortcomings, but the pros have already been said better than me
In general, I really like my phone, but, of course, there are much better ones, but they cost quite differently, so they are good for their price. 4+

Kruglikov Andrey, 24.02.2012

Advantages:
Androyd 2.1 works well and that the main thing is not stupid.
Good signal reception and speaker audibility

Disadvantages:
is not a special design. Well, perhaps the size and resolution of the screen.

Comment:
Optimal for your money))))

AntonovVR, 02/23/2012

Advantages:
The best phone for the money

Comment:
Used Samsung 5700 Spica for half a year and 5800 for half a year. , memory, in short — everything is a little better).
Except screen. More precisely, permissions — it is less. But this is not a big problem, it is a trifle, one might say. So feel free to take 5800.

Afanasiev Vyacheslav, 01/28/2012

Advantages:
For its price, the bright screen, the presence of Android with the prospect of switching to the next version, the design, the quality of the case and it plays the role of a phone well can be considered advantages:) Widgets are pleasing. I installed AutoRotate OnOff, BatteryLife, Minimalistic Text and Power Management. It is also convenient to move frequently used contacts to desktops (this compensates for the weak search in the notebook). The most normal ICQ surprisingly turned out to be a mail agent …)) I would never have thought)

Disadvantages:
loses network when switching GSM/3G.
The Wi-Fi antenna is terribly weak (where the Nokia 5800 catches stably, the sams switches to a hedgehog …).
After 4.5 months, the sound from the loudspeaker began to disappear (the standard melody was used, the phone did not drop). Now the device is in service. I’m starting to regret a little that I overpaid by buying it at the beginning of sales.
The disadvantages for someone include Android’s invincible greed for the Internet. As a result — a decrease in time in standby mode and money in the personal account. I cured it by connecting cheap internet. Voice dialing from a headset is not supported … It’s a pity. I’m used to Nokia. The quality and volume of sound after the Nokia 5800 is not at all pleasing … But it seems to have reconciled until it happened (see above) It’s a pity there is no Samsung vibration from pressing the screen (only for the «select» action and buttons). In the current version of Android, navigation through contacts is frankly weak. For owners of huge notebooks, this is a minus.

Comment:
The Galaxy 580 was bought to replace the Nokia 5800 that started to turn off for no reason. The first time I bought the body simply on the basis of «I liked it in the store.» Transferred a huge notebook from Nokia through synchronization with Google. I downloaded the synchronization program on the Nokia 5800 (from the software update menu), set it up for a Google account, and uploaded it. And then on the Galaxy 580 just synchronized with it. Everything is fine, though several dozen numbers out of about 800 pieces have disappeared, and these are numbers that were marked in Nokia as a «default number». I don’t know who is to blame. Transferred what he found lost manually. I almost never use GPS and a camera due to the presence of a GPS navigator and a camera. The main camera reads QR codes. Macro will also work)

Manufacturers

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Benefits

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM

Newer graphics card, release date difference 4 year(s) 5 month(s)
Newer graphics card production process allows3 make it more powerful, but with lower power consumption: 28 nm vs 40 nm

1544 MHz vs 823 MHz0029

2. 7 times more shader processors: 512 vs 192

5 times more floating point performance: 1,581.1 gflops vs 316.0 gflops

3 times more max memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB

11% more memory clock: 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) vs 1800 MHz

Release date	9 April 2015 vs 9 November 2010
Process	28 nm vs 40 nm

Core clock	1544 MHz vs 823 MHz
Texturing speed	49.4 billion / sec vs 13.17 GTexel / s
Number of shaders	512 vs 192
Floating point performance	1,581.1 gflops vs 316.0 gflops
Maximum memory size	1536MB vs 512MB
Memory frequency	2004 MHz (4008 data rate) vs 1800 MHz

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
PassMark — G3D Mark		4518
PassMark — G2D Mark		462
Geekbench — OpenCL		14740
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)		40.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		866.884
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)		4.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)		32.378
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		132.363
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		5953
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)		3717
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)		3357
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		5953
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)		3717
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)		3357
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score		809

Performance comparison

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
Architecture	Kepler 2. 0	Fermi 2.0
Codename	GK208B	GF110
Issue date	April 9, 2015	November 9, 2010
Place in the rating	not rated	541
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Price at first issue date		$499
Price now		$289.88
Price/performance ratio (0-100)		19. 21
Core frequency	823MHz	1544 MHz
Floating point performance	316.0 gflops	1,581.1 gflops
Process	28nm	40nm
Number of shaders	192	512
Texturing speed	13.17 GTexel/s	49.4 billion / sec
Number of CUDA conveyors		512
Maximum temperature		97 °C
Power consumption (TDP)		244 Watt
Number of transistors		3,000 million
Video connectors	No outputs	Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDMI
Maximum resolution VGA		2048×1536
Multi-monitor support
Interface	PCIe 2. 0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Tire		PCI-E 2.0×16
Height		4.376″ (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5″ (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
SLI support		3-way
Additional power connectors		One 6-pin and One 8-pin
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4. Навигация по записям Previous: Rtx 2080 ti strix pcb: ASUS RTX 2080 Ti ROG Strix Tear-Down & Custom PCB : hardware Next: I9 9900k vs ryzen 3700x: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs Intel Core i9-9900K Найти: Свежие записи Intel pentium dual core 6000: Please click the green button to continue. Rivatuner osd not display in league of legends: Reddit — Dive into anything 980 ti wattage: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Specs A6-5200M: AMD A-Series A6-5200 Notebook Processor G502 lightspeed review: Logitech G502 LIGHTSPEED Review — RTINGS.com Свежие комментарии Архивы Октябрь 2023 Сентябрь 2023 Август 2023 Июль 2023 Июнь 2023 Май 2023 Апрель 2023 Март 2023 Февраль 2023 Январь 2023 Декабрь 2022 Ноябрь 2022 Октябрь 2022 Сентябрь 2022 Август 2022 Июль 2022 Июнь 2022 Май 2022 Апрель 2022 Март 2022 Февраль 2022 Январь 2022 Декабрь 2021 Ноябрь 2021 Октябрь 2021 Сентябрь 2021 Август 2021 Июль 2021 Июнь 2021 Май 2021 Апрель 2021 Март 2021 Февраль 2021 Январь 2021 Декабрь 2020 Ноябрь 2020 Октябрь 2020 Сентябрь 2020 Август 2020 Июль 2020 Июнь 2020 Май 2020 Апрель 2020 Март 2020 Февраль 2020 Январь 2020 Декабрь 2019 Рубрики Amd Benchmark Cpu Gpu Miscellaneous Monitor Playstation Radeon Windows Xbox Мета Войти Лента записей Лента комментариев WordPress.org 2024 © All rights reserved

Gt 580m: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — NotebookCheck.net Tech

GeForce GT 730M vs GeForce GTX 580M Graphics cards Comparison

GeForce GT 730M and GeForce GTX 580M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M Specs, Price, and FPS in Games

Alternatives for GeForce GTX 580M

Specifications

Builds Using NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce RTX 3050

GeForce RTX 2060

Radeon RX 6600

Radeon RX 6600

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

GeForce RTX 3050

GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce GTX 1070

GeForce RTX 3060

Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M what is better?

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — review. GPU Benchmark & Specs

General info

Technical specs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Memory

Video outputs and ports

Technologies

API support

Overall gaming performance

AMD equivalent

Benchmark

Overall benchmark performance

XFX GeForce 7600 GT 580M AGP Review

Like this:

Search

Strange Google Magic!

Follow Blog via Email

Categories

Recent Posts

A Random Post

MMO Commentary

MMO News & Study

The Games I Play

The Games I Watch

The Humor Supplement

What Else Do I Read?

Archives

Top Posts

TAGN Spams Twitter

Release Flags of All Nations!

Spam Blocked

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M in 3 Benchmarks

General Information

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Technical Specifications

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Dimensions and Compatibility

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — GPU RAM Frequency and Speed

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Port and Display Support

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Technologies

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — API support

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M — Mining hashrates

Overall NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M Gaming Performance

AMD equivalent

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M in Benchmarks

Overall benchmark performance

Which comparisons are the most popular?

Price Comparison

User Reviews

Performance

Memory

Functions

Ports

Price Match

Which graphics cards are better?

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580. Comparative specifications and benchmarks of video cards

General information winner between NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580. Please note that the comparison is based on all indicators, and below are ratings from synthetic benchmarks that determine different criteria in games and work applications.

Specifications