Gtx 1650 super vs gtx 1080: Please click the green button to continue.

16 сентября, 2023

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1080



  1. Home
  2. VGA Benchmarks
  3. GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1080

Relative performance

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
80 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 1080 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1080
62% higher gaming performance.
Supports PhysX
Supports G-Sync
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 1080

The GeForce GTX 1080 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (38 combinations of games and resolutions).

Core Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1080
GPU Name TU116 () vs GP104 (GP104-400-A1)
Fab Process 12 nm vs 16 nm
Die Size 284 mm² vs 314 mm²
Transistors 6,600 million vs 7,200 million
Shaders 1280 vs 2560
Compute Units 20 vs 20
Core clock 1530 MHz vs 1607 MHz
ROPs 32 vs 64
TMUs 80 vs 160

Memory Configuration
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1080
Memory Type GDDR6 vs GDDR5X
Bus Width 128 bit vs 256 bit
Memory Speed 1500 MHz

12000 MHz effective		 vs 1251 MHz

10008 MHz effective
Memory Size 4096 Mb vs 8192 Mb
Additional details
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1080
TDP 100 watts vs 180 watts
Release Date 22 Nov 2019 vs 27 May 2016

GigaPixels — higher is better

GigaTexels — higher is better

GB/s — higher is better

GFLOPs — higher is better

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality preset DirectX 12 windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality preset DirectX 12 windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality, TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra High Quality TAA, Bahrain, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra quality — DirectX12 Windows 11

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality preset DirectX 12 windows 10 x64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Max Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

FPS (higher is better)

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10×64

FPS (higher is better)

VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Radeon RX 580
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1060
VS
GeForce GTX 1080 Radeon RX 6650 XT
VS
GeForce GTX 1080 GeForce RTX 2060 Super
VS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Radeon RX 5700 XT
VS
Radeon RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Benchmarks, Specs, Performance Comparison and Differences

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super vs Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the graphics cards, with Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super on one side and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, it has 1280 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,7 GHz, its lithography is 12 nm. The second is used on the desktop segment, it includes 3584 shading units, a maximum frequency of 1,6 GHz, its lithography is 16 nm. The following table also compares the boost clock, the number of shading units (if indicated), of execution units, the amount of cache memory, the maximum memory capacity, the memory bus width, the release date, the number of PCIe lanes, the values ​​obtained in various benchmarks.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.

Specification comparison:

Graphics card

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Market (main)

Desktop

Desktop
Release date

Q4 2019

Q1 2017
Model number

TU116-250-KA-A1

GP102-350-K1-A1
GPU name

TU116

GP102
Architecture

Turing

Pascal
Generation

GeForce 16

GeForce 10
Lithography

12 nm

16 nm
Transistors

6. 600.000.000

11.800.000.000
Bus interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

PCIe 3.0 x16
GPU base clock

1.530 MHz

1.481 MHz
GPU boost clock

1.725 MHz

1.582 MHz
Memory frequency

1.500 MHz

1.376 MHz
Effective memory speed

12 Gbps

11 Gbps
Memory size

4 GB

11 GB
Memory type

GDDR6

GDDR5X
Memory bus

128 Bit

352 Bit
Memory bandwidth

192,0 GB/s

484,4 GB/s
TDP

100 W

250 W
Suggested PSU 350W ATX Power Supply 600W ATX Power Supply
Multicard technology

—

4-way SLI, 2-way SLI HB
Outputs

1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x DisplayPort

1x HDMI
3x DisplayPort
Max display resolution

7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),

7680 x 4320@120Hz (2x DP),

3840 x 2160@240Hz (DP)

7680 x 4320@60Hz (DP),

4096 x 2160@60Hz (HDMI)
Maximum GPU Temperature

90°C

91°C
Cores (compute units, SM, SMX)

20

28
Shading units (cuda cores)

1. 280

3.584
TMUs

80

224
ROPs

32

88
Cache memory

1 MB

2,8 MB
Pixel fillrate

55,2 GP/s

139,2 GP/s
Texture fillrate

138,0 GT/s

354,4 GT/s
Performance FP16 (half)

8,8 TFLOPS

177,2 GFLOPS
Performance FP32 (float)

4,4 TFLOPS

11,3 TFLOPS
Performance FP64 (double)

138 GFLOPS

354,4 GFLOPS
Amazon


eBay


Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two graphics cards.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench.





FP32 Performance in GFLOPS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

11.340
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super

4.416

The difference is 157%.

Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these graphics cards, you may get different results.

Single precision floating point format, also known as FP32, is a computer number format that typically occupies 32 bits in PC memory. This represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values that employs a floating point.

Equivalence:

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Super AMD equivalentNvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti AMD equivalent

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk.