Gtx 1070 ti vs rtx 2060 super: RTX 2060 SUPER vs GTX 1070 Ti Game Performance Benchmarks (i7-8700K vs i7-7700K)

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060: What is the difference?

54points

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

60points

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

54 facts in comparison

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti better than Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060?

• 242MHz faster GPU clock speed?
  1607MHzvs1365MHz
• 1.74 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
  8.19 TFLOPSvs6.45 TFLOPS
• 27.06 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
  107.7 GPixel/svs80.64 GPixel/s
• 252MHz faster memory clock speed?
  2002MHzvs1750MHz
• 33.33% more VRAM?
  8GBvs6GB
• 54.2 GTexels/s higher texture rate?
  255.8 GTexels/svs201.6 GTexels/s
• 64bit wider memory bus width?
  256bitvs192bit
• 512 more shading units?
  2432vs1920

Why is Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti?

• 20W lower TDP?
  160Wvs180W
• 5992MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
  14000MHzvs8008MHz
• 79. 7GB/s more memory bandwidth?
  336GB/svs256.3GB/s
• 3600million more transistors?
  10800 millionvs7200 million
• 11°C lower load GPU temperature?
  69°Cvs80°C
• 4nm smaller semiconductor size?
  12nmvs16nm
• 1 higher version of GDDR memory?
  6vs5
• Supports DLSS?

Which are the most popular comparisons?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Price comparison

User reviews

Overall Rating

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

0 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

0. 0/10

0 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

4 User reviews

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

9.8/10

4 User reviews

Features

Value for money

No reviews yet

 

8.8/10

4 votes

Gaming

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

4 votes

Performance

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

4 votes

Fan noise

No reviews yet

 

9.0/10

4 votes

Reliability

No reviews yet

 

10.0/10

4 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1607MHz

1365MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.GPU turbo

1683MHz

1680MHz

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

3.pixel rate

107. 7 GPixel/s

80.64 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

4.floating-point performance

8.19 TFLOPS

6.45 TFLOPS

Floating-point performance is a measurement of the raw processing power of the GPU.

5.texture rate

255.8 GTexels/s

201.6 GTexels/s

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

2002MHz

1750MHz

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

7.shading units

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

8.texture mapping units (TMUs)

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

9.render output units (ROPs)

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

1.effective memory speed

8008MHz

14000MHz

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

2.maximum memory bandwidth

256.3GB/s

336GB/s

This is the maximum rate that data can be read from or stored into memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of a graphics card. More VRAM generally allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

192bit

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

5.version of GDDR memory

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

6.Supports ECC memory

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Features

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

2.OpenGL version

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

3.OpenCL version

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

4.Supports multi-display technology

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

6.supports ray tracing

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D display and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an upscaling technology powered by AI. It allows the graphics card to render games at a lower resolution and upscale them to a higher resolution with near-native visual quality and increased performance. DLSS is only available on select games.

9.PassMark (G3D) result

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti)

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060)

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

Ports

1.has an HDMI output

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

2.HDMI ports

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

3.HDMI version

HDMI 2.0

HDMI 2.0

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4.DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using DVI.

6.mini DisplayPort outputs

Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort.

Price comparison

Cancel

Which are the best graphics cards?

GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

1. Home
2. VGA Benchmarks
3. GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2060 Super

18% higher gaming performance.

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Supports PhysX

Supports G-Sync

Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute

Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)

Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

Supports PhysX

Supports G-Sync

Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)

Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

---

HWBench recommends GeForce RTX 2060 Super

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (59 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration

	GeForce RTX 2060 Super		GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GPU Name	TU106 (TU106-410-A1)	vs	GP104 (GP104-300-A1)
Fab Process	12 nm	vs	16 nm
Die Size	445 mm²	vs	314 mm²
Transistors	10,800 million	vs	7,200 million
Shaders	2176	vs	2432
Compute Units	34	vs	19
Core clock	1470 MHz	vs	1607 MHz
ROPs	64	vs	64
TMUs	136	vs	152

Memory Configuration

	GeForce RTX 2060 Super		GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Memory Type	GDDR6	vs	GDDR5
Bus Width	256 bit	vs	256 bit
Memory Speed	1750 MHz 14000 MHz effective	vs	2002 MHz 8008 MHz effective
Memory Size	8192 Mb	vs	8192 Mb

Additional details

	GeForce RTX 2060 Super		GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
TDP	160 watts	vs	180 watts
Release Date	9 Jul 2019	vs	26 Oct 2017

GigaPixels — higher is better

GigaTexels — higher is better

GB/s — higher is better

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality TTA DirectX11 Windows10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest quality DirectX11 Windows10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality DirectX12 Windows10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, HR Textures, DirectX11, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

UltraTX Max Quality, Vulkan, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA

FPS (higher is better)

	VS
GeForce RTX 2060 Super		Radeon RX 6650 XT

	VS
GeForce RTX 2060 Super		Radeon RX 5700

	VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti		Radeon RX 6600

	VS
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti		Radeon RX 6600 XT

	VS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super		Radeon RX 5700 XT

	VS
Radeon RX 5700 XT		Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

GTX 1070Ti vs RTX 2060 Super ⚙️

0x10—MH/s—W—MH/W

Allium9.221MH/s175W0.053MH/W

Argon2d-dyn217.08KH/s182W1.193KH/W

Argon2d250798.698KH/s124W6.441KH/W

Argon2d409643.491KH/s134W0.325KH/W

Astralhash9.766MH/s67W0.146MH/W

Autolykos277.26MH/s124W0.623MH/W

BCD18.867MH/s125W0.151MH/W

BMW512790.819MH/s63W12.553MH/W

BeamHashII23.93H/s127W0. 188H/W

BeamHashIII20.33H/s174W0.117H/W

Blake (14r)2.17GH/s66W0.033GH/W

Blake (2b)1.559GH/s75W0.021GH/W

Blake (2b-BTCC)1555.851MH/s75W20.745MH/W

Blake (2s)4.402GH/s123W0.036GH/W

Blake (2s-Kadena)0.937GH/s169W0.006GH/W

C1123.169MH/s122W0.19MH/W

CNReverseWaltz967.14H/s154W6.28H/W

Chukwa100.594KH/s180W0.559KH/W

Chukwa236.035KH/s123W0. 293KH/W

ChukwaWRKZ135.25KH/s143W0.946KH/W

Cortex0.041H/s88W0H/W

CryptoNight—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightAlloy390.59H/s123W3.176H/W

CryptoNightArto—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightBBC—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightConceal1411.8H/s130W10.86H/W

CryptoNightFast1308.35H/s65W20.128H/W

CryptoNightGPU1477.12H/s169W8.74H/W

CryptoNightHaven752.85H/s142W5. 302H/W

CryptoNightHeavy705.3H/s119W5.927H/W

CryptoNightHeavyX318.34H/s141W2.258H/W

CryptoNightLiteV71.543KH/s130W0.012KH/W

CryptoNightR765.6H/s149W5.138H/W

CryptoNightSaber680H/s116W5.862H/W

CryptoNightStelliteV4770.6H/s131W5.882H/W

CryptoNightStelliteV5—H/s—W—H/W

CryptoNightTurtle6.51KH/s146W0.045KH/W

CryptoNightUPX224.73KH/s154W0.161KH/W

CryptoNightV7—KH/s—W—KH/W

CryptoNightV8—KH/s—W—KH/W

CryptoNightZLS796. 65H/s144W5.532H/W

Cuckaroo29S3.29H/s160W0.021H/W

Cuckaroo29b3.03H/s177W0.017H/W

CuckooBFC26.63H/s134W0.199H/W

CuckooCycle5.96H/s130W0.046H/W

Dedal6.515MH/s125W0.052MH/W

Eaglesong0.797GH/s168W0.005GH/W

Equihash—GH/s—W—GH/W

Equihash(125,4)34.07H/s115W0.296H/W

Equihash(144,5)47H/s111W0.423H/W

Equihash(150,5)27. 79H/s138W0.201H/W

Equihash(192,7)29H/s183W0.158H/W

Equihash(210,9)203.08H/s71W2.86H/W

Equihash(96,5)16.334KH/s101W0.162KH/W

Equihash+Scrypt24.899KH/s167W0.149KH/W

EquihashBTCZ46H/s105W0.438H/W

EquihashBTG45H/s111W0.405H/W

EquihashSAFE46H/s105W0.438H/W

Etchash39.853MH/s124W0.321MH/W

Ethash39.37MH/s127W0.31MH/W

FiroPoW11. 5MH/s91W0.126MH/W

Globalhash20.525MH/s58W0.354MH/W

HMQ17253.603MH/s108W0.033MH/W

Handshake0.288GH/s166W0.002GH/W

HeavyHash201.041MH/s66W3.046MH/W

Hex8.456MH/s160W0.053MH/W

HoneyComb0.262MH/s40W0.007MH/W

Jeonghash6.781MH/s115W0.059MH/W

KAWPOW15.356MH/s119W0.129MH/W

Keccak0.66GH/s122W0.005GH/W

Keccak-C0. 66GH/s121W0.005GH/W

Lyra2REv241.101MH/s74W0.555MH/W

Lyra2REv339.007MH/s122W0.32MH/W

Lyra2vc0ban44.261MH/s125W0.354MH/W

Lyra2z2.121MH/s118W0.018MH/W

Mike752.125MH/s64W11.752MH/W

Myr-Groestl—MH/s—W—MH/W

NIST50.031GH/s125W0GH/W

NeoScrypt0.967MH/s109W0.009MH/W

Octopus38.14MH/s173W0.22MH/W

PHI161215. 294MH/s152W0.101MH/W

PHI27.797MH/s167W0.047MH/W

Padihash2.096MH/s67W0.031MH/W

Pawelhash3.785MH/s57W0.066MH/W

ProgPow12.612MH/s91W0.139MH/W

ProgPowSERO12.919MH/s98W0.132MH/W

ProgPowZ12.936MH/s99W0.131MH/W

RandomSFX—MH/s—W—MH/W

RandomX496.775H/s59W8.42H/W

SHA-256csm873.58MH/s66W13.236MH/W

ScryptSIPC1. 057KH/s138W0.008KH/W

Skein0.553GH/s138W0.004GH/W

Skein2400.86MH/s76W5.274MH/W

Skunkhash15.462MH/s100W0.155MH/W

SonoA0.981MH/s62W0.016MH/W

Tellor0GH/s138W0GH/W

Tensority0.008KH/s139W0KH/W

TimeTravel1023.776MH/s62W0.383MH/W

Tribus46.949MH/s162W0.29MH/W

Ubqhash42.346MH/s116W0.365MH/W

X11k1. 133MH/s80W0.014MH/W

X13—MH/s—W—MH/W

X157.206MH/s84W0.086MH/W

X16R8.799MH/s77W0.114MH/W

X16RT6.484MH/s123W0.053MH/W

X16RTVEIL6.289MH/s106W0.059MH/W

X16Rv218.713MH/s77W0.243MH/W

X16S15.255MH/s70W0.218MH/W

X178.68MH/s150W0.058MH/W

X17R6.152MH/s61W0.101MH/W

X181.048MH/s61W0. 017MH/W

X21S6.298MH/s146W0.043MH/W

X22i0.262MH/s67W0.004MH/W

X25X4.261MH/s125W0.034MH/W

X339.473MH/s87W0.109MH/W

Xevan2.756MH/s147W0.019MH/W

Zhash48.59H/s98W0.496H/W

cuckARoo24—H/s—W—H/W

cuckARoo296.528H/s129W0.051H/W

cuckARood291.78H/s164W0.011H/W

cuckARoom292.499H/s123W0.02H/W

cuckARooz294. 23H/s179W0.024H/W

cuckAToo310.51H/s178W0.003H/W

cuckAToo320.35H/s122W0.003H/W

vProgPow6.832MH/s95W0.072MH/W

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060 Graphics cards Comparison

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

Check Price

GeForce RTX 2060

Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	GeForce RTX 2060
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	160 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
	Check Price	Check Price

• GeForce GTX 1070 Ti has 12% more power consumption, than GeForce RTX 2060.
• Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
• GeForce GTX 1070 Ti has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce RTX 2060.
• Both cards are used in Desktops.
• GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is build with Pascal architecture, and GeForce RTX 2060 — with Turing.
• Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is 287 MHz higher, than GeForce RTX 2060.
• GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and GeForce RTX 2060 — by 12 nm process technology.
• GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is 38 mm longer, than GeForce RTX 2060.
• Memory clock speed of GeForce RTX 2060 is 6000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1070 Ti.

Game benchmarks

Assassin’s Creed OdysseyBattlefield 5Call of Duty: WarzoneCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveCyberpunk 2077Dota 2Far Cry 5FortniteForza Horizon 4Grand Theft Auto VMetro ExodusMinecraftPLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDSRed Dead Redemption 2The Witcher 3: Wild HuntWorld of Tanks
high / 1080p	65−70	65−70
ultra / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	40−45	40−45
4K / 2160p	24−27	24−27
low / 720p	90−95	90−95
medium / 1080p	75−80	75−80
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	95−100	95−100
QHD / 1440p	75−80	75−80
4K / 2160p	40−45	40−45
low / 720p	150−160	150−160
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	250−260
medium / 768p	230−240	230−240
QHD / 1440p	150−160	150−160
4K / 2160p	100−110	100−110
high / 768p	220−230	220−230
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p	70−75	70−75
medium / 1080p	50−55	50−55
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	85−90	85−90
ultra / 1080p	80−85	80−85
QHD / 1440p	60−65	60−65
4K / 2160p	30−35	30−35
low / 720p	110−120	110−120
medium / 1080p	90−95	90−95
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p	130−140	130−140
ultra / 1080p	100−110	100−110
QHD / 1440p	70−75	70−75
4K / 2160p	21−24	21−24
low / 720p	250−260	250−260
medium / 1080p	170−180	170−180
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	90−95	90−95
QHD / 1440p	70−75	70−75
4K / 2160p	45−50	45−50
low / 720p	160−170	160−170
medium / 1080p	120−130	120−130
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p	170−180	170−180
medium / 768p	160−170	160−170
high / 1080p	120−130	120−130
ultra / 1080p	70−75	70−75
QHD / 1440p	60−65	60−65
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	35−40	35−40
4K / 2160p	21−24	21−24
low / 720p	120−130	120−130
medium / 1080p	75−80	75−80
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	90−95	85−90
4K / 2160p	18−20	18−20
low / 720p	140−150	140−150
medium / 1080p	130−140	130−140
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN’S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1% more, than GeForce RTX 2060.
high / 1080p	50−55	50−55
ultra / 1080p	30−35	30−35
QHD / 1440p	27−30	27−30
4K / 2160p	18−20	18−20
low / 720p	120−130	120−130
medium / 1080p	80−85	80−85
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	250−260	250−260
medium / 768p	180−190	180−190
high / 1080p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	60−65	60−65
4K / 2160p	40−45	40−45
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p	200−210	200−210
ultra / 1080p	95−100	95−100
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	GeForce RTX 2060
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Code name	Pascal GP104	Turing TU106
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	2 November 2017	6 January 2019
Pipelines	2432	1920
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	1320 MHz
Boost Clock	1683 MHz	1620 MHz
Transistor count	7,200 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Texture fill rate	255. 8	201.6
Floating-point performance	8,186 gflops
Length	267 mm	229 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.3 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	—	—
G-SYNC support	+	+
VR Ready	+	+
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1. 2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	7.5
	Check Price	Check Price

Similar compares

• GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 8200
• GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q
• GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200
• GeForce RTX 2060 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max Q
• GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega II
• GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega II
• GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon Pro Vega II
• GeForce RTX 2060 vs Radeon Pro Vega II

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti on one side and Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 2432 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,7 GHz, its lithography is 16 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 2176 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,7 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specifications:

Graphics card		Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti				Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Market (main)		Desktop				Desktop
Release date		Q4 2017				Q3 2019
Model number		GP104-300-A1				TU106-410-A1
GPU name		GP104				TU106
Architecture		Pascal				Turing
Generation		GeForce 10				GeForce 20
Lithography		16 nm				12 nm
Transistors		7. 200.000.000				10.800.000.000
Bus interface		PCIe 3.0 x16				PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock		1,61 GHz				1,47 GHz
GPU boost clock		1,68 GHz				1,65 GHz
Memory frequency		2.002 MHz				1.750 MHz
Effective memory speed		8 GB/s				14 GB/s
Memory size		8 GB				8 GB
Memory type		GDDR5				GDDR6
Memory bus		256 Bit				256 Bit
Memory bandwidth		256,3 GB/s				448,0 GB/s
TDP		180 W				175 W
Suggested PSU		500W ATX Power Supply				550W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology		4-way SLI, 2-way SLI HB				—
Outputs		1x DVI 1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort				1x DVI 1x HDMI 2x DisplayPort 1x USB Type-C
Maximum GPU Temperature		94°C				89°C
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)		19				34
Shading units (cuda cores)		2. 432				2.176
TMUs		152				136
ROPs		64				64
Cache memory		2 MB				4 MB
Pixel fillrate		107,7 GP/s				105,6 GP/s
Texture fillrate		255,8 GT/s				224,4 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half)		127,9 GFLOPS				14,4 TFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float)		8,2 TFLOPS				7,2 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)		255,8 GFLOPS				224,4 GFLOPS
Amazon
eBay

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

	FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	8.186
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super	7.181

The difference is 14%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

log 04. 20:34:15

#0 checking url part for id 9631 +0s … 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8258 +0s … 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s . .. 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 02 Oct 2022 17:27:15 +0200 +0s … 0s

#4 composed specs +0.081s … 0.082s

#5 did output specs +0s … 0.082s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s … 0.082s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.03s … 0.112s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.114s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.115s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9631 +0s … 0.115s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.116s

#12 got single benchmarks 9631 +0.023s … 0.139s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 8258 +0s … 0.139s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.14s

#15 got single benchmarks 8258 +0.006s … 0.146s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s … 0.146s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.147s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.147s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.147s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.147s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.148s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.148s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.148s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.149s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.149s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.149s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.149s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.149s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.15s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.15s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0. 15s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.15s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.15s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.15s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.151s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.151s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.151s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.151s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.151s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.151s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.151s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.152s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.152s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.152s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.152s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.153s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.153s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.153s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.153s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.153s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.154s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.154s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.154s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.154s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.154s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.154s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.155s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.155s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.156s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.156s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.157s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.157s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.157s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.157s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.157s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.158s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.158s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.158s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.158s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.158s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.159s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.159s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.16s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.16s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.161s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.162s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.162s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.162s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.163s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.164s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.165s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.165s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.166s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.166s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.167s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.168s

#102 min, max, avg, median took s +0s … 0.169s

#103 before gaming benchmark output +0s . .. 0.169s

#104 Got 341 rows for game benchmarks. +0.046s … 0.215s

#105 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s … 0.215s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.215s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.215s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.216s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.216s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.216s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.217s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#173 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.217s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#176 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#182 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#183 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#185 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#187 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.217s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#193 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#200 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#201 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.217s

#202 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#205 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#206 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#208 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.217s

#209 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#210 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#211 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#214 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#215 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.218s

#216 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#218 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#219 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#220 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#221 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#223 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#224 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#225 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#226 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#227 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#228 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#229 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.218s

#230 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#231 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#232 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#233 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#234 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#235 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#236 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#237 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#238 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#239 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#240 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#241 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#242 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#243 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.218s

#244 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#245 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#246 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#247 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#248 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#249 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#250 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#251 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#252 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#253 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#254 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#255 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#256 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#257 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.218s

#258 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#259 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#260 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#261 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#262 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#263 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#264 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#265 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#266 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.218s

#267 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#268 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#269 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#270 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#271 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.219s

#272 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#273 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#274 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#275 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#276 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#277 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#278 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#279 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#280 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#281 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#282 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#283 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#284 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#285 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.219s

#286 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#287 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#288 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#289 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#290 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#291 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#292 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#293 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#294 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#295 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#296 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#297 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#298 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#299 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.219s

#300 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#301 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#302 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#303 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#304 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#305 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#306 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#307 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#308 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#309 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#310 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#311 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.219s

#312 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#313 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.22s

#314 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#315 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#316 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#317 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#318 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#319 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#320 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#321 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#322 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#323 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#324 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#325 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#326 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#327 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#328 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.22s

#329 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#330 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#331 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#332 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#333 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#334 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#335 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#336 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#337 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#338 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#339 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#340 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#341 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#342 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#343 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.22s

#344 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#345 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#346 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#347 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#348 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#349 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#350 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#351 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#352 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#353 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#354 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#355 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#356 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#357 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#358 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.22s

#359 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#360 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#361 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#362 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#363 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#364 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#365 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#366 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#367 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#368 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#369 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#370 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#371 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#372 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#373 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.22s

#374 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#375 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#376 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#377 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#378 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.22s

#379 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.221s

#380 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.221s

#381 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s … 0.222s

#382 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.223s

#383 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#384 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#385 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#386 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.223s

#387 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.224s

#388 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#389 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#390 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.224s

#391 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.225s

#392 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#393 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#394 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.225s

#395 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#396 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#397 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.225s

#398 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.226s

#399 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.226s

#400 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.226s

#401 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.227s

#402 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.227s

#403 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.227s

#404 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.227s

#405 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.227s

#406 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.227s

#407 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.227s

#408 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.227s

#409 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.227s

#410 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.228s

#411 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.228s

#412 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.228s

#413 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.228s

#414 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.229s

#415 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.229s

#416 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.229s

#417 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.229s

#418 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.229s

#419 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.229s

#420 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.23s

#421 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.23s

#422 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.23s

#423 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.23s

#424 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.23s

#425 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.232s

#426 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.232s

#427 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.232s

#428 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.232s

#429 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.233s

#430 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.233s

#431 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.233s

#432 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.233s

#433 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.234s

#434 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.234s

#435 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.234s

#436 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.234s

#437 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.234s

#438 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.234s

#439 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.234s

#440 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.234s

#441 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.235s

#442 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.235s

#443 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.235s

#444 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.236s

#445 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.236s

#446 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.237s

#447 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.237s

#448 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.237s

#449 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.237s

#450 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.237s

#451 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.238s

#452 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.238s

#453 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.238s

#454 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.241s

#455 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.241s

#456 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.241s

#457 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.241s

#458 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.243s

#459 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#460 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#461 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#462 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#463 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#464 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#465 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#466 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.243s

#467 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.244s

#468 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.013s … 0.257s

#469 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s … 0.263s

#470 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s … 0.267s

#471 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 006s … 0.273s

#472 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#473 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#474 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.273s

#475 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.275s

#476 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#477 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#478 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#479 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#480 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#481 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#482 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#483 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#484 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#485 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.275s

#486 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#487 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#488 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#489 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#490 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#491 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#492 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.275s

#493 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.276s

#494 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#495 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#496 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#497 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#498 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#499 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.276s

#500 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.276s

#501 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#502 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#503 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#504 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#505 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#506 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#507 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#508 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#509 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#510 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#511 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#512 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#513 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.277s

#514 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.277s

#515 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#516 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#517 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#518 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#519 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#520 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.277s

#521 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.278s

#522 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#523 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.278s

#524 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.279s

#525 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.279s

#526 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.279s

#527 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.279s

#528 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.279s

#529 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.279s

#530 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.279s

#531 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.279s

#532 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.28s

#533 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.28s

#534 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.28s

#535 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.28s

#536 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.28s

#537 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.28s

#538 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.28s

#539 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.28s

#540 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.28s

#541 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.28s

#542 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.281s

#543 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.281s

#544 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.281s

#545 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.282s

#546 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.282s

#547 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.283s

#548 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.283s

#549 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.283s

#550 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.283s

#551 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.283s

#552 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.283s

#553 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.284s

#554 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.284s

#555 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.285s

#556 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.285s

#557 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.285s

#558 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.285s

#559 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.286s

#560 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.287s

#561 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.287s

#562 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.287s

#563 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.287s

#564 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.288s

#565 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.288s

#566 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.288s

#567 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.288s

#568 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.288s

#569 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.288s

#570 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.289s

#571 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.289s

#572 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.289s

#573 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.289s

#574 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.289s

#575 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.289s

#576 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.289s

#577 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.29s

#578 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.29s

#579 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.29s

#580 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.29s

#581 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.291s

#582 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.291s

#583 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.292s

#584 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.292s

#585 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.292s

#586 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.292s

#587 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.292s

#588 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.292s

#589 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.293s

#590 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.293s

#591 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.293s

#592 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.293s

#593 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.293s

#594 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.293s

#595 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.293s

#596 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.293s

#597 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.293s

#598 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.293s

#599 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.293s

#600 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.293s

#601 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.293s

#602 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.294s

#603 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.294s

#604 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.294s

#605 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.294s

#606 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.294s

#607 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.294s

#608 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.294s

#609 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.294s

#610 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.294s

#611 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.294s

#612 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.295s

#613 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.295s

#614 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.295s

#615 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.295s

#616 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.295s

#617 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.295s

#618 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.295s

#619 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.295s

#620 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.295s

#621 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.295s

#622 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.298s

#623 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.3s

#624 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.3s

#625 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0. 001s … 0.301s

#626 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.301s

#627 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s … 0.305s

#628 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.305s

#629 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s … 0.308s

#630 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s

#631 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s

#632 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.308s

#633 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.308s

#634 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s

#635 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s

#636 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s

#637 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.309s

#638 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s

#639 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s . .. 0.309s

#640 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s

#641 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.309s

#642 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s … 0.31s

#643 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s

#644 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s … 0.31s

#645 benchmarks composed for output. +0s … 0.31s

#646 calculated avg scores. +0s … 0.31s

#647 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s … 0.312s

#648 return log +0.002s … 0.315s

0023 1365MHz

1.74 TFLOPS above FLOPS?
8.19 TFLOPS vs 6.45 TFLOPS

27.06 GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
107.7 GPixel/s vs 80.64 GPixel/s

252MHz faster memory speed?
2002MHz vs 1750MHz

33.33% more VRAM?
8GB vs 6GB

54. 2 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels?
255.8 GTexels/s vs 201.6 GTexels/s

64bit wider memory bus?
256bit vs 192bit

512 more stream processors?
2432 vs 1920

• 20W below TDP?
  160W vs 180W
• 5992MHz higher effective clock speed?
  14000MHz vs 8008MHz
• 79.7GB/s more memory bandwidth?
  336GB/s vs 256.3GB/s
• 3600million more transistor?
  10800 million vs 7200 million
• 11°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
  69°C vs 80°C
• Is 4nm smaller?
  12nm vs 16nm
• 1 later versions of GDDR memory?
  6 vs 5
• Supports DLSS?

What are the most popular comparisons?

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 2060

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

AMD Radeon RX 580

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 TI

VS

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1660 TI

NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 2060

VS

NVIDIA GTX 1660

NVIDIA GTX 100003

vs

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1660 Super

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

0003

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

vs

MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060

Price Match

User Reviews

Overall Rating

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

0 User Reviews

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

0. 0 /10

0 Reviews of users

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

4 Reviews of users

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

9.8 /10

4 Reviews

902 no

8.8 /10

4 Votes

Games

Reviews, no

10.0 /10

4 Votes 9Ol000 no

10.0 /10

4 votes

Performance

1.GPU clock speed

1607MHz

0004 The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

2.turbo GPU

1683MHz

1680MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

107.7 GPixel/s

80.64 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

8.19 TFLOPS

6. 45 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

255.8 GTexels/s

201.6 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

2002MHz

1750MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a graphics card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

8008MHz

14000MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the memory size and data transfer rate. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

256.3GB/s

336GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4.memory bus width

256bit

192bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5. versions of GDDR memory

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory debug code

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5.GPU Temperature at Boot

Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7. Supports 3D

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✖Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1.has HDMI output

✔Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to an attached display.

2.HDMI connectors

More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

HDMI 3.Version

HDMI 2.0

HDMI 2. 0

New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth for higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

• 5992MHz higher effective clock frequency? more memory bandwidth?
  448GB/s vs 256GB/s
• 3600million more transistors?
  10800 million vs 7200 million
• 12°C lower GPU temperature at boot?
  69°C vs 81°C
• Is 4nm smaller?
  12nm vs 16nm
• 1 later GDDR memory?
  6 vs 5
• Supports DLSS?
• Has DPFP?

Why is Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream better than Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super?

• GPU frequency 137MHz higher?
  1607MHz vs 1470MHz
• 1. 01 TFLOPS higher than FLOPS?
  8.19 TFLOPS vs 7.18 TFLOPS
• 252MHz faster memory speed?
  2002MHz vs 1750MHz
• 31.4 GTexels/s higher number of textured pixels? more stream processors?
  2432 vs 2176
• 16 more texture units (TMUs)?
  152 vs 136
• 1 more DisplayPort outputs?
  3 vs 2
• Has RGB backlight?

What are the most popular comparisons?

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

vs

MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Aero ITX

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

vs

MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming X

Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

vs

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050

Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

vs

Asus Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

vs

Nvidia Geforce0 Super GTX 160003

Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

vs

Asus Phoenix GeForce RTX 3050

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060

Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

vs

Asus ROG Strix0 1 Gaming0003

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

vs

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

vs

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070

Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

vs

Asus ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1070

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

vs

2 Asus GeForce RTX

Palit GeForce GTX 1070 TI Super JetStream

0. 0 /10

0 Reviews of Users

Functions

Cost Refract

10.0 /10

9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000 9000

10.0 /10

1 Votes

Reviews still not

performance

10.0 /10

1 VOTES

reviews yet not

Fan noise

7.0263 /10

1 Votes

Reviews not yet

Reliability

10.0 /10

1 VOTES

Reviews still no 9000 9000 9000

productivity

9. 1.GPU clock frequency

1470MHz

1607MHz

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock frequency.

2.Turbo GPU

1650MHz

1683MHz

When the GPU is running below its limits, it can jump to a higher clock speed to increase performance.

3.pixel rate

105. 6 GPixel/s

107.7 GPixel/s

The number of pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

4.flops

7.18 TFLOPS

8.19 TFLOPS

FLOPS is a measurement of GPU processing power.

5.texture size

224.4 GTexels/s

255.8 GTexels/s

Number of textured pixels that can be displayed on the screen every second.

6.GPU memory speed

1750MHz

2002MHz

Memory speed is one aspect that determines memory bandwidth.

7.shading patterns

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors in a video card that are responsible for processing various aspects of an image.

8.textured units (TMUs)

TMUs accept textured units and bind them to the geometric layout of the 3D scene. More TMUs generally means texture information is processed faster.

9 ROPs

ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, such as writing the final pixel data to memory and for performing other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the appearance of graphics.

Memory

1.memory effective speed

14000MHz

8008MHz

The effective memory clock frequency is calculated from the size and data transfer rate of the memory. A higher clock speed can give better performance in games and other applications.

2.max memory bandwidth

448GB/s

256GB/s

This is the maximum rate at which data can be read from or stored in memory.

3.VRAM

VRAM (video RAM) is the dedicated memory of the graphics card. More VRAM usually allows you to run games at higher settings, especially for things like texture resolution.

4. memory bus width

256bit

256bit

Wider memory bus means it can carry more data per cycle. This is an important factor in memory performance, and therefore the overall performance of the graphics card.

5.versions of GDDR memory

Later versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher data transfer rates, which improve performance.

6. Supports memory debug code

✖Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

✖Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

Memory debug code can detect and fix data corruption. It is used when necessary to avoid distortion, such as in scientific computing or when starting a server.

Functions

1.DirectX version

DirectX is used in games with a new version that supports better graphics.

2nd version of OpenGL

The newer version of OpenGL, the better graphics quality in games.

OpenCL version 3.

Some applications use OpenCL to use the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions are more functional and better quality.

4. Supports multi-monitor technology

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

✔Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

The video card has the ability to connect multiple screens. This allows you to set up multiple monitors at the same time to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as a wider field of view.

5.GPU Temperature at Boot

Lower boot temperature means that the card generates less heat and the cooling system works better.

6.supports ray tracing

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

✔Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections in games.

7.Supports 3D

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

✔Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

Allows you to view in 3D (if you have a 3D screen and glasses).

8.supports DLSS

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

✖Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) is an AI based scaling technology. This allows the graphics card to render games at lower resolutions and upscale them to higher resolutions with near-native visual quality and improved performance. DLSS is only available in some games.

9. PassMark result (G3D)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super)

Unknown. Help us offer a price. (Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream)

This test measures the graphics performance of a graphics card. Source: Pass Mark.

Ports

1. has HDMI output

✔Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super

✔Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Super JetStream

Devices with HDMI or mini HDMI ports can stream HD video and audio to the connected display.

2.HDMI connectors

More HDMI connectors allow you to connect multiple devices at the same time, such as game consoles and TVs.

HDMI 3.Version

HDMI 2.0

HDMI 2.0

New HDMI versions support higher bandwidth, resulting in higher resolutions and frame rates.

4. DisplayPort outputs

Allows connection to a display using DisplayPort.

5.DVI outputs

Allows connection to a display using DVI.

Mini DisplayPort 6.outs

Allows connection to a display using Mini DisplayPort.

Price Match

Cancel

Which graphics cards are better?

GeForce RTX 2060 Super VS GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in conjunction with a Core i5-10600KF processor

20 x 1080, 2560 x 1440 and 3440 x 1440.

Let’s see who will emerge victorious from this confrontation.

Test configuration, test tools and methodology

Test results: performance comparison

recommendations

Crysis Remastered

1% low and average FPS

Looking ahead, I note an important pattern: in most of the games tested, the GeForce RTX 2060 Super graphics card was faster than its predecessor, the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. In this material, two aspects will be considered:

• How effective was the veteran’s resistance to the «novice».
• What performance did the test subjects manage to show at resolutions of 1920 x 1080, 2560 x 1440 and 3440 x 1440.

In Crysis Remastered, the overclocked GeForce GTX 1070 Ti was only slightly ahead of the stock GeForce RTX 2060 Super. At the same time, both accelerators showed good results only in the «popular» resolution of 1920 x 1080.

Far Cry Primal

1% low and average FPS

In the prehistoric action game Far Cry Primal, the veteran managed to give a decent fight to his replacement. Depending on the resolution and mode of operation, the GeForce RTX 2060 Super model outperformed the old man by only 5% — 7%. At the same time, both models provided comfortable performance up to a resolution of 3440 x 1440.

Horizon Zero Dawn

1% low and average FPS

In the fantasy adventure Horizon Zero Dawn, the GeForce RTX 2060 Super was significantly faster than its predecessor. The latter, even after overclocking, could only show equal results with the leader operating in the nominal mode. This project submitted to the protagonists only in 1920 x 1080 resolution.

Iron Harvest

1% low and average FPS

In the Iron Harvest alternate reality strategy, parity was fixed between the GeForce RTX 2060 Super and the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. At the same time, the accelerators showed performance sufficient for a tolerable game of strategy up to a resolution of 3440 x 1440.

Mafia Remastered

1% low and average FPS

In the re-release of the legendary Mafia Remastered, the overclocked veteran managed to slightly outperform the «stock» newcomer. At the same time, both GPUs showed good results in all resolutions.

Project Cars 3

1% low and average FPS

In Project Cars 3, there was a situation similar to the balance of power in the previous game. With the only difference that the heroes of the review obeyed permissions 1920 x 1080 and 2560 x 1440. The same cannot be said about 3440 x 1440.

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Breakpoint

1% low and average FPS

In the action movie Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Breakpoint, the GeForce RTX 2060 Super graphics card confidently outperformed the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti accelerator. At the same time, in normal mode, the «newbie» was 6% — 7% faster than the overclocked veteran. Also a big plus for the GeForce RTX 2060 Super accelerator was that it provided comfortable performance at resolutions of 1920 x 1080, 2560 x 1440 and 3440 x 1440.

Total War Saga: Troy

1% low and average FPS

The Total War Saga: Troy strategy showed a typical picture: the overclocked veteran GeForce GTX 1070 Ti was slightly ahead of its successor GeForce RTX 2060 Super. At the same time, both models confidently demonstrated high results even at a resolution of 3440 x 1440.

Geometric mean results of video cards in eight games

1% low and average FPS

The graph of the geometric average performance of video cards in eight games shows that the GeForce RTX 2060 Super graphics accelerator was faster than its predecessor, the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. Depending on the resolution and operating mode, the gap between the leader and the outsider was 8% — 13%.

Now let’s consider the confrontation between video cards in individual games.

• The GeForce RTX 2060 Super was faster than the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in Crysis Remastered, Far Cry Primal, Horizon Zero Dawn, Mafia Remastered, Project Cars 3, Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Breakpoint and Total War Saga: Troy.

The

• GeForce RTX 2060 Super was on par with the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in Iron Harvest.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super outperformed its predecessor, the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, in seven out of eight games tested and tied in one test.

Protagonists delivered comfortable performance at 1920 x 1080 and 2560 x 1440 resolutions in most games tested. The resolution of 3440 x 1440 was conquered by the GeForce RTX 2060 Super video card in the Far Cry Primal, Iron Harvest, Mafia Remastered, Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Breakpoint and Total War Saga: Troy projects.

Dmitry Olegovich aka
PhoenixOC

Thank you for your help in preparing the material for publication: donnerjack .

The story of how Phoenix tests components in games

Subscribe to our channel in Yandex.Zen or telegram channel @overclockers_news — these are convenient ways to follow new materials on the site. With pictures, extended descriptions and no ads.

Comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of video cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) by all known characteristics in the categories: General information, Specifications, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions, requirements, API support, Memory, Technology support.
Analysis of video card performance by benchmarks: PassMark — G3D Mark, PassMark — G2D Mark, Geekbench — OpenCL, CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T -Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Benefits

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

• Newer graphics card, release date difference 1 year(s) 2 month(2) a new technological process for the production of a video card allows you to make it more powerful, but with less power consumption: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Performance in the Geekbench — OpenCL benchmark is about 14% higher: 59098 vs 51972
• About 29% better performance in CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s): 234.866 vs 182.11
• About 58% more performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) : 2849.031 vs 1797.792
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) performance about 28% higher: 17.956 vs 14.071
• CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) performance by 5.6 times( a) more: 147.291 vs 26.444
• performance in the GFXBENCH Benchmark 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) about 2% more: 3707 VS 3638
• performance in the GFXBENCH Benchmark 4.0 — Manhattan (FPS) more than 2% more: 3707 VS 3638
912
Issue date January 6, 2019 vs November 2, 2017 Process 12 nm vs 16 nm Geekbench — OpenCL 59098 vs 51972 CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s) 234.866 vs 182.11 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2849.031 vs 1797.792 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s) 17.956 vs 14.071 CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s) 147.291 vs 26.444 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames) 3707 vs 3638 GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3344 GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps) 3707 vs 3638 GFXBench 4. 0 — T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3344

Reasons to choose NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

• 27% more shader processors: 2432 vs 1920
• approx. Approximately 28% better performance in PassMark — G2D Mark benchmark: 882 vs 433
• Performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) benchmark: 1035.984 vs 809.639
• Performance in GFXBench 4.0 benchmark — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) about 4% more: 16128 vs 15485
• About 4% more performance in GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) benchmark: 16128 vs 15485
• About 21% more performance in 3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score: 6804 vs 5621
Quantity shader processors

2432 vs 1920
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
PassMark — G3D Mark	14596 vs 9755
PassMark — G2D Mark	882 vs 433
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1035.984 vs 809.639
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16128 vs 15485
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16128 vs 15485
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	6804 vs 5621

Benchmark comparison

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark — G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
PassMark — G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2
Geekbench — OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	234.866 182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2849.031 1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17. 956 14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	147.291 26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	809.639 1035. 984
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4. 0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark — G3D Mark	9755	14596
PassMark — G2D Mark	433	882
Geekbench — OpenCL	59098	51972
CompuBench 1. 5 Desktop — Face Detection (mPixels/s)	234.866	182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2849.031	1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — T-Rex (Frames/s)	17.956	14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Video Composition (Frames/s)	147.291	26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop — Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	809.639	1035.984
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15485	16128
GFXBench 4. 0 — Manhattan (Frames)	3707	3638
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3344
GFXBench 4.0 — Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15485	16128
GFXBench 4.0 — Manhattan (Fps)	3707	3638
GFXBench 4.0 — T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3344
3DMark Fire Strike — Graphics Score	5621	6804

Feature comparison

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Codename	TU106	GP104
Issue date	January 6, 2019	November 2, 2017
Place in rating	136	124
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Price at first issue date		$399
Price now		$379. 99
Price/performance ratio (0-100)		44.74
Process	12nm	16nm
Number of shaders	1920	2432
Boost core clock		1683MHz
Core frequency		1607 MHz
Floating point performance		8.186 gflops
Texturing speed		255.8 GTexel/s
Power consumption (TDP)		180 Watt
Number of transistors		7,200 million
G-SYNC support
Video connectors		1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Notebook size	large
Interface		PCIe 3. 0 x16
Length		267 mm
Additional power connectors		1x 8-pin
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
Vulcan
OpenGL		4.6
Maximum memory size	6GB	8GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory bandwidth		256. 3 GB/s
Memory frequency		8008 MHz
Shared memory		0
Multi-monitor support
VR Ready
Multi-Projection

GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER — Th200

Contents

1. Introduction
2. Features
3. Tests
4. Games
5. Key differences
6. Conclusion
7. Comments

Video card

Video card

Introduction

We compared two graphics cards: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER. On this page, you will learn about the key differences between them, as well as which one is the best in terms of features and performance.

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X is a Pascal-based GeForce 10 generation graphics card released on Dec 4th, 2018. It comes with 8GB of GDDR5X memory running at 1001MHz, has a 1x 8-pin power connector, and consumes up to 165W.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is a Turing-based GeForce 20 generation graphics card released on Jul 9th, 2019. It comes with 8GB of GDDR6 memory running at 1750MHz, has a 1x 8-pin power connector, and consumes up to 165W.

Descriptions

Graphics Card

Name

NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1070 GDDR5X

NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 2060 Super

003

FP16 (half) performance

101.0 GFLOPS (1:64)

14.36 TFLOPS (2:1)

FP32 (float) performance

6.463 TFLOPS

7.181 TFLOPS

FP64 (double) performance

202.0 GFLOPS (1:32)

224. 4 GFLOPS (1:32)

CLOCK Speeds

Basic frequency

1506 MHZ

1470 MHZ

1683 MHZ

9000 MHZ 9000 mHZ 9000

1001

1750

Render Config

Shading Units

1920

2176

Texture Units

120

136

Raster Units

64

64

SM Count

15

34

Tensor Cores

272

RT Cores

34

Graphics Features

DirectX

12 (12_1)

12 Ultimate (12_2)

003

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
+16%

3DMark Graphics

3DMark is a benchmarking tool designed and developed by UL to measure the performance of computer hardware. Upon completion, the program gives a score, where a higher value indicates better performance.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

Blender bmw27

Blender is the most popular 3D content creation software. It has its own test, which is widely used to determine the rendering speed of processors and video cards. We chose the bmw27 scene. The result of the test is the time taken to render the given scene.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

Games

1920×1080, Ultra

Game	GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X	GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Battlefield V
Cyberpunk 2077
DOOM Eternal
Far Cry 5
Hitman 3
Metro Exodus
Red Dead Redemption 2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
The Witcher 3
Average	0. 00 fps	98.02 fps

2560×1440, Ultra

Game	GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X	GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
Battlefield V
Cyberpunk 2077
DOOM Eternal
Far Cry 5
Hitman 3		+1%
Metro Exodus
Red Dead Redemption 2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
The Witcher 3
Average	0. 00 fps	74.96 fps

3840×2160, Ultra

Game	GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X	GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
Battlefield V
Cyberpunk 2077
DOOM Eternal
Far Cry 5
Hitman 3
Metro Exodus
Red Dead Redemption 2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Average	0. 00 fps	42.38 fps

Key differences

Why is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X better than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER?

Consumes 15% less power — 150W vs 175W

Has 2% higher pixel fill rate — 107.7 GPixel/s vs 105.6 GPixel/s

Why is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X?

Newer — 7 months late release

Has 16% better performance

More modern manufacturing process — 12 nm vs 16 nm

More advanced memory type — GDDR6 vs GDDR5X

Has 75% higher bandwidth — 448.0 GB/s vs 256.3 GB/s

Has 12% faster texture fill rate — 224.4 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel/ s

Has 256 more shading units

Conclusion

Which is better GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER or GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X?

The GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER delivers 16% better performance, consumes up to 17% more energy and holds the same amount of memory. According to our research, GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 3990X is more powerful than GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X.

Is GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER good today?

GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER has 8 GB memory and shows an average of 74.96 FPS in 10 games at 1440p, making it an excellent choice for games in 2022.
This graphics card will give you a good experience in every game on reasonable graphics settings.

What AMD graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER?

The Radeon RX 5700 is AMD’s closest competitor to the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER. It is 6% more powerful, uses 3% more energy, holds the same amount of memory, and has higher average FPS in games at 1080p, 1440p, 2160p.

What NVIDIA graphics cards is equivalent to GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER?

The GeForce RTX 2070 is NVIDIA’s closest competitor to the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER. It is 1% more powerful, uses the same amount of energy, holds the same amount of memory, and has higher average FPS in games at 1080p, 1440p, 2160p.

How does GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X perform compared to GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER and other graphics cards?

Relative capacity

Total capacity

Bench performance

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER vs. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

---

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER launched Q3/2019 , based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER architecture It will come with 8 GB high bandwidth GDDR6 memory. 2% and is equipped with a power input of 175 W. The GPU supports up to 4 monitors with a resolution of 7680×4320 . Besides, if you are looking for Air cooling cooler & Axial type fan, this will be your best choice.		ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1070 Ti launched Q4/2017 , based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti architecture It will come with 8 GB high bandwidth GDDR5 memory. 2% and is equipped with a power input of 180 W. The GPU supports up to 4 monitors with a resolution of 7680×4320 . Besides, if you are looking for Air cooling cooler & Axial type fan, this will be your best choice.
	GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER	Based on	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
TU106	GPU Chip	GP104-300-A1
34	Units	199
2176	Shader	2432
64	Render Output Units	64
136	Texture Units	152
	Memory
8GB	Memory Size	8GB
GDDR6	Memory Type	GDDR5
1.75GHz	Memory Speed ​​	2.002 GHz
448GB/s	Memory Band with	256 GB/s
256bit	Memory Interface	256bit
	Clock Speeds
1. 470 GHz	Base Clock	1.607 GHz
1.680 GHz + 2%	Boost Clock	1.721 GHz + 2%
1.650 GHz	Avg (Game) Clock	1.683 GHz
Yes	Acceleration	Yes
	Thermal Design
175 W	Rated power	180W
—	TDP (up)	—
—	Tjunction max	—
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin	PCIe-Power	1 x 8-Pin
	Cooler & Fans
Axial	Fan Type	Axial
3 x 90 mm	Fan 1	3 x 90 mm
—	Fan 2	—
Air cooling	Cooler Type	Air cooling
0 dB / Silent	Noise (Idle)	—
—	Noise (Load)	—
	Connectivity
4	Max. Displays	4
2.2	HDCP Version	2.2
2x HDMI v2.0b	HDMI Ports	2x HDMI v2.0b
2x DP v1.4a	DP Ports	2x DP v1.4
—	DVI Ports	1
—	VGA Ports	—
1	USB-C Ports	—
	Featureset
7680×4320	Max. resolution	7680×4320
12_2	DirectX	12_1
Yes	Raytracing	No.
Yes	DLSS / FSR	No}
ASUS Aura Sync	LED	ASUS Aura Sync
	Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode	h364	Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode	h365 / HEVC	Decode / Encode
No.