NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. GPU Comparison Specs & Benchmark
VS
General info
The general info section in the graphics cards comparison list contains information about the date of release, type, overall rating and other useful data for identifying winner between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
230
Place in performance rating
215
61.74
Value for money (0-100)
42.81
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
GK104
Code name
GP107
Desktop
Type
Desktop
30 May 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
25 October 2016 (5 years ago)
$399
Launch price (MSRP)
$139
$211 (0.5x MSRP)
Price now
$350 (2.5x MSRP)
14.82
Value for money
20.60
GK104
GPU code name
N17P-G1
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop
Technical specs
Which GPU is better between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in the fabrication process, power consumption, and also base and turbo frequency of the GPU is the most important part containing in the graphics cards hierarchy.
1536
Pipelines
768
1046 MHz
Core clock speed
1290 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
1392 MHz
3,540 million
Transistor count
3,300 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
230 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
134 billion/sec
Texture fill rate
66.82
3,333 gflops
Floating-point performance
2,138 gflops
98 °C
Maximum GPU temperature
97 °C
1536
CUDA cores
768
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
768
1085 MHz
Boost clock speed
1392 MHz
3,540 million
Number of transistors
3,300 million
230 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Let’s discuss how graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti come in different sizes (length), connector types and types of interfaces.
PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
10.5″ (26.7 cm)
Length
145 mm
One 8-pin and one 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
None
PCI Express 3.0
Bus support
no data
4.376″ (11.1 cm)
Height
no data
600 Watt
Minimum recommended system power
no data
Memory
Graphics cards memory plays important role both in gaming and in applications for graphics. The card will perform much quicker and better, if it has more memory capacity and right memory type. What is the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
7012 MHz
Memory clock speed
7 GB/s
224.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
112 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
—
Video outputs and ports
Let’s find out the difference in extra ports between two graphics cards. What’s the difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
+
G-SYNC support
+
4 displays
Multi monitor support
no data
+
HDCP
no data
2048×1536
Maximum VGA resolution
no data
Internal
Audio input for HDMI
no data
+
HDMI
+
Technologies
Let’s have a look what is the difference. It is worthwhile to note that NVIDIA and AMD are using different technologies.
no data
VR Ready
+
no data
Multi Monitor
+
+
3D Vision
+
+
GPU Boost
no data
+
CUDA
+
no data
Multi-Projection
+
no data
Ansel
+
+
Blu Ray 3D
no data
+
3D Gaming
no data
+
3D Vision Live
no data
+
FXAA
no data
+
TXAA
no data
+
Adaptive VSync
no data
+
PhysX
no data
API support
The confrontation between the two contenders NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is practically over. The hardware support (API) does not greatly affect the overall performance, it is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and other performance tests.
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.126
Vulkan
1.2.131
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti performance benchmarks comparison
Popular comparisons containing this graphics cards
1. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
2. | AMD Radeon RX 590 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
3. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
4. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
5. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
6. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | |
7. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. AMD Radeon RX 560 | |
8. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
9. | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
10. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
11. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
12. | NVIDIA T600 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
13. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
14. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | |
15. | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs. Radeon RX 6500 XT |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 770
|
|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 770
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 768 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,4 GHz, its lithography is 14 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 1536 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,1 GHz, its lithography is 28 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in various benchmarks.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
Graphics card | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 | ||||||
Market (main) | Desktop | Desktop | ||||||
Release date | Q4 2016 | Q2 2013 | ||||||
Model number | GP107-400-A1 | GK104-425-A2 | ||||||
GPU name | GP107 | GK104 | ||||||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler | ||||||
Generation | GeForce 10 | GeForce 700 | ||||||
Lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm | ||||||
Transistors | 3. 300.000.000 | 3.540.000.000 | ||||||
Bus interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 | ||||||
GPU base clock | 1,29 GHz | 1,05 GHz | ||||||
GPU boost clock | 1,39 GHz | 1,09 GHz | ||||||
Memory frequency | 1.752 MHz | 1.753 MHz | ||||||
Effective memory speed | 7 GB/s | 7 GB/s | ||||||
Memory size | 4 GB | 2 GB | ||||||
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | ||||||
Memory bus | 128 Bit | 256 Bit | ||||||
Memory bandwidth | 112,1 GB/s | 224,4 GB/s | ||||||
TDP | 75 W | 230 W | ||||||
Suggested PSU | 300W ATX Power Supply | 600W ATX Power Supply | ||||||
Multicard technology | — | SLI-ready | ||||||
Outputs |
1x DVI |
2x DVI |
||||||
Maximum GPU Temperature | 97°C | 98°C | ||||||
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX) | 6 | 6 | ||||||
Shading units (cuda cores) | 768 | 1. 536 | ||||||
TMUs | 48 | 128 | ||||||
ROPs | 32 | 32 | ||||||
Cache memory | 1 MB | 512 KB | ||||||
Pixel fillrate | 44,5 GP/s | 34,7 GP/s | ||||||
Texture fillrate | 66,8 GT/s | 138,9 GT/s | ||||||
Performance FP32 (float) | 2,1 TFLOPS | 3,3 TFLOPS | ||||||
Performance FP64 (double) | 66,8 GFLOPS | 138,9 GFLOPS | ||||||
Amazon | ||||||||
eBay |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
FP32 Performance in GFLOPS | |
---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 |
3.333 |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
2.138 |
The difference is 56%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.
Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.
See also:
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-QNvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M
Equivalence:
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 770 AMD equivalent
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB: Comparison
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB
VS
WINNER
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Rating: 19 points
Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB
Rating: 19 points
Performance
Memory
General Information
Features
Benchmark tests
Top specifications and features
- Passmark score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU benchmark score
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU benchmark score
Passmark test score
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: 6201
Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB: 5752
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: 6680
Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB:
3DMark Test Score Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: 7335
Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB: 7987
3DMark Ice Storm GPU Score
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: 345818
Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB:
3DMark Cloud Gate test score GPU
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: 49920
Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB:
Description
The Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti graphics card is based on the Pascal architecture. Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB based on Kepler architecture. The first has 3300 million transistors. The second is 3540 million. The Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has a transistor size of 14 nm, versus 28.
The base clock frequency of the first video card is 1290 MHz versus 1058 MHz for the second.
Let’s move on to memory. Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 4 GB. Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB has 4 GB installed. The bandwidth of the first video card is 112.1 Gb / s versus 224 Gb / s of the second.
FLOPS for Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 1.9. Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB 3.19.
Moves to benchmark tests. In the Passmark benchmark, the Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scored 6201 points. But the second card is 5752 points. In 3DMark, the first model scored 7335 points. Second 7987 points.
For interfaces. The first video card is connected using PCIe 3.0 x16. The second is PCIe 3.0 x16. The video card Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti — Directx version — 12. OpenGL version — 4.5. The video card Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB has Directx version — 11. OpenGL version — 4.3.
Why Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is better than Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB
- Passmark score 6201 vs 5752 , 8% higher
- GPU base clock 12
max 2459
Average: 1124.9 MHz
1058MHz
max 2459
Average: 1124.9 MHz
GPU memory frequency
This is an important aspect calculating memory bandwidth
1752MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
1753MHz
max 16000
Average: 1468 MHz
nine0003FLOPS
The measurement of processing power of a processor is called FLOPS.
1.9TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
3.19TFLOPS
max 1142.32
Average: 53 TFLOPS
RAM
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
Turbo GPU
If the GPU speed drops below its limit, it can go to a high clock speed to improve performance.
Show all1392MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
1110MHz
max 2903
Average: 1514 MHz
Texture size
A certain number of textured pixels are displayed on the screen every second.
Show all61.9 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
135 GTexels/s
max 756.8
Average: 145.4 GTexels/s
Architecture name
Pascal
Kepler
GPU name
GP107
GK104
Shared memory
N/A
N/A
Memory bandwidth
900
112.1GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
224GB/s
max 2656
Average: 257.8 GB/s
Effective memory speed
The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the size and information transfer rate of the memory. The performance of the device in applications depends on the clock frequency. The higher it is, the better.
Show all7008MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
7012MHz
max 19500
Average: 6984.5 MHz
RAM
4 GB
nine0003max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
4 GB
max 128
Average: 4.6 GB
GDDR Memory Versions
Latest GDDR memory versions provide high data transfer rates for improved overall performance
Show allfive
Mean: 4. 9
five
Mean: 4.9
Memory bus width
A wide memory bus indicates that it can transfer more information in one cycle. This property affects the performance of the memory as well as the overall performance of the device’s graphics card.
Show all128bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
256bit
max 8192
Average: 283.9bit
Heat dissipation (TDP)
Heat dissipation requirement (TDP) is the maximum amount of energy that can be dissipated by the cooling system. The lower the TDP, the less power will be consumed.
Show all75W
Average value: 160 W
230W
Average value: 160 W
Process technology
The small size of the semiconductor means it is a new generation chip.
14 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
28 nm
Average: 34.7 nm
Number of transistors
The higher the number, the more powerful the processor.
3300 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
3540 million
max 80000
Average: 7150 million
PCIe version
Considerable speed is provided for an expansion card used to connect a computer to peripherals. The updated versions have impressive throughput and provide high performance.
Show all3
Average: 3
3
Average: 3
Width
193mm
max 421. 7
Average: 192.1mm
267mm
max 421.7
Average: 192.1mm
Height
111.7mm
max 619
Average: 89.6mm
111mm
max 619
Average: 89.6mm
DirectX
Used in demanding games providing enhanced graphics
12
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
eleven
max 12.2
Mean: 11.4
OpenCL version
Used by some applications to enable GPU power for non-graphical calculations. The newer the version, the more functional it will be
Show all1.2
max 4.6
Average: 2.2
1.1
max 4.6
Average: 2.2
opengl version
Later versions provide better game graphics
4.5
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
4.3
max 4.6
Average: 4.2
Shader model version
6.4
max 6.6
Average: 5.9
5.1
max 6.6
Average: 5. 9
version VULKAN
1.2
1.1
version CUDA
Yes
has HDMI Output 9000 9000 They can transmit video and audio to the display.
Show allYes
Yes
HDMI version
The latest version provides a wide signal transmission channel due to the increased number of audio channels, frames per second, etc.
Show all2
max 2.1
Mean: 1.9
max 2.1
Mean: 1.9
DisplayPort
Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort
1
Average: 2.2
1
Average: 2. 2
DVI outputs
Allows connection to a display using DVI
1
Mean: 1.4
2
Mean: 1.4
Number of HDMI connectors
The more there are, the more devices can be connected at the same time (for example, game/TV type consoles)
Show all1
Average: 1.1
Average: 1.1
interface 9000
6201max 29325
Average: 7628.6
5752
max 29325
Average: 7628.6
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU score
49920
max 1
Average: 80042. 3
max 1
Average: 80042.3
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6680
max 38276
Average: 12463
max 38276
Average: 12463
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics test score
7335
nine0003max 49575
Average: 11859.1
7987
max 49575
Average: 11859.1
3DMark 11 Performance GPU score
9264
max 57937
Average: 18799.9
max 57937
Average: 18799. 9
3DMark Ice Storm GPU score
345818
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
max 533357
Average: 372425.7
FAQ
How does the Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti perform in benchmarks?
Passmark Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scored 6201 points. The second video card in Passmark scored 5752 points.
What is the FLOPS of video cards?
FLOPS Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 1.9TFLOPs. But the second video card FLOPS is 3.19 TFLOPS.
What is the energy consumption?
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 75 Watt. Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB 230 Watt.
How fast are the Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB?
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti runs at 1290 MHz. In this case, the maximum frequency reaches 1392 MHz. The clock base frequency of the Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB reaches 1058 MHz. In turbo mode it reaches 1110 MHz. nine0003
How much memory do graphics cards have?
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti supports GDDR5. Installed 4 GB of RAM. The throughput reaches 112.1 GB/s. Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB works with GDDR5. The second one has 4 GB of RAM. Its throughput is 112.1 GB/s.
How many HDMI connectors do they have?
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 1 HDMI output. Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB is equipped with No data HDMI outputs. nine0003
What power connectors are used?
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti uses No data. Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB is equipped with No data HDMI outputs.
What architecture are the graphics cards based on?
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal. The Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB uses the Kepler architecture.
What graphics processor is used?
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti equipped with GP107. Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB has GK104 installed. nine0003
How many PCIe lanes
The first graphics card has no PCIe lane data. And the PCIe version is 3. Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB does not have these PCIe lanes. PCIe version 3.
How many transistors?
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 3300 million transistors. Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB has 3540 million
transistors
Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
VS
Zotac GeForce GTX 770 4GB
ATI Radeon HD 5450
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
nine0003Asus Dual Radeon RX 580OC 8GB
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 AeroOC
VS
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming Z
AMD Radeon R9 380X
VS
XFX Radeon R9 380 Double Dissipation Black Edition 2GB
PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 470
VS
PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 470
MSI GeForce GTX 1060OC
VS
XFX Radeon RX 550 Low Profile 4GB
nine0002
MSI Radeon RX 580 Gaming X+VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
VS
Palit GeForce GTX 1660 Dual
AMD Radeon HD 6870
VS
AMD Radeon RX 560
AMD Radeon R9 280X
VS
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 G1 Gaming
AMD Radeon 540X
VS
AMD Radeon RX 480
Asus R9 Fury X
VS
MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming 8GB
AMD Radeon RX 570X
nine0003
VSAsus ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 Gaming
AMD Radeon R7 360
VS
AMD Radeon R9 290X
AMD Radeon HD 6670
VS
Sapphire HD 6670 HyperMemory
PowerColor Radeon RX 480 8GB
VS
PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 470
MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming
VS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Founders Edition
MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
VS
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
nine0003Gigabyte Aorus GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
VS
MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Gaming
Comparison GeForce GTX 770 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card.
Which one to choose?
Home / Video Card Comparison / Which is Better GeForce GTX 770 or GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card?
GeForce GTX 770
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card
May, 2013 | 1GHz | 2GB GDDR5
nine0923
September, 2010 | 783MHz | 4GB GDDR5
Edelmark rating
7.1Edelmark rating
6Overall Comparison
Game Performance
Graphics card tests performed on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. nine0003
GeForce GTX 770 7.4 out of 10 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card no data GeForce GTX 960 6.7 out of 10 Graphics
Tests used: T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor.
GeForce GTX 770 6.3 out of 10 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card 5.6 out of 10 GeForce GTX 960 8.0 out of 10 Computing power
Tested on: Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining.
GeForce GTX 770 6.7 out of 10 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card 5.4 out of 10 GeForce GTX 960 6.4 out of 10 Performance per Watt
Tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3 : Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP. nine0003
GeForce GTX 770 7.3 out of 10 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card 7.0 out of 10 GeForce GTX 960 8.6 out of 10 Price-performance ratio
Video card tested on: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070 , Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, Best new price. nine0003
GeForce GTX 770 no data GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card no data GeForce GTX 960 no data Noise and power
Video card tests performed on: TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level.
GeForce GTX 770 8.8 out of 10 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card 9.1 out of 10 GeForce GTX 960 9.1 out of 10 Overall graphics card rating
GeForce GTX 770 7.1 out of 10 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card 6.0 out of 10 GeForce GTX 960 7.5 out of 10 Benefits
Why is the GeForce GTX 770 better?
Much better 3DMark06 rating of 29.690 vs 1,887.5 Approximately 15.8x better than 3DMark06 rating Much better 3DMark vantage rating 36.150 vs 8.551 Approximately 4.2x better 3DMark vantage rating of Much better PassMark score 6.099 vs 1.557 Approximately 4x better PassMark score of Much higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 48 GB/s Approximately 4. 8x the memory bandwidth of Much higher effective memory clock speed 7.012 MHz vs 3.000 MHz More than 2.2x effective memory clock speed Overclocked 1.046 MHz vs 783 MHz Approximately 35% higher clock speed Significantly better floating point performance 3.213 GFLOPS vs 601.3 GFLOPS More than 5.2x better floating point performance Significantly faster texture processing speed 134 GTexel/s vs 25.06 GTexel/s More than 5.2x faster texture rendering speed Much better sky diver test 381.9 vs 115.77 More than 3.2x better sky diver test Many more texture units 128 vs 32 96 more texture units Faster pixel fill rate 33. 5GPixel/s vs 6.26 GPixel/s More than 5.2x faster pixel fill rate Significantly more shader units 1.536 vs 192 1344 more shader units Much higher memory clock speed 1.753 MHz vs 750MHz More than 2.2x higher memory clock speed Significantly better video build rating 83.26 frames/s vs 14.92 frames/s More than 5.5x better video construction rating More raster operation blocks 32 vs 16 Twice as many raster operation blocks Substantially better PassMark direct rating
3.083 vs 716 More than 4.2x better PassMark direct rating
Wider memory bus 256bit nine0923 vs
128bit 2x wider memory bus Why GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card is better?
Better 3DMark rating 11 16. 033.5 vs 11.310 More than 40% better 3DMark 11 score More memory vs 2.048 MB 2x more memory Significantly lower power consumption 106W vs 230W 2.2x lower power consumption Comparative benchmarks (benchmarks)
Bitcoin mining
GeForce GTX 770 112.94 mHash/s GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card 38.68 mHash/s Face Recognition
GeForce GTX 770 50.95 mPixels/s GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card 12.97 mPixels/s Ocean Surface Modeling
GeForce GTX 770 1,101.78 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Fake Card 302.51 frames/s T-Rex (GFXBench 3.